DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL REPORT Research to Support the Development of a Monitoring

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINAL REPORT Research to Support the Development of a Monitoring FINAL REPORT Research to Support the Development of a Monitoring Programme for New or Emerging Marine Biotoxins in Shellfish in UK Waters FS513005 15th March 2014 Dr Wendy A. Higman, Cefas Dr Andrew Turner, Cefas Mrs Clothilde Baker, Cefas Mr Cowan Higgins, AFBI Ms Andrea Veszelovszki, SAMS Professor Keith Davidson, SAMS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................... 10 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. 12 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 16 CHAPTER 1 1. AN OVERVIEW OF THE EFSA OPINIONS ON NEW AND EMERGING TOXINS AND A CONSIDERATION OF THE OPINIONS IN THE LIGHT OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TESTING METHODS AND TOXICOLOGICAL DATA 1.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 23 1.2 CYCLIC IMINES: SPIROLIDES (SPX); GYMNODIMINES (GYM); PINNATOXINS (PNTX); PTERIATOXINS (PTTX) ..................................................................................................... 25 1.2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 25 1.2.2 Occurrence of CI-group toxins ................................................................................................. 26 1.2.3 Methods of Analysis ................................................................................................................. 27 1.2.4 Table 1. Summary of methods for CIs ...................................................................................... 29 1.2.5 Exposure Assessment ............................................................................................................... 30 1.2.6 Toxicokinetics ........................................................................................................................... 31 1.2.7 Mode of Action ........................................................................................................................ 31 1.2.8 Effects in Animals and Relative Toxicity ................................................................................... 31 1.2.9 Relative Potency of Analogues ................................................................................................. 33 1.2.10 Observations in Humans ........................................................................................................ 33 1.2.11 Hazard Characterisation......................................................................................................... 33 1.2.12 Risk Characterisation ............................................................................................................. 34 1.2.13 Key Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 34 1.3 BREVETOXIN (BTX) .................................................................................................... 35 1.3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 35 1.3.2 Occurrence of BTX-group toxins .............................................................................................. 36 1.3.3 Methods of Analysis ................................................................................................................. 36 1.3.4 Table 2. Summary of Methods for Brevetoxin ......................................................................... 38 1.3.5 Toxicokinetics ........................................................................................................................... 39 2 1.3.6 Mode of Action ........................................................................................................................ 39 1.3.7 Effects in Animals and Relative Toxicity ................................................................................... 40 1.3.8 Observations in Humans .......................................................................................................... 40 1.3.9 Hazard Characterisation........................................................................................................... 41 1.3.10 Key Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 41 1.4 PALYTOXIN ............................................................................................................... 42 1.4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 42 1.4.2 Methods of Analysis ................................................................................................................. 43 1.4.3 Table 3. Summary of methods for PlTX ................................................................................... 47 1.4.4 Exposure Assessment ............................................................................................................... 49 1.4.5 Toxicity ..................................................................................................................................... 