Law Review Islamabad

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Law Review Islamabad Islamabad Law Review ISSN 1992-5018 Volume 1, Number 1 January – March 2017 Title Quarterly Research Journal of the Faculty of Shariah & Law International Islamic University, Islamabad ISSN 1992-5018 Islamabad Law Review Quarterly Research Journal of Faculty of Shariah& Law, International Islamic University, Islamabad Volume 1, Number 1, January – March 2017 Islamabad Law Review ISSN 1992-5018 Volume 1, Number 1 January – March 2017 The Islamabad Law Review (ISSN 1992-5018) is a high quality open access peer reviewed quarterly research journal of the Faculty of Shariah & Law, International Islamic University Islamabad. The Law Review provides a platform for the researchers, academicians, professionals, practitioners and students of law and allied fields from all over the world to impart and share knowledge in the form of high quality empirical and theoretical research papers, essays, short notes/case comments, and book reviews. The Law Review also seeks to improve the law and its administration by providing a forum that identifies contemporary issues, proposes concrete means to accomplish change, and evaluates the impact of law reform, especially within the context of Islamic law. The Islamabad Law Review publishes research in the field of law and allied fields like political science, international relations, policy studies, and gender studies. Local and foreign writers are welcomed to write on Islamic law, international law, criminal law, administrative law, constitutional law, human rights law, intellectual property law, corporate law, competition law, consumer protection law, cyber law, trade law, investment law, family law, comparative law, conflict of laws, jurisprudence, environmental law, tax law, media law or any other issues that interest lawyers the world over. Copyright © Islamabad Law Review 2017 All Rights Reserved. Editorial Team Editor in Chief: Prof. Dr. Ahmad Yousif Ahmad Al-Draiweesh Editor: Dr. Hafiz Aziz-ur-Rehman Associate Editors: Mr. Zaheer Abbas and Ms. Shamreeza Riaz Editorial Assistant: Mr. Fazal Khalique Editorial Board Prof. Dr. Muhammad Tahir Hakeem, Dean Faculty of Shariah & Law; Mr. Amjad Mahmood, Chairman, Department of Law, Faculty of Shariah & Law; Dr. Muhammad Munir, Associate Professor, International Islamic University, Islamabad; Dr. Samia Maqbool Niazi, Assistant Professor, International Islamic University, Islamabad; Dr. Shahbaz Cheema, Assistant Professor, University of the Punjab, Lahore; Justice Shakir Ullah Jan, Former Justice in the Supreme Court of Pakistan; Dr. Khursheed Iqbal, Dean Faculty, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Judicial Academy,Peshawar; Dr. Henning Grosse Ruse – Khan, University Lecturer, University of Cambridge, UK; Dr. Matthew Rimmer, Associate Professor, ANU College of Law, Australian National University, Australia; Professor Richard Johnstone, Director of Research, Queensland University of Technology, Australia; Prof. Martin W Lau, Professor of South Asian Law at SOAS, University of London, UK; Prof. Christie S. Warren, College of William & Mary, United States of America; Ms. Ramizah Bt. Wan Muhammad, Associate Professor, International Islamic University, Malaysia; Ms. Shamrahayu Binti Ab Aziz, Associate Professor, International Islamic University, Malaysia; Mr. Ahmad Azam Bin Othman, Assistant Professor, International Islamic University, Malaysia ______________________________________________________________ Editorial Office Room D-29, Faculty of Shariah & Law, Imam Abu Hanifa Block, International Islamic University, Sector H-10, Islamabad, Pakistan, Postal Code: 44000 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.iiu.edu.pk/ilr Phone: +92-51-9258022, +92-51-9019782 Contents Judicial Law-Making: An Analysis of Case Law on Khul‘ in Pakistan Muhammad Munir 07 Islamic Law and the Surrogate Mother Samia Maqbool Niazi 25 Sawara Marriages and Related Legal Issues Mudasra Sabreen 39 Rape Laws in Pakistan: Will We Learn from our Mistakes? Ruba Saboor 65 Qawamah in Islamic Legal Discourse: Analysis of Traditionalist and Modernist Approaches Shagufta Omar 99 Contributors MUHAMMAD MUNIR is Professor, Faculty of Shariah & Law, International Islamic University, Islamabad SAMIA MAQBOOL NIAZI is Assistant Professor, Faculty of Shariah & Law, International Islamic University, Islamabad MUDASRA SABREEN is Assistant