DOCSLIB.ORG

KEY to ENDSHEET MAP (Continued)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KEY to ENDSHEET MAP (Continued) KEY TO ENDSHEET MAP (continued) RESERVOIRS AND LAKES (AUTHORIZED) 181.Butler Valley Res. 185. Dixie Refuge Res. 189. County Line Res. 182.Knights Valley Res. 186. Abbey Bridge Res. 190. Buchanan Res. 183.Lakeport Res. 187. Marysville Res. 191. Hidden Res. 184.Indian Valley Res. 188. Sugar Pine Res. 192. ButtesRes. RESERVOIRS AND LAKES 51BLE FUTURE) 193.Helena Res. 207. Sites-Funks Res. 221. Owen Mountain Res. 194.Schneiders Bar Res. 208. Ranchería Res. 222. Yokohl Res. 195.Eltapom Res. 209. Newville-Paskenta Res. 223. Hungry Hollow Res. 196. New Rugh Res. 210. Tehama Res. 224. Kellogg Res. 197.Anderson Ford Res. 211. Dutch Gulch Res. 225. Los Banos Res. 198.Dinsmore Res. 212. Allen Camp Res. 226. Jack Res. 199. English Ridge Res. 213. Millville Res. 227. Santa Rita Res. 200.Dos Rios Res. 214. Tuscan Buttes Res. 228. Sunflower Res. 201.Yellowjacket Res. 215. Aukum Res. 229. Lompoc Res. 202.Cahto Res. 216. Nashville Res. 230. Cold Springs Res. 203.Panther Res. 217. Irish Hill Res. 231. Topatopa Res. 204.Walker Res. 218. Cooperstown Res. 232. Fallbrook Res. 205.Blue Ridge Res. 219. Figarden Res. 233. De Luz Res. 206.Oat Res. 220. Little Dry Creek Res. AQUEDUCTS AND TUNNELS (EXISTING OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION) Clear Creek Tunnel 12. South Bay Aqueduct 23. Los Angeles Aqueduct 1. Whiskeytown-Keswick 13. Hetch Hetchy Aqueduct 24. South Coast Conduit 2.Tunnel 14. Delta Mendota Canal 25. Colorado River Aqueduct 3. Bella Vista Conduit 15. California Aqueduct 26. San Diego Aqueduct 4.Muletown Conduit 16. Pleasant Valley Canal 27. Coachella Canal 5. Corning Canal 17. Madera Canal 28. East Highline Canal B.Tehama-Colusa Canal 18. Friant Kern Canal 29. All American Canal 7.Putah South Canal 19. San Luis Obispo Conduit 30. West Side Canal 8. Cache Slough Conduit 20. Whale Rock Conduit 31. Santa Rosa Conduit 9. Folsom South Canal 21. West Branch California 32. Sonoma Aqueduct 10. Mokelumne Aqueduct Aqueduct 11. Contra Costa Canal 22. Angeles Tunnel AQUEDUCTS AND TUNNELS (AUTHORIZED) 33. Stony Canal 37. Pacheco Tunnel 40. Coastal Branch 34. Folsom-Malby Conduit 38. Santa Clara Canal California Aqueduct 35. North Bay Aqueduct 39. Hollister-Watsonville 36. Peripheral Canal Conduit AQUEDUCTS AND TUNNELS (POSSIBLE FUTURE) 41. Clear Creek Tunnel #2 48. Garrett Tunnel 55. Contra Loma Canal 42. Trinity Tunnel 49. West Sacramento Canal 56. Tuway Canal 43. South Fork Tunnel 50. Cache Creek-Sacramento 57. Porterville- 44. Cottonwood Tunnel River Canal Bakersfield Canal 45. Westside Conveyance 51. Knights Valley-Lake 58. Sespe Conduit System Hennessey Canal 46. Grindstone Tunnel 52. Sonoma-Marin Conduit 47. Stony Creek 53. Hood-Clay Canal Conveyance Channel 54. Eastside Canal SOURCES: California Water Resources Development, Irrigation Districts Association of California, 1968 and Water Resources Development in California, California State Department of Water Resources, 1970 CALIFORNIA WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT EXISTING poçqiri p or under AUTHORIZED FUTURE CONSTRUCTION Reservoirs, lakes Aqueducts, tunnels Urban areas KEY TO ENDSHEET MAP RESERVOIRS AND LAKES (EXISTING OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION) 1. Copco Lake 61. Lake Tahoe 122. Nacimiento Res. 2. Iron Gate Res. 62. Lower Bear River Res. 123. Salinas Res. 3. Dwinnell Res. 63. Salt Springs Res. 124. Whale Rock Res. 4. Clair Engle Lake 64. Pardee Res. 125. Lopez Res. 5. Lewiston Res. 65. Camanche Res. 126. Twitchell Res. 6. Lake Pillsbury 66. New Hogan