DOCSLIB.ORG

Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH- T)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH- T) Final Evaluation Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH- T) Winrock International December 2013–March 2017 Evaluator: Deborah Orsini, Management Systems International Under contract to: United States Department of Labor Cooperative Agreement IL-23979-13-75-K Management Systems International 200 12th Street South, Suite 1200, Arlington, VA 22202 | T +1-703-979-7100 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................................................ iii ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... vi Evaluation Findings ............................................................................................................................................ vii Recommendations for Future Programming ...................................................................................................... xii I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Project Context ............................................................................................................................................... 1 B. Project Targets and Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 2 II. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES, KEY QUESTIONS AND METHODOLOGY ....................................................... 4 A. Objectives and Key Questions ....................................................................................................................... 4 B. Methodology ................................................................................................................................................... 5 III. EVALUATION FINDINGS.................................................................................................................................. 8 A. Project Scope: Challenges ............................................................................................................................. 8 B. Evaluation Questions .................................................................................................................................... 12 IV. LESSONS LEARNED AND GOOD PRACTICES ........................................................................................... 45 A. Lessons Learned .......................................................................................................................................... 45 B. Good Practices ............................................................................................................................................. 46 V. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................... 47 VI. RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 47 A. Priority Recommendations Prior to Project End ........................................................................................... 47 B. Recommendations for Future Child Labor Programming ............................................................................. 47 ANNEX A: CMEP Performance Indicators ........................................................................................................ 49 ANNEX B: Responses to Interim Evaluation .................................................................................................... 55 ANNEX C: Terms of Reference .......................................................................................................................... 57 ANNEX D: Desk Review Documents ................................................................................................................. 78 ANNEX E: Field Schedule .................................................................................................................................. 79 ANNEX F: List of Key Informants Interviewed (233 People) ........................................................................... 81 ANNEX G: Final Evaluation Stakeholder Meeting ............................................................................................ 85 INDEPENDENT FINAL EVALUATION: REACH-T PROJECT RWANDA i TABLES Table 1: Sites Visited During Final Evaluation ......................................................................................................... 6 Table 2: Key Dates for Project Implementation ....................................................................................................... 8 Table 3: Partner Responsibilities for Direct Services in Target Provinces ............................................................... 9 Table 4: Project Beneficiaries and Services .......................................................................................................... 11 Table 5: Child Labor Drivers, Related Strategies and Activities ............................................................................ 12 Table 6: Increased Enforcement Indicators and Results ....................................................................................... 18 Table 7: Education Indicators and Results ............................................................................................................ 21 Table 8: Income Generation Indicators and Results ............................................................................................. 24 Table 9: Children of Legal Working Age Indicators and Results ........................................................................... 