Study of Variation in Cosmic Ray Intensity Due to Solar-Interplanetary Activity Between 1996-2013 B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Study of Variation in Cosmic Ray Intensity Due to Solar-Interplanetary Activity Between 1996-2013 B Research Journal of Physical Sciences ________________________________________________ ISSN 2320–4796 Vol. 2(3), 4-8, June (2014) Res. J. Physical Sci. Study of variation in Cosmic ray Intensity due to Solar-Interplanetary activity between 1996-2013 B. K. Tiwari 1, B.R. Ghormare 2, P.K. Shrivastava 3 and D.P. Tiwari 4 1Department of Physics, Jawahar Lal Nehru College of Technology, Rewa, MP, INDIA 2Department of Physics, Rewa Engineering College, Rewa, MP, INDIA 3Department of Physics, Model Science College, Rewa, MP, INDIA 4 Department of Physics, A.P.S. University, Rewa, MP, INDIA Available online at: www.isca.in Received 22 nd May 2014, revised 2nd June 2014, accepted 4 th June 2014 Abstract Solar outputs and their variations are responsible to produce changes in cosmic ray intensity (CRI) both on short-term as well as on long–term basis. It is observed that sunspot number; 10.7 cm solar radio flux, coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and solar flares are the causal link to solar activity. Moreover, coronal mass ejections are associated with a variety of interplanetary plasma and field disturbances. Based on the observation from Omniweb data centre for solar- interplanetary data activity and monthly mean count rate of cosmic ray intensity (CRI) variation data from neutron monitors (Moscow, Oulu, Keil) during the period of 1996-2013.We observed a record high value of cosmic ray intensity with low values of solar interplanetary activity parameters during minimum of solar cycle 23 and ascending phase of 24. Statistical techniques are used to correlate data of solar interplanetary and count rate of cosmic ray intensity i.e. better anti-correlated with solar activity parameters. Keywords: Heliospheric magnetic field (HMF), Galactic cosmic ray (GCR), Magnetic clouds (MCs), Coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Introduction shocks 5. The interplanetary magnetic field emanated from the Sun changes with the solar activity cycle, changing variations in The intensity of galactic cosmic rays is subjected to heliospheric speed of particle transport process such as convection diffusion modulation under the influence of solar outputs and their drift and adiabatic deceleration 6. variations. Cosmic rays (charge particles) are scattered by irregularities in the structure of heliospheric magnetic field and Solar wind (SW) density, pressure and strength of interplanetary undergo convection and adiabatic deceleration in the expanding magnetic field (IMF) all are their lowest values and measured a solar wind changes in the heliospheric conditions as produced record excess GCR intensity was accompanied by the relative by the solar activity. Variation in cosmic ray is usually caused decrease of the anomalous cosmic rays (ACRs), quickly by transient interplanetary events, which are related to coronal decreased with energy about zero for low latitudes neutron mass ejections (CMEs). Scott. Forbush established the monitors during period between solar minimum of cycle 23 and correlation between world-wide decreases in cosmic ray ascending phase of 24. Solar and heliospheric conditions make 1 intensity and geomagnetic storms and the sunspot cycle ( ̴̴ 11 this period interesting for the study of cosmic rays modulation years) in GCRs intensity i.e., its variation in the opposite phase with indices of solar activity and heliospheric parameters. with sunspot number and which can be understood by the Sunspots are low or absent, strength of the HMF was transport of GCRs through the model of heliospheric magnetic exceptionally low between cycle 23 and 24 minimum and solar 2 field (HMF) . During high solar activity magnitude of the HMF interplanetary activity parameters where significant different increases due to larger number of CMEs ejected from the sun from the previous solar minimum 7. The main unusual features in (which occurs each ̴̴ 11- years sunspot cycle), therefore solar the GCR intensity in this anomalous period are excess of the magnetic field more effective at sweeping GCRs out of the inner maximum intensity during 2009-2010, the sun was much heliosphere which causes a strong reduction in GCR flux and quieter, the heliospheric magnetic field was weaker and reproduce the ̴ 22 years GCR modulation using a time- observed