DOCSLIB.ORG

Ministerial Committee Completes Its Work, Lays out Range of Options for 38 Oxley Road from Preservation to Demolition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ministerial Committee Completes Its Work, Lays out Range of Options for 38 Oxley Road from Preservation to Demolition MINISTERIAL COMMITTEE COMPLETES ITS WORK, LAYS OUT RANGE OF OPTIONS FOR 38 OXLEY ROAD FROM PRESERVATION TO DEMOLITION 1. The Ministerial Committee on 38 Oxley Road has completed its work and released its Report today. 2. The Report lays out a range of options for the Property – from preservation on one end, to demolition and redevelopment on the other. The Report does not make any recommendations and there is no need to make a decision on the Property now. The various options in the Report are meant to help a future government make an informed and considered decision when the need arises. 3. The Report addresses the Committee’s three terms of reference. First, the Committee assesses that the Property has architectural, heritage and historical significance. Second, it is the Committee’s view that while Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s preference was for the Property to be demolished, he was prepared to accept options other than demolition, provided that suitable arrangements were made to ensure that: (i) the Property was refurbished, and kept in a habitable state; and (ii) the family’s privacy was protected. Third, the Report lays out the possible plans and options for the Property, and the considerations for each of them, to serve as drawer plans for a future government. 4. Cabinet (without the Prime Minister, who had recused himself from all discussions regarding 38 Oxley Road) decided in June 2016 to task a Ministerial Committee to prepare drawer plans of various options for the Property and to consider their implications, given the public interest on this matter. Cabinet felt it would be beneficial for a future Cabinet to hear the views of those who had directly discussed the matter with Mr Lee Kuan Yew. The Report has been considered and approved by Cabinet. 5. In drawing up this Report, the Committee invited representations from Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s children, namely Mr Lee Hsien Loong, Dr Lee Wei Ling and Mr Lee Hsien Yang, in order to obtain as full a picture as possible of Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s thinking on 38 Oxley Road. A future Government can refer to this report and make a considered and informed decision when the time comes to decide on the matter. 6. The Report outlines a range of options that can be considered, as shown in the table below. Option (1) Retain the (2) Retain the Dining (3) Allow the Property Room and tear Property to be down the rest of the demolished fully, Property and allow redevelopment Sub- a) Gazette and The Dining Room a) By the owner for options preserve as a would be gazetted as residential use; or National a National Monument, b) By the State for Monument; or and integrated with an alternative use b) Gazette for alternative use for the (e.g. park, conservation site (e.g. park, heritage centre), heritage centre) after acquisition of the site Remarks Both sub-options Even if there is public Sub-option (a) could could include further access to the Dining result in the loss of a steps to significantly Room for national historically significant address Mr Lee Kuan education purposes, property, and the Yew’s concerns about demolition of the rest potential of that privacy (e.g. of the Property history being significant interior including the private leveraged for renovations of the spaces would ensure commercial profit. private spaces, and/or that the privacy of Mr with restricted and Mrs Lee Kuan access). Yew would be respected. 7. DPM Teo, the Chair of the Ministerial Committee said: “The Committee has considered a range of options for the Property as well as their implications. We did not make any recommendation because no decision is required at this point in time. Ultimately, in the fullness of time, a future Government will have the responsibility to consider the public interest aspects of the Property, taking into account Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s wishes. They will have to decide what to do with the Property and be able to carry the decision. The Committee has carefully studied the representations from Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s children. In reaching our views on Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s wishes, we relied particularly on the objective evidence placed before us and the key concrete steps that Mr Lee Kuan Yew himself took in his lifetime to put his wishes into effect. This included the demolition clause in Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s last will, his letter to Cabinet dated 27 December 2011, as well as the renovation/redevelopment plans for 38 Oxley Road which he submitted to the URA in March 2012, and obtained approval for. The work of this Ministerial Committee was thrust into the public spotlight last year. We therefore felt we owed it to Singaporeans to release our Report, explain our work, what were our findings, and the options for the Property that could be considered by a future Government. With this, we hope to close the chapter on this topic, and focus on other pressing national issues ahead of us.” 8. The Committee was chaired by Deputy Prime Minister and Coordinating Minister for National Security Teo Chee Hean, and included Cabinet members responsible for heritage, land issues and urban planning i.e. Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Grace Fu, Minister for Law K Shanmugam, and Minister for National Development Lawrence Wong. 9. The Report is attached. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 170702Mindmap Copy
