DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Stance in the Caucasus and the National Security Strategy of Georgia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian Stance in the Caucasus and the National Security Strategy of Georgia View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2005-06 Russian stance in the Caucasus and the national security strategy of Georgia Barnovi, Andro Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/2190 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS RUSSIAN STANCE IN THE CAUCASUS AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY OF GEORGIA by Andro Barnovi June 2005 Thesis Advisor: Hy Rothstein Second Reader: Douglas Borer Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2005 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Russian Stance in the Caucasus and the National Security Strategy of Georgia 6. AUTHOR(S) Andro Barnovi 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 13. ABSTRACT After the independence of Georgia, declared in 1991, Moscow’s strategic stance in the Caucasus has been heavily influencing the formation of the Georgian State, and has created many problems to its security. Three separatist regimes supported by Moscow, Russian bases in Georgia, and a significant economic dependence of Georgia on Russian energy markets were the most visible components of this influence. Russian negative influence on Georgia’s security, in combination with many apparent internal problems, determined that during 14 years of independence Georgia became to exist as a failed state. After the “Rose Revolution” of 2003 this situation has changed and Georgia started to develop policies relatively independent from Moscow’s strategic preferences. This thesis tries to define the possible objectives, strategies and means of the Georgian State to achieve its final independence from Russia, exercise its sovereignty on its entire territory, and provide conditions for the prosperous development of the country and its population. The thesis examines global trends and local developments that influence Georgia’s security, and suggests recommendations for the Georgian government. 14. SUBJECT TERMS : Georgia, Russia, National Security, Strategy, Separatism, Abkhazia, South 15. NUMBER OF Ossetia, GUUAM, Caucasus, Caspian Sea PAGES 126 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UL NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. RUSSIAN STANCE IN THE CAUCASUS AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY OF GEORIGIA Andro Barnovi Civilian, Parliament of Georgia Graduate Degree, Tbilisi State University, 1996 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN DEFENSE ANALYSIS from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL June 2005 Author: Andro Barnovi Approved by: Dr. Hy Rothstein Thesis Advisor Dr. Douglas Borer Second Reader Dr. Gordon H. McCormick Chairman, Department of Defense Analysis iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv ABSTRACT After the independence of Georgia, declared in 1991, Moscow’s strategic stance in the Caucasus has been heavily influencing the formation of the Georgian State, and has created many problems to its security. Three separatist regimes supported by Moscow, Russian bases in Georgia, and a significant economic dependence of Georgia on Russian energy markets were the most visible components of this influence. Russian negative influence on Georgia’s security, in combination with many apparent internal problems, determined that during 14 years of independence Georgia became to exist as a failed state. After the “Rose Revolution” of 2003 this situation has changed and Georgia started to develop policies relatively independent from Moscow’s strategic preferences. This thesis tries to define the possible objectives, strategies and means of the Georgian State to achieve its final independence from Russia, exercise its sovereignty on its entire territory, and provide conditions for the prosperous development of the country and its population. The thesis examines global trends and local developments that influence Georgia’s security, and suggests recommendations for the Georgian government. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 A. GENERAL FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM...................................1 B. BACKGROUND CONCERNING THE PROBLEM OF INTEREST.......4 C. FOCUS OF THE STUDY ...............................................................................5 D. METHODOLOGY ..........................................................................................6 II. RUSSIAN OBJECTIVES, CIRCUMSTANCES, OUTLOOK AND MEANS IN THE RELATIONS WITH GEORGIA ................................................................9 A. EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL DIMENSIONS OF THE STRUCTURE OF RUSSIA’S SECURITY ...................................................9 B. MAIN STRATEGIC DOCUMENTS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION...............................................................................................10 C. RUSSIA’S SECURITY DILEMMA AND SPECIFIC FOREIGN POLICY QUESTIONS..................................................................................15 D. RUSSIAN INTERESTS IN THE CAUCASUS...........................................17 E. IMPLICATIONS FOR GEORGIA..............................................................20 F. RUSSIAN STRATEGY TO ACHIEVE THEIR OBJECTIVES IN GEORGIA ......................................................................................................21 G. RUSSIA’S MEANS TO ACHIEVE THEIR STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES IN GEORGIA ......................................................................24 