DOCSLIB.ORG

Treatment of Organophosphorus Insecticides and Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides Using Membrane Bioreactor Technology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Treatment of Organophosphorus Insecticides and Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides Using Membrane Bioreactor Technology TREATMENT OF ORGANOPHOSPHORUS INSECTICIDES AND PHENOXYACETIC ACID HERBICIDES USING MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR TECHNOLOGY by AVIK GHOSHDASTIDAR Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (Chemistry) Acadia University Spring Convocation 2012 © by AVIK GHOSHDASTIDAR, 2012 This thesis by Avik Ghoshdastidar was defended successfully in an oral examination on April 18, 2012. The examining committee for the thesis was: ________________________ Dr. Rick Mehta, Chair ________________________ Dr. Michael Earle, External Examiner ________________________ Dr. Amitabh Jha, Internal Examiner ________________________ Dr. Anthony Tong, Supervisor _________________________ Dr. John Murimboh, Head This thesis is accepted in its present form by the Division of Research and Graduate Studies as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree Master of Science (Chemistry) …………………………………………. ii This thesis by Avik Ghoshdastidar was defended successfully in an oral examination on April 18, 2012. The examining committee for the thesis was: Dr. Rick Mehta, Chair Dr. Michael Earle, External Examiner Dr. Amitabh Jha, Internal Examiner Dr. Anthony Tong, Supervisor Dr. John Murimboh, Head This thesis is accepted in its present form by the Division of Research and Graduate Studies as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree Master of Science (Chemistry) I, Avik Ghoshdastidar, grant permission to the University Librarian at Acadia University to reproduce, loan or distribute copies of my thesis in microform, paper or electronic formats on a non-profit basis. I, however, retain the copyright in my thesis. ______________________________ Avik Ghoshdastidar ______________________________ Dr. Anthony Tong ______________________________ April 18, 2012 iii Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................... iv List of Tables .............................................................................................................. viii List of Figures ................................................................................................................ x Abstract ....................................................................................................................... xii List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................. xiii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... xvii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction to Pesticides ............................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Definitions .................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 History of Pesticide Use ............................................................................... 1 1.1.3 Pesticide Usage ............................................................................................ 5 1.1.4 The Economics of Pesticide Use ................................................................. 11 1.1.5 The Chemistry of Organophosphorus Insecticides .................................. 14 1.1.6 The Chemistry of PA and Benzoic Acid Herbicides ................................. 19 1.1.7 PA and Benzoic Acid Metabolites ............................................................ 22 1.1.8 Environmental Exposure and Pesticide Occurrence ............................... 22 1.1.9 Fate of Pesticides in Aquatic Environments ............................................ 28 1.1.10 Pesticide Toxicology .................................................................................. 38 1.1.11 Pesticide Regulations and Legislation ...................................................... 43 1.2 Water Quality ............................................................................................... 45 1.2.1 Physical Properties .................................................................................... 45 1.2.2 Inorganic Non-metallics ........................................................................... 47 1.2.3 Organics ..................................................................................................... 49 1.2.4 Microbiological Examination .................................................................... 50 1.3 Pesticide Treatment ...................................................................................... 50 1.3.1 Conventional Wastewater Treatment ...................................................... 50 1.3.2 Constructed Wetlands ............................................................................... 51 1.3.3 Granular Activated Carbon ....................................................................... 52 1.3.4 Ozonation ................................................................................................... 53 1.3.5 Photocatalytic oxidation ........................................................................... 54 1.3.6 Fenton’s Reagent ....................................................................................... 56 iv 1.3.7 Gamma Irradiation .................................................................................... 59 1.3.8 Ultrasonic Wave Treatment ...................................................................... 59 1.3.9 Bioremediation .......................................................................................... 