Scits Conference Program

SciTS 2019 Conference May 20-23, 2019 |Lansing, Michigan Host: Center for Interdisciplinarity at Michigan State University Building the knowledge base INSciTS for effective team science International Network for the Science of Team Science

Become a Founding Member of INSciTS INSciTS launched in 2018 as the membership organization for team science and the SciTS field. INSciTS provides a forum to share the latest evidence for what works in team science and collaborate with colleagues to advance the SciTS field.

Individuals leading, engaging in, managing, facilitating, supporting, evaluating, and producing scholarship on team science will find a professional home in INSciTS. All individuals who join INSciTS in 2019 and 2020 will be recognized as founding members. Benefits of Membership: • Receive a reduced annual conference registration rate • Join up to two special interest groups that focus on your core interests • Participate in a year-round forum for dialogue, coordination, and collaboration • Be included in, and access, the INSciTS member directory • Access leadership opportunities in the INSciTS organization

To learn more about membership, including levels and dues, go to: https://www.inscits.org/ While you’re there, read testimonials from current INSciTS members about why they joined.

Please join the conversation -- attend an INSciTS Special Interest Group Meeting at SciTS 2019! INSciTS Special Interest Groups (SIGs) will meet during the SciTS 2019 conference on Tuesday, May 21 at 12:15 pm. Meeting rooms are listed in the conference program.

Please join the conversation! You do not have to be an INSciTS member to participate in a SIG meeting at the SciTS 2019 meeting – all are welcome to participate and share their input! SIGs are chaired by national leaders on key topics in the SciTS field. Current SIGs address: • Fostering team science in academia • Incubator spaces for team science • Training and education for team science • Scientometrics and data analytics • Emerging careers in team science

SIGs build community around shared interests; enable dialogue, coordination of activities, and collaboration throughout the year; advance key priority areas in the SciTS field; and create opportunities to engage with external groups.

To learn more about the SIGs, go to: https://www.inscits.org/sigs Table ofof ContentsContents

WelcomeWelcome ...... 22 INSciTSINSciTS Board Board ...... 33 PlanningPlanning Committee Committee ...... 77 FacilityFacility Map Map ...... 88 SessionSession Evaluation Evaluation Information Information ...... 9 9 ConferenceConference at at a a Glance Glance ...... 1010 Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 SIGs...... 28 SIGs...... 28 Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Workshop Abstracts...... 38 Workshop Abstracts...... 38 Panel Abstracts...... 42 Panel Abstracts...... 42 Oral Abstracts ...... 52 Oral Abstracts ...... 52 Poster Abstracts ...... 106 Poster Abstracts ...... 106 SciTS Awards ...... 118 SciTS Awards ...... 119 Unconference Details ...... 118 Unconference Details ...... 119 Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 119 Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 120 Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 119 Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120

2019 SciTS Conference Program

2019Lansing SciTS Center, ConferenceLansing, Michigan Program | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 1 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome

Dear SciTS 2019 participants,

Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups interestedinterested inin studying,studying, practicing,practicing, andand facilitatingfacilitating teamteam science.science. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science.

The conference leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— has worked closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new directions.

One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative approaches in agriculture and natural resources.

Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments inin ourour planning,planning, drivingdriving ourour callscalls forfor participation,participation, invitedinvited presentations,presentations, andand feefee structure.structure. InIn addition,addition, we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinary research, education, and training.

We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information.

If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges.

Michael O’Rourke Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 2 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome INSciTS BoardTable ofof DirectorsContents

Welcome ...... 2 Dear SciTS 2019 participants, Maritza Salazar Campo, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor at the Paul Merage School of Business. She earned her PhD in Management from the Stern School of Business at New INSciTS Board ...... York University. She studies how interdisciplinary...... and culturally 3 diverse teams collaborate to Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Planning Committee ...... solve complex problems. She is also ...... the recipient of numerous 7 research awards including Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups a major multi-year grant from the National Science Foundation focused on studying and interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. Facility Map ...... facilitating the integrative capacity...... of interdisciplinary science 8 teams through team training. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation She has published her work in journals such as American Psychologist, Group and of the International Network for the Science of Team Science Session Evaluation InformationOrganizational ...... Management, Journal of Organizational...... Behavior 9 and Small Group Research. (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in She has provided training and education about the science of team science at various team science. Conference at a Glance ...... academic institutions around the country...... including the National 10 Academies of Science, NYU’s Langone Medical Center, Stanford’s School of Medicine, and the Feinberg School of Medicine MaritzaFeatured Salazar Keynote Campo, Ph.D.and Plenary Panels...... 14 The conference leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. at Northwestern University. President [email protected] Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— SIGs...... 28 has worked closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new Detailed Daily Schedule ...... Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Ed.D., Ph.D...... is an associate professor 30 of Clinical Research and directions. Leadership and of Pediatrics at the George Washington University School of Medicine Workshop Abstracts...... and Health Sciences. He has been faculty at George Washington 38 University since 2005 and has spent some of that time as faculty at Children’s National Health System. He One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels Panel Abstracts...... is a Morton A. Bender awardee for teaching excellence and 42 past chair of the George research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to Oral Abstracts ...... Washington University Society of Distinguished Teachers. 52 He is committed to the training feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative of well-rounded health professionals with the knowledge, insight, and critical thinking skills approaches in agriculture and natural resources. Poster Abstracts ...... to navigate the changing American healthcare environment 106 and serves as the Director of Doctoral Candidacy for the PhD in Translational Health Sciences at GWU and is the Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments SciTS Awards ...... Tean Science Lead for the Clinical Translational Science 119Institute at George Washington in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, University. Professor Lotrecchiano’s research interests include complexity leadership and we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather GaetanoUnconference R. Lotrecchiano, Details ...... characteristics, transdisciplinary team...... science, and motivation 119 in team collaboration and Ed.D., Ph.D. principal investigator of the Motivation Assessment for Team Readiness Integration and than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 120 for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- Vice President / President-Elect Collaboration (MATRICx) project. [email protected] disciplinary research, education, and training. Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120

We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Ph.D., is the Vice President, Research Intelligence on the Global active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such Strategic Networks team at Elsevier, where her responsibilities center on how insights as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information. from data, metrics, and analytics guide collaboration and strategic planning for research institutions, funders, and science policy organizations. Prior to joining Elsevier, Dr. Falk- If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those Krzesinski was a faculty member and administrator at Northwestern University where of us with red ribbons on our name badges. she launched a unit in the central Office for Research to support the development of interdisciplinary and collaborative grant proposals and built out a team science unit for the university’s Clinical and Translational Science Institute. Through her leadership with the Michael O’Rourke Annual International Science of Team Science Conference, TeamScience.net development, Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference research on reward and recognition for team science, team science consulting work, and involvement with three national team science initiatives, Dr. Falk-Krzesinski has been instrumental in developing a strong international community of practice for team science and Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Ph.D. the field of study called the science of team science (SciTS). Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019 Secretary [email protected]

2019 SciTS Conference Program 20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 3 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | |[email protected]@gmail.com | |https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org INSciTS2019 SciTS Board Conference of Directors Welcome

Kevin C. Wooten, Ph.D. is currently Chair and Professor of Management and Human Dear SciTS 2019 participants, Resource Management at the University of Houston at Clear Lake. He teaches courses in Organizational Behavior, Organizational Theory, Organizational Design, as well as Human Welcome to the 2019 Science ofResource Team Management Science (SciTS) courses such as Employee Selection, Organizational Development, Conference, the 10th annual gatheringand Employee of individualsTraining. He also and serves groups as an adjunct faculty member in the Department of interested in studying, practicing,Psychology and facilitating at Rice University, team and science. the Department of Preventative Medicine at the University of This meeting is also the first SciTSTexas –conference Medical Branch since at Galveston. formation Prior to joining the University of Houston System, Kevin of the International Network forserved the Science on the faculty of Teamof the A.B. Science Freeman School of Business at Tulane University, teaching (INSciTS), a professional societyOrganizational advancing Behavior related in the interests Executive inMBA Program. He is also the co-founder of the UHCL team science. MBA for Physicians Program, and currently serves as the Consulting Director of Tracking and Evaluation and Lead Consultant for Team Science for the University of Texas Medical Branch – Clinical and Translational Science Award. Kevin also serves on the Executive Committee and The conference leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. Kevin C. Wooten, Ph.D. the Board of Directors for the International Science of Team Science Association. Vasko,Treasurer Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— [email protected] worked closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new directions. Zaida Chinchilla Rodríguez, Ph.D., is Associate Research Professor at the Institute of Public Goods and Policies (IPP) of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC). She completed One of our aims for SciTS 2019her is Masterto demonstrate and PhD. in Libraryhow team and Information science Science animates at the andUniversity propels of Granada (Spain) research in environmental science,within agriculture, the SCImago Researchand natural Group. resources. In 2008, she movedTo this to Madridend, we(Spain) are to pleased work with ato feature for the first time panels tenuredfocusing position on Indigenousin CSIC. Since then,approa sheches acts as to an team external science advisor forand SCImago collaborative Lab.She approaches in agriculture and naturalis a social resources. scientist specialized in bibliometrics with a particular focus on institutional and national-level analysis. Her research interests include scientometrics, research evaluation, Other values drive SciTS 2019 asscholarly well. communication, Diversity and the inclusion science of teamhave science, been and fundamental information visualization. commitments She in our planning, driving our callshas for participated participation, in numerous invited research presentations, projects and contractsand fee for structure. different governments In addition, and we have worked to ensure a “green”funding conference, agencies. She hasgiving been you extensively the option working of on an drafting online scientific program reports rather and served as an analyst for a number of governments and research institutions analyzing national and than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center global developments in science and technology. She is actively involved in mentoring and Zaidafor Interdisciplinarity Chinchilla Rodriguez, seeks to createservice opportunities and has published to in refine numerous thinking prestigious about journals. collaboration Currently, she and is Associate cross- Ph.D.disciplinary research, education,Editor and of training. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. [email protected] We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such as kickboxing and pottery. PleaseDr. consult Stephen M.the Fiore, website Ph.D., foris Director, more Cognitivedetailed Sciences information. Laboratory, and Professor with the University of Central Florida's Cognitive Sciences Program in the Department If you have any questions or commentsof Philosophy for andthe Institute SciTS for 2019 Simulation Planning & Training. Committee, He maintains please a multidisciplinary look for those of us with red ribbons on our nameresearch badges. interest that incorporates aspects of the cognitive, social, organizational, and computational sciences in the investigation of learning and performance in individuals and Michael O’Rourke teams. His primary area of research is the interdisciplinary study of complex collaborative Chair, 2019 Science of Team Sciencecognition Conference and the understanding of how humans interact socially and with technology. Dr. Fiore is a founding conference committee member for the Science of Team Science annual conference, and a founding board member and past-president of the Interdisciplinary Network for Group Research. He has contributed to working groups for the National Academies of Sciences in understanding and measuring "21st Century Skills" and was Stephen M. Fiore,Lansing Ph.D. Center WIFIa committee Information member -of Username: their "Science of scits Team Science"and Password: consensus study, 2019 as well as a [email protected] member of the National Assessment of Educational Progress report Collaborative Problem Solving.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 4 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org INSciTS BoardTable ofof ContentsDirectors

Welcome ...... Kara L. Hall, Ph.D., is the Director of the Science of Team Science 2 (SciTS), the Director of the Theories Initiative, health scientist, and program director in the Behavioral Research Program INSciTS Board ...... of the Division of Cancer Control and...... Population Sciences at 3National Cancer Institute (NCI) of Planning Committee ...... the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr...... Hall helped launch 7and build the SciTS field through her leadership in conducting empirical studies, developing conceptual frameworks, creating Facility Map ...... practical strategies and resources,...... editing special journal issues, 8 chairing the Annual SciTS Conferences, and founding board member of INSciTS. Dr. Hall’s work aims to build an evidence Session Evaluation Informationbase for effective ...... team science approaches and...... support the translation9 of emerging knowledge into policies and practices. Notably, she served as a member of The National Academies Conference at a GlanceCommittee ...... on the Science of Team Science...... (2012-15), which 10 produced the report, Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (listed in the top 30 most downloaded National Academies Featured Keynote and PressPlenary reports Panels...... out of the more than 9000 released online...... since 14 1994). KaraSIGs...... Hall, Ph.D...... 28 [email protected] Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Andi Hess, MS(Tech) is the Director of the Interdisciplinary Translation and Integration Workshop Abstracts...... Sciences Initiative at Arizona State University, which aims to help38 research teams across the university bridge disciplinary gaps. Her research focuses on the Science of Team Science and Panel Abstracts...... Interdisciplinary Translation, a process of actively facilitating the42 exchange of knowledge across Oral Abstracts ...... disciplinary languages in team research settings. Through the 52 initiative, Andi organizes and leads custom workshops on the Science of Team Science for faculty interested in increasing the Poster Abstracts ...... effectiveness of team science projects. She is currently designing 106 Interdisciplinary Translation curriculum to develop team science competencies in undergraduate programs, and Continuing SciTS Awards ...... Education programs for Socio-Technical Integration Research. 119 Other research interests include issues of identity, conflict resolution, and intercultural competencies. She teaches courses in Unconference Details ...... Interdisciplinary Studies and Organizational...... Leadership, and 119serves as the Faculty Director for multiple Study Abroad programs. AndiThanks Hess, MS(Tech)to our Reviewers ...... 120 [email protected] Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120

Julie Thompson Klein, Ph.D., is Professor of Humanities Emerita in the English Department at Wayne State University and an Affiliate of the TdLab (Transdisciplinarity Lab) at the ETH-Zurich university for science and technology in Switzerland. She has also been a Mellon Fellow and a Visiting Professor in Digital Humanities at the University of Michigan. Klein is past president of the Association for Interdisciplinary Studies (AIS) and former editor of the AIS journal Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies. Her books include Interdisciplinarity (l990), Interdisciplinary Studies Today (co-edited 1994), Crossing Boundaries (1996), Transdisciplinarity (co-edited 2001), Interdisciplinary Education in K-12 and College (edited 2002),Mapping Interdisciplinary Studies (1999), Humanities, Culture, and Interdisciplinarity (2005), Creating Interdisciplinary Campus Cultures (2010), and Interdisciplining Digital Humanities (2015). She was also Associate Editor of The Oxford Handbook on Interdisciplinarity (2010, 2017). She has received numerous honors, including the Kenneth Boulding Award for outstanding scholarship on interdisciplinarity, Julie Thompson Klein, Ph.D. the Yamamoorthy & Yeh Distinguished Transdisciplinary Achievement Award, the Joseph Katz [email protected] Award for Distinguished Contributions to the Practice and Discourse of General and Liberal Education, and the Science of Team Science Recognition Award.

20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 5 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | |[email protected]@gmail.com | | https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org INSciTS2019 SciTS Board Conference of Directors Welcome

Shalini Misra, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs Dear SciTS 2019 participants, at Virginia Tech. Her research focuses on the social, psychological, and cultural implications of the Internet and mobile communication technologies; and the study of the processes and Welcome to the 2019 Science ofoutcomes Team of Science transdisciplinary (SciTS) collaborative scientific, training, and action research initiatives. Conference, the 10th annual gatheringKey themes of in individualsher research and and writing groups include: cognitive and health consequences of interested in studying, practicing,information and facilitating overload and team multitasking; science. interpersonal relationships in ubiquitous computing This meeting is also the first SciTSenvironments; conference environmental since orientations, formation identity, and sense of community in the Digital of the International Network forAge; the contextual Science influences of Team on Science interdisciplinary collaboration; interdisciplinary education and (INSciTS), a professional societycurriculum advancing development; related and interests evaluation inof team science initiatives. Her research has been team science. supported by grants from NSF, NIH, Urban Communication Foundation, Intel Digital Cultures, and the National Academies Keck Futures Initiative. She has a Ph.D. in Planning,Policy, and Design from University of California Irvine, an M.S. degree in Sustainable Resource The conference leadership teamManagement —myself, (Technical Dr. Stephanie University ofE. Munich, Germany) and a B.S. degree in Civil Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— Shalini Misra, Ph.D. Engineering (Gujarat University, India). [email protected] worked closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new directions. Darshana T. Shah, Ph.D., is a professor of pathology and associate dean for faculty One of our aims for SciTS 2019advancement is to demonstrate at the Marshall how University team scienceJoan C. Edwards animates School and of Medicine. propels Her passion research in environmental science,for service agriculture, has led her and to attain natural diverse resources. institutional roles, To thisnotably end, serving we as are founding pleased editor- to feature for the first time panelsin-chief focusing of the Marshallon Indigenous Journal of Medicine,approaches peer-reviewed to team open science access and academic collaborative journal. The focus of Dr. Shah’s work has been collaborating with institutional leaders in supporting approaches in agriculture and natural resources. faculty by creating resources, guiding policy-building and contributing to the development of programs and practices that positively impact the career advancement of faculty. Her research Other values drive SciTS 2019 andas scholarshipwell. Diversity delve deeply and intoinclusion faculty vitality have and been retention. fundamental Dr. Shah has commitments held a number in our planning, driving our callsof forleadership participation, positions in invited regional, presentations,national and international and feeorganizations, structure. including In addition, serving we have worked to ensure a “green”as national conference, chair of the Association giving you of American the option Medical of Colleges’an online Group program on Faculty rather Affairs to than a printed one and workingsupport to reduce the mission food of waste. building Andand sustaining as the primaryfaculty vitality host, in medical the MSU schools Center and teaching for Interdisciplinarity seeks to createhospitals. opportunities As president of tothe refine Group for thinking Research about in Pathology collaboration Education, Dr. and Shah cross- led an disciplinary research, education,academic and training. society of medical educators who teach pathology and supported the promotion of scholarly research and innovation in medical education. DarshanaWe hope thatT. Shah, you Ph.D.have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an [email protected] active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such as kickboxing and pottery. PleasePips consult Veazey, Ph.D.,the website is the Associate for more Project detailed Director for information. the Alaska Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR), a statewide program funded by the National If you have any questions or commentsScience Foundation for the andSciTS the State2019 of AlaskaPlanning aimed Committee, at increasing research please capacity. look for She those is of us with red ribbons on our namealso thebadges. lead and creator of Vis Space, a high-resolution visual environment designed to promote conversations about complex problems, develop creative solutions and enhance Michael O’Rourke team development. Her research interests include the development and implementation of Chair, 2019 Science of Team Scienceinterdisciplinary Conference research teams, the interaction between teams and technology, and team science leadership.Building on academic foundations in psychology (BA, Bates College) and oceanography (MS, University of Alaska, Fairbanks), she completed an interdisciplinary doctoral degree in team science leadership at UAF, examining the competencies required to be an effective leader of large interdisciplinary team science projects. She carries a passion Lansing Center WIFIfor synthesizing Information and implementing - Username: team sciencescits research and Password: to create more 2019 effective science Pips Veazey, Ph.D. teams to help propel innovative and transformative research. [email protected]

2019 SciTS Conference Program 6 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org SciTS 2019 Planning & AdvisoryTable ofCommittees Contents

CONFERENCEWelcome ...... CHAIR 2 Michael O’Rourke, Interim Director, MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity, Professor of Philosophy, AgBioResearch,INSciTS Board Michigan ...... State University ...... 3 CONFERENCEPlanning Committee LEADERSHIP ...... COMMITTEE ...... 7 Stephanie E. Vasko, PhD, Managing Director, Center for Interdisciplinarity, Michigan State University Facility Map ...... 8 Julie Thompson Klein, Professor of Humanities Emerita, English Department, Wayne State University; InternationalSession Research Evaluation Affiliate, Information Transdisciplinary ...... Lab (USYSTdLab),...... ETH-Zurich 9

PLANNINGConference COMMITTEE at a Glance ...... 10 Laura Challman Anderson, Research Staff Member – Science to Solutions, IBM Research—Almaden Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 Stephen David Beck, PhD, Derryl & Helen Haymon Professor of Music, Associate Vice President, Office of ResearchSIGs...... & Economic Development, Louisiana State University...... 28 HeatherDetailed Billings, Daily PhD, Schedule Assistant Professor, ...... Administrative Lead for...... Team Science, Center30 for Clinical and Translation Science, Mayo Clinic Workshop Abstracts...... 38 Stephen Crowley, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Boise State University KarenPanel Demby, Abstracts...... Administrative Director for Team Science, North Carolina Translational 42 and Clinical Sciences Institute,Oral AbstractsUniversity of ...... North Carolina at Chapel Hill 52 Deborah DiazGranados, Assistant Professor, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Poster Abstracts ...... 106 Christine Ogilvie Hendren, PhD, Assistant Research Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,SciTS Awards Duke University, ...... Executive Director, Center for the Environmental Implications 119 of NanoTechnology (CEINT) Unconference Details ...... 119 Patricia Jones, Lead, Common Metrics Initiative, Program Director, Division of Clinical Innovation, National CenterThanks for Advancing to our ReviewersTranslational Sciences,...... National Institutes of Health...... 120 ScottPost Leischow, Conference Professor Evaluation of Population Information...... Health, Director, Translational Teams,...... College 120 of Health Solutions, Arizona State University Anne Heberger Marino, Program Director Emeritus, Keck Futures Initiative, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Wayne T. McCormack, Distinguished Teaching Scholar & Professor, Dept. of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida Betsy Rolland, Assistant Director of Population Sciences, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin- Madison Amanda Vogel, Global Health Evaluation Specialist, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc.

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Marilyn Amey, Educational Administration Dan Ilgen, Psychology and Management Kendra Cheruvelil, Fisheries & Wildlife Steve Kozlowski, Psychology John Hollenbeck, Management Pat Soranno, Fisheries & Wildlife

20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 7 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | |[email protected]@gmail.com | |https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org 2019Lansing SciTS Center Conference Facility WelcomeMap Lansing Center Overview

Dear SciTS 2019 participants,

Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation Dock C of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science.

One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and Dockpropels A research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative

approachesver in agriculture and natural resources.

OtherGrand Ri values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinary research, education, and training.

If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges.

Michael O’Rourke Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference Michigan Avenue

MAP KEY Removable Walls Elevators Men’s Bathroom Coat Check Women’s Bathroom Drinking First Aid Fountain Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019 Here's a quick overview of our space:

2019 SciTS27,000+ Conference sq. ft. Program13,320 sq. ft. 12,038 sq. ft. registration space ballroom space of meeting space in 8 a total of 12 break Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] rooms .| https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents

ShareWelcome your...... Feedback 2 INSciTS Board ...... 3 onPlanning the Committee Conference ...... 7 SessionsFacility Map ...... you Attend ...... 8

LoveSession your mobileEvaluation device? Information ...... 9 UseConference it to give us at feedbacka Glance ...... 10 on the conference! Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 Here’sSIGs...... how: ...... 28 AccessDetailed the Dailyfeedback Schedule form ...... 30 onWorkshop your mobile Abstracts...... device or 38 laptop anytime here: Panel Abstracts...... 42 https:bit.ly/scits2019Oral Abstracts ...... or here 52 Poster Abstracts ...... 106 SciTS Awards ...... 119 Unconference Details ...... 119 University Outreach Thanks to our Reviewers ...... and Engagement 120 Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120 This should take you <2 minutes to complete

Aggregated feedback will be used to help improve programming at future SciTS conferences.

Thank you! SciTS 2019 Conference Evaluation Committee COLLABORATING WITH COMMUNITIES IMPROVING LIVES - BY - Facilitating university-community partnerships for broader impacts Promoting access to the University through public events, web portals, and K-12 programming Providing educational programs to develop community- engaged scholarship for faculty, staff, and students 2019 SciTS Conference Program engage.msu.edu 9 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org MSU is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity employer. 2019Conf SciTSerenc eConference at a Glanc Welcomee

Dear SciTS 2019 participants,

WelcomeMonday, to the May 2019 20, Science 2019 of Team Science (SciTS) Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9 :00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 interesteda.m. a.m. in studying,a.m. a.m. practicing,a.m. a.m.and facilitatinga.m. teama.m. science.a.m. a.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team ScienceRegistration (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science. Workshops Conference Welcome to SciTS TheRegistration conference leadershipTeaching team the —myself,Science of Team Dr. Science Stephanie (SciTS) E. Ballrooms 1-2 2019 Dr. Michael O’Rourke Vasko,Opens Dr. Julie ThompsonNavigating Klein, team and power Megghan dynamics in authorship Honke decisions Seidel— Room 101 has worked closely with theOptimizing SciTS mentoring 2019 relationships Planning in team Committee science: An engine and Room the 102 INSciTS board toDr. design Stephanie a E. Vasko for scientific accomplishment and inclusive excellence conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in excitingMSU Provost new directions. Mapping translational research stories: Team science Room 103 June Youatt Breakfast Lobby Coat Ballrooms 5-8 storytelling using the NIEHS translational research framework Room Community playbooks and collaboration guides-creating Ballrooms 3-4 Lansing Mayor

One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates andLunch on your own propels documentation to facilitate effective scientific teamwork Andy Schor research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to TBL 101: Introduction to team-based learning Room 104 feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborativeBallrooms 1-4 approaches in agriculture and natural resources.

Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, weTuesday, have worked May 21, to 2019ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center for8:00 Interdisciplinarity8:30 9 :00 9:30 seeks 10:00to create 10:30opportunities 11:00 to refine11:30 thinking12:00 about12:30 collaboration1:00 and cross-1:30 2 :00 a.m. a.m. a.m. a.m. a.m. a.m. a.m. a.m. p.m. p.m p.m. p.m. p.m. disciplinary research, education, and training.

We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while Registrationyou enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such

as kickboxing and pottery. Please consultConcurrent the website Sessions for more detailedSIGs information. Plenary Panel Rm 101 Innovating with Technology Rm 101 Fostering Team Science in If you have anyTeam questions Science orin comments for the SciTS 2019 PlanningAcademia Committee, please look for those Spatially Situated Case Studies Rm 102 of us with red ribbonsAgriculture on and our name badges. Team Science Training Rm 102 Collaboration Readiness Rm 103 Natural Resources Incubator Spaces for Team Rm 103 Michael O’Rourke Tools For Team Science & The Rm 104 Science Breakfast

Ballrooms 5-8 Science of Team Science Chair, 2019 Science of Team ScienceBallrooms 5-8 Conference Scientometrics and Data Rm 104 Training & Professional Brm 1-4 Analytics for Team Science Ballrooms 1-4 Development Lunch on your own Interreach Brm 1-4

Break and Sponsorand Break Showcase

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 10 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org ConferTableence aoft aContents Glance

Welcome ...... 2 INSciTS Board ...... 3 Planning Committee ...... 7 2 :00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6 :00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 p.m. Facilityp.m. Mapp.m...... p.m. p.m. p.m...... p.m. p.m. p.m. 8 p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. Session Evaluation Information ...... Registration ...... 9 Conference at a Glance ...... 10 Concurrent Panels Featured KeynoteIntereach and Community Plenary Effort... Panels...... Rm 101 Plenary Panel...... 14 Networking Reception at The Resilience of Team Science... Rm 102 Indigenous Lansing Brewing SIGs...... Approaches to 28 Company Keynote Changing Academic Institutional Rm 103 Culture to Facilitate and Support Team Science Joy Balls-Berry Detailed Daily ScheduleTeam Science ...... 30 Mayo Clinic Increasing Research Effectiveness Rm 104 Workshop Abstracts...... through Team Science Training for 38

Ballrooms 1-4 Ballrooms 5-8 Ballrooms 5-8 Research Teams 7:30 p.m. Panel Abstracts...... 42BreakRefreshand How to design teams, space and Rm 201 Networking Dinners Ballrooms 1-4 (Self-Pay) Break and Sponsorand Break Showcase careers for better team science; a Sponsorand Break Showcase Oral Abstracts ...... practical guide. 52 Poster Abstracts ...... 106 SciTS Awards ...... 119 Unconference Details ...... 119

2:30 Thanks3:00 to our Reviewers3:30 4:00 ...... 4:30 5:00 5:30 6...... :00 6:30 1207:00 7:30 8:00 p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120

Registration

Concurrent Sessions Rm 101 Plenary Panel SocioEnvionmental Team MSU Public Health Sponsored Dinner Science of Groups Science Integrating Team Science with Health and Teams Team Science Evaluation Rm 102 Science Research and Practice Team Process Rm 103 Artistic & Humanistic Rm 104 Ballrooms 5-8 Approaches to Team Science BreakRefreshand Ballrooms 1-4 Organizational & Management Brm 1-4 Ballrooms 1-4 Factors Break and Sponsorand Break Showcase

2019 SciTS Conference Program 11 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019Conf SciTSerenc eConference at a Glanc Welcomee

Dear SciTS 2019 participants, Wednesday, May 22, 2019 Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference,8:00 8:30 9the :00 10th9:30 annual10:00 gathering10:30 of individuals11:00 and11:30 groups 12:00 12:30 1:00 p.m. 1:30 2 :00 interesteda.m. a.m. in a.m.studying, a.m. practicing,a.m. and a.m.facilitating a.m. team science.a.m. p.m. p.m p.m. p.m. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team ScienceRegistration (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in

team science. Concurrent Sessions The conferencePlenary leadership Panel team —myself,Collaborative Dr. Networks Stephanie E. Rm 101 Buffet Lunch Changing Scale and Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, andEducation Megghan & Teaching Honke Team Seidel—Rm 102 & Scope of has worked closely with the SciTS 2019Science Planning Committee and the INSciTS boardPlenary to Panel design a Collaboration Rm 103 conference that builds on existing researchDiversity On and Teams practice strengths whileAgency also Approaches pointing in to exciting Team Science new Scaffolding & Academic Settings Rm 104 Breakfast

directions.Ballrooms 5-8 Ballrooms 5-8 PANEL: Collaborative Scientific Brm 1-4 Writing: Challenges & Strategies One of our aims Ballroomsfor SciTS 1-4 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates andBallrooms propels 1-4

research in environmental science,Sponsorand Break Showcase agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative approaches in agriculture and natural resources.

Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments inThursday, our planning, May driving 23, 2019 our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather 8:00 8:30 9 :00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2 :00 thana.m. a a.m.printed a.m. one anda.m. workinga.m. to reducea.m. food waste.a.m. And asa.m. the primaryp.m. host,p.m. the MSUp.m. Center p.m. p.m. for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinary research, education, and training. Registration We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an Concurrent Panels active downtownConcurrent with restaurants, Sessions local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such as kickboxingHigh and Level pottery. Theory Please consultRm 101 the websitePreparing for Students more for Interdisciplinarydetailed information. Rm 101 Collaboration and Team Research… Light Lunch CTSA Rm 102 Closing Session Reward and Recognition for Team-Based If you have anyDisciplinary questions Diversity - Theoryor comments Rm 103 for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee,Rm 102 please look for those and Cross-disciplinary Research of us with redand ribbons Praxis on our name badges. SciCom meets SciTS. Interdisciplinary Creative Approaches To Support Brm 1-4 Rm 103

Breakfast teamwork for science communication Ballrooms 5-8

Team Science in Academia Ballrooms 5-8 Michael O’Rourke training Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference Banquet 1-4 Identifying the Behaviors and Actions of Brm 1-4 Facilitators of Successful Teams Sponsorand Break Showcase

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 12 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org ConferTableence aoft aContents Glance

Welcome ...... 2 INSciTS Board ...... 3

2:30Planning 3:00 Committee3:30 ...... 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 ...... 6 :00 6:30 77:00 7:30 8:00 p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. Facility Map ...... 8

Session Evaluation Information ...... Registration ...... 9 Conference at a Glance ...... 10 Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 Poster Session MICHR Sponsored Dinner Sponsor Showcase SIGs...... Unconference ...... Cultivating 28Team Science in and Reception Clinical and Translational Detailed Daily Schedule ...... Research 30 Workshop Abstracts...... Ballrooms 1‐4 38 Ballrooms 5-8 Ballrooms 1-4 Panel Abstracts...... 42 Oral Abstracts ...... 52 Poster Abstracts ...... 106 SciTS Awards ...... 119 Unconference Details ...... 119 Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 120 Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120

2019 SciTS Conference Program 13 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Featured2019 SciTS Speaker Conference Welcome

Dear SciTS 2019 participants, Joyce (Joy) Balls-Berry, Ph.D. , Mayo Clinic Joyce (Joy) Balls-Berry, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Epidemiology and Senior Associate Welcome to the 2019 Science ofConsultant Team Science at Mayo Clinic (SciTS) College of Medicine and Science. She completed her formal Conference, the 10th annual gatheringeducation ofat Xavierindividuals University and of Louisiana groups with graduate training at Washington University interested in studying, practicing,School and of facilitating Medicine and team The University science. of Toledo. She completed a post-doctoral research fellowship in health equity, epidemiology, and biostatistics at The University of Florida. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation Her work as a scientist centers on increasing awareness of the importance of community- of the International Network for thepatient Science engagement of Team in research Science to increase health equity in minority and under-resourced (INSciTS), a professional societycommunities. advancing Dr. relatedBalls-Berry interests is the principal in investigator of several health disparities research team science. studies. Recently, she completed a PCORI project to expand the efforts of the Minority Women in Research Network, which she established in 2011. The network’s mission is to The conference leadership teampromote —myself, community-patient Dr. Stephanie engagement E. in research conducted by minority women scientists Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein,interested and Megghan in research Honkecollaborations, Seidel— academic scholarship, innovation, and dissemination. has worked closely with the SciTSShe 2019is the co-PI Planning of a National Committee Science Foundation and the GrantINSciTS that seeks board to expandto design opportunities a conferencefor diverse scientists. that builds As an educator, on existing she received research the Mayo and Clinic practice Teacher strengths of Year and while CCaTS also Educator pointing of the Yearin exciting awards. The new directions.faculty and the student body vote on these awards. Recently, she shared her story of living with dyslexia and handling personal challenges as TEDx Talk. Dr. Balls-Berry has served as a mentor and coach for students, academics, and leaders. Her work as a Onementor of focuses our aims on assisting for SciTS others 2019 in finding is totheir demonstrate true calling. how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to featureFocus areas for ofthe research: first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative approaches• Determining in agriculture the best community-engaged and natural resources. research approaches to increase health equity in populations at risk of premature death from preventable diseases Other• valuesEvaluation drive of the SciTS best practices 2019 asfor returningwell. Diversity cumulative and research inclusion results tohave study been participants fundamental commitments • Determining the perceptions and practices of African-Americans’ participation in clinical research in the post-Tuskegee in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, experiment era we have• Evaluation worked of to the ensure pedagogical a “green” approaches conference, to increase learners’ giving (students, you the trainees, option fellowsof an andonline community program members) rather than a printedknowledge one of community-engaged and working to researchreduce and food health waste. disparities And as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinarySignificance toresearch, patient care education, and training. Dr. Balls-Berry’s research will help to improve patient care by helping community members learn new approaches to increase wellness. WeMuch hope of Dr. thatBalls-Berry’s you have research an focusesexcellent on bringing time in awareness Lansing to whilepopulations you that enjoy we serve, SciTS and 2019. she hopes Lansing this work has promotes an activethoughtful downtown collaborative with partnerships restaurants, among communitylocal art members,shops, runningmedical practitioners trails, and and local academic community researchers classes to activity such commi t to ashelping kickboxing to improve and health pottery. care of individuals Please andconsult communities.Furthermore, the website for moreDr. Balls-Berry detailed is encouraged information. that this work will ultimately help to put the needs of our patients and communities first. If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges.

Michael O’Rourke Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

20192019 SciTSSciTS ConferenceConference ProgramProgram 14 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | | [email protected]@gmail.com | | https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org Featured Speaker TablePlenary of ContentsPanelists

Joyce (Joy) Balls-Berry, Ph.D. , Mayo Clinic IndigenousWelcome Approaches ...... to Team Science 2 Joyce (Joy) Balls-Berry, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Epidemiology and Senior Associate ThisINSciTS panel will Board discuss ...... the different roles that collaboration...... plays in Indigenous 3 responses to complex, Consultant at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science. She completed her formal socio-environmental problems in Canada and the United States. education at Xavier University of Louisiana with graduate training at Washington University Planning Committee ...... Dr. Kyle7 Whyte School of Medicine and The University of Toledo. She completed a post-doctoral research Henry Lickers Jimmie D Mitchell Jr Seneca Nation, Turtle Clan Chippewa Ottawa Resource Michigan State University fellowship in health equity, epidemiology, and biostatistics at The University of Florida. Facility Map ...... 8 Authority Her work as a scientist centers on increasing awareness of the importance of community- patient engagement in research to increase health equity in minority and under-resourced Session Evaluation InformationJimmie ...... has actively served on the ...... 9 communities. Dr. Balls-Berry is the principal investigator of several health disparities research Board of the Chippewa Ottawa studies. Recently, she completed a PCORI project to expand the efforts of the Minority Conference at a Glance ...... Resource Authority since 2003. He...... 10 has focused his attention on protecting Women in Research Network, which she established in 2011. The network’s mission is to Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 promote community-patient engagement in research conducted by minority women scientists the environment and also Tribal Rights interested in research collaborations, academic scholarship, innovation, and dissemination. SIGs...... secured in the Treaty ...... of 1836 and 28 She is the co-PI of a National Science Foundation Grant that seeks to expand opportunities since, reaffirmed in the 2000 and 2007 Detailed Daily Schedule ...... Consent Decrees, respectively.His...... 30 for diverse scientists. As an educator, she received the Mayo Clinic Teacher of Year and CCaTS Educator of the Year awards. The involvement during the contentious faculty and the student body vote on these awards. Recently, she shared her story of living with dyslexia and handling personal Workshop Abstracts...... Inland phase of the landmark US v 38 challenges as TEDx Talk. Dr. Balls-Berry has served as a mentor and coach for students, academics, and leaders. Her work as a Michigan court case, was instrumental Henry Lickers is a member of Seneca mentor focuses on assisting others in finding their true calling. Panel Abstracts...... in convincing the parties to negotiate 42 Nation, Turtle Clan. He has been Kyle Whyte, Ph.D., is a professor the case out of court. The results of this married for 47 years and has three and environmental activist working Focus areas of research: Oral Abstracts ...... painstaking effort served to reaffirm the 52 grown children. He has been the at Michigan State University. He • Determining the best community-engaged research approaches to increase health equity in populations at risk of premature existence of Inland Hunting, Fishing and Director of the Mohawk Council focuses on teaching and research death from preventable diseases Poster Abstracts ...... Gathering Rights, within the boundaries 106 of Akwesasne, Department of the • Evaluation of the best practices for returning cumulative research results to study participants of the 13.8 million acre Ceded Territory on #NoDAPL and Indigenous EnvironmentSciTS forAwards 33 years and...... is now 119 • Determining the perceptions and practices of African-Americans’ participation in clinical research in the post-Tuskegee and also, garnered Co-management climate justice, and places where the Environmental Science Officer experiment era rights and obligations outlined and you can follow my updates. the Unconferencepast 6 years. During this Details time, ...... 119 • Evaluation of the pedagogical approaches to increase learners’ (students, trainees, fellows and community members) secured within the 2007 Decree. He Whyte specifically focuses on he has been principle investigator on knowledge of community-engaged research and health disparities Thanks to our Reviewers ...... currently serves as an appointed ...... the problems120 and possibilities the EAGLE (Effects on Aboriginals representative on the Midwest Region Indigenous peoples face regarding in the Great Lakes Environment) Significance to patient care Post Conference Evaluation TribalInformation...... Interior Budget Committee which ...... 120 Project and the Naturalized Knowledge climate change, environmental Dr. Balls-Berry’s research will help to improve patient care by helping community members learn new approaches to increase wellness. is aimed to provide tribal guidance to Systems Project and the First Nation’s justice, and food sovereignty. He Much of Dr. Balls-Berry’s research focuses on bringing awareness to populations that we serve, and she hopes this work promotes insure the Trust Responsibilities of Community Health Indicators Project, participates in a variety of programs thoughtful collaborative partnerships among community members, medical practitioners and academic researchers to activity commit to the United States to Tribal Nations all of these projects are investigating at Michigan State University that helping to improve health care of individuals and communities.Furthermore, Dr. Balls-Berry is encouraged that this work will ultimately are realized and incorporated into the First Nations Environmental issues. He include Philosophy, Community help to put the needs of our patients and communities first. President's Budget. On behalf of his was also one of the contributors to the Tribal Nation, the Little River Band Sustainability, American Indian & First Nation Environment Assessment of Ottawa Indians he is the Director Indigenous Studies, Environmental Toolkit for Ontario, Chiefs of Ontario. of Natural Resources and is one of Science & Policy, Environmental their Traditional Carriers of the Sacred Philosophy & Ethics and the Pipe. He is also an active member Geocognition Research Lab. of Maaingun Dodem, (Wolf clan), he was born in Muskegon, Michigan, has traveled extensively throughout the world and now lives in Manistee with his family in a remote corner of 1836 reservation.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 15 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | |[email protected]@gmail.com | |https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org Plenary2019 SciTS Panelists Conference Welcome

DearTeam SciTS Science 2019 in participants, Agriculture and Natural Resources This panel will address how research in agriculture and natural resources both depends on and Welcomeinforms team to the science. 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Dr.Conference, Nick Haddad the 10th annual gatheringDr. Janiceof individuals Siegford and groups Dr. Patricia Soranno interestedMichigan State in studying,University practicing, andMichigan facilitating State teamUniversity science. Michigan State University This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science.

Dr.Welcome Scott Swinton ...... Moderator: Notes: 2 Michigan State University INSciTS Board ...... Sheril Kirshenbaum...... 3 Michigan State University Planning Committee ...... 7 Facility Map ...... 8 Session Evaluation Information ...... 9 Conference at a Glance ...... 10 Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 SIGs...... 28 Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Workshop Abstracts...... 38 ScottPanel Swinton Abstracts...... is Professor in the Sheril Kirshenbaum works to enhance 42 Department of Agricultural, Food, and public understanding of science and ResourceOral EconomicsAbstracts at Michigan ...... State improve communication between 52 University. His research examines scientists, policymakers and the public. agriculturePoster as aAbstracts managed ecosystem, ...... She has authored two books and her 106 focusing on decision analysis for writing appears in popular publications enhancedSciTS ecosystem Awards services...... He and scientific journals. Sheril has been 119 concentratesUnconference on problems Detailsinvolving ...... a 2015 Presidential Leadership...... Scholar, 119 crop, pest, pollination, and nutrient a Marshall Memorial Fellow, a legislative management;Thanks precision to our agriculture; Reviewers ...... Fellow in the U.S. Senate and a Next...... 120 resource conservation; and bioenergy Generation Fellow through the Robert production.Post ConferenceThroughout his career, Evaluation Scott StraussInformation...... Center for International Security ...... 120 has worked on multidisciplinary teams and Law. She speaks internationally (mostly with biologists) seeking ways to about science communication and has make agriculture more sustainable via appeared at events like TEDGlobal and improved technology, information, and Cuidad de las Ideas. Sheril currently incentives. His research in the USA, hosts "Our Table" at Michigan State Latin America, and Africa has been cited University. over 9,000 times (Google Scholar). Scott currently teaches undergraduate managerial economics and graduate research design & writing. He was elected president of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA) for 2016-19 after serving as director (2012-15).

20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 17 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | |[email protected]@gmail.com | |https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org Plenary2019 SciTS Panelists Conference Welcome

DearScience SciTS of 2019Groups participants, and Teams This panel will address recent work on the nature and function of teams and multi-team systems, with Welcomeperspectives to the from 2019 psychology, Science ofmanagement, Team Science and (SciTS) organizational behavior Conference,Dr. Lindred the (Lindy) 10th annual Greer gatheringDr. ofJohn individuals Hollenbeck and groups Dr. Daniel Ilgen interestedUniversity of in Michigan studying, practicing, andMichigan facilitating State teamUniversity science. Michigan State University This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science.

One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to Lindred (Lindy) Greer is Associate Daniel R. Ilgen is John A. Hannah feature for the first time panels focusingJohn R. onHollenbeck Indigenous holds the approa positionsches to team science and collaborative Professor of Management & of University Distinguished Professor Distinguished Professor Emeritus approaches in agriculture and natural resources. Organizations and faculty director of at Michigan State University and Eli at Michigan State University in the the Sanger Leadership Center at the Broad Professor of Management at Departments of Psychology and OtherStephen values M. Ross driveSchool SciTSof Business 2019 at as well.the Eli Diversity Broad Graduate and Schoolinclusion of have beenManagement. fundamental He received commitments his Ph.D. inthe our University planning, of Michigan. driving Her ourresearch calls for Businessparticipation, Administration. invited He presentations, received andin psychology fee structure. from the University In addition, of wefocuses have on howworked to design to ensureand lead a “green”his conference, Ph.D. in Management giving from you New the York option ofIllinois an andonline subsequently program held rather faculty thaneffective a printedorganizational one teams, and workingwith to reduceUniversity food in 1984. waste. He served And asas the the primaryappointments host, the at MSUthe University Center of Illinois, forspecific Interdisciplinarity interests in intra-group seeks hierarchy, to create acting opportunities editor at Organizational to refine Behavior thinking aboutUrbana-Champaign, collaboration the and U.S. cross- Military disciplinaryconflict, diversity, research, leadership, education, and andand training. Human Decision Processes in Academy, West Point, and Purdue emotion. Lindy has published in outlets 1995, the associate editor of Decision University before coming to Michigan such as Academy of Management State University. He a fellow of the We hope that you have an excellentSciences time in from Lansing 1999 to while2004, and you the enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an Journal, Organization Science, Journal Association for Psychological Science, active downtown with restaurants, localeditor artof Personnel shops, Psychologyrunning trails, from and local community classes such of Applied Psychology, Science, and 1996 to 2002. He has been awarded the American Psychological Association, as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information. Proceedings of the National Academy of over $7 million in external research the International Association of Applied Sciences, among others. Her work has funding, most of which was granted by Psychology, the Academy of Management, Ifbeen you covered have in any media questions outlets including or comments the U.S. for Department the SciTS of Defense2019 Planning and the Committee,the and the Society please for Industriallook for and those ofthe usNew with York redTimes, ribbons Forbes, onand ourFast name Nationalbadges. Science Foundation. He has Organizational Psychology. His work is Company, and she has received awards been awarded fellowship status in both in the general areas of work motivation, Michaelfrom the Academy O’Rourke of Management and the Academy of Management and the team behavior, performance evaluation, Chair,American 2019 Psychological Science Association. of Team ScienceAmerican Conference Psychological Association, and leadership. In recognition of this work, Lindy received her B.S. from the and was recognized with the Career he received the Distinguished Scientific Wharton School of Business at the Achievement Award by the HR Division Contributions Award from the Society of University of Pennsylvania, and her of the Academy of Management (2011), Industrial and Organizational Psychology Ph.D. in social and organizational as well as the Early Career Award (1992) and the Herbert A Henneman, Jr. Lifetime psychology from LansingLeiden University Center in the WIFI andInformation Distinguished - ServiceUsername: Contributions scits andCareer Password: Achievement 2019 Award given by Netherlands. Award of the Society of Industrial and the Human Resources Division of the Organizational Psychology. Academy of Management.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 18 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TablePlenary of ContentsPanelists

Dr.Welcome Steve Kozlowski ...... Moderator: Notes: 2 Michigan State University Dr. Steve Fiore INSciTS Board ...... University of Central Florida...... 3 Planning Committee ...... 7 Facility Map ...... 8 Session Evaluation Information ...... 9 Conference at a Glance ...... 10 Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 SIGs...... 28 Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Workshop Abstracts...... 38 StevePanel W. J. Kozlowski, Abstracts...... Ph.D. is a Dr. Stephen M. Fiore is Director, 42 Professor of Organizational Psychology Cognitive Sciences Laboratory, and at MichiganOral Abstracts State University...... He is Professor with the University of Central 52 a recognized authority in the areas Florida’s Cognitive Sciences Program of multilevelPoster theory; Abstracts team leadership ...... in the Department of Philosophy and 106 and team effectiveness; and learning, Institute for Simulation & Training. He training,SciTS and adaptation.Awards The ...... goal maintains a multidisciplinary research 119 interest that incorporates aspects of of hisUnconference programmatic research Details is to ...... 119 generate actionable theory, research- the cognitive, social, organizational, basedThanks principles, to and our deployable Reviewers ...... and computational sciences in ...... 120 tools to develop adaptive individuals, the investigation of learning and teams,Post and Conferenceorganizations. His researchEvaluation Information...... performance in individuals and teams...... 120 is, or has been, supported by the His primary area of research is the Agency for Health Research and interdisciplinary study of complex Quality (AHRQ), the Air Force Office collaborative cognition and the of Scientific Research (AFOSR), understanding of how humans interact the Army Research Institute for the socially and with technology. He was Behavioral and Social Sciences (ARI), president of the Interdisciplinary Network the National Aeronautics and Space for Group Research (INGRoup) and Administration (NASA), the National is currently a founding board member Science Foundation (NSF), and the of the International Network for the Office of Naval Research (ONR), among Science of Team Science. Dr. Fiore was others. His research has generated over a member of the expert panel for the $10M in funded work. Dr. Kozlowski is Organisation for Economic Co-operation the recipient of the SIOP Distinguished and Development’s 2015 Programme for Scientific Contributions Award and the International Student Assessment (PISA) INGRoup McGrath Award for Lifetime which focused on collaborative problem- Achievement in the Study of Groups. solving skills.

20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 19 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | |[email protected]@gmail.com | |https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org Plenary2019 SciTS Panelists Conference Welcome

Integrating Team Science with Health Science Research and Practice ThisDear panel SciTS will 2019 discuss participants, community-engaged research conducted by faculty in the Division of Public Health at the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Flint Campus and the use of teamWelcome science to the to 2019promote Science health of equity Team inScience Flint, MI (SciTS) and beyond Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups Dr. Rick Sadler Dr.interested Todd Lucasin studying, practicing, andDr. facilitating Vicki Johnson-Lawrence team science. Michigan State University Michigan State University Michigan State University This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science.

One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to Toddfeature Lucas, for PhD, the is first a social time and healthpanels focusingDr. Johnson-Lawrence on Indigenous is a socialapproa ches to teamDr. Rick science Sadler aand Flint, collaborative MI native and psychologist whose research considers urban geographer with expertise in approaches in agriculture and naturalepidemiologist resources. that uses community- psychosocial causes of racial health based approaches to address environmental science, GIS, food disparities. He is focused on stress and determinants and prevention practices systems planning, and land use Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments preventive health behavior pathways, to promote health equity. Her work has policy in legacy cities. He attended suchin our as planning,cancer screening. driving His ourresearch calls for expandedparticipation, from the invited role of a presentations,traditional andthe University fee structure. of Michigan-Flint In addition, (BSc, especiallywe have considers worked psychological to ensure a “green”secondary conference, data-driven giving epidemiologist you the option of2007) an onlineto pursue program his life-long rather dream justicethan a- the printed causes one and resultingand working to reduceto use community-engaged food waste. And research as the primaryof host,becoming the a MSUcartographer, Center and healthfor Interdisciplinarity and social consequences seeks of to createstrategies opportunities that inform to components refine thinking of her aboutlater collaboration attended graduate and school cross- in perceivingdisciplinary injustice research, for individuals education, and andresearch, training. but to also provide a direct the Department of Geography at the communities. His research is both context in which the work is applied, University of Western Ontario (PhD, psychophysiological, in considering the We hope that you have an excellentmodified, time in andLansing used to whilepromote you health enjoy SciTS2013) 2019. where Lansinghe was immersed has an in the ways in which psychosocial factors “get active downtown with restaurants, localimprovements art shops, through running existing trails,health and localCanadian community system ofclasses urban planning. such under the skin” to affect health, and also His experiences growing up in the as kickboxing and pottery. Please consultand community the website systems, forwith more local detailed information. intervention focused, in attempting to and community-based organizations, Flint region--where industrial growth, develop strategies to reduce disparities. and within the academic context. Her subsequent deindustrialization, HeIf you has receivedhave any funding questions from sources or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those work considers the dynamic nature and fragmented planning practices such as the National Cancer Institute of us with red ribbons on our name ofbadges. psychosocial factors over the life have had a profound influence on and the National Heart, Lung and course in relation to chronic disease the built form--shaped his drive to Blood Institute to support his program Michael O’Rourke risk, with a particular focus on co-morbid resolve inequalities that arise from of research on topics that have ranged Chair, 2019 Science of Team Sciencemental Conference and physical health outcomes imbalances between the salutogenic from understanding stress reactivity (particularly mood/anxiety disorders and pathogenic properties of urban responses to injustice to promoting and cardiovascular disease risk factors) areas. His research interests reflect better uptake of colorectal cancer exacerbated by chronic stress, and this concern and include an integration screening. His Michigan upbringing is strategies to address these conditions in of urban planning and public health a perpetual influence on his approach Lansing Center WIFI vulnerableInformation communities. - Username: scits andtopics Password: related to neighborhood/built 2019 to conducting research and forging environmental effects on health. collaborations that can reduce health and social disparities. 2019 SciTS Conference Program 20 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TablePlenary of ContentsPanelists

Discussant:Welcome ...... Notes: 2 Dr.INSciTS Debra Furr-Holden Board ...... 3 Michigan State University Planning Committee ...... 7 Facility Map ...... 8 Session Evaluation Information ...... 9 Conference at a Glance ...... 10 Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 SIGs...... 28 Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Workshop Abstracts...... 38 Dr. DebraPanel Furr-Holden Abstracts...... is an 42 epidemiologist with expertise in addictionOral epidemiology, Abstracts prevention ...... 52 science, psychosocial measurement andPoster behavioral Abstracts health equity research, ...... 106 interventions and policy. Her research focuseesSciTS on developing Awards environmental ...... 119 strategies,Unconference structural and policy Details ...... 119 interventions to promote behavioral healthThanks and health to equity. our Dr.Reviewers Furr- ...... 120 Holden’s community-based, action- orientedPost research Conference has been well Evaluation Information...... 120 received by community stakeholders and drove multiple policy interventions to address some of the nation’s greatest public health challenges, with a special emphasis on health equity and policy- level interventions. Her research is grounded in the rubrics of epidemiology and consistent with principles and practices for understanding social determinants of health and health equity. She is a C.S. Mott Endowed Professor of Public Health and the Interim Director at the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine Division of Public Health. She is also the Director of the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities funded Flint Center for Health Equity Solutions. 20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 21 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | |[email protected]@gmail.com | |https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org Plenary2019 SciTS Panelists Conference Welcome

DearThe ChangingSciTS 2019 Scale participants, and Scope of Collaboration: Implications for Team Science This panel will address various ways in which team science is changing, including size, disciplinary Welcomeand crossdisciplinary to the 2019 complexity,Science of Teamand geographical Science (SciTS) distribution (e.g., national, international). Conference,Dr. Arun Agrawal the 10th annual gatheringDr. ofSanford individuals Eigenbrode and groups Dr. Julie Thompson Klein interestedUniversity of in Michigan studying, practicing, andUniversity facilitating of Idaho team science. Wayne State University This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science.

One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to featureArun Agrawal, for thePhD, first emphasizes time panelsthe focusingSanford onD. IndigenousEigenbrode is Professor approaches of to teamJulie Thompsonscience Klein,and collaborativePh.D., is approachespolitics of international in agriculture development, and naturalEntomology resources. and University Distinguished Professor of Humanities Emerita in institutional change, and environmental Professor at the University of Idaho in the English Department at Wayne conservation in his research and State University and an Affiliate of Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well.the department Diversity of and Entomology, inclusion Plant have been fundamental commitments teaching. He has written critically on Pathology and Nematology. He received the TdLab (Transdisciplinarity Lab) at in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, indigenous knowledge, community- his MS in Natural Resources (1986) the ETH-Zurich university for science webased have conservation, worked common to ensure property, a “green” and conference, his PhD Entomology giving (1990) you fromthe option ofand an technology online programin Switzerland. rather She thanpopulation a printed resources, one and and environmental working to reduceCornell University.food waste. Sanford And conducts as the primaryhas host, also been the aMSU Mellon Center Fellow and a foridentities. Interdisciplinarity Agrawal is the coordinator seeks to for create research opportunities on insect ecologyto refine and thinkinginsect- aboutVisiting collaboration Professor in Digitaland cross-Humanities disciplinarythe International research, Forestry Resources education, andplant training. interactions in agroecosystems. at the University of Michigan. Klein and Institutions network and is currently An emphasis has been the chemical is past president of the Association Wecarrying hope out thatresearch you in havecentral anand excellenteast ecology, time in landscape Lansing ecology while and you enjoy SciTSfor Interdisciplinary 2019. Lansing Studies has (AIS) an and former editor of the AIS journal activeAfrica as downtown well as South with Asia. restaurants,Since 2013, localmanagement art shops, of insect-vectored running trails, viruses and local community classes such Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies. asAgrawal kickboxing has served and as thepottery. editor-in-chief Please consultof wheat, the potatoes website and legumes for more in the detailed information. of World Development and his recent Pacific Northwest. The broader context Her books include Interdisciplinarity work has appeared in Science, PNAS, (l990), Interdisciplinary Studies If you have any questions or commentsof his forentomological the SciTS research 2019 has Planning led Committee, please look for those Conservation Biology, Development to interdisciplinary projects addressing Today (co-edited 1994), Crossing of us with red ribbons on our name badges. and Change, among other journals. the sustainability of agricultural systems. Boundaries (1996), Transdisciplinarity (co-edited 2001), Interdisciplinary Preceding his work at U-M, Agrawal He was a co-PI on two NSF-IGERT Education in K-12 and College (edited Michaelwas educated O’Rourke at Duke University, the projects on the ecological and social 2002),Mapping Interdisciplinary Chair,Indian Institute 2019 ofScience Management, of Team and Scienceresilience Conference in changing landscapes, and Studies (1999), Humanities, Culture, Delhi University and has held teaching project director for a $20M NIFA-funded and Interdisciplinarity (2005), Creating and research positions at Yale, Florida, Coordinated Agricultural Project (CAP), Interdisciplinary Campus Cultures McGill, Berkeley, and Harvard among Regional Approaches to Climate Change (2010), and Interdisciplining Digital other universities. in Pacific Northwest Agriculture. He is a Humanities (2015). She was also Lansing Center WIFI InformationPI on a continuation - Username: NIFA CAP, Pacific scits and Password: 2019 Associate Editor of The Oxford Northwest Wheat-Based Systems: Handbook on Interdisciplinarity (2010, Landscapes in Transition. 2017). 2019 SciTS Conference Program 22 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TablePlenary of Contents Panelists

Dr.Welcome Jonathan ...... Kramer Moderator: Notes: 2 UniversityINSciTS of Maryland Board ...... Dr. Stephanie E. Vasko...... 3 Michigan State University Planning Committee ...... 7 Facility Map ...... 8 Session Evaluation Information ...... 9 Conference at a Glance ...... 10 Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 SIGs...... 28 Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Workshop Abstracts...... 38

JonathanPanel Kramer Abstracts...... is the Director for Dr. Stephanie E. Vasko is managing 42 Interdisciplinary Science at the National director for the MSU Center for Socio-EnvironmentalOral Abstracts Synthesis ...... Center, Interdisciplinarity and co-chair of the 52 University of Maryland (SESYNC). He 2019 SciTS Program Committee. She focusesPoster on the Abstracts design of programs ...... builds community and collaborative 106 andSciTS the use of Awards facilitation to...... advance capacity among academic and blended 119 synthesis-based research that can academic/community research teams, informUnconference problem solving around Details socio- ...... develops and delivers philosophically-...... 119 environmental issues. His work includes informed team based workshops as theThanks development to and our use Reviewersof effective ...... part of the Toolbox Dialogue Initiative,...... 120 practices that help interdisciplinary and researches the application of teamsPost of scientists Conference and others Evaluationwork Information...... machine learning to team science and ...... 120 effectively together. Jon has co-led the to agricultural diseases. She currently development and implementation of the serves on the Mayors Arts and Culture SESYNC Graduate Research Fellows Council in Lansing, MI and was former Program, a unique research and training AAAS Community Engagement Fellow. experience that has engaged over 300 Dr. Vasko is also a practicing artist doctoral students over the past 5 years. who works with clay and iron, takes His interests also include understanding inspiration from dynamic natural forms, and improving approaches that link and explores interactions of soft/hard/ science to decision-making in the malleable/brittle in form, as well as environmental arena and he is engaged the materials chemistry of surface in efforts that foster organizational transformations. development, strategic planning and management to strengthen science- based organizations. Jon received a BS at the University of Massachusetts, MS at SUNY Stony Brook and Ph.D. at the University of Maryland.

20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 23 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | |[email protected]@gmail.com | |https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org Plenary2019 SciTS Panelists Conference Welcome

DearAgency SciTS Approaches 2019 participants, to Team Science This panel will provide a number of different perspectives on team science from NSF and NIH Welcomerepresentatives. to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Dr.Conference, Claire Hemingway the 10th annual gatheringDr. Saraof individuals Kiesler and groups Dr. Peter R. Jackson Nationalinterested Science in studying, Foundation practicing, andCarnegie facilitating Mellon team University science. NIAID, NIH This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science.

One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to Clairefeature Hemingway for the isfirst a program time officerpanels focusingSara Kiesler on Indigenous is a rotator program approa ches to teamDr. Peter science R. Jackson and joined collaborative the NIAID inapproaches Office of International in agriculture Science and naturalmanager resources. in the Social, Behavioral, Scientific Review Program (SRP) in Engineering at the National Science and Economics Directorate, managing 1990. During his tenure SRP grew Foundation (NSF), where she manages from 10 to about 65 staff while NIAID’s Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well.interdisciplinary Diversity programs and inclusion including have been fundamental commitments international programs, serves on the Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace Extramural budget increased from in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, NSF working group for Navigating the and S&CC. She is University Professor approximately $500 million to $5 billion. Newwe haveArctic, andworked facilitates to ensurescience a “green”and conference, Hillman Chair Professorgiving you Emerita the option ofToday an theonline SRP managesprogram the rather scientific cooperationthan a printed with Canada. one and She workingis to reduceof Computer food Science waste. and And Human- as the primaryand host, technical the peer MSU review Center of grant currentlyfor Interdisciplinarity leading the new NSF-wide seeks to createComputer opportunities Interaction to at refine Carnegie thinking Mellon aboutapplications collaboration and contract and proposals cross- that programdisciplinary to foster research, the creation education, of andUniversity. training. Her Ph.D. was awarded in request total direct costs ranging from international networks of networks, social psychology. Her research spans $4 to $11 billion. As NIAID budgets grew AccelNet.We hope She that has you previously have managed an excellent behavioral time in andLansing social dimensions while you of enjoy SciTSand the 2019. Institute’s Lansing research has breadth an has expanded, he had unique opportunities theactive flagship downtown interdisciplinary with trainingrestaurants, localtechnology, art shops, including running the emergence trails, of and local community classes such to influence the direction of research program,as kickboxing NSF Research and pottery.Traineeship Please consultnew forms the of distributedwebsite work,for more science, detailed information. Program, in the Education and Human and commerce, changes in how people initiatives and peer review policies. Resources Directorate. Before joining As Chief of the AIDS Research Review If you have any questions or commentscommunicate for the and SciTS group 2019interactions Planning in Committee, please look for those NSF, she led a collaborative initiative social media, human-robot interaction, Branch (ARRB), Dr. Jackson employs of us with red ribbons on our name badges. across more than 18 international and emerging threats to privacy, security, creative practices to facilitate the pursuit of NIAIDs national and International scientific organizations to enhance and information authenticity. She has missions. He has represented the engagementMichael O’Rourke in the scientific enterprise been elected to the American Academy Director, SRP at NIH Review Policy andChair, scientific 2019 literacy Science by harnessing of Team Scienceof Arts Conference and Science and the National Committee meetings where NIH digital learning technologies and Academy of Engineering, and received peer review regulations, policies and providing innovative online mentoring for the ACM CHI Lifetime Achievement processes are developed / discussed. student research teams. Award, the Human-Robot Interaction Lifetime Service Award, the InGROUP Lansing Center WIFI McGrathInformation Lifetime -Award, Username: the ICA scits and Password: 2019 Williams Prize, and the Allen Newell Award for Research Excellence. 2019 SciTS Conference Program 24 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TablePlenary of ContentsPanelists

Dr.Welcome Anna L. Ramsey-Ewing ...... Moderator: Notes: 2 NCATS,INSciTS NIH Board ...... Patricia Jones, Dr.P.H.,...... M.P.H. 3 NCATS, NIH Planning Committee ...... 7 Facility Map ...... 8 Session Evaluation Information ...... 9 Conference at a Glance ...... 10 Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 SIGs...... 28 Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Workshop Abstracts...... 38 On PanelSept. 20, 2015,Abstracts...... Anna L. Ramsey- Patricia Jones joined NCATS as a 42 Ewing, Ph.D., joined NCATS as director program director in April 2016. She of theOral Office Abstracts of Grants Management ...... began her federal career with the Centers 52 and Scientific Review (OGMSR). She for Disease Control and Prevention previouslyPoster was Abstracts the Office of Extramural...... in 2004 and has been with NIH since 106 Research Policy and Operations 2012. Jones has experience overseeing, directorSciTS at NIH’s Awards National Institute...... of conducting and evaluating prevention 119 Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). science programs, implementation Ramsey-EwingUnconference began her DetailsNIH career ...... science, and international and domestic...... 119 in 1991Thanks as a research to our fellow Reviewers at NIAID, ...... clinical trials sites. She also has a ...... strong 120 and she later became a Fellows Award background in clinical networks. Jones for ResearchPost Conference Excellence recipient Evaluation and hasInformation...... served as an associate editor for ...... 120 senior staff fellow in NIAID’s Laboratory a clinical trials peer review journal and of Viral Diseases. She subsequently has taught psychology and research served as NIAID’s associate director methods as a lecturer at Oglethorpe for extramural science policy within University. She is a behavioral scientist the Division of Extramural Activities and holds a doctorate in public health in (DEA). In that role, Ramsey-Ewing was health promotion and health education responsible for policy development and with a concentration in psychology, health integration as well as dissemination and services research and epidemiology staff training in all facets of extramural from Loma Linda University. Jones policies and procedures. Her other also holds an M.P.H. in behavioral DEA roles included serving as a special sciences and health education from the assistant to the DEA director and as a University of California, Los Angeles, scientific review officer (SRO); as part and a bachelor’s degree in women’s of the latter role, she was instrumental studies from the University of California, in setting up a formal SRO training Berkeley. She is currently pursuing an program. M.S. in biotechnology with an emphasis in regulatory affairs as well as an M.B.A.

