Cytogenetic Studies in Gomphocerine Grasshoppers. I. Comparative Analysis of Chromosome C-Banding Pattern

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cytogenetic Studies in Gomphocerine Grasshoppers. I. Comparative Analysis of Chromosome C-Banding Pattern Heredity 56 (1986) 365—372 The Genetical Society of Great Britain Received 18 September 1985 Cytogenetic studies in gomphocerine grasshoppers. I. Comparative analysis of chromosome C-banding pattern J. Cabrero and J. P. M. Camacho Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain. Chromosome C-banding pattern have been studied in 20 species of gomphocerine grasshoppers. Paracentromeric C- bands were present in the chromosomes of all species analysed, which favours the equilocal model of heterochromatin distribution. Interstitial or distal C-bands, on the other hand, appeared, at most, in two different chromosome pairs within the same chromosome complement, which is not expected on the equilocal model. Interspecific comparisons of C-banding patterns reveal the existence of differences between species of either the same or of different genera, which emphasises the dynamic nature of heterochromatin. The X chromosome shows more similarities for C-banding between the species of the genera Stenobothrus, Euchorthippus, and Omocestus than between these species and those of Chorthippus, which seem to indicate the existence of a close relationship between these three genera. INTRODUCTION caught in the South of the Iberian Peninsula, and belong to the subfamily Gomphocerinae (Orthop- Acrididgrasshoppers are very uniform in chromo- tera, Acrididae). They include representatives of some form and number (John and Hewitt, 1966). 20 species: specifically Truxalis nasuta (L.), For this reason this family has long been regarded Dociostaurus genei (Ocsk.), Ramburiella hispanica as chromosomally conservative since the majority (Ramb.), Euchorthippus chopardi Desc., E. pul- have 2n =22+XOc/XXtelo-subtelocentric vinatus (F.-W.), Stenobothrus festivus Bol., S. chromosomes. The Gomphocerinae is the most grammicus (Caz.), Omocestus bolivari Chop., 0. distinctive subfamily within the Acrididae since panteli (Bol.), 0. raymondi (Yers.), 0. !lorenteae about half of the species analysed to date have Stauroderus scalaris (F.-W.), Chorthippus 2n = Pasc., 16+XOd/XX9with three long metacentric parallelus (Zett.), Ch. dorsatus (Zett.), Ch. jucun- chromosome pairs which are presumed to have dus (Fisch.), Ch. apicalis (H.-S.), Ch. nevadensis arisen by centric fusions. Despite this apparent Pasc., Ch. binotatus (Charp.), Ch. vagans karyotypic conservatism, the Acrididae show (Eversm.) and Ch. brunneus (Thunb.). In all a extensive intraspecific variation for supernumerary total of 771 male and 334 female adults were ana- chromosome segments (John and King, 1977; lysed together with 697 embryos. 1982; 1983; Hewitt, 1979; Camacho et a!., 1984), Adult individuals were analysed cytologically as well as interspecific variation for C-banding by the methods described in Camacho and Cabrero (King and John, 1980; Santos et a!., 1983) and (1982). The embryos were studied cytologically nuclear DNA content (John and Hewitt, 1966; following the technique described by Webb et al. Kiknadze and Vysotskaya, 1969; Rees et a!., 1978; (1978), and C-banding was carried out as Gosálvez et a!., 1980). described in Camacho et a!. (1984). In this paper we analyse C-banding pattern in In all species analysed the autosomes have been 20 species of gomphocerine grasshoppers in order classified into three size groups: L (long), M to determine the interspecific differences which (medium) and S (short). exist between them. RESULTS MATERIALSAND METHODS Inthe majority of the 20 species analysed there Allthe individuals analysed in this report were were variations in the C-banding pattern involving 366 J. CABRERO AND J. P. M. CAMACHO the presence of supernumerary chromosome seg- extremes, though they may vary even between ments. These variations will be reported separately, different