REGULAR MEETING OF MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
AGENDA TUESDAY , JULY 17, 2012 , STARTING AT 5:30 PM
In the Franz Wilhelmsen Theatre at Maurice Young Millennium Place 4335 Blackcomb Way, Whistler, BC V0N 1B4
APPROVAL OF AGENDA Approval of the Regular Council agenda of July 17, 2012.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES Adoption of the Committee of the Whole and Regular Council minutes of July 3, 2012.
PUBLIC QUESTION AND ANSWER PERIOD
MAYOR’S REPORT
INFORMATION REPORTS Whistler Olympic Plaza That Council receives Information Report No. 12-076 regarding an update on the Ice Skating Amenity ice skating amenity to be located at Whistler Olympic Plaza. Update Report No. 12-076 File No. 8216
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 3159 Lakecrest Lane That Council approve Development Variance Permit Application No. DVP. 1044 Setback Variance to vary the South side setback at 3159 Lakecrest Lane from 3.0 metres to 2.2 Report No. 12-080 metres in order to accommodate an outdoor hot tub on the ground level deck at File No. DVP.1044 the rear of the house as shown in the plans attached to this report.
RZ.1058 - Olive’s That Council consider giving first and second readings to “Zoning Amendment Organic Groceries at Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012”; and further 1200 Alpha Lake Road Report No. 12-077 That Council authorize the Mayor and Corporate Officer to schedule a Public File No. RZ. 1058 Hearing regarding “Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012”.
Regular Council Meeting Agenda July 17, 2012 Page 2
Report On Whistler Area That Council receive Appendix A to Administrative Report No. 12-078, “Report Hiking Trails on Whistler Area Hiking Trails” as a strategic framework for guiding hiking trail Report No. 12-078 planning in the Whistler area; File No. 8361 That Council direct staff to convene a Trails Planning Working Group to integrate the planning of non-motorized hiking and mountain biking trails within and adjacent to RMOW boundaries; and further,
That Council direct staff to engage the Trails Planning Working Group to prepare a non-motorized Recreational Trail Plan for inclusion in the 2012 Official Community Plan (OCP) update and the Recreation Master Plan and to guide the Alpine Trail Program in the current Five-Year Financial Plan.
Festivals, Events & That $1,200,000 from the Resort Municipality Initiative (RMI) reserve of Animation - 2013 Funding $2,263,125 is allocated to the 2013 Festivals, Events & Animation (FE&A) Allocation program for deployment from October 2012 through May 2013 – and in advance Report No. 12-079 of provincial confirmation of the 2013 RMI program – to secure programming for File No. 8216.09 the 2013 FE&A program.
Amendment to Building That Council consider giving first, second, and third readings to Building and and Plumbing Regulation Plumbing Regulation Amendment Bylaw No.2007, 2012. Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Report No. 12-081 File No. 4604
MINUTES OF COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS Measuring Up Select Minutes of the Measuring Up Select Committee meeting of May 2, 2012. Committee
Transit Management Minutes of the Transit Management Advisory Committee Advisory Committee meeting of June 7, 2012 and July 4, 2012.
BYLAWS FOR FIRST AND SECOND READINGS Zoning Amendment The purpose of Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. Bylaw (Industrial Service 2005, 2012 is to create an Industrial Service Zone with the same requirements as Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012 the IS1 Zone (Industrial Service One) with the addition of a grocery store as a permitted use.
BYLAWS FOR FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD READINGS Building and Plumbing The purpose of Building and Plumbing Regulation Amendment Bylaw No. 2007, Regulation Amendment 2012 is to establish an Occupancy Permit process that may permit homeowners Bylaw No. 2007, 2012 to legitimize illegally developed crawlspace or basement areas.
Regular Council Meeting Agenda July 17, 2012 Page 3
BYLAWS FOR THIRD READING Zoning Amendment The purpose of Zoning Amendment Bylaw (2188 Nordic Drive) 1994, 2012 is to Bylaw (2188 Nordic rezone the lands from RM24 (Residential Multiple Twenty-Four) to RM68 Drive) 1994, 2012 (Residential Multiple Sixty-Eight) in order to allow for conversion of the existing duplex on the site to a detached dwelling while still maintaining the uses currently permitted under the RM24 Zone.
BYLAWS FOR ADOPTION Housing Agreement The purpose of Housing Agreement Bylaw (1060 Legacy Way) No. 2004, 2012 is Bylaw (1060 Legacy to authorize the RMOW to enter into a replacement housing agreement modified Way) No. 2004, 2012 for the Whistler Housing Authority Rental Apartment Building located at 1060 Legacy Way.
OTHER BUSINESS Council Representative That Councillor R. McCarthy be appointed as the Council representative to the on Tourism Whistler Tourism Whistler Board of Directors. Board
CORRESPONDENCE Retaining Walls Correspondence from Brock Rodgers, dated July 4, 2012, regarding setback File No. 3009 requirements and bylaw amendments.
Noise From Whistler Correspondence from Tobias C. Van Veen, dated July 1, 2012, regarding Olympic Plaza concerns with the Whistler Olympic Plaza sound system. File No. 3009
Whistler Health Care Correspondence from Clive Camm, External Communications Leader for VCH Centre Helipad Communications and Public Affairs, dated July 3, 2012, announcing the Whistler File No. 7801 Health Care Centre helipad is open and operational.
Strategic Community Correspondence from The Honourable Ida Chong, Minister of Community, Sport Investment Fund and Cultural Development, dated June 29, 2012, regarding the Strategic File No. 9120 Community Investment Fund program.
Canadians for the Great Correspondence from the Coastal First Nations – Great Bear Initiative, WWF and Bear Initiative Canadians for the Great Bear, dated July 9, 2012, congratulating the municipality File No. 3009 for opposing the construction of the Northern Gateway pipeline, bestowing the municipality with the designation of “Canadian Great Bear Community” and requesting endorsement of the Canadians for the Great Bear initiative.
ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES T U E S D A Y , J U L Y 3 , 2 0 1 2 , STARTING AT 2:00 P.M.
At Municipal Hall – Flute Room 4325 Blackcomb Way, Whistler, BC V0N 1B4
PRESENT
Acting Mayor J. Faulkner
Councillors: J. Crompton, J. Grills, A. Janyk, and R. McCarthy
ABSENT: Mayor N. Wilhelm Morden, Councillor D. Jackson
Chief Administrative Officer, M. Furey General Manager of Resort Experience, J. Jansen General Manager of Corporate and Community Services, B. MacPherson Manager of Communications, M. Comeau Manager of Information Technology, K. Blunden Systems Administrator, L. Adams Recording Secretary, A. Winkle
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Moved by Councillor R. McCarthy Seconded by Councillor A. Janyk
That Council approve the Committee of the Whole agenda of July 3, 2012. CARRIED
PRESENTATION/DISCUSSION Resort-Wide Wi-Fi A presentation was given by B. MacPherson and K. Blunden regarding resort- wide Wi-Fi per the Council Action Plan.
A discussion was held regarding resort-wide Wi-Fi.
Fiber Optic Network A presentation was given by Bob MacPherson and Kelly Blunden regarding the background and opportunities for the municipally-owned fiber optic network.
A discussion regarding the municipally-owned fiber optic network.
ADJOURNMENT Moved by Councillor J. Crompton
That Council adjourn the meeting at 2:43 p.m. CARRIED
______Acting Mayor J. Faulkner
______Corporate Officer: L. Miller
REGULAR MEETING OF MUNICIPAL COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, JULY 3, 2012, STARTING A T 5 : 3 3 PM
In the Franz Wilhelmsen Theatre at Maurice Young Millennium Place 4335 Blackcomb Way, Whistler, BC V0N 1B4
PRESENT:
Mayor N. Wilhelm-Morden
Councillors: J. Crompton, J. Faulkner, J. Grills, A. Janyk, and R. McCarthy
ABSENT: Councillor D. Jackson
Chief Administrative Officer, M. Furey General Manager of Community Life, B. MacPherson General Manager of Infrastructure Services, J. Paul General Manager of Resort Experience, J. Jansen Corporate Officer, L. Miller Manager Environmental Projects, J. Hallisey Manager of Communications, M. Comeau Planner, M. Laidlaw Planning Analyst, K. Creery Transportation Demand Management Coordinator, E. DalSanto Emergency Program Coordinator, E. Marriner Senior Communications Officer, M. Darou Recording Secretary, A. Winkle
APPROVAL OF AGENDA Moved by Councillor J. Grills Seconded by Councillor J. Crompton
That Council approve of the Regular Council agenda of July 3, 2012. CARRIED
ADOPTION OF MINUTES Moved by Councillor A. Janyk Seconded by Councillor R. McCarthy
That Council adopt the Special Council minutes of June 4, 2012, and the Committee of the Whole and Regular Council minutes of June 19, 2012. CARRIED
MINUTES Regular Council Meeting July 3, 2012 Page 2
PUBLIC QUESTION AND ANSWER PERIOD Dave Buzzard, 9295 Emerald Drive, asked about the anticipated average budget for vehicle replacement. J. Paul responded that the average for the vehicle acquisition fund right now is about $1 million dollars. There is an anticipated bump of $1.6 million in a few years. At the beginning of each year the vehicles are re-evaluated to see if they can last another year and therefor affects the upcoming budget. He commented that the budget for this year is about $970,000. Mayor Wilhelm-Morden responded that the Finance and Audit Committee had a presentation about the policy and the work behind the policy. She commented that they were satisfied that it seemed to be in good shape.
Mr. Buzzard asked about the need to replace three of the pickup trucks being retired from the utilities department. He commented on their age and mileage. J. Paul responded that the annual report on vehicle acquisition will be before Council at an upcoming meeting and the information presented will be similar to what was shown to the Finance and Audit Committee. He reported that there is an optimization point at which vehicles are replaced that reflects ongoing operating costs versus the costs recoverable by selling the vehicle earlier. He commented that the age and vehicle type are taken into consideration, and that a vehicle could last longer if it does not require the same types of maintenance and operating costs as other vehicles.
Mr. Buzzard asked if Council would considered taking the same position as the federal government. He commented on the life of RCMP cruisers, other federal vehicles, and municipal vehicles in British Columbia. Mayor Wilhelm-Morden welcomed his comments when the presentation comes to Council.
PRESENTATIONS/DELEGATIONS Community Policing A presentation was given by Inspector Neil Cross and Staff Sergeant Steve Update LeClair regarding an update on RCMP community policing.
Corporate Plan A presentation was given by Mike Furey, Chief Administrative Officer, regarding the Corporate Plan for the Resort Municipality of Whistler.
MAYOR’S REPORT Mayor Wilhelm-Morden reported on the Canada Day weekend, and the parade. She thanked the staff and resort partners for their participation in planning the celebrations, and thanked the 40-plus businesses and community members who participated. She reported that she made a speech at Olympic Plaza, and there was cake that was enjoyed by many people.
Mayor Wilhelm-Morden reported that Festival, Events and Animation kicked off with the free concert series starting this weekend and the concerts for this summer have been announced. She commended staff, resort partners, and those with the FE&A working group and oversight committee for developing the Festival, Events and Animation 2012 line-up. She commented that a different approach is being taken this year to make the concerts a part of animation in the MINUTES Regular Council Meeting July 3, 2012 Page 3
village. The work done this year will help to ease the planning cycle for 2013. She acknowledged the concert production company, brand.LIVE, in putting together the concert series. She reported on upcoming performers, including the Vancouver Symphony Orchestra, Spirit of the West, and Great Lake Swimmers. More information can be found at whistler.ca/concertseries.
Mayor Wilhelm-Morden reported that Mountain Square Parkade Waterproofing Project is done and came in on budget. A ribbon cutting celebration will be held on July 15th. Details will be available on the municipal website.
Mayor Wilhelm-Morden reported that the Community Life Survey is underway by telephone and the online survey will be available July 4th until July 20th.
Mayor Wilhelm-Morden invited poetry lovers to the fourth Poet’s Pause Poetry Competition reading on Sunday, July 8, 2012 at 3 p.m. Pemberton resident, TJ Cheverie won for his poem Time" and Whistler resident and former Poet’s Pause winner, Mary McDonald won for her poem “Homage”. The event will be hosted by Joan Baron and there will be cake.
Mayor Wilhelm-Morden reported that helipad is reopening. She reported that the final inspection was June 28th. The re-opening now means that patients can be transported directly to and from the medical centre by helicopter.
Mayor Wilhelm-Morden reported on the Tough Mudder event held June 23rd and 24th. 14,000 people participated in the event on Saturday and 1,300 registered for Sunday and there was a noticeable impact on the local economy. The hotel occupancy was 88-91%, compared to 60% for the same weekend last year.
Mayor Wilhelm-Morden reported that Chris Poon of the Whistler Question is leaving Whistler to join the Surrey Now Newspaper. She reported that Jennifer Miller, editor of the Whistler Question, is leaving for Taiwan to teach English as a second language. Her replacement is Tanya Foubert, who is coming from the Canmore Leader.
Mayor Wilhelm-Morden reported that she attended a reception with the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority at the Big Sky Golf Course, with the theme of “Delivery of health services in the Sea to Sky Corridor.”
Mayor Wilhelm-Morden reported that she attended the Whistler Film Festival Society fundraiser in North Vancouver, and met their new programming director.
Councillor A. Janyk reported that she and Councillor Grills attended the Velo-city Global 2012 international conference. The conference was attended by cycling advocates and one of the themes was the integration of different modes of transportation (including public transportation, pedestrian, and cycling) to meet the needs of citizens. Councillor J. Grills reported that staff members E. DalSanto and F. Savage also attended the majority of the conference and can share more information.
Councillor A. Janyk reported that the Public Art Committee is going to see the new piece of art that will be put in the Whistler Olympic Plaza on July 30th.
MINUTES Regular Council Meeting July 3, 2012 Page 4
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS RZ 1059 – Function Moved by Councillor J. Faulkner Junction Indoor Seconded by Councillor J. Crompton Recreation Uses Report No. 12-075 That Council consider giving first and second readings to “Zoning Amendment File No. RZ 1059, Bylaw (Function Junction-Indoor Recreation Uses) No. 2003, 2012”; and further Bylaw 2003 That Council authorize the Corporate Officer to schedule a public hearing regarding “Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Function Junction-Indoor Recreation Uses) No. 2003, 2012”. CARRIED
Hilton Retail Building Moved by Councillor R. McCarthy Development Permit Seconded by Councillor J. Crompton Report No. 12-070 File No. DP 1242 That Council approve Development Permit Application 1242 for a freestanding retail building per the architectural plans prepared by Studio One Architecture Inc. dated May 1, 2012 and the landscape plans prepared by Durante Kreuk Ltd. dated April 16, 2012, all included as Appendix A to Administrative Report No. 12-070, subject to the resolution of the following items all to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Resort Experience: 1. Finalization of the plans and details to address the items specified in the letter attached as Appendix B to Administrative Report No. 12-070; 2. Provision of a letter of credit, or other approved security, in the amount of 135 percent of the costs of the hard and soft landscape works both on and off-site as security for the construction and maintenance of these works; 3. Adherence to the Whistler Village Construction Management Strategy; and further 4. Adoption of Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Hilton Retail Building) No. 1990, 2012. CARRIED
RMOW Hazard, Risk, Moved by Councillor A. Janyk and Vulnerability Seconded by Councillor R. McCarthy Assessment Report No. 12-071 That Council receive Administrative Report No. 12-071 regarding the Hazard, File No. 7513 Risk, and Vulnerability Assessment; and further,
That Council approves in principal the recommendations listed in Section 7.0 of the “Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Assessment” in Appendix A to Administrative Report 12-071 subject to appropriate budget allocations. CARRIED
2012 Annual Operating Moved by Councillor J. Crompton Agreement – Transit Seconded by Councillor J. Grills Report No. 12-072 File No. 532 That Council authorize the Mayor and Corporate Officer to execute the 2012- 2013 Whistler Transit Annual Operating Agreement (AOA) for the period April 1, MINUTES Regular Council Meeting July 3, 2012 Page 5
2012 through March 31, 2013; and
That Council accept the Whistler Transit Management Advisory Committee’s recommendation to modify the Whistler transit system routes structure by: 1. Modify the #6-Tapley’s Connector route structure to loop through the Blueberry neighbourhood. 2. Allocating extra service hours currently in the 2012/2013 Whistler Transit System AOA to provide more service for the US Thanksgiving weekend; and 3. Allocating extra service hours currently in the 2012/2013 Whistler Transit System AOA to bring forward the Early Winter start date from Thursday, November 22 to Saturday, November 17, 2012. CARRIED Tender Award - Whistler Moved by Councillor J. Crompton 2012 Road and Trail Seconded by Councillor J. Grills Reconstruction Report No. 12-073 That Council award the tender for the Whistler 2012 Road and Trail File No. 714 Reconstruction Program to Alpine Paving (1978 Ltd.) in the amount of $666,484. The total work completed under this contract may be less than this amount if one or more optional items are removed from the scope of work due to budgetary reasons. CARRIED
Municipal Fiber-Optic Moved by Councillor J. Faulkner Network Improvements Seconded by Councillor J. Grills Report No. 12-074 File No. 4530, 8660.03 That Council authorize staff to bring forward a budget amendment bylaw that anticipates an increase in revenue of $269,000 in the information technology division and an expenditure increase of $269,000 in the Information Technology department, all subject to an advancing of funds in the amount of $100,000 from a telecommunications provider for the enhancement of the municipally owned fiber-optic network. CARRIED
MINUTES OF COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS Audit and Finance Moved by Councillor J. Crompton Standing Committee Seconded by Councillor J. Grills
That minutes of the Audit and Finance Standing Committee Meeting of May 10, 2012 be received. CARRIED
BYLAW FOR FIRST AND SECOND READINGS Zoning Amendment Moved by Councillor J. Grills Bylaw (2188 Nordic Seconded by Councillor R. McCarthy Drive) 1994, 2012 That Zoning Amendment Bylaw (2188 Nordic Drive) 1994, 2012 receive first and second readings. CARRIED
MINUTES Regular Council Meeting July 3, 2012 Page 6
Zoning Amendment Moved by Councillor A. Janyk Bylaw (Function Seconded by Councillor R. McCarthy Junction Indoor Recreation Uses) No. That Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Function Junction Indoor Recreation Uses) No. 2003, 2012 2003, 2012 receive first and second readings. CARRIED
BYLAW FOR ADOPTION Zoning Amendment Moved by Councillor A. Janyk Bylaw (Hilton Retail Seconded by Councillor J. Faulkner Building) No. 1990, 2012 That Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Hilton Retail Building) No. 1990, 2012 be adopted. CARRIED
Land Use Procedures Moved by Councillor J. Grills and Fees Amendment Seconded by Councillor J. Crompton Bylaw No. 2006, 2012 That Land Use Procedures and Fees Amendment Bylaw No. 2006, 2012 be adopted. CARRIED
OTHER BUSINESS There were no items of Other Business.
CORRESPONDENCE Concerts by Donation Moved by Councillor J. Faulkner File No. 8216.41 Seconded by Councillor J. Grills
That correspondence from Lisa Bishop dated June 14, 2012, suggesting that free concerts in the village be "by donation" to the benefit of different local organizations be received. CARRIED
Fire Pit and Campfire Moved by Councillor J. Faulkner Ban Seconded by Councillor J. Crompton File No.3009 That correspondence from Keenan Moses, Owner of Whistler Eco Tours, dated June 14, 2012, requesting that Council reconsider Bylaw 1956 regarding campfires on commercial premises and provide permission for Whistler Eco Tours to continue having campfires in their fire pit be received and referred to staff. CARRIED
MINUTES Regular Council Meeting July 3, 2012 Page 7
Whistler U Moved by Councillor J. Grills File No. RA.438 Seconded by Councillor A. Janyk
That correspondence from Paul Boulanger dated June 18, 2012, in support of Whistler University in its proposed location and commenting on the report to Council be received. CARRIED
Whistler U Moved by Councillor R. McCarthy File No. RA.438 Seconded by Councillor A. Janyk
That correspondence from Tim Regan, Vision Pacific, dated June 19, 2012, in support of the Whistler U proposal be received. CARRIED
Official Community Plan Moved by Councillor J. Grills - Development Permit Seconded by Councillor A. Janyk Area File No. 10601 That correspondence from Auli Parviainen, Executive Officer for the Canadian Home Builders' Association - Sea to Sky, dated June 15, 2012, regarding concerns with the municipality's efforts to promote energy and water conservation as a way to reduce greenhouse gases through proposed legislation in the Development Permit Area in the draft Official Community Plan be received. CARRIED
ADJOURNMENT Moved by Councillor J. Crompton
That Council adjourn the July 3, 2012 Council meeting at 7:15 p.m.
CARRIED
______MAYOR: N. Wilhelm-Morden
______CORPORATE OFFICER: L. Miller
REPORT INFORMATION REPORT T O C O U N C I L
PRESENTED: July 17, 2012 REPORT: 12-076 FROM: Resort Experience FILE: 8216 SUBJECT: WHISTLER OLYMPIC PLAZA ICE SKATING AMENITY UPDATE
COMMENT/RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER That the recommendation of the General Manager of Resort Experience be endorsed.
RECOMMENDATION That Council receives Information Report No. 12-076 regarding an update on the ice skating amenity to be located at Whistler Olympic Plaza.
REFERENCES Appendix “A” – Murdoch Company Architecture + Planning Ltd – Ice Surface and Great Lawn
PURPOSE This information report serves to update Mayor and Council on the delivery status of the ice skating amenity at Whistler Olympic Plaza.
DISCUSSION During the winter of 2011 and 2012 the RMOW provided a temporary ice skating amenity as a pilot project at Whistler Olympic Plaza (WOPL). The pilot project’s intent was to test the acceptability, viability and operational costs associated with a modest facility and if deemed successful invest in necessary components to provide a more permanent amenity with reduced start-up and operational costs for subsequent seasons.
The provision of this amenity was based upon a long standing desire by the resort community to provide an outdoor ice skating amenity, as well as ongoing visitor feedback received by Tourism Whistler guests. This feedback has consistently expressed an interest in outdoor skating. Tourism Whistler also noted added value propositions associated with the amenity to round out guest’s outdoor experience.
The temporary pilot amenity proved to be very successful. After two months of operations, in March of 2012 staff reported to Council positive feedback trends from guest, Village Host, Tourism Whistler, Whistler Blackcomb and Whistler Chamber of Commerce. By season’s end the temporary pilot amenity had exceeded its revenue projections. A capital project to deliver a more permanent amenity for the 2012 - 2013 winter season is included within the Council approved Five Year Financial Plan 2012-2016.
Whistler Olympic Plaza Ice Skating Amenity Update Page 2 ... July 17, 2012
The new ice skating amenity is envisioned to build upon the successes of the pilot project and addressing its shortcomings. Similar to the pilot, the new project will include ice under the pavilion roof, on the ramps and out into the lawn area. The overall surface area of the ice is anticipated to be expanded by infilling the space between the pilot’s ice track on the lawn and the top of the pavilion stairs. Doing so provides a more flexible platform for greater programming opportunities and uses – the popular ice skating track will still be provided and the new infill space can be used for a variety of purposes.
In order to significantly reduce start up and operational costs it is proposed that a refrigerated concrete slab similar to a typical arena floor be installed. This means that the existing pavilion floor and ramps will be converted to a refrigerated concrete slab.
With regard to the ice outside of the pavilion and upon the lawn, staff is considering converting a portion from lawn and concrete pavers to a refrigerated concrete slab. In order to meet the project budget the extent of the ice in lawn area may vary somewhat and/or may include seasonal elements. Staff are sensitive to the “look” of a concrete slab in the lawn area, and are investigating means to integrate the slab with the surrounding landscape as well as improve upon slab aesthetics.
The new amenity is to include a permanent and purpose built refrigeration plant located in a currently underutilized location. This location will free up the service lane. The plant is anticipated to operating approximately 30% more efficiently than the pilot project’s plant and provides reduced overall operating costs because it is purpose built.
A preliminary concept plan of the skating amenity is attached in Appendix “A”.
Given the tight timelines to plan, design, tender and construct this facility a Construction Project Manager (CPM) has been retained via a select Request for Approval process. The technical nature and narrow tolerances associated with refrigerated concrete slab construction, especially in an outdoor environment, necessitated the need to work with personal having specific expertise. The CPM’s role is to be involved in all aspects of the pre-construction phase (design development, costing and tendering) while working closely with municipal staff. The municipality has retained Venture Pacific Construction Management (VPCM) from Langley, BC to fill this role. VPCM possess extensive ice rink expertise and has sufficient capacity to take on this project. For management of the construction phase the municipality has the option to negotiate a fee with VPCM or seek other options.
The project is currently in the design development and costing stage. The different components of the project will be tendered over the summer. Construction is anticipated to commence following the Grand Fondo event. A public opening is tentatively anticipated to occur prior to the primary holiday season in December.
Whistler Olympic Plaza Ice Skating Amenity Update Page 3 ... July 17, 2012
WHISTLER 2020 ANALYSIS W2020 TOWARD Descriptions of success that resolution Comments Strategy moves us toward The site has been designed as a public space for social interaction and spontaneous and planned shared activities, with the great lawn and public Community spaces encourage personal open space, expanded children’s play Built Environment interaction and shared activities area, and many seating areas. The potential covered outdoor skating area would be a very special and unique venue for shared activities for residents and visitors, families and people of all ages. The proposed ice amenity is proven to To maintain vibrancy, Whistler Village is contribute to the new activity node and the core of the resort community anchor in Whistler Village, creating new Built Environment energy and vibrancy and strengthening Whistler Village as the core of the resort community. The built environment anticipates and accommodates the needs of the resident The ice amenity will be relevant and attractive to the resident community. The Built Environment community while also satisfying the plan provides for family-oriented leisure expectations of guests and recreation activities.
This project seeks to expand the range of Whistler is globally recognized as a centre offerings of the resort community, of excellence in sustainable community through new recreation opportunities that Built Environment development support the long term sustainability of the community.
Whistler Village has become a model of success for the design of mountain resort Whistler’s unique character and vibrancy villages, and is a major asset of the provides competitive advantage in the resort community. However, the Village Economic must continue to evolve to remain destination resort marketplace competitive. The proposed ice amenity will strengthen Whistler’s unique character and vibrancy in a very positive way. Whistler has a diversified and year-round The proposed development will support diversification and a year-round economy Economic tourism economy by adding recreational programming in Whistler Olympic Plaza during the winter. Residents and visitors of all ages and The proposed covered outdoor skating abilities enjoy activities year-round that Recreation and was identified by the community as a encourage healthy living, learning and a very desirable feature for this site that Leisure sense of community would add a significant new weather- protected activity in winter. Recreation and leisure is a core Recreation and The public open space, children’s play contributor to the Whistler economy area and skating all support this Leisure description of success.
Whistler Olympic Plaza Ice Skating Amenity Update Page 4 ... July 17, 2012
Visitors are aware of and have access to a Ice skating would provide recreation and Recreation and variety of recreation and leisure offerings leisure opportunities that currently are not provided and would be valued by a wide Leisure at a range of price points demographic of visitors, including families. Quality recreation and leisure activities are Recreation and The proposed roof pavilion and outdoor delivered with exceptional service skating would provide a highly Leisure exceptional experience. Diverse and affordable opportunities for Resident Skating will be free and accessible to all recreation, leisure, arts and culture exist Affordability interested in participating.
Visitors choose Whistler to actively Visitor participate in recreation, learning, and Please refer to previous comments. Experience cultural opportunities
A diverse range of year-round activities is Visitor developed and offered Please refer to previous comments. Experience
The resort community’s authentic sense of place and engaging, innovative and Visitor renewed offerings attract visitors time and Please refer to previous comments. Experience time again
AWAY FROM Mitigation Strategies W2020 Strategy Descriptions of success that resolution and Comments moves away from The proposed skating facility would The new and renovated built environment consume energy for ice refrigeration. A has transitioned towards sustainable permanent facility will be based on a high Built Environment management of energy and materials level of energy efficiency and incorporate heat recovery.
OTHER POLICY CONSIDERATIONS The proposed amenity is consistent with other municipal policies.
BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS The Council approved 2012 – 2016 Five Year Financial Plan identifies $1,400,000 for this project. 100% of the project is funded via Resort Municipality Initiative.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION As the project proceeds communication will occur to advise guests and residents of the project. This will involve on site signage and communication pieces at project milestones.
The RMOW will provide the Province with an annual outcomes report outlining the expenditure of RMI funds, results, as well as a Communication Plan that recognizes its significant contribution through a variety of means.
Whistler Olympic Plaza Ice Skating Amenity Update Page 5 ... July 17, 2012
SUMMARY This report provides an update on the installation of an ice skating amenity at Whistler Olympic Plaza for the coming winter season.
Respectfully submitted,
Martin Pardoe MANAGER RESORT PARKS PLANNING SERVICES for Jan Jansen GENERAL MANAGER RESORT EXPERIENCE
APPENDIX A
REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE REPOR T TO COUNCIL
PRESENTED: July, 17, 2012 REPORT: 12-080 FROM: Resort Experience FILE: DVP. 1044 SUBJECT: 3159 LAKECREST LANE SETBACK VARIANCE
COMMENT/RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER That the recommendation of the General Manager of Resort Experience be endorsed.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve Development Variance Permit Application No. DVP. 1044 to vary the South side setback at 3159 Lakecrest Lane from 3.0 metres to 2.2 metres in order to accommodate an outdoor hot tub on the ground level deck at the rear of the house as shown in the plans attached to this report.
REFERENCES Owner: 0764833 B.C. LTD Civic Address: 3159 Lakecrest Lane Legal Description: Strata Lot 21 Strata Plan BCS 1403 District Lots 5411 & 7258 Group 1, NWD PID: 026-357-518 Zoning: RS-9 (Single Family Residential Nine) Appendices: “A” Location Plan “B” Architectural Plans
PURPOSE OF REPORT Development Variance Permit Application No. DVP. 1044 requests Council’s consideration of a side setback variance at 3159 Lakecrest Lane.
DISCUSSION This property is a single family lot located in the Lakecrest subdivision. Construction of a detached dwelling is currently under way. The parcel is zoned RS-9 (Residential Single Family Nine); as such, the side setback requirement is 3.0 metres. Additionally, the General Regulations of Zoning & Parking Bylaw 303, 1983 require a 3.0 metre side setback for uncovered swimming pools and hot tubs.
3159 Lakecrest Lane Setback Variance Page 2 July 17, 2012
This application requests Council’s approval of a hot tub located 2.2 metres from the South side property line. The tub is to be located on a covered deck on the ground floor at the rear of the dwelling. Both the deck and the roof over are permitted to project into the side setback per the General Regulations of the Zoning Bylaw and the applicant wishes to locate the hot tub at the South end of the deck.
The property that is most affected by this variance is the immediate neighbour to the South, 3163 Lakecrest Lane. This parcel is also owned by the applicant; the two lots are being developed jointly and will function, essentially, as one larger estate property with a principal dwelling (3159) and a secondary dwelling (3163).
Staff review of this application did not identify any concerns with regard to the proposed variance; therefore, this application is supported by RMOW staff.
WHISTLER 2020 ANALYSIS
W2020 TOWARD Descriptions of success that Comments Strategy resolution moves us toward none
W2020 AWAY FROM Mitigation Strategies Descriptions of success that Strategy and Comments resolution moves away from none
BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS There are no significant budget implications associated with this proposal. Development Variance Permit Application fees provide for recovery of costs associated with processing this application.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION
Notices describing the proposed variance were sent to surrounding property owners on June 15th, 2012. As of July 3rd, no responses have been received. Should staff receive any responses subsequent to the time of writing of this report, these will be made available for Council at their July 17th meeting.
SUMMARY DVP. 1044 requests Council’s approval of a relaxation to the South side setback requirement from 3.0 metres to 2.2 metres at 1044 Lakecrest Lane in order to permit a hot tub to be installed on the ground floor deck at the back of the dwelling.
3159 Lakecrest Lane Setback Variance Page 3 July 17, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
Roman Licko PLANNING TECHNICIAN for Jan Jansen GENERAL MANAGER OF RESORT EXPERIENCE
APPENDIX A
Development Variance Permit DVP. 1044, Location Plan
Subject Lands APPENDIX B
REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE REPOR T TO COUNCIL
PRESENTED: July 17, 2012 REPORT: 12-077 FROM: Resort Experience FILE: RZ. 1058 SUBJECT: RZ.1058 - OLIVE’S ORGANIC GROCERIES AT 1200 ALPHA LAKE ROAD
COMMENT/RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER That the recommendation of the General Manager of Resort Experience be endorsed.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council consider giving first and second readings to “Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012”; and further
That Council authorize the Mayor and Corporate Officer to schedule a Public Hearing regarding “Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012”.
REFERENCES Owner: Millar Creek Developments Ltd., Inc. No. 367768 Location: 1200 Alpha Lake Road Legal Description: A portion of Lot A, District Lots 4120, 5624, 7863, & 7979 Plan BCP 8757, Group 1 NWD Current Zoning: IS1 (Industrial Service One) Proposed Zoning: IS6 (Industrial Service Six)
Appendices: “A” Location Plan “B” Site Plan “C” Proposed IS6 Zone
PURPOSE OF REPORT This report introduces Rezoning Application No. RZ. 1058, an application that proposes to add “grocery store” as a permitted use at 1200 Alpha Lake Road, and asks for Council’s consideration of first & second readings of the zoning amendment bylaw.
RZ.1058 - Olive’s Organic Groceries at 1200 Alpha Lake Road Page 2 July 17, 2012
DISCUSSION History In the spring of 2012 Municipal Staff were contacted regarding a proposal to open a grocery store in Function Junction. Review of the applicable zoning, IS1 (Industrial Service One), showed that, while retail uses are permitted, they are limited as follows:
9.1.1 (s) Retailing and rental, but only including motor vehicles, industrial equipment, machinery, motor vehicles, industrial equipment, machinery, motor vehicle accessories and parts, bicycles, boats and boating supplies, hardware and building supplies, small equipment, tools, motors and household items.
The question was raised as to whether groceries constitute “household items”. To that end, staff received a legal opinion from RMOW solicitors, Young Anderson, clarifying that, within the context of Whistler’s Zoning Bylaw 303, this was not the case, thereby necessitating this Rezoning Application.
The applicants originally explored rezoning 1050 Millar Creek Road; however, concerns regarding the limited parking available at that location obliged them to refocus on 1200 Alpha Lake Road as shown on the location plan in Appendix “A”.
Current Application
This application proposes to locate, “Olive’s, an organically inspired grocery store” at 101- 1200 Alpha Lake Road, site of the current Burnt Stew Café. This unit is approximately 220 m2 in area; the intent is for the retail component to constitute 162 m2, and the remaining 58 m2 for back of house. Staff and the applicants have agreed to limit the maximum area of the grocery store to 300m2 in order to allow for some room for expansion in the long term, while still maintaining a small business footprint.