20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 25 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | |[email protected]@gmail.com | |https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org Plenary2019 SciTS Panelists Conference Welcome

DearCultivating SciTS 2019 Team participants, Science in Clinical and Translational Research The Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research panel will describe how the Institute promotes team Welcomescience by to incorporating the 2019 Science services of and Team resources Science designed (SciTS) for teams into its clinical and translational Conference,research infrastructure. the 10th annual In doing gathering so, it will alsoof individuals convey gener andal groups lessons for the SciTS community. interestedDr. Felix inKabo studying, practicing, andDr. facilitating Beth LaPensee team science. Susan Murphy, ScD, OTR ThisUniversity meeting of Michigan is also the first SciTSUniversity conference of Michigan since formation University of Michigan of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science.

Moderator:Welcome ...... Notes: 2 Dr.INSciTS George MashourBoard ...... 3 University of Michgian Planning Committee ...... 7 Facility Map ...... 8 Session Evaluation Information ...... 9 Conference at a Glance ...... 10 Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 SIGs...... 28 Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Workshop Abstracts...... 38 GeorgePanel A. Mashour, Abstracts...... M.D., Ph.D. is 42 an anesthesiologist and NIH-funded neuroscientistOral Abstracts at the University ...... 52 of Michigan. He is internationally recognizedPoster for Abstractshis work on ...... 106 consciousness and the mechanisms of unconsciousness.SciTS Awards Mashour ...... has 119 authored >200 publications, with key articlesUnconference and commentaries Detailsappearing in...... 119 the ThanksNew England to Journal our ofReviewers Medicine, ...... 120 Lancet, Science, and the Proceedings of thePost National Conference Academy of Sciences. Evaluation Information...... 120 He has also been the lead editor of five textbooks related to anesthesiology and the neurosciences, published by Cambridge University Press and Oxford University Press. Mashour is the founding director of the Center for Consciousness Science at the University of Michigan. He also serves as the Associate Dean for Clinical & Translational Research at the medical school as well as Director of the Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research, the NIH-funded CTSA institute of the University of Michigan. Mashour has received numerous awards as a researcher and educator; in 2018, he was elected to the National Academy of Medicine.

20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 27 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | |[email protected]@gmail.com | |https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org INSciTS2019 SciTS Special Conference Interest Welcome Groups

AboutDear SciTS INSciTS 2019 participants, Special Interest Groups INSciTS Special Interest Groups (SIGs) are member-led groups that provide a “home within a home” for INSciTSWelcome members to the 2019 to connect Science and of collaborateTeam Science with (SciTS) colleagues who have shared interests in the SciTS field.Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. INSciTSThis meeting SIGs: is also the first SciTS conference since formation •of Enable the International INSciTS members Network tofor connect the Science around of sharedTeam Science interests and aligned activities to build (INSciTS),community a Provideprofessional a forum society for INSciTS advancing members related to interests collaborate in with one another throughout the year •team Help science. to advance key priority areas in the Science of Team Science (SciTS) field, and • Create opportunities to engage as a community with external groups. The conference leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. ActiveVasko, Dr.Special Julie Thompson Interest Klein,Groups and Megghan Honke Seidel— has worked closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a Active SIGs are described below. “Example topics” offer a sense of the current scope of each SIG. conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new Focus areas and activities of each SIG will evolve based on the interests and goals of SIG members. directions. Fostering Team Science in Academia One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels Chair:research Scott in environmentalLeischow, PhD, science, Professor agriculture, and Director, and naturalTranslational resources. Science, To this College end, weof Health are pleased to Solutions,feature for Arizona the first State time University panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative Exampleapproaches topics: in agriculture and natural resources. • Appointment, promotion, and tenure policies •Other Institutional values driveorganization SciTS 2019 and structuresas well. Diversity (centers, and cross-depar inclusion havetmental), been fundamental commitments •in Funders’ our planning, influence driving - funding our calls mechanisms, for participation, policies, invited guidelines, presentations, requirements and fee structure. In addition, •we Publishing have worked opportunities to ensure and a “green” challenges conference, giving you the option of an online program rather than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center

for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- Team Science Training disciplinary research, education, and training. Chair: Wayne McCormack, PhD,Director, Clinical & Translational Science Predoctoral Training Program,We hope University that you have of Florida an excellent Clinical time & Translational in Lansing whileScience you Institute, enjoy SciTS and 2019.Director, Lansing University has anof Floridaactive Healthdowntown Office with ofrestaurants, Biomedical local Research art shops, Career running Development trails, and local community classes such as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information. Example topics: • Development and dissemination of curriculum, training, and educational resources If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those • Undergraduate, graduate, and early career training of us with red ribbons on our name badges. • Professional development • Syllabi - courses, workshops, training initiatives Michael O’Rourke • Team science competencies Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference • Online materials • Train the trainer approaches

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 28 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org INSciTS SpecialTable Interest of Contents Groups

IncubatorWelcome Spaces ...... for Team Science 2 ThisINSciTS SIG is for Board individuals ...... seeking to develop programs and...... spaces that can 3 serve to foster and incubate effective team science. Planning Committee ...... 7 Chair: Ellen Fisher, PhD,Assistant Vice President for Research and Strategic Initiatives, Colorado StateFacility University Map ...... 8 ExampleSession topics: Evaluation Information ...... 9 • Developing incubator activities and spaces at academic institutions (e.g., seed grants, cross- disciplinaryConference centers, at a Glance through ...... CTSAs and other center-focused...... programs) 10 • Fostering Team Science in Academia • StimulatingFeatured Keynotecreativity throughand Plenary incubator Panels...... activities and spaces ...... 14 • Sharing/designing/disseminatingSIGs...... best practices to...... support scientific teams 28 • Creating evidence-based interventions for team science Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Scientometrics and Data Analytics for Team Science Workshop Abstracts...... 38 Chair: Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez, PhD,Associate Research Professor, Spanish National Research CouncilPanel (CSIC), Abstracts...... Institute of Public Goods and Policies (IPP), Madrid, Spain 42

ExampleOral Abstracts topics: ...... 52 • ScientometricsPoster Abstracts indicators ...... for longitudinal analysis of team outcomes and scholarly 106 communications patterns (e.g., team size, productivity, persistence, diversity of collaborators, references, research topics)SciTS Awards ...... 119 • Network analysis for scientific collaborations and cognitive structures of team science • MechanismsUnconference and Detailsevaluation ...... criteria (metrics) for authorship...... and contributorship 119 in scientific publicationsThanks to ourand limitsReviewers to scientific ...... career advancement ...... 120 • Measuring interdisciplinary, novelty and conventionality in collaborative research • DataPost visualizations Conference Evaluation Information...... 120

Interreach - A SIG for Interdisciplinary Executive Scientists, Research Development Professionals, and I2S Specialists The goals of this SIG are to articulate and promote the need for a dedicated career path around interdisciplinary research expertise, and to develop and improve practitioners’ tools, best practices, success metrics, and career trajectories. Chair: Christine Hendren, PhD, Assistant Research Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Executive Director, Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology (CEINT) Duke University Example topics: • Developing the profession • Professional development – effective best practices, tools, methods, etc. • Evaluation • Hiring, promotion and tenure

20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 29 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | |[email protected]@gmail.com | |https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org 2019Daily SciTS Sche Conferencedule - Monday, Welcome May 20, 2019

Lobby Coat Room Dear 7 a.m. SciTS Registration 2019 participants,Open 7 a.m. – 6:30 p.m. 8 a.m. Breakfast Ballrooms 5-8 Welcome9 a.m. toWorkshops the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference,Teaching the 10th the annualScience of gathering Team Science of (SciTS) individuals and groups Ballrooms 1-2 interested inDr. studying, Jennifer Cross, Ms.practicing, Hannah Love, Dr.and Ellen Fisher;facilitating Colorado State team University science. This meetingNavigating is also Teamthe first Power DynamicsSciTS conference in Authorship Decisionssince formation Room 101 of the InternationalDr. Kevin Elliott, Network Dr. Kendra Cheruvelil, for the Michigan Science State University of Team; Dr. Isis Settles, Science University of Michigan; Dr. Patricia Soranno, Dr. Georgina Montgomery, Michigan State University (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in Room 102 team science.Optimizing mentoring relationships in team science: An engine for scientific accomplishment and inclusive excellence Dr. Melissa McDaniels, Dr. Katy Colbry; Michigan State University The conferenceMapping leadership Transitional team Research —myself, Stories: Team Dr. ScieStephanience Storytelling E. using the NIEHS Translational Room 103 Vasko, Dr. JulieResearch Thompson Framework Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— has worked Ms.closely Kristi Pettibone; with theNational SciTS Institute 2019 of Environmental Planning Health Committee Science and the INSciTS board to design a conference thatCommunity builds playbooks on existing and collaboration research guides and –practice creating documentation strengths while to facilitate also effective pointing in Ballrooms exciting 3-4 new directions. scientific teamwork Ms. Lou Woodley, Dr. Rebecca Aicher; AAAS TBL 101: Introduction to Team-Based Learning Room 104 One of our aimsDr. Wayne for McCormack SciTS ,2019University is of to Florida demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to 12 p.m. Lunch on your own feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative Welcome to SciTS 2019 with Dr. Michael O’Rourke, Dr. Stephanie E. Vasko, MSU Provost Ballrooms 1-4 approaches1 p.m. in agriculture and natural resources. June Youatt, Lansing Mayor Andy Schor Ballrooms1-4 Other2 p.m. valuesKeynote drive with SciTS Joy Balls-Berry,2019 as well. Mayo DiversityClinic and inclusion have been fundamental commitments in3 p.m.our planning,Beverage driving Break our and callsSponsor for Showcase participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. Ballrooms In addition, 5-8 we3:15 have p.m. workedConcurrent to ensure Panels a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center Intereach Community Effort: A Live Action “Potluck” Approach to Assembling Shared Team Room 101 for InterdisciplinarityScience Curricular seeks Resources to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinary research,Dr. Christine Hendren education,, Dr. Kristine and Glauber; training. Duke Clinical & Translation Science Institute The Resilience of Team Science: Lessons for the Science of Team Science from Puerto Rico’s Room 102 We hope thatPost you Hurricane have Mariaan excellent Response, Recovery,time in Lansingand Reconstruction while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active downtownDr. Cecilio with Ortiz restaurants,Garcia, Dr. Marla Perez local Lugo, art Dr. shops,Lionel Orama running Exclusa, University trails, ofand Puerto local Rico~Mayaguez; community classes such Mr. Jacob Mans, University of Minnesota as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information. Changing Academic Institutional Culture to Facilitate and Support Team Science Room 103 Dr. Scott Leischow, Ms. Andi Hess,Dr. Deborah Williams, Arizona State University; Ms. Rachel Chown, Manchester If you have anyCancer questions Research Centre; or Dr.comments Jennifer Cross, forColorado the State SciTS University 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us with redIncreasing ribbons Research on our Effectiveness name badges. through Team Science Training for Research Teams Room 104 Ms. Jennifer Sprecher, Institute of Translational Health Sciences; Dr. Brenda Zierler, FAAN, Professor; Dr. Erin Michael O’RourkeBlakeney, Ms. Nicole Summerside, MHA, University of Washington Chair, 2019 HowScience to design of teams,Team space Science and careers Conference for better team science; a practical guide. Room 201 Dr. Claire Smith, Ms. Ruth Norris, Mrs. Charlotte Stockton Powdrell, The University of Manchester, UK; Ms. Rachel Chown, Manchester Research Centre, Manchester UK; Dr. Amanda Lamb, The University of Manchester, UK 4:45 p.m. Break and Sponsor Showcase Ballrooms 5-8 5 p.m. Plenary Panel: Indigenous Approaches to Team Science Ballrooms 1-4 Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019 6:15 p.m. Break and Refresh 6:30 p.m. Networking Reception at the Lansing Brewing Company

2019 SciTS Conference Program 30 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Tuesday, May 21, 2019 Table- Dail yof S Contentschedule

8 a.m.Welcome Registration ...... Open 8 a.m.– 8 p.m. 2 Lobby Coat Room INSciTSBreakfast Board ...... 3 Ballrooms 5-8 9 a.m. Plenary Panel: Team Science in Agriculture and Natural Resources Ballrooms 1-4 10:15Planning a.m. Beverage Committee Break and ...... Sponsor Showcase ...... 7 Ballrooms 5-8 10:30 a.m. Innovating with Technology Room 101 Facility MapGetting ...... Started with Machine Learning and Team Science & Science...... of Team Science Research 8 Dr. Stephanie E. Vasko, Michigan State University Session CollaborativeEvaluation Data Information Design: A Tool for ...... Multisector Alignment ...... 9 Dr. Kathleen Pine, Dr. Michael Shafer, Dr. Margaret Hinrichs, Ms. Kailey Love, Dr. George Runger; Dr. William Riley, Arizona ConferenceState University at a Glance ...... 10 CohortGen: Promoting Collaboration Through Automatic Cohort Generation Dr. Charisse Madlock, Mr. Billy Barnett; University of Tennessee Health Science Center FeaturedDo Keynote More, Faster: and Utilizing Plenary Advanced Panels...... Computational Resources in Your Research...... Team 14 Dr. Dirk Colbry, Michigan State University SIGs...... Supplanting Institutionalized Science of Science Data Collection...... with Big Data Methods ‘in the Wild’ 28 Dr. Loannis Pavlidis, Mr. Mohammed Emtiaz Ahmed, University of Houston DetailedSpatially-Situated Daily Schedule Case Studies ...... 30 Room 102 Building climate resilience in Africa & South Asia: Lessons on membership, organization & Workshopcollaboration Abstracts...... from four transdisciplinary research consortia 38 Dr. Bruce Currie-Alder, International Development Research Centre (IDRC); Lucia Scodanibbio, University of Cape Town; Panel Abstracts...... Katharine Vincent, Kulima Integrated Development Solutions; Anjal Prakash, Teri School of Advanced Studies; Nathalie 42 Nathe, Overseas Development Institute Oral AbstractsA Scholar-Practitioner’s ...... Guide to Global Virtual Teams 52 Ms. Lejla Bilal-Maley, Antioch University Poster AbstractsUsing team science ...... to identify important and innovative questions for cancer research 106 Ms. Rachel Chown, Dr. Sarah George, Ms. Pip Peakman, Dr. Robert Bristow, Manchester Cancer Research Centre SciTS AwardsCollaboration ...... Readiness 119 Room 103 The experience and confidence of researchers and research support staff in conducting cross Unconference-disciplinary Details research ...... 119 Dr. Yan Ding, Dr. Justin Pulford, Dr. Imelda Bates, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine Thanks toBuilding our theReviewers Collaboration Readiness...... Framework for ad-interim Evaluation...... of 120 Transdisciplinary Collaborations Post ConferenceDr. Eva Kalmar, Dr. Evaluation Maarten van den Sanden Information...... , Ms. Ingrid van Marion, TU Delft ...... 120 Perceptions of Competence of Social Scientists and Natural Scientists Ms. Caitlin Kirby, Ms. Patricia Jaimes, Dr. Amanda R. Lorenz-Reaves, Dr. Julie C. Libarkin; Michigan State University Does a Shared Understanding Blind Groups to Surprise? Ms. Michal Russo, U of M School of Environment & Sustainability I’m ready, are you ready? How do you know of your team is ready? Dr. Jennifer Cross, Dr. Bailey Fosdick, Dr. Hannah Beth Love, Dr. Meghan Suter, Ms. Dinada Egan, Dr. Ellen Fisher, Colorado State University Tools For Team Science & The Science of Team Science Room 104 11 Best Practices for Successful Team Science: A series of motivational videos Ms. Nicole Exe, Ms. Laura Denton, Ms. Meg Fairchild, Mr. Jordan Hahn, Dr. Vicki Ellingrod, University of Michigan Infrastructuring a Federated Research Network Node Dr. Marcelline Harris, Lisa Ferguson, Airong Luo, University of Michigan It’s not all fun and games: Building multiplayer worlds to explore, learn and expand Mr. Benjamin Green, Ms. Georgina Moulton, Ms. Victoria Turner, University of Manchester Repertories as Blueprints and Frameworks for the Doing of Science Dr. Rachel Ankeny, University of Adelaide; Dr. Sabina Leonelli, University of Exeter Training & Professional Development Ballrooms 1-4 Reflecting on Transdisciplinary Team Science Training Dr. Stephen Fiore, University of Central Florida; Dr. Troy Hartley, College of William & Mary Virginia Institute of Marine Science; Dr. Linda Schaffner, College of William & Mary Virginia Institute of Marine Science; Dr. Karen McGlathery, University of Virginia; Dr. Deborah DiazGranados, Virginia Commonwealth University

2019 SciTS Conference Program 31 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019Daily SciTS Sche Conferencedule - Tuesday, Welcome May 21, 2019

10:30 a.m. Ballrooms 1-4 Dear SciTSTraining 2019 &participants, Professional Development Continued Evidence-based Team Development: Pre-post Assessment of Team Experiences with Team Coaching Dr. Tony Lingham, Antioch University; Dr. Bonnie Richley, Interaction Science, LLC Welcome to Developingthe 2019 Competencies Science of for Team Team ScienceScience (SciTS) Conference,Dr. the Deborah 10th DiazGranados, annual Virginia gathering Commonwealth of University; individuals Dr. Heather and Billings, groups Mayo Clinic; Dr. Allan Brasier, University of Wisconsin; interested inDr. studying, Dan Lackland, Medicalpracticing, University of andSouth Carolina; facilitating Dr. Wayne McCormack,team science. University of Florida; Dr. Maritza Salazar, University of California, Irvine; Jennifer Sprecher, University of Washington; Dr. Beth Tigges, University of New Mexico; Dr. Kevin C. Wooten, University This meetingof Houstonis also Dr. Dayanthe Ranwala,first MedicalSciTS University conference of South Carolina; since Dr. Gaetano formation Lotrecchiano, George Washington University of the InternationalTeam Science Network Boot camp: for theAnnual Science Trainings of to TeamImprove Science Team Performance (INSciTS), aDr. professional Brenda Zierler, Dr. Erin society Blakeney, Ms. advancing Jennifer Sprecher related, Ms. Nicole Summerside, interests University in of Washington Mastering complex conversations team science.Dr. Katy Colbry, Dr. Dirk Colbry, Michigan State University 12:15 p.m. SIG Meetings The conferenceFostering leadership Team Science team in Academia —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. Room 101 Vasko, Dr. JulieTeam ThompsonScience Training Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— Room 102 has worked Incubatorclosely Spaces with thefor Team SciTS Science 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to designRoom 103a conference thatScientometrics builds andon Dataexisting Analytics research for Team Science and practice strengths while also pointing in excitingRoom 104 new directions. Interreach Ballrooms 1-4 1:15 p.m. Lunch on Your Own 2:15 p.m. Plenary Panel: Science of Groups and Teams Ballrooms 1-4 One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels research3:30 p.m. inBeverage environmental Break and science, Sponsor Showcase agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased Ballrooms 5-8 to feature3:45 p.m. for SocioEnvironmentalthe first time panels Team focusing Science on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative Room 101 approaches Interlinkingin agriculture open science and natural to team-based resources. action research for socio-environmental cases Dr. Yasuhisa Kondo, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature; Mr. Akihiro Miyata, The University of Tokto; Dr. Ui Ikeuchi, University of Tsukuba; Dr. Satoe Nakahara, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature; Dr. Ken'ichiro Nakashima, Hiroshima University; Dr. Hideyuki Other valuesOnishi, drive Doshisha SciTS University 2019; Dr. Takeshi as Osawawell. Tokyo Diversity Metropolitan and University; inclusion Dr. Kazuhiko haveOta Research been Institute fundamental for Humanity and commitments in our planning,Nature; driving Dr. Kenichi Sato, our Kyoto calls Sangyo for University; participation, Dr. Ken Ushijima invited,Hokkaido Research presentations, Organization; Dr. Bianca and Vienni fee structure. In addition, Leuphana ,University of Lüneberg; Dr. Terukazu Kumazawa ,Research Institute for Humanity and Nature Dr. Kazuhiro Hayashi, National we have workedInstitute ofto Science ensure and Technology a “green” Policy; Dr. conference, Yasuhiro Murayama ,giving National Institute you of theInformation option and Communications of an online Techno logy;program rather than a printedDr. Noboruone Okuda,and Researchworking Institute to for reduce Humanity and food Nature; waste.Prof. Hisae Nakanishi,And as Doshisha the Universityprimary host, the MSU Center for InterdisciplinarityAdopting a Community seeks toScience create Model opportunities of Team Science for to Addressing refine Environmental thinking about Inequities collaboration and cross- disciplinary research,Dr. Jennifer Carrera, education, Dr. Kent Key, Michigan and State training. University; Ms. Karen Calhoun, University of Michigan; Dr. Sarah Bailey, All Faith and Health Alliance; Dr. Joseph Hamm, Dr. Courtney Cuthbertson, Michigan State University; Ms. Yvonne Lewis, National Center for African American Health Consciousness, Healthy Flint Research Coordinating Center; Dr. Susan J. Woolford, University of Michigan; Ms. E. Hill We hope thatDeLoney, you Flinthave Odyssey an House excellent Health Awareness time Center; in Lansing Ms. Ella Greene-Moton, while Community you enjoy Ethics Review SciTS Board; 2019. Ms. Kaneesha Lansing has an Wallace, Healthy Flint Research Coordinating Center; Mr. DeWaun E. Robinson, Artistic Visions Enterprise; Mr. Ismael Byers, Michigan active downtownState University; with Ms. restaurants, Patricia Piechowski-Whitney, local Universityart shops, of Michigan; running Mr. Luther Evans;trails, Ms., andAthena McKay,local Dr. community Don Vereen, University classes such as kickboxingof Michigan; and pottery. Ms. Arlene Sparks, Please Date2Dream consult the website for more detailed information. Leading large interdisciplinary research teams: Lessons from LAGOS Dr. Patricia Soranno, Dr. Kendra S. Cheruvelil, Michigan State University If you have anyManaging questions interdisciplinary or comments teams: Lessons for the learne SciTSd from 2019coupled Planning natural and Committee,human systems pleasemodeling look for those of us with redin lakeribbons catchments on our name badges. Ms. Reilly Henson, Dr. Kelly Cobourn, Dr. Cayelan Carey, Virginia Tech; Dr. Kathleen Weathers, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies; Michael O’RourkeDr. Kaitlin Farrell, Ms. Nicole Ward, Ms. Weizhe Weng, Virginia Tech; Dr. Jennifer Klug, Fairfield University; Dr. Michael Sorice, Virginia Tech Room 102 Chair, 2019Team Science Science of Evaluation Team Science Conference Indicators for measuring the contributions of individual knowledge brokers Dr. Sabine Hoffmann, Eawag, Switzerland; Dr. Simon Maag, Parliamentary Services, Swiss Parliament; Dr. Robert Kase-Pasanen, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland; Dr. Timothy J. Alexander, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology “Innovation happens at the intersections of disciplines.” Transdisciplinary research outcomes based onLansing the Transdisciplinary Center WIFIResearch Information on Energetics and- Username: Cancer (TREC) scits ll Initiative and experience Password: 2019 Ms. Sarah D. Hohl, University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Dr. Sarah Knerr, University of Washington; Dr. Sarah Gehlert, University of South Carolina; Dr. Marian Neuhouser, Beti Thompson, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

2019 SciTS Conference Program 32 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Tuesday, May 21, 2019 Table- Dail yof S Contentschedule

2:15Welcome p.m. Team ...... Science Evaluation Continued 2 Room 102 A new methodology for evaluating research integration INSciTSMs. Board Bethany Laursen, ...... Michigan State University; Dr. Nicole Motzer, National Socio-Environmental...... Synthesis Center (SESYNC)3 Evaluation of Centers ad Institutes: Developing a Framework from Complex Systems and Team Science PlanningDr. GwenCommittee C. Marchand, University ...... of Nevada Las Vegas; Dr. Jonathan C. Hilpert, Georgia...... Southern University 7 Evaluating, Transdisciplinary, Sustainability-Focused Higher Education Programs: Using Transdisciplinary Facility MapOrientation ...... as a Performance Measure in Three NSF-Funded Program...... Contexts 8 Dr. Shirley Vincent, Vincent Evaluation Consulting; Dr. Deana Pennington, University of Texas at El Paso; Dr. Robert Chen, University of SessionMassachusetts Evaluation at Boston; InformationDr. Alan Berkowitz, Cary Institute...... of Ecosystem Studies; Dr. Aude Lochet,...... Cary Institute of Ecosystem 9 Studies Team Process Room 103 ConferenceTeamwork at processesa Glance indicators: ...... learning from the source materials...... of teams 10 Dr. Laura Anderson, IBM Research - Almaden FeaturedExploring Keynote Narrative and Mapping Plenary as a Lens Panels...... into the Relationship of Team Member...... Attachment 14 Styles with Team Psychological Safety SIGs...... Mr. Jonathan Silk, Pepperdine University Graduate School of Education and...... Psychology; Ms. Michele Norton, Texas A&M28 University Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture DetailedAn Daily evaluation Schedule of researcher ...... motivations and productivity outcomes...... in international research 30 teams at a U.S. research-intensive university WorkshopDr. Jane Abstracts...... Payumo, Michigan State University; Dr. Danna Moore, Washington State University; Dr. Prema Arasu, North 38 Carolina State University Panel Abstracts...... Can we really use bibliometrics to form research teams? 42 Mr. Timothy Gawne, Ms. Kathryn Knight, Dr. Moody Altamimi, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Dr. Jane Payumo, Michigan State University Oral AbstractsMultiple Team ...... Identities: A Person-By-Team Interaction Perspective 52 Dr. Tammy L. Rapp, Ohio University PosterArtistic Abstracts & Humanistic ...... Approaches to Team Science 106 Room 104 Poetry, Space, and Embodiment: A Case Study in Transdisciplinary Collaboration SciTS AwardsDr. Ellen Moll, Dr...... Nancy DeJoy, Michigan State University 119 Connecting an Art-Science Practice to Collaborations UnconferenceDr. Edgar Cardenas Details, Michigan State...... University ...... 119 Integration as a Non-Reductive Team Virtue Dr. Stephen Crowley, Boise State University; Dr. Brian Robinson, Texas A&M University-Kingsville; Dr. Chad Gonnerman, University of Thanks Southernto our Indiana Reviewers ...... 120 TDI structured dialogue + pedagogy of the oppressed Post ConferenceDr. Anna Malavisi, Western Evaluation Connecticut State Information...... University ...... 120 Organizational & Management Factors Ballrooms 1-4 Principles of Community in Team Science Dr. Ellen Fisher, Dr. Jennifer Cross, Dr. Hannah Love, Dr. Bailey Fosdick, Colorado State University Overload, Stress, and Higher Order Cognition in Emergency Managers Dr. Shalini Misra, Mr. Matthew Rhodes, Dr. Patrick Roberts, Virginia Tech University Co-designed strategic planning and Agile project management in academia: case study of an action research group Mr. Enric Senabre Hidalgo, Dimmons Research Group, Internet Interdisciplinary Institute ,Universitat Oberta de Catalunya) Dr. Mayo Fuster Morell, Berkman Center for Internet and Society - Harvard University Building capacity and capability in Greater Manchester through peer to peer support and development: The Research Programme Managers’ Network (RPMN) Ms. Charlotte Stockton-Powdrell, Ms. Alison Littlewood, Ms. Sarah Ashton, The University of Manchester; Ms. Hayley Brooks, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust; Ms. Cara Afzal, Health Innovation Manchester (HInM); Dr Dieter Weichart,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust Multiagent Systems in an Agile Environment Dr. John Turner, University of North Texas; Mr. Nigel Thurlow, Toyota Connected; Dr. Rose Baker, University of North Texas; Mr. David Northcutt, Toyota Connected; Ms. Kelsey Newman, Emory University 5:30 p.m. Break and Refresh 6:15 p.m. Sponsored Dinner and Panel: Ballrooms 1-4 Integrating Team Science with Health Science Research and Practice 2019 SciTS Conference Program 33 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019Daily SciTS Sche Conferencedule - Wednesday, Welcome May 22, 2019

Dear8 a.m. SciTS 2019Registration participants,Open 8 a.m.– 8 p.m. Lobby Coat Room Breakfast Ballrooms 5-8 Welcome9 a.m. to thePlenary 2019 Panel: Science Changing of ScalTeame and Science Scope of (SciTS) Collaboration Ballrooms 1-4 Conference,10:15 a.m. Breakthe 10th and Sponsorannual Showcasegathering of individuals and groups Ballrooms 5-8 interested10:30 a.m. in Collaborativestudying, practicing, Networks and facilitating team science. Room 101 This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation Finding Colleagues and Emerging sub-disciplines via Systematic Network Analysis of Funding Awards of the InternationalDr. Steve NetworkElliott, Dr. Kimberly for A. Scott,the ElizabethScience Wentz, of Arizona Team State UniversityScience (INSciTS), a professionalPatterns of newly formedsociety interdisciplinary advancing collaboratio relatedns over interests time during in an immersive training experience team science.Dr. Bonnie Spring, Mr. Phillip Rak, Mr. H. Gene McFadden, Mr. Leland Bardsley, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Dr. Mark Hansen, Dr. Vivek Shetty, University of California, Los Angeles ; Dr. Angela Fidler Pfammatter, Northwestern University The conferenceNetwork leadership Improvement team Co mmunities—myself, and Dr. Organizational Stephanie Change E. : Considerations in Developing Vasko, Dr. Julieand Thompson Leading NICs Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— has worked closelyDr. Marilyn with Amey, Alexanderthe SciTS Gardner, 2019 Michigan PlanningState University Committee and the INSciTS board to design a Investigating Collaborative Processes of Research Teams through Social Network Analyses conference thatDr. Jonathanbuilds Hilpert, on Georgiaexisting Southern research University; Dr. Gwenand C. practice Marchand, Dr. strengthsKristine Bragg, University while of Nevadaalso Laspointing Vegas in exciting new directions. Understanding scientific collaboration through the sequence of authors in the publication bylines and the diversity of collaborators One of our aimsMr. Yifor Bu, IndianaSciTS University; 2019 Mr. Yongis to Huang, demonstrate Wuhan University; Dr.how Cassidy team R. Sugimoto, science Indiana University;animates Dr. Zaida and Chinchi propelslla- research in environmentalRodríguez, Spanish National science, Research agriculture,Council and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for theEducation first time & Teaching panels Team focusing Science on Indigenous approaches to team science andRoom collaborative 102 approaches inCo-development agriculture and of Interdisciplinary natural resources. Engineering Innovation in Health course by Engineering and Team Science Faculty to Accelerate Health Innovation from Bench to Bedside Dr. Soyoung Kang, University of Washington; Dr. Erin Blakeney, Ms. Nicole Summerside, Dr. Brenda Zierler, UW School of Other values driveNursing; SciTSMs. Jennifer 2019 Sprecher, as Institute well. of Translational Diversity Health Sciences;and inclusion Ms. Katrina Henrikson, have Dr. been Jonathan fundamental Liu, Dr. Eric Seibel, commitments in our planning,Dr. drivingJonathan Posner, our UW calls Mechanical for Engineeringparticipation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, we have workedClosing to ensure the Collaborative a “green” Skills conference, Gap: Assessing giving the Effectiveness you the of option a University-Wide of an online Course program rather Designed to Teach Students How to Collaborate in Diverse Groups than a printed Dr.one Kathryn and Plaisance working, Mr. Christopher to reduce Lok, Ness Lamont,food University waste. of Waterloo And as the primary host, the MSU Center for InterdisciplinarityThe Development seeks of toa Competency- create opportunities Based Team Science to Training refine Program: thinking A Case about Study ofcollaboration TeamMAPPS and cross- disciplinary research,Dr. Kevin C. Wooten, education, University of Houstonand training. Clear Lake; Dr. Martiza R. Salazar, University of California Irvine; Dr. Theresa K. Lant, Pace University; Dr. Eduardo Salas, Rice University; Cynde Ferris, Lori A. Wiseman, The University of Texas Medical Branch We hope that youTraining have and anDevelopment excellent on Interdisciplinarytime in Lansing Scientific while Teams you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an Ms. Hannah Beth Love, Dr. Jennifer Eileen Cross, Dr. Bailey Fosdick, Dr. Susan VandeWoude, Dr. Ellen Fisher, Colorado State active downtownUniversity with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information.

If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges.

Michael O’Rourke Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 34 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Wednesday, May 22, 2019Table - Dail yof S Contentschedule

10:30Welcome a.m. Diversity ...... on Teams 2 Room 103 INSciTS BoardThe impact ...... of gender composition and leadership on the productivity...... and authorship 3 practices of interdisciplinary research teams Ms. Jacalyn Beck, Michigan State University; Ms. Sheila Brassel, University of Michigan; Ms. Ellie Phillips, Ms. Jordan Fornier, Dr. Robert PlanningMontgomery, Committee Dr. Kevin Elliot, ...... Dr. Kendra Cheruvelil, Michigan State University; Dr. Isis ...... Settles, University of Michigan 7 Facility MapExplorations ...... of Temporal Diversity, Temporal Conflict,...... and Temporal Leadership 8 Dr. Susan Mohammed, Penn State University Session EvaluationStrategies for Promoting Information “Teaminess” ...... with a Focus on Diversity and...... Inclusion 9 Dr. Binyam Nardos, Dr. Letisha Wyatt, Dr. Damien Fair, Oregon Health & Science University ConferenceWhat at team a Glancecharacteristics ...... relate to team performance – and what...... is the role of diversity? 10 Dr. Ulf Sandström, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm; Dr. Peter Van Den Besselaar, Teresa Mom Consultancy & Vrije Featured KeynoteUniversiteit Amsterdam and Plenary Panels...... 14 Team Climate Mediates the Effect of Diversity on Science Teams SIGs...... Dr. Isis Settles, Ms. Sheila Brassel, University of Michigan; Dr. Patricia...... Soranno, Dr. Kendra Cheruvelil, Dr. Georgina 28 Montgomery, Dr. Kevin Elliott, Michigan State University Detailed ScaffoldingDaily Schedule and Academic ...... Settings ...... 30 Room 104 Developing Team Science Capacity at a Technological University WorkshopDr. Abstracts...... Kathleen E Halvorsen, Michigan Technological University 38 A year implementing a team science movement in a British University Panel Abstracts...... Ms. Ruth Norris, Dr. Claire Smith, Dr. Amanda Lamb, Ms. Charlotte Stockton-Powdrell, Ms. Rachel Chown, The University42 of Manchester Oral AbstractsAssessing ...... the Propensity of Research Collaboration in the Life Sciences 52 Dr. Kyuseon Lee, Dr. Steve Miller, Dr. Philip G. Pardey, University of Minnesota Poster AbstractsSocietal Impact ...... of Research on the Complexity of Language in France 106 Dr. Audrey Mazur-Palandre, University of Lyon; Dr. Gerald Niccolai, CNRS: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Dr. François SciTS AwardsPellegrino, ...... CNRS: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Dr. Kristine Lund, CNRS: Centre National de la 119Recherche Scientifique Deep Knowledge Integration across Disciplines: The EMBeRS Method UnconferenceDr. Deana Details Pennington, University ...... of Texas at El Paso; Dr. Kate Thompson, Griffith University;...... Dr. Shirley Vincent, 119 Vincent Evaluation Consulting, LLC; Dr. David Gosselin, University of Nebraska at Lincoln Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 120 PANEL: Collaborative Scientific Writing: Challenges and Strategies Ballrooms 1-4 Post ConferenceDr. Graham Hubbs, Evaluation University of Idaho; Dr.Information...... Kara Hall, Dr. Amanda Vogel, Leidos Biomed; Dr. Kendra...... Spence Cheruvelil; 120 Dr. Patricia Soranno, Michigan State University

12:15 p.m. Lunch 1 p.m. Plenary Panel: Agency Approaches to Team Science Ballrooms 1-4 2:15 p.m. Unconference Ballrooms 1-4 4:45 p.m. Poster Session, Sponsor Showcase and Reception Ballrooms 5-8 6:15 p.m. Dinner and Plenary Panel: Cultivating Team Science in Clinical and Translational Research Ballrooms 1-4

2019 SciTS Conference Program 35 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019Daily SciTS Sche Conferencedule - Thursday, Welcome May 23, 2019

Dear8 a.m. SciTS Registration2019 participants,Open 8 a.m.– 2 p.m. Lobby Coat Room Breakfast Ballrooms 5-8 Welcome9 a.m. toHigh the Level2019 Theory Science of Team Science (SciTS) Room 101 Conference, theTowards 10th a Theoryannual of Replications,gathering Openof individuals Science, and andReproducibility groups interested in studying,Dr. Bert Baumgaertner practicing,, Dr. Berna Devezer, and Dr. facilitating Erkan Buzbas, University team of science.Idaho; Dr. Luis G. Nardin, Brandenburg University of This meeting Technologyis also the first SciTS conference since formation of the InternationalFoxholes, Network Not Silos for the Science of Team Science Dr. James Foster, University of Idaho (INSciTS), a professionalTransdisciplinary society Knowledge advancing Producing Teams related (KPTs): interests Typology, in features, and communication team science.skills Dr. Gaetano Romano Lotrecchiano, George Washington University; Dr. Shalini Misra, Virginia Tech The conferenceCTSA leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. Room 102 Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— Using Instructional Design Principles to Engage Citizen Scientists as Clinical Research Partners has worked closelyMs. Janet Brishkewith ,theMs. ChristySciTS Evans 2019, Dr. Elizabeth Planning Shenkman, Committee University of Floridaand Collegethe INSciTS of Medicine board to design a conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new An Integrated Approach to Promoting Team Science Principles Across a CTSA directions. Dr. John (Jack) Kues, Dr. Jackie Knapke, Dr. Saundra Regan, Dr. Jennifer Molano, Dr. Rebecca Lee, Ms. Laura Hildreth, Elizabeth Heubi, University of Cincinnati One of our aimsImplementing for SciTS a Continuous 2019 is Qualityto demonstrate Improvement Interventionhow team in sciencea Clinical and animates Transitional and propels research in environmentalResearch Network science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to Ms. LaKaija Johnson, Ms. Gwenndolyn Porter, Ms. Jolene Rohde, Dr. Mary E. Cramer, Dr. Paul A. Estabrooks, University of feature for theNebraska first Medical time Center panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative approaches inThe agriculture relationship betweenand natural disciplinary resources. diversity, team composition, time-workload pressures and quality of interactions during patient-reviews in multidisciplinary tumor boards Other values Dr.drive Tayana SciTS Soukup, King's 2019 College as London; well. Mr. DiversityBen W Lamb, Cambridge and inclusion University; Mr. James have SA Green,been Whipps fundamental Cross University commitments in our planning,Hospital; driving Dr. Nick Sevdalis,our calls King's College for participation, London invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, we have workedDisciplinary to ensure Diversity a “green” – Theory conference,and Praxis giving you the option of an online program Room rather 103 than a printedAssessing one and the effectivenessworking toof various reduce funding food strategies waste. to foster And disciplinary as the diversity primary in research host, teams the MSU Center for InterdisciplinarityMr. David Campbell seeks, Mr. Brooketo create Struck, Science-Metrix opportunities Inc. to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinary research,Measuring theeducation, Division of Laborand intraining. Interdisciplinary Science Dr. Phillip Honenberger, University of Nevada-Las Vegas; Dr. Evelyn Brister, Rochester Institute of Technology We hope thatDo you Interdisciplinary have an excellent Researchers time Tend in to LansingJoin Teams? while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active downtownDr. Kevin with M. Kniffin restaurants,, Cornell University; Dr.local Andrew art S. Hanks, shops, The Ohio running State University trails, and local community classes such Spectacles of Inquiry: Perspective-Taking and Interdisciplinary Values as kickboxingDr. and Lisa Osbeck pottery., University Please of West Georgia consult the website for more detailed information. A Team Science Approach to Advance the Understanding of Low Back Pain If you have anyDr. Jacek questions Cholewicki, Dr. or John comments M. Popovich, Jr., Ms.for Angela the S. SciTS Lee, Mr. Payam 2019 Aminpour, Planning Dr. Steven Gray,Committee, Michigan State please look for those of us with redUniversity; ribbons Dr. Paul on W. our Hodges, name The University badges. of Queensland

Michael O’Rourke Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 36 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Thursday, May 23, 2019Table - Dail yof S Contentschedule

9 a.m.Welcome Creative ...... Approaches to Support Team Science in Academia 2 Ballrooms 1-4 INSciTS UsingBoard Collaborative ...... Design to Align Institutional Incentives ...... and Interdisciplinary Team 3 Expectations: The Case of Reappointment, Tenure, and Promotion Planning Dr.Committee Veronica Stanich, Mr. Gabriel...... Harp, Alliance for the Arts in Research Universities ...... 7 Mcubed: A Token-Based Seed Funding Program with No Formal Scientific Review Facility MapDr. Valerie ...... Johnson, Dr. Mark Burns, University of Michigan ...... 8 Working with your Research Development Office to Support Team Science Session EvaluationDr. Betsy Rolland, University Information of Wisconsin-Madison; ...... Dr. Holly Falk-Krzesinski, Elsevier ...... 9 Agbioscience: transdisciplinary collaboration and the land-grant university mission in the 21st Conferencecentury at a Glance ...... 10 Dr. Julie Aldridge, The Ohio State University FeaturedRethinking Keynote science and as Plenarya vocation: 100 Panels...... years of bureaucratization of academic...... science 14 John P. Walsh, Georgia Institute of Technology; You-Na Lee, National University of Singapore 10:45a.m.SIGs...... Break and Sponsor Showcase ...... 28 Ballrooms 5-8 11 Detaileda.m. Concurrent Daily Schedule Panels ...... 30 Preparing Students for Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Team Research: Case Studies and Room 101 WorkshopModels Abstracts...... from the Graduate and Undergraduate Level 38 Dr. Marisa Rinkus, Michigan State University; Dr. Graham Hubbs, University of Idaho; Dr. Chet McLeskey, Michigan State University Panel Abstracts...... Reward and Recognition for Team-Based and Cross-disciplinary Research 42 Room 102 Dr. Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Elsevier and Northwestern University; Dr. Kara L. Hall, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Oral AbstractsHealth; Dr. Julie ...... Thompson Klein, Wayne State University and International Research Affiliate, Transdisciplinarity Lab, 52 ETH-Zurich; Dr. Amanda L. Vogel, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc. Poster AbstractsSciCom meets ...... SciTS. Interdisciplinary teamwork for science communication training 106 Room 103 Dr. Jack C. Schultz, University of Toledo; Dr. Suzanne Burgoyne, Dr. Bimal Balakrishnan, Dr. Jonathan Stemmle, Dr. Shellly SciTS AwardsRodgers, University ...... of Missouri 119 UnconferenceIdentifying Details the Behaviors ...... and Actions of Facilitators of Successful...... Teams 119 Ballrooms 1-4 Ms. Jill Macchiaverna, Mr. Dave King, Exaptive, Inc.; Dr. Alicia Knoedler, Independent Contractor; Dr. Terri Gilbert, Cohen Veterans Thanks toBioscience; our ReviewersMr. Victor Soji Ladele, Health ...... Innovation Lab ...... 120 12:45p.m. Light Lunch and Closing Session Ballrooms 1-4 Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120 2 p.m. Conference Adjourns

Don’t forget to complete your session and post conference evaluations at: https://bit.ly/scits2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 37 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019Wo rSciTSkshop Conference Abstracts Welcome

Teaching the Science of Team Science (SciTS) Dr.Dear Jennifer SciTS Cross 2019, Ms. Hannahparticipants, Love, Dr. Ellen Fisher, Colorado State University

WorkingWelcome on a to team the can 2019 be a challenge!Science Haveof Team you ever Science said, "I hate(SciTS) group projects" or "It isn't natural for me to work on a team?" ThereConference, is a growing the body 10th of literature annual on gathering what makes ofgood individuals teams, but how and do groups you “DO” team science, and how do you “TEACH” team science?interested Educating in studying, teams about practicing, team science and involves facilitating various levelsteam of science. education and concepts including developing a vision, engagingThis meeting in the process, is also using the facilitation, first SciTS and creatingconference a shared since language. formation In addition, the critical skills needed for team science are slightlyof the differentInternational for pre and Network post-doctoral for traineesthe Science compared of to Team PIs. Join Science us for this three-part workshop to discuss what training is (INSciTS),needed for different a professional research levels, society learn about advancing best practices, related and participateinterests in ina 1-hour mini short course. The workshop will teaminvolve science.small group work, facilitated dialogs, and an active-learning training session. Be prepared to learn from each other and the facilitation team. Detail on each part of the workshop below: The conference leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. Vasko,Part I: Team Dr. Training Julie ThompsonLevels Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— hasAny given worked team closelycan consist with of several the SciTS different 2019 levels ofPlanning investigators Committee including pre and and post-doctoralthe INSciTS trainees, board senior to design investigators, a etc. conferenceWhat specific team that science builds training on existing do different research groups (i.e. and trai nees,practice junior strengthsinvestigators, while senior researchers,also pointing PIs, inadminist excitingrators, new projectdirections. managers, and community partners) need to be successful? This workshop will begin with small group discussions to brainstorm using what are the most critical training aspects. Using the matrix below, small groups will outline what critical team science skills, training and support is needed to train and support different team science groups (i.e. pre and post-doctoral trainees v PIs) on One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels scientific teams. researchLearning in objective: environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for Assess the first as a timecommunity panels what focusing type of training on Indigenousis needed for different approa levelsches of toresearch. team science and collaborative approaches Benefit in agriculture to SciTS Community: and natural Conduct resources. a needs assessment for the scientific community. PartOther II values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments Participantsin our planning, will discuss driving the results our from calls their for small participation, group conversations. invited In presentations, a facilitated dialog, and we will fee construct structure. an over Inarching addition, matrix ofwe the have critical worked aspects of to training ensure for eacha “green” level. As conference, a group we will: giving you the option of an online program rather than a Addprinted to the one beginning and listworking of Critical to Skills reduce to Develop food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity List resources or active seeks learning to create techniques opportunities for delivery for to each refine audience thinking about collaboration and cross- Todisciplinary conclude part research, II, participants education, will vote on andthe training training. area they would like to further focus on through a mini-training course that will constitute the last hour of the workshop. Learning Objectives: We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an  Construct a matrix as a team science community about what trainings and skills are needed for all trainee levels. active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such  Engage in a conversation about best practices for team science training. as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information.  Identity what trainings are needed in the team science community.

PartIf you III. SciTShave Training any questions Demonstration or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those Basedof us onwith the redoutcome ribbons of the onvote our (part name II), during badges. the last hour, the team will present a mini-training workshop that demonstrates 3 unique activities for developing teams. Our team science team has developed a series of training workshops for both pre and post docsMichael and senior O’Rourke PIs. We will come prepared to the workshop to demonstrate 3 unique modules, based on requests from workshop participants.Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference Learning Objective:  Achieve a greater understanding of best practices for team science training.  Benefit to SciTS Community: Demonstration of how research, training, and action come together in research-based trainings.

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 38 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org WorkTableshop ofA bContentsstracts

NavigatingWelcome Team ...... Power Dynamics in Authorship Decisions 2 Dr. Kevin Elliott, Dr. Kendra Cheruvelil, Michigan State University; Dr. Isis Settles, University of Michigan; Dr. Patricia Soranno, Dr. GeorginaINSciTS Montgomery Board, Michigan ...... State University ...... 3

ObjectivesPlanning Committee ...... 7 Facility1. To discuss Map current ...... research about challenges that science team...... s face related to the ways po 8wer dynamics affect authorship decisions Session2. To engage Evaluation in a dialogue aboutInformation both the role ...... that team climate can play in addressing...... difficult 9 authorship issues on science teams and strategies that can be used to improve team climate Conference3. To explore policies at a and Glance procedures ...... that can help teams productively navigate...... authorship decisions 10

GoalsFeatured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 1. To increase participants’ understanding of the effects of power dynamics on authorship practices in science teams SIGs...... 2. To share research about the importance of team climate for ...... addressing authorship issues on 28 teams and to facilitate small- and Detailedlarge-group Daily discussions Schedule about strategies ...... for improving climate on participants’...... teams 30 3. To develop best practices and procedures that build upon published examples and can be tailored to participants’ teams Workshop Abstracts...... 38 Expected Outcomes Panel1. Participants Abstracts...... will learn the latest research about the challenges teams face related to team power 42 dynamics and authorship decisions. Oral2. Participants Abstracts will develop ...... greater understanding of the important effects of team climate on authorship52 decisions and identify strategies that they can use for promoting a positive climate on their own teams. Poster3. Participants Abstracts will identify ...... policies and procedures that can help their teams handle authorship 106 decisions in a fair and SciTStransparent Awards manner...... 119 OptimizingUnconference Mentoring Details Relationships ...... in Team Science: An Engine...... for Scientific 119 Accomplishment andThanks Inclusive to Excellence.our Reviewers ...... 120 Dr. Melissa McDaniels, Dr. Katy Colbry, Michigan State University Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120 Inclusive and high quality mentorship is needed within and across scientific teams aiming to address complex and urgent scientific questions. In these environments, expertise is diffused – knowledge needed to address multi-faceted questions will be held across teams and institutions. A scientist’s ability to participate and contribute fully in these environments will rely upon one’s ability to mentor (and be mentored by) others from different disciplines and career stages (e.g., graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, junior faculty, mid-career, senior faculty).

In addition to research productivity (Steiner and Lanphear, 2004; 2007; Wingard et al, 2004), strong mentorship has been linked to increased recruitment and persistence in science, particularly for trainees from underrepresented groups (Hathaway et al, 2002; Nagda et al, 1998; Sambunjak et al, 2010; Williams et al, 2015; Bordes-Edgar et al., 2011; ). Empirical research has indicated that trainees with strong mentorship experience an enhanced science identity, sense of belonging and self-efficacy (Cho et al, 2011; Chemers et al, 2011; Thiry and Laursen, 2011).

Federal (U.S.) agencies and foundations, including the National Academies of Science, National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, Sloan Foundation, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Burroughs Wellcome Fund have invested significantly in the study and practice of optimizing mentoring relationships (Hemming, McDaniels, Pfund, Schwartz, Tartakovsky, & Yellin, 2018). Starting in 2018, the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS) started requiring applicants of training grants (e.g., T32s) to not only have robust professional development plans for trainees, but also for mentors.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 39 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Wo rSciTSkshop Conference Abstracts Welcome

InDear this interactiveSciTS 2019 workshop, participants, participants will (1) be introduced to the national landscape for supporting high quality and inclusive mentorship in research; (2) have the opportunity to share both needs and best practices with colleagues; (3) become familiar with WelcomeEntering Mentoring, to the an 2019 evidence-based Science approachof Team to Sciencesupporting (SciTS)the professional development of mentors and mentees (and experience Conference,a portion of that curricula); the 10th and annual (4) leave gathering with a plan toof connec individualst the professional and groups development needs of research team members to institutionalinterested and in national studying, resources practicing, on mentorship. and facilitating team science. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation Mappingof the International Translational Network Research for the Stories: Science Team of Team Science Science Storytelling Using the NIEHS Translational Research(INSciTS), Framework a professional society advancing related interests in team science. Ms. Kristi Pettibone, National Institute of Environmental Health Science

The NIEHS conference recently published leadership a framework team —myself,expanding the Dr. concept Stephanie of translational E. research. While the framework was originally intendedVasko, forDr. the Julie field ofThompson environmental Klein, health andscience, Megghan we purposely Honke designed Seidel— it to be useful for many types of team science and hastranslational worked research closely activities. with Teamthe SciTS science 2019is, after Planning all, a necessary Committee component and of translational the INSciTS research, board which to we design define as a the conferenceevolution of a research that builds idea into on concrete existing strategies research that protect and practiceand improve strengths human health. while also pointing in exciting new directions. During this workshop, we will provide an overview of the framework, participants will work in small groups to plan a team to conduct a Onemock translationalof our aims research for SciTS project, 2019 and participants is to demonstrate will use the translational how team research science narrative animates template and to map propels out a trans lational research story in andenvironmental identify opportunities science, for getting agriculture, to public health and impacts. natural The resources. presenter will To provide this in-personend, we consultati are pleasedons and to feedbackfeature throughoutfor the first the process. time panels We’ll talk focusing about the thingson Indigenous that facilitate translationapproachesal research to team and thescience things thatand pose collaborative challenges to conductingapproaches translational in agriculture research. Finally,and natural we’ll wrap resources. up with a brief overview of how the translational research framework can be used for evaluation purposes. Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments Workshopin our planning, Objectives: driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, we have To workedprovide an to overview ensure of thea “green” NIEHS translational conference, research giving framework, you the option of an online program rather than a Toprinted connect one the frameworkand working to team to science reduce approaches food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity To provide participants seeks with to an create opportunity opportunities to apply the framew to refineork in mapping thinking out about a translational collaboration research storyand and cross- identifying disciplinarypaths toresearch, achieving broader education, clinical, andpublic training. health, and social and behavioral impacts. Workshop Goals: We 1.hope To educatethat you participants have an on excellentthe NIEHS translational time in Lansing research whileframework you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active2. downtownTo understand with how teamrestaurants, science is necessarylocal art for shops, translational running research trails, and local community classes such as kickboxing3. To practice and using pottery. the framework Please to plan consult a translational the website research for project more and detailed map out paths information. for achieving meaningful impacts 4. To practice using the framework to tell a translational research story 5. To learn about the facilitators and challenges of conducting translational research If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges. Expected Workshop Outcomes  Increased understanding among participants of how to use the NIEHS translational research framework and of the resources Michaelavailable O’Rourke on www.niehs.nih.gov/tranlsation Chair, 2019Increased Science understanding of Team by NIEHS Science staff ofConference the facilitators and challenges to conducting translational research in real-life situations.  Written draft of a translational research stories for each participant.

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 40 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org WorkTableshop ofA bContentsstracts

CommunityWelcome Playbooks ...... and Collaboration Guides – Creating Documentation 2 to Facilitate Effective ScientificINSciTS Teamwork Board ...... 3 Ms. Lou Woodley, Dr. Rebecca Aicher, AAAS Planning Committee ...... 7 Community playbooks or collaboration guides are the documentation that establish the key goals, personnel, activities and outputs of a collaborativeFacility project. Map They ...... serve to create buy-in, illuminate processes, justify...... resource allocation, permit 8 scaling of a project and more. We’ve made producing a playbook for their community one of the key deliverables for fellows participating in the AAAS Community EngagementSession Fellows Evaluation Program. By Informationworking closely with ...... the fellows we have gained broad...... perspective 9 on the range of contexts in which this Conferencedocumentation adds at value a Glance – and have ...... created a new framework for conceptualizing...... the six core 10components of a community playbook. Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 In this workshop we will: SIGs...... 1. Work with participants via a multi-step activity that involves in...... dividual reflection and small group 28 synthesis that builds to the self-discovery of the core components of a community playbook or collaboration guide; Detailed2. Present Dailyand discuss Schedule the CSCCE ...... framework describing the core components...... of a community 30 playbook and; 3. Show and discuss examples of 4 different types of playbooks created by AAAS Community Engagement Fellows. These will Workshopinclude playbooks Abstracts...... for a research collaboration, for an organization providing scientific tools 38and services, and for a scientific society working with its members. Panel Abstracts...... 42 Participants will leave with an understanding of the value of creating a playbook or collaboration guide for their own projects. They will be equippedOral Abstracts with a framework ...... to enable them to audit their existing documentation and to transform 52it into a crucial backbone of their collaborativePoster work. Abstracts ...... 106 SciTS Awards ...... 119 TBL 101: Introduction to Team-Based Learning Dr. UnconferenceWayne McCormack, University Details of Florida...... 119

DescriptionThanks of workshop: to our objectives,Reviewers goals, ...... and expected outcomes ...... 120 Do yourPost students Conference dread the thought Evaluation of working in Information...... groups or teams? Are you ready to incorporate...... more 120 active learning methods into your teaching style? Have you ever wondered how to go about “flipping” your classroom? If either answer is “Yes”, consider trying Team-Based Learning (TBL). TBL is a structured small group active learning method that motivates students through a readiness assurance process to come to class prepared, teaches team skills via experience, and focuses classroom time on higher order skills such as problem-solving and decision-making. This workshop will be a great introduction to TBL, and will be conducted in the TBL format. Participants will prepare ahead, take a readiness assurance test, and then engage actively with their assigned team members. The structure, process, and essential characteristics of an effective TBL module will be emphasized.

Objectives:  Explain the key components of a successful TBL module.  Outline how they would construct a TBL module from a set of objectives.  Describe how they might convert a course/lecture they already teach into a TBL module.  Illustrate how to transform a small group into a productive learning-team.

