DOCSLIB.ORG

Official Election Results for United States Senate 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Official Election Results for United States Senate 2010 OFFICIAL ELECTION RESULTS FOR UNITED STATES SENATE 2010 U.S. Senate Campaigns 41% Incumbent Re-elected (22) New Member Elected (15) 59% 2010 U.S. SENATE RESULTS ELECTION TYPE: PRIMARY RUNOFF GENERAL CANDIDATE NAME PARTY # OF VOTES % # OF VOTES % # OF VOTES % ALABAMA June 1st November 2nd (I) Shelby, Richard C. R 405,398 84.35% 968,181 65.18% Moser, N.C. "Clint" R 75,190 15.65% Party Votes: R 480,588 Barnes, William G. D 160,993 60.77% 515,619 34.71% De Moore, Simone D. D 103,942 39.23% Party Votes: D 264,935 Scattered W 1,699 0.11% Total State Votes: 745,523 1,485,499 ALASKA August 24th November 2nd (I) Murkowski, Lisa R/W 53,872 49.09% 92,931 36.08% Miller, Joe R 55,878 50.91% 90,839 35.27% Party Votes: R 109,750 McAdams, Scott T. D 18,035 59.55% 60,045 23.32% Kern, Jacob Seth D 6,913 22.82% Vondersaar, Frank J. D 5,339 17.63% Party Votes: D 30,287 Murkowski W (Challenged Counted) 8,160 3.17% Murkowski W (Challenged NOT Counted) 2,035 0.79% Haase, Fredrick "David" LIB 5,793 100.00% 1,459 0.57% Party Votes: LIB 5,793 Carter, Tim NAF 927 0.36% Other - Misc. Names W 602 0.23% Gianoutsos, Ted NAF 458 0.18% Miller, Joe W 21 0.01% Hill, Sid W 13 0.01% McAdams W 8 0.00% Marin Jr., Edward D. W 6 0.00% Bradley, Red K. W 3 0.00% Cummins, Guy A. W 2 0.00% Lackey, Lisa M. W 2 0.00% McGahan, Richard W 2 0.00% Moser, Marvin Roger W 2 0.00% Perry, Karen W 2 0.00% Ransom, Eileen M. W 2 0.00% Whittaker, Jed W 2 0.00% Ames, Michael W 1 0.00% Austin, Kevin W 1 0.00% Beeman, David E. W 1 0.00% Beeman, Vicky L. W 1 0.00% Boyle, David W 1 0.00% Butler, Michael W 1 0.00% Crowell, Margaret A. W 1 0.00% Dillingham, Chris S. W 1 0.00% George, David S. W 1 0.00% Humphries, Alan D. W 1 0.00% Johnson, Petter M. W 1 0.00% Kelly, Eric C. W 1 0.00% (Continued on Next Page) -21- 2010 U.S. SENATE RESULTS ELECTION TYPE: PRIMARY RUNOFF GENERAL CANDIDATE NAME PARTY # OF VOTES % # OF VOTES % # OF VOTES % ALASKA (Continued) August 24th November 2nd Klemme, Bill W 1 0.00% Landis-Beck, Marjori W 1 0.00% Rice, Anthony W 1 0.00% Steve, Thompson W 1 0.00% Tolbert, Georgia Lee W 1 0.00% Total State Votes: 145,830 257,538 ARIZONA August 24th November 2nd (I) McCain, John R 333,744 56.25% 1,005,615 58.86% Hayworth, J.D. R 190,229 32.06% Deakin, Jim R 69,328 11.69% Party Votes: R 593,301 Glassman, Rodney D 100,307 34.60% 592,011 34.65% Eden, Cathy D 76,487 26.39% Dougherty, John D 68,589 23.66% Parraz, Randy D 44,435 15.33% Koller, William W(D) 48 0.02% Party Votes: D 289,866 Nolan, David F. LIB 2,669 100.00% 80,097 4.69% Party Votes: LIB 2,669 Joslyn, Jerry GRE 1,948 100.00% 24,603 1.44% Party Votes: GRE 1,948 Gilyeat, Ian W 5,938 0.35% Ellis, Loyd W 160 0.01% Chavez, Santos W 39 0.00% Dudikoff, Sydney W 14 0.00% Caplette, Ray J. W 7 0.00% Total State Votes: 887,784 1,708,484 ARKANSAS May 18th June 8th November 2nd Boozman, John R 75,010 52.73% 451,618 57.90% Holt, Jim R 24,826 17.45% Baker, Gilbert R 16,540 11.63% Reynolds, Conrad "Colonel" R 7,128 5.01% Coleman, Curtis R 6,928 4.87% Hendren, Kim R 5,551 3.90% Alexander, Randy R 4,389 3.09% Ramey, Fred R 1,888 1.33% Party Votes: R 142,260 (I) Lincoln, Blanche Lambert D 146,579 44.50% 134,756 52.00% 288,156 