OF the 15Th ANNUAL MEETING FERTILIZER INDUSTRY ROUND TABLE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
OF THE 15th ANNUAL MEETING FERTILIZER INDUSTRY ROUND TABLE 1965 Held at the :\IAYFI OWER HOTEL Washington, D. C. ~ovember IO·ll·I~, 1965 None of the printed matter in these proceedings may be reprinted without the written permission of the Fertilizer Industry Round Table. EXI'clIliv(' Committee Vincent Sauchelli. Chairman Housden L. Marshall, Sec'ty.Treasurer Joseph E. Reynolds, Jr. Albert Spillman Edilur;; Executive Committee Price $5.00 Copies may /J(' purchased from Housden L Marshall. 16M \Valterswood Rd. Baltimore, ~laryland 21212 Please make checks pa)'able to Fertilizer 1ndustry Round Table Table of Contents Page Page \Vednesday :Morning Session Moderator- Albert Spillman 34 November 10, 1965 Pinch-Pak Packaging Introductory Remarks-Vincent Sauchelli, Harlowe E. Lichtward 34 Chairman 5 A User's Viewpoint of the Pinch-Pak System- Moderator, Joseph E. Reynolds (j Walter K. Stone 36 Recent Deveiolnllenls In Gmrluiation Observations On Federal Air Frank P. Achorn and J. L. Lewis, Jr. 6 Polution Legislation- Hugh -"fullen _________ . 39 I.M.C.'s SOlltheastern Granlllat;on Units Frank T. Nielsson 1l Arl Inside Look At Air Pollution And Dust Crystal Strllcture Changes in Ammunium Control In The Fertilizer Industry- Nitrate During Processing- Larry Samuels ______ ._ ... _ 42 H. H. Tucker __ 13 Eqllipment, A1etJwds and Controls for Effect of Potassium Nitrate Additives on Fertilizer Ai?" Polution Problems- Ammonium Nitrate Conditions- David E. Bonn ____________ ._. _____ . _________ .. _._.. 44 Robert J. Harvey ---------------- ------------- ]5 Granulation of A1ixed Fertilizers Containing Potassium Nitrate- Rodger C. Smith 18 Thursday Morning Session November II, 1965 \Vednesday Afternoon Session Vincent Sauchelli, Moderator, Presiding ___________ .__ 48 November 10, 1965 Statistical Quality Control: Applying It To Fertilizer Production- Vincent Sauchelli and Albert Spillman O. R. ''''eaver 48 Moderators, Presiding Study On Sampling Bulk Fertilizer: Alodemtor- Progress Report- Vincent Sauchelli 23 Bruce Poundstone, Charles Gehrke, Trace Element Usage In Mixed Fertilizer- v\T. L. Baker ________________________________ . ___ . _________ . __ . ____________ ._ 51 H. Gordon Cunningham _..... _._._ ... _._ ... _____ . ____ ._. 2-1 A utomated Production And Quality Manufacture Of Phosphm'ic Acid FTOm A.A.C. Control Of Fertilizers- Black Rock Using The Dorr·Oliver Single James M. Martin 57 Tank Reactor- John G. Kronseder, Richard L. Kulp, Automatic P 2 0 5 Analysis Of Phosphate Rock- A. Jaeggi and David W. Leyshon __ ._____ .. ___ . __ .__ .___ 26 A. N. Baumann-H. H. Roberts _. _______. __ .. __________ _ 59 3 Page Page Thursday Afternoon Session Friday Morning Session November II, 1965 November 12, 1965 Albert Spillman and Vincent Sauchelli, Vincent Sauchelli, Moderator, Presiding _______ _ 82 Moderators, Presiding Discussion On Nitmphosphates Continued- Moderator Spillman ----------------------- ----- - ----------- 62 Panel Leader '''Tilliam C. \Veber _______________________ _ 82 Rubber-A iHaterial Of Construction. The iHanufactw'e Of Compound Fertilizers "Flexicone," The Rubber Cyclone and By The Kampa-Nitro Process- Hopper Componement- 'V. H. Nees and F. ,V, Brandt, Panelists 82 J. J. Lemaire --------------------- ------------------------------ ----- 62 Safety-A Way Of Life- The PEC Company And The Elmer C. Perrine _________ _ ___________________________ 6'1 Problem Of Nitrophosphates- Y. F. Berguin, Panelist ______________________ 88 Moderator Sauchelli _________________________________________________ 66 Nitrophosphate Processes Advantages Panel Discussion On Nitmphosphates- And Disadvantages- Panel Leader William C. Weber _____________________ 66 Travis p, Hignett, Panelist __________________________________ 92 Nitric Phosphate Process Utilizing Question and Answer Period Supplemental Acid- On Nitrophosphates- Ronald T . Young, Panelist ____ ____________________________ 67 William C. Weber, Panel Leader ______________________ 95 Nitrophosphates- Secretm'y- Treasurer Report R. J. Piepers, Panelist ______________________________ - ------_ 72 How"den L. Marshall 100 Costs and Techniques Of Nitrophosphate Recognition Press and Foreign Visitors-_____ _ 100 Production- Hans Banthien, Panelist ______________________________________ 77 Ad jou rn;ne n t __________________________ ~ _______________ --- ______________ _ 101 Wednesday Morning Session, Nov. 10, 1965 The Fifteenth Annual :VIeeting of the Fertilizer Industry Round Table Dr. Vincent Sauchelli, Chairman Joseph E. Reynolds, :\foderator DR. SAUCHELLl: ly constant and attractive to the Of course, all credit for these Ladies and gentlemen: "Vel farmer, with not much profit to currently high yields cannot be come to the 15th Annual Meeting the manufacturer, I might say. attributed to the use of fertilizers. of the Round Table, 1951, the In 1950, the total value of a!