DOCSLIB.ORG

Enhancement of Bone Ingrowth Into a Porous Titanium Structure to Improve Osseointegration of Dental Implants: a Pilot Study in the Canine Model

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enhancement of Bone Ingrowth Into a Porous Titanium Structure to Improve Osseointegration of Dental Implants: a Pilot Study in the Canine Model materials Article Enhancement of Bone Ingrowth into a Porous Titanium Structure to Improve Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Pilot Study in the Canine Model 1, 2, 3 4 5,6 Ji-Youn Hong y , Seok-Yeong Ko y, Wonsik Lee , Yun-Young Chang , Su-Hwan Kim and Jeong-Ho Yun 2,7,* 1 Department of Periodontology, Periodontal-Implant Clinical Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, Jeonbuk National University, 567, Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 54896, Korea; [email protected] 3 Advanced Process and Materials R&D Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, 7-47 Songdo-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 406-840, Korea; [email protected] 4 Department of Dentistry, Inha International Medical Center, 424, Gonghang-ro, 84-gil, Unseo-dong, Jung-gu, Incheon 22382, Korea; [email protected] 5 Department of Periodontics, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea; [email protected] 6 Department of Dentistry, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea 7 Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, 20, Geonjiro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 54907, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-63-250-2289 These authors contributed equally to this study. y Received: 8 May 2020; Accepted: 6 July 2020; Published: 8 July 2020 Abstract: A porous titanium structure was suggested to improve implant stability in the early healing period or in poor bone quality. This study investigated the effect of a porous structure on the osseointegration of dental implants. A total of 28 implants (14 implants in each group) were placed in the posterior mandibles of four beagle dogs at 3 months after extraction. The control group included machined surface implants with an external implant–abutment connection, whereas test group implants had a porous titanium structure added to the apical portion. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA); removal torque values (RTV); and surface topographic and histometric parameters including bone-to-implant contact length and ratio, inter-thread bone area and ratio in total, and the coronal and apical parts of the implants were measured after 4 weeks of healing. RTV showed a significant difference between the groups after 4 weeks of healing (p = 0.032), whereas no difference was observed in RFA. In the test group, surface topography showed bone tissue integrated into the porous structures. In the apical part of the test group, all the histometric parameters exhibited significant increases compared to the control group. Within the limitations of this study, enhanced bone growth into the porous structure was achieved, which consequently improved osseointegration of the implant. Keywords: porosity; dental implant; osseointegration; bone formation; titanium 1. Introduction A dental implant has been accepted as a reliable treatment modality for edentulous ridge with high long-term survival [1], and improvements in implant design, surface treatment, and surgical Materials 2020, 13, 3061; doi:10.3390/ma13143061 www.mdpi.com/journal/materials Materials 2020, 13, 3061 2 of 13 technique led to a marked increase in implant stability [2,3]. However, the results are mostly based on the selection of subjects with the exclusion of any clinical conditions that might have a negative effect on the healing around the implants. There are several possible risk factors associated with early implant failure or impaired healing, including smoking, head and neck radiation [4,5], bone quality and osteoporosis [6]. Osseointegration was defined as a direct and functional connection between bone and an artificial implant. However, the macroscopic (body structure and thread geometry) and microscopic (chemical composition and surface treatment) characteristics of dental implants could influence the success of the osseointegration [7]. The topographical features in an implant surface can be defined in terms of their scales, which were produced by surface modification treatments such as titanium plasma-spraying, grit-blasting, acid-etching, or combinations [2,8]. Apart from the macro-level that is related to the threaded screw of implant geometry and macroporous surface, mechanical interlocking is maximized by microtopographic roughness [9]. In addition, nanotopography is associated with the biological activities of cells to stimulate bone formation on an implant surface [10]. However, the majority of current surface treatments are unreliable to achieve reproducible nanoscale features as they range randomly from nanometers to millimeters. Another approach in surface modification was the production of porous bodies of titanium metal and its alloys, and