DOCSLIB.ORG

DSM2 Extension for the California Aqueduct, South Bay Aqueduct, and Delta-Mendota Canal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DSM2 Extension for the California Aqueduct, South Bay Aqueduct, and Delta-Mendota Canal DSM2 Extension for the California Aqueduct, South Bay Aqueduct, and Delta-Mendota Canal Prepared for State Water Contractors and Municipal Water Quality Investigation Program June 2005 2485 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 600 Sacramento, CA 95833 Contents Section Page Acronyms and Abbreviations .........................................................................................................vi 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 1-1 2. Review of System Operations................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 California Aqueduct and South Bay Aqueduct........................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 SWP Operations.................................................................................................. 2-8 2.2 Delta-Mendota Canal................................................................................................... 2-9 2.2.1 DMC Operations................................................................................................. 2-9 3. Review of Hydrologic, Operational, and Water Quality Data............................................ 3-1 3.1 Hydrologic Data ........................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Operational Data .......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Pumping Plants................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 Inflows.................................................................................................................. 3-2 3.2.3 Deliveries/Diversions........................................................................................ 3-2 3.3 Water Quality Data ...................................................................................................... 3-2 4. Physical System Data.................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 California Aqueduct and South Bay Aqueduct........................................................ 4-1 4.2 Delta-Mendota Canal................................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Results of Physical System Data Review................................................................... 4-2 5. Development of DSM2 Model Application........................................................................... 5-1 5.1 DSM2 Model.................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Physical System Representation................................................................................. 5-2 5.2.1 California Aqueduct and South Bay Aqueduct.............................................. 5-2 5.2.2 Closed Conveyance Structures: Pipelines, Siphons, and Tunnels............... 5-6 5.2.3 Delta-Mendota Canal ......................................................................................... 5-7 5.2.4 Reservoirs ............................................................................................................ 5-9 5.2.5 Aqueduct Gate Operations................................................................................ 5-9 5.2.6 San Luis Reservoir and O’Neill Forebay Mixing ........................................... 5-9 5.3 Conversion of Geometric Data to DSM2 Format ................................................... 5-10 5.3.1 Cross Section Geometry................................................................................... 5-10 5.4 Inflows and Diversions.............................................................................................. 5-12 5.4.1 Pumping Plant Inflows .................................................................................... 5-12 5.4.2 Floodwater and Groundwater Inflows.......................................................... 5-12 5.4.3 Flow Exchanges ................................................................................................ 5-13 5.4.4 Water Diversions .............................................................................................. 5-16 5.5 Water Balance and Required Closure Terms.......................................................... 5-18 5.6 Salinity.......................................................................................................................... 5-22 W062005003SAC/314451/051570001 (001.DOC) ii CONTENTS 6. Model Calibration, Validation, and Sensitivity Analysis ................................................... 6-1 6.1 Hydraulics Calibration ................................................................................................ 6-1 6.1.1 Flow ...................