1. Russian Diplomatic Capabilities.......................................................24 2. Russian Informational Capabilities..................................................29 3. Russia’s Economic “Sticks” ..............................................................31 4. Russia’s Military Capabilities in the Region...................................33 III. GEORGIAN NATIONAL INTERESTS, CIRCUMSTANCES, AND STRATEGY................................................................................................................37 A. GEORGIA’S NATIONAL INTERESTS.....................................................37 B. CIRCUMSTANCES: INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FACTORS INFLUENCING GEORGIA’S SECURITY ...............................................40 1. Internal Factors Influencing Georgia’s Security ............................40 a. Abkhazia..................................................................................41 b. South Ossetia...........................................................................46 c. Pankisi Gorge..........................................................................49 d. Other Minorities......................................................................51 e. Russian Military Bases in Georgia.........................................53 2. Diaspora Support to Insurgencies in Georgia.................................55 3. Refugee and IDP Influence on Separatism in Georgia...................57 4. Other Non-State Supporters of Separatism in Georgia .................57 C. GEORGIA’S RELATIVE POWER.............................................................59 1. Georgia’s Military Capabilities ........................................................59 2. Georgian Diplomatic Capabilities ....................................................62 3. Georgia’s Informational Capabilities ..............................................67 vii 4. Georgia’s Economic Capabilities......................................................71 IV. MAIN PRINCIPLES OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY AND FUTURE TASKS OF GEORGIA ............................................................................77 A. GEORGIA’S SECURITY DILEMMA........................................................77 B. FEASIBLE STRATEGIES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Russian-Georgian War: Implications for the Un and Collective Security
    OAKA Cilt:4, Sayı: 7, ss. 29-43, 2009 THE RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN WAR: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UN AND COLLECTIVE SECURITY RUSYA-GÜRCİSTAN SAVAŞI’NIN KOLLEKTİF GÜVENLİK VE BM ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ Roman MUZALEVSKY 1 ABSTRACT This paper examines UN’s involvement in Georgia following the dissolution of the Soviet Union and analyzes implications of the 2008 Russian-Georgian War for the international state system, the UN itself and collective security. It presents definitions of humanitarian intervention, self-defense, sovereignty and territorial integrity promoted by the UN as correct notions in theory but frequently conflicting concepts in practice. The war between Russia and Georgia, along with the cases of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, serves as a case study demonstrating the difficulties of regional dispute resolution when international principles conflict and geopolitics comes into play. The paper shows that the UN’s role in providing for international security after the Russian-Georgian war has been undermined and that there is a clear need for reforms within the UN, realignment of its vision, purposes, and especially principles. Better reconciling, legally and practically, the frequently exclusive conceptions of territorial integrity and self-determination, state sovereignty and humanitarian intervention is essential to help prevent or mitigate breaches of international law and collective security the UN positions but not quite serves as a sole guarantor of. Key Words: UN, Russia, Georgia, Security, International Law ÖZET Bu çalışma Sovyetlerin dağılmasını takiben Birleşmiş Milletler’in Gürcistan’a yönelik politikalarını incelemekte ve 2008 Rus-Gürcü Savaşı’nın uluslararası devlet sistemi, kollektif güvenlik ve Birleşmiş Milletler açısından etkilerini analiz etmektedir. Makale Birleşmiş Milletler tarafından desteklenen insancıl müdahale, meşru müdafaa, egemenlik ve bölgesel bütünleşme gibi kavramları teoride doğru ancak pratikte sık sık çatışan nosyonlar olarak değerlendirmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • Law of Georgia on the STATE of EMERGENCY
    Law of Georgia ON THE STATE OF EMERGENCY Article 1. 1. State of emergency is a temporary measure declared in accordance with the Georgian legislation to secure safety of citizens of Georgia in case of war, mass riot, infringement upon territorial integrity of the country, military coup d’etat, armed rebellion, ecological catastrophe, epidemic, natural calamity, gross breakdown, epizootic and in other circumstances where the public authorities are not able to normally exercises their constitutional powers. 2. Purpose of declaring a state of emergency is to normalize the situation most promptly and to restore law and order. Article 2. 1. President of Georgia may declare state of emergency on the entire territory of Georgia or in its part. 2. President of Georgia, through media, warns the population on declaring state of emergency on the entire territory of the country or in its part and within 48 hours submits his decision to the Parliament of Georgia for approval. If the Parliament refuses to approve the decision of President, the state of emergency will be considered cancelled. 3. In a state of emergency, President of Georgia issues decrees having a legal force of laws. Such decrees shall be submitted to the Parliament in 48 hours. 4. In a state of emergency, decrees issued by President of Georgia restricting human rights and freedoms prescribed in Articles 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 30, 33 and 41 of the Constitution of Georgia, shall be subject to approval by the Parliament. Text of the decree shall be aired in media within a day since it has been signed, at least once in every two hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia
    Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson SILK ROAD PAPER January 2018 Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center American Foreign Policy Council, 509 C St NE, Washington D.C. Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia- Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, Joint Center. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council and the Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study are those of
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia/Abkhazia
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ARMS PROJECT HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH/HELSINKI March 1995 Vol. 7, No. 7 GEORGIA/ABKHAZIA: VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF WAR AND RUSSIA'S ROLE IN THE CONFLICT CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................5 EVOLUTION OF THE WAR.......................................................................................................................................6 The Role of the Russian Federation in the Conflict.........................................................................................7 RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Republic of Georgia ..............................................................................................8 To the Commanders of the Abkhaz Forces .....................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Russian Federation................................................................................................8 To the Confederation of Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus...........................................................................9 To the United Nations .....................................................................................................................................9 To the Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe..........................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Bakradze Appointed As Georgian Ambassador To
    facebook.com/ georgiatoday Issue no: 888/49 • OCTOBER 18 - 20, 2016 • PUBLISHED TWICE WEEKLY PRICE: GEL 2.50 Dimitry Kumsishvili visiting reconstruction works in Gudauri In this week’s issue... Tbilisi - Ashkhabad Direct Flights to Be Launched as Part of Growing Cooperation PAGE 2 Khachapuri Index, Exchange Rate Dynamics and International Tourism ISET PAGE 4 Tbilisi Fashion FOCUS Week ON BUILDING BETTER Gudauri gets longed for water is Back system amid infrastructure PAGE 7 development works PAGE 1-2 Electricity Market Watch GALT & TAGGART PAGE 8 Bakradze Appointed as Georgian Former Diplomat Hopes Era of Messiahs Soon to Ambassador to USA End in Georgia POLITICS PAGE 11 existing relationships and the perspectives of BY THEA MORRISON strengthening cooperation between Georgia and its strategic partner, the United States. Batumi International Beach Gegeshidze’s replacement was announced by he President of Georgia, Giorgi Prime Minister of Georgia, Giorgi Kvirikashvili, Rugby Festival Short-listed for Margvelashvili, appointed David in early September. Davit Bakradze was hosted by President Bakradze, State Minister for Euro- The PM said that Bakradze had “excellent Margvelashvili Rhino Grassroots Award pean and Euro-Atlantic Integration, working experience as an ambassador among not infl uence the decision-making process.” The as the Georgia’s new Ambassador NATO member states, has huge experience President assessed his comments as “an incom- TExtraordinary and Plenipotentiary to the United regarding Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic integration petent statement from an unqualifi ed ambas- States of America (USA) on Wednesday. and his personal characteristics will also allow sador.” Bakradze, 41, replaced former ambassador to him to establish important relations.” Gegeshidze fi rst received formal criticism dur- the USA, Archil Gegeshidze, and will begin his Gegeshidze occupied the ambassador’s post ing the October 2015 visit of the Georgian Pres- new duties on December 5, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming of the Post-Soviet Georgia's Economy in 1991-2011
    Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies Center for Applied Economic Studies Reforming of the Post-Soviet Georgia’s Economy in 1991-2011 GFSIS Center for Applied Economic Studies Research Paper—03.2013 By Vladimer Papava Senior Fellow, Director of the Center for Applied Economic Studies, Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies (GFSIS), 3a, Shio Chitadze Street, Tbilisi, 0108, Republic of Georgia, Phone: (+995 32) 247-35-55 Fax: (+995 32) 298-52-65 E-mail: [email protected] www.gfsis.org www.papava.info 1 Reforming of the Post-Soviet Georgia’s Economy in 1991-2011 Vladimer Papava Abstract: Similarly to other post-Communist countries Georgia also embarked transition from a command economy to a market economy. The Georgian experience of reforming its economy should be considered interesting as the country succeeded in overcoming the hyperinflation and the economic