chromosomes of the same species. For and here we will consider the standard C-banding example, in Ramburiella hispanica (fig. 3) while pattern found in a majority of individuals within the four larger chromosome pairs have large para- the species analysed. centromeric C-bans the remainder have medium C-heterochromatin content and distribution in or small bands. In Omocestus panteli (fig. 9) para- the 20 species are shown in figs. 1-20 and table 1. centromeric C-bands are medium sized, with C-bands may show three different locations: para- exception of that in the S8 which is small. Chorthip- centromeric, interstitial and distal. Striking inter- pus apicalis (fig. 16) provides an extreme example specific differences exist for C-banding pattern in of the heterogeneous distribution of paracen- respect of the presence or absence of interstitial tromeric C-heterochromatin since it shows large and distal C-bands but more especially for the size C-bands in the L1, L2, L3, M6 and S8 chromosomes, of the paracentromeric bands. medium C-bands in the M7 and small C-bands in the X, M4 and M5. Other species show paracen- ParacentromericC-bands tromeric C-bands of medium size in all chromo- somes; this is so in Euchorthippus chopardi (fig. 4), Thechromosomes of all species analysed, like E. pulvinatus (fig. 5), Stenobothrusfestivus (fig. 6), those studied by King and John (1980) and Santos S. grammicus (fig. 7), Omocestus bolivari (fig. 8), et a!. (1983), have C-bands in the vicinity of the 0. llorenteae (fig. 11), Chorthippus parallelus (fig. centromeric regions. However, these paracen- 13), Ch.jucundus (fig. 15), Ch. nevadensis (fig. 17) tromeric C-bands may be small, representing and Ch. vagans (fig. 19). strictly centromeric heterochromatin, or large, in which case they are composed of both centric and interstitialC-bands proximal bands. The smallest centromeric C-bands occur in Omocestus raymondi (fig. 10) and Whileinterstitial bands are frequent in some Chorthippus dorsatus (fig. 14). Large compound species of Australian acridoids (King and John, paracentromeric C-bands are clearly exemplified 1980; John et aL, 1985) they are invariably scarce in Stauroderus scalaris (fig. 12), Chorthippus bino- in Spanish species (Santos et a!., 1983). In the tatus (fig. 18) and Ch. brunneus (fig. 20). In a present study we have observed them in 11 species majority of the species, however, paracentromeric but even here they never occur in more than two C-bands are intermediate between these two size chromosome pairs in any one species. A majority Table 1C-banding pattern in 20 species of gomphocerine grasshoppers Paracentromenc C-bands Interstitial Distal Species 2n Fig. Large Medium Small C-bands C-bands Dociostaurus genei 23 1 — L2-M4, M8 L1, M5-M7, X, M9-S11 L1 — Truxalis nasuta 23 2 — M9, 510 L1-M8, S11, X M9 M9 Ramburiella hispanica 23 3 L1M4 M5-S11, X — — — Euchorthippus chopardi 17 4 — All — X L3 Euchorthippus pulvinatus 17 5 — All — M6 — Stenobothrusfestivus 17 6 — All — — M6 Stenobothrus grammicus 17 7 — All — — — Omocestus bolivari 17 8 — All — — X Omocestus panteli 17 9 — All except S8 S8 L3 — Omocestus raymondi 17 10 — — All X L2, L3 Oinocestus llorenteae 17 11 — All — X — Stauroderus scalaris 17 12 All — — — — Chorthippus parallelus 17 13 — All — — L3 Chorthippus dorsatus 17 14 — — All — — Chorthippusjucundus 17 15 — All — L2, L3 — Chorthippus apicalis 17 16 L1-L3, M6, S0 M7 M4, M5, X — M Chorthippus nevadensis 17 17 — All — L2 M6, M7 Chorthippus binotatus 17 18 All — — — — Chorthippus vagans 17 19 — All — L2, L3 M4 Chorthippus brunneus 17 20 All — — L2, L3 M7 (fig. 15),Ch. vagans(fig.19)andCh. brunneus panteli (fig.9) andtheL2L3ofCh.jucundus of Chorthippus nevadensis(fig.17),the L3of0. and theXchromosomes.This includestheXof of interstitialC-bandsarelocated inthelong(L) Figures CYTOGENETIC STUDIESINGOMPHOCERINEGRASSHOPPERS.I mondi (fig.10)and0.llorenteae (fig.11),theL2 Euchorthippus chopardi(fig. 4),Omocestusray- (2) Truxalisnasuta,(3)Ramburiellahispanica,(4)Euchorthippuschopardi, (5)E.pulvinatus. a (4 -& 1—5 C-bandingpatterninthehaploidchromosomecomplementsof gomphocerinegrasshoppers.