DOCSLIB.ORG

Select Bibliography Films Achhut Kanya. Dir. Franz Osten. Perf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Select Bibliography Films Achhut Kanya. Dir. Franz Osten. Perf Select Bibliography Films Achhut Kanya. Dir. Franz Osten. Perf. Devika Rani, Ashok Kumar. Bombay Talkies. 1936. Film. A Throw of Dice. Dir. Himansu Rai. Perf. Himansu Rai, Charu Roy, Seeta Devi. Himansu Rai in collaboration with British Instructional Films Ltd. of U.K., and Ufa. 1930. Film. Durga. Dir. Franz Osten. Perf. Devika Rani, Rama Shukal. Bombay Talkies. 1939. Film. Izzat. Dir. Franz Osten. Perf. Devika Rani, Ashok Kumar. Bombay Talkies. 1939. Film. Janmabhoomi. Dir. Franz Osten. Perf. Devika Rani, Ashok Kumar. Bombay Talkies. 1936. Film. Light of Asia. Dir. Franz Osten. Perf. Himansu Rai, Seeta Devi, Prafulla Roy. Great Eastern Film Corporation of Delhi and Emelka Film Co. of Munich. 1926. Official Records related to Cinema Evidence of the Indian Cinematograph Committee, 1927-1928 (5 vols., Calcutta, 1928). Print. The Indian Cinematograph Committee Report, 1927-1928 (Calcutta, 1928). Print. The Evans Report (1922), Pdf. Report of the Film Enquiery Committee, 1951 (New Delhi, 1951). Print. 239 Film Journals and special issues Filmland The Cinema Varieties Weekly Filmindia The Mirror The Indian Cinematograph Year Book, 1938 (Bombay, 1938). Print. Variety Books Benjamin, Walter, Michael William Jennings, and Brigid Doherty. The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility, and other writings on media. Harvard University Press, 2008. Print. Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution. (1907) Trans. Arthur Mitchell. Mineola, NY: Dover (1998). Print. Bergson, Henri. Matter and Memory. Trans. Nancy Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer. (1912). Print. Bhattacharya, Indranil. Visions of Splendour: Himansu Rai and Indian Cinema. NFAI, 2009. Print. Bogue, Ronald. Deleuze on cinema. Routledge, 2013. Print. Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press, 1984. Print. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Randal Johnson. The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Columbia University Press, 1993. Print. Calhoun, Craig J. Habermas and the public sphere. MIT press, 1996. Print. 240 Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Habitations of modernity: Essays in the wake of subaltern studies. University of Chicago Press, 2002. Print. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press, 2009. Print. Chanan, Michael. The dream that kicks: the prehistory and early years of cinema in Britain. Routledge, 2003. Print. Chitnis, Leela. Chanderi Duniyet. 2nd ed. Pune: Shrividya Prakashan, 1981. Print. Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema 1: The movement-image trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986. Print. Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema 2: The time-image. trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989. Print. Deleuze, Gilles. Negotiations 1972-1990. Columbia University Press, 1997. Print. Deleuze, Gilles. Essays critical and clinical. Verso, 1998. Print. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. What is Philosophy?, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994. Print. Dwyer, Rachel. Filming the gods: Religion and Indian cinema. Routledge, 2006. Print. Fazalbhoy, Y. A. The Indian Film: A Review. Bombay: Bombay Radio Press, 1939. Print. Habermas, Jürgen. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT press, 1991. Print. Jaikumar, Priya. Cinema at the end of empire: A politics of transition in Britain and India. Duke University Press, 2006. Print. Joshi, Kusum and Lalit Joshi. Niranjan Pal: A Forgotten Legend and Such is Life. South Asian Foundation, London, 2011. Print. Koch, Gerhard. Franz Osten's Indian silent films. Max Mueller Bhavan, 1983. Print. 241 Majumdar, Neepa. Wanted cultured ladies only!: female stardom and cinema in India, 1930s-1950s. University of Illinois Press, 2009. Print. Martin-Jones, David. Deleuze and world cinemas. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2011. Pdf. Monaco, James. How to read a film: the world of movies, media, and multimedia: language, history, theory. Oxford University Press, USA, 2000. Print. Mukherjee, Madhuja. New Theatres Ltd: The Emblem of Art, the Picture of Success. National Film Archive of India, Government of India, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, 2009. Print. Mujawar, Isaac. Prabhat Chitre. Navachaitanya Prakashan, Mumbai, 2008. Print. Mujawar, Isaac. Phalke. Navachaitanya Prakashan, Pune, 2010. Muybridge, Eadweard. Animals in motion. Courier Corporation, 2012. Pdf. Naregal, Veena. Language Politics, Elites, and the Public Sphere. Ranikhet: Permenant Black. 