DOCSLIB.ORG

Capitol View

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capitol View Capitol View VOLUME 2, NUMBER 10 NOVEMBER 2004 Election On Tuesday, November 2, the Republican Party solidified its dominance of the Federal Government by reelecting President Bush by a comfortable popular vote margin of 51% to 48%, and extending its voting majorities in both the Senate and the House. These are victories of historic proportions. President Bush is the first President to be reelected and also gain seats in the Senate and House since Franklin Roosevelt in 1936. In doing so, he received more popular votes than any Presidential candidate in history. The Republicans have now been in control of the House for a decade and have assured their continued control for at least the next two years. The last time the Republicans controlled the House for a 12 year span concluded in January of 1933. Total voter turnout, including provisional and absentee ballots, was nearly 120 million voters. This represents the highest percentage of voter turnout in over three decades. Democrats needed to pick up 12 seats to gain control of the House but they probably lost a net of 4 seats from their current number. Democrats lost 4 House seats in the Texas delegation alone, including the dean of the Texas delegation, Representative Marty Frost (D-TX). The only major upset on the Republican side of the aisle was the defeat of the longest serving Republican in the House – Representative Philip Crane (R-IL). While some individual elections are still undecided, Republicans will occupy at least 231 seats, more than enough to control the House agenda and its 24 Committees. Democrats will hold at least 200 seats. The Leadership of both parties in the House will be returning in the next Congress. Dennis Hastert (R-IL), Tom DeLay (R-TX), Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Steny Hoyer (D-MD) all were easily re-elected. In the Senate, Republicans extended their majority from the present 51 to 55 Senators. There will be 44 Democratic Senators and one Independent. While this is still short of the 60 votes needed for a filibuster-proof Senate, it places Republicans in firm control of the agenda in the 109th Congress. Among the more prominent Democratic casualties was the Minority Leader, Senator Tom Daschle (D-SD). After a quarter century in Congress, Daschle was defeated by Representative John Thune (R-SD) in an enormous voter turnout, estimated to exceed 80% of South Dakota's eligible voters. Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) is expected to run to succeed Daschle as Minority Leader. Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Byron Dorgan (D-ND) are expected to compete for the Democratic Whip's position. Democrats were able to replace retiring Republican Senator Peter Fitzgerald of Illinois with Barack Obama who defeated Alan Keyes with 70% of the vote. Obama will be only the fifth African American ever elected to the Senate. Republicans captured formerly Democratic open seats in Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Louisiana. David Vitter became the first Louisiana Republican to win a seat in the Senate since Reconstruction. VALUE ADDED, VALUES DRIVEN.SM CAPITOL VIEW NOVEMBER 2004 2 What was once the solid South in terms of the Democratic Party's dominance in that region's Senate delegations has now been finally transformed to a South that is solidly Republican. While Republicans will, of course, maintain control of all Senate Committees, several current Chairmen will be replaced because of Republican Caucus term limit rules. Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) will replace Orin Hatch (R-UT) as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee; Thad Cochran (R-MS) will take over the Appropriations Committee from Ted Stevens (R-AL), who will, in turn, assume the chairmanship of the Commerce Committee from John McCain (R-AZ). Senator McCain will probably become the Chairman of the Committee on Indian Affairs. Either Pat Roberts (R-KS) or more likely Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) will take over Thad Cochran's Chair at the Agriculture Committee. The outcome of the elections will likely result in the continuation of the intense partisan divide which has plagued the Senate for the most recent sessions of Congress. This is particularly the case when as many as three Supreme Court nominations may be made in President Bush's second term. The confirmation process could be extremely bitter. President Bush has indicated he intends to submit proposals to the new Congress to reform Social Security, the tax code and the health care system. He will also urge modification of the tort system, particularly medical malpractice reform, a comprehensive energy reform bill and extension of the No Child Left Behind concepts to secondary schools. The First Session of the 109th Congress convenes in January of 