Celebrating 40 Years of Water Conservation News Above the Escarpment and All of Hale County

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Celebrating 40 Years of Water Conservation News Above the Escarpment and All of Hale County Published monthly by High Plains Underground Water Conservation District No. 1, 2930 Avenue Q, Lubbock, Texas 79405-Ph. 762-0181 Volume 40-No. 1 THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR WATER January 1994 Southern counties to elect District Directors, County Committee members Registered voters in eight counties within the High Plains Underground Water Conservation District No. 1 will elect District Directors and County Committee members on Saturday, January 15, 1994. Directors Precinct One Residents of District Director's Precinct One, consisting of the portion of Crosby County above the escarpment and all of Lubbock and Lynn Counties, are currently represented on the Board of Directors by James P. Mitchell of Wolfforth, who is running unopposed. Mitchell was first elected to the Water District Board of Directors in January 1976 and has served as President of the Board since 1979. Crosby County Committee can­ didates are Dale Laminack, County Commissioners' Precinct One; Jimmy JAMES P. MITCHELL STANLEY MILLER GILBERT FAWVER R. Wheeless, Precinct Two; Mark Incumbent District Director Incumbent District Director Incumbent District Director Schoepf, Precinct Three; Matthew Precinct One Precinct Two Precinct Five Wilmeth, Precinct Four; and Donald Edwards, Precinct Four; and Steve didates are Richard Williams, Com­ Lamb County Committee can­ Kirksey, member-at-large. Miller, member-at-large. missioners' Precinct One; Dennis didates are Royce Collins, Precinct Lubbock County Committee can­ Brown, Precinct Two; Dennis Lemons, One; Henrian Enloe, Precinct Two; didates are Jackie L. Brown, County Directors Precinct Two Brad Heffington, Precinct Three; Paul Commissioners' Precinct One; Larry Incumbent Stanley Miller of Precinct Three; Jimmy Mullinax, Precinct Four; and John D. Srygley, Yarborough, Precinct Four; and Jerry Gamble, Precinct Two; Rynn Truett, Amherst is running unopposed for Goheen, member-at-large. Precinct Three; Roy Lee " Rocky" Director of District Directors' Precinct member-at-large. Blair II, Precinct Four; and Herman Two, consisting of Cochran and most Hockley County Committee can­ Directors Precinct Five Lorenz, member-at-large. of Hockley and Lamb Counties. didates are Larry Smith, Commis­ Gilbert Fawver, current Director of Lynn County Committee candi­ Miller was appointed by the Board to sioners' Precinct One; Mike McKee, Director's Precinct Five, was first dates are John Earl Fields, Com­ serve the unexpired term of Mack Precinct Two; Scott Fred, Precinct elected to the Board of Directors in missioner s' Precinct One; W. A. Hicks of Levelland, who died in Three; Jim Copeland, Precinct Four; 1982 and is currently serving as Vice­ "Billy" Russ, Precinct Two; Glen March 1990. and Rodney McMillan, member-at­ President. He faces David Appling of "Burley" Brewer, Precinct Three; John Cochran County Committee can- large. Floydada and Bruce Rigler of Plain­ view in this race to represent the residents of the part of Floyd County Celebrating 40 years of water conservation news above the escarpment and all of Hale County. " ... We shall endeavor to present to After reading these articles, we center pivot sprinklers with Low Floyd County Committee candi­ you a cross section of the present day hope you experience a little nostalgia, Energy Precision Application (LEP A) dates are Edwin Nutt, Precinct One; activities in the field of Underground as well as a great feeling of pride at systems. Since water losses associat­ Charles W. Huffman, Precinct Two; Water as an instrument for keeping in the water conservation accomplish­ ed with wind drift, evaporation and Nathan Johnson, Precinct Three; AC. THE touch with the plans ments achieved by District residents. deep percolation are virtually elimi­ Pratt, Precinct Four; and F. L. a~d f~nctions of your For example, many agricultural nated, irrigation application efficien­ Montandon III, member-at-large. CROSS District." producers have begun to use surge cies as high as 95 percent may be Hale County Committee candi­ SECTION With these _words, valves to improve their furrow irriga­ achieved. dates are Mike Ferguson, Precinct The Cross Sectzon was tion application efficiencies. Water We are proud to have had the One; Carroll Leon, Precinct Two; introduced to readers savings of 10 to 40 percent are possi­ opportunity to share these success Tommie H. Wages, Precinct Three; by High Plains Water ble by reducing and/ or eliminating stories with you during the past 40 Birt Lane, Precinct Four; and Kevin District general man­ deep percolation and tailwater losses. years of conservation reporting in The Igo, member-at-large. ager Tom McFarland Most open, unlined ditches have Cross Section. We now turn to the Polling Places and Editor F. B. Jeu given way to underground pipelines. future in anticipation of the many Polling places will be open from 7 Devine in June 1954. These pipelines help eliminate water innovations it holds with regard to a.m. to 7 p.m., Saturday, January 15, To commemorate our 40th year of losses ranging from 10 to 30 percent ground water conservation. 