DOCSLIB.ORG

Road Signs and Other Devices of Traffic Control in Finland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Road Signs and Other Devices of Traffic Control in Finland Road signs and other devices of traffic control in Finland 1 Danger warning signs Right bend Left bend Several bends, Several bends, Dangerous the first to the right the first to the left descent Steep ascent Road narrows Two-way traffic Swing bridge Ferry, quay or river bank Traffic congestion Uneven road Road works Loose gravel Slippery road Dangerous Pedestrian Children Cyclists Ski track shoulders crossing Elks Reindeer Intersection with Intersection with minor Intersection with equal roads (give road (vehicles coming minor road way to the vehicles from the minor road coming from the right) have to give way) Intersection with Light signals Roundabout Tramway line Level-crossing minor road without gates 2 Danger warning signs Level-crossing Additional sign at Level-crossing Level-crossing Falling rocks with gates approach to with one track with two or more tracks level-crossing Aircrafts flying at Cross-wind Other danger low altitude Signs regulating priority Priority road End of priority Priority over oncoming traffic Priority for Give way (to vehicles Stop and give way oncoming traffic on the road you (to vehicles on the road are approaching) you are approaching) Prohibitory or restrictive signs Closed to all vehicles No entry for power- No entry for truck No entry for vehicle No entry for power- driven vehicles and van combinations driven agricultural vehicle 3 Prohibitory or restrictive signs No entry for No entry for No entry for vehicles No entry for bus No entry for moped motor cycle motor sledge carrying dangerous goods No entry for cycle No entry for No entry for pedestrian, No entry for riders No entry and moped pedestrian cycle and moped on horseback No left turn No right turn No U-turns No entry for No entry for vehicles having vehicles having an overall width an overall height exceeding...metres exceeding...metres No entry for vehicles No entry for vehicles Maximum permissible No entry for vehicles Maximum or combinations of exceeding...tons total mass of combi- having a mass exceed- permissible mass vehicles exceeding laden mass nation of vehicles ing...tons on one axle on bogie ...metres in length Overtaking End of prohibition Speed limit End of speed limit Speed limit zone prohibited of overtaking End of speed limit Prohibition or re- Standing and parking Parking prohibited Parking prohibited zone striction applying to one prohibited zone or more traffic lanes 4 Prohibitory or restrictive signs Enf of parking Taxi station zone Standing place Alternative parking Alternative parking prohibited zone (beginning) for taxi (odd days) (even days) Passing without Passing without Driving of vehicles stopping prohibited stopping prohibited less than..metres (customs control) (police control or apart prohibited No entry for vehicles carrying other reason) dangerous goods Mandatory signs Direction to be Direction to be Direction to be Direction to be Direction to be followed followed followed followed followed Compulsory Pass this side Divider of traffic Compulsory Compulsory roundabout (pass either side) foot-path cycle track Combined cycle Parallel cycle track Parallel cycle track Compulsory track Compulsory track cycle track and and foot-path and foot-path for motor sledges for riders on foot-path horseback 5 Special Regulation signs Pedestrian Parking place reserved for vehicles Parking place Placing vehicles crossing whose drivers are going to use means on a parking place of public transport (park-and-ride) Placing vehicles Placing vehicles Passing place Bus stop for Bus stop for long- on a parking place on a parking place (on narrow roads) local traffic distance traffic Tramway stop Taxi station (end) Bus lane (sign Bus lane (sign End of bus lane above the lane) above the lane) (sign above the lane) End of bus lane Tramway lane (sign Tramway lane (sign End of tramway lane End of tramway lane (sign above the lane) above the lane) above the lane) (sign above the lane) (sign above the lane) One-way road Motorway End of motorway Road for motor End of road for vehicles motor vehicles Built-up area End of built-up area Recidential End of recidential precinct precinct 6 Informative signs Advance direction Advance direction Advisory sign for sign sign detour Detour Advisory sign for detour Route to be followed Information on Information on Advance direction (in order to turn left) traffic lanes traffic lanes sign (above the lane) Advance direction Exit sign Direction sign Exit sign sign (above the lane) (above the lane) End of lane Direction sign on Location sign Direction sign for light traffic private road (pedestrian and cycle traffic) Direction sign for Direction sign for Direction sign for Direction