Statement regarding how the workshop can benefit SciTS attendees/community The SciTS community focuses on the value of team science in research. TBL focuses on the value of team science in teaching and learning. SciTS attendees who are in academia may be particularly interested in applying team science to their teaching.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 41 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Pan SciTSel Ab sConferencetracts Welcome

IntereachDear SciTS Community 2019 participants, Effort: A Live Action "Potluck" Approach to Assembling Shared Team Science Curricular Resources. Dr.Welcome Christine Hendrento the 2019, Dr. Kristine Science Glauber of, TeamDuke Clinical Science & Translation (SciTS) Science Institute Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups interestedFor this panel inpresentation, studying, we practicing, will take a “flash and presentation” facilitating approach, team science.with conference attendees being invited to submit 2-page Thispresentations meeting (and is associated also the materials) first SciTS ahead soconference we can use oursince time formation to share the floor and host a group working session, amassing ofresources the International for all of us to share. Network For those for whothe areScience attending of a Teamdifferent Science session, presentations and materials are still welcomed so we can include your input in the panel and your voice in the ongoing conversation. (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science. The Resilience of Team Science: Lessons for the Science of Team Science from Puerto Rico’s ThePost conference Hurricane Marialeadership Response, team —myself, Recovery Dr. and Stephanie Reconstruction E. Vasko,Dr. Cecilio Dr. Ortiz Julie Garcia Thompson, Dr. Marla Perez Klein, Lugo and, Dr. MegghanLionel Orama Honke Exclusa , Seidel—University of Puerto Rico,Mayaguez; Mr. Jacob Mans, Universityhas worked of Minnesota closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new There is consensus on the multidimensional uniqueness of Hurricane Maria’s level of destructive impact on the Puerto Rican archipelago.directions. The Maria blackout is now considered the longest in U.S. history. A George Washington University Report states that more than 2,975 deaths could be attributed to Hurricane Maria. Ultimately, FEMA describes the Hurricane Maria as “the largest operationOne of ourin the aims history for of theSciTS agency”. 2019 Years is beforeto demonstrate the storm howe howver, Theteam University science of Puerto animates Rico developed and propels a powerful resiliency toolresearch for the archipelago. in environmental The National science, Institute of agriculture, Energy and Island and Sustainability, natural resources. is a collaborative To this convergence end, we platform are pleased that brings to togetherfeature over for 90the resources first time in energy panels and sustainabilityfocusing onamong Indigenous the eleven campusesapproaches of the to UPR team system. science This Team and Science collaborative initiative, becameapproaches the only in convergence agriculture platform and capable natural of resources.providing expertise necessary in the reconstruction of the island’s electric grid. Alternatively, a National Science Foundation Critical Resilient Infrastructure Systems and Processes (CRISP) Grant had been awarded toOther the UPR values years beforedrive theSciTS Hurricane. 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, Thewe CRISPhave workedprogram studies to ensure the resilience a “green” of structurally conference, critical, yet giving highly youinterdependent the option infrastructure of an online systems program and process ratheres. As thanthe quintessential a printed Science one and of Team working Science to effort, reduce the projectfood broughtwaste. together And as 9 researchersthe primary from host, psychology the MSU to electrical Center engineering, political science to climate science and radars, from environmental sociology to computer science. In the case of this grant for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- the object of study was Puerto Rico’s electric grid. Before Maria arrived in Puerto Rico, the Puerto Rican media had flagged this grant disciplinary research, education, and training. as a possible answer to Puerto Ricco’s energy problems! Finally, a valuable lesson was also learned from Maria: the need for innovation in the way universities see themselves as intervenors in emergency management processes and practices. From disjointed, Wefragmented, hope competitors,that you have we should an excellentbe moving towards time in more Lansing heterarchical, while polycentric, you enjoy collaborative SciTS 2019. inter university Lansing platforms. has an Again, activeutilizing thedowntown Science of withTeam restaurants,Science, the Resiliency local artthrough shops, Inno vationrunning in Sustainable trails, and Energy local Platform community was created, classes to transfe suchr the asknowledge, kickboxing technologies and pottery. and science Please developed consult after the the hurricane website under for a morenew ethic detailed of equity information.and justice by universities which themselves might be hit with a catastrophic event in the future. If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those ofThis us panel with proposes red ribbons to introduce, on ouranalyze name and comparebadges. these 3 major team science efforts dealing with energy and sustainability issues in Puerto Rico, assess their performance before and after Hurricane Maria in effectively improving the resiliency of communities Michaelin Puerto Rico O’Rourke and ultimately help answer the question: what is the relationship between resilience and team science? How well do Chair,Team Science 2019 Efforts Science respond of toTeam the impacts Science of Catastrophic Conference Climatic Events? How can the Science of Team Science enhance the resiliency of these efforts and in turn, the resiliency of the communities engaged in these efforts? Panelists: Dr. Cecilio Ortiz Garcia, Dr. Marla Perez Lugo, Dr. Lionel Orama Exclusa; Discussant: Jacob Mans, AIA

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 42 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org PTableanel Aofb Contentsstracts

ChangingWelcome Academic ...... Institutional Culture to Facilitate and Support Team Science2 Dr. Scott Leischow, Ms. Andi Hess, Dr. Deborah Williams, Arizona State University; Ms. Rachel Chown, Manchester Cancer Research Centre;INSciTSDr. Jennifer Board Cross, Colorado...... State University; Dr. Gaetano Lotrecchiano...... , The George Washington 3 University Planning Committee ...... 7 Fostering Team Science requires new thinking and paradigmatic shifts in academia both structurally and functionally in order to maximizeFacility collaborative Map ...... science efforts that improve both the educational...... process and the advancement 8 of science to address increasingly complex and interconnected societal challenges and opportunities. Toward that end, INSciTS created a Special Interest GroupSession (SIG) dedicated Evaluation to Changing Information Academic Institutional ...... Culture to Facilitate and Support...... Team Science. 9 In order to begin exploring the evolving academic environment in support of enhancing team science, the leadership of this new SIG propose a panel session to exploreConference examples of academic at a Glance initiatives designed...... to develop and implement new...... ways to address complex10 challenges by improving teamsFeatured and team science. Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 TheSIGs...... approach in this panel is to highlight four universities that are actively...... involved in organizational efforts28 to foster team science, and working to document that process: Colorado State University, The University of Manchester, The George Washington University and ArizonaDetailed State University. Daily TheSchedule four formal presentations...... by those institutions (see...... specifics below), will 30 include a discussant summary followed by general discussion among attendees. Workshop Abstracts...... 38 Rachel Chown, University of Manchester ImplementingPanel Abstracts...... a New Way of Answering Our Complex Research Questions, in Healthcare and 42Beyond EffectiveOral changes Abstracts in cancer ...... treatment and care require a furthered awareness of multidisciplinary approaches 52 to the increased complexity of patients. These are populations with multiple co-morbidities and polypharmacy based on aging cohorts, and are populationsPoster of Abstractsunmet need within ...... the UK. As a result, our academics institutions and hospitals need 106TS for the required expertise to manage these complex patients, and improve outcomes. Two practical elements of the TS approach within the Manchester Cancer ResearchSciTS Centre Awards (MCRC) ...... will be presented; and both represent the plans for significant cultural and 119environmental change at the centre. As part of a new programme, the MCRC is now strategically funding scientific projects that can show: (a) cross-disciplinary collaborations,Unconference (b) high-risk, Details high-impact ...... ideas that will lead or can lead towards...... a step change in patient 119 care, (c) newly formulated cross-disciplinaryThanks to collaborations our Reviewers from different ...... specialties, (d) projects that are unique...... to the Manchester 120 environment Additionally, the planned physical co-location of ‘non-traditional’ teams in the building of a new comprehensive cancer centre (set to complete in 2021) aimsPost to facilitate Conference and develop moreEvaluation of these multidisciplinary Information...... teams...... 120

Jennifer Cross, Colorado State University The Institutional Change Pyramid: Policy, Education, and Intervention As society is facing increasingly complex problems, scientists and universities are looking for ways to build and develop larger and more transdisciplinary teams. How can universities provide support for transdisciplinary teams and support the culture change needed to develop and advance team science? Organizational change to support new models of science requires several components: new policies and procedures that incentivize and reward transdisciplinary and team science, educational offerings that expand the specific skill sets for transdisciplinary and team science, and developmental interventions for teams to enhance their effectiveness. Two case studies will be presented that describe the spectrum of organizational change efforts. At the CU Anschutz Medical Campus, culture change efforts are focused on developing a spectrum of educational offerings that provide training for three primary audiences: senior researchers, junior researchers and pre and postdocs. At Colorado State University, the policies and procedures for annual review and tenure and promotion have been revised to explicitly support transdisciplinary science. In addition, Colorado State University has launched a program to fund and develop large transdisciplinary teams through the early stages of formation, preliminary data collection, and competition for external funding. These two institutions demonstrate the range of activities and strategies being used by universities to support culture change.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 43 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Pan SciTSel Ab sConferencetracts Welcome

DearDeborah SciTS Williams, 2019 Arizon participants,a State University A Network-centric College Transformation Focused on Translational Education, Research and Community Engagement to WelcomeImprove Population to the 2019Health Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference,At Arizona State University,the 10th aannual team of diversegathering faculty of and individuals staff came together and groups in 2017-2018 to fully redesign ASU’s College of Health Solutions. The redesign was implemented with the goal of fostering team science, and included the elimination of departments and interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. schools, linking innovative research and academic programs, and fostering translational science to improve population health. Two key This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation components of this redesign are the creation of Translational Teams and Affinity Networks. Translational Teams bring together scientists,of the International students and community Network members for the to Science address health of Team challenges Science through transdisciplinary research, academic program development,(INSciTS), anda professional community engagement. society advancingThree different related levels of Translationalinterests in Teams have been implemented, ranging from incubation-orientedteam science. formative teams through established teams working to take their team to the next level. Affinity Networks are designed to address and improve methods and practices to enhance College and Translational Team functioning, similar to ‘cores’ but broaderThe conference in scope. Thus leadership far, 6 Translational team Teams—myself, and 3 Dr.Affinity Stephanie Networks have E. been implemented, and more are under development. Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— Gaetanohas worked R. Lotrecchiano, closely with The theGeorge SciTS Washington 2019 Planning University Committee and the INSciTS board to design a conferenceNormalizing Collaboration that builds Across on existing the Institutiona researchl Spectrum and practice of Learning, strengths Research, while and Practice also pointing in exciting new directions.While embarking on the task of enhancing collaboration on the university campus, one would think that organizational level strategies and infrastructures are the only way to achieve a culture of collaboration. In reality, though many universities espouse collaboration as Onea key strategicof our aimselement for in learning,SciTS 2019research is and to demonstratecommon practice, how few structures team science and requirements animates are developedand propels to ensure that such researchstrategic interests in environmental become commonplace science, across agriculture, the university. andNormalizing natural collaboration resources. starts To with this a commitment end, we areto the pleased processes, to featurebehaviors, for and the expectations first time associated panels with focusing shared knowledge on Indigenous and open environments.approaches Individuals, to team smallscience teams, and local collaborative projects, and andapproaches changes in behaviorin agriculture and attitude and are natural the beginning resources. stages of creating a culture of collaboration university wide. In this presentation, the author will share some approaches used at GW that provide models for normalizing collaboration across the spectrum. Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments Increasingin our planning, Research driving Effecti our callsveness for participation, Through Team invited Science presentations, Training for and Research fee structure. Teams In addition, Ms.we Jenniferhave worked Sprecher ,to Institute ensure of Translational a “green” Health conference, Sciences; givingDr. Brenda you Zierler the, Dr.option Erin Blakeneyof an online, Ms. Nicole program Summerside rather, thanSchool a of printed Nursing, Universityone and of working Washington to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinaryAs team science research, has moved fromeducation, industry to and clinical training. to research environments, the approach, method and competencies have had to adjust to meet the needs of the various audiences. The goal of this workshop is to describe and demonstrate an approach to team Wetraining hope that meetsthat youthe tailored have needsan excellent of research time teams. in The Lansing SciTS community while you and enjoy attendees SciTS that attend2019. this Lansing workshop has will bene an fit activefrom hearing downtown common researchwith restaurants, team challenges local and artwill gainshops, access running to interactive trails, teaching and local approaches community and resources classes used suchto asfacilitate kickboxing team training. and The pottery. workshop Please will focus consult on the followin the websiteg: lessons for learned more from detailed our 10 years information. of team training, the need to standardize team science competencies for research teams, tools to measure the impact of team science training, linkages to Iftranslational you have research any questions competencies, or and comments efforts to create for the a su stainable,SciTS 2019 scalable Planning method of Committee, training for research please teams. look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges. By the end of this panel, participants will gain a better understanding of team science and the growing need for team training among Michaelresearch teams. O’Rourke Participants will also leave with concrete examples of tools and strategies they can use with their own teams to help Chair,address common2019 Science challenges of among Team research Science teams Conference (communication, meeting management, role clarity). The target audience for this workshop are academic and clinical researchers, team science researchers and trainers (particularly those working CTSA settings).

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 44 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org PTableanel Aofb Contentsstracts

HowWelcome to Design ...... Teams, Space and Careers for Better Team Science; a Practical 2 Guide Dr. Claire Smith, Ms. Ruth Norris, Mrs. Charlotte Stockton Powdrell, The University of Manchester, UK; Ms. Rachel Chown, ManchesterINSciTS Research Board Centre, ...... Manchester UK; Dr. Amanda Lamb, The University...... of Manchester, UK 3

ThePlanning objectives of thisCommittee workshop are for...... participants to be better able to i) Understand...... and devise an effective7 professional development frameworkFacility for a Map diverse ...... team; ii) Explore and apply strategies to assist in...... designing the most effective 8 team for a proposed piece of research at the grant application stage ; iii) Consider how the physical research environment can be designed to facilitate team science TheSession goals and expected Evaluation outcomes Information from the session are:...... i) To improve the development...... pathways, opportunities 9 and outputs of non- academic research team science roles beyond Manchester and the UK by ensuring that workshop participants understand how to createConference such a framework at and a Glancethe value of ...... doing so ii) To increase the diversity and...... impact of research 10 teams by ensuring that team structure and design are appropriately considered at the grant application stage iii) To increase knowledge and consideration of the positiveFeatured contribution Keynote that the design and of physicalPlenary resear Panels...... ch environment can elicit for Team Science...... projects 14

We SIGs...... represent an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary population, collaborating...... with colleagues from 28 within our University (Manchester, UK)Detailed and between Daily our local Schedule hospital organisations...... Our team science approach has...... been working successfully 30 for several years and, whilst we haven’t always used the term ‘team science’, we certainly operationalise it on a daily basis and continue to increase awarenessWorkshop of this important Abstracts...... and developing approach. SciTS attendees will benefit by gaining an understanding 38 of how our approach to Team Science has developed over the last decade and accelerated over the past 12 months, with practical examples, which participantsPanel can Abstracts...... implement within their own organisation. Specifically, attendees will gain an insight into42 how non-traditional roles are increasingly playing an essential cross-boundary/facilitation role but are often constrained by a lack of development opportunities. The developmentOral Abstracts framework created ...... for the Research Program Manager’s Network is having a positive impact52 in this space and will be utilisedPoster as an exemplar.Abstracts In addition, ...... participants will be informed about our approach to team diversity 106 for maximum research output as well as the significant impact that the bespoke design of research spaces to facilitate optimal opportunities for team science can provide.SciTS Awards ...... 119

CollaborativeUnconference Scientific Details Writi ...... ng: Challenges and Strategies...... 119 Dr. ThanksGraham Hubbs, to ourUniversity Reviewers of Idaho; Dr...... Kara Hall, National Cancer Institute; Dr...... Amanda Vogel, 120Leidos Biomed; Dr. Kendra Spence Cheruvelil, Dr. Patricia Soranno, Michigan State University Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120 One of the standard products of scientific research is collaboratively authored manuscript. Writing collaborative manuscripts—scientific or otherwise—involves challenges from start to finish that will be familiar to anyone who has ever engaged in the process of collective authorship. Such challenges include establishing workflow, maintaining progress (especially when authors are spread out geographically), developing and executing a unified vision of the goals and content of the paper, establishing a consistent voice, and agreeing upon order of authorship, to name but a few. This panel will discuss these challenges and highlight strategies for overcoming them. The session will feature conceptual and practical perspectives on collaborative writing by experts from across disciplines (philosophy, psychology, public health, ecology) who work in a variety of research-related organizations (academia, government, and consulting).

Collaborative Writing and Collective Intentionality Dr. Graham Hubbs Collaborative writing is a form of collective action: when two or more people write a manuscript together, they unite their forces to produce a single text, and they commonly mark this unity by listing all of their names as co-authors of the manuscript. This is an example of a kind of action that exhibits collective intentionality—the intentions that guide the work manage to bind the agents together into a group, a collective that is unified in a way that a mere aggregate of individuals is not. For several decades, philosophers have studied the nature of this unity, examining the conditions under which a group of individuals count as a group bound by a collective intention. This presentation will analyze collaborative writing, and more specifically the writing of team science, within the two dominant

2019 SciTS Conference Program 45 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Pan SciTSel Ab sConferencetracts Welcome

Dearphilosophical SciTS frameworks 2019 participants, on collective intentionality, the psychologistic framework (cf. Bratman 2014) and the normative framework (cf. Gilbert 2014). This analysis generates two hypotheses about successful collaborative writing: (1) members of an authorial team need to Welcomehave individual to intentions the 2019 that Science interlock in of specific Team ways, Science and (2) (SciTS)there needs to be a specific structure of accountability between Conference,authors. Probing thethese 10th hypotheses annual may, gathering in turn, offer of guidance individuals to writing and teams. groups interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. Collaborative Writing Policies, Processes, and Practices This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation Dr. Kara L. Hall and Dr. Amanda L. Vogel ofA keythe benefit International to collaborative Network authorship for isthe the Scienceopportunity of fo rTeam greater Scienceinnovation in scholarship through the integration of diverse (INSciTS),expertise and perspectivesa professional (Hall, Vogel,society Huang, advancing et al., 2018). related Yet a recent interests study thatin explored retractions of collaboratively authored papersteam science.in the journal Science highlighted the vulnerability of collaborative authorship to misconduct and errors, particularly when there is a lack of team unity (Andersen & Wray, 2018). These findings point to the potential to increase the quality of scientific work (e.g., increasesThe conference in innovation/productivity leadership andteam reductions —myself, in errors/mi Dr. Stephaniesconduct) through E. the use of effective collaborative processes aimed at enhancingVasko, Dr. authorship Julie Thompson team unity. Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— has worked closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a Inconference this presentation that we builds offer considerations on existing for research how policies and (e.g., practice promotion strengths and tenure) whileand practices also pointing(e.g., author in contribu excitingtion new tracking;directions. CRediT taxonomy) can enhance transparency and accountability and thereby the degree of ownership, investment, and engagement in collective writing activities. We then go on to discuss effective practices for collaborative engagement depending on whichOne writingof our phase aims collaborators for SciTS are 2019 in (e.g., is toidea demonstrate generation, planning, how writing,team scienceediting, revising), animates how the and writing propels occurs (e.g., sequential,research parallel, in environmental simultaneous; inscience, person vs. agriculture, computer-media andted; fullnatural group vs.resources. subgroups ofTo authors), this end, and wewhat are type pleasedof product isto beingfeature developed for the (e.g., first type time and/or panels section focusingof manuscript). on LastlyIndigenous we will identify approa howches various to strategiesteam science support keyand team collaborative processes andapproaches provide suggestions in agriculture for which andstrategies natural to use resources. when, and with whom, to meet collaborative writing goals.

Adventures in Environmental Collaborative Manuscript Writing Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments Dr. Kendra Spence Cheruvelil and Dr. Patricia A. Soranno in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, We are big data lake ecologists who study what affects lakes at broad scales of space and time to predict how lakes will respond to we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather global pressures. To do so, we co-lead large and interdisciplinary research teams that include people from various institutions, disciplines,than a printed career stages,one and and workingbackgrounds. to Ourreduce research food team waste.s publish And approximately as the primary 10 collaborative host, andthe interdisciplinary MSU Center jo urnal articlesfor Interdisciplinarity per year. In this presentation, seeks to we create will draw opportunities on our 15 years ofto co-leading refine thinking research aboutteams to collaboration share the team policies and cross- and practicesdisciplinary we have research, developed education, for collaborative and writing. training. In particular, we will highlight the use of team authorship policies, collaborative manuscript management strategies, and author contribution paragraphs as mechanisms for improving collaborative writing. We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an Preparingactive downtown Students with for restaurants, Interdisciplinary local art Colla shops,boration running and trails, Team and Research: local community Case Studies classes and such Modelsas kickboxing from the and Graduate pottery. Please and Undergraduate consult the website Level for more detailed information. Dr. Marisa Rinkus, Michigan State University; Dr. Graham Hubbs, University of Idaho; Dr. Chet McLeskey, Michigan State University If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those Theof us challenges with red of teamribbons science on in our the 21namest century badges. call on educators to equip future researchers and practitioners with the skills they need to communicate and collaborate effectively across disciplinary boundaries. This panel will explain pedagogical techniques and strategiesMichael forO’Rourke providing students with these skills. Some presentations focus on direct student training, while other presentations discussChair, navigating2019 Science institutional of structuresTeam Science to set up Conferenceteam science programs. Much of the work here draws on the research and interventions of the Toolbox Dialogue Initiative (TDI).

Building Undergraduate SciTS Programs: Lessons from PPE Dr. Graham Hubbs Undergraduate educationLansing represents Center a WIFInext frontier Information for SciTS. As - Username:the SciTS community scits develops and Password: strategies for implementing 2019 its interdisciplinarity into undergraduate curricula and training, it can benefit from the lessons learned in establishing undergraduate programs in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (PPE). PPE has exploded in the past decade—there are scores of programs across

2019 SciTS Conference Program 46 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org PTableanel Aofb Contentsstracts

the Welcomecountry that are ...... popular with students and administrators alike. PPE programs leverage existing 2resources within universities to provide integrated interdisciplinary opportunities for students. This presentation will explain standard procedures for setting up and runningINSciTS a PPE program Board and ...... will explore ways in which these procedures can...... serve as a blueprint for 3 setting up similar programs to advance SciTS pedagogy at the undergraduate level. Planning Committee ...... 7 CultivatingFacility Interdisciplinary Map ...... Competencies at the Graduate Level: An...... Ethics-based Curriculum 8 for Environmental Team Science Dr. MarisaSession A. Rinkus Evaluation Information ...... 9 For interdisciplinary teams to participate effectively across disciplinary and values-based boundaries, they need opportunities to understandConference the impacts at of atheir Glance methodologies ...... and expertise, and to practice productive...... dialogue that 10 integrates different disciplinary languages and training. This presentation will introduce participants to the NSF-funded “Values and Responsibility in Interdisciplinary EnvironmentalFeatured Science” Keynote curriculum. and Our Plenary curriculum, Panels...... building on the results of the Toolbox Dialogue...... Initiative,14 focuses on four ethically- relevant themes that are a consistent part of interdisciplinary environmental science research contexts: 1) risk and uncertainty, 2) expertise,SIGs...... 3) non-human impacts, and 4) policy constraints. These themes...... provide a foundation for meaningful28 discussion of the roles playedDetailed by values Dailyand responsibility Schedule in interdisciplinary ...... environmental science contexts,...... in particular research 30 and policy, and provide useful grounding as graduate learners transition to become professionals in the field. This presentation will also discuss how a curriculumWorkshop of this nature Abstracts...... can help prepare graduate students for a future in team science. 38

HavingPanel the Difficult Abstracts...... Conversations: Using Facilitated Dialogue to Develop Values-Oriented Skills 42 Dr. Chet McLeskey ThereOral is a growingAbstracts recognition ...... of the role that values play in collaborative work, but the skills and experience 52 needed to reflect upon and discuss those values are often overlooked. Training graduate students to be successful in whatever endeavors lay before them involvesPoster the ability Abstracts to examine, ...... express, and defend the values that drive their work. We at C4I are working 106 to expand responsible conductSciTS of research Awards training ...... to include opportunities for the sort of reflection and discussion that facilities 119 these value-oriented skills. One way we are doing this is by modifying the Toolbox Dialogue Initiative’s model for guided discussions to include pedagogical aspectsUnconference that challenge participants’ Details views ...... and encourage discussion of the values...... they deem most important119 in their work. Using a combination of prompts designed to provoke dialogue and careful/purposeful facilitation participants reflect on their own views and learnThanks how their viewsto our relate Reviewers to those of others ...... in the group...... 120 Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120 Reward and Recognition for Team-Based and Cross-disciplinary Research Dr. Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Elsevier and Northwestern University; Dr. Kara L. Hall, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health; Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, Wayne State University and International Research Affiliate, Transdisciplinarity Lab, ETH-Zurich; Dr. Amanda L. Vogel, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc.

Recognition and reward systems, and particularly promotion and tenure policies, are essential factors in performance and evaluation of collaborative research, including cross-disciplinary team science. But, on the whole, promotion and tenure policies have been slow to change to reflect the growth of these approaches. A survey by the US National Academies in 2004 revealed that provosts as well as individuals considered promotion and tenure criteria the top impediment to cross-disciplinary research (Institute of Medicine, 2005). Recommendations and some changes followed. Yet, a decade later the National Research Council report, Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science, reported that most US universities continued to lack comprehensive and explicit criteria for evaluating individual contributions to team-based research.

This panel provides an overview of this important topic through a review of recent guidance documents and white papers, a summary of recent empirical research on promotion and tenure policies pertinent to team science, and a synthesis of literature on this topic. It will culminate in interactive discussion with audience members.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 47 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Pan SciTSel Ab sConferencetracts Welcome

DearFalk-Krzesinski SciTS will2019 open participants, the panel with an introduction to this topic, including highlights of a recent report by the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences, entitled, Academic Recognition of Team Science: How to Optimize the Canadian Academic System which outlines 12 recommendationsWelcome to the to facilitate2019 Science appropriate of recognition Team Science of individual (SciTS) contributions to team science. The recommendations encompass aspectsConference, of recognition the 10thand reward annual in the gathering promotion andof individualstenure system and efforts groups by publishers and expertise systems to recognize the full range of contributions to collaborative, team-based research articles and other types of research output. Additionally, she’ll share interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. her experience speaking with university leaders over the last five years about their efforts for institutional change. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation Hallof the and InternationalVogel will then share Network methods for and the findings Science from aof rigorous Team study Science of promotion and tenure policies from the US National Institutes(INSciTS), of Health a professional supported Clinical society and Translational advancing Sci relatedence Award interests (CTSA) recipient in institutions. The CTSA award is the largest NIHteam award science. for team-based, cross-disciplinary and translational science, and as such, these institutions represent the leading edge in these scientific approaches. In 2014, new language was included in the annually released funding opportunity announcement (FOA) statingThe conference that “CTSA hubs leadership should advance team team —myself, science and Dr. develop Stephanie academic E. promotion criteria that help create a viable career path forVasko, translational Dr. Julie scientists.” Thompson The presentation Klein, and will include Megghan analys esHonke from data Seidel— collected at three time points from 124 units (medical schoolshas worked and central closely administrations) with the acrossSciTS 69 2019 research Planning institutions. Committee The presentation and will the explore INSciTS the ways board in which to policydesign language a acknowledgesconference thethat growing builds prevalence, on existing value, research and importance and of practice team science strengths and interdisciplinary while also research, pointing provides in exciting encourageme newnt anddirections. recognition of faculty engagement in team science and interdisciplinary research, specifies criteria for evaluation of team science and interdisciplinary research, contributions, provides guidance for how to document indicators and processes for review, and outlines institutionalOne of our support aims for for team SciTS science 2019 and interdisciplinary is to demonstrate research. how We include team examples science of animates institutional supportand propels for team science and interdisciplinaryresearch in environmentalresearch and the specific science, types agriculture, of contribution toand coll aborativenatural work.resources. Additionally, To wethis w illend, highlight we howare pr pleasedomotion and to tenure policies are, and are not, evolving to recognize and reward these scientific approaches, and offer models of effective language feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative to help advance promotion and tenure policies to match the accelerating uptake of these approaches in science. approaches in agriculture and natural resources. Klein will follow with findings from a literature review she and Falk-Krzesinski conducted, published in the journal Research Policy. It synthesizedOther values findings drive on promotion SciTS 2019 and tenure as well.for interdisciplinary Diversity and and collaborativeinclusion havework. Klein been will fundamental highlight the importance commitments of creating ain culture our planning, of recognition driving and reward our forcalls team for science participation, that is consistent, invited aligned, presentations, and comprehensive and atfee all stagesstructure. and levels In addition, of evaluation.we have Aworked systematic to and ensure informed a “green”approach includesconference, taking preliminary giving you steps, the revisiting option existing of an practices online andprogram institution ratheral policies, writingthan anew printed guidelines, one preparing and working a dossier to for reduce evaluations, food and waste. advancing And support as the of professional primary host,organizations. the MSU Their Center accompa nying handoutfor Interdisciplinarity will include the table seeks codifying to strategiescreate opportunities and references for to further refine reading. thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinary research, education, and training. The panel will invite the audience to raise questions, contribute their insights from personal experience, and offer action steps for advancingWe hope the that stature you of haveteam science an excellent in the academic time inreward Lansing system while. The panel you willenjoy offer SciTSthe opportunity 2019. to Lansing learn about has the canurrent state of evaluating promotion and tenure with emphasis on contexts of team science, and to gain effective practices for reforming local active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such institutional cultures and revising promotion and tenure policies and procedures. as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information.  How extensive is the literature on evaluation of tenure and promotion for individuals conducting interdisciplinary and cross- disciplinary research? If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those  What insights emerged from the two surveys highlighted in this panel? of us with red ribbons on our name badges.  What are the major barriers and impediments to evaluating individual contributions to team research?  What are the prominent strategies for appropriate evaluation and related criteria? Michael O’Rourke Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference SciCom Meets SciTS. Interdisciplinary Teamwork for Science Communication Training Dr. Jack C. Schultz, University of Toledo; Dr. Suzanne Burgoyne, Dr. Bimal Balakrishnan, Dr. Jonathan Stemmle, Dr. Shellly Rodgers, University of Missouri

We train scientists,Lansing engineers Center and physicians WIFI to Information solve complex problems, - Username: and increasingly scits toand do so Password: as members of 2019 interdisciplinary teams. But the complex problem of how to communicate across disciplines and with the public receives little or no attention in training. As a result, STEM practitioners are often ill equipped to succeed in an environment requiring communication skills not normally

2019 SciTS Conference Program 48 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org PTableanel Aofb Contentsstracts

acquiredWelcome during training...... Success in both academic and non-academic settings as well as while interacting 2 with the public requires communication that reaches broader audiences. Researchers are increasingly concerned about communicating the value of science to a broadINSciTS constituency, Board and personalized ...... medicine is making personalized communication...... between physicians 3 and patients ever more important. Planning Committee ...... 7 This need is now widely appreciated and numerous training programs have appeared, especially aimed at improving STEM practitioners’Facility ability Map to communicate...... outside academia. Federal agencies,...... NGOs, for-profit enterprises 8 and universities all offer science communicationSession (SciCom) Evaluation workshops Information and ‘boot camps’...... Each typically offers a particular...... approach or 9point of view to SciCom training, for example emphasizing “storytelling”, communication training, or improvisation skills. Instructors and trainees of many of these programsConference report satisfaction at a withGlance the results, ...... and there is little doubt that at least ...... some of these programs 10 are helpful. But are the impressions of workshop participants really indicative of progress in communication? Evaluating SciCom training is yet another complexFeatured problem weKeynote must address. and A lackPlenary of relevant Panels...... evaluation means that trainers and trainees...... alike 14 remain unsure about the effectiveness of training itself, not to mention individual approaches. SIGs...... 28 We report on an NSF-sponsored project that brings together a highly interdisciplinary team from biology, strategic communication, journalism,Detailed theater, Daily visual Scheduledesign, education ...... and statistics to develop a controlled...... test bed for communication 30 training in STEM graduateWorkshop programs. Abstracts...... The program focuses on oral presentation skills because these are among the most 38 challenging aspects of communication for STEM trainees and are particularly suited to quantitative evaluation. It is innovative in assembling a team that can basePanel training Abstracts...... on a deep body of cognitive psychology and communication research, applied theater, 42and visual design from outside the sciences. It is unique in the using impact of training on audience perception as the ultimate success metric. Oral Abstracts ...... 52 Our panel comprises our project’s four instructors: JackPoster Schultz, PhDAbstracts (Dr. Emeritus, ...... University of Missouri; Exec. Director of Research Development, Univ. 106 of Toledo) will moderate and outline the structure of the project, emphasizing its unique approaches to training and evaluation. The entire project includes a complex experimentalSciTS designAwards that triangulates ...... evaluation from both internal and external sources. Schultz will 119 also briefly illustrate the role of cognitiveUnconference science underlying Details the training, ...... and show how it links the diverse disciplines...... and perspectives 119 the 4 instructors bring to the program. Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 120 Suzanne Burgoyne, PhD (Curators’ Distinguished Teaching Professor; Director, Center for Applied Theatre and Drama Research, Univ.Post of Missouri) Conference will illustrate Evaluationthe approach she Information...... uses to teach trainees to see themselves...... as playing 120 roles based on their own identities, while identifying specific communication goals and approaches. Using interactive exercises, Dr. Burgoyne encourages trainees to envision interacting with others – their audiences – in creative ways that are appropriate to audience identities (roles). This training has been critical and very successful in giving trainees a feeling of confidence in defining and meeting communication goals.

Bimal Balakrishnan, PhD. (Assoc. Prof, Department Chair and Director of Graduate Studies, Dept. of Architectural Studies, Univ. of Missouri) brings fundamental design principles to our program. His approach is based on his research in design processes and cognition, a perspective that builds upon Schultz’s introduction to cognitive aspects of communication. This aspect of the program focuses on uses of visual illustration and tools to provide effective support for oral presentations.

Jonathan Stemmle, MS Journalism (Assoc. Prof. and Chair Department of Strategic Communication; former Director Health Communication Research Center, Univ. of Missouri) focuses on how to assess and interact with audiences. Jonathan has extensive experience in designing effective health related messages for diverse audiences. His extensive research experience on how messaging influences health behaviors and science communication provides real-world, practical evidence about successful strategies. He is able to place the trainees in the situations they will encounter as they address different kinds of audiences and help them tune their messages appropriately.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 49 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Pan SciTSel Ab sConferencetracts Welcome

DearThe team SciTS is made 2019 effective participants, by regular meetings and joint sessions with trainees to make sure that the different approaches are integrated and common themes are clear. The trainees are exposed to interactions among the instructors in which alternative Welcomestrategies are to discussed the 2019 and Sciencepotential conflicts of Team are resolved. Science Work (SciTS)shop plans are written by each instructor and sessions are evaluated forConference, compliance with the the 10th plan. annualThis, too, gatheringassures that theof individualsteam members and are allgroups on the same page throughout. And a data analysis evaluation sub-team (not participating in this workshop) provides feedback about whether goals are being met and assesses the end interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. results. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation Theof the panel International discussion will includeNetwork what for we thehave Science learned by ofworking Team together, Science the ease (or difficulty) of working this way, issues in STEM(INSciTS), communication a professional training that society remain to advancing be resolved and related suggestions interests and recommendations in for others wishing to develop training. team science. Identifying the Behaviors and Actions of Facilitators of Successful Teams The conference leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. Ms. Jill Macchiaverna, Mr. Dave King, Exaptive, Inc.; Dr. Alicia Knoedler, Independent Contractor; Dr. Terri Gilbert, Cohen Veterans Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— Bioscience; Mr. Victor Soji Ladele, Health Innovation Lab has worked closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a Acrossconference the team that science builds literature on existingthere is a lot research of focus on and facilitation, practice but less strengths on the facilitator’s while also specific pointing contribution in excitings and the new effectivenessdirections. of those contributions. What is it about the facilitator that has such an impact on whether teams are effective, or even formed to begin with? What do we know about what facilitators do that catalyzes successful teams? And can those actions be conductedOne of our in a aimsvirtual environmentfor SciTS? 2019 Our panel is to will demonstrate consider specific how examples team of sciencefacilitator choices, animates behaviors, and andpropels discoverie s that haveresearch produced in successenvironmental within teams. science, We’ll hear agriculture, from the moderator and andnatural three resources.panelists who eachTo this have end, unique we perspectives are pleased on to facilitatingfeature forteams the in firstvarious time settings: panels academia, focusing bioscience on Indigenous foundation, non-governmental approaches toorganization, team science and digital/virtual. and collaborative approaches in agriculture and natural resources. Academic Perspective:The Science of Team Science Conference has become a multidisciplinary confluence of researchers and practitionersOther values sharing drive ideas SciTS and strategies 2019 asregarding well. workDiversity that occu andrs within inclusion teams. Overhave the been past decade, fundamental academic commitmentsinstitutions have been increasing their investments in personnel who provide support and assistance to these teams, but there is a lack of general in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, knowledge and understanding about how to measure the capabilities and performance of the individuals providing support and we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather assistance to teams. There is evidence that leadership turnover at the dean, vice president/chancellor for research, and provost levels createsthan a the printed need to one train theseand workingnew leaders to in reduce what makes food for waste.effective performanceAnd as the for primary team facilitators host, andthe project MSU managers. Center for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- Dr.disciplinary Alicia Knoedler, research, PhD, who education, has facilitated and and supportedtraining. the development of academic research teams for nearly 20 years, has been exploring how to most effectively bring knowledge about team facilitators, their behaviors and contributions, to research leadershipWe hope to that reinforce you the have value an that excellent practitioners time and facilitatorsin Lansing of teams while bring you to theenjoy success SciTS and growth2019. of Lansing the academic has research an enterprise.active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information. Bioscience Non-Profit Perspective:In a bioscience research non-profit setting, the feedback loop among researchers can determine whetherIf you havehypotheses any arequestions answered orin weeks comments or years. for Bioscientists the SciTS are fantastic2019 Planning at coming upCommittee, with great questions please and look experiment for thoses to find evidence. Many times the experimental evidence that is generated comes in the form of huge amounts of data. When it is time to of us with red ribbons on our name badges. perform analysis on the data, it must be handed off to the bioinformaticians.

BioscientistsMichael O’Rourke are trained in wet biology. Bioinformaticians are trained in data science. Most of the time in science, the scientist can understandChair, 2019 the limitationsScience of of methods Team and Science how far toConference interpret results, but when a bioscientist hands off their data to the bioinformatician, there are communication barriers due to the lack of cross-disciplinary understanding. There can be weeks between iterative cycles where the bioscientist has given their data and goals over to the bioinformatician and when the bioinformatician (likely running analyses for several scientists at once) can return the analyses and explain the results to the bioscientist.

Dr. Terri Gilbert, PhD,Lansing is the Engagement Center WIFI Director Information for BRAIN Commons - Username: at Cohen Veteransscits andBioscience. Password: She works 2019 to bridge that gap between bioscientists and bioinformaticians to reduce the iterative time necessary for quality research. She will share the practices that

2019 SciTS Conference Program 50 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org PTableanel Aofb Contentsstracts

haveWelcome led to successful ...... team development and collaboration in her experiences at Cohen Veterans Bioscience 2 and the Allen Institute for Brain Science. INSciTS Board ...... 3 NGO Perspective:In non-governmental organizations, coordination of rapid response teams during emergencies/humanitarian crises facesPlanning a lot of challenges Committee because of ...... its linear design. A hierarchical structure, geographical...... dispersion, 7 multiplicity of organizations, and disparate technical capacities make it difficult for the best ideas to be generated and a deep level of collaboration is near impossible. UsuallyFacility what is Maplearned ...... in learned only in retrospect, not during the crisis...... This inefficiency is measured 8 in lives lost and increased morbidity.Session Evaluation Information ...... 9 Dr. ConferenceVictor Soji Ladele, MBBS,at a Glance who was a humanitarian...... aid coordinator for the World...... Health Organization 10 during the 2014 Ebola outbreak in Liberia, proposes deploying a cognitive network platform during emergencies and humanitarian crises that will facilitate a realFeatured time coordination Keynote mechanism. and The Plenarybenefits would Panels...... include but not be limited to: ...... 14  Senior decision makers would receive quick feedback from the frontlines and new ideas to enhance effectiveness of the SIGs...... response would be generated...... 28  Lessons learned in one location would be quickly dispersed throughout the response. Detailed Native inhabitants Daily Schedule would be able ...... to contribute their unique perspective ...... to response activities, 30 and responder teams can build Workshopon their very Abstracts...... good ideas. 38  The right people would be gathered around the table for the right meetings. Panel Furthermore, Abstracts...... senior managers will see the effectiveness of various types of team composition 42 and more quickly determine the optimal skill mix for different response scenarios based on objective measures. Oral Abstracts ...... 52 Digital/Virtual Perspective:Team building is becoming more critical for innovation in every domain and organization. Gone are the days of lonePoster geniuses Abstracts locked away ...... coming up with the new ideas. Exaptive has created a virtual platform 106for innovation, the Cognitive City, whereSciTS teams canAwards connect ...... and collaborate around data. Founder and CEO, Dave King, can demonstrate 119 several cases of what facilitation looks like in a digital platform. Using integrative software allows organizations to capture digital exhaust (data created in the naturalUnconference occurence of activities Details like communicating, ...... holding meetings, utilizing digital...... tools) in a productive 119 way. In the process of interacting with a digital innovation platform, digital markers that indicate facilitation can be quantified and measured over time. Dave KingThanks will moderate to theour panel. Reviewers ...... 120

ThisPost panel willConference focus on actionable Evaluation lessons learned. Information...... Facilitation of successful teams is important...... in every 120 industry, every field, every specialty. When we can determine what the characteristics are of successful facilitators, we can discover the behaviors and activities that are teachable, replicable, and scalable.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 51 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Ora SciTSl Abs tConferenceracts Welcome

INNOVATINGDear SciTS 2019 WITH participants, TECHNOLOGY Moderator: Dr. Stephanie E. Vasko, Michigan State Univeristy Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference,Getting Started withthe Machine10th annual Learning gathering and Team of Science individuals & Science and of groupsTeam Science Research interestedDr. Stephanie inE. Vaskostudying,, Michigan practicing, State Univeristy and facilitating team science. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation ofOver the the International past few years, initialNetwork forays forinto machinethe Science learning of (ML) Team applications Science to the science of team science at the Science of Team Science annual conference have sparked moments of dialogue about new ways to conduct both team science and research on team science.(INSciTS), Additionally, a professional during 2018 societyalone, the advancingNational Academies related of Sciences interests published in two reports on workshops with a focus on ML, teamthe latter science. of which has implications for CTSA-based team science practitioners: “Data Matters: Ethics, Data, and International Research Collaboration in a Changing World: Proceedings of a Workshop” and “Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to Accelerate TheTranslational conference Research: leadership Proceedings team of a Workshop—in —myself, Brief.”Dr. Stephanie (National Academies E. of Sciences, 2018a and 2018b). These forays Vasko,have already Dr. found Julie themselves Thompson into theKlein, commercial and Megghan sector, with HonkeAmazon applyingSeidel— ML to their teams working on complex problems has(Machine worked Learning closely Center withof Excellence) the SciTS and Google2019 Planningpartnering with Committee universities andand to the push INSciTS advances inboard science to through design univers a ity- conferencecompany partnerships that builds focused on on existingML (Google research AI). These andinitial SciTSpractice talks, strengths NAS reports, while and industry also pointingdrivers spark in theexciting need to new unpack the landscape of ML applications and techniques. directions. In this talk, I will present expanded findings on two case studies where commercial and custom ML algorithms have been applied and Oneexplored: of our1) a scienceaims forof team SciTS science 2019 case is where to demonstrate authors are interested how team in predictions science on dialogueanimates from and research propels teams participating researchin Toolbox Dialogue in environmental Initiative workshops science, (Vasko, agriculture, et al, in progress) and and natural 2) a team resources. science case To on this agricultural end, wedisease are identif pleasedication to featureusing a combination for the first of im agetime data panels and ML. focusing These examples on Indigenous will be used toapproa comparchese and tocontrast team the science implementation and collaborative of commercial, approachesopen-source, and in homebuilt agriculture approaches and natural to ML and resources. team science research and research on team science. I will explore the hype around ML, unpacking promises and looking at realistic applications of techniques, the types of machine learning that can be used to approach different types of questions in the science of team science field, and potential costs associated with ML for applications in this Otherfield. This values talk will drivealso explore SciTS examples 2019 ofas bias well. in ML Diversity and the implications and inclusion this can haveand has been had in fundamental other research fields commitments before turning into a)our the planning,implications ofdriving bias on our the sciencecalls for of team participation, science and b)invited the ways presentations, in which this bias andcan be fee combatted structure. from theIn outsaddition,et of weresearch. have I willworked also touch to ensureon implications a “green” of ML for conference, team science andgiving team you science the research option for of data an management,online program workforce rather thandevelopment a printed (NSF, one 2018) and and careerworking pivots to for reduce masters food and PhD waste. students. And Finally, as the attend primaryees will host,leave this the talk MSU with aCenter list of options for(including Interdisciplinarity programming languages seeks and to createpackages) opportunities for using each of to these refine types thinking and a list aboutof ways collaborationto gain skills in these and areas. cross- disciplinary research, education, and training. Collaborative Data Design: A Tool for Multisector Alignment Dr. Kathleen Pine, Dr. Michael Shafer, Dr. Margaret Hinrichs, Ms. Kailey Love, Dr. George Runger, Dr. William Riley, Arizona State WeUniversity hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such asFragmentation kickboxing and and lack ofpottery. coordination Please between consult systems the represents website a significant for more barrier detailed to improving information. health, well-being and equity in our country. The fragmentation present in the behavioral health care delivery system leads to disruptions in continuity of care, lack of Ifcoordination, you have lack any of systems-levelquestions orsolutions, comments and siloed for datasets. the SciTS The Systems2019 Planning for Action (S4A) Committee, project on behavioralplease look health for in metrothose ofPhoenix us with utilized red an ribbons interdisciplinary on our framework name tobadges. create knowledge infrastructure aimed at facilitating data-driven behavioral healthcare delivery decision making, policy development, policy implementation, and policy evaluation across multiple sectors core to the behavioral healthcare delivery system in Phoenix, Arizona. Michael O’Rourke Chair,Three sectors 2019 comprising Science multiple of Team organizations Science are Conference key to behavioral health care delivery in Phoenix: health (e.g. provider organizations, crisis response organizations), local government (e.g. county public health office, county manager’s office), and public safety (county sheriff’s department, correctional health department). Our interdisciplinary team utilized a participatory approach to increase alignment between these sectors. Our approach consisted of multisector data sharing, complex interactive data visualizations, and a participatory design approach which entailed ongoing “convening” sessions of researchers and participants from key organizations in eachLansing of the three Center key sectors. WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 52 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TableOral ofAb Contentsstracts

ThroughWelcome an ongoing ...... series of meetings held at the ASU Decision Theater, participants identified datasets 2 for integration into a comprehensive behavioral health dataset. Participants then collaborated with researchers to collect these datasets, navigating political andINSciTS organizational Board barriers...... Once datasets were integrated into a central repository,...... researchers developed 3 a set of interactive data visualizations focused on the health care delivery system. Multisector participants then took part in a series of five “data design” meetingsPlanning with the Committeeresearch team in which...... they collectively explored and critiqued...... the data visualizations, 7 discussed behavioral health priority areas, and engaged in thought exercises about what questions could be asked of the data visualizations and how the dataset andFacility visualizations Map could ...... be mobilized to solve specific problems...... 8

To evaluateSession the participatoryEvaluation data sharingInformation and data design ...... process, the research team...... utilized a qualitative 9 approach including observations and semi-structured interviews. Our qualitative study revealed that five mechanisms emerged from our process to increaseConference alignment between at a differentGlance sectors...... These mechanisms were: 1) Data sharing...... (including both 10 the social and technical apparatus of sharing data); 2) Convening (recruiting a diversity of participants from appropriate sectors and engaging in repeated interaction);Featured Relationship Keynote Building and (creating Plenary shared communication Panels...... context and coming to know...... one 14another within that context); 4) Shared Information Tool (creating visualizations with effective data characteristics—actionable, poignant, efficient, and authoritative); 5) PerspectiveSIGs...... Taking (taking the perspective of different participants/sectors...... and developing an overview 28 of systems problems from the viewDetailed of these different Daily entities). Schedule Our study ...... further revealed that these five alignment...... mechanisms resulted 30 in four distinct alignment outcomes: 1) improved multisector systems awareness; 2) strengthened relationships between specific sectors; 3) increased acknowledgementWorkshop of Abstracts...... the importance of data sharing and transparency; and 4) augmented decision making.38 CohortGen:Panel PromotingAbstracts...... Collaboration Through Automatic Cohort Generation 42 Dr. Charisse Madlock, Mr. Billy Barnett, University of Tennessee Health Science Center Oral Abstracts ...... 52 In recent years there has been a significant focus on increasing collaboration within the biomedical community 1. Investigators need projectsPoster around Abstracts which to collaborate ...... as they are unlikely to reach out to without a need. Our system 106presents users both a generated cohort from an Electronic Medical Records (EMR) system and potential collaborators at the same time. This system gives users both a researchSciTS direction Awards along with ...... prospective co-investigator identification so the need for the collaborators 119 may be more apparent. We use the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) to summarize and link EMR data to a social network of researchers to facilitate datasetUnconference discovery and collaboration. Details Many ...... healthcare organizations have built enterprise...... data warehouses 119 (EDW) that gather electronic data from multiple sources into a single data model that can be used to facilitate analysis, reporting and strategic decision making2.Thanks The Cerner to our Healthfacts Reviewers © database ...... which the University of Tennessee Health...... Science Center 120 faculty and students have access to includes de-identified patient records from approximately 70 million patients and spans from 2001 to 2017. This data warehousePost Conferencecontains a deluge ofEvaluation complex healthcare Information...... information, and it can be difficult for researchers...... 120 to find useful information that relates to their fields of study and interest.

Our purpose is to provide a more personalized experience for viewing the contents of a large-scale EMR data warehouse. Our system generates graphical summaries and hierarchical structures that summarize the data that is relevant to researchers — thus providing potential collaborative possibilities with others who work in similar areas.

Our presentation will detail the development pipeline and user workflow for our system, CohortGen. We first extracted ICD codes from Healthfacts © and articles for UTHSC employees for the past ten years from Scopus. We used the ctakes clinical text analysis engine to tag articles with UMLS concepts. We used those UMLS concepts to create a crosswalk between the Cerner Healthfacts © database and UTHSC research articles using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases codes.

We created a website using Oracle’s Apex system which provides users with a way to explore potential datasets and potential collaborators based on UMLS concepts shared across researcher profiles generated by our system. Several reports, charts, and graphs are produced by our system which allowed a researcher or data analyst a quick insight into the contents of the data warehouse. Once users have completed their exploration, they can request access to the dataset that matches the ICD diagnostic codes identified by our system. We believe that our tool will not only help increase collaboration across our campus but also increase the use of a complex available dataset by UTHSC research faculty.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 53 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Ora SciTSl Abs tConferenceracts Welcome

DearReferences: SciTS 2019 participants, Bennett LM, Gadlin H, Levine-Finley S. Collaboration & Team Science: A Field Guide. NIH Office of the Ombudsman, Center for Cooperative Resolution Bethesda …; 2010. Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) ShinConference, S-Y, Kim WS, the Lee J-H.10th Characteristics annual gathering Desired in Clinical of individuals Data Warehouse and for groupsBiomedical Research. Healthc Inform Res. 2014;20(2):109. doi:10.4258/hir.2014.20.2.109 interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. DoThis More, meeting Faster: isUtilizing also theAdvanced first ComputatSciTS conferenceional Resources since in Yourformation Research Team Dr.of theDirk ColbryInternational, Michigan StateNetwork University for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in teamThe use science. of technology in research is becoming ubiquitous as low cost programmable sensors and advanced computing (e.g., AI and big data) emerge in nearly every domain. Out of necessity, many scientists and domain experts have become Technology Users: individuals who need to employ advanced technology in their research, but who do not have broad expertise in topics such as engineeringThe conference and programming. leadership Modern team laptop —myself, and desktop Dr. computers Stephanie are extremely E. powerful, and most scientists can accomplish 90- 95%Vasko, of what Dr. they Julie need Thompson with a computer Klein, in their and office. Megghan However, Honke much of Seidel—today’s cutting edge science needs bigger, stronger and fasterhas workedcomputers. closely High Performance with the SciTSComputing 2019 (HPC) Planning systems (aka Committee supercomputers) and arethe designed INSciTS to takeboard science to designto the next a level. Universitiesconference and that national builds funding on agencies existing (NSF, research NIH, DOD, and DO practiceE, etc.) provide strengths researchers while access also to pointing large scale in computing exciting new resources,directions. often free of charge. The most common barrier to scientists who want to utilize these resources is knowledge: that these tools exist, and how to get started using them.

ThisOne talk of will our introduce aims forthe worldSciTS of lar2019ge scale is to computing. demonstrate We will discusshow team how to science gain access animates to both local and and propels national reso urces, the commonresearch types in ofenvironmental problems that can science, be solved usingagriculture, these resources, and natural and training resources. programs specifically To this end, designed we toare help pleased new to researchersfeature for leverage the first these time technologies panels and focusing use them oneffectively Indigenous in their ownapproa research.ches to team science and collaborative approaches in agriculture and natural resources. Dr. Dirk Colbry is a Cyberinfrastructure Professional with many years of expertise in developing and facilitating both technical and professional skills training materials. With a background in Artificial Intelligence, Pattern Recognition, High Performance Computing and ComputationalOther values Science, drive Dr.SciTS Colbry 2019 has worked as well. with dozensDiversity of researchers and inclusion at three haveuniversities been (University fundamental of Michigan, commitments Michigan State Universityin our planning, and Arizona driving State University) our calls and for in manyparticipation, disciplines (zoology, invited biologypresentations,, physics, chemistry, and fee psychology, structure. engineering In addition,, math, linguistics,we have health worked sciences, to ensure and others) a “green” on projects conference, related to computational giving you sciences the option and cyberinfrastructure. of an online Dr.program Colbry ser ratherved as the Directorthan a ofprinted the MSU one High and Performance working Computing to reduce Center food and waste.as a Computational And as the Consultant primary at the host, MSU the Institute MSU of CyberCenter Enabled Researchfor Interdisciplinarity prior to assuming seeks his current to rolecreate in the opportunities Department of Computational to refine thinking Mathematics, about Science collaboration and Engineering and (CMSE) cross- at Michigandisciplinary State University.research, education, and training. Supplanting Institutionalized Science of Science Data Collection with Big Data Methods `in the Wild’ Dr.We Ioannis hope Pavlidis that you, Mr. haveMohammed an excellent Emtiaz Ahmed time, University in Lansing of Houston while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such ABSTRACT:as kickboxing The international and pottery. research Please community consult has thebeen website increasing for in size more and detailedconnectivity information. by leaps and bounds. Accordingly, policy makers need accurate, up to date indicators to help them craft and adjust policies for a rapidly evolving ecosystem. The UNESCOIf you have Science any Report questions series is orthe commentsdefinitive tool infor this the direction. SciTS The 2019 conventional Planning process Committee, of creating suchplease a report, look howe forver, those is timeof us consuming with red and ribbons requires onsignificant our name manpower. badges. To minimize the cost and improve the rapidity with which science of science indicators are produced for global and local policy makers, we introduce a new method based on big data and analytics. Specifically, we use the Google Scholar database (~2 million profiles) as an extensive sample of the worldwide research population. After performingMichael O’Rourkequality control, we analyze these data, showing that they produce results on par with the data in the UNESCO Science Report.Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference

METHODS: We collected all the available profiles in the Google Scholar repository as of June 2018. Each profile includes the researcher’s full name, university affiliation, total citations, research areas, and rank. In parallel, we collected the worldwide university list annotated with country codes. This way we were able to associate each research profile with a specific country. Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 54 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TableOral ofAb Contentsstracts

RESULTS:Welcome After data ...... cleaning, we performed exploratory data analysis finding that the United States 2 has the highest number of researchers, and the average US researcher has the highest mean citation among all countries. This is in agreement with other reports in theINSciTS literature. Importantly, Board ...... we found that the Google Scholar data are highly...... correlated with the UNESCO 3 Science Report data. CONCLUSION:Planning Conventional Committee collection ...... of global science of science data is part...... of a sophisticated UNESCO 7 operation involving the cooperation of nearly all the governments in the world for years at a time. It appears that a science of science dataset amassed from GoogleFacility Scholar Map in a few ...... days via scripting, provides essentially the same...... information and insight as the8 UNESCO dataset. Big data, automated analytics, and open sources promise to change the information model that feeds science policy makers. Session Evaluation Information ...... 9 SPATIALLY SITUATED CASE STUDIES Moderator:ConferenceKevin Bugin at, Centera Glance for Drug ...... Evaluation and Research, US Food and...... Drug Administration 10

BuildingFeatured Climate ResilienceKeynote in andAfrica Plenary & South Asia: Panels...... Lessons on Membership, Organizati...... on & Collaboration14 from Four Transdisciplinary Research Consortia Dr. SIGs...... Bruce Currie-Alder, International Development Research Centre; ...... Lucia Scodanibbio, University of28 Cape Town; Katharine Vincent, Kulima Integrated Development Solutions; Anjal Prakash, Teri School of Advanced Studies; Nathalie Nathe, Overseas Development InstituteDetailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Workshop Abstracts...... 38 More than one billion people live in deltas, semi-arid lands, and glacier-dependent river basins in Africa & South Asia, hotspot regions thatPanel are the most Abstracts...... vulnerable to climate change. During 2014-2018, the Collaborative Adaptation Research 42 Initiative in Africa and Asia (CARIAA) sought to build resilience in these hotspots by supporting four transdisciplinary research consortia involving more the forty institutionsOral Abstractsacross fifteen countries...... The intention was to inform adaptation policy & practice by supporting 52 science at a scale commensurate with the problem, linking local actions across similar landscapes. Drawing on the experience of these four consortia, this Posterpaper identifies Abstracts lessons in ...... membership, organization & collaboration for team science. 106 On SciTSmembership, Awards each of the...... participating institutions brought in complementary skills, expertise, & competencies119 bridging research, policy & practice, including connections with stakeholders and academia. Each of the CARIAA consortia consisted of up to five core institutions,Unconference with additional Detailsparticipants ...... taking on distinct roles such as in-country...... activities, outreach, 119 or engagement. Intellectual leadership was vital and benefited more from fewer full-time positions rather small shares of time among many people. Consortia had to mediateThanks power to differentials our Reviewers within and between ...... members, working across cultures...... and time zones, 120 and the entry and exit of members over time. Trust among members was facilitated by clear roles, often formalized through partnership agreements and periodicPost ‘health Conference checks’. Consortia Evaluation identified the Information...... different incentives that motivated participants,...... and intentionally120 provided opportunities for a range of career paths spanning academics & practitioners.

On organization, there is no perfect model for a research consortium. Despite common terms of reference, each consortium was unique in terms of work packages, distribution of responsibilities, and geographical coverage. Each produced a unique mixture of outputs, reflecting their memberships and seeking to reach diverse audiences. Bigger is not always better, as transaction costs of administering and coordinating the consortium increase with size and complexity. Consortia facilitated working across disciplines, by establishing agreement on units of analysis, ontology, methods, and research questions. CARIAA consortia permitted some tailoring of methods and datasets between work packages or regional nodes, which limited data comparability and aggregation. Consortia required mechanisms to hold participants to account for the work done. Internal communication served to ensure transparency & sense of belonging among members, helping to include participants that were less able to travel to in-person meetings.

On collaboration, CARIAA encouraged consortia through the provision of extra resources & budget to support cross-consortia work. Opportunistic collaboration arose from specific synergies once consortia were into their research, notably research on gender & migration, which proved more dynamic and successful than thematic topics identified at the beginning of the programme. Collaboration within and across consortia was driven by relationships between individuals rather than institutions, and require time for these relationships to flourish over time. Annual learning fora encouraged consortia to “up their game” in a spirit of friendly competition, rather than merely seeking to satisfy the funder’s expectations.

These lessons are feeding into the design of a new climate resilience research framework programme being designed during 2019.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 55 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Ora SciTSl Abs tConferenceracts Welcome

DearA Scholar-Practitioner’s SciTS 2019 participants, Guide to Global Virtual Teams Ms. Lejla Bilal-Maley, Antioch University Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) The relationship between scholarship and practice is a reciprocal one. The scholarship supports the practitioner’s experience, and the Conference,practitioner lens oftenthe informs10th annual the research gathering and its identified of individuals problems inand practice. groups Theory and practice go hand in hand to create interestedengaged scholarship in studying, (Van de Ven,practicing, 2007). This and presentation facilitating will offerteam both science. perspectives from a scholar-practitioner in regard to working onThis and meeting leading global is also virtual the teams first (GVTs.). SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS),The demands ofa leadingprofessional in an era societyof escalating advancing globalization related are fast andinterests furious. inGVTs help manage and coordinate a global market, teamwhich is science. very diverse in nature. Culturally diverse work teams are increasingly common in the workplace (Gibson and Cohen, 2003; Stahl et al., 2010; Zimmermann, 2011). Because these teams consist of individuals with very different cultural backgrounds, assumptions and approaches to work, organizations must be well equipped to create structures and processes that promote their success,The conference which will include leadership growing awarenessteam —myself, of the challeng Dr. Stephaniees they face, andE. how best to support their productivity. SinceVasko, the Dr.start Julieof the 21stThompson century, organizations Klein, and were Megghan predicted Honketo rely more Seidel— heavily on globally dispersed new product development teamshas worked versus collocated closely and with solely the virtual SciTS teams 2019 with moderatePlanning physical Committee dispersion, and approximately the INSciTS 20% (McDonough,board to design Kahn & aBarcza k, 2000).conference Such teams that have builds potential on toexisting provide companiesresearch with and more practice practical strengths and economical while services. also Thepointing economic in potentialexciting also new includesdirections. a cost savings for organizations. Research shows that GVTs with a flexible and configurable infrastructure save valuable resources, resulting in increased productivity (Anderson et al., 2007). One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels The obvious advantages are however accompanied by some challenges. Given the increased challenges of teams working virtually acrossresearch time andin environmental space, their effectiveness science, suffers agriculture, and requires andspecial natural attention. resources. Global virtual To teams this (GVTs) end, relywe on are computer pleased- to mediatedfeature communicationfor the first technologytime panels due tofocusing their geographic on Indigenous dispersion. Being approa globallyches scattered to team suggests science a culturally/nationally and collaborative diverseapproaches makeup inthat agriculture can also contributes and natural to miscommunications. resources. In addition, there are different workstyles and learning styles (Kolb, 1984) or learning needs (Lingham, 2010, 2018) when humans engage, all of which must be addressed using technology, as face-to- faceOther may values not be an drive option SciTS for team 2019 building as and well. conflict Diversity mitigation. and inclusion have been fundamental commitments in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, Mywe experience have worked working to on ensure and leading a “green” a GVT is accuratelyconference, expresse givingd in literature. you the My option team spans of an multiple online countries program and nationalrather cultures and time zones. All communication is mediated through technology, and although English is the common language, it is not than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center the first for the majority of team members, creating added challenges and the need for negotiation when it comes to appropriate communicationfor Interdisciplinarity media selection. seeks This to presentation create opportunities aims to shed light to on refine the expected thinking challenges about working collaboration with GVTs, and but also cross- to providedisciplinary lessons research,learned and toolseducation, and approaches and training. grounded in theory and practice to encourage team success in a virtual environment. Such suggestions include a shift from a task-based focus approach to a more relational, shared leadership approach that invitesWe hope opportunities that you for innovationhave an and excellent creative problemtime in solving. Lansing These while approaches you enjoy help to SciTScombat sub2019. group Lansing formations has and anemp ower individualsactive downtown as contributors with to teamrestaurants, success. local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information. Using Team Science to Identify Important and Innovative Questions for Cancer Research Ms.If you Rachel have Chown any, Dr. questions Sarah George or ,commentsMs. Pip Peakman for ,theDr. RobertSciTS Bristow 2019, Manchester Planning Cancer Committee, Research please Centre look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges. The Manchester Cancer Research Centre’s (MCRC) approach to Team Science (TS) is focused on enabling multidisciplinary groups to joinMichael forces towardsO’Rourke a shared goal – building upon excellence in basic and translational cancer research to ultimately improve patient outcomes. Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference To identify important and innovative new research questions in different cancer specialties we hold Town Hall meetings at MCRC. Each meeting focusses on a specific tumour type (e.g. breast cancer, melanoma, prostate cancer) and is open to all professionals involved in cancer research, including clinicians, academics, PhD students, nurses, clinical trials professionals, research managers and importantly, patients. The nuances of each disease group mean that each meeting has a unique set of participants and desired outcomes. Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 56 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TableOral ofAb Contentsstracts

TheWelcome goal of each Town ...... Hall meeting is to catalyse discussions to formulate an exciting research project 2 that harnesses our unique strengths and opportunities in Manchester, and can result in an exciting, game-changing headline in 3 years’ time. The group starts by identifyingINSciTS one or Boardmore such ...... projects and then back-fills the scientific research...... that would be needed. 3 This requires input from all disciplines represented in the room. Several ideas are pitched and our Director (Prof Rob Bristow) chairs an interactive session, until onePlanning idea is selected. Committee The work should ...... present an opportunity for added value via...... a new team approach 7 rather than repeat anything already happening or done before. Facility Map ...... 8 Key questions for disease groups: Session What is Evaluationbest and what is uniqueInformation about your ...... disease group’s research in Manchester?...... What 9could we do here that no one else could do? Conference What would be at an a enabling Glance Mancunian-driven, ...... high risk, high impact idea...... that could be accomplished 10 in 3 years? Featured What would Keynote the 3-year headlineand Plenary in a newspaper Panels...... be that would represent the accomplishment?...... 14 UnderpinningSIGs...... all projects is a ‘One Manchester’ approach: the project...... needs to use team members from28 across the city, across our NHS (hospital) trusts, and the University of Manchester. An already established team should not carry out the project, and the new teamDetailed should look Dailyto uplift moreSchedule junior fellows ...... and scientists to take on leadership...... roles. 30 TheWorkshop winning idea undergoes Abstracts...... international peer review to assess the innovative and novel nature of the 38 proposal; including whether it is likely to result in a high impact publication, and if the Manchester environment has sufficient capabilities to execute it. Pump-priming fundsPanel of approximately Abstracts...... £100-150,000 are provided to kick-start the project as well as the promissory 42of access to real-time outcomes, health economics and biobanking resources, and genomics for 40-50 patients. Groups are strongly encouraged to also seek additional diseaseOral group Abstracts donations and ...... charitable, donor or grant funding where possible. 52

WithinPoster this oral Abstracts presentation we ...... will showcase our methodology and successful case studies from our 106 TS approach in Manchester using Town Halls. We will discuss some of the challenges, including geographical dispersion, organisational barriers, differences in diseaseSciTS team Awardsapproaches, ...... working cultures, change management and communication. This ethos is 119 factored into our long-term aim of co-locating cancer teams and aligned disciplines in our new £150million cancer research building. Unconference Details ...... 119 Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 120 COLLABORATION READINESS Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120 Moderator: Kennan Kellaris Salinero, ReImagine Science

The Experience and Confidence of Researchers and Research Support Staff in Conducting Cross-disciplinary Research Dr. Yan Ding, Dr. Justin Pulford, Dr. Imelda Bates, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

Background Previous experience, confidence and the span of disciplines represented within a project have been identified as contributing to collaborative readiness during the initial stages of cross-disciplinary research projects. This paper explores previous experience and confidence of researchers and research support staff in an African health multidisciplinary research programme (IMPALA), to identify actions for further improvement and to provide baseline information in tracking changes during the programme lifetime.

