DOCSLIB.ORG

Doctorate of Philosophy in Quantitative Research Methods in Education

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Doctorate of Philosophy in Quantitative Research Methods in Education Doctorate of Philosophy in Quantitative Research Methods in Education University of Oregon College of Education Department of Educational Methodology, Policy and Leadership Program Manual 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 Doctoral Program Director: Gina Biancarosa Department Head: Gerald Tindal Department Student Academic Program Coordinator: Angela Burham PHD – QRME PROGRAM MANUAL 19F ‐ Rev 21 October 2019 Page | 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 3 PHD IN QRME PROGRAM PURPOSE AND GOALS .................................................................................. 4 PROGRAM DESIGN ............................................................................................................................... 5 LEARNING COMMUNITY AND APPLIED COURSES ................................................................................................. 5 QUANTITATIVE METHODS TRAINING ................................................................................................................ 5 INTERDISCIPLINARY CONCENTRATION ............................................................................................................... 5 APPRENTICESHIP MODEL ................................................................................................................................ 6 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL METHODOLOGY, POLICY, AND LEADERSHIP ......................................................................................................................................... 7 FACULTY RESEARCH INTERESTS & AREAS OF EXPERTISE ....................................................................................... 7 AFFILIATED RESEARCH AND OUTREACH CENTERS ................................................................................................ 8 HYBRID EDUCATION ....................................................................................................................................... 8 POLICIES .............................................................................................................................................. 9 PROGRAMS, POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND DEADLINES......................................................................................... 9 EMPL PHD CREDIT TRANSFER POLICY .............................................................................................................. 9 PROGRAM EXPECTATIONS & REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................... 10 COURSEWORK ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Planned Program ................................................................................................................................ 10 EMPL Learning Community Courses (24 credits) ................................................................................ 11 COE Core Methods (18 credits)........................................................................................................... 12 Advanced Quantitative Methods (24 credits) .................................................................................... 13 Interdisciplinary Concentration (24 credits) ....................................................................................... 14 Dissertation Credits (18 credits minimum) ......................................................................................... 14 COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO AND ADVANCEMENT TO CANDIDACY ...................................................................... 16 Portfolio Management ....................................................................................................................... 17 PROPOSAL AND DISSERTATION ...................................................................................................................... 18 Forming the Committee ..................................................................................................................... 20 Proposal .............................................................................................................................................. 20 Writing the proposal .......................................................................................................................... 20 Conducting and Defending the Dissertation ...................................................................................... 22 Dissertation Content Details ............................................................................................................... 23 Article‐based Dissertation .................................................................................................................. 23 Dissertation Tips from EMPL Students ............................................................................................... 