59 1.3.10 Metabolite Treatment ................................................................................ 61 1.3.11 Pesticide Wastewater Treatment .............................................................. 62 1.4 Membrane Bioreactor ................................................................................... 63 1.4.1 Introduction to Membrane Bioreactor ..................................................... 63 1.4.2 The History of Membrane Bioreactors ..................................................... 65 1.4.3 Membrane Fouling .................................................................................... 66 1.5 Objective ........................................................................................................ 68 2 Materials and Methods .........................................................................................69 2.1 Membrane Bioreactor ...................................................................................69 2.2 Experimental Setup .......................................................................................69 2.2.1 Wastewater Tank .......................................................................................69 2.2.2 Intermediate Tank ...................................................................................... 71 2.2.3 Pesticide Tank ............................................................................................. 71 2.2.4 Peristaltic Pumps and Flow Rates ............................................................. 72 2.2.5 Aeration Spargers ....................................................................................... 72 2.2.6 Temperature Controls ............................................................................... 73 2.2.7 Aeration ...................................................................................................... 73 2.2.8 Sampling ..................................................................................................... 73 2.3 Analytical Methods ....................................................................................... 74 2.3.1 Solid Phase Extraction ............................................................................... 74 2.3.2 Gas Chromatography ................................................................................. 74 2.3.3 High Pressure Liquid Chromatography .................................................... 75 2.3.4 Mass Spectrometry .................................................................................... 75 2.3.5 Quantitation............................................................................................... 75 2.4 Materials and Standards ............................................................................... 75 2.4.1 OP Pesticide Experiment ........................................................................... 75 2.4.2 PA Pesticide Experiment ........................................................................... 77 2.5 Chemical Analysis ......................................................................................... 78 2.5.1 Solid Phase Extraction ............................................................................... 78 2.5.2 Gas Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry ............................................. 79 v 2.5.3 Liquid Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry ........................................ 80 2.5.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control .......................................................... 81 2.6 Spectrophotometric Analysis ........................................................................ 81 2.7 Potentiometric Analysis ............................................................................... 82 2.7.1 pH ............................................................................................................... 82 2.7.2 Dissolved Oxygen .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ASM 2013 Countermotions.Pdf
    Christiane Schnura, Schweidnitzer Str. 41, 40231 Düsseldorf Christiane Schnura, Schweidnitzer Str. 41, 40231 Düsseldorf Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Gebäude Q 26 (Rechtsabteilung) Kaiser-Wilhelm-Allee 51368 Leverkusen Annual Stockholders’ Meeting on April 26, 2013 I hereby notify you that I will oppose the proposals of the Board of Management and the Supervisory Board as regards Items 2 and 3 of the Agenda, and will induce the other stockholders to vote in favor of the following countermotions. Countermotion to Item 2: The actions of the members of the Board of Management are not ratified The BAYER Group is responsible for many environmental and social problems. The Board of Management bears responsibility for this, and for this reason its actions should not be ratified. The following is a selection of current problem areas. Labeling of genetically engineered products BAYER contributed USD 2 million to a campaign operated by chemical corporations in the United States which resulted in an initiative to have genetically engineered food products labeled accordingly being defeated. Proposition 37, an initiative put forward in the federal state of California which called for mandatory European-style labeling, went to the ballot on Presidential Election Day, November 6. The companies invested more than USD 40 million in their advertising campaign, roughly ten times more than the proponents of the initiative. This is a classic example of double standards. In Europe it goes without saying that genetically modified ingredients are declared on the labeling of a food product. In the United States, on the other hand, spurious arguments are put forward to prevent labeling of this kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries
    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries. Peter Jentsch Extension Associate Department of Entomology Cornell University's Hudson Valley Lab 3357 Rt. 9W; PO box 727 Highland, NY 12528 email: [email protected] Phone 845-691-7151 Mobile: 845-417-7465 http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/faculty/jentsch/ 2 Historical Perspectives on Fruit Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Chemistries. by Peter Jentsch I. Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 Synthetic Pesticide Development and Use II. Influences Changing the Pest Management Profile in Apple Production Chemical Residues in Early Insect Management Historical Chemical Regulation Recent Regulation Developments Changing Pest Management Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 The Science Behind The Methodology Pesticide Revisions – Requirements For New Registrations III. Resistance of Insect Pests to Insecticides Resistance Pest Management Strategies IV. Reduced Risk Chemistries: New Modes of Action and the Insecticide Treadmill Fermentation Microbial Products Bt’s, Abamectins, Spinosads Juvenile Hormone Analogs Formamidines, Juvenile Hormone Analogs And Mimics Insect Growth Regulators Azadirachtin, Thiadiazine Neonicotinyls Major Reduced Risk Materials: Carboxamides, Carboxylic Acid Esters, Granulosis Viruses, Diphenyloxazolines, Insecticidal Soaps, Benzoyl Urea Growth Regulators, Tetronic Acids, Oxadiazenes , Particle Films, Phenoxypyrazoles, Pyridazinones, Spinosads, Tetrazines , Organotins, Quinolines. 3 I Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 The apple has a rather ominous origin. Its inception is framed in the biblical text regarding the genesis of mankind. The backdrop appears to be the turbulent setting of what many scholars believe to be present day Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Nerve Agent - Lntellipedia Page 1 Of9 Doc ID : 6637155 (U) Nerve Agent
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of MILLIONS of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com Nerve Agent - lntellipedia Page 1 of9 Doc ID : 6637155 (U) Nerve Agent UNCLASSIFIED From lntellipedia Nerve Agents (also known as nerve gases, though these chemicals are liquid at room temperature) are a class of phosphorus-containing organic chemicals (organophosphates) that disrupt the mechanism by which nerves transfer messages to organs. The disruption is caused by blocking acetylcholinesterase, an enzyme that normally relaxes the activity of acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter. ...--------- --- -·---- - --- -·-- --- --- Contents • 1 Overview • 2 Biological Effects • 2.1 Mechanism of Action • 2.2 Antidotes • 3 Classes • 3.1 G-Series • 3.2 V-Series • 3.3 Novichok Agents • 3.4 Insecticides • 4 History • 4.1 The Discovery ofNerve Agents • 4.2 The Nazi Mass Production ofTabun • 4.3 Nerve Agents in Nazi Germany • 4.4 The Secret Gets Out • 4.5 Since World War II • 4.6 Ocean Disposal of Chemical Weapons • 5 Popular Culture • 6 References and External Links --------------- ----·-- - Overview As chemical weapons, they are classified as weapons of mass destruction by the United Nations according to UN Resolution 687, and their production and stockpiling was outlawed by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993; the Chemical Weapons Convention officially took effect on April 291997. Poisoning by a nerve agent leads to contraction of pupils, profuse salivation, convulsions, involuntary urination and defecation, and eventual death by asphyxiation as control is lost over respiratory muscles.
    [Show full text]
  • Warning: the Following Lecture Contains Graphic Images
    What the новичок (Novichok)? Why Chemical Warfare Agents Are More Relevant Than Ever Matt Sztajnkrycer, MD PHD Professor of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Medical Toxicologist, Minnesota Poison Control System Medical Director, RFD Chemical Assessment Team @NoobieMatt #ITLS2018 Disclosures In accordance with the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) Standards, the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission (ANCC) and the Commission on Accreditation for Pre-Hospital Continuing Education (CAPCE), states presenters must disclose the existence of significant financial interests in or relationships with manufacturers or commercial products that may have a direct interest in the subject matter of the presentation, and relationships with the commercial supporter of this CME activity. The presenter does not consider that it will influence their presentation. Dr. Sztajnkrycer does not have a significant financial relationship to report. Dr. Sztajnkrycer is on the Editorial Board of International Trauma Life Support. Specific CW Agents Classes of Chemical Agents: The Big 5 The “A” List Pulmonary Agents Phosgene Oxime, Chlorine Vesicants Mustard, Phosgene Blood Agents CN Nerve Agents G, V, Novel, T Incapacitating Agents Thinking Outside the Box - An Abbreviated List Ammonia Fluorine Chlorine Acrylonitrile Hydrogen Sulfide Phosphine Methyl Isocyanate Dibotane Hydrogen Selenide Allyl Alcohol Sulfur Dioxide TDI Acrolein Nitric Acid Arsine Hydrazine Compound 1080/1081 Nitrogen Dioxide Tetramine (TETS) Ethylene Oxide Chlorine Leaks Phosphine Chlorine Common Toxic Industrial Chemical (“TIC”). Why use it in war/terror? Chlorine Density of 3.21 g/L. Heavier than air (1.28 g/L) sinks. Concentrates in low-lying areas. Like basements and underground bunkers. Reacts with water: Hypochlorous acid (HClO) Hydrochloric acid (HCl).