Res. 127. Jameson Lake 7. Lake Mendocino 67. Salt Springs Valley Res. 128. Gibralter Res. 8. Lake Sonoma 68. Farmington Res. 129. Cachuma Res. 9. Nicasio Res. 69. Woodward Res. 130. Matilija Res. 10. Lake Hennessy 70. Donnells Res. 131. Casitas Res. 11. Clear Lake 71. Beardsley Res. 132. Pyramid Lake 12. Lake Berryessa 72. New Melones Res. 133. Piru Lake 13. East Park Res. 73. Tulloch Res. 134. Castaic Lake 14. Stony Gorge Res. 74. Lake Lloyd 135. Fairmount Res. 15. Black Butte Res. 75. Lake Eleanor 136. Bouquet Res. 16. Whiskeytown Res. 76. Hetch Hetchy Res. 137. Hansen Res. 17. Keswick Res. 77. New Don Pedro Res. 138. San Fernando Valley Res 18. Shasta Lake 78. Turlock Lake 139. Chatsworth Res. 19. Box Canyon Res. 79. Lake McClure 140. Sepulveda Res. 20. McCloud Res. 80. McSwain Res. 141. Cogswell Res. 21. Pit #7 Res. 81. Lake Florence 142. San Gabriel Res. 22. Pit #6 Res. 82. Lake Edison 143. Morris Res. 23. Iron Canyon Res. 83. Mammoth Pool Res. 144. Santa Fe Res. 24. Lake Britton 84. Huntington Lake 145. Whittier Narrows Res. 25. Tule Lake 85. Shaver Lake 146. Brea Res. 26. Clear Lake Res. 86. Redinger Lake 147. Fullerton Res. 27. Goose Lake 87. Bass Lake 148. Carbon Canyon Res. 28. Eagle Lake 88. Millerton Lake 149. Puddingstone Res. 29. Honey Lake 89. Courtright Res. 150. San Antonio Res. 30.- Mountain Meadows Res. 90. Wishon Res. 151. Prado Res. 31. Lake Almanor 91. Pine Flat Res. 152. Irvine Lake 32. Butt Valley Res. 92. Terminus Res. 153. Villa Park Res. 33. Antelope Lake 93. Success Res. 154. Mojave Res. 34. Bucks Lake 94. Tulare Lake 155. Silverwood Lake 35. Lake Oroville 95. Isabella Res. 156. Lake Perris 36. Frenchman Lake 96. Buena Vista Lake 157. Lake Mathews 37. Lake Davis 97. Mono Lake 158. Railroad Canyon Res. 38. Little Grass Valley Res. 98. Grant Lake 159. Elsinore Lake 39. Sly Creek Res. 99. Lake Crowley 160. Auld Valley Res. 40. Thermalito Forebay and 100. Tinemaha Res. 161. Vail Res. Afterbay 101. Haiwee Res. 162. Lake Henshaw 41. Jackson Meadows Res. 102. San Pablo Res. 163. Sutherland Res. 42. New Bullards Bar Res. 103. Briones Res. 164. Lake Hodges 43. Bowman Lake 104. Upper San Leandro Res. 165. San Vicente Res. 44. Lake Spaulding 105. San Antonio Res. 166. Miramar Res. 45. Scotts Flat Res. 106. Calaveras Res. 167. Cuyamaca Res. 46. Englebright Res. 107. Lake Del Valley 168. El Capitan Res. 47. Merle Collins Res. 108. Clifton Court Forebay 169. Murray Res. 48. Rollins Res. 109. San Andreas Res. 170. Sweetwater Res. 49. Camp Far West Res. 110. Crystal Springs Lake 171. Lake Loveland 50. French Meadows Res. 111. Lexington Res. 172. Morena Lake 51. Hell Hole Res. 112. Calero Res. 173. Barrett Lake 52. Loon Lake 113. Chesbro Res. 174. Upper Otay Res. 53. Auburn Res. 114. Uvas Res. 175. Lower Otay Res. 54. Folsom Lake 115. Anderson Lake 176. Salton Sea 55. Lake Natoma 116. Coyote Lake 177. Lake Mead 56. Union Valley Res. 117. San Luis Res. 178. Imperial Res. 57. Ice House Res. 118. O'Neill Forebay 179. Senator Wash Res. 58. Silver Lake 119. Los Banos Creek Res. 180. Laguna Res. 59. Stampede Res. 120. Little Panoche Creek Res. 60. Prosser Creek Res. 121. San Antonio Res. KEY TO ENDSHEET MAP (continued) RESERVOIRS AND LAKES (AUTHORIZED) 181. Butler Valley Res. 185. Dixie Refuge Res. 189. County Line Res. 182. Knights Valley Res. 186. Abbey Bridge Res. 190. Buchanan Res. 183. Lakeport Res. 187. Marysville Res. 191. Hidden Res. 184. Indian Valley Res. 188. Sugar Pine Res. 192. ButtesRes. RESERVOIRS AND LAKES (POSSIBLE FUTURE) 193. Helena Res. 207. Sites-Funks Res. 221. Owen Mountain Res. 194. Schneiders Bar Res. 208. Ranchería Res. 222. Yokohl Res. 195. Eltapom Res. 