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1.2 Stage...................................................................................................................... 6-4 6.2 Salinity Calibration....................................................................................................... 6-5 6.3 Model Validation........................................................................................................ 6-12 6.4 Model Sensitivity Analysis........................................................................................ 6-12 7. Model Limitations....................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Water Balance................................................................................................................ 7-1 7.2 Diversion Timing.......................................................................................................... 7-1 7.3 Reservoir Operations ................................................................................................... 7-1 7.4 Gate Operations ............................................................................................................ 7-2 8. Conclusions and Recommendations........................................................................................ 8-1 8.1 Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 8-1 8.2 Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 8-1 8.2.1 Gate Operations .................................................................................................. 8-1 8.2.2 Link with Existing DSM2 Applications........................................................... 8-1 8.2.3 Tracer Tests for Determination of Travel Time .............................................. 8-2 8.2.4 Analysis of San Luis Reservoir Operations..................................................... 8-2 8.2.5 Develop Planning Mode.................................................................................... 8-2 8.2.6 Develop Forecasting Mode................................................................................ 8-2 9. Bibliography................................................................................................................................. 9-1 Websites................................................................................................................................ 9-1 Appendixes A Model Schematic B Aqueduct Channel Aggregation C Previous Deliverables and Meeting Notes Tables 5-1 Example of Channel Aggregation 5-2 South Bay Aqueduct DSM2 Channel Lengths 5-3 California Aqueduct (including East Branch) DSM2 Channel Lengths 5-4 West Branch DSM2 Channel Lengths 5-5 Delta-Mendota Canal DSM2 Channel Lengths 5-6 Monthly Average Inflows (cfs) in California Aqueduct by Pool W062005003SAC/314451/051570001 (001.DOC) iii CONTENTS Figures 2-1 State Water Project 2-2 Delta Division Including the South Bay Aqueduct plus Delta-Mendota Canal 2-3 San Luis Division plus Delta Mendota Canal 2-4 San Joaquin Division 2-5 Southern Division 2-6 San Luis Reservoir and O’Neill Forebay 5-1 Comparison of South Bay Pumping Plant Discharge Pipe Flow to Open Channel Flow Approximation 5-2 Comparison of the Effects of Channel Geometry Parameters (Manning roughness and invert slope) on Transport Velocity 5-3 Cross Section Generating Tool 5-4 Comparison of Actual Canal Invert Elevations along the California Aqueduct with Calculated Canal Invert Elevations Used in DSM2 5-5 Banks Pumping Plant Flow Data, Daily and 7-Day Average (DSM2 input) 5-6 Tracy Pumping Plant Flow Data, Daily and 7-Day Average (DSM2 input) 5-7 Gianelli Generating Plant Flow Data, Daily and 7-Day Average (DSM2 input) 5-8 Gianelli Pumping Plant Flow Data, Daily and 7-Day Average (DSM2 input) 5-9 O’Neill Pumping Plant Flow Data, Daily and 7-Day Average (DSM2 input) 5-10 O’Neill Generating Plant Flow Data, Daily and 7-Day Average (DSM2 input) 5-11 Comparison of Internal Flow Measurements in California Aqueduct 5-12 South Bay Pumping Plant Flow Data, Daily and 7-Day Average (DSM2 input) 5-13 Comparison of Total Net Diversions by Aqueduct Section 5-14 Comparison of Errors in Water Balance Calculations for Each Section 5-15 Time Series of Total Error in Water Balance Calculations for California Aqueduct (Banks to Pearblossom) 5-16 Error in O’Neill Forebay Water Balance Plotted Against San Luis Reservoir Release
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KEY to ENDSHEET MAP (Continued)
