DOCSLIB.ORG

The European Ombudsman the European Ombudsman Annual Report 2004 Annual Report 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The European Ombudsman the European Ombudsman Annual Report 2004 Annual Report 2004 ISSN 1680-3809 QK-AA-05-001-EN-C THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN ANNUAL REPORT 2004 ANNUAL REPORT 2004 Publications Offi ce Publications.eu.int www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int EN EN am506687CEE_EN_BAT.indd 2 20/07/05 15:01:16 THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN ANNUAL REPORT 2004 am506687CEE_EN_BAT.indd 3 20/07/05 15:01:17 © The European Ombudsman 2005 All rights reserved. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permitt ed provided that the source is acknowledged. Cover and separator photographs taken by Ms Glory Rozakis. All other photographs, unless otherwise indicated, are copyright of the European Ombudsman. The full text of the report is published on the internet at: htt p://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int/report/en/default.htm am506687CEE_EN_BAT.indd 4 20/07/05 15:01:17 THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN ANNUAL REPORT 2004 PRINTED IN BELGIUM ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER am506687CEE_EN_BAT.indd 5 20/07/05 15:01:17 am506687CEE_EN_BAT.indd 6 20/07/05 15:01:17 T HE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN P. N IKIFOROS DIAMANDOUROS Mr Josep BORRELL FONTELLES Strasbourg, 8 March 2005 President European Parliament Rue Wiertz B-1047 Brussels Mr President, In accordance with Article 195 (1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 3 (8) of the Decision of the European Parliament on the Regulations and General Conditions Governing the Performance of the Ombudsman’s Duties, I hereby present my Report for the year 2004. Yours sincerely, s P. Nikiforos Diamandouros The European Ombudsman 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman – B.P. 403 – F-67001 STRASBOURG Cedex ☎ : +33 (0)3.88.17.23.13 – Fax : +33 (0)3.88.17.90.62 http://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int – [email protected] am506687CEE_EN_BAT.indd 7 20/07/05 15:01:17 am506687CEE_EN_BAT.indd 8 20/07/05 15:01:18 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 17 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 23 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY COMPLAINTS AND INQUIRIES 2 COMPLAINTS AND INQUIRIES 35 AN INQUIRY 3 DECISIONS FOLLOWING AN INQUIRY 53 DECISIONS FOLLOWING 4 RELATIONS WITH EUROPEAN UNION RELATIONS WITH EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES 108 INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES 5 RELATIONS WITH OMBUDSMEN AND OMBUDSMEN RELATIONS WITH SIMILAR BODIES 113 AND SIMILAR BODIES 6 COMMUNICATIONS 127 COMMUNICATIONS ANNEXES 7 ANNEXES 161 am506687CEE_EN_BAT.indd 9 20/07/05 15:01:19 am506687CEE_EN_BAT.indd 10 20/07/05 15:01:21 ANNUAL REPORT 2004 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 17 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 23 2 COMPLAINTS AND INQUIRIES 35 2.1 THE LEGAL BASIS OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S WORK 35 2.2 THE MANDATE OF THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN 36 2.2.1 Unauthorised complaints 36 2.2.2 Community institutions and bodies 36 2.2.3 “Maladministration” 37 2.3 ADMISSIBILITY AND GROUNDS FOR INQUIRIES 38 2.4 ANALYSIS OF COMPLAINTS EXAMINED IN 2004 39 2.5 TRANSFERS AND ADVICE 40 2.6 THE OMBUDSMAN’S PROCEDURES 41 2.6.1 Starting an inquiry 42 2.6.2 Fair procedure 42 2.6.3 Inspection of the fi les and hearing of witnesses 42 2.6.4 Open procedure 43 2.7 THE OUTCOMES OF INQUIRIES 43 2.7.1 No maladministration 43 2.7.2 Cases sett led by the institution and friendly solutions 44 2.7.3 Critical remarks, draft recommendations and special reports 44 2.8 DECISIONS CLOSING CASES IN 2004 45 2.8.1 Access to documents and data protection 45 2.8.2 The Commission as “Guardian of the Treaty” 47 2.8.3 Contracts and grants 48 2.8.4 Recruitment and staff issues 49 2.8.5 The Commission’s responses to the Ombudsman’s inquiries 49 11 am506687CEE_EN_BAT.indd 11 20/07/05 15:01:21 ANNUAL REPORT 2004 Table of Contents 3 DECISIONS FOLLOWING AN INQUIRY 53 3.1 CASES WHERE NO MALADMINISTRATION WAS FOUND 53 3.1.1 The European Parliament 53 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT’S RULES ON TRAINEESHIPS ...........................................................................................................................................................53 PENSION SCHEME FOR MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ...............................................................................................................................54 3.1.2 The Council of the European Union 55 APPOINTMENT OF BOARD MEMBERS FOR THE EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY ............................................................................................55 ACCESS TO LEGAL SERVICE OPINIONS .........................................................................................................................................................................................56 3.1.3 The European Commission 57 EXCLUSION FROM AN INFORMATION SOCIETY PROJECT ......................................................................................................................................................57 TRANSPOSITION OF INSURANCE DIRECTIVES