September 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

VOL. 12, NO. 9 — SEPTEMBER 2020 II granted sole right of titling lands to the Proprietors FOR THE RECORDS (William Penn and his heirs). William Penn installed a Board Researching early Pennsylvania of Property with three to five members assigned to handle the majority of property transactions in his absence. When Penn New Warrants died in 1718, his will transferred proprietorship to his children by his second wife. His estate remained open until 1732, “Old Rights: Researching Early Pennsylvania,” published in when proprietorship transferred to his heirs. In 1732, Penn’s the July 2020 issue of PastPorts dealt with the complex his‐ heirs disbanded the board of property and handed over direc‐ tory of land ownership and development that researchers of‐ tion to Thomas Penn, who operated out of his home in Phila‐ ten face. This month’s article continues to explore this subject delphia. Thomas appointed a proprietary secretary, a surveyor in the period up to 1776. general, and a receiver general. In 1741, Thomas returned to England and signed over responsibility for warrants and The beginning of New Warrants patents to the Governor, who continued to use the three posi‐ tions created by Penn. The proprietary secretary moved his No official land office existed in early Pennsylvania. Charles office into a room in Provincial Hall. This was as close to an Genealogical Map of the Counties show the land treaty signed by the proprietors in 1732, 1736, 1737, 1749, 1754, and 1768. The map can be downloaded as a PDF from the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission’ <https://bit.ly/32GQWHK>. SEPTEMBER 2020 | PAGE 2 Survey completed in 1767 by Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon establishing the border between Pennsylvania and Maryland. (See A Plan of the West Line or Parallel of Latitude, Which is the Boundary between the Provinces of Maryland and Pennsylvania... In the bibliography). official “land office” as existed under the proprietors. Pennsylvania Land Records: A History and Guide for Re‐ search (see bibliography). William Penn used a number of schemes to sell and lease property¹. First Purchasers, Late Purchasers, Under Pur‐ Beginning in 1733, the new proprietors began issuing the first chasers, Original Purchasers, etc. – it was all very complex. new warrants for land in over 15 years. These warrants were With no land office to handle the documentation process, the the first issued without ties to the “old rights.” New warrants land titles grew out of control. 7 July 1759, the Pennsylvania created beginning in 1733 were issued via an Application to assembly presented to the governor “An Act for Recording all Warrant, available in digital format on FamilySearch as “Ap‐ Warrants and Surveys, and for rendering the Real Estate and plications for Warrant, 1734–1865.” These applications Property within this Province more Secure.” This Act in‐ would result in a Warrant to Survey, Survey, Return to Sur‐ cluded a provision put forth by the governor that established vey, and a Patent, which are digitized at FamilySearch as an “Office for Recording Warrants and Surveys.” This office “Original Surveys, 1682–1920” and “Patent Books, 1676– removed the responsibility for land title from the Proprietors. 1960”². John Hughes was assigned to the Warrants and Survey’s Office, where he set to inventory and copy the land records. Land treaties The proprietors objected to the act and sought a hearing with The new proprietors signed their first land treaty in 1732, fol‐ the King. George II vetoed the act in September 1760 and re‐ lowed by others in 1736, 1737, 1749, 1754, and 1768. Con‐ stored land title to the proprietors. In 1763, John Penn, son of sult the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission’s Proprietor Richard Penn, became Governor, and any notion Genealogical Map of the Counties (1985) <https://bit.ly/ of a land office was laid to rest. In 1763, the Proprietors re- 32GQWHK> to see the outline of these treaties. This will instituted a Board of Property and continued to use three ap‐ give you an idea of when warrants “could” be applied for pointed assistants: the proprietary secretary, surveyor general, within a particular region. Presumptive settlers (i.e, squatters) and receiver general. and settlers with licenses did not immediately warrant their lands just because their lands were included in a treaty. In Despite the short time frame of the Warrants and Survey’s many cases, the original settlers never applied for warrants, Office, Hughes was able to inventory and copy all of the but their children, grandchildren, and settlers to whom they records and compile them into two periods: the Old Rights sold their property did. Delaying patents indefinitely had ad‐ (1608–1732) and the New Warrants (1733–1776)². Hughes’ vantages. By doing so, one could avoid paying the full charge inventory appears in Appendix A of Donna Munger’s book, of the value of the land or the