209. Newville-Paskenta Res. 223. Hungry Hollow Res. 196. New Rugh Res. 210. Tehama Res. 224. Kellogg Res. 197. Anderson Ford Res. 211. Dutch Gulch Res. 225. Los Banos Res. 198. Dinsmore Res. 212. Allen Camp Res. 226. Jack Res. 199. English Ridge Res. 213. Millville Res. 227. Santa Rita Res. 200. Dos Rios Res. 214. Tuscan Buttes Res. 228. Sunflower Res. 201. Yellowjacket Res. 215. Aukum Res. 229. Lompoc Res. 202. Cahto Res. 216. Nashville Res. 230. Cold Springs Res. 203. Panther Res. 217. Irish Hill Res. 231. Topatopa Res. 204. Walker Res. 218. Cooperstown Res. 232. Fallbrook Res. 205. Blue Ridge Res. 219. Figarden Res. 233. De Luz Res. 206. Oat Res. 220. Little Dry Creek Res. AQUEDUCTS AND TUNNELS (EXISTING OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION) 1. Clear Creek Tunnel 12. South Bay Aqueduct 23. Los Angeles Aqueduct 2. Whiskeytown-Keswick 13. Hetch Hetchy Aqueduct 24. South Coast Conduit Tunnel 14 Delta Mendota Canal 25. Colorado River Aqueduct 3. Bella Vista Conduit 15. California Aqueduct 26. San Diego Aqueduct 4. Muletown Conduit 16. Pleasant Valley Canal 27. Coachella Canal 5. Corning Canal 17. Madera Canal 28. East Highline Canal 6. Tehama-Colusa Canal 18. Friant Kern Canal 29. All American Canal 7. Putah South Canal 19. San Luis Obispo Conduit 30. West Side Canal 8. Cache Slough Conduit 20. Whale Rock Conduit 31. Santa Rosa Conduit 9. Folsom South Canal 21. West Branch California 32. Sonoma Aqueduct 10. Mokelumne Aqueduct Aqueduct 11. Contra Costa Canal 22. Angeles Tunnel AQUEDUCTS AND TUNNELS I AUTHORIZED) 33. Stony Canal 37. Pacheco Tunnel 40. Coastal Branch 34. Folsom-Malby Conduit 38. Santa Clara Canal California Aqueduct 35. North Bay Aqueduct 39. Hollister-Watsonville 36. Peripheral Canal Conduit AQUEDUCTS AND TUNNELS (POSSIBLE FUTURE) 41. Clear Creek Tunnel #2 48. Garrett Tunnel 55. Contra Loma Canal 42. Trinity Tunnel 49. West Sacramento Canal 56. Tuway Canal 43. South Fork Tunnel 50. Cache Creek-Sacramento 57. Porterville- 44. Cottonwood Tunnel River Canal Bakersfield Canal 45. Westside Conveyance 51. Knights Valley-Lake 58. Sespe Conduit System Hennessey Canal 46. Grindstone Tunnel 52. Sonoma-Marin Conduit 47. Stony Creek 53. Hood-Clay Canal Conveyance Channel 54. Eastside Canal SOURCES: California Water Resources Development, Irrigation Districts Association of California, 1968 and Water Resources Development in California, California State Department of Water Resources, 1970 CALIFORNIA WATER A STUDY IN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CALIFORNIA WATER A STUDY IN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT EDITED BY DAVID SECKLER UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY, LOS ANGELES. LONDON 1971 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANCELES, CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS, LTD.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Madera Subbasin
    MADERA SUBBASIN Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) First Annual Report Prepared by Davids Engineering, Inc Luhdorff & Scalmanini ERA Economics April 2020 DRAFT Madera Subbasin Sustainable Groundwater Management Act First Annual Report April 2020 Prepared For Madera Subbasin Prepared By Davids Engineering, Inc Luhdorff & Scalmanini ERA Economics Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. ii List of Appendices ..................................................................................................................... iii List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary (§356.2.a) .................................................................................................. 2 Groundwater Elevations (§356.2.b.1) ........................................................................................ 6 Groundwater Level Monitoring .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • River West-Madera Master Plan