(1)Dociostaurusgenei, a°"e r S r • r C 4Sr W r r p.) ¼ • 4 inSantosand Giráldez,1982). chromosomes, isclearlyinterstitial(seefigs. 3and apparently distal C-bandwhich,inlesscondensed Euchorthippus pulvinatus (fig.5)possessesan and, finally,themegameric M6chromosomeof (fig. 20).Themegameric M9chromosomeof Truxalis nasuta(fig.2)has aninterstitialC-band 1:: 4.. — S - -4 -l UI 0 0 ee1 al S S 1 •2 0 0 0 0 367 Figures 368 (7) S.grammicus, (8)Omocestusbolivari,(9)0.panteli, (10)0.raymondi. 6—16 C-bandingpatterninthehaploid chromosomecomplementsofgomphocerinegrasshoppers.(6) Stenobothrusfestivus, -4 0 0 a —r S -t - S St I;. 4: S I C 'C 'C a a p J. CABREROANDP.M.CAMACHO 1. 0 S 9 4 3 I,) Figures 11—15 CYTOGENETIC STUDIESINGOMPHOCERINEGRASSHOPPERS.I -s - a -& C-banding pattern inthehaploidchromosomecomplements ofgomphocerinegrasshoppers. (11)Omocestusllorenteae, • 4 r (12) Stauroderus a r art • n. scalaris, (13)Chorthippus parallelus,(14)Ch.dorsatus, (15)Ch.jucundus. '4r S tie jS a • "I • S IC • • S -F - S a 'I), p 369 370 Figures (17) Ch. a -J a 16—20 C-banding patterninthehaploidchromosome complementsofgomphocerine grasshoppers. (16)Chorthippusapicalis, 0 - nevadensis, Sb r (18) Ch.binotatus, (19)Ch.vagans,(20)brunneus. ect .t fl • t a p__ a 3' -Se S S a —. a, a e jfr9 e - J. CABREROANDP.M.CAMACI-10 'a p. 1 a 'S 1 S CYTOGENETIC STUDIES IN GOMPHOCERINE GRASSHOPPERS. I 371 Distal C-bands limited by the fact that one cannot be sure that chromosomes of similar relative length are Theseare as infrequent as the interstistial C-bands and, like them, appear at most in two chromosome necessarily homologous in all genomes
Recommended publications
  • Articulata 2012 27 (1/2): 17௅28 Zoogeographie
    © Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V.; download http://www.dgfo-articulata.de/; www.zobodat.at ARTICULATA 2012 27 (1/2): 17௅28 ZOOGEOGRAPHIE Small scale ecological zoogeographic methods in explanation of the distribution patterns of grasshoppers Kenyeres, Z., & Rácz, I.A. Abstract We examined in this study, in a Central-European low mountain range, whether methods of ecological zoogeography can explain better the distribution patterns of grasshopper species and species-groups, than the methods of the historical zoogeography. Our results showed that zoogeographically defined microregions could be specified more precisely by the distribution of species groups of differ- ent eco-types than the distribution of species groups of the different faunal-types. We found that the macroclimate elements and landscape features determine the regional distribution patterns of the orthopteran species and species-groups with similar thermal and humidity requirements. Our case study revealed the impor- tant role of the ecological zoogeography in zoogeographical analyses of Orthop- tera fauna at small geographical scale. Zusammenfassung Wir haben untersucht, ob man mit ökologisch-tiergeographischen Methoden die Verteilungsmuster von Heuschrecken in einem mitteleuropäischen Mittelgebirge analysieren kann. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Unterschiede auf dem Niveau der Mikroregion bei den Heuschrecken nicht in den Fauna-Typen, son- dern in der Verteilung von Tierarten bzw. Tiergruppen mit unterschiedlichen öko- logischen Ansprüchen zu finden sind. Wir können somit die Elemente des Makro- klimas und die Merkmale der Landschaft identifizieren, die das lokale Vertei- lungsmuster von Artengruppen mit ähnlichen ökologischen Ansprüchen, bezie- hungsweise von bestimmten Tierarten bestimmen. Introduction Questions and methodology in the biogeographical searching have been domi- nated by the conceptions of the historical biogeography for a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Zum Rückgang Von Stenobothrus Stigmaticus Im Südwestlichen Waldviertel (Orthoptera: Caelifera) W