sign showing Direction sign detour detour local purposes a motorway or road for showing park-and- motor vehicles ride facilities Place name No through road No through road Recommended Sign showing Tourist road maximum speed distances Road number (E-road) Road number Road number Road number (primary road) (secondary road) (regional road) Road number Direction to the Interchange number (ordinary road) numbered road 7 Informative signs Symbol of motorway Symbol of road Airport Ferry Goods harbour for motor vehicles Industrial area Parking Railway station Bus station Itinerary for indicated vehicle category Itinerary for Itinerary for Itinerary for Overpass or under- Overpass or under- pedestrians handicapped transport of pass with steps pass without steps dangerous goods Radio station Information map Information office Telephone Emergency First-aid Sight Breakdown service Filling station telephone Hotel Restaurant Cafeteria Public lavatory Youth hostel 8 Informative signs Lodging in cabins Camping site Caravan site Picnic site Outing site Swimming place Fishing place Ski lift Countryside enterprise Additional panels Sign applies to Sign applies in Sign applies..km Distance to which Distance from the crossing road the direction of in the direction the sign applies sign to the point to the arrow of the arrow which the sign applies Distance to the Free width Free height Height of Sign applies to compulsory stop electric line both directions Passenger car Sign applies to Sign applies to the Regulation begins Regulation ends Bus both directions direction of the arrow from the sign to the sign Lorry Van Caravan Vehicle for Motor cycle handicapped Moped Cycle Method of parking Method of parking Very dangerous goods 9 Additional panels No entry for vehicles No drive-through for Sign applies bet- Sign applies bet- Sign applies bet- carrying dangerous vehicles carrying ween 0800 and 1700 ween 0800 and 1300 ween 0800 and 1400 goods of group A dangerous goods of hours, Mo-Fr hours, on Saturdays hours, on Sundays group B and holidays Parking against Parking against Time limit Obligatory use of fee fee parking disc Direction of priority road Obligatory use of Crossing of log Two-way cycle Additional panel parking disc transport road track with text Additional panel Direction of with text priority road “Driving in service purposes allowed” Most common road markings 1 Centre line 2 Traffic lane line 3 Yellow barrier line 4 White barrier line 5 Warning line 6 Edge line Pedestrian Continuation of the Stop line and Give way line Marked island crossing bicycle track barrier line and barrier line 10 Traffic light signals Red light = Stop Red and yellow = Green light = Go Yellow light = Stop the light is about to turn green Green arrow Red light with a Yellow light with a Flashing yellow light = Proceed with caution light = Go black arrow = Stop black arrow = Stop Flashing red light or Flashing white light = Follow Green arrow light Bicycle traffic lights alternately flashing red the traffic rules of level and red light = You lights = Stop crossing may turn to left Lane control signals above each lane Red cross light = Flashing yellow arrow light = The light is about to turn red Downwards directed Lane closed to traffic or the lane is closed further on green arrow light = Lane facing the sign available to traffic facing the sign Pedestrian light signals Other light signals Red light = Do not Green light = Walk start crossing Flashing green light = Flashing yellow light and warning sign or The light is about to turn red pedestrian sign = Drive with extra caution 11 Signals by policeman Approaching All road-users All road-users Road-users approaching vehicle must stop approaching from all approaching from in front from beckoning direction are directions must stop and behind must stop allowed to continue Vehicle in front of the police Vehicle behind of the police car must stop car must stop Drive safely! www.finnra.fi 12 Finnish road administration / Traffic engineering 01/2004.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transport and Map Symbols Range: 1F680–1F6FF
    Transport and Map Symbols Range: 1F680–1F6FF This file contains an excerpt from the character code tables and list of character names for The Unicode Standard, Version 14.0 This file may be changed at any time without notice to reflect errata or other updates to the Unicode Standard. See https://www.unicode.org/errata/ for an up-to-date list of errata. See https://www.unicode.org/charts/ for access to a complete list of the latest character code charts. See https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-14.0/ for charts showing only the characters added in Unicode 14.0. See https://www.unicode.org/Public/14.0.0/charts/ for a complete archived file of character code charts for Unicode 14.0. Disclaimer These charts are provided as