quitrents for its ownership. SEPTEMBER 2020 | PAGE 3 The proprietors set aside from their treaties ten percent of all John Digges, a Roman Catholic, a 10,000-acre warrant of his the lands they obtained for their own ownership. The inten‐ “choice” to be surveyed out of the wilderness. By 1735, a tion of these proprietary manors was to lease them for long- 6822-acre tract named Digges’ Choice was surveyed in what term income. The reality was that they were rarely free of pre‐ are today York and Adams counties. To populate this tract, sumptive settlers, who had no intention of leasing land they Digges brought with him many Maryland Catholics who pur‐ had already improved. The heirs expanded on their father’s chased lands directly from him. Digges attempted to draw in plans by creating the proprietary towns of York, Reading, Scotch-Irish settlers to his tract from Pennsylvania, but not Carlisle, Easton, Bedford, and Sunbury. Each town was laid wishing to be indebted to Digges, most settled outside of its out within a manor, which the proprietors warranted in their borders. Why the original survey was for 6822 acres is un‐ own names. Records for proprietary towns are available digi‐ known but appears to be a surveyor’s error, because Digges tally on FamilySearch as “Proprietary Towns, 1751–1829”³. attempted to resurvey his land in 1745. Pennsylvania deemed the second survey illegal in 1752 and did not honor Digges’s The Mason-Dixon Survey full claim⁵. The border between Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania In 1730, Governor Keith authorized Samuel Blunston, to is‐ created significant controversy for the proprietors. Conflict‐ sue “licenses” for warrant to Pennsylvanians willing to cross ing charters between Maryland and Pennsylvania placed their the Susquehanna into modern day York, Adams, and Cumber‐ border somewhere at or between 39 and 40 degrees north lat‐ land Counties⁶. In March, Calvert issued Thomas Cresap a itude, with the southeastern border beginning along a 12 mile warrant to acreage and a ferry in the Conestoga Valley on the half circle outside New Castle. The Pennsylvania charter was west side of the Susquehanna (near Wrightsville). Calvert ap‐ not clear as to where the center point of this circle was, and pointed Cresap as the local land surveyor and justice of the these conflicting charters could locate Philadelphia in Mary‐ peace for Baltimore Co. Cresap built a small block fort at his land and Baltimore in Pennsylvania. The western border of ferry crossing and began the work of luring Marylanders into Pennsylvania was to mirror the eastern border, and depending what is today York Co. Cresap and his gang of Marylanders on the location of the New Castle circle, portions of present attacked the natives and forcibly evicted Pennsylvanians who day Pennsylvania were within the boundaries of Virginia’s would not obtain Maryland warrants. Blunston, unable to 1612 charter. To make matters more complex, the French also grant warrants without a signed treaty with the natives, en‐ laid claim to much of the territory west of the Allegheny couraged Marylanders to obtain licenses for their properties. Mountains, lands that were also claimed by Maryland, Vir‐ Blunston issued 282 licenses during this period without war‐ ginia, and Pennsylvania. rants, mostly in Cumberland County. In the years following William Penn’s death and before his On 11 Oct. 1736, the proprietors purchased from the heirs assumed proprietorship, available country land within Onondaga, Seneca, Tuscarora, and Cayuga Indians all lands the boundaries of Pennsylvania treaties began to dry up. In on the east and west bank of the Susquehanna. Thomas Penn, 1718, Land Agent James Logan issued licenses to Scotch- acting as local proprietor, issued land warrants for 13,000 Irish immigrants to settle the east bank of the Susquehanna to acres between York and Wrightsville. Six weeks later, the create a barrier against Indians and Marylanders. Few if any Lancaster Sheriff acting on his own accord with a posse of 24 of these settlers ever filed a warrant. In 1722, Gov. William men went to apprehend Cresap. They set fire to Cresap’s Keith ordered—without treaty—the surveying of over 22,000 home (Cresap was inside with his wife and children) and cap‐ acres of manor land west of the Susquehanna in what is today tured him and several compatriots as they fled for the river. York Co. By the late 1720s, German settlers began to claim this land on the Manor of Spingettsbury⁴. In October 1736, In August 1737, George II ordered the ceasing of any “tu‐ Thomas Penn signed licenses of occupancy to these settlers. mults, riots, or other disorders” along the borders, as well as the stoppage of any issuance of license, warrant, and the pre‐ In 1727, Charles Calvert, 5th Baron Baltimore, granted to sumptive settlement of lands in-question between the two SEPTEMBER 2020 | PAGE 4 provinces and within the three lower counties⁷.
Recommended publications
  • Mason & Dixon, 3 Pages a Day, Read by Toby Levy

