White-Footed and Deer Mice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

White-Footed and Deer Mice University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Wildlife Damage for July 1994 White-Footed and Deer Mice Robert M. Timm University of California, Hopland Walter E. Howard University of California, Davis Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmhandbook Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Timm, Robert M. and Howard, Walter E., "White-Footed and Deer Mice" (1994). The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage. 9. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmhandbook/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Robert M. Timm Superintendent and Extension Wildlife Specialist WHITE-FOOTED AND Hopland Research and Extension Center University of California DEER MICE Hopland, California 95449 Walter E. Howard Professor Emeritus Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Conservation Biology University of California Davis, California 95616 Fig. 1. The deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus Damage Prevention and Store furniture cushions, drawers, and Fumigants Control Methods other items in infrequently used None are registered. buildings in ways that reduce Trapping Exclusion nesting sites. Snap traps. Rodent-proof construction will Frightening exclude mice from buildings and Not effective. Box- (Sherman) type traps. other structures. Repellents Automatic multiple-catch traps. Use hardware cloth (1/4-inch [0.6 cm] Other Methods mesh) or similar materials to exclude Naphthalene (moth balls or flakes) mice from garden seed beds. may be effective in confined spaces. Alternative feeding: Experiments Habitat Modification Toxicants suggest that application of sunflower seed may significantly Store food items left in cabins or other Anticoagulants. reduce consumption of conifer seed infrequently used buildings in Zinc phosphide. in forest reseeding operations, rodent-proof containers. although the tests have not been followed to regeneration. PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF WILDLIFE DAMAGE — 1994 Cooperative Extension Division Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Nebraska - Lincoln United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Animal Damage Control B-47 Great Plains Agricultural Council Wildlife Committee Identification southwestern United States to the Texas panhandle. The rock mouse is Fifteen species of native mice of the limited to Colorado, southeastern genus Peromyscus may be found in the Utah, eastern Arizona, New Mexico, United States. The two most common and the far western portion of Texas. and widely distributed species are the The white-ankled mouse is found only deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus, in parts of Texas and small areas in Fig. 1) and the white-footed mouse southern New Mexico, southern (P. leucopus). This chapter will deal Oklahoma, and southern Arizona. primarily with these species. Collec- The Merriam mouse is limited to areas tively, all species of Peromyscus are within southern Arizona. The Califor- often referred to as “white-footed nia mouse ranges from San Francisco mice” or “deer mice.” Other species a Bay to northern Baja California, include the brush mouse (P. boylei), including parts of the southern San cactus mouse (P. eremicus), canyon Joaquin Valley. The Sitka mouse is mouse (P. crinitus), cotton mouse found only on certain islands of Alaska (P. gossypinus), golden mouse and British Columbia. (P. nuttalli), piñon mouse (P. truei), rock mouse (P. difficilis), white-ankled The oldfield mouse is distributed mouse (P. pectoralis), Merriam mouse across eastern Alabama, Georgia, (P. merriami), California mouse South Carolina, and Florida. The (P. californicus), Sitka mouse Florida mouse, as its name indicates, is (P. sitkensis), oldfield mouse (P. polio- found only in Florida. notus), and the Florida mouse (P. floridanus). Habitat All of the Peromyscus species have The deer mouse occupies nearly every white feet, usually white undersides, type of habitat within its range, from and brownish upper surfaces. Their b forests to grasslands. It is the most tails are relatively long, sometimes as widely distributed and abundant long as the head and body. The deer Fig. 2. Range of the deer mouse (P. maniculatus) mammal in North America. mouse and some other species have a (a) and white-footed mouse (P. leucopus) (b) in North America. distinct separation between the brown- The white-footed mouse is also widely ish back and white belly. Their tails are distributed but prefers wooded or brushy areas. It is sometimes found in also sharply bicolored. It is difficult The brush mouse is found from south- open areas. even for an expert to tell all of the western Missouri and northwestern species apart. Arkansas through Oklahoma, central The other species of Peromyscus have In comparison to