DOCSLIB.ORG

A File in the Online Version of the Kouroo Contexture (Approximately

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A File in the Online Version of the Kouroo Contexture (Approximately PEOPLE MENTIONED IN A WEEK A POET QUOTED IN A WEEK: 1 CRATES OF THEBES “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY 1. Here, in a wall painting at the Villa Farnesina in Rome, Crates has been depicted with staff and his Cynic’s satchel, the pera. He is being approached by Hipparchia, who is bearing her possessions according to the Greek custom of a bride approaching her bridegroom. HDT WHAT? INDEX THE PEOPLE OF A WEEK:CRATES OF THEBES PEOPLE MENTIONED IN A WEEK A WEEK: A book should contain pure discoveries, glimpses of terra PEOPLE OF firma, though by shipwrecked mariners, and not the art of A WEEK navigation by those who have never been out of sight of land. They must not yield wheat and potatoes, but must themselves be the unconstrained and natural harvest of their author’s lives. “What I have learned is mine; I’ve had my thought, And me the Muses noble truths have taught.” We do not learn much from learned books, but from true, sincere, human books, from frank and honest biographies. The life of a good man will hardly improve us more than the life of a freebooter, for the inevitable laws appear as plainly in the infringement as in the observance, and our lives are sustained by a nearly equal expense of virtue of some kind. CRATES OF THEBES HDT WHAT? INDEX THE PEOPLE OF A WEEK:CRATES OF THEBES PEOPLE MENTIONED IN A WEEK 365 BCE At about this point Crates (Κράτης) was born in Thebes, a son of Ascondus and heir to a large fortune. He would become a student of Diogenes of Sinope, and a Cynic, but he was also described as being a student of Bryson the Achaean, and of Stilpo. He was the teacher of Zeno of Citium, the first Stoic. His other pupils included Metrocles, Monimus, Menippus, Cleomenes, Theombrotus, and Crates’s brother Pasicles. He may also have taught Cleanthes, Zeno’s successor as head of the Stoic school. He may have been deformed, with a lame leg and hunched shoulders. He acquired the nickname “Door-Opener” (θυρεπανοίκτης) because he could enter any house and be received gladly and with honor: He used to enter the houses of his friends, without being invited or otherwise called, in order to reconcile members of a family, even if it was apparent that they were deeply at odds. He would not reprove them harshly, but in a soothing way, in a manner which was non-accusatory towards those whom he was correcting, because he wished to be of service to them as well as to those who were just listening. NOBODY COULD GUESS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN NEXT Crates of Thebes “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX THE PEOPLE OF A WEEK:CRATES OF THEBES PEOPLE MENTIONED IN A WEEK 307 BCE Crates was apparently in Thebes when Demetrius Phalereus was exiled there. LIFE IS LIVED FORWARD BUT UNDERSTOOD BACKWARD? — NO, THAT’S GIVING TOO MUCH TO THE HISTORIAN’S STORIES. LIFE ISN’T TO BE UNDERSTOOD EITHER FORWARD OR BACKWARD. “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project Crates of Thebes HDT WHAT? INDEX THE PEOPLE OF A WEEK:CRATES OF THEBES PEOPLE MENTIONED IN A WEEK 285 BCE Between this year and 246 BCE Pharaoh Ptolemy II would widen the initial “Suez Canal” that had been dug under the orders of Pharaoh Necho II. EGYPT By this point Crates of Thebes had died of old age, and was buried in Boeotia. (We do not have a specific date of death, but since he was said to be aged at the point of his death we are confident that he lived for a considerable period into the 3d Century BCE.) Plutarch’s extended life of Crates is, unfortunately, lost. What survives of the Plutarch account is merely the following fragment: But Crates with only his wallet and tattered cloak laughed out his life jocosely, as if he had been always at a festival. He had not been one of these “publish or perish” people, and his writings had been few. Various fragments of his teachings have survived including a description of the ideal Cynic state. According to Diogenes