Biomes Project Pathfinder.Pdf
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan
The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California A Project of California Partners in Flight and PRBO Conservation Science The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California Version 2.0 2004 Conservation Plan Authors Grant Ballard, PRBO Conservation Science Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science Tom Gardali, PRBO Conservation Science Geoffrey R. Geupel, PRBO Conservation Science Tonya Haff, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Museum of Natural History Collections, Environmental Studies Dept., University of CA) Aaron Holmes, PRBO Conservation Science Diana Humple, PRBO Conservation Science John C. Lovio, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, U.S. Navy (Currently at TAIC, San Diego) Mike Lynes, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Hastings University) Sandy Scoggin, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at San Francisco Bay Joint Venture) Christopher Solek, Cal Poly Ponoma (Currently at UC Berkeley) Diana Stralberg, PRBO Conservation Science Species Account Authors Completed Accounts Mountain Quail - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Greater Roadrunner - Pete Famolaro, Sweetwater Authority Water District. Coastal Cactus Wren - Laszlo Szijj and Chris Solek, Cal Poly Pomona. Wrentit - Geoff Geupel, Grant Ballard, and Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science. Gray Vireo - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Black-chinned Sparrow - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Costa's Hummingbird (coastal) - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Sage Sparrow - Barbara A. Carlson, UC-Riverside Reserve System, and Mary K. Chase. California Gnatcatcher - Patrick Mock, URS Consultants (San Diego). Accounts in Progress Rufous-crowned Sparrow - Scott Morrison, The Nature Conservancy (San Diego). -
Forests Warranting Further Consideration As Potential World
Forest Protected Areas Warranting Further Consideration as Potential WH Forest Sites: Summaries from Various and Thematic Regional Analyses (Compendium produced by Marc Patry, for the proceedings of the 2nd World Heritage Forest meeting, held at Nancy, France, March 11-13, 2005) Four separate initiatives have been carried out in the past 10 years in an effort to help guide the process of identifying and nominating new WH Forest sites. The first, carried out by Thorsell and Sigaty (1997), addresses forests worldwide, and was developed based on the authors’ shared knowledge of protected forests worldwide. The second focuses exclusively on tropical forests and was assembled by the participants at the 1998 WH Forest meeting in Berastagi, Indonesia (CIFOR, 1999). A third initiative consists of potential boreal forest sites developed by the participants to an expert meeting on boreal forests, held in St. Petersberg in 2003. Finally, a fourth, carried out jointly between UNEP and IUCN applied a more systematic approach (IUCN, 2004). Though aiming at narrowing the field of potential candidate sites, these initiatives do not automatically imply that all of the listed forest areas would meet the criteria for inscription on the WH List, and conversely, nor do they imply that any site left off the list would not meet these criteria. Since these lists were developed, several of the proposed sites have been inscribed on the WH List, while others have been the subject of nominations, but were not inscribed, for various reasons. The lists below are reproduced here in an effort to facilitate access to this information and to guide future nomination initiatives. -
A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK November 2000 Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 ISSUES TO CONSIDER....................................................................................................................................1 3.0 WHAT IS BIODIVERSITY?..............................................................................................................................2 4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................3 5.0 CURRENT WORLD HERITAGE SITES............................................................................................................4 -
Rainforests and Tropical Diversity
Rainforests and Tropical Diversity Gaby Orihuela Visitor Experience Manager Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Objective IV: Education and awareness about plant diversity, its role in sustainable livelihoods and importance to all life on earth is promoted. – Target 14: The importance of plant diversity and the need for its conservation incorporated into communication, education and public awareness programs. What are Rainforests? Forests characterized by high rainfall, with definitions based on a minimum normal annual rainfall of 68–78 inches, and as much as 390 inches. (Miami receives an average annual of ~60 inches.) Two types: Tropical (wet and warm) and Temperate Around 40% to 75% of all biotic species are indigenous to the tropical rainforests Natural reservoir of genetic diversity and ecological services: – Rich source of medicinal plants – High-yield foods and a myriad of other useful forest products – Sustain a large number of diverse and unique indigenous cultures – Important habitat for migratory animals Peruvian Amazonia Where in the World? Today less than 3% of Earth’s land is covered with these forests (about 2 million square miles). A few thousand of years ago they covered 12% (6 million). Tropical forests are restricted to the latitudes 23.5° North and 23.5° South of the equator, or in other words between the Tropic of Capricorn and the Tropic of Cancer. Global distribution in four biogeographic realms: – Afrotropical (mainland Africa, Madagascar, and scattered islands) – Australian (Australia, New Guinea, and -
