Taxonomic Bibliography of Literature Pertaining to the Freshwater Organisms of British Columbia Freshwater Keys: Bibliography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Taxonomic Bibliography of Literature Pertaining to the Freshwater Organisms of British Columbia Freshwater Keys: Bibliography Compendium of Recommended Keys for British Columbia Freshwater Organisms: Part 2 Taxonomic Bibliography of Literature Pertaining to the Freshwater Organisms of British Columbia Freshwater Keys: Bibliography Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................................................. 2 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... 5 LIMNOLOGY............................................................................................................................................... 6 LIMNOLOGY (BRITISH COLUMBIA)................................................................................................................... 6 KINGDOM MONERA............................................................................................................................... 17 KINGDOM PROTISTA............................................................................................................................. 17 KINDOM FUNGI ....................................................................................................................................... 20 KINGDOM PLANTAE: ALGAE.............................................................................................................. 21 KINGDOM PLANTAE: AQUATIC PLANTS......................................................................................... 30 AQUATIC PLANTS (BRITISH COLUMBIA) ........................................................................................................ 44 KINGDOM ANIMALIA: SUBKINGDOM PARAZOA............................................................................ 46 PHYLUM PORIFERA..................................................................................................................................... 46 KINGDOM ANIMALIA: SUBKINGDOM EUMETAZOA ..................................................................... 47 PHYLUM CNIDARIA .................................................................................................................................... 48 Class HYDROZOA ................................................................................................................................... 48 PHYLUM PLATYHELMINTHES.................................................................................................................. 49 Class TURBELLARIA .............................................................................................................................. 49 PHYLUM NEMERTEA .................................................................................................................................. 49 PHYLUM GASTROTRICHA ......................................................................................................................... 49 PHYLUM ROTIFERA .................................................................................................................................... 50 PHYLUM NEMATODA ................................................................................................................................. 52 PHYLUM NEMATOMORPHA...................................................................................................................... 53 PHYLUM MOLLUSCA .................................................................................................................................. 54 Class BIVALVIA....................................................................................................................................... 56 PHYLUM ANNELIDA ................................................................................................................................... 56 Class POLYCHAETA ............................................................................................................................... 56 Class OLIGOCHAETA............................................................................................................................. 56 Class BRANCHIOBDELLIDA.................................................................................................................. 57 Class HIRUNDINEA (Leeches)................................................................................................................ 57 PHYLUM TARDIGRADA.............................................................................................................................. 61 PHYLUM BRYOZOA..................................................................................................................................... 61 PHYLUM ENTOPROCTA ............................................................................................................................. 62 PHYLUM ARTHROPODA............................................................................................................................. 62 SUBPHYLUM CHELICERATA......................................................................................................................... 62 Class ARACHNIDA.................................................................................................................................. 62 Order Araneae (spiders)........................................................................................................................................ 62 Subclass ACARI (mites and ticks)............................................................................................................... 