Solar and Space Weather Radiophysics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
High-Frequency Waves in Solar and Stellar Coronae
A&A 463, 1165–1170 (2007) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065956 & c ESO 2007 Astrophysics High-frequency waves in solar and stellar coronae V. G. Ledenev1,V.V.Tirsky2,andV.M.Tomozov1 1 Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, PO Box 4026, Irkutsk, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Laser Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk Branch, Russia Received 3 July 2006 / Accepted 15 November 2006 ABSTRACT On the basis of a numerical solution of dispersion equation we analyze characteristics of low-damping high-frequency waves in hot magnetized solar and stellar coronal plasmas in conditions when the electron gyrofrequency is equal or higher than the electron plasma frequency. It is shown that branches that correspond to Z-mode and ordinary waves approach each other when the magnetic field increases and become practically indistinguishable in a broad region of frequencies at all angles between the wave vector and the magnetic field. At angles between the wave vector and the magnetic field close to 90◦, a wave branch with an anomalous dispersion may occur. On the basis of the obtained results we suggest a new interpretation of such events in solar and stellar radio emission as broadband pulsations and spikes. Key words. plasmas – turbulence – radiation mechanisms: non-thermal – Sun: flares – Sun: radio radiation – stars: flare 1. Introduction in the magnetic field and, consequently, for determining solar coronal parameters in the flare region. Magnetic field estima- It has been widely accepted that numerous flare processes with tions give values of the ratio ωHe/ωpe < 1 (Ledenev et al. -
A Deep Learning Framework for Solar Phenomena Prediction
FlareNet: A Deep Learning Framework for Solar Phenomena Prediction FDL 2017 Solar Storm Team: Sean McGregor1, Dattaraj Dhuri1,2, Anamaria Berea1,3, and Andrés Muñoz-Jaramillo1,4 1NASA’s 2017 Frontier Development Laboratory 2Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Mumbai, India 3Center for Complexity in Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA 4SouthWest Research Institute, Boulder, CO, USA Abstract Solar activity can interfere with the normal operation of GPS satellites, the power grid, and space operations, but inadequate predictive models mean we have little warning for the arrival of newly disruptive solar activity. Petabytes of data col- lected from satellite instruments aboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) provide a high-cadence, high-resolution, and many-channeled dataset of solar phenomena. Several challenging deep learning problems may be derived from the data, including space weather forecasting (i.e., solar flares, solar energetic particles, and coronal mass ejections). This work introduces a software framework, FlareNet, for experimentation within these problems. FlareNet includes compo- nents for the downloading and management of SDO data, visualization, and rapid experimentation. The system architecture is built to enable collaboration between heliophysicists and machine learning researchers on the topics of image regres- sion, image classification, and image segmentation. We specifically highlight the problem of solar flare prediction and offer insights from preliminary experiments. 1 Introduction The violent release of solar magnetic energy – collectively referred to as “space weather" – is responsible for a variety of phenomena that can disrupt technological assets. In particular, solar flares (sudden brightenings of the solar corona) and coronal mass ejections (CMEs; the violent release of solar plasma) can disrupt long-distance communications, reduce Global Positioning System (GPS) accuracy, degrade satellites, and disrupt the power grid [5]. -
Why Is the Corona Hotter Than It Has Any Right to Be?