Professor, Faculty of Shariah & Law, International Islamic University, Islamabad RUBA SABOOR Worked at the British High Commission as a Lecturer and is currently a Lecturer at Al-Huda International Welfare Foundation SHAGUFTA OMAR is Incharge Dawah Center for Women, Dawah Academy, International Islamic University Islamabad JUDICIAL LAW-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS OF CASE LAW ON KHUL‘ IN PAKISTAN Muhammad Munir* Abstract This work analyses case law regarding khul‘ in Pakistan. It is argued that Balqis Fatima and Khurshid Bibi cases are the best examples of judicial law-making for protecting the rights of women in the domain of personal law in Pakistan. The Courts have established that when the husband is the cause of marital discord, then he should not be given any compensation; and that the mere filing of a suit for khul‘ by the wife means that hatred and aversion have reached a degree sufficient for courts to grant her the separation she is seeking by resorting to her right of khul‘. The new interpretation of section 10(4) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 by Courts in Pakistan is highly commendable. Key words: khul‘, Pakistan, Muslim personal law, judicial khul‘, case law. * [email protected] Dr. Muhammad Munir, PhD, is Professor at Faculty of Shari‘ah and Law, International Islamic University, Islamabad, and Visiting Professor of Jurisprudence and Islamic Law at the University College, Islamabad. He wishes to thank Yaser Aman Khan and Hafiz Muhammad Usman for their help. He is very thankful to Professor Brady Coleman and Muhammad Zaheer Abbas for editing this work. The quotations from the Qur’an in this work are taken, unless otherwise indicated, from the English translation by Muhammad Asad, The Message of the Qur’an (Wiltshire: Dar Al-Andalus, 1984, reprinted 1997). Islamabad Law Review Introduction The superior Courts in Pakistan have pioneered judicial activism1 regarding khul‘. In 1959, the Lahore High Court gave a revolutionary decision when it decided the Balqis Fatima case, which judicially recognized for the first time, the right of khul‘ for a Muslim woman without the consent of her husband. This was a revolutionary decision and was endorsed by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 1967 in the Khurshid Bibi case. Both were landmark decisions and are followed to date in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Since Khurshid Bibi, courts in Pakistan have given numerous decisions refining and polishing the law of khul‘ in Islam, based on the foundations of Balqis Fatima2 and Khurshid Bibi3 cases. These two cases are important for many reasons but one of the important ones is that they are the best examples of judicial law-making4 in the legal system of Pakistan. This work 1 The phrase “Judicial activism” was first used to describe some decisions of the US Supreme Court. In the US jurisprudence, it means that in determining whether laws would meet constitutional muster, the Court was accused of acting more as a legislative body than as a judicial body. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes JR (d. 1935) of the US Supreme Court from 1902-1932, in his famous dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York, 198 U. S. 45 (1905) argued for “judicial restraint,” cautioning the Court that it was usurping the function of the legislature. See, West Encyclopedia of American Law, Jeffrey Lehman & Shirelle Phelps eds., (MI: Thomson Gale, 2nd edn., 2005), vol. 6, p. 58, (Judicial Review). Two dissenting opinions were written in Lochner, one by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes and the other by Justice John M. Harlan. Both dissents attacked the majority opinion as judicial activism and extolled the virtues of judicial self-restraint. West Encyclopedia of American Law, vol. 6, p. 361, (Lochner v. New York). See, also, Christopher Wolfe, Judicial Activism: Bulwark of Freedom or Precarious Security (San Diego: Harcourt College Pub, 1990). Judicial activism was never a feature of Pakistan’s polity. It was born out of the guilt associated with the historic sins of our superior judiciary. As far as our constitutional history is concerned, it is replete with decisions which legitimized executive arbitrariness & extra-constitutional adventures. The law of khul‘ is, perhaps, the only exception in our legal system in which judges did not follow judicial restraint. 