Methods Between May-September 2018, a novel online survey based on required competencies from literature in conducting cross- disciplinary research was administered to respondents from the IMPALA programme. The survey carried personal information, previous experience, and confidence in conducting cross-disciplinary research. A four-phase model of cross-disciplinary research was the main analytical framework. It comprises development (establishing a shared understanding of scientific/societal problem space of interest); conceptualization (developing research questions and a research design); implementation (launching, conducting and refining the planned research); translation phases (applying research findings); and a cross-cutting component (contributing to the goals of the four phases). The researcher respondents were grouped according to academic ranks and primary academic fields, to compare the

2019 SciTS Conference Program 57 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Ora SciTSl Abs tConferenceracts Welcome

Dearpercentages SciTS of having2019 previous participants, research experience and their confidence in conducting cross-disciplinary research. Data from the research support staff were divided according to whether at least half of the respondents had previous experience of cross-disciplinary Welcomeresearch and towere the “extremely 2019 Science confident” ofor “confident”.Team Science (SciTS) FindingsConference, 43/56 researchers the 10th (grouped annual as gathering professors/senior of individuals researchers/early-career and groups researchers as well as in Humanities & Social Sciences/Medicineinterested in studying, & Clinical Sciences/Otherspracticing, and groups) facilitating and 8/10 reteamsearch science. support staff completed the survey. The researchers had mainlyThis meetinga Medicine is & Clinicalalso the Sciences first backgroundSciTS conference (64%), followed since by Humanities formation & Social Sciences (26%), and 74% had a ofmultidisciplinary the International background. Network At each forphase, the the Science professors of and Team the Humanities Science & Social Sciences group had the highest percentage (INSciTS),of previous cross-disciplinary a professional research society experience. advancing Overall, related researchers interests had less incross-disciplinary research experience at the teamtranslation science. phase. At the development and translation phases, there was a lower level of confidence in doing cross-disciplinary research. There were no differences in confidence between the Humanities & Social Sciences and Medicine/Clinical Sciences groups, whereas the early-career researchers had a lower level of confidence compared to professors and senior researchers except in the implementationThe conference phase. leadership The research team support —myself, staff potentially Dr. couldStephanie provide additional E. support for cross-disciplinary research by extendingVasko, Dr.collaboration Julie Thompson networks, interacting Klein, andwith non-academicMegghan Honke stakeholders, Seidel— incorporating cross-disciplinary research outcomes into hastechnical worked outputs, closely presenting with research the SciTS in non-technical 2019 Planning language, disseminatingCommittee cross-disciplinary and the INSciTS findings board to policymakers, to design an ad conferenceadvocating for cross-disciplinary that builds on research. existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new directions. Interpretation Overall, researchers had the least previous experience and confidence in the translation phase of cross-disciplinary Oneresearch. of ourThe programmeaims for SciTScould focus 2019 on creating is to demonstrate opportunities for howcross-fertilization team science among animates IMPALA researchers, and propels especially for early- career researchers, increasing researchers’ translational skills, and engaging research support staff for additional support in conducting researchcross-disciplinary in environmental research. science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative approachesBuilding the Collaboration in agriculture Readiness and naturalFramework resources. for Ad-interim Evaluation of Transdisciplinary Collaborations Dr. Eva Kalmar, Dr. Maarten van den Sanden, Ms. Ingrid van Marion, TU Delft Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments inThe our challenges planning, of our driving modern worldour callsare getting for participation,more and more multi-dimensional, invited presentations, integrating notand only fee technological structure. but In social, addition, weenvironmental have worked and politically to ensure sensitive a issues.“green” The conference, complexity of these giving problems you the requires option the involvementof an online of multiple program actors rather in the thanresearch a printedand innovation one processes,and working the engagement to reduce of foodscientists waste. with non-scientists And as the by primary bridging disciplinary host, the and MSU sector-based Center boundaries. for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinaryThe collaborating research, partners share education, their human and capital, training. risk and resources, join complementary skills and capacities in the course of joint work. These collaborations, often called as collaborative networks create new expectations, alter roles and shift communication Wepractices hope for thatits members. you have The partnersan excellent have to adjusttime toin new Lansing social, organizationalwhile you enjoyand management SciTS 2019. settings Lansing and adapt has to the an new activecollaboration-facilitating downtown with technologies. restaurants, Organizations local thatart lackshops, the ability running to share trails, and collaborateand local have community a huge potential classes to resist such these asadjustments kickboxing and adaptation and pottery. processes Please and limit consult the effectiveness the website of the forcollaboration more detailed as a whole. information. This could lead to the failure of the join work.

IfWe you claim have that next any to questionsthe technology or readiness comments levels, for collaboration the SciTS readiness 2019 levelsPlanning of research Committee, teams, organizations please look or compa for niesthose ofcan us be withmeasured red andribbons needs toon be our used name within innovationbadges. processes. Much has been studied regarding the success factors of collaborations, or the collaboration readiness of distinct partners working together, but still, the evaluation of such collaborations are yet Michaeldone at the O’Rourke last phase and are generally based on the number of produced research publications and patents. Our goal is to build a Chair,Collaboration 2019 Readiness Science framework of Team that Science can be used Conference to measure the collaborative status of collaborative networks even during their formation to support them in reaching their utmost potential.

Blockchain, the distributed ledger technology is a disruptive innovation, with potential uses in healthcare, food industry, energy, smart industry, logistics, and government. Blockchain entails an entirely new way of identification, transacting, trading and regulation. Blockchain is bestLansing seen as a technologyCenter WIFI that is Informationco-created with multiple - Username: stakeholders. scits The heterogeneityand Password: of the actors 2019 involved in its development implies that these stakeholders are likely to have very different backgrounds and interests and as a result, they are also

2019 SciTS Conference Program 58 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TableOral ofAb Contentsstracts

likelyWelcome to have very different...... understandings of Blockchain regarding (for example) what it is and what 2 it should do. This can both hamper collaboration among these stakeholders and reduce widespread support for Blockchain. INSciTS Board ...... 3 A pilot study was performed on the Dutch Blockchain Coalition in 2017 to map how different internal stakeholders collaborate, how they perceivePlanning the technology, Committee how they reach ...... out, and how these issues could determine...... the success of Blockchain7 innovations. The aim of the pilot study was dual. First, to check the theoretical framework of collaboration readiness generated by the authors based on theoreticalFacility input Map as the ...... first step in the design-based research approach...... The results of the pilot were 8 used to give feedback on issues that should be changed by the coalition to become more effective. The report on our findings was used to implement several organizationalSession changes. Evaluation This presentation Information summarizes ...... the collaboration readiness framework,...... the pilot 9 research, and draws the silhouette of the further research. Conference at a Glance ...... 10 Perceptions of Competence of Social Scientists and Natural Scientists Ms.Featured Caitlin Kirby, Ms. Keynote Patricia Jaimes and, Dr.Plenary Amanda R. Panels...... Lorenz-Reaves, Dr. Julie C. Libarkin...... , Michigan 14 State University

InterdisciplinarySIGs...... scientific research teams must often work across the ...... boundaries of social science and 28 natural science in developing solutionsDetailed for complex Daily scientific Schedule issues. However, ...... perceptual barriers across these...... boundaries may prevent 30 the formation of interdisciplinary teams or cause tension during interdisciplinary collaboration. Competence is one of the primary dimensions on which individualsWorkshop judge others, Abstracts...... and is a particularly important perception in the workplace. We explored the 38 perceptions of competence of natural science and social science through the development of a survey. The purpose of this work was to develop and validate these competencePanel measures.Abstracts...... The survey was taken by a population of earth scientists (n = 449) from a range 42 of career experiences. Resulting competence scales included three factors that we labeled as Perceived Respect (PR), Perceived Methodological Rigor (PM), andOral Perceived Abstracts Intelligence ...... (Pi). Scales were validated using confirmatory factor analysis, with all items 52 on each scale having factor scores >0.32. Earth scientists' scale scores for the three competence measures PR, PM, and Pi were analyzed for both social science andPoster natural science. Abstracts A Mann-Whitney ...... U test revealed that earth scientists perceived social science/scientists 106 as significantly less competent than natural science/scientists. To test the impact of various demographics on earth scientists' competence perceptions of socialSciTS and natural Awards science, ...... we conducted a multivariate multilevel analysis. Women perceived social 119scientists as more intelligent than men did. Having experience working with a social scientist improved scientists' competence perceptions of social science/scientists. HoldingUnconference an earth science PhDDetails lowered ...... earth scientists’ competence perceptions...... of social science/scientists. 119 Overall, our study indicated that competence in scientific disciplines is a multidimensional construct with components related to respect, methodological rigor,Thanks and intelligence. to our Our Reviewers survey results from ...... earth scientists indicated that perceptual...... barriers towards 120 other scientific disciplines related to competence exist and may be related to exposure to other disciplines. Future research could expand upon these competencePost Conference constructs, and gather Evaluation larger samples Information...... of scientists' competence perceptions across...... disciplines. 120

Does a Shared Understanding Blind Groups to Surprise? Ms. Michal Russo, U of M School of Environment & Sustainability

Change and uncertainty is ubiquitous in environmental resource management. To be effective, decision makers must not only master knowledge about current and past conditions, they must have the capacity to quickly and effectively adapt their understanding to changing conditions. However, large and complex environmental decisions are not made by individuals, but rather diverse and often contentious groups. The capacity to adapt is influenced by the group’s cognition – i.e. their shared understanding of the problem and solution space. While past research has explored the role of group cognition in the context of stable and directed goals, little empirical work has focused on dynamic and ambiguous problem-sheds characteristic of wicked problems. This research asks - does the process of working towards an agreement make advisory groups better or worse at detecting and responding to future surprises? I propose that understanding the relationship between decision making processes, group cognition, and adaptive capacity is essential to enhancing the facilitation of long term resource management and ultimately the resilience of socio-ecological systems. As an initial step, I suggest that scholars and practitioners need a robust and flexible instrument for assessing changes in group cognition, and relating those measures to decision making outcome metrics. In my research, I propose a mixed methods approach that centers on an experimental role play simulation.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 59 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Ora SciTSl Abs tConferenceracts Welcome

Dear“I’m Ready, SciTS Are 2019 You Ready?” participants, How Do You Know if Your Team is Ready? Dr. Jennifer Cross, Dr. Bailey Fosdick, Dr. Hannah Beth Love, Dr. Meghan Suter, Ms. Dinada Egan, Dr. Ellen Fisher, Colorado State WelcomeUniversity to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) IsConference, your team ready the to be10th a team? annual The gatheringScience of Team of individuals Science (SciTS) and literature groups has established that teams go through phases of developmentinterested (Hallin studying, et al., 2012), practicing, and it takes timeand for facilitating a team to develop team and science. perform. How do you know if a team is ready to apply for a grant,This writemeeting publications, is also and the conduct first research? SciTS conference Frequently, teams since ‘fail formationto launch.’ They have a good idea that requires team science, butof thethey Internationalfail to coalesce as Network a team. ‘Failure for the to launch,’Science can of leave Team a ‘bad Science taste’ for future research and collaboration. What if the team and(INSciTS), their sponsors a professional knew in early stages society if they advancing were “ready?” related What if interests there were tangiblein markers that teams could “check-off” before teammoving science.to the next stage of development. At Colorado State University, from 2015-2019 we conducted a mixed-methods study of three cohorts of interdisciplinary research teamsThe conference to examine the leadershipprocesses of teamteam development. —myself, We Dr. conducted Stephanie non-participant E. observation, social surveys, and social network analysisVasko, to Dr. understand Julie Thompson team dynamics Klein, and development. and Megghan We used Honke the data Seidel— in an iterative and recursive process to improve and enhancehas worked the OVPR closely program with through the developingSciTS 2019 new trainings,Planning establishing Committee stage andgates, the modifying INSciTS the funding board structure, to design and a conferencesupporting teams that through builds multiple on existingstages of development. research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new directions. This session will explore the processes of team development, describe evidence-based interventions to accelerate team development, Oneand provide of our metrics aims and for criteria SciTS for 2019understanding is to demonstrate what interventions how are bestteam suited science for different animates stages ofand development. propels Theresearch session inwill: environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature Provide for the detailed first casetime studies panels of teamsfocusing at several on Indigenousstages of development, approa ches to team science and collaborative approaches Define specificin agriculture metrics and and data natural collection resources. tools for assessing teams across the stages of development,  Identify interventions for advancing teams to higher levels of readiness, and Other valuesOutline recommended drive SciTS stage 2019 gates as (and well. associated Diversity metrics) and for inclusion university programshave been or other fundamental funders supporting commitments large in our planning,transdisciplinary driving teams our based calls on teamfor participation, readiness. invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, Participantswe have workedwill leave theto ensuresession with a “green”an enhanced conference, understanding giving of how you they canthe accelerateoption of development an online of program their own scientif ratheric teams,than a what printed interventions one and are mostworking appropriate to reduce for various food stages waste. of development, And as the and primarywhat tools host,can help the administrators MSU Center and fu nders assessfor Interdisciplinarity team readiness. seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- References:disciplinary Hall, research, K. L., Vogel, A. education, L., Stipelman, B.and A., Stoktraining.ols, D., Morgan, G., & Gehlert, S.(2012). A four-phase model of transdisciplinary team- based research: Goals, team processes, & strategies. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2(4),415–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-012-0167-y We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an TOOLSactive downtown FOR TEAM with SCIENCE restaurants, AND local THE artSCIENCE shops, runningOF TEAM trails, SCIENCE and local community classes such Moderator:as kickboxingDr. Ike and Iyioke, pottery. Michigan Please State University consult the website for more detailed information.

11If you Best havePractices any for questions Successful or Team comments Science: A for series the of SciTS Motivational 2019 VideosPlanning Committee, please look for those Ms.of us Nicole with Exe red, University ribbons of Michigan,on our name MICHR; badges. Ms. Laura Denton, University of Michigan, Faculty Development; Ms. Meg Fairchild, Mr. Jordan Hahn, Dr. Vicki Ellingrod, University of Michigan, MICHR

AsMichael Team Science O’Rourke is an ever growing emergent field, one of the key issues that must be addressed is how to engage researchers to learnChair, about 2019 team Science science and of theTeam skills Scienceneeded to successfullyConference participate in or lead a multi-disciplinary team. At last year’s Science of Team Science conference, we heard from many other institutions that they were providing team science training but were having difficulty motivating people to attend. Based on the Top 10 Take Aways from the Collaboration and Team Science: A Field Guide (1), we are creating short motivational videos to encourage researchers to learn more about various topics related to team science and seek out further training to do it well. The ten topics include: trust, vision, self-awareness and emotional intelligence, leadership, mentoring, team evolutionLansing and Center dynamics, WIFI communication, Information recogniti - Username:on and sharing success,scits and conflict Password: and disagreement, 2019 and navigating and leverage networks and systems.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 60 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TableOral ofAb Contentsstracts

AnotherWelcome motivating ...... factor to develop these videos was the University of Michigan’s diversity, equity, and2 inclusion (DEI) initiative that was rolled out in fall 2016. It involved the creation of a five-year DEI strategic plan for all campuses and we felt that this initiative would dovetailINSciTS nicely with Board our Team ...... Science video project since we know from the...... research that diverse teams 3 are more productive and innovative. Thus, we added an eleventh topic of “diversity” to the original Top 10 Take Aways. These eleven videos will be paired with resourcesPlanning such as Committee other readings, webinars, ...... and tools that the viewers can further...... explore. While video 7 creation is ongoing, we do have a sample of completed videos that can be demonstrated during the session. Facility Map ...... 8 Video creation consisted of identifying underlying sub-themes for each overarching topic. These were then translated into interview questionsSession for a mix Evaluation of experts and Informationteam science practitioners...... The interviewees are ...... comprised of both 9 faculty and staff from the University of Michigan as well as other thought leaders in these respective domains. Some of the interviewees touched on several of the Conferencekey topics while being at interviewed,a Glance thus ...... we were able to use clips in a number...... of the videos which 10 help tie them together for a cohesive series. The interviewees were informed of the motivational nature of the videos as opposed to more in-depth educational videosFeatured that already Keynote exist. The plan and was Plenary to have each Panels...... video be no more than three to four minutes...... in 14 length. Each interview is expertly edited with live on-screen content for emphasis of the key sub-themes. The videos and accompanying resources will be available on a websiteSIGs...... for both internal and external research community members to...... access. 28

Reference:Detailed National Daily Cancer Schedule Institute. “Collaboration ...... and Team Science: A Field ...... Guide”. May 18, 2018. 30 https://www.cancer.gov/about- nci/organization/crs/research-initiatives/team-science-field-guide.Workshop Abstracts...... 38 InfrastructuringPanel Abstracts...... a Federated Research Network Node 42 Dr. Marcelline Harris, Lisa Ferguson, Airong Luo, University of Michigan IntroductionOral Abstracts The contemporary ...... research environment is dynamic, and challenged to support what is 52broadly described as data- intensive science. The need for new models of collaboration and infrastructure is recognized; federated research networks (FRNs) are onePoster such model, Abstracts intended to address ...... research ‘at scale’. FRNs are collaborations among independent 106 partners who, through coordination at overarching network levels, bring together resources and services to enable more efficient research. In healthcare, thereSciTS are speculations Awards that ...... all 5500+ US hospitals may be connected to FRNs in the near future (Weber). 119 While there is emerging researchUnconference literature exploring Details infrastructure ...... at the FRN network level, insights into...... developing and sustaining 119 infrastructure at local participating institutions (node level) is nascent despite known challenges. Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 120 Adopting infrastructuring as an analytical lens, our research questions address the general question of what infrastructuring is required withinPost an institution Conference to support itsEvaluation participation in Information...... FRNs, what are the required infrastructural...... components, 120 how are the components assembled to meet research goals? A sociotechnical perspective of infrastructure encompasses multiple dimensions including a) the technical infrastructure; b) the human infrastructure, and, c) the institutional systems and policies. The terms “infrastructuring” and “the infrastructuring of work” define “the tentative, flexible and open character of the activity of designing and developing infrastructure”. Infrastructuring involves aligning and leveraging relationships among people, organizations, and technologies to make them productive and functional (Bietz). However investigators have observed that the work of infrastructuring is often invisible and marginalized; attention is typically directed toward technical infrastructure only (Bowker, Ribes). Method A participant observation was conducted at one healthcare institution; findings were validated through interviews with three other institutions in the same FRN. Jointly, these institutions could contribute data from > 4 million patient records to network studies. We first categorized infrastructural components and the processes to assemble components, then graphically represented the infrastructuring work using a mind mapping tool, and iteratively refined our analysis based on stakeholder feedback obtained through interviews. Results and Discussion Infrastructuring work includes governance of the node, meeting network requirements, provisioning the local technical infrastructure, providing core services to study teams, and evaluation of node functioning. Across these five work efforts, 26 ‘sub’-efforts and 148 specific tasks were identified. Fewer than half of discrete work efforts (43%) were directly focused on the technical infrastructure; more were devoted to coordinating and assembling resources, services and expertise within the institution and

2019 SciTS Conference Program 61 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Ora SciTSl Abs tConferenceracts Welcome

Dearacross theSciTS FRN. 2019 All sites participants, agreed that embedding the infrastructuring work within existing institutional systems and procedures was essential to achieve research goals and institutional commitment to sustained engagement. It was commonly noted that FRN Welcomeinfrastructure tocould the be 2019 reused Science to serve other of Team research Science projects and(SciTS) other FRNs, but this requires careful planning, organization and commitments within the institution. Future work will further examine the properties of the sociotechnical infrastructures in FRNs, their sustainabilityConference, and the reuse, 10th and annualembeddedness gathering as an organizingof individuals structure and for assessing groups research infrastructure maturity at academic institutions.interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation It'sof theNot AllInternational Fun and Games: Network Building for Multipl the Scienceayer Worlds of to Team Explore, Science Learn and Expand. Mr.(INSciTS), Benjamin Greena professional, Ms. Georgina society Moulton ,advancingMs. Victoria Turner related, University interests of Manchester in Ateam megagame science. is a complex system, tabletop simulation. The term megagame refers to experiences with a purely entertainment focus, many of the core ideas underlying them are common within military, political and industrial exercises more commonly named as wargames,The conference which tend leadership closer to training team and —myself, analysis. Despite Dr. Stephaniethis the terms E.can largely be used interchangeably. Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— Megagameshas worked tend closely to have atwith least the 20 players,SciTS usually2019 manyPlanning more and Committee involve asymmetric and the player INSciTS interactions board (most to commonly design a surroundingconference player that role). builds A further on keyexisting ingredient research is the ‘controller’, and practice a human strengths rules moderator while that also is empowered pointing to inmodify exciting the game new on the fly, to reward player ingenuity or invention, or to fix broken mechanics or direct the actions of players. Consequently this class of gamedirections. is unusal because its rules are semi-formalised but still, from player perspectives, apprear to be consistent enough to not affect immersion. InOne 2018 of we our designed aims andfor twiceSciTS ran 2019the megagame is to demonstrate “EnTRUSTed” tohow informally team observe science a megagame’s animates ability and to propels convey perspective, to understandresearch betterin environmental the process and considerationsscience, agriculture, of megagame and creation, natural and toresources. informally assess To this their end, reception we withinare pleasedgroups with to limitedfeature gaming for the experience. first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative approaches in agriculture and natural resources. The situation that EnTRUSTed was created to represent was that of the acute aspects of British NHS Hospitals. Roles included Anaesthetist, Board Member (such as CEO), Directorate Officer, Medical Consultant, Nursing Manager, and Surgical Consultant. Each roleOther had valuesvastly different drive focuses SciTS and 2019 despite as the well. central Diversity mode of cooperation,and inclusion commonly, have responsibilities been fundamental spanned two commitments or more roles, leadingin our toplanning, conflict and driving challenges our that calls players for needed participation, to overcome invited to succeed. presentations, and fee structure. In addition, we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather Wethan refer a printedto the game one as aand simulation working because to reduce it was designed food waste. to accurately And render as the the primarydecision space host, of theeach MSU represented Center role within the hospital environment. We aimed to create conditions, such as cliques, hierarchies, policies and competing drives that elicited true for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- to life behaviours (judged ostensibly by an observer with significant experience of working in a hospital). disciplinary research, education, and training. While EnTRUSTed is intended to accurately depict the decision space, the operational mechanics, the actual work that players undertake,We hope was that deliberately you have a low an granularity excellent abstraction time in of Lansing actual medical while practice. you enjoy This was SciTS to reinforce 2019. the Lansing perspective has of players an as hospitalactive managersdowntown and withsenior restaurants, professionals. local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such Theas kickboxingprocess of design and was pottery. informed Please by an extensive consult knowledge the website and experience for more of workingdetailed within information. a British NHS hospital and it was further supported by a leading expert in megagame creation and delivery. If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those Throughout,of us with ared significant ribbons concern on ourwas thatname of attendance. badges. To mitigate this, we targeted a number of key barriers hoping to remove or reduce them in order to increase the likelihood of attendance. For example, we delivered the experience over an evening (set aside for teachingMichael the O’Rourke various rules demonstrations) and the following day (used exclusively to run the game) to avoid the common complaint of megagames,Chair, 2019 that Science rules are inaccessibleof Team Science and often notConference explained. We consider these games to be ideal context specific platforms to test ideas or innovations, analyse systems or situations, and communicate a range of perspectives. However, it was anecdotally suggested that games of any type may only be attractive to those who play games. Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 62 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TableOral ofAb Contentsstracts

RepertoiresWelcome as Blueprints ...... and Frameworks for the Doing of Science 2 Dr. Rachel Ankeny, University of Adelaide; Dr. Sabina Leonelli, University of Exeter In thisINSciTS paper, we proposeBoard a ...... general framework for analysing the emergence,...... development, and evolution 3 of particular ways of doing science,Planning which we Committee call repertoires, in ...... which the successful alignment of conceptual,...... material, logistical 7 and institutional components (including specific skills and behaviours by participants in scientific efforts) results in a blueprint for how to effectively conduct, finance andFacility support research Map in ...... the longer term. The framework is grounded in our...... analysis of the specific characteristics 8 of the system of conceptual commitments, practices, technologies, institutions, and norms used within certain case studies taken from the life sciences, althoughSession we contend Evaluation that it can be Information fruitfully applied much ...... more widely to other types ...... of research. We 9 believe that it is important for philosophers of science to be able to trace and analyse the material, social, and epistemic conditions under which individuals join togetherConference to perform projects at a and Glance achieve common...... goals, in ways that are relatively...... robust over time despite10 the broader landscape and other features evolving and changings, as well as how these can be transferred to and learnt by other groups interested in similar goals.Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 We SIGs...... use a series of three case studies to illustrate how the repertoires...... framework facilitates philosophical 28 analysis and explanation of critical questions around the functioning, flexibility, durability, coherence, and longevity of research groupings and their outputs, includingDetailed the formation Daily of researchSchedule communities, ...... thus helping to account and understand...... the epistemic 30 implications and significance of different research practices, and related constellations of actors, technologies, and institutions. The framework thus functions as an overarchingWorkshop approach Abstracts...... to the study of scientific change, and especially of the role that a specific type 38of system of practice – the repertoire – has acquired over the course of the last century, with significant implications for what kind of science is regarded as most visible,Panel influential, Abstracts...... and topical in any one period. This perspective has implications for various research 42 practices including credit attribution and supports a highly distributed model of how science is done. Oral Abstracts ...... 52 TRAININGPoster AbstractsAND PROFESSIONAL ...... DEVELOPMENT 106 Moderator: Dr. Heather Billings, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science SciTS Awards ...... 119 Reflecting on Transdisciplinary Team Science Training Dr. UnconferenceStephen Fiore, University Details of Central ...... Florida; Dr. Troy Hartley, Dr. Linda Schaffner...... , College of William 119 & Mary Virginia Institute of MarineThanks Science; to Dr. ourKaren Reviewers McGlathery, University ...... of Virginia; Dr. Deborah DiazGranados...... , Virginia Commonwe120 alth University SolvingPost today's Conference most challenging Evaluation societal problems Information...... requires innovative, integrated breakthroughs...... and 120 novel solutions that transcend individual disciplines, reaching a deeper level of knowledge integration. However, achieving such integration through team science is challenging due to the lack of adequate training to develop such outcomes. This talk describes an approach and preliminary research findings from an NSF funded Innovations in Graduate Education grant awarded to the Virginia Sea Grant, the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, and the University of Virginia, in collaboration with the University of Central Florida, and Virginia Commonwealth University.

We bring together a multi-disciplinary team of faculty coaches to guide a class of diverse doctoral and master's students from the natural and physical coastal, marine and environmental sciences, engineering, design, and social and economic sciences. A series of workshops has been developed to train students on the fundamentals of team science as well as collaborative knowledge building on complex transdisciplinary problems. These are integrated through an intervention focusing on reflection in teamwork processes. Our aim is to introduce students to the principles of team science, collaborative problem solving, and effective self-reflective tools and strategies to improve teamwork. Further, by working closely with coastal community partners (e.g., municipalities, NGOs), this community-based climate-resilience project enables students to practice team science research and use reflective practices to improve their competencies with various stakeholders. Assessment of team processes, along with reflections on teamwork and taskwork will be used iteratively in order to highlight areas of collaboration needing improvement.

Our project is designed to improve understanding of how to nurture self-reflective competencies in the short-term and build capacity for team science research that will enhance students' careers over the long term. Specifically, our goals are to: (1) give a new generation of scientists and policy-makers the knowledge and critical skills they need to work together effectively to find solutions to complex

2019 SciTS Conference Program 63 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Ora SciTSl Abs tConferenceracts Welcome

Dearcoastal SciTSissues that 2019 are importantparticipants, to the citizens of Virginia, the nation, and coastal communities around the globe; (2) provide an opportunity for graduate students to work with stakeholders on complex interdisciplinary collaborative problem solving and learn how to Welcomework as a team to acrossthe 2019 disciplines; Science and, (3)of provideTeam collaborativeScience (SciTS) institutions an unprecedented opportunity to partner and bring together multi-disciplinary faculty teams to train students using innovative workshops focused on community-based coastal resilience Conference,issues. Initial findings the from10th our annual workshops gathering will be reported, of individuals including differences and groups between reflections on teamwork and on taskwork, interestedand the particular in studying, challenges graduatepracticing, student and participants facilitating faced team when workingscience. on complex problems. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation ofEvidence-based the International Team Development: Network for Pr thee-post Science Assessment of Team of Team Science Experiences with Team Coaching (INSciTS),Dr. Tony Lingham a professional, Antioch University; society Dr. Bonnie advancing Richley, Interactionrelated interests Science, LLC in Acrossteam thescience. globe, with the increasingly complex and volatile work environment organizations are recognizing the importance of developing their leaders and employees to increase internal capacity to innovate and enhance performance. A major shift in structural designThe conference to meet this need leadership is to incorporate team teams —myself, across all Dr. levels Stephanie of organizations. E. Despite this trend of becoming more team-oriented structurally,Vasko, Dr. few Julie programs Thompson focus on developing Klein, and teams Megghan in their actual Honke work environmentSeidel— although numerous offsite team-building programshas worked exist. Itclosely is quite evidentwith the that SciTS in very recent 2019 articles, Planning very fewCommittee team training and programs the INSciTS focus on developing board to teams design in their a organizationalconference context that builds with even on less existing that provide research evidence and based practice training forstrengths teams. Today, while many also individual pointing focused in excitingleadership -new trainingdirections. programs exist to help develop individuals but evidence-based training programs to develop teams are still very much in its infantile stage. In a review of the training and development literature since 2000 show very little evidence based training and development at the team level. Based on extant literature it is clear that team training and development is crucial to organizations and thisOne need of inspiredour aims us to for contribute SciTS to 2019 team trainingis to demonstrate involving team assessment, how team team science coaching animates and team development.and propels As suggested byresearch researchers in andenvironmental practitioners, our science, paper involves agriculture, assessing andexperiences natural of teamsresources. in their work To thiscontext; end, a structured we are teampleased coaching to process;feature and for a the longitudinal first time assessment panels to focusingdemonstrate on evidence Indigenous of team development.approaches We to used team a longitudinal science quantitativeand collaborative case study methodapproaches to test the in difference agriculture of teams’ and assessments natural resources. from Time1 and Time 2 and controlled for organizational culture variance by using teams that attended a leadership-training program that included team development. We present the team development program that weOther designed values and delivereddrive SciTS for a Midwestern 2019 as universitywell. Diversity staff leadership and inclusiontraining and havepresent been the findings fundamental from 64 teams commitments that went through the 6-month program from 2009 to 2014. Fifty-four teams that went through the program and completed assessment over the in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, two time periods and engaged in the team coaching process were used in this longitudinal case study. We tested six hypotheses of whichwe have three workedwere supported, to ensure one partially a “green” supported conference, and two not supported.giving you Using the paired option t-tests, of ouran majoronline results program show that rather the gap betweenthan a theprinted Desired one and and Actual working Experiences to reducein Time 2 foodis smaller waste. than inAnd Time as 1 (Mean the primary = -.11, p =.068)host, indicating the MSU team Center developme nt; linearfor Interdisciplinarity regression shows that seeks this reduction to create in the opportunitiesgap does impact theto internalrefine evaluation thinking fromabout the teamcollaboration members (beta and = -.31,cross- r2 = .097,disciplinary p<.05). We research, believe this education,study provides and evidence training. that team development can be demonstrated and that further work could be done to contribute to this stream so as to meet the crucial need of team development in organizations and educational institutions. We hope theWe design hope and that results you of have this study an wouldexcellent contribute time to thisin Lansing stream of workwhile by: you 1) using enjoy an evidence SciTS based2019. assessment Lansing sohas as toan capture team experiences; 2) proposing a programmatic and approach to team coaching; and 3) showing evidence of team active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such development from the team-training program. as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information. Developing Competencies for Team Science Dr.If you Deborah have DiazGranados, any questions Virginia or Commonwealth comments University;for the SciTS Dr. Heather 2019 Billings, Planning Mayo Clinic;Committee, Dr. Allan Brasier,please University look for of those Wisconsin;of us withDr. red Dan ribbons Lackland, on Medical our Universityname badges. of South Carolina; Dr. Wayne McCormack, University of Florida; Dr. Maritza Salazar, University of California, Irvine; Jennifer Sprecher, University of Washington; Dr. Beth Tigges, University of New Mexico; Dr. Kevin C. Wooten, University of Houston Clear Lake; Dr. Dayan Ranwala, Medical University of South Carolina; Dr. Gaetano Lotrecchiano, GeorgeMichael Washington O’Rourke University Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference The promotion of team science in grant applications has been increasing over the last decade. One such example is the funding announcement for the clinical and translational science awards funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). However, standardization of competence, which is required to inform effective team science skills, is still lacking, particularly to guide training and development as well as evaluation efforts. While there is a plethora of research within the social sciences literature that can inform our understanding of Lansingteam science Center effectiveness WIFI, the Information problem still remains - Username: in communicating scits a universaland Password: set of competencies 2019 that drives effective team science performance to stakeholders.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 64 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TableOral ofAb Contentsstracts

TheWelcome value of defining ...... competencies has been recognized (Shippmann, et al., 2000; Begg et al., 2014; 2 Lotrecchiano and Misra, 2019). Specifically, the act of defining competencies will allow for the explicit recommendations for practice in the area of team science, which will INSciTSclarify some ofBoard the vagueness ...... that currently exists. With the specific charge...... by several funding agencies 3 to “increase knowledge and awareness of what works best in team science” (PAR-18-940, NIH, https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-18-940.html) therePlanning is an apparent Committee need for clearer ...... definitions of identified competencies. Moreover,...... our work in mapping 7 the defined competencies to other relevant competencies (e.g., Translational, TL1 and KL2 competencies) will benefit educational and workforce development programsFacility as they Map target ...... the development of team science skills. It is our ...... intent to disseminate the developed 8 framework to the community who holds value in training and evaluating team science (i.e., INSciTS community). Session Evaluation Information ...... 9 This presentation will draw from the work of the Team Science Affinity work group, which has systematically identified competencies specificConference to team science at applicable a Glance to clinical ...... and translational teams as well as teams...... from other sectors. 10 Our work is designed to inform training programs, funders, evaluators, and investigators about the competencies, which are crucial to engaging in collaborative teamFeatured science. Specifically, Keynote our goals and in Plenarythis presentation Panels...... are to: (1) identify observable distinct...... competencies 14 that will result in effective collaborative team science, and (2) provide a framework which can inform training and development programs of faculty, students and researchSIGs...... staff as well as the assessment efforts of team science competencies...... The initial framework 28 of competencies will be presented and discussed. Attendees of this session will be provided time to engage in discussion and debate about the presented framework.Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30

TeamWorkshop Science Bootcamp: Abstracts...... Annual Trainings to Improve Team Performance 38 Dr. PanelBrenda Zierler Abstracts...... , Dr. Erin Blakeney, Ms. Jennifer Sprecher, Ms. Nicole Summerside, University of Washington42 The Team Science Training Team (TSTT), a core group of the University of Washington’s (UW) Institute for Translational Health Sciences-ITHSOral Abstracts (CTSA) offers ...... an annual 1.5 day team science training “Bootcamp” to ITHS-affiliated 52research teams in the Washington,Poster Wyoming, Abstracts Alaska, ...... Montana, and Idaho (WWAMI) region. The purpose of the Bootcamp 106 is to improve team performance and productivity. Research teams affiliated with UW’s ITHS are invited to bring an interdisciplinary team to Seattle to participate in the 1.5 SciTSday training. Awards The approach ...... to the annual Bootcamp includes a baseline assessment of team composition, 119 team structure, and team challenges. Prework requires all participants to complete a Personal Styles Inventory (PSI), the Thomas Kilmann Conflict Mode InstrumentUnconference (TKI), draft a Lean-based Details team...... project charter, and read an article “What...... Google Learned 119 from its Quest to Build the Perfect Team.” Team size for the training ranges from 3 to 7 members and the registration is capped at 60. The teams must be interdisciplinary andThanks all members to of theour research Reviewers team are invited,...... regardless of role. The TSTT has...... been conducting 120 team trainings for educators, healthcare teams, and students for more than 10 years at the UW. In 2018, we added research teams when the CTSAs were required to addPost team Conference science in their grant Evaluation applications. Information...... 120 We initially piloted the research team focused Bootcamp in February 2018 with ITHS program teams (n= 53 attendees comprising 14 teams). An online post-training survey found that 79% of participants indicated that the training moderately to greatly enhanced their knowledge of Lean-R and team science, 69% indicated that psychological safety in their teams improved. 70% of respondents indicated that they agreed or strongly agreed that the PSI and TKI were helpful in preparing for the Bootcamp. Survey comments included: “I didn’t know anything about Team Science before this boot camp, & the knowledge gained was very helpful”; “It was a good use of time. I think it helped the overall ITHS team and our team got some new ideas."

The overall objectives of the Bootcamp are to provide skills to manage their research projects, clarify team member roles, establish team processes, identify the value of working in teams and create awareness of what characterizes high performing teams, provide tools to increase team performance and the opportunity to apply tools real time, develop awareness of how PSI and mode for dealing with conflicts (TKI) affect team functioning. The TSTT utilizes interactive approaches to training including the use of Liberating Structures, and short didactic theory bursts followed by application of content.

The second annual Bootcamp with research teams will be held in February 2019 and we will share results and lessons learned from both the 2018 and 2019 trainings during the SciTS conference. Our evaluation approach has changed and in addition to formative and summative evaluations of the overall content and approach, we will measure the impact of the team science training at 6 and 12 months after training on the team challenges identified by each team.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 65 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Ora SciTSl Abs tConferenceracts Welcome

DearMastering SciTS Complex 2019 Communication participants, Dr. Katy Colbry, Dr. Dirk Colbry, Michigan State University

ThisWelcome highly interactive to the 2019 workshop Science examines of the Team leadership Science – and (SciTS)listening – skills that are essential to effective communication. You’ll learnConference, about the components the 10th ofannual complex gathering communications of individuals and build skills and for bothgroups leading and participating in problem-solving conversations.interested in This studying, engaging workshoppracticing, will teachand youfacilitating how to reduce team complexity science. and avoid confusion during technical conversations, Thisand give meeting you practical is also tools theto increase first understandingSciTS conference and foster since strong formation working relationships. (This session is adapted from materials andof the resources International developed Networkwith support for from the the Science National Science of Team Foundation, Science Award #1730137.) (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in Participants will develop skills for improved communication during complex, technical conversations. Through interactive exercises, participantsteam science. will learn and immediately practice communication techniques for reducing complexity, increasing understanding, and strengthening professional relationships. More specifically, participants will be able to: The1. conference Describe attributes leadership of effective team communication —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. Vasko,2. IdentifyDr. Julie methods Thompson to improve Klein, communication and Megghan skills Honke Seidel— has3. worked Demonstrate closely speaker with techniques the SciTS to initiate 2019 a Planningconversation Committee and communicate and a theproblem INSciTS board to design a conference4. Demonstrate that builds listener ontechniques existing for understandingresearch and and practice contributing strengths to problem solvingwhile also pointing in exciting new Workingdirections. effectively in interdisciplinary teams requires strong communication skills. Participants in this workshop will practice concrete communication skills in the context of problem-solving within interdisciplinary teams. The training covers both technical and interpersonalOne of our communication aims for SciTS skills, 2019and uses is interactiveto demonstrate rehearsal activitieshow team to provide science the op animatesportunity for andparticipants propels to im mediately practiceresearch the skillsin environmental as they are learned. science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative approaches in agriculture and natural resources. SOCIOENVIRONMENTAL TEAM SCIENCE Moderator: Dr. Marisa Rinkus, Michigan State University Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments Interlinkingin our planning, Open Science driving to ourTeam-based calls for Action participation, Research for invited Socio-environmental presentations, Cases and fee structure. In addition, Dr.we Yasuhisa have worked Kondo, Research to ensure Institute a “green” for Humanity conference, and Nature; givingMr. Akihiro you Miyata the , optionUniversity of of an Tokyo; online Dr. Uiprogram Ikeuchi, University rather of thanTsukuba; a printed Dr. Satoe one Nakahara and, workingResearch Instituteto reduce for Humanity food waste. and Nature; And Dr. as Ken'ichiro the primary Nakashima host,, Hiroshima the MSU University; Center Dr. forHideyuki Interdisciplinarity Onishi, Doshisha Women’sseeks to College create of Liberal opportunities Arts; Dr. Takeshi to refine Osawa thinking, Tokyo Metropolitan about collaboration University; Dr. Kazuhikoand cross- Ota disciplinaryResearch Institute research, for Humanity education, and Nature; and Dr. Kenichi training. Sato , Kyoto Sangyo University; Dr. Ken Ushijima, Hokkaido Research Organization; Dr. Bianca Vienni Leuphana, University of Lüneberg; Dr. Terukazu Kumazawa, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature; Dr. Kazuhiro Hayashi, National Institute of Science and Technology Policy; Dr. Yasuhiro Murayama, National Institute of WeInformation hope and that Communications you have an Technology; excellent Dr. time Noboru in LansingOkuda, Research while Instituteyou enjoy for Humanity SciTS and 2019. Nature; Lansing Dr. Hisae has Nakanishi an , activeDoshisha downtown University with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information. This paper discussed how open science, consisting of top-down open research data policies and bottom-up citizen science Ifmovements, you have can any be interlinked questions with or team-based comments action for research the SciTS for socio-environmental 2019 Planning cases. Committee, Through the please case studies look of for (1) those ofwaterweed us with recycling red ribbons in the catchment on our ofname Lake Biwa,badges. (2) participatory monitoring of alien species in Aso-Kuju, Oita, and (3) small-scale water supply management in Hokkaido, Japan, the authors found that team-based action research is often disrupted by sociopsychological boundaries, generated by asymmetric information, knowledge, value, socio-economic status, and power among actors, Michael O’Rourke while such boundaries between actors can be spanned by sharing information, knowledge, and wisdom through appropriate Chair,visualization 2019 and Science dialogue. Itof also Team revealed Science the importance Conference of inclusive and trans-sectoral knowledge-action networking in all three cases. Based on these notions, the authors are developing a methodology to interlink open science to team-based action research which consists of the following approaches, addressing socio-environmental issues. First, boundary spanning can be achieved by transcending, or discovering and sharing the goals that actors with different interests can tackle together, while carefully considering the ethical equity with special attention to empowering marginalized (or “small voice”) actors. Ethical equity is associated with fair data visualization, motivatedLansing by the Center FAIR (findable, WIFI accessible,Information interoperable, - Username: and reusable) scits data and principles, Password: and dialogue 2019 for solution. Civic Tech, or an open governance approach in which civic engineers develop a solution for local issues by using open government data and information and communication technologies, can be applied as a holistic approach.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 66 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TableOral ofAb Contentsstracts

Welcome ...... 2 To implement these concepts to technical operation of transdisciplinary research, open science is regarded as a movement of an open scientificINSciTS knowledge Board production ...... system rather than open scientific knowledge...... only. Open research da 3ta is implemented to the process as an input resource. As a method to engage societies to research experts, Civic Tech is applied to the team-based knowledge production,Planning action, Committee and networking to ...... co-create a solution as outcome, which is ...... then fed back to the resource7 to be used for next projects. This working hypothesis is being tested and further improved through the ongoing case studies. Through this process, open scienceFacility and transdisciplinary Map ...... theories will be integrated into a methodology...... of Open Team Science as 8 a new research paradigm.

AdoptingSession a Community Evaluation Science InformationModel of Team Sc ...... ience for Addressing Environmental...... Inequities 9 Dr. Jennifer Carrera, Dr. Kent Key, Michigan State University; Ms. Karen Calhoun, University of Michigan, MICHR; Dr. Sarah Bailey, CommunityConference Based Organization at a Glance Partners, ...... All Faith and Health Alliance; Dr. Joseph...... Hamm, Michigan 10 State University, Environmental Science and Policy Program, School of Criminal Justice; Dr. Courtney Cuthbertson, Michigan State University Extension; Ms. Yvonne LewisFeatured, National Center Keynote for African and American Plenary Health Consciousness,Panels...... Healthy Flint Research...... Coordinating 14 Center; Dr. Susan J. Woolford, University of Michigan; Ms. E. Hill DeLoney, Community Based Organization Partners, Flint Odyssey House Health AwarenessSIGs...... Center; Ms. Ella Greene-Moton, Community Ethics Review...... Board, Community Based Organization 28 Partners; Ms. Kaneesha WallaceDetailed, Healthy DailyFlint Research Schedule Coordinating ...... Center; Mr. DeWaun E. Robinson...... , Community Based 30Organization Partners, Artistic Visions Enterprise; Mr. Ismael Byers, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine; Ms. Patricia Piechowski-Whitney, UniversityWorkshop of Michigan, Abstracts...... MICHR; Mr. Luther Evans, Community Based Organization Partners; Ms. Athena 38 McKay, Dr. Don Vereen, University of Michigan, MICHR; Ms. Arlene Sparks, Community Based Organization Partners, Date2Dream Panel Abstracts...... 42 A team science model is generally used in academic, government, and industrial research settings to address large and complex problems.Oral AbstractsWhile the transdisciplinary ...... approach within team science assumes the creation of new methods 52 to tackle difficult problems, the institutional foundation of team science limits the degree to which power can adequately be addressed. We build on the team sciencePoster model Abstractsby reappropriating ...... the term ‘community science’ in order to emphasize the significance 106 of community members within the research team but also to diffusely connect the research team to the community in which it is engaging. Our project responds to silencesSciTS created Awards in the Flint ...... water crisis narrative by using a community-driven research study aimed 119 explicitly at elevating the frame of Flint residents in and around the Flint Water Crisis. This paper describes the coming together of the research team and lessons learnedUnconference over three interrelated Details research ...... projects. The three sub-projects include...... 1) a qualitative analysis 119 of community sentiment provided during 17 recorded legislative, media, and community events, 2) an analysis of trust in the Flint community through nine focus groupsThanks across demographic to our Reviewers groups (African ...... American, Hispanic, seniors, and youth)...... of residents in Flint,120 and 3) an analysis of the role of the faith-based community in response to public health crises through two focus groups with faith based leaders from Flint involved withPost response Conference efforts to the water Evaluation crisis. Information...... 120

The purpose of this paper is to describe a case analysis of the use of collaborative, community engaged, team science as a mechanism of community response to a crisis. The key contributions of this paper include a community based participatory research (CBPR) approach to interpreting what a process of resiliency means for a community during and after a crisis. Through a CBPR approach to team science, we propose a new definition for team science that incorporates the transdisciplinarity of team science with the formal and informal educational experiences of community members in the bridged concept of “community science.” Throughout the process of research we have been deliberate in our transdisciplinary approach and have felt that the nature of the work in the Flint community in the context of the water crisis drives the development of new methods of engagement, collaboration, and research analysis. We offer a model for community-based analysis of data for expressing community voice. Finally, we suggest community science as a potential model for rebuilding trust in the scientific community in the context of violation by experts in a crisis situation. We define community science as this collaboration collectively operating through a team science model (while also extending beyond this model to emphasize a community orientation over an [academic] institutional frame) to address community member questions, analyze community-based study findings, and share an intentional community framed perspective on the interpretation of the research. We aim through this framework of community science to achieve true resident control in the conduct of research on communities.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 67 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Ora SciTSl Abs tConferenceracts Welcome

DearLeading SciTS Large Interdisciplinary2019 participants, Research Teams: Lessons from LAGOS Dr. Patricia Soranno, Dr. Kendra S. Cheruvelil, Michigan State University

WelcomeResearch to addressto the large,2019 complex, Science and of interdisciplinary Team Science problems (SciTS) require scholars to work together as part of teams that include a varietyConference, of disciplines the and 10th perspectives, annual gatheringmany of which of are individuals also distributed and with groups a large number of people spread across institutions and nations.interested Although in studying, such large, interdisciplinarypracticing, and research facilitating teams have team the capacityscience. to accomplish a great deal, team leaders are also Thisfaced withmeeting challenges is also both thephilosophical first SciTS and logistical conference in nature. since In this formation presentation, we describe our experiences co-leading two largeof the interdisciplinary International research Network teams forassociated the Science with the LAGOSof Team project Science (www.lagoslakes.org) that studies environmental research problems(INSciTS), at the a scale professional of the continental society US. Weadvancing focus on three related areas intereststhat are especially in important for science teams: (1) balancing individualteam science. and collaborative research modes; (2) identifying research questions that engage experts in multiple disciplines, thus advancing more than one discipline; and (3) keeping busy, productive, and creative scientists engaged when all are not at the same institution. We will present literature-based practices that we implemented to address these three important leadership challenges for ourThe teams, conference share some leadership recommended team future —myself, research directions Dr. Stephanie for science E.of team scientists, and share recommendations for other scienceVasko, team Dr. leaders.Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— has worked closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a Managingconference Interdisciplinary that builds Teams: on existing Lesson researchs Learned from and Coupled practice Natural strengths & Human while Systems also Modeling pointing in inLake exciting Catchments new Ms. Reilly Henson, Dr. Kelly Cobourn, Dr. Cayelan Carey, Virginia Tech; Dr. Kathleen Weathers, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies; directions. Dr. Kaitlin Farrell, Ms. Nicole Ward, Ms. Weizhe Weng, Virginia Tech; Dr. Jennifer Klug, Fairfield University; Dr. Michael Sorice, Virginia Tech One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels Interdisciplinaryresearch in environmentalteam science is increasingly science, common agriculture, in fields suchand asnatural ecology, resources. where it is used To to this investigate end, wethe multifacetare pleaseded and to reciprocalfeature forinteractions the first between time humanspanels and focusing their environment. on Indigenous Bringing together approa multipleches todisciplines team scienceallows researchers and collaborative to examine ecologicalapproaches systems in inagriculture a more holistic and way, natural which is resources. necessary to understand system behavior and forecast environmental outcomes. However, the increased effort and flexibility required to conduct interdisciplinary team science can pose significant roadblocks for many projects. Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments Herein our we planning, present lessons driving learned our from calls a coupled for participation, natural and human invited systems presentations, (CNHS) modeling and projec feet focused structure. on freshwater In addition, lake catchments.we have worked Our project to brings ensure together a “green” more than conference, 20 researchers giving from disciplines you the such option as economics, of an online hydrology, program agronomy, rather and socialthan psychology.a printed Theseone and team workingmembers spanto reduce more than food six inst waste.itutions And that areas distributed the primary geographically host, the across MSU the Center eastern an d Midwesternfor Interdisciplinarity United States. Furthermore,seeks to create the team opportunities includes scientists to from refine a diversity thinking of career about stages, collaboration including undergraduate and cross- students all the way to professors emeritus. disciplinary research, education, and training. Two separate threads of the scientific literature examine the science of team science and address the factors that support project management.We hope that However, you havelittle exists an atexcellent the intersection time of in these Lansing two lines while of inquiry, you whichenjoy defines SciTS the 2019. practical, Lansing day-to-day has aspects an of conductingactive downtown interdisciplinary with research. restaurants, Given that local the studyart shops, of CNHS running in particular trails, involves and a suitelocal of communityactivities and characteri classesstics such that canas kickboxingcompound team and science pottery. related Please challenges, consult operational the websiteguidelines for approaching more detailed these projects information. are likely to be beneficial for similar teams. Our objective is to use our case study to develop best practices for CNHS research including a blueprint for potential risks and challenges as well as a set of strategies for dealing with them. If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those Overof us the with past redthree ribbons years, our on team our has name grappled badges. with large team size, geographically distributed researchers, complex interdisciplinary integration, and more. Drawing on established frameworks from the science of team science and project management literatures,Michael weO’Rourke delve into the lessons we have learned to support CNHS research in general. Examples of questions we address include:Chair, How2019 do Sciencewe build QA/QC of Team into the Science process ofConference moving datasets between sub-teams by establishing metadata standards, platforms for dataset sharing, and versioning control? How do we formalize our expectations for collaborative manuscript writing, while allowing for the flexibility to incorporate new types of research products and disciplinary publication standards? Which management techniques and meeting strategies have been most successful in driving forward coupled modeling efforts?

Our answers to these questions contribute to the growing body of science of team science knowledge. They highlight the types of challenges that ariseLansing in interdisciplinary Center WIFIteam science Information in the field -of Username: ecology, and identify scits potential and Password:strategies teams 2019 may use to address them. Insights from our experience provide a starting point that may be adapted to support projects that share some similarities to ours, whether in content or structure. Ultimately, we seek to support effective and efficient collaborative team science in order to advance the

2019 SciTS Conference Program 68 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TableOral ofAb Contentsstracts

stateWelcome of CNHS modeling...... Such advancement will help the scientific community move toward developing 2 a holistic understanding of complex freshwater systems and support policy development and management of these scarce resources. INSciTS Board ...... 3 TEAM SCIENCE EVALUATION Moderator:PlanningDr. Elias Committee Samuels, University ...... of Michigan, MICHR ...... 7 Facility Map ...... 8 Indicators for Measuring the Contributions of Individual Knowledge Brokers Dr. SessionSabine Hoffmann Evaluation, Eawag, Switzerland; Information Dr. Simon ...... Maag, Parliamentary Services,...... Swiss Parliament; 9 Dr. Robert Kase-Pasanen, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland; Dr. Timothy J. Alexander, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic ScienceConference and Technology at a Glance ...... 10 EnvironmentalFeatured research Keynote often aims and at achieving Plenary a broader Panels...... impact on society and the environment...... However, 14 the impact of such research on policy and practice tends to fall short of expectations. This is partially due to a lack of productive exchange across the interfaceSIGs...... between research, policy and practice. Researchers are sometimes...... not sufficiently informed 28 about the concerns of decision makers and hence produce knowledge that is barely relevant for them or poorly timed. On the other hand, decision makers are not alwaysDetailed sufficiently Daily aware ofSchedule available research ...... knowledge or its implications for both...... policy and practice. 30

GivenWorkshop these limitations, Abstracts...... an increasing number of knowledge brokers work at the interface between research, 38 policy and practice. Their specific function is to facilitate processes to foster productive exchange and mutual learning among research, policy and practice. The ultimatePanel goal Abstracts...... of such processes is to catalyze positive change in society and the environment. However, 42 empirical evidence on the effectiveness of the various processes facilitated by knowledge brokers remains incomplete. While frameworks exist for assessing researchOral impact, Abstracts few are available ...... for evaluating the contributions of individual knowledge brokers at 52 the interface between research, policyPoster and practice. Abstracts ...... 106 In thisSciTS presentation, Awards we respond ...... to this gap by presenting a set of indicators to measure the quantity 119and quality of contributions of individual knowledge brokers to projects, programs, and platforms at the interface. We focus on indicators related to the processes facilitatedUnconference by individual knowledge Details brokers ...... (‘process indicators’) and indicators related...... to the process 119 results on which knowledge brokers are likely to have a decisive influence (‘attributable results indicators’). For both indicators, we provide metrics as regards the quantityThanks and quality to ourof the Reviewerscontributions...... 120 ThePost set of indicatorsConference is based onEvaluation two sources: the Information...... existing literature and the practical experience...... of a120 group of knowledge brokers organized as a Community of Practice at the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), including the coauthors of this presentation. The insights gained from these two sources are integrated, synthesized and refined in an iterative process. The set of indicators is primarily intended to support knowledge brokers in self-assessing their contributions. It can help them to (a) identify ways to improve the effectiveness of their daily work, (b) demonstrate the benefits of their work, (c) reflect on processes of knowledge brokering and the desirable characteristics of process results, and (d) to sharpen their professional profile and clarify their roles and responsibilities vis-à-vis their employers and other stakeholders. The set of indicators is flexible enough to be applied even where available resources are limited.

“Innovation Happens at the Intersections of Disciplines.”Transdisciplinary Research Outcomes Based on the Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC) II Initiative Experience Ms. Sarah D. Hohl, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Dr. Sarah Knerr, University of Washington; Dr. Sarah Gehlert, University of South Carolina; Dr. Marian Neuhouser, Dr. Beti Thompson, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Public health problems are influenced by multiple and interacting biologic, social, behavioral, and environmental factors. The dominant strategy to addressing these problems relies on monodisciplinary methods. Dynamic research approaches in which transdisciplinary teams of scientists collaborate beyond traditional disciplinary, institutional, and geographic boundaries have emerged as promising strategies to address pressing public health priorities. Transdisciplinary research is conceptualized as yielding unique outcomes given its novel and collaborative nature where research teams develop and use new methods outside their immediate area of expertise.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 69 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Ora SciTSl Abs tConferenceracts Welcome

DearHowever, SciTS little prior 2019 work participants, has attempted to identify and characterize the outcomes of transdisciplinary research undertaken to address societal issues. We used a multistage mixed methods framework to identify and explore outcomes of transdisciplinary research using Welcomethe Transdisciplinary to the Research2019 Science in Energetics of Team and Cancer Science (TREC) (SciTS) II initiative as a case example. A survey of TREC II investigators and trainees identified nine initial transdisciplinary outcomes that were further refined using interviews and focus groups. The final transdisciplinaryConference, researchthe 10th outcomes, annual whose gathering relevance of toindividuals addressing complex and groups societal problems we describe using the TREC II experience,interested included: in studying, 1) new transdisciplinarypracticing, and team facilitating and consortia team formation; science. 2) integrated theoretical framework development; 3) multi- levelThis intervention meeting modelis also development the first and SciTS testing; conference 4) development since and adaptationformation of relevant statistical models; 5) translation of findingsof the Internationalacross levels of influence; Network 6) publicfor the policy Science influence; of 7) Team transdisciplinary Science manuscript publication; 8) transdisciplinary grant awards;(INSciTS), and 9) a training professional the next generation society of advancing transdisciplinary related researchers. interests Although in the outcomes identified were similar to those expectedteam science. from non-transdisciplinary approaches, they are distinguished by their involvement of team members representing diverse disciplines, reliance on integrated theoretical frameworks, and a social-problem-oriented focus. These transdisciplinary outcomes could guide inquiry about the value added to research by using a transdisciplinary approach. The conference leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. AVasko, New Methodology Dr. Julie Thompson for Evaluating Klein, Research and Integration Megghan Honke Seidel— Ms.has Bethany worked Laursen closely, Michigan with Statethe SciTS University; 2019 Dr. NicolePlanning Motzer Committee, National Socio-Environmenta and the INSciTSl Synthesis board Center to (SESYNC)design a conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new Adirections. defining feature of interdisciplinary research (IDR) is that it integrates disparate disciplinary contributions into new IDR insights (National Research Council, 2005). As such, “integration is widely regarded as the primary methodology of interdisciplinarity” (Klein, 2012) and, by extension, interdisciplinary team science. Yet, evaluating integrative team science processes and outcomes in transparent,One of our comparable, aims for and SciTS reproducible 2019 isways to remainsdemonstrate elusive. We how therefore team present science a new animates methodology and for propels evaluating the nature andresearch extent of in integration environmental in research science, products such agriculture, as peer-reviewed and naturalarticles. resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative Gatheringapproaches and evaluating in agriculture evidence and of integration natural is resources. difficult. Our literature review revealed no fine-grained methodologies for evaluating integration in research products, and also that related evaluations have primarily relied upon expert judgment to assess integration. However,Other values expert judgmentdrive SciTS is (1) not 2019 a transparent as well. method Diversity and therefore and inclusion does not increase have beenunderstanding, fundamental (2) makes commitments cross-case or cross-product comparisons difficult, and (3) not reproducible as it depends on the life experiences of the experts. Thus, while valuable, expertin our judgment planning, is not driving sufficient our for evaluatingcalls for integration. participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather Throughthan a aprinted collaboration one betweenand working Michigan to St atereduce University food and waste. the National And Socio-En as the vironmentalprimary host,Synthesis the Center MSU (SESYNC) Center - catalyzedfor Interdisciplinarity by MSU’s Engaged seeks Philosophy to create Internship opportunities Program (itself to a newrefine form thinking of team science) about - collaborationwe developed and and piloted cross- an innovativedisciplinary methodology research, to fill education,this need. This and is a mixedtraining. methods evaluation that falls under the general umbrella of “discourse analysis.” The main methods deployed within this approach are argument analysis and integration analysis, with both methods reflecting quantitative and qualitative aspects. Together, these methods contribute to an overall “Synthesis Signature” for a given researchWe hope product. that Theyou Synthesis have an Signature excellent descriptively time in and Lansing numerically while represents, you enjoy respectively, SciTS in 2019.what ways Lansing and to what has exte annt a givenactive research downtown product withis integrative/interdisciplinary/synthetic. restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information. The keystone of our methodology is the IPO model of integration developed by O’Rourke and colleagues (2016), demonstrated in team discourseIf you have at SciTS any 2017 questions by Laursen or and comments O’Rourke. The for IPOthe mode SciTSl theorizes 2019 integration Planning as Committee,a generic input-process-output please look (IPO)for those activity, in which the number of outputs is fewer than the number of inputs. The process transforming inputs-to-outputs is known as an of us with red ribbons on our name badges. integrative relation. We have adopted this IPO model to guide integration evaluation. In doing so, we become the first scholars to operationalize this framework not only for evaluative purposes, but for any purpose beyond theory. Michael O’Rourke WeChair, piloted 2019 the methodology Science of on Team five resear Sciencech articles Conference supported by SESYNC, whose primary goal is to address pressing socio- environmental challenges through interdisciplinary, team-based, socio-environmental (S-E) synthesis research. Pilot results help improve understanding and decision-making for not only SESYNC but for other research centers and funders similarly engaged with and committed to S-E synthesis.

References: Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019  Klein, J. T. (2012). Research Integration: A Comparative Knowledge Base. In A. F. Repko, W. Newell, & R. Szostak (Eds.), Case Studies in Interdisciplinary Research (pp. 283–298). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349541  National Research Council. (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 70 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org TableOral ofAb Contentsstracts

Welcome O'Rourke, M.,...... Crowley, S., & Gonnerman, C. (2016). On the nature of cross-disciplinary integration: A2 philosophical framework. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 56, 62–70. INSciTShttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.10.003 Board ...... 3 EvaluationPlanning of Centers Committee and Institutes: ...... Developing a Framework from Complex...... Systems and Team 7 Science Dr. Gwen C. Marchand, University of Nevada Las Vegas; Dr. Jonathan C. Hilpert, Georgia Southern University Facility Map ...... 8 There is a gap between research infrastructure goals of large scale centers and institutes and traditional evaluation efforts and reportingSession requirements. Evaluation Although thereInformation has been a shift ...... in funding from individuals to...... large scale collaboratives, 9 there has not been an equivalent shift in evaluation efforts focused on collaborative center/institute functioning. The science of team science (SciTS), and relatedConference complex systems at approaches a Glance to resear ...... ch, can fill this gap by providing direct...... ion for evaluation 10 methods and outcomes/ indictors that address the evaluation needs of centers and institutes. The purpose of this presentation is to provide our evaluation frameworkFeatured and illustrative Keynote examples and of itsPlenary use for the Panels...... evaluation of centers and institutes...... 14 ResearchSIGs...... collaboratives, such as those represented by funded centers...... and institutes, are complex systems 28 (Borner et al., 2010). They are characterized by behavior that is (a) complex – behavior at macro levels of the system that is not reducible (Gell-Mann & Lloyd, 1996;Detailed Mitchell, 2009); Daily (b) dynamicSchedule – microprocesses ...... amongst systems components...... that change over 30 time (Koopmans, 2015); and (c) emergent - microinteractions of system components give rise to novel macrosystem behavior (Holland, 2006). Research teams range in complexityWorkshop based Abstracts...... on tasks, goals, size, proximity, and diversity (Fiore, 2015). Evaluation approaches 38 must be multi-level and mixed- methods to adequately represent the ecology of team science (Fiore, 2015) and specifically, relationships that are bound by context andPanel discipline Abstracts...... (Borner et al. 2010). 42

EvaluationOral Abstractsof team science ...... and collaborative knowledge production, underscored by the use of mixed 52 methods approaches to network analysis, has begun to emerge as a promising avenue for evaluation of federally supported centers/institutes (Hilpert & Marchand, 2017;Poster Luke et al.,Abstracts 2015; Marchand ...... & Hilpert, 2018). SciTS approaches (e.g. Fiore, 2012) allow evaluators 106 to produce evidence regarding the development of research infrastructure, collaborative scholarly productivity, and the development of shared vision around a cultureSciTS of research. Awards Team ...... science outcomes are often more meaningful in the context of a multidisciplinary 119 center/institute than traditional evaluation approaches because they provide multiple forms of evidence for the cohesion of collaborative activity over the trajectoryUnconference of a research collaborative Details (Luke ...... et al., 2015)...... 119

EvaluationThanks efforts to focused our Reviewerson the development ...... of team science outcomes provides...... the best evidence 120 for productive ways forward for research collaboratives. We share an evaluation framework organized around a comprehensive set of team science outcome objectivesPost thatConference can be used to designEvaluation evaluation Information...... data collection and analyses. The framework...... allows 120 for the integration of outcome objectives and the production of knowledge around scientific advancement. The objectives are to provide evidence of the following outcomes: 1.Collaborative scholarly productivity 4.Mentoring and advancement of scientists 2.Planned and emergent research infrastructure 5.Leveraging of resources to promote growth 3.Shared vision and culture of research

Taken together, these outcomes can provide information that goes beyond traditional forms of evidence about the cohesion of a research collaborative. The evidence can be used to develop grant proposals, provide evidence for annual reporting, and to formulate resource requests.