    Who said what Numerous allegations have been made in the ongoing feud between Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his siblings, from misuse of power to a conict Against Lee Hsien Loong of interest in preparing the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s last will. Insight charts the Against Teo Chee Hean • Allegation: PM Lee misused his claims and accusations in the dispute over the fate of 38, Oxley Road. • Allegation: Committee focused power to prevent the house from solely on challenging validity of being demolished demolition clause in Mr Lee’s will PM’s response: Denied the DPM Teo’s response: Not true that “baseless” allegations, will refute committee bent on preventing them in a ministerial statement in demolition of the house Parliament tomorrow • Allegation: Committee did not • Allegation: PM Lee made disclose options in prior exchanges, contradictory statements about only identied members and its their father’s wishes and the house terms of reference when “forced in public and private into the daylight” Ms Indranee Rajah’s DPM Teo’s response: Nothing response: Notes that secret about committee; it is like Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s numerous other committees last will specically Cabinet sets up to consider specic accepts and Against Ho Ching Against K. Shanmugam issues acknowledges that DPM Tharman Allegation: Has a pervasive Allegation: Conict of interest demolition may not take place. • • Shanmugaratnam’s inuence on government, well being on ministerial committee, response: Cabinet has beyond her job scope having advised the late Mr Lee and • Allegation: Did not challenge the numerous committees family about the house last will in court when probate was on whole range of granted • Allegation: Removed the late Mr Mr Shanmugam’s response: issues, to help think Lee’s items from house without PM’s response: Wanted to avoid a Calls the claim ridiculous; says through difcult choices approval; represented the Prime public ght that would tarnish the nothing he said precluded him from Minister’s Ofce despite not family name serving in committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Ministerial Committee on 38 Oxley Road
    REPORT OF THE MINISTERIAL COMMITTEE ON 38 OXLEY ROAD TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Background Chapter 2: Historical and heritage significance Chapter 3: Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s thinking and wishes on the property Chapter 4: Possible options for the property Chapter 5: Committee’s views 2 CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND 1. Founding Prime Minister Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s former home at 38 Oxley Road (henceforth referred to as the “Property”) is a single-storey bungalow surrounded by low-rise residential developments. 2. The issue of whether to preserve Mr Lee’s home after his passing, to demolish it, or some other option has become a matter of public interest. Shortly after Mr Lee’s passing on 23 March 2015, PM Lee Hsien Loong addressed this issue in Parliament on 13 April 2015, where he said that “there is no immediate issue of demolition of the house, and no need for the Government to make any decision now”, given that Dr Lee Wei Ling “intended to continue living in the Property”. He also stated that “if and when Dr Lee Wei Ling no longer lives in the House, Mr Lee has stated his wishes as to what then should be done…however, it will be up to the Government of the day to consider the matter”. 3. Though there is no immediate need for a decision, given the significant public interest in the Property, the Cabinet 1 approved setting up a Ministerial Committee (“Committee”) on 1 June 2016 to consider the various options. The Committee was asked to prepare drawer plans of various options and their implications, with the benefit of views of those who had directly discussed the matter with Mr Lee, so that a future Government can refer to these plans and make a considered and informed decision when the time came to decide on the matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Sektor Pelancongan Anggar Rugi RM105 Juta, Sektor Perniagaan
    Ex-PM: Hsien Loong’s siblings trying to bring him down Free Malaysia Today July 5, 2017 The former Singapore prime minister vouches for the integrity of Lee Hsien Loong in parliamentary debate over abuse of power accusations made against the prime minister. SINGAPORE: Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong says Lee Hsien Yang’s goal is to bring his elder brother, Lee Hsien Loong, down as prime minister. Channel NewsAsia quoted the former prime minister of Singapore as saying the family feud between Hsien Loong and his two siblings had tarnished Singapore’s reputation. He asked if the two siblings were whistle-blowing in an effort to save Singapore or waging a personal vendetta against Hsien Loong. “It is now no longer a cynical parlour game. If the Lee siblings choose to squander the good name and legacy of Lee Kuan Yew and tear their relationship apart, it is tragic but a private family affair. “But if in the process of their self-destruction, they destroy Singapore too, that is a public affair.” Goh was speaking on the second day of a parliamentary discussion over a public dispute between the children of Lee Kuan Yew, following allegations by Hsien Yang and his sister Lee Wei Ling that Hsien Loong was abusing his powers to block the demolition of their 38 Oxley Road family home. Channel NewsAsia quoted Goh as saying Singaporeans were getting sick and tired of all this. “There must be a clear conclusion at the end of this debate. Either we clear the PM over the allegation on his abuse of power, or we censure him,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-Sghc-255-Pdf.Pdf