    Mason & Dixon, 3 Pages a Day, Read by Toby Levy

    On January 1st, 2006 I began to fulfill my New Years resolution to read Thomas Pynchon's Mason & Dixon at a pace of three pages a day. I resolved to look everything up that was interesting or obscure. I took a lot of notes throughout the nine months it took to read the book. This is the result. If you find any errors, please email me at [email protected] and I'll incorporate your corrections into this text. Toby Levy pages 1-3: Page 5 reveals that the year at the start of this book is 1786, and the place is Philadelphia. This is The first numbered page in the hardcover first where Charles Mason died earlier that year. The first edition is page 6. named character is Whiskers the cat. The children are identified on this page only as "the twins and their Leafing back from there, page 1 is the one that sister." They and assorted friends gather in this family has only the words "Mason & Dixon" in chapter room to hear tall tales told by the Reverend Wicks heading typeface about a quarter of the way down the Cherrycoke. Cherrycoke (the name of a bit character in page. The ampersand usage is correct in that it was a Gravity's Rainbow) came to Philadelphia to attend business partnership. Mason is always listed first Mason's funeral but arrived too late. The house because he was generally considered to be the man in belongs to his sister Elizabeth and Elizabeth's husband, charge of their two major undertakings.
  • Edwin Danson, UK: the Work of Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon

    Edwin Danson, UK: the Work of Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon

    The Work of Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon Edwin DANSON, United Kingdom Key words: Mason, Charles; Dixon, Jeremiah; Mason-Dixon Line; Pre-revolutionary History; Surveying; Geodesy; US History; Pennsylvania; Maryland. ABSTRACT The geodetic activities of Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon in America between 1763-68 were, for the period, without precedent. Their famous boundary dividing Maryland from Pennsylvania, the Mason-Dixon Line, today remains a fitting monument to these two brave, resourceful and extremely talented scientists. Tutored by Astronomer Royal Dr James Bradley, Charles Mason was aware of the contemporary theories and experiments to establish the true shape of the Earth. He was also cognisant of what was being termed “the attraction of mountains” (deviation of the vertical). However, at the time it was no more than a theory, a possibility, and it was by no means certain whether the Earth was solid or hollow. The Mason-Dixon Line, a line of constant latitude fifteen miles south of Philadelphia, although the most arduous of their tasks, was only part of their work for the proprietors of Maryland and Pennsylvania. For the Royal Society of London, they also measured the first degree of latitude in America. In recent years, the Mason-Dixon Line Preservation Partnership has located many of the original markers and surveyed them using GPS. The paper reviews the work of Mason and Dixon covering the period 1756-1786. In particular, their methods and results for the American boundary lines are discussed together with comments on the accuracy they achieved compared with GPS observations. CONTACT Edwin Danson 14 Sword Gardens Swindon, SN5 8ZE UNITED KINGDOM Tel.
  • Ing Items Have Been Registered