2005. __________________________________________________________________________________________ Lame Duck The Congress returns the week of November 15 for a post election lame duck session. This is the 14th lame duck session since the adoption of the 20th Amendment to the Constitution in 1933 which moved the date for convening a session of Congress from the "first Monday in December" to the "third day in January." It was the intention of that section of the 20th Amendment to largely eliminate lame duck sessions. Obviously, it has not been entirely successful in achieving this goal. In fact, lame duck sessions have been held in each of the last three Congresses. This year the lame duck session will be devoted to enacting the nine remaining appropriations bills most likely by combining them into an omnibus appropriation vehicle, raising the debt ceiling and possibly passing the conference report on legislation to reorganize the nation's intelligence services. While the full list of accomplishments for the 108th Congress will not be known for sure until adjournment sine die, it is highly likely that many of the major pieces of legislation considered at some point during the Congress will not see final enactment. These include bills to institute comprehensive reform of the nation's energy sector (S.2095), reauthorize the surface transportation program (H.R.3550), extend welfare reform (H.R.4), establish a streamlined administrative procedure for handling asbestos litigation (S.2290), class action reform (S.1751), limitation on medical malpractice awards (S.11), and a Constitutional Amendment to ban same sex marriages (S.J.Res.40). VALUE ADDED, VALUES DRIVEN.SM CAPITOL VIEW NOVEMBER 2004 3 Many of these measures passed in the House only to fail to be considered by the Senate. This contributes to a certain level of frustration and resentment among some Members of the House towards the ways of the Senate. It is a well established Congressional tradition. During its first session in the Spring of 1789, the Senate spent weeks considering various matters of protocol. Always cognizant of its role as the "upper body," the Senate settled on a plan for exchanging messages with the House. The plan called for the Senate Secretary to deliver legislation and other messages to the House but required legislation being sent by the House to the Senate to be brought over by two sitting Members of the House. Other non-legislative messages could be delivered to the Senate by one sitting Member. When presented to the House, the Senate proposal was greeted with laughter and hoots of derision. The House dispatched its Clerk to deliver its response to the Senate. Kevin Faley is the Editor of Capitol View and a partner in Venable's Legislative Practice Group. Mr. Faley can be reached at 202-344-4706. __________________________________________________________________________________________ Birch Bayh Leads Delegation Our partner, Birch Bayh, headed the American delegation to a conference co-hosted by the Italian Patent and Trademark Office (UIBM) together with the U.S. Embassy in Rome, from October 4-5 in Venice. The conference was entitled "Technology Transfer: The U.S. Experience, Italy's Case and the Future." Birch was one of the three keynote speakers opening the conference. He also moderated a panel on the U.S. Technology Transfer System with Ann Hammersla, Director, Office of Intellectual Property Counsel, MIT and President of the Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), John Raubitschek, Patent Counsel at the Department of Commerce, and Bonnie Harbinger, Deputy Director of the Office of Technology Transfer at the National Institute of Health. While in Venice, Birch also met with the Honorable Antonio Marzano, Minister of Productive Activities in Italy. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Dan Lungren Wins Election On Tuesday, November 2, Dan Lungren, a partner in Venable’s Legislative Practice Group, won his election to a seat in the House for the 109th Congress. Dan will be representing the Third Congressional District of California. __________________________________________________________________________________________ ### Capitol View is published by the Legislative Practice Group of the law firm Venable LLP, 575 7th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004-1601. Internet address: http://www.venable.com. It is not intended to provide legal advice or opinion. Such advice may only be given when related to specific fact situations. Editor: Kevin O. Faley Associate Editor: Kyle Miller VALUE ADDED, VALUES DRIVEN.SM CAPITOL VIEW NOVEMBER 2004 4 Questions and comments concerning materials in the newsletter should be directed to Kevin Faley at [email protected]. Please direct address changes to Kyle Miller at [email protected]. VALUE ADDED, VALUES DRIVEN.SM .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2012 Election Preview: the Projected Impact on Congressional Committees
