TEAM Working Paper No. 10, 2003: A critical analysis of the EU draft Constitution Anthony Coughlan TEAM Secretariat, The European Parliament, Rue Wiertz 2H-246, B-1047 Brussels, Tel. +32 2 284 65 67, Fax +32 2 284 91 44, E-mail:
[email protected], Website: www.teameurope.info "This is crossing the Rubicon, after which there will be no more sovereign states in Europe with fully-fledged governments and parliaments which represent legitimate interests of their citizens, but only one State will remain. Basic things will be decided by a remote 'federal government' in Brussels and, for example, Czech citizens will be only a tiny particle whose voice and influence will be almost zero. … We are against a European superstate." - Czech President Vaclav Klaus, Mlada Fronta Dnes, 29-9-2003 "We've got to be explicit that the road to greater economic success does not lie in this cosy assumption that you can move from a single market through a single currency to harmonising all your taxes and then having a federal fiscal policy and then effectively having a federal State." - Gordon Brown, British Chancellor of the Exchequer, The Guardian, 5-11-2003 "An enlarged Union based on Nice is not in the interest of any Member State … This is not a threat. This is a messenger delivering news." - German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer, Irish Times, 14-11-2003 "I don't think any of us would want to put our fate in the hands of the big countries now". - Netherlands Finance Minister Gerrit Zalm, Irish Times, 29-11-2003 "One basic formula for understanding the Community is this: 'Take five broken empires, add the sixth one later, and make one big neo-colonial empire out of it all.' " - Professor Johan Galtung, Norwegian sociologist, The European Community, a Superpower in the Making, 1973, p.