DOCSLIB.ORG

Papers from the Conference on Homeland Protection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Papers from the Conference on Homeland Protection “. to insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence . .” PAPERS FROM THE CONFERENCE ON HOMELAND PROTECTION Edited by Max G. Manwaring October 2000 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications and Production Office by calling commercial (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or via the Internet at [email protected] ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://carlisle-www.army. mil/usassi/welcome.htm ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-036-2 ii CONTENTS Foreword ........................ v Overview Max G. Manwaring ............... 1 1. A Strategic Perspective on U. S. Homeland Defense: Problem and Response John J. Hamre ................. 11 2. The Army of the Constitution: The Historical Context Gregory J.W. Urwin .............. 27 3. The Public’s Expectations of National Security Peter D. Feaver ................. 63 4. Security Expectations for Transnational Corporations George K. Campbell ............... 75 5. Ballistic and Cruise Missile Threats Steven A. Cambone ............... 85 6. Chemical and Biological Terrorism: Political Hype or Bona Fide Post-Cold War Threat? Russell Howard ................. 99 7. Infrastructure Warriors: A Threat to the U.S. Homeland by Organized Crime Thomas A. Johnson .............. 161 iii 8. Threat of Civil Unrest and Insurrection William A. Navas, Jr. ............. 171 9. Missile Defense John Costello ................. 181 10. Evolving Roles and Missions for the Reserve Components in Responding to Incidents Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction Ellen Embrey ................. 191 11. In Support of the Civil Authorities Donald A. Haus ................ 199 12. Where Domestic Security and Civil Liberties Collide Charles J. Dunlap, Jr . ............ 209 13. A Strategic View of Where the Army Is: Homeland Defense and Issues of Civil- Military Relations Don M. Snider John A. Nagl Tony Pfaff ................... 229 14. Toward a National Security Policy and Strategy for Now and the 21st Century Edwin G. Corr Max G. Manwaring ............. 261 About the Contributors ............... 273 iv FOREWORD On April 11-13, 2000, the U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute sponsored a major conference that examined what the Department of Defense must do “to insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence . .,” given the increasing contemporary threats to the U.S. homeland. The conference drew on the creative thinking of over 200 U.S. and foreign academic, business, civilian, governmental, and military leaders. The discussions generated an exceptionally rich exchange of information and ideas concerning problems and solutions to U.S. national security for now and into the 21st century. In general, the conference discussions revolved around four salient and interrelated issues: the historical context for dealing with threats to the American homeland; the complex threat situation; the evolving strategy and structure for homeland defense; and some critical considerations and recommendations. This book highlights the issues and themes that ran through the conference. As such, it is not a comprehensive record of the proceedings. It is organized as an anthology of the best of a series of outstanding conference presentations, revised in light of the discussions that took place there. Finally, the anthology is complemented by an overview and four specific recommendations. Those recommendations look to the future and place emphasis on the transformation strategy that conference participants considered essential to safeguard the American homeland now and into the future. We have not attempted to provide all the answers. Rather, our intention is to stimulate and facilitate a wider and more profound debate on U.S. defense priorities, and the need for a paradigm shift to meet the compound complex challenges of the contemporary national and global security environment. Such a debate will be critical in building the necessary support of the Congress, the Defense Commu- v nity, and the American people for the extensive changes that must be undertaken. We hope that the insights, concerns, and recommendations found in this anthology will help build a strong consensus for regenerating national security thinking, policy, strategy, and structure to meet the needs and threats of the next century. If we achieve that, we will have fulfilled our mission and commitment to you (the reader), the Department of Defense, and the American people. DOUGLAS C. LOVELACE, JR. Director Strategic Studies Institute vi OVERVIEW Max G. Manwaring Protecting the territory and interests of the United States and its citizens from “all enemies both foreign and domestic . .,” and “to insure domestic Tranquility . .” are the principal tasks of