> It cannot, however, be refuted initial year of our organization, sets of American agriculture was that, without the employment of now seems so long ago. "Vhat $132.5 billion. In 1965, it was adequate supplies of fertilizer, these changes have occurred since then $237.6 billion, a 79 per cent in record-breaking achievements could in all areas of human activities! crease. That's a tremendous figure, not have been realized. Remarkable changes have particu $237.6 billion of dollars in assets This lesson about the inclis larly characterized the fertilizer in for American agriculture. It is the pensable role of fertilizers in pro dustry and our agriculture. la~gest industry in the country. moting increases in crop yields is Ohange is nothing new, of In 1950, the production assets being driven home to those in the course. 'Vhat distinguishes recent used in agriculture were $95 bil developing countries where food innovations is the speed at which it lion, of '''ihieh machinery and and nutrient difficiencies are des occurs. But, then, aren't we liv motor vehicles were valued at perately serious. ing in the jet age? Speed is the $1l.I 2 billion. In 1965, total pro I have a slide here that will order of the day. Ours is now a duction assets were $186 billions, illustrate graphically the fertilizer dynamic industry. It is exhilarat an increase almost double in that picture. ing to be in it. interval. Change can be hard at times Production assets, the tools on the persons and organizations with which farmers create their PRICES OF SELECTED directly affected but I am sure none production: In 1950, American FARM INPUTS would have it otherwise. farmers spent $975 million for fer Technological changes in agri tilizer and lime: In 1964, they culture act as an indirect force in spent $1678 million, about a 70 causing changes in the fertilizer in per cent increase. This is a big in dustry. dustry, almost one and three-quart Fertilizer use is closely associ er billion dollars used for the pur ated with the pattern of farming chase of fertilizers and lime and which prevails in the area it serves. most of that is for fertilizers. May 1 point out some data u.s or ACIi'ICiJtTURf. showing the remarkably dramatic Our highly efficient agricul ture results from a combination of CROP PRODUCTION PER ACRE changes in American agriculture AND CROPLAND USED FOR CROPS during the period 1950 to 1964. constant research and education In that period production in that gives to our farmers the in creased 38 per cent. The most ef formation and techniques for pro fective factor in this increase was ducing more on every acre of crop the more intensive employment of land harvested. chemical fertilizers, an increase in vVe are now using about 40 consumption of 130 per cent dur million fewer acres of crop land 1960 1965 ing that period. That's on the basis than we used in 1950, 336 million 1964 INDICATED AS OfAIJGUST of actual plant nutrients. acres in 1950, 294 million acres in US.DEPT~ .. ___ Breaking this figure down, the 1964. But our population in the consumption of nitrogenous fertil interim increased from 152 million You will see 1950 and the izers increased by 279 per cent, to 191 million persons. present period. Here is the crop phosphate fertilizers by 55 per cent, Crop yields in 1964 exceeded land. See how it has been de and potassic fertilizers by 124 per all previous records. Corn, wheat, creasing and the use of fertiliz cent. barley, peanuts, rice, all the im er has taken the plaee of land. Improvements in technology portant cash crops almost dou bled Labor on the farm has been de on the farm and in the fertilizer in yield per acre in the interim creasing with more efficient use of plant kept fertilizer prices relative- between 1950 and 1964. that labor being made. Fertilizer 5 is taking the place of land and world capitals recognize that a na the floor, this nth meeting could labor. tion's economy is mightily strength. be one of our most memorable. Here are farm imputs, wages, ened when it is based on a vigorous I e~I:has~ze that. \Ye need your machinery, but the price of plant agriculture sustained and nourish partlCIpatlon through questions nutrients has gone rapidly down ed by an adequate fertilizer indus and answers in order to make our from 1950. try. meetings more interesting and up We have a remarkably fine \Ve are indebted to Mr. Wil to our tradition. record. liam \Yeber of Dorr-Oliver and to I now turn the meeting over So much for general remarks. Mr. Travis Hignett of Tennessee to your moderator for this morn I want to refer now to our pro Valley Authority for the splendid in, Mr. Joe Kcynohls. gram. Your Executive Committee, panel program on mixed acids in Remarks by Moderator Joseph mindful of the changing technol nitro processes which will take Reynolds. ogy and techniques in the chem place later on in this program. Thank you, Vince. Good ical laboratories and materials of The other items on our pro morning. It is my privilege and construction, has prepared a pro gram are important to us all. pleasure to appear before you again gram based on suggestions and Granulation has been almost an and give you also an official wel problems received from our mem annual subject on our agenda.