house mice, white- and western Texas, New Mexico, somewhat more specialized habitat footed and deer mice have larger eyes southwestern Colorado, Utah, Ari- preferences. For example, the cactus and ears. They are considered by most zona, and California. The cactus mouse occurs in low deserts with people to be more “attractive” than mouse is limited to western Texas, sandy soil and scattered vegetation house mice, and they do not have the southern New Mexico, Arizona and on rocky outcrops. The brush characteristic mousy odor of house (except the northeast portion), and mouse lives in chaparral areas of semi- mice. All species of Peromyscus cause southern California. The canyon desert regions, often in rocky habitats. similar problems and require similar mouse occurs in western Colorado, solutions. northwestern New Mexico, northern Food Habits and western Arizona, Utah, Nevada, Range southern California, southeast Oregon, White-footed and deer mice are prima- and southwestern Idaho. rily seed eaters. Frequently they will feed on seeds, nuts, acorns, and other The deer mouse is found throughout The cotton mouse is found only in the similar items that are available. They most of North America (Fig. 2). The southeastern United States from east also consume fruits, insects and insect white-footed mouse is found through- Texas and Arkansas through south- larvae, fungi, and possibly some green out the United States east of the Rocky eastern Virginia. The golden mouse vegetation. They often store quantities Mountains except in parts of the occupies a similar range but it extends of food near their nest sites, particu- Southeast (Fig. 2). slightly farther north. larly in the fall when seeds, nuts, or The piñon mouse is found from south- acorns are abundant. western California through the B-48 General Biology, Reproduction, and Behavior White-footed and deer mice are mostly nocturnal with a home range of 1/3 acre to 4 acres (0.1 to 1.6 ha) or larger. A summer population density may reach a high of about 15 mice per acre (37/ha). In warm regions, reproduction may occur more or less year-round in some species. More typically, breeding occurs from spring until fall with a summer lull. This is especially true in cooler climates. Litter size varies from 1 to 8 young, but is usually 3 to 5. Fig. 3. Abandoned bird nests are frequently Females may have from 2 to 4 or more roofed and converted into white-footed mouse (P. leucopus) homes. litters per year, depending on species and climate. doned bird or squirrel nests, adding a locating and digging up buried seed. During the breeding season, female protective “roof” of twigs and other Formerly, much reforestation was white-footed and deer mice come into materials to completely enclose a attempted by direct seeding of clear- heat every fifth day until impregnated. bird’s nest (Fig. 3). Like deer mice, cut areas, but seed predation by deer The gestation period is usually 21 to 23 they nest at or just below ground level mice and white-footed mice, and by days, but may be as long as 37 days in or in buildings. other rodents and birds, caused fre- nursing females. Young are weaned quent failure in the regeneration. For when they are 2 to 3 weeks old and Damage and Damage this reason, to reestablish Douglas fir become sexually mature at about 7 to 8 Identification and other commercial timber species weeks of age. Those born in spring and today, it is often necessary to hand- summer may breed that same year. The principal problem caused by plant seedlings, despite the increased expense of this method. Mated pairs usually remain together white-footed and deer mice is their during the breeding season but may tendency to enter homes, cabins, and In mid-1993, the deer mouse (P. take new mates in the spring if both other structures that are not rodent- maniculatus) was first implicated as a survive the winter. If one mate dies, a proof. Here they build nests, store potential reservoir of a type of new one is acquired. Family groups food, and can cause considerable hantavirus responsible for an adult usually nest together through the win- damage to upholstered furniture, respiratory distress syndrome, leading ter. They do not hibernate but may mattresses, clothing, paper, or other to several deaths in the Four Corners become torpid for a few days when materials that they find suitable for area of the United States. Subsequent winter weather is severe. their nest-building activities. Nests, isolations of the virus thought respon- droppings, and other signs left by sible for this illness have been made Nests consist of stems, twigs, leaves, these mice are similar to those of house from several Western states. The roots of grasses, and other fibrous mice. White-footed and deer mice source of the disease is thought to be materials. They may be lined with fur, have a greater tendency to cache food through human contact with urine, feathers, or shredded cloth.
