DOCSLIB.ORG

The Basics and Functions of Putinism in Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Basics and Functions of Putinism in Russia International Journal of Political Science ISSN: 2228-6217 Vol 9, No 1, Spring 2019, (pp.1-15) The Basics and Functions of Putinism in Russia Jahangir Karami 1*, Mahin Niroomand 2 1 Department of Russian and Eurasian Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran 2 Department of Political Science, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Received: 24 May 2018 ; Accepted: 20 Feb 2019 Abstract: The present Russian political system is tied up with Putin's name; and Putin is consi- dered as a full-fledged political reality. Today's powerful Russia, which has got a new life after the Cold War and the weak collapse period, and has a major impact on global developments including the Middle East, is not understandable except under this title. What inspired writers to analyze Putin's performance is to study the causes of the exis- tence of a personality such as him and the formation of Putinism in today's Russian so- ciety. Knowing the performance of Putin and Putinism requires a clear answer to some questions like, why the phenomenon of Putinism in the 21st century whit democratic structure has emerged and persisted, and what is Putinism at all? The hypothesis that will be presented to understand this issue is that the long-standing political culture of Russia and the geographical and historical imperative of Russian nation have led to the emergence and continuation of Putinism in today's Russian society, as well as the secu- rity and economic problems of the 1990s, humiliation, pressure, and blockade of the west against Russia is the mainstay of the emergence and continuation of Putinism. To investigate the hypothesis of research, firstly we examine the system of pseudo- democracy and then we will discuss Putin's functions and behaviors in the economic, political, and social spheres. Finally, we will discuss about the Russian domestic context and the external factors that led to the formation of Putinism. Keywords: Putin, Putinism, Political system, Authoritarianism, Pseudo-democracy, Russia Introduction In recent years, Putin has been known as a ence in international politics and challenged famous politician in the world. Entering the strategic conditions in the Middle East. In the Middle East scene, he highlighted his pres- past two decades, Putin has become a great *Corresponding Author’s Email: [email protected] 2 The Basics and Functions of Putinism in Russia international reality, and this name has been authors try to investigate this article by ana- used not only in Russia to understand the lyzing and criticizing the data and discussion Russian politics, but also in the world to un- of experts and scientists of Russia. derstand international equations. After a dec- The Russian economy relies on the vast ade of turmoil and chaos in Russia, his ac- energy resources and president Vladimir Pu- tions led to order, stability, and peace in the tin takes this responsibility due to its wealth country. Although Russia has faced problems of resources. He has been able to emancipate at the political, social, and economic level Russia from the anarchic situation of the over the past 15 years, but compared to the Yeltsin era and to bring about the current Yeltsin's ten-year period, the situation has state of harmony, but despite the creation of been much better and safer, and recent polls security and the integration in the country, he in Russia show that Putin has had a very high has been criticized. Among these criticisms is popularity, yet. What made Putinism famous the formation of the oligarchic government is this fact that he created a relatively unde- and the monopoly of huge energy resources mocratic and reliance on a circle of power, in its circle and its followers. Since the infra- which turned the ballot box and parliamenta- structure of the Russian society lacks a na- ry system into an apparent phenomenon. So, tional bourgeoisie, it is clear that this country different analysts used the notion of Putinism was unable to accept a different kind of Capi- to refer to a kind of political system based on talism (namely the western developed capi- the constitution, people's vote, different elec- talist) except for state capitalism or peripher- toral structures, and a fairy free economy. al capitalism. In these type of systems, the The purpose of this research is to study institution of the state has changed and bu- the cultural, economic, and political back- reaucracy is growing very strongly because grounds of present Russia to review its politi- the state is completely dominated in all insti- cal system, and to introduce us one of the tutions. In other words, in modern Russia, most important components necessary for the the state apparatus oligarchies is organized in recognition of the today Russia. However, such a way as to serve oligarchy, it means the our discussion in this article is not related to state and its oligarchies are the same. To an- Putin's performance in foreign policy, but swer the questions and examines the hypo- rather is about the military formation of