DOCSLIB.ORG

Streamflow Characteristics for the Black Hills of South Dakota, Through Water Year 1993

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Streamflow Characteristics for the Black Hills of South Dakota, Through Water Year 1993 STREAMFLOW CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE BLACK HILLS OF SOUTH DAKOTA, THROUGH WATER YEAR 1993 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4288 Prepared in cooperation with the SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES and the WEST DAKOTA WATER DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STREAMFLOW CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE BLACK HILLS OF SOUTH DAKOTA, THROUGH WATER YEAR 1993 By LISA D. MILLER and DANIEL G. DRISCOLL U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4288 Prepared in cooperation with the SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES and the WEST DAKOTA WATER DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Rapid City, South Dakota 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas J. Casadevall, Acting Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 1608 Mt. View Road Box 25286 Rapid City, SD 57702 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Description of study area............................................................................................................................................. 2 Physiography and climate.................................................................................................................................. 2 Hydrogeology .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Reservoirs and water use ................................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Summary of streamflow gaging in the Black Hills ............................................................................................................... 9 History of streamflow gaging ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Summary of streamflow records.................................................................................................................................. 10 Stations with records of only monthly mean flow............................................................................................. 16 Stations with less than 5 years of daily record .................................................................................................. 18 Stations with 5 to 9 years of daily record .......................................................................................................... 18 Stations with 10 or more years of daily record.................................................................................................. 18 Streamflow characteristics for selected basins ...................................................................................................................... 28 Methods for categorizing basins.................................................................................................................................. 29 Comparison of streamflow characteristics for selected hydrogeologic settings.......................................................... 34 Factors affecting streamflow variability ...................................................................................................................... 41 Summary and conclusions..................................................................................................................................................... 42 Selected references ................................................................................................................................................................ 44 Supplemental information ..................................................................................................................................................... 47 ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Map showing area of investigation for the Black Hills Hydrology Study showing locations of gaging stations outside of study area for which data are presented ........................................................................... 3 2. Map showing generalized outcrop of Madison Limestone and outer extent of Inyan Kara Group, within study area for Black Hills Hydrology Study ................................................................................................... 4 3. Stratigraphic section for the Black Hills .................................................................................................................... 6 4. Generalized geologic section A-A’ ............................................................................................................................ 7 5. Schematic showing simplified hydrogeologic setting of the Black Hills area .......................................................... 8 6. Map showing location of gaging stations within study area for which only monthly records are available ................................................................................................................................................... 17 7. Map showing location of gaging stations within study area with less than 5 years of daily record .......................... 20 8. Map showing location of gaging stations within study area with 5 to 9 years of daily record ..................................22 9. Map showing location of gaging stations within study area with 10 or more years of daily record ......................... 25 10. Location of selected gaging stations relative to selected geologic outcrops ............................................................. 