sintering of metal powders onto the surface was commonly used for porous coatings [11,12]. Advantages of porous surface-enhanced implant include the induction of new bone tissue ingrowth and neovascularization into the porous scaffold in three-dimensional (3D) aspects [13], elastic modulus closer to the cancellous bone that allows load distribution [14], and enhanced transport of metabolites and space for new bone through substantial porous interconnectivity [15]. To maximize the potential benefits from the porous structures, precise control of overall porosity and pore size was identified as important, although the optimal ranges were yet to be determined [16]. However, conventional methods had limitations of low volumetric porosity, irregular dimensions of pores, and poor interconnectivity [17]. Furthermore, possible mechanical failures related to a lack of yield strength and separation of coating materials led to soft tissue encapsulation and loosening of implants [18]. Recent approaches have utilized methods such as selective melting with laser or electron beam, 3D printing, casting or vapor deposition to control the internal pore geometry and distribution [12,19]. The porous scaffolds were sometimes combined with threaded implants for additional advantages in terms of primary mechanical stability and removability. One of the products that had been widely studied to adapt the porous structure to the root form implant was the porous tantalum trabecular metal (PTTM) enhanced implant [18,20,21]. PTTM was fabricated by foam-like vitreous carbon scaffold that resulted in the open-cell structure similar to the trabecular bone [18]. The PTTM part was added to the middle portion of the implant by laser welding and was combined with the screw-type design of titanium alloy surface at the cervical and apical portions, which were microtextured by grit-blasting with hydroxyapatite particles. From the animal studies, histomorphometric evaluations have demonstrated more new bone growth at the PTTM occupying the middle portion compared to the conventional surface within the 12-week study periods, and suggested the potential benefits of the porous structures in the compromised bone quality. However, there were limited biomechanical improvements assessed by the resonance frequency analysis in PTTM and the implant stability appeared comparable to the conventional microtextured surface. In the present study, a novel method of utilizing the powder injection molding technique has been employed to form a porous titanium structure, which was fabricated on the apical portion of the machined screw-type implant. The effect of the newly developed porous structure on osseointegration was compared to the smooth-surfaced implant in the canine model. Materials 2020, 13, 3061 3 of 13 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Design of the Implants MaterialsA threaded2020, 13, x FOR machined PEER REVIEW surface implant (c.p. titanium grade 4) with an external-type abutment3 of 13 connection (MegaGen Implant Co., Ltd., Gyeongsan, Korea) was used in the control group. The implant measuredimplant body 4.1 mm(core in diameter diameter, of 8.1 3.25 mm mm) in length, with aand homogenous had a straight thread configuration height of 0.35 of the mm implant (Figure body 1a). (coreThe test diameter group ofimplant 3.25 mm) had with a porous a homogenous titanium struct threadure height fabricated of 0.35 on mm the (Figure implant1a). core The at test the groupapical implantportion; hadthe core a porous had titaniuma reduced structure diameter fabricated of 1.25 mm on theand implant a thread core height at the of apical1.35 mm portion; to afford the core the hadspace a reducedfor the porous diameter scaffold of 1.25 (1 mmmm andin depth a thread and height0.83 mm of in 1.35 width) mm to(Figure afford 1b). the The space resulting for the porousprofile scahadff old3-mm (1 mmspiral in shape depth threads and 0.83 in mmthe apical in width) part, (Figure a regular1b). pitch The resultingdistance profileof 1.25 hadmm 3-mmand a thread spiral angle of 45°. shape threads in the apical part, a regular pitch distance of 1.25 mm and a thread angle of 45◦. Figure 1. Design of the implants: (a) overall profiles and dimensions of the implant in the control Figure 1. Design of the implants: (a) overall profiles and dimensions of the implant in the control group; (b) overall profiles and dimensions of the implant in the test group. group; (b) overall profiles and dimensions of the implant in the test group. 2.2. Fabrication of Porous Titanium Structure 2.2. Fabrication of Porous Titanium Structure The porous titanium
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wlinger-Ebook-Cosmetic-Final-022018.Pdf