    River West-Madera Master Plan APPENDICES Appendix A – River West-Madera Resource Assessment 39 | Page River West-Madera Master Plan River West- Madera Master Plan June 5, 2012 Resource Assessment The River West-Madera area consists of 795 acres of publicly owned land located in Madera County along the northern side of the San Joaquin River between Highway 41 and Scout Island. The Resource Assessment presents the area’s existing characteristics, as well as constraints and opportunities to future planning efforts. River West-Madera Master Plan River West-Madera Master Plan RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... 3 TABLES ................................................................................................................................. 4 EXISTING CHARACTERISITICS ............................................................................................. 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Land Use and History .............................................................................................................................. 7 Cultural History ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Sycamore Island ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Flows and Water Quality in the California Aqueduct Using DSM2
    Simulation of Flows and Water Quality in the California Aqueduct Using DSM2 Siqing Liu, Bob Suits DWR, Bay Delta Office, Modeling Support Branch 2011 CWEMF Annual Meeting, February 28 –March 2 1 Topics • Project objectives • Aqueduct System modeled • Assumptions / issues with modeling • Model results –Flows / Storage, EC, Bromide 2 Objectives Simulate Aqueduct hydraulics and water quality • 1990 – 2010 period • DSM2 Aqueduct version calibrated by CH2Mhill Achieve 1st step in enabling forecasting Physical System Canals simulated • South Bay Aqueduct (42 miles) • California Aqueduct (444 miles) • East Branch to Silverwood Lake • West Branch to Pyramid Lake (40 miles) • Delta‐Mendota Canal (117 miles) 4 Physical System, cont Pumping Plants Banks Pumping Plant Buena Vista (Check 30) Jones Pumping Plant Teerink (Check 35) South Bay Chrisman (Check 36) O’Neill Pumping-Generating Edmonston (Check 40) Gianelli Pumping-Generating Alamo (Check 42) Dos Amigos (Check 13) Oso (West Branch) Las Perillas (Costal branch) Pearblossom (Check 58) 5 Physical System, cont Check structures and gates • Pools separated by check structures throughout the aqueduct system (SWP: 66, DMC: 21 ) • Gates at check structures regulate flow rates and water surface elevation 6 Physical System, cont Turnout and diversion structures • Water delivered to agricultural and municipal contractors through diversion structures • Over 270 diversion structures on SWP • Over 200 turnouts on DMC 7 Physical System, cont Reservoirs / Lakes Represented as complete mixing of water body •
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 85 Tuesday, No. 236 December 8, 2020 Pages 78939–79116