downturn was followed with the economic growth. Successes in economic reforms were followed by stagnation, which was particularly exacerbated by the increased scale of corruption. The economic reforms, which were carried out after the ―Rose Revolution,‖ are especially interesting. Along with successful reforms of neo-liberal nature, neo-Bolshevik actions became apparent as the Government started openly infringing property rights. Keywords: economic reforms, economic development, transition to a market economy, ―Rose Revolution,‖ post-Soviet Georgia JEL Classification: P20, P21, P26, P31, P33 2 Introduction Georgia is a one of the most ancient country in the world (e.g., Lang, 1966; Metreveli, 1995), which has already made an exclusively right choice—to tie up its future with Europe, with the West (Rondeli, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Swedish Development Cooperation Within the Breakaway Region of Abkhazia, Georgia, 2011-2013 Final Report
    2013:19 Sida Decentralised Evaluation Vera Devine Susanna Dellas Jessica Rothman Ian Christoplos Review of the Swedish Development Cooperation within the Breakaway Region of Abkhazia, Georgia, 2011-2013 Final Report Review of the Swedish Development Cooperation within the Breakaway Region of Abkhazia, Georgia, 2011-2013 Final Report May 2013 Vera Devine Susanna Dellans with Jessica Rothman and Ian Christoplos Sida Decentralised Evaluation 2013:19 Sida Authors: Vera Devine and Susanna Dellans, with Jessica Rothman and Ian Christoplos The views and interpretations expressed in this report are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Sida. Sida Decentralised Evaluation 2013:18 Commissioned by The Embassy of Sweden in Georgia Copyright: Sida and the authors Date of final report: May 2013 Published by Citat 2013 Art. no. Sida61608en urn:nbn:se:sida-61608en This publication can be downloaded from: http://www.sida.se/publications SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY Address: S-105 25 Stockholm, Sweden. Office: Valhallavägen 199, Stockholm Telephone: +46 (0)8-698 50 00. Telefax: +46 (0)8-20 88 64 Postgiro: 1 56 34–9. VAT. No. SE 202100-478901 E-mail: [email protected]. Homepage: http://www.sida.se Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................. 3 Preface .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Country of Origin Information Report Republic of Georgia 25 November
    REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT Country of Origin Information Service 25 November 2010 GEORGIA 25 NOVEMBER 2010 Contents Preface Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Maps ...................................................................................................................... 1.05 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 3.01 Post-communist Georgia, 1990-2003.................................................................. 3.02 Political developments, 2003-2007...................................................................... 3.03 Elections of 2008 .................................................................................................. 3.05 Presidential election, January 2008 ................................................................... 3.05 Parliamentary election, May 2008 ...................................................................... 3.06 Armed conflict with Russia, August 2008 .......................................................... 3.09 Developments following the 2008 armed conflict.............................................. 3.10 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Sources of Secessionist War: the Interaction of Local Control and Foreign Forces in Post-Soviet Georgia
    Caucasus Survey ISSN: 2376-1199 (Print) 2376-1202 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rcau20 The sources of secessionist war: the interaction of local control and foreign forces in post-Soviet Georgia David Siroky To cite this article: David Siroky (2016) The sources of secessionist war: the interaction of local control and foreign forces in post-Soviet Georgia, Caucasus Survey, 4:1, 63-91, DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2015.1136516 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2015.1136516 Published online: 16 Feb 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 76 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 4 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rcau20 CAUCASUS SURVEY, 2016 VOL. 4, NO. 1, 63–91 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2015.1136516 The sources of secessionist war: the interaction of local control and foreign forces in post-Soviet Georgia David Siroky School of Politics and Global Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Nationalism is one of the most powerful forces in the modern world – Received 1 May 2015 but why some ethno-national groups mobilize for conflict, while Accepted 21 December 2015 others remain quiescent, remains subject to significant KEYWORDS disagreement. This paper argues that domestic politics create the Secessionist war; ethno- incentives for secession, and international forces make conflict – nationalism; external actors; feasible against a sometimes stronger military adversary the local control; state. The proposed theory unpacks this interaction of domestic ethnofederalism; Georgia; and international factors, and posits that when regional elites Abkhazia; South Ossetia; possess local control in an area that is contiguous with a potential Russia; Caucasus sponsor, external support is more feasible and more apt to lead to mobilization and conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • C R E E E S the Spring Semester Has Quickly Filled with Activities and and Slavic Events