24 APPENDIX A. PLANNED PROGRAM TOOLS .......................................................................................... 25 APPENDIX B. SAMPLING OF INTERDISCIPLINARY CONCENTRATIONS AND RELATED COURSES ............ 26 PHD – QRME PROGRAM MANUAL 19F ‐ Rev 21 October 2019 Page | 2 Introduction Welcome to the program manual for the Doctor of Philosophy in Quantitative Research Methods in Education (PhD in QRME). This manual contains important information that guides PhD students in the Department of Educational Methodology, Policy, and Leadership (EMPL) throughout their doctoral studies. In this manual, you will find information about the purpose and goals of the PhD in QRME program, details about the program’s design, and information about the EMPL department and faculty. You will also find URLs for important University of Oregon, College of Education, and department policies. The manual also includes an overview and details regarding the PhD coursework, comprehensive portfolio of competencies, and dissertation, all of which represent key milestones in every PhD student’s progress. It is critical for students admitted in a given year to read the manual for their admission year thoroughly and even more so to use it as resource repeatedly throughout the course of their studies. If you have questions not answered by the manual, be sure to reach out to EMPL personnel for help. Your best resources are your assigned Advisor, the PhD Program Director, the EMPL Academic Program Coordinator, and the EMPL Department Head. All of these individuals will be more than happy to assist you in your doctoral journey. Good luck! PHD – QRME PROGRAM MANUAL 19F ‐ Rev 21 October 2019 Page | 3 PhD in QRME Program Purpose and Goals The University of Oregon’s (UO) College of Education (COE) Department of Educational Methodology, Policy and Leadership (EMPL) offers a Doctorate of Philosophy (PhD) in Quantitative Research Methods in Education (QRME). The purpose of the PhD in QRME is to develop researchers, scholars, and policy leaders who engage in traditions of inquiry that create knowledge and understanding that is founded in empirical, largely quantitative, evidence. The focus is on (1) understanding causal and complex relationships within applied educational, social, and institutional settings and (2) the evidenced‐based application of knowledge to inform policy and practice in educational and social settings. This research‐intensive doctoral program emphasizes thorough grounding in a variety of quantitative research methods commonly employed in educational research while supporting advanced knowledge and scholarship in an interdisciplinary concentration related to education. The program of study for the interdisciplinary concentration is developed in consultation with a student’s program advisor and should represent a coherent but intersectional perspective on an area of education research. The degree requires 81 credits of post‐baccalaureate coursework and an additional 18 dissertation credits. Students are expected to employ advanced quantitative research methods in the pursuit of their dissertation. Graduates will be well trained to gain employment in academia and in local, state, or national research and policy centers and agencies. The goals of the PhD program are as follows: Prepare individuals to advance and apply rigorous research methods to evaluate and improve policy and practice in educational and social settings; Develop knowledge and skills in the application, interpretation, and dissemination of research essential to promoting success and equity in access and outcomes in education; and Foster professional outcomes for students including abilities to conduct and communicate research effectively, positively impact educational and social policy and practice, and serve in a variety of professional roles in academic institutions or applied institutional settings. PHD – QRME PROGRAM MANUAL 19F ‐ Rev 21 October 2019 Page | 4 Program Design The PhD in Quantitative Research Methods in Education is designed to provide a coherent curricular experience that includes both strong methods training and development of interdisciplinary expertise in a well‐defined aspect of education, all within a supportive learning community. The program is a full‐time commitment and typically includes three years of coursework and one or more years of dissertation work. As described in the Policies section of this manual, some of the coursework may be waived due to transfer credits, but not all graduate credits
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for Research Faculty
    RESEARCH FACULTY EXCERPT from the “Handbook of the Faculty of Arts & Sciences” DARTMOUTH COLLEGE March 2020 HANOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE Table of Contents RESEARCH FACULTY ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Specifications ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Eligibility................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Procedures for Initial Appointments, Reappointments and Promotion ................................................................ 3 Other Appointments .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Research Assistant ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Resident Scholar, Visiting Scholar .......................................................................................................................... 5 Postdoctoral Scholar .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appointments to the Faculty of Design