Recommended publications
  • Geographic Distribution of Hantaviruses Associated with Neotomine and Sigmodontine Rodents, Mexico Mary L
    Geographic Distribution of Hantaviruses Associated with Neotomine and Sigmodontine Rodents, Mexico Mary L. Milazzo,1 Maria N.B. Cajimat,1 Hannah E. Romo, Jose G. Estrada-Franco, L. Ignacio Iñiguez-Dávalos, Robert D. Bradley, and Charles F. Fulhorst To increase our knowledge of the geographic on the North American continent are Bayou virus, Black distribution of hantaviruses associated with neotomine or Creek Canal virus (BCCV), Choclo virus (CHOV), New sigmodontine rodents in Mexico, we tested 876 cricetid York virus, and Sin Nombre virus (SNV) (3–7). Other rodents captured in 18 Mexican states (representing at hantaviruses that are principally associated with neotomine least 44 species in the subfamily Neotominae and 10 or North American sigmodontine rodents include Carrizal species in the subfamily Sigmodontinae) for anti-hantavirus virus (CARV), Catacamas virus, El Moro Canyon virus IgG. We found antibodies against hantavirus in 35 (4.0%) rodents. Nucleotide sequence data from 5 antibody-positive (ELMCV), Huitzilac virus (HUIV), Limestone Canyon rodents indicated that Sin Nombre virus (the major cause of virus (LSCV), Montano virus (MTNV), Muleshoe virus hantavirus pulmonary syndrome [HPS] in the United States) (MULV), Playa de Oro virus, and Rio Segundo virus is enzootic in the Mexican states of Nuevo León, San Luis (RIOSV) (8–14). Potosí, Tamaulipas, and Veracruz. However, HPS has not Specifi c rodents (usually 1 or 2 closely related been reported from these states, which suggests that in species) are the principal hosts of the hantaviruses, northeastern Mexico, HPS has been confused with other for which natural host relationships have been well rapidly progressive, life-threatening respiratory diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordway- Swisher Biological Station Weekend Lab Field Manual for Wildlife Techniques (WIS 4945C)
    Ordway- Swisher Biological Station Weekend Lab Field Manual For Wildlife Techniques (WIS 4945c) Tentative schedule of activities for Ordway Field trip This schedule is meant to give you a rough outline of the weekend field trip. However it is likely that changes will be made based on conditions in the field, weather, and logistics. The 1s and 2s are to indicate the groups that will be assigned to each activity. Friday Saturday Sunday 7:00 -10:00 1. Small mammals 2. Small mammals 2. Bird/meso-mam. 1. Bird/meso-mam. 10:00-12:30 1. Amphibians 2.Insect lab 2. Insect lab 1. Amphibian 12:30 - 1:30 Lunch/break Clean camp/ Clean Traps/ Depart 2:00-3:30 Arrival/ set up 1 & 2. camp Frogs, gopher 3:30 -4:30 1. S. mammal set tortoise, P. gopher up 2. Amphibians, 4:30-6:00 meso-mammal 2. Small Mammal traps setup 1. Meso mammals /Squirrels 6:00-7:00 Dinner Dinner 7:30- 10:00 1. Call backs, FLIR, 1. Call backs, FLIR, (gators) spotlighting spotlighting 7:45- 10:00 2. Gators 2. Gators (Spotlight) Field Notebook Using a field notebook Being a wildlife professional means that you are a naturalist who makes observations about the natural environment and the interaction among animals, plants and the land. It is through these types of observations that you will develop an understanding of the natural world. These observations can also help us ask questions that lead to scientific research. From Darwin to Leopold on to the present the best method for recording observations, thoughts and activities in the field has been the field notebook.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Species Native to the USA and Canada for Which the MIL Has an Image (296) 31 July 2021
    Mammal species native to the USA and Canada for which the MIL has an image (296) 31 July 2021 ARTIODACTYLA (includes CETACEA) (38) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei - Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 7. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Bos bison - American Bison 2. Oreamnos americanus - Mountain Goat 3. Ovibos moschatus - Muskox 4. Ovis canadensis - Bighorn Sheep 5. Ovis dalli - Thinhorn Sheep CERVIDAE - deer 1. Alces alces - Moose 2. Cervus canadensis - Wapiti (Elk) 3. Odocoileus hemionus - Mule Deer 4. Odocoileus virginianus - White-tailed Deer 5. Rangifer tarandus -Caribou DELPHINIDAE - ocean dolphins 1. Delphinus delphis - Common Dolphin 2. Globicephala macrorhynchus - Short-finned Pilot Whale 3. Grampus griseus - Risso's Dolphin 4. Lagenorhynchus albirostris - White-beaked Dolphin 5. Lissodelphis borealis - Northern Right-whale Dolphin 6. Orcinus orca - Killer Whale 7. Peponocephala electra - Melon-headed Whale 8. Pseudorca crassidens - False Killer Whale 9. Sagmatias obliquidens - Pacific White-sided Dolphin 10. Stenella coeruleoalba - Striped Dolphin 11. Stenella frontalis – Atlantic Spotted Dolphin 12. Steno bredanensis - Rough-toothed Dolphin 13. Tursiops truncatus - Common Bottlenose Dolphin MONODONTIDAE - narwhals, belugas 1. Delphinapterus leucas - Beluga 2. Monodon monoceros - Narwhal PHOCOENIDAE - porpoises 1. Phocoena phocoena - Harbor Porpoise 2. Phocoenoides dalli - Dall’s Porpoise PHYSETERIDAE - sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus – Sperm Whale TAYASSUIDAE - peccaries Dicotyles tajacu - Collared Peccary CARNIVORA (48) CANIDAE - dogs 1. Canis latrans - Coyote 2.
    [Show full text]
  • David L.Reed
    Curriculum Vitae David L. Reed DAVID L. REED (February 2021) Associate Provost University of Florida EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: Management Development Program, Graduate School of Education, Harvard Univ. 2016 Advanced Leadership for Academic Professionals, University of Florida 2016 Ph.D. Louisiana State University (Biological Sciences) 2000 M.S. Louisiana State University (Zoology) 1994 B.S. University of North Carolina, Wilmington (Biological Sciences) 1991 PROFESSIONAL EXERIENCE: Administrative (University of Florida) Associate Provost, Office of the Provost 2018 –present Associate Director for Research and Collections, Florida Museum 2015 – 2020 Provost Fellow, Office of the Provost 2017 – 2018 Assistant Director for Research and Collections, Florida Museum 2012 – 2015 Academic Curator of Mammals, Florida Museum, University of Florida 2014 – present Associate Curator of Mammals, Florida Museum, University of Florida 2009 – 2014 Assistant Curator of Mammals, Florida Museum, University of Florida 2004 – 2009 Research Assistant Professor, Department of Biology, University of Utah 2003 – 2004 NSF Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Biology, University of Utah 2001 – 2003 Courtesy/Adjunct Graduate Faculty, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, UF 2009 – present Graduate Faculty, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, UF 2005 – present Graduate Faculty, Genetics and Genomics Graduate Program, UF 2005 – present Graduate Faculty, Department of Biology, UF 2004 – present ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD: Associate Provost, Office of the Provost, University of Florida July 2018-present Artificial Intelligence • Serve on and organize the AI Executive Workgroup dedicated to highest priority aspects of the AI Initiative. • Organize and host (Emcee) the all-day AI Retreat in April 2020. Had over 600 participants. • Establish AI Workgroups on nearly a dozen topics • Establish and Chair the AI Academic Workgroup focused on the AI Certificate, new and existing AI courses, the development of new certificates, minors, tracks and majors.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 243/Friday, December 18, 1998
    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 243 / Friday, December 18, 1998 / Rules and Regulations 70053 2. Paperwork Reduction Act 6. Civil Justice Reform Appendix BÐIssuers of Motor Vehicle Insurance Policies Subject to the The information collection This final rule does not have any retroactive effect, and it does not Reporting Requirements Only in requirements in this final rule have been Designated States submitted to and approved by the Office preempt any State law, 49 U.S.C. 33117 of Management and Budget (OMB) provides that judicial review of this rule Alfa Insurance Group (Alabama) 1 pursuant to the requirements of the may be obtained pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Allmerica P & C Companies (Michigan) Arbella Mutual Insurance (Massachusetts) Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 32909, section 32909 does not require submission of a petition for Auto Club of Michigan Group (Michigan) 3501 et seq.). This collection of Commerce Group, Inc. (Massachusetts) information was assigned OMB Control