DOCSLIB.ORG

Reading Biodiversity Action Plan Draft for Consultation 27 February 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reading Biodiversity Action Plan Draft for Consultation 27 February 2020 Page 1 of 70 Reading Biodiversity Action Plan Draft for consultation 27 February 2020 1. Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Biodiversity ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 What is biodiversity? .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Why is biodiversity important? .................................................................................................................................................. 5 What is a Biodiversity Action Plan? ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Why does Reading need a Biodiversity Action Plan? ......................................................................................................................... 5 The 2006 Reading BAP ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 What is the vision for Reading’s biodiversity? ................................................................................................................................ 6 How is the BAP structured, what are its aims, and who will it be used by? .............................................................................................. 6 3. Policy and legislation .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 4. The state of biodiversity ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 International context ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 National context .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Local context ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 5. Habitats ......................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Habitat classifications ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 An overview of habitats in Reading ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Woodland, trees and hedgerows ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Grasslands ......................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Watercourses ..................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Page 2 of 70 6. Designations .................................................................................................................................................................... 18 National Character Areas ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 Biodiversity Opportunity Areas................................................................................................................................................. 18 Statutory Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation .................................................................................................................... 18 Local Wildlife Sites .............................................................................................................................................................. 19 Green Links ....................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Green Infrastructure............................................................................................................................................................. 19 Species ............................................................................................................................................................................ 20 7. Stakeholders ................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Who owns and manages land in Reading? .................................................................................................................................... 21 Other stakeholders .............................................................................................................................................................. 21 Berkshire’s Local Nature Partnership ......................................................................................................................................... 22 Neighbouring authorities ........................................................................................................................................................ 22 8. Themes for action ............................................................................................................................................................. 23 A) Legislation ..................................................................................................................................................................... 23 B) Designated Sites .............................................................................................................................................................. 23 C) Planning and building control ............................................................................................................................................... 24 D) Woodlands, trees & hedgerows ............................................................................................................................................. 25 E) Grasslands and road verges ................................................................................................................................................. 27 F) The two rivers, their floodplains and other watercourses .............................................................................................................. 28 G) Management of council projects and the sale of land .................................................................................................................. 33 H) Education, access to nature, public engagement & volunteering ..................................................................................................... 34 I) Ecological records ............................................................................................................................................................. 36 J) Species and habitat specific actions ....................................................................................................................................... 36 K) Connectivity ................................................................................................................................................................... 37 L) Coordinated approach across council departments and within policy documents .................................................................................. 