36.95% Halter, Bill D 140,081 42.53% 124,405 48.00% Morrison, DC D 42,695 12.96% Party Votes: D 329,355 259,161 Drown, Trevor IND 25,234 3.24% Gray, John Laney, III GRE 14,430 1.85% Scattered W 376 0.05% Hercher, Stephan "Troublemaker" W 143 0.02% Total State Votes: 471,615 259,161 779,957 -22- 2010 U.S. SENATE RESULTS ELECTION TYPE: PRIMARY RUNOFF GENERAL CANDIDATE NAME PARTY # OF VOTES % # OF VOTES % # OF VOTES % CALIFORNIA June 8th November 2nd (I) Boxer, Barbara D 1,957,920 80.91% 5,218,137 52.18% Quintana, Brian D 338,442 13.99% Kaus, Robert M. "Mickey" D 123,573 5.11% Party Votes: D 2,419,935 Fiorina, Carly R 1,315,429 56.36% 4,217,386 42.17% Campbell, Tom R 504,289 21.61% Devore, Chuck R 452,577 19.39% Ramirez, Al R 42,149 1.81% Kalemkarian, Tim R 19,598 0.84% Party Votes: R 2,334,042 Lightfoot, Gail K. LIB 17,791 100.00% 175,235 1.75% Party Votes: LIB 17,791 Feinland, Marsha PAF 4,070 100.00% 135,088 1.35% Party Votes: PAF 4,070 Roberts, Duane GRE 19,983 100.00% 128,512 1.29% Party Votes: GRE 19,983 Noonan, Edward C. AIP 16,704 39.49% 125,435 1.25% Grundmann, Don J. AIP 14,170 33.50% Salehi, Al AIP 11,423 27.01% Party Votes: AIP 42,297 Harris, James E. W 41 0.00% Vlakancic, Connor W 11 0.00% Carroll, Jerry Leon W 10 0.00% Kugler, Hans J. W 5 0.00% Total State Votes: 4,838,118 9,999,860 COLORADO August 10th November 2nd (I) Bennet, Michael F. D 184,714 54.15% 854,685 48.08% Romanoff, Andrew D 156,419 45.85% Party Votes: D 341,133 Buck, Ken R 211,099 51.57% 824,789 46.40% Norton, Jane R 198,231 48.43% Party Votes: R 409,330 Kinsey, Bob GRE Unopposed 38,884 2.19% Stringer, Maclyn "Mac" LIB 1,186 52.45% 22,646 1.27% Finger, John LIB 1,075 47.55% Party Votes: LIB 2,261 Napolitano, Jason UN 19,450 1.09% Miller, Charley UN 11,351 0.64% Moromisato, J. UN 5,780 0.33% Rank, Robert W 52 0.00% Newman, Michele M. W 20 0.00% Lohmiller, Bruce E. W 11 0.00% Total State Votes: 752,724 1,777,668 -23- 2010 U.S. SENATE RESULTS ELECTION TYPE: PRIMARY RUNOFF GENERAL CANDIDATE NAME PARTY # OF VOTES % # OF VOTES % # OF VOTES % CONNECTICUT August 10th* November 2nd Blumenthal, Richard Combined Parties: 636,040 55.16% Blumenthal, Richard D * [605,204] [52.48%] Blumenthal, Richard WF [30,836] [2.67%] Alpert, Merrick D Whitnum, L. Lee D Mosler, Warren B. D/IND 11,275 0.98% McMahon, Linda E. R 60,479 49.44% 498,341 43.22% Simmons, Rob R 34,011 27.80% Schiff, Peter David R 27,831 22.75% Forras, Vincent R Book, Ethan R Party Votes: R 122,321 Mertens, John CFL 6,735 0.58% Hill, Brian K. W 559 0.05% Russell, Jeff W 45 0.00% Vachon, Todd W 45 0.00% Vassar, Carl E. W 31 0.00% Giles, Jay J. W 17 0.00% Traceski, John W 15 0.00% Coleman, Matthew W 7 0.00% Olszta, Dave W 5 0.00% Total State Votes: 122,321 1,153,115 * A candidate is endorsed by the party at the party convention. A primary election is only held if a qualified challenger to the party endorsed candidate receives 15% of the delegate votes on roll call at the convention and files for a primary, or, if after the convention, a challenger files a requisite number of petitions to qualify for primary ballot access. Otherwise, the party endorsed candidate is the nominee. The Democratic and Republican conventions for U.S. Senate were held on May 21, 2010. Convention nominees are noted with an asterisk. DELAWARE (Unexpired Term) September 14th November 