    Vol. 85 Tuesday, No. 236 December 8, 2020 Pages 78939–79116 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 19:59 Dec 07, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\08DEWS.LOC 08DEWS jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with FR_WS II Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 8, 2020 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, under the Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) Subscriptions: and the regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Government Publishing Office, is the exclusive distributor of the official edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general (Toll-Free) applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published FEDERAL AGENCIES by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Email [email protected] issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 132-80 the California State Water Project—Current Activities
    Department o Water Resource . Bulletin 132-8 The California State Water Project­ Current Activities ·and Future Management Plans .. October 1980 uey D. Johnson, Edmund G. Brown Jr. Ronald B. Robie ecretary for Resources Governor Director he Resources State of Department of . gency California Water Resources - ,~ -- performance levels corresponding to holder of the water rights. if the project capabilities as facilities are Contra Costa Canal should be relocated developed. Briefly, the levels of along a low-level alignment in the dt'velopmentcomprise: 1) prior to the future, the question of ECCID involve­ operation of New Melones, 2) after New ment will be considered at that time. Melones is operational but before operation of the Peripheral 'Canal, and SB 200, when implemented, will amend the 3) after the Peripheral Canal is oper­ California Water Code to include provi­ ational. sion that issues between the State and the delta water agencies concerning the The SDWA has indicated that the pro­ rights of users to make use of the posal is unacceptable. In March of waters of the Delta may be resolved by 1980, the Department proposed to reop­ .arbitration. en negotiation such that any differ- ·ences remaining between the Agency and WATER CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT the Department after September 30 be submitted to arbitration. The SDWA Thirty-one water agencies have entered also rejected that proposal. Before into long-term contracts with the State negotiations resume, SDWA wants to for annual water supplies from the State complete its joint study with WPRS. Water Project. A list of these agen­ The study concerns the CVP and SWP im­ cies, along with other information con­ pacts on south Delta water supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • CA-Waterways-Map.Pdf
    O R E G O N S rk m o it F h e dl R Mid . Goose Lake S o ut k h r o F C K l O O a m a N t h r Sa e c v r er i a Riv R m d e u A A aterways n o l t o o C c R W M E V A D i v e R i r r t v i e Some of the water you use every day has probably traveled T P r S S r i n i Trinity Lake ty M a d T T R iv er great distances and over high mountain ranges before reaching E UREKA R i v e r Shasta Lake Va n your faucet. This is because water is not always where we need R EDDING Du Clear zen Whiskeytown River Creek Lake Tunnel it. In California, most of the rain and snowfall is in the north. But Lake Antelope E Almanor Lake e l most of the people live in the south. The solution is to distribute S a R c i v r e a r m Corning R k Lake Frenchman e r n o Canal F Davis Lake the water to where it is needed through delivery systems such t o h t r o A R N rk Black i Fo v e e Butte r dl id as the State Water Project (SWP). Lake M Lake k N or F Oroville h t u So G Thermalito New Bullards The SWP delivers water from Lake Oroville in the north to the T Forebay and Bar Reservoir e h Lake Oroville Afterbay F e a a Visitors Center Indian m t h r a a e Valley e iv E R R r a San Francisco Bay area, the San Joaquin Valley, and Southern b u u Y Reservoir - s s i Clear Lake R a C i n o v e l u r S R sa i California.
