University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation PALEOENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF MONTBROOK: AN UNUSUAL FOSSIL LOCALITY FROM THE LATE MIOCENE IN NORTHERN FLORIDA By MICHAEL JOSEPH ZIEGLER A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2019 1 © 2019 Michael Joseph Ziegler 2 To Dorothy Helvak 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to formally thank all the enthusiastic volunteers of the Montbrook Fossil Site during the 2017-18 season for their interest and support during fieldwork. I thank Florida Geologic Survey staff for selflessly sharing resources and expertise. I thank my Thompson Earth System Institute: Moonshot Project 2019 Cohort lab group for assisting in the collection of research materials. Similarly, I thank my undergraduate researchers for preparing microfossils used in this study. I thank my graduate advisor and committee for pushing me to be a stronger researcher and communicator of science. With love, I thank my family for endless encouragement and laughter. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................7 LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................10 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................11 CHAPTER 1 MONTBROOK SITE INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................12 Research Inquiry .....................................................................................................................12 An Exceptional Miocene Locality ..........................................................................................13 Florida Platform During the Miocene .....................................................................................16 2 LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY AND FACIES MODELING .......................................................24 Regional Stratigraphic History ...............................................................................................24 Methods ..................................................................................................................................27 Microfacies Analysis .......................................................................................................27 Smear Slide Analysis .......................................................................................................28 Sediment Core Analysis ..................................................................................................30 Results .....................................................................................................................................31 Microfacies Analysis .......................................................................................................31 Rippled sand unit ......................................................................................................32 Massive fossiliferous gravel unit ..............................................................................33 Wavy cross laminated unit .......................................................................................35 Heterolithic flaser unit ..............................................................................................37 Smear Slide Analysis .......................................................................................................39 Sediment Core Analysis ..................................................................................................43 Discussion ...............................................................................................................................46 Smear Slide Analysis .......................................................................................................46 Micofacies Analysis ........................................................................................................51 Sediment Core Analysis ..................................................................................................55 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................58 3 ICHNOFOSSILS AND BIOTURBATION INDEX ..............................................................83 Methods ..................................................................................................................................84 Results .....................................................................................................................................86 Discussion ...............................................................................................................................87 5 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................90 APPENDIX A PALEOMAGNETISM ...........................................................................................................96 B EDUCATION, OUTREACH AND COLLABORATION ...................................................100 LIST OF REFERENCES .............................................................................................................103 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .......................................................................................................114 6 LIST OF TABLES Table page 2-1 Summary of facies assignments in Montbrook outcrop.. ..................................................80 2-2 Summary of smear slide results with patterns of presence and absence of major sediment