37 Page 3 of 70 M) Global biodiversity – what can the council do? .......................................................................................................................... 37 N) Ongoing review ............................................................................................................................................................... 38 Appendix 1 – Figures ............................................................................................................................................................... 39 Figure 1 – Phase 1 habitat types in Reading .................................................................................................................................. 40 Figure 2 – Designated sites, priority habitats and ancient woodland ..................................................................................................... 41 Figure 3 – Rivers .................................................................................................................................................................. 42 Figure 4 – woodland ownership in Reading ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Federation Autumn Event and Open Honey Show Will Be Held on Thursday 29Th September At:
    FEDERATION OF BERKSHIRE BEEKEEPERS ASSOCIATIONS August 2005 President: Miss Margery Cooper Number 590 Hon. Secretary: Hon. Editor William Napper R.F.Crocker Flat 27A School Road The Federation, its Council and its Officers cannot be held responsi- 25 Shiplake Bottom Tilehurst, Reading. ble for the views expressed in the Newsletter or possible errors. Peppard Common, Berkshire. RG31 5AR. Oxon RG9 5HH Tel: 0790 6903413 E-mail:- [email protected] (0118 972 2315) Future Events 21st – 26th August 2005 Apimondia Dublin 29th September Federation Autumn Show & Talk Dr Keith Lucas-Pollination & alpine flora st rd 21 –23 October National Honey Show The Federation Autumn Event and Open Honey Show Will be held on Thursday 29th September at: - CHARVIL VILLAGE HALL, CHARVIL Dr. Keith Lucas of Reading University Will be speaking on pollination and alpine flora Honey Judge: - Mr. Nick Grey from Buckinghamshire Put it in your diary now! Show schedules and entry forms, which include special classes for children under 14, From Hazel Blackburn Tel: 0118 9475451 1 In the Apiary - August Experiences of the June gap seem to be mixed this year. One beekeeper from Cumbria says that so far, this season is the worst that he has experienced; queen-raising over the country appears to have been erratic. In our own area some varieties of oil seed rape have yielded heavily whilst where there is no rape, honey yields have been poor or non-existent, most of June was dry and latterly hot, this did not help, hopefully rain at the end of the month will have helped. For most beekeepers in our area, at the end of July nectar secretion will have all but ceased and colonies will have been contracting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin As a Refuge of the Moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) Within the City
    Acta Biologica 23/2016 | www.wnus.edu.pl/ab | DOI: 10.18276/ab.2016.23-02 | strony 15–34 The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin as a refuge of the moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) within the city Łukasz Dawidowicz,1 Halina Kucharczyk2 Department of Zoology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland 1 e-mail: [email protected] 2 e-mail: [email protected] Keywords biodiversity, urban fauna, faunistics, city, species composition, rare species, conservation Abstract In 2012 and 2013, 418 species of moths at total were recorded in the Botanical Garden of the Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin. The list comprises 116 species of Noctuidae (26.4% of the Polish fauna), 116 species of Geometridae (28.4% of the Polish fauna) and 63 species of other Macrolepidoptera representatives (27.9% of the Polish fauna). The remaining 123 species were represented by Microlepidoptera. Nearly 10% of the species were associated with wetland habitats, what constitutes a surprisingly large proportion in such an urbanised area. Comparing the obtained data with previous studies concerning Polish urban fauna of Lepidoptera, the moths assemblages in the Botanical Garden were the most similar to the one from the Natolin Forest Reserve which protects the legacy of Mazovian forests. Several recorded moths appertain to locally and rarely encountered species, as Stegania cararia, Melanthia procellata, Pasiphila chloerata, Eupithecia haworthiata, Horisme corticata, Xylomoia graminea, Polychrysia moneta. In the light of the conducted studies, the Botanical Garden in Lublin stands out as quite high biodiversity and can be regarded as a refuge for moths within the urban limits of Lublin.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading 2050 Public Lecture Series 4
    Reading 2050 a smart and sustainable city? Edited by Tim Dixon and Lorraine Farrelly School of the Built Environment University of Reading Public Lecture Series (2017–2019) Copyright: No part of this publication may be reproduced without the permission of the editors and the appropriate contributing author. This book has been developed in partnership with Barton Willmore and Reading UK. ii Contents Foreword 3 1 Introduction: The Reading 2050 Public Lecture Series 4 Part 1: Place and environment 2 Reading 2050 vision 8 3 Reading’s history and heritage 15 4 The Urban Room at the School of Architecture, University of Reading 19 5 The future of energy in Reading 22 6 The future of transport and mobility in Reading 27 7 Climate change and the zero carbon challenge in Reading 35 Part 2: People and lifestyle 8 Transforming the Museum of English Rural Life: past, present and future 41 9 Nature and people in our urban future 44 10 Measuring Reading’s resource consumption – an application of urban metabolism 48 Part 3: Economy and employment 11 Developing a Smart City Cluster in Thames Valley Berkshire 57 12 What Reading’s history teaches us about its ability to harness green technology to drive its future 61 13 The Future of Reading in the greater south east in a changing economic landscape 66 14 Delivering national growth, locally: the role of Thames Valley Berkshire LEP 72 15 What impact will population change, and other factors have on housing in Reading by 2050? 77 2 Foreword Imagine living in a city that is so smart and sustainable that it is The University of Reading has been part of the fabric of this place, a joy to live there.