62 Order ACARIFORMES........................................................................................................................................ 64 Class INSECTA ........................................................................................................................................ 64 Order COLEOPTERA (Beetles)........................................................................................................................... 65 Amphizoidae (trout stream beetles)................................................................................................................. 66 Chrysomelidae (leaf beetles) ........................................................................................................................... 66 Curculionidae (weevils)................................................................................................................................... 66 Dryopidae (long-toed water beetles) ............................................................................................................... 66 2 Freshwater Keys: Bibliography Dytiscidae (predacious water beetles)..............................................................................................................66 Elmidae (riffle beetles) ....................................................................................................................................67 Gyrinidae (whirligig beetles) ...........................................................................................................................67 Halplidae (crawling water beetles) ..................................................................................................................67 Hydraenidae (minute moss beetles) .................................................................................................................67 Hydrophilidae (water scavenger beetles).........................................................................................................68 Lampyridae (fireflies and relatives) .................................................................................................................68 Limnichidae (marsh-loving beetles) ................................................................................................................68 Scirtidae (marsh beetles)..................................................................................................................................68 Order COLLEMBOLA (springtails).....................................................................................................................68 Order DIPTERA (Flies and Midges) ....................................................................................................................68 General ............................................................................................................................................................68 Ceratopogonidae..............................................................................................................................................69 Chaoboridae (Midges) .....................................................................................................................................69 Chironomidae ..................................................................................................................................................69 Culicidae (Mosquitos) .....................................................................................................................................71 Deuterophlebiidae............................................................................................................................................71 Dixidae ............................................................................................................................................................71 Empididae (dance flies) ...................................................................................................................................71
Recommended publications
  • From Lake Sediments in British Columbia / by Ian Richard
    LATE-QUATERNARY PALAEOECOLOGY OF CHIRONOMIDAE (DIPTERA: INSECTA) FROM LAKE SEDIMENTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA Ian Richard Walker B.Sc., Mount Allison University, 1980 M.Sc., University of Waterloo, 1982 THESIS SUBMIlTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Biological Sciences @ Ian Richard Walker 1988 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY March 1988 All rights -eserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, .without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name : Ian Richard Walker Degree : Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis: LATE-QUATERNARY PAWIlEOECOLOGY OF CHIRONOMIDAE (D1PTERA:INSECTA) FROM LAKE SEDIMENTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA Examining Comnittee: Chairman: Dr. R.C. Brooke, Associate Professor Dr. R .W . hlathewes , Professor, Senior Supervisor professor T. ~inspisq,~merd- J.G. ~tocX~%$ ~e~artmentof and Oceans, West Vancouver Dr. P. Belton, Associate Professor, Public Examiner Dr. R.J. Hebda, Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, Public Examiner Dr. D.R. Oliver, Biosystematics Research Centre, Central Experimental Farm, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, External Examiner Date Approved ern& 23, /988 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Slmn Fraser Unlverslty the right to lend my thesis, proJect or extended essay (the :It10 of whlch Is shown below1 to users ot the Slmon Fraser Unlverslty ~lbrlr~,and to make part la1 or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the 1 i brary of any other unlversl ty, or other educat lona l Insti tutIon, on its own behalf or for one of Its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of thls work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Taxonomic State of Water Mite Taxa (Acari: Hydrachnidia) Described from the Palaearctic, Part 3, Hygrobatoidea and Arrenuroidea with New Faunistic Data