the online reference to the character contents of the Unicode Standard, Version 14.0 but do not provide all the information needed to fully support individual scripts using the Unicode Standard. For a complete understanding of the use of the characters contained in this file, please consult the appropriate sections of The Unicode Standard, Version 14.0, online at https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/, as well as Unicode Standard Annexes #9, #11, #14, #15, #24, #29, #31, #34, #38, #41, #42, #44, #45, and #50, the other Unicode Technical Reports and Standards, and the Unicode Character Database, which are available online. See https://www.unicode.org/ucd/ and https://www.unicode.org/reports/ A thorough understanding of the information contained in these additional sources is required for a successful implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic and Road Sign Recognition
    Traffic and Road Sign Recognition Hasan Fleyeh This thesis is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of Napier University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2008 Abstract This thesis presents a system to recognise and classify road and traffic signs for the purpose of developing an inventory of them which could assist the highway engineers’ tasks of updating and maintaining them. It uses images taken by a camera from a moving vehicle. The system is based on three major stages: colour segmentation, recognition, and classification. Four colour segmentation algorithms are developed and tested. They are a shadow and highlight invariant, a dynamic threshold, a modification of de la Escalera’s algorithm and a Fuzzy colour segmentation algorithm. All algorithms are tested using hundreds of images and the shadow-highlight invariant algorithm is eventually chosen as the best performer. This is because it is immune to shadows and highlights. It is also robust as it was tested in different lighting conditions, weather conditions, and times of the day. Approximately 97% successful segmentation rate was achieved using this algorithm. Recognition of traffic signs is carried out using a fuzzy shape recogniser. Based on four shape measures - the rectangularity, triangularity, ellipticity, and octagonality, fuzzy rules were developed to determine the shape of the sign. Among these shape measures octangonality has been introduced in this research. The final decision of the recogniser is based on the combination of both the colour and shape of the sign. The recogniser was tested in a variety of testing conditions giving an overall performance of approximately 88%.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Traffic Signs and Regulations in the Netherlands Note This Is an Abridged Popular Version Published for Instructional Use
    Road Traffic Signs and Regulations in the Netherlands Note This is an abridged popular version published for instructional use. Due to abridging and modification of the text, no legal status may be derived from this document. The author accepts no liability for the consequences of interpreting the rules. The complete 1990 Traffic Rules and Signs Regulations (RVV 1990) can be viewed at www.ween.nl Road Traffic Signs and Regulations in the Netherlands Summary of Contents Road Trac Act 1994 (WVW 1994) 1 Traffic Conduct 6 1.1 Rules of Conduct 6 Trac Regulations and Road Signs (RVV 1990) 2 Traffic Regulations 9 2.1 Road position 9 2.2 Overtaking 11 2.3 Queues 12 2.4 Approaching road junctions 12 2.5 Giving priority 13 2.5a Level crossings 13 2.6 Cuing across military columns and motorised funeral processions 13 2.7 Turning 14 2.8 Speed limits 15 2.9 Waiting 19 2.10 Parking 19 2.11 Parking bicycles and mopeds 22 2.12 Signals and identification marks 22 2.13 Using lights while driving 24 2.14 Using lights while stationary 27 2.15 Special lights 28 2.16 Motorways and main highways 30 2.17 Roads across recreational areas 31 2.18 Roundabouts 31 2.19 Pedestrians 32 2.20 Emergency vehicles 32 2.21 Stray livestock 32 2.22 Boarding and alighting passengers 33 2.23 Towing 33 2.24 Special manoeuvres 33 2.25 Unnecessary noise 34 2.26 Warning triangles 34 2.26a Seats 35 2.27 Seat belts and child safety systems 36 2.28 Safety helmets 40 2.30 Use of mobile telecommunications equipment 41 2.31 Conveyance of persons in or on trailers and in loading space 42 3 Road
    [Show full text]
  • Speed Limits in Work Zones Guidelines October 2014 Table of Contents