Why is the corona hotter than it has any right to be? Sam Van Kooten CU Boulder SHINE 2019 Student Day Thanks to Steve Cranmer for some slides Why the Sun is the way it is The Sun is magnetically active The Sun rotates differentially Rotation + plasma = magnetism Magnetism + rotation = solar activity That’s why the Sun is the way it is Temperature Profile of the Solar Atmosphere Photosphere (top of the convection zone) Chromosphere (forest of complex structures) Corona (magnetic domination & heating conundrum) Coronal Heating ● How do you achieve those temperatures? ● Step 1: Have energy ● Step 2: Move energy ● Step 3: Turn energy to heat ● Step 4: Retain heat ● Step 5: HOT Step 1: Have energy ● The photosphere’s kinetic energy is enough by orders of magnitude Photospheric granulation Photospheric granulation Step 2: Move energy “DC” field-line braiding → “nanoflares” “AC” MHD waves “Taylor relaxation” “IR” (twist wants to untwist, due to mag. tension) Step 3: Turn energy to heat ● Turbulence ¯\_( )_/¯ ツ Step 4: Retain heat ● Very hot → complete ionization → no blackbody radiation → very limited cooling ● Combined with low density, required heat isn’t too mind-boggling Step 5: HOT So what’s the “coronal heating problem”? Cranmer & Winebarger (2019) So what’s the “coronal heating problem”? ● The theory side is fine ● All coronal heating models occur at small scales in thin plasmas – Really hard to see! ● It’s an observational problem – Can’t observe heating happening – Can’t measure or rule out models So why is the corona hotter than it -
Space Weather Lecture 2: the Sun and the Solar Wind
Space Weather Lecture 2: The Sun and the Solar Wind Elena Kronberg (Raum 442) [email protected] Elena Kronberg: Space Weather Lecture 2: The Sun and the Solar Wind 1 / 39 The radiation power is '1.5 kW·m−2 at the distance of the Earth The Sun: facts Age = 4.5×109 yr Mass = 1.99×1030 kg (330,000 Earth masses) Radius = 696,000 km (109 Earth radii) Mean distance from Earth (1AU) = 150×106 km (215 solar radii) Equatorial rotation period = '25 days Mass loss rate = 109 kg·s−1 It takes sunlight 8 min to reach the Earth Elena Kronberg: Space Weather Lecture 2: The Sun and the Solar Wind 2 / 39 The Sun: facts Age = 4.5×109 yr Mass = 1.99×1030 kg (330,000 Earth masses) Radius = 696,000 km (109 Earth radii) Mean distance from Earth (1AU) = 150×106 km (215 solar radii) Equatorial rotation period = '25 days Mass loss rate = 109 kg·s−1 It takes sunlight 8 min to reach the Earth The radiation power is '1.5 kW·m−2 at the distance of the Earth Elena Kronberg: Space Weather Lecture 2: The Sun and the Solar Wind 2 / 39 The Solar interior Core: 1H +1 H !2 H + e+ + n + 0.42 MeV 1H +2 He !3 H + g + 5.5 MeV 3He +3 He !4 He + 21H + 12.8 MeV The radiative zone: electromagnetic radiation transports energy outwards The convection zone: energy is transported by convection The photosphere – layer which emits visible light The chromosphere is the Sun’s atmosphere. -
Multi-Spacecraft Analysis of the Solar Coronal Plasma
Multi-spacecraft analysis of the solar coronal plasma Von der Fakultät für Elektrotechnik, Informationstechnik, Physik der Technischen Universität Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig zur Erlangung des Grades einer Doktorin der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigte Dissertation von Iulia Ana Maria Chifu aus Bukarest, Rumänien eingereicht am: 11.02.2015 Disputation am: 07.05.2015 1. Referent: Prof. Dr. Sami K. Solanki 2. Referent: Prof. Dr. Karl-Heinz Glassmeier Druckjahr: 2016 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. Dissertation an der Technischen Universität Braunschweig, Fakultät für Elektrotechnik, Informationstechnik, Physik ISBN uni-edition GmbH 2016 http://www.uni-edition.de © Iulia Ana Maria Chifu This work is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License Printed in Germany Vorveröffentlichung der Dissertation Teilergebnisse aus dieser Arbeit wurden mit Genehmigung der Fakultät für Elektrotech- nik, Informationstechnik, Physik, vertreten durch den Mentor der Arbeit, in folgenden Beiträgen vorab veröffentlicht: Publikationen • Mierla, M., Chifu, I., Inhester, B., Rodriguez, L., Zhukov, A., 2011, Low polarised emission from the core of coronal mass ejections, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 530, L1 • Chifu, I., Inhester, B., Mierla, M., Chifu, V., Wiegelmann, T., 2012, First 4D Recon- struction of an Eruptive Prominence -