    Ing Items Have Been Registered

    ACCEPTANCES Page 1 of 31 March 2015 LoAR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN REGISTERED: ÆTHELMEARC Adeliz Argenti. Release of Badge. Or, a gurges azure, overall four caltraps in pall gules. Amano Zenjirou Nakatsune. Name. Brygida Kxanszka. Name change from holding name Byrghitta of Abhainn Cíach Ghlais. Submitted as Brygida K siazska, the submitter requested authenticity for "Polish (Hanseatic League time)". First, the given name Brygida and the byname Ksiazska were documented in the Letter of Intent as modern forms. In commentary, ffride wlffsdotter documented the given name Brigida in Latin context, along with the attested forms of the byname Kxanszka, Czrenska, and Xanszka, all found in SSNO. As i/y/j switches are used in Poland in both Latin and Polish language documents, the spelling Brygida is a plausible variant of the attested Brigida. It is also found as an attested given name in mid- to late 16th century Switzerland in the FamilySearch Historical Records. The submitter preferred the spelling K xanszka, so we have made this change to the byname in order to register the name Brigida is dated between c.1265 and 1484. The byname Kxanszka is dated to 1390. Therefore, the name likely meets the submitter’s request for authenticity. Dorothea fitz Waryn. Device. Or, a dog rampant contourny and a chief indented gules. Dragos Palaiologos. Name change from holding name Dragos of Coppertree. The submitter requested authenticity for a 15th century Byzantine name. This request was not summarized in the Letter of Intent. However, we had enough information to consider the request instead of pending the name for further commentary.
  • The Mason Dixon Land Survey

    The Mason Dixon Land Survey

    Historic American Land Surveys: The Mason Dixon Land Survey 4 Hours PDH Academy PO Box 449 Pewaukee, WI 53072 (888) 564-9098 www.pdhacademy.com HISTORIC AMERICAN LAND SURVEYS – THE MASON-DIXON LINE SURVEY BY: NATHAN J. WALKER, PLS Objective: As the retracement surveyors of today are called upon to “follow in the footsteps” of those original surveyors who went before, it is useful and instructive to learn how and why the early surveyors conducted their projects. It is likewise worthwhile to consider the outcomes and consequences of the early land surveys that shaped and continue to influence America. This course seeks to study the historically important Mason-Dixon Line survey, the circumstances that led to the necessity of the survey, the surveyors who conducted the survey, and the methods and techniques they employed to complete their daunting project. Also, the lasting political and cultural effects of the survey will be examined and a timeline of events relating to the survey will be presented. Course Outline: The Mason-Dixon Line Survey A. Biographical Overview of Charles Mason B. Biographical Overview of Jeremiah Dixon C. Mason and Dixon’s Initial Expedition Section 1 – Historical Background 1. The Province of Maryland 2. The Province of Pennsylvania 3. The Penn-Calvert Boundary Dispute Section 2 – Surveying the Lines 1. Scope of the Survey 2. Celestial Observation and a Commencing Point 3. The Point of Beginning 4. The Tangent Line 5. The West Line and the North Line 6. Extending the West Line Section 3 – Lasting Effects of the Survey 1. The Delaware Wedge 2.
  • Paths to Freedom: a Regional Underground Railroad Symposium

