DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey NSF jRA-770910 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WESTERN HEMISPHERE STRONG-MOTION ACCELEROGRAPH STATION LIST - 1976 OPEN FILE REPORT No. 77-374 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Geological Survey standards and nomenclature. Prepared on behalf of the National Science Foundation REPRODUCED BY NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE If.S. DEPARTMEMrcOF COMMERCE SPRINGFIEll!. VA 22161- May 1977 EASINFORMA-TION RESOURCES NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 50272 -101 REPORT DOCUMENTATION !_I,--REPORT NO. 3. Recipient's Accession No. PAGE NSFjRA-770910 PBS) 1 03806 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Western Hemisphere Strong-Motion Accelerograph Station List, May 1977 1976 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Rept. No. 77-374 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 11. Contracl(C) or Grant(G) No. Seismic Engineering Branch (C) 345 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 (G) 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report & Period Covered Engineering and Applied Science (EAS) National Science Foundation Preliminary 1800 G Street, N.W. 14. Washington, D.C. 20550 15. Supplementary Notes I--------------~-------------------------- -- --------------------t ·16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) This list contains information on strong-motion stations installed in the Western Hemi­ sphere for which there is some data in the files of the U.S. Geological Survey. It is intended to provide an indication of the status of the networks as of March 1977. The numbering of the stations is based on their regional locations. Stations are arranged by country, north to south, by states in the section for the United States, and then alphabetically by station name. The station name is that which is believed to be the most commonly used name. Prominent facilities, such as dams, pumping plants, and reservoirs, are listed under the name of the facility. Buildings are listed under the city in which they are located and then either under the name of the building or the street address. All names that have been used on past records are cross-referenced to presently used names. The practice of numbering only the instrument station has re­ placed the former practice of numbering each individual instrument location. Only one number is assigned to a structure such as a building, bridge, or dam although there may be several instruments or many acceleration sensors installed at various locations in and near the structure. The brief site descriptions represent an interpretation of the conditions at each station based on data presently in the stations files. 17. Document Analysis a. Descriptors Earthquakes Ground movements Accelerometers b. Identifiers/Open-Ended Terms Western Hemisphere c. COSATI Field/Group 18. Availability Statement 19. Security Class (This Report) 21. No. of Pages f---------------j--------- NTIS 20. Security Class (This Page) 22. Price (See ANSI-Z39.18) See Instructions on Reverse OPTIONAL FORM 272 (4-77) (Formerly NTIS-35) Department of Commerce UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WESTERN HEMISPHERE STRONG-MOTION ACCELEROGRAPH STATION LIST - 1976 Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. OPEN FILE REPORT No. 77-374 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Geological Survey standards and nomenclature. P!'epaped on behaZf of the NationaZ Science Foundation May 1977 ,\ PREFACE The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) maintains a network of strong­ motion instrumentation for the National Science Foundation in coop­ eration with other Federal, State, and local agencies within the United States. In addition, cooperation is extended to similar groups in other countries throughout the world. Previous station lists published by the USGS contained information on only those stations considered to be part of the cooperative U.S. network. As more organizations throughout the world have developed networks, it has become obvious that composite lists of stations for each of the major regions of the world would be a valuable document for all con­ cerned. This present list is an attempt to bring into one document a minimum amount of information on all of the stations in the western hemisphere known to the USGS. It is hoped that others will begin to compile similar lists for all of the stations in Europe, Asia, and the south Pacific regions. No list of this type can be complete. Only partial information is available on the more recently installed station£, and due to rapid expansion of several of the networks no information is yet available on some of the stations. This list is as complete as practicable as of March 1977. Seismic Engineering Branch U.S. Geological Survey 345 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 iii CONTENTS page Introduction • 1 Notes and abbreviations 3 List of stations 7 Stations in Canada 8 Stations in the United States. 