2001. Print Natarajan, Swaminath. "A History of the Press in India." (1962). Print. Oommen, M. A. and K. V. Joseph. Economics of Indian Cinema. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., 1991. Print. Peirce, Charles S. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Ed. Charles Hartshorne. Vol. 8. Harvard University Press, 1974. Print. Prasad, M. Madhava. Ideology of the Hindi film: a historical construction/M. Madhava Prasad. Oxford University Press, 1998. Print. Rajadhyaksha, Ashish, and Paul Willemen. Encyclopedia of Indian cinema. Routledge, 2014. Print. Roy, Anjali. The Magic of Bollywood: At Home and Abroad. London: Sage, 2012. Print. Thompson, Kristin. Exporting entertainment: America in the world film market, 1907- 34. British Film Inst, 1985. Pdf. 242 Wadakar, Hansa. Sangatye Aika. 15th ed.Pune: Rajahansa Prakashan, 1970. Print. Articles Abbas, K. A. “The Only Three Great Directors of India.” Filmindia June 1940: 52- 56. Print. Baghdadi, Rafique and Rajiv Rao. “The Romance of Bombay Talkies.” Screen 28 Sept. 1984: 4-6. Print. Bhattacharya, Neeladri. “Notes towards a conception of the colonial public.” Civil Society, Public Sphere and Citizenship (2005): 142. Print. Bhaumik, Kaushik. “Cinematograph to Cinema Bombay 1896–1928.” BioScope: South Asian Screen Studies 2.1 (2011): 41-67. Print. “Bombay Calling.” Filmindia Jan. 1939: 12. Print. Bourdieu, Pierre. “Physical space, social space and habitus.” Vilhelm Aubert Memorial lecture, Report 10 (1996). Print. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “Provincializing Europe: Postcoloniality and the critique of history.” Cultural studies 6.3 (1992): 337-357. Print. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “Modernity and ethnicity in India.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 17.s1 (1994): 143-155. Print. Chowdhury, Ray. “Picture That Took England By Storm.” Varieties Weekly 9 March 1934: 10-12. Print. “Cinema Log.” The Cine-Technician April-May 1937: 12. Print. “Current Release.” Filmland 25th March 1933: 12. Print. Dass, Manishita. “The crowd outside the lettered city: imagining the mass audience in 1920s India.” Cinema Journal 48.4 (2009): 77-98. Print. Desai, M. “The Rise and Fall of Bombay Talkies.” Screen 12 Oct. 1984: 4. Print. “Editor’s Mail.” Filmindia Dec. 1937: 17. Print. 243 “Editor’s Mail.” Filmindia Feb. 1940: 24. Print. “Editor’s Mail.” Filmindia Jan. 1940: 16. Print. “Editor’s Mail.” Filmindia Jan. 1939: 18. Print. “Eighty-Four Units shipped to India.” Projection Engineering, 12, Dec. 1931: 11. Pdf Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy.” Social text 25/26 (1990): 56-80. Pdf Freitag, Sandria. “Visions of the nation: theorizing the nexus between creation, consumption, and participation in the public sphere.” Pleasure and the nation: The history, politics and consumption of public culture in India 3775 (2001). Print. Garga, B. D. “Himansu Rai…from Munich to Malad.” Movie (1984): 93-98. Print. George, Joppan. “The Many Passages of Sound Indian Talkies in the 1930s.” BioScope: South Asian Screen Studies 2.1 (2011): 83-98. Pdf “God’s Gift of Color Sense To The World.” The International Photographer Feb. 1937: 16-17. Pdf Gooptu, Sharmistha. “An Appeal beyond Aesthetics: Exploration of the Iconicity of New Theatres.” Economic and Political Weekly (2003): 2409-2416. Pdf Green, A. M. “The Indian Cinematograph Industry.” Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 78.4017 (1929): 3-19. Pdf Gvalani, Gangaram. “Motion Picture Industry in India.” Indian Cinematograph Year Book 1928. (1928): 113-127. Print Hansen, Miriam. “Early Silent Cinema: Whose Public Sphere?.” New German Critique 29 (1983): 147-184. Pdf. “India’s 45 Questions.” Variety 11th Jan. 1928: 4. Pdf. Jaaware, Aniket. “Who is it that is Singing? Shot-Music-Speech.” The Indian Public Sphere: Readings in Media History, New Delhi (2009): 151-168. Print. Jairaj. “B.T: The Complete Studio.” Screen 28 Sept. 1984: 20. Print. 