49 1.4.6 Observations in Humans .......................................................................................................... 50 1.4.7 Hazard Characterisation........................................................................................................... 51 1.4.8 Risk Characterisation ............................................................................................................... 52 1.4.9 Key Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 53 1.5 CIGUATOXIN (CTX) .................................................................................................... 54 1.5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 54 1.5.2 Occurrence of CTX-group toxins .............................................................................................. 55 1.5.3 Methods of Analysis ................................................................................................................. 55 1.5.4 Table 4. Summary of Methods for Ciguatoxin ......................................................................... 58 1.5.5 Human Consumption and Exposure ........................................................................................ 59 1.5.6 Toxicokinetics ........................................................................................................................... 59 1.5.7 Mode of Action ........................................................................................................................ 59 1.5.8 Effects in Animals and Relative Toxicity ................................................................................... 60 1.5.9 Observations in Humans .......................................................................................................... 60 1.5.10 Hazard Characterisation......................................................................................................... 61 1.5.11 Key Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 62 1.6 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................... 63 CHAPTER 2 1. POTENTIAL NEW AND EMERGING TOXIN THREATS FOR UK WATERS- PHYTOPLANKTON 1.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 66 3 1.2 CURRENT SHELLFISH TOXIN PRODUCING SPECIES IN THE UK ...................................... 67 1.3 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE, CURRENT STATUS, AND RECENT CHANGES ....................... 68 1.3.1 Historical perspective............................................................................................................... 68 1.3.2 Current status of biotoxin producing phytoplankton species present in UK waters ............... 69 1.4 FACTORS THAT MAY INFLUENCE THE ABUNDANCE OR TOXICITY OF HAB SPECIES IN UK WATERS ......................................................................................................................... 73 1.4.1 Ballast Water Transfer ............................................................................................................. 73 1.4.2 Anthropogenic Nutrients (Inorganic) ....................................................................................... 76 1.4.3 Nutrient Ratios ......................................................................................................................... 77 1.4.4 Anthropogenic Nutrients (Organic) ......................................................................................... 78 1.4.5 Factors that may influence cell toxicity ................................................................................... 79 1.4.6 Fishing ...................................................................................................................................... 80 1.4.7 Climate Change .......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER Norman, Oklahoma 2017 MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY AND PLANT BIOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Boris Wawrik, Chair ______________________________ Dr. J. Phil Gibson ______________________________ Dr. Anne K. Dunn ______________________________ Dr. John Paul Masly ______________________________ Dr. K. David Hambright ii © Copyright by JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER 2017 All Rights Reserved. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my two advisors Dr. Boris Wawrik and Dr. J. Phil Gibson for helping me become a better scientist and better educator. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Anne K. Dunn, Dr. K. David Hambright, and Dr. J.P. Masly for providing valuable inputs that lead me to carefully consider my research questions. I would also like to thank Dr. J.P. Masly for the opportunity to coauthor a book chapter on the speciation of diatoms. It is still such a privilege that you believed in me and my crazy diatom ideas to form a concise chapter in addition to learn your style of writing has been a benefit to my professional development. I’m also thankful for my first undergraduate research mentor, Dr. Miriam Steinitz-Kannan, now retired from Northern Kentucky University, who was the first to show the amazing wonders of pond scum. Who knew that studying diatoms and algae as an undergraduate would lead me all the way to a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Quantitative PCR Assay for the Detection And