    ©Österr. Ges. f. Entomofaunistik, Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Beiträge zur Entomofaunistik 12 95-103 Wien, Dezember 2011 Zum Rückgang von Stenobothrus stigmaticus im südwestlichen Waldviertel (Orthoptera: Caelifera) W. Schweighofer * Abstract In Austria Stenobothrus stigmaticus is an endagered species with its main populations in the western Waldviertel. There it is focussed on the occurrence of the grass Nardus stricta. In the southwestern Waldviertel ten locations were investigated in the 1990´s and again in Sommer 2011. In 2011 just three (30 %) of these ten locations were still inhabitated, while on the other locations due to different changes in the habitats the species could not be found any more. The reasons for the dramatic decline are discussed and protection measures proposed. Keywords: Stenobothrus stigmaticus, decline, Waldviertel Zusammenfassung Der in Österreich stark gefährdete Kleine Heidegrashüpfer (Stenobothrus stigmaticus) besitzt einen österreichischen Verbreitungsschwerpunkt im westlichen Waldviertel. Die Art ist dort an fl ächige Vorkommen des Borstgrases Nardus stricta gebunden. Im südwestlichen Waldviertel konnten in den 1990er Jahren zehn Fundorte kartiert werden, die im Sommer 2011 neuerlich kontrolliert wurden. Es stellte sich heraus, dass die Art nur mehr an drei (30 %) dieser zehn Fundpunkte bestätigt werden konnte, während sie an den restlichen durch unterschiedliche Veränderungen im Habitat nicht mehr nachweisbar war. Die Ursachen des dramatischen Bestandsrückgangs werden diskutiert und Schutzmaßnahmen vorgeschlagen. Einleitung Der Kleine Heidegrashüpfer (Stenobothrus stigmaticus) ist eine in Österreich nur regional verbreitete Heuschreckenart, die in der Roten Liste für Österreich als „endangered“ (stark gefährdet) eingestuft wird (BERG et al. 2005). Sie kommt in den Bundesländern Tirol, Oberösterreich, Niederösterreich, Kärnten, Steiermark und Burgenland vor (BERG & ZUNA- KRATKY 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Grasshopper Strips Prove Effective in Enhancing Grasshopper Abundance in Rivenhall Churchyard, Essex, England
    Conservation Evidence (2011) 8, 31-37 www.ConservationEvidence.com Grasshopper strips prove effective in enhancing grasshopper abundance in Rivenhall Churchyard, Essex, England Tim Gardiner 1* , Michelle Gardiner 1 & Nigel Cooper 2 12 Beech Road, Rivenhall, Witham, Essex CM8 3PF, UK 2Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] SUMMARY Grasshopper strips (alternate, 1-m wide strips of uncut and cut grassland) are a novel conservation feature in a rural churchyard in the village of Rivenhall (Essex), southeast England. The effectiveness of these strips in enhancing the abundance of grasshoppers (Acrididae) was investigated during the summer of 2010 using sweep-net surveys. Two grasshopper species were recorded. The meadow grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus was significantly more abundant in the cut grasshopper strips than in nearby short grassland (control) plots regularly mown throughout the summer. The field grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus was contrastingly more abundant in the uncut grasshopper strips than in the controls. The grasshopper strips appear to provide a mosaic of short and tall grassland in close proximity which is required for nymphs and adults of both C. parallelus and C. brunneus . BACKGROUND grasshoppers (and also butterflies and dragonflies) in Essex, southeast England There are over 20,000 churchyards in England (Gardiner & Pye 2001). For example, in All and Wales, and they can be havens for wildlife Saints Churchyard in the village of Writtle, as well as burial grounds (Greenoak 1993). five species of Orthoptera (grasshoppers and Churchyards provide wildlife habitats both in bush-crickets) were recorded in a conservation built-up and rural areas, assuming increasing area managed by a traditional hay-cut in conservation importance as urban areas August, but were absent from adjacent short expand and ‘greenspace’ is lost, and as grassland sward mown regularly (every 2-3 agricultural practices intensify (Rackham weeks) throughout the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Zum Erstfund Des Rotleibigen Grashüpfers Omocestus
