Vintage Vehicles to Vie for Victory
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Public Health and Criminal Justice Approaches to Homicide Research
The Relationship Between Non-Lethal and Lethal Violence Proceedings of the 2002 Meeting of the Homicide Research Working Group St. Louis, Missouri May 30 - June 2 Editors M. Dwayne Smith University of South Florida Paul H. Blackman National Rifle Association ii PREFACE In a number of ways, 2002 and 2003 represent transition years for the Homicide Research Working Group (HRWG), its annual meetings, variously referred to as symposia or workshops, and the Proceedings of those meetings. One major change, both in terms of the meetings and the Proceedings, deals with sponsorship. Traditionally, the HRWG’s annual meetings have been hosted by some institution, be it a university or group affiliated with a university, or a government agency devoted at least in part to the collection and/or analysis of data regarding homicides or other facets of homicide research. Prior to 2002, this generally meant at least two things: that the meetings would take place at the facilities of the hosting agency, and that attendees would be treated to something beyond ordinary panels related to the host agency. For example, in recent years, the FBI Academy provided an afternoon with tours of some of its facilities, Loyola University in Chicago arranged a field trip to the Medical Examiners’ office and a major hospital trauma center, and the University of Central Florida arranged a demonstration of forensic anthropology. More recently, however, the host has merely arranged for hotel facilities and meeting centers, and some of the panels, particularly the opening session. This has had the benefit of adding variety to the persons attracted to present at our symposia, but at the risk that they are unfamiliar with our traditional approach to preparing papers for the meetings and the Proceedings. -
108916NCJRS.Pdf
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. • ., CAlKli:'()RNKA C()RTI~IECTKOl\JAt SYSTEM'S POlITCH1E§ RIE:C;ARTI)KNG PAROLE RJE1L1EASE • AND l\1E Nl'A ttY D rrS()R[) JERE D () IF flE NIJ£ RS ., • • • ! ~!, ' •. I' ) \ 1) .\,' '/ ) \' ' I 1\1. " ll'\'" l,:...; .• I) . ( ..L\ I!'.,.!. \ ' (,.~, ,I. ' I I j l , :: • " . I • I • • • • • • • a)'i ilirt! i kl,itj~j)ns ficp • ":tcl tL·1 CdP'll to ~ 9 h1m, 94 ?tv/. !) S~rr~rn~nto, tA Y4249-noo1 • • t.. • 108'Qlh CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM'S POLICIES REGARDING I PAROLE RELEASE I~ AND MENTALLY DISORDERED OFFENDERS • • • • ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY • FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I • LARRY STIRLING, Chair Robert Campbell Burt Margolin • Terry B. Friedman' Mike Roos Tim Lesl ie Paul E. Zeltner DeeDee D'Adamo 9 Counsel Laura Hankinss Consultant LARRY STIRLING CIIiEF COUNSEL CHAIR i\slltwbln SUSAN SHAW GOODMAN ROBERT CAMPBELL COUNSEL l'E~1RY B. FRIEDMAN LISA BURROUGHS WAGNER TIM LESLIE QtaUfnrnta 1JJegt111ature DEEDEE D'ADAMO BURr MARGOLIN MELISSA K NAPPAN MII<EROOS PAUL E ZELTNER CONSULTANT LAURA HANKINS COMMITTEE SECRETARY • DARLENE E. BLUE • 1100 ,) STREET SACRAMENTO. CA 95814 (916) 445,3268 • August 5~ 1987 Honorab 1e kJi 11 i e L. Brown 9 Jr. Speaker of the Assembly State Capitol~ Room 219 • Sacramento~ California 95814 Dear Mr. Speaker~ The attached documents represent the testimony presented to the Committee on Public Safety at the "Informational Hearing on Parole Release Policies and • Evaluations and Treatment of Mentally Disordered Offenders." Also included are the committee's findings and recommendations regarding these issues. -
William Newsom POLITICS, LAW, and HUMAN RIGHTS
Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California William Newsom POLITICS, LAW, AND HUMAN RIGHTS Interviews conducted by Martin Meeker in 2008-2009 Copyright © 2009 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and William Newsom, dated August 7, 2009, and Barbara Newsom, dated September 22, 2009 (by her executor), and Brennan Newsom, dated November 12, 2009. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. -