Description of the Ecoregions of the United States
(iii) ~ Agrl~:::~~;~":,c ullur. Description of the ~:::;. Ecoregions of the ==-'Number 1391 United States •• .~ • /..';;\:?;;.. \ United State. (;lAn) Department of Description of the .~ Agriculture Forest Ecoregions of the Service October United States 1980 Compiled by Robert G. Bailey Formerly Regional geographer, Intermountain Region; currently geographer, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Prepared in cooperation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and originally published as an unnumbered publication by the Intermountain Region, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, Utah In April 1979, the Agency leaders of the Bureau of Land Manage ment, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Geological Survey, and Soil Conservation Service endorsed the concept of a national classification system developed by the Resources Evaluation Tech niques Program at the Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, to be used for renewable resources evaluation. The classifica tion system consists of four components (vegetation, soil, landform, and water), a proposed procedure for integrating the components into ecological response units, and a programmed procedure for integrating the ecological response units into ecosystem associations. The classification system described here is the result of literature synthesis and limited field testing and evaluation. It presents one procedure for defining, describing, and displaying ecosystems with respect to geographical distribution. The system and others are undergoing rigorous evaluation to determine the most appropriate procedure for defining and describing ecosystem associations. Bailey, Robert G. 1980. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1391, 77 pp. This publication briefly describes and illustrates the Nation's ecosystem regions as shown in the 1976 map, "Ecoregions of the United States." A copy of this map, described in the Introduction, can be found between the last page and the back cover of this publication. -
Conservation Issues: California Chaparral
Author's personal copy Conservation Issues: California Chaparral RW Halsey, California Chaparral Institute, Escondido, CA, United States JE Keeley, U.S. Geological Survey, Three Rivers, CA, United States ã 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. What Is Chaparral? 1 California Chaparral Biodiversity 1 Chaparral Community Types 1 Measuring Chaparral Biodiversity 4 Diversity Within Individual Plant Taxa 5 Faunal Diversity 5 Influence of Geology 7 Influence of Climate 7 Influence of Fire 8 Impact of Climate Change 10 Preserving Chaparral Biodiversity 10 References 10 What Is Chaparral? Chaparral is a diverse, sclerophyllous shrub-dominated plant community shaped by a Mediterranean-type climate (hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters), a complex mixture of relatively young soils (Specht and Moll, 1983), and large, infrequent, high-intensity fires (30–150 year fire return interval) (Keeley and Zedler, 2009; Keeley et al., 2004; Lombardo et al., 2009). Large expanses of dense chaparral vegetation cover coastal mesas, canyons, foothills, and mountain slopes throughout the California Floristic Province (Figure 1), southward into Baja California, and extending north into the Rogue River Valley of southwest Oregon. Disjunct patches of chaparral can also be found in central and southeastern Arizona and northern Mexico (Keeley, 2000). Along with the four other Mediterranean-type climate regions of the world with similar shrubland vegetation (Central Chile, Mediterranean Basin, South Africa, and southwestern Australia) (Table 1), California has been designated a biodiversity hot spot (Myers et al., 2000). Twenty-five designated locations in all, these hot spots have exceptional concentrations of endemic species that are undergoing exceptional loss of habitat (Myers et al., 2000; Rundel, 2004). -
Oak Woodlands and Chaparral