    Speed Limits in Work Zones Guidelines October 2014 Published by: Office of Traffic, Safety & Technology Office of Construction & Innovative Contracting SPEED LIMITS IN WORK ZONES GUIDELINES OCTOBER 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY CHART ................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 2 THE LAW ............................................................................................... 3 DOCUMENTATION ................................................................................. 4 ADVISORY SPEEDS ............................................................................. 5 WORKERS PRESENT SPEED LIMITS ................................................. 6 24/7 CONSTRUCTION SPEED LIMITS .................................................. 8 HIGHER FINES FOR INPLACE SPEED LIMITS IN WORK ZONES ....... 9 SPEED LIMITS ON DETOURS .............................................................. 10 DYNAMIC SPEED DISPLAY SIGNS ..................................................... 11 EXTRAORDINARY LAW ENFORCEMENT .......................................... 12 APPENDIX: Sample Extraordinary Law Enforcement Request ............................ 15 Sample Workers Present Speed Limit Documentation Form ........... 16 Layouts 1, 2, 2a, 2b, 3 and 4 ................................................................. 17 Dynamic Speed Display Sign Drawing ............................................... 23 The information contained
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Management Services VARIABLE SPEED LIMITS Deployment Guideline
    Traffic Management Services VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT S Deployment Guideline TMS-DG02 | VERSION 02-02-00 | DECEMBER 2015 2 TMS -DG02 – VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT S Support Further information dg.its-platform.eu Questions/help dg.its-platform.eu/user-support Preface (2016) After the EasyWay project ended in 2012, the Deployment Guidelines have been updated by the EIP / EIP+ projects. They focussed on updating Best Practice and did neither have the capacity nor the intention for a full revision of the text, since especially the Member State adoption of the guidelines' requirements form a huge asset of European harmonisation. In the light of recent European Delegated Regulations, the EU EIP platform will now consider a full revision of the format and the content of the whole set of Deployment Guidelines. Preamble (2012) EasyWay is a cooperation of road authorities and road operators from 27 European countries that have teamed up to unlock the benefits of cooperation and harmonisation in the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) on Europe’s major road network. ITS as a technology is a known contributor to sustainable mobility in terms of improved safety, efficiency and reduced environmental impact. Nevertheless, fragmented deployment on a national level will fail to deliver seamless European services and will not contribute to a coherent European Transport network. The European Member States have consequently launched the EasyWay project together with the European Commission as a platform to harmonise their ITS deployments. This document has been drafted by EasyWay as part of the set of documents containing the 2012 version of the EasyWay Deployment Guidelines (DG 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Direction Signs on Roads and Motorways
    Direction Signs On Roads And Motorways Josh is flippantly Pindaric after demographic Marven degum his lectionary strategically. Inodorous and patronizing Sibyl muffles: which Torrance is wrathless enough? Isaac remains reproachless: she rhapsodizing her premolar reverberates too sluggishly? The road on highway authority, which is no. Full directions for them is a blue panel of pedestrians whomight be surprised by. Where it is prohibited from motorway? Speaking into her autobiography is published, State Goverment of Jharkhand, tunnel mouth etc. The road users to saturday during restricted, it isimportant that you leave your left hand lane, credit card numbers. Mauritius is a former British colony. The signs you should follow will all have the same symbols on them to show which route you should take. Contacts for common benefits are listed below. Therefore, are involved in an incident, you may be able to make out only the shape of a sign. British roads are fairly narrow. Howeverthis number may need to be reduced depending on the extent of other signage at thejunction. They taking These signs are sovereign or rectangular ters or symbols. In environmentally sensitiveareas, you with autobahn routes and how should only. Dead end of a system based on a motorway ramp crossing intersections that all road you a sign blow horn before applying to and signs. The Cirencester highway is approximately half a mile long. White symbols on motorways and legally reduce speed cameras still do. When waiting restrictions in directional road or motorways. Special road or motorways, motorway and red. Up or caravan site uses cookies again, but slower than in modern society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Debate on Jock Kinneir's Road Sign Alphabet