    IN THE COURT OF THREE JUDGES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE [2020] SGHC 255 Court of Three Judges/Originating Summons No 2 of 2020 In the matter of Sections 94(1) and 98(1) of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2009 Rev Ed) And In the matter of Lee Suet Fern (Lim Suet Fern), an Advocate and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Singapore Between Law Society of Singapore … Applicant And Lee Suet Fern (Lim Suet Fern) … Respondent JUDGMENT [Legal Profession] [Solicitor-client relationship] [Legal Profession] [Professional conduct] — [Breach] This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to the publisher’s duty in compliance with the law, for publication in LawNet and/or the Singapore Law Reports. Law Society of Singapore v Lee Suet Fern (alias Lim Suet Fern) [2020] SGHC 255 Court of Three Judges — Originating Summons No 2 of 2020 Sundaresh Menon CJ, Judith Prakash JA and Woo Bih Li J 13 August 2020 20 November 2020 Judgment reserved. Sundaresh Menon CJ (delivering the judgment of the court): Introduction 1 This is an application by the Law Society of Singapore (“the Law Society”) for an order pursuant to s 98(1)(a) of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2009 Rev Ed) (“the LPA”) that the respondent, Mrs Lee Suet Fern (alias Lim Suet Fern) (“the Respondent”), be subject to the sanctions provided for under s 83(1) of that Act. At the time of the proceedings before the disciplinary tribunal (“the DT”), the Respondent was an advocate and solicitor of the Supreme Court of Singapore of 37 years’ standing and practised as a director of Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC, a law corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Kuan Yew Lee Kuan Yew Blazing the Freedom Trail Blazing the Freedom Trail Lee Kuanyew
    Anthony Oei Anthony For Review onlyLEE KUAN YEW LEE KUAN YEW BLAZING THE FREEDOM TRAIL BLAZING THE FREEDOM TRAIL YEW LEE KUAN It was the 1950s, a tumultuous time for post-war Singapore. Disgruntled with the British ruling power, anti-colonial forces were calling for independence. The main contenders were the People’s Action Party led by nationalist Lee Kuan Yew and the Communist Party of Malaya headed by Chin Peng. Displaying their political acumen, Lee and his team overcame all adversities to win the people’s mandate. Lee, who became Singapore’s first Prime Minister in 1959, orchestrated the movement to build a prosperous FREEDOM TRAI Singapore. When he stepped down in 1990, he left behind B L an efficient government, world-class infrastructure and a AZING THE thriving economy. When he died in 2015, he left behind a shining Singapore as his legacy. This book is an updated and revised edition of Days of Thunder: How Lee Kuan Yew Blazed the Freedom Trail (2005). It explores Lee’s leadership during Singapore’s early years and the question: Could Singapore have L achieved as much without Lee Kuan Yew, the founding father of modern Singapore? Marshall Cavendish Editions SINGAPORE/POLITICS ISBN 978-981-4677-77-6 Exploring the leadership of Singapore’s ,!7IJ8B4-ghhhhg! first Prime Minister from 1959 to 1990 Anthony Oei For Review only LEE KUAN YEW BLAZING THE FREEDOM TRAIL QUOTES BY LEE KUAN YEW For Review only The verdict of the people is a terrifying thing. To build a country, you need passion. You will trample over us, over our dead bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks by Esm Goh Chok Tong Parliamentary Debate on Pm’S Statement on Allegation of Abuse of Power – 4 July 2017
    REMARKS BY ESM GOH CHOK TONG PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE ON PM’S STATEMENT ON ALLEGATION OF ABUSE OF POWER – 4 JULY 2017 Mdm Speaker, 1. This sad public squabble between the Lee siblings is blown out of proportion. But it has embroiled all of us. It has tarnished the reputation of Singapore and distracted the Government from far more important work. 2. Because the allegations against PM have been made by members of the Lee family, they are given weight. The public is confused and concerned, even as Singaporeans continue to trust the PM and the Government. There is thus urgency to explain, restore trust and get back on track. It is our duty and responsibility to do this, to account to our voters. 3. My main concern is neither the fate of 38 Oxley Road nor the family feud. They are far removed from the daily concerns of Singaporeans. It is the wilful attack on the integrity of our leaders and the insidious corrosion of public faith in our institutions that I want to address. The nub of the issue for us in Parliament is integrity and trust – in the Prime Minister and our system of government. Absent these, Singapore will descend to a Third World country. 4. Incorruptibility of our Government is what distinguishes Singapore. The Prime Minister is central in upholding that incorruptibility. He holds the key levers of state power, entrusted by the people. When trust in the Prime Minister disappears, his moral authority and political capital shrivel. 1 Therefore, the constant self-policing, restraint and care of the Prime Minister in wielding the immense power at his disposal, is paramount.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech by Mr Lawrence Wong, Minister for National Development and Second Minister for Finance, on Issue of the House at 38 Oxley Road