1994. The voting places and publication, some articles and pho­ per 1,000 feet of open ditch. presiding judges are as follows: tographs from 1954 will be reprinted Other area producers have Carmon McCain in The Cross Section throughout 1994. replaced high pressure, above-line Editor See POLLING Page Three Page2 THE CROSS SECTION January 1994 Technical Division staff now making annual depth-to-water measurements Technical Division staff members monitoring program." was measured is affixed to are now making annual depth-to­ In future years, some of these wells equipment at the well site. water measurements to determine the will be dropped and new wells added The observation wells are mea­ effect of 1993 pumpage on ground as efforts are made to build the best sured each year, and the data col­ water levels of the Ogallala Aquifer program possible to reflect represen­ lected is com pared with that of within the 15-county Water District tative changes in water levels for each previous years to determine any service area. area of Hale County. changes in the ground water levels of The data collection started January Technical Division staff members the Ogallala Aquifer within the Water 3rd and will continue through take the measurement by lowering a District service area. This data is February. steel tape to the depth of the current used to construct maps showing Measurements are taken in the static water level inside the changes in water levels and the District's network of about 1,160 observation well. The lower ten to saturated thickness of the aquifer privately-owned observation wells. fifteen feet of the tape is coated with within the District. These wells are spaced at a density of blue carpenters' chalk. When the Maps showing the location and about one well per nine square miles chalk comes in contact with the throughout the District. ground water, it turns a darker shade well number of observation wells in "We have established observation of blue. This section of wetted tape is each county or portion of a county well sites for the newly-annexed subtracted from the total amount of served by the District are portions of Cochran and Lynn tape lowered into the well to traditionally published in the April Counties," says Don McReynolds, determine the depth-to-water from issue of The Cross Section. Along with Depth-to-Water Technical Division Director. "In land surface. the maps, tables listing the Engineer Technician Terry Bridges the portion of Hale County added After the depth-to-water-level observation wells in each county and makes a depth-to-water measure­ to the Water District in August, we measurement is taken, the data is the depth-to-water measurements for ment in one of the 1, 160 observation plan to measure depths-to-water recorded and a vinyl sticker showing one year (1993 to 1994), five year wells within the District's 15-county in wells currently included in the the well number, the depth-to-water (1989 to 1994) and ten year intervals service area. State of Texas ground water measurement, and the date the well (1984 to 1994) will also be printed. District cost-in-water income tax depletion allowance: Past and present EDITOR'S NOTE-The following story allowance for the depletion of from the June 1954 Cross Section d etails underground water. First, it will be the first steps that the High Plains Water necessary to establish that the District took to obtain a cost-in-water landowner has a cost in his income tax depletion allowance for area underground water as distin­ landown ers. The Wa ter Distr ict h as guished from the cost of the soil; provided this service since 1965.-CEM. second, it will be necessary to establish that the underground * ** water is depleted through its use; The High Plains Underground and third, it will be necessary to Water Conservation District has re­ establish the annual rate at which ceived a number of inquiries in such depletion occurs. Obviously recent months relative to the in areas where pumping does not possibility of obtaining the deplete the underground water approval of the Internal Revenue supply, the landowner would not Service for an expense deduction be entitled to an allowance for for income tax purposes of the cost water depletion. However in places value of under­ where underground water is being THE ground water depleted by continuous use, it It's Tax Time which is de­ would appear that a deduction Internal Revenue Service engineers recently reviewed cost-in-water guidelines CROSS pleted by use should be allowed the landowner and approved decline data developed by the Water District for use by landown­ SECTION for municipal, as a compensation for the asset ers in claiming a cost-in-water income tax depletion allowance on their 1993 ind us trial and (water) consumed in the production federal income tax returns.
