DOCSLIB.ORG

Is Implant Placement a Risk in Patients with Increased Susceptibility to Periodontitis?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Is Implant Placement a Risk in Patients with Increased Susceptibility to Periodontitis? CLINICAL Is implant placement a risk in patients with increased susceptibility to periodontitis? Johan Hartshorne 1 A critical appraisal of a systematic review: Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A, Periodontally compromised versus periodontally healthy patients and dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Journal of Dentistry (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.013 Article accepted: 25-9-2014 (Origin of research – University of Malmö, Sweden) Summary Systematic review conclusion: The present study suggests that an increased susceptibility for periodontitis may translate to an increased susceptibility for implant loss, loss of supporting bone, and postoperative infection. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the presence of uncontrolled confounding factors in the included studies, none of them randomized. Critical appraisal conclusion: Periodontally compromised patients are at higher risk post-operative infection, marginal bone loss (peri-implant disease) and implant failures in comparison to periodontally healthy patients. The clinical significance and implications of the results of this review should be interpreted with caution due to lack of controlling important confounding factors such as smoking habits that is known to influence the incidence of post-operative infections, peri-implant disease and implant failures. Implications for clinical practice: It is clinically prudent to accept that patients with a history of chronic periodontitis (susceptible or compromised) are at greater risk for implant related complications and failures. Patients with chronic periodontitis should be assessed and managed on an individual basis when contemplating implant therapy. The risks are higher in patients with aggressive periodontitis or with co-morbidity factors such as smoking or uncontrolled systemic conditions such as diabetes and immune- deficiency and therefore need extra precautionary measures. Appropriate periodontal therapy, adherence to a strict periodontal maintenance program and limiting co- morbidity risk factors are critical for ensuring a predictable and successful treatment outcome with implant therapy. 1 Johan Hartshorne B.Sc., Clinical question B.Ch.D., M.Ch.D, M.P.A. Ph.D. In periodontally compromised patients (PCP’s) receiving dental implants, do post- (Stell), FFPH.RCP (UK), operative infection, marginal bone loss and implant failure rates differ compared to Visiting Professor, Department of implants inserted in periodontally healthy patients (PHP’s). Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Review methods South Africa. Methodology This study followed the PRISMA Statement guidelines. 1 The methodological quality E-mail: assessment of the studies was executed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale [email protected] (NOS). 2 32 INTERNATIONAL DENTISTRY – AFRICAN EDITION VOL. 5, NO. 2 CLINICAL Search strategy and study selection was automatically omitted from the meta-analysis. A funnel The investigators did an electronic search without time or plot was used to estimate publication bias and other biases language restrictions in March 2014 of the electronic related to sample size. The choice between fixed-effect and databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Oral random effects model was based on I 2 statistical test for Health Group Trials Register, to identify papers on the topic in heterogeneity. the clinical question. They also conducted a manual search of dental implant-related journals. The reference list of the identified Main results studies and the relevant reviews on the subject were also A total of 22 publications were included in the meta-analysis. scanned for possible studies. Online databases Ten studies were controlled clinical trials (CCTs) and twelve (www.clinicaltrials.gov; www.centerwatch.com/clinicaltrials; retrospective analyses. There were no randomized controlled www.clinicalconnection.com) were also checked for possible studies. All studies except one were rated as having high clinical trials in progress. Three reviewers independently methodological rigor however, all were judged to be at high screened the titles and abstracts identified through the electronic risk of bias. The funnel plot showed asymmetry when the searches for articles related to the focus question. Full text articles studies reporting the outcome ‘implant failure’ in the of studies appearing to meet the inclusion criteria, or where there comparison between PCPs vs. PHPs are analyzed, indicating were insufficient data in the title and abstract to make a clear possible presence of publication bias. From the 22 studies decision were obtained and read by all the reviewers. comparing PHPs and PCPs, a total of 10927 dental implants Disagreements were resolved by discussion between the authors. were inserted in PCPs, with 587 failures (5.37%), and 5881 implants were inserted in PHPs, with 226 failures (3.84%). Eligibility and exclusion criteria A statistically significant increase in implant failure rates Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical was observed with insertion of dental implants in PCP’s trials on humans were eligible for this study. The clinical compared to PHPs. Pooling of the data showed a RR of 1.78 studies had to compare implant failure rates in PCP’s (95% CI 1.50-2.11) (P <0.00001). When only the CCTs receiving dental implants compared to PHP’s. Implant failure were pooled, a RR of 1.97 resulted (95% CI 1.38 -2.80) was defined as the complete loss of the implant. Case also showing a similar statistically significant increase in reports, technical reports, animal