Pu- thesis, first we examine the system of pseu- tinism in Russia. In this respect, the authors do-democracy and then we will discuss about focus on Putin's behaviors in various politi- Putin's act and behavior in the economic, po- cal, economic, and social spheres, and litical, and social spheres; and finally the is- through examining these behaviours and sue we are discussing about, will be the Rus- practices in the contexts of internal condi- sian domestic bases and the external factors tions and external factors, finds an appropri- that led to the formation of Putinism. ate answer to the question of why the phe- nomenon of Putinism emerges and persists in First. Theoretical Foundation : Pseudo- the 21st century's Russia with the democratic democratic Political System structure. The main hypothesis regarding the One of the important issues to understand the security and economic problems of the government's policies is their typology. Polit- 1990s, would be the humiliation, pressure, ical systems are very diverse in the fields of and blockade of the west against Russia. The theory and practice, and there are different 3 International Journal of Political Science, Vol 9, No 1, Spring 2019 types of political systems in today's world. ward a free and fair election, hopping that Here are some of the political systems dis- this election would led to a liberal western cussed and interpreted by theorists of politi- style democracy; it also begins a series of cal thoughts. These systems include democ- economic reforms in the early 1990s, hop- racy/ social democracy/ authoritarianism/ ping to create a western style capitalism, but totalitarianism/ conservative state/ liberal most of them failed” (Zakaria, 103 : 2006). state/ communist government/ and ultimately Societies that pass from tradition to mod- the foundations and elements of the forma- ernity are involved in such systems. Indeed, tion of the Pseudo-democratic system and its they are somewhere between democracy and functioning. In the pages that follow, our goal authoritarianism systems. In pseudo- demo- is to look at a Pseudo-democratic Political cratic systems, people have the right to vote, system with a theoretical overview of the elections are hold, and the political parties various political system in two parts of public compete with each other, but all of these are and certain forms, and by modeling it, pro- done at the surface level and in fact govern- vide a platform for a more accurate under- ments are ruled out invisibly. In such socie- standing of Putin's political system. The issue ties, if an institution or organization threathen of pseudo-democracy has emerged in devel- the government, will be easily excluded from oping countries. In these type of systems, participation in the political process. The political life is neither totally democratic nor voices of the oppositions are rarely heared totally totalitarian. Such countries essentially and the media are completely under control. involve the process of modernization and In these countries, three historical resolutions development, and the transition from tradi- have been the pattern of the organization of tion to modernity and the conflicts arising political and social life: firts, the French from these conditions prevent the establish- revolution; second, the industrial revolution; ment of democracy and totalitarianism, as and third, the Russian revolution with the well as the traditional social structure of the pattern of the former Soviet Union. Ideas dispersed and abandoned possibility of the such as constitutionality, constitution, nation- full establishment of a modern political sys- al sovereignty, nationality and democracy tem, whether democratic or totalitarian (Ba- were derived from the political model of shiriyeh, 167 : 2003). French Revolution. All of these concepts If the features of a Pseudo-democratic contradicted the indigenous political systems system exist in a monarchy, it is usually called of autocracy and traditional patriarch, theo- the developmental dictatorship or benevolent cracy, sheikh-salary, and so on. Although tyranny that has been called the legal tyranny each of these systems in inevitably adapted in Russia. According to Fareed Zakaria, Rus- some of that thought and made strange, intel- sia is not considered as a liberal democratic lectual, and political mixtures. (Bashiriyeh, country. He talks about non-liberal democra- 167 : 2003) cy. In this kind of democracy, there are no The industrial revolution has been the public satisfaction and no rule of law. economic pattern of many of these countries In the book, of titled, “The Future of to industrialize economic growth and moder- Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and nization. Naturally, the combination of the Abroad”, he wrote: "after the collapse of requirements of the economic model of the communism, Russia immediately moved to- industrial revolution and political pattern of 4 The Basics and Functions of Putinism in Russia the French Revolution in the developing as the last resort to guarantee the continuation countries have been very difficult.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Putinism: a Praetorian System?
