DOCSLIB.ORG

Park Rankings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PAGE 1 OF 4 Park Scoring Database // Note that the scores in this database are intended to be recalculated each year to factor in new demographic data and changes in park and community conditions. As a result, the Investment Priority Ranking may change. KEY INFORMATION BASIC INFO COMMUNITY NEED SCORES SITE NEED SCORES ENVIRONMENTAL OVERLAY SCORES The final Investment Priority Score is the The final Community Need Score is the sum of the Race & Poverty Score, Youth & Seniors The final Site Need Score is the sum of the Site These scores are not included in the final Investment Priority Score. sum of the Community Need Score and the Score, Neighborhood Condition Score, and Resident Health Score. Condition Score and the Investment Need Score, Below, air quality scores and sewershed priorities were shaded according Site Need Score. The Investment Priority multiplied by two so that it is weighted equal to the to their severity; darker red shading indicates higher scores / priorities. Ranking is assigned to non-passive city final Community Need Score. parks in order of their final score. Capital Investment projects will occur in order of the ranking. INVESTMENT INVESTMENT Site name and section Site split Site category Rec Site's Site acres Walkshed Walkshed RACE & YOUTH & N’HOOD RESIDENT COMMUNITY SITE INVESTMENT SITE NEED BLACK TREE AIR QUALITY SEWERSHED PRIORITY PRIORITY Large sites are split into multiple areas, specified by a description in parentheses into multiple Facility? primary acres qualifies as a POVERTY SENIORS CONDITION HEALTH NEED SCORE CONDITION NEED SCORE CARBON CANOPY SCORE PRIORITY SCORE RANKING sections? council Racially- 100 = Highest 100 = Highest 100 = Highest 100 = Highest 400 = Highest 100 = Poor 100 = Greatest 400 = Highest 100 = Highest 100 = Lowest 200 = Highest 800 = Highest Parks are ranked district Concentrated concentration of youth & senior rates of vacancy rates of select possible combined 66.6 = Fair investment need possible average black percent tree possible according to their 33.3 = Good combined site carbon levels (by canopy (by combined black possible combined Area of Poverty? high poverty and population & violent crime major medical community need community and site highest scoring section; non-white issues score 0 = Excellent need score walkshed) walkshed) carbon & tree Passive Sites are not need score residents canopy scores ranked 724 1 Baxter Park No Neighborhood Park 9 2.4 253.0 Yes 76 85 89 91 340 100 92 384 64 73 137 Secondary 622 2 McKinley Park (North Center) Yes Community Park 4 78.5 147.3 No 16 87 44 82 229 100 96 392 52 51 103 None 673 2 McKinley Park (Northeast) Yes Community Park 4 78.5 133.9 Yes 78 79 42 82 281 100 96 392 54 60 113 None 618 2 McKinley Park (Northwest) Yes Community Park 4 78.5 46.1 No 12 86 45 82 225 100 96 392 53 48 101 None 502 2 McKinley Park (Skate Park and Courts) Yes Community Park 4 78.5 63.4 No 18 0 9 82 109 100 96 392 74 31 105 None 583 2 McKinley Park (South) Yes Community Park 4 78.5 134.4 No 17 70 21 82 190 100 96 392 50 64 115 None 671 3 Spring Hill Park No Neighborhood Park 1 6.4 103.3 Yes 97 85 28 80 290 100 91 382 55 50 105 Secondary 669 4 Kennard Park No Neighborhood Park 6 13.4 148.7 Yes 79 73 90 92 335 100 67 334 59 65 123 Secondary 652 5 Ammon Park No Neighborhood Park Y 6 8.1 144.3 Yes 84 86 90 96 356 67 82 297 58 73 132 Primary 643 6 Paulson Rec Center No Special Use Park Y 9 0.4 139.9 No 18 87 47 92 243 100 100 400 59 57 116 Secondary 642 7 Kite Hill Park No Neighborhood Park 9 0.9 132.1 No 23 75 60 82 242 100 100 400 57 54 111 Secondary 633 8 East Hills Park No Community Park 9 11.1 88.4 Yes 89 92 72 92 346 67 77 288 48 55 103 None 622 9 Lewis Park No Neighborhood Park 5 0.9 150.0 Yes 74 82 52 87 294 67 98 328 69 74 143 Primary 602 10 Albert Turk Graham Park No Neighborhood Park 6 0.4 156.7 Yes 75 67 69 80 291 67 89 311 69 84 153 None 597 11 West End Park No Community Park 2 17.0 64.5 No 22 73 35 77 208 100 95 389 63 36 99 None 596 12 Fort Pitt Park No Neighborhood Park 9 9.5 81.9 Yes 78 78 45 85 286 67 88 310 52 54 106 Primary 595 13 Robert E. Williams Park No Neighborhood Park 6 12.3 108.5 No 14 72 31 84 201 100 97 394 50 66 115 Secondary 594 14 Vincennes Park No Neighborhood Park 6 1.6 107.5 Yes 78 81 55 93 306 67 78 288 54 62 116 Secondary 593 15 Granville Park No Neighborhood Park 6 0.6 139.4 No 26 86 73 92 277 67 92 316 57 82 139 None 586 16 Jefferson Park No Neighborhood Park Y 6 0.6 136.1 No 22 66 35 76 198 100 94 388 68 72 140 Secondary 582 17 Sheraden Park No Community Park Y 