House of Lords Official Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

House of Lords Official Report Vol. 737 Tuesday No. 4 15 May 2012 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDER OF BUSINESS Questions NHS: Risk Register Police: Misconduct and Corruption Democratic Republic of Congo Israel: Palestinian Hunger Strikers Mental Health (Discrimination) Bill [HL] First Reading Marine Navigation Bill [HL] First Reading Human Trafficking and Exploitation (Further Provisions and Support for Victims) Bill [HL] First Reading Extension of Franchise (House of Lords) Bill [HL] First Reading Standing Orders (Public Business) Motion to Agree Automatic Enrolment (Earnings Trigger and Qualifying Earnings Band) Order 2012 Motion to Refer to Grand Committee Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 (Amendment) Order 2012 Motion to Refer to Grand Committee Greater London Authority Act 1999 (Amendment) Order 2012 Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) (Amendment) Regulations 2012 Motions to Refer to Grand Committee Queen’s Speech Debate (4th Day) Written Statements Written Answers For column numbers see back page £3·50 Lords wishing to be supplied with these Daily Reports should give notice to this effect to the Printed Paper Office. The bound volumes also will be sent to those Peers who similarly notify their wish to receive them. No proofs of Daily Reports are provided. Corrections for the bound volume which Lords wish to suggest to the report of their speeches should be clearly indicated in a copy of the Daily Report, which, with the column numbers concerned shown on the front cover, should be sent to the Editor of Debates, House of Lords, within 14 days of the date of the Daily Report. This issue of the Official Report is also available on the Internet at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldhansrd/index/120515.html PRICES AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES DAILY PARTS Single copies: Commons, £5; Lords £3·50 Annual subscriptions: Commons, £865; Lords £525 WEEKLY HANSARD Single copies: Commons, £12; Lords £6 Annual subscriptions: Commons, £440; Lords £255 Index: Annual subscriptions: Commons, £125; Lords, £65. LORDS VOLUME INDEX obtainable on standing order only. Details available on request. BOUND VOLUMES OF DEBATES are issued periodically during the session. Single copies: Commons, £105; Lords, £40. Standing orders will be accepted. THE INDEX to each Bound Volume of House of Commons Debates is published separately at £9·00 and can be supplied to standing order. All prices are inclusive of postage. © Parliamentary Copyright House of Lords 2012, this publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through The National Archives website at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/our-services/parliamentary-licence-information.htm Enquiries to The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 4DU; email: [email protected] 247 NHS: Risk Register[15 MAY 2012] NHS: Risk Register 248 extremity of risks in any policy, whether it is policy A, House of Lords B or C? At the end of the day, they expect Ministers to look at those risks and take appropriate decisions. Tuesday, 15 May 2012. Against that background, therefore, the strategy that my noble friend is following is understood outside by 2.30 pm the ordinary public. It may not be understood by the lobby groups; nevertheless, it is the public whom we Prayers—read by the Lord Bishop of Wakefield. serve. NHS: Risk Register Earl Howe: My Lords, I am very grateful to my Question noble friend, and he is right. The risk assessment process, carried out by civil servants and detailed in 2.36 pm these registers, is an integral part of the formulation and development of government policy. It is in the Asked by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath public interest that this process be as effective as possible. We are clear that where policy is sensitive, To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they that necessitates confidentiality. consider the time will be right to publish the NHS risk register. Lord Martin of Springburn: My Lords, I take it that Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: My Lords, I beg leave to the decision that was made was a government decision, ask the Question standing in my name on the Order which was collective. I recall that the Deputy Prime Paper and, in so doing, I declare an interest as chair of Minister, before he became Deputy Prime Minister, an NHS foundation trust and as a consultant and was very keen on transparency. Was he therefore trainer on the NHS and health issues. comfortable about the withholding of this information? If the noble Earl does not know, perhaps he could come back and let the House know. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health (Earl Howe): My Lords, the transition risk register will be published when the balance of public Earl Howe: My Lords, the decision to exercise the interest favours disclosure. We will continue to be open veto, which is a decision provided for under the Freedom about risk. Last week we published a document containing of information Act, was made by my right honourable information on all risk areas in the register, along with friend the Secretary of State for Health. However, he a scheme of publication for future review and release would not have been able to exercise the veto without of information on risk. the collective approval of the Cabinet, and that approval was secured. Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: My Lords, I am extremely grateful to the noble Earl for that because he said that Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe: My Lords, last Thursday it would be published when the balance is in favour of I asked the Minister a question that he answered in the public interest. Can I take him back to the judgment part. The part that he did not answer was whether the of the First-tier Tribunal, which concluded that risk transitional risk register drew to the Government’s registers, attention the risk that patients would have to wait “would have provided the public with a far better understanding longer to see their GP. Speaking as someone who uses of the risks to a national institution”, the NHS and as part of the British public, I fear that on which millions depend? Surely the public interest the delays are getting longer and will continue to do and parliamentary scrutiny actually depended on that so. Could he please now answer the question about risk register being published, and it should have been whether or not this was in the risk register? published when the Bill was in this House. Earl Howe: I acknowledge that I did not answer Earl Howe: My Lords, we do not agree with that. that question and apologise to the noble Lord for not We have, as I have mentioned, published a document having done so last week. The whole issue of stakeholder setting out a summary of all the risks in the register support is one that the risk register addresses, as he and the mitigating actions associated with each category, will see from the document that we published. I do not but we resist publishing the risk register itself at present. recall the specific issue of waiting times to see one’s It is essential that officials are able to formulate sensitive GP arising in the risk register for the simple reason advice to Ministers, making frank assessments and that, although I acknowledge that it is currently a using direct language, without the fear of causing problem in some parts of the country, particularly unnecessary embarrassment for the Government or London, that is not a direct result of anything that the damage to their area of policy. That is the essence of Government are doing in our reform programme. the reason. Lord Tebbit: My Lords, would my noble friend Lord Naseby: Is my noble friend aware that there is decline to take lessons in these matters from those who nobody more passionate about the NHS than I am, supported former Prime Minister Blair in not publishing but that a great many people outside want civil servants a full and frank assessment of the intelligence reports and other advisers to Ministers to point out the whole on which he committed this country to a war? 249 NHS: Risk Register[LORDS] Police: Misconduct and Corruption 250 Earl Howe: My noble friend makes an extremely Police: Misconduct and Corruption good point because there are sensitive matters that any Question Government will inevitably wish to keep confidential if good government is to be maintained. 2.45 pm Asked by Lord Maginnis of Drumglass Lord Peston: My Lords, it is trivially obvious that all decision-making— To ask Her Majesty’s Government when it is appropriate for the Home Office to intervene directly Baroness Jolly: My Lords— in matters of police discipline and incidents of police corruption, and whether current delegated arrangements are proving adequate. Baroness Anelay of St Johns: My Lords, there is time, and we have not yet heard from the Liberal Democrat Back Benches. The Minister of State, Home Office (Lord Henley): My Lords, the police are expected to maintain the highest standards of professional behaviour at all Noble Lords: Order! times. Where there are allegations of misconduct or corruption, the most serious cases are investigated by Baroness Anelay of St Johns: I am most grateful to the Independent Police Complaints Commission. As the noble Lord, Lord Peston, for resuming his seat. the name suggests, the IPCC is independent of the Naturally, only one person should be on their feet at Government and the police to ensure that investigations one time. There is time, although we have now wasted are impartial. The Government do not intervene in a little more of it, so perhaps we might hear from the any individual cases.
Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Thursday Volume 506 25 February 2010 No. 45 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 25 February 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 427 25 FEBRUARY 2010 428 Dr. Alan Whitehead (Southampton, Test) (Lab): Does House of Commons my hon. Friend accept that a large element of fuel poverty relates to the energy efficiency of the homes in Thursday 25 February 2010 which fuel-poor people live? Does he also accept that efforts to ensure that those homes are made properly energy efficient are a vital part of our attack on fuel The House met at half-past Ten o’clock poverty? What is his assessment of the likely impact of community energy response teams, community energy saving programmes, and other schemes, such as the PRAYERS Great British Refurb, on improving the energy efficiency of homes? [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] Mr. Kidney: I agree that the most sustainable way of BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS helping people to stay out of fuel poverty is to ensure that their homes are energy efficient. That is why we have concentrated so much on the energy companies’ LONDON LOCAL AUTHORITIES BILL [LORDS] obligation, under which more than 6 million homes (BY ORDER) have been insulated. Another 2 million have been insulated Second Reading opposed and deferred until Thursday under Warm Front.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing in the 21St Century
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Policing in the 21st Century Seventh Report of Session 2007–08 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 30 October 2008 HC 364-II Published on 10 October 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chairman) Tom Brake MP (Liberal Democrat, Charshalton and Wallington) Ms Karen Buck MP (Labour, Regent’s Park and Kensington North) Mr James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) David TC Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Mrs Janet Dean MP (Labour, Burton) Patrick Mercer MP (Conservative, Newark) Margaret Moran MP (Labour, Luton South) Gwyn Prosser MP (Labour, Dover) Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Martin Salter MP (Labour, Reading West) Mr Gary Streeter MP (Conservative, South West Devon) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following Member was also a Member of the Committee during the inquiry: Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • At a Meeting of the Hounslow Borough
    At a meeting of the Hounslow Borough Community Police Consultative Group held on Monday, 11 July 2005 at 7:00 pm at Ground Floor Hall, Chiswick Catholic Centre, 2 Dukes Avenue, Chiswick W4 4AE. Present: Voting Membership: Abdul Ansary Bangladesh Welfare Association Andy Atkinson Hounslow Residents Group Mr J Bach Secondary Schools Headteacher Dominique Banza-Mwenze Disability Network Hounslow Flavia Beckwith Crime Prevention Panel (Brentford Chiswick and Isleworth) Mohammad Chaudhry Hounslow Town Twinning Association Mr K.L. Chopra Vedic Cultural Society Brian Close Heston Residents' Association Mel Collins Grand Union Developments Lata Dhiri Bereavement Services Hounslow Amar Girdhar Hindu Cultural Trust David Hardman LBH Neighbourhood Watch Association Hassan Isse Somali Consortium Basil Mann Hounslow, Heathrow and District Synagogue Mrs N. Yousef Isleworth Muslim Womens’ Association Non-Voting Membership: Chief Superintendent Ali Dizaei Metropolitan Police Hounslow Chief Inspector Gareth Morgan Metropolitan Police Hounslow Inspector Adrian Baxter Metropolitan Police Hounslow Councillors: Councillor Morgan-Watts Councillor McGregor Councillor Lal Apologies for Absence Councillors Carman and Edwards. Tony Arbour, Jo Bacquenois, Brenda Baptiste, Teresa Brown, Ashton Bynoe, Vivienne Cox, Meenu Dhiri, Andy Fielding, Bridget Jemmett, Alan Keen, Ann Keen, Anne Maloney, Javed Mirza, Mahmood Mirza, Brian Robinson, Leslie Robinson and Mohammad Saleem 82. Welcome and Apologies for Absence The Chair welcomed the inclusion of 5 new Council representatives
    [Show full text]
  • On the Morning of January 26, Sir Ian Reported Back to His Police Authority
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Greer, C. & McLaughlin, E. (2011). "Trial by media": Policing, the 24-7 news mediasphere and the "politics of outrage". Theoretical Criminology, 15(1), pp. 23-46. doi: 10.1177/1362480610387461 This is the unspecified version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/1986/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362480610387461 Copyright and reuse: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] ‘Trial by Media’: Policing, the 24-7 News Mediasphere and the ‘Politics of Outrage’ Greer, C. and McLaughlin, E. (2011) ‘Trial by Media: Policing, the 24-7 News Mediasphere, and the Politics of Outrage’, Theoretical Criminology, 15, 1: 23-46. Abstract This article analyses the changing nature of news media-police chief relations. Building on previous theoretical work (Greer and McLaughlin, 2010), we use the concepts of ‘inferential structure’ (Lang and Lang, 1955) and ‘hierarchy of credibility’ (Becker, 1967) to examine former Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) Commissioner Sir Ian Blair’s ‘trial by media’. We focus on the collective and overwhelmingly hostile journalistic reaction to Blair’s declaration in 2005 that, (a) the news media are guilty of ‘institutional racism’ in their coverage of murders, and (b) the murders of two ten- year-olds in Soham, 2001, received undue levels of media attention.