INTO GREEK LEGISLATION .....................................................................................................................58 PORTUGUESE LEGISLATION ON BULLFIGHTING ......................................................................................................................................................................59 ACCESS TO A DRAFT STATEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA JOINT COMMITTEE .................................................................................59 ACCESS TO WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION NEGOTIATION DOCUMENTS .....................................................................................................................60 ACCESS TO A FOOD AND VETERINARY REPORT ON ROMANIA ...........................................................................................................................................61 ACCESS TO A EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND MISSION REPORT ...................................................................................................................................................62 LEONARDO DA VINCI PROGRAMME .............................................................................................................................................................................................63 SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR A EUROPEAID PROJECT ............................................................................................................................................................64 ALLEGED IMPROPER HANDLING OF INFRINGEMENT COMPLAINTS ................................................................................................................................64 ACCESS TO AN ASSESSMENT OF GERMANY’S BUDGETARY SITUATION ............................................................................................................................65 3.1.4 The European Personnel Selection Offi ce 66 ALLEGED LACK OF REASONED EXPLANATION IN A SELECTION PROCEDURE ..............................................................................................................66 3.2 CASES SETTLED BY THE INSTITUTION 67 3.2.1 The European Parliament 67 SELECTION BOARD DECISION ON AN APPLICATION ..............................................................................................................................................................67 3.2.2 The European Commission 67 FAILURE TO PAY FOR SERVICES .......................................................................................................................................................................................................67 FAILURE TO PAY A GRANT .................................................................................................................................................................................................................68 ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS CONCERNING A RAILWAY PLAN ..................................................................................................................................................68 LATE PAYMENT FOR SERVICES .........................................................................................................................................................................................................69 3.2.3 The European Anti-Fraud Offi ce 70 ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS CONCERNING A NUCLEAR SAFETY CASE..................................................................................................................................70 3.3 FRIENDLY SOLUTIONS ACHIEVED BY THE OMBUDSMAN 71 ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS CONCERNING TRADE NEGOTIATIONS .......................................................................................................................................71 ACCESS TO DRIVING TEST RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................................................................................72 3.4 CASES CLOSED WITH A CRITICAL REMARK BY THE OMBUDSMAN 73 3.4.1 The European Parliament 73 THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RULES ON SMOKING .....................................................................................................................................................................73 3.4.2 The Council of the European Union 74 ACCESS TO PERSONAL FILES IN AN EARLY RETIREMENT CASE ...........................................................................................................................................74 12 am506687CEE_EN_BAT.indd 12 20/07/05 15:01:21 ANNUAL REPORT 2004 Table of Contents 3.4.3 The European Commission 75 LESS FAVOURABLE CLASSIFICATION AS A RESULT OF A DELAY IN RECRUITMENT ......................................................................................................75 LACK OF JUSTIFICATION FOR SUSPENSION OF PAYMENTS ...................................................................................................................................................75
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Decision of the European Ombudsman in Case 268/2021/VS Against the European Commission in Relation to a Procedure to Renew the Approval of an Active Substance