2 51.2 174.7 No 18 70 37 77 201 100 91 381 62 58 120 Primary 581 18 Townsend Park No Neighborhood Park 2 0.6 145.2 No 15 71 31 77 194 100 94 387 64 57 121 None 576 19 Homewood Park No Neighborhood Park Y 9 2.7 268.5 No 21 81 59 84 244 67 100 332 67 78 145 Secondary 569 20 Hazelwood Senior Center No Special Use Park Y 5 1.3 140.6 Yes 82 77 54 88 301 67 67 268 70 77 147 Primary 569 21 Manchester Park No Neighborhood Park 6 2.3 181.8 No 11 75 43 80 208 100 80 361 73 83 156 Primary 565 22 Cross and Strauss Park No Neighborhood Park 6 0.3 81.0 No 7 86 58 90 241 67 95 324 62 43 105 Primary 556 23 Able Long Park No Neighborhood Park 4 1.7 133.4 No 4 65 26 71 166 100 95 389 54 56 110 None 553 24 Dallas Park No Neighborhood Park 9 0.4 246.6 No 20 79 61 89 249 67 85 304 71 74 146 Secondary 553 25 Larimer Park No Neighborhood Park 9 1.5 218.1 No 25 79 49 93 246 100 54 307 68 71 139 Secondary 553 26 Brighton Heights Senior Center No Special Use Park Y 1 0.7 151.4 No 8 75 25 74 182 100 85 371 62 69 131 Secondary 541 27 Paul J. Sciullo II Memorial Park (East, Pool & Courts) Yes Neighborhood Park Y 7 5.8 177.6 No 8 56 18 70 153 100 94 388 71 89 160 Primary 549 27 Paul J. Sciullo II Memorial Park (West, Ball Field) Yes Neighborhood Park Y 7 5.8 189.0 No 10 60 20 71 161 100 94 388 72 89 161 Primary 548 28 Fairywood Park No Neighborhood Park 2 3.6 144.7 No 12 32 37 68 149 100 100 399 85 67 152 None 547 29 Paulson Park No Neighborhood Park 9 4.2 194.4 No 20 89 48 92 250 100 49 297 58 58 115 Secondary 542 30 Woods Run Park No Neighborhood Park 1 0.3 174.2 No 10 70 34 78 192 100 75 349 64 51 115 Secondary 540 31 Allegheny Commons (North Center Fields) Yes Community Park Y 1 59.9 308.1 No 17 63 59 72 212 67 98 329 72 79 151 Secondary 539 31 Allegheny Commons (Northeast Section) Yes Community Park Y 1 59.9 366.2 No 16 62 59 74 211 67 98 329 77 84 161 Secondary 522 31 Allegheny Commons (Northwest, Lake Elizabeth and Aviary) Yes Community Park Y 1 59.9 437.8 No 18 64 39 73 193 67 98 329 75 83 158 Secondary 536 31 Allegheny Commons (Southeast Section) Yes Community Park Y 1 59.9 315.9 No 16 60 57 74 207 67 98 329 82 90 172 Secondary 513 31 Allegheny Commons (Southwest Section) Yes Community Park Y 1 59.9 315.6 No 15 67 30 72 184 67 98 329 75 81 157 Secondary 535 32 Marshall-California Park No Neighborhood Park 1 0.3 96.8 No 16 76 33 81 206 67 98 330 71 60 131 None 535 33 Eleanor Street Park No Neighborhood Park 3 0.6 85.7 No 9 51 14 70 145 100 95 390 54 69 123 Secondary 535 34 Monongahela Park No Neighborhood Park 3 6.5 96.6 No 7 46 13 69 135 100 100 400 67 63 131 Secondary 534 35 Chadwick Park No Neighborhood Park 9 6.8 87.4 No 21 86 54 92 253 67 74 281 52 43 95 Secondary 533 36 Garland Park No Neighborhood Park 9 3.2 287.5 No 18 66 40 79 202 67 98 330 72 84 156 Secondary 528 37 Fineview Park (North, Fineview Park) Yes Neighborhood Park 1 1.8 75.0 No 20 72 31 81 204 67 95 324 53 51 104 Secondary 530 37 Fineview Park (South, Fineview Field) Yes Neighborhood Park 1 3.5 49.2 No 21 73 31 81 206 67 95 324 55 57 112 Secondary 527 38 Fifty-Seventh Street Park No Neighborhood Park 7 2.1 98.1 No 4 60 10 70 144 100 92 384 84 72 156 Primary 527 39 Young Field Park No Neighborhood Park 1 3.1 98.1 No 14 70 44 80 208 67 93 318 64 68 131 Secondary 414 40 Highland Park (Farmhouse Playground and Field) Yes Regional Park Y 7 377.9 189.7 No 3 78 2 65 148 33 100 266 54 57 111 Secondary 367 40 Highland Park (Northeast Parking Area) Yes Regional Park Y 7 377.9 137.6 No 0 80 21 0 101 33 100 266 69 35 104 Secondary 414 40 Highland Park (Northwest, Zoo) Yes Regional Park Y 7 377.9 108.5 No 6 71 4 67 148 33 100 266 72 55 128 Secondary 521 40 Highland Park (Southeast, Bike Track) Yes Regional Park Y 7 377.9 139.9 No 12 100 51 92 255 33 100 266 70 35 105 Secondary 427 40 Highland Park (Southeast, Community Garden) Yes Regional Park Y 7 377.9 123.7 No 9 69 15 68 161 33 100 266 60 62 122 Secondary 424 40 Highland Park (Southeast, Tennis Courts) Yes Regional Park Y 7 377.9 47.9 No 14 73 7 64 158 33 100 266 56 45 101 Secondary Highland Park (Southwest, Highland Ave, Mellon Terrace, & King 405 40 Estate) Yes Regional Park Y 7 377.9 290.4 No 3 66 2 68 139 33 100 266 57 60 117 Secondary 514 41 Oliver Bath House No Special Use Park Y 3 0.2 223.4 No 4 31 59 62 157 100 79 357 81 93 173 None PAGE 2 OF 4 Park Scoring Database // Note that the scores in this database are intended to be recalculated each year to factor in new demographic data and changes in park and community conditions.
Recommended publications
  • Author: Stephan Bontrager, Director of Communications, Riverlife a Big Step Forward: Point State Park