    SPEECH BY MR LAWRENCE WONG, MINISTER FOR NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SECOND MINISTER FOR FINANCE, ON ISSUE OF THE HOUSE AT 38 OXLEY ROAD Mdm Speaker, 1. I would like to speak on two matters in this debate. First, I will clarify the issue of the Deed of Gift between the executors of the estate of the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew and the National Heritage Board, as I was then the Minister for Culture, Community and Youth. Second, I will elaborate on due processes for proposals on the conservation and preservation of properties. Deed of Gift 2. First, let me touch on the deed of gift. From early 2015 onwards, NHB started planning for a major SG50 exhibition on 6 August 2015 (just before the Jubilee Weekend) and the exhibition was on Singapore’s founding leaders. Following the passing of Mr Lee Kuan Yew in March 2015, NHB was also in discussion with executors of the estate about a donation of artefacts from 38 Oxley Road which could be incorporated into the exhibition. 3. The deed of gift was not based on NHB’s standard agreement. The executors of the estate, namely Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee Wei Ling, insisted on several unusual conditions. These conditions included: - The right to buy back the items at $1 so long as the House was not demolished. - And the display of the wishes of the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew to demolish the House. 4. And as Members would have heard just now, the deed of gift required NHB to display only part of the demolition clause in Mr Lee’s will.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Kuan Yew's Thinking on 38, Oxley Road
    2011 PM Lee and his wife Ho Ching proposed to renovate the house without demolishing it. They suggested: Lee Kuan Yew’s thinking demolishing private living spaces to preserve the family’s privacy; keeping the historically signicant basement dining room; strengthening the decaying on 38, Oxley Road structure; creating a new living area. December 2011 Mr Lee accepted PM Lee’s proposal. He told the PM Lee: family it was best to redevelop the house straight away after he died, and do what PM Lee proposed. In December 2011, he In his ministerial statement, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong highlighted (Mr Lee Kuan Yew) key discussions on the family home when his father was alive, and what Dec 27, 2011 Mr Lee wrote to the Cabinet that if 38, Oxley Road told the family that it happened after Mr Lee died. was to be preserved, it needed to have its was “best to redevelop foundations reinforced and the whole building 38, Oxley Road refurbished. straight away”, after he PM Lee and Ms Ho proceeded along those lines, and kept the family fully informed. died, and do what we No one raised any objections to the plan. proposed. By redevelopment, he March 28, 2012 Oct 27, 2010 May 2011 means remove the Mr Lee signed the authorisation to submit Mr Lee wrote to the Cabinet to set on record his Mr Lee stepped down from the Cabinet a week the development application to the Urban private spaces, wish for his house to be demolished after his death. after the General Election on May 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Votes and Proceedings No. 47
    VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH PARLIAMENT OF SINGAPORE First Session MONDAY, 3 JULY 2017 No. 47 11.00 am 1 PRESENT: SPEAKER Mdm SPEAKER (Mdm HALIMAH YACOB (Marsiling-Yew Tee)). Mr AMRIN AMIN (Sembawang), Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Health. Mr ANG HIN KEE (Ang Mo Kio). Mr ANG WEI NENG (Jurong). Mr AZMOON AHMAD (Nominated Member). Mr BAEY YAM KENG (Tampines), Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth. Miss CHERYL CHAN WEI LING (Fengshan). Mr CHAN CHUN SING (Tanjong Pagar), Minister, Prime Minister's Office and Government Whip. Mr CHEE HONG TAT (Bishan-Toa Payoh), Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Communications and Information and Ministry of Health. Mr CHEN SHOW MAO (Aljunied). Miss CHENG LI HUI (Tampines). Ms CHIA YONG YONG (Nominated Member). Mr CHARLES CHONG (Punggol East), Deputy Speaker. Mr CHONG KEE HIONG (Bishan-Toa Payoh). Mr DESMOND CHOO (Tampines). Mr THOMAS CHUA KEE SENG (Nominated Member). Mr DARRYL DAVID (Ang Mo Kio). No. 47 3 JULY 2017 2 Mr CHRISTOPHER DE SOUZA (Holland-Bukit Timah). Mr CEDRIC FOO CHEE KENG (Pioneer). Ms FOO MEE HAR (West Coast). Ms GRACE FU HAI YIEN (Yuhua), Minister for Culture, Community and Youth and Leader of the House. Mr GAN KIM YONG (Chua Chu Kang), Minister for Health. Mr GAN THIAM POH (Ang Mo Kio). Mr GANESH RAJARAM (Nominated Member). Mr GOH CHOK TONG (Marine Parade). Assoc Prof DANIEL GOH PEI SIONG (Non-Constituency Member). Mr HENG CHEE HOW (Jalan Besar), Senior Minister of State, Prime Minister's Office. Mr HENG SWEE KEAT (Tampines), Minister for Finance.