    European Ombudsman Decision of the European Ombudsman in case 268/2021/VS against the European Commission in relation to a procedure to renew the approval of an active substance Decision Case 268/2021/VS - Opened on 05/03/2021 - Decision on 05/03/2021 - Institution concerned European Commission ( No maladministration found ) | Dear Mr X, On 8 February 2021, you submitted a complaint to the European Ombudsman on behalf of your client. The complaint concerns the European Commission’s conduct in a procedure to renew the approval of an active substance. We identified the following concerns in your complaint. You contend that: 1. The Commission failed to consider your requests to mandate the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to evaluate a population modelling report. 2. The Commission refused to take into account an October 2020 study, which your client brought to the Commission’s attention on 30 November 2020. You consider that the Commission should immediately suspend the relevant regulatory procedure and request EFSA, as risk assessor, to take into account all eco-toxicological and human health data in the assessment of the substance. After a careful analysis of all the information submitted to us, our assessment is as follows. As a preliminary remark, we note that the substance of your complaint relates to an alleged error by EFSA in conducting its risk assessment. In particular, you are concerned that EFSA did not take into account certain studies that you consider relevant. Your complaint is, however, against the Commission. As such, the Ombudsman examined your concern as to whether the Commission provided adequate replies to the points that your client raised with it.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Publication in PDF Format (3.66
    QK-AA-07-001-EN-C ISSN 1680-3809 THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN INVESTIGATES COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN AND HIS PERSONNEL annual report 2006 www.ombudsman.europa.eu ISBN 978-92-9212-090-0 ,!7IJ2J2-bcajaa! EN annual report 2006 THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN EUROPEAN THE annual report 2006 © The European Ombudsman 2007 All rights reserved. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permi ed provided that the source is acknowledged. All photographs, unless otherwise indicated, are copyright of the European Ombudsman. Front cover: © iStockphoto.com/urbancow The full text of the report is published on the internet at: h p://www.ombudsman.europa.eu Printed in Belgium PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER T HE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN P. N IKIFOROS DIAMANDOUROS Prof. Dr. Hans-Gert PÖTTERING MEP Strasbourg, 12 March 2007 President European Parliament Rue Wiertz 1047 Brussels BELGIQUE Mr President, In accordance with Article 195(1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 3(8) of the Decision of the European Parliament on the Regulations and General Conditions Governing the Performance of the Ombudsman’s Duties, I hereby present my Report for the year 2006. Yours sincerely, s P. Nikiforos Diamandouros The European Ombudsman 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman – B.P. 403 – F-67001 STRASBOURG Cedex ☎ : +33 (0)3.88.17.23.13 – Fax : +33 (0)3.88.17.90.62 http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu – [email protected] ANNUAL REPORT 2006 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 15 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 21 2 COMPLAINTS AND INQUIRIES 35 2.1 THE LEGAL BASIS OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S WORK 35 2.2 THE MANDATE OF THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN 35 2.2.1 Complaints and own-initiative inquiries ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Des Émirats À La Conquêtedu Ciel
    0123 8 | dossier MARDI 9 JUIN 2015 Un A380 de la compagnie Emirates, à Dubaï. BLOOMBERG/GETTY IMAGES Des émirats guy dutheil rois sœurs contre trois sœurs. En mars, American Airlines, United et Delta, les trois plus importantes compagnies aé- à la conquête du ciel riennes américaines, ont bru- talement mis les pieds dans le Tplat. Rapport à la clé, elles ont dénoncé la concurrence, qualifiée de déloyale, de leurs Emirates, Etihad, Qatar Airlines… En moins rivales venues du Golfe : Emirates, Qatar toriques » européennes et leurs rivales asia- Airways et Etihad. En colère, elles brandis- de dix ans, les compagnies du Golfe tiques sont loin derrière, avec respective- sent leur réquisitoire de 55 pages, aboutisse- ment 16 % et 11 % de parts de marché. ment de deux années d’enquête, qui prou- ont conquis le tiers du mar ché long-courrier verait que les « trois sœurs » du Golfe auraient bénéficié de 42 milliards de dollars entre l’Europe et l’Asie, et s’attaquent Une croissance considérable (environ 37,2 milliards d’euros) de subven- désormais à l’Amérique. Les acteurs Et le fossé ne cesse de se creuser, au point tions publiques. de sembler désormais insurmontable. Les L’ire des compagnies américaines a été historiques hurlent à la concurrence déloyale trois groupes proche-orientaux « ont un notamment provoquée par les velléités taux de croissance considérable », constate, d’expansion de leurs rivales d’Abou Dhabi, mi-admiratif mi-catastrophé, un cadre diri- du Qatar et de Dubaï. Après l’Europe et geant d’une grande compagnie européenne. l’Asie, les compagnies du Golfe visent désor- Elles sont même en plein boom.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Defender (Ombudsman) – Equinet