higher cosmic ray diffusion coefficient allows an dependent modulation model. In the interplanetary space GCR increase in GCR intensity 8,9,10 . can be modulated by sporadic emission of clouds of magnetized 3, 4, plasma and produce terrestrial geomagnetic storms . Small Data analysis decreases in galactic cosmic rays are associated with magnetic clouds (MCs) are not preceded by shocks where as large In order to study the long term variation in cosmic ray through decreases are associated with that MCs are preceding by the years 1996-2013 ,monthly mean values of cosmic rays data International Science Congress Association 4 Research Journal of Physical Sciences ____________________________________________________________ ISSN 2320–4796 Vol. 2(3), 4-8, June (2014) Res. J. Physical Sci. were used observed by neutron monitors http://www.nmdb.in from National Geographical Data Centre (NGDC) and analyzed (Moscow (Rc=2.32GV), Oulu (Rc=0.81GV) and Kiel solar interplanetary data from Omniweb data base (Rc=2.39GV). In this study we also used data of mean monthly http://www.omniweb,gsfc.nasa.gov.in . sunspot numbers (SSN), monthly group solar flare index taken 9800 140 9600 120 9400 100 9200 SSN 9000 80 8800 60 8600 40 8400 20 count ratecount of cri (moscow) 8200 moscow 8000 0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 SSN year (a) Variation in count rate of cri (moscow) with SSN during 1996-2013 11000 2 10500 1.5 10000 1 9500 0.5 9000 0 8500 Bz 8000 -0.5 7500 -1 7000 -1.5 count ratecount of cri (moscow) moscow 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year Bz (b) Variation of count rate of cri (moscow) and Bz during 1996-2013 9800 600 9600 550 9400 500 9200 450 9000 400 8800 8600 350 8400 300 8200 250 Solarwind velosity 8000 200 moscow count ratecount of cri (moscow) 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 SWV Year (c) Effect of solar wind velosity on cri (moscow) during 1996-2013 Figure-1 (a,b,c,) Long-term variation in cosmic ray intensity as observed by Moscow with solar-interplanetary activity indies (SSN,Bz,SWV) during 1996-2013 International Science Congress Association 5 Research Journal of Physical Sciences ____________________________________________________________ ISSN 2320–4796 Vol. 2(3), 4-8, June (2014) Res. J. Physical Sci. 11000 300 10000 250 9000 200 8000 150 7000 100 count ratecount of cri (moscow) 6000 50 SSN&10.7cm SSN&10.7cm solar radioflux 5000 0 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 year Year Figure-2 (d) 8000 300 7500 250 7000 200 6500 6000 150 5500 100 5000 Count Count of rate (oulu) cri 50 10.7cm SSN & solar radioflux 4500 4000 0 year Oulu SSN 1996 2001 2006 2011 10.7cm SF Year Figure-2(e) 12000 300 11000 250 10000 9000 200 8000 150 flux 7000 100 6000 50 Count Count of rate (kiel) cri 5000 4000 0 10.7cm SSN & solar radio year Kiel 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 Year SSN Figure-2(f) Figure-2 (d,e,f,) Long-term variation in cosmic ray intensity as observed by Moscow Oulu Keil with solar- activity indies (SSN,10.7 cm solar radio flux) during 1996-2013 International Science Congress Association 6 Research Journal of Physical Sciences ____________________________________________________________ ISSN 2320–4796 Vol. 2(3), 4-8, June (2014) Res. J. Physical Sci. 7000 200 6800 180 6600 160 6400 140 6200 120 6000 100 5800 80 CRI (oulu) CRI 5600 60 5400 40 5200 20 SSN&10.7cm Solar radioflux 5000 0 Oulu CRI 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 SSN year 10.7cmsolar radio flux Figure-3(g) 12000 200 180 10000 160 8000 140 120 6000 100 80 CRI (kiel) CRI 4000 60 2000 40 20 0 0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 10.7cm SSN& solar radioflux Kiel CRI Year SSN 10.7cmsolar radio flux Figure-3(h) 9800 200 9600 180 9400 160 9200 140 120 9000 100 8800 80 CRI (moscow) CRI 8600 60 8400 40 8200 20 SSN&10.7cm SSN&10.7cm solar radioflux 8000 0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 moscow CRI Year SSN 10.7cmsolar radio flux Figure-3(i) Figure-3 (g,h,i,) Long-term variation in cosmic ray intensity as observed by Oulu Keil Moscow with solar-interplanetary activity indies during 1996-2013 International Science Congress Association 7 Research Journal of Physical Sciences ____________________________________________________________ ISSN 2320–4796 Vol. 2(3), 4-8, June (2014) Res. J. Physical Sci. Result and Discussion to increase in interplanetary magnetic field and solar wind velocity, although the correlation are poor. Cosmic ray intensity variation are produced by the transient disturbance