    T h e U n i v e r s i t y o f T e x a s a t Au s t i n Center forR ussian East European E& urasian Studies Separatist Confl icts Challenge New Georgian President by Julie George NEWSMarch/ April 2005 When Mikheil Saakashvili became president of Georgia after Vol. 20 No.2 the Rose Revolution of 2003, one of his fi rst promises was to restore the territory of Georgia, reclaiming the separatist territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Current UN recognition understands both Abkhazia and South Ossetia as Georgian territory, but both operate independently Separatist Conflicts Challenge of Georgian law and influence. Of the many bold promises by the New Georgian President 1-2 young leader, the assurance of territorial unity is his most ambitious. The politics CREEES Calendar 3 of Soviet dissolution created opportunities Georgia: History, Legends, for separatism in the Myths and Stories 4-6 successor states. In Georgia, several From the Library 6 factors helped spur the secessionist Explore UT Schedule 7 movements by Abkhazia and South Outreach News 8 Ossetia. First, the i n d e p e n d e n c e CREEES News 9 movements of the Union Republics CREEES Travel 10 (such as Georgia) created a precedent Area Opportunities 11 for the Soviet ethnic autonomies to make similar claims for Map used with permission, GlobalSecurity.orgGlobalSecurity.org independence and http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/georgia.htm sovereignty, as they did in Chechnya, and Nagorno-Karabakh. Second, the The CREEES Newsletter is pub lished regularly during the academic year using politics of nationalism that helped drive Union Republic independence affected no state funds.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 0 1 8 a N N U a L R E P O
    A N N U A L R E P O R T R E P O R T B Y 2 0 1 8 T H E A T L A N T I C T R E A T Y A S S O C I A T I O N A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A publication of Atlantic Treaty Association Club Prince Albert Rue des Petits Carmes, 20-24 B- 1000 Bruxelles Tel: +32 2 502 31 60 Email: [email protected] Web: www.atahq.org 1 CONTENTS MISSION & VISION FOREWORDS ATA President ATA Secretary General NATO PUBLICATION GENERAL ASSEMBLY BUCHAREST ATA MEMBERS Albania Italy Armenia Lithuania Austria Montenegro Azerbaijan Netherlands Bosnia & Herzegovina North Macedonia Bulgaria Norway Canada Portugal Croatia Romania Estonia Serbia Georgia Slovakia Germany Slovenia Greece Spain Hungary Ukraine Iceland United States (US) Israel 2 MISSION & VISION The Atlantic Treaty Association (ATA) is an organization of 37 national chapters that, since 1954, has been conducting research, analyses, training, education, and information activities on foreign policy, security and defense issues relevant to the Atlantic Alliance. Relying on its extended and highly qualified network, ATA produces top- notch knowledge on strategic themes and promotes a variety of programs and events. ATA initiatives draw together government and institutional authorities, political leaders, decision-makers, diplomats, civilian and military officers, academics, economic actors, media representatives, as well as young professionals and researchers, in an effort to further a cooperative approach to security and international relations. 3 ATA has established cooperation programs with likeminded organizations in countries of the NATO Partnership for Peace, Mediterranean Dialogue and Istanbul Cooperation Initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime and Excessive Punishment: the Prevalence and Causes of Human Rights Abuse in Georgia’S Prisons
    CRIME AND EXCESSIVE PUNISHMENT: THE PREVALENCE AND CAUSES OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE IN GEORGIA’S PRISONS Gavin Slade Iago Kachkachishvili Lela Tsiskarishvili Nika Jeiranashvili Nino Gobronidze Advisors: Baroness Vivien Stern, Professor Andrew Coyle CRIME AND EXCESSIVE PUNISHMENT: THE PREVALENCE AND CAUSES OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE IN GEORGIA’S PRISONS Tbilisi, 2014 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The following report was made possible by generous contribution of individual experts and organizations who contributed their time and expertise. Open Society Georgia Foundation would like to extend special thanks to the authors and advisors of this report; contributing experts: Emil Adelkhanov, Giorgi Burjanadze, Mariana Chicu, Tsira Chanturia; and organizations: Article 42 of the Constitution, Georgian Center for Psychosocial and Medical Rehabilitation of Torture Victims (GCRT), Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association, Human Rights Center, Institute of Social Studies and Analysis, International Center for Prison Studies, Penal Reform International, Public Advocacy, and Youth for Justice. The Foundation would like to express gratitude to Public Defender of Georgia, to the Ministry of Corrections of Georgia, and to the Office of the Personal Data Protection Inspector, who enabled the interviewers to conduct prisoners’ survey. The Foundation would also like to thank hundreds of individuals throughout Georgia, who have participated as respondents in the survey. PREFACE In the last decade, the small south Caucasus country of Georgia has been turned into a testing ground for radical criminal justice policies. In 2003-2012, its prison population jumped by 300%, a huge increase that led to Georgia being the fourth biggest incarcerator in the world per capita by 2010. Then, following a change of government, in a three-month period, beginning at the end of 2012 around half of the 24,000- strong prison population were released in an amnesty.
    [Show full text]