    6. Literatur BLAB et al . , Hr sg. (19B4): Rote Liste der gefährdeten Tiere und Pflanzen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland , Greven: Kilda. MINISTER FÜR UMWELT, Hr sg. (1988): Rot e Liste der bedrohten Tier- und Pfla nzenarten im Saarland, Saarbrücken. NIET HA MMER , J., KRAPP F., HRSG. (1982): Handbu ch der Säugetiere Europas. SC HR ÖPFER, FELDMANN , VIER HAU S (1984): Die Säugetiere Westfalens , Abh andlg. au s dem Westfälischen Museum für Naturkunde, Münster Anschrift der Verfasser: Dipl. Geogr. Dieter DDRDA Dip l. Geogr. Dr. Stephan MAAS Dipl. Biol. Alo ysius ST AUDT ARBEIT SGEMEIN SC HAFT FÜR ÖKOLOGIE An der Saar 18 - 18 6630 Saarlouis ZUM ERSTFUND DES ROTLEIBIGEN GRASHÜPFERS DMOCESTUS HAEMORRHOIDALIS, CHARP., (Insecta: Sal tatoria) IM SAARLAND Von Dieter DORDA Omocestus gehört zur Unterfamilie Gomphocerinae (Grashüpfer) der Familie Acrididae (Feldheuschrecken). Feldheuschrecken, Knarrschrecken (Catantopidae) und Dornschrecken (Tetrigidae) werden zur Unt erordnung Caelifera (Kurzfühlerschrek- ke n ) gerechnet. Einige Gattungen der Grashüpfer wie Stenobothrus, Chorthippus und Omocestus sind im Gelände nur schwer vo neina nd er zu unterschei - den. Vielfach ist ein Geschlechtsdimorphismus ausgebildet, der die Verwechslung mit einer anderen Art möglich macht. So ist das Weibchen vo n Omocestus haemorrhoidalis mit Myrmeleotettix maculatus, der Gefleckten Keulenschrecke , das Männchen mit dem vo n Stenobothrus stigmaticus, dem Kleinen Heidegrashüpfer , zu verwechseln. Omocestus haemorrhoidalis ist eher unauffällig. Möglicherweise wurde sie im Saarland bislang übersehen, denn nur am Gesang läßt sich die Ar t im Gelände zuverlässig von a nd eren in Frage kommen - den Heuschrecken unterscheiden. 90 Der Gesang von Omocestus haemorrhoidalis ist sehr leise und hört sich mechanisch, hämmernd monoton an und erinnert entfernt an den Gesang des Feldschwirls .
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) Communities in Sown Margin Strips: the Role of Plant Diversity and Identity
    Author's personal copy Arthropod-Plant Interactions DOI 10.1007/s11829-015-9376-x ORIGINAL PAPER Enhancing grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) communities in sown margin strips: the role of plant diversity and identity 1,2,3 1,2,3 4 5 6 I. Badenhausser • N. Gross • S. Cordeau • L. Bruneteau • M. Vandier Received: 12 August 2014 / Accepted: 8 April 2015 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 Abstract Grasshoppers are important components of sown and non-sown plant species. Some grasshopper spe- grassland invertebrate communities, particularly as nutrient cies were positively correlated with the abundance of grass recyclers and as prey for many bird species. Sown margin and especially of a single sown plant species, F. rubra.In strips are key features of agri-environmental schemes in contrast, other grasshopper species benefited from high European agricultural landscapes and have been shown to plant diversity likely due to their high degree of polyphagy. benefit grasshoppers depending on the initial sown seed At the community level, these contrasted responses were mixture. Understanding the mechanisms by which the translated into a positive linear relationship between grass sown mixture impacts grasshoppers in sown margin strips cover and grasshopper abundance and into a quadratic re- is the aim of our study. Here, we investigated plant– lationship between plant diversity and grasshopper diver- grasshopper interactions in sown margin strips and the sity or abundance. Since plant identity and diversity are respective effects of plant identity and diversity on driven by the initial sown mixture, our study suggests that grasshoppers. We surveyed plants and grasshoppers in 44 by optimizing the seed mixture, it is possible to manage sown margin strips located in Western France which were grasshopper diversity or abundance in sown margin strips.