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/544247; this version posted February 8, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Development of a quantitative PCR assay for the detection and enumeration of a potentially ciguatoxin-producing dinoflagellate, Gambierdiscus lapillus (Gonyaulacales, Dinophyceae). Key words:Ciguatera fish poisoning, Gambierdiscus lapillus, Quantitative PCR assay, Great Barrier Reef Kretzschmar, A.L.1,2, Verma, A.1, Kohli, G.S.1,3, Murray, S.A.1 1Climate Change Cluster (C3), University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, 2007 NSW, Australia 2ithree institute (i3), University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, 2007 NSW, Australia, [email protected] 3Alfred Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum fr Polar- und Meeresforschung, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany Abstract Ciguatera fish poisoning is an illness contracted through the ingestion of seafood containing ciguatoxins. It is prevalent in tropical regions worldwide, including in Australia. Ciguatoxins are produced by some species of Gambierdiscus. Therefore, screening of Gambierdiscus species identification through quantitative PCR (qPCR), along with the determination of species toxicity, can be useful in monitoring potential ciguatera risk in these regions. In Australia, the identity, distribution and abundance of ciguatoxin producing Gambierdiscus spp. is largely unknown. In this study we developed a rapid qPCR assay to quantify the presence and abundance of Gambierdiscus lapillus, a likely ciguatoxic species. We assessed the specificity and efficiency of the qPCR assay. The assay was tested on 25 environmental samples from the Heron Island reef in the southern Great Barrier Reef, a ciguatera endemic region, in triplicate to determine the presence and patchiness of these species across samples from Chnoospora sp., Padina sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Producing Gambierdiscus Polynesiensis and G.Excentricus (Dinophyceae) Kohli, G
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen's University Research Portal Role of Modular Polyketide Synthases in the Production of Polyether Ladder Compounds in Ciguatoxin-producing Gambierdiscus polynesiensis and G.excentricus (Dinophyceae) Kohli, G. S., Campbell, K., John, U., Smith, K. F., Fraga, S., Rhodes, L. L., & Murray, S. A. (2017). Role of Modular Polyketide Synthases in the Production of Polyether Ladder Compounds in Ciguatoxin-producing Gambierdiscus polynesiensis and G.excentricus (Dinophyceae). DOI: 10.1111/jeu.12405 Published in: The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright Wiley 2017. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptomic Analysis of Polyketide Synthases in a Highly Ciguatoxic Dinoflagellate, Gambierdiscus Polynesiensis and Low Toxic
    PLOS ONE RESEARCH ARTICLE Transcriptomic analysis of polyketide synthases in a highly ciguatoxic dinoflagellate, Gambierdiscus polynesiensis and low toxicity Gambierdiscus pacificus, from French Polynesia 1¤a 1¤b 2¤c 3 Frances M. Van DolahID *, Jeanine S. Morey , Shard Milne , Andre Ung , Paul a1111111111 E. Anderson2¤d, Mireille Chinain3 a1111111111 a1111111111 1 Marine Genomics Core, Hollings Marine Laboratory, Charleston, SC, United States of America, 2 Charleston Computational Genomics Group, Department of Computer Science, College of Charleston, a1111111111 Charleston, SC, United States of America, 3 Laboratoire des Biotoxines Marines, Institut Louis MalardeÂÐ a1111111111 UMR 241 EIO, Papeete, Tahiti, French Polynesia ¤a Current address: Graduate Program in Marine Biology, University of Charleston, Charleston, SC, United States of America ¤b Current address: National Marine Mammal Foundation, Johns Island, SC, United States of America ¤c Current address: School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, OPEN ACCESS United States of America Citation: Van Dolah FM, Morey JS, Milne S, Ung A, ¤d Current address: Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, California Polytechnic Anderson PE, Chinain M (2020) Transcriptomic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, United States of America [email protected] analysis of polyketide synthases in a highly * ciguatoxic dinoflagellate, Gambierdiscus polynesiensis and low toxicity Gambierdiscus pacificus, from French Polynesia. PLoS ONE 15(4): Abstract e0231400. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0231400 Marine dinoflagellates produce a diversity of polyketide toxins that are accumulated in Editor: Ross Frederick Waller, University of marine food webs and are responsible for a variety of seafood poisonings. Reef-associated Cambridge, UNITED KINGDOM dinoflagellates of the genus Gambierdiscus produce toxins responsible for ciguatera poison- Received: January 29, 2020 ing (CP), which causes over 50,000 cases of illness annually worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Identification of Gambierdiscus and Fukuyoa