    KEY TO ENDSHEET MAP (continued) RESERVOIRS AND LAKES (AUTHORIZED) 181.Butler Valley Res. 185. Dixie Refuge Res. 189. County Line Res. 182.Knights Valley Res. 186. Abbey Bridge Res. 190. Buchanan Res. 183.Lakeport Res. 187. Marysville Res. 191. Hidden Res. 184.Indian Valley Res. 188. Sugar Pine Res. 192. ButtesRes. RESERVOIRS AND LAKES 51BLE FUTURE) 193.Helena Res. 207. Sites-Funks Res. 221. Owen Mountain Res. 194.Schneiders Bar Res. 208. Ranchería Res. 222. Yokohl Res. 195.Eltapom Res. 209. Newville-Paskenta Res. 223. Hungry Hollow Res. 196. New Rugh Res. 210. Tehama Res. 224. Kellogg Res. 197.Anderson Ford Res. 211. Dutch Gulch Res. 225. Los Banos Res. 198.Dinsmore Res. 212. Allen Camp Res. 226. Jack Res. 199. English Ridge Res. 213. Millville Res. 227. Santa Rita Res. 200.Dos Rios Res. 214. Tuscan Buttes Res. 228. Sunflower Res. 201.Yellowjacket Res. 215. Aukum Res. 229. Lompoc Res. 202.Cahto Res. 216. Nashville Res. 230. Cold Springs Res. 203.Panther Res. 217. Irish Hill Res. 231. Topatopa Res. 204.Walker Res. 218. Cooperstown Res. 232. Fallbrook Res. 205.Blue Ridge Res. 219. Figarden Res. 233. De Luz Res. 206.Oat Res. 220. Little Dry Creek Res. AQUEDUCTS AND TUNNELS (EXISTING OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION) Clear Creek Tunnel 12. South Bay Aqueduct 23. Los Angeles Aqueduct 1. Whiskeytown-Keswick 13. Hetch Hetchy Aqueduct 24. South Coast Conduit 2.Tunnel 14. Delta Mendota Canal 25. Colorado River Aqueduct 3. Bella Vista Conduit 15. California Aqueduct 26. San Diego Aqueduct 4.Muletown Conduit 16. Pleasant Valley Canal 27. Coachella Canal 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee San Diego County Water Authority Board Meeting
    San Diego County Water Authority Board Meeting Documents April 25, 2019 Committee Administrative and Finance Engineering and Operations Imported Water Legislation and Public Outreach Water Planning and Environmental Formal Board On April 9, Congress passed implementing legislation for the Drought Contingency Plan, capping years of collaborative efforts among the seven Colorado River Basin states and the Bureau of Page 1 of 146 Reclamation to minimize the impacts of long-term drought in the river basin. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ AND STANDING COMMITTEES’ REGULAR MEETING APRIL 25, 2019 BOARD ROOM WATER AUTHORITY HEADQUARTERS BUILDING 4677 OVERLAND AVENUE, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 1. UNIFIED AGENDA: This unified agenda provides a brief description of each item to be considered by the Board and its Administrative and Finance, Engineering and Operations, Imported Water, Legislation and Public Outreach, and Water Planning Committees. For convenience, the agenda for each of the Committees and for the formal Board meeting are stated separately; however, all agendas shall be considered as a single agenda and any item listed on the agenda of any Committee may be acted upon by the Board. All items on the agenda of any Committee, including information items, may be deliberated and become subject to action by the Board. 2. DOCUMENTS: Staff reports and any other public information provided to the Board or Committee before the meeting relating to items on the agenda are available for public review at the San Diego County Water Authority 4677 Overland Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 during normal business hours. Additional documents may be distributed at the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colorado River Aqueduct
    Fact Sheet: Our Water Lifeline__ The Colorado River Aqueduct. Photo: Aerial photo of CRA Investment in Reliability The Colorado River Aqueduct is considered one of the nation’s Many innovations came from this period in time, including the top civil engineering marvels. It was originally conceived by creation of a medical system for contract workers that would William Mulholland and designed by Metropolitan’s first Chief become the forerunner for the prepaid healthcare plan offered Engineer Frank Weymouth after consideration of more than by Kaiser Permanente. 50 routes. The 242-mile CRA carries water from Lake Havasu to the system’s terminal reservoir at Lake Mathews in Riverside. This reservoir’s location was selected because it is situated at the upper end of Metropolitan’s service area and its elevation of nearly 1,400 feet allows water to flow by gravity to the majority of our service area The CRA was the largest public works project built in Southern California during the Great Depression. Overwhelming voter approval in 1929 for a $220 million bond – equivalent to a $3.75 billion investment today – brought jobs to 35,000 people. Miners, engineers, surveyors, cooks and more came to build Colorado River the aqueduct, living in the harshest of desert conditions and Aqueduct ultimately constructing 150 miles of canals, siphons, conduits and pipelines. They added five pumping plants to lift water over mountains so deliveries could then flow west by gravity. And they blasted 90-plus miles of tunnels, including a waterway under Mount San Jacinto. THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA // // JULY 2021 FACT SHEET: THE COLORADO RIVER AQUEDUCT // // OUR WATER LIFELINE The Vision Despite the city of Los Angeles’ investment in its aqueduct, by the early 1920s, Southern Californians understood the region did not have enough local supplies to meet growing demands.