33 11. Graphs showing distribution of streamflow variability for selected gaging stations in selected hydrogeologic settings ............................................................................................................................................... 38 12. Map showing distribution of annual yield for gaging stations representative of selected hydrogeologic settings ............................................................................................................................................... 40 Contents III TABLES 1. Continuous-record streamflow-gaging stations operated in Black Hills area............................................................ 11 2. Site information for gaging stations for which only monthly streamflow records are available ............................... 16 3. Site information for gaging stations with less than 5 years of daily record ............................................................... 19 4. Site information for gaging stations with 5 to 9 years of daily record....................................................................... 21 5. Site information for gaging stations with 10 or more years of daily record .............................................................. 23 6. Summary of storage information for selected large reservoirs in Black Hills area.................................................... 26 7. Rationale for selection of statistics period for selected gaging stations..................................................................... 27 8. Hydrogeologic setting and degree of regulation for selected long-term gaging stations (generally those with 10 or more years of record) .................................................................................................... 30 9. Criteria for categorizing degree of regulation for Black Hills streams ...................................................................... 34 10. Comparison statistics for selected stations with various hydrogeologic settings....................................................... 35 CONTENTS OF SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONS Section A. Reservoir contents —Tables of monthend contents, in acre-feet, for stations: A1. 06401000, Angostura Reservoir near Hot Springs ............................................................................................ 51 A2. 06409500, Deerfield Reservoir near Hill City................................................................................................... 52 A3. 06411000, Pactola Reservoir near Silver City................................................................................................... 53 A4. 06427000, Keyhole Reservoir near Moorcroft, WY ......................................................................................... 54 A5. 06435000, Belle Fourche Reservoir near Belle Fourche ................................................................................... 55 Section B. Summary of streamflow records for stations with records of only monthly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cheyenne River 2
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA ) IN THE MATIER OF THE APPLICATION BY ) HP14-001 TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP ) FOR A PERMIT UNDER THE SOUTH DAKOTA) APPLICATION FOR ENERGY CONVERSION AND TRANSMISSION) PARTY STATUS BY FACILITIES ACT TO CONSTRUCT THE ) THE CHEYENNE RIVER KEYSTONE XL PROJECT ) SIOUX TRIBE ) COMES NOW, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, by and through its undersigned signatory, and pursuant to SDCL §49-41B-17(2)(3) petitions to be granted party-status in the above referenced matter. The petitioner's interests are as follows: 1. The Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe is a federally- recognized Indian Tribe residing on the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation of South Dakota. The address of the Tribal government headquarters is Post Office Box 590, Eagle Butte, South Dakota 57625. 2. The Keystone XL project would cross lands that has been adjudged by the U.S. Indian Claims Commission and the U.S. Court of Claims to be the aboriginal and Treaty-titled land of the petitioner Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe. United States v. Sioux Nation ofIndians, 601 F.2d 1157, 1172 (Ct. Cl. 1975) aff'd 448 U.S. 384 (1980); Sioux Nation v. United States, 21 Ind. CL Comm. 371, 382 (1974). 3. The proposed Keystone XL (KXL) pipeline threatens to contaminate the source of water for our Mni Waste Water System. The pipeline is proposed to run through our aboriginal homelands just south of the western border of our present reservation. The proposed route of the pipeline will cross the Cannonball River, Grand River, Moreau River, and Cheyenne River in the Dakotas and these rivers individually and collectively enter the Missouri River in Lake Oahe, the Pick Sloan Reservoir immediately upstream from our intake.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 06.Pub (Read-Only)