The applicant’s vision for this business is a locally owned & operated neighbourhood grocery/ convenience store serving people living or working in Function Junction and Cheakamus Crossing, while also picking up some of the business traffic that frequents the area.
“Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012” creates a new, IS6 (Industrial Service Six) zone, which mirrors the IS1 Zone but adds “Grocery Store” as a permitted use, and further limits the gross floor area of a grocery store to 300 m2. For clarity, this new IS6 Zone is applicable only to 1200 Alpha Lake Road and is attached to this report as Appendix “C”.
Parking & Loading As a part of this application, the applicant has submitted a parking study for all of 1200 Alpha Lake Road, indicating that, even with the proposed new use, this address has surplus parking. The current restaurant use at Unit 101 generates 5 stalls per 100 m2 and the proposed grocery store use generates 6; so the parking requirement for this unit goes up by two stalls. The parking study indicates that the total number of required spaces for this building including the proposed restaurant is 68 spaces. This property has 78 paved, delineated parking stalls as shown in the site plan attached here as Appendix “B”.
This building has four loading bays, including one specific to Unit 101. The total number of required loading bays for this property is two.
RZ.1058 - Olive’s Organic Groceries at 1200 Alpha Lake Road Page 3 July 17, 2012
Split Zoning Staff note that this parcel is a split-zoned. The front portion that contains the building itself is zoned IS1, while the rear portion of the lot is zoned IA1, (Industrial Auxiliary One). The IA1 zone permits industrial storage and parking uses. The portion of the lot zoned IA1 contains 45 of the total 78 parking stalls and is not subject to this rezoning. Only the IS1 Zoned Portion of the lot is proposed to be rezoned to the new IS6 Zone.
This split zoning is consistent with neighbouring parcels along this portion of Alpha lake Road, which are also split zoned. While split zoning is generally not desirable, it makes sense in these cases as the IA1 zoned portions of these parcels lie beneath the power lines.
WHISTLER 2020 ANALYSIS W2020 TOWARD Descriptions of success that Comments Strategy resolution moves us toward Building design, construction and Function Junction is evolving, while many uses operation is characterized by efficiency, remain, some new ones are being introduced. Built Environment durability and flexibility for changing long- The grocery store is a natural step in this term uses. evolution. Locally owned and operated businesses This locally owned & operated business will fill Economic thrive and are encouraged as an essential a perceived need in the Function Junction component of a healthy business mix. business mix. Chemical free, organically-grow food produced in the Sea-To-Sky Corridor is The business model provides for organically Health & Social available year-round at a price affordable grown foods at a competitive rate. to community members. Community members eat healthy food, exercise and engage in leisure and other stress relieving activities that assist in “ preventing illness and they avoid the As above. abusive use of substances that evidence indicates have negative effects on physical and mental health. The store is primarily aimed at people living or Resident Residents have access to affordable working in Function Junction and Cheakamus Affordability goods and services that meet their needs. Crossing, while also picking up some of the business traffic that frequents the area. A buy local culture helps to circulate As above. “ wealth within Whistler and the region. Products and services offered to meet residents’ needs move continuously Organically grown foods are clearly a more “ toward meeting our sustainability sustainable choice. objectives.
W2020 AWAY FROM Mitigation Strategies Descriptions of success that Strategy and Comments resolution moves away from none
RZ.1058 - Olive’s Organic Groceries at 1200 Alpha Lake Road Page 4 July 17, 2012
OTHER POLICY CONSIDERATIONS The RMOW Corporate Plan provides strategic direction for the organization for the coming two years and identifies development of a Function Junction Sub Area Plan as one of the goals for Planning Services. This application underlines the need for such a plan and can be seen as a small step toward fulfilling this objective. There is a perception within the community that Function Junction is changing from simply being Whistler’s industrial park. The zoning on many properties permits auxiliary residential dwelling units or caretaker units and there is also an appreciable employee housing component at the Northern terminus of Alpha Lake Road. The proposed grocery store would serve the residents of this neighbourhood, those who work there on a daily basis, and Cheakamus Crossing residents.
BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS There are no significant budget implications associated with this proposal. Rezoning application fees provide for recovery of costs associated with processing this application. Should the applicant choose to make changes to the building façade or landscaping, Development Permit and Building Permit fees will be applicable.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION
A sign describing Rezoning Application RZ .1058 was posted in June of this year. As of July 5th, no responses have been received. Should staff receive any responses subsequent to the time of writing of this report, these will be made available for Council at their July 17th meeting.
As noted, the applicants had previously explored rezoning another property in Function Junction, 1050 Millar Creek Road; however concerns from a neighbouring business owner regarding parking prompted the move to 1200 Alpha Lake Road.
Per the requirements of the Local Government Act, the zoning amendment bylaw will require four readings at Council’s open meeting, including a public hearing.
SUMMARY RZ. 1058 proposes to rezone the lands at 1200 Alpha Lake Road from IS1 to IS6 in order to allow a modestly sized grocery store to operate from this location. Creation of the IS6 Zone can be seen as a first step toward identifying the changing needs in Function Junction as noted in the RMOW Corporate Plan.
Respectfully submitted,
Roman Licko PLANNING TECHNICIAN for Jan Jansen GENERAL MANAGER OF RESORT EXPERIENCE
APPENDIX A
Rezoning Application No. RZ. 2058 Location Plan
Subject Lands
APPENDIX B APPENDIX C “Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012”
SCHEDULE 2
IS6 Zone (Industrial Service Six)
15 In an IS6 Zone:
15.1 All the regulations of the IS1 Zone apply with the addition of the following regulations:
(a) Grocery store shall also be a permitted use.
(b) The maximum permitted gross floor area of a grocery store shall be 300 square metres.
REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT TO COUNCIL
PRESENTED: July 17, 2012 REPORT: 12-078 FROM: Resort Experience FILE: 8361 SUBJECT: REPORT ON WHISTLER AREA HIKING TRAILS
COMMENT/RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER That the recommendation of the General Manager of Resort Experience be endorsed.
RECOMMENDATION That Council receive Appendix A to Administrative Report No. 12-078, “Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails” as a strategic framework for guiding hiking trail planning in the Whistler area;
That Council direct staff to convene a Trails Planning Working Group to integrate the planning of non-motorized hiking and mountain biking trails within and adjacent to RMOW boundaries; and further,
That Council direct staff to engage the Trails Planning Working Group to prepare a non- motorized Recreational Trail Plan for inclusion in the 2012 Official Community Plan (OCP) update and the Recreation Master Plan and to guide the Alpine Trail Program in the current Five-Year Financial Plan.
REFERENCES Appendices: “A” – January 2, 2012 Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails “B” – Minutes of February 15, 2012 FWAC Meeting (relevant excerpts) “C” – Draft Terms of Reference for Whistler Trails Planning Working Group
PURPOSE This report enables Council to receive the Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails (attached as Appendix “A”), which was previously presented to Council at the Committee of the Whole on April 17, 2012. Further, this report provides a background and summary of the hiking trails report, and it provides recommendations on the implementation of that report as part of the broader planning of Whistler area recreational trails and the Recreation Master Plan process.
BACKGROUND The following is a chronology of events leading up to this report to Council: In 2010 Whistler resident Mr. Kurt Mueller contacted Mayor Ken Melamed and advised him of the deteriorated condition of Whistler area hiking trails. The Mayor referred Mr. Mueller to the Forest and Wildland Advisory Committee (FWAC). On September 8, 2010 Mr. Mueller presented to FWAC his concerns about inconvenient access to trailheads, the poor condition of trails and asked about the role Report On Whistler Area Hiking Trails Page 2 ... July 17, 2012
of the Cheakamus Community Forest in the construction and maintenance of trails. In response, the committee formed the Hiking Trails Task Force (HTTF) as a subcommittee of FWAC. In 2011 HTTF volunteers hiked many of the Whistler area trails and submitted reports on the condition of the trails and trail access. The Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails was prepared, including a trail inventory and recommended actions. On January 11, 2012 HTTF presented the Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails to FWAC. On February 15, 2012 FWAC passed the following recommendations (relevant FWAC minutes attached as Appendix “B”): 1. FWAC recommends that Council instruct staff to adopt the HTTF report as a strategic framework for recreational trail development within and adjacent to the RMOW. 2. FWAC recommends that Council instruct staff to focus on the following three specific recommendations in the report to be implemented in the next 12 months: - Black Tusk and Whistler Mountain gates are open subject to results of Access Management Plan. - Keep permanent roads open subject to results of Access Management Plan. - With support of elected officials and TW, secure the allocation of an annual $300,000 to hiking trail reclamation, maintenance and construction within the RMOW. Furthermore, lobby the provincial government for an annual allocation of $300,000 for BC Parks and $300,000 for Recreation Sites and Trails BC (RSTBC) for hiking trail reclamation, maintenance and construction on trails adjacent to the RMOW. 3. Assign responsibility of an RMOW staff member to work with Recreation Sites and Trails BC to relocate, rehabilitate and upgrade Rainbow to Madley hiking trail to an appropriate, sustainable world class standard. In addition, make a beginning on other trail work with the RMOW, possibly the Crater Rim Trail viewpoints and signage as funding allows. On April 4, 2012 a meeting was held with representatives of municipal staff, Whistler Off Road Cycling Association (WORCA) and HTTF to explore common interests in the development of non-motorized alpine trails. On April 17, 2012 at the Committee of the Whole municipal staff made a presentation to Council on the Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails. On April 25, 2012 a meeting was held with representatives of municipal staff, WORCA, HTTF and provincial RSTBC to advance the planning of multi-use trails in the Mt. Sproatt area. On May 1, 2012 Council endorsed a report as RMOW input to the Garibaldi Park Management Plan amendment process. The comments to BC Parks included statements that multi-use trails can provide economic benefits to the resort community and an amenity for visitors and residents. The provincial RSTBC has promised $25,000 of trail maintenance funding in 2012 for each of the Rainbow Lake, Brandywine and Showh Lakes trails.
Report On Whistler Area Hiking Trails Page 3 ... July 17, 2012
An Alpine Trail Program is included in the Five-Year Financial Plan in the amount of $150,000 per year from 2013 through 2016 for development of multi-use (hiking and mountain biking), non-motorized alpine trails in the Whistler area. Terms of reference for a Whistler Trails Planning Working Group (attached as Appendix “C”) have been drafted and sent to prospective working group members for discussion at a scheduled July 12 meeting.
REVIEW OF REPORT ON WHISTLER AREA HIKING TRAILS Introduction The Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails provides a history of local hiking trail development, a very comprehensive hiking trail inventory, a discussion of the current state of Whistler’s hiking tourism product, the challenges of hiking access to the local alpine and recommendations for improvements to hiking trails and road access to trailheads. The report includes an inventory of 70 existing and 37 proposed hiking trails in the region from Culliton Creek (Big Orange Bridge) in the south to Nairn Falls in the north. While the inventory includes a wide variety of trails, the focus of the report is on trails to scenic alpine areas and the access roads leading to trailheads for alpine trails. These are the trails that appeal to local hiking enthusiasts and to visitors who are seeking an alpine hiking experience.
In the past hiking trails to the local alpine were constructed and maintained by mountaineering clubs and by the provincial parks and forestry agencies. The RMOW and the Squamish Forest District built the sub-alpine Flank Trail by linking and improving old resource roads, and it is currently maintained from Alpine Meadows to Function Junction. Whistler Blackcomb has developed alpine hiking trails on both mountains as an amenity for day visitors accessing the mountains by the lifts from Whistler Village and by the Peak to Peak gondola. The RMOW, WORCA and local trail builders have constructed a large number of low elevation mountain biking trails. These multi-use trails satisfy most casual hikers but don’t provide the alpine experience desired by dedicated hikers.
Challenges Identified The report identifies a number of challenges with creating high quality, self-powered hiking access to Whistler’s alpine areas: RSTBC, the manager of trails on Crown lands, has very limited resources for trail maintenance. The Cheakamus Community Forest at present has no resources for trail building or maintenance. Convenient hiking access from Whistler Village to the alpine was lost in 1990s when the Fitzsimmons slump progressed to the point where it is impossible to reach the Singing Pass parking lot by passenger vehicle. The very popular trail to Rainbow Lake (1450 m elevation) is badly deteriorated and is not a pleasant hiking experience. Sections of the Flank Trail north of Alpine Meadows and south of Function Junction have deteriorated and are rarely used. Access roads to trailheads are not maintained for passenger vehicle use, making it difficult for average hikers to drive to a trailhead and hike to an alpine destination in a
Report On Whistler Area Hiking Trails Page 4 ... July 17, 2012
day. Access roads to the microwave towers on Whistler Mountain and Black Tusk have gates that prevent public access. The Whistler valley’s low elevation (650 m) means an almost 1,000 m elevation gain is required to reach an alpine area. A round trip hike with a vertical gain of 1000 m could exceed the daily limit of most casual hikers. (The Whistler and Blackcomb Mountain lifts provide excellent access, for a fee, to the alpine areas on the east side of the Valley, including the Spearhead Range in Garibaldi Provincial Park.) There are limited true alpine areas within RMOW boundaries. Most are in Garibaldi Park and the Whistler Blackcomb CRA, though there are alpine areas on Mt. Sproatt within the RMOW. A policy needs to be established on the use of RMOW funds to build and maintain trail infrastructure outside of municipal boundaries (the jurisdiction Squamish Lillooet Regional District).
Recommendations from Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails The Executive Summary of the hiking trails report includes the following recommendations: Recognition, promotion and funding - Alpine hiking trails should be recognized as an important economic resource and a fundamental part of Whistler2020. - Tourism Whistler should take a more active role initially in the development and funding and later in the promotion of alpine hiking trail systems in the region. - RMOW should formally ask BC Parks, RSTBC and the Squamish Forest District (SFD) to re- establish funding for hiking trails and recreation sites in the region. - The RMOW should budget a suitable amount annually for the improvement of hiking trails within municipal boundaries. A reasonable estimate is $300,000 per year, perhaps Resort Municipality Initiative (RMI) funds. - Because the forest industry has basically stopped construction and maintenance of trails and recreation areas, the funding needs to be supplemented with revenues from tourism. Strategy and coordination - A hiking trail strategy should be developed for the whole region, including TW, Cheakamus Community Forest (CCF), all government partners and local the mountaineering and hiking clubs. - A trails coordination office should be created by all of the above partners. - The trails coordinator should be responsible management of funding applications, Section 56 and 57 approvals, budgets, stakeholders, media, etc. - A permanent advisory committee on alpine hiking trails should be established. - All locked gates to backcountry access roads should be reviewed, including Black Tusk microwave road and Whistler Mountain microwave road. Managing access - Two-wheel drive access roads standards with gentle grades should be established for all new forest service roads; heavily used recreation roads should be paved; as funding becomes available existing access roads should be upgraded to the new standards. - Major trail and access road construction projects within the RMOW need to be cost effectively planned and managed. - CCF and SFD to negotiate with backcountry operators regarding issues related to the maintenance of access roads.
Report On Whistler Area Hiking Trails Page 5 ... July 17, 2012
Use of volunteers - Work by volunteer groups should keep maintenance costs to a minimum. - Adopt-a-trail program should be implemented with volunteer groups. - Volunteers from other provinces or countries should be explored. Recommended trail improvements - Develop at least one popular “Squamish Chief-like” trail to a local peak or significant viewpoint. - Within the RMOW develop/improve three trails to the alpine within three years. - Within the SFD develop/improve three trails to the alpine within three years. - Develop and maintain other hiking trails per list in report. - Re-open back country access on roads with locked gates. - RMOW and WB improve access to Singing Pass Trail. - Recommended priorities for improvements: safety, signage, existing trails, new trails
DISCUSSION Trails form an essential component of Whistler’s recreation infrastructure and are a core amenity for the mountain resort community’s active residents and visitors. Hiking in the valley bottom and alpine of the Whistler area has long been a way for people to connect with nature and engage in active recreation. As there are other trail users in Whistler, the findings and recommendations in the Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails must also be considered in the context of the other recreational trail uses and planning processes, as discussed below.
Cycling Trails Planning – Alpine Cross Country Mountain Biking Experiences Whistler has been on the forefront of mountain biking since the sport evolved in the early 1980s, and in 2000 Council created the Whistler Cycling Committee to prepare a recreational cycling vision for the resort. In 2006 the Committee prepared a cycling trails master plan, which Council endorsed as part of the recreational cycling plan. In 2011 the cycling trails master plan was updated as Schedule G of the Official Community Plan (OCP) update, and the updated plan showed an area for the development of trails on Mt. Sproatt on Whistler’s west side.
The desirability of alpine cross country mountain biking experiences has long been identified by residents, visitors and commercial mountain bike tour operators. The Cycling Committee developed criteria and options for local alpine cycling trails, identifying an “east option” between Singing Pass and Cheakamus Lake and a “west option” on Mt. Sproatt between the Flank Trail and Whistler Olympic Park.
Regional Trails Planning The RMOW has jurisdiction and full control over the planning, construction and maintenance of trails located on municipally owned or controlled properties, including municipal parks and the Valley Trail. Many other trails within municipal boundaries are located on Crown lands, and the construction of recreational trails must be authorized under Section 57 of the provincial Forest and Range Protection Act. Recreational Sites and Trails BC (RSTBC) administers that process. The hiking trails report includes a number of trails located outside of RMOW boundaries. These trails are in the planning jurisdiction of the SLRD. The Cheakamus Community Forest (CCF) and FWAC are involved with trails and resource access roads to trailheads for lands having timber resources.
Report On Whistler Area Hiking Trails Page 6 ... July 17, 2012
Trails Planning Working Group Upon reviewing the Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails report municipal staff convened two meetings (April 4 and 25, 2012) with HTTF and WORCA members to discuss common interests and potential areas of collaboration between the local hiking and mountain biking communities and the RMOW. To that end a Whistler Trails Planning Working Group is being formed, with the initial meeting scheduled for July 12th. The working group (draft terms of reference attached as Appendix “C”) will have the following objectives: Plan new and upgraded non-motorized trails in the Whistler area. Coordinate and prioritize trail maintenance activities. Plan a network of trails to and within the alpine in the Whistler area as part of the Alpine Trail Program in the Five-Year Financial Plan. Understand the needs/wishes of visitors for hiking and biking experiences. Build capacity in the Whistler hiking community. Integrate trail planning into the broader context of the Recreation Master Plan. Modify Schedule G in the OCP update to include existing and future hiking and cycling trails.
Recreation Master Plan and Recreation and Leisure Advisory Committee A long term plan for recreational hiking and cycling trails will become an important component of the Recreation Master Plan, which is in its initial stages of development. The newly formed Recreation and Leisure Advisory Committee, a committee of Council, will be engaged to review the trails plan with respect to the recreational goals, objectives, policies and values of the resort community.
WHISTLER 2020 ANALYSIS
W2020 TOWARD Descriptions of success that resolution Comments Strategy moves us toward Residents and visitors of all ages and Trails provide opportunities for healthy physical abilities enjoy activities year-round that activity by residents and visitors of all ages and encourage healthy living, learning and a abilities. Recreation & sense of community Leisure Hiking opportunities, particularly those in scenic Recreation and leisure is a core alpine areas, provide a marketable active contributor to the Whistler economy tourism product that can attract more visitors for longer stays. A multi-use, non-motorized trail to the local Whistler has a diversified and year-round alpine would provide a year-round amenity for a tourism economy diversity of users, including hikers, mountain bikers, snowshoers and as an ascent trail for back country skiers. Economic Upgraded and new trails for hiking in Whistler Whistler is an integral part of the region’s and the surrounding area provide an economy and works collaboratively with opportunity for regional stakeholders stakeholders (municipalities, SLRD, First Nations and the provincial government) to collaborate for the benefit of the local and regional economy.
Report On Whistler Area Hiking Trails Page 7 ... July 17, 2012
Surveys show that hiking on the local trails is Community members’ passion for among the most popular recreational activities Whistler inspires visitors, and interaction for summer visitors and residents. Trails are a among the two groups creates memorable place where residents share with visitors the experiences Whistler passion for outdoor recreational Visitor experiences. Experience Trails provide visitors with a complete Visitors choose Whistler to actively experience: active recreation, and, through participate in recreation, learning, and interpretive signage, learning about the natural cultural opportunities environment and the cultural heritage of the region. Partners work toward aligned budgeting The development of trails is an opportunity for Partnership processes that leverage limited resources local and regional partners to leverage their for increased effectiveness and efficiency financial and human resources for the benefit of the region.
Resort community partners work together The Trails Planning Working Group presents an to identify shared spending priorities, opportunity for the RMOW, the hiking Finance share resources, and leverage funds and community, WORCA, RSTBC and the SLRD to financing opportunities collaborate to identify priorities and share resources. Residents live, work and play in relatively compact, mixed-use neighborhoods that Trails and hiking opportunities can be provided Built Environment reflect Whistler’s character and are close in proximity to all neighbourhoods, so residents to appropriate green space, transit, trails, and visitors can have access to nature. amenities and services Interpretive signage on trails provide Residents and visitors have many opportunities for residents and visitors to learn Learning opportunities to actively learn about the about the history of the resort community, the resort community, the natural environment diversity of the natural environment and the and First Nations culture richness of First Nations culture in the Sea to Sky region. Resident Diverse and affordable opportunities for Trails are a free amenity that provide for a wide Affordability recreation, leisure, arts and culture exist range of recreational activities.
W2020 AWAY FROM Mitigation Strategies Descriptions of success that Strategy and Comments resolution moves away from
The development of trails, particularly in Recreation and leisure infrastructure and sensitive alpine areas, has the potential to Recreation & practices minimize the degradation of degrade natural systems. Trail planning and Leisure natural areas and are transitioning construction of sustainable trails based on the toward sustainable use of energy and Whistler Trail Standards and RMOW trail materials building experience should minimize these impacts.
OTHER POLICY CONSIDERATIONS The implementation of the findings and recommendations in the Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails will also consider Whistler’s other high level planning documents, including the Official Community Plan, the Recreation Master Plan and the current Council Action Plan. If the RMOW intends to construct and maintain trails in areas beyond municipal boundaries (in SLRD jurisdiction), then a policy should be developed to manage these activities.
BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS
Report On Whistler Area Hiking Trails Page 8 ... July 17, 2012
The Alpine Trail Program is included the Five-Year Financial Plan in the amount of $150,000 per year from 2013 through 2016. The proposed annual budget of $150,000 is the amount that has previously been committed to the Whistler section of the Sea to Sky Trail, which is currently being completed. The present plan for the Alpine Trail Program is to re-build existing trails or construct new trails to access the alpine areas on the west side of the valley. The detailed planning and the appropriate annual budget for the program will be informed by the activities of the Trails Planning Working Group discussed above.
Though trails will be constructed in accordance with the Whistler Trails Standards with long term low maintenance in mind, the future cost of maintaining these trails must be considered. A goal of the Whistler Trails Planning Working Group will be to build capacity in the local hiking community to fund and maintain hiking trails.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION Community input on the implementation of the findings and recommendations of the Report on Whistler Area Trails will be considered by the Trails Planning Working Group, by the Recreation and Leisure Advisory Committee and by the public during the Recreation Master Plan process. The draft terms of reference of the trails working group identifies members and stakeholder groups who represent the trail-use interests of residents, visitors, the business community and government agencies. The Recreation and Leisure Advisory Committee, representing a broad cross-section of community stakeholders, will consider the recommendations of the trails working group.
SUMMARY This report introduces the Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails, which was prepared by the Hiking Trails Task Force. The hiking trails report is discussed in the broader context of trails and recreation planning in Whistler. A Trails Planning Working Group is proposed to promote collaboration among hiking and mountain biking stakeholders in the planning of Whistler area trails, including the Alpine Trail Program in the Five-Year Financial Plan.
Respectfully submitted,
Frank Savage PLANNER for Jan Jansen GENERAL MANAGER OF RESORT EXPERIENCE
APPENDIX A
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails DRAFT – Revision R2
FWAC HIKING TRAIL TASK FORCE January 2, 2012
This report has been produced at the request of the Forest and Wildlife Advisory Committee (FWAC). It provides an inventory of existing and potential new trails as well as assessing maintenance needs and priorities. It is intended as a working document and planning tool. DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Table of Contents Executive Summary ...... 6
Managing the Resource – Getting Back on the Trail ...... 7
Recognition, Promotion and Funding ...... 7
Strategy and Coordination ...... 7
Managing Access ...... 8
Use of Volunteers...... 8
Effective Trail actions that we can make now (with funding) ...... 8
Introduction ...... 10
Scope ...... 11
History ...... 11
General observations and goals ...... 13
Can We Offer One Extremely Popular Local Mountain Trail That Brings Them Back? ...... 15
Comparison with Canmore ...... 15
Access ...... 16
Recommendations ...... 17
Trails Strategy ...... 17
Signage and information ...... 18
Page | 2 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Access to trail heads ...... 18
Hiking Trails ...... 19
Trail Inventory ...... 20
Addendum I ...... 21
Hiking Trails Task Force Terms of Reference 2010/2011 ...... 21
Addendum II ...... 22
References ...... 22
Addendum III ...... 23
List of Abbreviations ...... 23
Addendum IV ...... 24
Trail Inventory ...... 24
Criteria Used for Rating and Estimating ...... 24
Priority rating criteria: ...... 24
Trail Difficulty Grading System ...... 24
Terrain rating criteria: ...... 24
Value rating criteria: ...... 25
FSR Classification ...... 25
Trail Standard Classification ...... 25
Budget Estimation ...... 26
Estimate Guide Lines and Rates used for this report ...... 26
Page | 3 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Guidelines for trail repair costs ...... 28
Summary Trails List ...... 28
Complete Listing of Trails by Location ...... 29
List of trails within RMOW boundaries ...... 33
List of trails within RMOW/SFD and SFD/BCP shared boundaries ...... 33
List of trails within SFD boundaries ...... 34
List of 20 Highest Priority Trails within RMOW and/or SFD boundaries combined ...... 35
List of 10 Most Scenic Alpine Trails (outside of BC Parks and WB) ...... 36
Detail Trail Reports ...... 36
Trails Atlas ...... 36
Trail Maps ...... 36
Page | 4 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Page | 5 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Executive Summary
Hiking is the number one activity for our summer guests visiting Whistler, according to a Tourism Whistler 2010 survey. With the exception of the Whistler Blackcomb tenure, most of the existing hiking trails and the access roads that deliver our guests to the trailheads are in a very serious state of deterioration. The long-term economic benefits of hiking could be an important building block to success for the future and should not be underestimated. We have been extraordinarily successful in developing our local mountain biking trails -now we need to put the same emphasis into alpine hiking.
From an economic perspective, BC Parks has estimated that for every $1 investment in a park improvement, there is a $10 return to the BC economy (the US Parks Service data supports this multiplier effect with a $4 return for every $1 invested in their Parks.) However, with drastic budget cuts, only minimum trail maintenance has been carried out in recent years in the provincial parks within the Whistler region. In the Centennial year of BC Parks, that is even more disturbing. B.C. Parks estimates that in Garibaldi Park alone there is over $2,000,000 in maintenance work required to bring their trails up to past standards
Locally, the Stawamus Chief and North Shore mountains (e.g. Grouse grind) see thousands of daily active hikers and currently there is nothing comparable to draw them to Whistler. However, we do have several options here that can be developed.
Our destination guests include an aging group of hikers from all over North America and a potentially huge new and future market of hikers from China, India, Brazil and other countries – Whistler is well- positioned to provide that truly memorable wilderness alpine hiking experience that they will be seeking. Hiking, as opposed to our other offerings, is doable and enjoyable by every family member.
The health benefits from hiking to our children and grandchildren are priceless, especially if we can entice them away from playing sedentary video games by providing better hiking options to experience the natural magic around Whistler’s Mountains. We need to begin making the investment in this critical resource now, before it is too late. Whistler needs to be a premier mountain resort in the Alpine hiking experience and not fall far behind competing resorts such as Banff, Canmore, Nelson, Ketchum, Jackson and others in North America.
The goal of this report is to put alpine hiking trails back on the local agenda, to establish priorities and provide a planning tool for alpine hiking trails in the Whistler region and to reverse the trend of neglect and deterioration of this important resource.
Page | 6 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Whistler should have good quality alpine hiking trails which can be accessed without the need for a high clearance 4WD vehicle. The trail heads where possible, should be at a level that allows the average hiker to get up to the alpine and even climb a peak in a day.
In order to achieve that, the following is recommended:
Managing the Resource – Getting Back on the Trail
Recognition, Promotion and Funding
Alpine hiking trails should be recognized as an important economic resource and a fundamental part of Whistler 2020. Tourism Whistler (TW) should take a more active role initially in the development and funding and later (when we have brought some trails up to acceptable standard), in the promotion of the alpine hiking trail systems in this region. The RMOW should formally ask the Province, BC Parks, SFD and RSTBC to increase or re- establish funding for hiking trails and recreational sites in this region. The RMOW should budget a suitable amount annually for the improvement of alpine hiking trails within municipal boundaries (perhaps from the Resort Municipality Initiative Fund (RMI)). A reasonable estimate is about $ 300,000 per year for 3 years initially Because the forest industry (SFD, CCF) has basically stopped construction and maintenance of trails and recreational areas, the funding for these now needs to be supplemented by revenues from tourism.
Strategy and Coordination
A hiking trails strategy should be developed for the whole region including these partners: Resort Municipality of Whistler (RMOW), Tourism Whistler (TW), Squamish and Lillooet First Nations, Squamish Lillooet Regional District (SLRD), Whistler-Blackcomb (WB), BC Parks, Cheakamus Community Forest (CCF), and the Recreation Sites and Trails Branch (RSTBC) / Squamish Forest District (SFD), as well as local mountaineering and hiking clubs. A trails coordination office should be created by the above partners. The trails coordinator should be responsible for applying for additional funds and grants; ensure trails are legal and registered under section 56 or 57 of the Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA), develop budgets, liaise with partners; communicate with back-country operators, public and media on trail issues. A permanent advisory committee on alpine hiking trails should be established comprised of local hikers and delegates from the above partners. Page | 7 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
All locked gates to backcountry access roads to be reviewed as part of the trail strategy. o Move Gate on Black Tusk microwave tower road up the road as high as possible, but still providing a controllable location to prevent motorized access beyond that point. o Remove Gate on CBC/CN tower access road to allow access for hikers onto the Khyber Pass trail. Trail coordinator to be part of approval process on any new locked gate.
Managing Access
Adequate 2-wheel drive road standards with gentler gradients should be established for new forestry service roads for this region by the CCF and SFD. These roads so designated would become permanent multi-use, recreational access roads. Heavily used recreational roads should be paved to reduce maintenance costs where possible. As funding becomes available, identified existing sub-standard road sections should also be upgraded to the new standards. Major trail and access road construction contracts within the RMOW need to be cost effectively planned, publicly tendered, managed and supervised. CCF, SFD to negotiate with backcountry operators re: maintenance issues of access roads.
Use of Volunteers
Work by volunteer groups such as Rotary Clubs, Habitat Improvement Team (HIT), Whistler Offroad Cycling Association (WORCA), Alpine Club of Canada (ACC), BC Mountaineering Club (BCMC) etc. would help greatly with keeping maintenance costs of trails to a minimum. An adopt a trail program should be implemented whereby each volunteer group takes care of minor maintenance on assigned trails on a regular schedule. One option to construct new hiking trails at low cost with volunteers from other provinces or countries should be explored. This would require good trail work lead hands and trainers. Typically, these volunteers would spend the summer here working on hiking trails and get meals and accommodation paid. Tools, materials and insurance would have to be provided. Such volunteer trail crews have been used very successfully in US National Forests and Parks in the Pacific Northwest to keep costs low and still provide good trails.
Effective Trail actions that we can make now (with funding)
Popular “Chief-like” trail - Initially, develop and maintain at least one popular trail to a local peak or significant viewpoint; options are: Cougar Mountain from Whistler Heli-Port, Sproatt Mtn. , Whistler Mtn. via CBC /CN tower road, Brandywine Mtn.,
Page | 8 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Goal within RMOW: 3 Alpine trails – develop/improve 3 trails to the Alpine within RMOW to “tourist-worthy” within 3 years; options are: W5.1 Rainbow Lake Trail (including W5.10 Rainbow Loop Trail) W4.2 Flank Trail North (to complete Rainbow-Skywalk Loop) E4.4 Crater Rim Trail Upgrade Cougar Mountain Road so that 2wd rental cars can drive up to Ancient Cedars trail head. Upgrade road from there to Flank Trail North Trail Head. Upgrade West Main Service road from Function Junction to Logger’s lake parking area to 2wd standard. Goal within SFD : 3 Alpine trails – develop/improve at least 3 trails to the Alpine within SFD to “tourist-worthy” within 3 years; options are: W5.17 Skywalk Route (including W4.4 Screaming Cat Lake Trail.) W7.5 Cougar Mountain Loop Route W5.2 Sproatt Ridge Route W5.11 Rainbow Lake-Madeley Lake Trail
Develop and maintain other hiking trails in the region according to priorities shown in the Trails Lists in Addendum IV.
Reopen backcountry access on roads with locked gates. o Move Gate on Black Tusk microwave tower road up the road as high as possible, but still providing a controllable location to prevent motorized access beyond that point. o Remove Gate on CBC/CN tower access road to allow access for hikers onto the Khyber Pass trail.
RMOW and WB should jointly take responsibility for improving access to the Singing Pass Trail either via the Innergex Power Plant road or by making road repairs to re-establish access to the old trail head and parking area near the abandoned mine shaft.
In order to make effective improvements as soon as possible, funding and work on trails should be prioritized as follows: 1st address risks and safety issues, 2nd provide adequate signage and information, 3rd improvements and maintenance on existing trails, 4th new trail construction.
Page | 9 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Introduction
This report is the result of an initiative by Kurt Mueller. He was concerned about the current unacceptable conditions of hiking trails and access roads that lead to alpine hiking trails in the Whistler area. He was also concerned that the huge potential for alpine hiking that the Whistler area has to offer, was largely ignored, which could impact the future competitiveness, viability and sustainability of this mountain resort community.
Kurt expressed his concerns to the mayor and was invited to make a presentation to the Forest and Wildlands Advisory Committee (FWAC). As a result of that presentation in September 2010, FWAC agreed that this was a high priority issue that needed more attention from the Resort Municipality of Whistler (RMOW) and Kurt was asked to establish and chair a Hiking Trail Task Force (HTTF) with the following objectives:
Provide an inventory of existing hiking trails Identify potential new hiking trails Assess maintenance needs and priorities Produce a report to FWAC
The Terms of Reference for the HTTF are included in Addendum l.