    Harvard University Graduate School of Design Handbook for Academic Appointments 1 | Page 4 INTRODUCTION 5 APPOINTMENTS TO THE FACULTY OF DESIGN 5 List of Appointments 6 General Conditions for the Development of the Faculty 7 Additional Criteria Applying to Tenured and Junior Appointments 8 Instruction and Research Conducted by Faculty 8 Appointment of Former GSD Faculty 8 Joint Appointments in other Harvard Faculties 8 Affiliate Status 8 Emeritus Status 9 Voting Status in the Faculty 9 Senior Faculty Council 9 Department Chairs 9 Nondiscrimination and Nepotism 9 Affirmative Action 10 APPOINTMENT DESCRIPTIONS 10 Senior Faculty Appointments: Tenured 10 Professor (tenured) 10 Professor in Practice (tenured) 11 Emeritus Status for Professor or Professor in Practice (tenured) 12 Senior Faculty Appointments: Non-Tenured 12 Professor in Residence (non-tenured) 13 Professor in Practice/Senior Lecturer (non-tenured) 14 Junior Faculty Appointments: Non-Tenured 14 Associate Professor (non-tenured) 16 Associate Professor in Practice (non-tenured) 18 Assistant Professor (non-tenured) 19 Instructor/Assistant Professor (non-tenured) 20 Assistant Professor in Practice (non-tenured) 22 Faculty Affiliate Appointments: Non-Tenured 23 Multi-Year and Annual Appointments: Non-Tenured 23 Design Critic (non-tenured) 24 Lecturer (non-tenured) 26 Instructor (non-tenured) 26 Visiting Professor, Visiting Associate Professor, Visiting Assistant Professor (non-tenured) 27 PROCEDURES INVOLVED IN APPOINTMENT PROCESS 27 Maintenance and Creation of Positions 30 Documentation
    [Show full text]
  • How to Become a Medical Professor – a Comparative Analysis of Academic
    Innov Surg Sci 2019; 4(3): 108–115 Original Article Seyed Arash Alawi*, Rosalia Luketina, Nicco Krezdorn, Lukas Fabian Busch, Anne Limbourg, Ludwik Branski, Peter M. Vogt and Andreas Jokuszies How to become a medical professor – a comparative analysis of academic requirements in Germany and the United States https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2019-0011 Due to different scientific cooperation and exchange pro- Received June 11, 2019; accepted August 6, 2019; previously grams, research and academic activities have reached an published online August 22, 2019 intense international exchange level. Yet there is no inter- Abstract national or even national standardization, quality assur- ance, and comparability to gain a medical professorship. Background: The acquisition of a medical professorship Keywords: academic career; academic system; professor- represents a significant step in a physician’s academic ship; research and teaching. career. The responsibility as well as the honor and the asso- ciated obligations are significant; however, the require- ments to become a medical professor vary in Germany. Objective: We analyzed the variable requirements for Introduction prospective medical professors in Germany, with special focus on the tenure track concept and the U.S. system. German academic system Methods: Based on an online research, we queried German medical faculty regulations to obtain a medical If you aspire to become a medical professor in Germany, professorship within Germany. the stairway is steep; however, there are different ways of Results: We analyzed 35 German universities. On average, climbing up the academic career ladder. As soon as you 11 publications are required after “venia legendi” to meet reach “venia legendi”, specific faculty requirements are set professorship (apl) prerequisites (median x̅ = 10, max = 24, to obtain professorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Assistant/Associate (PRA)
    Campus Administrative Policy Policy Title: Research Assistant/Associate (PRA) Policy Number: 4025 Functional Area: Human Resources ______________________________________________________________________________ Effective: July 1, 2019 Date Last Amended/Reviewed: June 27, 2019 Date Scheduled for Review: July 1, 2026 Supersedes: Research Assistant/Associate (PRA) (September 1, 2005) Approved by: Donald M. Elliman, Jr. Chancellor, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Dorothy A. Horrell Chancellor, University of Colorado Denver Prepared by: Human Resources Reviewing Office: Provost and Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic and Student Affairs Executive Vice Chancellor for Administration and Finance | CFO, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Senior Vice Chancellor for Administration and Finance | CFO, University of Colorado Denver Responsible Officer: Associate Vice Chancellor for Human Resources Applies to: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus University of Colorado Denver ____________________________________________________________________________ A. INTRODUCTION The research associate series of faculty titles was established by the Board of Regents to recognize the role of faculty members whose primary duties are to conduct research activities of the University of Colorado. This policy documents the basic human resource tenets for the research associate title series and should serve as a guide for the proper administration of these positions. B. TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Introduction ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Appointment Guidelines