2 Mst. Balqis Fatima v. Najm-ul-Ikram Qureshi, PLD 1959 Lahore 566; B.Z. Kaikaus, Shabir Ahmad, & Masud Ahmad JJ. 3 Mst. Khurshid Bibi v.Muhammad Amin, PLD 1967 SC 97; S.A. Rahman, Fazle-Akbar, Hamoodur Rahman, Muhammad Yaqub Ali, & S.A. Mahmood, JJ. 4 One of the heated jurisprudential debates is whether judges make or create law during adjudication in the same sense as the legislator or they simply discover it. Many famous jurists, among them Bacon, Hale, Blackstone, and Ronald Dworkin, were convinced that the office of the judge was only to declare and interpret the law, but not to make it. At the other end of 8 Judicial Law-Making: An Analysis of Case Law on Khul‘ in Pakistan focuses on an analysis of the case law concerning khul‘ over the years to point out its pros and cons. It discusses the weaknesses and the strengths of these cases from the perspective of Islamic law that the judges have been referring to and makes recommendations for further development of
Recommended publications
  • Punjab Judicial Academy Law Journal
    Punjab Judicial Academy Law Journal June, 2020 Copyright © 2020 by PUNJAB JUDICIAL ACADEMY 2 Punjab Judicial Academy Law Journal (PJALJ) Published by: The Punjab Judicial Academy 15-Fane Road, Lahore Tel: +92-42-99214055-58 Email: [email protected] www.pja.gov.pk 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Editorial Team of this first volume of the Punjab Judicial Academy Law Journal wish to thank Professor Dr. Dil Muhammad Malik, former Principal and Dean Faculty of Law, Punjab University Law College, Lahore, Dr. Khursheed Iqbal, AD&SJ, Mardan, Dr. Muhammad Ahmad Munir Mughal, In-charge Publications/Deputy Editor, Islamic Studies, IIU, Islamabad and Dr. Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema, Assistant Professor, Punjab University Law College, Lahore for their assistance in the publication of the this Journal. 4 EDITORIAL TEAM Patron-in-Chief: Honourable Mr. Justice Muhammad Qasim Khan, Chief Justice, Lahore High Court, Lahore / Chairperson, Board of Management, Punjab Judicial Academy Patrons: Honourable Mr. Justice Syed Shahbaz Ali Rizvi, Member, Board of Management, Punjab Judicial Academy Honourable Mr. Justice Shehram Sarwar Ch., Member, Board of Management, Punjab Judicial Academy. Editor-in-Chief: Mr. Habibullah Amir, Director General, Punjab Judicial Academy Editor: Mr. Muhammad Azam, Director (Research & Publications), Punjab Judicial Academy Member Editorial Board: Syed Nasir Ali Shah 5 C O N T E N T S (1) A REVIEW OF THE BOOK “FAMILY LAWS IN PAKISTAN, BY MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR ABBASI AND SHAHBAZ AHMAD CHEEMA, KARACHI: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS,2018” 7 Justice (R) Dr. Munir Ahmad Mughal (2) CLASSIFICATION OF PRISONERS INTO ORDINARY, BETTER, AND POLITICAL CLASS IN THE PRISONS ON ACCOUNT OF SOCIAL STATUS: A DENIAL OF LAW OF EQUALITY 17 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • „Marzy Mi Się Lew Boży”. Kryzys Ustrojowy W Pakistanie 1953–1955
    Dzieje Najnowsze, Rocznik L – 2018, 1 PL ISSN 0419–8824 Tomasz Flasiński Instytut Historii Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Warszawie „Marzy mi się Lew Boży”. Kryzys ustrojowy w Pakistanie 1953–1955 Abstrakt: Artykuł omawia przesilenie ustrojowe w Pakistanie, które trwało w latach 1953– 1955 i zakończyło się praktyczną likwidacją ustroju demokratycznego w tym państwie. Wła- dza wykonawcza (gubernator generalny) w sojuszu z sądowniczą (Sąd Najwyższy) i wojskiem odrzuciła przejęte po Brytyjczykach niepisane zasady regulujące parlamentaryzm, a w końcu rozpędziła i sam parlament. W ostatecznym rozrachunku droga ta powiodła kraj ku autokracji. S ł owa kluczowe: Pakistan, system westminsterski, Hans Kelsen. Abstract: The article describes the crisis of Pakistani policy between 1953 and 1955, which resulted de facto in the liquidation of democracy. The executive power (Governor-General) allied with the judicial one (Supreme Court) and the army to get rid of the unwritten princi- ples, taken over from the British, regulating the parliamentary order, and fi nally dissolved the Parliament itself. Ultimately, it led the country to autocracy. Keywords: Pakistan, Westminster system, Hans Kelsen. 12 VII 1967 r. do willi Mohammada Ayuba Khana w górskim kurorcie Murree przyszedł na kolację Muhammad Munir. Pierwszy z wymienionych, od dziewięciu lat – dokładniej od 27 X 1958 r., gdy obalił swego poprzed- nika Iskandra Mirzę – sprawujący dyktatorską władzę nad Pakistanem, powoli tracił w kraju mir po niedawnej, przegranej wojnie z Indiami; drugi, w 1962 r. minister prawa w jego rządzie, a przedtem (1954–1960) prezes Sądu Najwyższego, był już politycznym emerytem, gnębionym przez choroby. Konwersacja zeszła na temat, o którym w tej sytuacji obaj panowie mogli już rozmawiać zupełnie szczerze: zamach stanu Iskandra Mirzy, który 8 X 1958 r.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Law-Making: an Analysis of Case Law on Khul' in Pakistan