    [Show full text]
  • At a Meeting of the Hounslow Borough Community Police Consultative Group Held on Monday, 17 January 2005 at 7:00 Pm at Committee Rooms 1&2, Civic Centre, Hounslow
    At a meeting of the Hounslow Borough Community Police Consultative Group held on Monday, 17 January 2005 at 7:00 pm at Committee Rooms 1&2, Civic Centre, Hounslow. Present: Voting Membership: Mr J Bach Secondary Schools Headteacher Jo Bacquenois Hounslow Afro-Caribbean Association Flavia Beckwith Brentford, Chiswick and Isleworth Crime Reduction Panel Brian Close Heston Residents' Association Mel Collins Grand Union Developments Lata Dhiri Bereavement Services Hounslow Meenu Dhiri Victim Support Middlesex Julius Fletcher Heathrow, Hounslow & District Synagogue David Hardman LBH Neighbourhood Watch Association Bridget Jemmett HFTRA Raghbir Khangoora Gurdwara Sri Guru Singh Sabha Leslie Robinson LBH Chamber of Commerce John Rowntree CAB Management Committee Jajiwan Singh Gurdwara Sri Guru Singh Sabha Non-voting membership: Tony Arbour Metropolitan Police Authority Inspector Adrian Baxter Metropolitan Police, Hounslow Chief Superintendent Ali Dizaei Metropolitan Police, Hounslow Chief Inspector Gareth Morgan Metropolitan Police, Hounslow Hounslow Council: Councillor Chaudhary Councillor Dhillon, A Councillor Gill, M Councillor Mann Attendees: Inspector Alan Wither British Transport Police, Waterloo PC Russell Tatt British Transport Police, Waterloo Apologies for Absence Abdul Ansary, Andy Atkinson, Brenda Baptiste, Teresa Brown, Ashton Bynoe, Mohammad Chaudhry, Marion Dunn, Andy Fielding, Manjeet Heer, Hassan Isse, Jagpal Khangura, Anne Maloney, Mahmood Mirza, Rupinder Painach and Susanna White 48. Appointment of Chair and Vice Chairs Members voted for the reappointment of Mr Mohammad Chaudhry as Chair of the Group, and acknowledged that this would be his fifth and final year as Chair in this term, in accordance with the Group’s constitution. Flavia Beckwith and John Rowntree were appointed to the posts of Vice Chair. 49.