    7/30/2019 Public Defender (Ombudsman) – Equinet Equality Bodies Equinet Equality in Europe Equality Blog Have you been treated unfairly? PUBLIC DEFENDER (OMBUDSMAN) Overview: Public Defender (Ombudsman) of Georgia is mandated by the Constitution and Full name in English Organic Law of Georgia to oversee the observance of human rights and fundamental Public Defender freedoms on the territory of Georgia, identify the cases of infringement of human (Ombudsman) of Georgia rights and assist individuals in redressing of violations of their rights. It is an Full name in the national independent constitutional body, which acts to promote human rights and protect language(s): individuals from maladministration of State administrative organs. საქართველოს სახალხო დამცველის ოფისი Postal address Brief history 150 Aghmashenebeli Ave. Tbilisi 0112, Georgia Oce of Public Defender has a broad mandate to promote and protect human rights, and that Website it exercises this mandate in practice. In addition to its existing mandate, the PD has been http://www.ombudsman.ge/ mandated with responsibilities for as National Preventive Mechanism under OPCAT, and as monitoring mechanism under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. General email address [email protected] Since 2014 Oce of Public Defender is designated as an Equality Body under the Law of Georgia on Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination. Helpline 1481 PDO submits to the Parliament of Georgia annual reports, which includes general assessment of human rights situation in the country, a summary of ndings and recommendations on how Telephone number to address problems identied. PDO also prepares special reports concerning human rights +995 598 08 30 06 issues in various elds and presents main ndings and recommendations to the public and Other social media relevant state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Esporta Għal
    European Ombudsman Decision of the European Ombudsman on complaint 1949/2003/(TN)(IJH)TN against the European Commission Decision Case 1949/2003/TN - Opened on 04/11/2003 - Decision on 24/05/2004 Summary of decision on complaint 1949/2003/(TN)(IJH)TN against the European Commission The complaint concerned alleged non-payment for services carried out on the instructions of the Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat), which is a service of the Commission. The complainant had carried out a Global Assessment of the statistical system in Kazakhstan on Eurostat's instructions. The contracts were formally concluded with the organisation CESD-Communautaire, but the terms of reference were laid down by, and all the reporting was made to, Eurostat. Eurostat approved the complainant's work report in August 2003, but the complainant had not yet been paid at the time of submitting his complaint in October 2003. The complainant suspected that due to problems within Eurostat, its payments to CESD-Communautaire had been blocked. The complainant alleged that the Commission had failed to ensure payment for the services he had provided in accordance with Eurostat's instructions in relation to certain contracts. The complainant claimed that he should receive the outstanding payment for his services. In its opinion submitted in January 2004, the Commission underlined that it had no contractual relationship with the complainant. According to the Commission, CESD-Communautaire could at the time still submit invoices to it in the framework of the contracts concerned. The invoices submitted by CESD-Communautaire for the complainant up to the date of the Commission's opinion to the Ombudsman had been paid without delay to CESD-Communautaire's bank account on 29 December 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision in Case 624/2018/TE on How The
    European Ombudsman Decision in case 624/2018/TE on how the European Commission dealt with a request for access to a list of meetings with stakeholders on the Japan-EU Free Trade Agreement Decision Case 624/2018/TE - Opened on 17/04/2018 - Decision on 17/04/2018 - Institution concerned European Commission ( No maladministration found ) | The case concerned a request for access to a list of meetings between the Commission and stakeholders on the Japan-EU Free Trade Agreement. EU access to documents rules only apply if the requested documents are in the possession of the institution concerned. The Commission rejected the request on the grounds that it has not drawn up such a list. In addition, it stated that it would be a disproportionate administrative burden to create such a list. The Ombudsman was satisfied with the Commission’s explanation for not having such a list and agreed that it was not required to create one. She therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration. Background to the complaint 1. The complainant is a civil society organisation based in Brussels. 2. On 7 December 2017, the complainant requested [1] public access to “ a list of meetings of DG Trade officials and/or representatives (including the Commissioner and the Cabinet) and stakeholders, including trade unions, civil society groups, as well as representatives of individual companies, industry associations, law firms, public consultancies and think tanks in which the Japan-EU Free Trade Agreement (JEFTA) was discussed (between January 2017 and today) ”, in line with the EU’s rules for public access to documents [2] .