constituents.. .......................................................................................................81 3-1 Summary of BI analysis including percentage area of primary sediment structures (P.S.) and secondary sediment structures (S.S) with associated depth.. ............................95 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 1-1 Map of the Montbrook Fossil Site in Florida. Levy County is subset to illustrate the location of Montbrook as an area of interest in north-central Florida ...............................20 1-2 Faunal reconstruction of Montbrook, October 28, 2019. Courtesy of Rachel Keeffe .......21 1-3 Age distribution of Miocene and Pliocene fossil localities in Florida ...............................22 1-4 Geologic map of Florida modified from Scott et al. (2001) with Neogene fossil localities. Subset illustrates prominent fossil localities in north-central Florida and their proximity to Montbrook. ...........................................................................................23 2-1 Geologic cross-section of Florida from Scott et al. (2001) featuring the north to south transect ...............................................................................................................................61 2-2 Montbrook fossil site overview highlighting the various areas of interest within and around the locality..............................................................................................................62 2-3 Representative outcrop and key geologic features observed from the lower step .............63 2-4 Representative outcrop and key geologic features observed from the upper step .............64 2-5 Correlated lithostratigraphic columns of upper and lower steps based on site description and microfacies analysis where depth is measured in centimeters from the surface ..........................................................................................................................65 2-6 Representative section of rippled sand unit (facies A) ......................................................66 2-7 Representative section of massive gravel unit (facies B) ..................................................67 2-8 Representative section of wavy cross laminate sand unit (facies C) .................................68 2-9 Representative section of heterolithic flaser unit (facies D) ..............................................69 2-10 Feldspar grains observed from smear slide samples in XPL .............................................70 2-11 Heavy mineral grains observed from smear slide samples in PPL ....................................70 2-12 Quartz grains with pyrite framboids observed from smear slide samples in PPL .............71 2-13 Palygorskite observed from smear slide sample in XPL ...................................................71 2-14 SEM images of artifacts that contain needle-like minerals inside their hollowed structures ............................................................................................................................72 2-15 SEM images of microfossils found in situ .........................................................................72 8 2-16 SEM images of preferentially sorted phosphatic-rich grains .............................................73 2-17 FGS sediment core 19731 drilled north of Montbrook ......................................................74 2-18 FGS sediment core 19732 drilled south of Montbrook .....................................................75 2-19 FGS
Recommended publications
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    A new marine vertebrate assemblage from the Late Neogene Purisima Formation in Central California, part II: Pinnipeds and Cetaceans Robert W. BOESSENECKER Department of Geology, University of Otago, 360 Leith Walk, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, 9054 (New Zealand) and Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University 200 Traphagen Hall, Bozeman, MT, 59715 (USA) and University of California Museum of Paleontology 1101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA, 94720 (USA) [email protected] Boessenecker R. W. 2013. — A new marine vertebrate assemblage from the Late Neogene Purisima Formation in Central California, part II: Pinnipeds and Cetaceans. Geodiversitas 35 (4): 815-940. http://dx.doi.org/g2013n4a5 ABSTRACT e newly discovered Upper Miocene to Upper Pliocene San Gregorio assem- blage of the Purisima Formation in Central California has yielded a diverse collection of 34 marine vertebrate taxa, including eight sharks, two bony fish, three marine birds (described in a previous study), and 21 marine mammals. Pinnipeds include the walrus Dusignathus sp., cf. D. seftoni, the fur seal Cal- lorhinus sp., cf. C. gilmorei, and indeterminate otariid bones. Baleen whales include dwarf mysticetes (Herpetocetus bramblei Whitmore & Barnes, 2008, Herpetocetus sp.), two right whales (cf. Eubalaena sp. 1, cf. Eubalaena sp. 2), at least three balaenopterids (“Balaenoptera” cortesi “var.” portisi Sacco, 1890, cf. Balaenoptera, Balaenopteridae gen. et sp. indet.) and a new species of rorqual (Balaenoptera bertae n. sp.) that exhibits a number of derived features that place it within the genus Balaenoptera. is new species of Balaenoptera is relatively small (estimated 61 cm bizygomatic width) and exhibits a comparatively nar- row vertex, an obliquely (but precipitously) sloping frontal adjacent to vertex, anteriorly directed and short zygomatic processes, and squamosal creases.