Evaluating Transdisciplinary, Sustainability-Focused Higher Education Programs: Using Transdisciplinary Orientation as a Performance Measure in Three NSF-Funded Program Contexts Dr. Shirley Vincent, Vincent Evaluation Consulting; Dr. Deana Pennington, University of Texas at El Paso; Dr. Robert Chen, University of Massachusetts at Boston; Dr. Alan Berkowitz, Dr. Aude Lochet, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies Evaluation of transdisciplinary, sustainability-focused higher education programs is a nascent and evolving field. The National Science Foundation (NSF) has funded interdisciplinary education programs for many years, but best practices for evaluating the performance of these programs have not been determined. This presentation will focus on the use of the Transdisciplinary Orientation (TDO) Scale

2019 SciTS Conference Program 71 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

(MisraDear etSciTS al. 2015) 2019 as a participants,performance measure in three NSF funded program contexts. TDO is defined as the values, attitudes, beliefs, conceptual skills and knowledge, and behavioral characteristics important for effective collaboration in interdisciplinary teams. Scholars reportingWelcome higher to levelsthe 2019 of TDO Science produced ofscientific Team outputs Science judged (SciTS) to be more transdisciplinary in nature and to have greater Conference,translational, policy the and 10th practical annual relevance. gathering Since experience of individuals in transdisciplinary and groups research is positively and significantly correlated with higherinterested levels ofin TDO, studying, we predicted practicing, that training and in convergencefacilitating learning team science.and transdisciplinary problem-solving will result in developmentThis meeting of higher is also levels. the first SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team Science There are two dimensions of TDO: The Values, Attitudes and Beliefs Dimension (VAB) and the Conceptual Skills and Behaviors (CSB) dimension.(INSciTS), The a VAB professional dimension is societyassociated advancing with an intellectual related and interestspersonal orientat in ion towards interdisciplinary research and includesteam science. valuing collaboration and understanding the importance of including diverse disciplinary perspectives in solving complex problems. The CSB dimension is associated with the conceptual skills and behaviors required for effective interdisciplinary integration ofThe multiple conference disciplinary leadership perspectives andteam methods. —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— TDOhas scoresworked are closelyobtained usingwith athe validated SciTS 12-item 2019 scale. Planning We documented Committee TDO scores and thepre- andINSciTS post- program board in to three design program a contexts:conference a 9-week that summer builds undergraduate on existing research research experience and practice delivered bystrengths the Urban Waterwhile Innovation also pointing Network: in Transitioning exciting new Toward Sustainable Urban Water Systems program (NSF SRN), an intensive 2-week doctoral student training summer workshop offereddirections. through the Collaborative Research: Employing Model-Based Reasoning in Environmental Science program (NSF NRT-IGE), and a 2-year interdisciplinary graduate student training program provided by the Coasts and Communities: Natural and Human SystemsOne of inour Urbanizing aims for Environments SciTS 2019 program is to (NSF demonstrate IGERT) at the howUniversity team of Massachusettsscience animates at Boston. and The propelsfirst two programs recruitedresearch students in environmental from diverse higher science, education agriculture, institutions. and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative Fourapproaches cohorts in two in agricultureof the three programs and natural (30 UG andresources. 25 PhD students) had consistently significantly higher levels of TDO after their participation in the education program (paired t-tests). Undergraduate increases were tilted toward more change in the VAB dimension and PhD students toward the CSB dimension. Results were mixed in one cohort in the 2-year graduate training program with some studentsOther values reporting drive higher SciTSTDO and 2019 a few loweras well. levels Diversity (7 GR students). and inclusionA second cohort have has been completed fundamental the scale pre-program commitments and will completein our planning, post-program driving in May. our An additional calls for NSF-funded participation, graduate invited education presentations, program (NSF NRT) and will fee also structure. be using the In TDO addition, scale as awe performance have worked measure. to Differencesensure a in “green” the TDO scoresconference, for UG and giving GR students you the and optionin programs of an that online may influence program the development rather andthan student a printed reporting one of higherand workingTDO levels to will reduce be discussed. food TDOwaste. is only And one asmeasure the primary of program host, performance the MSU with TDOCenter results includedfor Interdisciplinarity in an array of evaluation seeks measures, to create but itopportunities shows promise asto a refine means thinkingfor evaluating about programs collaboration designed to developand cross- convergencedisciplinary learning research, and transdisciplinary education, researchand training. competencies.

TEAMWe hope PROCESS that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an Moderator:active downtownDr. Deborah with DiazGranados, restaurants, , Virginia local Commonwealth art shops, Universityrunning trails, and local community classes such as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information. Teamwork Process Indicators: Learning from the Source Materials of Teams Dr.If you Laura have Anderson any, IBMquestions Research or - Almaden comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those Buildingof us with an understanding red ribbons of effectiveon our teamwork,name badges. and how to foster it, continues to be an important topic to both the academic and professional communities. The social dimension of teams, with a focus on the human aspect of both individuals and their networks, has beenMichael recognized O’Rourke in previous research as an important factor but has been a difficult target for systematic data gathering and study. In theChair, course 2019 of performing Science their of work, Team teams Science produce Conference a wide variety of digital artifacts and traces. This primary data can also be used by researchers in the study of teams and teamwork to gain insights into the dynamics of a team, such as the interpersonal climate, patterns of information sharing, web application activity, and the team composition. The ultimate goal of this research program is to enable automated analysis of teams and teamwork “in the wild” to understand what is happening in a particular team, and to provide insight to the team members for their reflective use. This work utilizes 1. IBM’s Watson Tone Analyzer to examine sentiment analysis of technical discussions,Lansing 2. social Center network WIFIanalysis Information (e.g., Gephi) to -look Username: at patterns of scitsinformation and sharing Password: between team 2019 members, 3. log analysis for insights into usage and activity of computer web applications, and 4. mapping of disciplines to explore the implications of team composition. A grounding theoretical framework is provided by activity theory, with a focus on human motivation, human activity,

2019 SciTS Conference Program 72 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

andWelcome the externalization ...... of human ideas and objectives into something tangible in the world, provides 2the lens for a systemic visualization and abstraction of complex systems. The activity system provides a framework for understanding the interactions and interplayINSciTS among peopleBoard (subjects), ...... the human objective of the activity (object),...... the tools and mediating 3 artifact, and the outcome in a largerPlanning social, historical, Committee or work context...... It also enables a multi-focal unit of analysis,...... with the capability 7 for a granular examination of the situation of an individual person, as well as larger multi-person groups and organizations. Activity system analysis using source teamFacility data from Mapthe research ...... will be presented. A review of the empirical ...... data and analysis will discuss 8 what can be learned from these methods, and the limitations of today’s methods and tools. What can be learned about factors related to collaboration and situation awareness,Session in particular, Evaluation will be discussed, Information and future ...... research directions in this area...... will be highlighted. 9 ExploringConference Narrative Mapping at a Glance as a Lens ...... into the Relationship of Team Member...... Attachment Styles 10 with Team Psychological Safety Mr. FeaturedJonathan Silk, KeynotePepperdine University and Plenary Graduate SchoolPanels...... of Education and Psychology; Ms...... Michele 14 Norton, Texas A&M University Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture SIGs...... 28 This mixed method study explores the connection between a team leaders attachment style and the teams overall level of psychologicalDetailed safety. Daily In today’s Schedule high stake, ...... fast-paced landscape the interpersonal...... processes and functions 30 of member exchanges on work teams have become increasingly important as organizations compete at an accelerating rate. Attachment science (Bowlby, 1973), the Workshopconcept of team Abstracts...... psychological safety (Edmondson, 1999), and Leader-Member Exchange (Graen 38 &Bien, 1995) provide a lens in which to analyze the interactions of team members in organizations. As more organizations become reliant on the collective power of teams,Panel the ability Abstracts...... of a workgroup or team to learn, adapt and innovate rapidly becomes increasingly important.42 Team Psychological safety has been recognized as a key component of a team’s ability to learn and improve performance (Edmondson, 1999). Leaders andOral team members Abstracts have a...... role in establishing team psychological safety. They serve as attachment 52figures for their followers and members and can provide a secure, stable, safe environment for growth and development, or they can provide a sense of insecurity whichPoster restrains Abstracts learning (Popper ...... & Mayseless, 2003). There are significant gaps in current conceptions 106 of the relationship between leader attachment styles, leader-member exchange, and team psychological safety and how they impact various team behaviors (Kafetsios,SciTS Athanasiadou, Awards ...... & Dimou, 2014). 119

HowUnconference leaders and members Details present themselves ...... as attachment figures, the quality...... of member to member 119 exchanges, and how those exchanges are monitored in the team all contribute to the team climate and level of psychological safety. To explore the connections amongThanks those components, to our Reviewers the researchers ...... used a mixed-methods approach to narrative...... mapping of120 the teams (Koeslag-Kreunen, Van den Bossche, Hoven, Van der Klink, & Gijselaers, 2018). Data was collected from a survey on attachment styles and team psychologicalPost Conference safety. This data Evaluation was then analyzed Information...... to gain preliminary insight into the individuals...... on the120 team and their perceptions of the team’s psychological safety. Using insights from the survey, the researchers conducted semi-structured interviews to gain qualitative insight into the member to member exchanges and team climate. For analysis, the researchers constructed narrative maps of the team, based on their quantitative data from the survey and the qualitative data from the interviews. Preliminary results from this exploratory study show the mixed-method approach to narrative mapping provided useful insights into the team climate, especially in identifying the individual’s attachment styles and the resulting member to member interactions that seem to impact psychological safety. This research extends attachment theory, team psychological safety theory, and leader-member exchange theory, by exploring the relationship between leader attachment styles and the level of team psychological safety. The topic is relevant for team dynamics as the ability to effectively manage relationships in a team context is crucial in establishing a safe climate for workgroups and teams to explore, learn, and innovate.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 73 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

AnDear Evaluation SciTS of2019 Researcher participants, Motivations and Productivity Outcomes in International Research Teams at a U.S. Research- Intensive University. Dr.Welcome Jane Payumo to the, Michigan 2019 StateScience University; of Team Dr. Danna Science Moore, (SciTS)Washington State University; Dr. Prema Arasu, North Carolina State UniversityConference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. This paper meeting examines is alsofactors the that first influence SciTS faculty conference at a research-intensive since formation U.S. public land grant university to engage in international research teams and partnerships. We investigated using a mixed-mode (web, mail and telephone) survey, and collected data from 764 researchersof the International from a US university Network to provide for the a baseline Science and of curre Teamnt context Science of demographic characteristics, motivations, barriers, and academic(INSciTS), outcomes a professional in relation to internationalsociety advancing research partnersh relatedips interestsand collaboration. in Our results suggest that funding, reduced organizationalteam science. and institutional barriers, effective institutional support, previous global experience and tangible research outcomes can encourage faculty to engage in forming and maintaining international research teams. We also found that faculty involved in internationalThe conference research leadershipteams, on average, team exhibit —myself, higher pro Dr.ductivity Stephanie and a positive E. correlation with scholarly output, especially through jointVasko, publications Dr. Julie and Thompsonstudent training. Klein, The results and ofMegghan this study may Honke provide Seidel— a reference for national organizations and higher education institutionshas worked interested closely in optimizing with the their SciTS internationalization 2019 Planning agendas Committee and examining and their the policies, INSciTS research board evaluation to design strategies a and messaging to increase faculty engagement in international team science formation. conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new Candirections. We Really Use Bibliometrics to Form Research Teams? Mr. Timothy Gawne, Ms. Kathryn Knight, Dr. Moody Altamimi, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Dr. Jane Payumo, Michigan State UniversityOne of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to Bibliometricsfeature for is the widely first used time as an panels evaluation focusing tool for research on Indigenous performance, approa and prospectiveches to decisionteam science making related and tocollaborative research and development (R&D). In many R&D organizations, bibliometric analysis complemented with other important information, is used to assessapproaches research inperformance agriculture and andproductivity natural of individual resources. researchers and the organization as a whole. In this paper, we examine whether bibliometric information can be used to setup research teams and collaboration. We identify which types of bibliometric measuresOther values can be driveuseful inSciTS building 2019 and enhancing as well. a Diversityresearch team. and We inclusion also present have here beensome of fundamental the important gaps commitments and challenges wein ourencountered, planning, including driving some our strategies calls forwhen participation, using bibliometric invited data for presentations, forming teams and and enhancing fee structure. the research In network addition, in specificwe have disciplines. worked Finally, to ensure we offer asome “green” guidance conference, around providing giving bibliometrics you the data option and insights of an for online research program teams forma rathertion at thethan individual, a printed group, one and and organization working levels. to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- Multiple Team Identities: A Person-By-Team Interaction Perspective Dr.disciplinary Tammy L. Rapp research,, Ohio University education, and training.

ItWe is increasingly hope that common you have that employees an excellent simultaneously time in workLansing on multiple while teams you (i.e., enjoy MTM, SciTS multiple 2019. team memberships). Lansing has Although an scholarsactive downtownrecognize that with individuals restaurants, may develop local identities art shops, with multiple running teams trails,(O’Leary and et al., local 2011) community and agree that classes individual ssuch often developas kickboxing distinct identities and pottery. with multiple Please targets, consult (organization, the websitedepartment, for team; more Ashforth detailed & Mael, information. 1989), little research explores the notion of multiple simultaneous team identities. Research demonstrates that identifying with a team has powerful effects on individual team members’ behavior, attitudes, and performance (Ashforth & Mael, 1989). Yet, we know little about identity-related phenomena whenIf you individuals have any belong questions to multiple or teams. comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges. Drawing from social identity theory, we utilize logic grounded in identity motives (Vignoles et al., 2006) and motive-feature match (Riketta,Michael 2008) O’Rourke to argue that the strength of individuals’ multiple team identities will be a function of the match between individuals’ cognitive-motivationalChair, 2019 Science orientations of Team and featuresScience of theirConference teams. First, we offer a set of cross-level, direct effect hypotheses regarding the relationship of team-level characteristics and individuals multiple team identities. More specifically, we examine the role that three team-level factors (team cohesion, team efficacy, and team prestige) play in determining multiple team identities in a MTM context. These represent team characteristics that align with three of the primary drivers of social identity (Vignoles et al., 2006) – belongingness (cohesion), efficacy (team efficacy) and distinctiveness (team prestige). We argue that these factors serve to make some team memberships more compelling aspects of one’s identity, thereby influencing their identification per team membership. Second, we adoptLansing a person-by-situation Center WIFIperspective Information and apply the - Username: social identity concept scits of and motive-feature Password: match 2019(Riketta, 2008) to argue that individuals’ cognitive-motivational orientations will interact with team characteristics to influence their multiple team identities.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 74 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

A coreWelcome tenet of motive-feature ...... match theory is that individuals’ social identities will be strongest when 2 individual motives and contextual (e.g., team) features match. Accordingly, we argue that individuals’ cognitive-motivational orientations will interact with team features suchINSciTS that team identities Board will ...... be the strongest when there is a match between...... individual and team features. 3

To testPlanning our hypotheses, Committee we utilize data ...... collected from an information technology...... firm. The sample included 7 96 individuals who were members of 82 teams, and were assigned to an average of 3.33 teams. We adopted an unconventional perspective by viewing multiple teamsFacility as nested Map within ...... an individual. Because individuals were not cleanly...... nested in teams in the conventional 8 manner, these data are bestSession characterized Evaluation as cross-classified Information (i.e., individuals’ ...... per team memberships are cross-classified...... by 9 individuals and teams). To properly accommodate this dual nesting we employed cross-classified random effect models to conduct our analyses. Results largely supportConference our hypotheses. at a Glance ...... 10 ThisFeatured study contributes Keynote to MTM literature and Plenary in a several Panels...... ways. First, we provide initial evidence...... that team 14 features drive individuals’ multiple team identities in MTM contexts. Second, we demonstrate the identities individuals develop with their multiple teams are a complexSIGs...... function of individual and team characteristics. This study answers...... calls to investigate multiple 28 identities in MTM arrangements and offers a foundation for future work to uncover the complex drivers of multiple team identities. Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 ARTISTIC AND HUMANISTIC APPROACHES TO TEAM SCIENCE Moderator:WorkshopDr. Stephen Abstracts...... Crowley, Boise State University 38

Poetry,Panel Space, Abstracts...... and Embodiment: A Case Study in Transdisciplinary Collaboration 42 Dr. Ellen Moll, Dr. Nancy DeJoy, Michigan State University Oral Abstracts ...... 52 Theories of transdisciplinarity have often emphasized the need for transdisciplinary collaborations to address complex “real world” problems,Poster such Abstracts as climate change ...... and sustainability (for example, see Jahn, et al. 2012). Klein (2014) 106 has shown that the emphasis on problem-solving in discourses on transdisciplinarity has at times been influenced by a desire to address “‘real problems of the community’SciTS and Awards the demand ...... that universities perform their pragmatic social mission,” and to find transdisciplinary 119 formations that effectively address “wicked problems”; Klein also interrogates the assumptions and histories that underlie this emphasis. In this paper, we willUnconference use the case study Detailsof MSU’s Sidewalk ...... Poetry Project to theorize about what...... constitutes a “real 119 world,” “pragmatic,” and “wicked” problem within the context of transdisciplinary collaboration, and to suggest that such collaborations can challenge the boundaries betweenThanks theoretical to ourand real-world Reviewers knowledge...... Particularly, we show how team science...... can reveal that120 the boundary between theoretical and real-world problems, and between simple and complex problems, are politically laden distinctions. Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120 MSU’s Sidewalk Poetry Project solicited original poetry from the university and local community, and engraved selected poems in sidewalks around Michigan State University’s campus. The collaboration involved multiple forms of academic and non-academic expertise poets, scholars, concrete work specialists, landscape designers, and campus planning and facilities professionals working together. This team made decisions based on forms of expertise related to poetry and aesthetics, community values, new techniques for concrete engraving, ADA compliance, decades-long knowledge of the physical characteristics of each spot on campus, and others. Public poetry, and sidewalk poetry in particular, raises questions that might be considered highly theoretical within arts and humanities disciplines: What is the purpose of poetry? What does it mean for poetry to reflect and contribute to a community? How does the appearance, texture, and location of a poem shape different community members’ experience of the poem? What does it mean to physically move through the space of a poem, and how does this motion relate to what it means, more generally, for diverse bodies to move through institutional spaces? This paper argues that such questions are indeed “real world,” pragmatic, and even wicked problems, and that they therefore are best answered in local contexts through transdisciplinary teams that put diverse forms of disciplinary and community knowledge practices into practice. Drawing on interviews with collaborators and personal narratives, we show how technical, community, aesthetic, political, legal, and design expertise work together to build new community-based knowledge about poetry, bodies, and space.

References: Klein, Julie Thompson. Discourses of transdisciplinarity: Looking Back to the Future

2019 SciTS Conference Program 75 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

Futures,Dear SciTS Volume 63,2019 November participants, 2014, pp. 68-74. Jahn, Thomas, Matthias Bergmann, Florian Keil. Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization, Ecological Economics, Volume 79, Welcome2012, pp. 1-10. to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups interestedConnecting an in Art-Science studying, Prpracticing,actice to Collaborations and facilitating team science. Dr. Edgar Cardenas, Michigan State University This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation Theof the complexity International and interconnectedness Network for of the sustainability Science issues of Team has led Science to the joining of disciplines. This effort has been primarily within (INSciTS),the sciences with a professionalminimal attention society given to theadvancing relationship related between interestsscience and in art. The exclusion of art is problematic since teamsustainability science. challenges are not only scientific and technical; they are also cultural, so the arts, as shapers of culture, are critical components that warrant representation. In addition to contributing to the production of culture, arts have also been credited as Thecatalysts conference for scientific leadershipbreakthroughs; team thus it —myself,stands to reas Dr.on thatStephanie understanding E. art-science integration will benefit sustainability’s focus on use-inspired basic research. This study focused on understanding a) how teams collect information, generate responses, and validateVasko, their Dr. ideas; Julie b) Thompson how artists challenge Klein, orand accept Megghan scientists’ Honke ideas (and Seidel— vice versa); and c) how teams go about generating and pickinghas worked ideas, and closely how they with negotiate the SciTS disagreements. 2019 PlanningIn other wo rds,Committee I address the and question the INSciTS“What does boardit take to to develop design high a functioningconference artist-scientist that builds collaborations?” on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new directions. To answer this question, I used a multipronged approach to increase the explanatory power of an in-vivo study aimed at understanding ofOne what of art-science our aims synthesis for SciTS offers 2019sustainability is to demonstrateand how it functions. how I conducted team science a small group animates study of and three-person propels artis t-scientist teams tasked with developing interpretive signage for the Tres Rios constructed wetland site. I collected survey, ethnographic, and Sociometricresearch badgein environmental data (wearable sensorsscience, that agriculture,collect speaking, and movement, natural and resources. interaction data). To this These end, three we methods are pleased helped to triangulatefeature for how the team first members time believed panels they focusing and their teamon Indigenous performed, how approa I believedches they to performed, team science and how and wearable collaborative technologiesapproaches can in provided agriculture high-resolution and natural datasets resources. that allow for deeper quantitative analyses of speech dynamics. The objective of this data collection was to establish a rich understanding of individual and group factors that hinder or foster group creativity. OtherIn addition values to discussing drive methods,SciTS 2019this presentation as well. willDiversity cover the and following inclusion findings: have 1) successful been art-sciencefundamental practices commitments require insignificant our planning, energy and driving time investment. our calls 2) Althoughfor participation, art-science is invitedmost intensive presentations, in an individual and practice fee wherestructure. the person In addition, must webecome have “fluent” worked in two todisciplines, ensure it ais “green”still challenging conference, in a group settinggiving where you membersthe option must of become an online “conversational” program in rathereach other’s work. 3) Successful art-science syntheses appear to result in improved communication skills, better problem articulation, more creative thanproblem a solving,printed and one the andquestioning working of personal to reduce and disciplinary food waste. mental And models. as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinaryIntegration as aresearch, Non-Reductive education, Team Virtue and training. Dr. Stephen Crowley, Boise State University; Dr. Brian Robinson, Texas A&M University-Kingsville; Dr. Chad Gonnerman, University of WeSouthern hope Indiana that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such “A champion team will always beat a team of champions.” Success at an elite level in team sport requires as much individual level asexcellence kickboxing as an organization and pottery. can acquirePlease but consult by itself such the excellencewebsite isfor not more enough. detailed The individuals information. need to come together in some fashion that makes them more than a mere collection of individuals: they need to become a team. If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those ofIn theus context with red of team ribbons science, on our our story name suggests badges. that creating ‘champion’ teams requires insight into a)The nature of individual excellence in question b)The nature of collective excellence in question Michael O’Rourke c)A story about how a) and b) interact. Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference There is much great work already on all of a-c. The work of Lotrecchiano and colleagues [1] on collaboration readiness tells a great deal about the character and motivation of scientific collaborators. Longino’s work on how scientific knowledge arises out of the ‘democratic’ structures of scientific communities is a model of how to think about collective excellence for knowledge making teams [2]. We think that by taking philosophical work on epistemic virtues and extending it to character of successful teams, we can enrich our theoretical understandingLansing of ‘champion’ Center WIFIteams inInformation ways that are both - Username: illuminating and scits ultimately and fruitful. Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 76 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

TwoWelcome recent developments ...... in epistemology directly bear on knowledge production efforts by science teams.2 Social epistemology is the growing field of study that emphasizes the ways in which knowledge is molded, or perhaps even constituted, by social and collective relationshipsINSciTS and Boardinstitutions ...... [3]. Since team science relies upon collective efforts...... to generate and convey 3 knowledge, the relevance of socialPlanning epistemology Committee to the science of ...... team science has not gone unrecognized ...... [2]. 7 Meanwhile, within virtue epistemology, a recent focus has been on what intellectual character traits count as excellences of a knower by enablingFacility or fosteringMap ...... knowledge production or dissemination [4]. To date,...... virtue epistemology primarily 8 focuses on epistemic virtues of individuals.Session While Evaluation this focus can Information help us to analyze ...... what epistemic virtues makes one...... a good member 9 of a scientific team (topic a above), it has not yet addressed the larger social dimensions of team-based knowledge production (topics b and c above).

In thisConference talk we will combine at a the Glance threads of ...... social epistemology and virtue epistemology,...... building on Lahroodi’s 10 account of collective epistemicFeatured virtues. SpecificallyKeynote, we and argue Plenary for non-reductive Panels...... team virtues [5]. If scientific teams...... can produce 14 new knowledge that no individual person can and knowledge production requires epistemic virtues, then it follows that there are virtues possessed by the teamsSIGs...... or communities that produce them. We further claim that these...... are excellent traits of a group of28 people that arise from the group structure, dynamics, or the relation between the epistemic virtues of individual group members. Nevertheless, these team epistemic virtuesDetailed do not reduce Daily down Schedule to the virtues of...... individual group members such that ...... individual team members 30 can be said to possess this virtue. The primary example of a non-reductive team virtue we suggest is integration. ReferencesWorkshop Abstracts...... 38 1) Lotrecchiano, G. R., Mallinson, T.R., Leblanc-Beaudoin, T., Schwartz, L.S., Danielle Lazar, D., Falk-Krzesinski, H.J. (2016) Individual motivation and Panelthreat indicators Abstracts...... of collaboration readiness in scientific knowledge producing teams: a scoping review and 42domain analysis. Heliyon http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00105 2) Longino,Oral H.Abstracts E. (1990). Science ...... as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: 52Princeton University Press. ISBN 0- 691-02051-5 3) Goldman,Poster A. andAbstracts Blanchard, T...... (2015). Social epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Summer 106 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/epistemology-social 4) Zagzebski,SciTS L. Awards (2017). Exemplarist ...... Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 119 5) Lahroodi, R. (2007). Collective epistemic virtues. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 21(3): 281-297. Unconference Details ...... 119 TDI Structured Dialogue + Pedagogy of the Oppressed Dr. ThanksAnna Malavisi to, Western our Reviewers Connecticut State ...... University ...... 120

PauloPost Freire, Conference Brazilian educator Evaluation and philosopher Information...... used a critical pedagogical methodology to...... teach literacy 120 to poor Brazilian people, which later extended to many other Latin American countries. He believed that people would take responsibility for their own situation only when they understand it. This understanding came about from a process of concientizacion through a dialogical approach. In this paper I explore the possibility of bringing some aspects of Freire's critical pedagogy to the structured dialogue used in TDI, particularly for working in the aid sector. It seems that professionals working in the aid sector would also benefit from a process of concientizacion to better understand the lives of the people with whom they are working with, but also the structural issues which perpetuate global injustices. This process can be set in motion by the TDI approach.

Teams of development professionals working with the oppressed in richer developed countries or poorer, disadvantaged countries in the south are often confronted with highly challenging issues such as: trying to address the needs and priorities of vulnerable communities, but at the same time respond to the demands of their donors. This creates a tension, that is often not confronted, or is done so in a rather token way. And while development teams may have the best intentions, often times, due to structural issues, these best intentions prove to be insufficient and inadequate to generate the transformative action that is required.

The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative (http://toolbox-project.org), an example of engaged philosophy offers an innovative, concrete, and tangible approach to critical dialogue that can help in two ways. First, it can generate a space for critical dialogue within global development teams about issues that matter to them; second, it can enable discussion and analysis of specific concerns such that afflict development teams and organizations, such as conflicting assumptions, power dynamics, implicit biases, ethical issues, and

2019 SciTS Conference Program 77 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

epistemicDear SciTS injustice. 2019 Rooted participants, in philosophical analysis, Toolbox workshops enable cross-disciplinary collaborators to engage in a structured, reflexive dialogue about tacit assumptions that constitute the worldviews which frame their practice. Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference,Freire's work emphasizes the 10th the annual importance gathering of reflection-action, of individuals that is, to and work groupswith the dialectical tension of theory and practice. This is crucialinterested for development in studying, teams. practicing, Paulo Freire taughtand facilitating that the rhetoric team and thescience. praxis needed to go together. Pure activism brought chaos Thistogether meeting with poor is planning also theand thereforefirst SciTS poor results.conference Pure rhet sinceoric on formationthe other hand brought abstract theorizations, nebulous hypothesesof the International and likewise poorNetwork results, forsomething the Science that has beenof Team observed Science over the years in the aid sector. Dialogue for Freire cannot be reduced to the depositing of ideas from one to another, nor a simple exchange of ideas. Dialogue could only take place in the absence(INSciTS), of domination a professional of one over society the other, advancing and in the presence related of humility.interests How in can TDI through its structural dialogue process ensureteam science.that these principles are upheld? Is TDI compatible with Freire's ideas? This paper is an attempt to answer some of these questions. The conference leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. ORGANIZATIONALVasko, Dr. Julie Thompson & MANAGEMENT Klein, and MegghanFACTORS Honke Seidel— hasModerator: workedDr. Andrewclosely Ritcheson, with the Deloitte SciTS Consulting 2019 Planning LLP Committee and the INSciTS board to design a conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new directions.Principles of Community in Team Science Dr. Ellen Fisher, Dr. Jennifer Cross, Dr. Hannah Love, Dr. Bailey Fosdick, Colorado State University

ScienceOne of of our Team aims Science for (SciTS)SciTS frequently 2019 is involve to demonstrate a combination howof research, team teaching,science training, animates and administration. and propels Less frequently discussedresearch is inhow environmental team science embodies science, institutional agriculture, values and and responsible natural conduct resources. of research To this(RCR). end, In 2017, we are Colorado pleased State to Universityfeature for(CSU) the adopted first timeThe Principles panels of focusing Community, on a valuesIndigenous statement approa that supportsches theto teaminstitutional science mission and and collaborativevision of access, research,approaches teaching, in agricultureservice and engagement. and natural As membersresources. of the CSU community, the Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR) has built the principles of community into its strategic plan, including support for team science.

AtOther CSU, valueswe are examining drive SciTS how transdisciplinary 2019 as well. scientific Diversity teams formand andinclusion develop inhave a university been setting.fundamental This mixed-methods, commitments developmentalin our planning, evaluation driving has beenour trackingcalls for three participation, cohorts of teams invited funded presentations,by the OVPR. We administeredand fee structure. a longitudinal In socialaddition, networkwe have survey worked to understand to ensure team adevelopment “green” conference,and dynamics, agiving social survey you theto ask option about specificof an collaborationonline program practices, rather and conductedthan a printed participant one observation, and working interviews to reduceand focus food groups waste. to understand And asgroup the processes, primary assess host, turn-taking, the MSU and Center gain insi ght intofor groupInterdisciplinarity norms. These data seeks helped to reveal create how opportunities best practices in teamto refine science thinking are connected about to collaborationCSU’s principles ofand community cross- as well as the responsible conduct of research. disciplinary research, education, and training. First, effective team science embodies principles of community. CSU has developed five principles of community: inclusion, integrity, Werespect, hope service, that and you social have justice. an excellentThese principles time of in community Lansing have while been you incorporated enjoy SciTS into the OVPR2019. hiring Lansing and evaluation has an activeprocesses, downtown discussions with of what restaurants, these words mean local to artindividuals shops, (i.e. running creating commontrails, and language local and community understanding), classes and developme such nt ofas new kickboxing opportunities and within pottery. the research Please community. consult They the also website align with for best more practices detailed for teams information. which include even turn-taking, gender inclusivity, diversity on teams, and engaging in a team development process.

Second,If you have team science any questions mandates the or responsible comments conduct for theof research SciTS (RCR). 2019 WhenPlanning scientists Committee, work as a member please of a look team forthere those is a feelingof us ofwith responsibility red ribbons for the on success our nameof the whole badges. team. This sense of responsibility, also known as collective cognitive responsibility, gives rise to each member of the team taking ownership in the knowledge created by the team and feeling accountable forMichael team outcomes. O’Rourke This naturally requires that team members trust the integrity of data produced and that all team members are Chair,upholding 2019 ethical Science practices inof the Team research Science of the group. Conference Responsible conduct of team science necessitates development of various forms of trust, consistent communication, understanding of roles and relationships, and recognizing differences in research fields.

This presentation will address methods for integrating institutional values such as CSU’s principles of community as well as assessing the adoption and demonstration of these values as well as collective cognitive responsibility within academic teams. We will also discuss how to conduct trainings that provide development opportunities for teams in the context of institutional/team values and RCR Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019 principles. Finally, team science cannot be fully implemented without institutional support and culture change. Thus, it is important for

2019 SciTS Conference Program 78 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

administratorsWelcome to be ...... aware of best practices for team science, institutional values, and research ethics 2 to fully support teams and create meaningfulINSciTS change Board at in the ...... academy...... 3 Overload,Planning Stress, Committee and Higher Orde ...... r Cognition in Emergency Managers ...... 7 Dr. Shalini Misra, Mr. Matthew Rhodes, Dr. Patrick Roberts, Virgnia Tech Facility Map ...... 8 Studies of public management over the past decade have built upon the insight that there is a “collaboration imperative” (Kettl, 2006). PublicSession sector managers Evaluation face increasingly Information complex wicked ...... problems that span boundaries,...... while at the 9 same time coping with dwindling or static resources. Emergency managers may be particularly susceptible to these problems (Waugh & Streib, 2006). Collaboration acrossConference organizational silosat ais seenGlance as the ...... best way to meet the challenges of wicked...... problems in an 10age of limited public sector resources (O’ Leary, Girard, & Blomgren Bingam, 2006). While scholars of public sector decision making have increasingly looked “insideFeatured the black box” Keynote of collaboration and through Plenary studying Panels...... how the organizational and political...... environment 14 influences collaboration (Thomson & Perry, 2006), the relationship between information technology and knowledge sharing in teams (Kim & Lee 2006; Wang & NoeSIGs...... 2010), social media as a space to enhance collaboration (Bryer &...... Zavattaro 2011), very few studies 28 of public managers delve into the black box of the manager's head, examining cognitive factors that influence collaboration. Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 At the same time, public managers routinely need to process large amounts of information and communication from a variety of sources,Workshop be able to pruneAbstracts...... relevant information, identify misinformation, frequently switch between disparate 38 tasks, contend with quicker delivery of constantly updated indicators, more interruptions, and greater complexity, when the stakes are high and goals are often conflicting.Panel The Abstracts...... potential for information overload is especially acute in emergency and crisis management. 42 Emergency managers have periods of slack time in which they consume large amounts of ambiguous information under conditions of uncertainty. During a crisis, the Oralvolume Abstracts of information increases...... rapidly, and the potential consequences for lives and property are 52 more severe. Poster Abstracts ...... 106 The research reported in this paper investigates whether and how emergency managers experience information overload in an environmentSciTS ofAwards digital technology ...... and uncertainty and its relationship to rational thinking and information 119 processing, two aspects of higher order cognition that influence managers’ collaborative capacity. We use a sequential mixed method research design, including a surveyUnconference of 273 county-level Detailsemergency ...... managers from 44 out of 50 states, and in-depth...... semi-structured 119 interviews with 20 emergency managers to investigate these questions. Above and beyond the effects of age, education, experience, and time spent on emergency managerialThanks work, to higher our levels Reviewers of perceived ...... information overload from digital sources...... were significantly 120 associated with higher levels of perceived stress. Holding the same variables constant, higher levels of perceived stress were linked with lower levels of analytical thinkingPost and Conference higher levels of intuitive Evaluation thinking. Cyber-based Information...... overload was linked to a higher...... propensity 120 for intuitive thinking at a marginally significant level. Further managers who reported higher levels of critical thinking reported lower levels of stress. While we cannot imply causation, our qualitative analysis supports and enriches the survey findings by highlighting problems of digital overload in managerial environments, the potential for stress, and a lowered capacity for analytical thinking among emergency managers. We propose solutions that have worked in other contexts to bolster the capacity for critical and reflective thinking.

Co-designed Strategic Planning and Agile Project Management in Academia: Case Study of an Action Research Group Mr. Enric Senabre Hidalgo, Dimmons Research Group, Internet Interdisciplinary Institute, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya; Dr. Mayo Fuster Morell, Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Harvard University

Our study explores the novel phenomenon of strategic planning in academic research. In particular, we approach the phenomenon through two main questions: how strategic planning in research can be supported by co-creation methods, and which impact it might have on research groups. Articulated around a specific case study, the methodological approach is twofold. The methodology to address the first question, regarding co-creation applied to strategic planning, is based on participatory design, applied to conceptualize and prototype strategic planning according to co-creation principles. The methodology to address the second question, on the impact of the co-created strategic planning on the group’s day-to-day management, is based on content analysis of the online tools used for coordinating teamwork. We describe and analyse the collaborative elaboration of the long-term strategy of Dimmons, an action research group specialised in the collaborative economy, outlining its integration in the group’s novel agile project management (APM). Our paper explains the rationale for the different co-creation stages, in dialogue with literature about strategic planning, action research

2019 SciTS Conference Program 79 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

andDear project SciTS management. 2019 participants, Results coincide with existing literature about the need to understand strategic planning as a dialogic and emergent process. In this regard, we contribute to the field of research management by analysing the benefits and coherence of co- Welcomecreation approaches to the in2019 action Science research settings, of Team specifically Science in terms (SciTS) of engagement with strategic vision, as well as its impact Conference,improving communication the 10th and annual coordination gathering mechanisms. of individuals On the other andhand, groups we establish a common framework from a theoretical interestedperspective between in studying, participative practicing, strategic planning and facilitating and participative team design. science. Additionally, our study offers a detailed description about Thishow co-creation meeting for is strategic also the planning first in SciTSresearch conference could be appl ied,since which formation could be of practical interest for scientific institutions in their projectof the management International practices. Network for the Science of Team Science Created(INSciTS), in 2016, a professionalDimmons (http://dimmons.net/ society advancing) is one of the related eleven interestsresearch groups in of the Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3), the researchteam science. center of the Open University of Catalonia (UOC) based in Barcelona. The group is focused on transdisciplinarity and action research for the study of the collaborative economy from the perspective of the Commons and public policy innovation. As a requirementThe conference based on leadership the need to connect team during—myself, the implementation Dr. Stephanie phase E.strategic plans with managerial practices (Poister, 2010), Vasko,the combination Dr. Julie of co Thompsondesign techniques Klein, and and AMP Megghanpractices for Honkethe strategic Seidel— planning of the Dimmons research group was based on hasthe importance worked ofclosely design features with the and SciTS social mechanisms 2019 Planning for strategic Committee planning success and the (Barzelay INSciTS & Jacobsen, board 2009), to design as well aas - conferencedecentralised approaches that builds for higheron existing engagement research and performance and practice in dynamic strengths environments while (Andersen, also pointing 2004). Aimed in exciting at benefiting new from design thinking methodologies (Kimbell, 2012) that have proven to improve participant engagement in research (Senabre et al., directions. 2018), the process established different visual and discussion techniques at each stage for effective participation in scientific context. For this, the basic principle for the co design adoption was the concept of participation as ecosystem (Fuster Morell, 2010a), consideringOne of our the aims Dimmons for researchSciTS 2019group as is a to “research demonstrate ecosystem” how that teamholds several science forms animates and propels andresearch degrees in of environmentalinvolvement. science,- agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative Buildingapproaches Capacity in agricultureand Capability and in Gr naturaleater Manchester resources. Through Peer to Peer Support and Development: The Research Programme Managers’ Network (RPMN) Ms. Charlotte Stockton-Powdrell, Ms. Alison Littlewood, Ms. Sarah Ashton, The University of Manchester; Ms. Hayley Brooks, Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust; Ms. Cara Afzal, Health Innovation Manchester (HInM); Dr Dieter Weichart,The Christie NHSin our Foundation planning, Trust driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather Thethan Research a printed Programme one and Managers’ working Network to reduce (RPMN) foodis a continually waste. Andexpanding as the and primarydiverse network host, created the MSU by its Centermembers, for its members;for Interdisciplinarity a working example seeks of Team to Sciencecreate in opportunities action! The RPMN to was refine founded thinking in 2013 about by 2 research collaboration programme and managers, cross- Alison Littlewooddisciplinary and Cararesearch, Afzal who education, identified a need and for training. peer sup port in this highly skilled yet often under-recognised and under-valued role. Since 2013, the RPMN has grown and now has more than 200 members from The University of Manchester and several National Health Service (NHS) Hospital partner organisations across Greater Manchester and the North West of England. The RPMN provides peerWe tohope peer supportthat you for itshave members an excellent as well as networking time in Lansing and training while and development you enjoy opportunities. SciTS 2019. The Lansingnature of research has an project managementactive downtown in the UK with means restaurants, that many members local are art on shops, fixed term running contracts. trails, It is therefore and local vital thatcommunity we develop classesstrategies suchto train andas kickboxingretain this wealth and and pottery. breadth ofPlease experience consult to maintain the thewebsite excellent for standards more detailed of research information. delivery in our area.

InIf you2016, havea sub-group any questionsof RPMN members, or comments led by Charlotte for the Sto ckton-Powdrell,SciTS 2019 started Planning to create Committee, a development please framework look for for its those members. The development framework took 2 years to finalise, underwent a pilot testing phase, and has been endorsed by the Health Innovationof us with Manchester red ribbons (HInM) on Senior our Leadershipname badges. Team, an organisation that brings together research institutions across Greater Manchester. The development framework enables members to understand their current level of skills and knowledge and also highlightsMichael areas O’Rourke they may wish to develop. The RPMN provides several training sessions per year for its members, and all training Chair,links directly 2019 to theScience development of Team framework, Science ensuring Conference members are being appropriately skilled. This enables us to build capacity through motivating and retaining key staff, and capability by offering the relevant skills required for these roles. It has been shown that employing dedicated programme and project managers ensures delivery on recruitment targets, time targets and budgetary targets due largely to consistent management of the projects. This is beneficial to current projects and also increases the likelihood of securing funding to future projects. Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019 The RPMN has been nominated for The University of Manchester Distinguished Achievement Award and the Northern Power Women Awards Innovation category, as well as successfully achieving an Investing in Success Award from the Faculty of Biology, Medicine

2019 SciTS Conference Program 80 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

andWelcome Health in 2018...... These nominations, as well as numerous letters of support, demonstrate the added 2 value that the RPMN offers to its members and the research community in Greater Manchester and beyond. Furthermore, the RPMN has been recognised as a valuableINSciTS network Boardbeyond Greater ...... Manchester already and we have been asked...... to share our model with3 the Newcastle Joint Research OfficePlanning in the North Committee East of England...... This successful example of Team Science ...... can be replicated beyond 7 the UK and we are delighted to be part of the nascent Team Science Network (TSN) created by our colleagues Ruth Norris, Claire Smith and Amanda Lamb from the FacilityUniversity of Map Manchester ...... and Rachel Chown from The Manchester Cancer...... Research Centre who 8 are trail-blazers in this emerging field. Session Evaluation Information ...... 9 Multiagent Systems in an Agile Environment Dr. ConferenceJohn Turner, University at a of GlanceNorth Texas; ...... Mr. Nigel Thurlow, Toyota Connected;...... Dr. Rose Baker, University 10 of North Texas; Mr. David Northcutt, Toyota Connected; Ms. Kelsey Newman, Emory University Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to highlight a collaborative effort between academia (University of North Texas, Team Sciences)SIGs...... and practice (Toyota Connected (TC)). This study concentrated...... on current problems that had28 been experienced by TC: How to structure and manage multiteam systems (MTSs)? Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Design/methodology/approach – This research study utilized a realist systematic review to address an existingWorkshop problem Abstracts...... by working collaboratively with TC and academia. This collaboration involved 38 problem identification, the development of research questions and a full systematic review guided by the research questions. Panel Abstracts...... 42 Findings – This realist systematic reviewmerged the literature with current practices at TC in an effort to gather evidence to support the bestOral method Abstracts of structuring ...... and managing MTSs. The findings include a leadership structure that incorporates 52 both shared leadership (bottom-up) and existing hierarchical structures (top-down). Poster Abstracts ...... 106 Practical implications – The MTS models presented in this study provide new models for organizations/ manufacturers/industriesSciTS Awards to...... use as a guide when structuring their MTSs. 119 Originality/value – This study provides an example of a collaborative research effort between practice and academia using a realist systematicUnconference review. The paper Details also provides ...... some multiteam system models that...... could be implemented 119 and tested in different organizations. Also, new responsibilities and roles for scrum and MTSs are presented as a new method of achieving Agile. Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 120 Reference:Turner, J. R., Thurlow, N., Baker, R., Northcutt, D., & Newman, K. (2019). Multiagent systems in an Agile environment: A realist systematicPost review. Conference Journal of Manufacturing Evaluation Technology Information...... Management. Advance online publication...... doi:10.1108/JMTM-10-2018-0355 120 COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS Moderator: Dr. David Lebow, HyLighter

Finding Colleagues and Emerging Subdisciplines via Systematic Network Analysis of Funding Awards Dr. Steve Elliott, Dr. Kimberly A. Scott, Elizabeth Wentz, Arizona State University

Scientific teams often expand by connecting researchers interested in similar topics from across institutions or disciplines. Expansion can be especially important when teams look to pursue funding by which to scale previous work into research centers or hubs. For researchers in nascent subdisciplines or in remote institutions, however, finding potential colleagues can be difficult and overly dependent on chance, stalling the growth of subdisciplines and privileging those at large urban universities. In this paper, we present protocols for systematically finding potential colleagues based on publicly available funding awards. As a proof of principle, we focus on the US National Science Foundation's award database, and in particular on it's Broadening Participation (BP) portfolio, a collection of awards each of which aims partly to increase the number of underrepresented minorities in STEM fields. We focus on the emerging sub-discipline of BP education programs for grades K-12. From the lens of the funding agency, we demonstrate the scope of that subdiscipline, its primary players, and we indicate the extent to which those awards reveal collaboration networks. Those in the subdiscipline can use the results to systematically find potential collaborators and tap into extant networks. This work is based on computer assisted, but relatively low-tech, techniques to create large databases, find a subset of awards relative to research questions,

2019 SciTS Conference Program 81 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

findDear research SciTS outputs, 2019 and participants, visualize collaboration networks. The protocols used to conduct this work can be redeployed to address many questions about funding agencies portfolios. Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference,Patterns of Newly the Formed 10th Interdisciannual plinarygathering Collaborations of individuals Over Time and Du groupsring an Immersive Training Experience interestedDr. Bonnie Spring in studying,, Mr. Phillip Rakpracticing,, Mr. H. Gene and McFadden facilitating, Mr. Leland team Bardsley science., Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; ThisDr. Mark meeting Hansen, isDr. also Vivek the Shetty first, University SciTS of conferenceCalifornia, Los Angelessince formation; Dr. Angela Fidler Pfammatter, Northwestern University ofBackground: the International Understanding Network how team for and the disciplinary Science communicatio of Team nScience patterns predict work quality could help interdisciplinary project (INSciTS),teams to optimize a professional their performance. society We continue advancing to examine related the evolution interests of project-related in communication among newly formed teaminterdisciplinary science. teams embedded for one week at the annual NIH mHealth Summer Training Institute. The aim is to characterize communication in new interdisciplinary teams and to explore how patterns might predict performance outcomes. The conference leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. Objective: To characterize communication trajectories over time both within and between teams and within and between disciplines Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— engaged in mobile health. Based on 2017 findings, we hypothesized that (1) greater within team communication early in the week haswould worked predict better closely oral presentations; with the SciTS (2) greater 2019 between Planning team communicationCommittee laterand in the the INSciTSweek would boardpredict betterto design written a conferencecapstone projects; that and builds (3) data on scientists existing would research emerge as and the mostpractice central strengths cross-disciplinary while connectors. also pointing in exciting new directions.Methods: 2018 fellows (n=29) were split into Teams (n=5) and assigned mentoring faculty from different universities and disciplines (data science [computer science/engineering/informatics]; medicine/nursing; behavioral science; public health). Teams were given an Oneimmersive of our training aims experience for SciTS and charged2019 is with to developingdemonstrate a capstone how project team to science address a animateshealth challenge. and Requirementspropels were to researchproduce a final in oralenvironmental presentation and science, written grant agriculture, proposal eval anduated natural by independent resources. reviewers. To Atthis the end,end of we days are 1, 3, pleased and 5 of the to 5-dayfeature training, for thefellows first (nodes) time indicated panels with focusing whom they on discussed Indigenous their project approa (edges)ches since to team the prior science assessment. and Team collaborative and disciplinary network density were calculated as the ratio of observed edges to potential edges within and outside the team and the discipline.approaches Internal in and agriculture external network and densitiesnatural wereresources. examined to characterize emergent communication patterns and to explore predictors of oral and written project evaluations. Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments Results:in our planning, As the week driving progressed, our and calls teams for approached participation, the proj invitedect deadline, presentations, the density of project-related and fee structure. communication In addition, increased bothwe havewithin andworked between to teams ensure and awithin “green” and between conference, disciplines. giving Whereas you 2017 the teams option with of the an best online rated oralprogram and written rather presentations showed distinctive evolution of project-related communication, emergent communication patterns were more than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center homogenous in 2018. An exception was that the poorest performing team showed a mid-week decline in project-related communicationfor Interdisciplinarity both within andseeks between to create teams. opportunitiesFinally, examination to ofrefine disciplinary thinking interactions about showed collaboration that data scientists and cross- again serveddisciplinary as essential research, hub connectors education, in 2018, and closely training. followed by medical professionals.

Implications:We hope that In both you 2017 have and 2018,an excellent the density time of project-re in Lansinglated communications while you enjoy increased SciTS both within2019. and Lansing across teams has and an disciplinesactive downtown as project deadlines with restaurants, neared. Greater local homogeneity art shops, in network running communication trails, and trajectories local community among 2018 classesteams made such it challenging to discriminate high- from low-performing teams, failing to reproduce 2017 predictors of project performance. Data scientistsas kickboxing emerged andas key pottery. integrators Please of communication consult theacross website interdisciplinary for more mHealth detailed teams information.in both years. Here, we demonstrate a feasible methodology for collecting and analyzing team communication networks. Prediction of interdisciplinary team performance wouldIf you benefit have from any a largerquestions sample orof teams,comments data collection for the in SciTSother contexts, 2019 andPlanning exploration Committee, of other potential please predictors. look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges. Network Improvement Communities and Organizational Change: Considerations in Developing and Leading NICs Dr.Michael Marilyn O’RourkeAmey, Alexander Gardner, Michigan State University ScholarsChair, 2019 from multiple Science fields of and Team knowledge Science domains Conference have been called to work together by National Science Foundation (NSF) and other funding agencies to address some of the most complex challenges facing society. Network improvement communities (NIC) are recently identified as a means to champion these efforts. Funders of cross-unit collaborations are interested in knowing how to bring diverse faculty together to address challenging problems including how to form scholarly communities, break down structural barriers to working across boundaries, construct rewards and incentives to support these efforts, foster organizational change, and consider longer-term sustainabilityLansing – which Center is especially WIFI pertinentInformation if an initiative - Username: is funded. Outcomes scits andgenerated Password: through collaborative 2019 alliances such as network improvement communities (NICs) are prominent areas of research, but the process by which these groups are formed

2019 SciTS Conference Program 82 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

is largelyWelcome understudied, ...... especially at the postsecondary level. This presentation focuses on two research 2 questions – (1) How do postsecondaryINSciTS NICs Board form, and ...... (2) In what ways does the NIC assist members...... in facilitating change efforts3 on their campuses? DataPlanning were gathered Committee from an NSF fu nded...... NIC that is in its third year of existence...... As the evaluation team 7 of the NIC, data was collected through participant observation, survey, and individual participant interviews. As evaluators, we are specifically studying the evolution of theFacility NIC as an Map organization, ...... including ways in which trust, communication,...... shared norms and goals 8 are developed, how dissonance and failures are accounted for, and how learning occurs at both the individual member and NIC level. As the NIC continues to evolve, we betterSession understand Evaluation its role in facilitating Information organizational ...... change on member campuses...... even while it 9is not actually the agent of change. Although there appear to be some barriers at the institutional level (in the network under study) that remain unchanged by the NIC,Conference the NIC does act asat aa centralized Glance learning ...... hub that advances and expedites...... the learning process 10 of the group, which can result in institutional change. The information presented during this presentation identifies specific processes and elements to success and sustainabilityFeatured such Keynoteas leadership, and strategy, Plenary communication, Panels...... engagement, institutional infrastructure,...... data14 collection and analyses, building capacity and the possible emergence of network capital that can assist in developing protocols to support institutional change for NICs.SIGs...... It also shows some of the pitfalls of human resource organizations,...... such as NICs, that must 28 be addressed in order to be truly more than resource shells and “group work.” Consideration is also given to the NIC as a learning organization. BeyondDetailed providing Daily current knowledgeSchedule from ...... an evolving network improvement community,...... the presentation 30 intends to encourage discussion about the utility of NICs as facilitators of change as well as to raise questions for future research that deepen our understandingWorkshop of these Abstracts...... emerging collaboratives. 38

InvestigatingPanel Abstracts...... Collaborative Processes of Research Teams Through Social Network Analyses 42 Dr. OralJonathan Abstracts Hilpert, Georgia ...... Southern University; Dr. Gwen C. Marchand, Dr. Kristine Bragg, University 52 of Nevada Las Vegas In the evaluation of team science, questions may arise as to which team members or groups of members have access to and control information,Poster as Abstracts well as if collaborations ...... among team members produce increased scholarly productivity. 106 Network analyses within a social network analytic framework offers one method for mapping influence and scholarly productivity within a team project. We present the SciTSresults of aAwards brokerage analyses...... and exponential random graph modeling (ERGM) from an evaluation 119 of an NIH-funded multidisciplinary,Unconference cross-institutional Details biomedical ...... research center. The evaluation ...... assessed whether groups 119 within the center were functioning according to their primary intended role (i.e., administrative, research) to facilitate research and promote the sustainable developmentThanks of tothe center,our Reviewers as well as if collaborations ...... among team member produced...... increased evidence 120 of scholarly productivity in the form of publications and presentation of scientific work. Data on collaborative processes were collected annually from questionnairesPost Conference administered to Evaluation all members of the Information...... center. Three years of evaluation data are...... presented. 120 Cross sectional brokerage and longitudinal ERGM analyses provided evidence for team functioning.

Social network analyses were performed to address the following research questions: 1. What is the emergent community network structures of collaborative engagement among center members? 2. What brokerage processes between core center areas drives the emergence of the observed center community structure? 3. How do these brokerage processes align with the predefined roles of center cores areas? 4. Does collaboration among people from different core areas produce increased scholarly productivity among center members?

The evaluation team designed a survey to gather information about team work patterns. This information was used to identify (a) how information flows amongst members of a research center, (b) whether organizational structures within the center functioned to control information, and (c) if the roles of individuals and organizational structures shifted over time and lead to increased scholarly productivity.

First, modularity analyses were conducted on bipartiate network graphs to determine if community clusters self-organized around a priori organizational structures. Next, brokerage analyses were conducted at the group level. A brokerage score for a given node is the number of ordered pairs having the appropriate group membership brokerage relationship. Aggregate scores can be computed for defined groups within a network as well as at the network level. Expectations and variances of brokerage scores given the size and density of a network were also be computed. Analyses were conducted for 3 years of census networks and compared descriptively

2019 SciTS Conference Program 83 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

overDear time. SciTS These 2019 data were participants, then analyzed using longitudinal ERGM’s to determine if increased ties between members with different core function in the collaborative lead to increased productivity on behalf of individuals. The results provide insight into the emergent structureWelcome of the to research the 2019 collaborative Science and of the Team influence Science of structural (SciTS) relationships on scholarly productivity and knowledge production. Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups Understandinginterested in Scientificstudying, Collaboration practicing, Through and facilitating the Sequence team of Authors science. in the Publication Bylines and the Diversity of CollaboratorsThis meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation Mr.of theYi Bu International, Indiana University Network Bloomington for the(USA); Science Mr. Yong of Huang Team, School Science of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan (China); Dr. Cassidy R. Sugimoto, School of Informatics, Computing and Engineering, Indiana University (USA); Dr. Zaida Chinchilla- (INSciTS),Rodríguez, Spanish a professional National Research society Council advancing (CSIC) (Spain) related interests in team science. In science of team science, it is critical to investigate the patterns of scientific collaboration and how these patterns result in different Theimpacts. conference In this research, leadership we investigate team the —myself,relationship amongDr. Stephanie (a) scientific E.collaboration, (b) the sequence of authors in the Vasko,publication Dr. bylines, Julie and Thompson (c) the diversity Klein, of their and collaborators. Megghan The Honke diversity Seidel— of collaborators is quantified with two dimensions, namely hastopic andworked impact closely diversities. with Using the the SciTS ArnetMiner 2019 dataset Planning containing Committee ACM-indexed and publications the INSciTS in computer board science, to design we find thaa t the following two patterns tend to lead higher-impact scientific publications: (1) greater topic diversity of collaborators plus more tendency conferenceto work as leading that authors builds (including on existing first and/or research corresponding and authors);practice and strengths (2) less topic while diversity also of collaboratorspointing in plus exciting less tendency new directions.to work as leading authors. Meanwhile, from the perspective of impact diversity, the results of our empirical study show that authors who work as more leading authors and collaborate with less impact diversity researchers have tendencies to receive more citations Onethan those of our with aims collaborators for SciTS with greater 2019 impact is to diversity.demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to EDUCATIONfeature for the & first TEACHING time panels TEAM focusing SCIENCE on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative Moderator:approachesDr. Annain agriculture Malavisi, Virginia and Commonwealth natural resources. University

Co-developmentOther values driveof Interdisciplinary SciTS 2019 Engine as well.ering DiversityInnovation andin Health inclusion Course haveby Engineering been fundamental and Team Science commitments Faculty to Accelerate Health Innovation from Bench to Bedside Dr.in ourSoyoung planning, Kang, University driving ofour Washington; calls for Dr. participation, Erin Blakeney, Ms.invited Nicole presentations, Summerside, Dr. Brenda and fee Zierler structure., UW School In of addition, Nursing; weMs. Jenniferhave worked Sprecher ,to Institute ensure of Translational a “green” Health conference, Sciences; givingMs. Katrina you Henrikson the option, Dr. Jonathan of an online Liu, Dr. programEric Seibel, ratherDr. thanJonathan a printed Posner, UW one Mechanical and working Engineering to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinaryThe Engineering research, Innovation ineducation, Health (EIH) programand training. at the Univer sity of Washington (UW) promotes interdisciplinary collaboration between engineering and the health sciences with the goal of developing technical solutions to pressing challenges in health care. Undergraduate and graduate engineering students partner with health care professionals to solve unmet health challenges identified by Weclinical hope partners that and you their have teams. an EIH excellent follows a need-based time in Lansing design philosophy while you that beginsenjoy with SciTS an unmet 2019. health Lansing need and has examine an s activestakeholders, downtown market opportunity, with restaurants, intellectual property,local art FDA shops, regulations, running and reimbursement. trails, and local The program community results inclasses patent such assubmissions, kickboxing data forand research pottery. papers Please and proposals, consult and the medtech website startups. for more Students detailed receive degreeinformation. credits and develop skills working in interdisciplinary teams. By partnering with the UW Institute of Translational Health Sciences (ITHS) and the CTSA Team IfScience you haveinitiative, any EIH questions teaching faculty or commentsaim to accelerate for healththe SciTS innovation 2019 from Planning bench to bedside Committee, by improving please team dynamics,look for those ofcommunication us with red and ribbons program participanton our name satisfaction. badges. Close collaboration between engineering faculty and ITHS Team Science faculty is bringing tailored highly-interactive team science training to student-clinician teams. Starting in Fall 2018, team science content has included facilitated team formation and development of team agreements using Liberating Structures, completion of a team Welcome MichaelLetter, and O’Rourkeintroduction of a structured approach to giving and receiving feedback. Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference To track the impact of the co-developed Team Science modules, different EIH student cohorts have been surveyed annually since Fall 2017. The 2017 cohort did not receive any purposeful team science training so their survey results serve as a baseline to which subsequent survey data are compared. The most notable improvements, based on survey responses, have been seen in questions related to psychological safety and beliefs about the EIH project team. For example, students were asked to rate their level of agreement to statementsLansing such Center as, “Our WIFIproject Informationteam has a climate - Username: of collaboration scitsand trust,” and and Password: “Communication 2019 with my team members outside of class was easy,” to which the rate at which students responded “Strongly agree” increased more than 20% compared to the baseline year. Students also report finding the Welcome letter to be useful—for example a Fall 2018 student stated:

2019 SciTS Conference Program 84 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

“TheWelcome Welcome Letters ...... (to their clinician partners) was useful for laying foundations for team dynamics 2 and team expectations. It also helpedINSciTS the clinician Board get on-board ...... with meeting the team and understanding course/project...... expectations.” 3 The UW ITHS Team Science Core is providing tailored team training to the student-clinician teams with the express goals of measurablePlanning improvement Committee in team dynamics, ...... communication, and program participant...... satisfaction, as 7 well as increasing the number of program deliverables, such as patent applications, startup formation rates, device clinical evaluations, and research papers. Initial resultsFacility are positive Map and ...... are providing a foundation from which to develop...... best practices for team science 8 training with newly formed interdisciplinarySession teams.Evaluation Information ...... 9 ClosingConference the Collaborative at a Skills Glance Gap: Assessing ...... the Effectiveness of a Univer...... sity-Wide Course 10 Designed to Teach Students How to Collaborate in Diverse Groups Dr. FeaturedKathryn Plaisance Keynote, Mr. Christopher and PlenaryLok, Ness Lamont Panels...... , University of Waterloo ...... 14 As anyoneSIGs...... working on the Science of Team Science knows, collaboration...... is an essential skill for solving 28 complex problems. Not surprisingly, then, collaborative skills are in high demand by employers. According to a survey by the National Association of Colleges andDetailed Employers (NACE), Daily the Schedule “ability to work ...... well on a team” was tied for the #1 skill...... employers look for. 30 Yet, many students are not explicitly taught how to collaborate. At a previous talk at the Science of Team Science (2016), the author and her student collaborators presentedWorkshop data demonstrating Abstracts...... the lack of formal education around collaborative skills – a so-called collaborative 38 skills gap – at their own institution. Here, we present the next two phases of the project: (1) a new university-wide course designed to close the collaborativePanel Abstracts...... skills gap by teaching students how to work in diverse groups, and (2) an empirical assessment 42 of the effectiveness of the course in terms of students’ attitudes and collaborative capabilities. Oral Abstracts ...... 52 The course (INTEG 210: Making Collaboration Work) was co-designed by undergraduate students working on their Bachelors of KnowledgePoster Integration. Abstracts (Knowledge ...... Integration is an interdisciplinary program at the University of Waterloo 106 that teaches students critical and creative thinking, real-world problem-solving, and how to collaborate across disciplines.) Notably, many students in Canada do notSciTS have the Awards opportunity ...... to study or engage with other students from different disciplines, as university 119 education tends to be more specialized. Incoming students are typically required to apply to a specific program and are often discouraged from taking too many coursesUnconference outside their program, Details resulting ...... in university education that is highly siloed...... Furthermore, although 119 many students are expected to work in groups, few report having received explicit instruction on effective collaboration. INTEG 210 was designed to address this problem:Thanks first, by to inviting our students Reviewers from across ...... the university to take the course, and...... second, by explicitly 120 teaching students collaborative theories and best practices, including those that will help them work well in diverse groups. The course was first offered in FallPost 2018. It Conference drew students from Evaluation all six Faculties, Information...... and course evaluations indicate that students...... found 120 it very useful.

We conducted pre- and post-course surveys to determine how the course affected students’ attitudes, confidence, and capabilities with respect to collaborating in diverse groups. (Notably, students were placed in groups that were diverse in terms of gender, ethnicity, personality, program of study, and year in program. They had two such group experiences, with a significant project to be completed by each group.) We also asked students to complete three reflections: one at the beginning of the course, one after their first group experience, and one after their second group experience. In this talk, we will present the results of this study, focusing on the survey data and highlighting some of the qualitative findings from the reflections. We will also share a new web resource that is currently under development, called “Making Collaboration Work,” that is designed to share collaborative theories and best practices with both students and instructors.