Laërtius he had been the author of a number of letters on philosophical subjects; however, the corpus of writings that still exists under his name actually is made up of attributions concocted by rhetoricians of the 1st Century CE, and is entirely spurious. One of his poems parodied a famous hymn to the Muses written by Solon: whereas Solon had opted for prosperity, reputation, and “justly acquired possessions,” Crates offered typically Cynic motivations: Glorious children of Memory and Olympian Zeus, Muses of Pieria, listen to my prayer! Give me without ceasing food for my belly Which had always made my life frugal and free from slavery.... Make me useful to my friends, rather than agreeable. As for money, I do not wish to amass conspicuous wealth, But only seek the wealth of the beetle or the maintenance of the ant; Nay, I desire to possess justice and to collect riches That are easily carried, easily acquired, and are of great avail to virtue. If I may but win these, I will propitiate Hermes and the holy Muses, Not with costly dainties, but with pious virtues. There are also several fragments surviving of a poem describing the ideal Cynic state, which Crates began by parodying Homer’s description of Crete: There is a city Pera2 in the midst of wine-dark Tuphos,3 Fair and fruitful, filthy all about, possessing nothing, Into which no foolish parasite ever sails, Nor any playboy who delights in a whore’s ass, But it produces thyme, garlic, figs, and bread, For which the citizens do not war with each other, Nor do they possess arms, to get cash or fame. 2. In Greek, Pera refers not to a population center but to the beggar’s wallet carried by every Cynic. 3. This Greek term tuphos is one of the first known Cynic deployments of such a term, literally indicating mist or smoke. The term was employed by Cynics in description of the mental confusion in which most people are encased. The Cynics sought to dispel this mist so that things would be seen as they were. HDT WHAT? INDEX THE PEOPLE OF A WEEK:CRATES OF THEBES PEOPLE MENTIONED IN A WEEK Diogenes Laërtius also credited Crates with several philosophic tragedies. He preserved several different accounts of a story that Crates gave his fortune to the citizens of Thebes after seeing the beggar king Telephus in a tragedy, or that he placed his money in the hands of a banker with the instruction that it should be passed on to his sons unless they too were able to make of themselves philosophers — in which case these funds should be distributed among the poor. Subsequent to this he was said to have led a life of poverty on the streets of Athens. He taught a simple asceticism, which seems to have been milder than that of his predecessor Diogenes: And therefore Crates replied to the man who asked, “What will be in it for me after I become a philosopher?” “You will be able,” he said, “to open your wallet easily and with your hand scoop out and dispense lavishly instead of, as you do now, squirming and hesitating and trembling like those with paralyzed hands. Rather, if the wallet is full, that is how you will view it; and if you see that it is empty, you will not be distressed. And once you have elected to use the money, you will easily be able to do so; and if you have none, you will not yearn for it, but you will live satisfied with what you have, not desiring what you do not have nor displeased with whatever comes your way.” Hipparchia of Maroneia, a sister of Metrocles, one of Crates’s students, came to him as wife and then lived in the same manner. They produced at least two children, a girl and a boy, and Crates is said to have taught his son Pasicles about sex by taking him into a brothel, and to have allowed his daughter to enter into a month’s trial marriage with her potential suitors. A WEEK: A book should contain pure discoveries, glimpses of terra firma, though by shipwrecked mariners, and not the art of navigation by those who have never been out of sight of land. They must not yield wheat and potatoes, but must themselves be the unconstrained and natural harvest of their author’s lives. “What I have learned is mine; I’ve had my thought, And