28 Table 10: GoR Policies and Private Sector Action Plan Indicators and Results .................................................... 31 Table 11: Awareness-Raising Indicators and Results ........................................................................................... 32 Table 12: Social Protection Indicators and Results ............................................................................................... 34 Table 13: Effectiveness of Best Practices ............................................................................................................. 35 Table 14: Priorities within $5,000,000 Grant Ceiling ............................................................................................. 40 Table 15: Sustainability Priorities per Final Evaluation Stakeholder Meeting ........................................................ 41 Table 16: Selected Responses to Midterm Evaluation Recommendations ........................................................... 45 FIGURES Figure 1: REACH-T Intervention Areas ................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2: Project Targets vs. Achievements .......................................................................................................... 11 Figure 3: REACH-T’s Alignment with GoR Policy and Tea Sector ........................................................................ 13 Figure 4: REACH-T Outcomes .............................................................................................................................. 16 INDEPENDENT FINAL EVALUATION: REACH-T PROJECT RWANDA ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The evaluator would like to extend sincere thanks to the staff of Winrock International and its implementing partners, ADEPE, FERWACOTHE and Duterimbere, as well as its Government of Rwanda (GoR) partners, the Ministry of Public Service and Labor (MIFOTRA), the National Agricultural Export Board (NAEB) and the National Commission for Children (NCC), for their support during the evaluation. Sincere thanks are due to REACH-T’s Project Director and Deputy Director, who responded promptly to all requests for information, provided efficient coordination of a complex itinerary, and organized a productive stakeholder meeting. On the field level, special thanks to the local coordinators, community activists, teacher mentors and mother trainers who organized meetings and provided valuable insights into project achievements and challenges. The evaluator would also like to thank all the beneficiaries who traveled considerable distances on foot for focus group interviews, and to the 52 stakeholders and beneficiaries who generously shared their feedback at the final evaluation stakeholder meeting. INDEPENDENT FINAL EVALUATION: REACH-T PROJECT RWANDA iii ACRONYMS ADEPE Action Pour le Développement du Peuple (Action for the Development of the People) ALERT Accountability for Labor Law Enforcement Referrals and Tracking System ASSOC Sector Social Affairs Officer BDA Business Development Agency BDF Business Development Fund CA Community Activist CAHR Children at High Risk (of Child Labor) CL Child Labor CLMS Child Labor Monitoring System CMEP Comprehensive Monitoring and Evaluation Plan CSS Conditional Scholarship Support DLI District Labor Inspectors ECD Early Childhood Development FERWACOTHE Fédération Rwandaise des Coopératives de Théculteurs (Federation of Tea-Growing Cooperatives) FOA Funding Opportunity Announcement FRw Rwandan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rwanda Irrigation Master Plan
    Rwanda Irrigation Master Plan The Government of Rwanda, Ministry of Agriculture & Animal Resources Ebony Enterprises Ltd The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Rwanda Irrigation Master Plan The Government of Rwanda, Ministry of Agriculture & Animal Resources Ebony Enterprises Limited The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) i Rwanda Irrigation Master Plan The Government of Rwanda, Ministry of Agriculture & Animal Resources Ebony Enterprises Limited The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Coordinators of IMP Study: NGABONZIZA Prime MAIMBO Mabanga Malesu Supervisor of IMP study: DVOSKIN Dan Authors: MAIMBO Mabanga Malesu ODUOR Alex Raymonds KIPRUTO Cherogony NYOLEI Douglas GACHENE Charles BIAMAH Elijah Kipngetich O’NEIL Mick MIYUKI Ilyama JEPHINE Mogoi Steering Committee Members: SENDEGE Norbert NGABONZIZA Prime NZEYIMANA Innocent MUSABYIMANA Innocent MUSABYIMANA J. Claude AZENE BEKELE Tesemma KAGABO Desire HARINDINTWALI Reverien BAYOULI Amor MOULAYE Abdou Enterprises Ltd. Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources, MINAGRI ii Acknowledgement The World Agroforestry Centre greatly appreciates the opportunity accorded by the Managing Director of Ebony Enterprises Limited, Brigadier General (Rtd) Danny Kassif, to participate in the Rwanda Irrigation Master Plan through a sub-contractual agreement signed in March 2009. Upon inception of Phase I study, a number of Ebony personnel provided administrative and logistical support which cannot go unrecognized. These include Pini Moria, Ram Lustgarten, Arik Almog, Adina Avisar and Avi Evron. Cognizance is also extended to the Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources for providing technical backstopping and logistical support while carrying out the study in Rwanda. The following Officers are highly appreciated for their contributions to ensuring that Phase I of the study was a success: The Permanent Secretary – MINAGRI, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Education P.O.Box 622