2nd Coons, Christopher A. D Unopposed 174,012 56.61% O'Donnell, Christine R 30,563 53.08% 123,053 40.03% Castle, Michael N. R 27,021 46.92% Party Votes: R 57,584 Miller, Glenn A. IDE 8,201 2.67% Rash, James W., Jr. LIB 2,101 0.68% Bourgeois, Maurice F. W 25 0.01% Devard, Samtra W 10 0.00% Total State Votes: 57,584 307,402 -24- 2010 U.S. SENATE RESULTS ELECTION TYPE: PRIMARY RUNOFF GENERAL CANDIDATE NAME PARTY # OF VOTES % # OF VOTES % # OF VOTES % FLORIDA August 24th November 2nd Rubio, Marco R 1,069,936 84.62% 2,645,743 48.89% Kogut, William Billy R 112,080 8.86% Escoffery, William, III R 82,426 6.52% Party Votes: R 1,264,442 Meek, Kendrick B. D 528,266 57.53% 1,092,936 20.20% Greene, Jeff D 284,948 31.03% Burkett, Glenn A. D 59,840 6.52% Ferre, Maurice A. D 45,219 4.92% Party Votes: D 918,273 Crist, Charlie NPA 1,607,549 29.71% Snitker, Alexander Andrew LIB 24,850 0.46% Askeland, Sue NPA 15,340 0.28% Tyler, Rick NPA 7,397 0.14% DeCastro, Bernie CPF 4,792 0.09% Armstrong, Lewis Jerome NPA 4,443 0.08% Bean, Bobbie NPA 4,301 0.08% Riggs, Bruce Ray NPA 3,647 0.07% Blass, Piotr W 47 0.00% Lock, Richard W 18 0.00% Quarterman-Noah, Belinda Gail W 18 0.00% Drake, George W 13 0.00% Monroe, Robert W 6 0.00% Knepper, Howard W 4 0.00% LaRosa, Carol Ann Joyce W 2 0.00% Total State Votes: 2,182,715 5,411,106 GEORGIA July 20th November 2nd (I) Isakson, Johnny R 558,298 100.00% 1,489,904 58.31% Party Votes: R 558,298 Thurmond, Michael "Mike" D 297,226 84.35% 996,516 39.00% Hadley, R.J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E222 HON
    E222 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks February 13, 2003 Today, I honor him and ask all my col- For example, in the summer of 2000 two In addition, the bill would authorize the Sec- leagues to join me in remembering this politi- recreational off-road vehicle users ignored clo- retary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agri- cian and great leader from the great State of sure signs while four-wheel driving on Bureau culture to apply any funds acquired from rec- Florida. of Land Management land high above reational off-road vehicle violations to the area f Silverton, Colorado. As a result, they got stuck that was damaged or affected by such viola- for five days on a 70 percent slope at 12,500 tions, and to increase public awareness of the RESPONSIBLE OFF-ROAD VEHICLE feet along the flanks of Houghton Mountain. need for proper use of vehicles on federal ENFORCEMENT AND RESPONSE At first, they abandoned their vehicles. lands. (‘‘ROVER’’) ACT Then, they returned with other vehicles to pull This would give these agencies additional their vehicles out of the mud and off the resources to recover damaged lands and HON. MARK UDALL mountain. The result was significant damage areas that may be exposed to repeated viola- OF COLORADO to the high alpine tundra, a delicate ecosystem tions. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES that may take thousands of years to recover. The bill does not put any lands ‘‘off limits’’ Wednesday, February 12, 2003 As noted in a Denver Post story about this in- to recreational off-road vehicle use.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Ties Among Protest Movements the Great Plains Connection