    2012 Election Preview: the Projected Impact on Congressional Committees K&L Gates LLP 1601 K Street Washington, DC 20006 +1.202.778.9000 October 2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1-2 Introduction 3 House Key Code 4 House Committee on Administration 5 House Committee on Agriculture 6 House Committee on Appropriations 7 House Committee on Armed Services 8 House Committee on the Budget 9 House Committee on Education and the Workforce 10 House Committee on Energy and Commerce 11 House Committee on Ethics 12 House Committee on Financial Services 13 House Committee on Foreign Affairs 14 House Committee on Homeland Security 15 House Committee on the Judiciary 16 House Committee on Natural Resources 17 House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 18 House Committee on Rules 19 House Committee on Science, Space and Technology 20 House Committee on Small Business 21 House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 22 House Committee on Veterans' Affairs 23 House Committee on Ways and Means 24 House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 25 © 2012 K&L Gates LLP Page 1 Senate Key Code 26 Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 27 Senate Committee on Appropriations 28 Senate Committee on Armed Services 29 Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs 30 Senate Committee on the Budget 31 Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 32 Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 33 Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works 34 Senate Committee on Finance 35 Senate Committee on Foreign
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers of the House: Elections, 1913-2021
    Speakers of the House: Elections, 1913-2021 Updated January 25, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL30857 Speakers of the House: Elections, 1913-2021 Summary Each new House elects a Speaker by roll call vote when it first convenes. Customarily, the conference of each major party nominates a candidate whose name is placed in nomination. A Member normally votes for the candidate of his or her own party conference but may vote for any individual, whether nominated or not. To be elected, a candidate must receive an absolute majority of all the votes cast for individuals. This number may be less than a majority (now 218) of the full membership of the House because of vacancies, absentees, or Members answering “present.” This report provides data on elections of the Speaker in each Congress since 1913, when the House first reached its present size of 435 Members. During that period (63rd through 117th Congresses), a Speaker was elected six times with the votes of less than a majority of the full membership. If a Speaker dies or resigns during a Congress, the House immediately elects a new one. Five such elections occurred since 1913. In the earlier two cases, the House elected the new Speaker by resolution; in the more recent three, the body used the same procedure as at the outset of a Congress. If no candidate receives the requisite majority, the roll call is repeated until a Speaker is elected. Since 1913, this procedure has been necessary only in 1923, when nine ballots were required before a Speaker was elected.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Advisory Boards Commissions, and Groups
    CONGRESSIONAL ADVISORY BOARDS COMMISSIONS, AND GROUPS BOARD OF VISITORS TO THE AIR FORCE ACADEMY [Title 10, U.S.C., Section 9355(a)] Ernest F. Hollings, of South Carolina C.W. Bill Young, of Florida Max Cleland, of Georgia Joel Hefley, of Colorado Wayne Allard, of Colorado BOARD OF VISITORS TO THE MILITARY ACADEMY [Title 10, U.S.C., Section 4355(a)] Jack Reed, of Rhode Island Charles H. Taylor, of North Carolina Mary Landrieu, of Louisiana Sue Kelly, of New York Rick Santorum, of Pennsylvania BOARD OF VISITORS TO THE NAVAL ACADEMY [Title 10, U.S.C., Section 6968(a)] Paul Sarbanes, of Maryland Wayne T. Gilchrest, of Maryland Barbara Mikulski, of Maryland Joe Skeen, of New Mexico John McCain, of Arizona BOARD OF VISITORS TO THE COAST GUARD ACADEMY [Title 14 U.S.C., Section 194(a)] Ernest F. Hollings, of South Carolina Rob Simmons, of Connecticut Patty Murray, of Washington Gene Taylor, of Mississippi John McCain, of Arizona Peter G. Fitzgerald, of Illinois BOARD OF VISITORS TO THE MERCHANT MARINE ACADEMY [Title 46 U.S.C., Section 1295(b)] John Edwards, of North Carolina Peter T. King, of New York John Breaux, of Louisiana John McCain, of Arizona Olympia J. Snowe, of Maine 485 486 Congressional Directory BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS [Created by Public Law 103–236] 330 Independence Avenue SW, Suite 3360, 20237 phone 401–3736, fax 401–6605 Chairman.—Marc Nathanson. GOVERNORS Tom Korologos Cheryl Halpern Edward Kaufman Colin Powell Robert Mark Ledbetter (ex officio) Norman Pattiz STAFF Executive Director.—Brian Conniff. Legal Counsel.—Carol Booker.