    Notes de l’Ifri Russie.Nei.Visions 106 Putinism: A Praetorian System? Jean-Robert RAVIOT March 2018 Russia/NIS Center The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. This text is published with the support of DGRIS (Directorate General for International Relations and Strategy) under “Russia, Caucasus and Eastern Europe Observatory”. ISBN: 978-2-36567-808-7 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2018 How to quote this document: Jean-Robert Raviot, “Putinism: A Praetorian System?”, Russie.Nei.Visions, No. 106, Ifri, March 2018. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15—FRANCE Tel.: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00—Fax: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an online collection dedicated to Russia and the other new independent states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan). Written by leading experts, these policy-oriented papers deal with strategic, political and economic issues. Author Jean-Robert Raviot is a doctor of political science with accreditation to supervise research and professor of contemporary Russian civilization at Paris Nanterre University.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia and Saudi Arabia: Old Disenchantments, New Challenges by John W
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 35 Russia and Saudi Arabia: Old Disenchantments, New Challenges by John W. Parker and Thomas F. Lynch III Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, and Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified combatant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Vladimir Putin presented an artifact made of mammoth tusk to Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman Al Saud in Riyadh, October 14–15, 2019 (President of Russia Web site) Russia and Saudi Arabia Russia and Saudia Arabia: Old Disenchantments, New Challenges By John W. Parker and Thomas F. Lynch III Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 35 Series Editor: Denise Natali National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2021 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quest for an Ideal Youth in Putin's Russia I. Back to Our Future!
    The Quest for an Ideal Youth in Putin’s Russia I. Back to our Future! History, Modernity and Patriotism According to Nashi, 2015‐2012. By Ivo Mijnssen. Stuttgart: ibidem‐Verlag, 2012. 215pp. Bibliography. Index. Appendix I. Appendix II. Paperback. The Quest for an Ideal Youth in Putin’s Russia II. The search for Distinctive Conformism in the Political Communication of Nashi, 2005‐2009. By Jussi Lassila. Stuttgart: ibidem‐Verlag, 2012. 205 pp. Bibliography. Paperback. Regina Smyth, Indiana University In 2005, the Kremlin’s grey cardinal, Vladislav Surkov, orchestrated the formation of a youth organization, Nashi, in order to counter youth apathy and the potential for opposition protest in Russia’s capital. By 2013, Mr. Surkov, was dismissed from his position as the daunting architect of the political strategy that guided the first decade of Putin’s rule. Nashi’s founder, Vassily Iakamenko, registered a new political party named Smart Start that quickly failed. Most importantly, the Nashi existed in name only, eclipsed by competing youth organizations, including Stal’, the Young Guard, and the multi-headed All-Russian Youth Society. Against this vast shift in the political landscape, two complementary studies exploring the arc of Nashi’s development appeared under the common title, The Quest for an Ideal Youth in Putin’s Russia. Together, these significant works by Jussi Lassila and Ivo Mijnssen illuminate the persistent central tension inherent in Putinism, the negotiation of the line between modernization (openness) and stability (state control). Further, demonstrate how this tension produced Nashi’s downfall. There are a number of similarities across these paired studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Yulia Malysheva
    A Revolution of the Mind INTERVIEW WITH YULIA MALYSHEVA ulia Sergeevna Malysheva is one of the leading youth activists in Russia. An elected Y municipal deputy in Moscow, a researcher at the Institute for the Economy in Transi- tion, and leader of the youth organization Oborona (which she cofounded) and of the youth branch of the SPS party, Malysheva also later became the leader of the youth branch of the People’s Democratic Union, the political movement led by former Prime Minister Mikhail Kasyanov. In this interview, she speaks about the possibility of a color revolution in Russia, cooperation with other domestic and international youth groups, the Kremlin’s worried reaction, the nature of the Nashi pro-Kremlin youth group, the attempts to unite the Russian democrats, the successes of Oborona, the chances the democrats have of returning to power, and what she expects from the West. Demokratizatsiya: Tell us about Oborona. Malysheva: Oborona is a youth organization that appeared with the Orange wave in Ukraine. It was important for us that many others were waiting for us, since youth have always been in the avant-garde. At that time, our adult colleagues kept arguing as to who was more important. In the end, they got 3 percent [in the Duma elections]. It was evi- dent that they were not well presented before the Russian voters. We founded Oborona not only with young people who sympathize with SPS, Yabloko, the [former SPS leader and independent candidate Irina] Khakamada movement and other such formations—but also with those who support the democratic process and oppose the Putin regime.