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for Spring 1997 Cross-Border Ties Among Protest Movements The Great Plains Connection Mildred A. Schwartz University of Illinois at Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Schwartz, Mildred A., "Cross-Border Ties Among Protest Movements The Great Plains Connection" (1997). Great Plains Quarterly. 1943. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/1943 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CROSS .. BORDER TIES AMONG PROTEST MOVEMENTS THE GREAT PLAINS CONNECTION MILDRED A. SCHWARTZ This paper examines the connections among supporters willing to take risks. Thus I hypoth­ political protest movements in twentieth cen­ esize that protest movements, free from con­ tury western Canada and the United States. straints of institutionalization, can readily cross Protest movements are social movements and national boundaries. related organizations, including political pro­ Contacts between protest movements in test parties, with the objective of deliberately Canada and the United States also stem from changing government programs and policies. similarities between the two countries. Shared Those changes may also entail altering the geography, a British heritage, democratic prac­ composition of the government or even its tices, and a multi-ethnic population often give form. Social movements involve collective rise to similar problems. l Similarities in the efforts to bring about change in ways that avoid northern tier of the United States to the ad­ or reject established belief systems or organiza­ joining sections of Canada's western provinces tions.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL ELECTIONS 2018: Election Results for the U.S. Senate and The
    FEDERAL ELECTIONS 2018 Election Results for the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives Federal Election Commission Washington, D.C. October 2019 Commissioners Ellen L. Weintraub, Chair Caroline C. Hunter, Vice Chair Steven T. Walther (Vacant) (Vacant) (Vacant) Statutory Officers Alec Palmer, Staff Director Lisa J. Stevenson, Acting General Counsel Christopher Skinner, Inspector General Compiled by: Federal Election Commission Public Disclosure and Media Relations Division Office of Communications 1050 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20463 800/424-9530 202/694-1120 Editors: Eileen J. Leamon, Deputy Assistant Staff Director for Disclosure Jason Bucelato, Senior Public Affairs Specialist Map Design: James Landon Jones, Multimedia Specialist TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface 1 Explanatory Notes 2 I. 2018 Election Results: Tables and Maps A. Summary Tables Table: 2018 General Election Votes Cast for U.S. Senate and House 5 Table: 2018 General Election Votes Cast by Party 6 Table: 2018 Primary and General Election Votes Cast for U.S. Congress 7 Table: 2018 Votes Cast for the U.S. Senate by Party 8 Table: 2018 Votes Cast for the U.S. House of Representatives by Party 9 B. Maps United States Congress Map: 2018 U.S. Senate Campaigns 11 Map: 2018 U.S. Senate Victors by Party 12 Map: 2018 U.S. Senate Victors by Popular Vote 13 Map: U.S. Senate Breakdown by Party after the 2018 General Election 14 Map: U.S. House Delegations by Party after the 2018 General Election 15 Map: U.S. House Delegations: States in Which All 2018 Incumbents Sought and Won Re-Election 16 II.