studies, in vitro studies, and implant failure rates in PCPs. (P = 0.0002). reviews papers were excluded from this study. Only four studies provided information about postoperative infection. The insertion of dental implants in PCPs or PHPs Outcome measures and data extraction and synthesis statistically affected the incidence of postoperative infections Implant failure, postoperative infection and marginal bone in favor of PHPs. A RR of 3.24 (95% CI 1.69-6.21) loss were the primary outcomes that were measured. The (P=0.0004) was observed. estimates of relative effect for implant failure and Five studies provided information on the marginal bone postoperative infection were expressed in risk ratio (RR) with loss in PCPs and PHPs receiving dental implants (A total of a 95% confidence interval (CI). The estimate of relative effect 212 implants were placed in PCPs and 269 implants in for marginal bone loss was expressed as mean difference PHPs) There was statistically significant difference in marginal (MD) in millimeters with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The bone loss (MD 0.60, 95% CI 0.33-0.87; P < 0.0001) data for each variable was used to construct a Forest plot between PCPs and PHPs, favoring PHPs. for analysis of the pooled data. The authors of primary studies were contacted to obtain Conclusion information on missing data. Whenever outcomes of interest The present study suggests that an increased susceptibility for were not clearly stated, the data were not used for analysis. periodontitis may also translate to an increased susceptibility The statistical unit for the outcomes was the implant. for postoperative infection, loss of supporting bone, and Appropriate statistical analysis was conducted to implant loss. However, the results should be interpreted with determine biases, heterogeneity and differences in outcome caution due to the presence of uncontrolled confounding measures between PHPs and PCPs. factors in the included studies. A meta-analysis was only performed on studies with similar comparisons reporting the same outcome measures. Studies The authors did not declare whether they received lacking information about the relative probability of an event financial support or whether there was any potential VOL. 5, NO. 2 INTERNATIONAL DENTISTRY – AFRICAN EDITION 33 HARTSHORNE conflict of interest with respect to the authorship and/or limitation was the varying lengths of follow-up time (3-5 publication of this review. years) (median of 5 years). Such relative short follow-up could possibly have led to an underestimation of the estimate Commentary of the failure rate. Background and importance Wide inclusion criteria generally increase the risk of Dental implant therapy has become a well-established finding heterogeneity, thus making the analysis and treatment modality with favorable long-term success rates for interpretation of confounding factors on results difficult. replacing missing teeth in the general population. With However, statistical analysis surprisingly showed no increasing numbers of patients receiving dental implants, it significant heterogeneity between the test and control group. is certain that post-operative complications, incidence of peri- Based on the statistical test the investigators choose to use implant disease and implant failures will increase, posing a the fixed-effect model. However, it should be pointed out that significant health care problem for both the patient and the the choice between using a fixed-effect and a random-effects clinician. It is also plausible that more patients will receive meta-analysis should never be made on the basis of a implants to replace missing teeth lost due to periodontal statistical test for heterogeneity. 7 The two models are not the disease. In an attempt to limit post-operative complications, same and conceptually measure different things. The peri-implant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Position Statement – Implants
    Distribution Information AAE members may reprint this position statement for distribution to patients or referring dentists. Implants AAE Position Statement About This Document The following statement was Introduction prepared by the AAE Special The American Association of Endodontists has as its mission the fostering of Committee on Implants. excellence in endodontics and the highest standard of patient care. Our vision is to be a global resource in endodontic knowledge for the profession and the public. ©2007 Dentists and their patients have many alternative treatments available to preserve or replace diseased teeth. In the case of teeth with irreversible pulpal disease, endodontic therapy is a highly predictable method to retain teeth that otherwise would have been extracted. Many large studies show retention rates of more than 90 percent [1, 2]. Alternatively, extracted teeth may be replaced with implants [3-6]. Considerable progress has been made in restoring oral function for patients, but considerably less progress has been made in identifying the best strategies for selecting one treatment approach over another [7, 8], and accordingly, no guidelines set forth by the dental profession regarding endodontic versus implant therapy currently exist. This statement is intended to offer the AAE’s position on this issue. Treatment Planning Based on the Best Evidence Produces Ethical and Effective Results Although there is a lack of clinical trials that directly compare one treatment approach to another [7, 8], there are generally accepted guidelines for the ethical consideration of treatment planning and informed consent. These ethical guidelines provide a framework for all clinical decisions. Quality dental care can only be provided when treatment planning decisions are made by both the dentist and the patient, based on the patient’s general health status and specific oral health needs [9, 10].
