DOCSLIB.ORG

Safe Start Initiative: Demonstration Project, Phase I Case Studies II (2000 - 2005), Report #2006-2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Safe Start Initiative: Demonstration Project, Phase I Case Studies II (2000 - 2005), Report #2006-2 The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Safe Start Initiative: Demonstration Project, Phase I Case Studies II (2000 - 2005), Report #2006-2 Author(s): Association for the Study and Development of Community Document No.: 248609 Date Received: January 2015 Award Number: 2004-JW-MU-K001 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant report available electronically. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Safe Start Initiative: Demonstration Project Safe Start Initiative Phase I Case Studies II (2000 - 2005) Report #2006-2 July 2006 July 2006 Association for the Study and Development of Community 438 N. Fr4ederick Avenue, Suite 315 This project was supported by Grant # 2004Gaithersburg,-JW-MU-K001 awarded MD 20877 by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs,(301)519-0722 U.S. Department • of(301)519-0724 Justice. Points of fax view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not necessarilywww.capablecommunity.com represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Association for the Study and Development of Community 1 September 2005 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Preface The Safe Start Demonstration Project Five Year Report (2000 – 2005) was developed by the Association for the Study and Development of Community (ASDC) for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) for the National Evaluation of the Safe Start Demonstration Project. The report covers the first five years (2000 – 2005) of the Safe Start Demonstration Project. Volume 2 includes each site’s case study. We would like to recognize Katherine Darke Schmitt (Missing and Exploited Children and Child Abuse and Neglect Programs Coordinator and Safe Start Evaluation Manager) for her leadership and support. We would also like to thank Kristen Kracke, Safe Start Program Manager, for her assistance. ASDC staff contributing to this volume include: David Chavis (Project Director); Yvette Lamb (Co-Project Director); Mary Hyde (Senior Managing Associate); Kien Lee (Senior Managing Associate); Joie Acosta (Managing Associate); Deanna Breslin (Associate); Susanna Haywood (Associate); Tina Trent (Senior Managing Associate); Dewitt Webster (Managing Associate). Sylvia Mahon (Office Coordinator) assisted in the production. ASDC would like to thank the Local Evaluators and Project Directors of the 11 Safe Start Demonstration sites for their assistance with their respective case studies. These case studies would not be possible without the collaboration of many people from among the Safe Start Demonstration Project sites, including each site’s partners who were willing to meet with ASDC during site visits. Association for the Study and Development of Community i July 2006 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ iii Chapter I Baltimore Safe Start Initiative .................................................................... 1 Chapter II Bridgeport Safe Start Initiative ................................................................ 8 Chapter III Chatham County Safe Start Initiative .................................................. 29 Chapter IV Chicago Safe Start Initiative ................................................................... 55 Chapter V Pinellas Safe Start Initiative ................................................................... 84 Chapter VI Pueblo of Zuni Safe Start Initiative...................................................... 127 Chapter VII Rochester Safe Start Initiative ............................................................ 132 Chapter VIII San Francisco SafeStart ..................................................................... 170 Chapter IX Sitka Safe Start Initiative...................................................................... 199 Chapter X Spokane Safe Start Initiative ................................................................. 218 Chapter XI Washington County Safe Start Initiative ............................................ 251 Association for the Study and Development of Community ii July 2006 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Introduction incidence and prevalence of child maltreatment or community violence Eleven communities were competitively might affect public awareness of related selected as Safe Start Demonstration issues. Related to these contextual Project sites: Baltimore, Bridgeport, conditions are community capacities (the Chatham, Chicago, Pinellas, Pueblo of number and quality of initiatives focused Zuni, Rochester (New York), San on improving the well-being of young Francisco, Sitka, Spokane, and children, for example), also expected to Washington County (Maine). The Safe impact project planning and Start Demonstration Project is funded by implementation. According to the theory the Office of Juvenile Justice and of change, community capacity would Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). The