Initially, a list of 21 existing and 7 potential new hiking trails was developed and a draft report target of September 2011 was set. This initial list has grown from a total of 28 trails to over 100 trails. Not only had the scope more than tripled in size, but the 2011 hiking season had been delayed by a record snow pack and cool spring and early summer climate. This affected our ability in some cases to assess trail conditions in a timely manner. In mid-August there were still significant snow patches at 1500 m. elevation and on September 17, 2011 it snowed in some places again down to about 1600 m. Due to these factors FWAC agreed to extend the report date to the end of 2011.
The members of the HTTF are long time Whistler residents with good knowledge of the backcountry and trail systems around Whistler. This report has been produced as a voluntary service at no cost to the community.
In preparing this report we considered the needs and expectations of our visitors to Whistler in addition to those of Whistler residents. Visitors generally are not prepared for the deteriorated conditions of our forest service access roads and usually do not have high clearance 4WD vehicles. A number of Greater Vancouver hiking clubs also use the Whistler area alpine hiking trails. Many of those people are familiar with access to our trail heads; their needs are similar to those of local residents. Page | 10 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
While sincere efforts were made to produce this report as accurately as possible, no guarantees are implied as to the complete accuracy of this report due to the constantly changing environmental and other factors not under our control, that affect conditions of hiking trails and access roads.
Special thanks go to Don MacLaurin for his continued involvement and assistance in trail planning. John Hammons produced the maps for this report. Mitchell Sulkers, Rupert Merer, Kevin Titus, Bryce Leigh, Richard Auer, John Hammons and Kurt Mueller hiked the trails, proposed routes and filled in the trail reports. Iain Grunwell assisted with the writing and creation of this report.
This draft report is intended as a working document and planning tool. Further, the HTTF will be forming a hiking club and trails crew within the Alpine Club of Canada and continue to update the detail trail reports annually.
Scope
Although this report is primarily produced for the benefit of the Whistler community, the geographic area covered by this report is the old “Whistler, Callaghan and Soo Landscape Units”. These extend from the big orange bridge over Culliton creek in the South to Nairn Falls in the North and include all headlands and drainages of the Cheakamus and Green River watershed. This is the same area as covered in the FWAC charter. In this report this whole area is also referred to as the ”Whistler region”.
There are various jurisdictions in this area. Please note that for the purpose of this report only, we have separated the trails by RMOW boundary, WB boundary, BC Provincial Park boundaries, and all remaining by SFD boundaries.
Most hiking trails are covered. Valley trails and Lost Lake trails are not included. The intent of this report is to focus on hiking trails with special values and trails that lead into the alpine areas surrounding Whistler. Trails within provincial parks and within Whistler-Blackcomb tenures are mostly shown for reference only.
History
Like most hiking trails in the Coastal Ranges of BC, the Whistler area trails were developed by the Squamish Forest District after logging opened up access via forest service roads (FSR). Mountaineering clubs also built and maintained some of the hiking trails.
Page | 11 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Today, the SFD has virtually stopped any development or maintenance of hiking trails in this area. The Mountaineering clubs also have no trail budgets and have not maintained any trails in this area for several years.
The Cheakamus Community Forest has no funds at the moment but intends to help with hiking trails in the future when revenues from timber sales come in.
The RMOW in cooperation with the Provincial Government has constructed and improved trails such as the Flank trail and the trail up to Rainbow Mountain in the past. However, the RMOW has shifted the alpine trail budget for several years now to construct and maintain the Sea to Sky trail and other off- road bike trails in the valley. The Province has reduced funding for trails.
Mainly for these reasons, our hiking trails around Whistler are mostly so run down and dilapidated now that they do not even appear in hiking guide books any more.
The exceptions are trails on Whistler and Blackcomb Mountains. WB are doing a great job of continually developing more hiking trails and maintaining existing trails within their tenure. It appears as if WB are the only ones who can envision the economic long term benefits of hiking trails in this area.
However WB only operate the gondola from 10 AM to 5 PM except for weekend evenings when they are having a barbecue. These are short hours for serious hikers, especially those who wish to climb into the Fitzsimmons range.
European resorts generally keep their access gondolas and lifts open for longer hours- In Zermatt most of the lifts open by 8 AM and close at 6 PM in summer, but some, like the Gornergrat, operate from 7AM with the last ride down at 8 PM. The Brevent, above Chamonix operates from 8.15 AM with a last ride down at 5.45 PM in summer. The Brevent offers 9 hours hiking (allowing for gondola journey time), the Gornergrat over 12 hours, Whistler-Blackcomb allows only 6.5 hours. Even the little gondola in Banff operates for much longer hours, 8.30 AM to 9PM in summer, and takes dogs!
Parks BC have in the past built great trails in Garibaldi Park. Today, as everyone knows, BC Parks has seen drastic budget cuts since the new ministry was created. For this reason trails within the BC Parks system are barely maintained, although they receive more attention than the SFD forestry trails. We have tried many times to contact BC Parks, but they have not even been able to answer their phones or email. No new trails have been created for quite some time in Garibaldi, Callaghan or Brandywine Falls provincial parks. None of the master plans on trails shown in the websites of those parks have seen any activity in the last decade. BC Parks has not followed their own recommendation that development of trails will return benefits many times over. A government study from 2001 entitled ‘Economic Benefits of BC Provincial Parks’ claimed that for every tax dollar invested in parks, visitors spend $10 in the BC economy. (The US Parks Service data supports this multiplier effect with a $4 return for every $1 invested in their Parks.) Page | 12 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
New trail building in BC Parks ended decades ago. There is still no trail around the West side of Garibaldi Lake toward Mt Price, an objective with amazing vistas. A trail around Callaghan Lake has been on the Parks master plan for many years, but nothing has been done. Brandywine Falls Park was increased in size that now includes a nice little loop trail that needs very little work. However, the public is discouraged from using it because of an official (although incorrect) sign claiming that it goes through private lands.
General observations and goals
As representatives of the hiking community we feel that Whistler as a world class mountain resort has squandered a real economic development opportunity by not adequately developing and maintaining alpine hiking trails (except within the WB tenure). From 1966 when ski operations started, the community has grown from about 500 to 11,000 permanent residents today. In the same period, when all infrastructure developments were expanding, the number of hiking trails from the valley to alpine areas has actually decreased and many of the remaining trails are in a deplorable state of decline. Hiking in our opinion is an important recreational activity that could be an important economic driver for the future in our resort community. With visitors from developing economies such as China, Taiwan, India and Brazil expected to increase, we feel that the time has come for Whistler to take another look at this great resource of hiking potential. These new (mostly mature, less adventurous) visitors are more likely to expect hiking opportunities in a mountain resort rather than snow sports or skilled biking recreation. Even now, every day during the summer, many visitors ask for information on local alpine hiking trails.
We are getting more concerned in North America about the fitness level of our children and grandchildren. The health benefits of hiking to all of us are priceless. If we can improve the local hiking experience through better access and trails to our magnificent Mountains around Whistler, our children, grandchildren and elderly residents will benefit most.
This is a resource that we cannot longer afford to ignore. We need to approach hiking with a much greater vision to the future like Banff, Canmore, Nelson, Ketchum, Jackson and most other international mountain resorts have done. Not only is hiking more sustainable and has less impact on our natural environment than many of the other recreational activities, hiking has also the potential to provide significant economic benefits to our community.
There are plenty of trails in the valley and in the interpretive forests. Our greatest assets for hiking however are in our magnificent alpine areas. It is specifically in these areas where we have totally neglected our existing hiking trails and future potential.
Marketing of hiking trails by TW should only include trails that are in good shape, otherwise our trails get bad publicity and a failing grade before they are ready for tourists. Right now, this is a huge dilemma as even one of our most accessible alpine trails, the Rainbow Lake Trail is in very bad shape. Page | 13 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
One challenge that Whistler faces is that the valley is located at 650 m, which is about 900 to 1000 metres below the alpine. For most hikers this is a long hike. Starting at 650 m elevation the average hiker can reach the alpine but has little time or energy remaining to hike further and enjoy the alpine or even climb a peak. This means that almost all of the hiker’s day is spent in the trees, with limited or no views. In European and other North American mountain resorts the vertical distance from the valley to the alpine is typically no more than 400 m and hikers have time to enjoy the alpine or climb a peak.
The vertical height of a hike is always an important consideration. Few visitors or casual hikers want to climb more than 1000 metres vertically in a day. The reasonably fit or young will climb 1200/1500 m, but more than 1500 m in a day is a very long day for all but the most serious hiker.
Residents can usually solve this by driving with high clearance 4x4 vehicles to high trailheads on old logging roads. This option isn’t available to visitors using taxis or regular rental cars.
This explains why the loss of the old Singing Pass parking lot and trail head is so important. That TH was located at an elevation of about 1000 m, so that the alpine could be accessed relatively easily. Most hikers could reach Russet Lake and it was possible for a reasonably fit hiker to reach the alpine and climb a 2400 m peak in a day.
Many visitors to Whistler would like to hike in the alpine without paying the $45 (approximate) cost of the gondola, or being restricted by the gondola operating hours. Some of these visitors have large families or are part of groups and the total cost of the gondola ride for the family or group is considerable. And guests that do use the gondola and hike both mountains are looking for other alpine hikes if they stay longer or are a returning guest (they do not want to repeatedly hike the same trails). For visitors who do not wish to use the gondola but wish to hike to the alpine there are few options. Nevertheless, these visitors that come here and look for other alpine hiking options of course are still spending money in our town for accommodation, food, supplies and other services.
Logistically it is not easy to develop a business model for alpine hiking from the Whistler valley. The challenges of a very large area and degraded access roads are huge. The initial small numbers of hikers interested in particular alpine routes may not support a regular scheduled transport system (as for example in Denali Park) but we can all start by putting hiking back on the local agenda and begin to think toward developing that ultimate goal of improving trails and access. With better hiking trails available, no doubt, tour operators will find economical ways to shuttle clients to trail heads.
Some very encouraging news toward that type of thinking is to hear that the CCF is already planning to build future FSR mains with the specifications and goals for permanent recreational access.
We also discussed minimizing access roads and creating major trail heads or hubs. The benefit would be that fewer roads need to be maintained and therefore those roads could be built to a better standard and maintained better and more permanently. Of course, this sounds great, but is difficult to achieve Page | 14 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails without making some trails significantly longer. One location, the trail head for Ancient Cedars, has been discussed where this concept could work. With some modifications it could be a hub for Cougar Mountain, Flank trail North and some potential Soo valley aspects.
Can We Offer One Extremely Popular Local Mountain Trail That Brings Them Back?
Whistler has no equivalent to the Grouse Grind in North Vancouver or the Stawamus Chief in Squamish. The Chief Trail saw an average of 1400 hikers per day on summer weekends, with a peak of 2500 on one long weekend day.
Whistler could establish competitors to these trails which would be popular with tourists, lower mainland hikers and residents. These trails offer easy highway access, a test of fitness that attracts hikers for repeat visits (is my time better?) and scenic views at the summit.
Four Whistler alternatives are:
(1) A new trail to the top of Cougar Mountain from the heli-port parking area would provide fantastic views and would be very popular. (2) A trail directly up Sproatt from the Rainbow Lake trail. We realize that there are watershed issues, but these were resolved on the mountains behind Grouse, where access was limited in the 1960s due to watershed issues. (Also, the current trend for potable water supply in Whistler appears to be in using well water). This trail is practically existing, but it needs significant improvements in order to become really popular. The advantage of this trail is that it has paved access and it also can be reached from a Whistler Transit bus stop. (3) A trail up to Whistler peak from the CBC tower road would be even more popular because hikers with knee problems wouldn’t have to walk down when the lifts are operating. WB could charge for downloading. However, this would require removal of the current gate and some access road improvements to make the trail head accessible by 2wd. The other issue is that the trail goes through WB tenure at the top. (4) A new trail to the top of Brandywine would be extremely popular. However, this would require considerable access road upgrades to make it accessible by 2wd.
Comparison with Canmore
It should be possible for a visitor to Whistler to climb a mountain in one day, without worrying about the gondola cost or timetable. In Canmore the selection is overwhelming. There are at least 10 mountains in the immediate valley with good trails to the top, and many more a short distance away in Kananaskis.
Page | 15 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Whistler gives out two free maps to Tourists. The first shows the village and is a good guide to shopping, restaurants and hotels. The other map shows the valley trail system, and on the rear a detailed map of Lost Lake with its bike and general use trails. This map is firmly based on trails in the valley bottom.
The free map given to tourists in Canmore, which is Alberta’s mountain resort of similar size to Whistler, is a detailed topographical map with 200 metre contours. It shows most of the local mountains and alpine hiking trails. It shows a total of about 10 trails to local mountain summits and an additional 30 alpine trails, which are all within 40 km of the town. On the rear of the Canmore map is a topographical map of Kananaskis country, with additional alpine and mountain trails.
The difference between the Whistler and Canmore maps illustrates the difference in the way the two communities relate to the Alpine hiking potential on their mountains.
Access
Expanded timber harvesting in the 1950’s and 1960’s resulted in an extensive system of FSR’s in this region. These forestry roads were constructed to a standard that minimized costs with road gradients often in excess of 20%. Although these roads were constructed and maintained to support logging operations, they provided good 4-wheel drive access to a number of hiking trails. This changed dramatically in the 1990’s when the pace of timber harvesting was reduced and the policy of de- activating logging roads was introduced. With erosion and reduced levels of road maintenance, the steeper segments of these FSR’s have deteriorated badly. There has been no planning in the past to maintain strategic FSR’s as permanent recreational access roads for the purpose of hiking. As an all season Mountain Resort Community this situation really hurts us economically today. The costs to upgrade or even to maintain these roads are now becoming very high. However, without significant improvements to access roads that lead to our alpine trail heads, we cannot grow and promote this huge resource.
After de-activating road sections, locked gates came next, further reducing access to the alpine trails for hiking. We should not eliminate access for hiking to the alpine because of a risk of vandalism.
Backcountry operators are not maintaining roads for public access in their tenure areas and in fact contribute to deterioration of access roads by heavy use of ATV’s, which combined with weather and run-off makes some roads inaccessible.
These factors and others have dramatically reduced reasonable access for hiking especially for families and older persons. Reasonable access is defined here as a return trip from the trail head of 8 hours. Following is a list of trails that no longer are accessible within that criterion:
Singing Pass trail from old trail head – now gated at WB boundary Page | 16 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Black Tusk from microwave tower road – now gated at km 5 from Function Junction
Screaming Cat lake TH from 16 Mile Creek FSR – FSR deteriorated due to ATV tours
FSR connection from Cougar Mtn Road to 16 Mile Creek FSR – deterioration due to ATV tours
Whistler Mountain from CBC tower road – now gated at Function Junction
Jane Lakes loop – now gated at km 5 from Function Junction, access from other side deteriorated
Brandywine meadows – FSR deteriorated due to ATV tours
Recommendations
Trails Strategy
Whistler has come a long way in developing summer recreation. However, hiking somehow has fallen through the crack. The long-term economic benefits of hiking could be the building block to success for the future and should not be underestimated. The economic importance to develop and improve our alpine hiking trail network requires a trails strategy to be developed for this whole area.
This strategy should be managed by a trails coordinator. Ideally, that office would be a partnership between the RMOW, WB, CCF, BC Parks, SLRD, Squamish Lillooet First Nations and RSTBC/SFD. The trails coordinator would work with all partners to achieve goals on trail issues covering the whole area and ensure that all trails are legal and registered under section 56 or 57 of the FRPA. Further, he/she would be responsible to communicate to the public any closures, wildlife alerts, and current status of trails and access roads.
The trails coordinator would also pursue additional grants and funding applications to the partners, provincial and federal governments, Tourism Whistler (TW) and the Whistler business community and develop budgets for hiking trail construction and maintenance.
A permanent advisory committee on alpine hiking trails should be established comprised of local hikers.
Page | 17 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Signage and information
Generally, one of the first things that needs to be improved is signage. Initially all trails that are safe for use by visitors need clear directional signage to trail heads, trail head signs and trail markers. We live in the information age, yet much of the information that is on our current maps and guides is incorrect, leading visitors to de-activated or over-grown roads or worse, on trails were they can easily get lost because of lack of markers and signage. Many trail markers currently consist of coloured tapes. It is recommended to use official RSTBC trail markers on all official hiking trails. Tape should only be used in defining routes for future trails. The reason for this is that there are many types of tapes in our forests, which could be misleading to people, especially to visitors that do not have detailed maps of the area. (Some flagging and tapes are used for logging, mineral claims, surveying, future roads, etc.)
Trail information given and issued by TW and Village hosts needs to be up to date, accurate and precise. Only trails that are in good shape should be shown to visitors. A topographical map, similar to that issued in Canmore, would be a great help to our visitors and a great marketing tool.
Access to trail heads
The gate at the Black Tusk microwave road needs to be moved. Whistler residents are very upset with the current location of the gate. The gate should be moved as close as possible to the alpine area in order to allow access for hikers. This is an area where families could easily hike into the alpine area around Black Tusk with their children, providing opportunities for healthy recreation. This is a high value hiking area near Whistler. In fact, if the BC government is serious about restricting access around the potential Barrier slide area, it would be good planning to provide at least alternative (secondary) access to Garibaldi Park from the Black Tusk microwave road.
In general, locked gates punish hikers in order to protect assets against possible damage by vandals. There are better ways to protect these assets, such as security cameras and stronger legislation. Permit controlled access may also be an option.
The Backcountry operators at Brandywine FSR and at Cougar Mountain and 16 Mile Creek FSR should be approached to maintain the roads through their tenure for public access.
Whistler-Blackcomb, Whistler Legacies Society, and Inergex should be approached to provide access to the Singing Pass Trail via the Fitzsimmons IPP access road. This is one of the most important alpine access trails in Whistler and complements Whistler-Blackcomb's lift accessible trail system. As such restablishing this trail with a new bridge over Fitzsimmons Creek should be a high priority. Moving the access for hikers to the Blackcomb Mountain side of Fitzsimmons Creek would also eliminate the potential for collisions between hikers on the current Singing Pass access road and downhill mountain bikers using the Whistler Mountain bike park trails. If that cannot be achieved, the old access road should be repaired to the old trail head. Page | 18 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Cross ditching on recreational access roads should be done in a way so that 2WD vehicles can still reasonably drive across without risk of losing a muffler or an oil pan.
In the longer term, the CCF should establish a permanent multiple use road standard focused on public recreation access for 2-wheel drive vehicles with gentler road gradients (less than 16%). For some roads that are more frequently used, such as to the Cheakamus Lake TH, to the Loggers Lake TH, and to the Ancient Cedars TH, serious consideration should be given for asphalt surfacing to reduce maintenance costs and to provide a standard expected by our visitors. Finally, the existing sub-standard road sections in the present system of recreational access roads in the area in general should be identified and upgraded as funding allows.
Hiking Trails
Priority for improvement to hiking trails should be based on ease of access from public roads or transit and on values for effort.
Our recommended short term action plan for trails are:
Goal for RMOW: Develop /improve 3 Alpine Trails and their access to “tourist worthy” condition within 3 years. So that Village Hosts and TW can direct guests to hiking trails close to Whistler rather than sending them to other areas. Options are:
(1) W5.1 Rainbow Lake Trail (including W5.10 Rainbow Loop Trail) (2) W4.2 Flank Trail North (to complete Rainbow-Skywalk Loop) (3) E4.4 Crater Rim Trail (4) Upgrade Cougar Mountain Road so that 2wd rental cars can drive up to Ancient Cedars trail head. Upgrade road from there to Flank Trail North Trail Head. (5) Upgrade West Main Service road from Function Junction to Logger’s lake parking area to 2wd standard.
Goal for SFD: Develop /improve at least 3 Alpine Trails and their access to “tourist worthy” condition within 3 years. Options are:
(1) W5.17 Skywalk Route (including W4.4 Screaming Cat Lake Trail). (2) W7.5 Cougar Mountain Loop Route (3) W5.2 Sproatt Ridge Route (4) W5.11 Rainbow Lake-Madeley Lake Trail (5) Improve access road to Madely Lake to 2wd standard
If items 1 to 3 in each of the above goals are achieved, it would provide a good system of alpine trails with options for all levels of hikers close to Whistler. This system offers good access for everyone, Page | 19 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails including access by transit bus. It has truly outstanding views on many of it’s trail sections and of course from the top of Sproatt, Rainbow and Cougar mountains
Goals for BC Parks: Develop at least 1 new trail in the short term and restore access on Black Tusk micro wave tower road.
Develop a new trail at Callaghan Lake. It is suggested to build a trail from the Callaghan Lake parking area around the south-west side of the lake towards Ring Lake. Restore access to Black Tusk. Starting at a higher elevation will open up this Whistler iconic symbol.
Priorities of all other trails are shown in the trails list and individual trail reports in Addendum IV.
A volunteer trail crew is urgently needed to help maintain trails at reasonable costs. The HTTF members are intending to join the ACC and form a volunteer trail crew to work on and maintain local alpine hiking trails.
It is proposed that clubs like the Rotary Club, Rotary Club Millennium, HIT, ACC, WORCA, adopt trails for ongoing maintenance purposes.
Significant future potential exists for hiking in the Soo and Rutherford valleys. Due to costs and logistics, these routes are only mentioned as potential at this time. Any hikes in these valleys to alpine areas currently require significant bushwhacking and route finding skills. Any trail development would significantly improve accessibility in this area. New forest service roads will be built in these valleys and these will provide better potential access in future.
Trail Inventory
The trails list and inventory is shown in Addendum IV.
Trails in BC Parks and WB tenure are shown for reference only. Reference guide books are listed in Addendum II.
Page | 20 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Addendum I
Hiking Trails Task Force Terms of Reference 2010/2011
To advise the Forest & Wildland Advisory Committee regarding priority actions required to improve hiking trails in the Whistler area. Tasks include: Inventory existing hiking trails Identify potential new hiking trails Assess maintenance needs and priorities on existing trails Produce a report and submit to FWAC for inclusion in the access management strategy
Authorized and Appointed by
Forest & Wildland Advisory Committee
Comprised Of
Volunteers drawn from the Whistler community with expertise and knowledge of Whistler area hiking trails.
Term
The Hiking Trails Task Force will complete the tasks by September 1, 2011.
Chair
Kurt Mueller, Chair
Meetings
As required and determined by the task force. Communications The Hiking Trails Task Force communicates with FWAC through update reports submitted for inclusion in the monthly FWAC meeting agenda. Expectations All members are expected to: to review distributed material before the meeting and to keep up to date on issues; RSVP to Task Force Chair whether or not they will be able to attend the meeting.
Page | 21 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Addendum II References
References and links to trail information are generally provided in the report. Trail information is further available in the following guide books:
Book A The Whistler book: an all season outdoor guide / Jack Christie
Book B Whistler Hiking Guide / Brian Finestone & Kevin Hodder
Book C 109 Walks in BC’s Lower Mainland / Mary & David Macaree
Book D Whistler: the 10 premier hikes / Kathy & Craig Copeland
Book E Hike and Snowshoe Whistler/ Lynn Altieri-Need & Tanya McLaughlin
Book F Whistler Mountain Biking: A guide to trail rides in the Whistler Valley / Brian Finestone & Kevin Hodder
Book G Scrambles in SW BC / Matt Gunn
Page | 22 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Addendum III List of Abbreviations
AWARE Association of Whistler Area Residents for the Environment BCP BC Parks BCMC BC Mountaineering Club FMCBC Federation of Mountain Clubs of BC FRBC Forest Renewal BC FRPA Forest and Range Practices Act (BC) FSR Forest Service Road (includes also Resource roads in this report) FWAC Forest and Wildlands Advisory Committee 2WD 2-wheel drive Vehicle 4WD 4-wheel drive Vehicle HC 4x4 High Clearance 4-wheel drive Vehicle HIT Habitat Improvement Team (Volunteer group spearheaded by WB) HTTF Hiking Trails Task Force IPP Independent Power Plant LRUP Local Resource Use Plan MFLNRO Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (BC) MOF BC Ministry of Forests (old) REF Reference RMOW Resort Municipality of Whistler RSTBC Recreation Sites and Trails Branch BC (of MFLNRO) Note: All recreational sites and trails on crown land are within RSTBC jurisdiction. For the purpose of this report, all trails on crown land outside RMOW and WB boundaries are listed under SFD. SFD Squamish Forest District SLRD Squamish Lillooet Regional District TBD To be determined TH Trail-Head TW Tourism Whistler (Whistler Resort Association) VOC Varsity Outdoor Club WB Whistler-Blackcomb WES Whistler Environmental Strategy WLU Whistler Landscape Unit WORCA Whistler Offroad Cycling Association
Page | 23 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Addendum IV
Trail Inventory Criteria Used for Rating and Estimating
How did we do it? The evaluation of all hiking trails in the list outside of WB tenure and BC Parks are based on the following criteria and guidelines:
Priority rating criteria:
Trails were assigned a priority rating based on a mix of ease of access, value (views, features e.g. waterfalls), and work required to bring up to standard. Priority 1 being the highest and 4 the lowest.
Trail Difficulty Grading System
Duration Hours Elevation Gain m Difficulty of Terrain A 0-4 1 0-500 a Easy B 4-7 2 500-1000 b Moderate C 7-10 3 1000-1500 c Difficult D 10+ 4 1500+ d Advanced
For example: a hike that takes 2 hours, has 400 m elevation gain over easy terrain, is rated A1a. A hike that takes 8 hours, has 900m elevation gain over advanced Terrain is rated C2d.
Terrain rating criteria:
Easy Easy grades, generally easy conditions for hiking
Moderate Moderate grades, may have some moderate challenges
Difficult Steeper grades, may have high steps, longer muddy sections
Advanced Steep grades and /or exposed sections. Temporary river crossings can be challenging at times
Page | 24 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Value rating criteria:
Low Little reward for effort, limited scenic views, few features.
Medium Average reward for effort, good scenic views and unique features.
High Good reward for effort, great scenic views, outstanding features.
FSR Classification
Class A 2 WD access
Class B 4x4 access
Class C HC 4x4 access
Trail Standard Classification
To stay as close to the existing RMOW classification, we have tried to follow the Whistler Trail Standards. However, those were developed mainly for mountain bike trails, and are not quite applicable to hiking trails. In order to suit our needs for this report, we have added classification Type VI.
Reference: Whistler Trail Standards RMOW 2nd Draft http://www.thewhistlerway.ca/cms-assets/documents/3119-702261.trailstandardsfirstedition.pdf
BC MOF Foot Trail Guidelines / BC Parks Trail Classification
Type I Paved, Wheelchair accessible
Heavily used multi-purpose trail as per RMOW Trail Type I Standard, except minimum thread widths may be 1.5m and grades to be suitable for wheelchair use.
Type II Surfaced
Moderately used multi-purpose trail as per RMOW Trail Type II Standard.
Type III Unsurfaced
Page | 25 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Moderately used hiking trail as per RMOW Trail Type III Standard
Type IV Developed/Improved.
Lightly used wilderness hiking trail. Signage, Trail markers, Cairns above treeline. Similar to RMOW Trail Type VI Standard. Adequate drainage and protection in sensitive areas, boardwalks.
Type V Simple/Minor Development.
Lightly used wilderness trail. Visible path, some markers, adequate flagging or cairns. Similar to RMOW Trail Type V Standard except keep boardwalks to minimum required, use stepping boulders, log steps, where practical.
Type VI Minimal development.
Lightly used wilderness route with sufficient flagging and/or Cairns. Similar to (but less developed than) RMOW Trail Type V Standard. This is the first step in any new trail development and over time and depending on popularity and use, it will be upgraded.
Budget Estimation
Budget estimates for trails (and access roads in some cases), are provided in digital format only on official request.
Budget estimates are considered Order of Magnitude for the purpose of scoping and planning only. Some locations and individual situations may require considerable higher cost for transport, etc. Due to location, restricted access, etc. Estimates are based on following guide lines and average rates:
Estimate Guide Lines and Rates used for this report
Grading of existing Class A access road (1 pass with grader only) $1,000/km Page | 26 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Grade and brush access road (light growth) $1,500/km
Resurface road (Add 2” top dressing from local sources) $8,000/km
Repair impassable road section (smooth cross ditching) $1,000/each
Development of TH (using local materials) $7,000/each
Install lockable gate $4,000/each
Develop Type I trail (average cost below treeline) $60,000/km
Develop Type II trail (average cost below treeline) $30,000/km
Develop Type III trail (average cost below treeline) $20,000/km
Develop Type IV trail (average cost below treeline) $15,000/km
Develop Type V trail (average cost below treeline) $8,000/km
Develop Type VI trail (average cost below treeline) $2,000/km
Clear light brush and deadfall along trail $250/km
Clear heavy brush and deadfall along trail $1,000/km
New foot-bridge, 3m span, 2 local logs, hand-rail 1 side $1,200/each
Additional span of foot bridge (up to 10m max. Span) $400/m This unit can also be used for small stream crossings per m.
Basic board-walk (in wet areas) 0.6m wide (split cedar deck) $50/m
Trail sign on highway $500/each
Trail direction sign $200/each
Sign with map at TH or start of trail $2,000/each
Trail markers on trees $100/km
Page | 27 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Trail marking above tree line, Cairns, paint $300/km
Guidelines for trail repair costs
Trail repair costs are estimated as a percentage of new construction costs. To arrive at those costs, actual quantities shown for these items will be proportionally adjusted based on local situation and conditions. A few examples are shown here as follows:
Existing trail sections with major erosion problems use 100% of lengths
Existing trail sections with minor erosion problems use 30% of lengths
Sections where 40% of boardwalk needs to be replaced use 40% of lengths
At this time we have no costs included for habitat rehabilitation due to over-use or short-cutting. This will need to be addressed in future when trails are getting more use.
Summary Trails List
This is a summary list of all hiking trails by jurisdiction (total of 107 trails and 464 kms. )
Including 70 existing and 37 proposed trails.