    Ole Lund The public debate on Jock Kinneir’s road sign alphabet Prelude There has been some recent interest In August 1961 two researchers at the Road Research Laboratory in in Jock Kinneir and Margaret Britain published a paper on the ‘Relative effectiveness of some letter Calvert’s influential traffic signs types designed for use on road traffic signs’ (Christie and Rutley and accompanying letterforms for 1961b). It appeared in the journal Roads and Road Construction. A Britain’s national roads from the late shorter version was published in the same month (Christie and 1950s and early 1960s. Their signs Design and alphabets prompted a unique Rutley 1961c). These two papers were both based on a report ‘not for public debate on letterform legibility, publication’ finished in January the same year (Christie and Rutley which provoked the Road Research 1961a). These papers represented the culmination of a vigorous public Laboratory to carry out large-scale debate on letterform legibility which had been going on since March legibility experiments. Many people 1959. The controversy and the Road Research Laboratory’s subse- participated in the debate, in national quent experiments happened in connection with the introduction newspapers, design and popular of direction signs for Britain’s new motorways.¹ science magazines, technical journals, and radio. It was about alphabets and The design of these directional and other informational motorway signs that would soon become – and signs represented the first phase of an overall development of a new still are – very prominent in Britain’s coherent system of traffic signs in Britain between 1957 and 1963.
    [Show full text]
  • (Mostly) True Story of Helvetica and the New York City Subway by Paul Shaw November 18, 2008
    FROM VOICE ~ TOPICS: branding/identity, history, signage, typography The (Mostly) True Story of Helvetica and the New York City Subway by Paul Shaw November 18, 2008 here is a commonly held belief that Helvetica is the signage typeface of the New York City subway system, a belief reinforced by Helvetica, Gary Hustwit’s popular 2007 documentary T about the typeface. But it is not true—or rather, it is only somewhat true. Helvetica is the official typeface of the MTA today, but it was not the typeface specified by Unimark International when it created a new signage system at the end of the 1960s. Why was Helvetica not chosen originally? What was chosen in its place? Why is Helvetica used now, and when did the changeover occur? To answer those questions this essay explores several important histories: of the New York City subway system, transportation signage in the 1960s, Unimark International and, of course, Helvetica. These four strands are woven together, over nine pages, to tell a story that ultimately transcends the simple issue of Helvetica and the subway. The Labyrinth As any New Yorker—or visitor to the city—knows, the subway system is a labyrinth. This is because it is an amalgamation of three separate systems, two of which incorporated earlier urban railway lines. The current New York subway system was formed in 1940 when the IRT (Interborough Rapid Transit), the BMT (Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit) and the IND (Independent) lines were merged. The IRT lines date to 1904; the BMT lines to 1908 (when it was the BRT, or Brooklyn Rapid Transit); and the IND to 1932.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Variable Speed Limit Signs May 2017 6
    Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The U.S. Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. The FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Cover images: Federal Highway Administration 2 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-17-003 No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Synthesis of Variable Speed Limit Signs May 2017 6. Performing Organizations Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Bryan Katz, Jiaqi Ma, Heather Rigdon, Kayla Sykes, Report No. Zhitong Huang, Kelli Raboy 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Leidos 11251 Roger Bacon Drive 11. Contract or Grant No. Reston, VA 20190 Contract No. DTFH61-12-D-00045 ToXcel, LLC Task T-5009 7140 Heritage Village Plaza Gainesville, VA 20155 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period U.S. Department of Transportation Covered Federal Highway Administration Research Synthesis, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE March 2016–December 2016 Washington, DC 20590 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Safety Effectiveness of Clearview Font and Fluorescent Yellow Sheeting on Michigan Freeways and Non- Freeways