most directly affect assessment and goal of the project was to expand planning, as well as community existing partnerships among service engagement and collaboration. providers in key areas such as early Communities with relatively large childhood education/development, numbers of qualified professionals, for health, mental health, child welfare, instance, might be in a better position to family support, substance abuse reach out to the existing service provider prevention/intervention, domestic networks and engage them in assessment violence/crisis intervention, law and planning processes. In addition, the enforcement, courts, and legal services. capacity to conduct an assessment of Each demonstration site was expected to community needs and resources was create a comprehensive service delivery expected to be greatly influenced by the system to meet the needs of children and availability of local assistance, the their families at any point of entry in the ability to access national assistance, and system of care. Furthermore, this the availability of accurate community comprehensive system was expected to data. Partnerships were to be formed to improve the accessibility, delivery, and plan and initially implement a number of quality of services for young children system change activities. These activities who have been exposed to violence or were expected to change practice across are at high risk of exposure. organizations, within organizations, and at the point of direct services. The A theory of change was developed for system changes achieved were expected the Safe Start Demonstration Project to be continued, or institutionalized, in (See Figure 1). In essence, it was the form of service coordination and expected that collaborative planning and integration and improved service implementation of system change delivery. In turn, the result of continued activities would strengthen communities system changes would be increased in ways that would prevent young community supports for young children children from being exposed to violence exposed to violence such that fewer and reduce the impact of exposure for children would be exposed to violence those who were. More specifically, and the impact of exposure would be contextual conditions (political, reduced. economic, and social) were expected to influence project planning and implementation. For example, the Association for the Study and Development of Community iii July 2006 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Figure 1 SAFE START OVERALL LOGIC MODEL COMMUNITY CAPACITY System Change Institutionalization of Activities Change Integrated Assistance Development of System and Agency Local policies, Increased Community Change (e.g., service National procedures, supports for and uses of coordination and protocols integration; supportive services to address POS/Staff violence exposure and policies; improve Service decreased tolerance of service delivery within integration violence systems) Local Agency & activities (e.g., Community cross-disciplinary Point of Service Engagement & training, multi- Change (e.g., Collaboration system MIS) Within improved identification,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Title of Thesis: ACCESS to the CITY: PHYSICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL
    Title of Thesis: ACCESS TO THE CITY: PHYSICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL INCLUSION Adan Jose Ramos, Master of Architecture, Master of Real Estate Development, 2020 Thesis Directed By: Director of Architecture Program, Brian Kelly, School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation ABSTRACT Urban Renewal Highways built following the National Highway Act of 1956 perpetuate a culture of inequity and segregation by acting as socio economic dividers in many postindustrial American cities of the Great Migration. In the Post-Great Recession Real Estate Boom communities disconnected by these highways have received little to no investment, while communities in desirable locations have faced displacement. Southwest Baltimore, Maryland embodies the former. Separated from the heart of Baltimore by Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard the neighborhood has made modest strides in recovering from urban exodus and institutional racism involved in home loans, red lining, and block busting following World War II. As cities revitalize, now is a critical point in history to improve connectivity across Urban Renewal infrastructure and provide access to improved quality of life in communities like Southwest Baltimore, while maintaining affordability and existing culture. To maintain these physical dividers in place is an endorsement of divisive urbanism and subsequent inequitable culture. ACCESS TO THE CITY: PHYSICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL INCLUSION by Adan Jose Ramos Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of [Master of Architecture, Master of Real Estate Development ] [2020] Advisory Committee: Professor Brian Kelly, AIA, Director of Architecture Program, Chair Professor Emeritus Karl F.G.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This Form Is for Use in Nominating Or Requesting Determinations for Individual Properties and Districts