government. The primary reason to emphasize homeland defense is the change in the type, degree, and number of threats to the United States. Now, in addition to traditional regional security issues, an array of “nontraditional” threats—including nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons proliferation; a hundred different varieties of terrorism; ethnic and religious conflict; organized crime; drug trafficking; and criminal anarchy—challenges U.S. well-being. These threats to U.S. national security are exacerbated by “nonmilitary” threats and menaces that have heretofore been ignored or wished away. They include trade war, financial war, new terror war (e.g., the improving sophistication of using nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons of mass destruction [WMD]), and cyber war. All these threats challenge the United States at home and abroad, and blur the conventional dividing lines between military, political, economic, and informational security affairs. The combined effect of new, evolving, and increasing threats to U.S. national security is profound. It demands a new approach to both threat and response in terms of homeland defense. It suggests that, without significant changes in our national security thinking, structures, and processes, we face the grave risk that we will not be adequately prepared to deter and defend against traditional, nontraditional, and nonmilitary threats—and to minimize and contain the harm they might cause. The primary focus of our considerations and recommendations regarding these contemporary and future challenges is outlined below. 1 The Historical Context for Dealing with Threats to the American Homeland . A responsible, feasible, and achievable national security policy and strategy for the defense of the United States must begin with the values that we as a nation prize. In 1987, in observing the 200th anniversary of the United States Constitution, Americans celebrated these values with a sense of rededication—values such as human dignity, personal freedom, individual rights, ethical conduct, and the pursuit of happiness, peace, and prosperity. These are the values that lead us to seek a global order that encourages human rights, self-determination, the rule of law, legitimate institutions, economic prosperity, peaceful settlement of disputes, and the elimination of injustice. The ultimate purpose of U.S. national security policy and strategy is to protect and advance those values. The Founding Fathers acknowledged that a viable government required a military establishment formidable enough to defend its citizens from outside threats, and any lawless elements that might develop in their midst. Nevertheless, they were extremely concerned about the possible abuse of power and the related threat to freedom represented by a standing army. As a result, the Founding Fathers relied heavily on the state militias, and tolerated a substantial standing military establishment only under the most extreme circumstances. Moreover, both the militias and the regular military forces of the United States were carefully circumscribed by the separation of powers and checks and balances enumerated in the United States Constitution. At the same time, there was no constitutional requirement for the regular armed forces to provide support to civil authority. It is under the Common Law concept of “Necessity” that regular military support to civil authority has been allowed. In this context, military involvement in domestic affairs has been minimal, and the emphasis has been on the fact that the regular armed forces are always in 2 support of another federal, state, or local authority. Thus, the American military establishment has been on a short tether, and generally mandated to look outward—not inward. Americans want
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A WAY FORWARD with IRAN? Options for Crafting a U.S. Strategy
    A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? Options for Crafting a U.S. Strategy THE SOUFAN CENTER FEBRUARY 2021 A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? OPTIONS FOR CRAFTING A U.S. STRATEGY A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? Options for Crafting a U.S. Strategy THE SOUFAN CENTER FEBRUARY 2021 Cover photo: Associated Press Photo/Photographer: Mohammad Berno 2 A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? OPTIONS FOR CRAFTING A U.S. STRATEGY CONTENTS List of Abbreviations 4 List of Figures 5 Key Findings 6 How Did We Reach This Point? 7 Roots of the U.S.-Iran Relationship 9 The Results of the Maximum Pressure Policy 13 Any Change in Iranian Behavior? 