    marine drugs Short Note Molecular Identification of Gambierdiscus and Fukuyoa (Dinophyceae) from Environmental Samples Kirsty F. Smith 1,*, Laura Biessy 1, Phoebe A. Argyle 1,2, Tom Trnski 3, Tuikolongahau Halafihi 4 and Lesley L. Rhodes 1 1 Coastal & Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, Private Bag 2, 98 Halifax Street East, Nelson 7042, New Zealand; [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (P.A.A.); [email protected] (L.L.R.) 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, 20 Kirkwood Avenue, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand 3 Auckland War Memorial Museum, Private Bag 92018, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142, New Zealand; [email protected] 4 Ministry of Fisheries, P.O. Box 871, Nuku’alofa, Tongatapu, Tonga; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +64-3-548-2319 Received: 30 March 2017; Accepted: 28 July 2017; Published: 2 August 2017 Abstract: Ciguatera Fish Poisoning (CFP) is increasing across the Pacific and the distribution of the causative dinoflagellates appears to be expanding. Subtle differences in thecal plate morphology are used to distinguish dinoflagellate species, which are difficult to determine using light microscopy. For these reasons we sought to develop a Quantitative PCR assay that would detect all species from both Gambierdiscus and Fukuyoa genera in order to rapidly screen environmental samples for potentially toxic species. Additionally, a specific assay for F. paulensis was developed as this species is of concern in New Zealand coastal waters. Using the assays we analyzed 31 samples from three locations around New Zealand and the Kingdom of Tonga.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (Accessed on 20 July 2021)
    toxins Review Critical Review and Conceptual and Quantitative Models for the Transfer and Depuration of Ciguatoxins in Fishes Michael J. Holmes 1, Bill Venables 2 and Richard J. Lewis 3,* 1 Queensland Department of Environment and Science, Brisbane 4102, Australia; [email protected] 2 CSIRO Data61, Brisbane 4102, Australia; [email protected] 3 Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: We review and develop conceptual models for the bio-transfer of ciguatoxins in food chains for Platypus Bay and the Great Barrier Reef on the east coast of Australia. Platypus Bay is unique in repeatedly producing ciguateric fishes in Australia, with ciguatoxins produced by benthic dinoflagellates (Gambierdiscus spp.) growing epiphytically on free-living, benthic macroalgae. The Gambierdiscus are consumed by invertebrates living within the macroalgae, which are preyed upon by small carnivorous fishes, which are then preyed upon by Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus commerson). We hypothesise that Gambierdiscus and/or Fukuyoa species growing on turf algae are the main source of ciguatoxins entering marine food chains to cause ciguatera on the Great Barrier Reef. The abundance of surgeonfish that feed on turf algae may act as a feedback mechanism controlling the flow of ciguatoxins through this marine food chain. If this hypothesis is broadly applicable, then a reduction in herbivory from overharvesting of herbivores could lead to increases in ciguatera by concentrating ciguatoxins through the remaining, smaller population of herbivores. Modelling the dilution of ciguatoxins by somatic growth in Spanish mackerel and coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus) revealed that growth could not significantly reduce the toxicity of fish flesh, except in young fast- Citation: Holmes, M.J.; Venables, B.; growing fishes or legal-sized fishes contaminated with low levels of ciguatoxins.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Molecular Phylogenetic Identification And
    Hoppenrath et al. Marine Biodiversity Records (2019) 12:16 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-019-0175-4 MARINE RECORD Open Access Morphological and molecular phylogenetic identification and record verification of Gambierdiscus excentricus (Dinophyceae) from Madeira Island (NE Atlantic Ocean) Mona Hoppenrath1, A. Liza Kretzschmar2, Manfred J. Kaufmann3,4,5 and Shauna A. Murray2* Abstract The marine benthic dinoflagellate genus Gambierdiscus currently contains ~ 16 species that can be highly morphologically similar to one another, and therefore molecular genetic characterization is necessary to complement the morphological species determination. Gambierdiscus species can produce ciguatoxins, which can accumulate through the