Reasonable Compensation Coefficient of Maximum Gradient in Long Railway Tunnels

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reasonable Compensation Coefficient of Maximum Gradient in Long Railway Tunnels Journal of Modern Transportation 1 Volume 19, Number 1, March 2011, Page 12-18 Journal homepage: jmt.swjtu.edu.cn DOI: 10.1007/BF03325735 Reasonable compensation coefficient of maximum gradient in long railway tunnels Sirong YI*, Liangtao NIE, Yanheng CHEN, Fangfang QIN School of Civil Engineering, MOE Key Laboratory of High-Speed Railway Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China Abstract: This paper deals with the theory and calculation methods for compensation of the gradient in railway tunnels through theoretical analysis, numerical calculation, and statistic regression methods. On the basis of the principle that the resultant force is zero, the formula of the maximum calculated gradient was derived for the freight and passenger line and high-speed passenger special line. The formula of aerodynamic drag in tunnel is provided using the domestic and foreign relevant experimental investigations, and revised with modern train and engineering parameters. A calcula- tion model of aerodynamic drag when the train goes through a single-tracked tunnel was built. Finally, the concept of maximum calculated gradient was adopted to revise the formula for compensation of the gradient in railway tunnels. Key words: railway tunnel; maximum gradient; profile; gradient compensation © 2011 JMT. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction sonable compensation coefficient for the gradient of a long railway tunnel. or freight and passenger lines, at the location where F the maximum gradient needs to be used in design, 2. Calculation model of maximum gradient when the train passes through a tunnel of length more of design line than 400 m, its additional resistance increases, but the adhesion coefficient lessens, which leads to the design The maximum calculated gradient of a railway line is gradient of the profile plus the equivalent gradient of defined as the gradient value of the consecutive ascend- additional aerodynamic drag in the tunnel being greater ing grade on which a given locomotive can haul the than the maximum gradient. Therefore, in the profile de- train with a specified weight at the calculated, constant sign, we need to compensate for the maximum gradient speed of the locomotive. to ensure the general freight train can pass through this For freight trains and passenger trains with traction location at no less than the stipulated speed. Code for mass of G, the maximum calculated gradient of the train Design of Railway Line (hereinafter referred to as the is derived based on the principle that the resultant force Line Specification) offers us the maximum gradient acting on the train is zero when the freight train runs on compensation coefficients for the corresponding tunnels a consecutive ascending grade at the specified calculated, [1]. However, due to the advancement of railway speed constant speed of the locomotive. For a provided trac- in China, the calculation formula in the existing codes tion mass norm, the maximum calculated gradient at the cannot be adapted to the current engineering conditions. section where the train is hauled by a single locomotive In order to revise the principle and parameters of maxi- can be calculated as follows [2]: mum gradient compensation for railway tunnels, we O F ()Pwc Gwcc g should combine new technical conditions of the railway uc 0 0 icmax , system to study the theory, method, and compensation ()PGg model. where G is the norm of traction mass, in t; icmax is the Considering the electric railway, this paper will in- maximum calculated gradient; w0Ąis unit basic resis- troduce the research achievement on developing a rea- tance of locomotive under the calculated speed, in N/kN; w0ąis unit basic resistance of rolling stock under the calculated speed, in N/kN; F is calculated traction force, Received Dec.16, 2010; revision accepted Jan.11, 2011 c *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] in kN; P is locomotive mass, in t; ¬u is utilization coef- doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-087X.2011.01.003 Journal of Modern Transportation 2011 19(1): 12-18 13 ficient of traction force; g is acceleration of gravity, in and tail, train shape parameters, and tunnel design pa- DOI:m/s2. 