    [Show full text]
  • CBS NEWS POLL for Release: Sunday, January 7Th, 2007 10:30 A.M
    CBS NEWS POLL For Release: Sunday, January 7th, 2007 10:30 a.m. EST VIEWS ON THE LEADERS OF THE 110TH CONGRESS January 1-3, 2007 As the 110th Congress gets underway, the new Democratic leaders of both the House of Representatives and the Senate remain unfamiliar to most Americans. More than seven in 10 Americans are undecided or haven’t heard enough about Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat and the first woman Speaker of the House, to have an opinion of her. Those who do have an opinion are divided: 14% of Americans view her favorably, while 12% view her unfavorably. As expected, Democrats are more likely than Republicans to view Pelosi favorably. 24% of Democrats have a favorable opinion of the Speaker, while 30% of Republicans hold a negative view of her. OPINION OF NANCY PELOSI All Rep. Dem. Ind. 10/2006 Favorable 14% 3% 24% 12% 10% Not Favorable 12 30 2 9 17 Undecided/haven’t heard enough 74 67 74 79 71 Both men and women are divided in their opinions of Pelosi, and most can’t evaluate her. Speaker Pelosi, who represents the eighth district of California, gets a 26% favorable rating from Americans residing in the western portion of the country – the highest rating of any region. In October 2006, just prior to the mid-term elections, Americans were asked about then-Speaker Dennis Hastert. Like Pelosi, he was unfamiliar to most. The new Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, is even more unknown to the public than Speaker Pelosi. 86% of Americans are undecided or haven’t heard enough about Reid.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Stephen Johnson to Governor Schwarzenegger Denying
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 DEC 1 9 2007 OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR The Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor of the State of California State Capitol Sacramento, California 95814 Dear Governor Schwarzenegger, As I have committed to you in previous correspondence, I am writing to inform you of my decision with respect to the request for a waiver of Federal preemption for motor vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). As you know, EPA undertook an extensive public notice and comment process with regard to the waiver request. The Agency held two public hearings: one on May 22, 2007 in Washington, D.C. and one in Sacramento, California on May 30, 2007. We heard from over 80 individuals at these hearings and received thousands of written comments during the ensuing public comment process from parties representing a broad set of interests, including state and local governments, public health and environmental organizations, academia, industry and citizens. The Agency also received and considered a substantial amount of technical and scientific material submitted after the close of the comment deadline on June 15, 2007. EPA has considered and granted previous waivers to California for standards covering pollutants that predominantly affect local and regional air quality. In contrast, the current waiver request for greenhouse gases is far different; it presents numerous issues that are distinguishable from all prior waiver requests. Unlike other air pollutants covered by previous waivers, greenhouse gases are fundamentally global in nature. Greenhouse gases contribute to the problem of global climate change, a problem that poses challenges for the entire nation and indeed the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Howard Senior Vice President, Congressional and Public Affairs U.S
    Jack Howard Senior Vice President, Congressional and Public Affairs U.S. Chamber of Commerce Jack Howard is senior vice president of the Congressional and Public Affairs Division at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The division includes a team of 15 lobbyists in Washington, D.C., as well as seven regional offices charged with providing membership services and grassroots lobbying. Howard is responsible for developing the strategy and leading the tactical execution of the Chamber’s congressional lobbying activities, coordinating resources in Washington and around the country, and ensuring that the division’s mission and objectives align with those of the Chamber. With more than 25 years of government service, Howard served in the White House as deputy assistant to President George W. Bush. He worked in the Office of Legislative Affairs where he coordinated the efforts of senior-level White House officials, Cabinet departments, and agencies to secure congressional passage of President Bush’s legislative priorities. Earlier, he served in the White House under President George H.W. Bush from 1989 to 1992, also in the Office of Legislative Affairs, where he had similar responsibilities. Howard’s extensive experience also includes having worked at the highest levels of Congress and having served as senior counsel and adviser to Republican leaders of the House and Senate, including Speakers Dennis Hastert and Newt Gingrich as well as Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott. His experience earned him recognition as an inside leader in Washington. National Journal named him one of the “Top 50 Bush White House staff members.” Roll Call, the newspaper of Capitol Hill, regularly acknowledged Howard among the “Top 50 Congressional staff members.” Before joining the Chamber, Howard was vice chairman and chief operating officer of Wexler & Walker Public Policy Associates, a lobbying and consulting firm specializing in international affairs and trade advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Plea Agreement
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA No. 15 CR 315 v. Judge Thomas M. Durkin JOHN DENNIS HASTERT PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, ZACHARY T. FARDON, and defendant JOHN DENNIS HASTERT, and his attorneys, THOMAS C. GREEN and JOHN N. GALLO, is made pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The parties to this Agreement have agreed upon the following: Charges in This Case 2. The indictment in this case charges defendant with knowingly and willfully making materially false statements and representations in a matter within the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001(a)(2) (Count 1), and knowingly structuring currency transactions to evade reporting requirements, in violation of Title 31, United States Code, Section 5324(a)(3) (Count 2). 3. Defendant has read the charges against him contained in the indictment, and those charges have been fully explained to him by his attorneys. 4. Defendant fully understands the nature and elements of the crimes with which he has been charged. Charge to Which Defendant Is Pleading Guilty 5. By this Plea Agreement, defendant agrees to enter a voluntary plea of guilty to Count 2 of the indictment. Count 2 charges defendant with knowingly and for the purpose of evading the reporting requirements of Title 31, United States Code, Section 5313(a) and regulations prescribed thereunder, structuring and assisting in structuring currency transactions, in violation of Title 31, United States Code, Section 5324(a)(3).