Jurisdiction # of Trails Kms. BC Parks (BCP) 26 108 BCP/Squamish Forest District (SFD)shared 5 19 Resort Municipality of Whistler (RMOW) 23 83 RMOW/SFD shared 5 64 SFD 39 168 Whistler-Blackcomb 9 22
Page | 28 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
Complete Listing of Trails by Location
TRAIL NAME SYSTEM STATUS Length Priority Value Difficulty Access Number in KM Rating Rating Rating To TH
E TRAILS on East Side E1.1 Garibaldi Lake Trail Garibaldi Lake Existing 8.0 Paved E1.2 Taylor Meadows Connector Garibaldi Lake Existing 2.2 Trail Trail E1.3 Taylor Meadows - Black Tusk Garibaldi Lake Existing 3.9 Trail Lake Trail E1.4 Black Tusk Meadows Trail Garibaldi Lake Existing 1.8 Trail E1.5 Black Tusk Trail Garibaldi Lake Existing 1.5 Trail E1.6 Microwave - Black Tusk Route Garibaldi Lake Proposed 2.4 4x4 E1.7 Panorama Ridge Trail Garibaldi Lake Existing 2.5 Paved E1.8 Mt Price Route Garibaldi Lake Proposed 2.9 Trail E1.9 Lava Flats N. Route Conroy Creek Proposed 3.0 4 Medium C2C 4x4 E1.10 Lava Flats S. Route Conroy Creek Proposed 4.8 4 Medium C2C 4x4 E2.1 Jane Lakes Trail Jane Lakes Existing 6.6 3 Medium A1B 4x4 E2.2 Jane Lake - Brandywine Jane Lakes Proposed 2.4 4 Low A1A 4x4 Connector Route E3.1 Cheakamus Lake Trail Cheakamus Lake Existing 7.3 2WD E3.2 Helm Creek Trail Cheakamus Lake Existing 10.4 Trail E3.3 Cheakamus Lake to Singing Cheakamus Lake Proposed 3.1 Trail Pass Route E3.4 Corrie Lake Route Cheakamus Lake Proposed 1.0 Trail E4.1 Riverside Trail Whistler Existing 5.7 1 Low-Med A1A Paved Interpretive Forest E4.2 Farside Trail Whistler Existing 3.3 1 Low-Med A1A 2WD Interpretive Forest E4.3 Ridge Trail Whistler Existing 4.6 1 Low-Med A1B 2WD Interpretive Forest E4.4 Crater Rim Trail (Logger's Whistler Existing 3.1 1 High A1B 2WD Lake) Interpretive Forest E4.5 Riparian Trail Whistler Existing 1.2 1 Low-Med A1A 2WD Interpretive Forest E4.6 Highline Trail Whistler Existing 1.2 1 Medium A1B 2WD Interpretive Forest E4.7 Highline - Babylon Connector Whistler Proposed 2.0 4 Low A1A 2WD Route Interpretive Forest E4.8 Babylon Trail Whistler Existing 2.0 2 Low A1C 2WD Interpretive Forest E4.9 Upper Babylon Trail Whistler Existing 2.5 1 Medium A1C 2WD Interpretive Forest E4.10 Khyber Pass Trail Whistler Existing 1.7 1 High A1B 2WD Interpretive Forest E5.1 Northwest Passage Trail Northwest Existing 2.8 3 Low A1A Paved Passage E6.1 Singing Pass Trail (Road) Singing Pass Existing 4.0 Paved
Page | 29 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
TRAIL NAME SYSTEM STATUS Length Priority Value Difficulty Access Number in KM Rating Rating Rating To TH TRAILS on East Side E (cont’d) E6.2 Singing Pass Trail Singing Pass Existing 10.6 Trail E6.3 Fitzsimmons Creek - Singing Pass Proposed 6.3 2WD Spearhead Connector
E6.4 Spearhead Traverse Spearhead Proposed 7.6 Lift Traverse E6.5 Musical Bumps Trail - BC Singing Pass Existing 3.5 Trail Parks E6.6 Musical Bumps Trail - WB Whistler Mountain Existing 5.3 Lift E6.7 High Note Trail Whistler Mountain Existing 4.0 Lift E6.8 Flute - Singing Pass Route Singing Pass Proposed 2.7 Lift E7.1 Alpine Walk Trail Blackcomb Existing 1.5 Lift E7.2 Overlord Trail Blackcomb Existing 3.6 Lift E7.3 Marmot Trail Blackcomb Existing 1.1 Lift E7.4 Tree Line Trail Blackcomb Existing 1.0 Lift E7.5 Lakeside Loop Blackcomb Existing 1.3 Lift E7.6 Decker Loop Trail Blackcomb Existing 1.6 Lift E8.1 Comfortably Numb Trail Green Lake East Existing 20.1 3 Low C2C 4x4 E8.2 Young Lust Trail Green Lake East Existing 1.7 3 Low B2C 4x4 E9.1 Wedgemount Trail Wedgemount Lake Existing 3.3 2x4
V Trails in Valley V1.1 Sea to Sky Trail Daisy Lake Sea to Sky Trail Existing 6.2 2 Medium B1A Paved V1.2 Sea to Sky Trail Daisy Lake Route Sea to Sky Trail Propose 4.0 2 Medium B1A Paved V1.3 Sea to Sky Trail Whistler Sea to Sky Trail Existing 27.0 2 Medium B1A Paved V1.4 Sea to Sky - Green Lake Trail Sea to Sky Trail Existing 6.6 2 Medium B1A Paved V1.5 Sea to SkyTrail North Route Sea to Sky Trail Propose 19.7 2 Medium B1A Paved V1.6 Sea to SkyTrail North Sea to Sky Trail Existing 2.4 2 Medium B1A Paved V2.1 Brandywine Park Loop Brandywine Falls Existing 1.9 Paved V2.2 Brandywine Park to McGuire Trail Brandywine Falls Existing 2.7 Paved V2.3 Brandywine Park to Calcheak Trail Brandywine Falls Existing 2.4 Paved V3.1 Trainwreck Trail Trainwreck Existing 4.9 3 Medium A1A Paved V3.2 Lower Yer Seat Trail Trainwreck Existing 0.5 3 Medium A1A Paved V3.3 End of the Line Trail Trainwreck Existing 0.7 3 Low A1A Trail V4.1 Blueberry Hill Trail Blueberry Hill Existing 1.3 2 Medium A1B Paved V6.1 Shadow LakeTrails Shadow Lake Existing 4.7 2 Medium A1A Paved V7.1 Nairn Falls Trail Nairn Existing 1.3 Paved
Page | 30 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
TRAIL NAME SYSTEM STATUS Length Priority Value Difficulty Access Number in KM Rating Rating Rating To TH W Trails on West Side W1.1 Tricouni West Trail Tricouni Existing 4.4 3 High A1B HC4x4 W1.2 Tricouni East Trail Tricouni Existing 2.0 3 High A1A HC4x4 W1.3 Roe Creek - Cypress Tricouni Proposed 2.9 2 High A2C 4x4 Peak W1.4 Cloudburst from Tricouni Proposed 3.4 4 Medium A2C 4x4 Chance Creek Route W2.1 Brew Lake Trail Brew Lake Existing 7.1 2 High C4C Paved W2.2 Proposed New Brew Brew Lake Proposed 3.5 4 Low 4x4 Lake Trail W2.3 Roe Creek - Brew Lake Brew Lake Proposed 3.4 2 High B2C 4x4 W3.1 Lower Old Brandywine Brandywine Meadows Existing 1.7 2 High A2B 2x4 Meadows Trail W3.2 New Brandywine Brandywine Meadows Existing 0.3 2 High A1A HC4x4 Meadows Trail W3.3 Upper Brandywine Brandywine Meadows Existing 1.4 2 High A1A Trail Meadows Trail W4.1 Flank Trail West Flank Trail West Existing 8.0 4 Medium B1C Paved W4.2 Mid Flank Trail Mid Flank Trail Existing 14.7 1 Medium+ A1A Paved W4.3 Flank Trail North Flank Trail North Existing 7.9 1 Medium A1B HC4x4 W4.4 Screaming Cat Lake Flank Trail North Existing 1.2 1 Medium+ A1A Trail Trail W4.5 19 Mile Creek East Flank Trail North Existing 2.0 3 Medium A1B Paved W5.1 Rainbow Lake Trail Rainbow - Madely Existing 8.9 1 High B2A Paved W5.10 Rainbow Loop Trail Rainbow Madley Existing 0.9 1 High A1A Paved W5.11 Rainbow Lake - Madely Rainbow - Madely Existing 7.2 1 High B2A 2x4 Lake Trail W5.12 Madely Lakeside Trail Rainbow - Madely Existing 2.8 3 Low A1A 2x4 W5.13 Biathlon-Hanging Lake Rainbow - Madely Proposed 2.6 3 Low A1A 2x4 Route W5.14 Beverley Lake Route Beverley Lake Proposed 5.1 2 High A1A Trail W5.15 Beverley Lake Loop Beverley Lake Proposed 5.0 4 Low A2B Trail Route W5.16 Rainbow Ridge Loop Skywalk Proposed 7.9 4 Medium A2B Trail Route W5.17 Skywalk Route Skywalk Proposed 9.4 3 High B2C Trail W5.18 Dry Lakes Route Skywalk Proposed 3.0 4 Low A1B Trail W5.2 Sproatt Ridge Route Sproatt - Rainbow Proposed 13.2 3 High B2B Trail W5.3 Gin & Tonic Route Sproatt - Rainbow Proposed 1.1 3 High A1A Trail W5.4 Gin & Tonic Sproatt Sproatt - Rainbow Proposed 1.7 3 High A1A Trail Connector W5.5 North Air Mine Route Sproatt - Rainbow Proposed 2.2 3 High A1B 4x4 W5.6 Sproatt SW Ridge Sproatt - Rainbow Proposed 4.4 4 Medium A1B Trail Route W5.7 Van West Route Sproatt – Rainbow Proposed 6.2 4 Medium A1B Trail
Page | 31 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
TRAIL NAME SYSTEM STATUS Length Priority Value Difficulty Access Number in KM Rating Rating Rating To TH W Trails on West Side (Current) (Cont’d) W5.8 Sproatt Mountain - Sproatt - Rainbow Proposed 2.6 3 High A1B Trail Flank Trail Connector Route W5.9 Whip Me Snip Me Trail Mid Flank Trail Existing 1.7 2 Medium A1B Paved W6.1 Callaghan Lake - Callaghan Lake Existing 4.6 4x4 Conflict Lake Trail W6.2 Callaghan Lake - Ring Callaghan Lake Proposed 3.4 4x4 Lake Route W6.3 Callaghan Lake NE Callaghan Lake Proposed 3.6 4x4 Shore Route W6.4 Cirque Lake Trail Callaghan Lake Existing 1.4 High Boat W6.5 Callaghan Lake - Callaghan Lake Proposed 8.1 4x4 Madley Lake Connector Route W6.6 Pond Loop Route Callaghan Lake Proposed 1.5 4x4 W7.1 Ancient Cedars Trail Ancient Cedars, Showh Existing 2.9 1 High A1B 4x4 Lakes, Cougar Mountain W7.2 Showh Lake Connector Ancient Cedars, Showh Existing 0.5 2 Medium A1A 4x4 Trail Lakes, Cougar Mountain W7.3 Showh Lake Loop West Ancient Cedars, Showh Existing 1.6 2 Medium A1A 4x4 (Road) Lakes, Cougar Mountain W7.4 Showh Lake Loop West Ancient Cedars, Showh Existing 0.3 2 Medium A1A 4x4 (Trail) Lakes, Cougar Mountain W7.5 Cougar Mountain Loop Ancient Cedars, Showh Proposed 9.1 3 Medium A1B Trail Route Lakes, Cougar Mountain W7.6 Ancient Cedars South Ancient Cedars, Showh Proposed 1.9 3 Medium A1B Trail Loop Route Lakes, Cougar Mountain W8.1 Soo Falls Trail Soo Existing 0.3 3 Medium A1B 4x4 W8.2 Torrent Creek to Alpine Soo Proposed 7.5 4 High A2D HC4x4 Route W9.1 Rutherford to Mt. Rutherford Proposed 8.0 4 Medium B2D 4x4 Ipsoot
Page | 32 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
List of trails within RMOW boundaries
Trails within RMOW boundary prioritized by value
Trail Name Status Length Jurisdiction SFD% Section Value Number In km Priority W5.10 Rainbow Loop Trail Existing 0.9 RMOW 1 High E4.10 Khyber Pass Trail Existing 1.7 RMOW 2 High W4.2 Mid Flank Trail Existing 14.7 RMOW 3 Medium+ E4.4 Crater Rim Trail (Logger's Lake) Existing 3.1 RMOW 4 High E4.3 Ridge Trail Existing 4.6 RMOW 4.1 Low-Med E4.6 Highline Trail Existing 1.2 RMOW 4.2 Medium W4.5 19 Mile Creek East Existing 2.0 RMOW 5 Medium V4.1 Blueberry Hill Trail Existing 1.3 RMOW 6 Medium W5.6 Sproatt SW Ridge Route Proposed 4.4 RMOW 7 Medium W5.7 Van West Route Proposed 6.2 RMOW 7.1 Medium E2.1 Jane Lakes Trail Existing 6.6 RMOW 8 Medium V3.1 Trainwreck Trail Existing 4.9 RMOW 9 Medium V3.2 Lower Yer Seat Trail Existing 0.5 RMOW 9.1 Medium V3.3 End of the Line Trail Existing 0.7 RMOW 9.2 Low W4.1 Flank Trail West Existing 8.0 RMOW 10 Medium E4.9 Upper Babylon Trail Existing 2.5 RMOW 11 Medium E4.1 Riverside Trail Existing 5.7 RMOW 12 Low-Med E4.2 Farside Trail Existing 3.3 RMOW 12.1 Low-Med E4.5 Riparian Trail Existing 1.2 RMOW 13 Low-Med E4.8 Babylon Trail Existing 2.0 RMOW 14 Low E5.1 Northwest Passage Trail Existing 2.8 RMOW 15 Low E2.2 Jane Lake - Brandywine Connector Route Proposed 2.4 RMOW 16 Low E4.7 Highline - Babylon Connector Route Proposed 2.0 RMOW 17 Low
List of trails within RMOW/SFD and SFD/BCP shared boundaries
Trail Name Status Length Jurisdiction SFD% Section Value Number In km Share Priority W5.1 Rainbow Lake Trail Existing 8.9 RMOW/SFD 0.60 1 High W5.2 Sproatt Ridge Route Proposed 13.2 RMOW/SFD 0.50 2 High W4.3 Flank Trail North Existing 7.9 RMOW/SFD 0.10 3 Medium V1.3 Sea to Sky Trail Whistler Existing 27.0 RMOW/SFD 0.60 4 Medium V1.4 Sea to Sky - Green Lake Trail Existing 6.6 RMOW/SFD 0.80 4.1 Medium V1.1 Sea to Sky Trail Daisy Lake Existing 6.2 SFD/BCP 0.85 1 Medium V2.2 Brandywine Park to McGuire Trail Existing 2.7 SFD/BCP 0.10 2 Medium V2.3 Brandywine Park to Calcheak Trail Existing 2.4 SFD/BCP 0.40 3 Medium E1.9 Lava Flats N. Route Proposed 3.0 SFD/BCP 0.36 4 Medium E1.10 Lava Flats S. Route Proposed 4.8 SFD/BCP 0.15 4.1 Medium
Page | 33 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
List of trails within SFD boundaries
Trail Name Status Length Jurisdiction Section Value Number In km Priority W7.1 Ancient Cedars Trail Existing 2.9 SFD 1 High W7.5 Cougar Mountain Loop Route Proposed 9.1 SFD 1.1 Medium W7.6 Ancient Cedars South Loop Route Proposed 1.9 SFD 1.2 Medium W7.2 Showh Lake Connector Trail Existing 0.5 SFD 1.3 Medium W7.3 Showh Lake Loop West (Road) Existing 1.6 SFD 1.4 Medium W7.4 Showh Lake Loop West (Trail) Existing 0.3 SFD 1.5 Medium W5.11 Rainbow Lake - Madely Lake Trail Existing 7.2 SFD 2 High W5.17 Skywalk Route Proposed 9.4 SFD 3 High W4.4 Screaming Cat Lake Trail Existing 1.2 SFD 3.1 Medium+ W3.2 New Brandywine Meadows Trail Existing 0.3 SFD 4 High W3.3 Upper Brandywine Meadows Trail Existing 1.4 SFD 4.1 High W3.1 Lower Old Brandywine Meadows Trail Existing 1.7 SFD 4.2 High W2.1 Brew Lake Trail Existing 7.1 SFD 5 High W1.2 Tricouni East Trail Existing 2.0 SFD 6 High W5.4 Gin & Tonic Sproatt Connector Proposed 1.7 SFD 6.1 High W5.3 Gin & Tonic Route Proposed 1.1 SFD 7 High W5.14 Beverley Lake Route Proposed 5.1 SFD 7.1 High W5.13 Biathlon-Hanging Lake Route Proposed 2.6 SFD 7.2 Low W5.5 North Air Mine Route Proposed 2.2 SFD 8 High W5.8 Sproatt Mountain - Flank Trail Connector Route Proposed 2.6 SFD 9 High W2.3 Roe Creek - Brew Lake Proposed 3.4 SFD 10 High W1.3 Roe Creek - Cypress Peak Proposed 2.9 SFD 10.1 High W5.9 Whip Me Snip Me Trail Existing 1.7 SFD 11 Medium V6.1 Shadow LakeTrails Existing 4.7 SFD 12 Medium W1.4 Cloudburst from Chance Creek Route Proposed 3.4 SFD 13 Medium W5.16 Rainbow Ridge Loop Route Proposed 7.9 SFD 14 Medium W8.1 Soo Falls Trail Existing 0.3 SFD 15 Medium V1.6 Sea to SkyTrail North Existing 2.4 SFD 16 Medium V1.2 Sea to Sky Trail Daisy Lake Route Proposed 4.0 SFD 16.1 Medium V1.5 Sea to SkyTrail North Route Proposed 19.7 SFD 16.2 Medium W8.2 Torrent Creek to Alpine Route Proposed 7.5 SFD 17 High W9.1 Rutherford to Mt. Ipsoot Proposed 8.0 SFD 18 High E8.1 Comfortably Numb Trail Existing 20.1 SFD 19 Low E8.2 Young Lust Trail Existing 1.7 SFD 20 Low W5.12 Madely Lakeside Trail Existing 2.8 SFD 21 Low W2.2 Proposed New Brew Lake Trail Proposed 3.5 SFD 22 Low W5.15 Beverley Lake Loop Route Proposed 5.0 SFD 23 Low W5.18 Dry Lakes Route Proposed 3.0 SFD 23.1 Low W1.1 Tricouni West Trail Existing 4.4 SFD 24 High
Page | 34 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
List of 20 Highest Priority Trails within RMOW and/or SFD boundaries combined
TRAIL NAME STATUS Length Jurisdiction SFD Section Value Number in KM % Priority Rating W5.1 Rainbow Lake Trail Existing 8.9 RMOW/SFD 0.60 1 High W5.10 Rainbow Loop Trail Existing 0.9 RMOW 1.1 High W7.1 Ancient Cedars Trail Existing 2.9 SFD 2 High W5.17 Skywalk Route Proposed 9.4 SFD 3 High W4.4 Screaming Cat Lake Trail Existing 1.2 SFD 3.1 Medium+ E4.10 Khyber Pass Trail Existing 1.7 RMOW 4 High W7.5 Cougar Mountain Loop Route Proposed 9.1 SFD 5 Medium W7.6 Ancient Cedars South Loop Route Proposed 1.9 SFD 5.1 Medium W7.2 Showh Lake Connector Trail Existing 0.5 SFD 5.2 Medium W7.3 Showh Lake Loop West (Road) Existing 1.6 SFD 5.3 Medium W7.4 Showh Lake Loop West (Trail) Existing 0.3 SFD 5.4 Medium W5.2 Sproatt Ridge Route Proposed 13.2 RMOW/SFD 0.50 6 High W5.4 Gin & Tonic Sproatt Connector Proposed 1.7 SFD 6.1 High W5.11 Rainbow Lake - Madely Lake Trail Existing 7.2 SFD 7 High W4.2 Mid Flank Trail Existing 14.7 RMOW 8 Medium+ W4.3 Flank Trail North Existing 7.9 RMOW/SFD 0.10 8.1 Medium W4.1 Flank Trail West Existing 8.0 RMOW 8.3 Medium V4.1 Blueberry Hill Trail Existing 1.3 RMOW 9 Medium W3.2 New Brandywine Meadows Trail Existing 0.3 SFD 10 High W3.3 Upper Brandywine Meadows Trail Existing 1.4 SFD 10.1 High E4.4 Crater Rim Trail (Logger's Lake) Existing 3.1 RMOW 11 High W1.3 Roe Creek - Cypress Peak Proposed 2.9 SFD 12 High W2.1 Brew Lake Trail Existing 7.1 SFD 13 High W2.3 Roe Creek - Brew Lake Proposed 3.4 SFD 13.1 High W1.2 Tricouni East Trail Existing 2.0 SFD 14 High W1.4 Cloudburst from Chance Creek Route Proposed 3.4 SFD 15 Medium W4.5 19 Mile Creek East Existing 2.0 RMOW 16 Medium W5.16 Rainbow Ridge Loop Route Proposed 7.9 SFD 17 Medium W5.3 Gin & Tonic Route Proposed 1.1 SFD 18 High W5.14 Beverley Lake Route Proposed 5.1 SFD 18.1 High W5.5 North Air Mine Route Proposed 2.2 SFD 19 High W5.8 Sproatt Mountain - Flank Trail Connector Proposed 2.6 SFD 20 High Route
Page | 35 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
DRAFT
Report on Whistler Area Hiking Trails
List of 10 Most Scenic Alpine Trails (outside of BC Parks and WB)
This listing includes both, existing and proposed trails. Focus is on scenery at objective.
TRAIL NAME STATUS Jurisdiction Priority Value Access to W5.1 Rainbow Lake Trail Existing RMOW/SFD 1 High Rainbow, Sproat W3.2 New Brandywine Meadows Trail Existing SFD 2 High Brandywine, Metal Dome, W2.1 Brew Lake Trail Existing SFD 3 High Brew E4.10 Khyber Pass Trail Existing RMOW 4 High Whistler Mtn* W1.2 Tricouni East Trail Existing SFD 5 High Tricouni W7.5 Cougar Mountain Loop Route Proposed SFD 6 Medium Cougar Mtn. W1.3 Roe Creek - Cypress Peak Proposed SFD 7 High Cypress, Tricouni W1.4 Cloudburst from Chance Creek Proposed SFD 8 Medium Cloudburst Route W8.2 Torrent Creek to Alpine Route Proposed SFD 9 High Soo North Ridge, Sisqa Pk W9.1 Rutherford to Mt. Ipsoot Route Proposed SFD 10 High Ipsoot, Rhododendron Mtn *Although the Khyber Pass trail starts in the Whistler Interpretive Forest, it does enter WB tenure on the way up to Whistler Mountain.
Detail Trail Reports
Detail trail reports are available in digital format only.
Trails Atlas
An Atlas of all hiking trails listed in this report is available in digital format only.
Trail Maps
Maps showing all listed trails in the inventory are identified by a trail system number or a key trail number and are shown on the following pages.
Page | 36 January 2, 2012 – R2.4
APPENDIX B
February 15, 2012 FWAC MEETING MINUTES (Relevant Excerpts)
HIKING TRAILS TASK FORCE REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS 5. Hiking Trails Task Force • John, Kurt and Bryce provided by email key items for FWAC to Presentation Debrief consider. FWAC discussed and supports the recommendations as with composite Access included below. Much discussion on the gates Management Plan map Recommendation to Council: • Recommendation #1: FWAC recommends that Council instruct staff to adopt the report as a strategic framework for recreation trail development within and adjacent to the RMOW • Recommendation #2: FWAC recommends that Council instruct staff to focus on the following three specific recommendations in the report to be implemented in the next 12 months: • Rec. 2 (a) (i): Black Tusk and Whistler Mountain gates are open subject to the results of the Access Management Plan • Rec. 2 (a) (ii): Keep permanent roads open subject to the results of the Access Management Plan • Rec. 2 (b): With the support of elected officials and Tourism Whistler, secure the allocation of an annual $300,000 to hiking trail reclamation, maintenance and construction within RMOW. Furthermore, lobby the provincial government for an equal annual allocation of $300,000 for BC Parks and $300,000 for Recreation Sites and Trails BC for hiking trail reclamation, maintenance and construction on trails adjacent to the RMOW • Recommendation#3: Assign responsibility of an RMOW staff member to work with Recreation Sites and Trails BC to relocate, rehabilitate and upgrade the Rainbow to Madely hiking trail to an appropriate, sustainable world- class standard. In addition, make a beginning on other trail work within the RMOW possibly the Crater Rim Trail viewpoints and signage as funding allows.
Discussion: Engage MOFLNRO to explore the options of opening access to presently locked gates. If managed properly more access would enhance the visitor experience and work towards Whistler’s recreation goals. Concerns over controlling inappropriate use of the backcountry given that province can’t handle current load of enforcement work. Also concerns over further fragmentation of the landscape and human intrusion into wilderness.
June 19, 2012 APPENDIX C Whistler Trails Planning Working Group Terms of Reference – draft
Mandate and Role • Provide input to Recreation Master Plan process. • Provide input to the Official Community Plan (OCP) update process. • Provide input to the Alpine Trail Program in the 2013-2016 Five-Year Financial Plan. • Provide a forum for the coordination of trail planning and maintenance activities of the RMOW and the hiking and off-road cycling communities.
Objectives • Plan and prioritize the construction of new and upgraded non-motorized trails as part of the network of hiking and biking trails in the Whistler area. Coordinate and prioritize the maintenance activities on existing trails. • Plan a network of trails to and within the alpine in the Whistler area as an amenity for residents and visitors. The primary focus will be on summer use, but winter recreational uses will be considered. • Understand the needs/wishes of Whistler visitors for hiking and biking experiences. • Build capacity in the Whistler area hiking community to manage hiking trail planning, construction and maintenance activities. • Integrate non-motorized trail planning into the broader context of the Recreation Master Plan. • Modify Schedule G of the OCP to become a plan of existing and future hiking and cycling trails.
Whistler Trails Planning Working Group Guiding Principles • All trails should be planned as non-motorized and be constructed in accordance with the Whistler Trail Standards, with amendments for hiking trails. • Construction of new trails must be “authorized” under Section 57 of Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA). Section 56 “establishment” will be encouraged. • The development of non-motorized trails in the 21 Mile Creek watershed will be considered for trails constructed and maintained in accordance with the Whistler Trail Standards. • Multi-use alpine trails should be constructed in accordance with the Whistler Trail Standards as Type II or III un-surfaced (imported gravel surface is not practical for alpine trails). The Riverside and Farside trails in the Whistler Interpretive Forest are examples. • Multi-use trails constructed as part of the Alpine Trail Program should have a mountain biking technical difficulty rating of no more than intermediate level and be designed for two-way travel. • Mountain biking trails branching off of multi-use alpine trails may be constructed at a greater level of technical difficulty. • Hiking only trails branching off of multi-use alpine trails may be constructed. • The enjoyment and safety of all trail users is paramount. Potential for conflict between mountain bikers and hikers will be controlled by trail design, signage, trail etiquette guidelines and personal courtesy. WORCA and the hiking community will work with members to promote behaviours that will avoid and/or manage conflicts.
1
June 19, 2012 APPENDIX C
• Loop trails should be encouraged as an enhanced experience compared to out-and- back trails. • The provision and maintenance of convenient access to trailheads is vital to successful trail experiences. • Ecological values and guidelines of the RMOW draft Development Permit Area Guidelines shall be considered. • Search and Rescue access shall be considered. • Existing commercial recreation tenures shall be considered.
Working Group Membership Organization Individual RMOW Martin Pardoe (Manager, Parks Planning) Dave Patterson (Manager, Parks Operations) Frank Savage (Planner, Resort Experience) Cheakamus Community Forest Heather Beresford/Nicolette Richer (RMOW Environmental Stewardship) WORCA James Brooks, President (2 or 3 members) Emily Mann, Planning Director Simon Smith, Trails Director Hiking Group/Alpine Club Kurt Mueller (2 or 3 members) Mitch Sulkers Rupert Merer Recreation Sites & Trails BC Alistair McCrone/Teressa McMillan
Resource groups/stakeholders • Ministry of Natural Resource Operations, Crown Land Management • Squamish Lillooet-Regional District • Canadian Snowmobile Adventures • Whistler Sport Legacies • Biking and hiking tour operators • Biking and hiking retail/rental shops • Tourism Whistler • Whistler Blackcomb • BC Parks • Whistler Search and Rescue Society • Visitor Information Centre Hosts and Village Hosts
2
REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE REPOR T TO COUNCIL
PRESENTED: July 17, 2012 REPORT: 12-079 FROM: Resort Experience FILE: 8216.09 SUBJECT: FESTIVALS, EVENTS & ANIMATION – 2013 FUNDING ALLOCATION
COMMENT/RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER That the recommendation of the General Manager of Resort Experience be endorsed.
RECOMMENDATION
That $1,200,000 from the Resort Municipality Initiative (RMI) reserve of $2,263,125 is allocated to the 2013 Festivals, Events & Animation (FE&A) program for deployment from October 2012 through May 2013 – and in advance of provincial confirmation of the 2013 RMI program – to secure programming for the 2013 FE&A program.
PURPOSE OF REPORT Provide Council with the information necessary to allocate RMI reserve funds to the 2013 FE&A program in advance of the Province of BC confirming 2013 RMI funding.
DISCUSSION On February 21st the 2012-2014 Council Action Plan was presented to the community outlining five Priority Areas and twenty-six deliverables to which Council has committed.
Included in the Priority Area of Fiscal Responsibility is the deliverable of reviewing the FE&A program; and included in the Priority Area of Open for Business, is the deliverable to expand sport tourism.
On July 3rd the RMOW Corporate Plan was presented to the community outlining priorities, goals, strategies, deliverables and indicators, several of which pertain to the FE&A program including: Priority: Enhancing the resort experience: . Indicators: visitor satisfaction, number of visitors, atmosphere Priority: Ensuring economic viability . Indicators: resort occupancy, annual room nights Goal: RMOW is a valued community partner effectively supporting an exceptional resort experience . Indicator: impact of FE&A programming on guest satisfaction levels Deliverables for FE&A have been assigned to the Chief Administrator, Communications, Village Events & Animation, and Strategic Alliances. The 2012 FE&A planning process was initiated in February and concluded at the Public Council Meeting on May 1 when the FE&A Oversight Committee (OSC) presented the FE&A 2012 goals, strategies and plans to the community.
With Council and Provincial approval, the FE&A WG then began the process of booking performers and confirming augmentation for certain third party producers. Therefore, even though 2012 FE&A Festivals, Events & Animation – 2013 Funding Allocation Page 2 July 17, 2012
program began on the May long weekend, most summer programming – including Canada Day – was not secured, confirmed and promoted until late June.
During the 2012 FE&A planning process several businesses including hotels, restaurants, retailers, and activity providers expressed concern that not being able to announce the program until late June does not provide sufficient time to properly promote the FE&A program which, in turn, means the resort has not fully captured the potential impact of the FE&A program.
All parties involved in the development and approval of FE&A 2012 agree with that perspective and share that concern. Specifically, the FE&A WG, FE&A OSC, the Finance & Audit Committee, and, ultimately, Council all expressed a need to explore ways to provide funds to the FE&A program earlier in the process so that the FE&A program is able to secure and promote programming in a more timely and cost-effective manner.
However, the issue/obstacle of late confirmation of programming remains in place because the availability of RMI funds – a significant portion of which is allocated to FE&A – is subject to confirmation from the Province of BC, and, historically, the Province has not confirmed RMI funds until April or May. If the Province’s timing remains the same, the 2013 FE&A program would, again, be unable to optimize programming and promotional opportunities.
Planning for FE&A 2013 is already underway because the process and committees – including the FE&A Working Group (WG), FE&A OSC – are in place. FE&A 2013 budget assumptions are as follows: $2,685,000 as per the 2012 FE&A budget $ 155,000 unspent 2012 balance* (see note below) $2,840,000 total
If Council approves the recommendation contained in this report, the 2013 FE&A program could overcome the late funding obstacle by: a) Securing performers at best possible rates for concerts and street entertainment. b) Attracting third party producers on preferred dates; e.g. Tough Mudder in June. c) Enabling resort partners – Tourism Whistler, hotels, restaurants, retailers, activity providers – can be in-market with advertising and promotions well in advance of programming. d) Providing deposits to ensure exclusivity and/or premiere in Western Canada; e.g. Cirque Eloize. e) Considering augmentation for festivals and events that will occur during January-April 2013. f) Engaging and attracting potential sponsors. If Council approves the recommendation, the FE&A WG and OSC will deploy approximately $1,200,000 of the forecast 2013 FE&A budget from October 2012 through May 2013 as follows: a) Deposits (usually 50%) for anticipated 2013 Concerts, Fall Festival, and Street Entertainment b) 100% of anticipated investment in augmentation of third party events during January to April c) Deposits (usually 50%) of anticipated investment in augmentation of third party events during May to December d) 50% of anticipated FE&A contribution to 2013 FE&A marketing campaign
*The FE&A OSC approved a recommendation from the FE&A WG to postpone the 2012 Fall Festival until late Summer/early Fall 2013 to provide sufficient time to develop and plan what is anticipated to be a signature event.
Festivals, Events & Animation – 2013 Funding Allocation Page 3 July 17, 2012
WHISTLER 2020 ANALYSIS
W2020 TOWARD Descriptions of success that Comments Strategy resolution moves us toward Whistler's tourism economy is Deployment of RMI reserve funds to the progressive and ensures the highest 2013 FE&A program will enable the FE&A Economic and best use of limited financial, social WG to secure programming and provide and natural resources in the long- sufficient time to properly promote the term. FE&A program Whistler proactively seizes economic opportunities that are compatible with Economic tourism, and effectively adapts to As above changing external conditions.
Whistler holds competitive advantage in the destination resort marketplace Economic as a result of its vibrancy and unique As above character, products and services.
A diverse range of year-round Visitor activities is developed and offered As above Experience
BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS This recommendation anticipates that RMI is a recurring program and is secure based on recent discussions with the Province. However, if for some unforeseen reason the Province does not provide RMI funds for 2013, the RMOW will be required to make a decision to either forego deposits or access additional funds from the RMI Reserve. The RMOW Five Year Financial Plan identifies a current RMI Reserve balance of $2,263,125. If the recommendation in this report is approved by Council, staff will prepare a report to amend the RMOW budget bylaws for 2012 and 2013.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION The FE&A OSC has reviewed and supports the recommendation contained in this report. The FE&A WG will continue to engage resort stakeholders and consult with industry experts in the development of strategies and plans for FE&A 2013 and beyond.
SUMMARY If the recommendation in this report is approved b Council, the FE&A WG and OSC will be able to secure programming and provide sufficient time to properly promote the 2013 FE&A program, thereby optimizing the investment of RMI funds in FE&A.
Festivals, Events & Animation – 2013 Funding Allocation Page 4 July 17, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
John Rae MANAGER STRATEGIC ALLIANCES for Jan Jansen GENERAL MANAGER RESORT EXPERIENCE
REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE REPOR T TO COUNCIL
PRESENTED: July 17, 2012 REPORT: 12-081 FROM: Resort Experience FILE: 4604 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO BUILDING AND PLUMBING REGULATION BYLAW NO. 1617, 2002
COMMENT/RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER That the recommendation of the General Manager of Resort Experience be endorsed.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council consider giving first, second, and third readings to Building and Plumbing Regulation Amendment Bylaw No.2007, 2012.
REFERENCES This report includes the following appendix for Council’s information: APPENDIX A: Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002
PURPOSE OF REPORT This report presents Building and Plumbing Regulation Amendment Bylaw No. 2007, 2012 for consideration by Council to establish an Occupancy Permit process that may permit homeowners to legitimize illegally developed crawlspace or basement areas.
DISCUSSION
Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw #1617 regulates the construction and alteration of buildings in Whistler. Property owners wishing to undertake new construction, additions or renovations to their home are required to obtain a building permit, complete the construction and at certain intervals call for inspections to ascertain whether the health and safety aspects of the work are being carried out. This process helps to ensure substantial conformance with Provincial and Municipal regulations. When all work is complete an Occupancy Certificate is issued confirming that all works requiring an inspection have been inspected and accepted.
The above process has not always been adhered to in Whistler. There has been a history of homeowners illegally developing extra floor area in excess of that permitted by the Zoning Bylaw without the required permits and inspections. The developed spaces are often in over-height crawlspaces that were legally constructed but not permitted to be developed due to zoning restrictions.
To remedy this problem, Whistler Council at the May 15, 2012 regular meeting, adopted Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 1992, 2012 (Gross Floor area Exclusions). This has provided a solution by which the extra area developed in crawlspaces can be legitimized. This change, allowing for extra floor area, is only the first step in an overall approval process. To complete the legitimization of Amendment To Building And Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 2 July 17, 2012
illegally developed crawlspaces, a Building Permit process is needed to document and provide closure to these properties.
The proposed Building and Plumbing Amendment Bylaw #2007 will allow, if adopted, for a modified building permit process providing for a conditional Occupancy Permit at the completion of a project to legitimize illegal construction.
The first step in this modified Building Permit process will be the issuance of a Building Permit as required for any alteration or construction in Whistler. The Building Permit application drawings will detail the previously illegal alterations and allow for a plan review to ensure that the constructed spaces meet the requirements of applicable codes, regulations, Zoning Bylaw # 303 and Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 1992.
Once a building permit has been issued, a Municipal Building Inspector will undertake a site inspection to confirm conformance with permit drawings and review the property for obvious life, health and safety deficiencies. In many cases it will not be possible to inspect all components of construction requiring an inspection as the work will have been concealed as part of the illegal construction. In these instances, the RMOW will not issue a conventional Occupancy Permit as provided for by the current Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw. However, to provide a method of closure to the Building Permit files, the proposed Bylaw amendment recommends an “Occupancy Permit – Limited Building Inspections” attached as Schedule N to the amending bylaw.
The proposed Schedule N Occupancy Permit is a conditional permit stating conditions under which the RMOW will permit occupancy of a building having had limited inspections, the main conditions being: • The work authorized by the building permit complies with the RMOW Zoning Bylaw in respect of the floor area, siting and use of the building • The building contains construction that that was undertaken without permits and or inspections • Only the inspections checked off on the Occupancy Permit – Limited Building Inspections have been conducted • No person may rely on the permit as establishing full compliance with the Building Code, Building Bylaw or any standard of construction.
It should be noted that with respect to new construction, or previously undeveloped areas where all inspections can be completed, the current process will apply and full Occupancy granted when the required conditions are met.
WHISTLER 2020 ANALYSIS
W2020 TOWARD Descriptions of success that Comments Strategy resolution moves us toward 6. The built environment is safe and Recommended transparency around the accessible for people of all abilities, Occupancy Permit should facilitate increased Built Environment anticipating and accommodating wellbeing safety and understanding regarding the needs and satisfying visitor expectations. associated buildings.
Amendment To Building And Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 3 July 17, 2012
W2020 AWAY FROM Mitigation Strategies Descriptions of success that Strategy and Comments resolution moves away from Despite the transparency around the proposed 6. The built environment is safe and Occupancy Permits this approach clearly accessible for people of all abilities, indicates that some portions of some buildings Built Environment anticipating and accommodating will not benefit from careful staff inspections – wellbeing needs and satisfying visitor and by extension, will not benefit from the expectations. inherent health and safety safeguards of the BC Building Code.
BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS There are no budgetary impacts from this bylaw.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION Staff have canvassed the proposed bylaw amendment with representatives of the Canadian Homebuilders’ Association-Sea to Sky sitting on the Illegal Space Task Force. They are supportive of the proposed Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw amendment. SUMMARY Should this bylaw amendment be adopted, property owners with illegal crawlspace development in their homes will have a Building Permit process that allows for the legitimization of excluded areas through the issuance of a conditional “Occupancy Permit – Limited Building Inspections”.