    [Show full text]
  • Mortimer Heritage Trail
    Mortimer Heritage Trail Walk 2: Mortimer Common 3km (2.25 miles) This second of two moderate walks identifying interesting properties and places covers Mortimer Common, the newer part of the village, with homes being built mainly after 1880. Until then it had grown gorse and birch but not much else, the gravel soil being useless for agriculture. The Enclosure Acts from earlier that century had put the Common into private ownership. Housebuilding started slowly with existing ‘squatter’ cottages in Longmoor, Groves Corner and Summerlug being joined by a few more. West End House and Briar Lea House were the only sizeable properties by 1840. After land sales in 1870-71, house building started in earnest from about 1880 including in Windmill Road, Victoria Road and King Street (named after Mr King the baker), the population growing rapidly from the early 1900s. We start at the Community Centre car park, marked (1) on the red route on page 4, in the Fairground. The Fairground, is designated as an open space amenity. Today this is where travelling fairs and circuses come and village events are held. In the past, it has been used for gymkhanas, which have attracted Royal participants. Earlier still cattle and horse fairs were held there with animals being driven along Welshman’s Road allegedly from Wales but more likely from the railway sidings at Padworth. The Horse and Groom pub opposite would have been the oldest pub in the village had it remained in its original 17th century half-timbered building. The present pub was built adjacent, the original becoming a butcher’s shop.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Severe Weather and Other Emergencies
    HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN VOLUME 5 SEVERE WEATHER AND OTHER EMERGENCIES Neighbourhood Services, Wokingham Borough Council, PO Box 153, Council Offices, Shute End, Wokingham, Berkshire. RG40 1WL Tel No. 0118 974 6000 Fax No. 0118 974 6313 September 2013 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Volume 1: Introduction & Overview Volume 2: Highway Network Maintenance Volume 3: Highway Drainage Volume 4: Winter Service Volume 5: Severe Weather and other Emergencies Volume 6: Highway Structures Volume 7: Traffic & Transport (incl Traffic Management & Road Safety) Volume 8: Street Lighting and Illuminated Signs Volume 9: Other Miscellaneous Functions Including: Sweeping and Street Cleansing Weed Control Verges and Open Spaces Trees Grass Cutting Public Rights of Way Volume 10: Highway Development Control HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN VOLUME 5 - SEVERE WEATHER AND OTHER EMERGENCIES CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. SEVERE WEATHER AND OTHER EMERGENCIES ......................................... 1 1.1 Object ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Standards ............................................................................................... 1 2. FLOODING ......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 2 2.2 Advice to the Public...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BBOWT Water Vole Recovery Project
    Berks, Bucks and Oxon Water Vole Recovery Project 2016 Report Water vole carrying food for young, Chris Hughes, River Windrush Julia Lofthouse, Mammal Project Officer Gavin Bennett, Mammal Project Assistant Contents 1 Introduction 2 Water Vole Surveys Survey Methodology Survey Participants Survey Results 3 Mink Control Background Information Mink Control Results 2015- 2016 Analysis of Mink Control Schemes 4 Alert Maps and Local Key Areas 2017 5 Water Vole Recovery Project Updates 2016 Bayswater Brook Ewelme Stream and River Thames Great Ouse and Padbury Brook Holy Brook and Sulham Brook Hurst Ditches Kennet & Avon Canal Lower River Kennet, Foudry Brook and River Thames at Sonning Lower River Windrush Mill Brook Oxford Canal River Alderbourne River Glyme and River Dorn River Ock, Sandford Brook and River Stert Upper Thames 1 Introduction The water vole Arvicola amphibius is Britain’s fastest declining mammal which has been lost from approximately 89% of its former range since 1900. In the 1950s-60s changes in river engineering practices and agricultural intensification caused the water vole population to decline. These changes resulted in habitat loss and degradation which caused fragmentation and isolation of water vole populations. Since the 1980s an introduced predator, the American mink Neovison vison has decimated water vole populations as its range has expanded throughout England, Scotland and Wales. Mink are able to counter the water voles’ anti-predatory behaviours since they swim well, hunt efficiently and female mink are small enough to enter water voles’ burrows. The Berks, Bucks and Oxon Wildlife Trust launched its Water Vole Recovery Project in 1998. The aim of the project was to arrest the decline of water voles within the three counties and to work to stabilise and increase the water vole population.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002
    Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002 A Report on the Micro-Moths, Butterflies and Macro-Moths of VC58 S.H. Hind, S. McWilliam, B.T. Shaw, S. Farrell and A. Wander Lancashire & Cheshire Entomological Society November 2003 1 1. Introduction Welcome to the 2002 report on lepidoptera in VC58 (Cheshire). This is the second report to appear in 2003 and follows on from the release of the 2001 version earlier this year. Hopefully we are now on course to return to an annual report, with the 2003 report planned for the middle of next year. Plans for the ‘Atlas of Lepidoptera in VC58’ continue apace. We had hoped to produce a further update to the Atlas but this report is already quite a large document. We will, therefore produce a supplementary report on the Pug Moths recorded in VC58 sometime in early 2004, hopefully in time to be sent out with the next newsletter. As usual, we have produced a combined report covering micro-moths, macro- moths and butterflies, rather than separate reports on all three groups. Doubtless observers will turn first to the group they are most interested in, but please take the time to read the other sections. Hopefully you will find something of interest. Many thanks to all recorders who have already submitted records for 2002. Without your efforts this report would not be possible. Please keep the records coming! This request also most definitely applies to recorders who have not sent in records for 2002 or even earlier. It is never too late to send in historic records as they will all be included within the above-mentioned Atlas when this is produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist
    Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist Prepared by J.A. Powell, Essig Museum of Entomology, UC Berkeley. For a description of the Big Creek Lepidoptera Survey, see Powell, J.A. Big Creek Reserve Lepidoptera Survey: Recovery of Populations after the 1985 Rat Creek Fire. In Views of a Coastal Wilderness: 20 Years of Research at Big Creek Reserve. (copies available at the reserve). family genus species subspecies author Acrolepiidae Acrolepiopsis californica Gaedicke Adelidae Adela flammeusella Chambers Adelidae Adela punctiferella Walsingham Adelidae Adela septentrionella Walsingham Adelidae Adela trigrapha Zeller Alucitidae Alucita hexadactyla Linnaeus Arctiidae Apantesis ornata (Packard) Arctiidae Apantesis proxima (Guerin-Meneville) Arctiidae Arachnis picta Packard Arctiidae Cisthene deserta (Felder) Arctiidae Cisthene faustinula (Boisduval) Arctiidae Cisthene liberomacula (Dyar) Arctiidae Gnophaela latipennis (Boisduval) Arctiidae Hemihyalea edwardsii (Packard) Arctiidae Lophocampa maculata Harris Arctiidae Lycomorpha grotei (Packard) Arctiidae Spilosoma vagans (Boisduval) Arctiidae Spilosoma vestalis Packard Argyresthiidae Argyresthia cupressella Walsingham Argyresthiidae Argyresthia franciscella Busck Argyresthiidae Argyresthia sp. (gray) Blastobasidae ?genus Blastobasidae Blastobasis ?glandulella (Riley) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.1) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.2) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.3) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.4) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.5) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.6) Blastobasidae Holcocera gigantella (Chambers) Blastobasidae
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers in Spanish Formicidae (Hymenoptera) IV
    331 Chromosome Numbers in Spanish Formicidae (Hymenoptera) IV. New data of Species from the Genera Camponotus, Formica, Lasius, Messor, and Monomorium by Pedro Lorite1, Jose A. Carrillo1, Alberto Tinaut2 and Teresa Palomeque1 ABSTRACT In this paper we report new karyological data from seven species belonging to subfamilies Formicinae and Myrmicinae. Among them we include two that are considered as endemic Iberian species, Formica frontalis and Formica subrufa. Also the chromosome number of Formica gerardi is reported. In Lasius brunneus, a variation on chromosome number probably due to the presence of B-chromosomes was detected. For two other species (Camponotus cruentatus and Messor barbarus) we found different chromosome numbers from those previously published. Also we confirm the chromosome number reported for Monomorium subopacum. INTRODUCTION Hymenoptera form one of the most distinct and well-defined insect orders and have long been perceived as a natural group. Haplo-diploidy or male haploidy is the main characteristic of the order (Crozier 1975, Gauld & Bolton 1988). Several studies have been carried about cytogenetic aspects of ants. A wide variation has been observed in relation to the chromosome number (n=1 to n=42). Karyological analysis has proved to be useful to determine the karyotypic relationship and evolution between related species (Imai 1971, Loiselle et al. 1990, Palomeque et al. 1988, 1993) as well for the establishment and characterization of new species (Imai et al. 1994). In recent years our group have performed studies in Spanish Formicidae. In relation to this, we have published several reviews of chromosome numbers (Lorite et al. 1998a, 1998b, 2000). In this paper we report new karyological data from seven species from the Formicinae 1 Departamento de Biología Experimental.