like traveling interplanetary shocks, are produced by References coronal mass ejection and events vary with solar activity at the different phases of the sun spot cycle. Large decreases in CRI 1. Forbush, Physics Rev. 51 ,1108-1109, (1937) are associated with MCs preceded by shocks where as small 2. Parker E.N., Planet. Space Sci , 13 ,9-49,doi:10.1016/0032- decreases are associated magnetic clouds are not preceded by 0633(65) 90131-5, (1965 ) shocks. The variation cosmic ray intensity are inversely correlated with solar activity indices and these variations are 3. Van Allen, by book biographical memories ( 1985 ) produced by solar wind velocity (V) is related to convection, 4. Burlaga L.F. and Chang. G., J. Geophys, Res ., 93 , 2511- diffusion depends on the interplanetary field strength (B) and its 2518 ( 1988 ) fluctuations, and the tilt of the heliosphereic current sheet. 5. Tiwari B.K., Thesis Submitted to APSU, ( 2010 ) Conclusion 6. Burlaga L.F., Sitter E., Mariani F., Schwenn R., J. Geophys. Res., 86 , 6673 (1981) Cosmic ray intensity variations based on variation with Solar and interplanetary indices as well as tilt of the heliosphereic 7.
Recommended publications
  • Merle A. Tuve
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES M E R L E A N T O N Y T UVE 1901—1982 A Biographical Memoir by P H ILI P H . AbELSON Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1996 NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON D.C. MERLE ANTONY TUVE June 27, 1901–May 20, 1982 BY PHILIP H. ABELSON ERLE ANTONY TUVE WAS a leading scientist of his times. MHe joined with Gregory Breit in the first use of pulsed radio waves in the measurement of layers in the ionosphere. Together with Lawrence R. Hafstad and Norman P. Heydenburg he made the first and definitive measurements of the proton-proton force at nuclear distances. During World War II he led in the development of the proximity fuze that stopped the buzz bomb attack on London, played a crucial part in the Battle of the Bulge, and enabled naval ships to ward off Japanese aircraft in the western Pacific. Following World War II he served for twenty years as director of the Carnegie Institution of Washington’s Department of Ter- restrial Magnetism, where, in addition to supporting a mul- tifaceted program of research, he personally made impor- tant contributions to experimental seismology, radio astronomy, and optical astronomy. Tuve was a dreamer and an achiever, but he was more than that. He was a man of conscience and ideals. Throughout his life he remained a scientist whose primary motivation was the search for knowledge but a person whose zeal was tempered by a regard for the aspirations of other humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Ray Neutron Monitors
    Printed: 22 September 2013 (WFD – draft) Readme: Cosmic Rays Cosmic Rays Cosmic rays are energetic particles that are found in space and filter through our atmosphere. Cosmic rays have interested scientists for many different reasons. They come from all directions in space, and the origination of many of these cosmic rays is unknown. Cosmic rays were originally discovered because of the ionization they produce in our atmosphere. Cosmic rays also have an extreme energy range of incident particles, which have allowed physicists to study aspects of their field that cannot be studied in any other way. In the past, we have often referred to cosmic rays as "galactic cosmic rays" because we did not know where they originated. Now scientists have determined that the sun discharges a significant amount of these high-energy particles. "Solar cosmic rays" (cosmic rays from the sun) originate in the sun's chromosphere. Most solar cosmic ray events correlate relatively well with solar flares. Scientists have postulated that cosmic rays can affect the earth by causing changes in weather. Cosmic rays can cause clouds to form in the upper atmosphere, after the particles collide with other atmospheric particles in our troposphere. The process of a cosmic ray particle colliding with particles in our atmosphere and disintegrating into smaller pions, muons, and the like, is called a cosmic ray shower. These particles can be measured on the Earth's surface by neutron monitors. Cosmic rays affect satellite electronics and ground-based computer systems at high altitudes. The following text is taken the IBM Journal #40 by Zigler and Srinivasan (1996), “Modern electronic circuits are highly complex systems and, as such, are susceptible to occasional errors or failures.