    1NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name L. Greif & Bro., Inc. Manufactory other names B-5140 2. Location street & number 901 N. Milton Avenue • not for publication city or town Baltimore O vicinity state Maryland code MP county Baltimore City code 510 zip code 21205 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this M nomination • request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Registerof Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property Hjrieets • does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally • statewide Mlocally.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore City Arts & Entertainment District Report
    B A LTIMORE’ S A R T S & ENT E R TAINMEN T DIS TRIC T S W ORKIN G G R OUP REP O R T MARCH 2015 BALTIMORE’S ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICTS WORKING GROUP REPORT MARCH 2015 MEMBERS CONTENTS City of Baltimore 02 Casey Brent, Special Assistant, Mayor’s Office - Economic Executive Summary and Neighborhood Development Laura Larsen, Budget Management Analyst I 04 Dan Taylor, Central Team Director, Baltimore Develop- I. Introduction ment Corporation 06 Maryland State Arts Council II. Background Pamela Dunne, Program Director, Arts & Entertainment Districts 08 III. The State of Baltimore’s A&E Districts Baltimore Office of Promotion & the Arts Bill Gilmore, Executive Director 18 Krista D. Green, Cultural Affairs Assistant Director IV. Moving Forward Bromo Tower Arts & Entertainment District Priya Bhayana, Director, Bromo Tower Arts & 21 Entertainment District Appendix A: A&E District Profiles Jim French, French Companies Jessica Lanzillotti, Everyman Theatre 29 Jeffrey Kent, Subbasement Studios Appendix B: Memorandum Highlandtown Arts & Entertainment District 32 Chris Ryer, Director, Southeast CDC Appendix C: A&E District Legislation Sandra Abbott, Acting Secretary of ha! Gina Caruso, Creative Alliance Margaret Footner, Creative Alliance Kari Snyder, Southeast CDC Station North Arts & Entertainment District Ben Stone, Executive Director, Station North Arts & Entertainment, Inc. Rebecca Chan, Program Director, Station North Arts & Entertainment, Inc. Jane Brown, Robert W. Deutsch Foundation Marian Glebes, Guppy Management, artist + curator Mike Molla, Maryland Institute College of Art EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Baltimore’s three designated Arts & Entertainment (A&E) Districts lead the city’s cultural renaissance and serve as a national model for cultural districts. The Bromo Tower, Highlandtown, and Station North Arts & Entertainment Districts produce outstanding art installations and performances, host international festivals, convene national conferences, and earn nationally competitive grants for creative placemaking and arts based community development.
    [Show full text]
  • How Baltimore Became the New York of the South: European Immigration Between 1867-1914 and the Development of Ethnic Neighborhoods Around the Port of Baltimore
    HOW BALTIMORE BECAME THE NEW YORK OF THE SOUTH: EUROPEAN IMMIGRATION BETWEEN 1867-1914 AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ETHNIC NEIGHBORHOODS AROUND THE PORT OF BALTIMORE A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies and of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Studies By Ron Cassie Georgetown University Washington, D.C. April 15, 2016 HOW BALTIMORE BECAME THE NEW YORK OF THE SOUTH: EUROPEAN IMMIGRATION BETWEEN 1867-1914 AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ETHNIC NEIGHBORHOODS AROUND THE PORT OF BALTIMORE Ron Cassie, MA Mentor: Charles Edward Yonkers, JD ABSTRACT Located 40 miles south of the Mason-Dixon Line, Baltimore was the fourth – largest city in the U.S. and the largest in the South before the Civil War, serving as the economic hub of the Mid-Atlantic region. Although Baltimore was always home to a significant free black population, the city was centered in a largely slave-holding state. Although Maryland choose neither Union or Confederate sides during the Civil War before President Abraham Lincoln sent federal troops into Baltimore, the city’s port business in the middle of the 19th century focused on the rural exports of tobacco, cotton, grain, and flour; ship building; and the importation of sugar. Politically, economically, and culturally, Maryland was, at the time, a Southern state full of plantations from the Eastern Shore across the state’s central area around Baltimore. The city, however, was more a blend of white Southern and white Northern influences, a marginalized African-American citizenry, a significant group of German immigrants, and more recent Irish arrivals at the start of the Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Action Plan July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2020