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Energy Technical Report, DEIS
    Draft Power and Energy Technical Report Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation, California Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation June 2013 Contents Contents Chapter 1 Affected Environment ....................................................................................... 1-1 Environmental Setting .............................................................................................................. 1-1 Shasta Lake and Vicinity ................................................................................................. 1-7 Upper Sacramento River (Shasta Dam to Red Bluff) ...................................................... 1-9 Lower Sacramento River and Delta ............................................................................... 1-10 CVP/SWP Service Areas ............................................................................................... 1-12 Chapter 2 Modeling Results ................................................................................................ 2-1 Chapter 3 Bibliography ....................................................................................................... 3-1 Tables Table 1-1. Central Valley Project Power Plants, Capacities, and Historical Annual Generation ................................................................................................................. 1-5 Table 1-2. Major State Water Project Facilities, Capacities, and Historical Power Generation
    [Show full text]
  • California's Water-Energy Relationship
    CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION California's Water – Energy Relationship Prepared in Support of the 2005 Integrated EPORT Energy Policy Report Proceeding (04-IEPR-01E) R TAFF S INAL F NOVEMBER 2005 CEC-700-2005-011-SF Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor 1 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Primary Author Gary Klein California Energy Commission Martha Krebs Deputy Director Energy Research and Development Division Valerie Hall Deputy Director Energy Efficiency & Demand Analysis Division Terry O’Brien Deputy Director Systems Assessment & Facilities Siting Division B. B. Blevins Executive Director DISCLAIMER This paper was prepared as the result of work by one or more members of the staff of the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees, or the State of California. The Energy Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors and subcontractors make no warrant, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this paper; nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This paper has not been approved or disapproved by the California Energy Commission nor has the California Energy Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this paper. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The California’s Water-Energy Relationship report is the product of contributions by many California Energy Commission staff and consultants, including Ricardo Amon, Shahid Chaudhry, Thomas S. Crooks, Marilyn Davin, Joe O’Hagan, Pramod Kulkarni, Kae Lewis, Laurie Park, Paul Roggensack, Monica Rudman, Matt Trask, Lorraine White and Zhiqin Zhang. Staff would also like to thank the members of the Water-Energy Working Group who so graciously gave of their time and expertise to inform this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Calfornia Water Districts & Water Supply Sources
    WHERE DOES OUR WATER COME FROM? Quincy Corning k F k N F , M R , r R e er th th a a Magalia e Fe F FEATHER RIVER NORTH FORK Shasta Lake STATE WATER PROJECT Chico Orland Paradise k F S , FEATHER RIVER MIDDLE FORK R r STATE WATER PROJECT e Sacramento River th a e F Tehama-Colusa Canal Durham Folsom Lake LAKE OROVILLE American River N Yuba R STATE WATER PROJECT San Joaquin R. Contra Costa Canal JACKSON MEADOW RES. New Melones Lake LAKE PILLSBURY Yuba Co. W.A. Marin M.W.D. Willows Old River Stanislaus R North Marin W.D. Oroville Sonoma Co. W.A. NEW BULLARDS BAR RES. Ukiah P.U. Yuba Co. W.A. Madera Canal Delta-Mendota Canal Millerton Lake Fort Bragg Palermo YUBA CO. W.A Kern River Yuba River San Luis Reservoir Jackson Meadows and Willits New Bullards Bar Reservoirs LAKE SPAULDING k Placer Co. W.A. F MIDDLE FORK YUBA RIVER TRUCKEE-DONNER P.U.D E Gridley Nevada I.D. , Nevada I.D. Groundwater Friant-Kern Canal R n ia ss u R Central Valley R ba Project Yu Nevada City LAKE MENDOCINO FEATHER RIVER BEAR RIVER Marin M.W.D. TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL STATE WATER PROJECT YUBA RIVER Nevada I.D. Fk The Central Valley Project has been founded by the U.S. Bureau of North Marin W.D. CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT , N Yuba Co. W.A. Grass Valley n R Reclamation in 1935 to manage the water of the Sacramento and Sonoma Co. W.A. ica mer Ukiah P.U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story Behind Your Drinking Water Quality