me the Muses noble truths have taught.” We do not learn much from learned books, but from true, sincere, human books, from frank and honest biographies. The life of a good man will hardly improve us more than the life of a freebooter, for the inevitable laws appear as plainly in the infringement as in the observance, and our lives are sustained by a nearly equal expense of virtue of some kind. CRATES OF THEBES HDT WHAT? INDEX THE PEOPLE OF A WEEK:CRATES OF THEBES PEOPLE MENTIONED IN A WEEK Although it has been suggested that Thoreau may have gotten the above snippet out of Volume 34 of Bohn’s Classical Library in Waldo Emerson’s library, entitled ANTHOLOGIA GRAECIA. THE GREEK ANTHOLOGY: AS SELECTED FOR THE USE OF WESTMINSTER, ETON, AND OTHER PUBLIC SCHOOLS translated by George Burges (London: H.G.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A History of Cynicism
    A HISTORY OF CYNICISM Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com A HISTORY OF CYNICISM From Diogenes to the 6th Century A.D. by DONALD R. DUDLEY F,llow of St. John's College, Cambrid1e Htmy Fellow at Yale University firl mll METHUEN & CO. LTD. LONDON 36 Essex Street, Strand, W.C.2 Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com First published in 1937 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com PREFACE THE research of which this book is the outcome was mainly carried out at St. John's College, Cambridge, Yale University, and Edinburgh University. In the help so generously given to my work I have been no less fortunate than in the scenes in which it was pursued. I am much indebted for criticism and advice to Professor M. Rostovtseff and Professor E. R. Goodonough of Yale, to Professor A. E. Taylor of Edinburgh, to Professor F. M. Cornford of Cambridge, to Professor J. L. Stocks of Liverpool, and to Dr. W. H. Semple of Reading. I should also like to thank the electors of the Henry Fund for enabling me to visit the United States, and the College Council of St. John's for electing me to a Research Fellowship. Finally, to• the unfailing interest, advice and encouragement of Mr. M. P. Charlesworth of St. John's I owe an especial debt which I can hardly hope to repay. These acknowledgements do not exhaust the list of my obligations ; but I hope that other kindnesses have been acknowledged either in the text or privately.
    [Show full text]
  • DL Socrates Handout
    ISSS Virtual Socrates Colloquium 2021 Afterlives of an Eminent Philosopher: Socrates in Diogenes Laertius Stephen White, University of Texas at Austin, 9 June 2021 I. Socrates in the Lives: philosophy’s genealogy and a founder’s legacy 1. Plan of the Lives B1. Origins: Thales, sages, Pherecydes Ionic branch from Thales in Books 2-7 B2. Anaximander, Anaximenes, Anaxagoras, Archelaus B2. Socrates: Socratics Xenophon, Aeschines Aristippus: Cyrenaics; Phaedo (Eretriacs); Euclides: Megarics Crito (4 sons), Simon, Glaucon, Simmias, Cebes B3. Plato: Academics & Peripatetics B4. Academics B5. Aristotle: Peripatetics B6. Antisthenes: Cynics B7. Zeno: Stoics Italic branch from Pherecydes in Books 8-10 B8. Pythagoras: Pythagoreans B9. Heraclitus; Eleatics, Atomists, Protagoras … Pyrrho: Pyrrhonists B10. Epicurus: Epicureans 2. Preview of Lives organized by teacher-student succession: Lives 1.13-15 φιλοσοφίας δὲ δύο γεγόνασιν ἀρχαί, (B2) ἥ τε ἀπὸ Ἀναξιµάνδρου καὶ (B8) ἡ ἀπὸ Πυθαγόρου· τοῦ µὲν Θαλοῦ διακηκοότος, Πυθαγόρου δὲ Φερεκύδης καθηγήσατο. καὶ ἐκαλεῖτο ἡ µὲν Ἰωνική, ὅτι Θαλῆς Ἴων ὤν, Μιλήσιος γάρ, καθηγήσατο Ἀναξιµάνδρου· ἡ δὲ Ἰταλικὴ ἀπὸ Πυθαγόρου, ὅτι τὰ πλεῖστα κατὰ τὴν Ἰταλίαν ἐφιλοσόφησε. [14] καταλήγει δὲ ἡ µὲν εἰς (B4) Κλειτόµαχον καὶ (B7) Χρύσιππον καὶ (B5) Θεόφραστον ἡ Ἰωνική· ἡ δὲ Ἰταλικὴ εἰς (B10) Ἐπίκουρον. (B2) Θαλοῦ µὲν γὰρ Ἀναξίµανδρος, οὗ Ἀναξιµένης, οὗ Ἀναξαγόρας, οὗ Ἀρχέλαος, οὗ Σωκράτης ὁ τὴν ἠθικὴν εἰσαγαγών· οὗ οἵ τε ἄλλοι Σωκρατικοὶ καὶ (B3) Πλάτων ὁ τὴν ἀρχαίαν Ἀκαδηµίαν συστησάµενος· (B4) οὗ Σπεύσιππος καὶ Ξενοκράτης, οὗ Πολέµων, οὗ Κράντωρ καὶ Κράτης, οὗ Ἀρκεσίλαος ὁ τὴν µέσην Ἀκαδηµίαν εἰσηγησάµενος· οὗ Λακύδης ὁ τὴν νέαν Ἀκαδηµίαν φιλοσοφήσας· οὗ Καρνεάδης, οὗ Κλειτόµαχος. καὶ ὧδε µὲν εἰς Κλειτόµαχον.