    [Show full text]
  • SARIN the History and Politics of a Chemical Warfare Agent
    SARIN The History and Politics of a Chemical Warfare Agent Sarin: A Nerve Agent Sarin, a.k.a. GB, and its other organophosphorus relatives (VX, etc.) are members of the class of chemical weapons known as "nerve agents." These SARIN compounds target the central nervous system where they serve as cholinesterase inhibitors, blocking nerve impulse transmission across synapses. This effect can be lethal. From Sarin's MSDS: "Symptoms of overexposure may occur within minutes or hours, depending upon dose. They include: miosis (constriction of pupils) and visual effects, (C4H10FO2P) headaches and pressure sensation, runny nose and nasal congestion, salivation, Isopropylmethanefluorophosphonate tightness in the chest, nausea, vomiting, giddiness, anxiety, difficulty in thinking and sleeping, nightmares, muscle twitches, tremors, weakness, Common Names: GB, Zarin abdominal cramps, diarrhea, involuntary urination and defecation. With severe A volatile, colorless, odorless liquid exposure symptoms progress to convulsions and respiratory failure." Least-Effect Dose: Japan subway: Vomiting of blood 0.002 mg/L over 15 inhalations For detoxification: Lethal Dose: 0.07 mg/L over 15 inhalations Treat contaminated area with 10% NaOH solution or In humans: "administer, in rapid succession, all three Nerve Agent 1.7 g on skin (for a 70 kg human) Antidote Kit(s), Mark I injectors (or atropine if directed by physician). " The History of Nerve Agents 1936 Dr. Gerhard Schrader, a chemist at IG Farben, discovered the first of the organophosphorus nerve agents, Tabun, en route to finding more effective pesticides. The project had started in 1934. 1942-45 Germans develop the first generation "G" nerve agents. Schrader and colleagues make 2000 new compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • 6/26/2012 1 Malathion Impurities Dr. Yehia Ibrahim
    1 Malathion Impurities Dr. Yehia Ibrahim 6/26/2012 2 Malathion Impurities Dr. Yehia Ibrahim 6/26/2012 3 Malathion Impurities Dr. Yehia Ibrahim 6/26/2012 Organophosphates and Germany • 1820s: investigations into organophosphate (OP) chemistry began • Early 1900s: several OP compounds synthesized • 1930s: toxicity of OPs becoming recognized • 1940s: insecticidal action observed by Germany during WWII 4 Malathion Impurities Dr. Yehia Ibrahim 6/26/2012 Organophosphates and Germany • Group led by Gerhard Schrader searching for substitutes to nicotine as an insecticide – Nicotine in short supply during WWII – Developed a number of incredibly toxic nerve agents Sarin Soman Tabun 5 Malathion Impurities Dr. Yehia Ibrahim 6/26/2012 Organophosphates and Germany • Schrader’s group also created some of the first commercial OP insecticides Dimefox TEPP Schradan Parathion 6 Malathion Impurities Dr. Yehia Ibrahim 6/26/2012 After WWII • Schrader’s research records were captured by Allied forces – Led to massive increase in interest in OP insecticides • Early OPs – very effective against insects – Much more toxic to vertebrates than organochlorine insecticides – Nonpersistent and chemically unstable 7 Malathion Impurities Dr. Yehia Ibrahim 6/26/2012 Malathion • First produced by American Cyanamid in 1950 • Very safe due to its low vertebrate toxicity • Used on most fruits, vegetables and forage crops • Works on a wide range of insect pests 8 Malathion Impurities Dr. Yehia Ibrahim 6/26/2012 9 Malathion Impurities Dr. Yehia Ibrahim 6/26/2012 Diethyl 2-[(dimethoxyphosphorothioyl)sulfanyl]butanedioate 10 Malathion Impurities Dr. Yehia Ibrahim 6/26/2012 11 Malathion Impurities Dr. Yehia Ibrahim 6/26/2012 O Diethyl Maleate C CH O CH CH 2 3 S + CH O CH CH 2 3 CH O P O CH C O 3 3 S C S O CH CH O CH CH O P S 2 3 H O 3 O CH O CH C 2 2 CH + CH C 3 CH O CH 2 CH 3 Malathion 3 O CH 3 CH 2 O CH C O Diethyl Fumarate 12 Malathion Impurities Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • View Is Primarily on Addressing the Issues of Non-Permanently Charged Reactivators and the Development of Treatments for Aged Ache
    Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Therapeutics for the Treatment of Organophosphorus Poisoning by Nerve Agents and Pesticides Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Andrew Joseph Franjesevic Graduate Program in Chemistry The Ohio State University 2019 Dissertation Committee Professor Christopher M. Hadad, Advisor Professor Thomas J. Magliery Professor David Nagib Professor Jonathan R. Parquette Copyrighted by Andrew Joseph Franjesevic 2019 2 Abstract Organophosphorus (OP) compounds, both pesticides and nerve agents, are some of the most lethal compounds known to man. Although highly regulated for both military and agricultural use in Western societies, these compounds have been implicated in hundreds of thousands of deaths annually, whether by accidental or intentional exposure through agricultural or terrorist uses. OP compounds inhibit the function of the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and AChE is responsible for the hydrolysis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh), and it is extremely well evolved for the task. Inhibition of AChE rapidly leads to accumulation of ACh in the synaptic junctions, resulting in a cholinergic crisis which, without intervention, leads to death. Approximately 70-80 years of research in the development, treatment, and understanding of OP compounds has resulted in only a handful of effective (and approved) therapeutics for the treatment of OP exposure. The search for more effective therapeutics is limited by at least three major problems: (1) there are no broad scope reactivators of OP-inhibited AChE; (2) current therapeutics are permanently positively charged and cannot cross the blood-brain barrier efficiently; and (3) current therapeutics are ineffective at treating the aged, or dealkylated, form of AChE that forms following inhibition of of AChE by various OPs.