The Development of a Competency-Based Team Science Training Program: A Case Study of TeamMAPPS Dr. Kevin C. Wooten, University of Houston Clear Lake; Dr. Maritza R. Salazar, University of California Irvine; Dr. Theresa K. Lant, Pace University; Dr. Eduardo Salas, Rice University; Ms. Cynde Ferris, Ms. Lori A. Wiseman, The University of Texas Medical Branch

Objective: Responding to the National Research Council’s (2015) call for the identification and translation of knowledge, skills, and attitudes for successful team science, we present a case review of the development of an evidence-based competency model for team science training built around a previously-developed model (Wooten, Salas, Lant, Salazar, Sarraj, Brasier, & Wiseman, 2017). We

2019 SciTS Conference Program 85 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

reviewDear theSciTS refinement 2019 of participants, the model, learning objectives, use of an evidence-based approach to ensure transfer of training, and the application of instructional development techniques. Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference,Method: Using the the model 10th shown annual in Table gathering 1, we have of developed individuals a five-module and groups training program inclusive of: 1) Overview, 2) Facilitating interestedAwareness and in Information studying, Exchange, practicing, 3) Promoting and facilitating Psychological team Safety, science. 4) Self-Correction and Adaptation, and 5) Application and ThisSynthesis. meeting We have is builtalso the the modules first suchSciTS that theyconference 1) address sinceknown formationissues in team science, 2) are evidence-based, 3) can be described behaviorally, 4) can be used for either development or evaluation, 5) can be applicable to nascent or advanced teams, and 6)of canthe be International used as a training Network model or foras a the diagnostic. Science These of modulesTeam Sciencehave been developed to be facilitated face to face, or completely asynchronous(INSciTS), aas professionala web program. Insociety the instructional advancing development related we interests have utilized in adult learning theory (Merriam,2001), transformationalteam science. learning theory (Travis, 2006), options for a flipped classroom (McLaughlin, Roth, & Glatt, 2014), video-based behavioral modeling (Taylor, Russ-Eft, & Chan, 2005), and gamification (Dominguez, Saenz-de-Navarrete, de-Marcos, Fernández- Sanz,The conferencePagés, & Martínez-Herráiz, leadership 2013). team Content —myself, and methods Dr. Stephanie will be reviewed E. by team science educators, and ultimately field tested usingVasko, knowledge Dr. Julie checks Thompson as well as perceptionKlein, ands of self-efficacyMegghan around Honke the Seidel— competencies. Tablehas worked1 closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a Trainingconference Modules, that Targeted builds Competencies, on existing and research Citations and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new directions.Training Module Competencies Relevant Citations Facilitating Sharing unique Liang, J., Farh, C.I.C., & Farh, J. (2012). OneAwareness of our aims & for information/promotiveSciTS 2019 is to voice demonstrate Salazar, how M.R., team Lant, T.K.,science Fiore, animatesS.M., & Salas, and E. (2012).propels researchExchange in environmentalInquiring/probing science, agriculture,Huber, and G.P., natural & Lewis, resources. K. (2010). To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on IndigenousMarks, M.A., Mathieu, approa J.Eches., & Zaccaro,to team S.J. science (2001). and collaborative approaches in agricultureReframing and and natural integrating resources. Van Der Vegt, G.S., & Bunderson, J.S. (2005). Klein, J.T. (2005). Interdisciplinary teamwork: Promoting Perspective seeking Edmondson, A. (1999). Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments Psychological Acknowledging and including Edmondson, A. (1999). in ourSafety planning, drivingothers our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, we have worked to Addressingensure a issues“green” and conference,Edmondson, giving A. you (1999). the option of an online program rather than a printed one andresolving working conflict to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity Self-Correction & Monitoring/debriefing seeks to create opportunities LePine, to J.A. refine (2003). thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinaryAdaptation research, education, and training.Tannenbaum, S.I., & Cerasoli, C.P. (2013). Reflecting/Analyzing Tannenbaum, S.I., & Cerasoli, C.P. (2013). We hope that you haveCreating an change/excellent time in LansingLePine, J.A. while (2003). you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active downtown withdevelopment restaurants, plans local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such Summaryas kickboxing of Findings: and Developmentpottery. Please of real-life consult scenarios the for website application for exercises more detailedhas proven information. to be the most difficult instructional challenge. Use of gamification in the development of a “Design Your Own Experience” applications provide the most robust opportunity forIf you student have engagement any questions and transfer or of comments training. Additional for the effort SciTS is required 2019 to providePlanning a capstone Committee, experiential please to integrate look all for the those competenciesof us with red illustrated ribbons in Table on 1.our Further name plans badges. include providing additional modules for community constituents and patient advocates to provide skill-based training to optimize participatory research designs. SignificanceMichael O’Rourke of Study: When successfully pilot tested and reviewed, the TeamMAPPS program can provide significant training supportChair, for2019 individuals Science and institutionsof Team need Scienceing behaviorally Conference based team science training.

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 86 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

TrainingWelcome and Development ...... on Interdisciplinary Scientific Teams 2 Ms. Hannah Beth Love, Dr. Jennifer Eileen Cross, Dr. Bailey Fosdick, Dr. Susan VandeWoude, Dr. Ellen Fisher, Colorado State UniversityINSciTS Board ...... 3 Planning Committee ...... 7 Read (2016) claimed in Ecosphere that team science is needed to answer the complex problems of the 21st century. Despite the need for teamFacility science, Map the knowledge ...... base on how to train and develop scientific...... teams is still in nascent stages.8 This article presents an exemplary case study of a scientific team that is functioning as a training and development team. The methods of data collection included:Session social networkEvaluation surveys, participantInformation observation, ...... focus groups, interviews, historical...... social network 9 data, and turn-taking data. TheConference team is unique because at a theyGlance created ...... an internal structure to train and develop...... the next generation 10 of scientists to take on new roles in the team, and answer the next set of research questions. Through this process, the team grew and evolved over 12-years. ThisFeatured presentation willKeynote answer questions and Plenary about the structure Panels...... and process of the team including:...... how does14 the team train and develop scientists? How do the PI’s interact with team members to train and develop them? How do team members collaborate and influence eachSIGs...... other? How do the daily practices support the goals of the team?...... In addition, using social network 28 data the presentation will answer what is the structure of the team network, what is the ideal structure, where are different types of people (i.e. PIs, and postdocs)Detailed in the networkDaily and Schedule how does the ...... network change overtime? ...... 30

TheWorkshop team’s history of Abstracts...... collaboration and model of training and development has worked to propel forward 38 new ideas, collaborations, and research. Their narrative emphasizes that good science isn’t just about having the next big idea or scientific discovery. Science is also aboutPanel mentoring, Abstracts...... development and forming interpersonal relationships. 42

Read,Oral E. K., Abstracts O'Rourke, M., Hong, ...... G. S., Hanson, P. C., Winslow, L. A., Crowley, S., ... & Weathers, K. C. (2016). 52 Building the team for team science. Ecosphere, 7(3), e01291. Poster Abstracts ...... 106 DIVERSITYSciTS Awards ON TEAMS ...... 119 Moderator: Lejla Bilal-Maley, Antioch University Unconference Details ...... 119 The Impact of Gender Composition and Leadership on the Productivity and Authorship Practices of Interdisciplinary ResearchThanks Teams to our Reviewers ...... 120 Ms. Jacalyn Beck, Michigan State University; Ms. Sheila Brassel, University of Michigan; Ms. Ellie Phillips, Ms. Jordan Fornier, MichiganPost State Conference University; Dr. RobertEvaluation Montgomery Information...... , Dr. Kevin Elliot, Dr. Kendra Cheruvelil,...... Michigan 120State University; Dr. Isis Settles, University of Michigan

Gender diversity has been shown to have positive effects on team productivity across a variety of disciplines. Within scientific research teams, productivity is often measured by the number of peer-reviewed journal articles published by a team over time. However, it is unclear what role the gender composition of teams, specifically that of team leadership, plays in the resulting publications and their practices for co-authorship. We surveyed 229 researchers from 61 National Science Foundation-funded interdisciplinary environmental science teams on matters relating to team gender composition, inclusivity, leadership, and authorship. We collected information on ~2,400 articles published by these teams between 2006-2018, including author gender and number of co-authors. While most survey participants were satisfied with the authorship credit they were given in their team’s publications, more women than men felt the credit they received was inappropriate (6.6% vs. 2.3%, respectively). And while many participants were satisfied with the number of coauthors on their team’s publications, more women tended to feel that there were too many or too few coauthors (38.9% vs. 31.1% of men). This may be indicative of the disproportionate gender ratios within team leadership: on average, teams had 4.1 men PIs or coPIs and only 1.5 women PIs or coPIs. Results of this study have implications for the management of productive and inclusive interdisciplinary research teams.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 87 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

ExplorationsDear SciTS of 2019 Temporal participants, Diversity, Temporal Conflict, and Temporal Leadership Dr. Susan Mohammed, Penn State University Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference,Team research has the frequently 10th annual been criticized gathering for neglecting of individuals the role of andtime (e.g.,groups Kozlowski & Bell, 2003; Mathieu, Tannenbum, interestedDonsbach, & Alliger,in studying, 2014). In practicing,response, recent and research facilitating has expl teamored temporality science. in team diversity, cognition, and leadership. With Thisregard meeting to diversity, is individuals also the not first only differSciTS in demographicconference characteristics since formation and personality traits, but also differ in their temporal orientation (Mohammed & Harrison, 2013). Some individuals are chronically hurried whereas others are relaxed (time urgency; Conte, Landy,of the & International Mathieu, 1995). NetworkSome people for complete the Science work early of while Team others Science wait until the last minute (pacing style; Gevers, Mohammed, & Baytalskaya,(INSciTS), 2015). a professional Some people societyprefer to focus advancing on a single related task at ainterests time, whereas in others prefer to work on several activities concurrentlyteam science. (polychronicity; Bluedorn, 2002). What happens when individuals with different orientations toward time have to work together interdependently in a team context? Does diversity of time-based individual differences contribute to dysfunctional conflict or facilitateThe conference complementary leadership performance? team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. OneVasko, study Dr. found Julie that Thompsonthe mix of time-urgent Klein, andand time-patient Megghan team Honke members Seidel— heightened temporal disagreements (Mohammed, Alipour, Martinez,has worked Livert, closely& Fitzgerald, with 2017). the However,SciTS 2019 other research Planning reveals Committee that the answer and to the these INSciTS questions board depends to on design several a moderatingconference conditions. that builds For example, on existing the effect research of time urgency and andpractice pacing stylestrengths diversity while were more also positive pointing when in team exciting temporal new leadershipdirections. (team leader behaviors that help to coordinate the pacing of task accomplishment) was high (Mohammed & Nadkarni, 2011). In addition, shared temporal cognition (common understanding of the time-related aspects of executing collective tasks) attenuatedOne of our the aimsnegative for effects SciTS of polychronicity 2019 is to diversity demonstrate on team performancehow team (Mohammed science animates & Nadkarni, and2014). propels Recently, Gevers, Rispens,research and in Li, environmental 2016) found that the science, relationship agriculture, between paci andng style natural diversity resources. and team collaboration To this end, was positive we are only pleased when both to action planning and temporal familiarity (knowledge of members’ temporal traits) were high. feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative Inapproaches sum, individuals in oftenagriculture enter teams and with natural diverse, resources.deeply ingrained temporal orientations. A growing number of studies across diverse samples have begun to demonstrate that time-related dispositions of members are potentially crucial in teams and have important implicationsOther values for team drive processes SciTS and 2019 performance. as well. (e.g., Diversity Gevers etand al., 2016;inclusion Mohammed have & been Angel, fundamental2004; Mohammed commitments & Nadkarni, 2011,in our 2014; planning, Mohammed driving et al., our2017). calls How forcan participation,this research be leveraged invited presentations,to enhance team functioning? and fee structure. In addition, Unfortunately,we have worked the practical to ensure implications a “green” of this research conference, have yet togiving be unpacked. you the In response,option of the an focus online of this program presentation rather is to informthan aevidence printed based one practice and working regarding temporalto reduce diversity, food temporal waste. conflict, And as and the temporal primary leadership. host, Practitionersthe MSU willCenter be alerted to considerfor Interdisciplinarity differences in members’ seeks time to urgency, create pacingopportunities style, and polychronicity to refine thinking in forming about and monitoring collaboration team progress. and Expliccross-itly discussingdisciplinary expectations research, regarding education, deadlines and and pacingtraining. as part of the development of a team charter can structure this dialogue. Although temporal diversity can be a disruptive influence in teams, the interventions of temporal leadership, shared temporal cognition, actionWe hope planning, that and you temporal have familiarity an excellent can mitigate time the in negative Lansing effects while of temporal you enjoy diversity SciTS on team 2019. performance. Lansing Thus, has im anportant implications include encouraging leaders to actively coordinate the work of the team toward meeting deadlines and facilitating the active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such process by which team members reach agreement about temporal milestones. as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information. Strategies for Promoting “Teaminess” with a Focus on Diversity and Inclusion Dr.If you Binyam have Nardos any, Dr. questions Letisha Wyatt or ,commentsDr. Damien Fair for, Oregon the SciTS Health 2019& Science Planning University Committee, please look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges. Research institutions are often encouraging and supportive of collaborative team science because they recognize that team science is more impactful and efficient relative to independent research by a single investigator. A primary reason for this observation is attributed toMichael the increased O’Rourke creativity and diversity of ideas that team science affords. Needless to say, if diversity of ideas is to be enhanced withinChair, research, 2019 Sciencethe teams andof Teamuniversities Science should beConference composed of a diverse group of investigators from different backgrounds. The OHSU Fellowship for Diversity and Inclusion in Research (OFDIR) is a program with a mission to do just that – i.e., to enhance diversity of ideas in OHSU research teams by actively working to recruit and retain postdocs and junior investigators from underrepresented communities (e.g., primarily racial minorities, persons with disabilities, and from underserved communities). To grow a diverse scientific workforce at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), OFDIR focuses on supporting the career development of diverse talent and creating a nationalLansing network of Center OHSU-connected WIFI Information underrepresented - Username: scientists. Our Fellowsscits report and thatPassword: attractive components 2019 of the OFDIR program include financial support (salary, relocation and research enrichments funds), mentorship on grant and manuscript writing, and professional development opportunities for career advancement. Coordinating efforts with programs targeting

2019 SciTS Conference Program 88 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

undergraduatesWelcome and ...... post-baccalaureates at OHSU, such as NIH-funded BUILD EXITO and PREP, respectively,2 allows OFIDIR Fellows and research mentees invaluable mentoring and informal teaching experiences. These interactions also enhance relationships and communityINSciTS for underrepresented Board ...... individuals across OHSU’s interdisciplinary...... teams. Sense of community 3 is typically very important to diversePlanning candidates, Committee and as such, OFDIR ...... works with Fellows to ensure they feel...... welcome and connected 7 both professionally and personally via programs such as our monthly presentation series and frequent socials at OHSU and within the greater Portland area. SinceFacility the establishment Map ...... of OFDIR in 2012, the program has accepted 14...... underrepresented Postdoctoral 8 Fellows across departments and programs ranging from Cancer Biology, Dentistry, Neuroscience, and Engineering while coming in considerably under budget and outpacingSession recruitment Evaluation goals. Several Information postdocs have continued...... their fellowship in their...... host lab or taken 9 their next career step at OHSU, including Faculty positions. When surveyed on a five-point likert scale, all Fellows consistently report being “likely (4)” or “highly likely (5)” Conferenceto recommend the atprogram. a Glance We see an...... increase in the number that report “strongly...... agreeing” with 10 continuing in science when asked about their investment in pursuing a scientific career while comparing pre- and post- OFDIR experiences. In the future, we will extendFeatured OFDIR Postdoctoral Keynote Fellowships and Plenary to other areas Panels...... of OHSU through collaboration with...... similarly 14aimed programs in Family Medicine and the School of Public Health. We hope that other groups focused on team science will make concerted efforts to embed inclusivitySIGs...... and support of diverse individuals in their efforts to account...... for the successes of Team Science. 28

TeamDetailed Climate Mediates Daily theSchedule Effect of Diversity ...... on Science Teams ...... 30 Dr. Isis Settles, Ms. Sheila Brassel, University of Michigan; Dr. Patricia Soranno, Dr. Kendra Cheruvelil, Dr. Georgina Montgomery, Dr. KevinWorkshop Elliott, Michigan Abstracts...... State University 38

Background:Panel Abstracts...... The scientific community is striving to become more demographically diverse and promote 42 the advancement of groups that have been underrepresented in the sciences. At the same time, scientific research is increasingly conducted in teams. However, creatingOral successful Abstracts diverse ...... teams is not a simple matter of recruiting more individuals from underrepresented 52 groups. In fact, diverse teams can struggle with allocation of credit, differences in perspectives, and unequal power dynamics. We propose that a critical factor for addressingPoster Abstractsthese challenges ...... and promoting the success of diverse science teams is team climate, 106 or the perceived set of norms, attitudes, and expectations on a team. Although industrial/organizational psychologists have examined climate and its associations with teamworkSciTS and Awards job satisfaction ...... in traditional business workplaces, there are surprisingly few studies on119 the associations between diversityUnconference and climate within Details science teams...... In this study, we sought to address this...... gap by examining 119 how individual and team diversity are related to team climate, satisfaction, and perceptions of team functioning.

Method:Thanks In a sample to our of 266 Reviewers researchers working ...... in NSF-funded interdisciplinary science...... teams, we conducted120 a path analysis to examinePost whether Conference team climate Evaluation(measured as procedural Information...... justice, collaboration, and inclusion)...... mediates 120 the associations between individual and team demographic diversity and three outcome variables: team members’ overall satisfaction, satisfaction with team authorship practices specifically, and perceptions of the frequency of data sharing on their team.

Major findings: Regardless of one’s own characteristics, researchers on more diverse teams reported a more positive climate than those on less diverse teams, which was associated with more positive outcomes. In contrast, we found that researchers from underrepresented groups reported more negative perceptions of team climate, which was associated with more negative outcomes. Thus, overall, team diversity is associated with a more positive climate and better outcomes. However, the individuals who contribute said diversity – the team members from underrepresented groups – report more negative climate and outcomes.

Implications: Our findings about the positive effects of team demographic diversity are aligned with the literature indicating that diversity can have a number of beneficial effects on team outcomes. Demographic diversity might improve team climate because team members from traditionally underrepresented groups may be particularly likely to identify concerns about power dynamics and unfair or exclusive practices on these teams. However, we also found that individuals from multiple underrepresented groups (e.g., women, people of color, LGBTQ team members) perceived team climate more negatively than their socially dominant counterparts, and as a result reported more negative outcomes. The less positive outcomes for these individuals may be the result of “token effects,” which occur when group members experience stresses such as performance pressure and social isolation because they have characteristics that are unique within their teams. Thus, our results support ongoing efforts within the scientific community to incorporate more

2019 SciTS Conference Program 89 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

individualsDear SciTS from 2019underrepresented participants, groups in scientific teams, but we add the important caveat that it is critical to provide these individuals with adequate support and recognition, and to study additional ways to improve team climate for all team members. Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) SCAFFOLDINGConference, the IN10th ACADEMIC annual gathering SETTINGS of individuals and groups Moderator:interestedDr. in Deborah studying, Rocha, practicing, Indiana University and facilitating team science. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation ofDeveloping the International Team Science Network Capacity for at athe Technological Science ofUniversity Team Science (INSciTS),Dr. Kathleen E aHalvorsen professional, Michigan society Technological advancing University related interests in Manyteam universities science. struggle to develop team science capacity finding it difficult to bridge disciplinary and departmental boundaries. This paper focuses on describing how Michigan Technological University developed inter/transdisciplinary scientific research skills and Thenetworks conference in the area ofleadership environmental team sustainability. —myself, This Dr.deve Stephanielopment started E. with a few key faculty across the university interested in Vasko,developing Dr. interdisciplinary Julie Thompson environmental Klein, sustainability and Megghan research. Honke Seidel— has worked closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a A National Science Foundation IGERT grant on sustainability spurred the faculty to develop research projects, co-advise graduate conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new students, create a cross-university graduate certificate, and put in place a research institute to connect faculty and facilitate interdisciplinarydirections. research. This institute was critical in identifying some funding opportunities, helping develop interdisciplinary teams to pursue them, and assisting with proposal development. This in turn led to successful funding awards from multiple federal science agencies.One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to Asfeature a core offor environmental the first time sustainability panels researchers focusing acrosson Indigenous social, natural, approa engineering,ches andto teamcomputational science sciences and collaborativeworked together toapproaches pursue various in proposals agriculture and carry and out natural funded grants,resources. a core of experienced senior researchers developed skills in developing and managing inter/transdisciplinary scientific teams. Success in this research focus eventually began to attract more, higher caliber faculty and students in this area facilitated by a serious of university-wide faculty hiring initiatives in sustainability-related fields. Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments Thein our result planning, has been thedriving development our calls of a "deepfor participation, bench" of scientists invited skilled presentations, in working together and across fee boundaries structure. who Incan addition, trade-off leadershipwe have responsibilities worked to ensureand pivot ato “green”take advantage conference, of new opportunities. giving you It has the institutionalized option of an norms online and trainingprogram (form ratheral and informal)than a printedfor new faculty one andand stud workingents. At thisto reducepoint in time, food Mi chiganwaste. Tech And is poised as the to expandprimary this host, team sciencethe MSU skill baseCenter to develop newfor Interdisciplinarityareas of research going seeks beyond to the create initial environmental opportunities sustainability to refine core. thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinary research, education, and training. 365: A Year Implementing a Team Science Movement in a British University Ms. Ruth Norris, Dr. Claire Smith, Dr. Amanda Lamb, Ms. Charlotte Stockton-Powdrell, Ms. Rachel Chown, The University of ManchesterWe hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such Theas kickboxingauthor and co-authors and pottery. have informally Please applied consult components the website of the Team for moreScience detailed (TS) model information. to research at the University of Manchester for 10 years. Their particpation in SciTS 2018 was the catalyst for 365 days of change: empowering a knowledge-rich team withIf you the havetoolkit requiredany questions to formalize, or spread comments and operationalize for the SciTS a TS approach 2019 Planningacross the University Committee, of Manchester, please with look the for objectives those of: of us with red ribbons on our name badges.  Increasing the quality and quantity of research outputs and impact  Improving diversity and inclusion in research Michael Creating O’Rourke frameworks that reward and recognise contributions of non-traditional roles Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference The approach combines complementary methods to proliferate and embed TS in the research ecosystem:  Training and Development: creating evidence-based, innovative opportunities to support new ways of working and develop team science specialists. o Development of a formal TS network to advocate, support and advance the practice and research into TS across the LansingUniversity and Center sister networks.WIFI Information (Chown, Norris, - Smith)Username: scits and Password: 2019 o Events:

2019 SciTS Conference Program 90 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

Welcome Workshop, ...... July 2018: Interdisciplinary Translation Workshop led by Andi Hess, ASU (Hess, 2 Norris, Chown, Smith) [35 INSciTSattendees, Board second ...... event planned for 2019] ...... 3  Health Programme Evaluation Methods: December 2018 (Lamb, Smith, Steeles) Planning Proliferation Committee & Dissemination: ...... utilizing existing and new networks to raise...... TS profile, acceptance 7 and adoption o Invited Talks: Facilityo MapJoint ...... University and NHS Research & Innovation Hub,...... Newcastle University. Invited 8 to speak to their network. (tbc). [Norris, Stockton-Powdrell] Sessiono EvaluationOneHealthTech: Information Created a TS event ...... “Taking the I out of IT” to improve...... diversity in 9academia and industry. (December 2018, 100+ members) [Norris] Conferenceo Research at a Programme Glance Managers...... Network: (October 2018, 200+...... members). [Norris] 10 o Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester (November 2018 c.70 staff) [Norris] Featured Sponsorship: Keynote use relationships and Plenary with influencers Panels...... and agents of change to champion...... the creation 14 of a TS network, embed principles within research; and advocate for operational and policy change to support a TS model. SIGs...... 28 o Adoption of TS approach within the NIHR BioMedical Research Centre. TS principles are now weaved into this £28m translational health research programme’s objectives, with KPIs. These actively support the cross-disciplinary nature Detailed Dailyof this strategically Schedule important ...... programme). [Norris, Bruce] ...... 30 Workshop Leadership: Abstracts...... creating an empowered, credible team, with the theoretical and applied knowledge 38 to lead the organization to TS adoption at scale Panel Abstracts...... o CPD: Personal development plans for the TS Network Leadership team: 42  Providing individuals with professional and interpersonal training and development to empower them with the psychological Oralsafety Abstracts to lead, advocate ...... and spread the TS model. 52 DevelopmentPoster ofAbstracts a Research Management ...... Development framework 106 In conclusion, the journey to TS implementation across a British university was catalysed by attendance at the SciTS conference 2018. ThisSciTS initiative hasAwards begun at ...... pace using several complementary activities and workstreams,and has gained119 significant enthusiasm and traction from key senior academic and operational leadership figures; plus interest from external partners across the United Kingdom for adoption.Unconference Details ...... 119 TheThanks depth, breadth to andour sustainability Reviewers of this ...... movement, and its positive effect on research,...... will depend 120 on advocacy and sponsorship; operational and cultural change; and continued application of theory and methods to practice. Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120 Assessing the Propensity to Collaborate in the Life Sciences Dr. Kyuseon Lee, Dr. Steve Miller, Dr. Philip G. Pardey, University of Minnesota

Collaboration among researchers is increasing, but among all possible pairs of researchers few actually work together. It is thus natural to ask what information signals do researchers use in selecting research partners from among a large pool of potential collaborators. This study has addressed that question for life sciences researchers focusing on three particular types of signals: perceived research productivity, knowledge complementarity, and professional familiarity. We investigate the collaboration consequences of these signals by using academic publication data published by life sciences faculty at the University of Minnesota (UMN) from 1999 to 2014, focusing on papers in which all of the authors are affiliated with UMN.

We have found perceived research productivity is positively associated with the initiation of first collaboration while complementary knowledge is not. For continuing collaborations, however, knowledge complementarity becomes significant as well as the recency of first collaboration and the frequency of past collaborations. While complementarity is noted as a key driver of repetitive collaborations, researchers are more likely to collaborate with coauthors who have moderate differences in research profile. This suggests that the factors researchers consider when choosing coauthors vary with respect to the types of collaboration. This study contributes to the empirical literature on research team formation and to university administrators seeking to promote more collaboration among researchers.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 91 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

SocietalDear SciTS Impact 2019 of Research participants, on the Complexity of Language in France Dr. Audrey Mazur-Palandre, University of Lyon; Dr. Gerald Niccolai, Dr. François Pellegrino, Dr. Kristine Lund, CNRS: Centre National Welcomede la Recherche to theScientifique 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups interestedIn 2010, the Advanced in studying, Studies practicing, on LANguage and complexity facilitating (ASLAN) team “Laboratory science. of Excellence” obtained funding for ten years. Primarily Thismobilizing meeting the laboratories is also DDLthe (Dynamicsfirst SciTS of Language) conference and ICAR since (Interactions, formation Corpora, Learning, Representations), it has now been one of the 12 LabEx funded by the University of Lyon during 2011-2019. By considering language as a complex dynamic system, ofASLAN the proposesInternational to examine Network all facets for of languagethe Science use and of acquisit Teamion, Science as well as language diversity and history. This approach (INSciTS),addresses all languagea professional components society (from phonemes advancing to gestures, related from interests grammar toin interaction) as well as how biological, cognitive and teamsocial factors science. and language reciprocally influence each other. Although public sector researchers who willingly contribute to the resolution of societal issues is not new, ASLAN’s goal is to develop a collective approach, still lacking in the mid 2000s in France, especiallyThe conference in the Human leadership and Social Sciencesteam —myself, (HSS). Dr. Stephanie E. Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— Tohas meet worked this challenge, closely ASLAN with putthe together SciTS a 2019policy ofPlanning innovation, Committee dissemination and exploitation the INSciTS of research board results to design in order toa respond institutionally to societal issues. In addition to three scientific axes structuring research activities, ASLAN has also included threeconference societal challenges, that builds two ontransversal existing scientific research approaches, and practiceand axes dedicated strengths to training, while inreach,also pointing and outreach in exciting activities. new directions. A team responsible for the communication and enhancement of ASLAN was set up to rethink and increase the societal value of OneASLAN’s of perimeter,our aims while for workingSciTS closely2019 withinis to thedemonstrate scientific axes howand approaches. team science Since 2012, animates ASLAN andhas developed propels a program researchaimed at facilitating in environmental multi-inter-transdisciplinary science, agriculture,collaboration as and well asnatural real expertise resources. in adding To societal this end,value towe researc are pleasedh results in to featurelanguage sciences,for the firsteducational time sciencespanels andfocusing psychology. on IndigenousWe have done thisapproa by reflectingches to on team the concepts science of inreach, and collaborative outreach, and dissemination of research in HSS (Ogilivie Hendren & Ku, forthcoming). Our experience has led us to redefine the value of HSS approachesresearch. This was in facilitatedagriculture by our and decisi naturalon to give resources. responsibility for the development and animation of inreach, outreach, and dissemination to staff who are trained and practicing researchers (Scholz, 2017). This dual position - researcher and in charge of the Otherdevelopment values of inreach, drive outreach,SciTS 2019 and dissemination as well. Diversity – allows for and excellent inclusion knowledge have of ASLAN’s been fundamental disciplinary fields. commitments Such knowledge inenables our planning,a quick understanding driving ourof research calls forprojects, participation, and ease in identifyinginvited presentations, partnerships and new and academic fee structure. possibilities. In Finall addition,y, weawareness have ofworked different tostakeholders’ ensure a constraints “green” (e.g.conference, difference in giving the public you and the private option sector of timescales) an online facilitates program finding rather solutions thanthat satisfy a printed different one partners. and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center forIn light Interdisciplinarity of this background, ourseeks presentation to create will haveopportunities a twofold objective. to refine We will thinking (1) illustrate about that collaborationwhat is defined by and societal cross- value is disciplinaryextremely rich and research, goes beyond education, the creation and of market training. value, especially in HSS and (2) show examples from ASLAN that can be transferred or adapted to other societal issues in HSS research. Our work will soon be available in the form of a white paper. We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an References: Ogilvieactive Hendren, downtown C. & Ku, with S. (forthcoming). restaurants, New Directions local art Spotlight: shops, The runningInterdisciplinary trails, Executive and localScientist. community classes such Scholz,as kickboxing R.W. (2017). and The Normative pottery. Dimension Please in consult Transdisciplin thearity, website Transition for Management, more detailed and Transformation information. Sciences: New Roles of Science and Universities in Sustainable Transitioning. Sustainability, 9, 991. If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those Deepof us Knowledge with red ribbonsIntegration on Acro ourss name Disciplines: badges. The EMBeRS Method Dr. Deana Pennington, University of Texas at El Paso; Dr. Kate Thompson, Griffith University; Dr. Shirley Vincent, Vincent Evaluation Consulting, LLC; Dr. David Gosselin, University of Nebraska at Lincoln Michael O’Rourke DeepChair, knowledge 2019 Science integration of across Team disciplines Science has Conferencebeen identified as one of seven key challenges confronting interdisciplinary team science. Deep knowledge integration depends on identifying and linking relevant conceptual frameworks in multiple disciplines that could contribute synergistically towards research on a shared problem; yet which frameworks are relevant depends on the problem that is going to be addressed, which can itself be framed in a multitude of ways. Such “ill-defined” problems are known to be inherently complex, requiring different skills than needed for addressing well defined problems. Common approaches for tacking ill-defined problems dependLansing on effective Center team processes WIFI thatInformation facilitate participation - Username: and knowledge scits sharing. and Password: Yet in interdisciplinary 2019 teams, such processes are inadequate because of extreme differences in vocabulary and epistemology. Facilitating team interactions that enhance

2019 SciTS Conference Program 92 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

participationWelcome does not...... address the issue of team members not understanding the deep knowledge that 2 is being shared by their colleaguesINSciTS from otherBoard disciplines...... 3 The EMBeRS project (Employing Model-Based Reasoning in Socio-Environmental Synthesis) is investigating the challenge of deep knowledgePlanning integration Committee across disciplines ...... as a learning problem. Team members...... must learn enough about7 each other’s research and the basic concepts that are fundamental to understanding it to be able to generate an internal mental model of each colleague’s researchFacility and connect Map those...... with their mental model of their own research...... This must happen on-the-fly 8 during teamwork and is an exampleSession of experiential Evaluation learning. Once Information team members ...... have learned enough to generate...... such connections 9 across mental models, they have the capacity to generate a synergistic shared mental model of the problem. These connections and a shared mental model of the problemConference contribute towards at a development Glance of...... a distributed cognitive system, from which...... a shared vision 10 of research emerge. Shared vision is known to be a key factor determining the outcomes from team work. Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 This presentation will summarize the EMBeRS method for learning across disciplines to purposefully identify potential conceptual linkagesSIGs...... between team members and converge through time on a shared...... mental model of the problem. 28 The presentation will briefly summarize learning theories on which the method is based; provide a heuristic model for practices that facilitate learning in science teamsDetailed derived from Daily synthesizing Schedule those theories; ...... describe the PhD workshops that...... are being used to 30test the EMBeRS method; and present results from qualitative and quantitative analysis of data collected during the workshops. Results show promise for developmentWorkshop of a set Abstracts...... of generic activities that can be used in interdisciplinary science teams to intentionally 38 and purposefully integrate deep knowledge across disciplines, leading to development of a shared mental model of the problem and a path towards identifying a sharedPanel vision Abstracts...... of synergistic research. 42 HIGHOral LEVEL Abstracts THEORY ...... 52 Moderator: Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, Wayne State University, Emeritus Poster Abstracts ...... 106 Towards a Theory of Replications, Open Science, and Reproducibility Dr. SciTSBert Baumgaertner Awards, Dr...... Berna Devezer, Dr. Erkan Buzbas, University of Idaho; Dr. Luis G. Nardin 119, Brandenburg University of Technology Unconference Details ...... 119 The literature on the reproducibility crisis presents several putative causes for the proliferation of irreproducible results, including p- hackingThanks and publication to our bias. Reviewers Without a theory ...... of reproducibility, however, it is diffi...... cult to determine whether120 these putative causes can explain most irreproducible results. Drawing from an historically-informed conception of science that is open and collaborative, we identifyPost the componentsConference of an idealizedEvaluation experiment Information...... and analyze these components as a precursor...... to 120 develop such a theory. Openness, we suggest, has long been intuitively proposed as a solution to irreproducibility. However, this intuition has not been validated in a theoretical framework. We use probabilistic arguments and examine how openness of experimental components relates to reproducibility of results. We show that there are some impediments to obtaining reproducible results that precede many of the causes often cited in literature on the reproducibility crisis. That is, even if, for example, p-hacking never took place, publication bias was absent, and other erroneous individual- or system-level practices were corrected, reproducibility is not ensured.

Foxholes, Not Silos Dr. James Foster, University of Idaho

It has become de riguer, beyond even cliché, for academics to pejoratively describe the state of the Academy in terms of silos. The point of the metaphor is to decry narrow minded overspecialization and to encourage disciplinary specialists to interact more with specialists outside of their discipline. But in general, the silo metaphor for the modern university is worse than wrong. It is sterile. I propose a more accurate and useful metaphor for our situation, a framing that leads more naturally to possible solutions: foxholes.

Metaphors matter. Framing a subject can either hamper or facilitate discussion, shaping our ability to understand an issue and to deal with it. Statistician George E. P. Box’s observation about statistical models applies equally well to metaphors: “All models are wrong, but some are useful.” A useful metaphor illuminates, prodding us to deeper understanding, hopefully even suggesting solutions. In other words, good metaphors stimulate our imagination, rubbing imagery against reality with an eye to improving the latter.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 93 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

Dear SciTS 2019 participants, I maintain that the academic “siloization” metaphor (I have heard otherwise literate people use that term) is neither accurate nor useful Welcomeif we want to understandto the 2019 and Scienceimprove the of Academy. Team ScienceThe foxhole (SciTS) image leads more naturally to useful analogies. The foxhole metaphor Conference,suggests solutions. the Foxholes 10th annual provide different gathering perspectives, of individuals which might and help groups us understand where the threats really lie. Most interestedsignificantly, soldiers in studying, in foxholes practicing, are comrades, and not facilitating enemies. team science. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation Transdisciplinary Knowledge Producing Teams (KPTs): Typology, Features, and Communication Skills ofDr. theGaetano International Romano Lotrecchiano Network, George for the Washington Science University; of Team Dr. Science Shalini Misra , Virginia Tech (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in teamTransdisciplinary science. Knowledge Producing Teams (TDKPTs) are groups of stakeholder participants tasked with producing knowledge across disciplinary, sectoral, and ecological boundaries. This paper accesses literature from the Science-of-Team-Science (SciTS), Thecomplexity conference theory, and leadership systems theory team to construct —myself, a typology Dr. Stephanieof the features E. of TDKPTs. First, we conduct a descriptive analysis of features of TDKPTs from a systems perspective. We distinguish between interactive systemic complexities (arising from interpersonal Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— interactions in TD team settings) and structural systemic complexities (arising from characteristics inherent to the make of the team). hasWe analyze worked the closelycharacteristics with of the TDKPTs SciTS (such 2019 as complex Planning problem Committee solving, stakeholder and the involvement, INSciTS methodologicalboard to design pluralism), a conferenceelucidate how they that paralle buildsl various on existing complex adaptive research systems and factors practice (such strengthsas non-linearity, while open also systems, pointing interactions in exciting between new directions.systems components), and present case examples of both structural and interactive system complexities. Additionally, we identify concrete skill building aspects needed for TDKPTs to be successful. We align each skill building foci with specific outcomes related to Onesupporting of our effective aims communication for SciTS 2019in TDKPTs. is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to featureAs TDKPT for members the first are requiredtime panels to engage focusing in theoretical, on Indigenousepistemological, approa and methodologicalches to team reflections science to elucidate and collaborative the dynamic nature of TD knowledge producing teams, understanding how conflict, dissonance, and reciprocal interdependencies contribute to approachesknowledge generation in agriculture are key areas and of team natural effectiveness resources. and call for continual research and inquiry. This paper provides a framework by which team functioning can be considered and enhanced within TDKPTs. The features of TDKPTs developed and described in this Otherpaper inform values the developmentdrive SciTS of the 2019 requisite as well.skill set Diversity for better team and communication inclusion have and functioning. been fundamental This offering attractscommitments researchers inof TDour teams planning, and TD teamdriving members our callsalike to for reconsider participation, the development invited and presentations, study of TDKPTs. and fee structure. In addition, we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather CTSAthan a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center Moderator:for InterdisciplinarityDr. Karen Demby, seeks University to create of North opportunities Carolina to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinary research, education, and training. Using Instructional Design Principles to Engage Citizen Scientists as Clinical Research Partners Ms. Janet Brishke, Ms. Christy Evans, Dr. Elizabeth Shenkman, University of Florida College of Medicine We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an Background:active downtown Citizen Scientists with restaurants, help bridge the local gap between art shops, researchers running and communitytrails, and members. local community These stakeholders classes provide such input onas many kickboxing aspects of and clinical pottery. research Please studies, consultfrom general the consensus website feedback for more such detailed as selecting information. a logo for a fitness app, to providing suggestions on how to recruit patients more effectively. Citizen Scientists bring fresh perspective to research studies and offer insights typicallyIf you haveoverlooked any by questions research staff. or Dependingcomments on theirfor theprior SciTS experiences 2019 within Planning the health Committee, care system or please in their professi look foronal those lives, Citizen Scientists may initially not understand fundamental elements of the research process. This knowledge gap can create a communicationof us with red barrier ribbons between on the our stakeholder name badges. and researchers, and limit actionable feedback for implementation. Methods:Michael Working O’Rourke with experts in educational research and instructional design, a curriculum was created to train new community stakeholders.Chair, 2019 The Science curriculum of consists Team ofScience seven modules Conference with different themes relevant to clinical research. The modules each contain didactic lessons with video tutorials presented by subject matter experts. The curriculum was created using pedagogical best practices such as use of an instructional design model to guide the process, interactive assessments with color-coded feedback, learning objectives, and multimedia content delivery. The Citizen Scientists worked with the research team to help create the materials, from reviewing assessment language to starring in the videos. The curriculum was pilot tested with IRB approval among Citizen Scientists between July 2017Lansing and January Center 2018 using WIFI the Information Canvas learning -management Username: system. scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 94 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

Results:Welcome Citizen Scientists ...... were divided into two groups: established members and new members. The 2 cumulative score for both groups across all modules was 81%, ranging from 76% for the clinical and translational science module to 98% for the stakeholder engagementINSciTS module. Board Notable ...... differences were observed in the cultural competency...... module, where younger3 participants scored higher thanPlanning older participants Committee (90% vs 77%), ...... and in the orientation to citizen science module,...... where established 7 Citizen Scientists scored higher than new members (93% vs 81%). Participants also completed an evaluation that asked questions about comprehension, video quality,Facility and assessment Map ...... clarity. Most (75%) participants felt it was easy to...... understand the information 8 in the videos. The majority of participants (62.50%) felt the assessment items matched the learning objectives and 75% felt the assessments were comprehensive. TheSession evaluations askedEvaluation for unstructured Information comments as ...... well, and participants used this...... to offer concrete 9 feedback for future iterations of the curriculum. Conference at a Glance ...... 10 Conclusion: After completing the course, Citizen Scientists received sustained engagement certification and are now using this knowledgeFeatured on new Keynote research projects. and The Plenary Citizen Scientist Panels...... curriculum was a well-received ...... approach 14 to educating community stakeholders in aspects of clinical research. When community stakeholders are knowledgeable about research terminology, their ability to collaborateSIGs...... with researchers, and provide a community perspective...... while remaining cognizant of how28 research works, is enhanced. Having a more in-depth understanding of the research process fosters collaborative efforts and improved communication between the stakeholderDetailed and researchers.Daily Schedule Through an ...... understanding of how clinical research...... works, community stakeholders30 are better able to offer critical feedback to help advance health care. Workshop Abstracts...... 38 An Integrated Approach to Promoting Team Science Principles Across a CTSA Dr. PanelJohn (Jack) Abstracts...... Kues, Dr. Jackie Knapke, Dr. Saundra Regan, Dr. Jennifer Molano, Dr. Rebecca Lee 42, Ms. Laura Hildreth, Elizabeth Heubi, University of Cincinnati Oral Abstracts ...... 52 The application of the principles of team science have been an important part of the CTSAs almost from the inception of the program. ImplementationPoster Abstracts of this mandate ...... has been largely left to the discretion of individual centers. As we developed 106 our approach to integrating team science into our CCTST we identified the need for a comprehensive model included multi-level training, team consultations,SciTS Awards rewards for ...... successful collaboration and creation of high-functioning teams, mechanisms 119 to overcome institutional barriers to collaboration, and a shift in the institutional research culture that currently accepts dysfunctional and sub-optimal teams as the Unconferencenorm. Details ...... 119

We Thankshave been buildingto our a cross-institutional,Reviewers ...... comprehensive approach to transdisciplinary...... research to120 create a sustainable impact on the quality of research teams, collaboration and the culture of our CTSA partners. Our approach includes initiatives in the following areas:Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120

Administration: The director of the Center for Improvement Science (CIS) sits on the CCTST Executive Committee. He also consults directly with the University of Cincinnati Sr. VP for Research and our health systems. This high-level administrative network allows the CIS to understand broad-based institutional needs and propose cross-institutional solutions to common problems.

Education: The CIS provides on-going, multi-level education in the form of workshops (from team science basics to specialized topics), a graduate-level course in Team Science and Collaboration, on-demand education (one-hour events, grand rounds, workshops, and community workshops). These are broadly advertised to CCTST members (over 4,000) and through institutional training announcements. We typically have over 15 events per years with approximately 500 participants. We are currently co-sponsoring workshops with the university’s Staff Success Center.

Consultation: The CIS provides consultations for individual investigators, teams, and administrative units. Time periods vary from a single session to on-going relationships that include team assessments, customized training, and “touch base” meetings. We are averaging over 12 consultations per year.

The Collaboration Network: The CIS operates a weekly collaboration session Web-Ex. The purpose is to help investigators connect with potential collaborators and to learn more about colleagues and resources across the CCTST. We have monthly “member spotlight”

2019 SciTS Conference Program 95 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

sessionsDear SciTS and quarterly 2019 “specialparticipants, topic” sessions that are well advertised across all CCTST institutions and the community. Our most recent quarterly meeting on Aging included over 50 people from the CCTST and community partners. Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference,Integration Committee: the 10th This isannual a group gatheringof top investigators of individuals and core directors and groups from the CCTST. We invite new and mid-level interestedinvestigators toin present studying, their current practicing, research and and facilitatingchallenges. The team purpose science. of the meeting is to offer career advice, connect Thisinvestigators meeting with collaboratorsis also the and first resources, SciTS andconference to provide regular since follow-up formation contact to support their needs. This has been in place for over five years. We currently follow over 75 investigators. of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS),Monitoring and a Evaluation: professional We have society been gathering advancing data on related individual interests investigators, in teams, and funding programs to assess progress teamin promoting science. a collaborative research culture, educating and supporting investigators, and increasing the effective use of team science principles. As part of this presentation, we will provide the latest evaluation data that measure progress and effectiveness of our efforts. The conference leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. ImplementingVasko, Dr. Julie a Continuous Thompson Quality Klein, Improvement and Megghan Interventi onHonke in a Clinical Seidel— and Tran slational Research Network has worked closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a Ms.conference LaKaija Johnson that ,buildsMs. Gwenndolyn on existing Porter research, Ms. Jolene and Rohde practice, Dr. Mary strengths E. Cramer, Dr. while Paul alsoA. Estabrooks pointing, University in exciting of Nebraska new Medical Center directions. Purpose: To determine strengths and areas for improvement for the Great Plains IDeA Clinical and Translational Research (GP CTR) Onenetwork of and our develop aims insightfor SciTS into these 2019 needs is throughto demonstrate key informant how interviews team of science Network Steering animates Committee and propelsmembers over two researchyears. in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative Background: Clinical and translational research networks have been funded and developed to provide infrastructure to support approachesbreakthroughs in in disease agriculture treatment, and prevention, natural and resources. health promotion. There is a growing body of literature on the effectiveness of scientific teams across and within these networks, but limited information on the use of systems thinking tools for continuous quality improvementOther values (CQI). drive Measures SciTS such 2019 as the as Internal well. Coalition Diversity Effe ctiveness©and inclusion (ICE), ahave validated been instrument fundamental designed commitmentsto aid community coalitionsin our planning, with identifying driving organizational our calls strengths for participation, and areas for improvement, invited presentations, can be used to collectand feelongitudinal structure. data for In re addition,flection and actionwe have planning. worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center Methods: This project examined the implementation of a mixed methods CQI framework designed to identify strengths and areas for improvementfor Interdisciplinarity across domains seeks measured to create by the ICE: opportunities Shared Social toVision, refine Efficient thinking Practices, about Knowledge collaboration and Training, and Relationship cross- s, Participation,disciplinary and research, Activities, acrosseducation, the GP CTRand network. training. The ICE instrument was adapted to measure the internal governance of the network, and then used to develop an interview protocol. A convergent parallel mixed methods design was used to: (1) Administer the ICEWe to hope GP CTR that Steering you have Committee an excellent members and time grant-funded in Lansing faculty/staff while (n=36);you enjoy (2) Conduct SciTS semi-structured 2019. Lansing interviews has with an GP CTRactive steering downtown committee with members restaurants, (n=6). ICE localsurvey artdata shops, and interview running data weretrails, analyzed and local and compared. community We hypothesized classes such the proposedas kickboxing framework and is an pottery. effective Pleasemethod to consult identify opportuniti the websitees for changes for more that detailed will facilitate information. the translation of research evidence to improve population health outcomes.

Results:If you haveA mix ofany facilitators questions and barriers or comments were identified for from the survey SciTS and 2019 interview Planning responses. Committee, ICE survey respondents please look rated for network those effectivenessof us with redpositively ribbons in all domainson our (mean=name 5.30).badges. The highest rated construct was Knowledge and Training and the lowest rated construct was Participation. Key informant interview responses validated the survey results regarding the positive responses across MichaelICE domains. O’Rourke A new code emerged as unique “Accomplishments” were highlighted, including comments around professional Chair,development 2019 for Sciencepilot and scholar of Team awardees, Science the quality Conference of the annual GP CTR scientific meeting, and improvements in quality and number of applications across network-specific funding calls. Participation emerged as a predominant category with respondents indicating a need for continued focus on transparency, engagement in decision making, and sustained communication. Additional recommendations included continuing to facilitate networking opportunities and strengthening support mechanisms across GP CTR institutions.

Conclusions: A mixedLansing methods Center CQI framework WIFI Informationmay be a useful method- Username: for transdisciplinary scits and research Password: networks to 2019identify structures and processes that facilitate or inhibit the implementation of transdisciplinary research activities. We supported our initial hypothesis

2019 SciTS Conference Program 96 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

andWelcome identified feedback ...... garnered from the ICE survey and the key informant interviews that can be used 2 to inform changes in governance to promote advancements in translational science across the GP CTR network. Clinical and translational research network membersINSciTS enjoy the Board knowledge ...... sharing and training opportunities that come ...... with network membership 3 and are looking for opportunities to contributePlanning to the Committee development and ...... achievement of the network’s vision...... 7 TheFacility Relationship Map Between ...... Disciplinary Diversity, Team Composition,...... Time-workload Pressures 8 and Quality of Interactions During Patient-reviews in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards Dr. SessionTayana Soukup Evaluation, King's College Information London, London UK;...... Mr. Ben W Lamb, Cambridge...... University Hospitals 9 NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Mr. James SA Green, Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, UK; Dr. Nick Sevdalis, King's College London, LondonConference UK at a Glance ...... 10 Background:Featured The functionalKeynote perspective and Plenary of groups highlights Panels...... the importance of understanding...... the relationship 14 between internal factors that emanate from within a group (e.g. diversity and composition); external circumstances that are intractable (e.g. workload and time pressures);SIGs...... and the quality of interactions between team members during...... a given task. This premise 28has not yet been explored in the context of patient-reviews in multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs). We have therefore set out to gain better understanding of how externalDetailed circumstances Daily and Schedule internal factors ...... relate to the quality of interactions in ...... the disciplinary diverse 30 group of health professionals that constitute a MTB. Workshop Abstracts...... 38 Methods: Breast, colorectal and gynecological tumor boards from across 3 academic hospitals in the UK were video recorded over 12- weeklyPanel meetings, Abstracts...... encompassing 822 patient-reviews over 55h of MTB real-time work. Quality of interactions 42 for each of the 822 patient-reviews was assessed using a validated instrument, namely, Bales’ Interaction Process Analysis, that captures frequency of task-orientedOral Abstracts and socio-emotional ...... interactions during a team task. We also measured the following items:52  Group size (number of core team members present at any one patient-review), Poster Disciplinary Abstracts diversity ...... (number of core disciplines present at any one patient-review), 106 SciTS Disciplinary Awards distribution ...... (number of core members present per core discipline), and 119  Gender balance (more males, more females, equal number of males and females) Unconference Time and workload Details pressures ...... (ratio based on the time left to review patients...... on the MTB agenda 119 divided by the number of patients left to be reviewed). Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 120 The relationship between the variables was assessed using partial correlation analysis controlling for team/tumor type and the complexityPost ofConference the patient reviewed Evaluation (using a validated Information...... tool, MeDiC)...... 120 Participants were senior specialist physicians and nurses across the 3 MTBs (N=41 team members in total) including;  6 radiologists with on average 12 years’ experience,  5 histopathologists with on average 11 years’ experience,  12 surgeons with on average 8 years’ experience,  6 oncologists with on average 6 years’ experience, and  12 cancer specialist nurses with on average 7 years’ experience

Results: Disciplinary diversity and group size were significantly associated with reduced task oriented interactions such as sharing of patient related information (r=-.08, N=833, p<.05; r=-.14, N=388, p<.05; respectively), and increased seeking of such information from the team (r=.13, N=833, p<.05; r=.08, N=833, p<.05; respectively). Group size and more male team members present during patient- reviews were also associated with increased seeking of clinical opinions into care planning (r=.18, N=833, p<.05; r=.21, N=833, p<.05; respectively), while the opposite pattern was evident with more females present (r=-.16, N=833, p<.05).

Negative socio-emotional reactions such as antagonism were heightened with disciplinary diversity (r=.08, N=833, p<.05) and tension also increased with team size (r=.11, N=833, p<.05; r=.249, N=833, p<.05, respectively). Patient-reviews with more male team members present were associated with significantly more tension (r=.01, N=833, p<.05) and fewer disagreements (r=-.11), while the

2019 SciTS Conference Program 97 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

oppositeDear SciTS relationship 2019 was participants, evident when more females were present i.e. more disagreements (r=.10, N=833, p<.05) and less tension (r=-.11, N=833, p<.05). Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference,Time-workload pressure the 10th was annualassociated gathering with reduced of task-oriented individuals interactions and groups in particular providing fewer specialist opinions during interestedpatient-reviews in (r=-.15, studying, N=833, practicing, p<.05), and reducedand facilitating positive socio-emotional team science. interactions between team members such as solidarity This(r=-.14, meeting N=833, p<.05) is also and theagreeab firstleness SciTS (r=-.08, conference N=833, p<.05). since formation ofDiscussion: the International Disciplinary diversity, Network team for composition the Science and time-wor of Teamkload Science pressures are important elements to take into consideration when(INSciTS), evaluating a MTBsprofessional since we found society that they advancing affected the related quality of interests team interactions in in multiple different ways. It is arguable that smallerteam science.size teams with only core disciplines present and streamlining workload to reduce time-workload pressure on MTBs may be strategies to apply in order to ensure better team functioning and service quality in these clinically important specialist teams. The conference leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. DISCIPLINARYVasko, Dr. Julie DIVERSITYThompson Klein,– THEORY and Megghan AND PRAXIS Honke Seidel— hasModerator: worked Dr. Donclosely Takehara, with Universitythe SciTS of Illinois 2019 at PlanningUrbana-Champaign Committee and the INSciTS board to design a conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new Assessingdirections. the Effectiveness of Various Funding Strategies to Foster Disciplinary Diversity in Research Teams Mr. David Campbell, Mr. Brooke Struck, Science-Metrix Inc.

OneDiverse of funding our aims strategies for SciTSaimed at 2019fostering is disciplinaryto demonstrate diversity onhow research team teams science have beenanimates established and by propels a wide range of researchnational and ininternational environmental funders (e.g., science, HFSPO, agriculture, US-NSF, NSERC, and European natural Commission).resources. Through To this the end, recombination we are pleasedof knowledge to featurepieces outside for thethe contextfirst time in which panels they emerged, focusing such on strategies Indigenous aim to uncoverapproa innovativeches to solutionsteam science to the increasingly and collaborative complex approacheschallenges faced in by agriculture 21st century societies. and natural resources. The Human Frontier Science Program Organization (HFSPO) was one of the early adopters of such strategies, and the Human OtherFrontier valuesScience Programdrive SciTS (HFSP) 2019currently as integrates well. Diversity multiple stra andtegies inclusion in support haveof disciplinary been fundamentaldiversity. Science-Metrix commitments recently completedin our planning, a review of driving HFSP for our the calls2009–2018 for participation, funding period. The invited review presentations, was overseen by HFSPO’s and fee Independent structure. Scientific In addition, Review Committee,we have workedwhich provided to ensure methodological a “green” advice conference, and approved allgiving project you deliverables. the option of an online program rather than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center Infor performing Interdisciplinarity the HFSP review, seeks Science-Metrix to create approached opportunities discipl inaryto refine diversity thinking through twoabout lenses: collaboration multidisciplinarity and and cross- interdisciplinarity. The term multidisciplinarity is used to refer to research teams that integrate members from various disciplines, while thedisciplinary term interdisciplinarity research, is specificallyeducation, used and to refer training. to the integration of expertise and approaches from different disciplines into a research paper. In the former case, the Rao-Stirling index was used to quantify diversity in the disciplinary background of a paper’s authors,We hope whereas that inyou the latterhave case, an itexcellent was used to time quantify in Lansingdiversity in whilethe scientific you enjoysubfields SciTS of a paper’s 2019. references. Lansing The hasse two an dimensionsactive downtown may be independent: with restaurants, a multidisciplinary local teamart shops,may yet producerunning quite trails, monodisciplinary and local research,community while aclasses monodisciplina suchry teamas kickboxing may yet produce and highly pottery. interdisciplinary Please consultresearch. the website for more detailed information. This dual view on disciplinary diversity was in part motivated by the composition of HFSP’s funding portfolio. For example, the Cross- DisciplinaryIf you have Fellowships any questions (CDFs) fund or postdo commentscs from outsidefor the the SciTS life sciences 2019 to Planning conduct biology-related Committee, research please abroad look for forthe firstthose oftime. us Such with a fundingred ribbons scheme, on while our it willname generate badges. some disciplinary diversity within research teams (i.e., a postdoctoral fellow from outside the life sciences [e.g., in physics, chemistry] working with a supervisor in the life sciences), appears quite suitable to also Michaelensure strong O’Rourke knowledge integration across disciplines (i.e., a postdoctoral fellow from outside the life sciences [e.g., in physics, Chair,chemistry] 2019 working Science on a problem of Team within Sciencethe life sciences). Conference HFSP also includes the Research Grants (RGs) scheme, which funds multidisciplinary teams to conduct research that could not have been undertaken by individual labs. While this funding scheme is likely to ensure disciplinary diversity within research teams (i.e., multidisciplinarity), it might not translate into a level of knowledge integration that is as strong as for the CDFs (i.e., interdisciplinarity).

This presentationLansing will compare Center the multidisciplinarity WIFI Information and interdisciplinarity - Username: of the research scits papers and Password:resulting from different 2019 HFSP funding schemes to provide empirical evidence on the relative effectiveness of different strategies aimed at promoting disciplinary diversity in research. A comparison between career stage will also be presented to test the hypothesis that early-career researchers might be

2019 SciTS Conference Program 98 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

bolderWelcome in taking novel ...... approaches to research, whereas established researchers may be playing a role 2 in stimulating that daring among youngINSciTS colleagues. Board ...... 3 MeasuringPlanning the Division Committee of Labor in ...... Interdisciplinary Science ...... 7 Dr. Phillip Honenberger, University of Nevada-Las Vegas; Dr. Evelyn Brister, Rochester Institute of Technology

TeamFacility science isMap the new ...... norm and interdisciplinary collaborations have become...... more common. How 8 labor is divided on scientific teams—whoSession does Evaluation what, in what proportion, Information and for what ...... credit—varies across projects...... This paper investigates 9 common patterns of division of labor on disciplinary and multidisciplinary research teams using data from the contributor sections of 11,743 articles publishedConference in PNAS in aat five a year Glance period (2013-2017; ...... 70% of all PNAS articles published...... in that period). 10 JournalFeatured article contributor Keynote sections and report Plenary what type ofPanels...... labor each author performed—they identify,...... for 14 instance, who designed experiments, performed experiments, analyzed data, or wrote the paper. Contributor sections have become increasingly common in scienceSIGs...... and medical journals as a way of designating credit and discouraging...... ghost and gift authorship. 28 LarivièreDetailed et al. (2016) Daily analyze Schedule contributor sections...... for PLOS articles, introducing...... a metric of evenness 30 for how evenly labor is distributed between authors of papers in different disciplines. Our study extends those findings by tagging author contributions by their individualWorkshop disciplinary Abstracts...... affiliation rather than discipline of the paper, and by using the link between authors’ 38 disciplinary identities and types of labor performed to study common patterns of interdisciplinary division of labor in research teams. Panel Abstracts...... 42 First we refine the evenness measure and examine its implications. On our analysis, a team with a more even division of labor is one thatOral has a higherAbstracts percentage ...... of authors contributing to several tasks. In contrast, a team with a “parceled” 52 division of labor is one where contributors have distinct tasks, as on an assembly line. The evenness of the division of labor can be reported as the average of the numberPoster of tasks Abstracts of its contributing ...... authors. We demonstrate a significant correlation between team size 106 and average evenness, and we report on both team size and average evenness according to article subject category. Applied mathematics and computer science, for instance,SciTS have Awards smaller team ...... sizes and greater average evenness, while genetics and immunology have 119 larger team sizes and a more parceledUnconference division of labor. OurDetails analysis ...... also compares the evenness scores for ...... papers in different subject 119 categories when team size is taken into account. Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 120 We then use novel automated processes to study the division of labor in multidisciplinary teams. From our initial dataset, we hone in on two Postsubsets: Conference 1) those with teams Evaluation including both biologistsInformation...... and engineers, and 2) those with...... teams including 120 both social scientists and non-social scientists. Controlling for team size (see above), we draw out implications from our data for the understanding of division of labor in teams that fit these interdisciplinary profiles. Existing metrics of interdisciplinary integration (e.g. Porter & Rafols 2009) report the degree to which a corpus of articles in a research area cite outside their research area and how far away they cite. Our procedures shows how linking affiliation data with contributor data can supplement these metrics to provide a picture of common patterns of division of labor in teams meeting various interdisciplinary profiles.

Do Interdisciplinary Researchers Tend to Join Teams? Dr. Kevin M. Kniffin, Cornell University; Dr. Andrew S. Hanks, The Ohio State University

Interdisciplinary researchers can be reasonably characterized as conducting work that spans the boundaries of traditional disciplines. It is an open question, though, whether interdisciplinarians themselves are prone to span boundaries interpersonally by participating in teams. While substantial bibliometric work has been completed on the pathways of interdisciplinary research products (as reviewed by Kniffin and Hanks, 2017), we will focus on the people conducting research to explore the degree to which interdisciplinarians are more or less likely to participate in teamwork.

Teamwork is interesting to examine in relation to whether someone conducts interdisciplinary research since there is evidence of countervailing trends. In our own research, for example, we have found that STEM doctoral graduates who participate in teams tend to

2019 SciTS Conference Program 99 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

earnDear significantly SciTS 2019 higher participants, salaries (Kniffin and Hanks, 2018) while our analysis of near-term outcomes for all doctoral graduates in the United States from 2010 suggests that interdisciplinarians are penalized in the labor market for at least the year after earning the PhD. Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference,In order to address the our 10th focal question,annual wegathering looked at theof individuals2006 National Scienceand groups Foundation’s (NSF) Survey of Doctorate Recipients interested(SDR) – a longitudinal in studying, panel that practicing, is matched andwith responses facilitating to the team NSF’s science. Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED) – since the 2006 wave Thisuniquely meeting asked respondents is also the to indicate first theSciTS degree conference to which they since participated formation in teamwork with others. We find (with N = 2,748) that ofpeople the who International conducted interdisciplinary Network for dissertations the Science were –of controlling Team Science for discipline and demographic variables as well as employment sector (industry, education, and government) – significantly more likely to be part of teams with (a) others who are part of different (INSciTS),organizations ina theprofessional United States societyor (b) others advancing who are part related of an institution interests outside in of the United States. In contrast, interdisciplinary dissertatorsteam science. were not significantly more likely to be part of teams on-site or across units within their own organizations.

OurThe research conference provides leadership important baselines team for—myself, future studies Dr. t hatStephanie will examine E. the question of whether interdisciplinary researchers Vasko,tend to have Dr. – Julieover longer Thompson career spans Klein, – more and varied Megghan outcomes Honke than mono-disciplinary Seidel— researchers. For example, bibliometric hasresearch worked suggests closely that interdisciplinary with the SciTS research 2019 products Planning are more Committee likely to be “sleepy and beauties”the INSciTS or “late boardbloomers” to (e.g.,design Ke et a al., conference2015) while our thatresearch builds will help on informexisting whether research a comparable and practicepattern exists strengths for the individuals while alsowho conduct pointing early-career in exciting new interdisciplinary research. directions. References One ofKniffin, our aims K. M., andfor Hanks,SciTS A. S.2019 2017. is Antecedents to demonstrate and Near-T howerm Consequences team science for Interdisciplinary animates Dissertators. and propels Scientomet rics, 111: research1225-1250. in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to  Kniffin, K. M., and Hanks, A. S. 2018. The Tradeoffs of Teamwork among STEM Doctoral Graduates. In Press, American Psychologist. feature Ke, for Q., the Ferrara, first E., time Radicchi, panels F., & Flammini, focusing A. (2015). on Indigenous Defining and identifying approa Sleepingches to Beauties team in science science. Proceedings and collaborative of the National approachesAcademy in of agriculture Sciences, 112(24), and 7426-7431. natural resources.