Oak Woodlands and Chaparral Aligning chaparral-associated bird needs with oak woodland restoration and fuel reduction in southwest Oregon and northern California Why conservation is needed Oak woodland habitat in southwest Oregon and northern California is comprised of a vegetation gradient that includes oak savanna, open oak woodlands with grass or chaparral understory, closed canopy oak woodlands, and oak conifer forests. Oak habitats are at risk due to development, encroachment of coniferous forest, invasion of exotic species, and lack of oak regeneration. Birds and other wildlife that depend on these ecosystems have been negatively affected by habitat threats. Photo by Jaime Stephens What is chaparral and why is it important for birds? “Chaparral” is a short, shrubby vegetation type that can be composed of a variety of plant species. In this region, chaparral habitat is often associated with oak woodlands. Chaparral is a natural part of oak habitats, but it also poses a risk of spreading severe fire which can put large, old oak trees at risk. Because oak woodlands are threatened by loss and degradation, management initiatives sometimes reduce chaparral to reduce the risk of high severity fire and promote a mix of low to moderate severity fire. Still, functioning oak woodland mosaics in southern Oregon need many types of vegetation cover, including patches of chaparral. Restoring and managing oak woodland ecosystems in this region requires learning how to best achieve a balanced vegetation composition that includes chaparral habitat components. KBO, in partnership with the Klamath Siskiyou Oak Network, has conducted studies to determine how we might best manage oak and chaparral habitat for bird species. -
Species Composition and Diversity of Mangrove Swamp Forest in Southern Nigeria
International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology Research Article Open Access Species composition and diversity of mangrove swamp forest in southern Nigeria Abstract Volume 3 Issue 2 - 2018 The study was conducted to assess the species composition and diversity of Anantigha Sijeh Agbor Asuk, Eric Etim Offiong , Nzube Mangrove Swamp Forest in southern Nigeria. Systematic line transect technique was adopted for the study. From the total mangrove area of 47.5312 ha, four rectangular plots Michael Ifebueme, Emediong Okokon Akpaso of 10 by 1000m representing sampling intensity of 8.42 percent were demarcated. Total University of Calabar, Nigeria identification and inventory was conducted and data on plant species name, family and number of stands were collected and used to compute the species importance value and Correspondence: Sijeh Agbor Asuk, Department of Forestry and Wildlife Resources Management, University of Calabar, PMB family importance values. Simpson’s diversity index and richness as well as Shannon- 1115, Calabar, Nigeria, Email [email protected] Weiner index and evenness were used to assess the species diversity and richness of the forest. Results revealed that the forest was characterized by few families represented by few Received: October 23, 2017 | Published: April 13, 2018 species dominated by Rhizophora racemosa, Nypa fructicans, Avicennia germinans and Acrostichum aureum which were also most important in the study and a few other species. Furthermore, presence of Nypa palm (Nypa fructicans) as the second most abundant species in the study area was indicative of the adverse effect of human activities on the ecosystem. The Simpson’s diversity index and richness of 0.83 and 5.896, and Shannon- Weiner diversity and evenness of 2.054 and 0.801 respectively were low, compared to mangrove forests in similar locations thus, making these species prone to extinction and further colonization of Nypa fructicans in the forest. -
Climate and Vegetation Around the World
1 Grade 6 Geography Term 3 2018 Climate and Vegetation around the World Contents CLIMATE AROUND THE WORLD ........................................................................................................... 2 The difference between weather and climate ................................................................................. 2 Hot, mild and cold climates of the world ......................................................................................... 3 The wet and dry areas of the world ................................................................................................. 5 Tropical Rainforests ............................................................................................................................. 6 The location of rain forests of the world ......................................................................................... 7 The climate (temperature and rainfall) of tropical rainforests ........................................................ 7 The vegetation and wildlife of tropical Rain Forests ........................................................................ 8 The Vegetation of a Rainforest ........................................................................................................ 8 Natural vegetation and wildlife in a tropical rainforest ................................................................. 10 The deforestation of tropical rain forests ...................................................................................... 12 Destruction of rainforests -
Ecosystem Services in Temperate Rainforests of the Pacific Northwest, USA ⇑ Patric Brandt A,B, , David J