10 Alabama 10 Alas ka 10 Arizona 12 Arkansas • 12 California 13 Colorado • 59 Connecticut. 60 Flori da 60 Georgia 60 Hawai i 61 Idaho • 61 III i noi s . · 62 Indi ana • 62 Kansas 62 Kentucky. • 62 Massachusetts • 63 Mississippi. 63 Mi ssouri • • 63 Montana 64 Nevada •• 64 New Hampshire 65 New Mexico 65 New York. • 65 North Carolina. 66 North Dakota 66 Ohio 66 Oklahoma. 66 Oregon • 67 Pennsylvania 67 Rhode Island 68 South Carolina. • 68 South Dakota •••• 68 Tennessee 69 Utah •• 69 Vermont • 69 Virginia 70 Washington • 70 West Virginia 72 Stations in the Carribean 73 Stations in Central America 75 Stations in South Ameri ca 77 Numerical list of stations • 81 iv I NTRODU enON This list contains information on strong-motion stations installed in the western hemisphere. The stations have been installed and are maintained by many different organizations, although generally one organization is responsible for most of the instruments in anyone country. This is not the case in the United States where there are several different organizations that operate strong-motion instrument networks. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) operates a strong-motion instrument network for the National Science Foundation in cooperation with other Federal, State and local agencies. In addition, the USGS cooperates with similar groups both within the United States and in other countries throughout the world. This list contains information on all of the stations in the western hemisphere for which there is some data in the files of the USGS. It is recognized that the list is imcomplete even for stations in the United States. Furthermore,iSince this list is continuously changing, it is impossible to have complete information about all of the stations at anyone time. Rather, it is intended to provide the community of persons interested in the strong-motion programs with a reasonably complete indication of the current status of the networks at this time. The numbering of the stations is still based on the regional locations of the stations. However, for the convenience of the general users of the informa­ tion, the stations have been arranged by country, north to south, by states in the section for the United States, and then alphabetically by station name. The station name is that which is believed to be the most commonly used name for each station. Prominent facilities, such as dams, pumping plants, and reservoirs are listed under the name of the facility. Buildings are listed under the city in which they are located and then either under the name of the building or the street address. In Los Angeles, the practice of using the street address became common after the San Fernando earthquake, whereas in many other cities, the build­ ing name is generally used. Ground stations are often named after some nearby landmark such as a town, a hill, or a canyon, etc. To facilitate use of the list, all names that have been used on past records are cross-referenced to the names used herein. A practice of numbering only the instrument station has replaced the former practice of numbering each individual instrument location. Only one number is assigned to a structure such as a building, bridge or dam although there may be several instruments or many acceleration sensors installed at various locations in and near the structure, and its appurtenances in the case of dams. This has resulted in a consol idation of station numbers':::' when compared to those shown in 11 the previous IIStrong-Motion Accelerograph Station List - 1975 , USGS Open File Report No. 76-79. For instance, the Hoover Dam instruments, formerly listed under three separate numbers for the gallery, intake tower and oil house, are now listed under a single number, with the instrument location column indicating the specific emplacement site of the three accelerographs. The other information given for each station is intended to aid in ascer­ taining the nature of the effect of the site and of the presence of the structure on the motions recorded at each site. Thus, in addition to the station coordi­ nates, a brief description of the site conditions and structure at each site is given to the extent that this information is known. The brief site descriptions represent an interpretation of the conditions at each station based on data pre­ sently in the stations files. At numerous locations, particularly building sites 1 in the Los Angeles area, core logs have been obtained showing the soil profile directly beneath the accelerograph station. These soil logs, although providing specific information about the site, must be carefully interpreted since they generally begin at the original ground surface and do not allow for the removal of material during construction. In other instances, the depths to sailor rock interfaces were estimated on the basis of nearby soil logs, published geologic cross-sections, or shallow refraction surveys.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Terrace Official, Defends Dog Control Here Gas Deal $For B.C. Kemano To