    Office of Human Resources ⚫ hr.oregonstate.edu OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS GUIDELINES May 2013 Published by Office of Academic Affairs Office of Human Resources Date Posted: 06/29/18 Office of Human Resources ⚫ hr.oregonstate.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. OSU Policies and Standards Governing Academic Appointments ............................................................................ 1 II. Professorial Ranks ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Deans, Vice Presidents, and President B. Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor C. Fixed-Term Faculty Eligible for Professorial Ranks D. Faculty in Positions Without Expectation for Scholarly Accomplishment E. Definitions F. Faculty in Administrative Positions III. Other Faculty Ranks ................................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Use of Other Ranks B. Tenure-Track Instructor and Promotion to Senior Instructor I and Senior Instructor II C. Research Associates, Research Associates (Post Doc), Clinical Faculty and Professor of Practice Faculty D. Academic Credentials for Research-Related Ranks (other than professorial) IV. Tenure-Track and Fixed-Term Appointments ............................................................................................................. 4 A. Tenure-Track Appointments B. Tenure Commitment for Less
    [Show full text]
  • Approved by UIC Senate April 22, 2020 ST-20.01 UNIVERSITY of ILLINOIS CHICAGO SENATE (Second Reading Action Item, April 22, 2020 Senate Meeting)
    Approved by UIC Senate April 22, 2020 ST-20.01 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS CHICAGO SENATE (Second Reading Action Item, April 22, 2020 Senate Meeting) PROPOSED ACTION: Proposed revisions to the Statutes to permit the use of five year appointments for non-tenure track faculty. This would involve modifying the following sections: ARTICLE X (Academic Freedom and Tenure), Section 1 (a), 6. ARTICLE X (Academic Freedom and Tenure), Section 1 (a), 7. BACKGROUND: The University Statutes are the basis of determining the different categories and ranks of academic and administrative staff appointments for the University system. As currently specified, appointments for non-tenure track faculty (professors whose title have modifying terms or lecturer or instructor) can only be appointed for up to three years. In recent years, many of the academic units at the different Universities have recognized that it is important to have faculty who have contracts that are longer than three years, to permit them to engage in longer-term projects and to be recognized for their long-term participation in University work. For example, there are research, service, and teaching initiatives that may require a commitment of faculty time that ensures the completion of the project. By having a five year contract, non-tenure track faculty would be able to engage in such projects with confidence. Another issue associated with the limited contract term relates to the participation of these faculty within governance structures. Currently, such faculty are able to participate in the University Senate and its committees. Having a longer term of a contract, and knowing that subsequent extensions will be of similar length, allows these faculty to undertake such service commitments more readily.
    [Show full text]
  • HDFS Guide to Graduate Programs and Supplementary Application
    DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND FAMILY SCIENCE GUIDE TO GRADUATE PROGRAMS Revised 9/2021 Description of Master of Science Programs Option in Human Development and Family Science Option in Marriage and Family Therapy Description of the Doctor of Philosophy Degree Program HDFS Graduate Faculty Members Faculty Links to Core Areas Faculty Interests: Developmental Periods Facilities Marriage and Family Therapy Center Auburn University Early Learning Center Harris Early Learning Center of Birmingham Graduate Student Office Suites and Computer Access Library Facilities Curricula for Graduate Degree Programs Master of Science in HDFS Option in Human Development and Family Science Option in Marriage and Family Therapy Doctor of Philosophy in HDFS Doctoral Competency Requirements Teaching Competencies Research Competencies Service Competencies Doctoral Graduate Job Placements Elements of a Complete Application to HDFS Graduate Programs at Auburn Application Deadline