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Provided by CDC Stacks Author Manuscript Chem Biol Interact
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE NIH Public Access provided by CDC Stacks Author Manuscript Chem Biol Interact. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 July 23. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Chem Biol Interact. 2013 March 25; 203(1): 85–90. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2012.10.019. Proteomic analysis of adducted butyrylcholinesterase for biomonitoring organophosphorus exposures Judit Marsillacha,b, Edward J. Hsiehb, Rebecca J. Richtera,b, Michael J. MacCossb, and Clement E. Furlonga,b,* Judit Marsillach: [email protected]; Edward J. Hsieh: [email protected]; Rebecca J. Richter: [email protected]; Michael J. MacCoss: [email protected]; Clement E. Furlong: [email protected] aDept. of Medicine (Division of Medical Genetics), University of Washington, 98195 Seattle, WA, USA bDept. of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, 98195 Seattle, WA, USA Abstract Organophosphorus (OP) compounds include a broad group of toxic chemicals such as insecticides, chemical warfare agents and antiwear agents. The liver cytochromes P450 bioactivate many OPs to potent inhibitors of serine hydrolases. Cholinesterases were the first OP targets discovered and are the most studied. They are used to monitor human exposures to OP compounds. However, the assay that is currently used has limitations. The mechanism of action of OP compounds is the inhibition of serine hydrolases by covalently modifying their active-site serine. After structural rearrangement, the complex OP inhibitor-enzyme is irreversible and will remain in circulation until the modified enzyme is degraded. Mass spectrometry is a sensitive technology for analyzing protein modifications, such as OP-adducted enzymes.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacists Adolf Schall and Ernst Ratzlaff and the Synthesis of Tabun-Like Compounds: a Brief History
    ORIGINAL ARTICLES Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA Pharmacists Adolf Schall and Ernst Ratzlaff and the synthesis of tabun-like compounds: a brief history G. A. Petroianu Received February 12, 2014, accepted March 25, 2014 Prof. Dr. med. Georg A Petroianu, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Depart- ment of Cellular Biology & Pharmacology, University Park (11200 SW 8th Street), Miami, 33199 FL georg.petroianu@fiu.edu Pharmazie 69: 780–784 (2014) doi: 10.1691/ph.2014.4028 The history of the synthesis of organophosphate inhibitors of cholinesterase starting with the synthe- sis of tetraethyl-pyrophosphate by Moschnin(e) and de Clermont and leading to the recognition about half a century later of the toxicity of the phosphor ester by Lange and von Krueger has been told in great detail previously. An almost parallel history –described originally by Bo Holmstedt – exists for organophosphonate inhibitors of cholinesterase starting with the synthesis (1898) in Rostock of diethylamido-ethoxy-phosphoryl-cyanide by the pharmacist Adolph Schall (1870–1957), a graduate stu- dent of August Michaelis (1847–1916), the re-examination of the chemical structure of the Schall compound (1903) by Michaelis, recognition (1937) of the toxicity of class by Gerhard Schrader (1903–1990) and con- firmation (1951) of the structure by Bo Holmstedt (1919–2002). This short report attempts to shed some light on the life of the pharmacists and chemists involved in the synthesis of the first P-CN organophos- phonate inhibitor of cholinesterase, focusing on the two less known pharmacists, the graduate students of Professor Michaelis Adolph Schall and Ernst Ratzlaff (1870–1948).