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Proposals for the 109Th Congress
    Order Code RL33237 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Congressional Gifts and Travel: Legislative Proposals for the 109th Congress January 17, 2006 Mildred Amer Specialist in American National Government Government and Finance Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Congressional Gifts and Travel: Legislative Proposals for the 109th Congress Summary It has been a decade since the House and Senate examined their rules on the acceptance of gifts and travel expenses. Press accounts of alleged excesses in privately funded congressional travel and gifts, particularly from lobbyists, have provided an impetus for proposed changes in the 109th Congress. Legislative proposals introduced thus far and related to congressional gifts and travel all focus on some aspect of lobbyists and lobbying and include changes to (1) requirements for the disclosure reports required by the Lobbying Disclosure Act; (2) permissible gifts given to Members of Congress under the current congressional gift rules; and (3) the various types of officially-connected travel Members, officers, and employees of Congress are allowed under current rules. The bills addressing some or all of these issues in the 109th Congress are H.R. 2412, introduced by Representative Martin Meehan; H.R. 3177, introduced by Representative George Miller; S. 1398, introduced by Senator Russ Feingold; S. 2128, introduced by Senator John McCain; and H.R. 4575, introduced by Representative Christopher Shays. This report provides an analysis of the proposals for change introduced or discussed in the 109th Congress and will be updated as events warrant. For additional information, please refer to CRS Report RL33065, Lobbying Disclosure: Background and Legislative Proposals, 109th Congress, by Eric Peterson, and CRS Report RL33234, Lobbying Disclosure and Ethics Proposals Related to Lobbying Introduced in the 109th Congress, A Comparative Analysis, by Eric Peterson.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Bank Primary Campaign Spending for Governor Since 1978
    Breaking the Bank Primary Campaign Spending for Governor since 1978 California Fair Political Practices Commission • September 2010 Breaking the Bank a report by the California Fair Political Practices Commission September 2010 California Fair Political Practices Commission 428 J Street, Suite 620 Sacramento, CA 95814 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Cost-per-Vote Chart 8 Primary Election Comparisons 10 1978 Gubernatorial Primary Election 11 1982 Gubernatorial Primary Election 13 1986 Gubernatorial Primary Election 15 1990 Gubernatorial Primary Election 16 1994 Gubernatorial Primary Election 18 1998 Gubernatorial Primary Election 20 2002 Gubernatorial Primary Election 22 2006 Gubernatorial Primary Election 24 2010 Gubernatorial Primary Election 26 Methodology 28 Appendix 29 Executive Summary s candidates prepare for the traditional general election campaign kickoff, it is clear Athat the 2010 campaign will shatter all previous records for political spending. While it is not possible to predict how much money will be spent between now and November 2, it may be useful to compare the levels of spending in this year’s primary campaign with that of previous election cycles. In this report, “Breaking the Bank,” staff of the Fair Political Practices Commission determined the spending of each candidate in every California gubernatorial primary since 1978 and calculated the actual spending per vote cast—in 2010 dollars—as candidates sought their party’s nomination. The conclusion: over time, gubernatorial primary elections have become more costly and fewer people turnout at the polls. But that only scratches the surface of what has happened since 19781. Other highlights of the report include: Since 1998, the rise of the self-funded candidate has dramatically increased the cost of running for governor in California.