244 Jaikumar, Priya. “An Act of transition: empire and the making of a national British film industry, 1927.” Screen 43.2 (2002): 119-138. Print. Jaikumar, Priya. “More Than Morality: The Indian Cinematograph Committee Interviews (1927).” The Moving Image 3.1 (2003): 82-109. Print. Judas. “Bombay Calling.” Filmindia Jan. 1938: 7-10. Print. ---. “Bombay Calling.” Filmindia Dec. 1937: 11. Print. ---. “Bombay Calling.” Filmindia Feb. 1938: 9. Print. Kapur, Geeta. “Revelation and Doubt: Sant Tukaram and Devi.” Interrogating Modernity: Culture and Colonialism in India, Calcutta (1993): 19-46. Print. Majumdar, Neepa. “Sound in Indian Cinema: Beyond the Song Sequence: Theorizing Sound in Indian Cinema.” Sound and Music in Film and Visual Media (2009): 303- 324. Print. “Studio Close-Ups.” Filmindia Jan. 1938: 39. Print. Mukherjee, Debashree. “Notes on a Scandal: Writing Women’s Film History Against an Absent Archive.” BioScope: South Asian Screen Studies 4.1 (2013): 9-30. Pdf. Mukherjee, Debashree. “A Material World Notes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mumbai Macbeth: Gender and Identity in Bollywood Adaptations Rashmila Maiti University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2018 Mumbai Macbeth: Gender and Identity in Bollywood Adaptations Rashmila Maiti University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Asian Studies Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, and the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Maiti, Rashmila, "Mumbai Macbeth: Gender and Identity in Bollywood Adaptations" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2905. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2905 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Mumbai Macbeth: Gender and Identity in Bollywood Adaptations A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies by Rashmila Maiti Jadavpur University Bachelor of Arts in English Literature, 2007 Jadavpur University Master of Arts in English Literature, 2009 August 2018 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. M. Keith Booker, PhD Dissertation Director Yajaira M. Padilla, PhD Frank Scheide, PhD Committee Member Committee Member Abstract This project analyzes adaptation in the Hindi film industry and how the concepts of gender and identity have changed from the original text to the contemporary adaptation. The original texts include religious epics, Shakespeare’s plays, Bengali novels which were written pre- independence, and Hollywood films. This venture uses adaptation theory as well as postmodernist and postcolonial theories to examine how women and men are represented in the adaptations as well as how contemporary audience expectations help to create the identity of the characters in the films.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashoke Kumar
    Ashoke Kumar The boss's wife and leading actress of a leading Film Company runs off with her lead man. She is caught and taken back but not the lead man who is unceremoniously dismissed. So now the company needs a new hero. The boss decides his laboratory assistant would be the Film Company's next leading man. A bizzare film plot??? Hardly. This real life story starred the Bombay Talkies Film Company, it's boss Himansu Rai , lead actress Devika Rani and lead man Najam-ul-Hussain and last but not least its laboratory assistant Ashok Kumar. And thus began an extremely successful acting career that lasted six decades! Ashok Kumar aka Dadamoni was born Kumudlal Kunjilal Ganguly in Bhagalpur and grew up in Khandwa. He briefly studied law in Calcutta, then joined his future brother-in-law Shashadhar Mukherjee at Bombay Talkies as laboratory assistant before being made its leading man. Ashok Kumar made his debut opposite Devika Rani in Jeevan Naiya (1936) but became a well known face with Achut Kanya (1936) . Devika Rani and he did a string of films together - Izzat (1937) , Savitri (1937) , Nirmala (1938) among others but she was the bigger star and chief attraction in all those films. It was with his trio of hits opposite Leela Chitnis - Kangan (1939) , Bandhan (1940) and Jhoola (1941) that Ashok Kumar really came into his own. Going with the trend he sang his own songs and some of them like Main Ban ki Chidiya , Chal Chal re Naujawaan and Na Jaane Kidhar Aaj Meri Nao Chali Re were extremely popular! Ashok Kumar initiated a more natural style of acting compared to the prevaling style that followed theatrical trends.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Performing Artists in Colonial India There Were Few Women Painters in Colonial India