Three-Dimensional Convective Velocity Fields in the Solar Photosphere
Three-dimensional convective velocity fields in the solar photosphere 太陽光球大気における3次元対流速度場 Takayoshi OBA Doctor of Philosophy Department of Space and Astronautical Science, School of Physical sciences, SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies) submitted 2018 January 10 3 Abstract The solar photosphere is well-defined as the solar surface layer, covered by enormous number of bright rice-grain-like spot called granule and the surrounding dark lane called intergranular lane, which is a visible manifestation of convection. A simple scenario of the granulation is as follows. Hot gas parcel rises to the surface owing to an upward buoyant force and forms a bright granule. The parcel decreases its temperature through the radiation emitted to the space and its density increases to satisfy the pressure balance with the surrounding. The resulting negative buoyant force works on the parcel to return back into the subsurface, forming a dark intergranular lane. The enormous amount of the kinetic energy deposited in the granulation is responsible for various kinds of astrophysical phenomena, e.g., heating the outer atmospheres (the chromosphere and the corona). To disentangle such granulation-driven phenomena, an essential step is to understand the three-dimensional convective structure by improving our current understanding, such as the above-mentioned simple scenario. Unfortunately, our current observational access is severely limited and is far from that objective, leaving open questions related to vertical and horizontal flows in the granula- tion, respectively. The first issue is several discrepancies in the vertical flows derived from the observation and numerical simulation. Past observational studies reported a typical magnitude relation, e.g., stronger upflow and weaker downflow, with typical amplitude of ≈ 1 km/s. -
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION CINDY COHN (145997) Ci
Case 3:06-cv-00672-VRW Document 294-1 Filed 07/05/2006 Page 1 of 173 1 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION CINDY COHN (145997) 2 [email protected] LEE TIEN (148216) 3 [email protected] KURT OPSAHL (191303) 4 [email protected] KEVIN S. BANKSTON (217026) 5 [email protected] CORYNNE MCSHERRY (221504) 6 [email protected] JAMES S. TYRE (083117) 7 [email protected] 454 Shotwell Street 8 San Francisco, CA 94110 Telephone: 415/436-9333 9 415/436-9993 (fax) 10 TRABER & VOORHEES LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD R. WIEBE BERT VOORHEES (137623) RICHARD R. WIEBE (121156) 11 [email protected] [email protected] THERESA M. TRABER (116305) 425 California Street, Suite 2025 12 [email protected] San Francisco, CA 94104 128 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 204 Telephone: 415/433-3200 13 Pasadena, CA 91103 415/433-6382 (fax) Telephone: 626/585-9611 14 626/ 577-7079 (fax) 15 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 16 [Additional counsel appear on signature page.] 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS, ) No. C-06-0672-VRW CAROLYN JEWEL and ERIK KNUTZEN, on ) 21 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly ) CLASS ACTION ) Situated,, 22 ) EXHIBITS A-K, Q-T, AND V-Y TO ) 23 Plaintiffs, ) DECLARATION OF J. SCOTT MARCUS ) IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ 24 v. ) MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY ) INJUNCTION 25 AT&T CORP., et al., ) ) Date: June 8, 2006 26 Defendants. ) Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor ) Judge: Hon. Vaughn Walker 27 28 EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF MARCUS IN SUPPORT OF C-06-0672-VRW PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Case 3:06-cv-00672-VRW Document 294-1 Filed 07/05/2006 Page 2 of 173 Exhibit A Case 3:06-cv-00672-VRW Document 294-1 Filed 07/05/2006 Page 3 of 173 CV – J. -