Respectfully submitted,
Joe Mooney BUILDING DEPARTMENT MANAGER for Jan Jansen GENERAL MANAGER, RESORT EXPERIENCE
APPENDIX A RESORT MUNICIPALITY OF WHISTLER CONSOLIDATED BUILDING AND PLUMBING REGULATION BYLAW NO. 1617, 2002
BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE BUILDING AND PLUMBING FOR THE RESORT MUNICIPALITY OF WHISTLER
WHEREAS section 694 (1) of the Local Government Act authorizes the Resort Municipality of Whistler, for the health, safety and protection of persons and property to regulate the construction, alteration, repair, or demolition of buildings and structures by bylaw;
AND WHEREAS the Province of British Columbia has adopted a building code to govern standards in respect of the construction, alteration, repair and demolition of buildings in municipalities and regional districts in the Province;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Resort Municipality of Whistler, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
1. TITLE
1.1 This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as the “Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002”.
2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 In this bylaw: The following words and terms have the meanings set out in section 1.1.3.2 of the Building Code: assembly occupancy, building, building area, building height, business and personal services occupancy, care or detention occupancy, constructor, coordinating registered professional, designer, field review, high hazard industrial occupancy, industrial occupancy, low hazard industrial occupancy, major occupancy, mercantile occupancy, medium hazard industrial occupancy, occupancy, owner, plumbing contractor, plumbing system, registered professional, and residential occupancy. Agent means a person authorized by the owner to apply for and obtain a building permit, by way of a written authorization in the form of Schedule A to this bylaw. Building Code means the British Columbia Building Code as adopted by the Minister pursuant to section 692 (1) of the Local Government Act, as amended or re-enacted from time to time. (Bylaw 1991) Building official includes the Manager of Building Services, building inspectors, plan checkers and plumbing inspectors designated by the Resort Municipality of Whistler. Complex building means: (a) all buildings used for major occupancies classified as (i) assembly occupancies, (ii) care or detention occupancies, (iii) high hazard industrial occupancies, and (b) all buildings exceeding 600 square meters in building area or exceeding three storeys in building height used for major occupancies classified as (i) residential occupancies, Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 2
(ii) business and personal services occupancies, (iii) mercantile occupancies, or (iv) medium and low hazard industrial occupancies (c) all tenant improvements in complex buildings except where the owner provides the building official with evidence to demonstrate such requirement is unnecessary. Health and safety aspects of the work means design and construction regulated by Part 3, Part 4, and sections 7.1, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 9.4, 9.8, 9.9, 9.10, 9.12, 9.13, 9.14, 9.15, 9.18, 9.19, 9.20, 9.21, 9.22, 9.23, 9.24, 9.25, 9.31, 9.32, 9.34, 9.35, and 9.36 of Part 9 of the Building Code. Plumbing fixture means: water closet, sink, lavatory, bathtub, shower, hot water tank, clothes washer, dish washer, floor drain, roof drain, water heater, oil and grease interceptor, sump, floor drain, catch basin, backflow prevention device, vacuum breaker and any similar appliance which is connected to sanitary drain water supply or internal rain water leader. Standard building means a building of three storeys or less in building height, having a building area not exceeding 600 square meters and used for major occupancies classified as (a) residential occupancies, (b) business and personal services occupancies, (c) mercantile occupancies, or (d) medium and low hazard industrial occupancies. Owner includes, except in the definition of the term agent, the owner's agent. Structure means a construction or portion thereof of any kind, whether fixed to, supported by or sunk into land or water, but specifically excludes landscaping, fences, paving and retaining structures less than 1.5 meters in height.
3. PURPOSE OF THIS BYLAW
3.1 This bylaw shall, notwithstanding any other provision herein, be interpreted in accordance with this section.
3.2 This bylaw has been enacted for the purpose of regulating construction within the Resort Municipality of Whistler in the general public interest. The activities undertaken by or on behalf of the Resort Municipality of Whistler pursuant to this bylaw are for the sole purpose of providing a limited and interim spot checking function for reasons of health, safety and the protection of persons and property. It is not contemplated nor intended, nor does the purpose of this bylaw extend:
3.2.1 to the protection of owners, owner/builders or constructors from economic loss;
3.2.2 to the assumption by the Resort Municipality of Whistler or any building official of any responsibility for ensuring the compliance by any owner, his or her representatives or any employees, constructors or designers retained by him or her, with the Building Code, the requirements of this bylaw and other applicable enactments respecting safety;
3.2.3 to providing any person a warranty of design or workmanship with respect to any building or structure for which a permit including an occupancy permit is issued under this bylaw;
3.2.4 to providing a warranty or assurance that construction undertaken pursuant to building permits issued by the Resort Municipality of Whistler is free from latent, Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 3
or any defects.
4. PERMIT CONDITIONS 4.1 A permit is required whenever work regulated under this bylaw is to be undertaken. 4.2 The issuance of a permit under this bylaw and the acceptance or review of plans, drawings and supporting documents shall in no way serve to relieve the owner or his or her agent from full and sole responsibility to perform the work in strict accordance with this bylaw, the Building Code and other applicable enactments respecting safety. 4.3 No inspections or observations made by or on behalf of the Resort Municipality of Whistler shall serve to relieve the owner or his or her agents from full and sole responsibility to perform the work in strict accordance with this bylaw, the Building Code and other applicable enactments respecting safety. 4.4 It shall be the full and sole responsibility of the owner (and where the owner is acting through an agent, the agent) to carry out the work in respect of which the permit was issued in compliance with the Building Code and this bylaw and other applicable enactments respecting safety. 4.5 Neither the issuance of a permit under this bylaw nor the acceptance or review of plans, drawings or specifications or supporting documents, nor any inspections made by or on behalf of the Resort Municipality of Whistler constitute in any way a representation, warranty, assurance or statement that the Building Code, this bylaw and other applicable enactments respecting safety have been complied with. 4.6 No person shall rely upon any permit as establishing compliance with this bylaw or assume or conclude that this bylaw has been administered or enforced according to its terms. The person to whom the building permit is issued and his or her agents are responsible for making such determination.
5. SCOPE AND EXEMPTIONS
5.1 This bylaw applies to the design, construction and occupancy of new buildings and structures, and the alteration, reconstruction, demolition, removal, relocation and occupancy of existing buildings, structures and plumbing systems.
5.2 This bylaw does not apply to buildings or structures exempted by Part 1 of the Building Code except as expressly provided herein, nor to retaining structures less than 1.5 meters in height.
5.3 For the purpose of section 5.2, that portion of the Whistler Sliding Centre on Blackcomb Mountain that comprises a structure commonly known as a sliding track is deemed to be a “temporary building” as referred to in section 1.1.2.2(1)(f) of the Building Code, and this bylaw does not apply to it. (Bylaw 1618, Bylaw 1755, Bylaw 1991)
6. PROHIBITIONS 6.1 No person shall commence or continue any construction, alteration, reconstruction, demolition, removal, relocation or change the occupancy of any building, structure or plumbing system including excavation or other work related to construction unless a building official has issued a valid and existing permit for the work. 6.2 No owner shall occupy or use or permit others to occupancy or use any building or structure unless a valid and existing occupancy permit has been issued by a building official for the building or structure, or contrary to the conditions of any permit issued or any notice given by a building official. 6.3 No person shall knowingly submit false or misleading information to a building official in Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 4
relation to any permit application or construction undertaken pursuant to this bylaw. 6.4 No person shall, unless authorized in writing by a building official, reverse, alter, deface, cover, remove or in any way tamper with any notice, permit or certificate posted upon or affixed to any building or structure pursuant to this bylaw. 6.5 No owner shall do any work or permit others to do any work that is substantially at variance with the approved descriptions, plans and specifications of a building, structure, or other works for which a permit has been issued, unless that variance has been accepted in writing by a building official. 6.6 No person shall obstruct the entry of a building official or other authorized official of the Resort Municipality of Whistler on property in the administration of this bylaw.
7. BUILDING OFFICIALS
7.1 Each building official may:
7.1.1 administer this bylaw;
7.1.2 keep records of permit applications (so long as the building permit is issued within 6 months of receipt of the application), permits, notices and orders issued, inspections and tests made, and may retain copies of all papers and documents connected with the administration of this bylaw or microfilm or digital copies of such documents.
7.1.3 establish whether the methods or types of construction and types of materials used in the construction of a building or structure for which a permit is sought under this bylaw substantially conform with the requirements of the Building code.
7.2 A building official:
7.2.1 may enter any land, building, structure, or premises at any reasonable time for the purpose of ascertaining that the regulations of this bylaw are being observed;
7.2.2 where any building or structure is occupied, shall obtain the consent of the occupant or provide written notice to the occupant not less than 24 hours in advance of entry; and
7.2.3 shall carry proper credentials confirming his or her status as a building official.
7.3 A building official may order the correction of any work which is being done or has been done in contravention of this bylaw.
7.4 A building official may determine, for the purposes of the Solar Hot Water Ready Regulation B.C Reg. 101/2011, whether building site conditions permit effective use of solar hot water heating. (Bylaw 1991)
8. APPLICATIONS
8.1 Every owner shall apply for and obtain:
8.1.1 an excavation permit before excavating or preparing the site for foundation forms and installing services related to the construction of a building or structure;
8.1.2 a building permit before constructing or altering a building or structure; Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 5
8.1.3 a plumbing permit before constructing or altering a plumbing system;
8.1.4 a moving permit before moving a building or structure;
8.1.5 a demolition permit before demolishing a building or structure;
8.1.6 a fireplace and chimney permit prior to the construction of a masonry fireplace or the installation of a wood burning appliance.
8.2 Applications for any permits required in accordance with this bylaw shall be made using forms provided by the Resort Municipality of Whistler.
8.3 All plans submitted with permit applications shall bear the name and address of the designer of the building or structure.
8.4 Each building or structure to be constructed on a site requires a separate building permit and shall be assessed a separate building permit fee based on the value of that building or structure as determined in accordance with Schedule B to this bylaw, except where a building official determines that a single permit may be issued in respect of more than one building. (Bylaw 1991)
8.5 Each plumbing system to be constructed on a site requires a separate plumbing permit for each building and shall be assessed a separate plumbing permit fee determined in accordance with Schedule B to this bylaw. (Bylaw 1991)
8.6 Deleted. (Bylaw 1991)
9. APPLICATIONS FOR COMPLEX BUILDINGS
9.1 An application for a building permit with respect to a complex building shall;
9.1.1 be signed by the owner or agent or a signing officer if the owner is a corporation, and the coordinating registered professional;
9.1.2 be accompanied by the owner’s acknowledgment of responsibility and undertakings made in the form attached as Schedule C to this bylaw, signed by the owner, or a signing officer if the owner is a corporation;
9.1.3 include a copy of a title search made within 30 days of the date of the application;
9.1.4 include the owner’s estimate of the value of construction for the purpose of calculating the building permit fee, which shall be the estimate of the owner’s registered professional or, at the owner’s option, the estimate of a qualified quantity surveyor; (Bylaw 1991)
9.1.5 include a site plan showing:
9.1.5.1 the bearing and dimensions of the parcel taken from the registered subdivision plan;
9.1.5.2 the legal description and civic address of the parcel;
9.1.5.3 the location and dimensions of all statutory rights of way, easements and setback requirements; Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 6
9.1.5.4 the location and dimensions of all existing and proposed buildings or structures on the parcel;
9.1.5.5 setbacks to the natural boundary of any lake, swamp, pond or watercourse where the Resort Municipality of Whistler’s land use regulations establish siting requirements related to flooding;
9.1.5.6 the existing and finished ground levels to an established datum at or adjacent to the site and the geodetic elevation of the underside of the floor system of a building or structure where the Resort Municipality of Whistler’s land use regulations establish siting requirements related to minimum floor elevation; and
9.1.5.7 the location, dimensions and gradient of parking and driveway access;
9.1.5.8 the building official may waive the requirements for a site plan, in whole or in part, where the permit is sought for the alteration of an existing building or structure.
9.1.6 include floor plans showing the dimensions and uses of all areas: the dimensions and height of crawl and roof spaces; the location, size and swing of doors; the location, size, and opening of windows; floor, wall, and ceiling finishes; plumbing systems including plumbing fixtures; structural elements; and stair dimensions.
9.1.7 include a cross section through the building or structure illustrating foundations, drainage, ceiling heights and construction systems;
9.1.8 include elevations of all sides of the building or structure showing finish details, roof slopes, windows, doors and finished grade;
9.1.9 include cross-sectional details drawn at an appropriate scale and at sufficient locations to illustrate that the building or structure substantially conforms to the Building Code.
9.1.10 include copies of approvals required under any enactment relating to health or safety, including, without limitation, sewage disposal permits, highway access permits and Ministry of Health approval.
9.1.11 a include a letter of assurance in the form of Schedule A as referred to in section 2.6 of the Building Code, signed by the owner, or a signing officer if the owner is a corporation, and the coordinating registered professional.
9.1.12 include letters of assurance in the form of schedules B-1 and B-2 as referred to in section 2.6 of Part 2 of the Building Code, each signed by such registered professionals as the building official or Building Code may require to prepare the design for and conduct field reviews of the construction of the building or structure;
9.1.13 include two sets of drawings at a suitable scale of the design but not less than 1/8 inch to the foot prepared by each registered professional and including information set out in sections 9.1.5 through 9.1.8 of this bylaw; 9.2 In addition to the requirements of section 9.1 of this bylaw, the following may be required by a building official to be submitted with a building permit application for the construction of a complex building or structure or where siting circumstances warrant: Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 7
9.2.1 site servicing drawings, including sufficient detail of off-site services to indicate locations in relation to property lines, prepared and sealed by a registered professional, in accordance with standards set out in the Resort Municipality of Whistler’s subdivision servicing bylaw: 9.2.2 a section through the site showing grades, buildings, structures, parking areas and driveways;
9.2.3 any other information required to establish substantial compliance with this bylaw, the Building Code and other bylaws and enactments relating to the building or structure. 9.3 An application for a plumbing permit with respect to a complex building shall;
9.3.1 be signed by the owner, or a signing officer if the owner is a corporation, and the plumbing contractor.
10. APPLICATIONS FOR STANDARD BUILDINGS 10.1 An application for a building permit with respect to a standard building shall; 10.1.1 be signed by the owner or his or her agent, or a signing officer if the owner is a corporation. 10.1.2 be accompanied by the owner’s acknowledgment of responsibility and undertakings made in the form attached as Schedule C to this bylaw, signed by the owner, or a signing officer if the owner is a corporation; 10.1.3 include a copy of a title search made within 30 days of the date of the application; 10.1.4 include the owner’s estimate of the value of construction for the purpose of calculating the building permit fee, which may be the owner’s own estimate, the estimate of the owner’s registered professional if a registered professional has prepared the building design, or the estimate of a qualified quantity surveyor; (Bylaw 1991) 10.1.5 include a site plan showing: 10.1.5.1 the bearing and dimensions of the parcel taken from the registered subdivision plan; 10.1.5.2 the legal description and civic address of the parcel; 10.1.5.3 the location and dimensions of all statutory rights of way, easements and setback requirements; 10.1.5.4 the location and dimensions of all existing and proposed buildings or structures on the parcel; 10.1.5.5 setbacks to the natural boundary of any lake, swamp, pond or watercourse where the Resort Municipality of Whistler’s land use regulations establish siting requirements related to flooding; 10.1.5.6 the existing and finished ground levels to an established datum at or adjacent to the site and the geodetic elevation of the underside of the floor system of a building or structure where the Resort Municipality of Whistler’s land use regulations establish siting requirements related to minimum floor elevation; and 10.1.5.7 the location, dimensions and gradient of parking and driveway access; 10.1.6 the building official may waive the requirements for a site plan, in whole or in Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 8
part, where the permit is sought for the alteration of an existing building or structure. 10.1.7 include floor plans showing the dimensions and uses of all areas: the dimensions and height of crawl and roof spaces; the location, size and swing of doors; the location, size, and opening of windows; floor, wall, and ceiling finishes; plumbing fixtures; structural elements; and stair dimensions. 10.1.8 include a cross section through the building or structure illustrating foundations, drainage, ceiling heights and construction systems; 10.1.9 include elevations of all four aspects of the building or structure showing finish details, roof slopes, windows, doors and finished grade; 10.1.10 include a roof plan and roof height calculations; 10.1.11 include cross-sectional details drawn at an appropriate scale and at sufficient locations to illustrate that the building or structure substantially conforms to the Building Code. 10.1.12 include copies of approvals required under any enactment relating to health or safety, including, without limitation, sewage disposal permits, highway access permits and Ministry of Health approval. 10.1.13 include structural design including foundation design prepared by a registered professional in accordance with Part 4 of the Building Code accompanied by letters of assurance in the form of schedules B-1 and B-2 as referred to in section 2.6 of Part 2 of the Building Code, signed by the registered professional. 10.1.14 the requirements of section 10.1.12 of this bylaw may be waived by a building official in circumstances where the owner has provided the building official with evidence that a building or structure is not subject to snow loads. 10.1.15 include two sets of drawings at a suitable scale of the design prepared by each registered professional and including information set out in sections 10.1.6 through 10.1.10 and section 10.1.12 of this bylaw; 10.2 In addition to the requirements of section 10.1 of this bylaw, the following may be required by a building official to be submitted with a building permit application for the construction of a standard building where the project involves two or more buildings, which in the aggregate building area total more than 1000 square meters, or two or more buildings that will contain four or more dwelling units, or otherwise where the complexity of the proposed building or structure or siting circumstances warrant: (Bylaw 1911) 10.2.1 site servicing drawings, including sufficient detail of off-site services to indicate locations at the property line, prepared and sealed by a registered professional, in accordance with the Resort Municipality of Whistler’s subdivision servicing bylaw; 10.2.2 a section through the site showing grades, buildings, structures, parking areas and driveways; 10.2.3 structural, electrical, mechanical or fire suppression drawings prepared and sealed by a registered professional; 10.2.4 letters of assurance in the form of schedules B-1 and B-2 as referred to in section 2.6 of Part 2 of the Building Code, each signed by such registered professionals as the building official or Building Code may require; 10.2.5 any other information required by the building official or the Building Code to establish substantial compliance with this bylaw, the Building Code and other bylaws and enactments relating to the building or structure. Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 9
11. PROFESSIONAL PLAN CERTIFICATION 11.1 The letters of assurance in the form of schedules B-1 and B-2 referred to in section 2.6 of Part 2 of the Building Code and provided pursuant to sections 9.1.10, 9.1.11, 10.1.12, and 10.2.4 and 15.1 of this bylaw are relied upon by the Resort Municipality of Whistler and its building officials as certification that the design and plans to which the letters of assurance relate comply with the Building Code and other applicable enactments respecting safety. 11.2 A building permit issued for the construction of a complex building, or for a standard building for which a building official required registered professional design pursuant to section 15.1 of this bylaw and letters of assurance pursuant to section 10.2.4 of this bylaw shall be in the form of Schedule D to this bylaw. 11.3 A building permit issued pursuant to section 11.2 of this bylaw shall include a notice to the owner that the building permit is issued in reliance upon the certification of the registered professionals that the design and plans submitted in support of the application for the building permit comply with the Building Code and other applicable enactments relating to safety. 11.4 When a building permit is issued in accordance with section 11.2 of this bylaw the permit fee shall be reduced by 5% of the fees payable pursuant to Schedule B to this bylaw, up to a maximum reduction of $500.00 (five hundred dollars).
12. FEES AND CHARGES 12.1 In addition to applicable fees and charges required under other bylaws, a permit fee, calculated in accordance with Schedule B to this bylaw, shall be paid in full upon issuance of any permit under this bylaw. 12.2 An application made for a building permit shall be accompanied by the appropriate plan processing fee as set out in Schedule B to this bylaw. 12.2.1 The plan processing fee is non-refundable and shall be credited against the building permit fee at the time of permit issuance. 12.2.2 An application shall be cancelled and the plan processing fee forfeited if: (Bylaw 1911) 12.2.2.1 the building permit has not been issued and the permit fee paid within 180 days of date of written notification to the owner or the owner’s agent that the permit is ready for issuance; (Bylaw 1911) 12.2.2.2 the owner or owner’s agent has been requested to provide additional information to complete the application in accordance with section 9 or section 10 of this bylaw or the Building Code, and the requested information has not been provided within the time indicated by the building official in requesting the additional information; or (Bylaw 1911) 12.2.2.3 the owner or owner’s agent advises the Resort Municipality of Whistler in writing that the applicant wishes to abandon the application. (Bylaw 1911) 12.2.3 When an application is cancelled the plans and related documents submitted with the application may be destroyed. 12.2.4 12.2.4 Plan processing fees do not apply to permits other than building permits. 12.3 The owner may obtain a refund of the permit fees set out under Schedule B to this bylaw when a permit is surrendered and cancelled before any construction begins provided: 12.3.1 the refund shall not include the plan processing fee paid pursuant to section 12.2 Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 10
of this bylaw; 12.3.2 the refund shall be 90% of the balance of the permit fee calculated in accordance with Schedule B to this bylaw after deducting the fee set out under section 12.2 of this bylaw; 12.3.3 no refund shall be made where construction has begun or an inspection has been made. 12.4 Where, due to noncompliance with the provisions of this bylaw, more than two inspections are necessary when one inspection is normally required, for each inspection after the second inspection, an inspection charge as set out in Schedule B to this bylaw shall be paid prior to additional inspections being performed. 12.5 For a required permit inspection requested to be done after the hours during which the offices of the Resort Municipality of Whistler are normally open, an inspection charge as set out in Schedule B to this bylaw shall be payable based on the time actually spent in making such inspection, including any traveling time and any administrative costs associated with the inspection. 12.6 An inspection charge as set out in Schedule B to this bylaw shall be payable in advance for a voluntary inspection to establish compliance of or to obtain a written report on the status of an existing building or structure. 12.7 Fees for miscellaneous services related to the administration of this bylaw and related enactments shall be charged at an hourly rate in accordance with charges as set out in Schedule B to this bylaw. 12.8 Where the proposed work includes excavation or construction on lands within 10 meters of a municipal roadway, sewer, drain, water main or other municipal work, the applicant shall pay to the Resort Municipality of Whistler the highway use, clearing and inspection fee set out in Schedule B to this bylaw. (Bylaw 1991) 12.9 An applicant shall ensure that the construction authorized by a building permit is carried out in such a manner as to minimize damage to any municipal roadway, sewer, drain, water main or other municipal work, and shall clear from the municipal roadway on at least a daily basis all soil and similar material that may accumulate due to construction activity and interfere with the use of the highway. (Bylaw 1991) 12.10 An applicant may apply to the Resort Municipality of Whistler for refund of a fee paid under section 12.8 upon completion of the construction authorized by the building permit, or upon cancellation of the building permit without construction having commenced, but no such application may be made later than two years following the date of issuance of the building permit. The application shall be in the form prescribed for that purpose by a building official, and the Resort Municipality of Whistler shall refund the fee, less a $58.78 inspection charge, if a building official has inspected the municipal roadway, sewer, drain, water main or other municipal works and is satisfied that the applicant has not caused any damage to the municipal works and has cleared and restored the highway such that all evidence of construction activity has been removed. (Bylaw 1991) 12.11 If a building official is not satisfied that the applicant has caused no damage to municipal works and cleared and restored the highway, the Resort Municipality of Whistler may also retain such portion of the fee paid under section 12.8 as may correspond to the cost to the Resort Municipality of Whistler to repair the damage or clear or restore the highway, and refund the balance to the applicant. (Bylaw 1991) 12.12 If a building official determines that the fee paid by the applicant, less the inspection charge, is insufficient to pay the cost to the Resort Municipality of Whistler repairing damage to municipal works or clearing and restoring the highway, the permit holder shall pay the balance of the cost to the Resort Municipality of Whistler within 30 days of Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 11
receipt of an invoice for such costs, and a building official may withhold any occupancy permit in respect of the construction authorized by the permit if the damage remains unrepaired so as to create a health or safety hazard. (Bylaw 1991) 12.13 The payment of a fee under this section does not entitle an applicant or any other person to use or occupy any highway of the Resort Municipality of Whistler with any temporary or permanent structure, but the applicant may use the highway immediately abutting the construction site for the unloading of vehicles associated with the construction activity and for the temporary placement of construction materials, but not the storage of materials or for the parking of vehicles other than such parking as is generally permitted by the bylaws of the Resort Municipality of Whistler. (Bylaw 1991) 13. BUILDING PERMITS
13.1 When:
13.1.1 a completed application including all required supporting documentation has been submitted;
13.1.2 the owner has signed the form attached as Schedule C to this bylaw acknowledging and accepting his or her responsibilities in accordance with sections 9.1.2 and 10.1.2 of this bylaw.
13.1.3 the proposed work set out in the application substantially conforms with the Building Code, this bylaw and all other applicable bylaws and statutes;
13.1.4 the owner or his or her agent has paid all applicable fees prescribed in accordance with section 12.1 of this bylaw and deposited the security prescribed in accordance with section 12.8 of this bylaw;
13.1.5 the owner or his or her agent has paid all charges and met all requirements imposed by any other enactment or bylaw;
13.1.6 no enactment, covenant, agreement or regulation in favour or, or regulation of, the Resort Municipality of Whistler authorizes a permit to be withheld;
13.1.7 the owner has retained a professional engineer or geoscientist if required by the provisions of the Engineers and Geoscientists Act;
13.1.8 the owner has retained an architect if required by the provisions of the Architects Act; a building official shall issue the permit for which the application is made.
13.2 When the application is in respect of a new building that includes, or will include, a residential occupancy, the building permit shall not be issued unless the owner provides evidence pursuant to section 30 (1) of the Homeowner Protection Act that the proposed building:
13.2.1 is covered by home warranty insurance, and
13.2.2 the constructor is a licensed residential builder.
13.3 Section 13.2 of this bylaw does not apply if the owner is not required to be licensed and to obtain home warranty insurance in accordance with sections 20 (1) or 30 (1) of the Homeowner Protection Act. Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 12
13.4 Every permit is issued upon the condition that the permit shall expire and the rights of the owner under the permit shall terminate if:
13.4.1 the work authorized by the permit is not commenced within 12 months from the date of issuance of the permit; or
13.4.2 work is discontinued for a period of 12 months.
13.5 A building official may extend the period of time set out under sections 13.4.1 and 13.4.2 of this bylaw where construction has not been commenced or where construction has been discontinued due to adverse weather, strikes, material or labour shortages or similar hardship beyond the owner’s control. 13.6 When a permit has expired before the works encompassed in the scope of the permit have been completed and an occupancy permit has not been issued the owner shall obtain a new permit to complete the work. (Bylaw 1911)
13.7 A building official may issue an excavation permit in the form of Schedule F to this bylaw as a portion of a building permit prior to the issuance of a building permit.
13.8 A building official may issue an foundation permit in the form of Schedule G to this bylaw as a portion of a building permit prior to the issuance of a building permit.
13.9 A building official may issue a building permit for a portion of a building or structure before the plans and specifications for the entire building or structure have been accepted, provided sufficient information has been provided to the Resort Municipality of Whistler to demonstrate to the building official that the portion authorized to be constructed substantially complies with this and other applicable bylaws and the permit fee applicable to that portion of the building or structure has been paid. The issuance of the permit not withstanding, the requirements of this bylaw apply to the remainder of the building or structure as if the permit for the portion of the building or structure had not been issued.
13.10 When a site has been excavated under an excavation permit issued under section 13.7 of this bylaw or a foundation has been constructed for a foundation permit issued under section 13.8 of this bylaw and a building permit is subsequently not issued or an existing building permit has expired in accordance with the requirements of section 13.4 of this bylaw, but without construction of the building or structure for which the building permit was issued having commenced, the owner shall remove any work and fill in the excavation and restore the original gradients of the site within 60 days of being served notice by the Resort Municipality of Whistler to do so.
14. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION
14.1 Neither the issuance of a permit under this bylaw, the review and acceptance of the drawings, plans and specifications, nor inspections made by a building official, shall constitute a representation or warranty that the Building Code or this bylaw have been complied with or that the building or structure meet any standard of materials and workmanship, and no person shall rely on any of those acts as establishing compliance with the Building Code or this bylaw or any standard of construction.
15. PROFESSIONAL DESIGN AND FIELD REVIEW
15.1 When a building official considers that the site conditions, size or complexity of a development or an aspect of a development warrant, he or she may require registered professional design and plan certification and field review in the form of schedules B-1, Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 13
B-2 , C-A (where applicable) and C-B referred to in section 2.6 of Part 2 of the Building Code.
15.2 Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for a complex building or standard building in circumstances where letters of assurance have been required in accordance with sections 9.1.10, 9.1.11, 10.1.12, 10.2.4 or 15.1 of this bylaw, the owner shall provide the Resort Municipality of Whistler with letters of assurance in the form of schedules C-A or C-B, as appropriate, referred to in section 2.6 of Part 2 of the Building Code or, where applicable, Schedule H to this bylaw for the assurance of professional design and field review for site servicing.
15.3 When a registered professional provides letters of assurance in accordance with sections 9.1.10, 9.1.11, 10.1.12, 10.2.4 or 15.1 of this bylaw, he or she shall also provide proof of insurance to the building official.
16. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE OWNER
16.1 Every owner shall ensure that all construction complies with the Building Code, this bylaw and other applicable enactments respecting safety.
16.2 Deleted. (Bylaw 1991)
16.3 Every owner to whom a permit is issued or the owner’s agent shall, during construction:
16.3.1 post and maintain the permit in a conspicuous place on the property in respect of which the permit is issued;
16.3.2 keep a copy of the building permit plans and specifications on the property and make them available when requested to so by the building official; and
16.3.3 post the civic address on the property in a location visible from any adjoining street.
17. INSPECTIONS
17.1 When a registered professional provides letters of assurance in accordance with sections 9.1.10, 9.1.11 or 15.1 of this bylaw, the Resort Municipality of Whistler will rely solely on field reviews undertaken by the registered professional and the letters of assurance submitted pursuant to section 15.2 of this bylaw as assurance that the construction substantially conforms to the design and that the construction substantially complies with the Building Code, this bylaw and other applicable enactments respecting safety.
17.2 Notwithstanding section 17.1 of this bylaw, a building official may attend the site from time to time during the course of construction to ascertain that the field reviews are taking place, to monitor the field reviews undertaken by the registered professionals and may issue advisory notices to the registered professional providing information pertaining to the status of their field reviews.
17.3 A building official may attend periodically at the site of the construction of standard buildings or structures to ascertain whether the health and safety aspects of the work are being carried out in substantial conformance with the those portions of the Building Code, this bylaw and other applicable enactments respecting safety.
17.4 The owner or his agent shall give not less than 48 hours notice, exclusive of Saturdays, Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 14
Sundays and statutory holidays, to the Resort Municipality of Whistler when requesting an inspection and shall obtain an inspection and receive a building official’s acceptance of the following aspects of the work prior to concealing it:
17.4.1 potable water service, sanitary service and storm service is installed;
17.4.2 foundation forms excluding the structural aspects of the foundation;
17.4.3 perimeter drain tiles and damp-proofing, prior to backfilling;
17.4.4 preparation of ground, including ground cover, when required, is complete and prior to the placing of a concrete slab;
17.4.5 factory built chimneys and fireplaces and solid fuel burning appliances are roughed-in;
17.4.6 masonry chimneys and fireplaces when;
17.4.6.1 the smoke chamber is complete but before the chimney is constructed;
17.4.6.2 the chimney is roughed-in;
17.4.7 framing and sheathing, excluding the structural aspects, is complete;
17.4.8 any underground plumbing is installed and tested;
17.4.9 plumbing system rough-in and test;
17.4.10 bathtubs, showers and site constructed shower pans and test;
17.4.11 insulation and vapour barrier are installed;
17.4.12 completed fireplaces and solid fuel burning appliances;
17.4.13 plumbing fixtures;
17.4.14 substantial completion of the building or structure or part of the building or structure for occupancy, but before occupancy takes place of the whole or a part of the building or structure.
18. OCCUPANCY PERMITS
18.1 No owner shall occupy or permit others to occupy a building or part of a building or structure until an occupancy permit has been issued in the form of Schedule I to this bylaw for complex buildings and in the form of Schedule J to this bylaw for standard buildings.
18.2 An occupancy permit shall not be issued by a building official unless:
18.2.1 all letters of assurance have been submitted when required in accordance with sections 9.1.10, 9.1.11, 10.1.12, 10.2.4, 15.1 and 15.2 of this bylaw.
18.2.2 all aspects of the work requiring inspection and acceptance pursuant to section 17.4 of this bylaw have both been inspected and accepted or the inspections and Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 15
acceptance are not required in accordance with section 17.1 of this bylaw.
18.3 A building official may issue an occupancy permit for a part of a building or structure when the part of the building or structure is self-contained, provided with essential services, and the requirements set out in section 18.2 of this bylaw have been met with respect to it.
19. RETAINING STRUCTURES
19.1 A registered professional shall undertake the design and conduct field reviews of the construction of a retaining structure greater than 1.5 metres in height. Sealed copies of the design plan and field review reports prepared by the registered professional for all retaining structures greater than 1.5 metres in height shall be submitted to a building official prior to acceptance of the works.
20. PERMITS
20.1 A building permit for a standard building, building permit for a complex building, demolition permit, moving permit or plumbing permit shall be in the form of Schedule D to this bylaw.
20.2 An excavation permit shall be in the form of Schedule F to this bylaw.
20.3 A foundation permit shall be in the form of Schedule G to this bylaw.
20.4 A fireplace and chimney permit shall be in the form of Schedule K to this bylaw.
21. PENALTIES AND ENFORCEMENT
21.1 Every person who contravenes any provision of this bylaw commits an offense punishable on summary conviction and shall be liable to a fine of not more than $10,000.00 (ten thousand dollars) or to imprisonment for not more than 6 months.
21.2 Every person who fails to comply with an order or notice issued by a building official, or who allows a violation of this bylaw to continue, contravenes this bylaw.
21.3 A building official may order the cessation of any work that is proceeding in contravention of the Building Code or this bylaw by posting a Stop Work notice in the form attached as Schedule L to this bylaw.
21.4 The owner of property or the portion of the property on which a Stop Work notice has been posted shall ensure that any construction regulated by this bylaw that is the subject of the Stop Work notice cease immediately and not resume until all applicable provisions of this bylaw have been substantially complied with and the Stop Work notice has been rescinded in writing by a building official.
21.5 Where a person occupies a building or structure or part of a building or structure in contravention of section 6.2 of this bylaw a building official may post a Do Not Occupy notice in the form attached as Schedule M to this bylaw on the affected part of the building or structure.
