DOCSLIB.ORG

Project/Programme Proposal to the Adaptation Fund

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project/Programme Proposal to the Adaptation Fund PROJECT/PROGRAMME PROPOSAL TO THE ADAPTATION FUND PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: Small-sized Country: Namibia Title of Project: Community-based Integrated Farming System for Climate Change Adaptation Type of Implementing Entity: National Implementing Entity: Desert Research Foundation of Namibia Executing Entity: Polytechnic of Namibia (transforming to the Namibia University of Science and Technology) Amount of Financing Requested: USD 750,000 Short Summary The overall goal of this project to: strengthen the resilience and adaptation of vulnerable communities to climate variability and climate change. The goal will be achieved through community mobilisation and capacity building (Component 1), implementation of integrated farming systems (Component 2) market research (Component 3), strengthening communities‘ capacity to manage rangeland and livestock production (Component 4) and, students involvement and capacity building (Component 5). [i] Table of Contents PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION ................................................................................................................ i 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT ........................................................................................ 4 2. PROJECT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................... 9 PART II: PROJECT JUSTIFICATION ........................................................................................................... 11 A. Project contribution to overall resilience .................................................................................................... 11 Detailed Project Component Description ........................................................................................................ 13 B. Economic, social and environmental benefits of the project ................................................................... 25 C. Analysis of cost effectiveness .................................................................................................................. 26 D Consistence of the project with national or sub-national sustainable development strategies ................. 27 E. Relevant national technical standards compliance ................................................................................... 31 F. Description of duplication with other funding ......................................................................................... 32 G. Description of learning and knowledge management .............................................................................. 32 H. Description of consultative process ......................................................................................................... 33 I. Justification for requested funding ........................................................................................................... 34 J. Description of sustainability of the project outcomes .............................................................................. 36 K. Overview of the environmental and social impacts and risks analysis .................................................... 38 PART III: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ................................................................................... 39 A. Description of project management arrangements ................................................................................... 39 B. Measures for financial and project risk management .............................................................................. 46 C. Description of measures for environmental and social risk management ................................................ 47 D. Monitoring and evaluation arrangements ................................................................................................ 49 E. Results framework for the project proposal ............................................................................................. 51 F. Demonstration of project alignment with adaptation fund the results framework ................................... 57 G. Detailed budget with budget notes ........................................................................................................... 58 H. Disbursement schedule ............................................................................................................................ 61 PART IV: ENDORSEMENT BY GOVERNMENT AND CERTIFICATION BY THE IMPLEMENTING ENTITY ........................................................................................................................................................... 62 1. References ................................................................................................................................................ 