Chapter 11 SOLAR RADIO EMISSION W
Chapter 11 SOLAR RADIO EMISSION W. R. Barron E. W. Cliver J. P. Cronin D. A. Guidice Since the first detection of solar radio noise in 1942, If the frequency f is in cycles per second, the wavelength radio observations of the sun have contributed significantly X in meters, the temperature T in degrees Kelvin, the ve- to our evolving understanding of solar structure and pro- locity of light c in meters per second, and Boltzmann's cesses. The now classic texts of Zheleznyakov [1964] and constant k in joules per degree Kelvin, then Bf is in W Kundu [1965] summarized the first two decades of solar m 2Hz 1sr1. Values of temperatures Tb calculated from radio observations. Recent monographs have been presented Equation (1 1. 1)are referred to as equivalent blackbody tem- by Kruger [1979] and Kundu and Gergely [1980]. perature or as brightness temperature defined as the tem- In Chapter I the basic phenomenological aspects of the perature of a blackbody that would produce the observed sun, its active regions, and solar flares are presented. This radiance at the specified frequency. chapter will focus on the three components of solar radio The radiant power received per unit area in a given emission: the basic (or minimum) component, the slowly frequency band is called the power flux density (irradiance varying component from active regions, and the transient per bandwidth) and is strictly defined as the integral of Bf,d component from flare bursts. between the limits f and f + Af, where Qs is the solid angle Different regions of the sun are observed at different subtended by the source. -
A Decadal Strategy for Solar and Space Physics
Space Weather and the Next Solar and Space Physics Decadal Survey Daniel N. Baker, CU-Boulder NRC Staff: Arthur Charo, Study Director Abigail Sheffer, Associate Program Officer Decadal Survey Purpose & OSTP* Recommended Approach “Decadal Survey benefits: • Community-based documents offering consensus of science opportunities to retain US scientific leadership • Provides well-respected source for priorities & scientific motivations to agencies, OMB, OSTP, & Congress” “Most useful approach: • Frame discussion identifying key science questions – Focus on what to do, not what to build – Discuss science breadth & depth (e.g., impact on understanding fundamentals, related fields & interdisciplinary research) • Explain measurements & capabilities to answer questions • Discuss complementarity of initiatives, relative phasing, domestic & international context” *From “The Role of NRC Decadal Surveys in Prioritizing Federal Funding for Science & Technology,” Jon Morse, Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP), NRC Workshop on Decadal Surveys, November 14-16, 2006 2 Context The Sun to the Earth—and Beyond: A Decadal Research Strategy in Solar and Space Physics Summary Report (2002) Compendium of 5 Study Panel Reports (2003) First NRC Decadal Survey in Solar and Space Physics Community-led Integrated plan for the field Prioritized recommendations Sponsors: NASA, NSF, NOAA, DoD (AFOSR and ONR) 3 Decadal Survey Purpose & OSTP* Recommended Approach “Decadal Survey benefits: • Community-based documents offering consensus of science opportunities -
The Sun's Dynamic Atmosphere
Lecture 16 The Sun’s Dynamic Atmosphere Jiong Qiu, MSU Physics Department Guiding Questions 1. What is the temperature and density structure of the Sun’s atmosphere? Does the atmosphere cool off farther away from the Sun’s center? 2. What intrinsic properties of the Sun are reflected in the photospheric observations of limb darkening and granulation? 3. What are major observational signatures in the dynamic chromosphere? 