    I. (A) Personal Details Role Name Affiliation Principal Investigator Prof. Sumita University of Allhabad Parmar Paper Coordinator Prof Rekha Pande University of Hyderabad Author Dr. Archana Verma Independent Scholar Content Reviewer (CR) Prof Rekha Pande University of Hyderabad Language Editor (LE) Prof. Sumita University of Allhabad Parmar (B) Description of Module Items Description of Module Subject Name Women’s Studies Paper Name Women and History Module Name/ Title, Women performers in colonial India description Module ID Paper- 3, Module-30 Pre-requisites None Objectives To explore the achievements of women performers in colonial period Keywords Indian art, women in performance, cinema and women, India cinema, Hindi cinema Women Performing Artists in Colonial India There were few women painters in Colonial India. But in the performing arts, especially acting, women artists were found in large numbers in this period. At first they acted on the stage in theatre groups. Later, with the coming of cinema, they began to act for the screen. Cinema gave them a channel for expressing their acting talent as no other medium had before. Apart from acting, some of them even began to direct films at this early stage in the history of Indian cinema. Thus, acting and film direction was not an exclusive arena of men where women were mostly subjects. It was an arena where women became the creators of this art form and they commanded a lot of fame, glory and money in this field. In this module, we will study about some of these women. Nati Binodini (1862-1941) Fig. 1 – Nati Binodini (get copyright for use – (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Binodini_dasi.jpg) Nati Binodini was a Calcutta based renowned actress, who began to act at the age of 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit-2 Silent Era to Talkies, Cinema in Later Decades
    Bachelor of Arts (Honors) in Journalism& Mass Communication (BJMC) BJMC-6 HISTORY OF THE MEDIA Block - 4 VISUAL MEDIA UNIT-1 EARLY YEARS OF PHOTOGRAPHY, LITHOGRAPHY AND CINEMA UNIT-2 SILENT ERA TO TALKIES, CINEMA IN LATER DECADES UNIT-3 COMING OF TELEVISION AND STATE’S DEVELOPMENT AGENDA UNIT-4 ARRIVAL OF TRANSNATIONAL TELEVISION; FORMATION OF PRASAR BHARATI The Course follows the UGC prescribed syllabus for BA(Honors) Journalism under Choice Based Credit System (CBCS). Course Writer Course Editor Dr. Narsingh Majhi Dr. Sudarshan Yadav Assistant Professor Assistant Professor Journalism and Mass Communication Dept. of Mass Communication, Sri Sri University, Cuttack Central University of Jharkhand Material Production Dr. Manas Ranjan Pujari Registrar Odisha State Open University, Sambalpur (CC) OSOU, JUNE 2020. VISUAL MEDIA is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-sa/4.0 Printedby: UNIT-1EARLY YEARS OF PHOTOGRAPHY, LITHOGRAPHY AND CINEMA Unit Structure 1.1. Learning Objective 1.2. Introduction 1.3. Evolution of Photography 1.4. History of Lithography 1.5. Evolution of Cinema 1.6. Check Your Progress 1.1.LEARNING OBJECTIVE After completing this unit, learners should be able to understand: the technological development of photography; the history and development of printing; and the development of the motion picture industry and technology. 1.2.INTRODUCTION Learners as you are aware that we are going to discuss the technological development of photography, lithography and motion picture. In the present times, the human society is very hard to think if the invention of photography hasn‘t been materialized. It is hard to imagine the world without photography.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Kervan – International Journal of Afro-Asiatic Studies n. 21 (2017) Item Girls and Objects of Dreams: Why Indian Censors Agree to Bold Scenes in Bollywood Films Tatiana Szurlej The article presents the social background, which helped Bollywood film industry to develop the so-called “item numbers”, replace them by “dream sequences”, and come back to the “item number” formula again. The songs performed by the film vamp or the character, who takes no part in the story, the musical interludes, which replaced the first way to show on the screen all elements which are theoretically banned, and the guest appearances of film stars on the screen are a very clever ways to fight all the prohibitions imposed by Indian censors. Censors found that film censorship was necessary, because the film as a medium is much more popular than literature or theater, and therefore