    [Show full text]
  • The Therapeutic Efficacy of Oxime Treatment in Cyclosarin- Poisoned Mice Pretreated with a Combination of Pyridostigmine Benactyzine and Trihexyphenidyl
    Journal of Applied Biomedicine 2: 163–167, 2004 ISSN 1214–0287 ORIGINAL ARTICLE The therapeutic efficacy of oxime treatment in cyclosarin- poisoned mice pretreated with a combination of pyridostigmine benactyzine and trihexyphenidyl Lucie Ševelová, Kamil Kuča, Gabriela Krejčová, Josef Vachek Purkyně Military Medical Academy, Department of Toxicology, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic Received 30th January 2004. Revised 20th March 2004. Published online 25th April 2004. Summary The present study was performed to assess and compare the therapeutic efficacy of various oximes (methoxime, BI-6, HI-6) combined with benactyzine (BNZ) in cyclosarin (GF-agent)- poisoned mice and to evaluate the influence of pretreatment with PANPAL (pyridostigmine, benactyzine and trihexyphenidyl) on the effect of antidotal treatment in mice poisoned with the GF-agent. In the first part of our experiment, methoxime, BI-6 or HI-6 in combination with benactyzine were used for the treatment of GF-poisoned mice. In the second part of the experiment the animals were pretreated with PANPAL 60 min before the GF-agent challenge and then the oxime therapy was applied in the same time scheme as before. All the therapeutic regimens showed a protective ratio higher than 2 and significantly increased the LD50 of GF-agent. The most efficacious oxime in decreasing of GF-agent toxicity was HI-6. PANPAL increased the protective ratios of all therapeutic regimens in comparison with administration of the oxime and BNZ alone. From the results obtained, the combination of pretreatment with PANPAL and following therapy with BNZ and HI-6 seems to be the most efficacious therapeutic regimen for treatment of GF-agent-poisoned mice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Toxicity of Parathion to Orconectes Rusticus and Viviparus Malleatus
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Dissertations 1978 THE TOXICITY OF PARATHION TO ORCONECTES RUSTICUS AND VIVIPARUS MALLEATUS Leslie Alan Goldsmith University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss Recommended Citation Goldsmith, Leslie Alan, "THE TOXICITY OF PARATHION TO ORCONECTES RUSTICUS AND VIVIPARUS MALLEATUS" (1978). Open Access Dissertations. Paper 151. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss/151 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TOXICITY OF PARATHION TO ORCONECTES RUSTICUS AND VIVIPARUS MALLEATUS BY LESLIE ALAN GOLDSMITH A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES (PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY) UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 1978 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DISSERTATION OF LESLIE ALAN GOLDSMITH Approved: Dissertation Committee Dean of the Graduate School UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 1978 PARATHION TOXICITY TO ORCONECTES & VIVIPARUS Abstract Parathion is an organophosphate pesticide used in great quantities in the United States and around the world. The mechanism of toxicity for parathion in mammals has been attributed to its enzymatic desulfuration to its oxygen analog paraoxon which subsequently fonns a covalent bond with acetylcholinesterase
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Activation of Organophosphorus Insecticides by Liver Microsomes Richard Emanuel Johnsen Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1962 Comparative activation of organophosphorus insecticides by liver microsomes Richard Emanuel Johnsen Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Johnsen, Richard Emanuel, "Comparative activation of organophosphorus insecticides by liver microsomes " (1962). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 2004. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/2004 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 62—3010 microfilmed exactly as received JOHNSEN, Richard Emanuel, 1936- COMPARATIVE ACTIVATION OF ORGANO­ PHOSPHOROUS INSECTICIDES BY LIVER MICROSOMES. Iowa State University of Science and Technology Ph.D., 1962 Zoology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan COMPARATIVE ACTIVATION OF ORGANOPHOSPHORUS INSECTICIDES BY LIVER MICROSOMES bY Richard Emanuel Johnsen A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Entomology Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In Charge of Major Work Signature was redacted
    [Show full text]