    : 231T..[or.... r. TD~A~7 PARL~A',E~'I' BLD~S 7ICTORIA B C Terrace official, defends dog control here By DON SCHAFFER Herald Staff Writer bylaws governing ownership of animals within here. because they_ don't allow cows and sheep municipal boundaries " wlmin their boundaries, like Terrace does," he killing problem because they don't allow sheep and goats." Keith Norman, Terrace's' municipal treasurer, "Kitimat doesn't have thesame problem we do said. "They wouldn't have the sheep and goat- says mat comparing the dog problems in Norman said the dog-control procedures in Terrace and Kifimat is like comparing apples Terrace are much more efficient t~an the ones in: and oranges. YET ANOTHER DOG ATTACK Kitimat. • There has apparently been yet another attack on a "they were pretty shook up." Terrace resident's livestock. i6Th e sztuatlons• . m• the two places are com- The next morning he noticed a huge rip on the hind "We (the municipality) pick up way more dogs Alan Mernett of 5242 Soucie Avenue had to destroy end of one of the sheep, which as a result had to be than Kitimat does, so i[isn't fmr to say that we p,letely different," Norman said Wednesday. one of his four sheep Thursday after dogs attacked The problem we have here is that Terrace is a destroyed. don't have as good control over our stray dogs. In rural community while Kitimat is an urban them Wednesday evening. He said he entered the "It is the first time I've had an attack," he said, fact, our dog control is better." one." sheep barn at about 11 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Recovery Recommendation Report
    Economic Recovery Recommendation Report June 2020 Los Angeles County Economic Resiliency Task Force Infrastructure Development and Construction Sector Subcommittee Fran Inman, Chair County of Los Angeles Coronavirus (COVID-19) Economic Resiliency Task Force Infrastructure Development and Construction Sector Recommendation Report Introduction: As Los Angeles County represents a huge, diverse geographic footprint with an incredibly diverse population base, we collectively have the opportunity with the Infrastructure, Development, and Construction sector(s) to provide a robust economic stimulus across our County and beyond. In the face of the COVID-19 crisis, the County must strengthen its commitment to sustainability, equity, and resilience in order to create a pathway for investment in a safe, healthy, and inclusive future. Throughout our nation’s history, a concerted focus on infrastructure investments during an economic downturn has reaped both short-term and long-term benefits. This combined sector represents an enormous opportunity to leverage both public and private investments to provide immediate positive economic impacts for all with good paying jobs, dynamic career pathways, and the pride of playing a part in the development of tangible assets. We appreciate the work of our fellow task force sectors and recognize that each and every one of these sectors has cross-over economic recovery needs relating to infrastructure, development, and construction. Our work group represents a broad base and stands ready to continue our engagement as we recognize that our work will not be complete with this initial report. We hope the focus we have provided with our initial recommendations will be viewed as just the beginning of our bold, inclusive vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Vernon & District Family History Society Library Catalogue
    Vernon & District Family History Society Library Catalogue Location Title Auth. Last Notes Magazine - American Ancestors 4 issues. A local history book and is a record of the pioneer days of the 80 Years of Progress (Westlock, AB Committee Westlock District. Many photos and family stories. Family Alberta) name index. 929 pgs History of Kingman and Districts early years in the 1700s, (the AB A Harvest of Memories Kingman native peoples) 1854 the Hudson Bay followed by settlers. Family histories, photographs. 658 pgs Newspapers are arranged under the place of publication then under chronological order. Names of ethnic newspapers also AB Alberta Newspapers 1880 - 1982 Strathern listed. Photos of some of the newspapers and employees. 568 pgs A history of the Lyalta, Ardenode, Dalroy Districts. Contains AB Along the Fireguard Trail Lyalta photos, and family stories. Index of surnames. 343 pgs A local history book on a small area of northwestern Alberta from Flying Shot to South Wapiti and from Grovedale to AB Along the Wapiti Society Klondyke Trail. Family stories and many photos. Surname index. 431 pgs Alberta, formerly a part of the North-West Territories. An An Index to Birth, Marriage & Death AB Alberta index to Birth, Marriage and Death Registrations prior to Registrations prior to 1900 1900. 448 pgs AB Ann's Story Clifford The story of Pat Burns and his ranching empire. History of the Lower Peace River District. The contribution of AB Around the Lower Peace Gordon the people of Alberta, through Alberta Culture, acknowledged. 84 pgs Illustrated Starting with the early settlers and homesteaders, up to and AB As The Years Go By...