Recommended publications
  • Geophysical Mapping of Mount Bonnell Fault of Balcones Fault Zone
    Geophysical mapping of Mount Bonnell fault of Balcones fault zone and its implications on Trinity-Edwards Aquifer interconnection, central Texas, USA Mustafa Saribudak1 Abstract There are up to 1200 ft (365 m) of total displacement across the Geophysical surveys (resistivity, natural potential [self-po- BFZ. Faults generally dip steeply (45–85°), varying primarily tential], conductivity, magnetic, and ground penetrating radar) due to specific rock properties and local stress fields (Ferrill and were conducted at three locations across the Mount Bonnell fault Morris, 2008). in the Balcones fault zone of central Texas. The normal fault has The BFZ includes the Edwards and Trinity aquifers, which hundreds of meters of throw and is the primary boundary between are primary sources of water for south-central Texas communities, two major aquifers in Texas, the Trinity and Edwards aquifers. including the city of San Antonio. The Trinity Aquifer underlies In the near surface, the fault juxtaposes the Upper Glen Rose the Edwards Aquifer through the Balcones fault zone. Formation on the Edwards Plateau, consisting of interbedded The BFZ’s most prominent fault is the Mount Bonnell, with limestone and marly limestone, against the Edwards Group, which a vertical throw of up to 600 ft (183 m) (Figure 1). The fault is mostly limestone, on the eastern down-thrown side (coastal hydrogeologically juxtaposes these Cretaceous carbonate aquifers plain). The Upper Glen Rose member is considered to be the during the Miocene tectonic deformation associated with the Upper Trinity Aquifer and also a confining zone underlying the Balcones fault zone, where the younger Edwards Group limestone Edwards Aquifer.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2014 Midden
    The Midden League City Rain Garden by Chris LaChance Galveston Bay Area Chapter - Texas Master Naturalists April 2014 Table of Contents President’s Corner by Maureen Nolan-Wilde, President 2014 Prairie Ponderings 2 Wetland Wanderings 2 In mid-January, current and former board members took part in a planning day at Julie Receives Award 4 Galveston Island State Park. The purpose of the day was to build on the Chapter’s accomplishments, identify opportunities and help plan for the future. 2014 Plant of the Yr. 4 Early People of Texas 6 We developed a “roadmap” that can be used to set goals and focus our efforts for 2014 and beyond. We identified the following areas where we can make immediate Heritage Book Study - 6 improvements: Review Membership 7 Succession planning for key roles (learning exactly what board members and Outreach Survey committee chairs do so that, in the future, this knowledge isn’t lost), Coastal Mammals AT 7 Pelican AT 8 Leveraging current technologies (for example, making better use of the website, social media and tools for sending messages to our members), Diurnal Raptors AT 9 GBA Clan 10 Growing our outreach efforts (such as stewardship and education in schools). WaterSmart Award 12 Since that meeting, we have launched an image database that contains over 1,000 GBAC 1st Camp Out 12 pictures and has been viewed more than 10,200 times. This database, which is easily 2014 Class Fun 14 accessible and can be viewed 24/7, is a great example of using technology to make us more efficient and effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Water for All Texans
    Water for All Texans 2020 ANNUAL REPORT Texas Water Trade’s mission is to unleash the power of markets and technological innovation to build a future of clean, flowing water for all Texans. LETTER FROM THE CEO Greetings,I am thrilled to present you with Texas Water Trade’s first Annual Report. And what a year it’s been! We’ve stepped up to the challenge as a young start-up, raising money and setting big goals. It’s been rewarding to make plans with our partners on the ground across the state and deliver on our mission to bring clean, abundant and flowing water to all Texans. Halfway through our first full year in existence, COVID-19 hit. Like all of you, the 2020 we had planned was very different from the year we experienced. One of the many lessons the year has taught us is the importance of clean, flowing water—for our mental and our physical health. For many of us, water is where we go to find inspiration, solace and joy. When COVID closed us off from so much of the rest of our lives, our waters were still there. For me, our springs, rivers and bays were even more precious this year than ever before. That’s why at Texas Water Trade, we’re dedicated to building a future in which clean, flowing water is never a distant memory. From Comanche Springs and the Pecos River in West Texas to the rivers of the Hill Country and all the way to the Texas Gulf Coast, we are there working with our conservation peers, government agencies, and communities to restore and protect the waters that make Texas home.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Society of America Bulletin