21 Biden Administration Policy and Implementation Options 31 Conclusion 48 Contributors 49 About The Soufan Center 51 3 A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? OPTIONS FOR CRAFTING A U.S. STRATEGY LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS BPD Barrels Per Day FTO Foreign Terrorist Organization GCC Gulf Cooperation Council IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ICBM Intercontinental Ballistic Missile IMF International Monetary Fund IMSC International Maritime Security Construct INARA Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act INSTEX Instrument for Supporting Trade Exchanges IRGC Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps IRGC-QF Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps - Qods Force JCPOA Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action MBD Million Barrels Per Day PMF Popular Mobilization Forces SRE Significant Reduction Exception 4 A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? OPTIONS FOR CRAFTING A U.S. STRATEGY LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Iran Annual GDP Growth and Change in Crude Oil Exports 18 Figure 2: Economic Effects of Maximum Pressure 19 Figure 3: Armed Factions Supported by Iran 25 Figure 4: Comparison of Iran Nuclear Program with JCPOA Limitations 28 5 A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? OPTIONS FOR CRAFTING A U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Security Council and the Iran-Contra Affair
    THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL AND THE IRAN- CONTRA AFFAIR Congressman Ed Jenkins* and Robert H. Brink** I. INTRODUCTION Early in November of 1986, newspapers in the United States carried the first reports that the United States government, in an effort to gain release of United States citizens held hostage by terrorists in Lebanon, had engaged in a covert policy of supplying arms to elements within Iran.' Later in that month, following a preliminary inquiry into the matter, it was revealed that some of the funds generated from those arms sales had been diverted to support the "Contra" 2 forces fighting the Sandinista government in Nicaragua. The events giving rise to these disclosures became known collectively as the "Iran-Contra Affair." Both elements of the affair raised serious questions regarding the formulation and conduct of our nation's foreign policy. In regard to the Iranian phase of the affair, the Regan administration's rhetoric had placed the administration firmly in op- position to any dealings with nations supporting terrorism, and with Iran in particular.' In addition, the United States had made significant * Member, United States House of Representatives, Ninth District of Georgia. LL.B., University of Georgia Law School, 1959. In 1987, Congressman Jenkins served as a member of the House Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran. ** Professional Staff Member, Committee on Government Operations, United States House of Representatives. J.D., Marshall-Wythe School of Law, College of William and Mary, 1978. In 1987, Mr. Brink served as a member of the associate staff of the House Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 12/07/2020 9:54:33 AM
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 12/07/2020 9:54:33 AM Friday 12/04/20 This material is distributed by Ghebi LLC on behalf of Federal State Unitary Enterprise Rossiya Segodnya International Information Agency, and additional information is on file with the Department of Justice, Washington, District of Columbia. ‘Stand Our Ground’: US Lawmakers Call to Resist Chinese Communist Party’s ‘Quest to Exert Dominance’ by Morgan Artvukhina Top US intelligence officials have sounded the alarm in recent days about the supreme danger posed by China and the Communist Party of China to the United States. While their rhetoric casts the US as a victim of China’s unfair rise, in reality the US’ climb to world leadership was helped by its own sabotage of Chinese development. In a joint statement on Friday. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence acting Chairman Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Vice Chairman Mark Warner (D-VA) said they agree with US Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe “that China poses the greatest national security threat to the United States. Our intelligence is clear: the Chinese Communist Party will stop at nothing to exert its global dominance.” The day prior, Ratcliffe penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal in which he argued that “the People’s Republic of China poses the greatest threat to America today, and the greatest threat to democracy and freedom world-wide since World War II.” Ratcliffe claimed “Beijing intends to dominate the US and the rest of the planet economically, militarily and technologically” through a vast espionage plan to steal intellectual property from the US, replicate the technology, then edge those same firms out of the market - a strategy he called “rob, replicate and replace.” Ratcliffe’s article isn’t limited to attacking the Communist Party of China, however: he also warns of the dangers “Chinese nationals” pose to intellectual property and to “research and development secrets,” noting the FBI is “frequently arresting” them.