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Analysis of Marine Mammal Dispersal Routes Across Major Ocean Regions Using Beta Diversity at the Generic Level
    A Statistical Analysis of Marine Mammal Dispersal Routes Across Major Ocean Regions Using Beta Diversity at the Generic Level A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at George Mason University By Carlos Mauricio Peredo Bachelor of Science Seton Hill University, 2012 Director: Mark D. Uhen, Assistant Professor Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Earth Sciences Spring Semester 2015 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Copyright 2015 Carlos Mauricio Peredo All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION Dedicated to my wonderful parents, Mauricio and Julie Peredo, who left behind everything they knew and started fresh in a foreign land purely in the pursuit of a better life for their children; to my older brother Miguel, whose witty humor, eternal optimism, and fierce loyalty has kept my head above water and a smile on my face throughout countless tribulations; to my younger brother Julio, who has far surpassed us all in talent and intellect, and who inspires me to never stop learning; and most of all, to my loving wife Molly, who has never stopped believing in me and drives me to settle for nothing less than perfection. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members, Drs. George, Lyons, and Parsons, for their tireless revisions and hard work on my behalf. I would like to thank George Mason University and the Smithsonian Institution for providing the support and inspiration for much of this project. I would like to thank the Paleobiology Database, and all of its contributors, for their ambitious vision and their relentless pursuit of its execution.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Otter of Giant Size, Siamogale Melilutra Sp. Nov. \(Lutrinae
    UCLA UCLA Previously Published Works Title A new otter of giant size, Siamogale melilutra sp. nov. (Lutrinae: Mustelidae: Carnivora), from the latest Miocene Shuitangba site in north-eastern Yunnan, south-western China, and a total- evidence phylogeny of lutrines Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11b1d0h9 Journal Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 16(1) ISSN 1477-2019 Authors Wang, X Grohé, C Su, DF et al. Publication Date 2018-01-02 DOI 10.1080/14772019.2016.1267666 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of Systematic Palaeontology ISSN: 1477-2019 (Print) 1478-0941 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjsp20 A new otter of giant size, Siamogale melilutra sp. nov. (Lutrinae: Mustelidae: Carnivora), from the latest Miocene Shuitangba site in north- eastern Yunnan, south-western China, and a total- evidence phylogeny of lutrines Xiaoming Wang, Camille Grohé, Denise F. Su, Stuart C. White, Xueping Ji, Jay Kelley, Nina G. Jablonski, Tao Deng, Youshan You & Xin Yang To cite this article: Xiaoming Wang, Camille Grohé, Denise F. Su, Stuart C. White, Xueping Ji, Jay Kelley, Nina G. Jablonski, Tao Deng, Youshan You & Xin Yang (2017): A new otter of giant size, Siamogale melilutra sp. nov. (Lutrinae: Mustelidae: Carnivora), from the latest Miocene Shuitangba site in north-eastern Yunnan, south-western China, and a total-evidence phylogeny of lutrines, Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2016.1267666 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2016.1267666 View supplementary material Published online: 22 Jan 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tjsp20 Download by: [UCLA Library] Date: 23 January 2017, At: 00:17 Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2016.1267666 A new otter of giant size, Siamogale melilutra sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Multigene Phylogeny of the Mustelidae: Resolving Relationships
    BMC Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Multigene phylogeny of the Mustelidae: Resolving relationships, tempo and biogeographic history of a mammalian adaptive radiation Klaus-Peter Koepfli*1, Kerry A Deere1, Graham J Slater1, Colleen Begg2, Keith Begg2, Lon Grassman3, Mauro Lucherini4, Geraldine Veron5 and Robert K Wayne1 Address: 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1606, USA, 2Postnet Suite 230, Private Bag X18, Rondebosch, 7701, Republic of South Africa, 3Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, MSC 218, 700 University Boulevard, Texas A and M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363, USA, 4Grupo de Ecología Comportamental de Mammiferos (GECM), Cátedra Fisiología Animal, Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur – CONICET, San Juan 670, 8000 Bahía Blanca, Argentina and 5Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Département Systématique et Evolution, CP 51 USM 601-UMR 5202, Origine, Structure et Evolution de la Biodiversité, 57 Rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France Email: Klaus-Peter Koepfli* - [email protected]; Kerry A Deere - [email protected]; Graham J Slater - [email protected]; Colleen Begg - [email protected]; Keith Begg - [email protected]; Lon Grassman - [email protected]; Mauro Lucherini - [email protected]; Geraldine Veron - [email protected]; Robert K Wayne - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 14 February 2008 Received: 29 January 2008 Accepted: 14 February 2008 BMC Biology 2008, 6:10 doi:10.1186/1741-7007-6-10 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/6/10 © 2008 Koepfli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Leeds Thesis Template