    Downloaded from gsabulletin.gsapubs.org on January 11, 2012 Geological Society of America Bulletin Structural framework of the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone in south-central Texas David A. Ferrill, Darrell W. Sims, Deborah J. Waiting, Alan P. Morris, Nathan M. Franklin and Alvin L. Schultz Geological Society of America Bulletin 2004;116, no. 3-4;407-418 doi: 10.1130/B25174.1 Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Geological Society of America Bulletin Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Balcones Fault Zone Along the Growth Corridor of San Antonio, Boerne, Wimberley, and New Braunfels, South-Central Texas
    Geology of the Balcones Fault Zone along the Growth Corridor of San Antonio, Boerne, Wimberley, and New Braunfels, South-Central Texas Edward W. Collins Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin, University Station, Box X, Austin, TX 78713-7508 Extended Abstract The south-central Texas region that encompasses San Antonio, Boerne, Wimberley, and New Braunfels and adjacent areas west of San Antonio and northeast of New Braunfels is undergoing rapid urban growth. It lies within part of the recharge zone of the Edwards aquifer and includes a complex part of the Balcones Fault Zone (Fig. 1). The geology of this region is important to geologists and other professionals involved in planning land use, designing construction projects, and studying the Edwards aquifer. Recharge of the aquifer may be locally enhanced at karst features, faults, and joints. Faulted aquifer strata partly influence regional ground-water flow, and faults locally juxtapose strata having different physical properties, creating potential construction/foundation problems. Geologic maps are some of the most basic and useful sources of information for this geologically critical area of Central Texas. In this study, maps (scale 1:24,000) were prepared for a >1,250 mi2 region; additional mapping west of San Antonio and Boerne is ongoing. Maps have been interpreted using standard field mapping techniques and studying aerial photographs. Compilation and field verification of existing geologic maps of various scales aided map interpretation. This study benefited greatly from the many previous stratigraphic, structural, and mapping studies of the region. The Balcones Fault Zone, one of the main structural features of Central Texas, extends from near Del Rio east-northeastward to San Antonio, where the zone bends northward through New Braunfels, Austin, Georgetown, and Waco and continues toward Dallas.
    [Show full text]
  • Barton Springs Segment of the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer, Central Texas
    OLD G The Geological Society of America Memoir 215 OPEN ACCESS Barton Springs segment of the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer, central Texas Brian B. Hunt Brian A. Smith Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, Austin, Texas 78748, USA Nico M. Hauwert Balcones Canyonland Preserve, City of Austin, Austin Water, Wildland Conservation Division, Austin, Texas 78738, USA ABSTRACT The Barton Springs segment of the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer is a prolifi c karst aquifer system containing the fourth largest spring in Texas, Barton Springs. The Barton Springs segment of the Edwards Aquifer supplies drinking water for ~60,000 people, provides habitat for federally listed endangered salamanders, and sustains the iconic recreational Barton Springs pool. The aquifer is composed of Lower Cretaceous carbonate strata with porosity and permeability controlled by dep- ositional facies, diagenesis, structure, and karstifi cation creating a triple permeability system (matrix, fractures, and conduits). Groundwater fl ow is rapid within an inte- grated network of conduits discharging at the springs. Upgradient watersheds pro- vide runoff to the recharge zone, and the majority of recharge occurs in the streams crossing the recharge zone. The remainder is direct recharge from precipitation and other minor sources (infl ows from Trinity Group aquifers, the San Antonio segment, the bad-water zone, and anthropogenic sources). The long-term estimated mean water budget is 68 ft3/s (1.93 m3/s). The Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conserva- tion District developed rules to preserve groundwater supplies and maximize spring fl ow rates by preserving at least 6.5 ft3/s (0.18 m3/s) of spring fl ow during extreme drought.