    [Show full text]
  • CHEY Special Lecture by John HAMRE.Pdf
    Executive Summary In Search of a Durable Strategy to Guide ROK-US Relations Special Lecture by Dr. John Hamre, President of CSIS The following publication is based on the special lecture titled ‘In Search of a Durable Strategy to Guide ROK-US Relations’ given by Dr. John Hamre, President of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), on September 24th 2019, at the Korea Foundation for Advanced Studies Conference Hall. Chey Institute for Advanced Studies is a knowledge-sharing platform established in October 2018 to honor the 20th anniversary of the passing of CHEY Jong-hyon, the former Chairman of SK Group. The Chey Institute is committed to analyzing various geopolitical risks surrounding the Korean Peninsula, and exploring opportunities and challenges posed by scientific innovation. In doing so, the Chey Institute aims to come up with pragmatic solutions to the challenges that Northeast Asia and the global community at large face today. Specifically, the Chey Institute seeks to identify geopolitical risks that threaten regional and global stability, investigate opportunities and challenges posed by scientific innovation, and help generate and disseminate new knowledge to the world. In the process, the Chey Institute partners with leading academic institutions, research organizations, and think tanks around the world to establish a global network of top thinkers and groups working to solve the challenges of this century. All views and opinions expressed in CHEY publications are the sole responsibility of the author(s) or speaker(s). For Further information about Chey Institute for Advanced Studies or this publication, please visit our website, www.chey.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall2011.Pdf
    Grove Press Atlantic Monthly Press Black Cat The Mysterious Press Granta Fall 201 1 NOW AVAILABLE Complete and updated coverage by The New York Times about WikiLeaks and their controversial release of diplomatic cables and war logs OPEN SECRETS WikiLeaks, War, and American Diplomacy The New York Times Introduction by Bill Keller • Essential, unparalleled coverage A New York Times Best Seller from the expert writers at The New York Times on the hundreds he controversial antisecrecy organization WikiLeaks, led by Julian of thousands of confidential Assange, made headlines around the world when it released hundreds of documents revealed by WikiLeaks thousands of classified U.S. government documents in 2010. Allowed • Open Secrets also contains a T fascinating selection of original advance access, The New York Times sorted, searched, and analyzed these secret cables and war logs archives, placed them in context, and played a crucial role in breaking the WikiLeaks story. • online promotion at Open Secrets, originally published as an e-book, is the essential collection www.nytimes.com/opensecrets of the Times’s expert reporting and analysis, as well as the definitive chronicle of the documents’ release and the controversy that ensued. An introduction by Times executive editor, Bill Keller, details the paper’s cloak-and-dagger “We may look back at the war logs as relationship with a difficult source. Extended profiles of Assange and Bradley a herald of the end of America’s Manning, the Army private suspected of being his source, offer keen insight engagement in Afghanistan, just as into the main players. Collected news stories offer a broad and deep view into the Pentagon Papers are now a Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the messy challenges facing American power milestone in our slo-mo exit from in Europe, Russia, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • DCCA Opinion No. 91-BG-1518: in Re Elliott Abrams
    Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 91-BG-1518 IN RE ELLIOTT ABRAMS, RESPONDENT, A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility ON REHEARING EN BANC (Reargued En Banc May 7, 1996 Decided February 5, 1997) Charles J. Cooper, with whom William L. McGrath was on the brief, for respondent. Michael S. Frisch, Assistant Bar Counsel, with whom Leonard H. Becker, Bar Counsel, and Julia L. Porter, Assistant Bar Counsel, were on the brief, for the Office of Bar Counsel. Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and FERREN, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, KING, RUIZ, and REID, Associate Judges. Opinion for the court by Associate Judge SCHWELB. Concurring opinion by Associate Judge SCHWELB, with whom Associate Judges FERREN and FARRELL join, at p. __. Concurring opinion by Associate Judge KING at p. __. Concurring opinion by Associate Judge RUIZ at p. __. Dissenting opinion by Associate Judge TERRY, with whom Chief Judge WAGNER and Associate Judges STEADMAN and REID join, at p. __. SCHWELB, Associate Judge: This matter is before us on the recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that Elliott Abrams, Esq., a member of our Bar, and formerly Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs, be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period 2 of one year.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H2616