    [Show full text]
  • USSYP 2010 Yearbook.Pdf
    THE HEARST FOUNDATIONS DIRECTORS William Randolph Hearst III UNTED STATE PESIDENTR James M. Asher Anissa B. Balson David J. Barrett S Frank A. Bennack, Jr. SE NAT E YO John G. Conomikes Ronald J. Doerfler George R. Hearst, Jr. John R. Hearst, Jr. U Harvey L. Lipton T Gilbert C. Maurer H PROGR A M Mark F. Miller Virginia H. Randt Paul “Dino” Dinovitz EXCUTIE V E DIRECTOR F ORT Rayne B. Guilford POAR GR M DI RECTOR Y - U N ITED S TATES SE NATE YOUTH PROGR A M E IGHT H A N N U A L WA S H INGTON WEEK 2010 sponsored BY THE UNITED STATES SENATE UNITED STATES SENATE YOUTH PROGRAM FUNDED AND ADMINISTERED BY THE THE HEARST FOUNDATIONS FORTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL WASHINGTON WEEK H M ARCH 6 – 1 3 , 2 0 1 0 90 NEW MONTGOMERY STREET · SUITE 1212 · SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-4504 WWW.USSENATEYOUTH.ORG Photography by Jakub Mosur Secondary Photography by Erin Lubin Design by Catalone Design Co. “ERE TH IS A DEBT OF SERV ICE DUE FROM EV ERY M A N TO HIS COUNTRY, PROPORTIONED TO THE BOUNTIES W HICH NATUR E A ND FORTUNE H AV E ME ASURED TO HIM.” —TA H O M S J E F F E R S ON 2010 UNITED STATES SENATE YOUTH PROGR A M SENATE A DVISORY COMMITTEE HONOR ARY CO-CH AIRS SENATOR V ICE PRESIDENT SENATOR HARRY REID JOSEPH R. BIDEN MITCH McCONNELL Majority Leader President of the Senate Republican Leader CO-CH AIRS SENATOR SENATOR ROBERT P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revival of the Nevada Democratic Party
    CASE STUDY The Revival of the Nevada Democratic Party When a state political party’s electoral performance falters, how should political actors change its fortunes for the better— concentrate on the needs of individual candidates, bolster allied outside groups, or invest in the formal party itself? Sam Rosenfeld Daniel Schlozman August 2021 SNF Agora Case Studies The SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University offers a series of case studies that show how civic and political actors navigated real-life challenges related to democracy. Practitioners, teachers, organizational leaders, and trainers working with civic and political leaders, students, and trainees can use our case studies to deepen their skills, to develop insights about how to approach strategic choices and dilemmas, and to get to know each other better and work more effectively. How to Use the Case Unlike many case studies, ours do not focus on individual leaders or other decision-makers. Instead, the SNF Agora case studies are about choices that groups make collectively. Therefore, these cases work well as prompts for group discussions. The basic question in each case is: “What would we do?” After reading a case, some groups role-play the people who were actually involved in the situation, treating the discussion as a simulation. In other groups, the participants speak as themselves, discussing the strategies that they would advocate for the group described in the case. The person who assigns or organizes your discussion may want you to use the case in one of those ways. When studying and discussing the choices made by real-life decision-makers (often under intense pressure), it is appropriate to exhibit some humility.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Park Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior State of the Park Report Rocky Mountain National Park Colorado December 2017 National Park Service. 2017. State of the Park Report for Rocky Mountain National Park. State of the Park Series No. 50. National Park Service, Washington, DC. On the cover: Hallett Peak reflected in Dream Lake. NPS Photo. Disclaimer. This State of the Park report summarizes the current condition of park resources, visitor experience, and park infrastructure as assessed by a combination of available factual information and the expert opinion and professional judgment of park staff and subject matter experts. The internet version of this report provides additional details and sources of information about the findings summarized in the report, including references, accounts on the origin and quality of the data, and the methods and analytic approaches used in data collection and assessments of condition. This report provides evaluations of status and trends based on interpretation by NPS scientists and managers of both quantitative and non-quantitative assessments and observations. Future condition ratings may differ from findings in this report as new data and knowledge become available. The park superintendent approved the publication of this report. Executive Summary The mission of the National Park Service is to preserve unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of national parks for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. NPS Management Policies (2006) state that “The Service will also strive to ensure that park resources and values are passed on to future generations in a condition that is as good as, or better than, the conditions that exist today.” As part of the stewardship of national parks for the American people, the NPS has begun to develop State of the Park reports to assess the overall status and trends of each park’s resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Sangre De Cristo Landscape What’S Inside