    Author: Stephan Bontrager, Director of Communications, Riverlife a Big Step Forward: Point State Park

    Author: Stephan Bontrager, Director of Communications, Riverlife A Big Step Forward: Point State Park Pittsburgh’s riverfronts have undergone a long transformation from being used primarily for industry in the first half of the 20th century to the green public parks, trails, and facilities of today. The city’s riverbanks along its three rivers—the Allegheny, Monongahela and Ohio—are a patchwork quilt of publicly- and privately owned land, lined with industrial and transportation infrastructure that has created challenges for interconnected riverfront redevelopment across property lines. Despite the obstacles, Pittsburgh has seen a remarkable renaissance along its waterfronts. The city’s modern riverfront transformation began with the construction of Point State Park during the first “Pittsburgh Renaissance” movement of the 1940s and 50s by then- mayor David L. Lawrence. The 36-acre park at the confluence of Pittsburgh’s three rivers (the Allegheny, Monongahela and Ohio) was conceived as a transformational urban renewal project that would create public green space at the tip of the Pittsburgh peninsula. Championed by a bipartisan coalition of Lawrence, banker Richard King Mellon, and the Allegheny Conference on Community Development, Point State Park was created on land used primarily as a rail yard and acquired through eminent domain. Construction took several decades and the park was officially declared finished and opened to the public in 1974 with the debut of its signature feature, a 150-foot fountain at the westernmost tip of the park. After its opening, Point State Park saw near-constant use and subsequent deferred maintenance. In 2007 as part of the Pittsburgh 250th anniversary celebration, the park underwent a $35 million top-to-bottom renovation led by the Allegheny Conference, Riverlife, and the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources which owns and operates the park.
  • CITY of PITTSBURGH 2020 Capital Budget & Six Year Plan