Biological Conservation 169 (2014) 362–371 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Multifunctionality and biodiversity: Ecosystem services in temperate rainforests of the Pacific Northwest, USA ⇑ Patric Brandt a,b, , David J. Abson c, Dominick A. DellaSala d, Robert Feller b, Henrik von Wehrden b,c a Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate - Atmospheric Environmental Research, Kreuzeckbahnstraße 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany b Leuphana University Lüneburg, Centre for Methods & Institute of Ecology, Faculty of Sustainability, Scharnhorststr. 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany c Leuphana University Lüneburg, FuturES Research Center, Scharnhorststr. 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany d Geos Institute, 84-4th St., Ashland, OR 97520, USA article info abstract Article history: Forests produce a myriad of ecosystem related benefits known as ecosystem services. Maximizing the Received 1 August 2013 provision of single goods may lead to the overexploitation of ecosystems that negatively affects biodiver- Received in revised form 30 October 2013 sity and causes ecosystem degradation. We analyzed the temperate rainforest region of the Pacific North- Accepted 2 December 2013 west, which offers a multitude of ecosystem services and harbors unique biodiversity, to investigate Available online xxxx linkages and trade-offs between ecosystem services and biodiversity. We mapped nine actual and poten- tial ecosystem services, grouped into provision, supporting, regulating and cultural ecosystem service Keywords: categories, as well as species richness of four taxonomic groups (mammals, birds, trees, and amphibians). Biodiversity conservation We analyzed linkages and tradeoffs between ecosystem services, their overall diversity, and species rich- Ecosystem management Ecosystem service diversity ness as well as different levels of taxon diversity. -
The Chaparral Vegetation in Mexico Under Nonmediterranean Climate: the Convergence and Madrean-Tethyan Hypotheses Reconsidered1
American Journal of Botany 85(10): 1398±1408. 1998. THE CHAPARRAL VEGETATION IN MEXICO UNDER NONMEDITERRANEAN CLIMATE: THE CONVERGENCE AND MADREAN-TETHYAN HYPOTHESES RECONSIDERED1 ALFONSO VALIENTE-BANUET,2,4 NOEÂ FLORES-HERNAÂ NDEZ,2 MIGUEL VERDUÂ ,3 AND PATRICIA DAÂ VILA3 2Instituto de EcologõÂa, Universidad Nacional AutoÂnoma de MeÂxico, Apartado Postal 70±275, UNAM, 04510 MeÂxico, D.F.; and 3UBIPRO, ENEP-Iztacala, Universidad Nacional AutoÂnoma de MeÂxico, Apartado Postal 314, MeÂxico, 54090, Tlalnepantla, MeÂxico A comparative study between an unburned evergreen sclerophyllous vegetation located in south-central Mexico under a wet-summer climate, with mediterranean regions was conducted in order to re-analyze vegetation and plant characters claimed to converge under mediterranean climates. The comparison considered ¯oristic composition, plant-community struc- ture, and plant characters as adaptations to mediterranean climates and analyzed them by means of a correspondence analysis, considering a tropical spiny shrubland as the external group. We made a species register of the number of species that resprouted after a ®re occurred in 1995 and a distribution map of the evergreen sclerophyllous vegetation in Mexico (mexical) under nonmediterranean climates. The TehuacaÂn mexical does not differ from the evergreen sclerophyllous areas of Chile, California, Australia, and the Mediterranean Basin, according to a correspondence analysis, which ordinated the TehuacaÂn mexical closer to the mediter- ranean areas than to the external group. All the vegetation and ¯oristic characteristics of the mexical, as well as its distribution along the rain-shadowed mountain parts of Mexico, support its origin in the Madrean-Tethyan hypothesis of Axelrod. Therefore, these results allow to expand the convergence paradigm of the chaparral under an integrative view, in which a general trend to aridity might explain ¯oristic and adaptive patterns detected in these environments. -
Under the Canopy: a Guide to the Rainforests Of
NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Under the Canopy A guide to the rainforests of NSW 1 Contents What are rainforests? ........................................................................... 3 How did Australian rainforests originate? .................................... 4 What determines where rainforests occur? ................................ 5 The types of rainforest in New South Wales .............................. 6 Special features of rainforest plants .............................................. 8 The animals living in our rainforests ............................................. 10 Regeneration under the canopy .................................................... 12 The status of rainforest conservation in NSW ......................... 13 How can we all help preserve the rainforest? .......................... 14 World Heritage ...................................................................................... 15 Where does rainforest occur in New South Wales?.............. 16 1 Richmond – Tweed .................................................................... 18 2 Washpool & Gibraltar ................................................................ 20 3 Dorrigo – New England ............................................................22 4 Sea Acres ....................................................................................... 24 5 Barrington and Gloucester Tops .......................................... 26 6 Minnamurra ..................................................................................