21.6 The owner of property or a portion of a property on which a Do Not Occupy notice has been posted shall ensure that the occupancy of the building or structure or the portion of the building or structure ceases immediately and that no further occupancy takes place until all applicable provisions of the Building Code and this bylaw have been Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 16
substantially complied with and the Do Not Occupy notice has been rescinded in writing by a building official.
21.7 Every owner who commences work or permits any person to commence work requiring a permit in accordance with this bylaw without first obtaining such permit shall, if a Stop Work notice has been issued by a building official, pay double the permits fees set out in Schedule B to this bylaw provided that the additional permit fee shall not be more than $2000 or less than $500. (Bylaw 1991)
22. CLIMATIC DATA 22.1 Climatic data for the design of a building or structure in the Resort Municipality of Whistler shall be as issued by a building official from time to time pursuant to section 1.1.3 of the Building Code. (Bylaw 1911)
23. SEISMIC DATA 23.1 Seismic data for the design of a building or structure in the Resort Municipality of Whistler shall be as issued by a building official from time to time pursuant to section 1.1.3 of the Building Code. (Bylaw 1911)
24. SWIMMING POOLS
24.1 Except as prescribed in section 24.2 of this bylaw, every structure designed or constructed as a private swimming pool, wading pool, hot tub or spa having a depth greater than 0.75 metres at any point shall be surrounded by an enclosure not less than 1.25 metres in height. The enclosure shall be constructed surrounding the pool or pond in such a manner as to substantially render the pool or pond secure from unauthorized entry. All openings in the enclosure surrounding a pool or pond shall be in the form of a gate operated by a spring loaded hinge and latch mounted on the inside of the gate.
24.2 Public pools and hot tubs and spas less than 2.75 metres in horizontal dimension are exempted from the requirements of section 24.1 of this bylaw.
25. SITE SERVICES
25.1 The minimum depth of bury for water services shall be 1.8 metres unless the owner provides the building official with evidence that a lesser depth will not increase the risk of freezing.
25.2 The minimum depth of bury for sanitary sewer and storm drain services shall be 1.2 metres unless the owner provides the building official with evidence that a lesser depth will not increase the risk of freezing.
25.3 When required by a building official, the owner or the owner’s agent shall submit to the building official a record drawing showing the installation of potable water service, sanitary sewer service and storm drain service installations. The drawing shall indicate sizes and type of material, all fittings and references for cleanouts triangulated to substantially permanent landmarks such as building foundations, hydro kiosks and the like.
26. SURVEYOR’S OR SITE IMPROVEMENT CERTIFICATES
26.1 Prior to the placing of concrete in forms for the foundations for a building or structure a building official may require that the location of the forms in relation to Land Title Office plans and B.C.L.S. monuments property lines, easements, or right of ways be Consolidated Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 Page 17
established by a B.C.L.S. or a certified member of the Applied Science Technologists and Technicians of British Columbia who is registered in site improvement surveys (RSIS).
26.2 Prior to the occupancy of a building or structure a building official may require that the location of the foundations in relation to Land Title Office plans and B.C.L.S. monuments property lines, easements, or right of ways be established by a B.C.L.S. or a certified member of the Applied Science Technologists and Technicians of British Columbia who is registered in site improvement surveys (RSIS).
26.3 The site improvement surveys required in sections 26.1 and 26.2 of this bylaw shall show:
26.3.1 the shortest distances from the outer surfaces of the foundations of the building or structure on the property to the adjacent property lines, easements, or right of ways; and
26.3.2 the elevation of the applicable aspect of the floor system in relation to a flood reference, where the Resort Municipality of Whistler’s land use regulations establish siting requirements related to flooding.
27. Deleted. (Bylaw 1991)
28. SEVERABILITY The provisions of this bylaw are severable and the invalidity of any part of this bylaw shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this bylaw.
29. SCHEDULES Schedules A to M attached to this bylaw form a part of this bylaw.
30. REPEAL Resort Municipality of Whistler Building Regulation Bylaw No. 1456, 2000 and Resort Municipality of Whistler Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1462, 2000 are repealed.
TABLE OF SCHEDULES
TO
BUILDING AND PLUMBING REGULATION BYLAW NO. 1617, 2002
SCHEDULE A ...... Owner’s Authorization of Agent
SCHEDULE B ...... Building and Plumbing Permit Fees
SCHEDULE C ...... Acknowledgement of Owner or Owner’s Agent
SCHEDULE D...... Building, Moving, Demolition and Plumbing Permit
SCHEDULE E...... Damage Deposit
SCHEDULE F...... Excavation Permit
SCHEDULE G...... Foundation Permit
SCHEDULE H – Part 1 ...... Assurance of Professional Design and ...... Commitment for Field Review
SCHEDULE H – Part 2...... Assurance of Professional Field Review and Compliance of Site Servicing
SCHEDULE I ...... Occupancy Permit for a Complex Building
SCHEDULE J ...... Occupancy Permit for a Standard Building
SCHEDULE K ...... Fireplace and Chimney Permit
SCHEDULE L...... Stop Work Notice
SCHEDULE M ...... Do Not Occupy Notice
SCHEDULE A
OWNER’S AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT
The undersigned registered owner of land in the Resort Municipality of Whistler legally described as Property Legal Description and having a civic address of Property Civic Address hereby authorizes to: Name of Agent 1. apply for and obtain as my agent a building permit in respect of the land from the Resort Municipality of Whistler under the provisions of Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002; 2. provide to the Resort Municipality as my agent all information and documents required by the bylaw for such an application; 3. execute and deliver to the Resort Municipality of Whistler, as my agent, the document entitled ‘Acknowledgement of Owner or Owner’s Agent’ in the form of Schedule C to Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002.
Owner Name* (please print) Owner Signature Signed this day of 2003.
PLEASE LIST ALL OWNERS IF PROPERTY HAS MORE THAN ONE OWNER:
Owner Name (please print) Owner Signature Signed this day of 2003.
Owner Name (please print) Owner Signature Signed this day of 2003.
Owner Name (please print) Owner Signature Signed this day of 2003.
Owner Name (please print) Owner Signature Signed this day of 2003.
*If owner is a company, please use table on page over.
Schedule A to Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002
O WNER’S AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT Page 2 PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IF THE OWNER IS A COMPANY:
Company name Limited no.
Name of signing officer (please print) Signature of signing officer Signed this day of 2003.
Name of signing officer (please print) Signature of signing officer Signed this day of 2003.
Name of signing officer (please print) Signature of signing officer Signed this day of 2003.
SCHEDULE B
SCHEDULE B Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002
VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION The value of construction for a building or structure is the value of construction declared by the applicant on the building permit application or, if the Resort Municipality of Whistler is of the view that the construction value declared by the applicant is not accurate, the value based on the current edition of the Marshall and Swift Residential Cost Handbook, Marshall Valuation Service or other current valuation tables reasonably appropriate to the type of construction involved.
BUILDING PERMIT FEES Using the value of construction building permit fees are calculated according to TABLE 1 below. Where the Resort Municipality of Whistler requires a professional plan certification, a discount of 5% of the building permit fee as calculated in TABLE 1 will apply, up to a maximum reduction of $500.00. Where work requiring a building permit in accordance with this bylaw has been started without first obtaining such a permit, the permits fees as calculated in TABLE 1 will be doubled provided that the additional permit fee shall not be more than $2000 or less than $500. Table 1 Up to $20,000 $11.70 per $1000 or part thereof, minimum fee of $80.90 $20,001 $50,000 $234.00 plus $10.48 per $1000 or part thereof over $20,000 $50,001 $100,000 $548.40 plus $9.78 per $1000 or part thereof over $50,000 $100,001 $1,000,000 $1,037.40 plus $8.18 per $1000 or part thereof over $100,000 $1,000,001 and up $8,399.40 plus $7.74 per $1000 or part thereof over $1,000,000
In addition, the following charges may apply for archiving, fire suppression systems and site servicing:
Archiving: $2.88 per sheet of building plans over 8 ½” x 11. $1.49 per sheet of building plans 8 ½” x 11” or under. Fire suppression System: $159.90 per sprinkler system. Site Servicing Inspections Fees: $39.99 for the first 30 meters of potable water, sanitary sewer and storm drain services. $15.99 for each additional 30 meters of potable water, sanitary sewer and storm drain services. $39.99 for each 100 meters of drain tile.
Building and Plumbing Regulation Amendment Bylaw No. 1991, 2012 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES The fees payable for the issuance of a plumbing permit are calculated according to Table 2 below. Where work requiring a permit in accordance with this bylaw has been started without first obtaining such a permit, the plumbing permit fees as calculated according to Table 2 will be doubled. For the purposes of this bylaw, plumbing fixtures include: water closet, sink, lavatory, bathtub, shower, hot water tank, clothes washer, dish washer, floor drain, roof drain, water heater, oil and grease interceptor, sump, catch basin, backflow prevention device, vacuum breaker and any similar appliance which is connected to sanitary drain water supply or internal rain water leader. Table 2 Fixtures/Appliances: $18.45 per plumbing fixture $38.43 for each water meter $38.43 for each sewage pump $76.87 for each public swimming pool or site constructed whirlpool Alterations to Existing Piping Systems: $38.43 for each 30 meters of water, sanitary or storm drain pipe installed Minimum Fee: A minimum fee of $76.87 for all plumbing permits
OTHER PERMIT FEES Demolition Permit: $159.90 for each demolition permit. Fireplace and Chimney Permit: $76.42 for each fireplace permit. Moving Permit: $159.90 for each moving permit. Foundation Permit: $459.96 for each foundation permit. This fee in non-refundable and shall be credited against the building permit fee at the time of issuance.
Building and Plumbing Regulation Amendment Bylaw No. 1991, 2012 PLAN PROCESSING FEES The plan processing fee is non-refundable and is due in whole or in part upon application for a building permit. To Construct a New One, Two or Three Family Dwelling: $459.96 for the first dwelling unit. $230.09 for each additional dwelling unit. To Construct other than a New One, Two or Three Family Dwelling: 25% of the building permit fee. A minimum fee of $1,150.43 for multiple residential units. A minimum fee of $76.00 for other than multiple residential units.
HIGHWAY USE, CLEARING AND INSPECTION FEE Residential Buildings per Dwelling Unit: $1,500.00 for the first residential unit. $1,000.00 for each additional residential unit. Buildings or Structures other than Residential or for Improvements: Using the value of construction used to determine the building permit fee, for buildings or structures other than residential or for improvements are as follows: Table 3 Value of Construction Fee up to $50,000 in value $200.00 from $50,001 to $100,000 $500.00 from $100,001 to $500,000 $1,000.00 from $500,001 to $1,000,000 $2,000.00 each additional $1,000,000 $1,500.00
Building and Plumbing Regulation Amendment Bylaw No. 1991, 2012 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES More than two inspections are necessary where one inspection is normally required: $58.78 for each inspection after the second inspection – to be paid prior to additional inspections being performed. Required permit inspection requested to be done after normal operating hours of the RMOW: $58.78 per hour, billed by the quarter hour and including traveling time. A minimum charge of $235.14. Voluntary Inspections: $58.78 for each inspection – to be paid prior to additional inspections being performed.
MISCELLANEOUS FEES
Plan Revisions for any existing building permit application or building permit:
$58.78 per hour, billed by the quarter hour. A minimum charge of $58.78.
Equivalency Processing for any existing building permit application or building permit:
$235.14 for each equivalency.
Covenant Preparation (Land Title Office registration fee remains the responsibility of the registered owner):
$58.78 per hour, billed by the quarter hour. A minimum charge of $58.78.
Release of Microfilm:
$100.00 cash security to be deposited upon release of microfilm records of properties to the owner of the same property.
Refundable only upon return of same microfiche within 60 days of release.
Miscellaneous Services:
$58.78 per hour, billed by the quarter hour, payable upon delivery of services not otherwise mentioned in this schedule.
No minimum fee for services not otherwise mentioned in this schedule or Administrative Fees Bylaw No. 1575, 2004.
Building and Plumbing Regulation Amendment Bylaw No. 1991, 2012 SCHEDULE C
ACKOWLEDGEMENT OF OWNER OR OWNER’S AGENT
(NOTE: An agent may not apply for or obtain a building permit on behalf of an owner without having provided a written authorization by the owner, in the form provided by the Resort Municipality of Whistler for that purpose.)
I acknowledge that the owner of the land in respect of which this permit is issued is solely responsible for carrying out the work authorized by this permit in accordance with the Building Code and other applicable laws respecting safety.
I acknowledge that the Resort Municipality provides a limited monitoring service in relation to building construction and does not, by accepting or reviewing plans, inspecting construction, monitoring the inspection of construction by others, or issuing building or occupancy permits, make any representation or give any assurance that the construction authorized by this permit complies in every or any respect with the Building Code or any other applicable laws respecting safety.
If the Resort Municipality has so indicated on this permit, I acknowledge that the Resort Municipality has issued the permit in reliance on the certification of a registered professional, engaged by me to provide such a certification, that the plans for the work authorized by the permit comply with the Building Code and other applicable enactments, and that the fee for the permit has been accordingly reduced. I acknowledge that the Resort Municipality, by issuing this permit or any occupancy permit, makes no representations to me or any other person as to any such compliance.
If I am executing this acknowledgement as the agent of the owner, I represent to the Resort Municipality that: • I am authorized by the owner to receive this permit and make these acknowledgements on the owner’s behalf; and • The owner is aware that the owner is solely responsible for carrying out the work authorized by this permit in accordance with the Building Code and other applicable laws respecting safety.
Property Civic Address Permit no.
Property Legal Description
Owner or agent Name1 (please print) Owner or agent Signature
Signed this day of 2003.
1 If more than one owner, please complete page over; OR, if owner is a company, please complete page over.
Schedule C to Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002
ACKOWLEDGEMENT OF OWNER OR OWNER’S AGENT Page 2
PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IF PROPERTY HAS MORE THAN ONE OWNER:
1st Owner Name (please print) Owner Signature Signed this day of 2003.
2nd Owner Name (please print) Owner Signature Signed this day of 2003.
3rd Owner Name (please print) Owner Signature Signed this day of 2003.
4th Owner Name (please print) Owner Signature Signed this day of 2003.
5th Owner Name (please print) Owner Signature Signed this day of 2003.
PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IF THE OWNER IS A COMPANY:
Company name Limited no.
Name of signing officer (please print) Signature of signing officer Signed this day of 2003.
Name of signing officer (please print) Signature of signing officer Signed this day of 2003.
Name of signing officer (please print) Signature of signing officer Signed this day of 2003.
SCHEDULE D
SCHEDULE E
Schedule E is deleted by Building and Plumbing Regulations Amendment Bylaw No. 1991, 2012. SCHEDULE F
EXCAVATION PERMIT Pu rsuant to section 13.7 of Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002
DATE:
OWNER OR AGENT:
CIVIC ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Pursuant to section 13.7 of Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002, permission is granted to:
1. Excavate the site for building foundations/complete geotechnical work. 2. Rough-in vehicular access and off street parking. 3. SITE SERVICING.
NO FORM OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COMMENCED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED
It is understood that this Excavation Permit will be subject to full conformance with the Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 and all other bylaws and that no building official or representative of the Resort Municipality of Whistler has checked the plans and/or specifications in detail for conformance with the BC Building Code. It is understood that it is the duty of the owner to make inquiries as to such matters before commencing the works. In consideration of the granting of this Excavation Permit, I hereby agree to indemnify and release the Resort Municipality of Whistler against all claims, liabilities, judgments, costs and expenses of whatsoever kind which may in any way accrue against the said Municipality in consequence of, and incidental to, the granting of this Excavation Permit.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AGENT SIGNATURE OF BUILDING OFFICIAL
Schedule F to Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 SCHEDULE G
FOUNDATION PERMIT Pu rsuant to section 13.8 of Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002
DATE:
OWNER OR AGENT:
CIVIC ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Pursuant to section 13.8 of Building And Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002, permission is granted to construct a foundation as part of
BUILDING PERMIT NO.
As a condition of issuing this Foundation Permit, the undersigned agrees and accepts that they are proceeding entirely at their own risk.
The undersigned further agrees and accepts that Resort Municipality of Whistler in issuing this Foundation Permit is not implying or in any way representing or warranting that the plans and specifications submitted for the building permit application have been checked in detail for conformance with the applicable regulations including Whistler Zoning Bylaw #303 and the BC Building Code. It is the duty of the owner to make inquiries as to such matters before commencing the works encompassed by this permit.
In consideration of the granting of the foundation permit, I hereby agree to indemnify and release the Resort Municipality of Whistler against any and all claims, liabilities, judgments, costs and expenses of whatsoever kind which may in any way accrue against the said Municipality in consequence of, and incidental to, the granting of this Permit.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AGENT SIGNATURE OF BUILDING OFFICIAL
Schedule G to Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 SCHEDULE H Part 1
ASSURANCE OF PROFESSIONAL DESIGN AND COMMITMENT FOR FIELD REVIEW
*¤REGARDING:
Property Civic Address Permit no.
Property Legal Description
Project description I hereby give assurance that: a) the design of the plans and supporting documents prepared by me in support of the application for the building permit for the site services shown on drawing number(s) ______dated ______substantially comply with good engineering practices and other applicable enactments respecting safety except for construction safety aspects.
b) I undertake to be responsible for field reviews§ of the referenced works during construction. c) I agree to submit copies of field inspection reports and a letter of Assurance of Professional Field Review and Compliance of Site Servicing to the Resort Municipality of Whistler at the completion of the works.
d) I am a registered professional as defined in the British Columbia Building Code~.
* This form must be submitted before issuance of a building permit. ¤ In this letter words in italics have the same meaning as in the BC Building Code. § BC Building Code defines field reviews to mean those reviews of the work a) at a project site of a development to which a building permit relates, and b) where applicable, at fabrication locations where components of the works are fabricated for use at the project site. ~ The BC Building Code defines a registered professional as: a) a person who is registered or licensed to practise as an architect under the Architects Act, or b) a person who is registered or licensed to practise as a professional engineer under the Engineer’s and Geoscientists Act.
Schedule H- Part 1 to Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002
ASSURANCE OF PROFESSIONAL DESIGN Page 2 AND COMMITMENT FOR FIELD REVIEW OF SITE SERVICES
e) I also undertake to notify the authority having jurisdiction in writing as soon as possible if my contract for field review is terminated at any time during construction.
Name of registered professional Signature of registered professional
2003 Signed this day of .
(Affix PROFESSIONAL SEAL here)
CONTACT INFORMATION FOR REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
Address:
Telephone:
IF THE REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL IS A MEMBER OF A FIRM, COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING:
I am a member of the firm:
print name of firm
and sign this letter on behalf of the firm.
SCHEDULE H Part 2
ASSURANCE OF PROFESSIONAL FIELD REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE OF SITE SERVICING
*¤REGARDING:
Property Civic Address Permit no.
Property Legal Description
Project describption I hereby give assurance that: a) I have fulfilled my obligations for field review as outlined in the previously submitted “ASSURANCE OF PROFESSIONAL DESIGN AND COMMITMENT FOR FIELD REVIEW for SITE SERVICES”, and b) The components of the project substantially comply in all material respects with: i) the applicable requirements of good engineering practices and other applicable enactments respecting safety, not including construction safety aspects; and ii) the plans and supporting documents submitted in support of the application for the building permit. c) I have enclosed the final design plans and supporting documents prepared by me for this project, and d) I am a registered professional as defined in the British Columbia Building Code~.
Name of registered professional Signature of registered professional
Signed this day of 2003.
(Affix PROFESSIONAL SEAL here)
* This form must be submitted upon completion of the project. ¤ In this letter words in italics have the same meaning as in the BC Building Code. ~ The BC Building Code defines a registered professional as: c) a person who is registered or licensed to practise as an architect under the Architects Act, or d) a person who is registered or licensed to practise as a professional engineer under the Engineer’s and Geoscientists Act.
Schedule H- Part 2 to Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002
ASSURANCE OF PROFESSIONAL FIELD REVIEW Page 2 A ND COMPLIANCE OF SITE SERVICING
CONTACT INFORMATION FOR REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
Address:
Telephone:
IF THE REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL IS A MEMBER OF A FIRM, COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING:
I am a member of the firm:
print name of firm
and sign this letter on behalf of the firm.
SCHEDULE I
OCCUPANCY PERMIT – COMPLEX BUILDING
BUILDING PERMIT No.:
CIVIC ADDRESS:
OWNER:
PROJECT TITLE:
ALL WORKS ENCOMPASSED BY THE BUILDING PERMIT
(PORTION OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE)
NOTE: Where the certificate is issued for other than “all works encompassed by the building permit”, additional inspections and Occupancy Permit(s) are required.
This Occupancy Permit is issued pursuant to section 694(1) of the Local Government Act and section 18.2.1 of the Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002. This permit confirms that all letters of assurance required in accordance with sections 9.1.10, 9.1.11, 10.1.12, 10.2.4, 15.1 and 15.2 of this bylaw have been submitted to the Resort Municipality of Whistler.
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION Neither the issuance of a permit under this bylaw, the review and acceptance of the drawings, plans and specifications, nor inspections made by a building official, shall constitute a representation or warranty that the Building Code or this bylaw have been complied with or that the building or structure meet any standard of materials and workmanship, and no person shall rely on any of those acts as establishing compliance with the Building Code or this bylaw or any standard of construction.
SIGNATURE OF BUILDING OFFICIAL
SIGNED THIS DAY OF 2003.
Schedule I to Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 SCHEDULE J
OCCUPANCY PERMIT – STANDARD BUILDING
BUILDING PERMIT No.:
CIVIC ADDRESS:
OWNER:
PROJECT TITLE:
ALL WORKS ENCOMPASSED BY THE BUILDING PERMIT
(PORTION OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE)
NOTE: Where the certificate is issued for other than “all works encompassed by the building permit”, additional inspections and Occupancy Permit(s) are required.
This Occupancy Permit is issued pursuant to section 694(1) of the Local Government Act and section 18.2.1 of the Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002. This permit confirms that all aspects of the work requiring inspection and acceptance pursuant to section 17.4 of this bylaw have both been inspected and accepted or the inspections and acceptance are not required in accordance with section 17.1 of this bylaw.
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION Neither the issuance of a permit under this bylaw, the review and acceptance of the drawings, plans and specifications, nor inspections made by a building official, shall constitute a representation or warranty that the Building Code or this bylaw have been complied with or that the building or structure meet any standard of materials and workmanship, and no person shall rely on any of those acts as establishing compliance with the Building Code or this bylaw or any standard of construction.
SIGNATURE OF BUILDING OFFICIAL
SIGNED THIS DAY OF 2003.
Schedule J to Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 SCHEDULE K
FIREPLACE AND CHIMNEY PERMIT Pursuant to section 8.1.6 of Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002
DATE:
OWNER OR AGENT:
CIVIC ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Pursuant to section 8.1.6 of Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002, permission is granted to install: Masonry Fireplace and Chimney (BCBC 9.22) Factory-Built Fireplace (ULC S610) Fireplace Insert (ULC S628) Wood Stove – Space Heater for Use With Solid Fuels (CAN/ULC B366.2 / S627) 6500 Factory–Built Chimney (CAN/ULC S629) OTHER (please specify) ______In accordance with section 17.4 of Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002, the owner or his agent shall give not less than 48 hours notice, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and statutory holidays, to the municipality when requesting an inspection and shall obtain an inspection and receive a building official’s acceptance of the following aspects of the work prior to concealing it: 1) after factory built chimneys and fireplaces or solid fuel burning appliances are roughed-in; 2) after masonry chimneys and fireplaces are roughed-in when: i) the smoke chamber is complete but before the chimney is constructed; ii) the chimney is roughed-in; and iii) after the fireplace or solid fuel burning appliance is complete. DO NOT CONCEAL ANY WORK UNTIL WRITTEN APPROVAL IS RECEIVED FROM THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. INSTALLATION MANUALS MUST BE ON SITE FOR ALL INSPECTIONS OF SOLID FUEL APPLIANCES.
It is understood that this permit will be subject to full conformance with the Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 and all other bylaws and that the municipality has not checked the plans and/or specifications in detail for conformance with the Building Code. It is the duty of the owner to make inquiries as to such matters before commencing the works. In consideration of the granting of the fireplace and chimney permit, I hereby agree to indemnify and release the Resort Municipality of Whistler against all claims, liabilities, judgments, costs and expenses of whatsoever kind which may in any way accrue against the said municipality in consequence of, and incidental to, the granting of this fireplace and chimney permit.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AGENT SIGNATURE OF BUILDING OFFICIAL
Schedule K to Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002
SCHEDULE L
Schedule L to Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002
M SCHEDULE
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MEASURING UP SELECT COMMITTEE OF COUNCIL (MUSCC)
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 2, 2012 AT 3:00 P.M.
LOCATION: COMMUNITY ROOM, WHISTLER PUBLIC LIBRARY 4329 MAIN ST., WHISTLER, BC V0N 1B4
IN ATTENDANCE Members - Present Chelsey Walker, Executive Director, Whistler Adaptive Sports Program Chris Fudge, Visitor Experience, Tourism Whistler Melissa Deller, Whistler Community Services Society, SNAP Coordinator Phil Chew, Paralympic Athlete Sue Lawther, Mature Action Committee Wendy Aitken, Director Guest Services, Whistler Blackcomb
Municipal Staff Kevin Damaskie, Sustainability Coordinator & MUSCC Chair Sarah Tipler, Measuring Up Coordinator, & MUSCC Vice-Chair & Secretary Kay Chow, Resort Experience Clerk & MUSCC Recording Secretary
ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS Approval of Agenda Kevin Damaskie called the meeting to order at 3:07 p.m.
Moved by Wendy Aitken Seconded by Sue Lawther
That the MUSCC approves the meeting agenda for May 2, 2012.
CARRIED. Adoption of Minutes Moved by Phil Chew Seconded by Sue Lawther
That the minutes of the MUSCC meeting held on April 4, 2012 be adopted. CARRIED.
Committee of the Whole 1. The MUSCC presentation to the Committee of the Whole is Presentation scheduled for May 15, 2012. 2. Format and topics: 3. Sarah Tipler will present an overview; what this Committee’s about, history, evolution, programs, and accomplishments. 4. The MUSCC members will participate in the presentation and share their stories and their perspective, explain why they became involved. Show images. 5. Emphasis on accessibility, not disability. Provide definition of
May 2, 2012 RMOW Measuring Up Select Committee of Council Meeting Minutes Page 2
accessibility. 6. We want to showcase that Accessibility is for everyone. 7. Utilize ad campaigns from the series of The Whistler Way advertisements promoting accessibility. 8. Whistler was the pilot community, introduced at the World Urban Forum in 2006. 9. Recreation infrastructure legacies – show photos of Cheakamus Crossing High Performance Centre. 10. Accessibility in General – examples of some of the challenges; photo of a parent pushing a child’s stroller standing at the bottom of a set of stairs and looking up the stairs. 11. Show photos of achievements - curb cuts throughout Whistler, accessible playgrounds, Peak 2 Peak Gondola, elevator at Jeff Harbers Center, ramps, gateway entrance, accessible picnic tables located by the water at one of our parks, we could try and add audio within the PowerPoint to showcase the crosswalk audio. 12. Present work completed to date – way-finding, mapping, curb cuts. 13. Adaptive Sports action photos. 14. Show that there is no difference between a temporary injury/disability (i.e. sports injury) vs. permanent disability when facing a barrier. Accessibility challenges are accessibility challenges. 15. Terms of Reference – identifies membership, including representation that is currently missing. See if there is 1 strong statement that could be taken from the TOR? 16. Key aspect of the measuring up committee’s success is through communication and sharing of knowledge. 17. Highlight importance of not being isolated because of built barriers (think aging in place). Showcase MAC and its membership people enjoying themselves at fund raisers, group activities such as snow shoeing, paddling. 18. Present high level statistics on the demographics and an increasing aging population. 19. Collaboration with WCSS to create the SNAP role. Melissa will present this. 20. Present the big picture, from tourism perspective (TW & WB). 21. Accessible accommodations and restaurants provide greater inclusivity therefore attracting a wider clientele. As an example, restaurants could offer menus with larger font for persons with low vision. Alternately show a group with some individuals with visible disabilities all leaving the destination if they are unable to accommodate the PWD. 22. The group multiplier in 2006 was an average of 2.5 people that travel with a person with a disability, it is likely higher now. The loss of business isn't just the individual with the disability but the entire group, friends and family. 23. Provide statistics on the amount of money that persons with disability spend during their travels. Identify revenue opportunities, return on investment. 24. Council direction to encourage private business, opportunities arise when a building renovates, incorporate current accessibility standards. 25. Identify the Committee’s ongoing work, signage program, asset
May 2, 2012 RMOW Measuring Up Select Committee of Council Meeting Minutes Page 3
mapping. 26. Make an impact. Inclusion means everyone all the time whenever possible, doing anything. 27. Wrap up – extend invitation to the municipal council and thank them for their time.
Committee Membership 1. Mature Action Committee representative has approached potential candidate to represent group with cognitive disabilities and an informal invitation was extended to join this committee on a trial basis. The candidate has tentatively accepted to attend with her sister. She is just waiting for an invitation from the measuring up coordinator to attend the next meeting. 2. WASP representative will continue to act as the voice for young adults, but will continue to pursue representation by a parent. 3. Staff have contacted the Whistler Chamber of Commerce; they are currently reorganizing their Board and should be able to provide a representative in the future. 4. Staff will continue to pursue membership for representation from other sectors.
WCSS Update Melissa Deller advised on the following. (Whistler Community Services Society) 1. The WCSS moved to its new location in Spring Creek in January 2012; an open house was held in March. 2. The Whistler Blackcomb Foundation Social Services Centre houses WCSS, Zero Ceiling Society, and Howe Sound Women’s Centre Society. 3. Community Kitchens are also at this location. A grant was received from Campbell’s Soup to upgrade the kitchen to an industrial kitchen. Cooking classes are offered, with a meal afterwards; this also provides an opportunity for community members to get out and socialize. 4. 6 week Balance Yoga program; this program will offer yoga from a different perspective – introductory, stress relief, address mental health / addiction issues. 5. The green houses are back in operation and very popular with a long wait list. 6. WCSS provided free income tax filing services for those earning less than $22,000/year. Volunteers prepared and filed 150 tax returns. 7. Seniors programs offered on Thursdays. 8. June – resume walking group. 9. June 6 - family dinner night fundraiser at WCSS.
NEW BUSINESS Committee members provided updates on the following.
1. Para snowboarding will be represented in 2014 Paralympic Games in Sochi. 2. Whistler Adaptive Sports Program: Ben Thompson hired as the summer programs coordinator and coach; addition of a new Co-op student from the University of
May 2, 2012 RMOW Measuring Up Select Committee of Council Meeting Minutes Page 4
Waterloo; June 8 – Raise the Roof fundraiser. 3. 2 members coached by Phil Chew have been selected for the national Para-Alpine team. 4. The Canadian Sport Tourism Alliance conference was recently held in Richmond. Chelsey was able to provide a tour of some of the facilities in Whistler. There is potential to bring this conference to Whistler in future. 5. Whistler Chamber of Commerce will be offering a year round Spirit Program with targeted roll out in summer 2013.
ADJOURNMENT Moved by Sue Lawther Seconded by Phil Chew
That the MUSCC meeting be adjourned at 4:35 p.m. CARRIED.
CERTIFIED CORRECT:
______Kevin Damaskie, Chair Sarah Tipler, Vice-Chair & Secretary
cc: 8320.01
FILE 584
MINUTES TRANSIT MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TMAC) MEETING Thursday 7 June 2012 1:00 p.m. – 3:35 p.m. Piccolo Room – WHISTLER MUNICPAL HALL
Present Jack Crompton, RMOW Councillor – TMAC Chair Scott Pass, Citizen-at-Large Bill Murray, Citizen-at-Large Johann van Schaik, BC Transit – Regional Transit Manager, South Coast Trevor Webb, Director Transit Operations PWTransit Joe Paul, RMOW –General Manager Infrastructure Services Emma DalSanto, RMOW – TDM Coordinator
Guests Steve Antil, Service Delivery Manager, Whistler Transit Ltd. Emily Watson, BC Transit – Manager Transit Planning
APPROVAL OF AGENDA Moved by Scott Pass, Seconded by Bill Murray That TMAC approve of the TMAC agenda of June 7, 2012 as amended to include: Three information updates (BC Transit Connections Newsletter, BC Transit web site update, BC Transit Customer Satisfaction Tracking Research Annual Report 2011-2012) under “Other Business”
CARRIED ADOPTION OF MINUTES Moved by Bill Murray, Seconded by Scott Pass That TMAC adopt the Transit Management Advisory Committee meeting minutes of March 21, 2012.
CARRIED 2012/2013 Whistler Transit System AOA The committee reviewed the revised 2012/2013 AOA Schedule F – Service Standard Measures as circulated with the agenda package. BC Transit and RMOW staff have worked through the outstanding items listed in the March 19, 2012 memo to TMAC discussed at the March 21, 2012 TMAC meeting. Budget numbers presented in the 2012/2013 AOA fit within the 2012 municipal transit budget adopted by Council. There was agreement that, subject to budgetary restrictions, the AOA permits flexibility to adjust allocation of the specified service hours, to other seasons than currently detailed. The 2012/2013 AOA also has house-keeping updates to the Master Operating Agreement related to insurance coverage. TMAC reviewed the draft report to Council scheduled for July 3, 2012. The report will need to include the actual recommendations resulting from the review and discussion of the next agenda item.
Moved by Scott Pass, Seconded by Bill Murray THAT TMAC recommends Council endorse Schedule F of the AOA subject to the following two changes. 1) In section 1.c, move “Fare” to the middle column
Minutes of TMAC Meeting –7 June 2012 Page 2 of 3
2) In section 1.d “Passenger pass-ups” reads: “to be evaluated annually in terms of the percentage of trips with pass-ups as well as the average number of passengers that were passed up by route and time. CARRIED
ACTION 1: RMOW staff will update the draft report reflecting the discussions from TMAC and decisions regarding changes to the route structure for winter 2012/2013.
Whistler Transit Service Review Implementation – April Workshop Follow-up
Emily Watson, BC Transit’s Manger Transit Planning walked TMAC through BC Transit’s standard process and timelines for service reviews, expansions and implementation of service changes. As Whistler just completed a transit service review in 2011 the key focus of the presentation was the process and timelines needed for implementation of service changes as well as introducing the concept of the Memorandum of Understanding.
Joe Paul joined the meeting at 2:20pm
TMAC reviewed the memo prepared by BC Transit staff summarizing the results of the implementation of recommendations from the 2011 Whistler Transit Service Review with a focus on lessons learned from winter 2011/2012. The key findings were: o The overall system performance demonstrates the goal of improving efficiency and reducing costs was achieved. While overall ridership dropped 11%, revenue only dropped 7% and rides per service hour increase 5% from 41 to 43. o Route by route, day of week and time of day analysis showed that there are minor changes to the route structure and service levels that should be considered. The memo had many recommendations to review. A long discussion ensued related to the various options available for transit to serve the Tapley’s, Blueberry and Alta Vista neighbourhoods for winter 2012/2013. TMAC felt they need more time to fully explore all options and recommendations presented in the memo. There is concern about the riders guide layout. The presentation of information is not clear and/or user friendly.