    [Show full text]
  • ED45E Rare and Scarce Species Hierarchy.Pdf
    104 Species 55 Mollusc 8 Mollusc 334 Species 181 Mollusc 28 Mollusc 44 Species 23 Vascular Plant 14 Flowering Plant 45 Species 23 Vascular Plant 14 Flowering Plant 269 Species 149 Vascular Plant 84 Flowering Plant 13 Species 7 Mollusc 1 Mollusc 42 Species 21 Mollusc 2 Mollusc 43 Species 22 Mollusc 3 Mollusc 59 Species 30 Mollusc 4 Mollusc 59 Species 31 Mollusc 5 Mollusc 68 Species 36 Mollusc 6 Mollusc 81 Species 43 Mollusc 7 Mollusc 105 Species 56 Mollusc 9 Mollusc 117 Species 63 Mollusc 10 Mollusc 118 Species 64 Mollusc 11 Mollusc 119 Species 65 Mollusc 12 Mollusc 124 Species 68 Mollusc 13 Mollusc 125 Species 69 Mollusc 14 Mollusc 145 Species 81 Mollusc 15 Mollusc 150 Species 84 Mollusc 16 Mollusc 151 Species 85 Mollusc 17 Mollusc 152 Species 86 Mollusc 18 Mollusc 158 Species 90 Mollusc 19 Mollusc 184 Species 105 Mollusc 20 Mollusc 185 Species 106 Mollusc 21 Mollusc 186 Species 107 Mollusc 22 Mollusc 191 Species 110 Mollusc 23 Mollusc 245 Species 136 Mollusc 24 Mollusc 267 Species 148 Mollusc 25 Mollusc 270 Species 150 Mollusc 26 Mollusc 333 Species 180 Mollusc 27 Mollusc 347 Species 189 Mollusc 29 Mollusc 349 Species 191 Mollusc 30 Mollusc 365 Species 196 Mollusc 31 Mollusc 376 Species 203 Mollusc 32 Mollusc 377 Species 204 Mollusc 33 Mollusc 378 Species 205 Mollusc 34 Mollusc 379 Species 206 Mollusc 35 Mollusc 404 Species 221 Mollusc 36 Mollusc 414 Species 228 Mollusc 37 Mollusc 415 Species 229 Mollusc 38 Mollusc 416 Species 230 Mollusc 39 Mollusc 417 Species 231 Mollusc 40 Mollusc 418 Species 232 Mollusc 41 Mollusc 419 Species 233
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition of a Two-Element Song in the Grasshopper <Emphasis Type="Italic">Chorthippus Dorsatus</Emphasis&G
    J Comp Physiol A (1992) 171:405-412 Joul~l of Comparative .....,, Physiology A ~%", Springer-Verlag 1992 Recognition of a two-element song in the grasshopper Chorthippus dorsatus (Orthoptera: Gomphocerinae) Andreas Stumpner 1 and Otto von Helversen Institut fiir Zoologie II, Friedrich-Alexander Universit~it Erlangen-Nfirnberg, Staudtstr. 5, W 8520 Erlangen, FRG Accepted June 6, 1992 Summary. Males of the grasshopper Chorthippus dor- by the second note "qui" (Narins and Capranica 1976, satus produce songphrases which contain two differently 1978). Calling songs of the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus structured elements - pulsed syllables in the first part (A) also consist of two distinctly different elements, "chirp" and ongoing noise in the second part (B). Females of Ch. and "trill". T. oceanicus females prefer song models com- dorsatus answer to artificial song models only if both prising chirps but no trills over 100% trill models, while elements A and B are present. Females strongly prefer males show the reversed preference (Pollack and Hoy song models in which the order of elements is A preced- 1979, 1981; Pollack 1982). Also, in the seventeen-year ing B. Females discriminate between the two elements cicada Magicicada cassini the first calling song element mainly by the existence of gaps within A-syllables. Pulses "tick" obviously is used for synchronizing male chorus- of 5-8 ms separated by gaps of 8-15 ms make most ing, while the second element "buzz" effectively elicits effective A-syllables, while syllable duration and syllable phonotaxis in females (Huber et al. 1990). intervals are less critical parameters. Females respond to In addition to frogs, crickets and cicadas, many spe- models which contain more than 3 A-syllables with high cies of grasshoppers have evolved complex acoustic com- probability.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoological Philosophy
    ZOOLOGICAL PHILOSOPHY AN EXPOSITION WITH REGARD TO THE NATURAL HISTORY OF ANIMALS THE DIVERSITY OF THEIR ORGANISATION AND THE FACULTIES WHICH THEY DERIVE FROM IT; THE PHYSICAL CAUSES WHICH MAINTAIN LIFE WITHIr-i THEM AND GIVE RISE TO THEIR VARIOUS MOVEMENTS; LASTLY, THOSE WHICH PRODUCE FEELING AND INTELLIGENCE IN SOME AMONG THEM ;/:vVVNu. BY y;..