    [Show full text]
  • San Luis Unit Project History
    San Luis Unit West San Joaquin Division Central Valley Project Robert Autobee Bureau of Reclamation Table of Contents The San Luis Unit .............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................4 Project Authorization.....................................................7 Construction History .....................................................9 Post Construction History ................................................19 Settlement of the Project .................................................24 Uses of Project Water ...................................................25 1992 Crop Production Report/Westlands ....................................27 Conclusion............................................................28 Suggested Readings ...........................................................28 Index ......................................................................29 1 The West San Joaquin Division The San Luis Unit Approximately 300 miles, and 30 years, separate Shasta Dam in northern California from the San Luis Dam on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley. The Central Valley Project, launched in the 1930s, ascended toward its zenith in the 1960s a few miles outside of the town of Los Banos. There, one of the world's largest dams rose across one of California's smallest creeks. The American mantra of "bigger is better" captured the spirit of the times when the San Luis Unit
    [Show full text]
  • 4.4 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity
    4.4 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity 4.4 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity This section presents an analysis of potential geology, soils, and seismicity impacts that would result from implementation of the Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project. The section includes a description of the affected environment, the associated regulatory framework (including all applicable geology, soils, and seismicity policies), the methodology, and the impact assessment. Mitigation measures are identified, where necessary, to avoid or reduce potential impacts. 4.4.1 Affected Environment Regulatory Setting The following federal, state, and local regulations relevant to geology, soils, and seismicity are applicable to the proposed project. Federal The Dam Safety and Security Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-310) The Dam Safety and Security Act of 2002 amends the National Dam Safety Program Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303, Section 215), which amends the National Dam Inspection Act of 1972 (Public Law 92-367). The purpose of these acts is to reduce the risks to life and property from dam failure in the United States through the establishment and maintenance of a national dam safety program that integrates the expertise and resources of the federal and non-federal communities to achieve national dam safety hazard reduction. The acts established: • A national dam inventory • A national inspection program by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with reports to the appropriate state and federal agencies • The Federal Interagency Committee on Dam Safety chaired by the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) • A dam safety training program • Assistance for state dam safety programs State Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (formerly the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act), signed into law in December 1972, requires the delineation of fault rupture zones along active faults in California.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of PREPARATION Waterfix EIR for WSC Amendments
    July 13, 2018 NOTICE OF PREPARATION Environmental Impact Report For the Proposed SWP Water Supply Contract Amendments for Water Management and California WaterFix July 13, 2018 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Department of Water Resources (DWR) will be the Lead Agency and will prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed State Water Project Water Supply Contract Amendments for Water Management and California WaterFix (proposed project). As more fully discussed below, this proposed project includes amending certain provisions of the State Water Resources Development System (SWRDS) Water Supply Contracts (Contracts). SWRDS (defined in Water Code Section 12931), or more commonly referred to as the State Water Project (SWP), was enacted into law in the Burns-Porter Act, passed by the Legislature in 1959 and approved by the voters in 1960. DWR constructed and currently operates and maintains the SWP, a system of storage and conveyance facilities that 1 provide water to 29 State Water Contractors known as the Public Water Agencies (PWAs). These PWAs include local water agencies and districts legislatively enabled to serve irrigation, municipal and industrial water supply customers or retail water supply 1 The State Water Project Public Water Agencies include Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Zone 7), Alameda County Water District, Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency, Castaic Lake Water Agency, City of Yuba City, Coachella Valley Water District, County