ACTION 2: BC Transit will work with RMOW staff and the operator to produce a Service Change Memorandum focused on the free shuttles (routes #4, #5, and #8). It should look at current service hours provided, recommended service expansions to the free shuttles and new costs.
ACTION 3: TMAC agrees to reconvene in early July to complete the discussion and finalize service decisions on recommended changes for winter 2012/2013.
Moved by Scott Pass and Seconded by Bill Murray That TMAC recommends that Council directs staff to work with BC Transit to accomplish the following route structure and service modifications with the 2012/2013 Whistler Transit System AOA budget presented to TMAC on June 7, 2012: 1. Revert the #6-Tapley’s Connector route structure to a loop through the Blueberry neighbourhood.
Minutes of TMAC Meeting –7 June 2012 Page 3 of 3
2. Allocate extra service hours currently in the 2012/2013 Whistler Transit System AOA to provide more service for the US Thanksgiving weekend; and 3. Allocate extra service hours currently in the 2012/2013 Whistler Transit System AOA to bring forward the Early Winter start date from Thursday, November 22 to Saturday, November 17, 2012.
CARRIED Alta Lake Road Transit Service Discussion TMAC deferred this item to the July meeting.
Whistler Transit Facility Commercial Services Business Case Update The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure has granted BC Transit an Order in Council to proceed with developing a business plan to allow non-BC Transit (third party) vehicles to use the Whistler Transit Facility under a fee-for-service model. The RMOW will require a rezoning of the property before any third party vehicles can use the Whistler Transit Facility. This is a requirement even for parking thirds party vehicles on site. As part of the rezoning, the RMOW will require that BC Transit update the business case report based on the comments from TMAC.
ACTION 4: RMOW staff will re-send BC Transit TMACs comments from the March 21, 2012 TMAC meeting as well as any additional comment to be collected by June 13, 2012
Other Business TMAC deferred the Action Item update and the Whistler Transit Facility Lighting update to the July meeting.
ACTION 5: RMOW staff will circulate the BC Transit Connections Newsletter, BC Transit web site update press release and the link to the BC Transit Customer Satisfaction Tracking Research Annual Report 2011- 2012 to TMAC by e-mail.
Next meeting will be set for July 4, 2012 to complete the June 7, 2012 agenda. TMAC members will submit new items for the July 4, 2012 agenda by June 13, 2012 TMAC has requested that the next meeting be scheduled for four hours with a break to allow for time to complete the agenda.
Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 3:35pm.
CERTIFIED CORRECT
______Jack Crompton Chair, TMAC
Minutes prepared by: Emma DalSanto, TDM Planner, RMOW
FILE 584
MINUTES TRANSIT MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TMAC) MEETING Wednesday 4 July 2012 12:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Piccolo Room – WHISTLER MUNICPAL HALL
Present Jack Crompton, RMOW Councillor – TMAC Chair Scott Pass, Citizen-at-Large Bill Murray, Citizen-at-Large Johann van Schaik, BC Transit – Regional Transit Manager, South Coast – by phone Trevor Webb, PWTransit, Director Transit Operations Southern Region Joe Paul, RMOW – General Manager Infrastructure Services Emma DalSanto, RMOW – TDM Coordinator
Guests Steve Antil, Whistler Transit Ltd. – Service Delivery Manager Emily Watson, BC Transit – Manager Transit Planning – by phone Gerald Chang, BC Transit – Manager Sales and Revenue – by phone
APPROVAL OF AGENDA Moved by Scott Pass, Seconded by Bill Murray That TMAC approve of the TMAC agenda of July 4, 2012 as circulated.
CARRIED
ADOPTION OF MINUTES Moved by Bill Murray, Seconded by Scott Pass That TMAC adopt the Transit Management Advisory Committee meeting minutes of June 7, 2012 as circulated with the agenda package and deleting the proposed resolution regarding the rider’s guide as it will be discussed as part of the July 4, 2012 meeting item 9 – Marketing.
CARRIED Whistler Transit Service Review Implementation – continued from June 7, 2012
Emily Watson, BC Transit’s Manger Transit Planning reviewed the recommendations in the June 7, 2012 TMAC Planning Update report and presented additional information with respect to the free Village Shuttles BC Transit clarified that it would continue to build recovery time at Gondola Transit Exchange on Route #1 for winter 2012/2013 as is currently being done in the spring/summer/fall 2012 schedule as well as adjusting run times of routes which is estimated to require up to 600 unallocated Extra Service hours from the exiting 2012/2013 AOA. BC Transit also stated that based on discussions at the June 7, 2012 TMAC meeting, it will be streamlining Route 1 and Route 2 termini locations whilst still maintaining existing service levels to Cheakamus Crossing and Function Junction. Spring Creek, Tamarisk and Alta Vista diversions will be added to the route that is most logical and efficient from a scheduling perspective and then from a passenger perspective. It was noted that the resort tends to be at Christmas capacity for the last two weeks of February. It was suggested by committee members that extra Village Shuttle service may be needed during this period in the future. Minutes of TMAC Meeting –4 July 2012 Page 2 of 5
There was a suggestion to discuss and specify peak holiday periods that may require service top-ups, at a future meeting.
ACTION 1: THAT RMOW staff receive and review resort occupancy reports for winter 2012/2013 and make BC Transit and the operator aware of upcoming busy periods so that the operator can be prepared to add Extra Service and so that monitoring can be done to assist with planning for winter 2013/2014.
ACTION 2: THAT RMOW, BC Transit and Whistler Transit Ltd staff calculate the 2012/2013 free Village Shuttles hours (routes 4, 5 and 8) and cost to determine if the existing $966,000 Hotel Tax allocated to the Transit Budget will allow cover expanded service and how much expanded service by the August TMAC meeting.
After detailed discussions, the following resolutions were passed:
Moved by Scott Pass, Seconded by Jack Crompton THAT TMAC endorses continuing with original plan to expand winter weekend service levels to Fridays and stat holiday Mondays by allocating Extra Service hours from within existing AOA envelop of hours subject to final calculations of existing Hotel Tax funding allocated to transit. CARRIED
Moved by Bill Murray, Seconded by Joe Paul THAT TMAC requests the RMOW engage with community (especially hotel sector) on Route 4 and 5 transit service. CARRIED
Moved by Bill Murray, Seconded by Joe Paul THAT TMAC endorses an improved manual monitoring program be set up for winter 2012/13 to more accurately determine Mon-Thurs ridership/pass-ups and Friday-Sunday ridership/pass-ups with a special focus on routes 4 and 5. CARRIED
Moved by Scott Pass, Seconded by Bill Murray THAT TMAC endorses allocating an additional four hours of Extra Service hours from within the 2012/2013 AOA for evening service between 1:00 and 3:00 a.m. during peak winter to deal with operational issues. CARRIED
A short break was called at 1:55 PM.
The meeting resumed at 2:05 PM.
Moved by Scott Pass, Seconded by Bill Murray Whereas, the Tapley’s Connector bus will loop through Blueberry for winter 2012/2013; THAT TMAC endorses providing morning peak period northbound only service into Alta Vista for winter 2012/2013; and THAT usage of this AM service be monitored to see if it should be eliminated for winter 2013/2014. CARRIED
Minutes of TMAC Meeting –4 July 2012 Page 3 of 5
Alta Lake Road Transit Service Discussion BC Transit outlined the BC Transit Taxi Supplement program. • Intent of Taxi Supplement is to support established custom transit systems in communities by providing taxi service to registered handyDART users when handyDART service is at capacity (e.g. peak travel times) • These taxi services are dispatched by the local operating company. • Whistler does not have a custom transit system with registered handyDART users • This would set a precedent for taxi service in other neighbourhoods in Whistler where transit service is limited and/or not available. • At this time the actual demand for this service is minimal, and in consideration of other priorities, there is not sufficient funding available for this service. • A Taxi Supplement program would require new funding to the transit program It was also noted that BC Transit is updating its guidelines for introducing service to neighbourhoods.
Moved by Scott Pass, Seconded by Jack Crompton THAT RMOW staff reply to the February 1, 2012 letter stating that TMAC examined the request and the possibility of a Taxi Supplement program, however TMAC does not endorse restoring service to Alta Lake Road at this time. CARRIED
Update on BC Transit’s Ridership Monitoring Program • BC Transit is working with operating company to ensure that GFI farebox ridership data is as accurate as possible • Supplementing GFI data with manual passenger counts where required and where feasible • BC Transit is trialing a technique of equipping buses with GPS equipment linked to GFI data. The result, if successful, will be a system that can monitor and report on passenger boardings by transit stop
Emily Watson left the meeting and Gerald Chang joined the meeting at 2:20pm.
Whistler Transit Facility Commercial Services Business Case Update BC Transit thanked TMAC for the comments on Business Case and provided an update Some questions raised at previous meetings were answered, others remain outstanding BC Transit has indicated that the proposed operational plan is using a crawl, walk, run approach o Phase 1 of the implementation would be providing parking only o Prospective customer has been identified and confirmed interest in renting six covered parking stalls at the proposed market rates starting on September 1, 2012 o BC Transit has confirmed that there are no material cost/issues with extending the insurance to accommodate the parking of third party vehicles on the site o Potential net revenue for parking is approximately $33,000 a year
Moved by Scott Pass, Seconded by Bill Murray THAT TMAC recommends that staff not proceed to Council with the rezoning to allow third party parking and other bus activities until all the information requests that were forwarded to BC Transit in the letter dated June 14, 2012 are satisfactorily provided. CARRIED
Gerald Chang left the meeting at 2:50pm. Minutes of TMAC Meeting –4 July 2012 Page 4 of 5
Action Item Update from Minutes of the January 16, March 21, and June 7, 2012 TMAC meeting In the interest of time, only outstanding action items were reviewed Only Action 5 from the January 16, 2012 meeting remains outstanding
Whistler Transit Facility Lighting Update BC Transit has had their consultant looked at the lighting at the facility in light of complaints from neighbours The consultant has recommended that shades be placed on 8 lamp standards closest to the highway. The cost is minimal at approximately $200 per lamp which can be accommodated in the 2012/2013 AOA budget. BC Transit will be organizing installation
Whistler Transit Marketing At the June 7, 2012 meeting, TMAC raised concerns about the Whistler riders guide layout. TMAC would like to see the information presented more by neighbourhood. For example, those living north of the Village should have consolidated #1 and #3 schedules and those living south of the Village should have consolidated #1 and #2 schedules.
Moved by Scott Pass, Seconded by Jack Crompton In consideration that the majority of WAVE riders are travelling to/from Whistler Village, TMAC recommends that BC Transit develop a more user-friendly riders guide format, that presents route/time/destination information more effectively for the transit systems riders, utilizing a north/south of Whistler village format. CARRIED
TMAC discussed the Valley Connector name and routing. TMAC was reminded of the Transit Service Review process that resulted in the Valley Connector. Major changes to the Valley Connector route structure, such as splitting it, would require a service review process. TMAC reviewed the proposed revised signs for Bay 2, Bay 3 and Bay 6 at Gondola Transit Exchange based on the modifications to the route structure that have been recommended by TMAC. TMAC agreed that some sort of notation should be used to show limited service to Emerald, Tamarisk, Spring Creek and Function Junction.
Other Business Councilor Crompton has received a proposal from a Whistler citizen on an alternate vision for transit in Whistler ACTION 3: The citizen proposal will be added to the next TMAC agenda and written proposal will be circulated with the agenda package.
TMAC reviewed the role of TMAC and which types of decisions would need to be elevated to Council in a report with a resolution and which types of decisions are strictly operational and can be implemented without requiring a Council resolution.
Real Time GPS Data from transit vehicles ACTION 4: TMAC requested that, within the next six months, BC Transit and the operator update TMAC on the opportunities and limitations to making real-time in-service bus GPS data available for public use.
Minutes of TMAC Meeting –4 July 2012 Page 5 of 5
Johann van Schaik left the meeting at 4:00pm.
Facility Comparison Spreadsheet ACTION 5: RMOW staff will update the categories in the Facility Comparison Spreadsheet based on the comments received from TMAC and send it to BC Transit requesting that it be filled in.
ACTION 6: RMOW staff will set the next TMAC meeting for early August, preferable August 7, 2012 from 1 to 3pm.
Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 4:10pm.
CERTIFIED CORRECT
______Jack Crompton Chair, TMAC
Minutes prepared by: Emma DalSanto, TDM Planner, RMOW RESORT MUNICIPALITY OF WHISTLER
ZONING AMENDMENT BYLAW (INDUSTRIAL SERVICE SIX ZONE) NO. 2005, 2012
A BYLAW TO AMEND THE RESORT MUNICIPALITY OF WHISTLER ZONING AND PARKING BYLAW NO. 303, 1983.
WHEREAS Council may, in a zoning bylaw pursuant to Sections 903, 904 and 906 of the Local Government Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323, divide all or part of the area of the Municipality into zones, name each zone and establish the boundaries of the zone, regulate the use of land, buildings and structures within the zones, require the provision of parking spaces and loading spaces for uses, buildings and structures, and establish different density regulations for a zone, one applicable to the zone generally and the other to apply if conditions are met;
NOW THEREFORE the Municipal Council of the Resort Municipality of Whistler, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012”
2. Zoning and Parking Bylaw No. 303, 1983 is amended by:
(a) adding “IS6” to Section 7 under the heading, “Zones” after “ILR” and adding under the heading, “Industrial Zones”, the following:
“Industrial Service Six (Bylaw No. 2005, 2012)”.
(b) amending Schedule “A” Zoning Map by changing the zoning designation of the lands described as a portion of Lot A District Lots 4120, 5624, 7863, and 7979, Plan BCP8757, Group 1 NWD to IS6 (Industrial Service Six) as shown in heavy black outline and identified on the plan annexed to this Bylaw as Schedule 1.
(c) adding to Section 9 in numerical order the IS6 Zone as annexed to this Bylaw as Schedule “2”.
(d) by amending Section 23, Schedule “A”, “Legend of Zones”, by adding under the heading, “Industrial Zones” the following in appropriate order:
“Service Six (IS6)”.
Given first and second reading this __ day of ______, ___.
Pursuant to Section 890 of the Local Government Act, a Public Hearing was held this __ day of ______, ___.
Given third reading this __ day of ______, ___.
Approved by the Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure this __ day of ______, ___.
Adopted by the Council this __ day of ______, ___.
Nancy Wilhelm-Morden Lonny Miller Mayor Corporate Officer
“Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012”
I HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a true copy of “Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012”
Lonny Miller, Corporate Officer
“Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012”
SCHEDULE 1
Subject Lands
Subject Lands
“Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012”
“Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Industrial Service Six Zone) No. 2005, 2012”
SCHEDULE 2
IS6 Zone (Industrial Service Six)
15 In an IS6 Zone:
15.1 All the regulations of the IS1 Zone apply with the addition of the following regulations:
(a) Grocery store shall also be a permitted use.
(b) The maximum permitted gross floor area of a grocery store shall be 300 square metres.
RESORT MUNICIPALITY OF WHISTLER
BUILDIING AND PLUMBING REGULATION AMENDMENT BYLAW No. 2007, 2012
A bylaw to amend Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002
WHEREAS the Community Charter authorizes the Resort Municipality of Whistler to regulate, prohibit and impose requirements in relation to buildings and other structures, and in so doing to provide for a system of licenses, permits or approvals;
AND WHEREAS the Council has amended the Zoning Bylaw to provide for the exclusion of certain building floor areas from the calculation of gross floor area, and the Council wishes to provide for the issuance of building occupancy permits in respect of building floor areas that were constructed without inspection prior to the amendment of the Zoning Bylaw;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Resort Municipality of Whistler, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
TITLE
1. This Bylaw may be cited as “Building and Plumbing Regulation Amendment Bylaw No. 2007, 2012”.
AMENDMENTS
2. Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 is amended by adding the following as Section 18.4 and by adding the form of occupancy permit attached to this bylaw as Schedule N:
18.4 A building official may issue an occupancy permit in the form of Schedule N in the following circumstances: 18.4.1 the occupancy permit is issued in respect of an existing building for the purpose of authorizing the occupancy of existing floor areas that are excluded from the calculation of gross floor area as a consequence of the enactment of Zoning Amendment Bylaw (Gross Floor Area Exclusions) No. 1992, 2012; 18.4.2 the building complies with all applicable provisions of the Zoning Bylaw including without limitation all provisions in respect of gross floor area or is lawfully non- conforming in respect of such provisions; and 18.4.3 it is not possible for the building official to inspect the building in its entirety for compliance with the Building Code as a result of construction not having been inspected during the course of construction.
READ A FIRST TIME this ___ day of ______, ____.
READ A SECOND TIME this ___ day of ______, ____.
READ A THIRD TIME this ___ day of ______, ____.
ADOPTED this ___ day of ______, ____.
Nancy Wilhelm-Morden Lonny Miller Mayor Corporate Office
SCHEDULE N
OCCUPANCY PERMIT – LIMITED BUILDING INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT No.:______DATE: ______
CIVIC ADDRESS: ______
OWNER: ______
PROJECT TITLE: ______
This Occupancy Permit is issued pursuant to section 18.4 of the Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 as amended. The permit confirms that the work authorized by the building permit complies with the Resort Municipality of Whistler Zoning Bylaw in respect of the floor area, siting and use of the building. The building contains construction that was undertaken without municipal permits or in contravention of municipal permits, or that was not inspected in accordance with the Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw, and that cannot be so inspected without damaging the building.
The issuance of this permit does not constitute a representation or warranty that the owner or builder has complied with the Building Code or Resort Municipality of Whistler Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw No. 1617, 2002 or that the building or structure meets any standard of materials and workmanship. Only the inspections checked on the second page of this permit have been conducted. No person may rely on this permit as establishing compliance with the Building Code, the Building and Plumbing Regulation Bylaw or any standard of construction.
______BUILDING OFFICIAL
______SIGNATURE OF BUILDING OFFICIAL
SEE OVER
SAFTEY INSPECTIONS
BUILDING OFFICIAL MUST INDICATE INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED ()
N/A ACCEPTED Conformance with approved Building Permit drawings Smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors – BCBC 9.10.18 & 9.32.4.2 Fire separations for secondary suite – BCBC 9.36.2.16 Ceiling heights – BCBC 9.5.3 Bedroom window egress – BCBC 9.7.1.2 Ventilation of rooms and spaces – BCBC 9.32 Stair rise and run – BCBC 9.8. Guards – BCBC 9.8 Handrails – BCBC 9.8 Structural upgrades – BCBC Part 4 Visual components of the plumbing system – BCBC Part 7 Gas Notification of Completion – BC Safety Authority Electrical Notification of Completion - BC Safety Authority
______
______
______
______
______
______
2
RESORT MUNICIPALITY OF WHISTLER ZONING AMENDMENT BYLAW (2188 NORDIC DRIVE) NO. 1994, 2012
A BYLAW TO AMEND THE RESORT MUNICIPALITY OF WHISTLER ZONING AND PARKING BYLAW NO. 303, 1983.
WHEREAS Council may, in a zoning bylaw pursuant to Sections 903, 904 and 906 of the Local Government Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323, divide all or part of the area of the Municipality into zones, name each zone and establish the boundaries of the zone, regulate the use of land, buildings and structures within the zones, require the provision of parking spaces and loading spaces for uses, buildings and structures, and establish different density regulations for a zone, one applicable to the zone generally and the other to apply if conditions are met;
NOW THEREFORE the Municipal Council of the Resort Municipality of Whistler, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Zoning Amendment Bylaw (2188 Nordic Drive) No. 1994, 2012”
2. Zoning and Parking Bylaw No. 303, 1983 is amended by:
(a) adding “RM68” to Section 7 under the heading, “R Zones” after “RM65” and adding under the heading, “Residential Zones”, the following:
“Residential Multiple Sixty-Eight (Bylaw No. 1994, 2012)”.
(b) amending Schedule “A” Zoning Map by changing the zoning designation of the lands described as Lot 2, District Lots 4979, 7179, and 7765, Plan LMP 16203 to RM68 (Residential Multiple Sixty-Eight) as shown in heavy black outline and identified on the plan annexed to this Bylaw as Schedule 1.
(c) adding to Section 12 in numerical order the RM68 Zone as annexed to this Bylaw as Schedule “2”.
(d) by amending Section 23, Schedule “A”, “Legend of Zones”, by adding under the heading, “Residential Zones” the following in appropriate order:
“Multiple Sixty-Eight (RM68)”.
Given first and second reading this 3rd day of July, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 890 of the Local Government Act, a Public Hearing was held this __ day of ______, ____.
Given third reading this __ day of ______, ____.
Approved by the Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure this __ day of ______, ____.
Adopted by the Council this __ day of ______, ____.
______Nancy Wilhelm-Morden, Lonny Miller, Mayor Corporate Officer Zoning Amendment Bylaw (2188 Nordic Drive) No. 1994, 2012
I HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a true copy of “Zoning Amendment Bylaw (2188 Nordic Drive) No. 1994, 2012”
Lonny Miller, Corporate Officer
Zoning Amendment Bylaw (2188 Nordic Drive) No. 1994, 2012
SCHEDULE 1
“Subject Lands”
“Zoning Amendment Bylaw (2188 Nordic Drive) No. 1994, 2012” Zoning Amendment Bylaw (2188 Nordic Drive) No. 1994, 2012
SCHEDULE 2
RM68 Zone (Residential Multiple Sixty- Eight) (Bylaw No. 1994)
Intent
The intent of this zone is to provide for low density, slope-responsive residential use.
68 In an RM68 Zone:
Permitted Uses
68.1 The following uses are permitted and all other uses are prohibited:
(a) auxiliary buildings and auxiliary uses;
(b) park and playground;
(c) detached dwelling;
(d) duplex dwelling; and
(e) townhouse.
Density
68.2.1 The maximum permitted floor space ratio is 0.25.
68.2.2 Notwithstanding section 68.2.1, the maximum permitted gross floor area of a detached dwelling is 465 square metres.
68.2.3 Notwithstanding section 68.2.1, the maximum permitted gross floor area of a duplex dwelling is 511 square metres.
68.2.4 The maximum permitted floor area for auxiliary parking use of a detached dwelling contained in a principal or auxiliary building or structure is 90 square metres.
68.2.5 The maximum permitted floor area for auxiliary parking use of a duplex dwelling contained in a principal or auxiliary building or structure is 90 square metres per dwelling unit.
68.2.6 The maximum permitted floor area for auxiliary parking use of a townhouse dwelling contained in a principal or auxiliary building or structure is 40 square metres per dwelling unit.
Height
68.3.1 The maximum permitted height of a principal building is 10.7 metres.
68.3.2 The maximum permitted height of an auxiliary building is 5 metres.
Parcel Size
68.4.1 The minimum permitted parcel area is 0.34 hectares. Zoning Amendment Bylaw (2188 Nordic Drive) No. 1994, 2012
68.4.2 The minimum permitted frontage is 85 metres.
Site Coverage
68.5 The maximum permitted site coverage is 20%.
Setbacks
68.6.1 The minimum permitted setback from any parcel boundary is 7.6 metres.
68.6.2 The minimum permitted separation between principal use buildings is 6 metres.
Off-Street Parking and Loading
68.7 Off-street parking and loading shall be provided and maintained in accordance with regulations contained in Section 6 of this Bylaw.
Other Regulations
68.8.1 The minimum permitted gross floor area of a dwelling unit is 55 square metres.
68.8.2 The maximum permitted number of bedrooms in a dwelling unit is 4.
68.8.3 Auxiliary residential dwelling units are prohibited.
RESORT MUNICIPALITY OF WHISTLER
HOUSING AGREEMENT BYLAW (1060 LEGACY WAY) NO. 2004, 2012
A Bylaw to authorize the amendment of housing agreements
The Council of the Resort Municipality of Whistler, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This bylaw may be cited as “Housing Agreement Bylaw (1060 Legacy Way) No. 2004, 2012".
2. The Resort Municipality may modify housing agreements with the Whistler Housing Authority in respect of the strata lots and common property identified in the Schedule to the Land Title Office Form C attached to and forming part of this bylaw as Schedule A, and the Mayor and Corporate Officer are authorized to execute such documents as are required to effect the modification of the housing agreements.
3. The terms of the modified housing agreements authorized by Section 1 shall be the Standard Charge Terms filed in the Land Title Office under number ST080100, as modified by Schedule A.
Given first reading this 19th day of June, 2012.
Given second reading this 19th day of June, 2012.
Given third reading this 19th day of June, 2012.
Adopted by the Council this __ day of ______, ____.
Nancy Wilhelm-Morden, Lonny Miller, Mayor Corporate Officer
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Housing Agreement Bylaw (1060 Legacy Way) No. 2004, 2012.
Lonny Miller, Corporate Officer
LAND TITLE ACT FORM C
(Section 233) Province of British Columbia
GENERAL INSTRUMENT-PART 1 (This area for Land Title Office use) Page 1 of 13 Pages
1. APPLICATION: (Name, address, phone number and signature of applicant, applicant's solicitor or agent)
Sharon Fugman Resort Municipality of Whistler 4325 Blackcomb Way Sharon Fugman Whistler, BC V0N 1B4 Phone: 604-932-5535
2. PARCEL IDENTIFIER(S) AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION(S) OF LAND:*
(PID) (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) See Schedule
3. NATURE OF INTEREST:* Description Document Reference Person Entitled to Interest (page and paragraph)
See Schedule
4. TERMS: Part 2 of this instrument consists of (select one only)
(a) Filed Standard Charge Terms __ D.F. No. ST080100 (b) Express Charge Terms __ Annexed as Part 2 (c) Release _ _ There is no Part 2 of this Instrument. A selection of (a) include any additional or modified terms referred to in Item 7 or in a schedule annexed to this instrument. If (c) is selected, the charge described in Item 3 is released or discharged as a charge on the land described in Item 2.
5. TRANSFEROR(S):*
WHISTLER HOUSING AUTHORITY LTD. (Inc. No. BC0810519) [as to Section 219 Covenant (Housing Agreement), Rent Charge and Section 219 Covenant] PROVINCIAL RENTAL HOUSING CORPORATION [as to priority]
6. TRANSFEREE(S): (including postal address(es) and postal code(s))*
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, represented by the Minister of Forests Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Parliament Buildings, Victoria, B.C. V8V 1X4
RESORT MUNICIPALITY OF WHISTLER, 4325 Blackcomb Way, Whistler, B.C. V0N 1B4
LAND TITLE ACT FORM C
(Section 233) Province of British Columbia
GENERAL INSTRUMENT-PART 1 Page 2 of 13 Pages
7. ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED TERMS:*
N/A
8. EXECUTION(S):**This instrument creates, assigns, modifies, enlarges, discharges or governs the priority of the interest(s) described in Item 3 and the Transferor(s) and every other signatory agree to be bound by this instrument, and acknowledge(s) receipt of a true copy of the filed standard charge terms, if any.
Officer Signature Execution Date Transferor Signature Y M D
WHISTLER HOUSING AUTHORITY 2012 ______LTD. by its authorized signatory(ies): Name of Officer
Name: MARLA ZUCHT
OFFICER CERTIFICATION: Your signature constitutes a representation that you are a solicitor, notary public or other person authorized by the Evidence Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.124, to take affidavits for use in British Columbia and certifies the matters set out in Part 5 of the Land Title Act as they pertain to the execution of this instrument. * If space insufficient, enter "SEE SCHEDULE" and attach schedule in Form E. ** If space insufficient, continue executions on additional page(s) in Form D.
LAND TITLE ACT FORM D
EXECUTIONS CONTINUED Page 3 of 13 Pages
8. EXECUTION(S):**This instrument creates, assigns, modifies, enlarges, discharges or governs the priority of the interest(s) described in Item 3 and the Transferor(s) and every other signatory agree to be bound by this instrument, and acknowledge(s) receipt of a true copy of the filed standard charge terms, if any.
Officer Signature Execution Date Transferee Signature Y M D
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN
2012 ______RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF Name of Officer BRITISH COLUMBIA, represented by Minister of Forests Lands and Natural Resource Operations by his or her authorized representative:
Name:
Title:
OFFICER CERTIFICATION: Your signature constitutes a representation that you are a solicitor, notary public or other person authorized by the Evidence Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.124, to take affidavits for use in British Columbia and certifies the matters set out in Part 5 of the Land Title Act as they pertain to the execution of this instrument. * If space insufficient, enter "SEE SCHEDULE" and attach schedule in Form E. ** If space insufficient, continue executions on additional page(s) in Form D.
LAND TITLE ACT FORM D
EXECUTIONS CONTINUED Page 4 of 13 Pages
8. EXECUTION(S):**This instrument creates, assigns, modifies, enlarges, discharges or governs the priority of the interest(s) described in Item 3 and the Transferor(s) and every other signatory agree to be bound by this instrument, and acknowledge(s) receipt of a true copy of the filed standard charge terms, if any.
Officer Signature Execution Date Transferee Signature Y M D
RESORT MUNICIPALITY OF WHISTLER by its authorized 2012 ______signatory(ies): Name of Officer
Mayor: Nancy Wilhelm-Morden
(as to both signatures) Corporate: Officer: Lonny Miller
PROVINCIAL RENTAL HOUSING 2012 ______CORPORATION by its authorized Name of Officer signatory(ies):
(as to both signatures)
OFFICER CERTIFICATION: Your signature constitutes a representation that you are a solicitor, notary public or other person authorized by the Evidence Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.124, to take affidavits for use in British Columbia and certifies the matters set out in Part 5 of the Land Title Act as they pertain to the execution of this instrument. * If space insufficient, enter "SEE SCHEDULE" and attach schedule in Form E. ** If space insufficient, continue executions on additional page(s) in Form D.
LAND TITLE ACT Form E
SCHEDULE Page 5 of 13 Pages ______Enter the required information in the same order as the information must appear on the Freehold Transfer Form, Mortgage Form or General Document Form.
2. PARCEL IDENTIFIER(S) AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION(S) OF LAND:*
(PID) (LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
028-308-301 Strata Lot 1 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-310 Strata Lot 2 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-328 Strata Lot 3 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-336 Strata Lot 4 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-344 Strata Lot 5 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-352 Strata Lot 6 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-361 Strata Lot 7 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-379 Strata Lot 8 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-387 Strata Lot 9 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
LAND TITLE ACT Form E
SCHEDULE Page 6 of 13 Pages ______Enter the required information in the same order as the information must appear on the Freehold Transfer Form, Mortgage Form or General Document Form.
(PID) (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) 028-308-395 Strata Lot 10 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-409 Strata Lot 11 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-417 Strata Lot 12 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-425 Strata Lot 13 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-433 Strata Lot 14 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-441 Strata Lot 15 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-450 Strata Lot 16 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-468 Strata Lot 17 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-476 Strata Lot 18 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
LAND TITLE ACT Form E
SCHEDULE Page 7 of 13 Pages ______Enter the required information in the same order as the information must appear on the Freehold Transfer Form, Mortgage Form or General Document Form.
(PID) (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) 028-308-484 Strata Lot 19 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-492 Strata Lot 20 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-506 Strata Lot 21 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-514 Strata Lot 22 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-522 Strata Lot 23 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-531 Strata Lot 24 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-549 Strata Lot 25 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-557 Strata Lot 26 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-565 Strata Lot 27 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
LAND TITLE ACT Form E
SCHEDULE Page 8 of 13 Pages ______Enter the required information in the same order as the information must appear on the Freehold Transfer Form, Mortgage Form or General Document Form.
(PID) (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) 028-308-573 Strata Lot 28 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-581 Strata Lot 29 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-590 Strata Lot 30 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-603 Strata Lot 31 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-611 Strata Lot 32 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-620 Strata Lot 33 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-638 Strata Lot 34 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-646 Strata Lot 35 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-654 Strata Lot 36 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
LAND TITLE ACT Form E
SCHEDULE Page 9 of 13 Pages ______Enter the required information in the same order as the information must appear on the Freehold Transfer Form, Mortgage Form or General Document Form.
(PID) (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) 028-308-662 Strata Lot 37 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-671 Strata Lot 38 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-689 Strata Lot 39 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-697 Strata Lot 40 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-701 Strata Lot 41 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-719 Strata Lot 42 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-727 Strata Lot 43 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-735 Strata Lot 44 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-743 Strata Lot 45 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
LAND TITLE ACT Form E
SCHEDULE Page 10 of 13 Pages ______Enter the required information in the same order as the information must appear on the Freehold Transfer Form, Mortgage Form or General Document Form.
(PID) (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) 028-308-751 Strata Lot 46 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-760 Strata Lot 47 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-778 Strata Lot 48 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-786 Strata Lot 49 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-794 Strata Lot 50 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-808 Strata Lot 51 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-816 Strata Lot 52 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-824 Strata Lot 53 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
028-308-832 Strata Lot 54 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
LAND TITLE ACT Form E
SCHEDULE Page 11 of 13 Pages ______Enter the required information in the same order as the information must appear on the Freehold Transfer Form, Mortgage Form or General Document Form.
(PID) (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) 028-308-841 Strata Lot 55 District Lot 8073 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan EPS37 and an undivided 34/5885 share in Lot 9 Plan EPP277 (See Plan EPP277 as to Limited Access)
No PID Common Property, Strata Plan EPS37
3. NATURE OF INTEREST:* Description Document Reference Person Entitled to Interest (page and paragraph) Section 219 Covenant Entire Instrument except Transferee (Resort Municipality of (Housing Agreement) Sections 22, 23 and 46 Whistler)
Rent Charge Sections 22 and 23 Transferee (Resort Municipality of Whistler)
Section 219 Covenant Section 46 Transferee (Her Majesty The Queen In Right of the Province of British Columbia)
Priority Agreement granting Page 13 Section 9 Transferee (Resort Municipality of Section 219 Covenant Whistler and Her Majesty The Queen In ______, Rent Charge Right of the Province of British ______and Section 219 Columbia) Covenant ______priority over Section 219 Covenant BB1181277 and Option to Purchase BB1181278
LAND TITLE ACT Form E
SCHEDULE Page12 of 13 Pages ______Enter the required information in the same order as the information must appear on the Freehold Transfer Form, Mortgage Form or General Document Form.
1. Acknowledgment - By executing and delivering this Agreement, the Transferor acknowledges it has received from the Transferee a true copy of the Standard Charge Terms filed under number ST080100 (the “Standard Terms”).
2. Dwelling Unit - The definition of “Dwelling Unit” in section 1(e) of the Standard Terms is deleted and replaced with the following:
“e. “Dwelling Unit” means each strata lot included within the definition of Land;”.