SpectaclesOther values of Inquiry: drive Perspective-T SciTS 2019aking as andwell. Interdisciplinary Diversity and Values inclusion have been fundamental commitments Dr.in ourLisa planning,Osbeck, University driving of Westour Georgiacalls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, Thewe talkhave is organized worked around to ensure discussion a “green” of perspective conference, taking as angiving epistemic you activity the option or practice, of anone onlineespecially program important ratherin interdisciplinarythan a printed communities. one and Iworking first distinguish to reduce several foodsenses waste. of perspective And asthat the have primary emerged inhost, contemporary the MSU scholarship Center: disciplinaryfor Interdisciplinarity perspective, perspective seeks toas createframework opportunities within a discipline, to andrefine perspective thinking as personalabout collaborationor cultural identification. and cross- I suggest thatdisciplinary controversies research, surrounding education, the idea that andknowledge training. is perspectiv al stem in part from a conflation of different senses of perspective, as well as from the assumption that a researcher is hopelessly locked within a given perspective and unable to transcend it. As a corrective,We hope I offerthat a you view haveof perspective-taking an excellent as timean intentional in Lansing effort to while transcend you a enjoy given epistemic SciTS 2019.vantage Lansingpoint and to has imaginatively an occupyactive a downtown different vantage with point, restaurants, by means of localwhich theart researcher shops, running can trade trails,one set andof epistemic local constraintscommunity or limitations classes fo suchr another set. As an intentional act of this kind, problem-solving is valuable in innovative interdisciplinary science communities because it encouragesas kickboxing the ability and to pottery.navigate strategically Please consult between theviewpoints website for in for the moreinterests detailed of a given information. problem-solving goal and in response to the complexity and demands of a phenomenon. Second, at the level of interaction, perspective-taking can facilitate communication Ifbetween you have researchers any questionsfrom different or disciplinary comments backgrounds for the and SciTS enable 2019 anticipation Planning of what Committee, is needed for effective please collaborati look foron. those of us with red ribbons on our name badges. I will offer an illustration of the importance of perspective taking in interdisciplinary science settings with reference to an analysis of interviewMichael transcripts O’Rourke with bioengineering scientists, in the context of a multidisciplinary investigation of cognitive and learning practices in four different research laboratory contexts, on which I collaborated with the ethnographic study’s principal investigators. One finding fromChair, the 2019study was Science that researchers of Team from Science divergent Conference science backgrounds (e.g., engineering and biology) or different skill sets (e.g., experimenting and computational modeling) expressed different views about priorities in problem-solving and revealed implicit hierarchies, with some practices viewed as more consistent with a researcher’s view of “good science.” On the other hand, our team found that researchers also displayed the ability to adopt perspectives different from that with which they started through concerted effort and targeted educational experiences. Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 100 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

AfterWelcome offering these ...... illustrations, I emphasize that a proper understanding of perspective taking is one 2 that establishes it as a practice that functions to enhance knowledge of complex phenomena and facilitate innovative strategies in collaborative problem-solving. I will endINSciTS by exploring whatBoard is required ...... to cultivate perspective-taking in interdisciplinary...... settings. 3 Planning Committee ...... 7 A Team Science Approach to Advance the Understanding of Low Back Pain Dr. FacilityJacek Cholewicki Map, Michigan ...... State University; Dr. John M. Popovich, Jr.,...... MSU Center for Orthoped 8ic Research, MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine; Ms. Angela S. Lee, MSU Center for Orthopedic Research, MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine; Mr. Payam AminpourSession, Community Evaluation Sustainability, Information College of Agricultur ...... e & Natural Resources, Michigan...... State University 9 ; Dr. Steven Gray, Community Sustainability, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, Michigan State Univeristy; Dr. Paul W. Hodges, School of HealthConference & Rehabilitation at Sciences, a Glance The University ...... of Queensland ...... 10 INTRODUCTION:Featured AmongKeynote health and disorders Plenary contributing Panels...... to the global burden of disease, low...... back pain 14 (LBP) is a leading cause of disability. Like other persistent pain conditions, LBP is increasingly recognized as a multifactorial problem involving biological, psychologicalSIGs...... and social factors. It is difficult to fully appreciate the complexity...... of LBP because the knowledge 28 necessary to do so spans many areas of expertise. Indeed, perspectives differ between LBP experts and diverse treatments, supported with variable evidence,Detailed are offered. Daily This Schedule is not surprising, ...... considering theoretical foundations ...... and emphases vary 30among disciplines, and these experts (e.g., researchers and clinicians) may have different “mental models” of what and how various factors relate to LBP. A novel wayWorkshop to integrate the Abstracts...... interdisciplinary knowledge shared among various stakeholders is a team science 38 approach using collaborative modeling. This study used this approach with a multidisciplinary team of experts to build a model to enhance understanding of the LBP problem.Panel Abstracts...... 42

METHODS:Oral Abstracts Participants who ...... have contributed significant knowledge to the area of LBP (e.g., publications, 52 contributions to societies, etc.),Poster were selectively Abstracts recruited ...... for this study. Each participant underwent a structured one-on-one interview 106 to construct a fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) (Mental Modeler software, www.mentalmodeler.org) representing his/her understanding of how factors related to LBPSciTS interact andAwards affect patient ...... outcomes (pain, disability and quality of life). This process involved nomination 119 of factors contributing to patients’ outcomes and the weighting of the connections (strength of the effect) between these factors. All individual FCMs were then integratedUnconference into one meta-model Details (Gephi ...... software, www.gephi.org). Factors in the...... meta-model were grouped 119 into 10 categories: Nociceptive Detection & Processing, Behavioral/Lifestyle, Tissue Injury/Pathology, Social/Work/Contextual, Psychological, Comorbidities,Thanks Biomechanical,to our Reviewers Individual Factors, ...... Outcomes, and Treatment. To determine...... the importance 120 of each factor expressed in the meta-model, centrality was computed as: Centrality = sum|weight of connections in|+sum|weight of connections out|, where the weightPost determines Conference the strength Evaluation of the connection. Information...... Based on this definition, centrality is proportional...... to120 the number of connections to and from the specific factor in the meta-model, as well as by the weighting of these connections.

RESULTS: From 38 invited experts, 29 (76%) agreed to participate. They represented nine disciplines and eight countries (Basic Science (n=3), Chiropractic (n=4), Orthopedic Surgery (n=2), Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (n=2), Physical Therapy (n=10), Psychology (n=2), Exercise Science (n=1), Biomechanics (n=3), and Epidemiology (n=2)). The meta-model, that integrated the understanding of LBP of all participants, consisted of 145 factors and 2,233 connections representing interactions among these factors. “Psychology” emerged as the most central category in the meta-model, followed by “Biomechanics” and “Social/Work/Contextual” categories.

DISCUSSION: The integration of 29 FCMs, representing diverse participants’ views of LBP dynamics, resulted in a meta-model that was extremely complex, but still feasible to produce meaningful interpretations. This approach could provide the framework for a larger, community-wide platform for further development and refinement of this meta-model. Such a meta-model could then be used to simulate other “what if” scenarios, to identify gaps in knowledge, and to inform new essential research directions to ultimately improve patient care and outcomes for LBP.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 101 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

Dear SciTS 2019 participants, CREATIVE APPROACHES TO SUPPORT TEAM SCIENCE IN ACADEMIA Moderator: Dayan Ranwala, Medical University of South Carolina Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) UsingConference, Collaborative the Design10th annual to Align gatheringInstitutional ofIncentives individuals and Interdisciplinary and groups Team Expectations: The Case of Reappointment,interested in studying,Tenure, and practicing, Promotion and facilitating team science. ThisDr. Veronica meeting Stanich is ,alsoMr. Gabriel the first Harp , AllianceSciTS conferencefor the Arts in Re sincesearch formation Universities (a2ru) of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS),As universities aincreasingly professional encourage society interdisciplinary advancing collaboration related andinterests team-based in science, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure team(RPT) policies science. must be retooled to better align with shifting practices and institutional values. The Alliance for the Arts in Research Universities (a2ru) supports the integration of the arts, humanities, and design into the Theinterdisciplinary, conference collaborative leadership research team fabric —myself, of universities. Dr. A2RU Stephanie built a two-day E. workshop, grounded in insights derived from 600 Vasko,interviews Dr. with Julie faculty Thompson and administrators Klein, at 38and research Megghan universities, Honke to support Seidel— faculty and academic leaders who are charged with hasRTP policy.worked closely with the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee and the INSciTS board to design a conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new directions.This workshop transforms a2ru research insights into a unique, immersive experience that builds knowledge in three ways: 1) Participants acquire understanding and new frameworks to guide their work on their own campuses. 2) Workshop teams co-create tangible, portable tools that become vehicles for the dissemination of better RTP practices. 3) a2ru observations of workshop Oneprocesses, of our coupled aims with for participant SciTS 2019feedback, is toinform demonstrate future workshop how iterations team as science well as further animates research. and Critical propels elements of the researchworkshop’s research-basedin environmental content science, and design agriculture, enable all three and types natural of knowledge resources. creation. To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative approachesFor example, consistent in agriculture with previous and scholarship, natural resources. we find a recurring theme in the need to render explicit the unspoken expectations, assumptions, and definitions involved in the RTP process. With the user in mind, the workshop experience strategically organizes such Otherrelevant valuesresearch driveinsights SciTS according 2019 to the as approach well. Diversity to RTP (institutional and inclusion or individual), have the been key players fundamental (administrators commitments and/or faculty), inand our the stageplanning, of the RTPdriving process. our In calls the resulting for participation, matrix, users can invited identify presentations, their own situations and and therebyfee structure. connect to In germa addition,ne issues. we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather thanThe choice a printed to mobilize one research and working insights in to a workshopreduce formatfood waste.allows for And the benefits as the of primary experiential host, learning, the as MSU well as Center knowledge- forsharing Interdisciplinarity among a community seeks of peers. to Structural create choicesopportunities for the wo torkshop refine amplify thinking these positive about ou collaborationtcomes. Rather than and positionin cross-g disciplinaryparticipants as passiveresearch, recipients education, of information, and the training. workshop is structured as a design sprint. This format augments the research-in- translation-to-practice experience, engaging participants as “makers.” We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an activeIn addition downtown to shaping participants’ with restaurants, experience localof the workshop,art shops, the runningdesign sprint trails, inherently and resultslocal incommunity creation—each classes small gr oupsuch of participants collaboratively creates a practical tool to support the RTP process. Such tools can be shared and disseminated, thereby as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information. extending workshop insights to a broader community of impact. a2ru actively supports this process, producing and distributing the best of these team-developed tools such as "What’s Next?" a card deck to facilitate personal research planning as well as mentor-mentee Ifdialogue. you have Likewise, any a2ru questions makes available or comments the "Implicit/Explicit" for the SciTScard deck 2019 used inPlanning the workshop Committee, to surface unspoken please understandi look for ngsthose of ofRTP us policy with and red indicate ribbons next steps.on our name badges.

Michaela2ru research O’Rourke team members act as participant-observers at workshops and actively gather feedback from participants, gleaning new Chair,insights from2019 the Science process. of Team Science Conference

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 102 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Table of Contents Oral Abstracts

Mcubed:Welcome A Token-Based ...... Seed Funding Program with No Formal Scientific Review 2 Dr. INSciTSValerie Johnson Board, Dr. Mark ...... Burns, University of Michigan ...... 3 FoundedPlanning by faculty Committee at the University ...... of Michigan in 2012, Mcubed stimulates innovative...... research and 7 scholarship by distributing real- time seed funding to transdisciplinary faculty trios, or “cubes.” Teams can secure $15,000 or $60,000 right away, keeping pace with the Facilityrapid information Map flow ...... in today’s research environment. Through the program’s...... prior two cycles, a8 six-year, $27 million investment from U-M and its faculty members has yielded nearly $130 million in external funding, more than 320 publications, roughly 50 artistic andSession scholarly products Evaluation and 20 invention Information disclosure reports ...... or patents. To date, Mcubed...... has distributed 9 funding to 648 faculty teams, with more cubes forming each month in its current (and third) cycle. For the first time, Mcubed now includes all three University of MichiganConference campuses—Ann at aArbor, Glance Dearborn, ...... and Flint—with 7000 faculty members...... in its online platform. 10 MCubedFeatured has been Keynotefeatured in venues and suchPlenary as Science Panels...... (website), The Washington Post, and...... The Chronicle 14 of Higher Education, and Reuters has twice recognized the University of Michigan system as one of the most innovative university in the world, in part due to the McubedSIGs...... program. What’s distinctive about Mcubed, and what enables...... its speedy distribution of team 28 funding, is its substitution of a token-based online peer review system for traditional scientific review. While the lack of a formal scientific review process might appearDetailed risky, this Dailydeparture Schedule actually de-risks ...... institutional investments. As recent...... studies have shown, 30 review panels are typically challenged to distinguish the excellent proposals from the passable ones. Mcubed eliminates this step. Instead of investing in only a handfulWorkshop of proposals Abstracts...... determined to be the “cream of the crop” from a lengthy proposal submission and 38 review process, it spreads a smaller level of funding out among teams of researchers self-selected in a novel, real-time peer-to-peer review process. The result is an excellentPanel returnAbstracts...... on investment and a much healthier research climate. 42

In thisOral presentation, Abstracts we will ...... share strategies for the program’s implementation across the three U-M campuses,52 discuss the impact of the Posterprogram, and Abstracts explore implications ...... for evaluation and funding of transdisciplinary teams in the broader 106 research landscape. WorkingSciTS with Awards your Rese arch...... Development Office to Support Team Science 119 Dr. Betsy Rolland, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Dr. Holly Falk-Krzesinski, Elsevier Unconference Details ...... 119 As team science expands in size and scope, investigators struggle to build teams and write proposals that implement the principles of teamThanks science and to take our advantage Reviewers of what we ...... know about making teams work. Outside...... of the NIH-supported 120 Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) institutions, few universities have resources specifically devoted to fostering and facilitating interdisciplinary researchPost teams Conference or writing proposals Evaluation that give more Information...... than perfunctory attention to how the team...... will function. 120 As funding agencies integrate team-science review criteria into their funding opportunities, the burgeoning field of Research Development seeks to fill this gap by helping Principal Investigators develop a deeper understanding of the published funding announcements and these special review criteria, while also distilling the field of team-science research into actionable goals and objectives, personnel, and institutional infrastructure to support complex proposals.

The goal of this session is to help team-science leaders understand how best to work with their institutional Research Development teams to submit winning proposals that will result in high-functioning teams. Drawing upon our experience facilitating team science and creating institutional team science services and resources, we will cover:  What is Research Development and how can RD professionals play a role in facilitating Team Science?  What services do RD professionals offer?  What are the key praxis concepts from the Science of Team Science that can help you foster and support multidisciplinary research team?  How are funding agencies assessing your proposal’s team-science components and using special review criteria to encourage inclusion of team-science support in proposals?  What types of research infrastructure should institutions offer to support complex teams?

2019 SciTS Conference Program 103 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org 2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Oral Abstracts

Agbioscience:Dear SciTS transdisciplinary2019 participants, collaboration and the land-grant university mission in the 21st century Dr. Julie Aldridge, The Ohio State University Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) AgbioscienceConference, is identified the 10th as annuala significant gathering source of scientificof individuals innovation and and economicgroups opportunity at land-grant state agricultural experimentinterested stations in studying, (SAES) throughout practicing, the Un andited facilitatingStates. The impact team of science. agbioscience has been the subject of multiple analyses and Thisreports meeting from private is research also the entities, first but SciTS a search conference for the term insince online formation databases produces few to no results. The goal of this study ofwas the to use International an accepted and Network established for research the Science method toof investigate Team Science agbioscience for the perspective of experts who are involved in the activity. This study used the Delphi method to develop a definition for agbioscience, explore the differences between (INSciTS),agbioscience and a professional agricultural science, society identify advancing agbioscience related research interests needs and priorities,in and provide insight on how to better prepare teamfuture contributors science. to the field. The expert panel for this study consisted of leadership from SAES and university extension’s agriculture and natural resources (ANR) program. Participants represented the Southern, North Central, and 1890’s land-grant university regions. TheIn addition conference to consensus leadership on an agbioscience team —myself, definition, the Dr. panel Stephanie emphasized E. the need for transdisciplinary, collaborative approaches Vasko,to real-world Dr. problem Julie Thompsonsolving and identified Klein, a and skills Megghandeficit in agricultural Honke science Seidel— program graduates and practitioners. Students need hasto learn worked through closelypractice how with to collaboratethe SciTS beyond 2019 the Planning land-grant Committeesystem’s existing and disciplinary the INSciTS boundaries. board Practitioners to design need a professionalconference development that builds programs on existing to help them research develop andthese practiceskills. Another strengths major theme while to emergealso pointing is the need in to exciting communicate new the value of agbioscience research with the public. Agbioscience generalists would have the potential to not only break through academic boundaries,directions. but also to reconnect science-based agriculture with society at large. Currently, students and practitioners are locked inside an academic discipline model created in the mid-nineteenth century. As one Delphi panel expert stated, “the status quo is self- fulfilling”.One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to Rethinkingfeature for Science the first as a timeVocation: panels 100 Yearsfocusing of Bureaucratization on Indigenous of Academicapproaches Science to team science and collaborative Dr.approaches John P. Walsh in, Georgiaagriculture Institute and of Technology natural resources.; You-Na Lee, National University of Singapore Science has long been characterized as a craft practice, and even as a vocation. However, science is increasingly becoming a team activity.Other Wevalues argue drive that scientific SciTS teams 2019 are as becoming well. Diversity bureaucratized and with inclusion larger size: have characterized been fundamental by division of labor, commitments standardization,in our planning, hierarchy driving and decentralization.our calls for participation,Furthermore, we developinvited this presentations, argument to show and how fee this structuralstructure. change In addition, can affect thewe training have andworked careers to of ensure scientists a at “green” the individual conference, level and also giving performance you the at the option team level. of an We online will discuss program the trai ningrather and careersthan a of printed scientists, one the roleand of working new data analyticsto reduce technologies, food waste. the relations And asbetween the primarybureaucratization host, theand institutionalMSU Center environment, particularlyfor Interdisciplinarity competition for funding,seeks andto createthe implications opportunities for scientific to creativity, refine thinkingand for pathologies about collaboration in science. and cross- disciplinary research, education, and training. We then review a series of empirical studies we have conducted in this area to show the degree of bureaucratization and its effects on the work, careers and products of science. We find that larger size is associated with greater bureaucratization in the team and that We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an over the last several decades there has been an increase in supporting scientists (those who are never lead authors). We find that divisionactive ofdowntown labor is associated with restaurants, with greater productivity local art in theshops, lab for runningthose doing trails, applied and research, local but community less productivity classes for those such doing basicas kickboxing research. Furthermore, and pottery. we find Please that division consult of labor the is websiteassociated for with more greater detailed novelty in theinformation. publications, but also with greater likelihood of retractions. Hence, we can see the two faces of the bureaucratization of scientific teams. If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those Weof us conclude with redwith aribbons discussion on of ourthe implications name badges. of these theories and findings and develop a set of policy recommendations and outline a research agenda designed to develop science policies and a sociology of science that match this shift from vocation to bureaucracy in science. In particular, we argue that PIs need to decide the extent to which they will encourage “cross-training” in their Michael O’Rourke teams, versus specialization. And, similarly, the extent to which the lines of communication will be hierarchical versus more cross- cutting.Chair, Concerns2019 Science about productivity of Team may Science push labs Conference toward more bureaucratic structures, including early specialization of graduate students, and more hierarchical structures where students report to post-docs and post-docs report to PIs. But, university labs have the dual function of producing science and producing scientists. There may be tradeoffs in these two goals, and PIs may want to think about the tradeoffs when organizing their research teams. Similarly, university career structures need to change in order to accommodate the growth of supporting scientists, with new positions, new career paths and new evaluation and reward structures that are matched to theLansing changing orCenterganization WIFI of scientific Information work. - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 104 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Poster Abstracts PoTablester Aofb Contentsstracts

Welcome4.1. Cross-disciplinaryImproving ...... Human-Lion Integration Conflict in Rese FDAarch Team Through Science Interdisciplinarity 2 Mr.Ms. KevinJacalyn Bugin Beck, George, Dr. Maria Washington Claudia LopezUniversity, Mr. Tutilo Mudumba, Dr. Robert Montgomery, Michigan State University INSciTS Board ...... 3 TheWicked Food socio-ecological and Drug Administration problems are(FDA) inherently is responsible complex for and assessing require anthe interdisciplinary safety and effectiveness approach of to new mitigate. drug Here,products we Planningbeforeinvestigated they Committee can the bemany legally drivers marketed...... of human-lion and used conflict in clinical in East practice. Africa Thisand ...... ispresent a critical a novel translational conceptual 7 activity model on illustratingthe biomedical the researchintricate interactions continuum. withinIn order and to betweenconduct thesethe five assessments, main dimensions the FDA of conflict. forms teams We highlight of varying the degreesimportance of cross-disciplinarity, of broadening Facilityrangingresearch Map from efforts multi-disciplinary...... to include these to multipletrans-disciplinary. dimensions A atknowledge all stages...... gap of the exists research regarding process how as these8 well cross-disciplinary as to incorporate teamshigher operate,levels of diversityspecifically into their research integrative teams. capacity We offer and examples processes, and which recommendations hampers the FDA’son how ability to approach to develop human-lion practical conflict Sessionguidelinesfrom a moreEvaluation to interdisciplinarypromote the Information team perspective. effectiveness However, ...... of its assess challengesments exist and andevaluate will...... continue the success to arise of9 interventions as diverse interdisciplinary to promote cross-disciplinaryteams form. We address integration. several To addressmain barriers this gap, to interdisciplinarity a mixed-methods, and comparative encourage caseresearchers study design and institutions will be used to supportto explain a Conferencecross-disciplinaryteam science atapproach aintegration Glance to solving of FDA...... wicked teams. ecological This study problems will leverage like human-lion the ...... theoretical conflict. framework 10 of integration postulated by O’Rourke, Crowley and Gonnerman in 2015, which includes evaluable parameters related to the integration process, both Featured2. quantitativeMeasuring Keynote and Interdisciplin qualitative. and Characterizing Plenaryary Skills Panels...... the Acquisition cross-disciplinary integration process...... using 14this framework permits the Dr.purposeful Stefanie selection Blain-Moraes of FDA, Dr. teams Christopher with high Moraes and low, McGill integration University; for a comparisonDr. Rob Gorbet of the, University skills, abilities of Waterloo and practices at the SIGs...... team level that can be used to inform practical guidelines to ...... promote effective cross-disciplinary 28 integration. Across North America, educators are experimenting with different approaches to educating interdisciplinary scholars. This is Detaileddriven by Daily factors Schedulesuch as increased ...... demand for interdisciplinary research...... to support policy decisions,30 and the growing need 5. forStrategies individuals withto Promote the skills necessary Effectiv toe analyze Student and addressResearch complex Teams societal in problems Undergraduate which demand Science the contribution Labs of Dr. Kendra Spence Cheruvelil, Ms. Angela De Palma-Dow, Michigan State University; Dr. Karl A. Smith, Purdue University Workshopseveral disciplines Abstracts...... (i.e., “wicked” problems). However, despite broad recognition of the importance 38 of interdisciplinarity, and University of Minnesota there is no consensus on the specific skill set required to achieve interdisciplinary thinking, and how to teach and assess Panel Abstracts...... 42 theseMany scienceskills. labs make use of student teams. However, many students resist working in teams, often for good reasons OralbasedConsidering Abstracts on prior the experiences. fact ...... that different Although disciplines instructors subscribe struggle to diwithfferent how knowledge to help student paradigms teams leadsbe 52 effective, us naturally effective to identify teams onein sciencehigh-level labs skill are required achievable. of an We“interdisciplinarian” increased student as learningthat of knowledge and satisfaction integration—the when working ability in toresearch integrate teams across by: knowledg 1) e Posterparadigms.including Abstracts a teamwork To do this, ...... learning especially objective in a collaborative in the syllabus interdisciplinary “to practice effective team, requires teamwork appreciation, and team 106 management,understanding, including and comfortmodeling with behaviors differences of inclusion in language, and ethics, methods, and evidence, using leadership and beliefs. skills Learningto foster problemthe skills solving, of knowledge team communication, integration has more SciTStoconflict do, Awards then, management, with exercising...... consensus empathy, building, humility, and and idea valuing generation” other andviewpoints 2) designing than it and does implementing intellectual 119 growth. exercises We that use teach Bloom’s Affectivestudents whyTaxonomy they should as a frameworkwork in a team to create and howa concrete to be pa andrt of effective an effective tool tostudent identify team associated (e.g., developing learning objectives shared and Unconferenceassessexpectations, students’ norms progressionDetails of behavior, ...... in this and key team interdisciplinary culture; building skill. aw areness...... of why team conflict 119 is important and likely student responses to such conflict). We also used individual and team reflections of team functioning following formal team Thanks3. assessment.The CyberAmbassador to our We Reviewerswill presents pre-/post-test Training ...... dataProgram demonstrating student ...... attitudes and beliefs 120 regarding teamwork and the detailsMs. Astri of Briliyantiour curricular, Dr. Dirk innovations. Colbry, Dr. These Katy changesLuchini Colbry resulted, Dr. in Julieimproved Rojewski student, Mr. satisfaction TJ Van Nguyen and ,success Michigan and State reduced University Postinstructor Conference guesswork andEvaluation stress regarding Information...... student teams...... 120 Our project aims to provide training for CI professionals, with the goal of developing “CyberAmbassadors” who are prepared 6. toMotivation, lead multidisciplinary, Threat, computationally-intensive and Engagement Intensityresearch at theirin Cross-Disciplinary home institutions. It has theHealth, following Biomedical, objectives: (1) Develop Curriculum that focuses on professional skills (communications, teamwork, leadership) within the context of large scale,Policy, multi-disciplinary and Education computational Teams: research; Pilot (2)Analysis Pilot, Evaluate and Revise the curriculum; (3) “Train the Trainers” by Ms. Patricia Deyo, Ms. Ellen Cook, Mr. Kevin Bugin, Ms. Melissa Gentry, Ms. Landria Sheffey, Ms. Leocadia Conlon, Dr. collaborating with external partners. Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, George Washington University During our first year, we have focused on curriculum development. We launched our first curriculum, and explored different This is a second phase mixed methods study that follows original research to test a psychometric tool, the Motivation training modalities: face-to-face vs. online; short vs. longer sessions. Using a Kirkpatrick model of evaluation, we focused on Assessment for Team Readiness, Integration, and Collaboration (MATRICx) (Lotrecchiano et al., 2016; Mallinson et al., participants’ reaction and learning. Our initial result shows that participants were highly satisfied with our curriculum. Their 2016), that assesses motivations and threats collaboration in health and biomedical teams. The aim of this study is to understanding and skills regarding the specific topics that we taught increased. Additionally, we found that the Video investigate the relationship between motivations, threats, degrees of engagement, and satisfaction of human need among Conferencing method had more advantages compared to the face-to-face method to participants. They suggested that such team members working in established knowledge producing teams. a mode is more convenient for busy people, enables the trainers to reach a wider base of people, and provides a more Arelaxed mixed environment. methods comparative Our participants analysis have study indicated is being that conducted. online learning The qualitative can be asmethod effective being as usedin-person is semi-structured meetings.In this in- personposter, weinterviews introduce with our individual curriculum members and offer of preliminaryknowledge producingresearch data teams. from Following our ongoing the interview,evaluation participants efforts. We arewill askedalso to completediscuss how the thisMATRICx feedback instrument, is shaping which changes utilizes we quantitative are implementing methods. in the Data curriculum. from the qualitative interviews will be triangulated with the quantitative survey data to support further interpretation of the meaning of the constructs of the MATRICx. An initial pilot of one teams qualitative data was completed in spring 2019.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 105 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Pos SciTSter Ab Conferencestracts Pos Welcometer Abstr a cts

4. Cross-disciplinary Integration in FDA Team Science Dear SciTSMr.Based Kevin on2019 Buginpreliminary participants,, George analysis Washington from coding University of the initial four interviews, several findings can be deduced. A total of 85 codes were identified across one team. Three codes were identified across all four participants which included collaboration, role WelcomeThedefinition, toFood the and 2019 Drugcollegial. ScienceAdministration Prioritization, of Team(FDA) meeting is Science responsible schedules, (SciTS) for and assessing team identity the safety were and also effectiveness frequently used of new codes drug across products three of Conference,beforethe four they theinterviews. can 10th be legallyThereannual weremarketed gathering an additional and used of 39 inindividuals codesclinical that practice. were and onlyThis groups usedis a critical one time translational across the activity interviews. on the Additional biomedical researchanalysis willcontinuum. be conducted In order to determineto conduct ifthese these assessments, individual code thes shouldFDA forms remain teams independent of varying or degrees recoded of through cross-disciplinarity, the iterative interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. rangingcoding process. from multi-disciplinary to trans-disciplinary. A knowledge gap exists regarding how these cross-disciplinary teams This meetingoperate, specificallyis also the their first integrative SciTS capacity conference and proces sinceses, which formation hampers the FDA’s ability to develop practical of the InternationalguidelinesSince this studyto promote hasNetwork only the analyzedteam for effectiveness the a subset Science of of data, its of assess dataTeam collectionments Science and and evaluate analysis the will success continue of interventionsas the research to promote team (INSciTS),cross-disciplinarycontinues. a professional Coding integration. will continue society To as address anadvancing iterative this gap,process related a mixed-methods, following interests the methods comparative in outlines case for study the study design to willensure be used intercoder to explain team science.cross-disciplinaryreliability and continuation integration of thematicof FDA teams. analysis This as study more will data leverage is analyzed. the theoretical Once qualitative framework data of is integration analyzed andpostulated quantitative by O’Rourke,data is collected, Crowley merging and Gonnerman and integration in 2015, of the which data includes will occur. evaluable parameters related to the integration process, both The conferenceReferencesquantitative andleadership qualitative. team Characterizing —myself, the cross-discipDr. Stephanielinary integration E. process using this framework permits the purposeful selection of FDA teams with high and low integration for a comparison of the skills, abilities and practices at the Vasko, Lotrecchiano,Dr. Julie G., Thompson Mallinson, T., Leblanc-Beaudoin, Klein, and MegghanT., Schwartz, L., Honke Lazar, D., &Seidel— Falk-Krzesinski, H. (2016). Motivation and threat indicators for teamcollaboration level thatreadiness can inbe knowledge used to informgenerating practical teams (KPTs): guidelines A scoping to promote review and effective domain analysis. cross-disciplinary Heliyon, 2(5), integration.e00105. has workedMallinson, closely T., Lotrecchiano, with G.,the Furniss, SciTS J., Schwartz, 2019 L.,Planning Lazar, D., & Falk-Krzesinski,Committee H. and(2016). the Rasch INSciTS Analysis as aboard method forto designing design a readiness a model for collaboration. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 64(7), 1186-1193 conference5. Strategies that builds to Promote on existing Effectiv researche Student and practiceResearch strengths Teams inwhile Undergraduate also pointing Science in exciting Labs new directions. 7. Dr.The Kendra Economics Spence Cheruvelil of Collaboration, Ms. Angela De at Palma-Dow a Regional, Michigan University State University; Dr. Karl A. Smith, Purdue University and University of Minnesota One ofDr. our Stephen aims Crowleyfor SciTS, Ms. Marisa2019 Richteris to demonstrate, Mr. Archer Ward how, Boise team State scienceUniversity animates and propels researchUniversityMany in scienceenvironmental leadership labs make promotes use science, of thestudent value agriculture, teams. of both However, collaboration and many natural and students interdisciplinary resources. resist working research. To in this teams, Despite end, often wethese for are good efforts pleased reasons to based on prior experiences. Although instructors struggle with how to help student teams be effective, effective teams in featureinterdisciplinary for the first collaborative time panels research focusing remains on the Indigenous exception rather approa than theches rule to at manyteam universities. science andIf the claimscollaborative science labs are achievable. We increased student learning and satisfaction when working in research teams by: 1) approachesadvanced in areagriculture correct there and is a natural'gap' (call resources.it the collaboration gap) between what leadership wants and what researchers do. includingHere we providea teamwork an initial learning report objective on our attemptsin the syllabus to anal “toyze practice the collaboration effective teamwork gap at one and regional team management,university. including modeling behaviors of inclusion and ethics, and using leadership skills to foster problem solving, team communication, Other valuesconflictWe report management, drive the results SciTS ofconsensus interviews 2019 as building, with well. both and Diversity leadership idea generation” andand faculty inclusion and regarding 2) designing have interest andbeen inimplementing and fundamental incentives exercises for interdisciplinarycommitments that teach in our planning,studentsand collaborative why driving they scholarly should our work callsactivity in afor and team participation, attempt and how to make to be sensepainvitedrt of ofan the presentations,effective feedback student we have team and received. (e.g., fee developing structure. We suggest shared Inthat addition, an we haveexpectations,'economic' worked model tonorms ensure of facultyof behavior, a decision “green” and making team conference, culture; that tracks building 'return giving aw onareness youinvestment' theof why option (for team re sources conflictof an issuchonline important as timeprogram and and likely pay-offs rather student such than a responsesasprinted publications) one to such andmakes conflict). working better We sense also to reduceofused the individual collaboration food andwaste. gapteam (at reflectionsAnd the institution as the of team primarywe functioningstudied) host, than following accountsthe MSU formal based Center team on some for Interdisciplinarityassessment.form of ignorance We will (concerningseeks presents to pre-/post-testcreateincentives opportunities for datacollaboration) demonstrating to amongst refine student faculty. thinking attitudes about and beliefs collaboration regarding teamwork and cross- and the details of our curricular innovations. These changes resulted in improved student satisfaction and success and reduced disciplinary research, education, and training. 8. instructorNDNQI®: guesswork Using andBig stress Data regarding to Advance student teams.the Science of Interprofessional Teams Dr. Nancy Dunton, Dr. Teri Kennedy, The University of Kansas Medical Center We 6.hope Motivation, that you haveThreat, an andexcellent Engageme time innt Lansing Intensity while in Cross-Disciplinary you enjoy SciTS 2019. Health, Lansing Biomedical, has an active downtownInterprofessionalPolicy, and with Education practice restaurants, and educationTeams: local is Pilot viewed art shops,Analysis as the holyrunning grail to trails, achieve and the Quadruple local community Aim in healthcare: classes improved such as kickboxingpatient, population, and pottery. price, andPlease practitioner consult outcomes. the website A 2014 scoping for more review detailed found that information. research had not yet demonstrated theMs. impactPatricia of Deyo, IPE, citingMs. Ellen the need Cook, for Mr. systematic Kevin Bugin, research Ms. Melissa to strengthen Gentry, the Ms. evidence Landria base Sheffey, for interprofessional Ms. Leocadia Conlon, team-based Dr. Gaetanocare. R. Lotrecchiano, George Washington University If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us withThisThe Nationalredis a secondribbons Database phase on mixedofour Nursing name methods Quality badges. study Indicators that follows (NDNQI) original ® Survey, research completed to test a psycby 240,000hometric RNs tool, in the2018, Motivation includes Assessmentinterprofessional for Team relationship Readiness, measures Integration, between and RNs Collaborati and physicians,on (MATRICx) APRNs, (Lotrecchiano pharmacists, et therapists, al., 2016; andMallinson social et workers. al., 2016), that assesses motivations and threats collaboration in health and biomedical teams. The aim of this study is to MichaelRNs O’Rourke rated relationships on conflict management skills; respect; assignment of blame for adverse events; shared investigateaccountability; the andrelationship understanding between role motivations,s, knowledge, threats, and skillsdegrees of RNs. of engagement, and satisfaction of human need among Chair, 2019team members Science working of Team in established Science knowledge Conference producing teams. RNs rated “respect for the contributions of RNs” most highly and gave the lowest rating to “colleagues understand the roles, Aknowledge mixed methods and skill comparative of RNs.” Interprofessional analysis study is relationships being conducted. were hiTheghest qualitative on critical method care units,being followedused is semi-structured by ambulatory care. in- personRatings interviews were lowest with in individualthe operating members room andof knowledge perioperative producing units. teams.RNs rated Following their relationships the interview, with participants social workers are asked more to completehighly than the with MATRICx other professions. instrument, Ratingswhich utilizes were lowestquantitative for physicians. methods. Data from the qualitative interviews will be triangulatedLansing with the Centerquantitati veWIFI survey Information data to support - further Username: interpretation scits of the and meaning Password: of the constructs 2019 of the MATRICx.These results An highlightinitial pilot areas of one for teams improvement qualitative in interprofessi data was completedonal healthcare in spring and 2019. demonstrate the promise of big data to advance the science of interprofessional teams in healthcare.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 106 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Poster Abstracts PoTablester Aofb Contentsstracts

Welcome4. Cross-disciplinary ...... Integration in FDA Team Science 2 Mr.Based Kevin on Buginpreliminary, George analysis Washington from coding University of the initial four interviews, several findings can be deduced. A total of 85 codes INSciTSwere identified Board across ...... one team. Three codes were identified across...... all four participants which 3 included collaboration, role Thedefinition, Food and Drugcollegial. Administration Prioritization, (FDA) meeting is responsible schedules, for and assessing team identity the safety were and also effectiveness frequently used of new codes drug across products three of Planningbeforethe four they interviews.Committee can be legallyThere weremarketed...... an additional and used 39 in codesclinical that practice. were onlyThis used...... is a critical one time translational across 7the activity interviews. on the Additional biomedical researchanalysis willcontinuum. be conducted In order to determineto conduct ifthese these assessments, individual code thes shouldFDA forms remain teams independent of varying or degrees recoded of through cross-disciplinarity, the iterative Facilityrangingcoding Map process. from multi-disciplinary...... to trans-disciplinary. A knowledge...... gap exists regarding how these8 cross-disciplinary teams operate, specifically their integrative capacity and processes, which hampers the FDA’s ability to develop practical SessionguidelinesSince this Evaluation studyto promote has only the Information analyzedteam effectiveness a subset ...... of of data, its assess data collectionments and and evaluate analysis...... the will success continue of9 interventionsas the research to promote team cross-disciplinarycontinues. Coding integration. will continue To as address an iterative this gap,process a mixed-methods, following the methods comparative outlines case for study the study design to willensure be used intercoder to explain Conferencecross-disciplinaryreliability and atcontinuation aintegration Glance of thematicof FDA...... teams. analysis This as study more will data leverage is analyzed. the ...... theoretical Once qualitative framework data10 of is integration analyzed andpostulated quantitative by O’Rourke,data is collected, Crowley merging and Gonnerman and integration in 2015, of the which data includes will occur. evaluable parameters related to the integration process, both FeaturedReferencesquantitative Keynote and qualitative. and Characterizing Plenary Panels...... the cross-disciplinary integration process...... using 14this framework permits the Lotrecchiano,purposeful selectionG., Mallinson, of FDAT., Leblanc-Beaudoin, teams with hi ghT., Schwartz,and low integrationL., Lazar, D., for& Falk-Krzesinski, a comparison H. of(2016). the skills,Motivation abilities and th andreat indicatorspractices for at the SIGs...... teamcollaboration level thatreadiness can inbe knowledge used to informgenerating practical teams (KPTs): guidelines A scoping to ...... promote review and effective domain analysis. cross-disciplinary Heliyon, 28 2(5), integration.e00105. Mallinson, T., Lotrecchiano, G., Furniss, J., Schwartz, L., Lazar, D., & Falk-Krzesinski, H. (2016). Rasch Analysis as a method for designing a readiness Detailedmodel for collaboration.Daily Schedule Journal of Investigative ...... Medicine, 64(7), 1186-1193 ...... 30 5. Strategies to Promote Effective Student Research Teams in Undergraduate Science Labs Workshop7. Dr.The Kendra Economics Abstracts...... Spence Cheruvelil of Collaboration, Ms. Angela De at Palma-Dow a Regional, Michigan University State University; Dr. Karl 38 A. Smith, Purdue University and University of Minnesota PanelDr. StephenAbstracts...... Crowley, Ms. Marisa Richter, Mr. Archer Ward, Boise State University 42 UniversityMany science leadership labs make promotes use of thestudent value teams. of both However, collaboration many and students interdisciplinary resist working research. in teams, Despite often these for good efforts reasons Oralbasedinterdisciplinary Abstracts on prior experiences. collaborative ...... Although research instructors remains the struggle exception with rather how to than help the student rule at teams many be universities.52 effective, effectiveIf the claims teams in scienceadvanced labs are are correct achievable. there is We a 'gap' increased (call it studentthe collaboratio learningn andgap) satisfaction between what when leadership working inwants research and whatteams researchers by: 1) do. PosterincludingHere Abstractswe providea teamwork an initial...... learning report objective on our attemptsin the syllabus to anal “toyze practice the collaboration effective teamwork gap at one and regional team 106 management, university. including modeling behaviors of inclusion and ethics, and using leadership skills to foster problem solving, team communication, SciTSconflictWe reportAwards management, the results ...... ofconsensus interviews building, with both and leadership idea generation” and faculty and regarding 2) designing interest and inimplementing and 119 incentives exercises for interdisciplinary that teach studentsand collaborative why they scholarly should work activity in a and team attempt and how to make to be sensepart of ofan the effective feedback student we have team received. (e.g., developing We suggest shared that an Unconferenceexpectations,'economic' model norms Detailsof facultyof behavior, decision ...... and making team culture; that tracks building 'return aw onareness investment'...... of why (for team re sourcesconflict 119 issuch important as time and and likely pay-offs student such responsesas publications) to such makes conflict). better We sense also ofused the individual collaboration and gapteam (at reflections the institution of team we functioningstudied) than following accounts formal based team on some Thanksassessment.form of toignorance our We Reviewerswill (concerning presents pre-/post-testincentives ...... for datacollaboration) demonstrating amongst student faculty...... attitudes and beliefs 120 regarding teamwork and the details of our curricular innovations. These changes resulted in improved student satisfaction and success and reduced Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120 8. instructorNDNQI®: guesswork Using andBig stress Data regarding to Advance student teams.the Science of Interprofessional Teams Dr. Nancy Dunton, Dr. Teri Kennedy, The University of Kansas Medical Center 6. Motivation, Threat, and Engagement Intensity in Cross-Disciplinary Health, Biomedical, Interprofessional practice and education is viewed as the holy grail to achieve the Quadruple Aim in healthcare: improved patient,Policy, population, and Education price, and practitionerTeams: Pilotoutcomes. Analysis A 2014 scoping review found that research had not yet demonstrated theMs. impactPatricia of Deyo, IPE, citingMs. Ellen the need Cook, for Mr. systematic Kevin Bugin, research Ms. Melissa to strengthen Gentry, the Ms. evidence Landria base Sheffey, for interprofessional Ms. Leocadia Conlon, team-based Dr. Gaetanocare. R. Lotrecchiano, George Washington University ThisThe Nationalis a second Database phase mixedof Nursing methods Quality study Indicators that follows (NDNQI) original ® Survey, research completed to test a psycby 240,000hometric RNs tool, in the2018, Motivation includes Assessmentinterprofessional for Team relationship Readiness, measures Integration, between and RNs Collaborati and physicians,on (MATRICx) APRNs, (Lotrecchiano pharmacists, et therapists, al., 2016; andMallinson social et workers. al., 2016),RNs rated that relationshipsassesses motivations on conflict and management threats collaboration skills; respect; in health assignment and biomedical of blame teams. for adverse The aim events; of this shared study is to investigateaccountability; the andrelationship understanding between role motivations,s, knowledge, threats, and skillsdegrees of RNs. of engagement, and satisfaction of human need among team members working in established knowledge producing teams. RNs rated “respect for the contributions of RNs” most highly and gave the lowest rating to “colleagues understand the roles, Aknowledge mixed methods and skill comparative of RNs.” Interprofessional analysis study is relationships being conducted. were hiTheghest qualitative on critical method care units,being followedused is semi-structured by ambulatory care. in- personRatings interviews were lowest with in individualthe operating members room andof knowledge perioperative producing units. teams.RNs rated Following their relationships the interview, with participants social workers are asked more to completehighly than the with MATRICx other professions. instrument, Ratingswhich utilizes were lowestquantitative for physicians. methods. Data from the qualitative interviews will be triangulated with the quantitative survey data to support further interpretation of the meaning of the constructs of the MATRICx.These results An highlightinitial pilot areas of one for teams improvement qualitative in interprofessi data was completedonal healthcare in spring and 2019. demonstrate the promise of big data to advance the science of interprofessional teams in healthcare.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 107 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Pos SciTSter Ab Conferencestracts Pos Welcometer Abstr a cts

9. Engagement Models of Science Communication: Working Tools for Team Researchers at Dear SciTSBased on2019 preliminary participants, analysis from coding of the initial four interviews, several findings can be deduced. A total of 85 codes werethe Microidentified Level across one team. Three codes were identified across all four participants which included collaboration, role Ms. Soraida Garcia, Dr. Laurel Weldon, Dr. Rosalee Clawson, Ms. Allison Roberts, Purdue University, PPRI Welcomedefinition, to the and 2019 collegial. Science Prioritization, of Team meeting Science schedules, (SciTS) and team identity were also frequently used codes across three of Conference,theIt is fourwidely theinterviews. agreed 10th that Thereannual early were involvement gathering an additional with of 39 stakeholders,individuals codes that were and and buildingonly groups used thick one relationships time across betweenthe interviews. researchers Additional and analysiscommunities will be of conductedinterest, dramatically to determine improves if these public individual impact code ands shouldrelevance remain of scientific independent research. or recoded Much ofthrough science the iterative interestedcoding in process. studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. This meetingcommunication is also follows the afirst marketing SciTS mode conferencel for dissemination since of formationresults rather than an engagement model, offering techniques to attract audiences to a completed research project, rather than outlining strategies for early engagement at the of the InternationalSince this study hasNetwork only analyzed for the a subset Science of data, of dataTeam collection Science and analysis will continue as the research team continues.individual researcher Coding will level. continue Even as the an most iterative innovative process models following of sciencethe methods communication- outlines for focusingthe study on to socialensure media, intercoder the arts, (INSciTS),or game a professional playing- often treat society scientific advancing results as a productrelated to interestsbe sold rather in than a process in which to participate. Also, in team science.reliability and continuation of thematic analysis as more data is analyzed. Once qualitative data is analyzed and quantitative datathose is bodies collected, of scholarship merging and that integration are focused of theon engagement,data will occur. actionable models at the micro-level for individual researchers are hard to find. Instead, it tends to focus at the macro-level of administrative policy or university-wide supports and The conferenceenablingReferences structures. leadership We offer team a template —myself, for an engagementDr. Stephanie model E.of science communication that emphasizes relationship- Vasko, Lotrecchiano,buildingDr. Julie and G., Thompsonearly Mallinson, connections T., Leblanc-Beaudoin, Klein, with communitiesand MegghanT., Schwartz, of interest, L., Honke Lazar, at D., the &Seidel— Falk-Krzesinski,stage of problem H. (2016). formation Motivation and and question threat indicators development. for collaborationWe provide readiness several inconcrete knowledge examples generating ofteams interdisciplinary (KPTs): A scoping research review and on domaingrand analysis.challenges Heliyon, to illustrate 2(5), e00105. how models for science has workedMallinson, closely T., Lotrecchiano, with G.,the Furniss, SciTS J., Schwartz, 2019 L.,Planning Lazar, D., & Falk-Krzesinski,Committee H. and(2016). the Rasch INSciTS Analysis as aboard method forto designing design a readiness a on different places in the continuum work. conferencemodel for that collaboration. builds Journal on existing of Investigative research Medicine, 64(7), and 1186-1193 practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new directions. 7.10. The roleEconomics of transdisciplinary of Collaboration healthcare at a Regional teams andUniversity tollgates in quality improvement One ofDr.processes our Stephen aims Crowleyfor SciTS, Ms. Marisa2019 Richteris to demonstrate, Mr. Archer Ward how, Boise team State scienceUniversity animates and propels Dr. Courtney Goetz, Dr. Sukhesh Sudan, Dr. Judy Arnetz, Dr. John vanSchagen, Michigan State University; Dr. William researchBaerUniversity in, Susanenvironmental leadership Hoppough promotes, Mercy science, Healththe value agriculture,St. ofMary’s; both collaboration Dr. Bengtand naturalArnetz and ,interdisciplinary Michigan resources. State research.University To this Despite end, wethese are efforts pleased to featureinterdisciplinary for the first collaborative time panels research focusing remains on the Indigenous exception rather approa than theches rule to at manyteam universities. science andIf the claimscollaborative approachesadvancedDespite in substantial areagriculture correct attent there ion,and is healthcarea natural'gap' (call systems resources.it the collaboratio face severen gap) and betweenrecalcitrant what quality leadership challenges, wants li andke hospital-associated what researchers do. Hereinfections we provide and 30-day an initial readmissions. report on our This attempts suggests to analthat yzethe themultidisciplinary collaboration teamsgap at traditionallyone regional used university. to address and Other valuesimplement drive quality SciTS initiatives 2019 are notas sufficientlywell. Diversity effective. and We purport inclusion that there have needs been to be fundamental a structured process commitments for Weimplementation report the results that promotes of interviews inter- with and both transdisciplinary leadership and team faculty processes. regarding In orderinterest to inachieve and incentives the formation for interdisciplinary of such high- in our planning,andperformance collaborative driving quality scholarly improvement our callsactivity forteams and participation, attempt in healthcare to make systems, senseinvited of we thepresentations, propose feedback the we use have of and tollgates. received. fee structure. TollgatesWe suggest are Inthat process addition, an we have'economic'checkpoints worked model that to ensurefacilitate of faculty an a decision iterative“green” making process conference, that used tracks to ident 'return givingify unit-levelon youinvestment' the drivers option (for of, reandsources of barriers an suchonline to implementation,as timeprogram and pay-offs rather allowi suchng than a asforprinted publications)accurate one adaptations andmakes working better to be sensemade. to reduceof For the each collaboration foodproposed waste. gapintervention, (at And the institution as teams the examine primarywe studied) high- host, than and accounts thelow- performingMSU based Center onunits some and for Interdisciplinarityformidentify of ignorancedrivers and (concerningseeks barriers, to which createincentives can thenopportunities for becollaboration) statistically to amongstverified refine for faculty. thinkingsensitivity andabout specificity. collaboration The accurate, and cross- disciplinarycomprehensive research, identification education, of these and factors training. requires effective collaboration, best achieved via transdisciplinary healthcare 8. qualityNDNQI®: teams. Using We hypothesize Big Data that to inter- Advance and transdisciplinary the Science teams of will Interprofessional be able to identify drivers Teams and barriers more Dr. Nancy Dunton, Dr. Teri Kennedy, The University of Kansas Medical Center We hopeaccurately, that you resulting have in anhigher excellent sensitivity time and specificity in Lansing in proposed while interventions,you enjoy asSciTS well as 2019. better implementationLansing has an outcomes. We plan to study the relationship between team maturity (multi-, inter-, transdisciplinary) and the effectiveness of Interprofessional practice and education is viewed as the holy grail to achieve the Quadruple Aim in healthcare: improved active downtowntollgates at driving with quality restaurants, improvements. local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such as kickboxingpatient, population, and pottery. price, andPlease practitioner consult outcomes. the website A 2014 scoping for more review detailed found that information. research had not yet demonstrated theAcknowledgements: impact of IPE, citingThis study the need was funded for systematic by Contributory research Research to stre Fngthenunds from the Mercyevidence Health base St. Mary’s,for interprofessional Grand Rapids, team-basedMI. care. If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us11. with TheA conceptual Nationalred ribbons Database model on ofour Nursing to name guide Quality badges. planning, Indicators (NDNQI) implementation, ® Survey, completed and evaluation by 240,000 RNs of in 2018, includes interprofessionaltransdisciplinary relationship research measures between RNs and physicians, APRNs, pharmacists, therapists, and social workers. MichaelMs.RNs O’Rourke Sarah rated relationshipsD. Hohl, Dr. Sarah on conflict Knerr management, University of skills; Washington, respect; Fredassignment Hutchinson of blame Cancer for Researchadverse events; Center; shared Dr. Shirley accountability; and understanding roles, knowledge, and skills of RNs. Chair, 2019Beresford Science, University of ofTeam Washington; Science Dr. MarianConference Neuhouser, Dr. Beti Thompson, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center ThisRNs workrated describes“respect for a conceptualthe contributions model of of RNs” determinants most highly and and outcomes gave the of lowesttransdisciplinary rating to “colleagues research. The understand model offers the roles, the publicknowledge health and research skill of RNs.”and practice Interprofessional community relationshipstools to bolster were evaluation highest capacity,on critical advance care units, knowledge, followed byand ambulatory inform efforts care. toRatings conduct were transdisciplinary lowest in the operating research roomto confront and perioperative complex public units. health RNs problems. rated their The relationships model was with developed social workers based on more theoreticalhighly than literaturewith other of professions. transdisciplinary Ratings research were lowestand the for evid physicians.ence generated from transdisciplinary initiatives in the United States. TheLansing model includes Center four WIFI major Information components: problem - Username: focus, institutional scits resources and Password: and organizational 2019 structure, These results highlight areas for improvement in interprofessional healthcare and demonstrate the promise of big data to collaboration characteristics, and transdisciplinary outcomes. The model posits that the problem focus i.e., the topic area advance the science of interprofessional teams in healthcare. that a research endeavor aims to address, and institutional resources and organizational structure influence collaboration

2019 SciTS Conference Program 108 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Poster Abstracts PoTablester Aofb Contentsstracts

Welcome4. characteristics,Cross-disciplinary ...... which, in turnIntegration influence outcomes in FDA of Team transdisciplinary Science research. Improved population 2 health benefits from Mr.collaborative Kevin Bugin efforts, George to address Washington the interacting University biological, social, behavioral and environmental factors that influence public INSciTShealth problems Board and ...... their outcomes. The conceptual model presented...... here may facilitate systematic 3 planning and Theimplementation Food and Drug of transdisciplinary Administration (FDA)projects, is responsibleassist in evaluating for assessing transdisciplinary the safety andresearch, effectiveness determining of new if a drug transdisciplina products ry Planningapproachbefore they Committee is cansuited be forlegally a research marketed...... question, and used and, in perhapsclinical practice. most importantly, This ...... is a criticalassess translational the value 7 of activity transdisciplinary on the biomedical approaches toresearch resolving continuum. complex Inpublic order health to conduct problems these and assessments, promoting gains the FDA in public forms health. teams of varying degrees of cross-disciplinarity, Facilityranging Map from multi-disciplinary...... to trans-disciplinary. A knowledge...... gap exists regarding how these8 cross-disciplinary teams 12. operate,Determining specifically Depth their integrative of Collaboration capacity and Potentialprocesses, which hampers the FDA’s ability to develop practical SessionguidelinesDr. Alicia Evaluation Knoedler to promote, Independent the Information team effectiveness Contractor; ...... Mr.of its Dave assess King,ments Ms. andJill Macchiaverna evaluate...... the success, Exaptive, of9 Inc.interventions to promote cross-disciplinary integration. To address this gap, a mixed-methods, comparative case study design will be used to explain Conferencecross-disciplinaryA funding agency at aintegrationwants Glance to identify of FDA...... and teams. invite This investigators study will toleverage a convening the ...... theoretical around a frameworktopic relevant 10 of integration to their work. postulated by UndergraduateO’Rourke, Crowley students and Gonnerman wants to locate in 2015, faculty which with includes openings evaluable in their research parameters programs related to to include the integration undergraduate process, both Featuredresearchers.quantitative Keynote and Team qualitative. leaders and want Characterizing Plenary to become Panels...... theknowledgeable cross-discip linaryabout integration the current process topics...... in using their 14 thisfield framework to develop permits new teams the to purposefulpursue leading selection research of FDA efforts. teams These with andhigh many and low other integration connection for challengesa comparison occur of theon askills, daily abilities basis in and the practicesdomain of at the SIGs...... teamresearch level development. that can be used Beyond to inform just finding practical people, guidelines what are to ...... promotesome ways effective that research cross-disciplinary development 28 integration. professionals can Detailedassess theDaily collaboration Schedule potential ...... within a research community? This Idea...... Showcase presentation 30 will highlight concepts, 5. methodsStrategies and tools to Promote to help research Effectiv developmente Student professionals’ Research increase Teams their awarenessin Undergraduate and knowledge Science of information Labs and WorkshopDr.factors Kendra that Abstracts...... Spencecan influence Cheruvelil research, Ms. collaboration.Angela De Palma-Dow, Michigan State University; Dr. Karl 38 A. Smith, Purdue University and University of Minnesota Panel13. Successful Abstracts...... Process Evaluation Provides Insight into Team Development 42 and Goal ManyAttainment science labs make use of student teams. However, many students resist working in teams, often for good reasons based on prior experiences. Although instructors struggle with how to help student teams be effective, effective teams in OralMs. Abstracts Hannah Love ...... , Dr. Bailey Fosdick, Dr. Jennifer Eileen Cross, Dr. Meghan Suter, Ms. Dinada 52 Egan, Dr. Ellen Fisher, science labs are achievable. We increased student learning and satisfaction when working in research teams by: 1) Colorado State University Posterincluding Abstracts a teamwork ...... learning objective in the syllabus “to practice effective teamwork and team 106 management, including modelingIt is becoming behaviors more ofcommon inclusion for and scientists ethics, to and break using out leadership of their academic skills to silosfoster and problem combine solving, knowledge team communication, to solve pressing SciTSconflictscientific Awards management, questions ...... as consensusmembers of building, teams. and What idea makes generation” an interdisciplinary and 2) designing scientific and team implementing successful?119 exercises Often successthat teach is studentsmeasured why using they classic should metrics work inlike a teampublications, and how grants, to be paandrt ofinvention an effective patents. student However, team (e.g., these developing products mayshared take years to Unconferenceexpectations,amass. What normsif you Details neededof behavior, to...... know and ‘inteam the culture;moment’ building if a team aw wasareness engaging...... of why in team a meaningful conflict 119 is way important to meet and their likely goals student and responsesachieve success? to such conflict).A process We evaluation also used study individual examines and teamvarious reflections aspects of team functioninginteractions following as indicators formal of teamlong-term Thanksassessment.success. to Atour ColoradoWe Reviewerswill presents State University, pre-/post-test ...... from data2015-2017 demonstrating we conducted student a ...... attitudesmixed-methods and beliefs evaluation 120 regarding on eightteamwork interdisciplinary and the detailsresearch of teamsour curricular to investigate innovations. the processes These changes of team resulted development. in improved Using student a rank correlation,satisfaction ourand results success report and whichreduced Postinstructorprocess Conference metrics guesswork correlated andEvaluation stress with classicregarding Information...... team student outcomes. teams. More specifically, successful...... teams 120 are gender inclusive, serve on student committees together, and more! 6. Motivation, Threat, and Engagement Intensity in Cross-Disciplinary Health, Biomedical, 14. UsingPolicy, structured and Education dialogue Teams: to break Pilot downAnalysis disciplinary silos within global development Ms.teams Patricia Deyo, Ms. Ellen Cook, Mr. Kevin Bugin, Ms. Melissa Gentry, Ms. Landria Sheffey, Ms. Leocadia Conlon, Dr. GaetanoDr. Anna R.Malavisi Lotrecchiano,, Western George Connecticut Washington State University; University Dr. Marisa Rinkus, Dr. Michael O'Rourke, Michigan State UniversityThis is a second phase mixed methods study that follows original research to test a psychometric tool, the Motivation Assessment for Team Readiness, Integration, and Collaboration (MATRICx) (Lotrecchiano et al., 2016; Mallinson et al., The theory and practice of sustainable development gives rise to many challenges, not least, how to achieve effective 2016), that assesses motivations and threats collaboration in health and biomedical teams. The aim of this study is to communication among the various disciplines within global development teams. The absence of effective communication investigate the relationship between motivations, threats, degrees of engagement, and satisfaction of human need among can lead to a lack of mutual understanding. We might wonder whether different team members share an understanding of team members working in established knowledge producing teams. the concepts of development and sustainability? Do they coordinate their thinking about the impact on the communities that areA mixed the principal methods beneficiaries comparative of analysis their work? study We is beingsubmit conducted. that structured The qualitativedialogue about method these being and used other is issues semi-structured that in- undermineperson interviews deep, mutual with individual understanding members within of knowledge global development producing teams teams. can Following improve the the interview, effectiveness participants of sustainable are asked to developmentcomplete the MATRICxefforts. instrument, which utilizes quantitative methods. Data from the qualitative interviews will be Theretriangulated is a need with to the generate quantitati a vespace survey for criticaldata to reflection support further and dialogue interpretation about theof the values meaning and beliefsof the constructsthat influence of the developmentMATRICx. An decisions. initial pilot The of one Toolbox teams Dialogue qualitative Initiative data was offers completed an innovative, in spring concrete, 2019. and tangible approach to critical dialogue that can help in two ways. First, it can generate a space for critical dialogue within teams about issues that matter 2019 SciTS Conference Program 109 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Pos SciTSter Ab Conferencestracts Pos Welcometer Abstr a cts

to them; second, it can enable discussion and analysis of specific concerns that afflict those working in the practice of Dear SciTSsustainableBased on2019 preliminary development, participants, analysis such from as conflicting coding of assumptions,the initial four powerinterviews, dynamics, several implicit findings biases, can beethical deduced. issues, A totaland epistemicof 85 codes injustice.were identified across one team. Three codes were identified across all four participants which included collaboration, role Welcomedefinition, to the and 2019 collegial. Science Prioritization, of Team meeting Science schedules, (SciTS) and team identity were also frequently used codes across three of Conference,the four theinterviews. 10th Thereannual were gathering an additional of 39 individuals codes that were and only groups used one time across the interviews. Additional 15. analysisICPSR will Virtual be conducted Data Enclaveto determine as if thesea Collaboratory individual codes forshould Team remain Science independent or recoded through the iterative interestedDr.coding John in process. studying, Marcotte , Ms. practicing, Sarah Rush ,andMs. Sarafacilitating Britt, University team of science. Michigan This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation A challenge of managing access to restricted-use data is to ensure adequate protections and at the same time break down of the InternationalSince this study hasNetwork only analyzed for the a subset Science of data, of dataTeam collection Science and analysis will continue as the research team continues.barriers to teamCoding science. will continue Security as requirementsan iterative process for restricted-use following the data methods often present outlines obstacles for the study to team to ensure science. intercoder For (INSciTS),example, a professional requiring the use society of a non-networked advancing computer related thereb interestsy prevents in file sharing and collaboration. The trend in team science.reliability and continuation of thematic analysis as more data is analyzed. Once qualitative data is analyzed and quantitative datasecurity is collected, for restricted-use merging dataand integrationis moving towardsof the data providing will occur. access through computing enclaves. Such enclaves can provide collaboration space for research teams and enhanced security over other options for restricted-use data access. Since this The conferenceReferencescollaboration leadership space is within team the computing —myself, enclave, Dr. theStephanie shared disk E. space meets security requirements for restricted-use Lotrecchiano,data. G., Mallinson, T., Leblanc-Beaudoin, T., Schwartz, L., Lazar, D., & Falk-Krzesinski, H. (2016). Motivation and threat indicators for Vasko, collaborationDr. Julie readiness Thompson in knowledge Klein, generating and teams Megghan (KPTs): A scoping Honke review Seidel— and domain analysis. Heliyon, 2(5), e00105. has workedMallinson,As compared closely T., Lotrecchiano, with with non-networked G.,the Furniss, SciTS J., computers, Schwartz, 2019 L.,Planning computing Lazar, D., & enclavesFalk-Krzesinski,Committee offered H. and(2016). two importantthe Rasch INSciTS Analysis security as aboard methodenhancements: forto designing design (1) a readiness a conferencemodelProhibiting for that collaboration. the builds download Journal on ofexisting of restricted-useInvestigative research Medicine, data; 64(7),and and (2) 1186-1193 practice Vetting of outputstrengths for disclosure while risk.also Computing pointing enclaves in exciting are new directions.accessible through encrypted network connections and prevent researchers from downloading or uploading restricted-use 7. Thedata and Economics derivatives. Moreover,of Collaboration these enclaves at enablea Regional third party University review of output for compliance with disclosure One ofDr.protections our Stephen aims such Crowleyfor asSciTS minimum, Ms. Marisa2019 cell Richterissizes to anddemonstrate, Mr. embargoed Archer Ward variables. how, Boise team State scienceUniversity animates and propels researchUniversityICPSR in environmental has leadership deployed promotesone thesescience, theenclaves. value agriculture, of The both ICPSR collaboration andVirtual natural Da andta-Enclave interdisciplinary resources. (VDE) isresearch. Toaccessible this Despite end, through wethese encrypted are efforts pleased network to featureinterdisciplinaryconnections for the first and collaborative timetwo-factor panels authentication. research focusing remains The on VDEthe Indigenous exception facilitates rather team approa thanscience theches forrule theto at analysismanyteam universities. science of restricted-use andIf the claimscollaborative data archived approachesadvancedwith ICPSR. in areagriculture Because correct thereresearchers and is a natural'gap' access (call resources. itthe the restricted-use collaboration datagap) virtually,between physical what leadership proximity wants is no andlonger what a barrier researchers to do. Herecollaboration. we provide The an VDE initial enables report researcherson our attempts in different to anal yzedisciplines the collaboration and at different gap at organizations one regional university.to work together.