    [Show full text]
  • 10.1057/9780230282940.Pdf
    St Antony’s Series General Editor: Jan Zielonka (2004– ), Fellow of St Antony’s College, Oxford Othon Anastasakis, Research Fellow of St Antony’s College, Oxford and Director of South East European Studies at Oxford Recent titles include: Julie Newton and William Tompson (editors) INSTITUTIONS, IDEAS AND LEADERSHIP IN RUSSIAN POLITICS Celia Kerslake , Kerem Oˇktem, and Philip Robins (editors) TURKEY’S ENGAGEMENT WITH MODERNITY Conflict and Change in the Twentieth Century Paradorn Rangsimaporn RUSSIA AS AN ASPIRING GREAT POWER IN EAST ASIA Perceptions and Policies from Yeltsin to Putin Motti Golani THE END OF THE BRITISH MANDATE FOR PALESTINE, 1948 The Diary of Sir Henry Gurney Demetra Tzanaki WOMEN AND NATIONALISM IN THE MAKING OF MODERN GREECE The Founding of the Kingdom to the Greco-Turkish War Simone Bunse SMALL STATES AND EU GOVERNANCE Leadership through the Council Presidency Judith Marquand DEVELOPMENT AID IN RUSSIA Lessons from Siberia Li-Chen Sim THE RISE AND FALL OF PRIVATIZATION IN THE RUSSIAN OIL INDUSTRY Stefania Bernini FAMILY LIFE AND INDIVIDUAL WELFARE IN POSTWAR EUROPE Britain and Italy Compared Tomila V. Lankina, Anneke Hudalla and Helmut Wollman LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Comparing Performance in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Russia Cathy Gormley-Heenan POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND THE NORTHERN IRELAND PEACE PROCESS Role, Capacity and Effect Lori Plotkin Boghardt KUWAIT AMID WAR, PEACE AND REVOLUTION Paul Chaisty LEGISLATIVE POLITICS AND ECONOMIC POWER IN RUSSIA Valpy FitzGerald, Frances Stewart
    [Show full text]
  • Managed Nationalism: Contemporary Russian Nationalistic Movements
    88 FIIA Working Paper August 2015 Veera Laine MANAGED NATIONALISM CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN NATIONALISTIC MOVEMENTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE GOVERNMENT Veera Laine Research Fellow The Finnish Institute of International Affairs The Finnish Institute of International Affairs Kruunuvuorenkatu 4 FI-00160 Helsinki tel. +358 9 432 7000 fax. +358 9 432 7799 www.fiia.fi ISBN: 978-951-769-460-5 ISSN: 2242-0444 Language editing: Lynn Nikkanen The Finnish Institute of International Affairs is an independent research institute that produces high-level research to support political decision-making and public debate both nationally and internationally. All manuscripts are reviewed by at least two other experts in the field to ensure the high quality of the publications. In addition, publications undergo professional language checking and editing. The responsibility for the views expressed ultimately rests with the authors. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 4 1 INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Research design and data used 6 1.2 Concepts and structure of the paper 9 2 THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENTS 12 2.1 The Eurasian Youth Union and the Russian March as examples of nationalism 15 2.2 The example movements’ ideas as presented today 18 2.3 EuroMaidan, Crimea, and “Novorossiya” 21 2.4 General notes on the Internet presence 23 2.5 The ideological basis of the movements 23 3 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE STATE AND THE NATIONALISTS 25 3.1 Electoral protests 2011–2012 – the “Bolotnaya case” 25 3.2 Ethnic riots in Moscow in 2013 – the “Biryulevo case” 27 3.3 Russian Marches in Moscow in 2014 29 3.4 “Antimaidan” and the Russian Spring 32 4 CONCLUSIONS: MANAGED NATIONALISM – HOW IS IT ACHIEVED? 35 BIBLIOGRAPHY 37 3 SUMMARY This paper argues that nationalist movements in Russia can have a certain role to play in the Kremlin’s management of nationalism in the country, despite the fact that they might promote a very different form of nationalism than the state leadership itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran and the CIA This Page Intentionally Left Blank Iran and the CIA the Fall of Mosaddeq Revisited