reconsideration or other administrative Commercial Union Insurance Companies Number 2127±0547 (``Insurer Reporting proceedings before parties may file suit (Maine) Requirements'') and was approved for in court. Concord Group Insurance Companies use through July 31, 2000. (Vermont) List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 544 Island Insurance Group (Hawaii) 1 3. Regulatory Flexibility Act Crime insurance, Insurance, Insurance Kentucky Farm Bureau Group (Kentucky) companies, Motor vehicles, Reporting Nodak Mutual Insurance Company (North The agency has also considered the and recordkeeping requirements. Dakota) effects of this rulemaking under the Southern Farm Bureau Group (Arkansas, Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 In consideration of the foregoing, 49 Mississippi) U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Watching in Northern Mexico Vladimir Dinets
    Mammal watching in Northern Mexico Vladimir Dinets Seldom visited by mammal watchers, Northern Mexico is a fascinating part of the world with a diverse mammal fauna. In addition to its many endemics, many North American species are easier to see here than in USA, while some tropical ones can be seen in unusual habitats. I travelled there a lot (having lived just across the border for a few years), but only managed to visit a small fraction of the number of places worth exploring. Many generations of mammologists from USA and Mexico have worked there, but the knowledge of local mammals is still a bit sketchy, and new discoveries will certainly be made. All information below is from my trips in 2003-2005. The main roads are better and less traffic-choked than in other parts of the country, but the distances are greater, so any traveler should be mindful of fuel (expensive) and highway tolls (sometimes ridiculously high). In theory, toll roads (carretera quota) should be paralleled by free roads (carretera libre), but this isn’t always the case. Free roads are often narrow, winding, and full of traffic, but sometimes they are good for night drives (toll roads never are). All guidebooks to Mexico I’ve ever seen insist that driving at night is so dangerous, you might as well just kill yourself in advance to avoid the horror. In my experience, driving at night is usually safer, because there is less traffic, you see the headlights of upcoming cars before making the turn, and other drivers blink their lights to warn you of livestock on the road ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Mammals at Walnut Canyon, Wupatki, and Sunset Crater National Monuments
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Inventory of Mammals at Walnut Canyon, Wupatki, and Sunset Crater National Monuments Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR–2009/278 ON THE COVER: Top: Wupatki National Monument; bottom left: bobcat (Lynx rufus); bottom right: Wupatki pocket mouse (Perogna- thus amplus cineris) at Wupatki National Monument. Photos courtesy of U.S. Geological Survey/Charles Drost. Inventory of Mammals at Walnut Canyon, Wupatki, and Sunset Crater National Monuments Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR—2009/278 Author Charles Drost U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Editing and Design Jean Palumbo National Park Service, Southern Colorado Plateau Network Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona December 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Fauna Associated with Gopher Tortoise Burrows at Florida Atlantic
    Identification of fauna associated with Gopher Tortoise burrows at Florida Atlantic University Preserve and Jonathan Dickinson State Park Laura De Souza Dr. Evelyn Frazier and Jessica Huffman Research Proposal Application for the Honors Thesis Program July 2018 1 Introduction The gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) is endemic to the southeastern United States, and threatened throughout its distribution from extreme eastern Louisiana, to southern South Carolina and Florida1,2. The gopher tortoise is an herbivorous chelonian with a life span of up to 60 years according to Florida Fish and Wildlife. Individuals may become reproductively mature typically around 7 years of age and females egg clutch range from 1-15 eggs in each reproductive season3 where they are mating and laying eggs. Gopher tortoise