has an impact on all people. Indeed, the viewers perceive the screen story as the world around them, so it becomes easy for them to accept the screen reality and move it to everyday life. That’s why the movie, despite the fact that even the very process of its creation is much more conventional than, for example, the theater performance, seems to be much more “real” to the audience than any story shown on the stage. Therefore, despite the fact that one of the most dangerous elements on which Indian censorship seems to be extremely sensitive is eroticism, this is also the most desired part of cinema. Moreover, filmmakers, who are tightly constrained, need at the same time to provide pleasure to the audience to get the invested money back, so they invented various tricks by which they manage to bypass censorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Bombay Talkies
    A Cinematic Imagination: Josef Wirsching and The Bombay Talkies Debashree Mukherjee Encounters, Exile, Belonging The story of how Josef Wirsching came to work in Bombay is fascinating and full of meandering details. In brief, it’s a story of creative confluence and, well, serendipity … the right people with the right ideas getting together at the right time. Thus, the theme of encounters – cultural, personal, intermedial – is key to understanding Josef Wirsching’s career and its significance. Born in Munich in 1903, Wirsching experienced all the cultural ferment of the interwar years. Cinema was still a fledgling art form at the time, and was radically influenced by Munich’s robust theatre and photography scene. For example, the Ostermayr brothers (Franz, Peter, Ottmarr) ran a photography studio, studied acting, and worked at Max Reinhardt’s Kammertheater before they turned wholeheartedly to filmmaking. Josef Wirsching himself was slated to take over his father’s costume and set design studios, but had a career epiphany when he was gifted a still camera on his 16th birthday. Against initial family resistance, Josef enrolled in a prestigious 1 industrial arts school to study photography and subsequently joined Weiss-Blau-Film as an apprentice photographer. By the early 1920s, Peter Ostermayr’s Emelka film company had 51 Projects / Processes become a greatly desired destination for young people wanting to make a name in cinema. Josef Wirsching joined Emelka at this time, as did another young man named Alfred Hitchcock. Back in India, at the turn of the century, Indian artists were actively trying to forge an aesthetic language that could be simultaneously nationalist as well as modern.
    [Show full text]
  • DADASAHEB PHALKE AWARD for AMITABH BACHCHAN Relevant For: Pre-Specific GK | Topic: Important Prizes and Related Facts
    Source : www.thehindu.com Date : 2019-09-25 DADASAHEB PHALKE AWARD FOR AMITABH BACHCHAN Relevant for: Pre-Specific GK | Topic: Important Prizes and Related Facts Amitabh Bachchan The country’s highest film honour, the Dadasaheb Phalke award, conferred for “outstanding contribution for the growth and development of Indian cinema” will be presented this year to Amitabh Bachchan. The first intimation of it came via a tweet by Information and Broadcasting Minister Prakash Javadekar in which he stated that “The legend Amitabh Bachchan who entertained and inspired for two generations has been selected unanimously for #DadaSahabPhalke award. The entire country and international community is happy. My heartiest congratulations to him. @narendramodi @SrBachchan.” Timely arrival The award, very appropriately comes in the year that marks Mr. Bachchan’s golden jubilee in cinema. He made his debut in 1969 with Khwaja Ahmad Abbas’ Saat Hindustani about seven Indians attempting to liberate Goa from Portuguese colonial rule. The same year he also did the voiceover for Mrinal Sen’s Bhuvan Shome , one of the earliest films of Indian parallel cinema. Interestingly, the Dadasaheb Phalke award itself was first presented in the year of Mr. Bachchan’s debut. It was introduced by the government in 1969 to commemorate the “father of Indian cinema” who directed Raja Harishchandra (1913), India’s first feature film, and it was awarded for the first time to Devika Rani, “the first lady of Indian cinema.” One of the most influential figures in Indian cinema for the past five decades, Mr. Bachchan, with four national awards and 15 Filmfare trophies behind him, has had a many-splendoured stint in the world of entertainment.