food chain and cause ciguatera fish poisoning. Recent studies have suggested that Gambierdiscus excentricus may be one of the main species responsible for ciguatoxin production in the temperate and tropical regions of the eastern Atlantic. The present study definitively identifies the species, G. excentricus, from Madeira Island, Northeast-Atlantic Ocean (32° 38′ N 16° 56′ W) by examining the morphology of a strain using light and scanning electron microscopy and sequencing regions of the ribosomal DNA (D8-D10 LSU, SSU rDNA). Variability in the shape of the apical pore and the microarchitecture of the apical pore plate were documented for the first time, as well as variability in the width of the second antapical plate. The first SSU rDNA sequence for the species is reported. Because G. excentricus is known to produce high levels of CTX-like compounds, its presence and toxicity should be regularly monitored to establish whether it is the primary cause of the ciguatera poisoning events on Madeira Island. Keywords: Benthic, Epiphytic, Gambierdiscus, Morphology, Phylogeny, SSU rDNA Background can show intra-specific morphological variability (Bravo et The marine benthic dinoflagellate genus Gambierdiscus al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • DNA-Based Assays and Biosensors for the Detection of Toxic Microalgae and Viruses in the Marine Environment
    DNA-based assays and biosensors for the detection of toxic microalgae and viruses in the marine environment ANNA TOLDRÀ FILELLA Doctoral Thesis 2019 Doctoral Thesis DNA-based assays and biosensors for the detection of toxic microalgae and viruses in the marine environment ANNA TOLDRÀ FILELLA Supervised by: Dr. Mònica Campàs Co-supervised by: Dr. Ciara K. O’Sullivan IRTA - Departament d’Enginyeria Química (URV) Tarragona 2019 I II I STATE that the present study, entitled “DNA-based assays and biosensors for the detection of toxic microalgae and viruses in the marine environment”, presented by Anna Toldrà Filella for the award of the degree of Doctor, has been carried out under my supervision at the Department Chemical Engineering of this university, and that it fulfils all the requirements to be eligible for the International Doctorate Award. Tarragona, 5th July 2019 Dr. Mònica Campàs Dr. Ciara K. O’Sullivan III IV Even stars collide, and out of their crashing new worlds are born Charles Chaplin In: As I began to love myself poem V VI AGRAÏMENTS La gent sol pensar que sóc una persona de poques paraules. Els que em coneixeu bé sabeu que no és sempre així, i encara menys quan es tracta d’agrair. Aquesta tesi no l’he feta sola. Hi ha intervingut molta gent, alguns m’heu guiat, altres ajudat i d’altres acompanyat, en un punt o en tot el procés. Anem a pams. En primer lloc, vull agrair a l’IRTA i a la Universitat Rovira i Virgili per haver-me acollit durant aquest període i per, juntament amb el Banco Santander, haver-me concedit la beca predoctoral Martí Franquès.
    [Show full text]
  • Ciguatera-Causing Dinoflagellates in the Genera Gambierdiscus and Fukuyoa: Distribution, Ecophysiology and Toxicology
    In: Dinoflagellates ISBN: 978-1-53617-888-3 Editor: D. V. Subba Rao © 2020 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 11 CIGUATERA-CAUSING DINOFLAGELLATES IN THE GENERA GAMBIERDISCUS AND FUKUYOA: DISTRIBUTION, ECOPHYSIOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY Mireille Chinain1,*, Clémence M. Gatti1, Mélanie Roué2 and H. Taiana Darius1 1Institut Louis Malardé (ILM), Laboratoire De Recherche Sur Les Biotoxines Marines, Papeete, Tahiti, French Polynesia 2Institut de Recherche Pour Le Développement (IRD), Faa’a, Tahiti, French Polynesia ABSTRACT Ciguatera poisoning results from the consumption of fish and marine invertebrates contaminated with lipid soluble toxins known as ciguatoxins (CTXs) that are produced by benthic dinoflagellates in the genera Gambierdiscus and Fukuyoa. Overall, 16 species of Gambierdiscus and three closely related Fukuyoa species are now recognized worldwide. Occurrence data clearly highlight the current geographical expansion of these organisms from tropical and sub-tropical waters to temperate-like areas, a likely consequence of climate change. Numerous studies have examined Gambierdiscus/ Fukuyoa spp. in vitro growth responses under varying environmental factors. Results confirm that differences in both tolerance and optimum growth ranges exist not only across species, but across strains as well. Gambierdiscus/Fukuyoa spp. are the potential source of at least six families of cyclic polyether compounds whose contribution to ciguatera syndrome (except for CTXs) as well as ecological relevance remain to be ascertained. Factors governing toxinogenesis in these organisms are not well understood, but several studies have provided evidence that this functional trait may depend on a combination of abiotic and biotic (including genetic) factors. Despite the significant advances achieved in the understanding of this phenomenon, ciguatera incidents remain difficult to predict, and their recent expansion to novel areas continues to pose a serious threat to the public health, lifestyle and economy of world populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Epibenthic Harmful Marine Dinoflagellates From