    [Show full text]
  • Cynicism As a Way of Life: from the Classical Cynic to a New Cynicism
    Akropolis 1 (2017) 33–54 Dennis Schutijser* Cynicism as a way of life: From the Classical Cynic to a New Cynicism Introduction Both within and outside the world of academic philosophy, art of living has been increasingly in the spotlight. Objectives such as success, pleasure and happi- ness are expressly validated in contemporary society, but more philosophically val- id objectives such as cultivation of the soul also receive ample attention. On the other side, within academic philosophy, the question for the art of living has also been receiving increasing attention.1 This revival could arguably be led back to Mi- chel Foucault’s genealogical return to antiquity in the second and third parts of his History of Sexuality, in turn undoubtedly influenced by the works of Pierre Hadot. Especially classical philosophy has proven a rich source of investigation and inspi- ration for a philosophy of the art of living. Many currents in ancient philosophy ac- tually proposed different ways of living, based on different values and articulated in different practices.2 One of the central currents throughout a large part of antiquity was Cyn- icism. This school is accompanied with a number of methodological difficulties. Not least of all, today’s connotation of the name Cynicism is radically different from its classical origins. Today, being a cynic is associated with a depreciative at- titude, intended to insult and offend, rather than being concerned with any phil- osophical foundation. A further complication is that little is known directly of classical Cynicism, and what we do know often comes from anecdotes and stories written down by posterity, and not from actual first hand sources of substantial profundity.
    [Show full text]
  • Demonax Vita, Chreia
    ἔρωτα παύει λιμός. εἰ δὲ μή, χρόνος· ἐὰν δὲ τούτοις μὴ δύνῃ χρῆσθαι, βρόχος. —Crates (Cynic philosopher) Hunger puts a stop to erōs. If not, time does. But, if you can’t use these, a noose works. Lucian of Samosata born around AD 125 died after AD 180 (mentions death of Marcus Aurelius) Sophist and Satirist Second Sophistic begins some time in late 1st century BC? flourishes from Nero’s reign (mid 1st AD) until mid 3rd century new (Roman) funding + prestige of Greek ironic, self-aware, campy reaction to kitschy imitation mixes philosophy and school-rhetoric revives/fetishizes Attic dialect of Greek from 400-700 years before but in new sociopolitical climate (Some) 2nd Sophistic Genres lives (encomia turned into biography) collections of chreiæ or sayings collections of memorable acts epistles (letters) and collections of epistles dreams and dream-interpretation Menippean satire “novel” (whatever that is) Pythagoras weird culty mathy stuff Democritus Atomism Plato Academy Diogenes Aristotle Cynics (Dogs) Peripatetics Zeno Stoic (Porch) Epicurus Garden family tree Skeptics of major later Pyrrhonists philosophies Neoplatonists Stoics believe cosmos = god = nature; soul = part of god/cosmos trying to figure itself out seek public life, contribute to public good physics (study of nature) + logic = ethics avoid emotions/passions; embrace reason; act, don’t be acted upon—you control yourself good = knowledge of truth/nature; evil = ignorance Epicureans avoid pain—seek ataraxia (untroubled peace) reject false pleasures leading to pain enjoy moderation
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One the SAYING of ANTISTHENES the ASKESIS of the EARLY GREEK CYNICS
    Chapter One THE SA YING OF ANTISTHENES & THE ASKESIS OF THE EARLY GREEK CYNICS ] 'aitOlgolfrs distinglle, en ejfet, dans Ie diJ"Collrs, Ie di11? et Ie dit. QIIe Ie di11? doive fomporterlin dit est line nefessite dllme me ord11? qlle felle qlli imp ose line societe, avec des lo is, des institlltions et des 11?lations so ciales. iVlaisIe dire, e'est Ie foit que de vant Ie visagei: ne restepas simplement /a a Ie contempler,je Ill i riponds. Ledire est linemaniere de saltier alllmi, mais saltier alltmi, e'est dija ripond11? de Illi. (E. Livinas, Ethiqlle et bifini, Paris: FCfYard, 1982, pp . 