10.1007/BF03325733 rameters. These calculation parameters determine the At the section where the maximum gradient needs to correctness of the result. Especially, the pressure drag be used, if the equivalent gradient of the profile exceeds coefficient of the train head and tail and the frictional the maximum gradient, the freight train will eventually resistance coefficient of the train surface have a great in- run at a speed less than calculated speed on the consecu- fluence on the correctness of the result. tive ascending grade, which will result in accidents due When a train is going through a tunnel, the aerody- to the slow speed, even causing a suspension. Hence, the namic drag includes three items: pressure drag of the design gradient of the profile plus the equivalent gradi- train head, pressure drag of the tail, and surface friction ent of additional resistance in the tunnel should not be resistance of the body. The key to determining aerody- greater than the maximum gradient. Therefore, for the namic drag when a train passes through a tunnel is to de- profile design of railway, we need to reduce the maxi- termine the pressure drag coefficient of the train head mum gradient to ensure the freight train passes through and tail, surface friction resistance coefficient of the this section at no less than calculated or stipulated speed. train body and wind speed in the tunnel. The related studies [3-5] show that additional aero- 2.1. Calculation model of additional aerodynamic drag dynamic drag in the tunnel is related to driving speed, in single-tracked tunnel length of the train, the superficial area of the train against the air, train shape, tunnel length, area of tunnel When a train goes through a double-track tunnel, cross-section, and tunnel surface roughness. The relation there is no directional airflow, so the average aerody- between aerodynamic drag in the tunnel, air pressure namic drag formula cannot be deduced theoretically. In difference and tunnel cross-section area can be ex- the case of no meeting trains, because the train runs pressed as follows: through the tunnel of larger cross section, the blockage WhFtt , ratio becomes greater, and the aerodynamic drag is less where Ft is the area of tunnel cross-section, for the sim- than that in the single-track tunnel. In the case of meet- plification of calculation, can be taken as the value in ing trains in double-track tunnel, through mathematical Table 1. analysis on the energy and momentum of aerodynamic drag, we can analyze the flow field (velocity field and Table 1 The minimum effective area of cross-section in 2 dynamic pressure field) around the location of the meet- tunnel (recommended value in calculation) m ing trains of different type and length with different Electric traction Diesel Traction speed, and then calculate the increment of aerodynamic Design running speed of passen- Single- Double- Single- Double- drag. ger train (km/h) The paper herein deals with a calculation method of track track track track additional aerodynamic drag in single-tracked tunnel. İ120 37 31 When a train goes through a single-tracked tunnel, İ160 42 76 42 76 there exists directional airflow in tunnel. Then we can deduce average aerodynamic drag formula theoretically. 200 50 80 50 80 Air cannot spread due to being restrained by tunnel 250 58 90 58 90 when train is running in tunnel, leading the piston phe- 350 70 100 70 100 nomenon, i.e. the difference between head positive pres- Without considering requirements of sure and tail negative pressure, which produces the re- Remarks sistance to the train. Meanwhile, the turbulent flow in double-decked container trains tunnel produces friction between the air and the surface Unit aerodynamic drag in the tunnel is of the train and the tunnel, which also generates the re- sistance to the train. Therefore, when the train is running hFt wt , in the tunnel, aerodynamic drag acting on the train is far ()PGg more than that in the open. The aerodynamic drag in- where h is unit difference of air pressure, in N/m2: crement is called additional aerodynamic drag in the J 2 tunnel. hK (), vv0 In the calculation of aerodynamic drag increment in 2 the tunnel, a series of parameters need to be determined where K is the effect coefficient of piston pressure: first, such as the frictional resistance coefficient of the NL 86u 104 L train surface, frictional resistance coefficient of tunnel K tr tr , (1FF / )22 (1 FF / ) surface, the pressure drag coefficient of the train head tr t tr t 14 Sirong YI et al. / Reasonable compensation coefficient of maximum gradient in long railway tunnels where Ltr is length of train, in m, and Ftr is area of cross- than 160 km/h, it is taken as 22.5 m for single-track tun- DOI:section 10.1007/BF03325733 of train, taken as 12.6 m2; Ȗ is the density of air, nel, and 31.55 m for a double-track tunnel. When design 3 taken as 1.2 kg/m ; v is speed of train, in m/s; v0 is wind speed is in the range of 160 to 200 km/h, it is taken as speed in piston, in m/s: 34.5 m for a double-track tunnel. When design speed is v in range of 200 to 250 km/h, it is 28.0 m for a single- v0 , 1/ ] K track tunnel and 35.0 m for a double-track tunnel. When t design speed is in the range of 250 to 350 km/h, it is where ȗt is total resistance coefficient of tunnel: 32.0 m for a single-track tunnel and 37.5 m for a double- LL track tunnel.