    [Show full text]
  • Προς Μια Συμπεριληπτικη Ευρωπαϊκη Πολιτοτητα Towards an Inclusive European Citizenship
    ΠΡΟΣ ΜΙΑ ΣΥΜΠΕΡΙΛΗΠΤΙΚΗ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗ ΠΟΛΙΤΟΤΗΤΑ TOWARDS AN INCLUSIVE EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP Σειρά: ΔΙΚΑΙΟ ΚΑΙ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΕΣ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΕΣ Διεύθυνση σειράς: Ασπασία Ι. Τσαούση Εκδόσεις ΠΑΠΑΖΗΣΗ ΑΕΒΕ ΠΡΟΣ ΜΙΑ ΣΥΜΠΕΡΙΛΗΠΤΙΚΗ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗ ΠΟΛΙΤΟΤΗΤΑ Επιμέλεια: Λίνα Παπαδοπούλου - Δέσποινα Αναγνωστοπούλου ISBN: 978-960-02-3549-4 Copyright © Αύγουστος 2019: Eκδόσεις ΠAΠAZHΣH AEBE Nικηταρά 2 & Eμμ. Mπενάκη, 106 78 Aθήνα Tηλ.: 210-38.22.496, 210-38.38.020 Fax: 210-38.09.150 site: www.papazisi.gr e-mail: [email protected] Υποκατάστημα Θεσσαλονίκης Σιατίστης 7, 54 631 Τηλ.: 2310 227410 e-mail: [email protected] Εκτύπωση-Βιβλιοδεσία: grafima med!a | creat!ve | pr!nt Λ. Ελευθερίας 29 (Αμφιθέας), Άλιμος Τ.Κ. 174 55 Τηλ. Kέντρο: 210 72 51 600, Fax: 210 72 51 605 grafimaprint.gr Απαγορεύεται η μερική ή ολική αναδημοσίευση του έργου αυτού, καθώς και η αναπαραγωγή του με οποιο δήποτε μέσο χωρίς σχετική άδεια του Εκδότη Σειρα: ΔΙΚΑΙΟ ΚΑΙ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΕΣ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΕΣ ΠΡΟΣ ΜΙΑ ΣΥΜΠΕΡΙΛΗΠΤΙΚΗ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗ ΠΟΛΙΤΟΤΗΤΑ Επιμέλεια: Λίνα Παπαδοπούλου – Δέσποινα Αναγνωστοπούλου ΚΕΝΤΡΟ ΑΡΙΣΤΕΙΑΣ JEAN MONNET ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟΥ ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΑΣ «ΕΡΕΥΝΑ ΣΤΑ ΚΡΙΣΙΜΑ ΘΕΜΑΤΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΩΣΗΣ» ΠΡΑΚΤΙΚΑ ΔΙΕΘΝΩΝ ΣΥΝΕΔΡΙΩΝ: Ρατσισμός και Ξενοφοβία στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση (10.6.2016) Ενίσχυση Δικαιωμάτων Ευρωπαίων Πολιτών (27.4.2017) Ασφάλεια και Ισότητα στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση (20.4.2018) Η υποστήριξη της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής στην παραγωγή της παρούσας έκδοσης δεν συνιστά αποδοχή του περιεχομένου, το οποίο αντικατοπτρίζει αποκλειστικά τις απόψεις των συντακτών, και η Επιτροπή δεν μπορεί να αναλάβει
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Forced Return Operations
    MONITORING FORCED RETURN OPERATIONS 0 The Ombudsman as a human rights monitor in forced return operations Contents ▌Introduction ................................................................................................... 2 ▌ The operations .............................................................................................. 4 ▌ What monitoring is about ............................................................................ 4 ▌ The mandate................................................................................................ 6 ▌ The monitors …………………………………………………………………..... 7 ▌ Before the operation ……………………………………………………….… 9 - Preparing for monitoring missions - Pre-return phase ▌ During the operation…………………………………………………...……..12 - Pre-departure phase - In-transit phase - Hand-over phase ▌ After the operation .................................................................................... 15 - Monitoring reports - Following-up on the reports’ findings and recommendations - Complaint mechanism, assessment of monitors’ work and possible disciplinary proceedings - Publicising conclusions and recommendations ▌ Frontex pool of monitors .......................................................................... 18 ▌ COVID-19 and forced returns monitoring............................................... 19 ▌ Concluding remarks ................................................................................... 21 ▌ Annex – Questionnaire sent ..................................................................... 22 1