    H2616 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE March 15, 2007 b 1715 peace or stability in Iraq or Iran with- and the British), began running a similar op- out addressing the Palestinian-Israeli eration, aimed at avoiding congressional USING CONSTRUCTIVE ENGAGE- scrutiny or public accountability of any sort, MENT IN THE MIDDLE EAST issue openly, honestly and urgently. The issues of the Middle East are in- out of Vice President Dick Cheney’s office. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. They dipped into ‘‘black pools of money’’, extricably interconnected, and no one possibly stolen from the billions of Iraqi oil BOYDA of Kansas). Under a previous understands that better than Speaker order of the House, the gentleman from dollars that have never been accounted for PELOSI. At a time when the White since the US occupation began. Washington (Mr. MCDERMOTT) is recog- House prefers to choose sides, our dis- Some of these funds, as well as Saudi ones, nized for 5 minutes. tinguished leader prefers to pursue were evidently funneled through the embat- Mr. MCDERMOTT. Madam Speaker, peace in the Middle East, demanding tled, Sunni-dominated Lebanese government you don’t negotiate with the barrel of diplomacy aimed at achieving peace of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora to the sort a gun, but that seems to be the Presi- of Sunni jihadist groups (‘‘some sympathetic through social and economic justice for to al-Qaeda’’) whose members might nor- dent’s strategy with respect to Iran. all. That is why the House must legislate mally fear ending up in Guantanamo and to It is the kind of vision the whole a group, or groups, associated with the fun- to ensure that the President cannot world has passionately embraced before damentalist Muslim Brotherhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program
    Geopolitics of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program But Oil and Gas Still Matter CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES A Report of the CSIS Energy and National Security Program 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 author Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Robert E. Ebel E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org March 2010 ISBN 978-0-89206-600-1 CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & Ë|xHSKITCy066001zv*:+:!:+:! CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES Geopolitics of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program But Oil and Gas Still Matter A Report of the CSIS Energy and National Security Program author Robert E. Ebel March 2010 About CSIS In an era of ever-changing global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and practical policy solutions to decision- makers. CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for America to survive as a nation and prosper as a people. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent public policy institutions. Today, CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. More than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focus their expertise on defense and security; on the world’s regions and the unique challenges inherent to them; and on the issues that know no boundary in an increasingly connected world.
    [Show full text]
  • Northumbria Research Link
    Northumbria Research Link Citation: White, Dean (2012) The UK's Response to the Rwandan Genocide of 1994. Doctoral thesis, Northumbria University. This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/10122/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html THE UK’S RESPONSE TO THE RWANDAN GENOCIDE OF 1994 DEAN JAMES WHITE PhD 2012 THE UK’S RESPONSE TO THE RWANDAN GENOCIDE OF 1994 DEAN JAMES WHITE MA, BA (HONS) A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Northumbria at Newcastle for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Research undertaken in the School of Arts and Social Sciences. July 2012 ABSTRACT Former Prime Minister Tony Blair described the UK’s response to the Rwandan genocide as “We knew.