    Our Land Our Water Our Future COLORADO OPEN L ANDSCAPES A NEWSLETTER OF COLORADO OPEN LANDS The Southern Sangres contain layer upon layer of conservation values in their rich history, outstanding natural habitat, and unforgettable scenic views. The Southern Sangre de Cristo Landscape What’s Inside —Developing a Community Vision of Conservation President’s Letter At Uptop Ghost Town, you will not only get a sense of Colorado in the late Page 3 1800s and early 1900s, but on a clear day you’ll enjoy a stunning view of the Spanish Peaks and you may even spot a Bald Eagle flying overhead or a bobcat foraging in Stewardship Corner the woods. If you’re really lucky, you may also get to meet two of the most energetic Page 5 Two landowners and historians/conservationists in Southern Colorado. their management teams receive Sisters Deborah Lathrop and Dianne (Sam) Lathrop Law moved to Colorado in awards for managing their ranches 2001 and fell in love with the ghost town and forest lands located on Old La Veta Pass sustainably. in Huerfano County. The sisters bought the property, named the ghost town ‘Uptop’, and set about restoring and uncovering the history of the 1877 train depot and the Board Spotlight 1920s chapel, dance hall/tavern, school house, lumber mill and outbuildings. Ruth Wright Their greatest concern was that one day someone might purchase the property Page 6 Board member Ruth who would be more interested in its potential for large summer homes or an RV park— Wright shares her enthusiasm for the fate of many of the neighboring lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpted from James Gustav Speth, America, Rising to Its Dream (Forthcoming, Yale U.P., Fall 2012) * How Can We Gauge What
    !"#$%&'$()*%+,)-.,$/)01/'.2)3&$'45))!"#$%&'()*%+%,-)./)01+)2$#'")34/$15&/"%,-()6'7#)89:9()4'77);<=;>)) 6) 7+8)#.9)8$):.1:$)84.')4./)4.&&$9$()'+)1/);9)'4$)&./')*$8)($#.($/).9() 84$%$)8$)/'.9()'+(.<=)>9$)8.<)'+).9/8$%)'4;/)?1$/';+9);/)'+)@++A).')4+8)8$) #+,&.%$)8;'4)+'4$%)#+19'%;$/);9)A$<).%$./B)3+)@$'C/)@++A).').):%+1&)+*).(2.9#$() ($,+#%.#;$/DD'4$)#+19'%;$/)+*)'4$)>%:.9;E.';+9)*+%)!#+9+,;#)F++&$%.';+9).9() G$2$@+&,$9'),;91/)'4$)*+%,$%)3+2;$')H@+#)#+19'%;$/5)I$";#+5)J1%A$<5)K+%$.5) L#[email protected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
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Going to Dance with Somebody Who Calls You a Main Streeter" Communism, Culture, and Community in Sheridan County, Montana, 1918,1934
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for 1995 "WHO'S GOING TO DANCE WITH SOMEBODY WHO CALLS YOU A MAIN STREETER" COMMUNISM, CULTURE, AND COMMUNITY IN SHERIDAN COUNTY, MONTANA, 1918,1934 Gerald Zahavi University of Albany Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Zahavi, Gerald, ""WHO'S GOING TO DANCE WITH SOMEBODY WHO CALLS YOU A MAIN STREETER" COMMUNISM, CULTURE, AND COMMUNITY IN SHERIDAN COUNTY, MONTANA, 1918,1934" (1995). Great Plains Quarterly. 1083. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/1083 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. "WHO'S GOING TO DANCE WITH SOMEBODY WHO CALLS YOU A MAIN STREETER" COMMUNISM, CULTURE, AND COMMUNITY IN SHERIDAN COUNTY, MONTANA, 1918,1934 GERALD ZAHAVI ""'1: 1 he Catholics and the Lutherans met the So began Logan's long career in Sheridan train," recalled Bernadine Logan, a former County. The year was 1930, and she had just schoolteacher in Plentywood, Montana, "to arrived from North Dakota, a fresh Cum Laude get the nab on the new teachers, any crop graduate of Jamestown College.2 The social that would come in. Did they take care of and cultural walls that divided the commu­ us women teachers! We had a list of the nity were at once unambiguously defined for people with whom we were not to associ­ her-with a simple list.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nonpartisan League
    FURTHER READINGS ON The Nonpartisan League “The history of the League is a compelling chapter in the struggle by farmers throughout our country’s history. The dramatic story of the NPL’s rapid rise to power and equally rapid decline has long been of interest to historians and other scholars … The League appeals to nonacademic readers as an exciting story of political and social confrontation played out by seemingly larger-than-life characters.”1 The standard work on the Nonpartisan League remains Robert Loren Morlan’s Political Prairie Fire: The National Nonpartisan League, 1915-1922 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1955); reprinted by Greenwood Press (1974) and Minnesota Historical Society Press (1985). Morlan's well- written, evocative account depends largely on League sources and offers an interpretation favorable to the organization. Morlan’s work includes an extensive bibliography of books, government documents, pamphlets, articles, theses and archival documents regarding the history of the League. In 1985 the Minnesota Historical Society Press published an updated bibliography of works about the League, The Nonpartisan League 1915-22: An Annotated Bibliography, by Patrick K. Coleman and Charles R. Lamb. Their bibliography includes works that have become available since Morlan’s book was published. Another major work is NPL journalist Herber Gaston's The Nonpartisan League (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Howe, 1920); it is totally undocumented, but is the most often cited of the "first generation histories." Other early works include Charles Edward Russell’s The Non-Partisan League (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1920), and Andrew A. Bruce’s Non-Partisan League (New York: Macmillan Co., 1921).