    Cosmetic Dentistry – The Complete Guide To Everything You Need To Know - And Probably More Firstly, I’d like to say welcome to this guide. I’m Doctor. Linger and I want to give you an insight into the world of cosmetic dentistry. My world! I’ve been a dentist for over 20 years and have a real passion for transforming smiles. This book is designed to provide help and information to those people who aren’t for whatever reason happy with the way that their smile looks. Don’t worry, you’re not alone. Over 70 million Americans are just as unhappy with their smiles too! We’ll delve into the science behind a smile and why it’s so powerful, we’ll look at what makes up a great looking smile and the factors that ruin it – some you’ll have no control over! We’ll go in depth about the various tech- niques and treatments on offer and show you how they can help transform your smile into something spec- tacular. I’ll even give you plenty of hints and tips on how to choose the right cosmetic dentist. So if you’re ready, grab yourself a cup of coffee, pull up a chair and read on..... Section 1 - Cosmetic Dentistry – What’s All The Fuss About? Your smile is the first thing people notice. The power of a healthy, big smile turns strangers into friends while it makes us feel good inside. People who have a confident smile project warmth, friendliness and sincerity and put other people at ease.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Statement – Implants
    Distribution Information AAE members may reprint this position statement for distribution to patients or referring dentists. Implants AAE Position Statement About This Document The following statement was Introduction prepared by the AAE Special The American Association of Endodontists has as its mission the fostering of Committee on Implants. excellence in endodontics and the highest standard of patient care. Our vision is to be a global resource in endodontic knowledge for the profession and the public. ©2007 Dentists and their patients have many alternative treatments available to preserve or replace diseased teeth. In the case of teeth with irreversible pulpal disease, endodontic therapy is a highly predictable method to retain teeth that otherwise would have been extracted. Many large studies show retention rates of more than 90 percent [1, 2]. Alternatively, extracted teeth may be replaced with implants [3-6]. Considerable progress has been made in restoring oral function for patients, but considerably less progress has been made in identifying the best strategies for selecting one treatment approach over another [7, 8], and accordingly, no guidelines set forth by the dental profession regarding endodontic versus implant therapy currently exist. This statement is intended to offer the AAE’s position on this issue. Treatment Planning Based on the Best Evidence Produces Ethical and Effective Results Although there is a lack of clinical trials that directly compare one treatment approach to another [7, 8], there are generally accepted guidelines for the ethical consideration of treatment planning and informed consent. These ethical guidelines provide a framework for all clinical decisions. Quality dental care can only be provided when treatment planning decisions are made by both the dentist and the patient, based on the patient’s general health status and specific oral health needs [9, 10].
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Implants Placement of Dental Implants Is a Procedure, Not an American Dental Association (ADA) Recognized Dental Specialty
    Dental Implants Placement of dental implants is a procedure, not an American Dental Association (ADA) recognized Dental Specialty. Dental implants like all dental procedures require dental education and training. Implant therapy is a prosthodontic procedure with radiographic and surgical components. Using a dental implant to replace missing teeth is dictated by individual patient needs as determined by their dentist. An implant is a device approved and regulated by the FDA, which can provide support for a single missing tooth, multiple missing teeth, or all teeth in the mouth. The prosthodontic and the surgical part of implant care can each range from straightforward to complex. A General Dentist who is trained to place and restore implants may be the appropriate practitioner to provide care for dental implant procedures. This will vary depending on an individual clinician’s amount of training and experience. However, the General Dentist should know when care should be referred to a specialist (a Prosthodontist, a Periodontist or an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon). Practitioners should not try to provide care beyond their level of competence. Orthodontists may place and use implants to enable enhanced tooth movement. Some Endodontists may place an implant when a tooth can’t be successfully treated using endodontic therapy. Maxillofacial Prosthodontists may place special implants or refer for placement when facial tissues are missing and implants are needed to retain a prosthesis. General Dentists are experienced in restorative procedures, and many have been trained and know requirements for the dental implant restorations they provide. However, if a patient’s implant surgical procedure is beyond the usual practice of a dentist, this part of the care should be referred to another dentist that is competent in placement of implants.
