<<

IMPROVING QUALITY THROUGH HEALTH

INTRODUCTION According to EPA, more than 70% of the United States’ and streams are in fair or poor biological condition. Recurring events, such as harmful algal blooms in Western Erie and the “hypoxic zone” in the Gulf of Mexico, have drawn public attention to runoff from as a contributing source of degradation. In 2014, the City of Toledo, Ohio warned citizens not to drink the water due to high microcystin levels associated with algal blooms. In 2015, the Des Moines Water Works in announced litigation against neighboring agricultural counties for high levels in the public . Such events increase the likelihood of more on- regulations, which some contend would to fewer and a greater reliance on other countries for our supply. Several of the same -promoting practices that increase productivity for farmers and ranchers are also proven to reduce nutrient runoff and , thereby protecting and improving water quality.

OPPORTUNITIES uptake of that nitrate by the . Consequently, There is a significant opportunity for landowners to in order to ensure benefits to water quality, capitalize on the economic and production benefits of recommendations for the following crop must account for soil health, while simultaneously improving surface and that will become available from the decomposing quality. Given the fact that 70% of in cover crop. As many practices used to enhance soil health the United States is privately owned, landowners have influence nutrient availability, is the greatest opportunity to impact food production in an inherently a key soil health practice, and an entire systems environmentally responsible manner. For example, no- perspective is required to optimize benefits and minimize till and cover crops are primary practices farmers use to nutrient losses. This recognition has given rise to the enhance soil health. Research in Maryland showed that “4R” nutrient stewardship concept advocated by the these same practices also reduced loss of nitrate by 88% fertilizer industry and followed by many natural and phosphorus by 92%. Adding cover crops to no-till professionals and farmers, where are to be added soybeans in Missouri reduced loss of soil by as much as from the Right source, at the Right rate and Right time, and 94%, nitrate by 77% and phosphorus by 63%. An analysis in the Right place. of 69 separate research studies from across the U.S. showed that cover crops reduced nitrate loss by an average RESEARCH AND ENGAGEMENT NEEDS of 70%. Significant research needs still exist to achieve soil health management systems to protect and enhance Additional soil health practices, such as and both groundwater and quality. A concerted nutrient management, also play key roles for protecting research effort would enable us to: and enhancing water quality through soil health. In fact, ■ Assess the potential water quality improvements and reduction in nitrate loss to groundwater is generally due to associated temporal dynamics for major watersheds given different levels of soil health management system proficient grants program adoption in order to prioritize key sub-watersheds and that develops and associated practices. capitalizes on synergies ■ Quantify the current status of soil health and the current among projects; adoption level of soil health management systems ■ Continually work across the U.S. in order to assess the current state and alongside grantees to establish a baseline for measuring future progress. assess and ensure impact ■ Quantify the impacts of soil health-promoting practices of the investments and systems on profitability and economic risk across made and provide that a range of , cropping systems and . This information back to is needed for practices already proven to enhance soil funders and the public; health, as well as for new technologies and practices. ■ Incorporate research ■ Quantify potential increases in soil organic carbon and results into educational available water holding capacity across a range of soils to and programs develop a Decision Support System for farmers to guide for farmers, ranchers and them in increasing drought resilience through soil health. other audiences; and This will serve as an additional driver to farmer adoption ■ Build and enhance of practices that also improve water quality. partnerships for ■ Determine optimal cover crop species mixes, seeding education, technology rates and seeding methods (e.g., inter-seeding, transfer and adoption. inter-cropping, frost-seeding) to enhance cover crop establishment and survival, increase soil organic carbon, SUMMARY and protect and enhance water quality. Research has clearly shown that many of the same soil health practices of interest to farmers for enhancing Ultimately, farmers and ranchers are business owners. productivity are also beneficial for water quality. Accordingly, the Soil Health Institute will prioritize the Consequently, conducting the additional research and development and transfer of materials and tools that focus education needed to expand adoption of soil health on the profitability and economic risk of proven soil health management systems by farmers will afford the practices and technologies. simultaneous benefits of protecting and improving water quality. Assessments of current land management ROLES OF THE SOIL HEALTH INSTITUTE practices and potential water quality improvements will To protect and enhance water quality, the Soil Health allow identification of priority sub-watersheds and practice Institute will: adoption needs. Quantifying the current status of soil health ■ Build research/implementation strategic plans and and adoption of soil health-promoting practices will provide corresponding networks/synergies to carry out those a baseline for measuring future progress and impact. plans; ■ Seek and obtain funding to address the gaps identified; Enhancing soil health will significantly improve water ■ Administer an accountable, transparent and technically quality while addressing farmers’ production goals.