    [Show full text]
  • A Watershed Protection Plan for the Pecos River in Texas
    AA WWaatteerrsshheedd PPrrootteeccttiioonn PPll aann ffoorr tthhee PPeeccooss RRiivveerr iinn TTeexxaass October 2008 A Watershed Protection Plan for the Pecos River in Texas Funded By: Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board (Project 04-11) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Investigating Agencies: Texas AgriLife Extension Service Texas AgriLife Research International Boundary and Water Commission, U.S. Section Texas Water Resources Institute Prepared by: Lucas Gregory, Texas Water Resources Institute and Will Hatler, Texas AgriLife Extension Service Funding for this project was provided through a Clean Water Act §319(h) Nonpoint Source Grant from the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Acknowledgments The Investigating Agencies would like to take this opportunity to thank the many individuals who have contributed to the success of this project. The development of this watershed protection plan would not have been possible without the cooperation and consolidation of efforts from everyone involved. First, we would like to thank the many landowners and other interested parties who have attended project meetings, participated in surveys, and provided invaluable input that has guided the development of this document. Your interest in this project and the Pecos River was and will continue to be instrumental in ensuring the future restoration and improvement of the health of this important natural resource. While there are too many of you to name here, we hope that your interest, involvement, and willingness to implement needed management measures will grow as progress is made and new phases of the watershed protection plan are initiated. Our gratitude is extended to the following individuals who have contributed their support, technical expertise, time, and/or advice during the project: Greg Huber, J.W.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan BIOSYSTEMATIC STUDY of OENUS BERLANDIERA DC
    This dissertation has been 65—3903 microfilmed exactly as received PINKAVA, Donald John, 1933- BXDSYSTEMATIC STUDY OF GENUS BERLANDIERA DC. (COMPOS1TAE). The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1964 Botany University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan BIOSYSTEMATIC STUDY OF OENUS BERLANDIERA DC. (COMPOSITAE) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of tha Requirement* for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By DONALD JOHN PINKAVA, B.Sc.t M.Sc. The Ohio State University 1964 Approved by Adviser Department of Botany and Plant Pathology PLEASE NOTE Figure pages are not original copy. They tend to "curl". Filmed in the best possible way. University Microfilms, Inc. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincere gratitude to Dr* T. Richard Fisher, my adviser, who not only suggested thia problem, but moat effectively guided it to ita completion* I am thankful alao to Drs* Clara G. Weiahaupt, Emanuel 0. Rudolph, Dale A. Ray and Carroll A* Swanson for reading thia dissertation and for their helpful criticisms and suggestions* Special recognition is extended to John M* Speer* Unless otherwise cited, the photography is to be credited to his talents so unselfishly shared* I am deeply indebted to Dr* Ray for statistical assistance; to the curators of the herbaria for loaned specimens and/or photographs; and to my colleagues for their many useful suggestions* Financial assistance was provided by The Ohio State Research Foundation and the National Science Foundation* ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Pag* ACKNOWLEDGMENTS....................................... 11 LIST OF T A B I E S ......................................... It LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS................................. Yl INTRODUCTION........................................... 1 GENUS D E S C R I P T I O N ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Summary
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE G 4032 provided by UT Digital Repository T3 cs 2005 C6 GEOL MAPS Miscellaneous Map No. 43 eologic Map of the West Half of the Taylor, Texas, 30 x 60 Minute Quadrangle: Central Texas Urban Corridor, Encompassing Round Rock, Georgetown, Salado, Briggs, Liberty Hill, and Leander Edward W. Collins ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; -!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ill - Q. < - :::E ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; CJ .J - 0 rn w ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; er c(J -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; " c(J U) c(J 0 = c() Ill ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ::r 0 ~ ...-'! 0 - ru N Ill 0 ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; M - I- N = M 0 - 'It' -!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - " Bureau of Economic Geology Scott W. Tinker, Director John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78713-8924 2005 Miscellaneous Map No. 43 Geologic Map of the West Half of the Taylor, Texas, 30 x 60 Minute Quadrangle: Central Texas Urban Corridor, Encompassing Round Rock, Georgetown, Salado, Briggs, Liberty Hill, and Leander Edward W. Collins Bureau of Economic Geology Scott W. Tinker, Director John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78713-8924 2005 ( CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... l INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 Methods .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aquifers of Texas
    Texas Water Development Board Report 345 Aquifers of Texas bY John B. Ashworth, Geologist and Janie Hopkins, Geologist November 1995 Aquifers of‘Texas November1935 Texas Water Development Board Craig D. Pedersen, Executive Administrator Texas Water Development Board William B. Madden, Chairman No6 Fernandez, Vice Chairman Charles W. Jenness, Member Elaine M. Barron, M.D., Member Lynwood Sanders, Member Charles L. Geren, Member Authorization for use or reproduction of any original material contained in this publication, i.e., not obtained from other sources, is freely granted. The Board would appreciate acknowledgement. Published and Distributed by the Texas Water Development Board P.O. Box 13231 Austin, Texas787 1 l-323 1 iii Aquifers of Texas November 1995 Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION.. ................. 1 GENERAL GROUND-WATER PRINCIPLES.. 7 MAJOR AQUIFERS Ogallala. .......................... 10 Gulf Coast. ..................... 12 Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone). ..... 14 Carrizo-Wilcox. ................ 16 Trinity. ............................ 18 Edwards-Trinity (Plateau). ......... 20 Seymour. ......................... 22 Hueco-Mesilla Bolson. ..... 24 Cenozoic Pecos Alluvium. ....... 26 MINOR AQUIFERS Bone Spring-Victorio Peak. ...... 30 Dockum. ......................... 32 Brazos River Alluvium. ... 34 Hickoryv. ........................ 36 West Texas Bolsons. .......... 38 Queen City. ................. 40 Woodbine. .................. 42 Edwards-Trinity (High Plains). ... 44 Blaine. ........................ 46 Sparta. ........................ 48 Nacatoch. ...................... 50 52 lgneous. ......................... 54 Rita Blanca. .................... 56 Ellenburger-San Saba. ...... 58 Blossom. ....................... 60 Marble Falls. ................... 62 Rustler. ............................. 64 Capitan Reef Complex. ..