Recommended publications
  • the Swindon and Cricklade Railway
    The Swindon and Cricklade Railway Construction of the Permanent Way Document No: S&CR S PW001 Issue 2 Format: Microsoft Office 2010 August 2016 SCR S PW001 Issue 2 Copy 001 Page 1 of 33 Registered charity No: 1067447 Registered in England: Company No. 3479479 Registered office: Blunsdon Station Registered Office: 29, Bath Road, Swindon SN1 4AS 1 Document Status Record Status Date Issue Prepared by Reviewed by Document owner Issue 17 June 2010 1 D.J.Randall D.Herbert Joint PW Manager Issue 01 Aug 2016 2 D.J.Randall D.Herbert / D Grigsby / S Hudson PW Manager 2 Document Distribution List Position Organisation Copy Issued To: Copy No. (yes/no) P-Way Manager S&CR Yes 1 Deputy PW Manager S&CR Yes 2 Chairman S&CR (Trust) Yes 3 H&S Manager S&CR Yes 4 Office Files S&CR Yes 5 3 Change History Version Change Details 1 to 2 Updates throughout since last release SCR S PW001 Issue 2 Copy 001 Page 2 of 33 Registered charity No: 1067447 Registered in England: Company No. 3479479 Registered office: Blunsdon Station Registered Office: 29, Bath Road, Swindon SN1 4AS Table of Contents 1 Document Status Record ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Document Distribution List ................................................................................................................................... 2 3 Change History .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:14 Page 1
    BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:14 Page 1 BRITAIN‘S LEADING HISTORICAL RAILWAY JOURNAL VOLUME 22 • NUMBER 1 • JANUARY 2008 • £3.60 IN THIS ISSUE 150 YEARS OF THE SOMERSET & DORSET RAILWAY GWR RAILCARS IN COLOUR THE NORTH CORNWALL LINE THE FURNESS LINE IN COLOUR PENDRAGON BRITISH ENGLISH-ELECTRIC MANUFACTURERS PUBLISHING THE GWR EXPRESS 4-4-0 CLASSES THE COMPREHENSIVE VOICE OF RAILWAY HISTORY BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 15:59 Page 64 THE COMPREHENSIVE VOICE OF RAILWAY HISTORY END OF THE YEAR AT ASHBY JUNCTION A light snowfall lends a crisp feel to this view at Ashby Junction, just north of Nuneaton, on 29th December 1962. Two LMS 4-6-0s, Class 5 No.45058 piloting ‘Jubilee’ No.45592 Indore, whisk the late-running Heysham–London Euston ‘Ulster Express’ past the signal box in a flurry of steam, while 8F 2-8-0 No.48349 waits to bring a freight off the Ashby & Nuneaton line. As the year draws to a close, steam can ponder upon the inexorable march south of the West Coast Main Line electrification. (Tommy Tomalin) PENDRAGON PUBLISHING www.pendragonpublishing.co.uk BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:17 Page 4 SOUTHERN GONE WEST A busy scene at Halwill Junction on 31st August 1964. BR Class 4 4-6-0 No.75022 is approaching with the 8.48am from Padstow, THE NORTH CORNWALL while Class 4 2-6-4T No.80037 waits to shape of the ancient Bodmin & Wadebridge proceed with the 10.00 Okehampton–Padstow.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverrailway Curves Book.Cdr
    RAILWAY CURVES March 2010 (Corrected & Reprinted : November 2018) INDIAN RAILWAYS INSTITUTE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING PUNE - 411 001 i ii Foreword to the corrected and updated version The book on Railway Curves was originally published in March 2010 by Shri V B Sood, the then professor, IRICEN and reprinted in September 2013. The book has been again now corrected and updated as per latest correction slips on various provisions of IRPWM and IRTMM by Shri V B Sood, Chief General Manager (Civil) IRSDC, Delhi, Shri R K Bajpai, Sr Professor, Track-2, and Shri Anil Choudhary, Sr Professor, Track, IRICEN. I hope that the book will be found useful by the field engineers involved in laying and maintenance of curves. Pune Ajay Goyal November 2018 Director IRICEN, Pune iii PREFACE In an attempt to reach out to all the railway engineers including supervisors, IRICEN has been endeavouring to bring out technical books and monograms. This book “Railway Curves” is an attempt in that direction. The earlier two books on this subject, viz. “Speed on Curves” and “Improving Running on Curves” were very well received and several editions of the same have been published. The “Railway Curves” compiles updated material of the above two publications and additional new topics on Setting out of Curves, Computer Program for Realignment of Curves, Curves with Obligatory Points and Turnouts on Curves, with several solved examples to make the book much more useful to the field and design engineer. It is hoped that all the P.way men will find this book a useful source of design, laying out, maintenance, upgradation of the railway curves and tackling various problems of general and specific nature.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Cornwall Line the LSWR Had Already Long Maintained a from Waterloo on 22Nd August 1964
    BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:17 Page 4 SOUTHERN GONE WEST A busy scene at Halwill Junction on 31st August 1964. BR Class 4 4-6-0 No.75022 is approaching with the 8.48am from Padstow, THE NORTH CORNWALL while Class 4 2-6-4T No.80037 waits to shape of the ancient Bodmin & Wadebridge proceed with the 10.00 Okehampton–Padstow. BY DAVID THROWER Railway, of which more on another occasion. The diesel railcar is an arrival from Torrington. (Peter W. Gray) Followers of this series of articles have seen The purchase of the B&WR, deep in the heart how railways which were politically aligned of the Great Western Railway’s territory, acted he area served by the North Cornwall with the London & South Western Railway as psychological pressure upon the LSWR to line has always epitomised the progressively stretched out to grasp Barnstaple link the remainder of the system to it as part of Tcontradiction of trying to serve a and Ilfracombe, and then to reach Plymouth via a wider drive into central Cornwall to tap remote and sparsely-populated (by English Okehampton, with a branch to Holsworthy, the standards) area with a railway. It is no surprise latter eventually being extended to Bude. The Smile, please! A moorland sheep poses for the camera, oblivious to SR N Class 2-6-0 to introduce this portrait of the North Cornwall Holsworthy line included a station at a remote No.31846 heading west from Tresmeer with line by emphasising that railways mostly came spot, Halwill, which was to become the the Padstow coaches of the ‘Atlantic Coast very late to this part of Cornwall — and left junction for the final push into North Cornwall.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Railway Terms
    GLOSSARY OF COMMON RAILWAY TERMS Terminology varies by country, and also often by railroad. The following are general terms as usually understood in Canada. agent – an employee of the railway appointed to be in charge of a station. The agent was responsible for conveying train orders to train crews, and for staffing and operating the station. This included ticket sales, freight way bills, dispatch and receipt of express parcels and LCL (less than a car load of) merchandise, the operation of the station telegraph, maintenance of the station area, provision for the well-being and direction of passengers, and the safety and accuracy of freight shipments. A person of standing in the local community along with the banker, priest, postmaster and head teacher. air brake – a power braking system with compressed air as the operating medium. bad order (track) – a track to hold cars requiring minor repairs, usually in a marshalling yard. baggage – a passenger’s luggage, carried with the passenger or conveyed in the baggage compartment and (where required) stored in the baggage room at the station. ballast – crushed stone or slag put down to form a level bed for the track and to facilitate drainage of the roadbed. bridge – a structure consisting of plate girder or truss spans, intermediately supported, if needed, by piers at longer intervals than those of a trestle. brakeman/trainman – an employee of the railway. These terms are interchangeable. The word brakeman dates from the days before air brakes when the brakes had to be applied by hand to stop the train. When the engineer wanted to stop the train he blew one short blast of the engine whistle.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Engineering
    University of Technology Branch of Bridges & Department of Buildings & Highways Engineering rd. Constructions Engineering 3 Stage Railway Engineering By Dr. Karim H. Al Helo Introduction 1.1 Definition: Rail transport refers to the land transport of passengers and goods along railways or railroads. A railway (or railroad) track consists of two parallel rail tracks, formerly of iron but now of steel. Usually vehicles running on the rails are arranged in a train (a series of individual powered or unpowered vehicles linked together). The cars move with much less friction and the locomotive that pulls the train uses much less energy than is needed to pull wagons. 1.2 History: 1. Ruman were the first try running of animals drawn vehicles on stone line (parallel). 2. 15th century, wooden rail in Europe – good speed. 3. Wooden rail above were covered by iron at the next stage. 4. Using angle iron to prevent lateral movements. 5. The above were replaced with rised flange (Cast Iron C.I.). 6. It was observed that animals can draw vehicle on C.I. better than on roads. 7. 17th century, thinking of device to replace the animals was found. 8. In France, Nicolas Cugnot at 1771 constructed steam locomotive. 9. In Britain 1786, William Murdock prepared steam locomotive model. 10. 1797-1804 it was designed (steam locomotive). 11. First complete success 1781-1848 George Stephenson had got complete success. 1 12. In 1825 on 27 September, the first running was successed between Stockton and Darlington. 1.3 Comparison between Roads and Railway: 1. In railway the concentrated load needs very strong track.