    [Show full text]
  • Forbush Effects and Their Connection with Solar, Interplanetary and Geomagnetic Phenomena
    Universal Heliophysical Processes Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 257, 2008 © 2009 International Astronomical Union N. Gopalswamy & D.F. Webb, eds. doi:10.1017/S1743921309029676 Forbush effects and their connection with solar, interplanetary and geomagnetic phenomena A. V. Belov Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation Russian Academy of Sciences (IZMIRAN), 142190 Troitsk, Moscow region, Russia email: [email protected] Abstract. Forbush decrease (or, in a broader sense, Forbush effect) - is a storm in cosmic rays, which is a part of heliospheric storm and very often observed simultaneously with a geomagnetic storm. Disturbances in the solar wind, magnetosphere and cosmic rays are closely interrelated and caused by the same active processes on the Sun. Thus, it is natural and useful to investigate them together. Such an investigation in the present work is based on the characteristics of cosmic rays with rigidity of 10 GV. The results are derived using data from the world wide neutron monitor network and are combined with relevant information into a data base on Forbush effects and large interplanetary disturbances. Keywords. elementary particles, Sun: activity, interplanetary medium, solar-terrestrial rela- tions, coronal mass ejections (CMEs), shock waves. 1. Introduction A special kind of cosmic ray (CR) variation which we name Forbush decrease (FD) or Forbush effect (FE) was discovered by S. Forbush in 1937 (Forbush 1937, Forbush 1938). Since then hundreds of such events have been observed and discussed, and a large number of papers have been devoted to their study. The present work is not a traditional review of the published literature, such as the fundamental reviews J.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Francis Birch 3 by Thomas J
    http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6201.html We ship printed books within 1 business day; personal PDFs are available immediately. Biographical Memoirs V.74 Office of the Home Secretary, National Academy of Sciences ISBN: 0-309-59186-4, 398 pages, 6 x 9, (1998) This PDF is available from the National Academies Press at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6201.html Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council: • Download hundreds of free books in PDF • Read thousands of books online for free • Explore our innovative research tools – try the “Research Dashboard” now! • Sign up to be notified when new books are published • Purchase printed books and selected PDF files Thank you for downloading this PDF. If you have comments, questions or just want more information about the books published by the National Academies Press, you may contact our customer service department toll- free at 888-624-8373, visit us online, or send an email to [email protected]. This book plus thousands more are available at http://www.nap.edu. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF File are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Distribution, posting, or copying is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. Request reprint permission for this book. i ined, a he original t be ret Biographical Memoirs ion. om r f ibut r t cannot not r at o f book, however, version ng, i t at ive NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES at rm riginal paper it o f c hor i f he o t om r he aut f ng-speci http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6201.html Biographical MemoirsV.74 as t ed i t ion peset y iles creat L f her t M is publicat h X t of om and ot r f yles, version posed Copyright © National Academy ofSciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary: Multimessenger Solar Astrophysics
    READERS’ FORUM Commentary Multimessenger solar astrophysics SOHO/EIT, SOHO/LASCO, SOHO/MDI (ESA & NASA) he term “multimessenger astron- omy”—combining different signals, T or messengers, from the same as - trophysical event to obtain a deeper un- derstanding of it—is in the air nowa- days, largely because of the remarkable success of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational- Wave Observatory (LIGO) in detecting gravitational waves1 (see PHYSICS TODAY, December 2017, page 19). Four messengers reach us from beyond the solar system: photons, neutrinos, cos- mic rays, and now gravitational waves. Lost amid the current buzz, though, is that the Sun produces many