    DRAFT DRAFT Annual Action Plan July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2020 Bernard C. Young, Mayor Michael Braverman, Commissioner/DHCD Terry Hickey, Director/MOHS Annual Action Plan 1 2019 DRAFT Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 Lead and Responsible Agencies 9 Consultations 10 Participation 22 Expected Resources 25 Annual Goals and Objectives 36 Projects 44 Geographic Distribution 156 Affordable Housing 157 Public Housing 159 Homeless and Other Special Needs 161 HOPWA 165 Barriers to Affordable Housing 166 Other Actions 168 Program Specific Requirements 172 Annual Action Plan 2 2019 DRAFT Executive Summary AP-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction Baltimore City’s Consolidated Plan 2015 – 2020 is a federally required planning document that helps guide and describe community development efforts in Baltimore City and serves as the application for funding for four Federal formula grant programs. The Plan, while having many required parts, has three core components: 1) an analysis of housing and community development needs; 2) a statement of strategies and objectives to address identified needs; and 3) a detailed listing of activities that implement proposed strategies. The needs assessments and strategies, though they can be amended, remain constant for the Plan’s five-year period, while the implementing activities are updated annually through the Annual Action Plan. The Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2019/City Fiscal Year (CFY) 2020 Annual Action Plan is the fifth and final year of the current five-year Consolidated Plan period and identifies the activities to be undertaken under the four formula grant programs during the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Annual Henrietta Lacks Memorial Award Winner Announced
    Fall 2012, Issue 15 Second Annual Henrietta Lacks Memorial Award Winner Announced Johns Hopkins Urban Health Institute Awards $15,000 to Moveable Feast We’re pleased to announce Moveable Feast as the winner of the second annual Henrietta Lacks Memorial Award. Named in honor of Henrietta Lacks, the award recognizes and supports Baltimore community organizations that are collaborating with Johns Hopkins University to improve the health and well-being of the city of Baltimore. The award was presented on October 6, 2012 at the Annual Henrietta Lacks Memorial Lecture at Johns Hopkins University. Moveable Feast is one of over a dozen established community-university collaborations from across the city nominated for the award of $15,000. The organization was selected by a panel of leaders from community and city organizations and Johns Hopkins as a model collaboration for creating and sustaining healthier communities. Moveable Feast was nominated by the Hopkins-based bike team Fierce Chicks Rock. Fierce Chicks Rock and Moveable Feast have an eight year history of successful collaboration, which has resulted in significant funding for Moveable Feast’s food and nutrition services and a better continuum of care, namely for HIV/AIDS patients transitioning to outpatient care. Founded in 1989, Moveable Feast puts nutritious food on the table for people in Maryland with AIDS, breast cancer and other severe illnesses. Executive Director Tom Bonderenko accepted the award for the organization. “What this award will enable us to do, is take the household name Moveable Feast that is well known on Osler 8 and the Moore Clinic and let that become the same thing on all the oncology floors at Hopkins, that way when people go home and are in need of delivered meals, nurses, social workers and doctors think Moveable Feast is the answer for those individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline Highlights
    Timeline of Events This timeline of events is intended to highlight the scope and complexity of events leading up to and including the civil unrest that followed the arrest and death of Freddie Gray in the spring of 2015. A comprehensive review of communications, personal interviews, media reports, and official documents was completed by the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and other city agencies to provide the most accurate accounting of events as they unfolded. It is important to note that this is a summary of activity and not intended to be an account of every single action and occurrence during this time period. This document should be considered a critical element in evaluating any after action analysis of the events contained here within. 2 Sunday, 26 February 2012 In Sanford, Florida seventeen year old Trayvon Martin is shot by a neighborhood watch volunteer, which garners national attention, sparking protests, debate and a statement from President Obama. Monday, 19 March 2012 The Department of Justice announces it will investigate the Trayvon Martin shooting. Saturday, 13 July 2013 A jury finds George Zimmerman not guilty of second-degree murder and manslaughter. Protests are witnessed across the country, which are predominantly peaceful. Thursday, 17 July 2014 Eric Garner dies in New York City shortly after a police officer subdued him with an apparent chokehold during an arrest. Friday, 1 August 2014 The New York City medical examiner rules Mr. Garner’s death a homicide, labeling the cause of death as compression of the neck, chest compression and being laid flat on the ground while being restrained by officers.