    Zootaxa 3981 (4): 542–552 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3981.4.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:861CEBBE-5277-4E4C-B3DF-8850BEDD2A23 On the taxonomic state of water mite taxa (Acari: Hydrachnidia) described from the Palaearctic, part 3, Hygrobatoidea and Arrenuroidea with new faunistic data HARRY SMIT1, REINHARD GERECKE2, VLADIMIR PEŠIĆ3 & TERENCE GLEDHILL4 1Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] 2Biesingerstr. 11, 72070 Tübingen, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Biology, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put b.b., 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro. E-mail: [email protected] 4Freshwater Biological Association, The Ferry House, Far Sawrey, Ambleside, Cumbria LA22 0LP, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Following revision of material from museum collections and recent field work, new taxonomic and faunistic data are given for several representatives of the water mite superfamilies Hygrobatoidea and Arrenuroidea. Ten new synonyms are established: Family Limnesiidae: Limnesia martianezi Lundblad, 1962 = L. arevaloi arevaloi K. Viets, 1918; Limnesia jaczewskii Biesiadka, 1977 = Limnesia connata Koenike, 1895. Family Hygrobatidae: Hygro- bates properus Láska, 1954 = H. trigonicus Koenike, 1895. Family Unionicolidae: Unionicola finisbelli Ramazzotti, 1947 = U. inusitata Koenike, 1914. Family Pionidae: Tiphys koenikei (Barrois & Moniez, 1887) = Forelia variegator (Koch, 1837); Piona falcigera Koenike, 1905, P. bre h m i Walter, 1910, P. trisetica bituberosa K. Viets, 1930 and P. dentipes Lun- dblad, 1962 = P. alpicola (Neuman, 1880).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Mites of the Genus Arrenurus (Acari; Hydrachnida) from Europe and North America
    Department of Animal Morphology Institute of Environmental Biology Adam Mickiewicz University Mariusz Więcek EFFECTS OF THE EVOLUTION OF INTROMISSION ON COURTSHIP COMPLEXITY AND MALE AND FEMALE MORPHOLOGY: WATER MITES OF THE GENUS ARRENURUS (ACARI; HYDRACHNIDA) FROM EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA Mentors: Prof. Jacek Dabert – Institute of Environmental Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University Prof. Heather Proctor – Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta POZNAŃ 2015 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I want to thank my mentor Prof. Jacek Dabert. It has been an honor to be his Ph.D. student. I would like to thank for his assistance and support. I appreciate the time and patience he invested in my research. My mentor, Prof. Heather Proctor, guided me into the field of behavioural biology, and advised on a number of issues during the project. She has been given me support and helped to carry through. I appreciate the time and effort she invested in my research. My research activities would not have happened without Prof. Lubomira Burchardt who allowed me to work in her team. Many thanks to Dr. Peter Martin who introduced me into the world of water mites. His enthusiasm was motivational and supportive, and inspirational discussions contributed to higher standard of my research work. I thank Dr. Mirosława Dabert for introducing me in to techniques of molecular biology. I appreciate Dr. Reinhard Gerecke and Dr. Harry Smit who provided research material for this study. Many thanks to Prof. Bruce Smith for assistance in identification of mites and sharing his expert knowledge in the field of pheromonal communication. I appreciate Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research
    CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research No. 25 ISSN 0172-1941 (printed) 1891-5426 (online) November 2012 CONTENTS Editorial: Inventories - What are they good for? 3 Dr. William P. Coffman: Celebrating 50 years of research on Chironomidae 4 Dear Sepp! 9 Dr. Marta Margreiter-Kownacka 14 Current Research Sharma, S. et al. Chironomidae (Diptera) in the Himalayan Lakes - A study of sub- fossil assemblages in the sediments of two high altitude lakes from Nepal 15 Krosch, M. et al. Non-destructive DNA extraction from Chironomidae, including fragile pupal exuviae, extends analysable collections and enhances vouchering 22 Martin, J. Kiefferulus barbitarsis (Kieffer, 1911) and Kiefferulus tainanus (Kieffer, 1912) are distinct species 28 Short Communications An easy to make and simple designed rearing apparatus for Chironomidae 33 Some proposed emendations to larval morphology terminology 35 Chironomids in Quaternary permafrost deposits in the Siberian Arctic 39 New books, resources and announcements 43 Finnish Chironomidae 47 Chironomini indet. (Paratendipes?) from La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Photo by Carlos de la Rosa. CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research Editors Torbjørn EKREM, Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Peter H. LANGTON, 16, Irish Society Court, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, Northern Ireland BT52 1GX The CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research is devoted to all aspects of chironomid research and aims to be an updated news bulletin for the Chironomidae research community. The newsletter is published yearly in October/November, is open access, and can be downloaded free from this website: http:// www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/chironomus. Publisher is the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • “Two-Tailed” Baetidae of Ohio January 2013