    Middle to Late Miocene terrestrial biota and climate by Matthew James Pound M.Sci., Geology (University of Bristol) Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Earth and Environment September 2012 - 2 - Declaration of Authorship The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his/her own, except where work which has formed part of jointly-authored publications has been included. The contribution of the candidate and the other authors to this work has been explicitly indicated below. The candidate confirms that appropriate credit has been given within the thesis where reference has been made to the work of others. Chapter 2 has been published as: Pound, M.J., Riding, J.B., Donders, T.H., Daskova, J. 2012 The palynostratigraphy of the Brassington Formation (Upper Miocene) of the southern Pennines, central England. Palynology 36, 26-37. Chapter 3 has been published as: Pound, M.J., Haywood, A.M., Salzmann, U., Riding, J.B. 2012. Global vegetation dynamics and latitudinal temperature gradients during the mid to Late Miocene (15.97 - 5.33 Ma). Earth Science Reviews 112, 1-22. Chapter 4 has been published as: Pound, M.J., Haywood, A.M., Salzmann, U., Riding, J.B., Lunt, D.J. and Hunter, S.J. 2011. A Tortonian (Late Miocene 11.61-7.25Ma) global vegetation reconstruction. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 300, 29-45. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2012, The University of Leeds, British Geological Survey and Matthew J.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAM the 11Th International Congress of Vertebrate Morphology
    PROGRAM The 11th International Congress of Vertebrate Morphology 29 June – 3 July 2016 Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center Washington, DC CONTENTS Welcome to ICVM 11 ........................ 5 Note from The Anatomical Record........... 7 Administration ............................. 9 Previous Locations of ICVM ................. 10 General Information ........................ .11 Sponsors .................................. 14 Program at-a-Glance ....................... 16 Exhibitor Listing............................ 18 Program ................................... 19 Wednesday 29th June, 2016 ................... .19 Thursday 30th June, 2016 ..................... 22 Friday 1st July, 2016 ........................... 34 Saturday 2nd July, 2016 ....................... 44 Sunday 3rd July, 2016 ......................... 52 Hotel Floor Plan ................... Back Cover Program 3 Journal of Experimental Biology (JEB)(JEB) isis atat thethe forefrontforefront ofof comparaticomparativeve physiolophysiologygy and integrative biolobiology.gy. We publish papers on the form and function of living ororganismsganisms at all levels of biological organisation and cover a didiverseverse array of elds,fields, including: • Biochemical physiology •I• Invertebratenvertebrate and vertebrate physiology • Biomechanics • Neurobiology and neuroethology • Cardiovascular physiology • Respiratory physiology • Ecological and evolutionary physiology • Sensory physiology Article types include ReseaResearchrch Articles, Methods & TeTechniques,chniques, ShoShortrt
    [Show full text]
  • FOSSIL Project Newsletter Summer 2017
    News from the FOSSIL Project Vol. 4, Issue 2, Summer 2017 [email protected] www.myfossil.org @projectfossil The FossilProject Inside this issue: NEWS FROM THE PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY Featured Professional: by Bruce J. MacFadden, President Elect, Paleontological Society Amy C. Henrici Since our last news, there is much to report from the Paleontological Society (PS). In Amateur Spotlight: particular, as you likely know, in 2016 the PS instituted a new avocational member George Martin category. Since that time, more than 60 members have signed up as avocational members; this bodes well for the future. The PS has also added a member of the Featured Organization: amateur/avocational community as an advisor Northwest Paleontological to the PS Council. We are pleased to announce Assocation that Jayson Kowinsky of the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania area and founder of The Fossil Vertebrate Paleontology of Guy web site has agreed to serve a two-year Orange County, California term. Jayson is otherwise known to members of myFOSSIL in several capacities, including Scorpy, the Giant Sea as the first speaker in our 2016 webinar series, Scorpion! and as a presenter at GSA 2015 in South Carolina and 2016 in Pittsburgh, the latter WIPS’10th Founders where he also led a very successful field trip Symposium collecting Carboniferous plants. We are excited Jayson Kowinsky that Jayson has agreed to serve and we look Montbrook Otter forward to both his input and representation of the amateur fossil community. Online Fossil Projects Seek Volunteers Douglas S. Jones Elected to be a PS Fellow Digital Photography 101 Dr. Douglas S.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleobiogeography of Miocene to Pliocene Equinae of North America: a Phylogenetic