    [Show full text]
  • New World Spring 2008.Pdf
    news and comment on the United nations and UnA-UK Spring 2008 | £3.00 NE W WORLD SHIRLEY WILLIAMS on the new push to rid the world of nuclear weapons The Beginning of The end? AND Foreign Secretary David Miliband speaks to YPN page 27 The global food crisis page 9 Join the debate on climate change page 2 Combat child The US-Un The right to trafficking relationship water page 16 page 10 page 14 PLUS groundbreaking disability treaty page 5 The responsibility to protect page 7 oil-for-food page 10 Parliament and the Un page 18 david hannay’s new book page 20 UnA-UK 63rd Annual Conference page 22 new Youth Council page 30 UNA-UK UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION OF THE UK | 3 Whitehall Court, London SW1A 2EL | www.una.org.uk UNA-UK What is the role of the United Nations in finding solutions to climate change and building CLIMATE CHANGE resilience to its impacts? CONFERENCE SERIES Is the UK government doing enough to build 2008-09 a low-carbon economy? What can you do as an individual ? An upcoming series of one-day conferences on climate change, to be held by UNA-UK in 2008-2009 in different cities around the UK, will be tackling these questions. The first conference of the series will be held in Birmingham on Saturday, 7 June 2008. The second will be held in Belfast on Thursday, 6 November 2008. Two further events are being planned for the autumn of 2008 and early 2009 – one in Wales and the other in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership in Times of Transition
    U.S. Department of Defense Executive Development Program LEADERSHIP IN TIMES OF TRANSITION FEBRUARY 21–24, 2016 HOSTED BY The Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS) IN COLLABORATION WITH Robertson Foundation Consortium of Universities Syracuse University, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs Tufts University, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy Texas A&M University, Bush School of Government and Public Service University of California, San Diego, School of Global Policy and Strategy University of Maryland, School of Public Policy SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY TIME FEB. 21 FEB. 22 FEB. 23 FEB. 24 8:45 AM BREAKFAST BREAKFAST MODULE 1: INTERAGENCY DECISION-MAKING IN TRAVEL TO A COMPLEX WORLD MODERATED BY KATHLEEN HICKS DOD ON OWN 9 AM PART I: COUNTERING NONSTATE ACTORS JUAN ZARATE SIMULATION: PRINCIPALS COMMITTEE MEETING PART II: INTERAGENCY HOTWASH AND WRAP-UP COOPERATION AND COLLABORATION ARRIVE AT DOD AND JOHN HAMRE, MICHAEL GREEN TRANSFER THROUGH JAMES STAVRIDIS, SECURITY JAMES STEINBERG, RYAN 10 AM BREAK CROCKER, AND PETER COWHEY PART III: DOMESTIC SECURITY COORDINATION CHALLENGES CONVERSATION WITH PAUL STOCKON SECRETARY ASH CARTER 11 AM PART IV: RAPID INTRO. OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TRAVEL TO CSIS BREAK DENISE ZHENG AND ANDREW HUNTER CLOSING LUNCH MODULE WRAP-UP 12 PM CONVERSATION WITH DR. ZBIGNIEW MODULE 2: LEADERSHIP AND BRZEZINSKI TRANSITION: FUNCTIONAL IMPERATIVES JOHN HAMRE ROBERT MURRETT 1 PM PANEL I: NATIONAL SECURITY MODULE 3: CYBER CRISIS LEADERSHIP, REFORM, SIMULATION: DEFENSE AND TRANSITION AND
    [Show full text]
  • Welcoming Remarks by Dr. Hamre
    JoongAng Ilbo-CSIS Forum 2014 Welcoming Remarks By John Hamre President and CEO, and the Pritzker Chair, CSIS Dr. John Hamre was elected president and CEO of CSIS in January 2000 and named Pritzker Chair in December 2012. Before joining CSIS, he served as the 26th U.S. deputy secretary of defense. Prior to holding that post, he was the under secretary of defense (comptroller) from 1993 to 1997. As comptroller, Dr. Hamre was the principal assistant to the secretary of defense for the preparation, presentation, and execution of the defense budget and management improvement programs. In 2007, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates appointed Dr. Hamre to serve as chairman of the Defense Policy Board. Before serving in the Department of Defense, Dr. Hamre worked for 10 years as a professional staff member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. From 1978 to 1984, Dr. Hamre served in the Congressional Budget Office, where he became its deputy assistant director for national security and international affairs. Dr. Hamre received his Ph.D. from the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University on international politics and economics and U.S. foreign policy. He received his B.A. from Augustana College in Sioux Falls, South Dakota on political science and economics. The following year he studied as a Rockefeller fellow at the Harvard Divinity School in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Good morning, Ladies and Gentlemen. It is a great honor to be back in Seoul, which feels increasingly like my second home. I am honored to be here, partnering with my good friend and mentor, Chairman Ambassador Hong Seok-Hyun at this, the 2014 JoongAng Ilbo-CSIS Forum.
    [Show full text]