    [Show full text]
  • Risks and Complications of Orthodontic Miniscrews
    SPECIAL ARTICLE Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews Neal D. Kravitza and Budi Kusnotob Chicago, Ill The risks associated with miniscrew placement should be clearly understood by both the clinician and the patient. Complications can arise during miniscrew placement and after orthodontic loading that affect stability and patient safety. A thorough understanding of proper placement technique, bone density and landscape, peri-implant soft- tissue, regional anatomic structures, and patient home care are imperative for optimal patient safety and miniscrew success. The purpose of this article was to review the potential risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews in regard to insertion, orthodontic loading, peri-implant soft-tissue health, and removal. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:00) iniscrews have proven to be a useful addition safest site for miniscrew placement.7-11 In the maxil- to the orthodontist’s armamentarium for con- lary buccal region, the greatest amount of interradicu- trol of skeletal anchorage in less compliant or lar bone is between the second premolar and the first M 12-14 noncompliant patients, but the risks involved with mini- molar, 5 to 8 mm from the alveolar crest. In the screw placement must be clearly understood by both the mandibular buccal region, the greatest amount of inter- clinician and the patient.1-3 Complications can arise dur- radicular bone is either between the second premolar ing miniscrew placement and after orthodontic loading and the first molar, or between the first molar and the in regard to stability and patient safety. A thorough un- second molar, approximately 11 mm from the alveolar derstanding of proper placement technique, bone density crest.12-14 and landscape, peri-implant soft-tissue, regional anatomi- During interradicular placement in the posterior re- cal structures, and patient home care are imperative for gion, there is a tendency for the clinician to change the optimal patient safety and miniscrew success.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment Planning for Implant Dentistry
    Dr. Michael Tischler Treatment Planning for Implant Dentistry: A General Dentist’s Guide Earn 3 CE to Obtain Implant and credits This course was written for dentists, Soft Tissue Success dental hygienists and assistants Publication date: May 2013 Course #13-23 Expiration date: May 2014 Course Objective: To provide the learner with a process for treatment planning dental implants with an emphasis on the health of the surrounding soft tissue. Six areas of treatment planning will be discussed: prosthetic options, health history and clinical data, cone-beam computerized tomography, implant and abutment design, surgical strategies, and oral hygiene for maintenance and daily homecare. Learning Outcomes: • Explain the importance of treatment planning for dental implants while considering the issues surrounding soft tissue health. • Identify the prosthesis options available and how they relate to the surrounding soft tissue, esthetics, and function of the patient. • Explain how the patient’s medical and dental history and clinical data impact implant success. • Discuss the importance of cone-beam CT and how it is an integral part of the dental implant treatment planning process. • Recognize how implant and abutment design is related to soft-tissue health. Author’s Biography: • Identify key surgical principles that will allow for soft-tissue Dr. Michael Tischler received his DDS degree from the success with dental implants. Georgetown University School of Dentistry in 1989. He is a • Recommend the appropriate dental hygiene methods that will diplomat of the American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant maintain the success of soft tissue around dental implants. Dentistry, a diplomat of the International Congress of Oral Implantology, a fellow of the Academy of General Dentistry, a fellow of the Misch International Implant Institute, and a fellow of the American Academy of Implant Dentistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Endodontic Retreatment V/S Implant
    Journal of Dental Health Oral Disorders & Therapy Review Article Open Access Endodontic retreatment v/s implant Abstract Volume 9 Issue 3 - 2018 One of the most popular current debates covered by dental associations is the Sarah Salloum,1 Hasan Al Houseini,1,2 Sanaa comparison of the endodontics retreatment’s outcome with that of the implant 1 1 treatment’s, taking into account the patient’s best interest. With the advent of new Bassam, Valérie Batrouni 1Department of Endodontics, Lebanese University School of endodontics’ technologies and the struggling of implant innovations to achieve and Dentistry, Lebanon maintain high search results rankings, Data analysts are facing more difficulties when 2Department of Forensic Dentistry, Lebanese University School performing meaningful cross-study comparison. Accordingly, this literature review of Dentistry, Lebanon aims to answer one of the principal questions addressed by risk-benefit analysis of two long term treatments, that is “How safe, is safe enough?” Correspondence: Sarah Salloum, Department of Endodontics, Lebanese University, Lebanon, Tel 0096170600753, Email sas. Keywords: implant, root canal, retreatment, success rate, NiTi, study, evolution [email protected] Received: May 24, 2018 | Published: June 25, 2018 Introduction the reason for failure, the integrity of the tooth and its roots, and the patient’s overall health, both oral and general—and, importantly, “There are living systems; there is no living matter”, Jacques what may be involved in a root canal re-treatment. Saving a
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Implant Options As Dental Implant Placement