64 [1] LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Adverse effects of climate change on the rural communities of Otjozondjupa and Omaheke regions 6 Table 2: Bush densities in villages in the Omaheke and Otjozondjupa regions ................................................ 8 Table 3: Project components and financing ..................................................................................................... 10 Table 4: Project calendar ................................................................................................................................. 10 Table 5: Summary of partial enterprise budget for poultry .............................................................................. 19 Table 6: Summary of a partial enterprise budget for irrigated horticultural production .................................. 21 Table 7: Summary of cost effectiveness Proposed action and approach ......................................................... 26 Table 8: Summary of possible duplication ...................................................................................................... 32 Table 9: Summary of sustainability outcomes ................................................................................................. 36 Table 10: Environmental and social impacts and risks analysis ...................................................................... 38 Table 11: Risk factors and mitigation measure analysis .................................................................................. 46 Table 12: Summary environmental and social risk management .................................................................... 47 Table 13: Summary of results framework ........................................................................................................ 51 Table 14: Project‘s objectives and outcomes aligned with the AF‘s outcome and output indicators .............. 57 Table 15: Summary of Budget breakdown ...................................................................................................... 58 Table 16: Detailed budget breakdown ............................................................................................................. 59 Table 17: Budget cost note description ............................................................................................................ 60 Table 18: Implementing Entity budget ............................................................................................................ 61 Table 19: Disbursement schedule .................................................................................................................... 61 Table 20: Projected calendar ............................................................................................................................ 61 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Map of Namibia .................................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 2: Linkages between the various components (Project design) ............................................................ 13 Figure 3: Inter-linkage of supply chain of the project...................................................................................... 15 Figure 4: Integrated farming system ................................................................................................................ 17 Figure 5: Proposed production design ............................................................................................................. 18 Figure 6: Regional Rural Development concept .............................................................................................. 28 Figure 7: Organogram for the project implementation .................................................................................... 33 Figure 8: Mentoring and Evaluation cycle ....................................................................................................... 50 [2] LIST OF ACRONYMS AF Adaptation Fund CBA Community-Based Adaptation Programme CBEND Combating Bush Encroachment for Namibia‘s Development CCA Climate Change Adaptation Project CONTILL Conservation Tillage Project CPP ISLM Country Pilot Partnership for Integrated Sustainable Land Management DRWS Directorate of Rural Water Supply DYET Directorate of Youth Employment and Training ENSO El Niño-Southern Oscillation () ERB Ephemeral River Basins FIRM Forum for Integrated Resource Management GEF Global Environment Facility IFS Integrated farming system MAWF Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry MET Ministry of Environment and Tourism NDP National Development Plan NIE National Implementing Entity SGP Small Grants Programme UNCCD UN Convention to combat Desertification
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposal for Namibia (3)