    Ohio EPA Larval Key for the “two-tailed” Baetidae of Ohio January 2013 Larval Key for the “two-tailed” Baetidae of Ohio For additional keys and descriptions see: Ide (1937), Provonsha and McCafferty (1982), McCafferty and Waltz (1990), Lugo-Ortiz and McCafferty (1998), McCafferty and Waltz (1998), Wiersema (2000), McCafferty et al. (2005) and McCafferty et al. (2009). 1. Forecoxae with filamentous gill (may be very small), gills usually with dark clouding, cerci without dark band near middle, claws with a smaller second row of teeth. .............................. ............................................................................................................... Heterocloeon (H.) sp. (Two species, H. curiosum (McDunnough) and H. frivolum (McDunnough), are reported from Ohio, however, the larger hind wing pads used by Morihara and McCafferty (1979) to distinguish H. frivolum have not been verified by OEPA.) Figures from Ide, 1937. Figures from Müller-Liebenau, 1974. 1'. Forecoxae without filamentous gill, other characters variable. .............................................. 2 2. Cerci with alternating pale and dark bands down its entire length, body dorsoventrally flattened, gills with a dark clouded area, hind wing pads greatly reduced. ............................... ......................................................................................... Acentrella parvula (McDunnough) Figure from Ide, 1937. Figure from Wiersema, 2000. 2'. Cerci without alternating pale and dark bands, other characters variable. ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Check List 4(2): 92–97, 2008
    Check List 4(2): 92–97, 2008. ISSN: 1809-127X NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Baetidae: Range extensions and new state records from Kansas, U.S.A. W. Patrick McCafferty 1 Luke M. Jacobus 2 1 Department of Entomology, Purdue University. West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Biology, Indiana University. Bloomington, Indiana 47405 USA. The mayfly (Ephemeroptera) fauna of the U.S.A. other central lowland prairie states as well state of Kansas is relatively poorly documented (McCafferty et al. 2001; 2003; Guenther and (McCafferty 2001). With respect to small minnow McCafferty 2005). Some additionally common mayflies (family Baetidae), only 16 species have species will be evident from the new data we been documented with published records from present herein. Kansas. Those involve Acentrella turbida (McDunnough, 1924); Acerpenna pygmaea Our examination of additional unidentified (Hagen, 1861); Apobaetis Etowah (Traver, 1935); material of Kansas Baetidae housed in the Snow A. lakota McCafferty, 2000; Baetis flavistriga Museum, University of Kansas, Lawrence, McDunnough, 1921; B. intercalaris McDunnough, Kansas, and collected mainly by the State 1921; Callibaetis fluctuans (Walsh, 1862); C. Biological Survey of Kansas, has led to the pictus Eaton, 1871; Centroptilum album discovery of 19 additional species of Baetidae in McDunnough, 1926; C. bifurcatum McDunnough, Kansas, resulting in a new total of 35 species of 1924; Fallceon quilleri (Dodds, 1923); Baetidae now known from the state. The records Paracloeodes minutus (Daggy, 1945); P. given alphabetically below also represent the first dardanum (McDunnough, 1923); P. ephippiatum Kansas records of the genera Camelobaetidius, (Traver, 1935); P.
    [Show full text]
  • Dytiscid Water Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of the Yukon
    Dytiscid water beetles of the Yukon FRONTISPIECE. Neoscutopterus horni (Crotch), a large, black species of dytiscid beetle that is common in sphagnum bog pools throughout the Yukon Territory. 491 Dytiscid Water Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of the Yukon DAVID J. LARSON Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 3X9 Abstract. One hundred and thirteen species of Dytiscidae (Coleoptera) are recorded from the Yukon Territory. The Yukon distribution, total geographical range and habitat of each of these species is described and multi-species patterns are summarized in tabular form. Several different range patterns are recognized with most species being Holarctic or transcontinental Nearctic boreal (73%) in lentic habitats. Other major range patterns are Arctic (20 species) and Cordilleran (12 species), while a few species are considered to have Grassland (7), Deciduous forest (2) or Southern (5) distributions. Sixteen species have a Beringian and glaciated western Nearctic distribution, i.e. the only Nearctic Wisconsinan refugial area encompassed by their present range is the Alaskan/Central Yukon refugium; 5 of these species are closely confined to this area while 11 have wide ranges that extend in the arctic and/or boreal zones east to Hudson Bay. Résumé. Les dytiques (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) du Yukon. Cent treize espèces de dytiques (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) sont connues au Yukon. Leur répartition au Yukon, leur répartition globale et leur habitat sont décrits et un tableau résume les regroupements d’espèces. La répartition permet de reconnaître plusieurs éléments: la majorité des espèces sont holarctiques ou transcontinentales-néarctiques-boréales (73%) dans des habitats lénitiques. Vingt espèces sont arctiques, 12 sont cordillériennes, alors qu’un petit nombre sont de la prairie herbeuse (7), ou de la forêt décidue (2), ou sont australes (5).