    Paths to Freedom: a Regional Underground Railroad Symposium

    PATHS TO FREEDOM: A REGIONAL UNDERGROUND RAILROAD SYMPOSIUM View of the Columbia-Wrightsville Bridge, circa 1840 by W. H. Bartlett The York County History Center is hosting a two-day event to showcase recent scholarship on the Underground Railroad in south central Pennsylvania. It will provide insight into Underground Railroad activities in York County as well as connections throughout the region. The Mason–Dixon Line, surveyed by Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon in the 1760s, formed a 40-mile line that became the goal of freedom seekers. Assisting runaway slaves in their escape was illegal and punishable by prison time and fines, so much of the history associated with the secretive Underground Railroad movement is based upon oral traditions. Presenters will bring expertise both north and south of the Mason-Dixon Line and east and west of the Susquehanna River. Sponsored by: Bob & Donna Pullo and York College of PA, Department of History & Political Science Friday March 31, 2017 Saturday April 1, 2017 The Ground Swallowed Them Up: Underground Railroad Symposium Slavery and the Underground Railroad In York 9 a.m. - 3:15 p.m. County by Scott L. Mingus, Sr. Full schedule at 7-8 p.m. Author Talk 8:00-8:30 p.m. Book signing www.yorkhistorycenter.org Thank you to our partner: FREE - pre-registration requested: Goodridge Freedom Center www.yorkhistory.org or Registration required - see back [email protected] or (717) 848-1587 Historical Society Museum, Library & Archives Historical Society Museum, Library & Archives 250 E. Market St., York 250 E. Market St., York HOW TO REGISTER FEATURED SPEAKER Saturday April 1, 2017 DR.
  • Papenfuse Layout.4

    Papenfuse Layout.4

    From Colony to State IN THE EMPIRE 1752 to 1769.2 Like most of the British empire in North [ 123 ] America, Maryland was left largely to its own devices until From Surveying to The first fifty years of the eighteenth century were a time of the 1750s. To be sure, there was a constant struggle for power Cartography institutional development and internal growth for the colo- within the colony. Both Lords Baltimore took an active inter- nies. As Edmund Burke was to point out in 1775 as he looked est in the affairs of their province and were forever at odds back on what seemed better times, it was a period of “wise with factions in the General Assembly. This very conflict and salutary neglect” during which the colonies were allowed strengthened the colonial assembly’s capacity for self-reli- to go much their own way.1 In Maryland the Calverts worked ance. It made it easier for Maryland to join the movement for diligently to maintain political and economic control. After independence in the 1770s, although the Proprietary, or Benedict Leonard Calvert, Cecil’s grandson, renounced his “Court,” Party cultivated its interest with such care and acu- Roman Catholicism and succeeded to the title as fourth Lord men that the decision for independence was far more painful Baltimore in 1715, the king restored his right to direct the in Maryland than in most of the other twelve colonies.3 government of the province, which had been taken from his Cartographic knowledge of Maryland did not advance father by force in 1689.
  • Here It Seemed, at Least in Spirit, As Were Benjamin Franklin and Charles Mason Themselves

    Here It Seemed, at Least in Spirit, As Were Benjamin Franklin and Charles Mason Themselves

    theCelebrating Stargazer and the Surveyor homas Pynchon was there it seemed, at least in spirit, as were Benjamin Franklin and Charles Mason themselves. Others who attended this year’s annual Surveyors’ Rendezvous in Philadelphia most certainly shared the sentiment. Pynchon’s prose sets the stage for this report, in colorful passages, respect- fully shared here, from his epic novel Mason & Dixon (1997). A master of majick and mysticism in the printed word, Pynchon captures a moment of dockside Philadelphia 1763, captivating words delight one’s senses with glints of light on balls of cheese and slip- pery eel skins, musty nets creaking with cargo, boisterous seamen and hawkers of brackish-smelling shell food, bound together with the anticipation found in the postures of 35-year-old Mason and 30-year-old Dixon as they await the precious measuring instruments about to be unloaded: Philadelphia ‘Tis the middle of November, though seeming not much different from a late English summer. It is an overcast Evening, rain in the Offing. In a street nearby, oysters from the Delaware shore are being cried by the Waggon-load. The Surveyors stand together at the Quarter-deck, Mason in gray stockings, brown breeches, and a snuff-color’d Coat with pinch-beck buttons,—Dixon in red coat, Breeches, and boots, and a Hat with a severely Military rake to it,—waiting the Instruments,… as all around them Sailors and Dockmen labor, nets lift and sway as if by themselves, bulging with Drafting a map in the field. This American Civil War mapper demonstrates the fine art of 19th century cartography to the many modern mappers at the Harland House picnic.
  • Mason, Dixon Made Mark in Carroll" Carroll County Times Article for 29 June 2008 by Mary Ann Ashcraft