other messen- gers. What’s more, multimessenger solar astrophysics began as long ago as 1722, SOLAR MULTIMESSENGER when London clockmaker George Gra- EVENTS. Extreme- UV images ham noted a new solar messenger: diur- of the Sun (top), obtained nal variations in Earth’s magnetic field. by the Solar and Heliospheric Multimessenger information routinely Observatory spacecraft, forms a major part of current research in recorded two messages from solar and heliospheric physics. One such a solar flare: on the left, EUV example, shown in the figure, is a “snow- photons that arrived 8 minutes storm” of solar cosmic rays directly de- after the flare happened (the tected by a space- borne extreme- UV im- horizontal “bleed” is due to ager. Scott Forbush identified similar CCD saturation), and on the signals detected at ground- based cosmic- right, the “snowstorm” of solar ray stations in 1942 and 1946 as being cosmic rays that arrived soon due to energetic solar protons.2 Such dan- after and had filled the helios- gerous ionizing particles are a messenger phere within 12 hours later.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the APL Colloquium, Covering Its First Four Decades Through 1988, Has Been Previously Described in the Technical Digest
    D. m. siLVer The ApL colloquium David M. Silver The ApL Colloquium has been a 59-year tradition at the Laboratory. The lectures are held weekly, generally from October to May, and cover an eclectic range of topics. The early history of the ApL Colloquium, covering its first four decades through 1988, has been previously described in the Technical Digest. The present article highlights some of the history of the institution and provides a chronological inventory of the colloquium lectures from 1988 to 2006. INTRODUCTION A colloquium is a meeting for the exchange of views staff on what is currently exciting, relevant, and of value covering a broad range of topics, usually led by a differ- to the work and people of ApL. ent lecturer on a different topic at each meeting, and The colloquium schedule has been chronicled in pre- followed by questions and answers. A colloquium series vious Technical Digest articles, beginning with the first is aimed at a diverse audience and differs from a seminar issue in 1961 of the precursor APL Technical Digest.1 series, which tends to be geared to specialists in the field This tradition has continued to the present in the and is consequently more restrictive and esoteric with Digest, where the “miscellanea” section regularly con- respect to the topics covered. given this distinction tains a list of recent colloquia (the Laboratory has tradi- between colloquium and seminar, the ApL Colloquium tionally used the Latin plural, colloquia, rather than the is certainly rightly named, covering an eclectic range of english form, colloquiums). The early history and first topics intended to appeal to the ApL staff in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Plasma Physics at the Applied Physics Laboratory Over the Past Half-Century
    THOMAS A. POTEMRA SPACE PLASMA PHYSICS AT THE APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY OVER THE PAST HALF-CENTURY Exploration of our planet's space plasma environment began with the use of ground-based radio propagation experiments and with instruments carried to high altitudes by balloons and rockets. The Applied Physics Laboratory was intimately involved in these pioneering activities through the work of its flrst director, Merle A. Tuve, and one of its fIrst staff members, James A. Van Allen. During the past half-century, the Laboratory's space plasma physics activities have evolved into a major and multifaceted effort involving the observation and study of phenomena from the Earth's atmosphere to the Sun and beyond to the outer planets and heliosphere. Space plasma physics has become a mature scientiflc discipline that now more than ever provides many challenges and promises of exciting discoveries for APL scientists in the future. INTRODUCTION Plasma physics is the study of the collective interac­ flown on a V-2 rocket in July 1947.8 It demonstrated for tions of electrically charged particles with one another the first time the cosmic ray ceiling of the atmosphere, and with electric and magnetic fields. It has been esti­ the altitude above which there is no appreciable effect of mated that 99% of the mass of the Universe exists as a the atmosphere on the primary radiation. John 1. Hopfield plasma, J and the realization that plasma is the fourth and Van Allen used a quartz spectrograph on an APL physical state of matter is regarded as a major achieve­ Aerobee rocket to measure the altitude profile of ozone ment of twentieth-century physics.2 The Earth's environ­ at altitudes up to 60 km.9 Hopfield and his colleagues ment is composed of complex plasmas, including the measured the solar ultraviolet (Uv) spectrum down to a ionized layers of the atmosphere (the ionosphere) and the 230-nm wavelength with a grating spectrograph flown on comet-like shape of the geomagnetic field (the magne­ V-2 rockets at heights up to 155 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Weather Data Stewardship in NOAA