    [Show full text]
  • Monmouth University Poll COLORADO: TIGHT RACE FOR
    Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Released: Contact: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769 (cell); 732-263-5858 (office) [email protected] Follow on Twitter: @PollsterPatrick COLORADO: TIGHT RACE FOR U.S. SENATE Monmouth University Poll finds incumbent Governor in lead The Monmouth University Poll finds an extremely tight race in the Colorado U.S. Senate contest, with Rep. Cory Gardner holding an insignificant one point lead over first-term incumbent Mark Udall. In the race for Governor, incumbent John Hickenlooper holds a 7 point lead over former Congressman Bob Beauprez who is making his second run for this office. In the election for U.S. Senate, Colorado voters who are likely to cast a ballot next month divide their vote – 47% for Republican challenger Cory Gardner and 46% for Democratic incumbent Mark Udall. Another 4% say they will vote for a different candidate and 3% remain undecided. In the race for Colorado Governor, 50% of likely voters support Democratic incumbent John Hickenlooper and 43% support GOP challenger Bob Beauprez. Another 3% say they will vote for a different candidate and 4% remain undecided. All major party candidates have strong support among their partisan bases. Specifically, 93% of Democrats support Hickenlooper for governor and 92% support Udall for senator, while 85% of Republicans support Beauprez and 86% support Gardner. Independent voters in Colorado have a clearer preference for one office than they do for the other. Independent voters support Hickenlooper over Beauprez by a 53% to 35% margin in the race for governor, but split their vote for senator 43% for Udall and 42% for Gardner.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Directory COLORADO
    46 Congressional Directory COLORADO COLORADO (Population 2000, 4,301,261) SENATORS WAYNE ALLARD, Republican, of Loveland, CO; born in Fort Collins, CO, December 2, 1943; education: graduated, Fort Collins High School, 1963; preveterinary studies, Colorado State University, 1964; Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State University, 1968; re- ceived veterinarian license in Colorado; Chief Health Officer, Loveland, CO, 1970–78; Larimer County Board of Health, 1978–82; Colorado State Senate, 1982–90; chair, Health and Human Services Committee and majority caucus; member: American Veterinary Medical Association, National Federation of Independent Business, Chamber of Commerce, Loveland Rotary, Amer- ican Animal Hospital Association, American Board of Veterinary Practitioners, Companion Ani- mal; married: the former Joan Elizabeth Malcolm; children: Christi and Cheryl; Deputy Majority Whip; in February 2001, appointed by Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott to serve on the High Tech Task Force and the National Security Working Group; chairman, Senate Renewable En- ergy and Energy Efficiency Caucus, and the Veterinary Caucus; elected to the 102nd Congress, November 6, 1990; reelected to each succeeding Congress; committees: Appropriations; Bank- ing, Housing, and Urban Affairs; Budget; subcommittees: chairman, Housing and Transpor- tation; chairman, Strategic Forces; Emerging Threats and Capabilities; Financial Institutions; Fisheries, Wildlife and Water; Readiness and Management Support; Securities and Investment; Superfund and Waste Management; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 6, 1996; reelected to each succeeding Senate term. Office Listings http://allard.senate.gov 521 Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 .................................... (202) 224–5941 Chief of Staff.—Sean Conway. FAX: 224–6471 Scheduler.—Ali Monroe. Press Secretary.—Angela deRocha. 7340 East Caley, Suite 215, Englewood, CO 80111 ..................................................
    [Show full text]