are originally said to be mating and courting from the month April-June, and laying eggs from May to June4 . However, evidence are being shown that due to warmer temperature, areas in Florida such as Jupiter shows mounting evens from February to December, carcasses of hatching from January to December, and all year round courtship4. The gopher tortoises excavate burrows that can be up to 4 m deep and 12 m long. Chelonians, are ectothermic and rely on their environment to regulate internal body temperatures. Tortoises of the genus Gopherus have been observed using thermoregulatory behaviors such as seeking shade, frothing, rapid breathing, and basking 5. Tortoises and other species have been observed going outside of the burrows to bask and warm up their bodies along with multiple other ectothermic species such as snakes, frogs, and lizards. When temperatures were too extreme, the tortoises, reptiles, mammals, amphibians, and insects would seek shelter in the shade of the burrows 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint Earth Field Guide
    Blueprint Earth Field Guide Plants Note that this list is not comprehensive. If you are uncertain of the identification you’ve made of a particular plant, take a picture and a voucher (when possible) and discuss your observations with the Supervisory Scientist team. Trees & Bushes Joshua tree - Yucca brevifolia Parry saltbush - Atriplex parryi Mojave sage - Salvia pachyphylla Creosote bush - Larrea tridentata Mojave yucca - Yucca schidigera Chaparral yucca - Yucca whipplei Torr. Desert holly - A. hymenelytra Torr. Manzanita - Arctostaphylos Adans. Cacti Barrel cactus - Ferocactus cylindraceus var. Jumping cholla - Cylindropuntia bigelovii Engelm. lecontei Foxtail cactus - Escobaria vivipara var. alversonii Silver cholla - Opuntia echinocarpa var. echinocarpa Pencil cholla - Opuntia ramosissima Cottontop cactus - Echinocactus polycephalus Hedgehog cactus - Echinocereus engelmanii var. Mojave mound cactus - Echinocereeus chrysocentrus triglochiderus var. mojavensis Beavertail cactus - Opuntia basilaris Grasses Indian Rice Grass - Oryzopsis hymenoides Bush Muhly - Muhlenbergia porteri Fluff Grass - Erioneuron pulchella Red Brome - Bromus rubens Desert Needle - Stipa speciosa Big Galleta – Hilaria rigida Flowers Wooly Amsonia Chuparosa Amsonia tomentosa Justicia californica Brittlebush Encelia farinosa Chia Salvia columbariae Sacred Datura Desert Calico Datura wrightii Loeseliastrum matthewsii Bigelow Coreopsis Desert five-spot Coreopsis bigelovii Eremalche rotundifolia - Desert Chicory Rafinesquia Desert Lupine neomexicana Desert Larkspur
    [Show full text]
  • Prescribed Burning Effects, Scrub, Refugia, Survival, Small Mammals
    International Journal of Ecosystem 2014, 4(3): 135-149 DOI: 10.5923/j.ije.20140403.06 Small Mammal Use of Refugia, Population Recovery, and Survival Following Prescribed Burning in Scrubby Flatwoods Ecosystem, Florida, USA Jose L Silva-Lugo Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA Abstract This study was conducted in Cedar Key Scrub State Reserve, Florida, USA, with the purpose of establishing: (1) if small mammals used wetlands as refugia following prescribed fire, (2) if small mammals returned to burned areas after the regrowth of the vegetation, and (3) if prescribed burning had a negative effect on the survival of the species. Few studies have addressed these topics in the literature, which are important for management and restoration purposes. The design consisted of two treatments and two control sites (scrub) with 100 traps each and a wetland next to each site with two transects (10 traps each) between the scrub and the wetland. A total of 182 individuals of Florida mouse (Podomys floridanus), cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus), cotton mice (Peromyscus gossypinus), and golden mouse (Ochrotomys nuttalli) were marked to monitor movements between the scrub and the wetlands, but only Florida mouse and cotton rat had sufficient data for analysis. The survival analysis was carried out by using Cormack-Jolly-Seber model and the program MARK. In treatment sites, Florida mouse and cotton rat were captured primarily in the scrub (69%) before burning, they used the vegetation surrounding wetlands as refugia for 11 months after burning, and they returned to the scrub after that.