    SWx Data Stewardship in NOAA 30 April 2010 Bill Denig Solar & Terrestrial Physics Division World Data Center for Solar- Terrestrial Physics 303 497-6323 [email protected] Scientific Data Stewardship National Geophysical Data Center NGDC's Mission is to provide long-term scientific data stewardship for the Nation's geophysical data, ensuring quality, integrity, and accessibility. NGDC's Vision is to be the world's leading provider of geophysical and environmental data, information, and products. Space Weather Workshop – 27-30 Apr 2010 3 Scientific Data Stewardship Challenges Managing the Nation’s operational SWx datasets – NOAA’s satellite space environmental data & models – DoD’s space weather data – ground & space – Other duties, as assigned – World Data Center Safeguarding historical datasets – Geomagnetic / solar indices & records – Solar synoptic drawings and photographs – NOAA Climate Data Modernization Program • Documenting relevant datasets – metadata1 – Global Change Master Directory – ISO 19115 – Space Physics Archive Search and Extract (SPASE) Archiving data for long-term preservation – Comprehensive Large Array-data Stewardship System (CLASS) – Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Developing data discovery / access tools – Space Physics Interactive Data Resource – New STP website available for comment Dr. Rob Redmon – circa 2040 1Not to be discussed Space Weather Workshop – 27-30 Apr 2010 4 Operational SWx Datasets NOAA’s Current SWx Datasets - Satellites GOES Space Environment Monitor • Geosynchronous Orbit, since 1974
    [Show full text]
  • SCOTT ELLSWORTH FORBUSH April 10, 1904 – April 4, 1984
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES S C O T T E LLS W ORT H F OR B US H 1904—1984 A Biographical Memoir by J A M E S A. VA N ALLEN Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1998 NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON D.C. SCOTT ELLSWORTH FORBUSH April 10, 1904 – April 4, 1984 BY JAMES A. VAN ALLEN COTT FORBUSH LAID THE observational foundations for many Sof the central features of the now huge field of solar- interplanetary-terrestrial physics. The heart of his research was the patiently meticulous and statistically sophisticated analysis of the temporal variations of cosmic-ray intensity, as measured by ground-based detectors at various latitudes and altitudes, and the correlation of such variations with presumptively causative or at least related geophysical and solar phenomena. Among the latter were magnetic storms, solar activity, rotation of the Earth, and rotation of the Sun. Working almost alone with only technical assistance, Forbush either discovered or put on a reliable basis for the first time the following fundamental cosmic-ray effects: • The quasi-persistent 27-day variation of intensity; • The diurnal variation of intensity; • The absence of a detectable sidereal diurnal variation of intensity; • The sporadic emission of very energetic (up to several GeV) charged particles by solar flares; • Worldwide impulsive decreases (Forbush decreases) of intensity followed by gradual recovery; • The 11-year cyclic variation of intensity and its 3 4 BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS anticorrelation with the solar activity cycle as measured by sunspot numbers; and • The 22-year cycle in the amplitude of the diurnal varia- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA News Release #8