    CITY of PITTSBURGH 2020 Capital Budget & Six Year Plan

    CITY OF PITTSBURGH 2020 Capital Budget & Six Year Plan Pittsburgh City Council As approved by City Council December 17, 2019 City of Pittsburgh City Council Members Bruce A. Kraus, President District 3 Darlene M. Harris, Human Resources District 1 Theresa Kail-Smith, Public Works District 2 Anthony Coghill, Urban Recreation District 4 Corey O’Connor, Intergovernmental Affairs District 5 R. Daniel Lavelle, Public Safety District 6 Deborah L. Gross, Land Use & Economic Development District 7 Erika Strassburger, Performance and Asset Management District 8 Rev. Ricky V. Burgess, Finance & Law District 9 City Council Budget Office Bill Urbanic, Budget Director Michael Strelic, Budget Manager Office of the City Clerk Brenda Pree, City Clerk Kimberly Clark-Baskin, Assistant City Clerk Special thanks to Chief Schubert for the cover Additional thanks to Mayor Bill Peduto, City Controller Michael Lamb, the Mayor’s Budget Office staff, and the many citizens who participated through the process Special thanks to Valerie Jacko for design and printing services. Visit us on the web at: www.pittsburghpa.gov 2020 Project Summary 2020 Project Summary Page Project Name 2020 Budget Functional Area: Engineering and Construction 18 28TH STREET BRIDGE (TIP) 250,000 ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT 20 3,492,571 TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT (ATCMTD) 22 BRIDGE UPGRADES 4,396,476 24 BUS RAPID TRANSIT - 26 CBD SIGNAL UPGRADES (TIP) - 28 CHARLES ANDERSON BRIDGE (TIP) - 30 COMPLETE STREETS 17,722,742 32 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND INSPECTION SERVICES 244,011
  • MUNICIPALITY Ward District LOCATION NAME ADDRESS

    MUNICIPALITY Ward District LOCATION NAME ADDRESS

    MUNICIPALITY Ward District LOCATION_NAME ADDRESS ALEPPO 0 1 ALEPPO TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL BUILDING 100 NORTH DRIVE ASPINWALL 0 1 ASPINWALL MUNICIPAL BUILDING 217 COMMERCIAL AVE. ASPINWALL 0 2 ASPINWALL FIRE DEPT. #2 201 12TH STREET ASPINWALL 0 3 ST SCHOLASTICA SCHOOL 300 MAPLE AVE. AVALON 1 0 AVALON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 640 CALIFORNIA AVE. AVALON 2 1 AVALON PUBLIC LIBRARY - CONF ROOM 317 S. HOME AVE. AVALON 2 2 LORD'S HOUSE OF PRAYER 336 S HOME AVE AVALON 3 1 AVALON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 721 CALIFORNIA AVE. AVALON 3 2 GREENSTONE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 939 CALIFORNIA AVE. AVALON 3 3 GREENSTONE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 939 CALIFORNIA AVE. BALDWIN BORO 0 1 ST ALBERT THE GREAT 3198 SCHIECK STREET BALDWIN BORO 0 2 ST ALBERT THE GREAT 3198 SCHIECK STREET BALDWIN BORO 0 3 BOROUGH OF BALDWIN MUNICIPAL BUILDING 3344 CHURCHVIEW AVE. BALDWIN BORO 0 4 ST ALBERT THE GREAT 3198 SCHIECK STREET BALDWIN BORO 0 5 OPTION INDEPENDENT FIRE CO 825 STREETS RUN RD. BALDWIN BORO 0 6 MCANNULTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5151 MCANNULTY RD. BALDWIN BORO 0 7 BALDWIN BOROUGH PUBLIC LIBRARY - MEETING ROOM 5230 WOLFE DR BALDWIN BORO 0 8 MCANNULTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5151 MCANNULTY RD. BALDWIN BORO 0 9 WALLACE BUILDING 41 MACEK DR. BALDWIN BORO 0 10 BALDWIN BOROUGH PUBLIC LIBRARY 5230 WOLFE DR BALDWIN BORO 0 11 BALDWIN BOROUGH PUBLIC LIBRARY 5230 WOLFE DR BALDWIN BORO 0 12 ST ALBERT THE GREAT 3198 SCHIECK STREET BALDWIN BORO 0 13 W.R. PAYNTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3454 PLEASANTVUE DR. BALDWIN BORO 0 14 MCANNULTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5151 MCANNULTY RD. BALDWIN BORO 0 15 W.R.
  • Pwsa Sewer System