    Iran and the CIA This page intentionally left blank Iran and the CIA The Fall of Mosaddeq Revisited Darioush Bayandor © Darioush Bayandor 2010 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2010 978-0-230-57927-9 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2010 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-36788-7 ISBN 978-0-230-27730-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780230277304 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of an Emperor €“ Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi
    The death of an emperor – Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi and his political cancer Khoshnood, Ardavan; Khoshnood, Arvin Published in: Alexandria Journal of Medicine DOI: 10.1016/j.ajme.2015.11.002 2016 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Khoshnood, A., & Khoshnood, A. (2016). The death of an emperor – Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi and his political cancer. Alexandria Journal of Medicine, 52(3), 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2015.11.002 Total number of authors: 2 Creative Commons License: CC BY-NC-ND General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Download date: 02.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Global Racisms and Racism in Russia: an Introduction 2 Race And
    Notes 1 Global Racisms and Racism in Russia: An Introduction 1. All translations from Russian and German are by the author unless otherwise indicated. 2. Sik became a prisoner of war of the Russians during World War One. He chose to stay in Russia after being released, joined the Soviet Communist Party in 1920, and lived as an Hungarian émigré in the Soviet Union until 1945, when he returned to Hungary. He later served as the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Hungary from 1958 to 1961. 3. http://www.sova-center.ru/en/. 2 Race and Racism in the Russian Past 1. The film featured the following song by Pavel German: ‘Before all enemies are known / While at least one of them is still alive / Every honest and simple Soviet citizen / Has to be an NKVD officer (chekist). / Our fortresses are ever stronger / The chekists of today / Are all the 170 million / Of my Fatherland’s Patriots!’ 2. Stalin composed his Marksizm i natsional’nyi vopros [Marxism and the Nationalities Question] in opposition to Otto Bauer’s Die Nationalitätenfrage und die Sozialdemokratie. Bauer emphasized that ‘commonality of des- tiny’ defines national character (aus Schicksalsgemeinschaft erwachsende Charaktergemeinschaft), and he pointed to ‘commonality of origin’ and ‘natural heredity’ as the important factors in this regard. He nevertheless maintained that ‘cultural commonality’ is the factor which defines the repro- duction of national differences. Bauer’s position may be defined as cultural racism in the language used by some contemporary scholars of racism. 3 Race, Racialization and Racism: A New Theoretical Framework 1. Although only Kant’s Kritik der Urteilskraft is cited here, two different English translations are chosen to use, namely, Pluhar’s and the most recent Cambridge University Press edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Pro-Government Protest Organizations in Contemporary Russia
    Research Memo: Pro-Government Protest Organizations in Contemporary Russia prepared for “Mobilized Contention: The State-Protest Movement Nexus” Matthew Reichert Harvard University Department of Government September 17-18th, 2015 Introduction This memo overviews a subtype of state-mobilized politics that has emerged in the Russian Federation and the broader former Soviet space: pro-government protest organizations, or what Graeme Robertson calls 'ersatz' social movements.1 Most notable among pro-government protest organizations, and representative as an illustration of the subtype, is Nashi, or officially “the Youth Democratic Anti-Fascist Movement 'Ours!' (Molodezhnoye demokraticheskoye antifashistskoye dvizhenye ‘Nashi’) ” – the formally autonomous, government-funded youth movement and political organization that from 2005 to 2011 frequently organized counter-oppositional public demonstrations. One objective of this memo is to roughly and inductively conceptualize the particular class of state- mobilized politics represented by this constellation of organizations. Pro-government protest organizations in Russia (as I conceptualize them here) are one example of a "government-organized non-governmental organization" (GONGO), though not all GONGOs are pro-government protest organizations - pro-government protest organizations represent a subset united around a few shared characteristics. The collection of groups under study here were chosen inductively – they are those groups that appear most frequently in journalistic reports, or where