    WYOMING WATER DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Fall 2006 Water News Framework Water Plan Update ment Office also gave a One of the topics Progress on the presentation at the 50% that will be addressed in the Framework Water Plan was Aspen Alley progress meeting. In his next round of basin planning reported at the 50% progress presentation, it was stated is groundwater. WWC’s meeting on July 11 in Cas- that the Water Development team is responsible for mak- per. Progress meetings have Office will be seeking fund- ing recommendations on been scheduled for 5%, 50% ing to update two basins this how groundwater should be Inside this issue: and 90% project completion. fall. Mr. Schroeder will be updated. In recent years the Representatives from each responsible for making the drought has highlighted the Framework Water Plan 1 Basin Advisory Group (BAG) recommendation in October need for better groundwater Update/Platte River attended the meetings to regarding which two basin data. This information will Basin Plan is Com- discuss basin issues and to plans should be updated be used to help protect and pleted relay information from the first. Several factors will be manage one of Wyoming’s Framework consultant back considered, including the most valuable resources. News from the WWDC 2 to their groups. The BAGs following: A major task the News from Water Re- 2 learned that each basin is unique but many issues iden- • The length of time since WWC team will be complet- sources Data System/ the last plan was written; ing soon is the BAG survey. State Climate Office tified by the seven basins are A survey will be e-mailed to similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams 2015 – 2019
    Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams 2015 – 2019 South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks Wildlife Division Gene Galinat Greg Simpson Bill Miller Jake Davis Michelle Bucholz John Carreiro Dylan Jones Stan Michals Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams, 2015-2019 Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 II. Resource Descriptions ........................................................................................................... 4 Black Hills Fish Management Area ...................................................................................... 4 III. Management of Black Hills Fish Management Area Stream Fisheries ...................... 7 Classification of Trout Streams ............................................................................................. 7 Regulations .............................................................................................................................. 7 Stocking .................................................................................................................................... 8 Fish Surveys ............................................................................................................................ 8 Angler Surveys ........................................................................................................................ 9 Habitat and Angler Access ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Belle Fourche River Escherichia Coli Total Maximum Daily Load February 2012
    ESCHERICHIA COLI BACTERIA TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) FOR THE BELLE FOURCHE RIVER, SEGMENT 1, BUTTE COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources Water Resources Assistance Program March, 20122 Belle Fourche River Escherichia coli Total Maximum Daily Load February 2012 Total Maximum Daily Load Summary Waterbody Type: Stream 303(d) Listing Parameter: Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria Designated Uses: Warmwater permanent fish life propagation waters, immersion recreation waters, fish and wildlife propagation, recreation, and stock watering, and irrigation water Size of Impaired Waterbody: Approximately 64.2 km in length Size of Watershed: 24,348 acres Indicator(s): Concentrations of E. coli bacteria Analytical Approach: Load Duration Curve Location: Hydrologic Unit Codes (12-digit HUC): 101202020109 101202020201 Goal: Meet applicable water quality standards for fecal coliform bacteria Target (Water Quality Standards): Maximum daily concentration of ≤ 400 cfu/100mL and a geometric mean of 5 samples over a 30 day period ≤ 200 cfu/100mL. These criteria apply from May 1st through September 30th. Reach Number: SD-BF-R-BELLE_FOURCHE_01 Load Allocations based on Geometric Mean: High Flow Zone WLA (cfu/day): 0 High Flow Zone LA (cfu/day): 6.04E+15 High Flow Zone MOS (cfu/day): 4.47E+11 High Flow Zone TMDL (cfu/day): 6.04E+15 2 South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources Belle Fourche River Escherichia coli Total Maximum Daily Load February 2012 Table of Contents Total Maximum Daily Load
    [Show full text]
  • North and South Dakota
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BtELIiETIN 575 «v^L'l/"k *. GEOLOGY OP THE NORTH AND SOUTH DAKOTA BY W. R. CALVERT, A. L. BEEKLY, V. H. BARNETT AND M. A. PISHEL WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1914 vti.'CS i«\ IJ) C -«"PA4 £, * 0 CONTENTS. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Field work............................................................... 6 Previous examinations........:............................................ 6 Geography. .............................................................. 7 Location and extent of area............................................ 7 Relief................................................................ 7 Drainage.............................................................. 8 Culture. ....................................................v .......... 8 Descriptive geology........................................................ 9 Stratigraphy.......................................................... 9 Occurrence of the rocks. ........................................... 9 Cretaceous system (Montana group)................................ 9 Pierre shale.................................................. 9 Character and distribution................................. 9 Age..................................................... 11 Fox Hills^sandstone.......................................... 11 Character and distribution................................. 11 Age......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Recommendations to Prevent Nuisance Algae Conditions