How Empirical Studies Can Affect Positively the Politics of the Death Penalty Ronald J
Cornell Law Review Volume 83 Article 1 Issue 6 September 1998 How Empirical Studies Can Affect Positively the Politics of the Death Penalty Ronald J. Tabak Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Ronald J. Tabak, How Empirical Studies Can Affect Positively the Politics of the Death Penalty, 83 Cornell L. Rev. 1431 (1998) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol83/iss6/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOW EMPIRICAL STUDIES CAN AFFECT POSITIVELY THE POLITICS OF THE DEATH PENALTY RonaldJ Tabakj INTRODUCTION Empirical studies concerning the death penalty can play an im- portant role in public discourse on capital punishment and can affect our political system's handling of this issue. But constructive dis- course will occur only if opponents of the death penalty educate themselves about what the empirical studies show. Abolitionists then can include these studies in their arsenal along with other arguments against state-implemented killings. The discussion below exemplifies how death penalty opponents can use empirical studies to make effec- tive arguments against capital punishment. I DETERRENCE Death penalty proponents persistently make the argument that capital punishment deters killing. This argument takes a variety of forms, none of which withstands analysis. A. Reputable Studies Fail to Find a Deterrent Effect Scholars conducting valid studies on the subject of deterrence have failed to find any deterrent effect from capital punishment.' This proposition holds true whether one looks just at the states with the death penalty or whether one compares death penalty states with non-death penalty states. -
California Correctional System's Policies Regarding Parole Release and Mentally Disordered Offenders Assembly Committee on Public Safety
Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Assembly California Documents 1987 California Correctional System's Policies Regarding Parole Release and Mentally Disordered Offenders Assembly Committee on Public Safety Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_assembly Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Assembly Committee on Public Safety, "California Correctional System's Policies Regarding Parole Release and Mentally Disordered Offenders" (1987). California Assembly. Paper 282. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_assembly/282 This Committee Report is brought to you for free and open access by the California Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Assembly by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KFC - 22 .L500 P871 1987 no .1 CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM 1 S POLICIES REGARDING PAROLE RELEASE AND MENTALLY DISORDERED OFFENDERS ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LARRY STIRLING, Chair Robert Campbell Burt Margolin Terry B. Friedman Mike Roos Tim Leslie Paul E. Zeltner DeeOee D1 Adamo, Counsel Laura Hankins, Consultant LARRY STIRLING CHIEF COUNSEl CHAiR SUSAN SHAW GOODMAN COUNSEL LISA BURROUGHS WAGNER 1Il.egislaturt DEEDEE D'ADAMO MELISSA K. CONSULTANT PAUL E. ZELTNER LAURA HANKINS COMMITTEE SECRETARY DARLENE E. BLUE 11 00 J STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 (916) 445-3268 testimony presented to the Committee on ng on Parole Release Policies Disordered Offenders." Also incl are ons regarding these issues. regarding the recent release of leton, and regarding several rel ease and post-release programming ly disordered offenders. -
Castrating Pedophiles Convicted of Sex Offenses Against Children: New Treatment Or Old Punishment