    CreatingHealthySmiles-circ2RFF_.qxd 8/25/14 9:41 AM Page 1 Dental Implants: What to Expect How to Choose Your Implant Dentist Teeth restored with dental Who you choose to restore your missing teeth is implants look, feel and func- just as important as the technique they use. Creating tion just like natural teeth. healthy smiles using the best restoration method for You brush, floss and visit your missing or damaged natural teeth requires the care dentist for regular check-ups of a dental implant expert who is specially trained and cleanings, same as you and skilled in implant dentistry. would to care for a natural tooth. Questions to Ask When Selecting The process is often completed over multiple visits: an Implant Dentist • Consultation and planning, including initial exam, • What’s your education and training in dental implant imaging of your teeth, questions about your treatment? dental and medical history, and discussion of • How many dental implant procedures have you your treatment options. performed? • Placement of the dental implant(s). • What treatment options do you use to restore The dental implant, usually a cylindrical and/or missing teeth? tapered post made of titanium, is placed • What steps are involved in the process and where surgically into the jawbone. and by whom are they performed? • Placement of the abutments, or connectors placed on, or built into, the top of the implant to help The American Academy of Implant Dentistry (AAID) connect your replacement teeth, if needed. provides infor mation, education and training for den- Additional connecting devices needed to attach tists, periodontists, prosthodontists and oral surgeons Dental multiple replacement teeth to the implants also who perform surgical and/or restorative procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Implant Placement a Risk in Patients with Increased Susceptibility to Periodontitis?
    CLINICAL Is implant placement a risk in patients with increased susceptibility to periodontitis? Johan Hartshorne 1 A critical appraisal of a systematic review: Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A, Periodontally compromised versus periodontally healthy patients and dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Journal of Dentistry (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.013 Article accepted: 25-9-2014 (Origin of research – University of Malmö, Sweden) Summary Systematic review conclusion: The present study suggests that an increased susceptibility for periodontitis may translate to an increased susceptibility for implant loss, loss of supporting bone, and postoperative infection. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the presence of uncontrolled confounding factors in the included studies, none of them randomized. Critical appraisal conclusion: Periodontally compromised patients are at higher risk post-operative infection, marginal bone loss (peri-implant disease) and implant failures in comparison to periodontally healthy patients. The clinical significance and implications of the results of this review should be interpreted with caution due to lack of controlling important confounding factors such as smoking habits that is known to influence the incidence of post-operative infections, peri-implant disease and implant failures. Implications for clinical practice: It is clinically prudent to accept that patients with a history of chronic periodontitis (susceptible or compromised) are at greater risk for implant related complications and failures. Patients with chronic periodontitis should be assessed and managed on an individual basis when contemplating implant therapy. The risks are higher in patients with aggressive periodontitis or with co-morbidity factors such as smoking or uncontrolled systemic conditions such as diabetes and immune- deficiency and therefore need extra precautionary measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Implants
    dental implants for tooth replacement be a confident you smile big why replace missing teeth? Losing one or more of your teeth creates a gap in your smile, affects your ability to chew properly, and can alter your diet and nutrition. In addition to these serious issues, tooth loss also causes bone loss. Anyone missing one or more teeth understands how tooth loss can make you feel uncomfortable about smiling or eating in tooth loss causes bone loss public. You may avoid social situations and as a result begin to feel isolated. This could impact your daily life and your self-confidence. When a tooth is lost, the jawbone beneath it shrinks from lack of stimulation. Not only does losing teeth affect your smile, it also changes the shape of your face causing you to look prematurely aged. Current dental implant treatments can change your life. From a single missing tooth to an entire set of teeth, dental implants restore your appearance, speech, nutrition, oral health, comfort, and self-esteem. So smile big, eat what you want, and be a confident you! smile big, eat what you want, be a confident you! bone loss ages your face why choose dental implants? Crowns, bridges and dentures address the short-term cosmetic problem of missing teeth but do nothing to stop bone loss. Crown & bridge dentistry requires grinding down healthy teeth leaving them at much greater risk for cavities and tooth failure. Bridges do not stop bone loss. Dentures become uncomfortable and unstable over time as the jawbone shrinks causing eating and speech problems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Osseointegration: a Review
    IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry 2021;7(1):29–36 Content available at: https://www.ipinnovative.com/open-access-journals IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Journal homepage: https://www.ipinnovative.com/journals/APRD Review Article A brief history of osseointegration: A review Myla Ramakrishna1,*, Sudheer Arunachalam1, Y Ramesh Babu1, Lalitha Srivalli2, L Srikanth1, Sudeepti Soni3 1Dept. of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sree Sai Dental College & Research Institute, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India 2National Institute for Mentally Handicapped, NIEPID, Secunderbad, Telangana, India 3Dept. of Prosthodontic, Crown and Bridge, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India ARTICLEINFO ABSTRACT Article history: Background: osseointegration of dental implants refers to direct structural and functional link between Received 11-01-2021 living bone and the surface of non-natural implants. It follows bonding up of an implant into jaw bone Accepted 22-02-2021 when bone cells fasten themselves directly onto the titanium surface.it is the most investigated area in Available online 26-02-2021 implantology in recent times. Evidence based data revels that osseointegrated implants are predictable and highly successful. This process is relatively complex and is influenced by various factors in formation of bone neighbouring implant surface. Keywords: Osseointegration © This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Implant License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and Bone reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 1. Introduction 1.1. History Missing teeth and there various attempts to replace them has An investigational work was carried out in Sweden by presented a treatment challenge throughout human history.