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • NWS Public Information Statement
    Page 1 of 4 Send to Printer PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT NOUS46 KLOX 040045 PNSLOX PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE LOS ANGELES/OXNARD CA 445 PM PST MON FEB 03 2008 ...PRELIMINARY RAINFALL TOTALS... THE FOLLOWING ARE RAINFALL TOTALS IN INCHES FOR THIS RAIN EVENT THROUGH 400 PM THIS AFTERNOON. .LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN AVALON............................ 0.83 HAWTHORNE (KHHR).................. 0.63 DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES.............. 0.68 LOS ANGELES AP (KLAX)............. 0.40 LONG BEACH (KLGB)................. 0.49 SANTA MONICA (KSMO)............... 0.42 MONTE NIDO FS..................... 0.63 BIG ROCK MESA..................... 0.75 BEL AIR HOTEL..................... 0.39 BALLONA CK @ SAWTELLE............. 0.40 BEVERLY HILLS..................... 0.30 HOLLYWOOD RSVR.................... 0.20 L.A. R @ FIRESTONE................ 0.30 DOMINGUEZ WATER CO................ 0.59 LA HABRA HEIGHTS.................. 0.28 .LOS ANGELES COUNTY VALLEYS BURBANK (KBUR).................... 0.14 VAN NUYS (KVNY)................... 0.50 NEWHALL........................... 0.22 AGOURA............................ 0.39 CHATSWORTH RSVR................... 0.61 CANOGA PARK....................... 0.53 SEPULVEDA CYN @ MULHL............. 0.43 PACOIMA DAM....................... 0.51 HANSEN DAM........................ 0.30 NEWHALL-SOLEDAD SCHL.............. 0.20 SAUGUS............................ 0.02 DEL VALLE......................... 0.39 .LOS ANGELES COUNTY SAN GABRIEL VALLEY L.A. CITY COLLEGE................. 0.11 EAGLE ROCK RSRV................... 0.24 EATON WASH @ LOFTUS............... 0.20 SAN GABRIEL R @ VLY............... 0.15 WALNUT CK S.B..................... 0.39 SANTA FE DAM...................... 0.33 WHITTIER HILLS.................... 0.30 CLAREMONT......................... 0.61 .LOS ANGELES COUNTY MOUNTAINS AND FOOTHILLS http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/cnrfc/printprod.php?sid=LOX&pil=PNS&version=1 2/3/2008 Page 2 of 4 MOUNT WILSON CBS.................. 0.73 W FK HELIPORT..................... 0.95 SANTA ANITA DAM..................
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of Los Angeles County Arroyo Sequit Arroyo Sequit consists of about 3.3 stream miles. The arroyo is formed by the confluence of the East and West forks, from where it flows south to enter the Pacific Ocean east of Sequit Point. As part of a survey of 32 southern coastal watersheds, Arroyo Sequit was surveyed in 1979. The O. mykiss sampled were between about two and 6.5 inches in length. The survey report states, “Historically, small steelhead runs have been reported in this area” (DFG 1980). It also recommends, “…future upstream water demands and construction should be reviewed to insure that riparian and aquatic habitats are maintained” (DFG 1980). Arroyo Sequit was surveyed in 1989-1990 as part of a study of six streams originating in the Santa Monta Mountains. The resulting report indicates the presence of steelhead and states, “Low streamflows are presently limiting fish habitat, particularly adult habitat, and potential fish passage problems exist…” (Keegan 1990a, p. 3-4). Staff from DFG surveyed Arroyo Sequit in 1993 and captured O. mykiss, taking scale and fin samples for analysis. The individuals ranged in length between about 7.7 and 11.6 inches (DFG 1993). As reported in a distribution study, a 15-17 inch trout was observed in March 2000 in Arroyo Sequit (Dagit 2005). Staff from NMFS surveyed Arroyo Sequit in 2002 as part of a study of steelhead distribution. An adult steelhead was observed during sampling (NMFS 2002a). Additional documentation of steelhead using the creek between 2000-2007 was provided by Dagit et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Kemano Hydroelectric Development, BC
    Canadian Geotechnical Society Canadian Geotechnical Achievements 2017 Kemano Hydroelectric Development Kenney Dam; Kemano Tunnel and Powerhouse Geographical location Key References Lawton FL. 1953. The Kemano-Kitimat Hydro- South of Kitimat, British Columbia Electric Power Development. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, Vol 101, pp 887-909. Reports for Aluminum Company of Canada When it began or was completed Ltd: Dolmage V. 1951. Geology of the Kemano- Began in 1951; completed in 1954 Tahtsa Tunnel. Dolmage V and Campbell DD. 1961. Kemano Tunnel Inspection and Repair Why a Canadian geotechnical achievement? 1961 – Geology. See also: When initiated in 1951, this project was the largest hydroelectric http://www.kitimatmuseum.ca/node/3 power development ever financed with private capital. Its completion in 1954 coincided with the completion of the aluminum smelter in Kitimat. The short construction period is Photographs (permission pending) just one of many feats of this project that was built in the remote coastal mountains of BC with no road access. When completed, the associated Kenney Dam (97 m high and 457 m wide along the top) across the Nechako River was the 3rd highest rock fill dam in the world. The 16 km long Kemano tunnel provided almost 800 m of head to the underground powerhouse. The tunnel and underground powerhouse required excavation of 13.3 million m3 of rock. Tunneling advance-rate records were set and the underground powerhouse was the largest underground development in the world, at that time. This massive engineering project had unprecedented logistical Kenney Dam construction, October 1952. Kitimat challenges and costs, which required a very large workforce and Museum photo #00016.