    Judicial Law-Making: An Analysis of Case Law on Khul‘ in Pakistan Muhammad Munir* Abstract This work analyses case law regarding khul‘ in Pakistan. It is argued that Balqis Fatima and Khurshid Bibi cases are the best examples of judicial law- making for protecting the rights of women in the domain of personal law in Pakistan. The Courts have established that when the husband is the cause of marital discord, then he should not be given any compensation; and that the mere filing of a suit for khul‘ by the wife means that hatred and aversion have reached a degree sufficient for courts to grant her the separation she is seeking by resorting to her right of khul‘. The new interpretation of section 10(4) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 by Courts in Pakistan is highly commendable. Key words: khul‘, Pakistan, Muslim personal law, judicial khul‘, case law. * [email protected] The author, is Associate Professor at Faculty of Shari‘a & Law, International Islamic University, Islamabad, and Visiting Professor of Jurisprudence and Islamic Law at the University College, Islamabad. He wishes to thank Yaser Aman Khan and Hafiz Muhammad Usman for their help. He is very thankful to Professor Brady Coleman and Muhammad Zaheer Abbas for editing this work. The quotations from the Qur’an in this work are taken, unless otherwise indicated, from the English translation by Muhammad Asad, The Message of the Qur’an (Wiltshire: Dar Al-Andalus, 1984, reprinted 1997). Islamabad Law Review Introduction The superior Courts in Pakistan have pioneered judicial activism1 regarding khul‘.
    [Show full text]
  • C.A. 1095 2018 13092019
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) PRESENT: MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, CJ MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN CIVIL APPEALS NO. 1095-1097 and 1021-1026 OF 2018 (against the judgment dated 05.03.2018 passed in C.P. No. D-5812/2015, etc. by the High Court of Sindh, Karachi) AND CIVIL APPEAL NO. 134-L OF 2018 AND CIVIL PETITION NO. 1362 OF 2019 (against the judgments dated 05.04.2018 passed in W.P. No. 29724/2015, etc. and 30822/2015, respectively, by the Lahore High Court, Lahore) AND CIVIL APPEALS NO. 1138, 1154-1158, 1486 AND 1487 OF 2018 (against the judgment dated 03.09.2018 passed in C.P. No. D-6274/2017, etc. by the High Court of Sindh, Karachi) AND CIVIL PETITIONS NO. 4475 AND 4476 OF 2018 (against the order dated 19.11.2018 passed in C.M.A. No. 33322/2018 by the High Court of Sindh, Karachi AND CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITIONS NO. 14 AND 18 OF 2019 (Non-compliance of this Court’s order dated 10.01.2019 passed in C.A. No. 1095/2018) CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITIONS NO. 25 AND 26 OF 2019 (Non-compliance of this Court’s order dated 01.10.2018 passed in C.P. No.3620 and 3623/2018) AND CIVIL REVIEW PETITIONS NO. 20, 37 TO 49 AND 77 OF 2019 (Review against this Court’s order dated 13.12.2018 passed in C.A. No. 1023- 1025, 1138, 1154-1158, 1486-1487, 134-L/2018 and C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • (Advisory Jurisdiction) PRESENT: Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, CJ Mr
    SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Advisory Jurisdiction) PRESENT: Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, CJ Mr. Justice Mushir Alam Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial Mr. Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi REFERENCE NO.1 OF 2020 [Reference by the President of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, under Article 186 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973] For the Federation : Mr. Khalid Jawed Khan, [in Reference No.1/2020] Attorney General for Pakistan [in CMA.127-128, 170, Mr. Sohail Mehmood, Addl. Attorney General 989,1293/2021] for Pakistan Mr. Ayaz Shaukat, DAG [Assisted by Ms. Maryum Rasheed, Advocate] For the National Assembly : Mr. Abdul Latif Yousafzai, Sr. ASC [in CMA.278/2021] Mr. Muhammad Mushtaq, Addl. Secretary (Legislation) Mr. Muhammad Waqar, DPO (Lit.) For the Senate of Pakistan : Senator Muhammad Ali Khan Saif [in CMA.296/2021] Mr. Muhammad Javed Iqbal, DD For the Election Commission : Mr. Sikandar Sultan Raja, Chief Election [in CMA.210, 808, 880, 983, Commissioner 1010/2021] Mr. Justice (R) Muhammad Iltaf Ibrahim Qureshi, Member (Punjab) Mrs. Justice (R) Irshad Qaiser, Member (KP) Mr. Shah Mehmood Jatoi, Member (Balochistan) Mr. Nisar Ahmed Durrani, Member (Sindh) Mr. Sajeel Shehryar Swati, ASC Mr. Sana Ullah Zahid, ASC, L.A. Dr. Akhtar Nazir, Secretary Mr. Muhammad Arshad, DG (Law) For Government of Punjab : Mr. Ahmed Awais, AG [in CMA.95/2021] Barrister Qasim Ali Chohan, Addl.AG Ms. Imrana Baloch, AOR For Government of Sindh : Mr. Salman Talib ud Din, AG [in CMA.386/2021] Mr. Sibtain Mahmud, Addl.AG (via video link from Karachi) For Government of KP : Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Shariʿa the Politics of Islamic Judicial Review by Shoaib
    Defining Shariʿa The Politics of Islamic Judicial Review By Shoaib A. Ghias A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Malcolm M. Feeley, Chair Professor Martin M. Shapiro Professor Asad Q. Ahmed Summer 2015 Defining Shariʿa The Politics of Islamic Judicial Review © 2015 By Shoaib A. Ghias Abstract Defining Shariʿa: The Politics of Islamic Judicial Review by Shoaib A. Ghias Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Malcolm M. Feeley, Chair Since the Islamic resurgence of the 1970s, many Muslim postcolonial countries have established and empowered constitutional courts to declare laws conflicting with shariʿa as unconstitutional. The central question explored in this dissertation is whether and to what extent constitutional doctrine developed in shariʿa review is contingent on the ruling regime or represents lasting trends in interpretations of shariʿa. Using the case of Pakistan, this dissertation contends that the long-term discursive trends in shariʿa are determined in the religio-political space and only reflected in state law through the interaction of shariʿa politics, regime politics, and judicial politics. The research is based on materials gathered during fieldwork in Pakistan and datasets of Federal Shariat Court and Supreme Court cases and judges. In particular, the dissertation offers a political-institutional framework to study shariʿa review in a British postcolonial court system through exploring the role of professional and scholar judges, the discretion of the chief justice, the system of judicial appointments and tenure, and the political structure of appeal that combine to make courts agents of the political regime.
    [Show full text]
  • A View from Pakistan Clark B
    University of St. Thomas Law Journal Volume 7 Article 9 Issue 3 Spring 2010 2010 Can Islamizing a Legal System Ever Help Promote Liberal Democracy?: A View from Pakistan Clark B. Lombardi Bluebook Citation Clark B. Lombardi, Can Islamizing a Legal System Ever Help Promote Liberal Democracy?: A View from Pakistan, 7 U. St. Thomas L.J. 649 (2010). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UST Research Online and the University of St. Thomas Law Journal. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE CAN ISLAMIZING A LEGAL SYSTEM EVER HELP PROMOTE LIBERAL DEMOCRACY?: A VIEW FROM PAKISTAN CLARK B. LOMBARDI* I. INTRODUCTION1 Over the past twenty-five years, academics have written a great deal about the relationship between Islam and democracy and between Islam and human rights. In the course of the scholarly discourse, debate has emerged as to whether the thickly liberal rule of law can survive in a society where the legal system is undergoing Islamization. Commentators can generally be divided into pessimists and cautious optimists. Pessimists suggest that, regrettably, Islamic values are essentially incompatible with the thickly lib- eral rule of law.2 The cautious optimists disagree.3 Cautious optimists argue * Associate Professor of Law, Adjunct Associate Professor of International Relations, Uni- versity of Washington. The author dedicates this article to the memory of his mother, Rosemarie Benner Lombardi, 1936–2009, relentlessly enthusiastic, supportive, and ever willing to think “outside the box.” 1. The research for this article grows out of an earlier research project whose findings were published in Clark B.