    [Show full text]
  • Turning a Good Newsroom Bad: White Collar Crime, Tort and Case Management Issues Arising from the UK Phone Hacking Scandal
    Turning a good newsroom bad: White collar crime, tort and case management issues arising from the UK phone hacking scandal Judge Gibson, President, Judiciary Working Group1, Union Internationale des Avocats 55th Congress 1 November, 2011 - Miami “Wrongdoers turned a good newsroom bad and this was not fully understood or adequately pursued.” James Murdoch, 7 July 20112. “A mighty, wealthy family-run organization that can effectively buy up politicians and police officers: we feel we have a word for that, and it originates in Sicily rather than Sydney.” Jonathan Freedland, “10 days that shook Britain”, The Guardian, 16 July 2011. “Do our media brethren really want to invite Congress and prosecutors to regulate how journalists gather the news?” Editorial, Wall Street Journal, 19 July 2011 Introduction Phone tapping, computer hacking and other illegal means of information gathering can intrude into the privacy of every person who has ever used a telephone or computer. Although the information illegally obtained may be sold for large sums, ruin rival businesses or reputations, or be used to commit crimes, criminal penalties have been derisory, particularly where the information gathered has related to the private life of persons in the news3.This discussion paper looks at how a lack of 1 This draft discussion paper (31 July 2011) is circulated for comment and corrections prior to the Judiciary Working Group session at the UIA Miami congress. An updated and amended copy of the paper, which reviews legal issues arising from the use (or abuse) of news-gathering technology and the “phone hacking scandal”, will be provided at the Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues of Religious Diversity
    ISSUES OF RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY AFFECTING VISIBLE MINORITY ETHNIC POLICE PERSONNEL IN THE WORKPLACE An exploration and critical analysis of issues of religious diversity in the police service with specific reference to an evaluation of the religious needs of, and policies relevant to, police personnel of non-Christian religions in their working environment from the time of the equal opportunities thematic inspection of 1995 to December 2003, the date of the implementation of the European community directives concerning religion and belief. by RICHARD NORRIS ARMITAGE A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Historical Studies The University of Birmingham September 2006 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis focuses on issues of religious diversity affecting police personnel in the workplace. The importance of these issues became apparent as a consequence of research, which I had previously undertaken. In 1995, I succeeded in gaining a Police Research Group Award to investigate chaplaincy within the police service. The research led to the publication of Police Chaplaincy – Servant to the Service.
    [Show full text]
  • EYE Catch-Up: the Trial of Citizen Murrer
    1 EYE CATCH-UP: The trial of Citizen Murrer 1 Index 2 Deep Throat it isn’t: Why Thames Valley police rifled through packets of Cup-a- Soup at the Milton Keynes Citizen. 3 The Plod thickens: The local newspaper hack, her contact, the police and the silly buggers 4 The loan arrangers: How Johnston Press put a price on press freedom and that of its harassed reporter 5 He shoots, he scores: The own goals notched up by Inspector Knacker, gifted with two flat-feet 6 What a tangled Webb: How a former attorney-general and ex-director of public prosecutions were dragged into the affair 7 Murrer Christmas, Sally! The case – a cause célèbre for press freedom – is thrown out by Judge Southwell 2 EYE CATCH-UP: The trial of Citizen Murrer THAMES VALLEY POLICE 24 hours. By the end she was suitably bewildered and terrified, and ready for the interrogation. Contact sport Detectives didn’t ask her about HEN people think of investigative state secrets: they wanted to know Wreporters meeting secret contacts, they how she had found out about Izale recall the Washington car park where Deep McLeod; who had reminded her Throat dished the dirt on Watergate, not the about her old piece on Doug Belcher; Jury’s Inn, Milton Keynes. and they also asked whether she Nevertheless, it was in this unglamorous three- could confirm that she had talked star hotel that a part comic, but mainly sinister battle about a potential suicide bomber with over the future of free reporting in Britain began in a police officer but printed nothing.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XXII-4 | 2017 “My Dad Was a Bus Driver”
    Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XXII-4 | 2017 The May 2016 Devolved Elections in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and London: Convergences and Divergences “My Dad was a bus driver”. The 2016 mayoral elections in London « Mon père était chauffeur de bus ». Les Elections à la mairie de Londres de 2016 Timothy Whitton Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/1583 DOI: 10.4000/rfcb.1583 ISSN: 2429-4373 Publisher CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d'études en civilisation britannique Electronic reference Timothy Whitton, « “My Dad was a bus driver”. The 2016 mayoral elections in London », Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique [Online], XXII-4 | 2017, Online since 20 November 2017, connection on 07 May 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/1583 ; DOI : 10.4000/rfcb.1583 This text was automatically generated on 7 May 2019. Revue française de civilisation britannique est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. “My Dad was a bus driver”. The 2016 mayoral elections in London 1 “My Dad was a bus driver”. The 2016 mayoral elections in London « Mon père était chauffeur de bus ». Les Elections à la mairie de Londres de 2016 Timothy Whitton Introduction 1 In May 2016 Sadiq Khan became the first “British” Muslim to be elected mayor of a European capital city, ushering in a new era of politics in London which will undoubtedly contrast starkly with the respective reigns of Ken Livingstone (2000 – 2008) and Boris Johnson (2008 – 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry 10 Years On