    [Show full text]
  • The San Dimas Experimental Forest: 50 Yearsof Research
    United States Department of Agriculture The San Dimas Forest Service Pacific Southwest Experimental Forest: Forest and Range Experlrnent Station 50 Yearsof Research General Technical Report PSW-104 Paul H.Dunn Susan C. Barro Wade G. Wells II Mark A. Poth Peter M. Wohlgemuth Charles G. Colver The Authors: at the time the report was prepared were assigned to the Station's ecology of chaparral and associated ecosystems research unit located in Riverside, California. PAUL H. DUNN was project leader at that time and is now project leader of the atmospheric deposition research unit in Riverside. Calif. SUSAN C. BARRO is a botanist, and WADE G. WELLS II and PETER M. WOHLGEMUTH are hydrologists assigned to the Station's research unit studying ecology arid fire effects in Mediterranean ecosystems located in Riverside, Calif. CHARLES G. COLVER is manager of the San Dimas Experimental Forest. MARK A. POTH is a microbiologist with the Station's research unit studying atmospheric deposition, in Riverside, Calif. Acknowledgments: This report is dedicated to J. Donald Sinclair. His initiative and exemplary leadership through the first 25 years of the San Dimas Experimental Forest are mainly responsible for the eminent position in the scientific community that the Forest occupies today. We especially thank Jerome S. Horton for his valuable suggestions and additions to the manuscript. We also thank the following people for their helpful comments an the manuscript: Leonard F. DeBano, Ted L. Hanes, Raymond M. Rice, William O. Wirtz, Ronald D. Quinn, Jon E. Keeley, and Herbert C. Storey. Cover: Flume and stilling well gather hydrologic data in the Bell 3 debris reservoir, San Dimas Experimental Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • 3-8 Geologic-Seismic
    Environmental Evaluation 3-8 GEOLOGIC-SEISMIC Changes Since the Draft EIS/EIR Subsequent to the release of the Draft EIS/EIR in April 2004, the Gold Line Phase II project has undergone several updates: Name Change: To avoid confusion expressed about the terminology used in the Draft EIS/EIR (e.g., Phase I; Phase II, Segments 1 and 2), the proposed project is referred to in the Final EIS/EIR as the Gold Line Foothill Extension. Selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative and Updated Project Definition: Following the release of the Draft EIS/EIR, the public comment period, and input from the cities along the alignment, the Construction Authority Board approved a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) in August 2004. This LPA included the Triple Track Alternative (2 LRT and 1 freight track) that was defined and evaluated in the Draft EIS/EIR, a station in each city, and the location of the Maintenance and Operations Facility. Segment 1 was changed to extend eastward to Azusa. A Project Definition Report (PDR) was prepared to define refined station and parking lot locations, grade crossings and two rail grade separations, and traction power substation locations. The Final EIS/EIR and engineering work that support the Final EIS/EIR are based on the project as identified in the Final PDR (March 2005), with the following modifications. Following the PDR, the Construction Authority Board approved a Revised LPA in June 2005. Between March and August 2005, station options in Arcadia and Claremont were added. Changes in the Discussions: To make the Final EIS/EIR more reader-friendly, the following format and text changes have been made: Discussion of a Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Alternative has been deleted since the LPA decision in August 2004 eliminated it as a potential preferred alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    This page intentionally left blank Table of Contents 1. Section 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Hazard Mitigation Planning ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 ............................................................................... 1-1 1.4 Community Rating System – Activity 510 Floodplain Management Planning ....... 1-2 1.5 Local Participants ..................................................................................................... 1-2 1.6 Community Profile ................................................................................................... 