SMU Law Review Volume 51 Issue 2 Article 4 1998 Castrating Pedophiles Convicted of Sex Offenses against Children: New Treatment or Old Punishment William Winslade T. Howard Stone Michele Smith-Bell Denise M. Webb Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation William Winslade et al., Castrating Pedophiles Convicted of Sex Offenses against Children: New Treatment or Old Punishment, 51 SMU L. REV. 349 (1998) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol51/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. CASTRATING PEDOPHILES CONVICTED OF SEX OFFENSES AGAINST CHILDREN: NEW TREATMENT OR OLD PUNISHMENT? William Winslade* T. Howard Stone** Michele Smith-Bell*** Denise M. Webb**** TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................ 351 II. PEDOPHILIA AND ITS TREATMENT ................. 354 A. THE NATURE OF PEDOPHILIA ......................... 355 1. Definition of Pedophilia ........................... 355 2. Sex Offenses and Sex Offenders ................... 357 a. Incidence of Sex Offenses ..................... 357 b. Characteristics of and Distinctions Among Sex O ffenders ..................................... 360 B. ETIOLOGY AND TREATMENT .......................... 364 1. Etiology and Course of Pedophilia................. 364 2. Treatment ......................................... 365 a. Biological of Pharmacological Treatment ...... 366 * Program Director, Program on Legal & Ethical Issues in Correctional Health, In- stitute for the Medical Humanities, James Wade Rockwell Professor of Philosophy of Medicine, Professor of Preventive Medicine & Community Health, and Professor of Psy- chiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Dis- tinguished Visiting Professor of Law, University of Houston Health Law & Policy Institute. -
Enrollment Goes Down by 1,000 High Percentage Ofgrads Obtain Jobs
WaamPatersonCotege Serving the college community since 1936 Vol. 51 No. 9 Wayne, New Jersey October 8,1984 Enrollment goes down by 1,000 Freshman enrollment down by 200 BY ANDREW OGILVIE^ . aduating. He said the administration NEWS EDITOR is studying the attrition rate to decideif it There are 891 less students, including is a problem or not. 200 less freshmen, than there were last In the meantime, the Admissions office year, according to Den nis Santillo, has released a new series of publications director of college relations. to "improve our pitch," Santillo said. Santillo said due to a population shift, Faculty has also been involved to a there are less people of the traditional greater extent to glow the attrition rate. college age available to enter college. Santillo said this is the first time Santillo said the rise in enrollment has declined in at least four tuition this semester has no years. However, he.said the population relation to the loss of the shift has been widely anticipated by students. colleges. ' Santilio said the rise in tuition this semester has no relation to the loss of the Santillo stressed that although there students, which represent something are less students available to enter college, admission standards have not near $600,000 in lost money for the state. ; He explained that WPG, like the other decreased. ' We won't lower standards to state colleges, is allotted a certain get more students," he said. "The amount of money from the state. 'admission standards have been increased for next year as they have been In addition to the loss of incoming in the past years." The acceptance rate is students, Santillo has expressed concern still near 59 percent and SAT scores of The loss of 1,000 students this s em ester? ho u Id create more room in the jiver students who leave the college before incoming freshmen have increased. -
Co-Opting Compassion: the Federal Victim's Rights Amendment
Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 1998 Co-Opting Compassion: The Federal Victim's Rights Amendment Lynne N. Henderson Indiana University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Henderson, Lynne N., "Co-Opting Compassion: The Federal Victim's Rights Amendment" (1998). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 1958. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1958 This Response or Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTARY CO-OPTING COMPASSION: THE FEDERAL VICTIM'S RIGHTS AMENDMENT LYNNE HENDERSON* For several years, Congress has considered a number of proposals to recommend a Victim's Rights Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. In 1996, Senators Feinstein' and Kyl2 and Representative Hyde3 introduced proposed amendments to the Constitution that would provide certain, variously defined rights to crime victims During Na- tional Crime Victim's Week in 1997,' the Senate Committee on the Judici- ary held hearings on the most current proposal, Senate Judiciary Resolu- tion 6.6 The hearings were then heavily attended by members of victim advocacy groups supporting its adoption.7 Televised by Cable News Net- work, the hearings included testimony from numerous groups and indi- * Professor of Law, Indiana University-Bloomington School of Law. -
1987 Topps Baseball Card Checklist
1987 TOPPS BASEBALL CARD CHECKLIST 1 Roger Clemens 2 Jim Deshaies 3 Dwight Evans 4 Dave Lopes 5 Dave Righetti 6 Ruben Sierra 7 Todd Worrell 8 Terry Pendleton 9 Jay Tibbs 10 Cecil Cooper 11 Indians Leaders 12 Jeff Sellers 13 Nick Esasky 14 Dave Stewart 15 Claudell Washington 16 Pat Clements 17 Pete O'Brien 18 Dick Howser 20 Gary Carter 21 Mark Davis 22 Doug DeCinces 23 Lee Smith 24 Tony Walker 25 Bert Blyleven 26 Greg Brock 27 Joe Cowley 28 Rick Dempsey 30 Tim Raines 31 Braves Leaders 31 Braves Leaders (G.Hubbard/R.Ramirez) 32 Tim Leary 33 Andy Van Slyke 34 Jose Rijo 35 Sid Bream 36 Eric King 37 Marvell Wynne 38 Dennis Leonard 39 Marty Barrett 40 Dave Righetti 41 Bo Diaz 42 Gary Redus 43 Gene Michael Compliments of BaseballCardBinders.com© 2019 1 44 Greg Harris 45 Jim Presley 46 Danny Gladden 47 Dennis Powell 48 Wally Backman 51 Mel Hall 52 Keith Atherton 53 Ruppert Jones 54 Bill Dawley 55 Tim Wallach 56 Brewers Leaders 57 Scott Nielsen 58 Thad Bosley 59 Ken Dayley 60 Tony Pena 61 Bobby Thigpen 62 Bobby Meacham 63 Fred Toliver 64 Harry Spilman 65 Tom Browning 66 Marc Sullivan 67 Bill Swift 68 Tony LaRussa 69 Lonnie Smith 70 Charlie Hough 72 Walt Terrell 73 Dave Anderson 74 Dan Pasqua 75 Ron Darling 76 Rafael Ramirez 77 Bryan Oelkers 78 Tom Foley 79 Juan Nieves 80 Wally Joyner 81 Padres Leaders 82 Rob Murphy 83 Mike Davis 84 Steve Lake 85 Kevin Bass 86 Nate Snell 87 Mark Salas 88 Ed Wojna 89 Ozzie Guillen 90 Dave Stieb 91 Harold Reynolds 92 Urbano Lugo 92A Urbano Lugo Compliments of BaseballCardBinders.com© 2019 2 92B Urbano Lugo 93 Jim -
1988 Topps Baseball Card Set Checklist
1988 TOPPS BASEBALL CARD SET CHECKLIST 1 Vince Coleman 2 Don Mattingly 3 Mark McGwire (No White Triangle) 3 Mark McGwire (White Triangle By Lf.Foot) 4 Eddie Murray 5 J.Niekro/P.Niekro 6 Nolan Ryan 7 Benito Santiago 8 Kevin Elster 9 Andy Hawkins 10 Ryne Sandberg 11 Mike Young 14 Sparky Anderson 16 Kirk McCaskill 17 Ron Oester 18 Al Leiter ("Ny" On Shirt) 18 Al Leiter (No "Ny" On Shirt) 19 Mark Davidson 21 Red Sox Leaders (W.Boggs/S.Owen) 22 Greg Swindell 23 Ken Landreaux 25 Andres Galarraga 26 Mitch Williams 27 R.J. Reynolds 28 Jose Nunez 29 Argenis Salazar 30 Sid Fernandez 31 Bruce Bochy 33 Rob Deer 35 Harold Baines 36 Jamie Moyer 37 Ed Romero 38 Jeff Calhoun 40 Orel Hershiser 42 Bill Landrum 43 Dick Schofield 44 Lou Piniella 45 Kent Hrbek 48 Alan Ashby 49 Dave Clark 51 Orioles Leaders (E.Murray/C.Ripken Jr.) 52 Don Robinson Compliments of BaseballCardBinders.com© 2019 1 53 Curt Wilkerson 54 Jim Clancy 55 Phil Bradley 56 Ed Hearn 57 Tim Crews 58 Dave Magadan 59 Danny Cox 60 Rickey Henderson 61 Mark Knudson 64 Ken Caminiti 66 Shane Rawley 67 Ken Oberkfell 68 Dave Dravecky 69 Mike Hart 70 Roger Clemens 71 Gary Pettis 72 Dennis Eckersley 73 Randy Bush 74 Tommy Lasorda 75 Joe Carter 76 Denny Martinez 76 Denny Martinez 77 Tom O'Malley 78 Dan Petry 79 Ernie Whitt 80 Mark Langston 81 Reds Leaders (J.Franco/R.Robinson) 82 Darrel Akerfelds 83 Jose Oquendo 84 Cecilio Guante 85 Howard Johnson 85 Howard Johnson 86 Ron Karkovice 87 Mike Mason 88 Earnie Riles 89 Gary Thurman 90 Dale Murphy 91 Joey Cora 91 Joey Cora 92 Len Matuszek 93 Bob Sebra 94 Chuck -