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINWON 25, 0. C. PIONEER V PRESS CONFERENCE, APRIL 29, 1960 12 o’clock noon We have available this morning press packages containing summaries of Pioneer V results prepared by the individual experimenters . Members of the panel are: Dr. Homer Newell, Deputy Director, NASA Office of Space Flight Programs. Mr. Harry doett, Director, NASA Ooddard Space Flight Center Dr. John Lindsay, NASA Project Scientist on Pioneer V, Goddard Space Flight Center Major Jay Smith, Director of Space Probe Pro ects, Air Force Ballistic E”issi3.e Division i ARDC) Inglewood, Calif. Dr. John A. Simpson, Enrico Fermi Institute for Nuclear Studies University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill. Dr. John Winckler, School of Physics, University of Minnesota, I Minneapolis, Minn. Dr. Charles P. Sonett Director of Space Physics Section, Research & Development Division, Space Technology Laboratories, Inc., Los Angeles, Calif . Dr. Adolph K. Thiel, Director, Experimental Space Projects,’ Space Technology Laboratories, Inc. Mr. Paul Glaser, Assistant to the Mrector, Experimental Space Projects, Space Technology Laboratories, Inc, Mr. Maurice Dubin, Head of Aeronomy Section, NASA Office of Space Flight Programs, NASA Headquarters. Dr. Brian O’brien, Department of Physics and Astronomy, State University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 4-- Walter T. Bonney, Director Office of, Public Information I NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Washington, D.C. PRESS CONFERENCE PIONEER V Friday, 29 April 1960 The press conference was called to order at 12:OO noon, Mr. Herb Rosen, Office of Public Information, NASA, presiding. PANEL MEMBERS: DR. HOMER NEWELL, Deputy Director, NASA Office of Space Flight Programs . HR. HARRY GOETT, Director, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Modulation of the Cosmic Ray Intensity and the Measurement of the Cerenkov Reemission in Nova’S Liquid Scintillator
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2015 Solar Modulation of the Cosmic Ray Intensity and the Measurement of the Cerenkov Reemission in NOvA’s Liquid Scintillator Philip James Mason University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Elementary Particles and Fields and String Theory Commons, Stars, Interstellar Medium and the Galaxy Commons, and the The Sun and the Solar System Commons Recommended Citation Mason, Philip James, "Solar Modulation of the Cosmic Ray Intensity and the Measurement of the Cerenkov Reemission in NOvA’s Liquid Scintillator. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2015. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3595 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Philip James Mason entitled "Solar Modulation of the Cosmic Ray Intensity and the Measurement of the Cerenkov Reemission in NOvA’s Liquid Scintillator." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Physics. Tom Handler, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Yuri Kamyshkov, Yuri Efremenko, Larry Townsend Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Research on Abundances of Solar Energetic Particles
    universe Review The Evolution of Research on Abundances of Solar Energetic Particles Donald V. Reames IPST, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; [email protected] Abstract: Sixty years of study of energetic particle abundances have made a major contribution to our understanding of the physics of solar energetic particles (SEPs) or solar cosmic rays. An early surprise was the observation in small SEP events of huge enhancements in the isotope 3He from resonant wave–particle interactions, and the subsequent observation of accompanying enhancements of heavy ions, later found to increase 1000-fold as a steep power of the mass-to-charge ratio A/Q, right across the elements from H to Pb. These “impulsive” SEP events have been related to magnetic reconnection on open field lines in solar jets; similar processes occur on closed loops in flares, but those SEPs are trapped and dissipate their energy in heat and light. After early controversy, it was established that particles in the large “gradual” SEP events are accelerated at shock waves driven by wide, fast coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that expand broadly. On average, gradual SEP events give us a measure of element abundances in the solar corona, which differ from those in the photosphere as a classic function of the first ionization potential (FIP) of the elements, distinguishing ions and neutrals. Departures from the average in gradual SEPs are also power laws in A/Q, and fits of this dependence can determine Q values and thus estimate source plasma temperatures. Complications arise when shock waves reaccelerate residual ions from the impulsive events, but excess protons and the extent of abundance variations help to resolve these processes.
    [Show full text]