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT SUBSIDENCE STUDY San Luis Field Division San Joaquin Field Division
    State of California California Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Division of Engineering CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT SUBSIDENCE STUDY San Luis Field Division San Joaquin Field Division June 2017 State of California California Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Division of Engineering CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT SUBSIDENCE STUDY Jeanne M. Kuttel ......................................................................................... Division Chief Joseph W. Royer .......................... Chief, Geotechnical and Engineering Services Branch Tru Van Nguyen ............................... Supervising Engineer, General Engineering Section G. Robert Barry .................. Supervising Engineering Geologist, Project Geology Section by James Lopes ................................................................................ Senior Engineer, W.R. John M. Curless .................................................................. Senior Engineering Geologist Anna Gutierrez .......................................................................................... Engineer, W.R. Ganesh Pandey .................................................................... Supervising Engineer, W.R. assisted by Bradley von Dessonneck ................................................................ Engineering Geologist Steven Friesen ...................................................................... Engineer, Water Resources Dan Mardock .............................................................................. Chief, Geodetic
    [Show full text]
  • RK Ranch 5732 +/- Acres Los Banos, CA Merced County
    FARMS | RANCHES | RECREATIONAL PROPERTIES | LAND | LUXURY ESTATES RK Ranch 5732 +/- acres Los Banos, CA Merced County 707 Merchant Street | Suite 100 | Vacaville, CA 95688 707-455-4444 Office | 707-455-0455 Fax | californiaoutdoorproperties.com CalBRE# 01838294 FARMS | RANCHES | RECREATIONAL PROPERTIES | LAND | LUXURY ESTATES Introduction This expansive 5732 acre ranch is ideal for hunting, fishing, your favorite recreational activities, a family compound, agriculture, or cattle grazing. Located in Merced County, just an hour and a half from the San Francisco Bay Area, infinite recreational opportunities await with elk, trophy black tail deer, pigs, quail, and doves. The angler will be busy with catfish, bluegill, and outstanding bass fish- ing from the stock ponds. The South Fork of the Los Banos Creek flows through the property. This property is currently leased for cattle, but the recreational uses are only limited by your imagination. Location The property is located in Merced County, 17 miles from the town of Los Banos, 26 miles from Merced, and 8 miles from the San Luis Reservior. With all the benefits of seclusion, and the conveniences of major metropolitan areas close by, this property is just a 1.5 hour drive to Silicon Valley. Air service is provided by Fresno-Yosemite International Airport, 78 miles from the property, or Norman Y. Mi- neta San Jose International Airport, 83 miles from the property. Los Banos Municipal Airport is lo- cated 17 miles away. The closest schools would be 17 miles away in Los Banos. From the north, take Highway 101 South to CA-152 East, right onto Basalt Road, left onto Gonzaga Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTI8 SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 296 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS OF CALIFORNIA PART II. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP JOHN C. HOYT BY B. D. WOOD In cooperation with the State Water Commission and the Conservation Commission of the State of California WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 NOTE. A complete list of the gaging stations maintained in the San Joaquin River basin from 1888 to July 1, 1912, is presented on pages 100-102. 2 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS IN SAN JOAQUIN RIYER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. By B. D. WOOD. INTRODUCTION. This gazetteer is the second of a series of reports on the* surf ace waters of California prepared by the United States Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the State of California as repre­ sented by the State Conservation Commission, George C. Pardee, chairman; Francis Cuttle; and J. P. Baumgartner, and by the State Water Commission, Hiram W. Johnson, governor; Charles D. Marx, chairman; S. C. Graham; Harold T. Powers; and W. F. McClure. Louis R. Glavis is secretary of both commissions. The reports are to be published as Water-Supply Papers 295 to 300 and will bear the fol­ lowing titles: 295. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part I, Sacramento River basin. 296. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part II, San Joaquin River basin. 297. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part III, Great Basin and Pacific coast streams. 298. Water resources of California, Part I, Stream measurements in the Sacramento River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Flows and Water Quality in the California Aqueduct Using DSM2