3. Qualified Business - Section 4 of the Standard Terms is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end of section 4:
“For the purposes of this section, Whistler Housing Authority Ltd. is deemed to be a Qualified Business.”
4 Previous Sale – For the purposes of the first transfer of any Dwelling Unit after registration of this Agreement, the “Previous Sale” as defined in section 1(t) of the Standard Terms means the transaction by which the Dwelling Units were acquired by Whistler Housing Authority Ltd.
5. Previous Sale Price – For the purposes of the first transfer of any Dwelling Unit after registration of this Agreement, the “Previous Sale Price” of that Dwelling Unit as defined in section 1(u) of the Standard Terms means the sum of $7,568,400.00, the price paid by Whistler Housing Authority for the building containing all the Dwelling Units, divided by the respective unit entitlement for each Dwelling Unit as shown on the Schedule of Unit Entitlement for Strata Plan EPS37.
6. Maximum Price, Resale – For the purposes of the first transfer of any Dwelling Unit after registration of this Agreement, the “Maximum Price, Resale” of that Dwelling Unit as defined in section 1(o) of the Standard Terms and the “Change in CCPI” as defined in section 1(c) of the Standard Terms shall be calculated such that the date of the Previous Sale is August 18, 2010, being the date that Whistler Housing Authority Ltd. paid for construction of the Dwelling Units.
7. Rent Restriction - Subsection 11(b) of the Standard Terms is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end of subsection 11(b):
LAND TITLE ACT Form E
SCHEDULE Page 13 of 13 Pages ______Enter the required information in the same order as the information must appear on the Freehold Transfer Form, Mortgage Form or General Document Form.
"If the Owner is either the Whistler Housing Authority Ltd. (WHA), or Provincial Rental Housing Corporation (PRHC) and, if necessary for either the WHA or PRHC, as the case may be, to break even in its revenue and costs in managing the Land, the WHA may increase the rent described in this subsection by the amount necessary to cover any reasonable property management costs."
8. Tenant Charges - Subsection 11(c) of the Standard Terms is deleted and the following is inserted in its place:
“c. Extra Charges - the Owner may not require the Tenant to pay any extra charges or fees for use of any common property, limited common property, or other common area, or for sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water utilities, or property taxes. For clarity, this subsection does not apply to parking, cablevision, telephone, other telecommunications, gas utility or electricity utility or District Energy System fees or charges; provided, however, that the Owner may charge a maximum of an additional $75.00 per month if the Dwelling Unit is fully furnished and an additional $25.00 per month if the Dwelling Unit contains a fully functioning washer and dryer. This subsection does not apply where the Owner is Whistler Housing Authority Ltd.”.
9. Priority Agreement
Provincial Rental Housing Corporation, having an address at Suite 1701 – 4555 Kingsway, Burnaby, B.C. V5H 4V8, as holder of the following registered charges in consideration of the sum of $1.00 hereby consents to the registration of Section 219 Covenant (Housing Agreement) ______, Rent Charge ______and Section 219 Covenant ______and agrees that they shall have priority over its charges:
Type of Charge Section 219 Covenant BB1181277
Option to Purchase BB1181278
END OF DOCUMENT
From: Brock Rodgers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 9:14 AM To: Mayor's Office Cc: Paul Martin Subject: Retaining walls
Without Prejudice
Mayor and council
Every so often we come across well intentioned rules that have ridiculous consequences.
I have owned one of the older A Frames in Alta Vista since 1994. With the addition of two in‐laws and three grandchildren we elected to add some space.
Simple enough – large flat lot simply tag on a garage and loft to the rear. So after being charged just shy of a record breaking $17,000 for a building permit for a $330,000 addition we are proceeding.
In consultation and in full agreement with both neighbors we placed a row of large rocks along each property boundary leveling all three properties. The height may exceed the 1.5 meters noted for landscaping in some areas but in no case reaches 2.0 meters in height. So we may have exceeded the height stipulated in the building bylaw for landscaping and would be happy to rectify that.
The unacceptable and frankly ridiculous part enters with the one meter setback requirement noted in the zoning bylaw. As I’m sure the lawyers among you know full well, nothing gets neighbors into a dispute quicker than a fence. Here we have all agreed to place the rocks with the face at or near the property line. In fact just to be on the safe side I placed them on my side of the property line in both cases. So on the eastern (uphill from my lot) there is no debate as to where the rocks are situated, to the west (downhill from my lot) the faces may in some cases reach and may possibly cross the property line. But all with the three property owners in agreement.
If this was a 6 foot concrete fence there is no issue. In fact knowing what I know now that’s exactly what it would have been and then three years later the space between the two adjacent properties and the fence would have amassed a nice collection of debris causing the same effect as we now have. That debris would be piled against one of those attractive, and likely leaning, concrete fences I’m sure we have all notices along the Upper Levels Highway in North and West Vancouver.
In a normal course of events I suppose I should just pay the $380.00 and go to the board of variance. But frankly after the extortion of a 5% building permit fee my mind set is “In for a dime, in for a dollar”. And since my reading of the local papers suggest the RMOW likes nothing more than a good legal battle I think I’m leaning towards going all in.
I’m sure the intent of this bylaw had some sound intentions but frankly the idea that a retaining wall at a property boundary would be a variance rather that the norm seems wrong to me. And the fact that this bylaw would have effectively cause me to have given up two meters on both sides of my property (one for the set back and one for the rocks assuming one meter rocks) is completely inequitable.
I realize looking back eating $380.00 will likely look prudent and cheap but this is just a ridiculous rule and I’m not about to ask for a variance to do what is logical. I realize bylaw amendments are not inexpensive, but since I ponied up $17,000 1 for the permit perhaps you will see fit to spend a small amount of that amending the bylaw rather than three times the amount in legal fees.
I should add that Paul Martin in building was very diplomatic, and frankly just short of apologetic, when he brought this matter up.
Respectfully
Brock Rodgers RI(BC) DAC
2
-----Original Message----- From: [ . tobias c. van Veen . ] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 6:26 PM To: Donna Wango Cc: Andrée Janyk; Roger McCarthy; John Grills; Jayson Faulkner; Jack Crompton Subject: the Sound & the Fury from Whistler Olympic Plaza
dear Mayor Nancy Wilhem-Morden, and esteemed members of Council,
First, congratulations on your terms so far. I voted for all of you, actually, and it's good to see progress on many fronts. Second, as I've writ in the past concerning the crazy bus schedule, and not only did the Mayor kkindly answer my letter but the concerns were addressed, I thought I would write again, and even offer my help with the following concern, if need be.
I am writing because every single weekend my house is filled with the booming, echoing and ultimately annoying sounds of Whistler Olympic Plaza's soundsystem, which seems to have been implemented without care for the surrounding community.
It would appear that the previous Council, the architects and engineers, and perhaps the current Council, have not looked at ways to properly baffle and redirect the sound that echoes out from the massive system. This can be done. I know, because I have been an events promoter for 15 years, specifically for electronic dance music, which requires extensive baffling to avoid noise complaints.
I live on Nester's Road, down the street from the market. This is by no means close to the venue --- I am about a kilometre away. When I bike around at night, I can easily hear the Plaza's soundsystem throughout the Nester's and White Gold neighbourhoods. I have talked to a few dozen people about the sound, and many have said it is irritable and annoying that nothing is being done to baffle or redirect it.
If this were a private venue, such as a club or festival, noise complaints to police would be handled under ByLaw, and the owner/operator would be forced to better soundproof the venue. But because the Plaza is RMOW, it would appear that the venue and thus the Muni believes it is above the law --- in this case, Whistler's noise ByLaws. If you call the police to complain, they basically laugh it off. I mean, how can you call in a noise complaint against the very Muni that drafted the noise ByLaw?
Now, as an events promoter and DJ I can say I fully support WOP and the concert schedule (though I think the Muni should stop playing promoter if they want to see paying rentals --- but I digress). My point is that I am not a NIMBY type. But I am a smart type, and I am tired of having my evening barbecues disrupted by some idiot blathering away on a mic, or some two-bit band wailing and clanging over a kilometre away, when I know that something could be done about it with the proper engineering. It's loud enough that I have to _close my windows inside to hear my own radio or stereo_, and even then, I can hear the music seeping in through my double-paned windows.
1 On hot summer nights with the windows open, it's unbearable --- I want to be able to light up the grill with friends, and I have to yell to be heard above the bloody Plaza. In my own house. This is especially bad when I have to work early, and I get an earful of WOP's curatorial aesthetics of has-been bands into the late night (sorry for the jabs, but hey, what did you expect --- I'm tired of it already).
Indeed, I'd be happy to invite you over to my place to witness what I'm talking about. We could have a nice little Council BBQ and try to have a normal conversation above the WOP. Heck, I moved here to get away from this kind of urban noise, and now RMOW is the worst contributor to degrading the quality of sound --- as in somewhat peaceful silence --- that Whistler, for the most part, enjoys.
So I ask what you and Council are prepared to do to fix this. It is the Muni's responsibility to properly soundproof its own venue, I believe. Unfortunately, had the Plaza been designed with care, the stadium would've faced the mountains --- and not the residential neighbourhoods --- like the original Olympic set-up (which we could not hear).
However, it is a fact of life, and evidence of design stupidity, that the permanent WOP set-up faces the neighbourhoods surrounding the Village. This said, sound baffling, speaker orientation, and better care during soundchecks would go a long way. Perhaps I can even offer my consultation here as an events promoter who has had to resolve similar issues when confronted with noise complaints. There is a lot that could be done to mitigate noise complaints and reduce sound leakage, even from an outdoor venue.
What really frustrates me is that some nights I go by WOP and no one is even there, but the venue staff apparently feels it's appropriate to blast random CDs at ~50, 000 watts into the surrounding neighbourhood. I just find this cheap and distasteful for a town like Whistler. I get home and *know* it's not even a raging concert going on --- it's just some venue manager abusing the soundsystem without care nor concern for residents.
Sure, we want outdoor concerts, but RMOW's venues should be brought to the same standard as our other music venues, which do all they can to limit sound leakage --- for example the GLC can no longer keep patio doors open in the evening to avoid noise complaints from the surrounding hotels; I know as I've dj'ed there. Why is the Plaza not being held to the same standard? Why are the noise complaints --- which I know have been called in --- not been addressed? Are tourist pleasures for free concerts being put above the long-term health (and property values) of residents?
Deep questions indeed. Hmmm. What should we do? Let's try to engineer some kind of solution.
As I write this, at 6pm on Canada Day, the soundsystem has already cranked up, and even though I have friends over for my own private celebrations, with the windows closed I can already "enjoy" what sounds like a horrid basement band playing underwater right in the confines of my own living room. At this rate, I'll just have to stop hosting BBQs. That sucks.
I'm looking forwards to hearing if anything will be done about this; perhaps to get my point across in a constructive fashion I will go the petition route and make a short and sweet presentation to Council?
I can even show you fancy diagrams demonstrating the acoustics of long-range sound --- neat, eh? all the best,
tobias c. van Veen 604 906 3010
7101 Nesters Rd (Google Map it)
2 From: Camm, Clive [CORP] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 3:54 PM To: Donna Wango; Jack Crompton; Duane Jackson; Jayson Faulkner; Andrée Janyk; John Grills; Roger McCarthy Subject: Whistler Health Care centre helipad is officially operational
Hello Mayor and Council,
It is a pleasure to inform you that the Whistler Health Care Centre helipad is finally open and operational. Transport Canada re-inspected the facility late last week and gave it the green light for operations.
Now that it’s operational, it needs to be acknowledged that our helipad is one of the most technologically advanced in the province. It will enhance our ability to provide high quality patient care at the WHCC regardless of weather conditions as well as further our ability to transport patients to other regional facilities when more highly intensive and specialized care is required.
We would like to thank the community and the Resort Municipality of Whistler for its patience and support during the past two years while VCH continued to work on what turned out to be the most complicated helipad rebuilds we’ve experienced. And we would especially like to thank the Sea to Sky Regional Hospital District for its financial contribution to this project.
Please contact me if you have any questions about the new helipad. Thank you.
Clive
Clive Camm, APR External Communications Leader VCH Communications and Public Affairs
231 East 15th Street North Vancouver, BC V5L 2L7
Tel: 604.984.3868 Cell: 604.230.2672 E-mail: [email protected] www.vch.ca
This e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential. Any distribution, copying, disclosure or other use is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the message unread, including any attachments. Thank you.
Please don't print this email unless you need to.
1 From: LGIF CSCD:EX [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 11:10 AM To: Donna Wango Subject: Strategic Community Investment Fund Letter
Ref: 150506
Her Worship Mayor Nancy Wilhelm-Morden and Members of Council Resort Municipality of Whistler 4325 Blackcomb Way Whistler, BC V0N 1B4
Email: [email protected]
Dear Mayor Wilhelm-Morden and Councillors:
Strategic spending by British Columbia communities stimulates local economies, encourages growth, creates local jobs and helps offset the effects of the global economic downturn. As such, the Province of British Columbia provided an immediate $60 million of relief in March 2012 to local governments through a restructuring of the current provincial grant programs. This provides local communities with more provincial funding sooner, giving greater certainty and improved financial flexibility for the future.
The June 2012 initiative totalling $93.5 million consists of $48.5 million for the Traffic Fine Revenue Sharing Program to help municipalities enhance policing and community-based public safety programs, and $45 million for Small Community and Regional District Grants supporting local governments to provide services in areas with smaller tax bases.
For your community, the following amount(s) will be transferred to you on or before June 29, 2012.
Small Community Grant $276,651 Traffic Fine Revenue $198,000
1 The next three instalments of program funding will be made in March 2013 and June 2013, with the final instalment in June 2014.
As with the previous Strategic Community Investment Fund program, we expect that local governments will continue to report publicly on the use of these funds through the annual reporting requirements.
Sincerely,
Ida Chong, FCGA Minister of Community, Sport and Cultural Development
2
From: Canadians For Great Bear [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 3:15 PM To: Mayor's Office Subject: To Mayor and Council
July 9, 2012
Dear Mayor Wilhelm-Morden and Councillors,
The Coastal First Nations-Great Bear Initiative, WWF and Canadians for the Great Bear would like to congratulate the city of Whistler on its pioneering stand opposing the construction of the Northern Gateway pipeline.
Your declaration reflects a commitment to the values shared by Canadians for the Great Bear and by many British Columbians. Canadians have the opportunity to be good stewards of this global treasure, and good stewards of our country’s future and we thank you for paving the way in this endeavor. We would like to honor your city by bestowing upon it the designation of “Canadian Great Bear Community”.
The WWF and the CFN have joined forces to create Canadians for the Great Bear. Canadians for the Great Bear is a diverse group of Canadians calling for a sustainable future for this region. The Great Bear region of British Columbia’s north coast is one of the world’s largest remaining intact coastal temperate rainforests and is one of the richest and most spectacular ecosystems on our planet. The proposed Northern Gateway pipeline is designed to bring 525,000 barrels of toxic crude oil and 193,000 barrels of condensate a day to this region, requiring upwards of 220 oil tankers each year to its seas. Statistics show that oil tankers and a crude oil pipeline represent inevitable oil spills that would threaten the ecosystems, jobs, cultures and communities of this region and would affect the entire BC Coastline. It’s not a question of if, it’s a question of when.
Canadians for the Great Bear choose a future that protects the region’s rare wildlife, respects First Nations rights and title and protects tens of thousands of BC jobs that rely on these healthy ecosystems. There are better, more sustainable options for Canada’s economy and future energy
1 security than accelerating our crude oil exports. A backgrounder on who we are is attached to this email.
As a way of continuing your support for a thoughtful energy strategy that protects our natural heritage, respects deep Canadian values of fairness and inclusiveness, protects Canadian jobs, and safeguards the interests of all Canadians, we ask you to endorse this initiative. You can show your support by:
• Being listed on our website as a Canadian Community for the Great Bear; and • Sharing the campaign through your professional, personal, organizational and media Networks
We are Canadians for the Great Bear. Join us. www.canadiansforgreatbear.ca.
Scott Niedermayer Robyn Allan Grand Chief Edward John Peter Ladner
Dr. Anne K. Salomon Hon. Tom Siddon Dr. Eric B. Taylor
2
Canadians for the Great Bear This is no place for oil tankers The Great Bear region of British Columbia’s north coast is one of the world’s largest remaining intact coastal temperate rainforests. The Great Bear contains some of the Earth’s most pristine wild salmon rivers which flow to seas teeming with life. It is one of the richest and most spectacular ecosystems on our planet. The Great Bear is a global ecological treasure, and its future is in our hands. The proposed Northern Gateway pipeline would bring millions of barrels of toxic crude oil and hundreds of massive oil tankers each year to this special place. Oil tankers and a pipeline present the unacceptable risk of oil spills that would threaten the ecosystems, jobs, cultures and communities of this region. In 2006, Canadian governments forged an historic agreement with First Nations, industry, and other groups to pursue a new vision for The Great Bear. Together, they set out a global model of sustainability designed to create jobs, attract investment, and strengthen communities while protecting ecosystems. This is the future we choose for Canada’s Great Bear. We choose a future that protects the region’s rare Spirit bears, and salmon, whales and wolves. We choose a future that respects First Nations rights and title. A future for the tens of thousands of long term, Canadian jobs that rely on these healthy ocean and forest ecosystems. This is also the future we choose for Canada. There are better, more sustainable options for Canada’s economy and future energy security than accelerating our crude oil exports. Canada needs a thoughtful energy strategy that protects our natural heritage, respects deep Canadian values of fairness and inclusiveness, protects Canadian jobs, and safeguards the interests of all Canadians now and in the future. Canadians have the opportunity to be good stewards of this global treasure, and good stewards of our country’s future. We are Canadians for the Great Bear. Join us.
Scott Niedermayer Robyn Allan Grand Chief Edward John Peter Ladner Anne K. Salomon Hon. Tom Siddon
Eric B. Taylor
www.canadiansforgreatbear.ca 1
Canadians for the Great Bear
Scott Niedermayer
Known as ‘Captain Canada’ for his leadership role as captain of the Canadian Olympic men’s hockey team, Scott Niedermayer is one of Canada’s hockey heroes. Over the course of his career, Scott has earned every North American and international hockey championship, including four Stanley cups and two Olympic gold medals. Scott was born in Edmonton and raised in Cranbrook, B.C. He grew up enjoying the lakes, rivers and mountains of interior B.C., where he gained a deep appreciation for Canada’s natural beauty and wildlife. He now puts this passion for nature to work as WWF’s Freshwater Ambassador. Scott and his wife Lisa continue to explore B.C.’s great outdoors with their four sons.
Robyn Allan
Named by the Financial Post as one of Canada’s top 200 CEOs, economist Robyn Allan has held key leadership positions in British Columbia’s public and private sector. They include: president and CEO of the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia; executive director of the Vancity Community Foundation; and senior economist for the B.C. Central Credit Union. As a consulting economist, Robyn has provided strategic business management and public policy advice to senior private sector and government personnel on investment, corporate restructuring, international trade and business development. She was a commissioner on the Barrett Commission of Inquiry into the Quality of Condominium Construction in British Columbia, and its economic and financial adviser. Robyn recently wrote the report “An Economic Assessment of Northern Gateway,” submitted as evidence to the National Energy Board. Her book Quest for Prosperity: the Dance of Success was published in 1996.
www.canadiansforgreatbear.ca 2
Canadians for the Great Bear
Grand Chief Edward John Grand Chief Edward John is a Hereditary Chief of Tl'azt'en Nation located on the banks of the Nak'al Bun (Stuart Lake) in northern B.C. Combining his background in law with his commitment to social and economic justice for Canada’s Indigenous people, Chief John has served in many leadership roles at the local, provincial, national and international levels. He is currently serving his ninth consecutive term on the First Nations Summit Task Group (political executive). The group is mandated to carry out specific tasks related to Aboriginal Title and Rights negotiations with B.C. and Canada, and other issues of common concern to First Nations in British Columbia. He is a former co chair of the North American Indigenous Peoples’ Caucus and participated in the development of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in September 2007. Chief John also currently serves as North American representative to the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues.
Peter Ladner Former politician, business owner and author, Peter Ladner is the co founder of the Business in Vancouver Media Group, which includes the award winning Business in Vancouver weekly newspaper. Peter is currently a weekly columnist on Vancouver business and civic issues, and a Fellow at the Simon Fraser University Centre for Dialogue. He was first elected to Vancouver City Council in 2002 and re elected in 2005. He ran for mayor in 2008, and remains active on a range of regional economic development and community issues. Peter has more than 35 years of journalistic experience in print, radio and television and is a frequent speaker on business, community and food issues. His first book, The Urban Food Revolution: Changing the Way we Feed Cities, was published in 2011.
www.canadiansforgreatbear.ca 3
Canadians for the Great Bear
Anne K. Salomon Author, marine ecologist and conservation biologist, Anne K. Salomon is a professor of applied ecology at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia. Her research is motivated by a deep interest in understanding how human activities alter the biodiversity, productivity and resilience of coastal food webs to inform ecosystem approaches to marine conservation. These interests have taken Anne to the surf swept coasts of Alaska, New Zealand and, most recently, to California as a Smith Fellow in Conservation Science. In 2009, Anne launched a research program with Parks Canada, Haida Fisheries, Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Simon Fraser University to examine the ecological repercussions of the proposed Gwaii Haanas National Marine Conservation Area Reserve on valuable fisheries (rockfish, red sea urchin), species at risk (northern abalone) and kelp forest dynamics. In 2010, she began collaborating with the Heiltsuk on B.C.'s Central Coast to advance our understanding of sea otter impacts, marine spatial planning, and Pacific herring fluctuations.
Hon. Tom Siddon
Former federal cabinet minister, the Hon. Tom Siddon has a long career in science, business and politics. Originally from Alberta, Tom taught as a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of British Columbia for ten years. He was first elected to the Parliament of Canada in 1978. He was appointed to the federal Cabinet by Prime Minister Brian Mulroney in 1985 and served for nine years in several portfolios: as Minister of Science and Technology; Fisheries and Oceans; Indian Affairs and Northern Development; and National Defence. During that time he led numerous important initiatives in the areas of fisheries management, environmental protection, science policy and aboriginal treaty settlements. Following his political career, Tom has remained active as a consultant, lecturer, and corporate board member, and he was recently elected to the Regional District of Okanagan Similkameen. Tom’s leadership and signature accomplishments have been recognized with a number of awards including an honourary Doctorate from the University of British Columbia. Tom and his wife live in Kaleden, B.C.
www.canadiansforgreatbear.ca 4
Canadians for the Great Bear
Eric B. Taylor Awarded the MA Newman prize in 1998 for excellence in aquatic research, Eric B. Taylor has been a professor in the Department of Zoology at the University of British Columbia since 1993. He is the associate director of the Biodiversity Research Centre at UB.C. and director of the Fish Collection at the Beaty Biodiversity Museum. With a PhD in zoology (evolutionary ecology of fishes), Eric was a research fellow and visiting scientist at Dalhousie University in Halifax and at the Pacific Biological Station in Nanaimo. His research in evolution and ecology includes an interest in understanding its relevance to conservation of native fish biodiversity. Author of more than 100 scientific publications, Eric co chairs the Freshwater Fishes Subcommittee of the Committee for the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC).
www.canadiansforgreatbear.ca 5
10 Things You Should Know about the Great Bear
1 The Great Bear is an ecological treasure. The Great Bear Sea borders the coastline of The Great Bear Rainforest on B.C.’s north coast. It’s the second largest intact coastal temperate rainforest left on Earth. And one of the richest and most spectacular ecosystems on the planet. In 2006, this rainforest was protected through an historic agreement to ensure eco friendly logging practices, support sustainable economies and strengthen First Nations decisions about their traditional lands. 2 Many bears call it home. The Great Bear takes its name from the many bears found here – including the grizzly, black bear, iconic Haida black bear and white Spirit bear, which is rarer than the panda. 3 The Great Bear is traditional First Nations territory. B.C.’s North and Central Coast, and Haida Gwaii, are the traditional territory of 12 coastal First Nations whose rights to this land have never been ceded or relinquished. The First Nations’ goal is to restore responsible resource management in their territory through ecologically, socially and economically sustainable practices. 4 Endangered species live here. The Great Bear Sea is home to at least 17 types of marine mammals – and has critical habitat for threatened or endangered blue, fin, right, sei and killer whales.
5 First Nations and coastal communities depend on the sea. Coastal First Nations’ traditional territories and coastal communities depend economically on The Great Bear Sea. Marine dependent activities in these territories represent significant economic value. A report on the economic contribution of B.C. seafood and tidal recreational fishing shows that the industry generates $2.5 billion per year – and supports more than 30,000 jobs. 6 A Global Treasure. The Great Bear region is an ecological treasure that also supports thousands of jobs in tourism. Marine tourism generates $104.3 million in revenues and provides 2,200 long term jobs. 7 Not the place for oil tankers. Canada does not have the ability or technology to adequately deal with a major oil spill in this region – a situation made worse by federal budget cuts earlier this year. The communities that depend on the Great Bear Sea have consistently and adamantly opposed major expansion of oil tanker traffic for decades. It’s a risk not worth taking. 8 Treacherous Waters. Environment Canada says Hecate Strait in the Great Bear Sea is known as one of the four most treacherous bodies of water in the world. In the winter months, waves can reach up to eight metres, here and in the Queen Charlotte Basin. Waves over 30 metres high have been recorded. Yet under the proposed pipeline plan for this region, oil tankers – as long as the Empire State Building is high – are expected to navigate these waters and transport toxic crude oil across the Pacific Ocean. 9 Rivers feed the sea. The Great Bear Sea is fed by some of B.C.’s largest wild and free flowing rivers, including the Skeena and the Nass.
10 Everything here is connected. Salmon reflect the interconnectedness of the sea, wild rivers and land in The Great Bear Sea. Countless streams feed rich estuaries and are lifelines for all five species of Pacific salmon. Bears, wolves, birds and trees are all nourished by the salmon.
www.canadiansforgreatbear.ca 6
THE RISK: B.C. JOBS AND ECONOMIC VALUES
The Great Bear region currently sustains many thousands of long term, Canadian jobs in commercial fishing, aquaculture, tourism, and other sectors that depend on the health and productivity of coastal ecosystems. The proposed Northern Gateway pipeline puts these jobs, and the future of B.C.’s coastal economy, at risk.
Commercial and recreational fisheries in the Skeena watershed alone have been valued at more than $100 million per year. A report commissioned by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans on the economic contribution of B.C. seafood and tidal recreational fishing shows industry generates $2.5 billion per year – and supports more than 30,000 jobs in B.C. Each year, marine tourism in the Great Bear region generates $104.3 million in revenues and provides 2,200 long term jobs. First Nations and other coastal communities have invested over $400 million and a decade of effort laying the foundation for a diverse regional economy that includes forestry, fishing, aquaculture, tourism, renewable energy, and the transport and export of liquefied natural gas. All of these sectors are threatened by the proposed oil pipeline development. The total annual benefits of existing marine dependent activities in the region that could be affected by an oil spill are estimated at close to $30 billion (2012 Canadian dollars). The economic value of these marine dependent activities is expected to increase significantly over the next decade as the region continues developing a healthy sustainable economy. The presence of hundreds of huge oil tankers each year in the narrow passages in and around Douglas Channel could severely restrict cruise ships, commercial fishing vessels, and local boat traffic. Ship exhaust and other on going industrial would affect air and water quality in local communities. Even relatively small oil spills could threaten fisheries, tourism, and natural capital throughout the region – all of which put local communities and jobs at risk. The Great Bear Agreement of 2006 between Coastal First Nations, B.C. government, forest companies, and environmental organizations formally acknowledged the region as a world leading model of sustainability; one that demonstrates it is possible to create jobs, attract investment, and strengthen communities while protecting ecosystems and growing natural capital. The Agreement did not contemplate oil tankers or oil pipelines in the region.
B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell, 2006: “This Gift to the Earth recognizes the many people who worked so hard to achieve success, as well as all British Columbians who view the central and north coast regions as a gift to the Earth with immense value within our province and far beyond our borders.”
www.canadiansforgreatbear.ca 7
THE RISK: CANADIAN JOBS AND ECONOMY
The risks associated with the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline are not limited to regional impacts on B.C. jobs and the coastal economy. The proposal also represents a threat to Canada’s long term economic well being.
Enbridge’s business case depends on claiming a surcharge on every barrel of oil produced in Canada every year for 30 years. This will mean rising prices for gas and consumer products in Canada, at the expense of taxpayers, households, and non oil producing businesses. The consequences of oil price shocks to the Canadian economy are negative and lead to a permanent decline in GDP, employment and government revenues. Inflationary pressure will be made worse by Enbridge’s business plan, which assumes that 23 per cent of existing Canadian supply will be redirected to China. According to Enbridge’s business plan, there will be a 14 per cent supply restriction to existing U.S. customers as crude is re directed to China. This will result in supply challenged Canadian and U.S. refineries bidding up the price of oil as they seek new sources. In short, Enbridge’s business case is based on Canadians paying more at the pump, at the store, and in our homes. The export of crude oil represents a loss of economic wealth because value is not added to raw crude in Canada. The crude oil will be upgraded and refined in other countries. As well, shipping crude oil offshore means lost jobs and labour income, and lower environmental standards for upgrading and refining. Far more jobs could be created by keeping Canadian oil in Canada, for the benefit of Canadians workers and businesses. Enbridge estimates at most a few thousand temporary jobs in pipeline construction. Even these might not be jobs for Canadians, as – according to Enbridge – PetroChina (the Chinese government’s national oil company) has expressed interest in bidding on the pipeline construction. Jim Prentice (former Minister of the Environment in the Harper government) June 20, 2010: "We don't want to see carbon leakage, we don't want to see a loss of Canadian jobs.” The oil pipeline proposal is designed to serve the energy interests of other countries without meeting the needs of eastern Canada. Without a secure, domestic supply of energy, Canada faces significant risks to our country’s long term economic growth. The proposal does not address the cost to Canada of ignoring an important domestic energy market.
www.canadiansforgreatbear.ca 8
THE RISK: CANADA’S ENERGY SECURITY
Canada’s oil reserves represent an important strategic resource whose value can be expected to grow over time. Rather than rushing to export as much as possible in the near future, and relinquishing our authority to determine the pace, scale, and Canadian benefits of development, Canada should be conserving and developing this resource thoughtfully. The Northern Gateway pipeline proposal threatens Canada’s energy security.
The ownership structure of the Northern Gateway Project represents greater foreign control over Canada's oil resources. Three of China's largest, nationally owned oil companies are directly involved in crude oil production and two have the right to ownership interests in Northern Gateway and the proposed Kitimat marine terminal. PetroChina has expressed an interest in building the pipeline. Canada currently imports almost half of its crude oil needs from volatile and uncertain foreign markets including the Middle East. If we were to meet our energy needs first, in a planned and sustainable manner, before rushing to build pipelines to serve the needs of other countries, we would have a more stable economy and less upward pressure on exchange rates. Canada currently imports almost half of its domestic refinery demand. Rather than keeping Canadian oil at home, we will be shipping raw products away to benefit other countries while simultaneously increasing our dependence on foreign oil imports. Not only does this increase the risk of an oil spill on both our coasts, it lowers our energy return on investment and undermines our energy independence. The economic and public interest benefit case Enbridge has prepared is fundamentally flawed and misleading:
Enbridge has developed a business case that estimates only a positive impact on the oil industry without including economic, social and environmental costs—it has provided a benefits case, not a cost benefit analysis. No board of directors would accept such an approach—particularly when results are forecast for 30 years. An Input Output (IO) model is used to further exaggerate the project's impact. The application of an IO model is inappropriate and misleading. IO models are incapable of providing an assessment of the macroeconomic consequences of rapid oil expansion and export; they give only a partial picture of overall benefits and costs. (As an example, an IO model would conclude that an oil spill or a plane crash is a positive economic generator). Empirical evidence shows that the value of the Canadian dollar increases with expanded crude oil exports and rising oil prices. Contrary to this evidence, Enbridge’s business case assumes that assumed that the Canadian dollar will fall to 85 cents US by 2016 and stay at that level for 30 years, while oil prices rise significantly. This unrealistic scenario results in overstated benefits and an exaggerated supply forecast. This inflated supply forecast is used to predict the need for new pipeline capacity. With this pipeline proposal Canada is promising energy jobs, and energy security, to other countries – at the expense of our own.
www.canadiansforgreatbear.ca 9
THE RISK: ECOLOGICAL VALUES
The Northern Gateway pipeline and oil tanker proposal represents a significant risk to one of the richest and most spectacular ecosystems in the world. This is one of the world’s last (and North America’s largest) intact coastal temperate rainforest ecosystems. It is one of the only places left in the world where coastal temperate rainforest, healthy and productive seas, and wild salmon rivers come together in an interconnected, living system. The region includes eelgrass meadows and estuaries that are crucial habitat for commercially important fish and seafood species. It provides habitat for deep sea and cold water corals and sponges, including nine thousand year old ancient glass sponge reefs. The Great Bear region includes many important ecological “contact zones” between animals and plants of coastal and interior origin. Such zones are associated with heightened genetic and ecological diversity, and are of tremendous scientific value. The region sustains more than 400 species of freshwater and marine fish, including three of B.C.’s five major herring stocks, all five species of Pacific salmon, and B.C.’s highly prized steelhead trout. Its watersheds provide critical spawning habitat for almost 60 per cent of B.C.’s wild salmon stocks. The proposed pipeline would carry toxic diluted bitumen across hundreds of salmon rivers and streams. The region is home to rare and iconic animals including the white Spirit Bear (B.C.’s provincial mammal), killer whales, and unique Pacific Coastal wolves. The Great Bear Sea is home to at least 17 types of marine mammals, including sea otters, sea lions, whales, dolphins and porpoises. The region has critical habitat for at risk populations of grey, fin, sei, and killer whales. The Great Bear’s quiet underwater environment and nutrient rich seas makes it crucial feeding and rearing grounds for B.C.’s recovering humpback whale populations. Researchers estimate that more than 10 per cent of B.C.’s humpback population has been observed in Caamano Sound. The surrounding area – directly in the path of proposed oil tankers and their shipping noise – is one of the only places on Earth where humpback whales have been recorded singing outside of their breeding grounds. There is no existing technology that can effectively clean up a diluted bitumen spill at sea. Once spilled, diluted bitumen separates into a toxic gas (which can linger in the area for days, delaying the start of a cleanup effort) and bitumen particles. These particles can spread through the water column from the surface to the ocean floor, and could disperse long distances from the site of the spill. The area encompassing coastal ecosystems that have not yet recovered from Alaska’s Exxon Valdez spill over 20 years ago is roughly equivalent to the area of the B.C. coast, from Vancouver to Haida Gwaii. John Baird former Minister of Environment in the Harper government, January 2007: “This is an area of extraordinary ecological significance … In fact, it is one of the 14 high priority conservation areas identified by the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation.”
www.canadiansforgreatbear.ca 10