92-93) The valrle!essnw" ofItfo (die Werlhlosigkeit des le bms) was grasped by the 0nics, bllt it wasn 'tyet app lied against Itfl . (F.Nie tZJ·,·he, Posth"moIlJ" Fragments Slimmer 1882-Spnng 1884, 7[222J) Introduction In this part of the dissertation, I will be considering the early Greek Cynics, and particularly Antisthenes and Diogenes of Sinope. I will analyzeAntisthenes' ethics and theory of language before studying the ethics of the early Greek Cynics.l Rather than distinguishing between Antisthenes' ethics and theory oflanguage as most earlier scholars have done, I will try to show how his theory oflanguage 1 Our main primarysou rce fo r Antisthenes and the early Greek Cynics is Diogenes Laertius. The SL...:th book of his Lives and Opinions oj-Eminent Philosophersis dedicated to the early Cynics. There are also various references in Aristotle, Stobaeus, Plutarch, the Gnom% giJ{m Vati,"tlnllm, Philodemus, Clement of Alexandria, Sirnplicius,Julian, and Epictetus, just to cite a fe "T.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Human Beings Become Bad. the Early Stoic Doctrine of Double Perversion ______
    Why Human Beings Become Bad. The Early Stoic Doctrine of Double Perversion __________________________________________________________________ RENÉ BROUWER University of Utrecht [email protected] Recibido: 07/10/2019 - Aceptado: 09/11/2019 DOI https://doi.org/10.20318/fons.2020.5055 Abstract In this article I offer a reconstruction of the early Stoics’ account of why human beings become bad, which they referred to as the doctrine of «double perversion», and place this doctrine in its Hellenistic context. I do so on the basis of the extant sources, going beyond the standard collections of evidence on the Stoics, and with particular emphasis on Calcidius’ account, which I suggest is somewhat longer than often assumed. The two causes the early Stoics identified are each first set out within Stoic thought itself and subsequently placed against the background of the debate about human conduct among the different schools of thought that emerged in the Hellenistic period. With regard to the first cause, persuasiveness of external matters, I maintain that the early Stoics in fact attacked the Epicureans, arguing that humans should not be misled by the pleasurable nature of some things. With regard to the second cause, verbal influence by others, the early Stoics actually followed Socrates and the Cynics in emphasizing the importance of thinking against common opinion. Keywords: perversion (Greek: $%&'()*+,, Latin: perversio), badness, early Stoa, Epicurus, Cynics, Socrates, Calcidius Resumen En este artículo ofrezco una reconstrucción de la explicación de los primeros estoicos de por qué los seres humanos se vuelven malos, conocida como la doctrina de la «doble perversión», y coloco esta doctrina en su contexto helenístico.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeno of Citium's Philosophy of Stoicism Miles Mcavoy
    Parkland College A with Honors Projects Honors Program 2016 Zeno of Citium's Philosophy of Stoicism Miles McAvoy Recommended Citation McAvoy, Miles, "Zeno of Citium's Philosophy of Stoicism" (2016). A with Honors Projects. 170. http://spark.parkland.edu/ah/170 Open access to this Essay is brought to you by Parkland College's institutional repository, SPARK: Scholarship at Parkland. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Myles McAvoy Ethics Honor Project Philosophy 105 Professor Greg Whitlock 23 February 2016 Zeno of Citium’s Philosophy of Stoicism Zeno of Citium, the founding philosopher of Ancient Greek Stoicism, has lost most of his story to time, leaving his teachings to live on in only a few fragments of what was rumored to be hundreds of treatises. Faithfully, the majority of Stoicism has survived the ages through the translations of fellow philosophers, Stoic and contemporary alike. Zeno the Stoic was born a Greek citizen of Citium, Cyprus in 335 B.C, son to Mnaseas, a successful merchant of the Mediterranean and Aegean Seas. Little is known of Zeno’s childhood, instead his history most commonly begins at the age of thirty, notably transcribed by Diogenes Laërtius within his compendium, Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers. Zeno is reliably described within as a lean man with thick legs, regarded appropriately as being both flabby and delicate; he was a man of simple pleasures and commonly described as leading an ascetic lifestyle prior even to his philosophical teachings, “they say he was fond of eating green figs and of basking in the sun… [declining] most invitations to dinner” (Laërtius).