    [Show full text]
  • House Speaker Job Requires Many Hats Paul Ryan Has Never Worn - the New York Times 10/28/15, 4:17 PM
    House Speaker Job Requires Many Hats Paul Ryan Has Never Worn - The New York Times 10/28/15, 4:17 PM http://nyti.ms/1KELLUT POLITICS House Speaker Job Requires Many Hats Paul Ryan Has Never Worn By JENNIFER STEINHAUER and CARL HULSE OCT. 28, 2015 WASHINGTON — To most Americans, the speaker of the House is the man (and in one case, the woman) sitting next to the vice president during the State of the Union address to Congress, and the one who goes on television now and then to denounce the opposing party’s ideas. But the speaker’s daily duties, by dint of House rules, traditions and institutional realities, are myriad and relentless. He oversees legislative strategy sessions, reaches out to the Senate and the White House on pending bills and negotiations, oversees the Capitol (“A chunk of plaster just fell on someone’s head!”), unveils statues and fends off a sometimes-adversarial news media. And of course he raises money and more money. The role is one part landlord, the person who opens the House doors most days. It is another part partisan politician, who must help coordinate his party’s messaging and legislative goals. And it is a final part parent to 434 other members, who must be told in excruciating terms exactly why they need to vote the way a speaker wishes, or who come as supplicants wanting to be placed next to someone important at an event. For Representative Paul D. Ryan, the man who is set to be voted into the office this week, many of those traditions are as foreign as his beloved Brett Favre of the Green Bay Packers playing in a Vikings’ uniform.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Reps All Formatted
    Representative in Congress 1st Congressional District Lawrence R. Pamela Mike Thompson* Wiesner Elizondo DEM REP GRN Del Norte 5,261 3,657 241 Humboldt 43,081 17,164 3,754 Lake 15,572 7,875 839 Mendocino 25,452 9,180 2,535 Napa 38,329 14,959 1,667 Sonoma 21,990 9,584 1,481 Yolo 39,681 17,551 3,118 District Totals 189,366 79,970 13,635 Percent 67.0% 28.2% 4.8% 2nd Congressional District Mike Johnson Wally Herger* DEM REP Butte 32,750 43,945 Colusa 1,670 4,206 Glenn 2,611 6,586 Shasta 20,857 54,858 Siskiyou 6,387 13,920 Sutter 8,440 20,975 Tehama 6,555 16,123 Trinity 2,324 4,006 Yolo 3,306 5,337 Yuba 5,410 12,163 District Totals 90,310 182,119 Percent 33.1% 66.9% 3rd Congressional District Douglas Arthur Gabe Castillo Dan Lungren Tuma DEM REP LIB Alpine 300 335 34 Amador 5,516 11,212 583 Calaveras 6,861 14,000 967 Sacramento 85,211 148,505 7,520 Solano 2,137 3,686 206 District Totals 100,025 177,738 9,310 Percent 34.8% 62.0% 3.2% 4th Congressional District David I. Winters John T. Doolittle* DEM REP Butte 6,152 10,413 El Dorado 28,468 55,070 Lassen 2,838 8,312 Modoc 1,055 3,237 Nevada 21,682 29,695 10 Representative in Congress 4th Congressional District (cont.) Placer 48,969 97,518 Plumas 3,429 7,253 Sacramento 4,259 9,116 Sierra 591 1,312 District Totals 117,443 221,926 Percent 34.6% 65.4% 5th Congressional District Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Redistricting and Congressional Control Following the 2012 Election
    Redistricting and Congressional Control Following the 2012 Election By Sundeep Iyer On Election Day, Republicans maintained control of the House of Representatives. While two Congressional races remain undecided as of November 20, it appears that Democrats may have picked up about eight seats during the 2012 election,1 falling well short of the 25 seats Democrats needed to take back control of the House. Before the election, the Brennan Center estimated that redistricting would allow Republicans to maintain long-term control of 11 more seats in the House than they would have under the previous district lines.2 Now that the election is complete, it is worth re-examining the influence of redistricting on the results of the 2012 election. This brief assesses how the new district lines affected the partisan balance of power in the House. The report is the prologue to more extensive analyses, which will examine other aspects of redistricting, including the fairness of the process and its effect on minority representation, among others. Based on our initial analysis of the 2012 election, several important trends emerge: • Redistricting may have changed which party won the election in at least 25 House districts. Because of redistricting, it is likely that the GOP won about six more seats overall in 2012 than they would have under the old district lines. • Where Republicans controlled redistricting, the GOP likely won 11 more seats than they would have under the old district lines, including five seats previously held by Democrats. Democrats also used redistricting to their advantage, but Republicans redrew the lines for four times as many districts as Democrats.
    [Show full text]