    Wadeable Streams of Montana’s Hi-line Region: An Analysis of Their Nature and Condition, with an Emphasis on Factors Affecting Aquatic Plant Communities AND Recommendations to Prevent Nuisance Algae Conditions Prepared by Michael Suplee, Ph.D. May 2004 Montana Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Standards Section 1520 E. 6th Ave P.O. Box 200901 Helena, MT 59620-0901 Wadeable Streams of Montana’s Hi-line Region: An Analysis of Their Nature and Condition, with an Emphasis on Factors Affecting Aquatic Plant Communities AND Recommendations to Prevent Nuisance Algae Conditions Prepared by Michael Suplee, Ph.D. May 2004 Montana Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Standards Section 1520 E. 6th Ave P.O. Box 200901 Helena, MT 59620-0901 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project could not have been completed without the efforts of a number of people. I would like to thank the private landowners for granting us permission to carry out this study on their property, and I would like to thank the peoples of the Fort Peck Reservation for the same. I would particularly like to thank Dr. Vicki Watson of the University of Montana for her suggestions early in the project on study design and site selection, and for the innumerable conversations we had throughout the project that helped to improve it. I would also like to acknowledge John Lhotak and Marianne Zugel, both graduate students of Dr. Watson, whom conducted the vast majority of the field- work and much of the laboratory analyses. I would like to thank Rosie Sada de Suplee of the Montana Department of Environmental Quality for her assistance with early scouting efforts in the Hi-line region, and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Dakota, Nakota, Lakota Life South Dakota State Historical Society Education Kit Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Goals and Materials 2 Photograph List 3-4 Books and CDs in the Kit 5 Music CDs and DVD in the Kit 6 Erasing Native American Stereotypes 7-8 Teacher Resource 9-18 Bibliography 19-20 Worksheets Word Find 21 Word Find Key 22 Crossword Puzzle 23 Crossword Puzzle Key 24 Word Scramble 25 Word Scramble Key 26 Activities Reading an Object 27-28 Object Identification Sheet 29-35 Trek to Wind Cave 36-37 South Dakota Coordinates Worksheet 38 Comparing Families 39-40 Comparing Families Worksheet 41 What Does the Photo Show? 42-43 Beadwork Designs 44-45 Beadwork Designs Worksheet 46 Beadwork Designs Key 47 Lazy Stitch Beading 48-49 Lazy Stitch Beading Instructions / Pattern 50-51 What Do You Get From a Buffalo? 52-53 Buffalo Uses Worksheet 54 Pin the Parts on the Buffalo 55-56 Pin the Parts on the Buffalo Worksheet 57 Pin the Parts on the Buffalo Worksheet Key 58 Pin the Parts on the Buffalo Outline & Key 59-60 Create a Ledger Drawing 61-62 Examples of Ledger Drawings 63-66 Traditional & Contemporary: Comparing Drum 67-68 Groups Come Dance With Us: Identifying Powwow Dance 69-72 Styles 1 Dakota, Nakota, Lakota Life South Dakota State Historical Society Education Kit Goals and Materials Goals Kit users will: explore the history and culture of the Dakota, Nakota and Lakota people understand the changes brought about by the shift from buffalo hunting to reservation life appreciate that the Dakota, Nakota and Lakota culture is not something
    [Show full text]
  • Map of the Hills
    From Broadus, - Little Bighorn From Buffalo, SD Belle Fourche Reservoir From Bowman, ND From Faith, SD Z Rocky Point Devils Tower Battlefield and Alzada, MT and Medora, ND State Rec. Area Orman Dam and Dickinson, ND and Lemmon, SD National Monument Belle Fourche River 212 J 85 212 From Devils Tower Tri-State Museum NEWELL and Hulett, Wyo 22 BLACK ? Center of the Nation 212 NISLAND 24 34 Monument 10 Belle Fourche ALADDIN McNenny River 543 Fish Hatchery BELLE FOURCHE Mirror Lake EL3021 VALE HILLS 111 10 20 21 34 BEULAH 17 & BADLANDS 90 19 ? 2 85 Spearfish Rec & ST. ONGE 14 8 Aquatic Center 79 205 10 18 D.C. Booth Historic ofSouth Dakota 10 12 19 Nat’l Fish Hatchery & Northeastern Wyoming ? 14 17 SPEARFISH J 23 3 EL3645 90 Bear Butte 863 WHITEWOOD Bear Butte State Park 34 MAP LEGEND Crow Peak EL3654 Lake From Devils Tower, Wyo Tower, From Devils Termeshere Gallery & Museum Tatanka Story of ©2018 by BH&B 134 14A High Plains Western the Bison Computer generated by BH&B Citadel 30 Bear Butte Creek ? SUNDANCE 130 Spearfish Heritage Center Boulder Canyon 112 EL4744 Rock Peak 85 14 STURGIS Interchange Exit Number Byway Golf Club at EL3421 14 U.S. Hwy. Marker 214 195 Broken Boot 8 6 J Bridal Apple Springs 44 Scenic Veil Falls Gold Mine State Hwy. Marker Mt. Theo DEADWOOD ? Iron Creek Black Hills Roosevelt 14A Canyon 32 Ft. Meade Old Ft. Meade 21 Forest Service Road EL4537 Grand Canyon Lake Mining Museum Canyon Little 133 12 Moskee Hwy. 134 Boulder 18 Crow Peak Museum 4 County Road Adventures at Sturgis Motorcycle 141 Cement Ridge Museum 170 34 ? Visitor Information Lookout Spearfish 19 CENTRAL CITY Days of 76 Museum Canyon Lodge Spearfish ? ? & Hall of Fame Bikers 7 Mileage Between Stars 222 Spearfish Historic LEAD 103 Falls Homestake EL5203 Adams Museum & House 170 Black Hills Scenic SAVOY PLUMA 79 37 Byway Paved Highway 807 Opera House 3 National Dwd Mini-Golf & Arcade 18 Cemetery Multi-Lane Divided Hwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Belle Fourche River