    [Show full text]
  • Voices and Visions Hollins Market: 1830-2018 INTRO
    AA JOURNEYJOURNEY THROUGHTHROUGH HOLLINSHOLLINS Voices and Visions Hollins Market: 1830-2018 INTRO A Journey Through Hollins is a research-based project documenting the history and ongoing changes in the Hollins Market neighborhood of southwest Baltimore. As part of the American Studies course “Preserving Places, Making Spaces in Baltimore,” UMBC students have conducted historical research and interviews to better understand the diverse stories of the people and places in the neighborhood. For more on these projects. Visit the website: www.baltimoretraces.umbc.edu We welcome you to the College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences (CAHSS) @ UMBC’s downtown classroom in the Lion Brothers Building, for a zine release + walking tour + open mic Schedule: 2pm: Meet and mingle at the Lion Brothers Building + zine debut 2:30pm: Debut of StoryMap website https://tinyurl.com/ybkrn297 3-4pm: Walking tour of Hollins Market with Curtis Eaddy (Southwest Partnership) 4pm: Open Mic @ Hollins Place (1116 Hollins Street) In addition to conducting research and interviews, students took a tour of the neighborhood led by Curtis Eaddy of the Southwest Partnership, one of the community’s influential organizations. Students also took an active role in attending various community events and assisting with local projects. For example, students shared their research projects with Neighborhood Lights (Hollins Market) artist Malaika Clements for her Stories from Sowebo newspaper that was part of the Light City programming. Like this zine, the newspaper was designed by Markele Cullins (VARTS @ UMBC). Back (left): Curtis Eaddy (Southwest Partnership), Liz Ridinger (B.A. American Studies), Zachary Utz (M.A. Historical Studies - Public History), DeAndre Bright (B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Year in Review
    B ALTIM ORE COMMEM ORA TES the BICEN TENNIA L of the Year in 2012Review Year in Review 2012 Letter from the Executive Director In 2012, the heritage area conducted numerous meetings and listening sessions in the development of a new Amidst a Whirlwind of a Year, comprehensive management plan. During this process, a mission statement for the Accomplishments Cast a Solid heritage area was crafted to clearly and concisely reflect the organization’s purpose. Foundation for the Heritage Area See page 6 for more information on the As I pause to reflect over our accomplishments from the past twelve months, I am planning process. in awe of the number of initiatives and events the heritage area has brought to life— through both in-house efforts and with our wonderful partners. These successes in 2012 occurred while our own organization was in a state of transformation. MISSION STATEMENT The past year was a whirlwind of change and activity, starting with the transfer of The Baltimore National Heritage Area’s the heritage area’s management from the Mayor’s Office to the Baltimore Heritage mission is to promote, preserve, and Area Association, a new independent non-profit entity. Just as the moving boxes were unpacked, we kicked off the 2012 guided tour season and joined in the enhance Baltimore’s cultural and historic excitement and events of June’s Star-Spangled Sailabration. As 2012 drew to a close, legacy and natural resources for current our team worked diligently to complete the 300+ page initial draft of our federally and future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidate Action Plan-Finall
    DRAFT CONSOLIDATED PLAN FY 2021-2025 & DRAFT ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FY 2021 Baltimore City Department of Housing & Community Development DHCD.Baltimorecity.gov Page Intentionally Left Blank 0 ES-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - 24 CFR 91.200(C), 91.220(B) ...................................................................... 4 ES.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 ES.2 Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview .............................. 6 ES.3 Evaluation of past performance ........................................................................................................................... 7 ES.4 Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process ...................................................................... 