    [Show full text]
  • Curves Are Provided
    Transportation Engineering Course Code –CE-422 Contact Hours -3+3 Dr Hassan Mujtaba What is a Curve • A curve is defined either by its radius or by its degree. • The degree of the curve is the angle subtended at its centre by a 100 ft chord or 30.5 m chord. • The value of degree of curve can be determined by – Circumference of circle = 2 r 2 Curve (cont’d) • Angle subtended at the centre by the circle with this circumference = 360 deg • Angle subtended at the centre by a 30.5 m chord or degree of curve • D = 360* 30.5/ 2* pi*r – D = 1750/R (R in meters) – D = 5730/R ( R in feet) 3 Problem • Find out the radius of the track laid on 4 o curve. • Find out the degree of the curve if the radius is 1500 ft. • Find out the degree of the curve if the radius is 500 m. • Find out the radius of track in ft laid on 3 degree of the curve. 4 Why Curves are provided • It is desirable to lay the track as straight and gentle as possible but it is not possible due to – Natural features of the country – Due to necessity of avoiding obstruction both natural and artificial • As curves are unavoidable so it is desirable to lay track on the curves as flat as possible. 5 Why Curves should be avoided • Curves produce resistance to haulage of trains • Wear both in track and vehicle • Reduce the safe speed limits • Increase the maintenance cost 6 Compensation for Curvature • Extra power is required to move the train along the curve.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mallet Locomotive As a Factor in Railway Location
    The Mallet Locomotive as a Factor in Railway Location Railway Civil Engineering 19 15 THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY ?3t THE MALLET LOCOMOTIVE AS A FACTOR IN RAILWAY LOCATION BY WILLIAM SING-CHONG PUNG B. S. University of Illinois, 1914- THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN RAILWAY CIVIL ENGINEERING IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1915 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS THE GRADUATE SCHOOL M.ay....24 r 5 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPER- PUNG, B.S. VISION BY WILLIAM SING-CHONG _ ENTITLED THE JIALLST.....LQ.C.OIIQ.T.IYS....AS A....EA.C..T.O.R....I.N.....EA.I.L.WAY. LOCATION, _ _ _ __. BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF. MASTER OF SCIENCE In Charge of Thesis Head of Department Recommendation concurred in :* Committee on Final Examination* ^Required for doctor's degree but not for master's. UIUC CONTENTS. Page Introduction 1 A. -Befinition of Mallet Articulated Locomotive. 1 B. -Importance of Motive Power in the Economics of Railway Operation 1 C. -Purpose of the Investigation. 4 CHAPTER I. History and Development of Mallet Locomotive 6 A. -Early History of the Articulated Locomotive. 6 1. -Horatio Allen f s Design -1831. 2. -Fairlie Type - 1860. 3. -Mallet Type - 1876-1888. 4. -Mellin Type - 1904. B. -Compel is on of the Early Types of Articulated Locomotives. 11 C. -The Development of the Modern Heavy Articulated Locomotives. IE CHAPTER II. Extent of Present Use of Mallet Locomotives.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad San Juan Extension
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILROAD SAN JUAN EXTENSION Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Denver & Rio Grande Railroad San Juan Extension Other Name/Site Number: Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad; 5AA664; 5CN65 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Railway corridor from Antonito, CO to Chama, N.M. via Cumbres Pass Not for publication: City/Town: Antonito Vicinity: State: Colorado County: Conejos Code: 021 Zip Code: 81120 City/Town: Chromo Vicinity: X State: Colorado County: Archuleta Code: 007 Zip Code: 81128 City/Town: Chama Vicinity: State: New Mexico County: Rio Arriba Code: 039 Zip Code: 87520 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: Building(s): ___ Public-Local: District: _X_ Public-State: X Site: ___ Public-Federal: Structure: ___ Object: ___ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 21 5 buildings 0 0 sites 144 110 structures 1 0 objects 166 115 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 240 contributing Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: Railroads in Colorado 1858-1948 NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form ((Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILROAD SAN JUAN EXTENSION Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Plaaces Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that tthis ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Unified Inspection and Maintenance of Ghat Section