    [Show full text]
  • Un-Claim Dividend and Shares for Upload in Company Web Site
    UN-CLAIM DIVIDEND AND SHARES FOR UPLOAD IN COMPANY WEB SITE. Company FOLIO Name Address Amount Shares Abbott 41 BILQIS BANO C-306, M.L.COMPLEX MIRZA KHALEEJ1,507.00 BEG ROAD,0 PARSI COLONY KARACHI Abbott 43 MR. ABDUL RAZAK RUFI VIEW, JM-497,FLAT NO-103175.75 JIGGAR MOORADABADI0 ROAD NEAR ALLAMA IQBAL LIBRARY KARACHI-74800 Abbott 47 MR. AKHTER JAMIL 203 INSAF CHAMBERS NEAR PICTURE600.50 HOUSE0 M.A.JINNAH ROAD KARACHI Abbott 62 MR. HAROON RAHEMAN CORPORATION 26 COCHINWALA27.50 0 MARKET KARACHI Abbott 68 MR. SALMAN SALEEM A-450, BLOCK - 3 GULSHAN-E-IQBAL6,503.00 KARACHI.0 Abbott 72 HAJI TAYUB ABDUL LATIF DHEDHI BROTHERS 20/21 GORDHANDAS714.50 MARKET0 KARACHI Abbott 95 MR. AKHTER HUSAIN C-182, BLOCK-C NORTH NAZIMABAD616.00 KARACHI0 Abbott 96 ZAINAB DAWOOD 267/268, BANTWA NAGAR LIAQUATABAD1,397.67 KARACHI-190 267/268, BANTWA NAGAR LIAQUATABAD KARACHI-19 Abbott 97 MOHD. SADIQ FIRST FLOOR 2, MADINA MANZIL6,155.83 RAMTLA ROAD0 ARAMBAG KARACHI Abbott 104 MR. RIAZUDDIN 7/173 DELHI MUSLIM HOUSING4,262.00 SOCIETY SHAHEED-E-MILLAT0 OFF SIRAJUDULLAH ROAD KARACHI. Abbott 126 MR. AZIZUL HASAN KHAN FLAT NO. A-31 ALLIANCE PARADISE14,040.44 APARTMENT0 PHASE-I, II-C/1 NAGAN CHORANGI, NORTH KARACHI KARACHI. Abbott 131 MR. ABDUL RAZAK HASSAN KISMAT TRADERS THATTAI COMPOUND4,716.50 KARACHI-74000.0 Abbott 135 SAYVARA KHATOON MUSTAFA TERRECE 1ST FLOOR BEHIND778.27 TOOSO0 SNACK BAR BAHADURABAD KARACHI. Abbott 141 WASI IMAM C/O HANIF ABDULLAH MOTIWALA95.00 MUSTUFA0 TERRECE IST FLOOR BEHIND UBL BAHUDARABAD BRANCH BAHEDURABAD KARACHI Abbott 142 ABDUL QUDDOS C/O M HANIF ABDULLAH MOTIWALA252.22 MUSTUFA0 TERRECE 1ST FLOOR BEHIND UBL BAHEDURABAD BRANCH BAHDURABAD KARACHI.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal, Judicial and Interpretive Trends in Pakistan
    Development of Khul‘ Law: Legal, Judicial and Interpretive Trends in Pakistan Muhammad Ahmad Munir Institute of Islamic Studies McGill University, Montreal January 2020 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Muhammad Ahmad Munir, 2020 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Résumé .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. 6 A Note on Transliteration .................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 9 The Question of Ijtihād: What is Ijtihād? ........................................................................................... 13 The ‘Ulamā’ in Modern Pakistan......................................................................................................... 19 Literature Review ................................................................................................................................. 26 Chapter Outline ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part 5 Sindh
    Environmentalw ain Pakistan L Governing Natural Resources and the Processes and Institutions That Affect Them Part 5 Sindh Environmental Law in Pakistan Governing Natural Resources and the Processes and w in Pakistan Institutions That Affect Them Sindh Contents Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction to the Series .................................................................................................... 6 Foreword................................................................................................................................ 7 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. 9 1. Legislative Jurisdiction ............................................................................................ 