Application form Processing Fees Transcripts Test Scores (e.g., TOEFL) Letters of Recommendation Letter of Intent Optional Application Materials Mailing Addresses for Submitting Application Materials Request for Additional Materials for MFT Applicants Fee Structure Per Semester for Full-Time Graduate Students Assistantship Stipends in HDFS Tuition Implications for Students with Assistantships Other Means of Managing Finances Competitive Scholarships Loans and Grants The Academic Common Market Description of Master of Science Degree Programs Option in Human Development and Family Science: The MS-option in Human Development and Family Science is flexible and can be customized to prepare a student for a variety of careers in applied family services in industry, education, or government. This program emphasizes basic knowledge of the dynamics of human development and family interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz Campus 2002-03
    ACADEMIC SALARY SCALES SANTA CRUZ CAMPUS 2002-03 Table of Contents TITLE OR SCALE Page Table of Contents 1-2 Alphabetical Index of Scales 3-4 NOTES -- Professor Series 5-6 NOTES -- Librarian Series 7 NOTES -- Supervisor of Physical Education Series 7 Off-Scale Salary Limits - Professor Series 8 Off-Scale Salary Limits - Professor Series B & E Scales 9 Faculty - Ladder Ranks -- Professor Series Academic Year 10 Fiscal Year 11 Faculty - Ladder Ranks -- Specialized Salary Scales Business Administration/Management and Engineering Academic Year 12 Fiscal Year 13 Faculty - Acting Ranks -- Professor Series Academic and Fiscal Year 14 Faculty - Acting Ranks -- Specialized Salary Scales Business Administration/Management and Engineering Academic and Fiscal Year 15 Faculty - Recall Teaching Stipends 16 Supervisor of Physical Education Series 17 Lecturers and Senior Lecturers with Security of Employment Lecturers and Senior Lecturers with Potential Security of Employment Academic and Fiscal Year 18 SOE Table of Pay Rates 19-20 Other Lecturer Titles - Unit 18 Academic and Fiscal Year 21 Unit 18 Lecturer Table of Pay Rates 22-23 Supervisor of Teacher Education 24-25 Faculty Research Series Academic Year 26 Academic Year (1/9th monthly) 27 1 TITLE OR SCALE Page Professional Research Fiscal Year (11 months) 28 Professional Research Fiscal Year (11 months) Business/Management/Engineering 28a Student Titles & Non-Student Titles Reader 29 Teaching Assistant 29 Teaching Fellow 29 Tutor 29 Graduate Student Researcher 30 Associate In ____ 31 Remedial Tutor
    [Show full text]
  • Study Coordinator Career Advancement Tips
    HELLO MY NAME IS… Stephanie Swords Research Program Manger – Office of Recruitment and Retention (ORR) Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR) Johns Hopkins University – School of Medicine 1820 Lancaster Street – Suite 300 Baltimore MD 21231 (410)-502-5673 [email protected] TOPICS: - Career Options - Educational Opportunities - Certifications - Training Opportunities - JHU Career Progression CAREERS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH Government Pharma Study Coordinator Research Management Clinical Research CLINICAL RESEARCH CAREER PATH - Centered around being a participant of a study team - Gain greater responsibility as you gain more experience - With further education and training you can become a strong study team member with greater responsibilities RESEARCH MANAGEMENT - Can be part of a research team, but typically participant interaction is limited - More focused on education and training of others - responsible for others - Must stay on top of all changes in rules and regulations PHARMA - Working for a Pharmaceutical Company - Monitor, Study Development, Project Manager - Includes lots of travel - Home office and other perks - Loss of participant interaction GOVERNMENT - NIH - Military Contractor - Grant Writing & Project Management - May include some participant interaction EDUCATION: - Getting a Degree - Clinical Degrees - Tuition Remission Benefits - Clinical Research Specific Degrees outside of JHU GETTING A DEGREE If you don’t have one think about getting one… If you do have one, think about getting another one… DEGREES
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Academic Titles with 2015-2016 Changes Tracked
    This document is out of date. To view the current document, click the link below: http://academiccouncil.jhu.edu/appointments-promotions/ Academic Council Procedures Manual Description of Academic Titles, Appointment and Promotion Policies Approved by Academic Council on June 5, 2002 (Includes Revisions Approved on May 6, 2009, May 18, 2011, April 4, 18, November 28, 2012, April 17, 2013, February 21, 2014, February 25, 2014, March 12, 2014, January 13, 2016) 1. Preamble The full-time, tenure-track faculty at the Schools form the academic backbone of the Institution. Collectively they are responsible for the vast majority of undergraduate and graduate teaching, and for intellectual leadership in scholarship and research. This document describes appointment and promotion policies for members of the tenure-track faculty, and also addresses