    Pwsa Sewer System

    PWSA SEWER SYSTEM ² Summer Hill Perry North Lincoln-Lemington-Belmar Brighton Heights Upper Lawrenceville Morningside Stanton Heights Northview Heights Lincoln-Lemington-Belmar Highland Park Marshall-Shadeland Central Lawrenceville Perry South Spring Hill-City View Garfield Marshall-Shadeland Troy Hill Esplen Lower Lawrenceville East Liberty Fineview Troy Hill California-Kirkbride Spring Garden Larimer Bloomfield Friendship Windgap Chartiers City Homewood West Central Northside R Polish Hill Sheraden E Homewood North Manchester IV East Allegheny R Y N E H Allegheny Center G Strip District Fairywood E Upper Hill Shadyside O L East Hills H Allegheny West L Homewood South IO A Bedford Dwellings R Chateau Point Breeze North IV E R Crafton Heights North Shore Middle Hill Elliott North Oakland Point Breeze Crawford-Roberts Terrace Village West End Squirrel Hill North Central Business District West Oakland Central Oakland Duquesne Heights South Shore Bluff Westwood HELA RIVER MONONGA South Oakland Ridgemont Regent Square Oakwood Squirrel Hill South Mount Washington Southside Flats East Carnegie Allentown Greenfield Southside Slopes Beltzhoover Swisshelm Park Arlington Heights Knoxville Arlington Beechview Banksville Mount Oliver Borough Hazelwood Mt. Oliver Bon Air St. Clair Glen Hazel Brookline Carrick Hays Overbrook New Homestead Lincoln Place Neither the City of Pittsburgh nor the PW&SA guarantees the accuracy of any of the information hereby made available, including but not limited to information concerning the location and condition of underground structures, and neither assumes any responsibility for any conclusions or interpretations made on the basis of such information. COP and PW&SA assume no Drawn By: JDS Date: 6/3/2016 City of Pittsburgh responsibility for any understanding or representations made by their agents or employees unless such understanding or representations are expressly set forth in a duly authorized written document, and such document expressly provides that responsibility therefore is assumed by the City or the PW&SA.
  • 2019 State of Downtown Pittsburgh

    2019 State of Downtown Pittsburgh

    20 STATE OF DOWNTOWN PITTSBURGH19 TABLE OF CONTENTS For the past eight years, the Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership has been pleased to produce the State of Downtown Pittsburgh Report. This annual compilation and data analysis allows us to benchmark our progress, both year over year and in comparison to peer cities. In this year’s report, several significant trends came to light helping us identify unmet needs and better understand opportunities for developing programs and initiatives in direct response to those challenges. Although improvements to the built environment are evident in nearly every corridor of the Golden Triangle, significant resources are also being channeled into office property interiors to meet the demands of 21st century companies and attract a talented workforce to Pittsburgh’s urban core. More than $300M has been invested in Downtown’s commercial office stock over the 4 ACCOLADES AND BY THE NUMBERS last five years – a successful strategy drawing new tenants to Downtown and ensuring that our iconic buildings will continue to accommodate expanding businesses and emerging start-ups. OFFICE, EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION Downtown experienced a 31% growth in residential population over the last ten years, a trend that will continue with the opening 6 of hundreds of new units over the next couple of years. Businesses, from small boutiques to Fortune 500 companies, continued to invest in the Golden Triangle in 2018 while Downtown welcomed a record number of visitors and new residents. HOUSING AND POPULATION 12 Development in Downtown is evolving and all of these investments combine to drive the economic vitality of the city, making Downtown’s thriving renaissance even more robust.
  • Summer 2021 at | Cmu.Edu/Osher W