10 1.1 Natural Resources .....................................................................................................................10 1.2 Processes and Institutions.........................................................................................................12 2. Methodology.............................................................................................................. 18 3. Hierarchy of Legal Instruments ............................................................................... 19 3.1 Legislative Acts..........................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Olitical Amphlets from the Indian Subcontinent Parts 1-4
    A Guide to the Microfiche Edition of olitical amphlets from the Indian Subcontinent Parts 1-4 UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA fc I A Guide to the Microfiche Collection POLITICAL PAMPHLETS FROM THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT Editorial Adviser Granville Austin Associate Editor and Guide compiled by August A. Imholtz, Jr. A microfiche project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA An Imprint of CIS 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, MD 20814-3389 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publicaîion Data: Indian political pamphlets [microform] microfiche Accompanied by a printed guide. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-55655-206-8 (microfiche) 1. Political parties-India. I. UPA Academic Editions (Firm) JQ298.A1I527 1989<MicRR> 324.254~dc20 89-70560 CIP International Standard Book Number: 1-55655-206-8 UPA An Imprint of Congressional Information Service 4520 East-West Highway Bethesda, MD20814 © 1989 by University Publications of America Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. TABLE ©F COMTEmn Introduction v Note from the Publisher ix Reference Bibliography Part 1. Political Parties and Special Interest Groups India Congress Committee. (Including All India Congress Committee): 1-282 ... 1 Communist Party of India: 283-465 17 Communist Party of India, (Marxist), and Other Communist Parties: 466-530 ... 27 Praja Socialist Party: 531-593 31 Other Socialist Parties:
    [Show full text]
  • S. No. Folio No. Security Holder Name Father's/Husband's Name Address
    Askari Bank Limited List of Shareholders without / invalid CNIC # as of 31-12-2019 S. Folio No. Security Holder Name Father's/Husband's Name Address No. of No. Securities 1 9 MR. MOHAMMAD SAEED KHAN S/O MR. MOHAMMAD WAZIR KHAN 65, SCHOOL ROAD, F-7/4, ISLAMABAD. 336 2 10 MR. SHAHID HAFIZ AZMI S/O MR. MOHD ABDUL HAFEEZ 17/1 6TH GIZRI LANE, DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, PHASE-4, KARACHI. 3,280 3 15 MR. SALEEM MIAN S/O MURTUZA MIAN 344/7, ROSHAN MANSION, THATHAI COMPOUND, M.A. JINNAH ROAD, KARACHI. 439 4 21 MS. HINA SHEHZAD MR. HAMID HUSSAIN C/O MUHAMMAD ASIF THE BUREWALA TEXTILE MILLS LTD 1ST FLOOR, DAWOOD CENTRE, M.T. KHAN ROAD, P.O. 10426, KARACHI. 470 5 42 MR. M. RAFIQUE S/O A. RAHIM B.R.1/27, 1ST FLOOR, JAFFRY CHOWK, KHARADHAR, KARACHI. 9,382 6 49 MR. JAN MOHAMMED S/O GHULAM QADDIR KHAN H.NO. M.B.6-1728/733, RASHIDABAD, BILDIA TOWN, MAHAJIR CAMP, KARACHI. 557 7 55 MR. RAFIQ UR REHMAN S/O MOHD NASRULLAH KHAN PSIB PRIVATE LIMITED, 17-B, PAK CHAMBERS, WEST WHARF ROAD, KARACHI. 305 8 57 MR. MUHAMMAD SHUAIB AKHUNZADA S/O FAZAL-I-MAHMOOD 262, SHAMI ROAD, PESHAWAR CANTT. 1,919 9 64 MR. TAUHEED JAN S/O ABDUR REHMAN KHAN ROOM NO.435, BLOCK-A, PAK SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD. 8,530 10 66 MS. NAUREEN FAROOQ KHAN SARDAR M. FAROOQ IBRAHIM 90, MARGALA ROAD, F-8/2, ISLAMABAD. 5,945 11 67 MR. ERSHAD AHMED JAN S/O KH.
    [Show full text]