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION P.O.BOX 622 KIGALI Rwanda Report on Variable Tranche linked to two Indicators: 1.Equity Indicator: Pre-Primary Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) increased from an average of 10% in 2014 to 17% by 2017 in the 22 poorest performing districts (defined as those that had GER of less than 17% in 2014). $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 2. Efficiency: Education Statistics 2016, disaggregated at district level, available. $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 October 2017 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1: EQUITY INDICATOR: PRE-PRIMARY GROSS ENROLMENT RATE (GER) IN 22 POOREST PERFORMING DISTRICTS ............................................................ 3 Table 1. Pre-Primary Enrolment in 2016 and 2017 (All Distrcits) ................................. 3 Table 2. Pre-Primary Gross Enrolement Rate in Rwanda (as per GPE requirement) 5 Table 3. Pre-Primary GER in 2017 in 22 poorest performing districts current status 5 Table 4. Average of GER in Pre-Primary in 8 better performing districts in 2017 ...... 6 Table 5. GER in Pre-Primary Comparison between 2014 and 2017 in 22 Poorest Performing Districts ............................................................................................................ 7 Table 6. Classrooms Rehabilitated
    [Show full text]
  • THESIS UWIRAGIYE Emmanuel.Pdf
    HOUSEHOLD DEVELOPMENT BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH LAND EXPROPRIATION IN KIBEHO AND MUNINI SECTORS UWIRAGIYE Emmanuel A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Development Studies, College of Arts and Social Science (CASS), in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Arts in Development Studies of the University of Rwanda (UR). Supervisor: Dr UWIZEYE Dieudonné Huye, June 2021 DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is the result of my own work and has not been submitted for any other degree at the University of Rwanda or any other institution. UWIRAGIYE Emmanuel REG No.219014043 Signature: ………… Date: ………………………………………………… Supervisor I certify that this work was done under my supervision, and I confirm that it is ready for examination. DR. UWIZEYE Dieudonné Signature : ………………………………… Date : …………………………………………… I DEDICATION I dedicate this work to all those who toil day and night without advanced education and manage to parry what poverty and limited capabilities hurl on them! II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to God and to the Jesuits who allowed and sponsored my studies. The completion of this study would not have been possible without the support and encouragement of several special people. I express my gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. UWIZEYE Dieudonné. He provided helpful feedbacks at a surprising pace. His guidance, both during the research and over the entire course of my time at UR was invaluable. I am deeply indebted to him. I humbly acknowledge that within the university I have also had the support of many lecturers, Dr. Buchanan I., Dr. Mulindahabi C., Dr. Ndahiriwe I., Dr Nkurayija J., Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda NCA Land Accounts 2018
    RWANDA NATURAL CAPITAL ACCOUNTS - LAND March 2018 The Rwanda Natural Capital Accounts for Land, has been compiled, designed and published by the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) and the Ministry of Environment with assistance from the World Bank and the WAVES Global Partnership. Additional information about the NCA Land 2016 may be obtained from: NISR: KN, 2 Av, 36, PO. Box 6139, Kigali Rwanda; Telephone: +250 252 571 035 Email: [email protected] Ministry of Environment: PO Box 3502, Kigali Rwanda; Telephone +250 788 305 291 Website: www.minirena.gov.rw Ministry of Land and Forest: PO Box 3502, Kigali Rwanda; Telephone +250 788 305 291 Website: www.minilaf.gov.rw Cover image constructed from maps produced by the Regional Centre for Mapping Resources for Development, available from www.rcmrd.org and available on RLMUA Land Use Planning Portal www.rwandalanduse.rnra.rw. Recommended citation: Government of Rwanda (NISR, Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Lands and Forestry), Natural Capital Accounts for Land, March 2018. ii Contents LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... V LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RWANDA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (REMA) Public Disclosure Authorized
    RWANDA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (REMA) Public Disclosure Authorized THE LANDSCAPE APPROACH TO FOREST RESTORATION AND CONSERVATION (LAFREC) PROJECT IN RWANDA (GISHWATI AND MUKURA FOREST RESERVES) Public Disclosure Authorized SOCIAL ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized THARCISSE MUSABYIMANA Tel. +250 788640812 Email: [email protected] Public Disclosure Authorized April 2014 Page 1 of 93 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................ 0 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Objective of the Study .................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2.1 Desk review .............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2.2 Field Research .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.3 Sample and sampling technique .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda LAND Report: Access to the Land Tenure Administration