    [Show full text]
  • India Unveils Budget 2011-12
    A Publication of the Embassy of India, Washington, D.C. March 1, 2011 I India RevieI w Vol. 7 Issue 3 www.indianembassy.org Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee arrives in Parliament House to present the General Budget 2011-12, in New Delhi on February 28, 2011. India unveils Budget 2011-12 n India’s $280 billion n India’s economy n India hikes export budget for 2011-12 likely to grow by 9 pc target to $220 bn for seeks to further in 2011-12, says chief fiscal 2010-11 from advance growth of the PM’s Economic the earlier estimate and curb inflation Advisory Council of $200 bn Cover STORY federal budget to advance growth, reforms Finance Minister allows registered mutual funds to accept money from foreign investors and hikes the cap on investments in infrastructure bonds Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee arrives in Parliament House to present the General Budget 2011-12, in New Delhi on February 28, 2011. Ministers of State of Finance S.S. Palanimanickam (left) and Namo Narain Meena (right) are also seen. ndia’s `12.58 lakh crore money toward health, infrastructure, cent. He also proposed a “very sen - 2 (`12.58 trillion or $280 billion) education, farming and defense, and ior” category of income tax payers, Union Budget for 2011-12 on outlined measures to check the fiscal above the age of 80, for whom the tax IFebruary 28 sought to address deficit. In a 110-minute Budget exemption will be up to `5 lakh. In every stakeholder with tax reliefs to Speech in the Lok Sabha, the Lower addition, he lowered the qualifying cheer households and corporates alike House of Parliament, Mukherjee said age limit for senior citizens to avail of while also promising reforms on sub - he proposed to enhance the income tax cuts to 60 from 65.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. World Needs Spiritual Transformation
    1. World needs spiritual transformation THE four Purusharthas (Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha) are regarded in common parlance as the purposes of human life. They are given a worldly meaning. But their real meaning is spiritual. The foremost purpose of the four Purusharthas is to make man realise that his primary duty is to divinise himself (to transform himself from Man to Madhava). The word Purusha does not signify the masculine gender as is commonly assumed. It refers to the Atma, the Supreme Consciousness, which has no gender and which is immanent in all beings. Of the two terms Purusha and Prakriti, the latter represents the gross element in Nature. It refers also to the body. Purusha is the Consciousness, the Indweller in the body. The two are interdependent. The sastras have declared that the body is jada (gross) and the Atma is chaitanya (consciousness) and that the body is feminine. Every being can be considered as made up of both elements and therefore everyone irrespective of sex, is entitled to pursue the Purusharthas. The true meaning of Purusharthas Of the four Purusharthas (Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha, the first one, Dharma, is regarded in common usage as referring to actions like charity, the duties of one's ashrama (stage in life), going on pilgrimages and such other good deeds. But these relate only to external actions. The true Dharma of every human being is to make every endeavour to realise the Divine. The process by which this consummation can be reached constitutes Dharma. The observance of the duties relating to different ashramas (Brahmacharya , Grihastha, Vaanaprastha and Sanyasa) is incidental to the particular stage in life.