    German Spanish Korean Chinese Annual Water Quality Report ~ Published June 2009 June Published ~ Report Quality Water Annual In fact, our water was far better than required for most standards most for required than better far was water our fact, In met all drinking water standards for health and safety again this year. year. this again safety and health for standards water drinking all met Aqueduct Las Virgenes Municipal Water District District Water Municipal Virgenes Las California Water Quality Report for 2008 for Report Quality Water Sierra Mtn Snow Mtn Sierra Lake Oroville in northern California northern in Oroville Lake Drinking Water Quality Water Drinking The Story Behind Your Your Behind Story The LVMWD For More Information PRSRT STD Board of Directors US POSTAGE Division 1 LVMWD PAID NO HOLLYWOOD CA Customer Service Charles Caspary PERMIT #8 Phone: (818) 251-2200 President Fax: (818) 251-2109 Division 2 E-mail: [email protected] Glen Peterson Additional information about drinking water safety and Secretary standards can be found at: MWD Representative Division 3 California Department of Public Health EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline Lee Renger Office of Drinking Water (800) 426-4791 Vice President 601 N. 7th St. www.epa.gov/safewater/standards.html Division 4 Sacramento, CA 94234-7320 (Information on how drinking water laws are www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/drinkingwater/Pages/ established) Joseph M. Bowman default.aspx Board Member U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Centers for Disease Control Division 5 (EPA) and Prevention Jeff Smith Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water 1600 Clifton Road Treasurer 401 M Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30333 Washington, DC 20460 www.cdc.gov General Manager www.epa.gov/safewater/ (800) 311-3435 John R.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikola P. Prokopovich Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt4199s0f4 No online items Inventory of the Nikola P. Prokopovich Papers Finding aid created by Manuscript Archivist Elizabeth Phillips. Processing of this collection was funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, and administered by the Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR), Cataloging Hidden Special Collections and Archives program. Department of Special Collections General Library University of California, Davis Davis, CA 95616-5292 Phone: (530) 752-1621 Fax: Fax: (530) 754-5758 Email: [email protected] © 2011 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Inventory of the Nikola P. D-229 1 Prokopovich Papers Creator: Prokopovich, Nikola P. Title: Nikola P. Prokopovich Papers Date: 1947-1994 Extent: 83 linear feet Abstract: The Nikola P. Prokopovich Papers document United States Bureau of Reclamation geologist Nikola Prokopovich's work on irrigation, land subsidence, and geochemistry in California. The collection includes draft reports and memoranda, published writings, slides, photographs, and two films related to several state-wide water projects. Prokopovich was particularly interested in the engineering geology of the Central Valley Project's canals and dam sites and in the effects of the state water projects on the surrounding landscape. Phyiscal location: Researchers should contact Special Collections to request collections, as many are stored offsite. Repository: University of California, Davis. General Library. Dept. of Special Collections. Davis, California 95616-5292 Collection number: D-229 Language of Material: Collection materials in English Biography Nikola P. Prokopovich (1918-1999) was a California-based geologist for the United States Bureau of Reclamation. He was born in Kiev, Ukraine and came to the United States in 1950.
    [Show full text]