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-2015 Evaluation of the Safety Effectiveness of Clearview Font and Fluorescent Yellow Sheeting on Michigan Freeways and Non- Freeways Lusanni Mercedes Acosta Rodrieuez Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, and the Transportation Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Acosta Rodrieuez, Lusanni Mercedes, "Evaluation of the Safety Effectiveness of Clearview Font and Fluorescent Yellow Sheeting on Michigan Freeways and Non-Freeways" (2015). Master's Theses. 616. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/616 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY EFFECTIVENESS OF CLEARVIEW FONT AND FLUORESCENT YELLOW SHEETING ON MICHIGAN FREEWAYS AND NON-FREEWAYS by Lusanni Mercedes Acosta Rodriguez A thesis submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering Civil Engineering Western Michigan University August 2015 Thesis Committee: Valerian Kwigizile, Ph.D., Chair Jun-Seok Oh, Ph.D. Zhanbo Sun, Ph.D. Diana Prieto, Ph.D. EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY EFFECTIVENESS OF CLEARVIEW FONT AND FLUORESCENT YELLOW SHEETING ON MICHIGAN FREEWAYS AND NON-FREEWAYS Lusanni Mercedes Acosta Rodríguez, M.S.E Western Michigan University, 2015 Halation or irradiation makes guide sign fonts difficult to read. Missing the necessary guide sign information causes anxiety and confusion to drivers, and hence may lead to crashes.
    [Show full text]
  • How New Technologies Could Change Road Signage in the Future
    David Casacuberta The Web as Utopia Architecture journals Big data How New Technologies Creative process Critical design Could Change Road Signage Cultural analytics Curricular revision Digital signage in the Future Digital publishing Driver assistance systems Reliance on new technologies for road transport is increasing, Digital revolution both on the road and in the car. While some may still need to Global positioning system be perfected, several current devices are presented to show Domus Road signage how they can clearly be of help to drivers. The influence of new technologies on road signage is also examined, in the light Editorial design of a hypothesis that illustrates how road signs could evolve if designers took such technologies as their starting point. Graphic design Information design Information visualisation Innovation Intangible support Over the last decade the introduction of new tech- what the driver had achieved with a little rental car Interaction Joan Zalacain nologies into road transport has increased dramati- and no previous experience driving in snow, but the Interaction design cally. Their presence continues to grow, both on question was why? Why had the driver decided to Internet “There will come a point roads and in cars, improving safety and aiding driv- continue all the way to the top when the signs further ers to have smooth and comfortable journeys. They down the road advised against it? The answer he gave (In)visible design when essential and suggest routes, help avoid traffic and warn of pos- was ‘I just followed the GPS!’ Disregarding all the ad- Multi-script sible hazards miles ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision-Based Traffic Sign Detection and Recognition Systems
    sensors Review Vision-Based Traffic Sign Detection and Recognition Systems: Current Trends and Challenges Safat B. Wali 1 , Majid A. Abdullah 2, Mahammad A. Hannan 2,* , Aini Hussain 1 , Salina A. Samad 1, Pin J. Ker 2 and Muhamad Bin Mansor 2 1 Centre for Integrated Systems Engineering and Advanced Technologies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia; [email protected] (S.B.W.); [email protected] (A.H.); [email protected] (S.A.S.) 2 Institute of Power Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Malaysia; [email protected] (M.A.A.); [email protected] (P.J.K.); [email protected] (M.B.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 2 April 2019; Accepted: 26 April 2019; Published: 6 May 2019 Abstract: The automatic traffic sign detection and recognition (TSDR) system is very important research in the development of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). Investigations on vision-based TSDR have received substantial interest in the research community, which is mainly motivated by three factors, which are detection, tracking and classification. During the last decade, a substantial number of techniques have been reported for TSDR. This paper provides a comprehensive survey on traffic sign detection, tracking and classification. The details of algorithms, methods and their specifications on detection, tracking and classification are investigated and summarized in the tables along with the corresponding key references. A comparative study on each section has been provided to evaluate the TSDR data, performance metrics and their availability. Current issues and challenges of the existing technologies are illustrated with brief suggestions and a discussion on the progress of driver assistance system research in the future.
    [Show full text]