8 ES.5 Summary of public comments ............................................................................................................................. 8 ES.6 Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them ........................................ 8 ES.7 Summary of the City’s Planning Process ............................................................................................................... 8 THE PROCESS ............................................................................................................................................... 9 PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore College of Dental Surgery Letters Finding Aid
    Baltimore College of Dental Surgery Letters Finding Aid Item Type Other Authors Wink, Tara Publication Date 2019-12 Abstract The Baltimore College of Dental Surgery Letters contains letters relating to the administrative business of the school. The letters are dated across the leadership dates of four deans: Ferdinand J.S. Gorgas (1865-1882), Richard B. Winder (1882-1894),... Keywords dental school history; dental education history; first dental school; dental school administration; Baltimore College of Dental Surgery; Baltimore College of Dental Surgery--Letters; Letters; Gorgas, Ferdinand J. S. (Ferdinand James Samuel), 1835-1914; Foster, M. Whillden; Dentistry--History Rights Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Download date 02/10/2021 21:38:35 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10713/11621 Baltimore College of Dental Surgery Letters Dates Created: 1866 to 1914 and undated Bulk Dates: 1866, 1872-1882 Extent: 1.7 Linear Feet or 4 clamshell boxes Creator: Baltimore College of Dental Surgery Subjects: Baltimore College of Dental Surgery; Baltimore College of Dental Surgery--Letters; University of Maryland, Baltimore. School of Dentistry; Letters.; Gorgas, Ferdinand J. S. (Ferdinand James Samuel), 1835-1914; Winder, R. Bayly (Richard Bayly), 1920-1988; Foster, M. Whillden; Foster, William G.; Dentistry--History; Dentistry--Study and teaching.; Dentistry--United States--History.; Education, Dental. Abstract: The Baltimore College of Dental Surgery Letters contains letters relating to the administrative business of the school. The letters are dated across the leadership dates of four deans: Ferdinand J.S. Gorgas (1865-1882), Richard B. Winder (1882-1894), M. Whillden Foster (1895-1913), and William G.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Baltimore
    Timeline of Baltimore The following is a timeline of the history of the city of of land along southern shore of Patapsco River of Baltimore, Maryland, United States previous “Ann Arundell” [antique spelling]), along with future additional Howard, Carroll, and Kent This is an incomplete list that may never Counties (south to Chester River). Officeholder be able to satisfy particular standards for of Sheriff for Baltimore County first designated in completeness. You can help by expanding it legal papers from the General Assembly. with reliably sourced entries. • 1661 – First court sits for Baltimore County, meet- ing at Capt. Thomas Howell’s place in what is now modern Cecil County. 1 17th century • Charles Gorsuch, a Quaker patents 50 acres of land on narrow jagged peninsula which juts out into the Patapsco River, between what is • 1608 – Captain John Smith sails up Chesapeake Bay (later by the 18th century) called the North- and records first description of area that would be- west Branch to the north and the Middle come future site of Baltimore, then a hunting ground and Ferry Branches to the south and south- for local American Indians. Smith sails up and west, ending in “Whetstone Point” (includ- records in his map and journal “a river not inhab- ing future old “South Baltimore” areas with ited yet navigable”, which he names the “Bolus Flu” Federal Hill, Locust Point, Riverside neigh- – Indian who hunt in the region call it the “Patap- borhoods, Spring Gardens, Ferry Bar and Fort sco”. McHenry). He promises to pay Lord Balti- • 1632 – Charter to Colony granted by King Charles more, Cecilius Calvert, 61 pounds sterling per I of England to George Calvert (1579–1632), First year for the use of the land.
    [Show full text]