    STUDY ON ACCESS TO THE LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM IN RWANDA AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SYSTEM ON ORDINARY CITIZENS FINAL REPORT July 2015` This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Written by: INES - Ruhengeri CONTACT INFORMATION: LAND Project Nyarutarama, Kigali Tel: +250 786 689 685 [email protected] STUDY ON ACCESS TO THE LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM IN RWANDA AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SYSTEM ON ORDINARY CITIZENS FINAL REPORT Subcontract No. AID=696-C-12-00002-INES-10 Chemonics International Recommended Citation: BIRARO, Mireille; KHAN, Selina; KONGUKA, George; NGABO, Valence; KANYIGINYA, Violet; TUMUSHERURE, Wilson and JOSSAM, Potel; 2015. Final Report of Study on the access to the land tenure administration system in Rwanda and the outcomes of the system on ordinary citizens. Kigali, Rwanda: USAID | LAND Project. September, 2015 The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. 5 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Multisystemic Framework for Mental Health, Social Cohesion
    HHr Health and Human Rights Journal Societal Healing in Rwanda: Toward a MultisystemicHHR_final_logo_alone.indd 1 10/19/15 10:53 AM Framework for Mental Health, Social Cohesion, and Sustainable Livelihoods among Survivors and Perpetrators of the Genocide against the Tutsi alexandros lordos, myria Ioannou, eugène rutembesa, stefani christoforou, eleni anastasiou, and thröstur björgvinsson Abstract The genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda left the country almost completely devastated, with tremendous consequences for mental health, social cohesion, and livelihoods. In the aftermath of such extreme circumstances and human rights violations, societal healing should be conceptualized and approached based on a multisystemic framework that considers these three sectors—mental health, social cohesion, and livelihoods—as well as their interactions. The aims of the present study are twofold: (1) to review evidence on multisystemic healing initiatives already applied in Rwanda using fieldwork notes from interviews and focus groups, alongside relevant scholarly and gray literature, and (2) to propose a Alexandros Lordos, PhD, is a Lecturer in Clinical Psychology at the Department of Psychology of the University of Cyprus and the Special Advisor on Mental Health and Peacebuilding at Interpeace, Geneva, Switzerland. Myria Ioannou, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Researcher in Clinical Psychology at the Department of Psychology of the University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. Eugène Rutembesa, PhD, is a Professor of Clinical Psychology at the University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda. Stefani Christoforou, MSc, is a postgraduate student in the Clinical Psychology Doctoral Program at the Department of Psychology of the University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. Eleni Anastasiou, MSc, is a postgraduate student in the Clinical Psychology Doctoral Program at the Department of Psychology of the University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO Rwanda Newsletter, March 2020
    FAO Rwanda Newsletter March 2020 — Issue #1 FAO/T.Mutesi FAO/T.Mutesi Leveraging the power of technologies in agribusiness Lastly, as the world grappled with the Coronavirus outbreak, Rwanda was no exception. March, was a special month as FAO Rwanda staff started working from home following Rwanda’s complete lockdown to control the spread of the COVID-19 disease in the country. It was a difficult time and a different way of doing office business but we adapted well to the ‘new normal’. Although, non-essential services and travels were suspended, those related to food supply chain remained functional, including veterinary drugs and animal feeds, ©FAO agricultural inputs, harvesting, buying and collecting agricultural produce, extension services, and agro processing factories (feeds and food). Dear reader, Delighted to share further details on our work in this newsletter. Activities at FAO Rwanda Office during the first quarter were intense with the unveiling of a number of projects. Gualbert Gbehounou, FAO Representative In January, FAO joined forces with other UN agencies and the government of Rwanda in a new project aimed to strengthen Rwanda’s social protection. HIGHLIGHTS February saw the launching of a Technical Cooperation New initiative to strengthen e-Commerce in Rwanda Programme project in collaboration with Rwanda FAO trains agriculture experts in Desert Locust control and Development Board (RDB) to digitalize commerce in management agricultural value chains. The initiative will strengthen the Emergency project to support victims of floods in Kirehe capacities of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to be district more competitive on local and foreign markets. FAO and UN agencies join forces to strengthen Rwanda’s social protection Home-based teleworking in the face of COVID-19: Staff’s Similarly, we made an emergency intervention to support experience the farmers in Kirehe district that were severely affected Knowing water better: Assessing water uses and needs by floods late last year destroying crops.