    [Show full text]
  • China-Iran Relations: a Limited but Enduring Strategic Partnership
    June 28, 2021 China-Iran Relations: A Limited but Enduring Strategic Partnership Will Green, Former Policy Analyst, Security and Foreign Affairs Taylore Roth, Policy Analyst, Economics and Trade Acknowledgments: The authors thank John Calabrese and Jon B. Alterman for their helpful insights and reviews of early drafts. Ethan Meick, former Policy Analyst, Security and Foreign Affairs, contributed research to this report. Their assistance does not imply any endorsement of this report’s contents, and any errors should be attributed solely to the authors. Disclaimer: This paper is the product of professional research performed by staff of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission and was prepared at the request of the Commission to support its deliberations. Posting of the report to the Commission’s website is intended to promote greater public understanding of the issues addressed by the Commission in its ongoing assessment of U.S.- China economic relations and their implications for U.S. security, as mandated by Public Law 106-398 and Public Law 113-291. However, the public release of this document does not necessarily imply an endorsement by the Commission, any individual Commissioner, or the Commission’s other professional staff, of the views or conclusions expressed in this staff research report. Table of Contents Key Findings ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy of the Authoritarian Rule in Russia: Mainstream and Critical Perspectives Aram Terzyan
    The Anatomy of the Authoritarian Rule in Russia: Mainstream and Critical Perspectives Aram Terzyan Eurasian Affairs Research Papers 1/2020 Center for East European and Russian Studies Abstract This paper focuses on the anatomy of the authoritarian rule in Russia involves accounting for the core external and internal factors determining the steady survival of the Putin regime. The findings suggest that the reasons for persisting autocracy range from limited reach of international/Western influence to fragility of civil society, compounded by Kremlin’s extensive crackdown on the public space. Apart from injecting the latter with nationalism and loyalty to the regime, the Kremlin has consistently strived to undermine the very idea of liberal democracy. The latter has been reduced to the acceptance of radical minority rights, endangering national identities and traditional values. Moreover, it has not been uncommon for Putin to legitimate his regime through exaggerating external threats, emanating particularly from the West. Frequent appeals to the external threats have been accompanied by a heightened emphasis on the necessity of strong presidential power, with a “strongman” who is capable of withstanding the enemies’ conspiracies. Keywords: Russia; “Putinism”; authoritarian rule; democratization; civil society. Introduction There is a broad consensus among the students of Russian politics that the Russian regime - centered around “Putinism” is inherently autocratic and personalistic (Fish 2017, p. 61). As a matter of fact, the post-Soviet transition in Russia has been marred by a series of authoritarian malpractices, ranging from centralization and personalization of power to extensive crackdown on civil liberties and political freedoms (Freedom House 2019a). As a result, the consensus of scholarly analyses in the West concludes that, if Russia did enter a transition to democracy, that transition was not successful (Evans, 2011, p.
    [Show full text]