    [Show full text]
  • England Biodiversity Indicators 2020
    4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance England Biodiversity Indicators 2020 This documents supports 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance Technical background document Fiona Burns, Tom August, Mark Eaton, David Noble, Gary Powney, Nick Isaac, Daniel Hayhow For further information on 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance visit https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/england-biodiversity-indicators 1 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance Indicator 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance Technical background document, 2020 NB this paper should be read together with 4b Status of UK Priority Species; distribution which presents a companion statistic based on time series on frequency of occurrence (distribution) of priority species. 1. Introduction The adjustments to the UK biodiversity indicators set as a result of the adoption of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity (including the Aichi Targets) at the 10th Conference of Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity mean there is a need to report progress against Aichi Target 12: Target 12: By 2020 the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservation status, particularly of those most in decline, has been improved and sustained. Previously, the UK biodiversity indicator for threatened species used lead partner status assessments on the status of priority species from 3-yearly UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) reporting rounds. As a result of the devolution of biodiversity strategies to the UK's 4 nations, there is no longer reporting at the UK level of the status of species previously listed by the BAP process. This paper presents a robust indicator of the status of threatened species in the UK, with species identified as conservation priorities being taken as a proxy for threatened species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U
    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Table 1. Current taxonomic keys and the level of taxonomy routinely used by the Ohio EPA in streams and rivers for various macroinvertebrate taxonomic classifications. Genera that are reasonably considered to be monotypic in Ohio are also listed. Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Species Pennak 1989, Thorp & Rogers 2016 Porifera If no gemmules are present identify to family (Spongillidae). Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Cnidaria monotypic genera: Cordylophora caspia and Craspedacusta sowerbii Platyhelminthes Class (Turbellaria) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nemertea Phylum (Nemertea) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Phylum (Nematomorpha) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nematomorpha Paragordius varius monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Ectoprocta monotypic genera: Cristatella mucedo, Hyalinella punctata, Lophopodella carteri, Paludicella articulata, Pectinatella magnifica, Pottsiella erecta Entoprocta Urnatella gracilis monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Polychaeta Class (Polychaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Annelida Oligochaeta Subclass (Oligochaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Hirudinida Species Klemm 1982, Klemm et al. 2015 Anostraca Species Thorp & Rogers 2016 Species (Lynceus Laevicaudata Thorp & Rogers 2016 brachyurus) Spinicaudata Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Williams 1972, Thorp & Rogers Isopoda Genus 2016 Holsinger 1972, Thorp & Rogers Amphipoda Genus 2016 Gammaridae: Gammarus Species Holsinger 1972 Crustacea monotypic genera: Apocorophium lacustre, Echinogammarus ischnus, Synurella dentata Species (Taphromysis Mysida Thorp & Rogers 2016 louisianae) Crocker & Barr 1968; Jezerinac 1993, 1995; Jezerinac & Thoma 1984; Taylor 2000; Thoma et al. Cambaridae Species 2005; Thoma & Stocker 2009; Crandall & De Grave 2017; Glon et al. 2018 Species (Palaemon Pennak 1989, Palaemonidae kadiakensis) Thorp & Rogers 2016 1 Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Informal grouping of the Arachnida Hydrachnidia Smith 2001 water mites Genus Morse et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    UNIVERSITY THOUGHT doi:10.5937/univtho7-15336 Publication in Natural Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2017, pp. 1-27. Original Scientific Paper A CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE OF THE BALKAN LEPIDOPTERA. SOME PYRALOIDEA (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE & PYRALIDAE) ENCOUNTERED RECENTLY IN SOUTHERN SERBIA, MONTENEGRO, THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA AND ALBANIA COLIN W. PLANT1*, STOYAN BESHKOV2, PREDRAG JAKŠIĆ3, ANA NAHIRNIĆ2 114 West Road, Bishops Stortford, Hertfordshire, CM23 3QP, England 2National Museum of Natural History, Sofia, Bulgaria 3Faculty of Natural Science and Mathematics, University of Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia ABSTRACT Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera: Crambidae & Pyralidae) were sampled in the territories of southern Serbia, Montenegro, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Albania on a total of 53 occasions during 2014, 2016 and 2017. A total of 173 species is reported here, comprising 97 Crambidae and 76 Pyralidae. Based upon published data, 29 species appear to be new to the fauna of Serbia, 5 species are new to the fauna of Macedonia and 37 are new to the fauna of Albania. The data are discussed. Keywords: Faunistics, Serbia, Montenegro, Republic of Macedonia, Albania, Pyraloidea, Pyralidae, Crambidae. of light trap. Some sites were visited on more than one occasion; INTRODUCTION others were sampled once only. Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera: Crambidae and Pyralidae) have As a by-product of this work, all remaining material from been examined in detail in the neighbouring territory of the the traps was returned to Sofia where Dr Boyan Zlatkov was Republic of Bulgaria and the results have been published by one given the opportunity to extract the Tortricoidea. The remaining of us (Plant, 2016). That work presented data for the 386 species material was retained and sent by post to England after the end of and 3 additional subspecies known from that country.
    [Show full text]