Other valuesWeIn this report paper, drive the weresults SciTS illustrate of interviews 2019 how the as withICPSR well. both VDE Diversity leadership (and computing andand faculty inclusion enclaves regarding inhave general) interest been promotein and fundamental incentives team science for interdisciplinarycommitments by serving as a in our planning,andsecure collaborative online driving Collaboratory. scholarly our callsactivity for and participation, attempt to make senseinvited of thepresentations, feedback we have and received. fee structure. We suggest Inthat addition, an we have'economic' worked model to ensure of faculty a decision “green” making conference, that tracks 'return giving on youinvestment' the option (for resources of an suchonline as timeprogram and pay-offs rather such than a asprinted publications) one andmakes working better sense to reduceof the collaboration food waste. gap (at And the institution as the primarywe studied) host, than accountsthe MSU based Center on some 16. formU-LINK: of ignorance The development (concerning incentives and forevaluation collaboration) of amongst an innovative faculty. program to support high-impact for Interdisciplinarityinterdisciplinary seeks research to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinary research, education, and training. 8. Dr.NDNQI®: Susan E. UsingMorgan, BigDr. Ali Data Mosser to, AdvanceDr. Soyeon Ahnthe, Dr.ScienceTyler Harrison of Interprofessional, Dr. Jue Wang, Ms. Ashley Teams Reynolds , Ms. Qian HuangDr. Nancy, Ms. Dunton Bingjing, Dr. Mao Teri, Dr.KennedyJohn ,Bixby, The University University of of Kansas Miami Medical Center We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active downtownTheInterprofessional University with of practiceMiami restaurants, has and developed education local an is innovativeviewed art shops, as program,the holyrunning grail called to trails, achieveU-LINK and (theUniversity Quadruple local ofcommunity Miami’s Aim in Lhealthcare:aboratory classes forimproved such as kickboxingpatient,INtegrated population, and Knowledge), pottery. price, designed andPlease practitioner to consultfoster outcomes. high-impact the website A 2014interdisciplinary scoping for more review research detailed found and that education.information. research Inhad addition not yet to demonstrated its focus on thesocietal impact grand of IPE, challenges, citing the U-LINK need for has systematic five unique research (unusual?) to stre qungthenalities: 1)the a evidence 2-phase structurebase for interprofessionalthat provides protected team-based time care.for team development and vision refinement during Phase I; 2) strong, meaningful partnerships with the Graduate School If you have(which anyfunds questions the participation or commentsof a doctoral student for the on SciTS each Ph 2019ase II team), Planning the Clinical Committee, & Translational please Science look Institute for those of us with(whichThe Nationalred financially ribbons Database supports on ofour Nursing one name Phase Quality badges.I team), Indicators and the (NDNQI) Librarie ®s (whichSurvey, support completed the participationby 240,000 RNsof librarians in 2018, as includes U-LINK teaminterprofessional members); 3)relationship dedicated measures meeting space between in each RNs of and 3 camp physicians,us libraries APRNs, helps pharmacists, to ease geographic therapists, barriers; and social 4) embedded workers. MichaelRNslibrarians O’Rourke rated on relationships each U-LINK on team; conflict and management 5) sustained skills; team respect; science assignmenttraining and of education blame for based adverse on empiricallyevents; shared supported best accountability; and understanding roles, knowledge, and skills of RNs. Chair, 2019practices Science for interdisciplinary of Team collaborations. Science Conference The success of U-LINK will be evaluated on several metrics, including team success (ROI from external funding, publications and citations) relative to non-U-LINK collaborative teams, as well as RNs rated “respect for the contributions of RNs” most highly and gave the lowest rating to “colleagues understand the roles, organizational impacts including future interdisciplinary collaborations by awardees, and greater levels of faculty satisfaction knowledge and skill of RNs.” Interprofessional relationships were highest on critical care units, followed by ambulatory care. and commitment to the organization. Early outcomes of the U-LINK initiative are reported. Ratings were lowest in the operating room and perioperative units. RNs rated their relationships with social workers more highly than with other professions. Ratings were lowest for physicians. Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019 These results highlight areas for improvement in interprofessional healthcare and demonstrate the promise of big data to advance the science of interprofessional teams in healthcare.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 110 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Poster Abstracts PoTablester Aofb Contentsstracts

Welcome4. Cross-disciplinary ...... Integration in FDA Team Science 2 17. Mr.Maintenance Kevin Bugin, George of a Multi-disciplinary Washington University Team to Study Preoperative Anxiety in Spine Surgery: INSciTSA Two-Year Board Case ...... Study ...... 3 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drug products Mr. Arif Musa, Wayne State University; Dr. Jeffrey C Wang, Dr. Frank L Acosta, Dr. Rana Movahedi, University of Southern before they can be legally marketed and used in clinical practice. This is a critical translational activity on the biomedical PlanningCalifornia; Committee Ms. Adana Melkonian ...... , Western University of Health Sciences;...... Mr. Alan Shahbazi 7, Touro College; Dr. David research continuum. In order to conduct these assessments, the FDA forms teams of varying degrees of cross-disciplinarity, Safani, University of California; Mr. Syed F Hussain, Wayne State University; Dr. Gligor Gucev, University of Southern ranging from multi-disciplinary to trans-disciplinary. A knowledge gap exists regarding how these cross-disciplinary teams FacilityCalifornia Map ...... 8 operate, specifically their integrative capacity and processes, which hampers the FDA’s ability to develop practical SessionMulti-disciplinaryguidelines Evaluation to promote teams the are Information team attractive effectiveness in clinical ...... of researchits assess forments a variety and evaluateof reasons...... the including success varied of9 interventions expertise, to resource promote efficiency,cross-disciplinary and potential integration. for creative To address solutions. this gap,This acase mixed-methods, study describes comparative the activity case of a study multi-institutional design will be and used to explain Conferenceinterdisciplinarycross-disciplinary at taskforce aintegration Glance over of a FDA ...... two-year teams. time This course study and will leveragedocuments the methods ...... theoretical used framework to maintain 10 of integrationthe team in postulated the face of by changesO’Rourke, following Crowley its and initial Gonnerman development. in 2015, The which Spine includes Preoperative evaluable Anxiety parameters Research related Taskforce to the (SPARTA), integration a process,team of both Featuredstudentsquantitative fromKeynote and the qualitative. University and ofCharacterizing Plenary Southern California, Panels...... the cross-discip Universilinaryty of California integration Irvine, process...... and using Western 14this Universityframework of permits Health the purposefulSciences and selection faculty ofin FDAthe fields teams of with psychiatry, high and anesthesiology, low integration neurosurgery,for a comparison and of orthopedic the skills, surgery,abilities andwas practicesdeveloped at to the SIGs...... teaminvestigate level thatpreoperative can be used anxiety to inform – an under-studiedpractical guidelines phenomenon. to ...... promote Team effective members cross-disciplinary were chosen 28 integration.based on their expertise, Detailedinterest inDaily studying Schedule preoperative anxiety,...... and previous team building experience...... among other 30 factors. The team obtained 5. InstitutionalStrategies Review to Promote Board approval Effectiv and wase Student awarded theResearch Nation Institutes Teams of Health in Undergraduate Southern California Science Clinical and Labs WorkshopDr.Translational Kendra Abstracts...... Spence Science Cheruvelil Institute, (NIHMs. Angela SC CTSI) De TeamPalma-Dow Building, Michigan Award. AfterState two University; years of Dr. activity, Karl 38 A. SPARTA Smith, Purdue produced University research andleading University to two poof diumMinnesota presentations, six poster presentations, and one peer-reviewed publication. As a result, the goals of PanelSPARTA Abstracts...... have shifted from development to maintenance of the multi-disciplinary team following 42 the relocation of students to Manymedical science school labs and make influx useof new of student members, teams. which However, presented many several students challenges. resist working Solutions in teams, included often reallocation for good reasonsof Oralbasedresponsibility Abstracts on prior such experiences...... as by assigning Although the instructors Department struggle of Anesthesiology with how to helpat the student University teams of Southernbe 52 effective, California effective the teams role ofin sciencemanaging labs grant are fundsachievable. on behalf We of increased the team. student Outsourcing learning account and satisfaction management when allowed working members in research of SPARTA teams by: to redirect1) Posterincludingresources Abstracts a to teamwork the development ...... learning ofobjective future research in the syllabus projects “to and practice to disseminate effective teamwork findings to and the team 106greater management, scientific community including via modelingconference behaviors travel. Previously, of inclusion the and team ethics, was andlocal using to southern leadership California, skills to but foster over problem the course solving, of the team second communication, year, integral SciTSconflictteam Awards members management, relocated ...... consensus to two different building, states. and idea This generation” led to further and reliance 2) designing on electronic and implementing means 119 of communication exercises that suchteach as studentsby text messaging, why they should online workvideo in calls, a team and and electronic how to mail.be pa Thert of addition an effective of new student members team also(e.g., required developing reallocation shared of Unconferenceexpectations,responsibilities norms and Details review of behavior, of ...... each and team team member’s culture; rolebuilding in SPARTA. awareness Further...... of why plans team were conflict ma de119 is forimportant obtaining and additional likely student fundingresponses to maintainto such conflict). team activities We also and used for individualdeveloping and follow-up team reflections studies. The of teampresentation functioning of th followingis two-year formal case team study Thanksanalyzesassessment. to the our Weactivities Reviewerswill presents of a multi-disciplinary pre-/post-test ...... dataclinical demonstrating research team student and efforts ...... attitudes to maintain and beliefs those120 regarding activities teamwork despite logistiand thecal challenges.details of our curricular innovations. These changes resulted in improved student satisfaction and success and reduced Postinstructor Conference guesswork andEvaluation stress regarding Information...... student teams...... 120 18. R2D2: A Team Approach to Bridging Research in Medicine and Public Health 6. Dr.Motivation, Harold W. Neighbors Threat,, Dr.and Ike Engageme Iyioke, Michigannt StateIntensity University in Cross-Disciplinary Health, Biomedical, Policy, and Education Teams: Pilot Analysis Ms.The Patriciapurpose Deyo, of this Ms. poster Ellen is Cook,to present Mr. Keanvin innovative Bugin, Ms. NIH-funded Melissa Gentry, developmental Ms. Landr researchia Sheffey, program Ms. Le titled,ocadia “Research Conlon, toDr. GaetanoReduce Disparities R. Lotrecchiano, in Disease” George (R2D2). Washington R2D2 develops University the research skills of medical students at the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine (MSU-CHM). R2D2 prepares medical students from underrepresented groups to Thisaddress is a racial/gendersecond phase health mixed disparities methods studyby developing that follows a transdisciplinary original research research to test a education psychometric program tool, thatthe Motivationcombines Assessmentmedicine and for public Team health. Readiness, R2D2 preparesIntegration, medical and Collaborati students toon conduct (MATRICx) the transdisciplinary(Lotrecchiano et researchal., 2016; necessary Mallinson toet achieveal., 2016),health equitythat assesses in cardiovascular motivations diseases and threats by providing collaboration mentored in health research and biomedicalinternship opportunitiesteams. The aim to bridgeof this thestudy artificial is to investigateboundary between the relationship medicine between and public motivations, health. To threats, accomplish degrees these of importantengagement, goals, and R2D2 satisfaction created of a humantrans-disciplinary need among team membersconsisting workingof faculty in fromestablished Public Health, knowledge Medicine, producing Psych teams.ology, Philosophy (bioethics), and Health Informatics. Medical doctors play an important role in the nation’s health by treating the sick. Public health complements medicine by focusing on Apopulation mixed methods health. comparativeMedicine and analysis public health study isare being natural conducted. allies. However, The qualitative professional method differences being used in trainingis semi-structured and in- personperspectives interviews have withled toindividual a false impressionmembers of that knowledge public health producing works teams.“upstream” Following on prevention the interview, while participants physicians workare asked to complete“downstream” the MATRICx on patient instrument, care. R2D2 which medical utilizes students quantitative will combine methods. medicine Data fromand public the qualitative health by interviews bringing biology will be into the triangulatedcommunity and with the the communi quantitatityve into survey the clinic. data to support further interpretation of the meaning of the constructs of the MATRICx. An initial pilot of one teams qualitative data was completed in spring 2019.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 111 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Pos SciTSter Ab Conferencestracts Pos Welcometer Abstr a cts

19. Education in Maximizing Team Performance for Early-Career Biomedical Research Faculty Dear SciTSDr.Based Barbara on2019 preliminary Nicklas participants,, Dr. analysis Holly Browerfrom coding, Dr. Amy of the Wallis initial, Dr.four Michael interviews, Nader several, Ms. Lyndsayfindings canTrost be, Wake deduced. Forest A totalUniversity of 85 codes were identified across one team. Three codes were identified across all four participants which included collaboration, role Welcomedefinition,Early-career to the and 2019biomedical collegial. Science Prioritization,research of faculty Team meeting are Science often schedules, isolated (SciTS) and by departmentteam identity or were discipline also frequentlyand are not used provided codes training across three of Conference,theopportunities four theinterviews. 10thin team Thereannual science. were gathering To an address additional this,of 39 individuals the codes Wake that Forest were and Clinicalonly groups used and one Translational time across Science the interviews. Institute Additional Team Science analysis will be conducted to determine if these individual codes should remain independent or recoded through the iterative interestedProgram in studying, developed “Maximizingpracticing, Team and Performance” facilitating education team science. modules as part of a broad “Translational Scholars codingAcademy”. process. Scholars are early-career research scientists and the modules are delivered by team science faculty experts This meetingfrom the Wakeis also Forest the School first ofSciTS Business. conference The curriculum since includes formation three sessions where scholars learn team development Since this study has only analyzed a subset of data, data collection and analysis will continue as the research team of the Internationalnorms and best practicesNetwork and for develop the Science skills to effectively of Team lead Science teams. For program development, a mixed methods needs continues. Coding will continue as an iterative process following the methods outlines for the study to ensure intercoder (INSciTS),assessment a professional was conducted society consisting advancing of a research related scholar interests survey (n=42) in and semi-structured individual interviews (n=8). reliability and continuation of thematic analysis as more data is analyzed. Once qualitative data is analyzed and quantitative team science.Responsive training modules were constructed based on the popular classical model of team development (Tuckman, data is collected, merging and integration of the data will occur. 1965) involving stages of forming, storming, norming and performing. Participants engage in case analyses, problem The conferenceReferencessolving, lectures leadership and class discussionsteam —myself, about the Dr. value Stephanie and process E. of developing team charters, engaging all members of Vasko, Lotrecchiano,aDr. team, Julie resolving G., Thompson Mallinson, conflict, T., Leblanc-Beaudoin,planning Klein, andand managing MegghanT., Schwartz, effective L., Honke Lazar, meetings, D., &Seidel— Falk-Krzesinski, and follow-through. H. (2016). Motivation Scholars and reported threat indicators 93% high for collaborationsatisfaction; readiness evaluation in knowledge of new teamgenerating formation teams (KPTs): and team A scoping effectiveness review and isdomain on-going. analysis. Heliyon, 2(5), e00105. has workedMallinson, closely T., Lotrecchiano, with G.,the Furniss, SciTS J., Schwartz, 2019 L.,Planning Lazar, D., & Falk-Krzesinski,Committee H. and(2016). the Rasch INSciTS Analysis as aboard method forto designing design a readiness a conferencemodel for that collaboration. builds Journal on existing of Investigative research Medicine, 64(7), and 1186-1193 practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new 20. Applying Team Science Principles to Biomedical Publications Teams: Understanding directions. 7. TeamThe Economics Effectiveness of Collaboration at a Regional University Ms. Quentin O’Brien, Dr. Gaetano Lotrecchiano, George Washington University One ofDr. our Stephen aims Crowleyfor SciTS, Ms. Marisa2019 Richteris to demonstrate, Mr. Archer Ward how, Boise team State scienceUniversity animates and propels researchTheUniversity in Science environmental leadership of Team promotesScience science, is the a relativelyvalue agriculture, of bothnew collaborationinterdisciplin and naturalary and field interdisciplinary resources.of study that research.aims To tothis investigate Despite end, wethese the are factors efforts pleased that to featurehinderinterdisciplinary for the or facilitate first collaborative time team-based panels research research focusing remains and practice,on the Indigenous exception with a focus rather approa on than how theches these rule factorsto at manyteam impact universities. science scientific andIf theinnovation claimscollaborative and approachestranslation.advanced in areagriculture Teams correct and there their and is interactions a natural'gap' (call are resources.it the complex, collaboratio makingn gap) measurement between what of teams’ leadership characteristics wants and and what outcomes researchers do. challenging.Here we provide There an is initial a myriad report of on methods our attempts used in to the anal Scienceyze the ofcollaboration Team Science gap that at one aid regionalin measuring university. the effectiveness of biomedical teams. Bibliometric analysis is one method by which researchers have attempted to measure team Other valueseffectiveness.We report drive the resultsIn SciTS bibliometric of interviews 2019 studies as with well.of teamboth Diversity leadershipeffectiveness, andand jourfaculty inclusionnal, regardingarticle, haveand interest author been in level and fundamental dataincentives have been for interdisciplinarycommitments used as a proxy in our planning,forand assessing collaborative driving the valuescholarly our of science callsactivity for teamsand participation, attempt in producing to make new senseinvited and/or of the presentations,integrated feedback knowledge. we have and received. This fee method, structure. We suggest however, Inthat isaddition, annot we havewithout'economic' worked its flaws,model to ensureas of co-authorshipfaculty a decision “green” does making notconference, necessarily that tracks 'returnequa givingte on to youinvestment'collaboration the option (for and re teamwosources of anrk. suchonline Bibliometrics as timeprogram and are pay-offs solely rather such than a quantitativeasprinted publications) one and andmakesleave working much better to sense be to desired reduceof the regardingcollaboration food thewaste. gapqualitative (at And the interactionsinstitution as the primarywe between studied) host,teams than accountsworkingthe MSU together based Center on on some for Interdisciplinaritybiomedicalform of ignorance publications. (concerningseeks These to createincentives quantitative opportunities for metrics collaboration) cannot to amongstprov refineide sufficient faculty. thinking insight about into the collaboration factors that facilitate and teamcross- disciplinaryfunctioning, research, effectiveness, education, and quality and of training.experience. Given this gap, this case study aimed to assess a biomedical 8. publicationsNDNQI®: teamUsing using Big both Data quantitative to Advance and qualitative the Science methods. Bibliometric of Interprofessional data were collected Teams and analyzed by the author.Dr. Nancy Additionally, Dunton, Dr. a teamTeri Kennedy teleconference, The University with the biomedical of Kansas Medicalpublications Center team occurred in Fall 2018, and qualitative and We hopequantitative that you coding have of thean discussion excellent were time used in to Lansing evaluate team while interactions. you enjoy These SciTS methods 2019. revealed Lansing that scientific has an impact active downtownmeasuredInterprofessional by bibliometricswith practice restaurants, and was education relatively local isequal viewed art between shops, as the authors, holyrunning grail with to trails, achieveonly one and the author Quadruple local having community Aiman h-index in healthcare: ofclasses at least improved 20, such as kickboxingsuggestingpatient, population, and no significant pottery. price, differences andPlease practitioner consult between outcomes. authors’the website A publication2014 scoping for impacts.more review detailedCoding found thatof discussionsinformation. research had between not yet team demonstrated members revealedthe impact positive of IPE, sociopsychological citing the need for systematicdynamics and research high levels to stre ofngthen cohesion, the evidenceas well as base robust for informationinterprofessional sharing team-based among care. If you haveteam members any questions leading to orknowledge comments transfer for and the progression SciTS 2019toward Planningproject goals. Committee, Conflict was least please prominent look among for those all of us withtypesThe Nationalred of communication, ribbons Database on of ourand Nursing whenname Quality it did badges. occur, Indicators it was (NDNQI) resolved ® quickly. Survey, Preliminary completed findingsby 240,000 from RNs this instudy 2018, suggest includes that highinterprofessional levels of positive relationship social interactions measures between and cohesion RNs and are physicians,necessary to APRNs, assembling pharmacists, functional therapists, publications and teams. social workers.These findings point to the need to further understand optimal team factors when assembling biomedical publications teams. In MichaelRNs O’Rourke rated relationships on conflict management skills; respect; assignment of blame for adverse events; shared futureaccountability; studies, moreand understanding emphasis on therole uses, knowledge, of qualitative and methods skills of mayRNs. help to provide further insights into the characteristics Chair, 2019of teams Science and their membersof Team that Science facilitate Conferenceeffective functioning and positive team experiences. RNs rated “respect for the contributions of RNs” most highly and gave the lowest rating to “colleagues understand the roles, knowledge and skill of RNs.” Interprofessional relationships were highest on critical care units, followed by ambulatory care. Ratings were lowest in the operating room and perioperative units. RNs rated their relationships with social workers more highly than with other professions. Ratings were lowest for physicians. Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019 These results highlight areas for improvement in interprofessional healthcare and demonstrate the promise of big data to advance the science of interprofessional teams in healthcare.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 112 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Poster Abstracts PoTablester Aofb Contentsstracts

Welcome4. Cross-disciplinary ...... Integration in FDA Team Science 2 21. Mr.Team-Based Kevin Bugin, GeorgeApproaches Washington to University Opioid Misuse in Mid-Michigan INSciTSMr. Payam Board Aminpour ...... , Dr. Madhur Chandra, Ms. Suzanne Neefus, ...... Dr. Michael O’Rourke, Dr. 3 Stephanie E. Vasko, Michigan TheState Food University and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drug products Planningbefore they Committee can be legally marketed...... and used in clinical practice. This ...... is a critical translational 7 activity on the biomedical researchOpioid misuse continuum. is a complex In order multifaceted to conduct theseproblem assessments, with social, theeconomic, FDA forms biological teams and of varying behavioral degrees dimensions. of cross-disciplinarity, We will Facilityrangingemploy Map anfrom interdisciplinary multi-disciplinary...... team to sciencetrans-disciplinary. approach toA knowledgeinvestigate...... gapthe factorsexists regarding underlying how the thesemisuse8 cross-disciplinary of prescription opioids teams in operate,Clare and specifically Gladwin in their order integrative to integrate capacity the knowledge and proces andses, perspectives which hampers shared the by FDA’s various ability stakeholders. to develop Inpractical the background Sessionguidelinesof the problem Evaluation to promote is a policy the Information shiftteam in effectiveness laws pertaining ...... of itsto assessprescripmentstion opioid and evaluate use and...... thea concomitant success of9 draininterventions on hospital to promote resources as cross-disciplinaryperceived by community integration. partners. To address Our methodology this gap, a encompasmixed-methods,ses a combinationcomparative ofcase structured study design survey will questions be used and to explain Conferencecross-disciplinaryqualitative interviews at aintegration Glance to elicit mentalof FDA...... modelsteams. Thisthat willstudy help will identify leverage differential the ...... theoretical stakeholder framework perspectives 10 of integration on the postulated issue. Our by O’Rourke,study will thus Crowley help andenhance Gonnerman understanding in 2015, of which the lar includesger opioid evaluable crisis as parameters experienced related by the to community. the integration process, both Featuredquantitative Keynote and qualitative. and Characterizing Plenary Panels...... the cross-disciplinary integration process...... using 14this framework permits the purposeful selection of FDA teams with high and low integration for a comparison of the skills, abilities and practices at the SIGs...... 22. Evaluating Translational Research - Tell Us What...... You Think 28 Ms.team Kristi level Pettibone that can ,be National used to Institute inform practicalof Environmental guidelines Health to promote Science effective cross-disciplinary integration. Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 5. TheStrategies National Institute to Promote of Environmental Effectiv Healthe Student Sciences Research (NIEHS) published Teams a translationalin Undergraduate research framework Science that Labs builds WorkshopDr.on previousKendra Abstracts...... Spence models Cheruvelil(Pettibone, etMs. al., Angela Environmental De Palma-Dow Health, PerspectivesMichigan State 2018). University; The framework Dr. Karl 38 A. defines Smith ,five Purdue categories University or andrings University of translational of Minnesota research that parallel the traditional translational research categories and new category names Panelrecognize Abstracts...... the contribution of non-clinical work to the translational process. The model also incorporates42 nodes along these Manyrings that science represent labs make the types use of studentactivities teams. that might However, be conducted many students within theseresist categoriesworking in teams,of translational often for research. good reasons Finally , Oralbasedthe Abstracts model on priorrecognizes experiences...... movement Although from instructorsnode to node struggle as well with as howfrom to ring help to studentring as translational.teams be 52 effective, The framework effective teamscan also in be sciencea helpful labs tool arefor reflectingachievable. on Weand increased demonstrating student the learning value of and team satisfaction science in when translational working research.in research NIEHS teams is by: now 1) using Posterincludingthe model Abstracts a to teamwork evaluate ...... learningtranslational objective research in the efforts, syllabus including “to practice the contributions effective teamwork of team and science team 106 to management, translational work.including This modelingposter will behaviors provide an of overview inclusion of and the ethics, framework, and using will highlight leadership the skills benefits to foster of the problem framework, solving, and teamwill describe communication, the strategie s SciTSconflictwe are Awards usingmanagement, to evaluate ...... consensus translational building, research. and idea This generation” poster will beand designed 2) designing as an and interactive implementing 119 opportunity exercises for participants that teach to studentsprovide input why onthey key should evaluation work inquestions a team and that how will shapeto be pa howrt of we an ultimately effective studentuse the teamframework (e.g., todeveloping assess translational shared Unconferenceexpectations,research efforts. norms Details of behavior, ...... and team culture; building awareness...... of why team conflict 119 is important and likely student responses to such conflict). We also used individual and team reflections of team functioning following formal team Thanksassessment. to our We Reviewerswill presents pre-/post-test ...... data demonstrating student ...... attitudes and beliefs 120 regarding teamwork and the 23. detailsFunction, of our curricularinformation innovations. and Thesecontributions changes resulted – an in eva improvedluation student of national satisfaction multidisciplinary and success and reduced team Postinstructormeetings Conference guesswork for rare andEvaluation cancer stress regarding types Information...... student teams...... 120 Ms. Linn Rosell, Dr. Jessica Wihl, Lund University; Mr. Oskar Hagberg, Dr. Björn Ohlsson, Regional Cancer Centre South; 6. Dr.Motivation, Mef Nilbert, DanishThreat, Cancer and Society Engageme Researchnt CentreIntensity in Cross-Disciplinary Health, Biomedical, BackgroundPolicy, and and Education Objective: Following Teams: centralized Pilot Analysis treatment for rare cancer types in Sweden, virtual national multidisciplinary treatmentMs. Patricia meetings Deyo, Ms. (MDTM) Ellen haveCook, been Mr. Ke established.vin Bugin, Ms.We asseMelissassed Gentry, function, Ms. information, Landria Sheffey, participants´ Ms. Le ocadiacontributions Conlon, and Dr. Gaetanoviews of theR. Lotrecchiano,national MDTMs George for rare Washington cancer types. University ThisMethods: is a second Data on phase participants’ mixed methods views were study collected that follows using orig an inalelectronic research survey to test distributed a psychometric to participants tool, the in Motivation six national AssessmentMDTMs. Data for from Team structured Readiness, observations Integration, were and obtained Collaborati fromon the (MATRICx) MDTMs for(Lotrecchiano penile-, anal-, et al.,and 2016; vulvar Mallinson cancer using et al., the 2016),standardized that assesses observational motivations tools MDT-MOTand threats and collaboration MDT-MODe in healthwhich assessand biomedical information teams. presented The aim and of participants’this study is to investigatecontributions the to relationship the case discussion. between motivations, threats, degrees of engagement, and satisfaction of human need among team members working in established knowledge producing teams. Results: Participants’ rated the national MDTMs favorably with high scores for development of competence and Aconsideration mixed methods of patients comparative comorbidity. analysis Areas study that is being received conducted. lower scores The qualitative included stuctured method being evaluations used is of semi-structured MDTMs in- personfunctionality, interviews technology with individual and guidelines members for ofcommunicating knowledge producing treatment teams. recommendations. Following the Applicationinterview, participants of the observational are asked to completetools rated the case MATRICx histories, instrument, leadership which and teamworkutilizes quantitative as well-functioning, methods. Datawhereas from patient-centered the qualitative interviews care, consideration will be of triangulatedcomorbidities, with psychosocial the quantitati aspectsve survey and datainvolvement to support of furthercare professionals interpretation received of the meaning low scores. of the constructs of the MATRICx. An initial pilot of one teams qualitative data was completed in spring 2019.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 113 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Pos SciTSter Ab Conferencestracts Pos Welcometer Abstr a cts

Conclusion: National virtual MDTMs are feasible with well-functioning leadership and teamwork. Weaknesses identified Dear SciTSrelatedBased on2019to limitedpreliminary participants, consideration analysis fromof patient-centered coding of the initial aspects four andinterviews, suboptimal several contribution findings canto the be case deduced. discussions A total fromof 85 care codes professionals.were identified Increasedacross one attention team. Three to these codes factors were could identified further across optimize all four treatment participants recommendations which included from collaboration, national, virtual role WelcomeMDTMs.definition, to the and 2019 collegial. Science Prioritization, of Team meeting Science schedules, (SciTS) and team identity were also frequently used codes across three of Conference,the four theinterviews. 10th Thereannual were gathering an additional of 39 individuals codes that were and only groups used one time across the interviews. Additional analysis will be conducted to determine if these individual codes should remain independent or recoded through the iterative interestedcoding in process. studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. This24. meeting The Bio-CS is also Bridge: the first A TransdisciplinarySciTS conference Tsinceeam formationApproach to Integrating Biology and of the InternationalSinceComputer this study Science hasNetwork only analyzedin for High the a Schoolsubset Science of data,Curricula of dataTeam collection Science and analysis will continue as the research team (INSciTS),Dr.continues. Elizabeth a professional Coding Ryder will, Dr. continue Carolinasociety as Ruiz anadvancing iterative, Ms. Shari process Weaverrelated following, Dr. interests Robert the methods Gegear, in outlines Worcester for thePolytechnic study to ensureInstitute intercoder team science.reliability and continuation of thematic analysis as more data is analyzed. Once qualitative data is analyzed and quantitative dataTo learn is collected, to solve today’smerging complex and integration biological of problems,the data will high occur. school students need to integrate scientific practices such as experimental design and hypothesis testing with computational thinking and skills such as modeling, simulation, and The conferenceReferencessystems approaches leadership to biology. team However, —myself, it is difficult Dr. Stephanie for educators E. to create integrated ‘STEM+C’ curricula, because Lotrecchiano,teachers of G.,biology Mallinson, and T.,computer Leblanc-Beaudoin, science T.,have Schwartz, little understandi L., Lazar, D., ng& Falk-Krzesinski, of the terminology, H. (2016). key Motivation concepts, and thandreat approaches indicators for that Vasko, collaborationDr. Julie readiness Thompson in knowledge Klein, generating and teams Megghan (KPTs): A scoping Honke review Seidel— and domain analysis. Heliyon, 2(5), e00105. has workedMallinson,each side closely T., has Lotrecchiano, to offer.with G.,the Furniss, SciTS J., Schwartz, 2019 L.,Planning Lazar, D., & Falk-Krzesinski,Committee H. and(2016). the Rasch INSciTS Analysis as aboard method forto designing design a readiness a conferencemodelTo address for that collaboration. thisbuilds problem, Journal on existingwe of Investigativecreated research a transdisciplinaryMedicine, 64(7), and 1186-1193 practice (TD) team strengthsconsisting of whileuniversity also specialists pointing in biology, in exciting computer new directions.science, and education, graduate and undergraduate students, and high school teachers and students. The curriculum we 7. Theare creating Economics involves studentsof Collaboration in real research at – aa citizenRegional science University project addressing pollinator decline – while they learn One ofDr.scientific our Stephen aims practices Crowleyfor SciTS and, Ms. use Marisa2019 computational Richteris to demonstrate, Mr.approaches. Archer Ward The how, BoiseTD team State approach scienceUniversity allowed animates us to build and a sharedpropels vision for the researchUniversityproject, in environmental and leadership an understanding promotes science, of the teachers' value agriculture, of needs both collaborationin the and classroom. natural and interdisciplinary In resources.addition, teacher research. To feedback this Despite end, helped wethese usare effortsto makepleased better to choices in developing our computational tools, which in turn has allowed more varied and modular curriculum. We will featureinterdisciplinary for the first collaborative time panels research focusing remains on the Indigenous exception rather approa than theches rule to at manyteam universities. science andIf the claimscollaborative present our ongoing progress in team development, as well as a sample of the curriculum itself, which our teachers are approachesadvanced in areagriculture correct there and is a natural'gap' (call resources.it the collaboration gap) between what leadership wants and what researchers do. Herecurrently we providepiloting. an initial report on our attempts to analyze the collaboration gap at one regional university. Other valuesWe report drive the results SciTS of interviews 2019 as with well. both Diversity leadership andand faculty inclusion regarding have interest been in and fundamental incentives for interdisciplinarycommitments in our25. planning, andAdoption collaborative driving of the scholarly scrumour callsactivity framework for and participation, attempt forto make agile senseinvited project of thepresentations, feedbackmanagement we have and inreceived. afee research structure. We suggest network Inthat addition, an we have'economic'Mr. worked Enric Senabre model to ensure of Hidalgo faculty ,a decisionInternet “green” Interdisciplinarymaking conference, that tracks Institute 'return giving on youinvestment' the option (for resources of an suchonline as timeprogram and pay-offs rather such than a Thisasprinted publications) poster one describes andmakes workingthe better process sense to of reduceofadoption the collaboration offood agile waste. methods gap (at And for the the institution as online the coordination primarywe studied) host, ofthan collaborative accountsthe MSU based research. Center on some It's for Interdisciplinaritybasedform of on ignorance a case study (concerningseeks at the to Centre createincentives for opportunitiesthe for Evaluationcollaboration) of Complexityto amongst refine faculty. Across thinking the aboutNexus (CECAN), collaboration a research and network cross- disciplinaryhosted research, by the University education, of Surrey, andfor testing training. and promotin g innovative policy evaluation approaches. The study addresses 8. theNDNQI®: extent to whichUsing key Big principles Data andto Advancetools usually theused Science in scrum, a of specific Interprofessional set of agile principles Teams and practices for self- Dr.organizing Nancy Duntoncross-functional, Dr. Teri Kennedyteams in ,software The University development of Kansas projects, Medical can Center contribute to the collaborative management and We hopecoordination that you of havetasks in an research excellent processes. time The in responsesLansing frwhileom interviews you enjoy with 17 SciTS researchers, 2019. as Lansing well as participant has an active downtownobservationInterprofessional and with analysispractice restaurants, ofand online education activity, local is areviewed art examined shops, as the andholyrunning presented grail to trails, achieve in this and the case Quadruple local study. community Results Aim in indicate healthcare: classes that improvedintegrating such as kickboxingagilepatient, methods population, and and pottery. principlesprice, andPlease for practitioner interdisciplinary consult outcomes. the collaboration website A 2014 scoping canfor havemore review a positive detailed found influencethat information. research on team had dynamicsnot yet demonstrated and efficiency,the impact butof IPE, it also citing requires the need a high for degreesystematic of flexibility research and to astre “leangthenrn by thedoing” evidence approach. base for interprofessional team-based care. If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us26. with TheAdvancing Nationalred ribbons Database Team on ofScienceour Nursing name QualityPrinciples badges. Indicators throu (NDNQI)gh Interprofessional® Survey, completed by Team-Based 240,000 RNs in 2018,Education includes Dr.interprofessional Sarah Shrader relationship,The University measures of Kansas,; between Dr. RNsTeri andKennedy physicians,, The University APRNs, pharmacists,of Kansas Medical therapists, Center and social workers. MichaelRNs O’Rourke rated relationships on conflict management skills; respect; assignment of blame for adverse events; shared Interprofessionalaccountability; and team-based understanding care role addressess, knowledge, the needs and ofskills complex of RNs. patients and connects with the Quadruple Aim in Chair, 2019healthcare Science for improved of Team patient, Science population, Conference price, and practitioner outcomes. Safety-net clinics serve high-need patients experiencingRNs rated “respect health for disparities the contributions who benefit of RNs” from mostcoordinated highly andteam-based gave the care. lowest rating to “colleagues understand the roles, knowledge and skill of RNs.” Interprofessional relationships were highest on critical care units, followed by ambulatory care. TheRatings University were lowest of Kansas in the Medical operating Center room developed and perioperative an academic/community units. RNs rated partnership their relationships between with health social professions workers more educatorshighly than and with safety-net other professions. clinics serving Ratings patients were inlowest Kansas for Cityphysicians. and Leavenworth, Kansas. Interprofessional practitioners at these sitesLansing were provided Center with WIFItwo educational Information interventions - Username: that employed scits team science and Password: principles spanning 2019 over 9- months.These results highlight areas for improvement in interprofessional healthcare and demonstrate the promise of big data to advance the science of interprofessional teams in healthcare.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 114 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Poster Abstracts PoTablester Aofb Contentsstracts

Welcome4. Pre-Cross-disciplinary and post-...... survey data Integration was collected usingin FDA the AssessmentTeam Science for Collaborative Environments 2 (ACE-15), a rapid 15-item Mr.assessment Kevin Bugin tool, measuringGeorge Washington practitioners’ University perceptions of interprofessional “teamness,” suitable for a range of health INSciTSprofessionals Board and clinical...... sites. The tool was administered to healthcare...... team members at 3baseline and 9-months (n=28) Thelater Foodfollowing and theDrug educational Administration team (FDA) science is responsibleintervention. for Means assessing were thecompared safety andusing effectiveness an unpaired of t-test. new drug products before they can be legally marketed and used in clinical practice. This is a critical translational activity on the biomedical PlanningPractitioners Committee exposed to team ...... education had improved scores on all 15-items...... Seven of the 7 items reached statistically research continuum. In order to conduct these assessments, the FDA forms teams of varying degrees of cross-disciplinarity, significant improvements in “teamness”(p-value < 0.01). The largest improvement was the item stating “all voices on the ranging from multi-disciplinary to trans-disciplinary. A knowledge gap exists regarding how these cross-disciplinary teams Facilityteam areMap heard ...... and valued.” This intervention demonstrates the...... potential of interprofessional 8 team-based education to operate, specifically their integrative capacity and processes, which hampers the FDA’s ability to develop practical advance team science principles. Sessionguidelines Evaluation to promote the Information team effectiveness ...... of its assessments and evaluate...... the success of9 interventions to promote cross-disciplinary integration. To address this gap, a mixed-methods, comparative case study design will be used to explain Conference27. cross-disciplinaryThe Collaboration at aintegration Glance Kit: of Research FDA...... teams. ThisInsights study will Transformed leverage the ...... theoretical into Practical framework 10 Supportof integration for postulated by O’Rourke,Interdisciplinary Crowley and Collaboration Gonnerman in 2015, which includes evaluable parameters related to the integration process, both FeaturedDr.quantitative Veronica Keynote and Stanich qualitative., Mr. and Gabriel Characterizing Plenary Harp, Alliance Panels...... the cross-discip for the Artslinary in Research integration Universities process...... using 14this framework permits the purposeful selection of FDA teams with high and low integration for a comparison of the skills, abilities and practices at the SIGs...... teamThe Collaboration level that can Kit be is used a physical to inform toolkit practical that allows guidelines users to to ...... promote create for effective themselves cross-disciplinary the Alliance 28 forintegration. the Arts in Research Universities (a2ru) two-day workshop on interdisciplinary collaboration. The workshop experience, and the Kit, represent a Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 5. particularStrategies phase to in Promote a2ru’s research-to-practice Effective Student cycle, which Research comprises Teams data collection in Undergraduate and analysis, derivation Science of insights, Labs WorkshopDr.translation Kendra ofAbstracts...... Spence insights Cheruvelil into experiences,, Ms. Angela and De finally Palma-Dow collecting, Michigan data from State these University; experiences. Dr. Karl For38 theA. SmithCollaboration, Purdue Workshop,University andwe used University data from of Minnesota our interviews at 38 research universities to surface characteristics of effective collaboration. Building on Panelthose Abstracts...... characteristics, we designed the framework for a hands-on workshop experience. In this42 poster, we highlight individualMany science activities labs makein the useworkshop, of student identifying teams. theHowever, research many basis students for each resist component working and in teams, explaining often how for good insights reasons were Oralbasedtranslated Abstracts on priorinto activities.experiences...... We Althoughalso unpack instructors the workshop’s struggle recursive with how design,to help studentwherein teams participants be 52 effective, engage effective on two levels:teams in scienceacquiring labs information, are achievable. skills, and We bestincreased practices student about learning collaboration and satisfaction even as they when immerse working themselves in research in teams a simulation by: 1) activity Posterincludingthat requires Abstracts a teamwork collaboration ...... learning with objective other participants. in the syllabus By translating “to practice our effective research teamwork insights intoand hands-onteam 106 management, activities, we including mobilize modelingall the benefits behaviors of active of inclusion learning. and We ethics, also use and the using experience leadership as anskills opportunity to foster problemfor further solving, research, team completing communication, the SciTSconflictresearch-to-practice Awards management, ...... cycle. consensus building, and idea generation” and 2) designing and implementing 119 exercises that teach students why they should work in a team and how to be part of an effective student team (e.g., developing shared Unconference28. expectations,Data Science norms Details and of behavior, Data ...... Analytic and team culture;Learning building Envir awarenessonments...... of why at team Small conflict Liberal 119 is important Arts and Institutions likely student responsesDr. John Symms, to such Carroll conflict). University We also used individual and team reflections of team functioning following formal team Thanksassessment. to our We Reviewerswill presents pre-/post-test ...... data demonstrating student ...... attitudes and beliefs 120 regarding teamwork and the detailsOn March of our 29 curricularand 30, Carroll innovations. University These hosted changes an NSF resulted funded in workshopimproved studentwith the satisfactiongoal being toand form success a consortium and reduced of small Postinstructorliberal Conference arts guesswork colleges that andEvaluation would stress work regarding together Information...... student to expand teams. the usage of and development...... of next 120 generation digital learning environments (NGDLE’s) for teaching data science and data analytics (DSA). The workshop was attended by 55 people 6. fromMotivation, 11 different Threat, institutions. and Randomly Engageme assignednt toIntensity teams based in onCross-Disciplinary interests, eight teams of Health, participants Biomedical, worked on team building and content goals. Content consisted of NGDLE’s, DSA, learning science, and team science. Given the importancePolicy, and on working Education across institutions,Teams: Pilot team scienceAnalysis was a central theme throughout. The consortium is working on six Ms.work Patricia stream Deyo,goals, Ms. designed Ellen Cook,around Mr. four Ke fundamentalvin Bugin, Ms. research Melissa questions: Gentry, Ms. (1) Landr Howia will Sheffey, NGDLE’s Ms. prepare Leocadia students Conlon, for Dr. Gaetanoemployment R. Lotrecchiano, that requires DSA?George (2) Washington How will the University design of DSA NGDLE’s account for the variability of learners? (3) How Thiswill NGDLE’s is a second be phaseassessed mixed to measure methods student study that DSA follows competency? original research (4) How towill test a nationala psychometric consortium tool, for the digital Motivation learning at Assessmentsmall liberal artsfor Team institutions Readiness, form and Integration, function toand sustain Collaborati and expandon (MATRICx) the workshop (Lotrecchiano outcomes? et al., We 2016; will reportMallinson on results et al., 2016),thus far, that as assesseswell as report motivations on post-workshop and threats team collaboration activities. in (NSF health Grant and biomedicalNo. 1824727) teams. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between motivations, threats, degrees of engagement, and satisfaction of human need among 29. teamThe membersECHO Transdisciplinary working in established knowledge Team Science producing Model teams. Dr. Leslie Thompson, Dr. Christina Park, Dr. Matthew Gillman, NIH/ECHO A mixed methods comparative analysis study is being conducted. The qualitative method being used is semi-structured in- personDetermining interviews how awith broad individual array of members early environmental of knowledge factors producing influence teams. child Following health across the interview, the lifecourse participants is challenging. are asked to completeNIH’s Environmental the MATRICx influences instrument, on Childwhich Health utilizes Outcomes quantitative (ECHO) methods. program, Data fromwhose the mission qualitative is to interviewsenhance the will health be of triangulatedchildren for generationswith the quantitati to come,ve surveyaddresses data this to support challenge further within interpretation a complex multidisciplinaryof the meaning ofconsortium the constructs of over of 1000the MATRICx.investigators. An ECHOinitial pilot espouses of one ateams team qualitativescience framework data was to completed cultivate investigatorin spring 2019. collaboration and novel approaches that transcend disciplinary boundaries, which we call transdisciplinary team science (TDTS). Based on observations within the

2019 SciTS Conference Program 115 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org

2019Pos SciTSter Ab Conferencestracts Pos Welcometer Abstr a cts

first two years of ECHO and supporting literature, we developed a preliminary causal model for achieving TDTS. It involves Dear SciTStwoBased interrelated on2019 preliminary participants, pathways, analysis one fromvia team coding science of the principles initial four and interviews, the other several via solution-oriented findings can be research deduced. practices. A total of The 85 codes purposewere identified of this acrossstructured one literature team. Three review codes is to were refine identified the model across and identifyall four participantsteam member which attitudes included that collaboration, promote these role Welcomepathways.definition, to the andEarly 2019 collegial. findings Science Prioritization, suggest of that Team meetingprogram Science schedules,and peer (SciTS) lea anddership team canidentity strengthen were also team frequently integration used by codes implementing across three best- of Conference,practicesthe four theinterviews. for team10th science, Thereannual were like gathering sharedan additional mission, of 39 individuals language,codes that and were and goals, only groups andused thereby one time fostering across positivethe interviews. team-oriented Additional attitudes. analysis will be conducted to determine if these individual codes should remain independent or recoded through the iterative interestedMotivation in studying, for conducting practicing, actionable and scien facilitatingce that involves team early science.stakeholder input may enrich team-level stakeholder engagementcoding process. and, subsequently, solution-oriented research. Though teams may achieve integration and solution-oriented This meetingresearch isindependently, also the first we propose SciTS that conference together they sincecatalyze formation TDTS. of the InternationalSince this study hasNetwork only analyzed for the a subset Science of data, of dataTeam collection Science and analysis will continue as the research team continues. Coding will continue as an iterative process following the methods outlines for the study to ensure intercoder (INSciTS),30. Team-Based a professional Approaches society toadvancing Arts Participation related interests in Mid-Michigan in team science.reliability and continuation of thematic analysis as more data is analyzed. Once qualitative data is analyzed and quantitative Dr.data Stephanie is collected, E. Vaskomerging, Ms. and Vy integration Dao, Mr. Scottof the Jarvie data will, Mr. occur. AJ Rice , Dr. Michael O’Rourke, Michigan State University; Ms. Debbie Mikula, Arts Council of Greater Lansing The conferenceReferences leadership team —myself, Dr. Stephanie E. Our study investigates arts participation of diverse populations in our community. Working with the Arts Council of Greater Vasko, Lotrecchiano,Dr. Julie G., Thompson Mallinson, T., Leblanc-Beaudoin, Klein, and MegghanT., Schwartz, L., Honke Lazar, D., &Seidel— Falk-Krzesinski, H. (2016). Motivation and threat indicators for collaborationLansing, we readiness asked, inwhat knowledge do arts generating experiences teams (KPTs):look like A scopingin these review communities, and domain andanalysis. in what Heliyon, ways 2(5), and e00105. spaces do these groups has workedMallinson,participate closely T., inLotrecchiano, the witharts? UsingG.,the Furniss, SciTS both J., qualitative Schwartz, 2019 L., Planningmethods Lazar, D., to & collectFalk-Krzesinski,Committee narratives H. and(2016). from the Raschdiverse INSciTS Analysis community as aboard method members, forto designing design and a readiness a conferencemodelquantitative for that collaboration. methodsbuilds Journal onto measure existing of Investigative the research economic Medicine, impact64(7), and 1186-1193 ofpractice the ar ts, ourstrengths team considers while the also ways pointing that arts andin exciting culture exist new directions.and matter to members of these communities, and how it might inform arts programming. As a transdisciplinary team with 7. extensiveThe Economics backgrounds of in Collaborationarts-based education at anda Regional African American University and African Studies, we share a deep concern for One ofDr.exploring our Stephen aims the Crowley forrelationship SciTS, Ms. betweenMarisa2019 Richteris the to arts demonstrate, Mr. and Archer justice. Ward We how ,are Boise particularly team State scienceUniversity interested animates in how the andresults propels of this inquiry could researchUniversitybe usedin environmental to leadership direct resources promotes science, to the the spaces value agriculture, ofand both programs collaboration and that natural mo andst effectivelyinterdisciplinary resources. contribute research. To to this the Despite economicend, wethese development are efforts pleased of the to Greater Lansing area. featureinterdisciplinary for the first collaborative time panels research focusing remains on the Indigenous exception rather approa than theches rule to at manyteam universities. science andIf the claimscollaborative approachesadvanced in areagriculture correct there and is a natural'gap' (call resources.it the collaboration gap) between what leadership wants and what researchers do. 31. HereThe weAAAS provide Center an initial for report Scientific on our attempts Collaborati to analyzeon the and collaboration Community gap at one Engagement regional university. (CSCCE) – a research and training institute to support scientific community building. Other valuesWe report drive the results SciTS of interviews 2019 as with well. both Diversity leadership andand faculty inclusion regarding have interest been in and fundamental incentives for interdisciplinarycommitments Ms. Lou Woodley, Dr. Rebecca Aicher, AAAS in our planning,and collaborative driving scholarly our callsactivity for and participation, attempt to make senseinvited of thepresentations, feedback we have and received. fee structure. We suggest Inthat addition, an we haveThe'economic' worked AAAS modelCenter to ensure offor faculty Scientific a decision “green” Collaboration making conference, that and tracks Community 'return giving Engagementon youinvestment' the (CSCCE)option (for resources ofwas an established suchonline as timeprogram in late and 2018 pay-offs rather as a such than a researchasprinted publications) andone training andmakes instituteworking better senseto supportto reduceof the the collaboration individuals food waste. whogap nurture(at And the institution scientificas the primarycommunitieswe studied) host, than and accountsteams.the MSU Community based Center on some for Interdisciplinarityengagementform of ignorance managers (concerningseeks (CEMs) to createincentives may be opportunitiesfound for collaboration) in a range ofto amongst sci refineentific faculty. communities thinking about – from collaborationthose convened by and professional cross- disciplinaryassociations research, to large-scale education, collaborations and training. between multiple research institutions. They may also possess a broad range of 8. jobNDNQI®: titles – from Using program Big directors Data to project Advance administrators the Science and community of Interprofessional managers. CSCCE’s Teams activities combine research andDr. Nancy practice Dunton to deliver, Dr. anTeri evolving Kennedy set, The of resources University and of Kansas support Medical a new community Center of practice of scientific CEMs, wherever We hopethey that are found. you have an excellent time in Lansing while you enjoy SciTS 2019. Lansing has an active downtownInterprofessional with practice restaurants, and education local is viewed art shops, as the holyrunning grail to trails, achieve and the Quadruple local community Aim in healthcare: classes improved such as kickboxingCSCCEpatient, population,has and three pottery. synergistic price, andPlease areaspractitioner ofconsult focus: outcomes. i) theThe AAASwebsite A 2014 Community scoping for more review Engagement detailed found that Fellowship information. research Program, had not yetwhich demonstrated trains and connectsthe impact scientific of IPE, citingCEMs the through need fora year-long systematic professional research to development strengthen the fellowship; evidence ii) base on demand for interprofessional training and online team-based care. If you haveresources any for questions scientific CEMs, or comments including workshops, for the reports SciTS and 2019 webinars Planning and; iii) researchCommittee, into the please roles of scientific look for CEMs those including defining the skillsets of community professionals, and the impact of CEMs on communities focuses on broadening The National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) ® Survey, completed by 240,000 RNs in 2018, includes of us withparticipation red ribbons in STEM. on our name badges. interprofessional relationship measures between RNs and physicians, APRNs, pharmacists, therapists, and social workers. MichaelRNs O’Rourke rated relationships on conflict management skills; respect; assignment of blame for adverse events; shared accountability; and understanding roles, knowledge, and skills of RNs. Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference RNs rated “respect for the contributions of RNs” most highly and gave the lowest rating to “colleagues understand the roles, knowledge and skill of RNs.” Interprofessional relationships were highest on critical care units, followed by ambulatory care. Ratings were lowest in the operating room and perioperative units. RNs rated their relationships with social workers more highly than with other professions. Ratings were lowest for physicians. Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019 These results highlight areas for improvement in interprofessional healthcare and demonstrate the promise of big data to advance the science of interprofessional teams in healthcare.

2019 SciTS Conference Program 116 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Overwhelmed by conflicting information about food & health? Most of us are.

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY CAN HELP. We want to be your trusted partner in discussions about food and where it comes from. Please pull up a chair to Our Table as we talk about food and its impact on our health, our planet and our society.

Join the conversation at food.msu.edu. 2019SciTS SciTS Awards Conference Welcome

DearThe SciTSSciTS 2019 Meritorious participants, Poster Awards recognize posters that demonstrate excellence in communicating scholarly or practice-based content and cover topics of significance toWelcome the field to the of 2019team Science science. of Team This Scienceyear's (SciTS)poster awards will be voted on by the communityConference, theduring 10th theannual poster gathering session. of individuals and groups interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation ofThe the SciTS International Outstanding Network Presentationfor the Science Awardsof Team Scienceacknowledge presenters whose (INSciTS),demonstrate a professional skills in conducting society advancing rigorous, related innovative interests in scholar ship are matched by their teamability science. to engage an audience and communicate their ideas with clarity.

PosterThe conference and Presentation leadership team Awards —myself, will Dr.be Stephanieawarded E.to individuals the following categories:Vasko, Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, and Megghan Honke Seidel— has• worked Early closely Career, with Scholarly the SciTS or2019 Theoretical Planning Committee Focus and the INSciTS board to design a conference that builds on existing research and practice strengths while also pointing in exciting new directions.• Early Career, Practice or Applied Focus • Established Career, Scholarly or Theoretical Focus One• of Established our aims for SciTS Career, 2019 Practice is to demonstrate or Applied how Focus team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to featureJoin us for in the congratulating first time panels this focusing year’s onawardees, Indigenous to approa be announcedches to team atscience the meeting! and collaborative approaches in agriculture and natural resources.

Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments in our planning, driving our calls for participation,Unconference invited presentations, and Details fee structure. In addition, we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- Havedisciplinary you research,ever met education, people at and a conference training. and wanted to start a project, but not had he structure or opportunity to capitalize on that? Have you heard a talk you want to followWe hope up that with? you Dohave you an excellentneed to timemeet in upLansing with currentwhile you collaborato enjoy SciTSrs 2019. for aLansing focused has work an sprint?active downtown with restaurants, local art shops, running trails, and local community classes such as kickboxing and pottery. Please consult the website for more detailed information.

ThisIf you yearhave atany SciTS questions 2019, or commentsyou’ll have for thethe SciTSopportunity 2019 Planning to engage Committee, in new please collaborations, look for those talkof us to with old red collaborators, ribbons on our andname do badges. deeper dives through an unconference. The unconference will be on Wednesday, May 22nd, from 2:15 - 4:45 p.m. Dr. Stephanie E.Michael Vasko O’Rourke will lead you through an icebreaker, explain the charge of the afternoon, andChair, then 2019 you Science can ofbreak Team off Science into Conferencework groups. We’ll come back together for series of flash talks about our unconference experiences at the end. In the spirit of preplanning, connecting, and sharing ideas about projects for the unconference, we’ve set up a Slack at inscits.slack.com, with a channel called #unconference, that you can use. Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019 If you need an invite to Slack, have questions about the Slack process or about the unconference, please contact Dr. Vasko at [email protected]

20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 118 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | [email protected] | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org | https://www.inscits.org Thanks to TableSciTS ofReviewers Contents

Welcome ...... 2 A special thank you to our SciTS 2019 abstract reviewers for helpingINSciTS develop Board ...... our program...... 3 Planning Committee ...... 7 • Dr. Laura Anderson, IBM Almaden • Dr. Bree Mitchell, Oregon Health & Science Facility• Dr. Erin Map Blakeney, ...... University of Washington ...... University 8 • Dr. Jennifer Cross, Colorado State University • Dr. Linda Nebeling, NIH/NCI Session• Dr. Stephen Evaluation Crowley, Information Boise State University ...... • Dr. Michael...... O’Rourke, 9 Michigan State Conference• Dr. Deborah at Diaz a Glance Granados, ...... Virginia University...... 10 Commonwealth University • Dr. Christina Park, NIH/ECHO Featured• Dr. Stephen Keynote Fiore, andUniversity Plenary of Central Panels...... • Dr. Vanessa...... Pena, 14 IDA/S Florida • Dr. Marisa A. Rinkus, Michigan State SIGs...... • Dr. Ellen Fisher, Colorado State University ...... University 28 • Dr. Chad Gonnerman, University of Southern • Dr. Kennan Salinero, ReImagine Science Detailed Indiana Daily Schedule ...... • August...... Schaeffer 30 Workshop• Dr. Anne Abstracts...... Heberger Marino • Dr. Karen Schwab, 38 UT Health San Antonio • Dr. Graham Hubbs, University of Idaho • Dr. Tayana Soukup, King’s College London Panel• Dr. FelichismAbstracts...... Kabo, University of Michigan • Dr. Jack Schultz, University42 of Toledo • Mr. Brent T. Ladd, Purdue University • Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, Wayne State Oral• Dr. Abstracts Theresa Lant, ...... Pace University University & ETH Zurich52 Poster• Ms. BethanyAbstracts Laursen, ...... Michigan State • Dr. Stephanie E. Vasko, 106 Michigan State University University SciTS• Dr. KyuseonAwards Lee, ...... University of Minnesota • Dr. Amanda Vogel, 119 NIH/NCI • Dr. Anna Malavisi. Western Connecticut • Dr. Ge Wang, Virginia Tech Unconference University Details ...... • Dr...... Brenda Zierler, 119 University of Washington • Dr. Wayne McCormack, University of Florida Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 120 Post Conference Evaluation Information...... 120

Post-Session Evaluation Please take 2 minutes to complete this brief but valuable post session evaluation. Responses are anonymous and will be used to improve future programming.

Type https:bit.ly/scits2019 into your browser to launch survey or... Scan this QR code

20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 119 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | [email protected] | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org | https://www.inscits.org Notes2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Notes

Dear SciTS 2019 participants,

Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science.

One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels Theresearch Alliance in environmental for the science,Arts in agriculture, Research and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to Universitiesfeature for the (A2RU) first time ispanels a partnershipfocusing on Indigenous of approaches to team science and collaborative Director, overapproaches forty research in agriculture universities and natural whoresources. work to transcend institutional barriers to arts- Joe Krajcik Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental Contact: commitments integrativein our planning, research, driving curricula, our calls for and participation, practice. invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, (517)432-0816 A2RUwe have supports worked toacademic ensure a “green” leadership conference, at giving you the option of an online program rather partnerthan a institutionsprinted one and through working consultationto reduce food waste. on And as the primary host, the MSUcreate4stem.msu.edu Center thefor structural Interdisciplinarity and organizational seeks to create opportunities dynamics to refineCollaborative thinking about collaboration and cross- requireddisciplinary to research,launch andeducation, sustain and training.innovative Research in E arts-integrative efforts, sharing of best ducation, We hope that you have an excellent time in Lansing whileAssessment you enjoy SciTS and 2019. Lansing has an practices,active downtown and withconnecting restaurants, localinstitutions art shops, running trails, and local community classes such Teaching Innovation, acrossas kickboxing its national and pottery. network. Please consult the website for more detailed information. Environments Investigation, and Information focused If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges. for the fields of on improving STEM teaching and Michael O’Rourke Science, learning for all Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference Technology, students Engineering and Mathematics Learn More and Join the Alliance: Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019 a2ru.org

20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 120 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | [email protected] | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org | https://www.inscits.org Notes Table of ContentsNotes

Welcome ...... 2 INSciTS Board ...... 3 Planning Committee ...... 7 Facility Map ...... 8 Session Evaluation Information ...... 9 Conference at a Glance ...... 10 Featured Keynote and Plenary Panels...... 14 SIGs...... 28 Detailed Daily Schedule ...... 30 Workshop Abstracts...... 38 Panel Abstracts...... 42 The Alliance for the Arts in Research UniversitiesOral Abstracts (A2RU) ...... is a partnership of 52 Director, over Posterforty research Abstracts universities...... who work 106 to transcend institutional barriers to arts- Joe Krajcik SciTS Awards ...... 119 integrative research, curricula, and practice. Contact: A2RUUnconference supports academic Details ...... leadership at ...... 119 (517)432-0816 partner institutions through consultation on create4stem.msu.edu Thanks to our Reviewers ...... 120 the structural and organizational dynamics Collaborative requiredPost toConference launch and Evaluation sustain Information...... innovative Research in...... 120 E arts-integrative efforts, sharing of best ducation, A practices, and connecting institutions ssessment and T across its national network. eaching Innovation, Environments Investigation, and Information focused for the fields of on improving STEM teaching and Science, learning for all Technology, students Engineering and Mathematics Learn More and Join the Alliance: a2ru.org

201920192019 SciTS SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Conference Program Program Program 121 LansingLansingLansing Center, Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan Michigan | [email protected] | |[email protected]@gmail.com | https://www.inscits.org | |https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org Notes2019 SciTS Conference Welcome Notes

Dear SciTS 2019 participants,

Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science.

One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative approaches in agriculture and natural resources.

Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinary research, education, and training.

If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges.

Michael O’Rourke Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

20192019 SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Program Program 122 LansingLansing Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan | [email protected] | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org | https://www.inscits.org Notes Table of ContentsNotes

201920192019 SciTS SciTS SciTS Conference Conference Conference Program Program Program 123 LansingLansingLansing Center, Center, Center, Lansing, Lansing, Lansing, Michigan Michigan Michigan | [email protected] | |[email protected]@gmail.com | https://www.inscits.org | |https://www.inscits.orghttps://www.inscits.org Notes2019 SciTS Conference Welcome

Dear SciTS 2019 participants,

Welcome to the 2019 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference, the 10th annual gathering of individuals and groups interested in studying, practicing, and facilitating team science. This meeting is also the first SciTS conference since formation of the International Network for the Science of Team Science (INSciTS), a professional society advancing related interests in team science.

One of our aims for SciTS 2019 is to demonstrate how team science animates and propels research in environmental science, agriculture, and natural resources. To this end, we are pleased to feature for the first time panels focusing on Indigenous approaches to team science and collaborative approaches in agriculture and natural resources.

Other values drive SciTS 2019 as well. Diversity and inclusion have been fundamental commitments in our planning, driving our calls for participation, invited presentations, and fee structure. In addition, we have worked to ensure a “green” conference, giving you the option of an online program rather than a printed one and working to reduce food waste. And as the primary host, the MSU Center for Interdisciplinarity seeks to create opportunities to refine thinking about collaboration and cross- disciplinary research, education, and training.

If you have any questions or comments for the SciTS 2019 Planning Committee, please look for those of us with red ribbons on our name badges.

Michael O’Rourke Chair, 2019 Science of Team Science Conference

Lansing Center WIFI Information - Username: scits and Password: 2019

2019 SciTS Conference Program 124 Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org MSU CENTER FOR INTERDISCIPLINARITY

THE MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR INTERDISCIPLINARITY (C4I) ADVANCES INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION WHILE ADDRESSING THE MOST CHALLENGING QUESTIONS OF OUR TIME. SERVING AS AN ADVOCATE FOR RESEARCHERS AND SCHOLARS, THE CENTER CONSULTS WITH TEAMS, PROVIDES RESOURCES FOR AND ABOUT INTERDISCIPLINARITY, AND CREATES OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRAINING, EDUCATION, NETWORKING, MENTORSHIP, VISIBILITY, AND FUNDING BOTH ON AND OFF CAMPUS.

LEARN MORE BY VISITING C4I.MSU.EDU

2019 SciTS Conference Program

Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org Thank You SciTS 2019 Sponsors

Diamond ($20,000 +) Ruby ($15,000+)

Platinum ($10,000 +) Gold ($5,000 +)

Silver ($2,500+) Exhibitors ($1,000+)

Supporters ($500+)

Lansing Center, Lansing, Michigan | [email protected] | https://www.inscits.org