    [Show full text]
  • A Longitudinal Study of Sin Nombre Virus Prevalence in Rodents, Southeastern Arizona
    Hantavirus A Longitudinal Study of Sin Nombre Virus Prevalence in Rodents, Southeastern Arizona Amy J. Kuenzi, Michael L. Morrison, Don E. Swann, Paul C. Hardy, and Giselle T. Downard University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA We determined the prevalence of Sin Nombre virus antibodies in small mammals in southeastern Arizona. Of 1,234 rodents (from 13 species) captured each month from May through December 1995, only mice in the genus Peromyscus were seropositive. Antibody prevalence was 14.3% in 21 white-footed mice (P. leucopus), 13.3% in 98 brush mice (P. boylii), 0.8% in 118 cactus mice (P. eremicus), and 0% in 2 deer mice (P. maniculatus). Most antibody-positive mice were adult male Peromyscus captured close to one another early in the study. Population dynamics of brush mice suggest a correlation between population size and hantavirus-antibody prevalence. We examined the role of rodent species as success, and webs 2, 3, and 4 were operated from natural reservoirs for hantaviruses in southeast- May 1995 through December 1997. ern Arizona to identify the species infected with From May 1995 through September 1996, hantavirus, describe the characteristics of webs 1 and 4 were considered controls. Captured infected animals, and assess temporal and mice from these webs were identified, marked, intraspecific variation in infection rates. weighed, and measured, but not bled. Beginning in November 1996, we began collecting blood Trapping Procedures samples from mice on web 4. The bleeding process Beginning in May 1995, we established four had little effect on survival (1). The methods for permanent trapping webs on the Santa Rita obtaining blood samples and the serologic testing Experimental Range in the Santa Rita Moun- of samples for hantavirus antibodies are tains of southeastern Arizona (Pima County).
    [Show full text]
  • Seminole State Forest Soils Map
    EXHIBIT I Management Procedures for Archaeological and Historical Sites and Properties on State-Owned or Controlled Lands Management Procedures for Archaeological and Historical Sites and Properties on State-Owned or Controlled Properties (revised February 2007) These procedures apply to state agencies, local governments, and non-profits that manage state- owned properties. A. General Discussion Historic resources are both archaeological sites and historic structures. Per Chapter 267, Florida Statutes, ‘Historic property’ or ‘historic resource’ means any prehistoric district, site, building, object, or other real or personal property of historical, architectural, or archaeological value, and folklife resources. These properties or resources may include, but are not limited to, monuments, memorials, Indian habitations, ceremonial sites, abandoned settlements, sunken or abandoned ships, engineering works, treasure trove, artifacts, or other objects with intrinsic historical or archaeological value, or any part thereof, relating to the history, government, and culture of the state.” B. Agency Responsibilities Per State Policy relative to historic properties, state agencies of the executive branch must allow the Division of Historical Resources (Division) the opportunity to comment on any undertakings, whether these undertakings directly involve the state agency, i.e., land management responsibilities, or the state agency has indirect jurisdiction, i.e. permitting authority, grants, etc. No state funds should be expended on the undertaking until the Division has the opportunity to review and comment on the project, permit, grant, etc. State agencies shall preserve the historic resources which are owned or controlled by the agency. Regarding proposed demolition or substantial alterations of historic properties, consultation with the Division must occur, and alternatives to demolition must be considered.
    [Show full text]