    For official use only GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS UNIFIED INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF GHAT SECTION CAMTECH/2003/C/GHAT/1.0 SEPTEMBER - 2003 Centre for Advanced Maintenance TECHnology Excellence in Maintenance Maharajpur, GWALIOR - 474 020 CAMTECH/C/2003/GHAT/1.0 1 Unified Inspection & Maintenance of Ghat Section Unified Inspection and Maintenance of Ghat Section September - 2003 CAMTECH/C/2003/GHAT/1.0 2 Foreword In this handbook on Ghat Section, CAMTECH has tried to furnish details of typicality and complexity of Permanent Way in hilly terrain. General details of track, bridge & works sites as well as their inspection and maintenance are nicely brought out with several sketches and case histories of various ghat sections. Civil Engineering branch of CAMTECH has made excellent effort to bring out this handbook. I am sure that this book will certainly prove to be useful for field engineers & staff of Indian Railways CAMTECH/Gwalior C.B.Middha Date : 10.9.2003 Executive Director Unified Inspection and Maintenance of Ghat Section September - 2003 CAMTECH/C/2003/GHAT/1.0 3 Preface The Ghat sections are the important, strategic and vital part of the Indian Railway track having scattered and varying in character. The idea of bringing out this handbook is to furnish information regarding inspection & maintenance of track, bridges, tunnel & protection works typical to the ghat sections, at one place for the Railway Maintenance Engineers. This lesson plan does not supersede any existing instruction from Railway Board, IRPWM, LWR Manual & RDSO on the subject. I am grateful for the assistance given by Shri Anupam Sharma, CTA/Civil, Shri Sunil Gupta, STA/Bridge and Shri Anil Dubey, STA/P.Way, who went through the complete text, collected information, data etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture-15 RAILWAY ALIGNMENT
    Lecture-15 RAILWAY ALIGNMENT INTRODUCTION Geometric design of a railway track discusses all those parameters which affect the geometry of the track. These parameters are as follows: 1. Gradients in the track, including grade compensation, rising gradient, and falling gradient 2. Curvature of the track, including horizontal and vertical curves, transition curves, sharpness of the curve in terms of radius or degree of the curve, cant or superelevation on curves, etc. 3. Alignment of the track, including straight as well as curved alignment It is very important for tracks to have proper geometric design in order to ensure the safe and smooth running of trains at maximum permissible speeds, carrying the heaviest axle loads. The speed and axle load of the train are very important and sometimes are also included as parameters to be considered while arriving at the geometric design of the track. NECESSITY FOR GEOMETRIC DESIGN The need for proper geometric design of a track arises because of the following considerations: (a) To ensure the smooth and safe running of trains (b) To achieve maximum speeds (c) To carry heavy axle loads (d) To avoid accidents and derailments due to a defective permanent way (e) To ensure that the track requires least maintenance (f) For good aesthetics DETAILS OF GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF TRACK The geometric design of the track deals with alignment of railway track and Curves Details regarding curves and their various aspects. GRADIENTS Gradients are provided to negotiate the rise or fall in the level of the railway track. A rising gradient is one in which the track rises in the direction of movement of traffic and in a down or falling gradient the track loses elevation the direction of movement of traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions Register.Xlsx
    Appendix A Submissions register April 2014 Volume 2 Appendix A Submissions register (Proponent) NGBR - EIS Submission Issues Register Sub. No. Submitter Submitter Type Issue No. Issue - Topic Issue - Details Submitter Recommendations / Suggested Mitigation Proponent response 1 Submitter 1 Individual 1 a MNES Great Barrier Reef The beauty of the Great Barrier Reef should be preserved. Send coal and other products south below the Great Sandy Island Noted. (below Rainbow Beach) to act as a buffer to save the Great Barrier Reef. The rail feed could start from Maryborough and run south via Tuan. 1 Submitter 1 Individual 1 b MNES Great Barrier Reef Reference to spoils - from dredging? Dump dredging material on land in leach proof area until the sun Noted. does its job. 2 Powerlink Queensland Organisation 2 a Land use and tenure Existing and proposed Protection of Powerlink's rights under the easement terms and conditions. Any development activity within the corridor would need to be The NGBR Project final rail corridor is planned to intersect two Powerlink Assets. Please refer attachments: infrastructure undertaken in accordance with the terms and conditions of the - Submission 2a response attachment_301001-01735-CI-DSK-0119_B - Powerlink Crossing - CH 89.126 easement dealing (registered in DERM) relevant to each of the - Submission 2a response attachment_301001-01735-CI-DSK-0120_B - Powerlink Crossing - CH 94.765 subject properties. Copies of these dealings can be obtained from During detail design, interface agreements shall be negotiated between Adani and Powerlink in light of Powerlink's co-use guidelines. DERM. Such interface agreements will ensure the required accessibility to Powerlink's existing assets is appropriately provided for and maintained.
    [Show full text]