certain aspects of the conditions of their employment. In addition the Johns Hopkins University derives considerable benefits from its association at various levels and degrees with people having professional, cultural or scholarly qualifications but who, for one reason or another, are not members of the tenure-track family. They make substantial contributions to the teaching and research functions of these two divisions, and add greatly to the intellectual life of the University. Such people, in turn, value their association with the University; in some cases the associations are honorary while in others, part-time stipend or full time salary, though not tenure, may be involved. Sections of this document seek to codify the nature of the various forms of association, the University titles that should be attached to them, and the ways in which such appointments are made.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Faculty Hiring Guidelines
    RESEARCH FACULTY GUIDELINES FOR APPOINTMENT, EVALUATION, AND PROMOTION Provost’s Office The University of Texas at El Paso May 2011 As UTEP increases its research capacity, the University must provide a mechanism to recognize non-tenure track faculty members whose professional activities involve a primary commitment to research. While such individuals may have some negotiated teaching, service, or administrative responsibilities, research faculty titles are reserved for those individuals who are appointed essentially as full-time researchers. Titles Titles used in the research faculty track will be in compliance with The University of Texas System, Rules and Regulations of the Board of Regents, Series 31001, Number 2, Section 2.2 (j). Research faculty titles are: Research Professor in (title of specialty), Research Associate Professor in (title of specialty), Research Assistant Professor in (title of specialty), and Research Instructor in (title of specialty). Research faculty positions are non-tenure track positions. UTEP tenure track faculty, during their term of employment, may make a one-time request to resign from their tenure track position and request to be appointed to an open research faculty position with approval of the chair or director, Dean and the Provost. UTEP research faculty may apply for an open tenure track position at UTEP at any time. Appointment Standards of Initial Appointment. Appointment to the rank of Research Instructor should be based on potential for further development in research. The candidate should hold at least a master’s degree and have one or more years of training and/or experience post the degree with appropriate research experience. Additionally, there should be clear evidence the individual has the aptitudes for successful performance of the assigned professional responsibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctor of Philosophy in Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Graduate Program Handbook Dr
    Doctor of Philosophy in Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Graduate Program Handbook Dr. Diana Brixner, Director, Graduate Program Last Revised: March 2020 For updates contact: Linda O’Connor, Education Coordinator [email protected], #5-1065 1 Welcome to the University of Utah / Doctor of Philosophy Degree Program in Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research The doctor of philosophy (PhD) degree in Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research is offered through the University of Utah College of Pharmacy. The program centered in the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, has state-of-the-art classroom, research and library facilities for students pursuing graduate and professional doctoral education. The College of Pharmacy is a highly ranked world-class biomedical research enterprise. The Department of Pharmacotherapy has a rich history of providing highly qualified post-graduate training for pharmacy practitioners and outcomes researchers. We seek students who are highly motivated and encourage applicants with backgrounds in pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences, health economics, and other healthcare fields. An inclusive climate is vital to the intellectual rigor, commitment to excellence, and social fabric of the University; preparing faculty, staff, students, and trainees with evidence-based skills necessary to provide high-value care in a world defined by cultural and intellectual diversity. With this in mind, we seek to ensure a workplace environment that attracts and promotes the success of diverse communities. Students graduate with core competencies in health economics, epidemiology, research design, outcomes research, and statistics. Graduates are well-prepared to be independent outcomes researchers who generate evidence to support health policy decisions regarding pharmaceuticals and related technologies. Graduates of the program apply these skills in a broad range of career settings including the pharmaceutical industry, academia, institutional pharmacy, community pharmacy, and managed care organizations.
    [Show full text]