    Summer 2021 at | Cmu.Edu/Osher W

    Summer 2021 at | cmu.edu/osher w CONSIDER A GIFT TO OSHER To make a contribution to the Osher Annual Fund, please call the office at 412.268.7489, go through the Osher website with a credit card, or mail a check to the office. Thank you in advance for your generosity. BOARD OF DIRECTORS CURRICULUM COMMITTEE OFFICE STAFF Allan Hribar, President Stanley Winikoff (Curriculum Lyn Decker, Executive Director Jan Hawkins, Vice-President Committee Chair & SLSG) Olivia McCann, Administrator / Programs Marcia Taylor, Treasurer Gary Bates (Lecture Chair) Chelsea Prestia, Administrator / Publications Jim Reitz, Past President Les Berkowitz Kate Lehman, Administrator / General Office Ann Augustine, Secretary & John Brown Membership Chair Maureen Brown Mark Winer, Board Represtative to Flip Conti CATALOG EDITORS Executive Committee Lyn Decker (STSG) Chelsea Prestia, Editor Rosalie Barsotti Mary Duquin Jeffrey Holst Olivia McCann Anna Estop Kate Lehman Ann Isaac Marilyn Maiello Sankar Seetharama Enid Miller Raja Sooriamurthi Diane Pastorkovich CONTACT INFORMATION Jeffrey Swoger Antoinette Petrucci Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Randy Weinberg Helen-Faye Rosenblum (SLSG) Richard Wellins Carnegie Mellon University Judy Rubinstein 5000 Forbes Avenue Rochelle Steiner Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3815 Jeffrey Swoger (SLSG) Rebecca Culyba, Randy Weinberg (STSG) Associate Provost During Covid, we prefer to receive an email and University Liaison from you rather than a phone call. Please include your return address on all mail sent to the Osher office. Phone: 412.268.7489 Email: [email protected] Website: cmu.edu/osher ON THE COVER When Andrew Carnegie selected architect Henry Hornbostel to design a technical school in the late 1890s, the plan was for the layout of the buildings to form an “explorer’s ship” in search of knowledge.
  • October Parks News | Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy

    October Parks News | Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy

    10/8/2020 October Parks News | Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy october parks news To explore the dozens of events coming to your local parks this month, read below. Click here to explore our events calendar. https://preview.hs-sites.com/_hcms/preview/content/14924728214?portalId=415693&_preview=true&cacheBust=0&preview_key=fmeSffiC&from_buffer=false&__… 1/7 10/8/2020 October Parks News | Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy celebrate fall with guided nature hikes You can register here for October's First Friday Nature Walk, Third Friday Fitness Hike, and Hike with a Naturalist. This month, naturalist educators will be discussing themes of Fall and showcasing all the ways in which our parks and paths change with every season. During the family-friendly Hike with a Naturalist, kids and families can participate in a leaf scavenger hunt and craft activity. frick park after dark wraps up its first season Thank you for the support you've shown to the Frick Park After Dark series! We're wrapping up our first FPAD season with an indoor workshop hosted by Third Day, live music by Rhythm and Steel, food from Revival Chili Food Truck, and adult beverages from Wigle Whiskey. Purchase tickets here → https://preview.hs-sites.com/_hcms/preview/content/14924728214?portalId=415693&_preview=true&cacheBust=0&preview_key=fmeSffiC&from_buffer=false&__… 2/7 10/8/2020 October Parks News | Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy parks listening tour II: the parks plan continues Phase Two of the Listening Tour details the plans for improved park safety, increased fair funding and access, and upgraded maintenance and facilities for all existing city parks.
  • May–June 2015 You Continue to Improve Mellon Square Downtown