    [Show full text]
  • BURSA İLİ LİMNOKARASAL TARDIGRADA FAUNASI Tufan ÇALIK
    BURSA İLİ LİMNOKARASAL TARDIGRADA FAUNASI Tufan ÇALIK T.C. ULUDA Ğ ÜN İVERS İTES İ FEN B İLİMLER İ ENST İTÜSÜ BURSA İLİ LİMNOKARASAL TARDIGRADA FAUNASI Tufan ÇALIK Yrd. Doç. Dr. Rah şen S. KAYA (Danı şman) YÜKSEK L İSANS TEZ İ BİYOLOJ İ ANAB İLİM DALI BURSA-2017 ÖZET Yüksek Lisans Tezi BURSA İLİ LİMNOKARASAL TARDIGRADA FAUNASI Tufan ÇALIK Uluda ğ Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı Danı şman: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Rah şen S. KAYA Bu çalı şmada, Bursa ili limnokarasal Tardigrada faunası ara ştırılmı ş, 6 familyaya ait 9 cins içerisinde yer alan 12 takson tespit edilmi ştir. Arazi çalı şmaları 09.06.2016 ile 22.02.2017 tarihleri arasında gerçekle ştirilmi ştir. Arazi çalı şmaları sonucunda 35 lokaliteden toplanan kara yosunu ve liken materyallerinden toplam 606 örnek elde edilmi ştir. Çalı şma sonucunda tespit edilen Cornechiniscus sp., Echiniscus testudo (Doyere, 1840), Echiniscus trisetosus Cuenot, 1932, Milnesium sp., Isohypsibius prosostomus prosostomus Thulin, 1928, Macrobiotus sp., Paramacrobiotus areolatus (Murray, 1907), Paramacrobiotus richtersi (Murray, 1911), Ramazzottius oberhaeuseri (Doyere, 1840) ve Richtersius coronifer (Richters, 1903) Bursa ilinden ilk kez kayıt edilmi ştir. Anahtar kelimeler: Tardigrada, Sistematik, Fauna, Bursa, Türkiye 2017, ix+ 85 sayfa i ABSTRACT MSc Thesis THE LIMNO-TERRESTRIAL TARDIGRADA FAUNA OF BURSA PROVINCE Tufan ÇALIK Uludag University Graduate School of Natural andAppliedSciences Department of Biology Supervisor: Asst. Prof. Dr. Rah şen S. KAYA In this study, the limno-terrestrial Tardigrada fauna of Bursa province was studied and 12 taxa in 9 genera which belongs to 6 families were identified. Field trips were conducted between 09.06.2016 and 22.02.2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 63–90 (2014)Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland 63 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland Lauri Paasivirta1 1 Ruuhikoskenkatu 17 B 5, FI-24240 Salo, Finland Corresponding author: Lauri Paasivirta ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Kahanpää | Received 10 March 2014 | Accepted 26 August 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/F3343ED1-AE2C-43B4-9BA1-029B5EC32763 Citation: Paasivirta L (2014) Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 63–90. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 Abstract A checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) recorded from Finland is presented. Keywords Finland, Chironomidae, species list, biodiversity, faunistics Introduction There are supposedly at least 15 000 species of chironomid midges in the world (Armitage et al. 1995, but see Pape et al. 2011) making it the largest family among the aquatic insects. The European chironomid fauna consists of 1262 species (Sæther and Spies 2013). In Finland, 780 species can be found, of which 37 are still undescribed (Paasivirta 2012). The species checklist written by B. Lindeberg on 23.10.1979 (Hackman 1980) included 409 chironomid species. Twenty of those species have been removed from the checklist due to various reasons. The total number of species increased in the 1980s to 570, mainly due to the identification work by me and J. Tuiskunen (Bergman and Jansson 1983, Tuiskunen and Lindeberg 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts
    Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts September 15, 2013 This report is the result of several years of field data collection, analyses and IBI development, and consideration of the opportunities for wetland program and policy development in relation to IBIs and CAPS Index of Ecological Integrity (IEI). Contributors include: University of Massachusetts Amherst Kevin McGarigal, Ethan Plunkett, Joanna Grand, Brad Compton, Theresa Portante, Kasey Rolih, and Scott Jackson Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Jan Smith, Marc Carullo, and Adrienne Pappal Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Lisa Rhodes, Lealdon Langley, and Michael Stroman Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts Abstract The purpose of this study was to develop a fully empirically-based method for developing Indices of Biotic Integrity (IBIs) that does not rely on expert opinion or the arbitrary designation of reference sites and pilot