    Simulation of Flows and Water Quality in the California Aqueduct Using DSM2 Siqing Liu, Bob Suits DWR, Bay Delta Office, Modeling Support Branch 2011 CWEMF Annual Meeting, February 28 –March 2 1 Topics • Project objectives • Aqueduct System modeled • Assumptions / issues with modeling • Model results –Flows / Storage, EC, Bromide 2 Objectives Simulate Aqueduct hydraulics and water quality • 1990 – 2010 period • DSM2 Aqueduct version calibrated by CH2Mhill Achieve 1st step in enabling forecasting Physical System Canals simulated • South Bay Aqueduct (42 miles) • California Aqueduct (444 miles) • East Branch to Silverwood Lake • West Branch to Pyramid Lake (40 miles) • Delta‐Mendota Canal (117 miles) 4 Physical System, cont Pumping Plants Banks Pumping Plant Buena Vista (Check 30) Jones Pumping Plant Teerink (Check 35) South Bay Chrisman (Check 36) O’Neill Pumping-Generating Edmonston (Check 40) Gianelli Pumping-Generating Alamo (Check 42) Dos Amigos (Check 13) Oso (West Branch) Las Perillas (Costal branch) Pearblossom (Check 58) 5 Physical System, cont Check structures and gates • Pools separated by check structures throughout the aqueduct system (SWP: 66, DMC: 21 ) • Gates at check structures regulate flow rates and water surface elevation 6 Physical System, cont Turnout and diversion structures • Water delivered to agricultural and municipal contractors through diversion structures • Over 270 diversion structures on SWP • Over 200 turnouts on DMC 7 Physical System, cont Reservoirs / Lakes Represented as complete mixing of water body •
    [Show full text]
  • CA-Waterways-Map.Pdf
    O R E G O N S rk m o it F h e dl R Mid . Goose Lake S o ut k h r o F C K l O O a m a N t h r Sa e c v r er i a Riv R m d e u A A aterways n o l t o o C c R W M E V A D i v e R i r r t v i e Some of the water you use every day has probably traveled T P r S S r i n i Trinity Lake ty M a d T T R iv er great distances and over high mountain ranges before reaching E UREKA R i v e r Shasta Lake Va n your faucet. This is because water is not always where we need R EDDING Du Clear zen Whiskeytown River Creek Lake Tunnel it. In California, most of the rain and snowfall is in the north. But Lake Antelope E Almanor Lake e l most of the people live in the south. The solution is to distribute S a R c i v r e a r m Corning R k Lake Frenchman e r n o Canal F Davis Lake the water to where it is needed through delivery systems such t o h t r o A R N rk Black i Fo v e e Butte r dl id as the State Water Project (SWP). Lake M Lake k N or F Oroville h t u So G Thermalito New Bullards The SWP delivers water from Lake Oroville in the north to the T Forebay and Bar Reservoir e h Lake Oroville Afterbay F e a a Visitors Center Indian m t h r a a e Valley e iv E R R r a San Francisco Bay area, the San Joaquin Valley, and Southern b u u Y Reservoir - s s i Clear Lake R a C i n o v e l u r S R sa i California.
    [Show full text]
  • Downstream of O'neill Forebay
    DSM2DSM2 CaliforniaCalifornia AqueductAqueduct ExtensionExtension Presented to California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum March 1, 2005 Introduction and Project Goals • CH2M HILL is constructing a DSM2 model of the California Aqueduct on behalf of DWR’s Municipal Water Quality Investigation (MWQI) program and the State Water Project Contractors • Goals: – Detailed evaluation of Aqueduct Hydrodynamics, Water Quality, and Operations – Forecasting short-term and long-term water quality – Potential for Real-time analysis of Water Quality throughout system Model Coverage and Geometry • The model includes – California Aqueduct, South Bay Aqueduct – East Branch to Silverwood Lake, West Branch to Pyramid Lake, – San Luis Reservoir and O’Neill Forebay, and – DMC from Tracy Pumping Plant to the Mendota Pool – 580 miles in total • EXCEL tool built to generate ASCII cross section files • Pipes and Tunnels treated as channels Model Area Model Schematic Boundary Conditions • Flow at Tracy and Banks • San Luis Reservoir Operations • DMC and O’Neill Forebay Operations • Diversions to South Bay Aqueduct and West Branch (pumping plant data) • Contractor Diversions Database • Mass Balance Closure Terms Application-specific issues • Treatment of Check Structures – gates and weirs to control elevation • Use of Object to Object programming – DSM2 tool that allows for instantaneous transfer of water from location to another • Flow into South Bay Aqueduct • O’Neill Pumping and Generating Flows • Gianelli Pumping and Generating Flows • Flow into South Bay
    [Show full text]