    AFB/PPRC.17/14 18 September 2015 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee Seventeenth Meeting Bonn, Germany, 6-7 October 2015 Agenda Item 6 i) PROPOSAL FOR NAMIBIA (3) AFB/PPRC.17/14 Background 1. The Operational Policies and Guidelines (OPG) for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund (the Fund), adopted by the Adaptation Fund Board (the Board), state in paragraph 45 that regular adaptation project and programme proposals, i.e. those that request funding exceeding US$ 1 million, would undergo either a one-step, or a two-step approval process. In case of the one-step process, the proponent would directly submit a fully-developed project proposal. In the two-step process, the proponent would first submit a brief project concept, which would be reviewed by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and would have to receive the endorsement of the Board. In the second step, the fully- developed project/programme document would be reviewed by the PPRC, and would ultimately require the Board’s approval. 2. The Templates approved by the Board (OPG, Annex 4) do not include a separate template for project and programme concepts but provide that these are to be submitted using the project and programme proposal template. The section on Adaptation Fund Project Review Criteria states: For regular projects using the two-step approval process, only the first four criteria will be applied when reviewing the 1st step for regular project concept. In addition, the information provided in the 1st step approval process with respect to the review criteria for the regular project concept could be less detailed than the information in the request for approval template submitted at the 2nd step approval process.
    [Show full text]
  • Scraping the Pot”: San in Namibia Two Decades After Independence Bibliography
    Annex Annex A: Sites visited for the field research Region # of sites Sites Date Caprivi (eastern) 5 Marakavan, Bito, Waya Waya, Kyarecan and Mulanga 5-12 August 2012 Caprivi (western 4 Omega 1, Mushashane and Mushangara 23-31 October 2011 – i.e. Bwabwata National Park) Mashambo 31 May 2012 Kavango 4 Likwaterera and Wiwi 10-18 April 2012 Xeidang and Ndama 1-9 May 2012 Oshana 1 Okaukuejo 8-12 December 2011 Kunene 1 Outjo (Etosha Poort) 6-9 February 2012 Oshikoto 3 Oshivelo 16-20 July 2012 Tsintsabis and Farm Six (both visited twice) 16-18 April 2012 and 28-30 June 2012 Ohangwena 6 Ekoka and Ouholamo 22-29 April 2012 Oshikoha and Onane 21-28 May 2012 Omukukutu and Omiishi 18-25 June 2012 Omaheke 6 Skoonheid October 2011 Gobabis (Epako) 14-17 February 2012 Blouberg 2-5 April 2012 Corridors 13 and 17 3-9 June 2012 Otjinene 9-12 September 2012 Omusati 4 Okatseidhi and Amarika 3-10 July 2012 Okathakanguti and Okapya 18-26 September 2012 Otjozondjupa 8 Tsumkwe and Nyae Nyae Conservancy (||Xa|hoba and 7-15 November 2011 N‡animh) N‡a Jaqna Conservancy (Mangetti Dune, Luhebo and 30 January to Omatako) 5 February 2012 Vergenoeg 21-23 July 2012 Uitkoms 22 July 2012 Total 42 Field research period: 23 October 2011 to 26 September 2012 Bibliography 631 Annex B: Stakeholder interviews Name of Interviewee Institution and/or position Date Place Windhoek (Khomas Region) Lara Diez, Wendy Viall Nyae Nyae Development Foundation of Namibia (NNDFN) 7/12/2011 NNDFN office Sam Mayinoti Independent consultant 2/10/2012 LAC office Aaron Classe Office of the Prime Minister (OPM), Division of San Development 31/1/2013 OPM John Walters Ombudsman Namibia 25/2/2013 Office of the Ombudsman Nelago S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor Muesee Kazapua Also Said Yesterday That Madikizela-Mandela Deserves a Street to Be Named After Her
    11111 Media Monitoring on Urban Development in Namibia Media Monitoring on Urban Development in Namibia is a service provided by Development Workshop Namibia (DWN), a Namibian NGO with a focus on sustainable urban development and poverty reduction. DWN is part of a world-wide network of Development Workshop (DW) organisations with centres in Canada, Angola and France, and offices in Vietnam and Burkino Faso. It was founded in the 1970s by three architect students in the UK and has been funded by non- governmental organisations, private citizens, and national and international development organisations. In Namibia, DWN’s activities focus on urban related research, effective urban planning for the urban poor, solutions to informal settlements, water & sanitation, and projects specifically targeting disadvantaged segments of the urban youth. Through 40 years of engagement on urban issues mainly in Africa and Asia, the DW network of organisations has acquired significant institutional knowledge and capacity and is well integrated in regional and international networks. The Namibian media provide an important source of information on urban development processes in the country, highlighting current events, opportunities and challenges. The media further provide insight into the different views and perceptions of a variety of actors, be it from government, non- government, private sector, and individuals that reside in Namibia’s towns and settlements. It is therefore hoped that DWN’s Media Monitoring service will provide insights into those different views, with potential use for a variety of institutions and decision-makers that work in the urban environment in Namibia. The Media Monitoring service is currently provided on a monthly basis and monitors the following newspapers: The Namibian, Republikein, Namibian Sun, New Era, Windhoek Observer, Confidente, and Informante.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, D.C
    SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION THE HERERO PEOPLE’S REPARATIONS CORPORATION, : a District of Columbia Corporation : 1625 K Street, NW, #102 : Washington, D.C. 20006 : : THE HEREROS, : a Tribe and Ethnic and Racial Group, : by and through its Paramount Chief : By Paramount Chief Riruako : Paramount Chief K. Riruako : P.O. Box 60991 Katutura : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Mburumba Getzen Kerina : P.O. Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Kurundiro Kapuuo : Case No. 01-0004447 Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Judge Jackson Calendar 2 Cornelia Tjaveondja : Next Scheduled Event: P.O. Box 24861 : Initial Scheduling Conference Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : September 18, 2001 at 9:30 a.m. Moses Nguarambuka : P.O. Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Hilde Kazakoka Kamberipa : SQ66 Genesis Street : P.O. Box 61831 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Festus Korukuve : P.O. Box 50 : Opuuo (Otuzemba), Namibia : Uezuvanjo Tjihavgc : Box 27 : Opuuo, Namibia : Ujeuetu Tjihange : Box 27 : Opuuo, Namibia : Moses Katuuo : P.O. Box 930 : Gobabis, Namibia 9000 : Levy K. O. Nganjone : P.O. Box 309 : Gobabis, Namibia : Festus Ndjai : Opuuo, Namibia : Hoomajo Jjingee : Opuuo, Namibia : Uelembuia Tjinawba : Okandombo : Okunene Region, Namibia : Jararaihe Tjingee : Opuuo, Namibia : Hangekaoua Mbinge : Opuuo, Namibia : Ehrens Jeja : Box 210 : Omaruru : Omatjete, Namibia : Nathanael Uakumbua : Box 211 : Omaruru, Namibia : Rudolph Kauzuu : Box 210 : Omatjete : Omaruru, Namibia : 2 Jaendekua Kapika : Opuuo, Namibia : Ben Mbeuserua : P.O. Box 224 : Okakarara, Namibia 9000 : Felix Kokati : Box 47 : Okakarara, Namibia 9000 : Samuel Upendura : Oyinene : Omaheke Region, Namibia : Majoor Festus Kamburona : P.O. 1131 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Uetavera Tjirambi : Okonmgo : Okanene Region, Namibia : Julius Katjingisiua : P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Democracy and Elections in Namibia
    MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ––––––––––––– ❑ ––––––––––––– Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA ISBN 1-920095-02-0 Debie LeBeau 9781920 095024 Edith Dima Order from: [email protected] EISA RESEARCH REPORT No 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 i MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ii EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 iii MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA BY DEBIE LEBEAU EDITH DIMA 2005 iv EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 Published by EISA 2nd Floor, The Atrium 41 Stanley Avenue, Auckland Park Johannesburg, South Africa 2006 P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 1-920095-02-0 EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2005 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. –––––––––––– ❑ –––––––––––– Cover photograph: Yoruba Beaded Sashes Reproduced with the kind permission of Hamill Gallery of African Art, Boston, MA USA EISA Research Report, No. 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 v CONTENTS List of acronyms viii Acknowledgements x Preface xi 1. Background to multiparty democracy in Namibia 1 Historical background 1 The electoral system and its impact on gender 2 The ‘characters’ of the multiparty system 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats
    1 Electoral Commission of Namibia 2020 Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats Votes recorded per Seats Allocation per Region Local authority area Valid votes Political Party or Organisation Party/Association Party/Association Independent Patriots for Change 283 1 Landless Peoples Movement 745 3 Aranos 1622 Popular Democratic Movement 90 1 Rally for Democracy and Progress 31 0 SWANU of Namibia 8 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 465 2 Independent Patriots for Change 38 0 Landless Peoples Movement 514 3 Gibeon 1032 Popular Democratic Movement 47 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 433 2 Independent Patriots for Change 108 1 Landless People Movement 347 3 Gochas 667 Popular Democratic Movement 65 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 147 1 Independent Patriots for Change 97 1 Landless peoples Movement 312 2 Kalkrand 698 Popular Democratic Movement 21 0 Hardap Rally for Democracy and Progress 34 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 234 2 All People’s Party 16 0 Independent Patriots for Change 40 0 Maltahöhe 1103 Landless people Movement 685 3 Popular Democratic Movement 32 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 330 2 *Results for the following Local Authorities are under review and will be released as soon as this process has been completed: Aroab, Koës, Stampriet, Otavi, Okakarara, Katima Mulilo Hardap 2 Independent Patriots for Change 180 1 Landless Peoples Movement 1726 4 Mariental 2954 Popular Democratic Movement 83 0 Republican Party of Namibia 59 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 906 2 Independent Patriots for Change 320 0 Landless Peoples Movement 2468 2 Rehoboth Independent Town