its application in forested wetlands, coastal salt marshes and wadable freshwater streams in Massachusetts. The method we developed involves: 1) using a suite of regression models to estimate the abundance of each taxon across a gradient of stressor levels, 2) using statistical calibration based on the fitted regression models and maximum likelihood methods to predict the value of the stressor metric based on the abundance of the taxon at each site, 3) selecting taxa in a forward stepwise procedure that conditionally improves the concordance between the observed stressor value and the predicted value the most and a stopping rule for selecting taxa based on a conditional alpha derived from comparison to pseudotaxa data, and 4) comparing the coefficient of concordance for the final IBI to the expected distribution derived from randomly permuted data.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Parasitism Mediate Water Mite Biogeography?
    Systematic & Applied Acarology 25(9): 1552–1560 (2020) ISSN 1362-1971 (print) https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.25.9.3 ISSN 2056-6069 (online) Article Does parasitism mediate water mite biogeography? HIROMI YAGUI 1 & ANTONIO G. VALDECASAS 2* 1 Centro de Ornitología y Biodiversidad (CORBIDI), Santa Rita 105, Lima 33. Peru. 2 Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), c/José Gutierrez Abascal, 2, 28006- Madrid. Spain. *Author for correspondence: Antonio G Valdecasas ([email protected]) Abstract The biogeography of organisms, particularly those with complex lifestyles that can affect dispersal ability, has been a focus of study for many decades. Most Hydrachnidia, commonly known as water mites, have a parasitic larval stage during which dispersal is predominantly host-mediated, suggesting that these water mites may have a wider distribution than non-parasitic species. However, does this actually occur? To address this question, we compiled and compared the geographic distribution of water mite species that have a parasitic larval stage with those that have lost it. We performed a bootstrap resampling analysis to compare the empirical distribution functions derived from both the complete dataset and one excluding the extreme values at each distribution tail. The results show differing distribution patterns between water mites with and without parasitic larval stages. However, contrary to expectation, they show that a wider geographic distribution is observed for a greater proportion of the species with a non-parasitic larval stage, suggesting a relevant role for non-host-mediated mechanisms of dispersal in water mites. Keywords: biogeography, water mites, non-parasitic larvae, parasitic larvae, worldwide distribution patterns Introduction Studies of the geographic distribution of organisms have greatly influenced our understanding of how species emerge and have provided arguments favoring the theory of evolution by natural selection proposed by Darwin (1859).
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata, 2021 1 Each Species Entry in the Checklist Is a Paragraph In- Table 2
    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2021 Edition (updated 12 February 2021) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2021 Edition (updated 12 February 2021) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009; updated February 2011, February 2012, October 2016, November 2018, and February 2021. Copyright © 2021 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009, 2011, 2012, 2016, 2018, and 2021 editions published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Male Calopteryx aequabilis, River Jewelwing, from Crab Creek, Grant County, Washington, 27 May 2020. Photo by Netta Smith. 1 1724 NE 98th Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 471 species of North American Odonata (Canada and the continental United States) considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approximate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION We publish this as the most comprehensive checklist Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, of all of the North American Odonata. Muttkowski with number of species. (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Anisoptera and Zygoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Needham, Westfall, and May (2014) and West- fall and May (2006), respectively.
    [Show full text]