    Section 319 NONPOINT SOURCE PROGRAM SUCCESS STORY WatershedSouth Partnership Restores River Dakota Waterbodies Improved Stream entrenchment and bank failure caused excess sediment to enter the Belle Fourche River, prompting South Dakota to add two segments of the river to its 2002 Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) list of impaired waters for elevated total suspended solids (TSS). The Belle Fourche River Watershed Partnership led efforts to restore riparian grazing areas and reduce the volume of unused irriga- tion water returning to the river, both of which reduced the amount of sediment entering the river. Water quality has improved and standards are now being met. South Dakota removed both segments of the Belle Fourche River from the 2008 CWA section 303(d) list for TSS. Problem The South Dakota portion of the Belle Fourche River watershed (Figure 1) drains parts of Butte, Lawrence and Meade counties. The river flows eastward into the Cheyenne River and ultimately to the Missouri River. Land use in the watershed is primarily livestock grazing with some cropland and a few urban and suburban areas. Data show that elevated levels of sediment in the river were causing TSS levels to exceed the water quality standard of 158 milligrams per liter (mg/L) TSS daily maximum. Therefore, South Dakota added two seg- ments of the Belle Fourche River—a 23-mile-long segment from near Fruitdale to Whitewood Creek and a 17-mile-long segment from Whitewood Creek to Willow Creek—to the 2002 CWA section 303(d) Figure 1. The Belle Fourche River watershed drains list of impaired waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Hills Resilient Landscapes Project Final Environmental Impact Statement
    United States Department of Black Hills Resilient Landscapes Project Agriculture Forest Service Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2018 USDA Forest Service Black Hills National Forest Commonly Used Acronyms AMZ Aquatic management zone NEPA National Environmental Policy Act BE Biological evaluation NFMA National Forest Management Act BHNF Black Hills National Forest NFS National Forest System BHRL Black Hills Resilient Landscapes Project NHPA National Historic Preservation Act BMP Best management practice NLEB Northern long-eared bat CDA Connected disturbed area NRHP National Register of Historic Places CMAI Culmination of mean annual increment OHV Off-highway vehicle CTA Commercial treatment area PA Programmatic agreement CWPP Community wildfire protection plan POL Products other than logs DEIS Draft environmental impact statement ROD Record of decision EPA Environmental Protection Agency ROS Recreation opportunity spectrum ESA Endangered Species Act SDGFP SD Department of Game, Fish and Parks FEIS Final environmental impact statement SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer FRCC Fire regime condition class SIO Scenic integrity objective FSH Forest Service handbook SOLC Species of local concern FSM Forest Service manual SS Structural stage GIS Geographic information system USFWS US Fish and Wildlife Service HFRA Healthy Forest Restoration Act WCPH Watershed Conservation Practices hdbk. HUC Hydrologic unit code WUI Wildland-urban interface MA Management area MIS Management indicator species MVUM Motor vehicle use map In accordance
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of SDAS 1997
    Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science,Vol. 76 (1997) 119 THE ORIGIN OF WATERFALLS IN THE BLACK HILLS, SOUTH DAKOTA Charles Michael Ray and Perry H. Rahn South Dakota School of Mines and Technology ABSTRACT We studied the largest waterfalls in the Black Hills to better understand the geologic and hydrologic reasons for their existence. The waterfalls studied include: an unnamed falls on the Cheyenne River above Angostura Reservoir, “Big Falls” on Battle Creek below Keystone, “Bridal Veil Falls” on Rubicon Gulch along Spearfish Canyon, “Spearfish Falls” on Little Spearfish Creek near Savoy, “Roughlock Falls” on Little Spearfish Creek above Savoy, the waterfalls of Fall River below Hot Springs, and “Cascade Falls” on Cascade Creek. The geology of each waterfall was determined, their heights were measured, and cross sections were constructed. The discharge over each waterfall was ob- tained from USGS records; where no records were available the discharge was estimated. The waterfalls form in primarily two different ways. First, where more re- sistant rock units are exposed, this resistant ledge of rocks forms rapids and/or waterfalls. Thus a “knickpoint” is formed in the longitudinal stream profile. Second, some waterfalls form where calcareous-tufa is deposited in the stream bed. This usually happens below springs draining the Madison Limestone. The calc-tufa deposits typically accumulate within a mile below the spring, in a reach that already contains rapids. The rapids further encourage the outgassing of carbon dioxide, leading to the deposition of calcite and/or aragonite. Data compiled in this research may be used to help understand the geo- logic processes that created these waterfalls and help preserve them as aes- thetic resources for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 . / OMB No. 1024-uuiB (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individud See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Register Bulletin 16A) . Complete each item by marking "x" in the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, yjfljrtii -TT7A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and arcV*u 61 significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic names Entrance Road________________________________________________ other names/site number Entrance Drive; Entrance Highway; NPS Route #1; State Route 110; HS-R10; #48CK1645_________________________________________ 2. Location street & number Devils Tower National Monument___ not for publication ___ city or town Devils Tower____________________ vicinity ___ state Wyoming code WY county Crook code Oil zip code 82714-0010 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X_ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant __ nationally __ statewide _X_ locally.
    [Show full text]