    [Show full text]
  • District Profile
    THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA District Profile Nyaruguru Fourth Population and Housing Census, Rwanda, 2012 Rwanda, Census, and Housing Fourth Population NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS OF RWANDA THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda Fourth Population and Housing Census, Rwanda, 2012 District Profile Nyaruguru January 2015 The Fourth Rwanda Population and Housing Census (2012 RPHC) was implemented by the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR). Field work was conducted from August 16th to 30th, 2012. The funding for the RPHC was provided by the Government of Rwanda, World Bank (WB), the UKAID (Former DFID), European Union (EU), One UN, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and UN Women. Additional information about the 2012 RPHC may be obtained from the NISR: P.O. Box 6139, Kigali, Rwanda; Telephone: (250) 252 571 035 E-mail: [email protected]; Website: http://www.statistics.gov.rw. Recommended citation: National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR), Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning (MINECOFIN) [Rwanda]; 2012. Rwanda Fourth Population and Housing Census. District Profile: Nyaruguru xiii xv Fourth Population and Housing Census, Rwanda, 2012 District Profile:Nyaruguru iv Fourth Population and Housing Census, Rwanda, 2012 District Profile:Nyaruguru Table of Content Foreword ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Action Plan Estimates/ Budget
    Resettlement Action Plan For Selected Feeder Roads in the District of Karongi in Rwanda - Project ID: P 126498 REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND ANIMAL RESOURCES (MINAGRI) RWANDA FEEDER ROADS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (RFRDP) FINAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized UPDATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN FOR SELECTED FEEDER ROADS OF KARONGI DISTRICT Prepared in November 2013 and Revised in February 2017 Public Disclosure Authorized | P a g e PROJECT BASIC DATA No Description Impacts in Quantity 1 District Karongi 2 Province Western Province Construction/Rehabilitation/upgr ading of Roads, Drainage and 3 Planned Civil works Bridges 4 Cost of Civil works (priority roads for 72.25 km) 6,816,881 million $ 5 Cost by km 92,495 USD 6 Cost of RAP 151,534,305 Frw 7 Number of households to be physically displaced 38 8 Private fences affected in meters 13,094 9 Number of institutional buildings affected fully 1 10 Number of institutional buildings affected partially No 11 Number of institutional fences in meters No Loss of agricultural lands permanently in 22.41 12 hectares* 13 Loss of Crops and trees in hectares 19.99 14 settlements in Hectares 2.42 15 Number of households who lose strips of lands in 1,021 RoW 16 Loss of trees in Number 30,000 17 Loss of telephone line affected in meters No 18 Public water taps 2 19 Cemeteries No 20 Partially affected households 983 21 Total number of project affected households 1,021 22 Project Affected Persons (PAPs) 5,105 2 | P a g e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rwanda has four provinces (East, West, North and South) and Kigali City1.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Health Systems
    Strengthening health systems Evidence-informed approaches and lessons learned from Rwanda ‘Institutional Support to Ministry of Health – Phase IV’ (Minisanté IV) Program Capitalization and Knowledge Management: generating lessons from program implementation and translating them into concrete actions at managerial and technical levels for increased ownership, evidence-based policy development and sharing of good practices This booklet is a product of the Ministry of Health in Rwanda in collaboration with the ‘Institutional Support to Ministry of Health – Phase IV’ (Minisanté IV) Program through support from the Belgian Development Agency. The book capitalizes on the work done within the BTC- Rwanda partnership and reflects on different components such as health system strengthening, Strengtheningmaternal health, mental health, urban health, health health technologies and ecologicalsystems interventions, decentralization and aid modalities reflections. It is also a reflection on the value of results achieved and the progress made through the whole institutional support process while providing an appreciation of the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability and impact of planned Evidence-informedinterventions. In addition, this book is seen approaches as an intensive sharing and and learning lessons opportunity in order to draw useful lessons for other similar interventions, new policies and strategies in other learnedcountries and future from partnerships Rwanda in Rwanda. Strengthening health systems Evidence-informed approaches
    [Show full text]
  • FAO Rwanda Newsletter, December 2020
    FAO Rwanda Newsletter December 2020 — Issue #2 FAO/Teopista Mutesi FAO/Teopista Sustaining food systems with rural women in agriculture potential risk in the region. There are many more interesting stories from the people we work in the field in this newsletter. We congratulate our FAO-Rwanda colleague, Jeanne d’Arc who was recognized by the FAO Director General as a committed staff to the Organization, and welcome to new staff who joined the office during the difficult times. I move my vote of thanks to the FAO-Rwanda team, FAO regional and headquarters offices, our partners, service providers and the farmers for your commtiment, together we have made it! I look forward to working with you, and FAO/Teopista Mutesi FAO/Teopista more partners in the coming year. Message from the FAO Representative I wish you a happy holiday season, and blessings in the New Year 2021! Dear Reader, Enjoy reading. We are almost at the end of 2020! For the most part of the year, the world has been battling with COVID-19 pandemic. Gualbert Gbehounou, We got familiar with the words like, build back better, FAO Representative lockdown, teleworking or ‘working from here’ and washing hands every now and then, etc. HIGHLIGHTS Empowering rural women to become entrepreneurs. It has been equally a challenging period working in the Vegetable farmers in rural Rwanda are building back field, yet, colleagues at FAO-Rwanda have been resilient better. and doubled efforts to improve the livelihoods of the Increasing organic farmers in Rwanda. farmers in Rwanda. Immediately after the COVID-19 Clarifying gender equality in the gender-based induced lockdown was lifted on the country, we distributed violence fight.
    [Show full text]