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Implants Placement of Dental Implants Is a Procedure, Not an American Dental Association (ADA) Recognized Dental Specialty
    Dental Implants Placement of dental implants is a procedure, not an American Dental Association (ADA) recognized Dental Specialty. Dental implants like all dental procedures require dental education and training. Implant therapy is a prosthodontic procedure with radiographic and surgical components. Using a dental implant to replace missing teeth is dictated by individual patient needs as determined by their dentist. An implant is a device approved and regulated by the FDA, which can provide support for a single missing tooth, multiple missing teeth, or all teeth in the mouth. The prosthodontic and the surgical part of implant care can each range from straightforward to complex. A General Dentist who is trained to place and restore implants may be the appropriate practitioner to provide care for dental implant procedures. This will vary depending on an individual clinician’s amount of training and experience. However, the General Dentist should know when care should be referred to a specialist (a Prosthodontist, a Periodontist or an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon). Practitioners should not try to provide care beyond their level of competence. Orthodontists may place and use implants to enable enhanced tooth movement. Some Endodontists may place an implant when a tooth can’t be successfully treated using endodontic therapy. Maxillofacial Prosthodontists may place special implants or refer for placement when facial tissues are missing and implants are needed to retain a prosthesis. General Dentists are experienced in restorative procedures, and many have been trained and know requirements for the dental implant restorations they provide. However, if a patient’s implant surgical procedure is beyond the usual practice of a dentist, this part of the care should be referred to another dentist that is competent in placement of implants.
    [Show full text]
  • Risks and Complications of Orthodontic Miniscrews
    SPECIAL ARTICLE Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews Neal D. Kravitza and Budi Kusnotob Chicago, Ill The risks associated with miniscrew placement should be clearly understood by both the clinician and the patient. Complications can arise during miniscrew placement and after orthodontic loading that affect stability and patient safety. A thorough understanding of proper placement technique, bone density and landscape, peri-implant soft- tissue, regional anatomic structures, and patient home care are imperative for optimal patient safety and miniscrew success. The purpose of this article was to review the potential risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews in regard to insertion, orthodontic loading, peri-implant soft-tissue health, and removal. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:00) iniscrews have proven to be a useful addition safest site for miniscrew placement.7-11 In the maxil- to the orthodontist’s armamentarium for con- lary buccal region, the greatest amount of interradicu- trol of skeletal anchorage in less compliant or lar bone is between the second premolar and the first M 12-14 noncompliant patients, but the risks involved with mini- molar, 5 to 8 mm from the alveolar crest. In the screw placement must be clearly understood by both the mandibular buccal region, the greatest amount of inter- clinician and the patient.1-3 Complications can arise dur- radicular bone is either between the second premolar ing miniscrew placement and after orthodontic loading and the first molar, or between the first molar and the in regard to stability and patient safety. A thorough un- second molar, approximately 11 mm from the alveolar derstanding of proper placement technique, bone density crest.12-14 and landscape, peri-implant soft-tissue, regional anatomi- During interradicular placement in the posterior re- cal structures, and patient home care are imperative for gion, there is a tendency for the clinician to change the optimal patient safety and miniscrew success.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment Planning for Implant Dentistry
    Dr. Michael Tischler Treatment Planning for Implant Dentistry: A General Dentist’s Guide Earn 3 CE to Obtain Implant and credits This course was written for dentists, Soft Tissue Success dental hygienists and assistants Publication date: May 2013 Course #13-23 Expiration date: May 2014 Course Objective: To provide the learner with a process for treatment planning dental implants with an emphasis on the health of the surrounding soft tissue. Six areas of treatment planning will be discussed: prosthetic options, health history and clinical data, cone-beam computerized tomography, implant and abutment design, surgical strategies, and oral hygiene for maintenance and daily homecare. Learning Outcomes: • Explain the importance of treatment planning for dental implants while considering the issues surrounding soft tissue health. • Identify the prosthesis options available and how they relate to the