    May–June 2015 You Continue to Improve Mellon Square Downtown

    www.pittsburghparks.org May–June 2015 You continue to improve Mellon Square downtown Park edges get a facelift to frame a masterpiece ast summer you Lcompleted the restoration of downtown’s modernist park masterpiece. Today, the improvement of the “Square in the Triangle” continues as the project moves to the streetscape of this unique city block. “Mellon Square was designed from curb-to- Scott Roller credit photo curb. It integrates a park, retail stores, and a parking garage,” says Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy Parks Curator Susan Rademacher. “Every square inch of this world- “People should be proud of a design can experience relaxation, renowned place should be that serves us all so well. We are.” renewal and reunion with special.” – Dylan, Talbott, and Henry Simonds the natural world. People should be proud of a ellon Square’s design that serves us all so Mstreetscape on new interpretive wall and Dylan, Talbott, and Henry well. We are,” they said. Smithfield Street will get a Aan illuminated signband Simonds, the grandsons of total facelift with brand-new overhead have already been Mellon Square’s designer ublic and private curbing, sidewalk planters, completed. It alerts people John Ormsbee Simonds, Ppartners continue to benches, as well as trash to Mellon Square’s presence funded the creation of the be identified to secure receptacles. The storefronts above and provides a brief interpretive wall. “This garden the needed resources along the street will be history of Pittsburgh’s first plaza is an oasis of calm and for this plan to be updated and streamlined. Renaissance and the park.
  • Openspacepgh

    Openspacepgh

    OpenSpacePGH APPENDIX A OPENSPACEPGH INVENTORY Appendix A: OPENSPACEPGH Inventory APPENDIX A: OPENSPACEPGH INVENTORY (Park classifications and acreages current as of Dec. 2011. Park facilities inventory current as of March 2011.) Acres Community Community Garden Stairs Division Shelter Recreation Center Center Senior Pool Spray Park Pool Spray Area Play Court Tennis w/Lights Court Tennis No Lights Basketball FullCourt w/Lights Basketball No Full Court Lights Basketball Half Court w/Lights Basketball No Half Court Lights REGIONAL PARK Emerald View Regional Park 257.2 1 2 28 1 2 - 1 - 1 5 - - 2 1 - 1 Bigbee Field 0.8 - - 4 Duquesne Heights Greenway* 61.5 Eileen McCoy Parklet 0.9 - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - 1 Grandview Overlook 6.1 - - 5 Grandview Park 33.4 - 1 4 Band Stand 1 1 Mt. Washington Park 45.8 - - 5 1 1 1 Olympia Park 9.3 - - 5 1 1 1 Other Undesignated Property 97.4 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ream Parklet 2.0 - - 5 1 1 1 Frick Park 643.8 - - 3 2 2 6 1 1 Highland Park 377.9 - - 2 8 1 4 11 2 Riverview Park 258.8 - - 1 6 1 1 2 Schenley Park 434.1 1 1 3 7 1 5 13 regional park subtotal 1,971.7 2 3 37 24 2 - 4 - 1 17 15 17 2 2 - 4 COMMUNITY PARK Allegheny Center Park Plaza (Public Square) 2.5 - - 1 1 Allegheny Commons Park 59.9 2 - 1 - - - 1 - - 4 3 3 2 1 - - East Common Park 22.0 2 - 1 - - - 1 - 4 3 3 2 1 West Common Park 38.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Arsenal Park 8.8 - - 2 1 4 1 Banksville Park 16.6 - - 5 2 1 1 1 1 Brighton Heights Park 32.0 - - 1 1 1 1 1 Brookline Memorial Park 54.4 - 1 4 1 1 1 1 Dinan Park 16.4 - - 2 1 1 East
  • Urban Essay Fall 06 Website.Pub

    Urban Essay Fall 06 Website.Pub

    University of Pittsburgh’s Urban Studies Association Newsletter Issue 13 October 2005 T HE PRESIDENT’ S A DDRESS My fellow Urbanites— We’re back! The urbanSA (yes, we had a branding change this year) is starting Fall 2005 renewed and ready to explore the city again. After a mid-summer planning session with officers, alumni, and current members, the urbanSA is setting up its first strategic plan to make sure we’re sustain- able enough for years to come. Put your two cents into our strategic plan by taking our first-ever online survey, available from our website’s front page. Your opinion will affect how we plan our events in the not-so-distant future. And speaking of events... We know how much you heart getting out into town. So TRACKS OF STEEL: LIGHT far, we’ve set up Oakland cleanups with the Oakland Planning and Development Corporation’s Adopt-a-Block program, an- R AIL IN PITTSBURGH other work day with Habitat for Humanity’s Panther Chapter B Y PATRICK SINGLETON (which was a huge success even in last winter’s 19-degree weather), a tour of Regent Square, with more tours of East One of the most hotly contested issues recently is, not surprisingly, Liberty and other hotspots in the East End in the works, plus a government spending on a transportation project. This time, it is a light talk with Boldly Live Where Others Won’t author Mark Harvey rail extension to the T termed the North Shore Connector. With both Smith and a screening of the End of Suburbia.
  • Final Si Management Report 10 06 10