    Paleobiogeography of Miocene to Pliocene Equinae of North America: A Phylogenetic Biogeographic and Niche Modeling Approach A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Kaitlin Clare Maguire June 2008 2 This thesis titled Paleobiogeography of Miocene to Pliocene Equinae of North America: A Phylogenetic Biogeographic and Niche Modeling Approach by KAITLIN CLARE MAGUIRE has been approved for the Department of Geological Sciences and the College of Arts and Sciences by Alycia L. Stigall Assistant Professor of Geological Sciences Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT MAGUIRE, KAITLIN CLARE, M.S., June 2008, Geological Sciences Paleobiogeography of Miocene to Pliocene Equinae of North America: A Phylogenetic Biogeographic and Niche Modeling Approach (195 pp.) Director of Thesis: Alycia L. Stigall The biogeography and evolution of the subfamily Equinae is examined using two separate but related analyses, phylogenetic biogeography and ecological niche modeling. The evolution of Equinae is a classic example of an adaptive radiation during a time of environmental change. Both analyses employed here examine the biogeography of the equine species to interpret how environmental and historical variables led to the rise and fall of this clade. Results determine climate change is the primary factor driving the radiation of Equinae and geodispersal is the dominant mode of speciation between regions of North America. A case study in the Great Plains indicates distributional patterns are more patchy during the middle Miocene when speciation rates are high than in the late Miocene, when the clade is in decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldotterday
    www.otter.org IOSF e-update no.78 June 2017 e-Update 78, June 2017 Join our IOSF mailing list and receive our newsletters - Click on this link: http://tinyurl.com/p3lrsmx st 31 May 2017 #worldotterday #worldotterday 1 of 11 Regulated By Oscr British Animal Honours 2013 (Office of the Scottish IFAW Animal Action Wildlife Conservation Charity Regulator) Award Winner 2012 Award Winner May 31st www.otter.org IOSF e-update no.78 June 2017 Thanks to YOU, World Otter Day was a huge success. Just look at some of the events which went on worldwide (photos above). Many people joined in with our social media posts and we had #WorldOtterDay trending. Posters and banners were designed and used in many countries to raise awareness. Schools got involved; so many young people were talking about otters and having fun learning. There was even a rally in Nepal and, zoos and wildlife parks in several countries held special otter awareness days. And all of this was only possible because of your support! So a huge thank you to everyone who took part, and to those who fundraised for us Of course otter awareness is not just for one day – every day is otter awareness day. So let’s keep telling people about otters. www.otter.org Grand Raffle Prize Winners We are delighted to announce that the World Otter Day Grand Raffle raised almost £800. Thank you to everyone who took part. The winners are: 1st prize, Otter sculpture by Mike Wood - Allan from Edinburgh 2nd prize, Otter Watching Day for 2 people - Marie in France 3rd prize, Pollyanna Pickering limited edition print - Wendy from Macclesfield Allan with his otter sculpture Photo: Allan Stewart 4th prize, Sea Otter print by Wendy Payne - Flora from Winchester 5th prize, Otter Adoption Gift Box - Meredith in USA 6th prize, Signed copy of Otters of the World - Nancy in USA 7th prize, Soft otter plush toy - Heidy in Germany IOSF Welcomes New Member of Staff As of 1 June, IOSF now has a new member of staff.
    [Show full text]
  • ECHININIOPSIS Dysprosorthis Rong 1984, /N Nanjing Institute Of
    ECHININIOPSIS 195 Dysprosorthis Rong 1984, /n Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology. Symposium on the Cambrian-Ordovician and Ordovician-Silurian boundaries (J 983: Nanjing}. Su-atigraphy and palaeontology of systemic boundaries in China. Ordovician Silurian boundary (I}. Anhui Science and Technology Publishing House, Nanjing: 133. -Brach. Dystylosaurus Jensen 1985, Great Basin Nat. 45 ( 4): 707. - t Repc.(Dinosauria} Dytoscotes Smetana & Campbell 1980, Canadian Ent 112 (10): 1061. -Ins.(Col.) Dytoscytina Lin Qibin 1986, Palaeontologia sin. (N.S. B) No. 21: 100. - t Ins.(Hem.) Ozarogneta Kuliev 1978, Doklady Akad. Nauk azerb. SSR 34 (5): 74. - Aracbn.(Acari} Dzeregia Ponomarenko 1985, Tntdy paleont. Inst. 211: 77. - lns.(Col.} Dzhagdycyathus Beljaeva in Belyaeva, Luchinina, Nazarov, Repina & Sobolev 1975, Trudy Inst. Geol. Geofiz. sib. Otd. 226: 102. - t Arch.(lrregulares) Dzhajloutshella Goroch 1994, Zoosystematica Rossica 3(1}: 53. -Ins.(Saltatoria} Dzhanganoceras Zhuravleva 1989, Paleontol Zh 1989 (I}: 36. - Moll.(Cephalopoda} Dzba.nok.menia Kostyukov 1977, Entomologicheskoe Oooz.r. 56 (t}: 189. -Ins.(Hym.) (As Tetrastichus (Dihanokmenia}} Dzhebaglina Misyus 1986, [Brachiopods of Lhc Ordovician of northern Kirgizia.) Ilim, Frun1.e: 169. - Brach. Dzhinsetoceras Zhuravleva 1978, Paleontologicheskii Zh. 1978 (4): 69. - Moll.(Cephalopoda) Dzhungarodorcadion Danilevs 1993, Russian Entomological Journal 2(1), February: 47. - lns.(Col.) (As Dorcadion (Dzhungarodorcadion}} E Eadya Huddleston & Short 1978, Journal Aust. ent. Soc. 17 (4): 317. - Ins.(Hym.} Ealata Quinlan 1986, Bulletin Br. Mus. oat. Hist. (Ent.} 52 (4): 257. - Tns.(Hym.) EarendiJ van Valen 1978, Evolutionary Theory 4 (2): 63. - t Mrunm.(Condylarthra} Earlandammina Bronnimann & Whittaker 1988, The Trochamminacea of the Discovery reports. A review of the Trocbamminacea (Protozoa: Foraminiferida} described from S Atlantic & Antarctic waters by Heron- Allen & Earland (1932) & Earland (1933; 1934; 1936) British Museum (Natural History), London: 126.