Criminal Justice in America Fifth Edition
cja_teachers_cover:Layout 1 8/28/2012 1:55 PM Page 1 CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN AMERICA FIFTH EDITION TEACHER’S GUIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN AMERICA FIFTH EDITION TEACHER’S GUIDE Developed by Bill Hayes Marshall Croddy 601 South Kingsley Drive Los Angeles, California 90005 (213) 487- 5590 www.crf-usa.org T. Warren Jackson, Chair Marshall P. Horowitz, Chair, Publications Committee Jonathan Estrin, President Marshall Croddy, Vice President Board Reviewers Marshall P. Horowitz, Lisa Rockwell, Patrick Rogan, K. Eugene Shutler, Douglas Thompson, Lois Thompson Developed by Bill Hayes and Marshall Croddy Editor Bill Hayes Contributing Writers Bill Hayes, Sophia Kahn, Adam Leeman, Caitlin W. Meyd, Shruti Modi, Anjelica Grace Sarmiento, Marianna Muratova Design and Production Andrew Costly The development of these materials was financially assisted through the United States Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Grant #85-JS-CX-0007. ISBN: 978-1886253-46-7 © 2012, 2005, 2000, 1998, 1983, 1993, 1991, Constitutional Rights Foundation. All rights reserved. Published in 2012. First Printing. First edition published 1983; second edition, 1991 and 1993; third edition, 2000, fourth edition, 2005. Printed in the United States of America CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN AMERICA TEACHER’S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview Chapter 20: Children and the Constitution....66 Section 1: The Text Chapter 21: Juvenile Corrections ................69 Goals ............................................................4 Unit 6: Solutions Standards Addressed .....................................5 -
A Cost and Lack-Of-Benefit Analysis of the Death Penalty
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Volume 23 Number 1 Symposium—The Death Penalty Article 5 Approaches the 1990s: Where Are We Now 11-1-1989 The Execution of Injustice: A Cost and Lack-of-Benefit Analysis of the Death Penalty Ronald J. Tabak J. Mark Lane Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Ronald J. Tabak & J. M. Lane, The Execution of Injustice: A Cost and Lack-of-Benefit Analysis of the Death Penalty, 23 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 59 (1989). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol23/iss1/5 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EXECUTION OF INJUSTICE: A COST AND LACK-OF-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF THE DEATH PENALTY* Ronald . Tabak** and J. Mark Lane*** TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ......................................... 61 II. THE DEATH PENALTY IS STILL ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS ............................................ 62 A. The CapitalPunishment System Does Not Rationally Select Those Who Shall Die ......................... 62 B. Overzealous ProsecutorsImproperly Seek and Obtain Death Sentences ..................................... 64 C Ineffective Defense Renders Capital Trials Unfair ..... 69 D. The Juq Selection Process Fails to Ensure Unbiased Juries .............................................. 75 E. Jurors in Capital Cases Are Often Misled, Misinstructed, or Incompletely Informed ............. 77 F. The Lack of Real ProportionalityReview Means that * This Article was prepared for New York Lawyers Against the Death Penalty, an organization of over 1,000 members of the New York Bar, as a memorandum in opposition to legislation which would restore the death penalty in New York State.