    Final Si Management Report 10 06 10

    Sycamore Island Management Report Prepared by Applied Ecological Services Inc. 1110 East Hector Street Conshohocken PA, 19428 For Allegheny Land Trust 409 Broad Street, Suite 206A Sewickley, PA 15143 This report is made possible by the generous support from TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3. PROJECT PHILOSOPHY AND APPROACH 4. SITE CONTEXT ‐ p.1 4.1 Location ‐ p.1 4.1. Geology and the Shaping of the Allegheny River and Surrounding Watershed ‐ p.1 4.2. Soils, Topography, and Drainage ‐ p.2 4.3. Ecology ‐ p.2 4.4. Cultural History ‐ p.3 4.5. Impacts of a Regulated River ‐ p.5 5. NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY, ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1. Natural Community Mapping, Vegetation and Seedbank Studies ‐ p.7 5.2. Aquatic Species Surveys ‐ Fishes, Mollusks, and Macroinvertebrates ‐ p. 33 5.3. Vertebrate Species Surveys ‐ Reptiles, Amphibians, and Mammals ‐ p. 42 5.4. Avian Species Surveys ‐ p.48 5.5. Threatened and Endangered Species Survey and Existing Studies Review ‐ p. 57 5.6. Invasive Vegetative Species Management ‐ p. 63 5.7. Geotechnical Investigation ‐ p.68 5.8. Bathymetry Survey ‐ p.75 5.9. Human Use and Impact Study ‐ p. 76 6. TEST AND DEMONSTRATIONN PLOT TREATMENT AND MONITORING PLAN ‐ p.78 7. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION AND VOLUNTEER STEWARDSHIP ACTIVITIES ‐ p.85 8. TRAIL AND INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE PLANS ‐ p.92 9. MANAGEMENT AND PRIORTIZATION STRATEGY FOR CARRYING OUT RECOMMENDATIONS ‐ p.96 10. REFERENCES ‐ p.106 APPENDICES A. Maps B. Soil Series C. Quadrat Datas D. T & E Species Search E. Invasive Vegetation Cut Sheets F.
  • Mellon Park City of Pittsburgh Historic Landmark Nomination

    Mellon Park City of Pittsburgh Historic Landmark Nomination

    Mellon Park City of Pittsburgh Historic Landmark Nomination Prepared by Preservation Pittsburgh for Friends of Mellon Park 412.256.8755 1501 Reedsdale St., Suite 5003 September, 2020. Pittsburgh, PA 15233 www.preservationpgh.org HISTORIC REVIEW COMMISSION Division of Development Administration and Review City of Pittsburgh, Department of City Planning 200 Ross Street, Third Floor Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY HISTORIC NOMINATION FORM Fee Schedule HRC Staff Use Only Please make check payable to Treasurer, City of Pittsburgh Date Received: .................................................. Individual Landmark Nomination: $100.00 Parcel No.: ........................................................ District Nomination: $250.00 Ward: ................................................................ Zoning Classification: ....................................... 1. HISTORIC NAME OF PROPERTY: Bldg. Inspector: ................................................. Council District: ................................................ Mellon Park 2. CURRENT NAME OF PROPERTY: Mellon Park 3. LOCATION a. Street: 1047 Shady Ave. b. City, State, Zip Code: Pittsburgh, Pa. 15232 c. Neighborhood: Shadyside/Point Breeze 4. OWNERSHIP d. Owner(s): City of Pittsburgh e. Street: 414 Grant St. f. City, State, Zip Code: Pittsburgh, Pa. 15219 Phone: (412) 255-2626 5. CLASSIFICATION AND USE – Check all that apply Type Ownership Current Use: Structure Private – home Park District Private – other Site Public – government Object Public - other Place of religious worship 1 6. NOMINATED BY: a. Name: Elizabeth Seamons for Friends of Mellon Park & Matthew Falcone of Preservation Pittsburgh b. Street: 1501 Reedsdale St. #5003 c. City, State, Zip: Pittsburgh, Pa. 15233 d. Phone: (412) 417-5910 Email: [email protected] 7. DESCRIPTION Provide a narrative description of the structure, district, site, or object. If it has been altered over time, indicate the date(s) and nature of the alteration(s). (Attach additional pages as needed) If Known: a.