    The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry 10 Years On An Analysis of the Literature A Runnymede Report by Nicola Rollock RUNNYMEDE REPORTS Acknowledgements There are a number of colleagues without whose support and advice this report would have been considerably more difficult to complete. Biographical details In particular, we at Runnymede would like to thank members of the of the author 10 Years On reference group for their advice and support, notably Dr Nicola Rollock is a Claire Alexander, Barbara Cohen, Simon Holdaway, Richard Stone Research Associate for the and Seamus Taylor. Runnymede Trust Our thanks also go to Matthew Ryder, Marcus Ryder at the BBC, and colleagues at the Metropolitan Police Service’s press office who Reference Group have been particularly helpful in providing information for this The Reference Group which literature review. advised and supported the development of this report We would also like to express our appreciation to Runnymede comprised the following research intern Dinah Gross, who met the challenge of learning about individuals: the criminal justice system in a short space of time with enthusiasm and unfaltering commitment. Dr Claire Alexander Finally, we are very grateful indeed to the Leigh Trust and the Uniting Dr Rob Berkeley Britain Trust, who funded the research and publication of this report. (Runnymede Trust) Barbara Cohen Catherine Cousins Janet Foster Dr Theo Gavrielides Professor David Gillborn Professor Simon Holdaway Michelynn Laflèche (Runnymede Trust, to December 2008) Dr Robin Oakley Dr Coretta Phillips Dr Richard Stone ISBN-13: 978-1-906732-16-5 (print) EAN: 9781906732165 (print) Seamus Taylor ISBN-13: 978-1-906732-17-2 (online) Doreen Lawrence was EAN: 9781906732172 (online) consulted and provided feedback on draft versions Published by Runnymede in February 2009, this document is copy- of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science Policing Minority
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Policing minority ethnic communities: A case study in London’s ‘Little India’ Sara Trikha A thesis submitted to the Department of Sociology of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, December 2012. Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 94,284 words. The bibliography of my thesis was typed by David Church. Sara Trikha 1 Abstract The Macpherson Inquiry (1999) was instrumental in forcing into the public domain the issue of police racism, which for decades had been an endemic part of police culture. My thesis, undertaken post Macpherson (1999), examined ongoing tensions in the policing of minority ethnic communities through a case study of policing in London’s ‘Little India’. My thesis highlights the continuing influence of racism in policing, describing a world of policing ethnically diverse communities that is far more complex, variable and contradictory than has yet been documented in the empirical policing literature. I describe how policing in Greenfield was a patchwork of continuity and change, illustrating how, despite the advances the police in Greenfield had made in eradicating overt racism from the organisation, passive prejudice remained rife among officers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cops That Stick Together and Lie Together
    Story 25 - THE COPS THAT STICK TOGETHER AND LIE TOGETHER ................................................................................. 3 Case 418 - Race-Hate mail Officer sacked from Force ................................................................................................... 3 Case 419 - Chief Inspector dismissed after car offences ............................................................................................... 3 Case 420 - Theft Cop is jailed for nine months .............................................................................................................. 3 Case 421 - Police Officer jailed for theft on pensioner .................................................................................................. 3 Case 422 - Chief Super launching corruption clean-up resigns ..................................................................................... 4 Case 423 - Merseyside Detective Chief charged with corruption ................................................................................. 4 Case 424 - Police Sergeant is nailed by video evidence ................................................................................................. 4 Case 425 - Detective Inspector on theft charges ........................................................................................................... 4 Case 426 - Booze smuggling detectives fined ................................................................................................................ 4 Case 427 - Chief Inspector charged
    [Show full text]