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Report on the Activity of the Ombudsman in Poland
    List of Commissioners Ewa Łętowska Tadeusz Zieliński Adam Zieliński 1987–1992 1992–1996 1996–2000 Summary of the Report Summary of the Report on the Activity of the Ombudsman in Poland on the Activity Andrzej Zoll Janusz Kochanowski Irena Lipowicz 2000–2006 2006–2010 2010–2015 of the Ombudsman in Poland in 2017 Adam Bodnar from 2015 On 15 July 1987 Sejm passed the Act on the Commissioner for Human Rights On 1 January 1988 the Commissioner for Human Rights was established Commissioner for Human Rights 2017 al. Solidarności 77, 00-090 Warszawa CIVIC HELPLINE 800 676 676 www.rpo.gov.pl 17 Summary of the Report on the Activity of the Commissioner for Human Rights in 2017, with Comments on the Observance of Human and Civil Rights and Freedoms 1 COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS BULLETIN 2018, No 2 SOURCES Summary of the Report on the Activity of the Commissioner for Human Rights/Ombudsman in 2017, with Comments on the Observance of Human and Civil Rights and Freedoms Editor-in-chief: Stanisław Trociuk Edited by the Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights: Irena Kumidor Translation: COMTEX JOANNA WYKRĘTOWICZ Published by: Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights al. Solidarności 77, 00-090 Warszawa www.rpo.gov.pl Helpline 800 676 676 © Copyright by Biuro Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich Warszawa 2018 ISSN 0860-7958 Submitted for typesetting in August 2018 Authorised for publication in August 2018 Edition: 250 copies Proofreading, printing and binding: Grafpol Agnieszka Blicharz-Krupińska ul. Czarnieckiego 1, 53-650 Wrocław tel. 507 096 545; mail: [email protected] 2 Table of contents Table of contents ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Verfassung Und Verwaltung in Europa
    Ulrich Becker/Armin Hatje/ Michael Potacs/Nina Wunderlich (Hrsg.) Verfassung und Verwaltung in Europa Festschrift für Jürgen Schwarze zum 70. Geburtstag Nomos BUT_Hatje_FS Schwarze_1365-3.indd 3 23.05.14 09:19 Vorwort Diese Festschrift ist Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Jürgen Schwarze gewidmet, der am 9. Juli 2014 sein 70. Lebensjahr vollendet. In Bielefeld geboren studierte er nach dem Abitur 1964 Rechtswissenschaft an den Universitäten Göttingen, Münster und Freiburg im Breisgau. Die Erste Juristische Staatsprüfung legte er 1968 ab. Die Promotion erfolgte im Jahr darauf mit einer Arbeit über den Eingriff in den Gewerbebetrieb durch Gesetz. Das Zweite Juristische Staats- examen bestand er 1971 in Stuttgart. Schon mit 27 Jahren war Jürgen Schwarze ein promovierter Assessor mit glänzenden Ergebnissen. Auch die Geschwindigkeit und Qualität seiner weiteren beruflichen Entwicklung sind nicht minder bemerkenswert. Im Jahre 1976, also mit gerade einmal 32 Jah- ren, wurde Jürgen Schwarze von der Universität Freiburg mit der von Werner von Simson betreuten Schrift „Die Befugnis zur Abstraktion im Eu- ropäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht“ für Öffentliches Recht einschließlich Eu- roparecht habilitiert. Er gehörte damit zu den wenigen seiner Generation, die sich ausdrücklich einem neuen Rechtsgebiet zuwandten, das heute in kaum einer Venia fehlen darf. Nach Lehrstuhlvertretungen in München und Heidelberg folgte 1978 der Ruf auf eine Professur an die Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Bereits zwei Jahre später erreichte ihn der ehrenvolle Ruf auf den renommierten Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht unter besonderer Berück- sichtigung des Europarechts an der Universität Hamburg. Seine Vorgänger waren der Altmeister des Europarechts Hans Peter Ipsen und der früh ver- storbene Christoph Sasse. Von 1986 bis 1989 wurde Jürgen Schwarze für die Wahrnehmung einer Professur am Europäischen Hochschulinstitut in Florenz beurlaubt.