surrounding soft tissue, esthetics, and function of the patient. • Explain how the patient’s medical and dental history and clinical data impact implant success. • Discuss the importance of cone-beam CT and how it is an integral part of the dental implant treatment planning process. • Recognize how implant and abutment design is related to soft-tissue health. Author’s Biography: • Identify key surgical principles that will allow for soft-tissue Dr. Michael Tischler received his DDS degree from the success with dental implants. Georgetown University School of Dentistry in 1989. He is a • Recommend the appropriate dental hygiene methods that will diplomat of the American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant maintain the success of soft tissue around dental implants. Dentistry, a diplomat of the International Congress of Oral Implantology, a fellow of the Academy of General Dentistry, a fellow of the Misch International Implant Institute, and a fellow of the American Academy of Implant Dentistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Endodontic Retreatment V/S Implant
    Journal of Dental Health Oral Disorders & Therapy Review Article Open Access Endodontic retreatment v/s implant Abstract Volume 9 Issue 3 - 2018 One of the most popular current debates covered by dental associations is the Sarah Salloum,1 Hasan Al Houseini,1,2 Sanaa comparison of the endodontics retreatment’s outcome with that of the implant 1 1 treatment’s, taking into account the patient’s best interest. With the advent of new Bassam, Valérie Batrouni 1Department of Endodontics, Lebanese University School of endodontics’ technologies and the struggling of implant innovations to achieve and Dentistry, Lebanon maintain high search results rankings, Data analysts are facing more difficulties when 2Department of Forensic Dentistry, Lebanese University School performing meaningful cross-study comparison. Accordingly, this literature review of Dentistry, Lebanon aims to answer one of the principal questions addressed by risk-benefit analysis of two long term treatments, that is “How safe, is safe enough?” Correspondence: Sarah Salloum, Department of Endodontics, Lebanese University, Lebanon, Tel 0096170600753, Email sas. Keywords: implant, root canal, retreatment, success rate, NiTi, study, evolution [email protected] Received: May 24, 2018 | Published: June 25, 2018 Introduction the reason for failure, the integrity of the tooth and its roots, and the patient’s overall health, both oral and general—and, importantly, “There are living systems; there is no living matter”, Jacques what may be involved in a root canal re-treatment. Saving a
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Implant Options As Dental Implant Placement
    CreatingHealthySmiles-circ2RFF_.qxd 8/25/14 9:41 AM Page 1 Dental Implants: What to Expect How to Choose Your Implant Dentist Teeth restored with dental Who you choose to restore your missing teeth is implants look, feel and func- just as important as the technique they use. Creating tion just like natural teeth. healthy smiles using the best restoration method for You brush, floss and visit your missing or damaged natural teeth requires the care dentist for regular check-ups of a dental implant expert who is specially trained and cleanings, same as you and skilled in implant dentistry. would to care for a natural tooth. Questions to Ask When Selecting The process is often completed over multiple visits: an Implant Dentist • Consultation and planning, including initial exam, • What’s your education and training in dental implant imaging of your teeth, questions about your treatment? dental and medical history, and discussion of • How many dental implant procedures have you your treatment options. performed? • Placement of the dental implant(s). • What treatment options do you use to restore The dental implant, usually a cylindrical and/or missing teeth? tapered post made of titanium, is placed • What steps are involved in the process and where surgically into the jawbone. and by whom are they performed? • Placement of the abutments, or connectors placed on, or built into, the top of the implant to help The American Academy of Implant Dentistry (AAID) connect your replacement teeth, if needed. provides infor mation, education and training for den- Additional connecting devices needed to attach tists, periodontists, prosthodontists and oral surgeons Dental multiple replacement teeth to the implants also who perform surgical and/or restorative procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Implants