    [Show full text]
  • Contradictions and Compromises in Preserving Values at Lee Kuan Yew’S Oxley Road Home, Singapore
    “WHEN I’M DEAD, DEMOLISH IT”: CONTRADICTIONS AND COMPROMISES IN PRESERVING VALUES AT LEE KUAN YEW’S OXLEY ROAD HOME, SINGAPORE Cherie-Nicole Leo Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Historic Preservation Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Columbia University (May, 2016) L e o | i Abstract Since the death of Singapore’s founding prime minister, Lee Kuan Yew, on March 23, 2015, the fate of his house at 38 Oxley Road remains in question. In spite of its association to this seminal political leader and the fact that historic meetings that led to Singapore’s independence from British rule in 1959 were held in its basement dining room, heritage authorities and the Singaporean public are faced with a dilemma because Lee Kuan Yew had, on multiple occasions, expressed his wish to have the more-than-a- century-old colonial bungalow demolished after his passing—and he had included this wish in his last will and testament. This thesis uses the ongoing debate surrounding 38 Oxley Road as a case study. It aims to address how decision-makers in the heritage conservation field might more effectively negotiate the multiplicity of competing values ascribed to heritage sites in working toward a future common good. Through a discourse analysis, the thesis examines how a values-based approach to heritage conservation can serve as a basis for exploring more robust tools for decision-making through the adoption of a more future-looking, scenario-focused framework. In this way, heritage decision-makers are challenged to look beyond some of the field’s traditional paradigms, as reflective of the broad shift from more expert-driven materials-based approaches to more participatory and contextually aware values-based approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Dr LWL Was to Live
    IN THE GENERAL DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE [2021] SGHC 87 Originating Summons No 916 of 2020 Between (1) Lee Wei Ling (2) Lee Hsien Yang … Plaintiffs And (1) Law Society of Singapore … Defendant JUDGMENT [Legal Profession] — [Disciplinary procedures] [Legal Profession] — [Disciplinary proceedings] [Legal Profession] — [Professional conduct] TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 FACTS...............................................................................................................2 THE WILLS.......................................................................................................2 THE BENEFICIARIES’ QUERIES AND MS KWA’S EMAILS IN RESPONSE ..............3 THE EXECUTORS’ REQUEST FOR DOCUMENTS..................................................5 THE LETTER OF COMPLAINT AND THIS APPLICATION .......................................6 DECISION ........................................................................................................8 LEGAL CONTEXT OF APPLICATION .....................................................8 ROLE OF THE INQUIRY COMMITTEE...............................................................10 ROLE OF THE COUNCIL..................................................................................13 ROLE OF THE COURT IN S 96 APPLICATIONS...................................................15 THE FIRST COMPLAINT...........................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • A Special Exhibition on Singapore's Founding Leaders Opens at The
    Embargoed for release until 7pm, 21 September 2015 A Special Exhibition on Singapore’s Founding Leaders Opens at the National Museum of Singapore Highlights include artefacts from a major donation from the Estate of Lee Kuan Yew, as well as donations and loans from the families of other founding leaders. SINGAPORE, 21 September 2015 – For the first time, an exhibition that chronicles the contributions made by the nation’s founding team of leaders in the first 10 pivotal years (1965 to 1975) of Singapore’s independence, will open to the public from 22 September 2015. Entitled We Built A Nation, the exhibition seeks to provide a better understanding of this crucial period in Singapore’s history, and to pay tribute to our founding team of leaders who helped to build modern Singapore. Through eight sections, the exhibition brings visitors through the important roles played by our founding leaders in developing Singapore’s economy, foreign policy and diplomacy, security and defence, education and infrastructure. It also highlights the milestone events leading up to Singapore’s separation from Malaysia, as well as the first 10 years of nation building after independence. The exhibition showcases over 100 artefacts and items, many of which have never been seen before, such as private and official documents, archival images, state gifts and personal items. Many of the artefacts were donated by the Estate of Lee Kuan Yew. These bear testament to the simple and disciplined lifestyle of Mr Lee Kuan Yew and pay tribute to his legacy as Singapore’s founding Prime Minister. In addition, the exhibition features a recently de-classified secret document, the Albatross Separation File from Dr Goh Keng Swee, which offers a perspective of the negotiations leading up to separation.
    [Show full text]