    [Show full text]
  • Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006
    The Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006 (As amended upto July 1, 2017) Reserve Bank of India Central Office Mumbai TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short Title, Commencement, Extent and Application 1 2. Suspension of the Scheme 1 3. Definitions 2 CHAPTER II ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE OF BANKING OMBUDSMAN 4. Appointment & Tenure 3 5. Location of Office and Temporary Headquarters 3 6. Secretariat 3 CHAPTER III JURISDICTION, POWERS AND DUTIES OF BANKING OMBUDSMAN 7. Powers and Jurisdiction 4 CHAPTER IV PROCEDURE FOR REDRESSAL OF GRIEVANCE 8. Grounds of Complaint 5 9. Procedure for Filing Complaint 8 10. Power to Call for Information 10 11. Settlement of Complaint by Agreement 10 12. Award by the Banking Ombudsman 12 13. Rejection of the Complaint 13 14. Appeal Before the Appellate Authority 14 15. Banks to Display Salient Features of the Scheme 15 for Common Knowledge of Public CHAPTER V MISCELLANEOUS 16. Removal of Difficulties 16 17. Application of the Banking Ombudsman Schemes, 16 1995, 2002 ANNEXURE Annexure 'A' - Form of Complaint 17 Annexure 'B' - Addresses and Area of Operation 20 of Banking Ombudsman Deputy Governor Reserve Bank of India Mumbai THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN SCHEME 2006 NOTIFICATION Ref. CEPD. PRS. No. 6317 /13.01.01/2016-17 JUNE 16, 2017 In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949) and in partial modification of its Notifications Ref. (i) RPCD. BOS. No. 441/ 13.01.01/2005-06 dated December 26, 2005, (ii) CSD. BOS 4638 /13.01.01 /2006-07 dated May 24, 2007 and (iii) CSD.
    [Show full text]
  • The Protection of Human Rights in the New Polish Constitution
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 22, Issue 2 1998 Article 2 The Protection of Human Rights in the New Polish Constitution Ryszard Cholewinski∗ ∗ Copyright c 1998 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj The Protection of Human Rights in the New Polish Constitution Ryszard Cholewinski Abstract This Article examines the extent of human rights protection under the Constitution of the Re- public of Poland of April 2, 1997 (”new Polish Constitution” or “Constitution”), adopted on April 2, 1997, by the Polish National Assembly and approved by the Polish people in a referendum on May 25, 1997. The Constitution, a lengthy document composed of 243 articles, came into force on October 17, 1997, and is one of the last constitutions to be adopted in Central and Eastern Europe since the start of the political and socio-economic transformations of the post-communist era. This Article emphasizes the importance of the new Polish Constitution in light of the long tradition of constitutionalism in Poland. Part I surveys some of the earlier constitutional texts, with particular focus on the provisions concerning the protection of human rights. After briefly discussing the difficulties encountered in drafting the new Polish Constitution, Part II analyzes the protection of rights and freedoms in the Constitution in light of the most recent developments. This part focuses on the general principles underlying rights and freedoms in the Constitution, certain prominent civil and political rights of particular importance in their specific Polish context, the debate surrounding the constitutionalization of economic and social rights, the protection of so-called ”third-generation rights” such as the right to a clean and healthy environment, and lim- itations on rights and freedoms.
    [Show full text]