    dental implants for tooth replacement be a confident you smile big why replace missing teeth? Losing one or more of your teeth creates a gap in your smile, affects your ability to chew properly, and can alter your diet and nutrition. In addition to these serious issues, tooth loss also causes bone loss. Anyone missing one or more teeth understands how tooth loss can make you feel uncomfortable about smiling or eating in tooth loss causes bone loss public. You may avoid social situations and as a result begin to feel isolated. This could impact your daily life and your self-confidence. When a tooth is lost, the jawbone beneath it shrinks from lack of stimulation. Not only does losing teeth affect your smile, it also changes the shape of your face causing you to look prematurely aged. Current dental implant treatments can change your life. From a single missing tooth to an entire set of teeth, dental implants restore your appearance, speech, nutrition, oral health, comfort, and self-esteem. So smile big, eat what you want, and be a confident you! smile big, eat what you want, be a confident you! bone loss ages your face why choose dental implants? Crowns, bridges and dentures address the short-term cosmetic problem of missing teeth but do nothing to stop bone loss. Crown & bridge dentistry requires grinding down healthy teeth leaving them at much greater risk for cavities and tooth failure. Bridges do not stop bone loss. Dentures become uncomfortable and unstable over time as the jawbone shrinks causing eating and speech problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancement of Bone Ingrowth Into a Porous Titanium Structure to Improve Osseointegration of Dental Implants: a Pilot Study in the Canine Model
    materials Article Enhancement of Bone Ingrowth into a Porous Titanium Structure to Improve Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Pilot Study in the Canine Model 1, 2, 3 4 5,6 Ji-Youn Hong y , Seok-Yeong Ko y, Wonsik Lee , Yun-Young Chang , Su-Hwan Kim and Jeong-Ho Yun 2,7,* 1 Department of Periodontology, Periodontal-Implant Clinical Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, Jeonbuk National University, 567, Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 54896, Korea; [email protected] 3 Advanced Process and Materials R&D Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, 7-47 Songdo-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 406-840, Korea; [email protected] 4 Department of Dentistry, Inha International Medical Center, 424, Gonghang-ro, 84-gil, Unseo-dong, Jung-gu, Incheon 22382, Korea; [email protected] 5 Department of Periodontics, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea; [email protected] 6 Department of Dentistry, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea 7 Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, 20, Geonjiro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 54907, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-63-250-2289 These authors contributed equally to this study. y Received: 8 May 2020; Accepted: 6 July 2020; Published: 8 July 2020 Abstract: A porous titanium structure was suggested to improve implant stability in the early healing period or in poor bone quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodontic Space Closure Vs. Implant-Borne Crowns in Patients with Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors
    ©2018 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. www.jco-online.com Orthodontic Space Closure vs. Implant-Borne Crowns in Patients with Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors UTE E.M. SCHNEIDER, DDS LORENZ MOSER, MD, DDS GIUSEPPE PELLITTERI, MD GIUSEPPE SICILIANI, MD, DDS, PhD onsidering that the incidence of agenesis of one or both maxillary lat- eral incisors is .8-2% in the general population,1,2 orthodontic treatment Cinvolving either space closure by canine substitution or space opening and subsequent implant-borne crown substitution is relatively common. Orthodontic space closure can produce ex- problems with dental esthetics and periodontal cellent long-term treatment results when performed health can be resolved only with complex inter- with optimal torque control, differential extrusion disciplinary approaches such as corticotomy and of the canines and intrusion of the first premolars, distraction followed by crown replacement.18-23 bleaching and subtractive recontouring of the ca- Over the last decade, substantial improve- nine cusps and buccal curvature, and additive re- ments have been made in implantology, muco- shaping of the six anterior teeth using either com- gingival surgery, abutment design, and prostho- posite or ceramic veneers.3-9 Space closure allows dontic materials, and more systematic protocols the entire treatment to be finished within a rela- have been established to enhance the performance tively short time after orthodontic therapy, and the of implant-borne crowns.24-27 Long-term success resulting dentition can adapt to continuous facial seems to be correlated with proper implant place- changes over the patient’s life.10 ment, following the “2B-3D” rule (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodontic Implants: Concepts for the Orthodontic Practitioner