    [Show full text]
  • Godless Human Philosophy: Truth According to Man
    Chapter One Godless Human Philosophy: Truth According to Man “The desire of power in excess caused the angels to fall; the desire of knowledge in excess caused man to fall.” Francis Bacon, Advancement of Learning, 1605 Man’s Futile Search for Wisdom and Truth The origin of the word “philosophy” comes from the combination of the Greek words philos, which means love, and sophia, which means wisdom. The meaning of the word philosophy, therefore, is a “love of wisdom.” As sentient creatures made in the image and likeness of God, human beings have an inborn urge to know and understand the truth. No other creatures have this desire for wisdom and knowledge. That’s what separates us from the brutes. Merely surviving from day to day like the animals do is not enough for mankind, for we cannot live in peace with ourselves if we don’t ponder where we come from and where we’re going when we die. God recognizes this inborn desire we have, for he was the one who gave it to us in the first place, and has revealed himself to us in order that we may know the truth, and love him and seek him out, and ultimately be reunited to him when we die. As we have discovered from the modern sciences of archaeology, anthropology, and paleontology, the whole of human history has been a never-ending search for the truth about our creator. Primitive savages once believed that the heavenly bodies and the natural forces and elements of the earth were gods and therefore worshipped such things as the moon, the sun, the planets, earth, wind, fire, rain, crops, animals, insects, and many other things that exist in the natural realm.
    [Show full text]
  • Hellenistic Philosophy in Greek and Roman Times
    Center for Open Access in Science ▪ https://www.centerprode.com/ojsp.html Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 2019, 3(1), 1-6. ISSN (Online) 2560-5380 ▪ https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.0301.01001k _________________________________________________________________________ Hellenistic Philosophy in Greek and Roman Times Ioanna-Soultana Kotsori University of Peloponnese, Kalamata, GREECE Faculty of Humanities and Cultural Studies Received 21 February 2019 ▪ Revised 21 May 2019 ▪ Accepted 11 June 2019 Abstract The new Hellenistic philosophies that emerged in Athens at the end of the 4th century BC – mainly Stoicism and Epicureanism – were largely non-original and second choice, compared to Plato and Aristotle. Unlike what happened with the works of Plato and Aristotle, the works of early Hellenistic era were lost on a large scale. However, they became the dominant philosophies of the next five centuries, and were extended from Greece to Rome and the distant provinces of the Roman Empire. A common element of the philosophers created in Hellenistic and Roman times is the connection of philosophy with individual life and its perception as an “art of life”. Philosophy ends up being a driver of life and a source of relief, a healing art, a way to cope with a hostile world. From the 4th century BC up to the first Christian centuries, Cynics, Stoics, Epicists and skeptical philosophers give a new role to philosophy. Keywords: Stoicism, Epicureanism, Cynicism, Hellenistic era, Roman Empire. 1. Introduction As professor Anthony A. Long says, in the early 1960s’ there were two predominant ideas for Hellenistic philosophy. One was that the new Hellenistic philosophies that emerged in Athens at the end of the 4th century BC – mainly Stoicism and Epicureanism – were largely non- original, and second choice, compared to Plato and Aristotle.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Teachings of Classical Antiquity Philosophers in the Poetry of Saint Gregory of Nazianzus
    Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 2019, 9 (3–4), 98–105 DOI:10.2478/ebce-2019-0014 Ethical teachings of Classical Antiquity philosophers in the poetry of Saint Gregory of Nazianzus Erika Brodňanská1 & Adriána Koželová2 Abstract The paper focuses on the ethical teachings of Classical Antiquity philosophers in the poetry of Saint Gregory of Nazianzus, especially on the parallels between the author’s work and the Cynics and the Stoics. The syncretic nature of Gregory’s work, reflected in the assimilation of the teachings of ancient philosophical schools and the then expanding Christianity creates conditions for the explanation and highlighting of basic human virtues. Gregory of Nazianzus’ legacy also draws on the teachings of such philosophers as Plato and Aristotle, but he always approaches them from the perspective of a strictly Christian worldview. He understands philosophy as a moral underlying basis from which one can draw inspiration for a virtuous and happy life. Gregory thinks that philosophy cannot harm Christians in the pursuit of a virtuous life. Nevertheless, Christian teachings and God are the highest authority. They stand above all philosophical schools or ideas advanced by specific philosophers. Gregory’s moral poetry thus directs his readers, if they are to deserve eternal life, to follow the commandments, which is possible only if one lives a practical and virtuous life. Keywords: Gregory of Nazianzus, moral poetry, Cynicism, Stoicism, virtues The Golden Age of Patristic Literature, as the 4th and 5th century CE are often referred to, provides an abundance of material of great theological and literary significance. It is a period in which the declining culture of pagan antiquity meets the successfully expanding Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • 4Reek Philosophy
    OUTLINES OE THE HISTORY OF 4reek philosophy BY Dr. EDWARD ZELLER TRANSLATED WITH THE AUTHOR'S SANCTION BY SARAH FRANCES ALLEYNE AND -ABBOTT tJNlVEBSITi t NEW YORK HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY 1S86 IN' MEMORIAM SARAH FRANCES ALLE7NE AUTHOR’S PREFACE. F or some years it has been my intention to respond to a request arising from various quarters, and add to my larger work on the Philosophy of the Greeks a short sketch of the same subject. But until the third edition of the History was brought to a conclusion I had not the leisure for the work. Sketches of thi3 kind will proceed on different lines according to the aim which is held in view. My object has been primarily to provide students with a help for academical lectures, which would facilitate preparation, and save the time wasted in writing down facts, without interfering with the lecturer’s work or imposing any fetters upon it. Hence I have made it my task to give my readers a pic­ ture of the contents of the philosophical systems, and the course of their historical development, which should contain all the essential traits— and also to put into their hands the more important literary references and sources. But as in the last points I have not gone beyond what is absolutely necessary, so in the historical account I have as a rule indicated the parts very briefly with which historical considerations of a general kind or special explanations and inquiries are connected, or in viii AUTHOR'S PREFACE. which, it seemed proper to supplement my earlier work.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Western Philosophy Ralph Mcinerny
    A History of Western Philosophy Ralph McInerny Volume I Foreword / Acknowledgements • Part I: Presocratic Philosophy o Chapter I: Before Philosophy A. The Quarrel Between Philosophy and Poetry B. The Theological Poets C. Greek Primitive Religion o Chapter II: The Ionians A. Thales of Miletus B. Anaximander of Miletus C. Anaximenes of Miletus D. Xenophanes E. Heraclitus of Ephesus o Chapter III: The Italians A. The Pythagoreans 1) Pythagoras of Samos 2) Pythagorean Doctrines B. Parmenides of Elea C. Zeno of Elea D. Melissus of Samos o Chapter IV: Empedocles of Acragas A. On Nature B. Purifications o Chapter V: Anaxagoras of Clazimenae o Chapter VI: Atomism Diogenes of Apollonia o Chapter VII: The Sophists A. Protagoras of Abdera B. Gorgias of Leontini C. Prodicus of Ceos D. Some Other Sophists E. Concluding Summary • Part II: The Classical Period o Chapter I: Socrates A. His Life B. The Character of Socrates C. The Doctrine of Socrates D. The Socratic Schools o Chapter II: Plato A. The Man and His Work B. The Doctrine of Forms C. The Crisis in Plato's Thought D. Plato's Natural Doctrine E. Plato's View of Man o Chapter III: Aristotle A. The Man and his Work B. The Nature and Division of Philosophy C. Aristotle's Logic D. Aristotle's Philosophy of Nature E. Moral and Political Philosophy F. First Philosophy • Part III: The Hellenistic Period o Chapter I: Epicureanism A. Canonic B. Physics C. Ethics D. The History of the School o Chapter II: The Stoics A. Logic B. Physics C. Ethics D.
    [Show full text]