~~ .9 I J. B. LAMARCK MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED LONDON' BOMBAY' CALCUTTA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN COMPANY TRANSLATED, WITH AN INTRODUCTION, BY NEW YORK • BOSTON . CHICAGO DALLAS • SAN FRANCISCO HUGH ELLIOT THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, LTD. AUTHOR OF "MODERN SCIENC\-<: AND THE ILLUSIONS OF PROFESSOR BRRGSON" TORONTO EDITOR OF H THE LETTERS OF JOHN STUART MILL," ETC., ETC. MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED ST. MARTIN'S STREET, LONDON TABLE OF CONTENTS P.4.GE INTRODUCTION xvii Life-The Philo8ophie Zoologique-Zoology-Evolution-In. heritance of acquired characters-Classification-Physiology­ Psychology-Conclusion. PREFACE· 1 Object of the work, and general observations on the subjects COPYRIGHT dealt with in it. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE 9 Some general considerations on the interest of the study of animals and their organisation, especially among the most imperfect. PART I. CONSIDERATIONS ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF ANIMALS, THEIR CHARACTERS, AFFINITIES, ORGANISATION, CLASSIFICATION AND SPECIES. CHAP. I. ON ARTIFICIAL DEVICES IN DEALING WITH THE PRO- DUCTIONS OF NATURE 19 How schematic classifications, classes, orders, families, genera and nomenclature are only artificial devices. Il. IMPORTANCE OF THE CONSIDERATION OF AFFINITIES 29 How a knowledge of the affinities between the known natural productions lies at the base of natural science, and is the funda- mental factor in a general classification of animals.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Short Horn Grasshoppers in the Menoua Division, West Region of Cameroon
    AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY JOURNAL OF NORTH AMERICA ISSN Print: 2151-7517, ISSN Online: 2151-7525, doi:10.5251/abjna.2013.4.3.291.299 © 2013, ScienceHuβ, http://www.scihub.org/ABJNA An inventory of short horn grasshoppers in the Menoua Division, West Region of Cameroon Seino RA1, Dongmo TI1, Ghogomu RT2, Kekeunou S3, Chifon RN1, Manjeli Y4 1Laboratory of Applied Ecology (LABEA), Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang, P.O. Box 353 Dschang, Cameroon, 2Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture and Agronomic Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, P.O. Box 222, Dschang, Cameroon. 3 Département de Biologie et Physiologie Animale, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Yaoundé 1, Cameroun 4 Department of Biotechnology and Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture and Agronomic Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, P.O. Box 222, Dschang, Cameroon. ABSTRACT The present study was carried out as a first documentation of short horn grasshoppers in the Menoua Division of Cameroon. A total of 1587 specimens were collected from six sites i.e. Dschang (265), Fokoue (253), Fongo – Tongo (267), Nkong – Ni (271), Penka Michel (268) and Santchou (263). Identification of these grasshoppers showed 28 species that included 22 Acrididae and 6 Pyrgomorphidae. The Acrididae belonged to 8 subfamilies (Acridinae, Catantopinae, Cyrtacanthacridinae, Eyprepocnemidinae, Oedipodinae, Oxyinae, Spathosterninae and Tropidopolinae) while the Pyrgomorphidae belonged to only one subfamily (Pyrgomorphinae). The Catantopinae (Acrididae) showed the highest number of species while Oxyinae, Spathosterninae and Tropidopolinae showed only one species each. Ten Acrididae species (Acanthacris ruficornis, Anacatantops sp, Catantops melanostictus, Coryphosima stenoptera, Cyrtacanthacris aeruginosa, Eyprepocnemis noxia, Gastrimargus africanus, Heteropternis sp, Ornithacris turbida, and Trilophidia conturbata ) and one Pyrgomorphidae (Zonocerus variegatus) were collected in all the six sites.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Taxonomic Significance of Aedeagus in the Classification Of
    International Journal of Entomology Research International Journal of Entomology Research ISSN: 2455-4758; Impact Factor: RJIF 5.24 www.entomologyjournals.com Volume 1; Issue 7; November 2016; Page No. 20-31 Taxonomic significance of aedeagus in the classification of Indian Acrididae (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) Shahnila USMANI, Mohd. Kamil Usmani, Mohammad AMIR Section of Entomology, Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India Abstract Comparative study of aedeagus is made in one hundred and two species of grasshoppers representing fifty-nine genera belonging to the family Acrididae. Its taxonomic significance is shown. Divided, undivided or flexured conditions of aedeagus is taken as familial character. Apical valve of aedeagus longer or shorter than basal valve is considered as generic character. Shape of apical and basal valves