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Dentistry Volume 2012, Article ID 549761, 7 pages doi:10.1155/2012/549761 Review Article Orthodontic Implants: Concepts for the Orthodontic Practitioner Carlos Nelson Elias,1 Antonioˆ Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas,2 and Daniel Jogaib Fernandes1 1 Biomaterials Laboratory, Military Institute of Engineering, 22290-270 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil 2 Department of Orthodontics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 21941-617 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Correspondence should be addressed to Carlos Nelson Elias, [email protected] Received 20 July 2012; Revised 24 September 2012; Accepted 18 October 2012 Academic Editor: Timo Sorsa Copyright © 2012 Carlos Nelson Elias et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Orthodontic implants have become a reliable method in orthodontic practice for providing temporary additional anchorage. These devices are useful to control skeletal anchorage in less compliant patients or in cases where absolute anchorage is necessary. There are a great number of advantages in this new approach which include easy insertion, decreased patient discomfort, low price, immediate loading, reduced diameter, versatility in the forces to be used, ease of cleaning, and ease of removal. However, a proper management of the screws by the practitioner is necessary in order to increase the success rate of the technique. The purpose of this paper is to update practitioners on the current concepts of orthodontic implants and orthodontic mechanics. 1. Terminology or upon the bones of the craniofacial complex, the primary purposes of which are to support and to resist displacement A wide range of devices may be implanted in and around of a dental prosthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implant As Orthodontic Anchorage
    JCDP 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1044 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implant as Orthodontic Anchorage Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implant as Orthodontic Anchorage Anirban Sarmah, Anirudh K Mathur, Vikas Gupta, Vinaya S Pai, S Nandini ABSTRACT Source of support: Nil Aim: The purpose of this three-dimensional (3D) finite element Conflict of interest: None declared study was to investigate orthodontic loading simulation on a single endosseous implant and its surrounding osseous structure, to INTRODUCTION analyze the resultant stresses and to identify the changes in the bone adjacent to the implant following orthodontic loading. Orthodontics is gradually changing from an opinion-based Materials and methods: Two models were constructed using practice to evidence-based practice. In contemporary period, finite element method consisting of endosseous dental implant it is necessary to have scientific rationale for any treatment and the surrounding bone. In the first model, the contact between modality and the evidence of tissue response to it. The the implant and the bone was simulated showing no osseointegration, while the second model showed 100% greatest progress lies in perceiving some unifying concepts osseointegration. Simulated horizontal loads of 20 N, at 90° in the abundant evidence and ideas. from the long axis, were applied to the top of the implant. The The number of adults seeking orthodontic treatment has study simulated loads in a horizontal direction, similar to a distal- 1 mesial orthodontic movement. increased significantly in recent decades. However, not Results: In the first model, the stress was mainly concentrated everyone has adequate dentition for orthodontic anchorage, at the neck of the implant and at the closest surrounding bone.
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Implants Are an Alternative to Dentures Over 3 Million Americans Have Dental Implants — and Bridges
    Common Procedures Dental implant Also known as: Endosseous implant • Dental fixture Why get implants? Replacements for natural teeth and roots, Did you know? dental implants are an alternative to dentures Over 3 million Americans have dental implants — and bridges. Implants are “anchored” in the and this number is growing by half a million a year. jaw, offering comfort and stability. American Academy of Implant Dentistry Advantages • Improve chewing and speech ability • Restore natural appearance • Permanent • 85–90% effective • Slow down bone loss Am I a good candidate for implants? To be an ideal candidate for implants, you must have: • good general health • healthy gums • sufficient bone structure • personal commitment to good oral hygiene Implants might not be the right option if you: • smoke • clench or grind your teeth • have diabetes We keep you smiling® deltadentalins.com/enrollees Did you know? The first dental implant was performed on Anatomy of an implant Gösta Larsson in Crown 1965. Carried out in (replacement tooth) Gothenburg, Sweden, the procedure was a major Abutment (connector) success, establishing “osseointegration” in the world of dentistry and Implant body (artificial root) giving Larsson a set of teeth that lasted for the rest of his life. How does the process work? Placement of dental implants involves a multi-step process that can take several months to a year. • First, the dentist surgically places the implant body, without the replacement tooth, directly into the jawbone. The bone fuses to the metal, in a process called osseointegration. During this time, you might wear a temporary crown, denture or bridge. • Next, as soon as the bone has fused to the implant, the connecting piece (abutment) is attached.
    [Show full text]