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL SCOPING REPORT March 2021
    App- 002400 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR TOWNSHIP ESTABLISHMENT ON PORTION B & C OF THE FARM EPUKIRO RESERVE NO. 329, OTJINENE FINAL SCOPING REPORT March 2021 Project Title: OTJINENE TOWNSHIP ESTABLISHMENT Type of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING ASSESSMENT Project Location: REMAINDER OF PORTION 1 OF THE FARM EPUKIRO RESERVE NO. 329 Competent Authority: MINISTRY OF URBAN AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT NAMIBIA PLANNING AND ADVISORY BOARD / TOWNSHIPS BOARD PRIVATE BAG 13289 WINDHOEK NAMIBIA Approving Authority DIRECTORATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM PRIVATE BAG 13306 WINDHOEK Proponent/Client: OTJINENE VILLAGE COUNCIL P.O. BOX 1005, OTJINENE OTJINENE Consultancy: WINPLAN PO BOX 90761, KLEIN WINDHOEK TEL.: (061) 246 761 E-MAIL: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................. i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF MAPS .......................................................................................................................................... iv APPENDICES ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • People, Cattle and Land - Transformations of Pastoral Society
    People, Cattle and Land - Transformations of Pastoral Society Michael Bollig and Jan-Bart Gewald Everybody living in Namibia, travelling to the country or working in it has an idea as to who the Herero are. In Germany, where most of this book has been compiled and edited, the Herero have entered the public lore of German colonialism alongside the East African askari of German imperial songs. However, what is remembered about the Herero is the alleged racial pride and conservatism of the Herero, cherished in the mythico-histories of the German colonial experiment, but not the atrocities committed by German forces against Herero in a vicious genocidal war. Notions of Herero, their tradition and their identity abound. These are solid and ostensibly more homogeneous than visions of other groups. No travel guide without photographs of Herero women displaying their out-of-time victorian dresses and Herero men wearing highly decorated uniforms and proudly riding their horses at parades. These images leave little doubt that Herero identity can be captured in photography, in contrast to other population groups in Namibia. Without a doubt, the sight of massed ranks of marching Herero men and women dressed in scarlet and khaki, make for excellent photographic opportunities. Indeed, the populär image of the Herero at present appears to depend entirely upon these impressive displays. Yet obviously there is more to the Herero than mere picture post-cards. Herero have not been passive targets of colonial and present-day global image- creators. They contributed actively to the formulation of these images and have played on them in order to achieve political aims and create internal conformity and cohesion.
    [Show full text]
  • I~~I~ E a FD-992A-~N ~II~I~I~I~~ GOVERNMENT GAZE'rte of the REPUBLIC of NAMIBIA
    Date Printed: 12/31/2008 JTS Box Number: lFES 14 Tab Number: 30 Document Title: GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA, R2,BO - NO 473, NO 25 Document Date: 1992 Document Country: NAM Document Language: ENG lFES ID: EL00103 F - B~I~~I~ E A FD-992A-~n ~II~I~I~I~~ GOVERNMENT GAZE'rtE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA R2,80 WINDHOEK - I September 1992 No. 473 CONTENTS Page PROCLAMATION No. 25 Establishment of the boundaries of constituencies in Namibia ........ PROCLAMATION by the PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA No. 25 1992 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BOUNDARIES OF CONSTITUENCIES IN NAMIBIA Under the powers vested in me by section 4(2)( a) of the Regional Councils Act, 1992 (Act 22 of 1992), I hereby make known the boundaries of constituencies which have been fixed by the Delimitation Commission under the provisions of Article 106(1) of the Namibian Constitution in respect of the regions referred to in Proclamation 6 of 1992. - Given under my Hand and the Seal of the RepUblic of Namibia at Windhoek this 29th day of August, One Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety-two. Sam Nujoma President BY ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT-IN-CABINET F Clifton White Resource Center International Foundation for Election Systems 2 Government Gazette I September 1992 No. 473 SCHEDULE BOUNDARIES OF CONSTITUENCIES REGION NO. I: KUNENE REGION compnsmg: Ruacana Constituency This Constituency is bounded on the north by the middle of the Kunene River from the said river's mouth upstream to the Ruacana Falls whence the boundary conforms with the demarcated international straight line east­ wards to Boundary Beacon 5; thence the boundary turns southwards and coincides with the straight line boundary common to the Kunene and Omusati Regions as far as line of latitude 18° S; thence along this line of latitude westwards to the Atlantic Ocean; thence along the line of the coast in a general northerly direction to the mouth of the Kunene River.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegenberger and Burger Oorlogsende Porphyry