    [Show full text]
  • Srimad Bhagavad Gita
    Srimad Bhagavad Gita Introduction & Chapter 1 Arjuna Vishaada Yogah: Yoga of the Despondency of Arjuna Transliterated Sanskrit Text Free Translation & Brief Explanation By T.N.Sethumadhavan Published In Esamskriti.com & Medhajournal.com Nagpur September 2010 [email protected] Srimad Bhagavad Gita Methodology of Presentation T.N.Sethumadhavan The radiance of the Bhagavad Gita is being brought to the readers under this column through the means of easy to handle tools. This arrangement consists of a series of essays covering the entire Gita in a simple, direct and interactive style employing the technique of a Distance Education Programme. The presentation of each Chapter of the Gita will have ¾ All transliterated Sanskrit Verses with a lucid translation and explanatory notes divided into different topics for a clear-cut grasp of the subject ¾ A brief account of the issues and concepts involved ¾ Strategies to put the ideas discussed into practice and ¾ A questionnaire for self-assessment by the reader The periodicity of posting these essays would be about once in a fortnight barring unforeseen circumstances. In preparing these essays I have steered clear off all the scholastic debates and controversies with a view to reach out to the average modern educated young people who require the strength of the Gita to wade through the current day troubled waters. My purpose is just to help them to understand the essential message of the Gita so that they will blossom into integrated persons full of equanimity of mind, speech and action. Their needs in the context of our present habits of study were fully kept in view in this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text of the Calendar
    2009 Worlds Beyond Cover Image: Mylapore Gowri Ammal, c. 1930s The revival of Bharata Natyam brought outstanding dancers amongdevadasis - girls who were dedicated to deities - into the limelight. Mylapore Gowri Ammal, who lived during the early twentieth century, was among them. She came from a family of singers and dancers and was a student of Nelluru Munuswamy Nattuvanar as well as of her mother from whom she received elaborate training inabhinaya. Her command over Sanskrit, Telugu and Tamil enabled her to quote from the Shastras while demonstrating aspects of aesthetics relevant to dance.Padams and javalis were Gowri Ammal's speciality, and outstanding amongst her pupils were Balasaraswathi and Rukmini Devi Arundale. Soondarbai Powar, c. 1890s Courtesy: Samudri Archives, Chennai A close friend and companion of Pandita Ramabai - one of India's first women social reformers and probably among the most controversial women of her times - Soondarbai was her right hand at Mukti Sadan, initially an overtly Christian institution. Ramabai's focus on lower-caste victims alienated her further from caste society. Sharada Sadan, the first residential school for widows in Bombay (Mumbai) was started by her in 1889 and after it moved to Poona (Pune), Mukti Sadan was merged with it. The new institution now projected a progressive, secular image. Ramabai expanded activities of this `kingdom of women' to include a school, income-generating activities such as classes for teachers and PHOTOGRAPHS nurses, a weaving centre and even a printing press. From Centre for Women's Development Studies Riding in a small bullock cart, Soondarbai Powar visited the women of Re-presenting Indian Women 1875-1947 A Visual Documentary.
    [Show full text]
  • Saadat Hasan Manto Ashok Kumar
    Ashok Kumar A Najmul Hasan made off with Devika Rani, Bombay Talkies was thrown into complete chaos. Filming had started, a few scenes had even been finished when Najmul Hasan pulled his heroine from the world of celluloid into the real world. But the person who was most distressed and worried at the Talkies was Himanshu Roy—Devika Rani’s husband and the behind-the-scenes brains of the company. In those days S. Mukherjee, brother-in-law of Ashok Kumar and the well-known filmmaker of many popular movies, was an assistant to Mr. Savak Vacha, the sound engineer at the Talkies. Being a Bengali himself he naturally felt for Himanshu Roy. Somehow or other he wanted Devika Rani to come back. So, without consulting Himanshu Roy, he made some efforts on his own and, by using his exceptional tact, he persuaded Devika Rani to fly from the arms of her lover back into the arms of the Talkies, which offered her talent more room to grow. And fly back she did. Then S. Mukherjee used his tact once again and prevailed upon his distraught mentor, Roy, to take her back. Poor Najmul Hasan joined the list of lovers separated from their beloveds by political, religious and capitalist intrigues. He was cut off—with a pair of scissors as it were—from the film and dumped into the wastebasket. This created a problem: who should now be cast opposite the already smitten Devika Rani as her lover on the screen? Himanshu Roy was an exceedingly hardworking filmmaker who pretty much kept to himself and remained quietly absorbed in his work.
    [Show full text]