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of the Trans-Pecos Texas
    Guidebook 25 Trans-Pecos ISxas Charles W. Kreitler andJohn M. Sharp, Jr. Field Trip Leaders and Guidebook Editors Bureau of Economic Geology*W. L. Fisher, Director The University ofTexas at Austin*Austin, Texas 78713 1990 Guidebook 25 Hydrogeology of Trans-Pecos Texas Charles W. Kreitler and John M. Sharp, Jr. Field Trip Leaders and Guidebook Editors Contributors J. B. Ashworth, J. B. Chapman, R. S. Fisher, T. C. Gustavson, C. W. Kreitler, W. F. Mullican III, Ronit Nativ, R. K. Senger, and J. M. Sharp, Jr. with selected reprints by F. M. Boyd and C. W. Kreitler; L. K Goetz; W. L. Hiss; J. I. LaFave and J. M. Sharp, Jr.; P. D. Nielson and J. M. Sharp, Jr.; B. R. Scanlon, B. C. Richter, F. P. Wang, and W. F. Mullican III; and J. M. Sharp, Jr. Prepared for the 1990 Annual Meeting ofthe Geological Society ofAmerica Dallas, Texas October 29-November 1,1990 Bureau ofEconomic Geology*W. L. Fisher, Director The University ofTexas atAustin*Austin, Texas 78713 1990 Cover: One ofthe five best swimming holes inTexas. San Solomon Spring with divers, during construction ofBalmorhea State Park, 1930's. Photograph courtesy ofDarrel Rhyne, Park Superintendent, Balmorhea State Park, 1990. Contents Preface v Map ofthe field trip area, showing location ofstops vi Field Trip Road Log First-Day Road Log: El Paso, Texas-Rio Grande-Carlsbad, New Mexico l Second-Day Road Log: Carlsbad, New Mexico-Fort Davis, Texas 7 Third-Day Road Log: Fort Davis-Balmorhea State Park- Monahans State Park 14 References 19 Technical Papers Water Resources ofthe El Paso Area, Texas 21 John B.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Pecos Trail Region
    Frontier Spirit in Big Sky Country ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ igh tabletop mesas rise from wide-open prairies. Ancient rivers course through sheer limestone canyons. Cool artesian springs bubble up from deep underground and ceaseless wind sculpts sand into ever-changing dunes. Above it all stretches a sky so big you can almost reach out and touch it. This is the legendary Wild West of classic books and movies, and the real-life landscape of the Texas Pecos Trail Region. The region’s 22 West Texas counties cover almost 35,000 square miles, an area larger than a dozen average-sized U.S. states. This big land comprises an ecological transition zone at the junction of the high and rolling plains in the north, Edwards Plateau in the east, mountain basins and Chihuahuan Desert in the west and brush country in the south. For centuries, scattered Native American groups hunted buffalo and other game across the immense UTSA’s InstituteUTSA’s Cultures, of Texan #068-0154 grassland prairies. These same groups also used plant Comanche warrior resources and created large plant processing and baking features on the landscape. Dry caves and Th e front cover photo was taken at the American Airpower Heritage rock shelters in the Lower Pecos canyon lands display Museum in Midland, which houses one of the world’s largest collections native rock art and preserve material evidence of the of World War II aircraft nose art. Th ese original nose art panels are titled “Save the Girls” and represent the artistic expressions of World prehistoric lifeways. Later, Native Americans such as War II bomber pilots.
    [Show full text]