    [Show full text]
  • ERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI FEDERICO II Analisi Dei
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI FEDERICO II Analisi dei trend di taglia corporea nei mammiferi cenozoici in relazione agli assetti climatici. Dr. Federico Passaro Tutor Dr. Pasquale Raia Co-Tutor Dr. Francesco Carotenuto Do ttorato in Scienze della Terra (XXVI° Ciclo) 2013/2014 Indice. Introduzione pag. 1 Regola di Cope e specializzazione ecologica 2 - Materiali e metodi 2 - Test sull’applicabilità della regola di Cope 3 - Risultati dei test sulla regola di Cope 4 - Discussione dei risultati sulla regola di Cope 6 Habitat tracking e stasi morfologica 11 - Materiali e metodi 11 - Risultati 12 - Discussione 12 Relazione tra diversificazione fenotipica e tassonomica nei Mammiferi cenozoici 15 - Introduzione 15 - Materiali e metodi 16 - Risultati 19 - Discussione 20 Influenza della regola di Cope sull’evoluzione delle ornamentazioni in natura 24 - Introduzione 24 - Materiali e metodi 25 - Risultati 28 - Discussione 29 Considerazioni finali 33 Bilbiografia 34 Appendice 1 48 Appendice 2 65 Appendice 3 76 Appendice 4 123 Introduzione. La massa corporea di un individuo, oltre alla sua morfologia e struttura, è una delle caratteristiche che influisce maggiormente sulla sua ecologia. La variazione della taglia (body size), sia che essa diminuisca o sia che essa aumenti, porta a cambiamenti importanti nell’ecologia della specie: influisce sulla sua “longevità stratigrafica” (per le specie fossili), sulla complessità delle strutture ornamentali, sulla capacità di occupare determinati habitat, sulla grandezza degli areali che possono occupare (range size), sull’abbondanza (densità di individui) che esse possono avere in un determinato areale, sulla capacità di sfruttare le risorse, sul ricambio generazionale, sulla loro capacità di dispersione e conseguentemente sulla capacità di sopravvivere ai mutamenti ambientali (in seguito ai mutamenti si estinguono o tendono a spostarsi per seguire condizioni ecologiche ottimali – habitat tracking).
    [Show full text]
  • The Great American Biotic Interchange in Florida
    Bull. Fla. Mus. Nat. Hist. (2005) 45(4): 271-311 271 THE GREAT AMERICAN BIOTIC INTERCHANGE IN FLORIDA Gary S. Morgan1 Late Neogene vertebrate faunas from Florida provide the most complete record of South American mammals and birds that arrived in temperate North America during the Great American Biotic Interchange (GABI). The first major pulse of the GABI began in the early Hemphillian (late Miocene, ~9 Ma), defined in part on the first appearance of two sloths of South American origin, the megalonychid Pliometanastes and the mylodontid Thinobadistes. The type localities of Pliometanastes protistus (McGehee Farm) and Thinobadistes segnis (Mixson’s Bone Bed) are both earliest Hemphillian (8-9 Ma) sites from northern Florida. Pliometanastes evidently gave rise to Megalonyx in the late Hemphillian. The latest Hemphillian (~5 Ma) Palmetto Fauna documents the earliest occurrence of Megalonyx in Florida. The second major pulse of the GABI occurred during the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene, from 2.7 to1.5 Ma. The late Blancan is defined by the first appearance in temperate North America of a diverse assemblage of vertebrates from South America, including ten genera, all of which occur in Florida during the late Blancan: the giant flightless bird Titanis, the glyptodont Glyptotherium, the armadillos Dasypus and Pachyarmatherium, the pampathere Holmesina, the mylodontid Glossotherium, the megatheriid Eremotherium, the porcupine Erethizon, and the capy- baras Hydrochaeris and Neochoerus. During the late Blancan, Titanis, Dasypus, Pachyarmatherium, Holmesina, Eremotherium, and Hydrochaeris are primarily restricted to Florida, whereas Glyptotherium, Glossotherium, Erethizon, and Neochoerus are more widespread, occurring in Florida as well as the western United States.
    [Show full text]