    Communs Geol. Surv. SW Africa/Namibia, 1 (1985) 23-30 THE OORLOGSENDE PORPHYRY MEMBER, SOUTH WEST AFRICA/ NAMIBIA: ITS AGE AND REGIONAL SETTING by W. Hegenberger and A.J. Burger ABSTRACT per Sinclair Sequence. Formerly, it was included in the Skumok Formation (Schalk 1961; Geological Map of +18 The age of 1094 -20 m.y. of the Oorlogsende Porphy- South West Africa 1963; Martin 1965), a name that is ry (Area 2120) supports correlation with the Nückopf now obsolete. Formation, an equivalent of the Sinclair Sequence. The rocks form a tectonic sliver, and their position suggests 2. OCCURRENCE AND DESCRIPTION OF THE that the southern Damara thrust belt continues into the ROCKS Epukiro area. Dependent on whether the Kgwebe for- mation in Botswana is considered coeval with either the Several isolated outcrops of feldspar-quartz porphyry Eskadron Formation (Witvlei area, Gobabis District) occur over a distance of 9 km in the Epukiro Omuram- or with the Nückopf Formation of central South West ba and its tributaries in Hereroland East (Area 2120; Africa/Namibia, the correlation of the Ghanzi Group 21°25’S, 20015’E), halfway between the Red Line and in Botswana with only the Nosib Group or with both Oorlogsende (Fig. 2). The nearest site to lend a name the Eskadron Formation and the Nosib Group of South is Oorlogsende, a deserted cattle-post situated about 8 West Africa/Namibia is implied. km to the east of the easternmost porphyry outcrop. No rock type other than the porphyry is exposed. UITTREKSEL The porphyry is a massive, hard, grey to black rhy- olitic rock with a light brownish weathered crust.
    [Show full text]
  • Customary and Legislative Aspects of Land Registration and Management on Communal Land in Namibia
    Communal land in Namibia: a free for all Customary and legislative aspects of land registration and management on communal land in Namibia John Mendelsohn (RAISON – Research & Information Services of Namibia) December 2008 Report prepared for the Ministry of Land & Resettlement and the Rural Poverty Reduction Programme of the European Union Contents Summary_________________________________________________________3 Abbreviations and definitions_________________________________________5 Acknowledgements_________________________________________________5 Introduction_______________________________________________________6 Methods__________________________________________________________7 Functioning and structure of traditional authorities ________________________9 Recommendations___________________________________________14 Customary land registration _________________________________________14 Misunderstandings, confusions and objections_____________________15 Focus on higher levels of traditional authority ____________________17 Other aspects_______________________________________________18 Recommendations___________________________________________19 The management of communal land___________________________________22 Access to land ______________________________________________22 Inheritance_________________________________________________23 Commonages_______________________________________________25 The capture of land values by the elite ___________________________26 Recommendations___________________________________________29 APPENDICES
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Separation: the Case of the Ovaherero of Ngamiland
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. Pula: Botswana Journal of African Studies, vol. 13, nos. 1 & 2 (1999) The politics of separation: the case of the OvaHerero of Ngamiland George Uaisana Manase A number of OvaHerero, fleeing the German war of extermination in 1904, crossed from German South West Africa (Namibia) into the Bechuianaland Protectorate and settled in Ngamiland. These OvaHerero came under Tawana overlordship, but retained their cultural identity and even a large degree of their political structures. Initially destitute and unfamiliar with Bechuanaland conditions, they became richer over time. Although proposals for a return to Namibia, including one involved with Tshekedi Khama's campaign against the incorporation of South West Africa into South Africa, were not realized, the desire to return remained. Politically the Ngamiland OvaHerero were associated with SWANU more than SWAPo. In spite of the distance separating the Ovaherero of Ngamiland and those in Namibia,l there has been a continued desire on the side ofthe Ngamiland Ovaherero to go back to Namibia. The strength of this desire has varied through time due to political and economic pull and push forces. From the Namibian side, the fundamental issue has been the political relations between the various Namibian Administrations and the Ovaherero of Namibia. As long as Namibian Hereros remained on bad terms with the various colonial administrations, the Ovaherero of Ngamiland could not be welcomed in the land of their birth.
    [Show full text]