    Mason, Dixon Made Mark in Carroll" Carroll County Times Article for 29 June 2008 by Mary Ann Ashcraft

    "Mason, Dixon Made Mark in Carroll" Carroll County Times article for 29 June 2008 By Mary Ann Ashcraft Couldn’t you just kick yourself sometimes! What did I have to do on October 19, 2002, that was more important than watching a re-enactment of the placing of a Mason-Dixon crownstone near Harney on the Maryland-Pennsylvania boundary? Hundreds of media types, surveyors and local residents were gathered to see a 575-pound replica of an original marker lowered into position precisely on the line where English surveyors Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon would have sunk one about 1765. Somehow I missed that special event, and I’ll probably never see the likes of it again! Descendants of William Penn and the Maryland Calverts had been arguing over the boundary between their two colonies since Penn received his charter in the 1680s. The 40th parallel was supposed to be the dividing line, but if that had been used, Philadelphia would have ended up in Maryland! So in 1763, Charles II of England sent two of his best surveyors to settle the question. After nearly 5 years of slashing their way through primeval forests and encountering Native Americans who were not especially hospitable, Mason and Dixon finished their task of defining the boundaries between Penn’s “Three Lower Counties” (now Delaware) plus the rest of Pennsylvania and Maryland. Every mile of the boundary was marked with a stone, but at every fifth mile the surveyors erected special “crownstones” which had been brought over as ballast in their ship. Opposite sides of the 5-foot stones were carved with the coats of arms of the Penn and Calvert families, leaving no doubt about who controlled which side.
  • Staindrop Conservation Area Character Appraisal

    Staindrop Conservation Area Character Appraisal

    Heritage, Landscape and Design Staindrop APPROVED December 2012 Staindrop CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL Subject Page Summary of Special Significance ..............................................................5 Staindrop Public Consultation...................................................................................6 Planning Legislation .................................................................................7 Conservation Area Character Appraisals ...................................................8 December 2012 Location and Setting.................................................................................8 Historical Summary ................................................................................ 12 Form and Layout .................................................................................... 16 Character Areas ..................................................................................... 19 Character Area 1: The Church and Front Street ....................................... 20 Character Area 2: The West End............................................................. 22 Character Area 3: The Village Green and back lanes................................ 23 Important Buildings................................................................................. 30 Building Materials................................................................................... 32 Boundaries and Means of Enclosure ....................................................... 37 Open Spaces and Trees ........................................................................
  • Monument School of the People : a Sesquicentennial History of St. Mary's College of Maryland, 1840-1990

    Monument School of the People : a Sesquicentennial History of St. Mary's College of Maryland, 1840-1990

    MONUMENT SCHOOL OF THE PEOPLE A Sesqukentennial History of St. Mary's College of Maryland, 1840-1990 by J. Frederick Faiisz Associate Professor of History St. Mary's College of Maryland This book is dedicated to the students, staff, and supporters of St. Mary's College, past and present, who have made this school so special. Rich joy and love we got and gave, Our hearts were merry as our desires. Pile laurel wreaths upon our grave Who did not gain, but were success. -Joyce Kilmer, as quoted in The Castellan. 1949 COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Mary's of Copyright © 1990 by J. Frederick Fausz and St. College Maryland All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this work in any form whatsoever, except for brief passages in connection with a review. For information write: The Office of Advancement/Publishers, St. Mary's College of Maryland, St. Mary's City, MD 20686 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 90-60400 ISBN 0-9625867-0-6 Printed in The United States of America -M Ktsrx- TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 6 Introduction: Where the Past is Present for the Future 8 Chapter I. St. Mary's City, Haven of Hope: The Seventeenth Century As Prologue 10 Chapter II. Ever Rising from the Ashes: St. Marys Female Semmary, 1840-1923 24 Chapter III. Trials and Triumphs: Miss Frances Junior College, 1923-1948 60 Chapter IV. Forever Young: The Old School and the New College, 1948-1990 98 A Note on Sources 150 Photo Credits 151 Appendices 152 Index 157 Whatever one person's path to the past, once there it is an intriguing place to spend time.
  • (717)646-9900 for Immediate R