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Epibenthic Harmful Marine Dinoflagellates from Fuerteventura (Canary Islands), with Special Reference to the Ciguatoxin-Producing Gambierdiscus Isabel Bravo 1,*, Francisco Rodríguez 1 , Isabel Ramilo 1 and Julio Afonso-Carrillo 2 1 Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo, Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO), Subida a Radio Faro 50, 36390 Vigo, Spain; [email protected] (F.R.); [email protected] (I.R.) 2 Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), Pabellón de Gobierno, C/Padre Herrera s/n, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 September 2020; Accepted: 5 November 2020; Published: 12 November 2020 Abstract: The relationship between the ciguatoxin-producer benthic dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus and other epibenthic dinoflagellates in the Canary Islands was examined in macrophyte samples obtained from two locations of Fuerteventura Island in September 2016. The genera examined included Coolia, Gambierdiscus, Ostreopsis, Prorocentrum, Scrippsiella, Sinophysis, and Vulcanodinium. Distinct assemblages among these benthic dinoflagellates and preferential macroalgal communities were observed. Vulcanodinium showed the highest cell concentrations (81.6 103 cells gr 1 wet × − weight macrophyte), followed by Ostreopsis (25.2 103 cells gr 1 wet weight macrophyte). These two × − species were most represented at a station (Playitas) characterized by turfy Rhodophytes. In turn, Gambierdiscus (3.8 103 cells gr 1 wet weight macrophyte) and Sinophysis (2.6 103 cells gr 1 wet × − × − weight macrophyte) were mostly found in a second station (Cotillo) dominated by Rhodophytes and Phaeophytes. The influence of macrophyte’s thallus architecture on the abundance of dinoflagellates was observed. Filamentous morphotypes followed by macroalgae arranged in entangled clumps presented more richness of epiphytic dinoflagellates.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Expert Meeting on Ciguatera Poisoning Rome, 19–23 November 2018
    9 FOOD SAFETY AND QUALITY SERIES ISSN 2415‑1173 REPORT OF THE EXPERT MEETING ON CIGUATERA POISONING ROME, 19–23 NOVEMBER 2018 REPORT OF THE EXPERT MEETING ON CIGUATERA POISONING ROME, 19–23 NOVEMBER 2018 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ROME, 2020 Required citation: FAO and WHO. 2020. Report of the Expert Meeting on Ciguatera Poisoning. Rome, 19–23 November 2018. Food Safety and Quality No. 9. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8817en. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or World Health Organization (WHO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or WHO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or WHO. ISSN 2415‑1173 [Print] ISSN 2664‑5246 [Online] ISBN 978‑92‑5‑132518‑6 (FAO) ISBN 978‑92‑4‑000629‑4 [electronic version] (WHO) ISBN 978‑92‑4‑000630‑0 [print version] (WHO) © FAO and WHO, 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution‑Non Commercial‑ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY‑NC‑SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by‑nc‑sa/3.0/igo/legalcode).
    [Show full text]
  • From Ecosystems to Socioecosystems. Proceedings of the 18Th Intl
    HARMFUL ALGAE 2018 – FROM ECOSYSTEMS TO SOCIO-ECOSYSTEMS PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMFUL ALGAE 21-26 October 2018, Nantes, France 1 ISBN 978-87-990827-7-3 HARMFUL ALGAE 2018 – FROM ECOSYSTEMS TO SOCIO-ECOSYSTEMS PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMFUL ALGAE 21-26 October 2018, Nantes, France Editor: Philipp Hess (Ifremer) Graphic design : MCI France Lay-out : Hélène Parfait (Ifremer) Published by the International Society for the Study of Harmful Algae (ISSHA) and the Institut Francais de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (Ifremer), in cooperation with the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (IOC/UNESCO). For bibliographic purposes, this document should be cited as follows: Ph. Hess [Ed]. 2020. Harmful Algae 2018 – from ecosystems to socioecosystems. Proceedings of the 18th Intl. Conf. on Harmful Algae. Nantes. International Society for the Study of Harmful Algae. 214 pages. ISBN: 978-87-990827-7-3. DISCLAIMER Authors are responsible for the choice and the presentation of the facts contained in signed articles and for the opinions expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of ISSHA, IOC/UNESCO or Ifremer and do not commit these organizations. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Ifremer, ISSHA or UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its
    [Show full text]