is suggested as specific character. Keywords: 1. Introduction done in clove oil. The aedeagus was mounted in Canada The aedeagus is a main intromittent organ consisting of a pair balsam on a cavity slide under 22mm square cover glass. of basal and apical valves. The basal valves are lying above the Drawings were made with the help of Camera lucida. spermatophore sac and connected by the flexure with the long curved apical valves which are normally concealed under the 3. Description of Aedeagus membranous pallium. During the course of copulation it is Subfamily Acridinae inserted between ventral ovipositor valves of the female into 1. Truxalis eximia Eichwald, 1830 (Fig. 1 A) vagina and its tip reaches the spermathecal duct. Dirsh & Aedeagus flexured, apical valve long and narrow, slightly Uvarov (1953) [2] studied apical valves of penis in three species curved, apex obtusely pointed, slightly narrower and shorter of Anacridium.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Steppengrashüpfer, Chorthippus Vagans
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Göttinger Naturkundliche Schriften Jahr/Year: 1994 Band/Volume: 3 Autor(en)/Author(s): Meineke Thomas, Menge Kerstin, Grein Günter Artikel/Article: Der Steppengrashüpfer, Chorthippus vagans (Eversmann, 1848), (Insecta: Orthoptera) im und am Harz gefunden 45-53 Göttinger Naturkundliche Schriften3, 1994: 4 5 - 53 © 1994 Biologische Schutzgemeinschaft Göttingen Der Steppengrashüpfer, Chorthippus vagans (Ev ersm a n n , 1848), (Insecta: Orthoptera) im und am Harz gefunden* The Heath Grasshopper, Chorthippus vagans (E v e r s m a n n , 1848), (Insecta: Orthoptera) recorded in the Harz mountains Thomas Meineke, Kerstin Menge und Günter Grein The Heath Grasshopper, Chorthippus vagans, was recorded in and around the Harz mountains. Distribution, status and habitats are described and discussed. 1. Einleitung und Dorset) (MARSHALL & Haes 1988), Nord-Frankreich (Flandern) (Duijm & Der Steppengrashüpfer wurde in den Kruseman 1983), den Niederlanden meisten Teilen Süd- wie Mitteleuropas (Gelderland) (Hermes & Fliervoet 1987), und ostwärts bis in den Südteil der Nord-Jütland (Skagen, Dänemark) Sowjetunion nachgewiesen (Harz 1975). (Holst 1986) und Nord-Polen (Raum Aufgrund der meist kleinen und oft weit Danzig) (Zacher 1917) markiert. voneinander entfernt lebenden Popula­ In Niedersachsen wurde Chorthippus tionen gilt die Feldheuschreckenart in vagans bisher in 21 Meßtischblatt-Qua­ Mitteleuropa jedoch als relativ selten dranten beobachtet, und zwar in den (Bellmann 1985). Bereichen Lingen/Ems, Sage in Süd- Die nördliche Arealgrenze wird nach Oldenburg, Steinhuder Meer, Elbdünen den gegenwärtigen Kenntnissen durch zwischen Hitzacker und Bleckede, Göhr­ Fundorte in Süd-England (Hampshire de und Drawehn sowie um Gifhorn (vgl. *) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transcriptomic and Genomic Architecture of Acrididae Grasshoppers
    The Transcriptomic and Genomic Architecture of Acrididae Grasshoppers Dissertation To Fulfil the Requirements for the Degree of “Doctor of Philosophy” (PhD) Submitted to the Council of the Faculty of Biological Sciences of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena by Bachelor of Science, Master of Science, Abhijeet Shah born on 7th November 1984, Hyderabad, India 1 Academic reviewers: 1. Prof. Holger Schielzeth, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 2. Prof. Manja Marz, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 3. Prof. Rolf Beutel, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 4. Prof. Frieder Mayer, Museum für Naturkunde Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Berlin 5. Prof. Steve Hoffmann, Leibniz Institute on Aging – Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena 6. Prof. Aletta Bonn, Friedrich Schiller University Jena Date of oral defense: 24.02.2020 2 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 5 Zusammenfassung............................................................................................................ 7 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9 Genetic polymorphism ............................................................................................................. 9 Lewontin’s paradox ....................................................................................................................................... 9 The evolution
    [Show full text]