    (717)646-9900 for Immediate R

    Hampstead Youth For Christ d/b/a Mason-Dixon Youth For Christ PO Box 1 Hampstead, MD 21074 Phone: (717)646-9900 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Gary Grecco Greg Rhines Executive Director Race Director Mason Dixon YFC [email protected] [email protected] 410-596-5310 717.646.9900 Run Celebrates 252nd Anniversary of the Mason Dixon Line and Celebrates Changed Lives of Local Teens TANEYTOWN, MD - Two hundred and fifty-two years ago on October 18, 1767, Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon were thrilled to have finally finished their four-year task of creating a boundary line that would resolve the ongoing dispute between the Calvert’s of Maryland and the Penn’s of Pennsylvania. On October 19, 2019, the first annual Mason Dixon Run will take place running from Maryland into Pennsylvania and back again. The Mason Dixon Run will begin and end in Taneytown at the Harney Volunteer Fire Department, crossing into Pennsylvania running along Mason Dixon Road and through The Links of Gettysburg golf course community. Runners can choose to run the 5k or 10k course. Anyone preferring to walk, are welcome to take part in the 5k. This event benefits Mason Dixon Youth For Christ (YFC). Registration is $35 for the 5K and $45 for the 10K. There are cash prizes for the winners of each division thanks to the run’s Prize Sponsor, Wealth Builders CPAs & Consultants of Westminster. All runners who register before October 1 will receive a run tech shirt and all 10k runners will receive a finishers medal. Day-of registration will be available from 6:30- 7:30 a.m.
  • Jeremiah Dixon: Dixie and Coal Gas W Extended Footnote in the History and Antiquities of the County Palatine of Durham (William Fordyce, New­ Acastle Upon Tyne: A

    Jeremiah Dixon: Dixie and Coal Gas W Extended Footnote in the History and Antiquities of the County Palatine of Durham (William Fordyce, New­ Acastle Upon Tyne: A

    Jeremiah Dixon: Dixie and Coal Gas W extended footnote in The History and Antiquities of the County Palatine of Durham (William Fordyce, New­ Acastle upon Tyne: A. Fullarton & Co., vol. 2, 1857, pp. 78-79) gives interesting information both on one of the constructors of the famous Mason-Dixon Line and on the origin of gaslighting. Jeremiah Dixon, born at Cockfield, County Durham, was clearly a man of many parts. Although lacking public school or university education, he was selected by the Royal Academy of Woolwich to observe, on St. Helena, the transit of Venus across the sun. After success in this assignment, Dixon was employed by the Academy in setting the limits and bounds of Pennsylvania and Maryland. In a quite different connection, Jeremiah Dixon origi­ nated many mechanical contrivances for coalmining and associated work. It has been stated that he was the original discoverer of coal gas, and that his garden wall on the edge of Cockfield Fell was the first place ever to be lighted by that material. This discovery is, of course, generally attributed to William Murdock, and Fordyce states that it is probable that the two men made the discovery simultaneously and that, from Dixon's "residence in an obscure locality, and unostentatious disposition, his discovery did not become known till after that of Murdock. His first experiment is said to have been made—like that of many other embryo philosophers—with rather a crude sort of apparatus; his retort being an old tea kettle; and for pipes, to convey it along an orchard wall, he used the stalks of hemlock." Dixon was a Friend and died in Cockfield, being buried at a little chapel (sic) belonging to the Society of Friends at the village of Old Raby, near Raby Park.