    [Show full text]
  • Immediate Implants in Extraction Sockets with Periapical Lesions: an Illustrated Review
    JOURNAL of OSSEOINTEGRATION ArtHUR B. NOVAES JR.1, VaLDir A. MUGLia3, UmbErtO D. RamOS1, DaniLO M. REINO1, LaURO G. AYUB2 1 Department of Bucco-Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Traumatology and Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil 2 Department of Clinical Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil 3 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil Immediate implants in extraction sockets with periapical lesions: an illustrated review TO CitE THIS ARtiCLE Novaes Jr. AB, Muglia VA, Ramos, UD, Reino DM, Ayub LG. Immediate implants in extraction treatment of totally edentulous patients, posteriorly for sockets with periapical lesions: an illustrated review. J Osseointegr 2013;5(3):45-52. partially edentulous and single unit implants. The classic protocol for the treatment with osseointegrated implants recommended 6 to 8 month between tooth extraction and implantation. This long ABSTRACT waiting period is associated with an unavoidable bone loss that occurs after tooth extraction, which may lead Aim Immediate implantation has gained great attention to difficulties such as insufficient bone at the time of since first proposed. Immediate implants in replacement of implantation. The insufficient bone leads to the use teeth with periapical lesion is, to date, an issue of discussion. of angulated implants or the need of bone grafting The aim of this study is to perform an illustrated literature procedures, increasing the morbidity, the treatment review of immediate implants in sockets exhibiting previous chair time and costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodontic Space Closure Vs. Implant-Borne Crowns in Patients with Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors
    ©2018 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. www.jco-online.com Orthodontic Space Closure vs. Implant-Borne Crowns in Patients with Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors UTE E.M. SCHNEIDER, DDS LORENZ MOSER, MD, DDS GIUSEPPE PELLITTERI, MD GIUSEPPE SICILIANI, MD, DDS, PhD onsidering that the incidence of agenesis of one or both maxillary lat- eral incisors is .8-2% in the general population,1,2 orthodontic treatment Cinvolving either space closure by canine substitution or space opening and subsequent implant-borne crown substitution is relatively common. Orthodontic space closure can produce ex- problems with dental esthetics and periodontal cellent long-term treatment results when performed health can be resolved only with complex inter- with optimal torque control, differential extrusion disciplinary approaches such as corticotomy and of the canines and intrusion of the first premolars, distraction followed by crown replacement.18-23 bleaching and subtractive recontouring of the ca- Over the last decade, substantial improve- nine cusps and buccal curvature, and additive re- ments have been made in implantology, muco- shaping of the six anterior teeth using either com- gingival surgery, abutment design, and prostho- posite or ceramic veneers.3-9 Space closure allows dontic materials, and more systematic protocols the entire treatment to be finished within a rela- have been established to enhance the performance tively short time after orthodontic therapy, and the of implant-borne crowns.24-27 Long-term success resulting dentition can adapt to continuous facial seems to be correlated with proper implant place- changes over the patient’s life.10 ment, following the “2B-3D” rule (Fig.
    [Show full text]