4. What might cause the heating of the upper atmosphere? Can Sound waves heat the upper atmosphere of the Sun? 5. Where does the solar wind come from? 15.1 Introduction The Sun’s atmosphere is composed of three major layers, the photosphere, chromosphere, and corona. The different layers have different temperatures, densities, and distinctive features, and are observed at different wavelengths. Structure of the Sun 15.2 Photosphere The photosphere is the thin (~500 km) bottom layer in the Sun’s atmosphere, where the atmosphere is optically thin, so that photons make their way out and travel unimpeded. Ex.1: the mean free path of photons in the photosphere and the radiative zone. The photosphere is seen in visible light continuum (so- called white light). Observable features on the photosphere include: • Limb darkening: from the disk center to the limb, the brightness fades. • Sun spots: dark areas of magnetic field concentration in low-mid latitudes. • Granulation: convection cells appearing as light patches divided by dark boundaries. Q: does the full moon exhibit limb darkening? Limb Darkening: limb darkening phenomenon indicates that temperature decreases with altitude in the photosphere. Modeling the limb darkening profile tells us the structure of the stellar atmosphere. -
Adv. Communication Lab 6Th Sem E&C
TH ADV. COMMUNICATION LAB 6 SEM E&C • the line-coded signal can directly be put on a transmission line, in the form of variations of the voltage or current (often using differential signaling). • the line-coded signal (the "base-band signal") undergoes further pulse shaping (to reduce its frequency bandwidth) LINE CODING and then modulated (to shift its frequency bandwidth) to create the "RF signal" that can be sent through free space. Line coding consists of representing the digital signal to be • the line-coded signal can be used to turn on and off a light transported by an amplitude- and time-discrete signal that is in Free Space Optics, most commonly infrared remote optimally tuned for the specific properties of the physical channel control. (and of the receiving equipment). The waveform pattern of • the line-coded signal can be printed on paper to create a voltage or current used to represent the 1s and 0s of a digital bar code. data on a transmission link is called line encoding. The common • the line-coded signal can be converted to a magnetized types of line encoding are unipolar, polar, bipolar and spots on a hard drive or tape drive. Manchester encoding. • the line-coded signal can be converted to a pits on optical For reliable clock recovery at the receiver, one usually imposes a disc. maximum run length constraint on the generated channel Unfortunately, most long-distance communication sequence, i.e. the maximum number of consecutive ones or channels cannot transport a DC component. The DC zeros is bounded to a reasonable number. -
Solar Activity Affecting Space Weather
March 7, 2006, STP11, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Solar Activity Affecting Space Weather Kazunari Shibata Kwasan and Hida Observatories Kyoto University, Japan contents • Introduction • Flares • Coronal Mass Ejections(CME) • Solar Wind • Future Projects Japanese newspaper reporting the big flare of Oct 28, 2003 and its impact on the Earth big flare (third largest flare in record) on Oct 28, 2003 X17 X-ray Intensity time A big flare on Oct 28, 2003 (third largest X-ray intensity in record) EUV Visible light SOHO/EIT SOHO/LASCO • Flare occurred at UT11:00 on Oct 28 Magnetic Storm on the Earth Around UT 6:00- Aurora observed in Japan on Oct 29, 2003 at around UT 14:00 on Oct 29, 2003 During CAWSES campaign observations (Shinohara) Xray X17 X6.2 Proton 10MeV 100MeV Vsw 44h 30h Bt Bz Dst Flares What is a flare ? Hα chromosphere 10,000 K Discovered in Mid 19C Near sunspots=> energy source is magnetic energy size~(1-10)x 104 km Total energy 1029 -1032erg (~ 105ー108 hydrogen bombs ) (Hida Observatory) Prominence eruption (biggest: June 4, 1946) Electro- magnetic Radio waves emitted from a flare (Svestka Visible 1976) UV 1hour time Solar corona observed in soft X-rays (Yohkoh) Soft X-ray telescope (1keV) Coronal plasma 2MK-10MK X-ray view of a flare Magnetic reconneciton Hα X-ray MHD simulation of a solar flare based on reconnection model including heat conduction and chromospheric evaporation (Yokoyama-Shibata 1998, 2001) A solar flare Observed with Yohkoh soft X-ray telescope (Tsuneta) Relation between filament (prominence) eruption and flare A flare