1-3 1.6.1 Unincorporated Ventura County................................................................... 1-3 1.6.2 Participating Cities ........................................................................................ 1-3 1.6.3 Participating Special Districts ....................................................................... 1-4 1.7 Description of the Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan ..................................................... 1-6 1.7.1 Section 2: Record of Adoption ..................................................................... 1-6 1.7.2 Section 3: Planning Process .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER Projects List with Districts CR EQ.Xlsx
    Upcoming LA County Regional Infrastructure Projects Supporting Climate Resilience & Equity State State Congressional No. Project Name Location Project Type Assembly Senate District District District 1 Rosewood - Stanford Avenue, et al. Rosewood Road Construction 64 35 44 Cap Project - 2 Cogen Landfill Gas Mitigation Los Angeles 49 22 27 Buildings 3 East Los Angeles - Michigan Avenue, et al. East Los Angeles Road Maintenance 49, 51 22, 24 27, 40 Florence-Firestone - Compton Av at Nadeau 4 Firestone, Florence Traffic Design 64 35 44 St Hacienda Heights Community - Hacienda 5 Hacienda Heights Traffic Design 57 35 38, 39 Boulevard at Shadybend Drive Hacienda Heights-Garo St- Stimson 6 Hacienda Heights Traffic Design 57 35 38, 39 Av/Fieldgate Av 7 Willowbrook - Wadsworth Av at E 126th St Willowbrook Traffic Design 64 35 44 Cap Project - 8 Redondo Beach Yard Redondo Beach 66 26 33 Buildings 9 Altadena - Glenrose Ave, et al. Altadena Road Maintenance 41 25 27 10 Rowland Heights - Otterbein Avenue, et al. Rowland Heights Road Maintenance 55 29 39 Cap Project - 11 RB Maint Yard and Restroom DM Repair Redondo Beach 66 26 33 Buildings Cap Project - 12 Hansen Yard Sun Valley 39 18 29 Buildings Cap Project - 13 Imperial Yard 2 South Gate 63 33 44 Buildings South Whittier - Gunn and Du Page Avenue, et 14 South Whittier Road Maintenance 57 32 38 al. Cap Project - 15 LAC USC Parking Lot 12 Structure ADA Los Angeles 51 24 34 Buildings Cap Project - 16 East Yard Irwindale 48 22 32 Buildings Cap Project - 17 Rio Hondo Spreading Grounds Montebello 58 32
    [Show full text]
  • Paths Forward: Hydropower and Indigenous Relationships Across Canada
    PATHS FORWARD HYDROPOWER AND INDIGENOUS RELATIONSHIPS ACROSS CANADA 2018 EDITION PATHS FORWARD The story of Canada’s hydro development dates back to the late 19th century when the power of falling water was fi rst used to supply mills and light buildings. While it played an important role in the economic growth of our country, we must acknowledge the impacts that were experienced by Indigenous communities. As we look forward from this history, meaningful engagement between utilities and communities are redefi ning how projects are undertaken. Paths Forward: Hydropower and Indigenous Relationships Across Canada features stories of recent hydro development projects pursued collaboratively between utilities and Indigenous communities. They are powerful examples of what can be achieved when relationships are founded on communication, honesty, and an equitable sharing of our country’s resources and their benefi ts. Development projects, procurement practices and capacity building continue to improve in their approach to meaningful consultation and inclusion. Projects like those showcased in this booklet are major economic drivers and represent sources of job creation, skills training, and opportunities for long term revenue streams that support the health, education, infrastructure and cultural needs of Indigenous People. As the largest and longest running clean source of electricity in Canada, hydropower is a signifi cant part of our supply mix. From coast to coast, Indigenous People are using their skills to create a clean energy future, and helping grow our country’s world-class hydroelectric expertise. Responsible development and the collaborative relationships they create are important steps toward a brighter, more inclusive future. The stories contained in this booklet were prepared by CHA members in consultation with representatives of Indigenous communities across Canada.
    [Show full text]