DOCSLIB.ORG

A Publication of the Lancaster County Planning Commission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A publication of the Lancaster County Planning Commission Summer 2005 Lancasterfyi County Further Evolves as a Well-Planned and Balanced Community The Lancaster County Planning Commission (LCPC) mix of housing choices. The 24 members of the Hous- and County Task Forces have devoted hundreds of hours ing Steering Committee, representing organizations with to drafting three new or updated elements of the Coun- housing interests throughout the County, unveiled a ty’s Comprehensive Plan. These Updates plan for future draft of key Goals, Objectives, and Strategies to key stake- land-use through the year 2030. holders at the Lancaster County Conference on Current Housing Issues on April 27, 2005. The three major elements—the Growth Management Update, the Housing Update and the Tourism Element Strategic Tourism Element Drafted and Finalized —were developed through extensive public outreach pro- This new element to the Comprehensive Plan, a first for cesses involving County residents, local municipalities, the County, strategically identifies the important tour- key stakeholders, and focus groups. The Task Forces and ism challenges and opportunities that we will be facing Committees are purposely composed of representatives in Lancaster County in the future. The Lancaster County from a cross-section of geographic areas and interests. Strategic Tourism Development Plan was adopted on June 15, 2005. (See article below.) Ultimately, the goal of all three elements is to make Lancaster County the most desirable place for you, your The Growth Management and Housing Updates and the children and grandchildren to live, work, learn and play. new Tourism Element complement each other. All three Here’s how: elements work to preserve the quality of life and unique sense of place which residents and visitors value.Working Growth Management Element Update on all three elements simultaneously is a tremendous un- With a wealth of public input garnered through the dertaking, but the synergies that were found ensure that “This Land Is Your Land” three-part public meeting the elements build upon and balance each other. This series, the Growth Management Update Task Force’s will improve the overall understanding, structure and 60-members are now completing a draft blueprint on implementation of the County’s Comprehensive Plan, Lancaster County’s future. which will benefit residents for years. Courtesy of Rob Bowman Photography Bowman Courtesy of Rob Residents indicated that they want to see growth intensi- Maintaining a balance is a central goal of all the elements. Lancaster County continues to evolve as a fied in the Growth Areas through higher density; the In fact, 94% of Lancaster County residents surveyed by model for “Smart Growth” and balance through creation of mixed-use centers for shopping, housing and Franklin & Marshall’s Floyd Center for Opinion Research its new and updated elements of the County’s employment; and more housing choices. They also want believe balancing new growth with the preservation of Comprehensive Plan. a rural strategy that incorporates farmland, open space, farmland and open space is important. natural resources and crossroad communities. Collaboration with municipalities including public par- In this issue: Housing Element Update Unveiled ticipation will continue to be key, as it was in the devel- Growth Management Element Update . 2 The theme “Choices” was used by the Housing Steering opment process for all three elements. Outreach to mu- 75 Years of Regional Planning in Lancaster County. 2 Committee throughout its 18 month public outreach nicipalities has included surveys, meetings, and regional Fall 2005 Master Planner. 3 and research process. Forecasts commissioned by the breakfasts. The Growth Management Update Task Force Housing Element Update. 3 County indicate that sometime in the middle of the next has also met with the Boroughs Association and the Lan- Municipal Planning Training. 3 decade the baby boomers will become seniors and the caster County Association of Township Supervisors. Two Home Runs for Lancaster. .4 millennial population will reach their twenties. These Lancaster County Bicycle Map . 4 segments of Lancaster’s population and others will want a To meet local needs and ensure effective implementation, LCPC looks forward to hearing from municipalities and Lancaster County Strategic others as these elements are circulated for public comment. Tourism Development Plan Adopted The LCPC and its Tourism Task Force have recently completed the “Lancaster guidance during the process and to assist in the preparation of the Ele- County Strategic Tourism Development Element of the County’s Compre- ment and implementation strategies. The consulting firms of Econ- hensive Plan.” This Element, the first of its kind in the County, strategically sult and McCormick Taylor, both of Philadelphia, are also key identifies the important tourism challenges and opportunities that we will members of the Parter International Planning Team. be facing in Lancaster County. Areas identified for specific action steps for implementation include: The Element was adopted by the Lancaster County Board • Organization/Collaboration of Commissioners on June 15, 2005, as an important • Product Development component of the Lancaster County Comprehen- • Infrastructure/Mobility sive Plan. To view the document, please go to www. • Marketing co.lancaster.pa.us/planning, and click on the link on • Outreach/Public Involvement the left under “In the Spotlight.” To assist and provide guidance in this planning effort, the LCPC appointed a Tourism Task Force made up of 12 representatives from the public, private, For more information on the Lancaster County and non-profit sectors in August 2003. Jim Smucker, owner of the Bird-in- Strategic Tourism Development Element, please call Hand Corporation/Village Inn of Bird-In-Hand, chairs the Task Force. or write Scott Standish, Director, Heritage Planning at 717-299-8333, the LCPC address or via email at The County Planning Commission retained the consultant services of Parter [email protected]. International, Inc. from New York, NY, to provide professional expertise and Growth2 Management Element Update This Land Is Your Land year 2030. The target A Summary of these concepts and the toolbox has been date for adoption of released for a 30-day public comment period. Munici- the Update is late fall of palities and the general public are highly encouraged to 2005. Co-chairs of the share their insights on the Summary with the GMUTF. GMUTF are Lois Herr, Secretary of LCPC, and Public input on the Summary will then be incorporated, Ron Beam, Vice Presi- as appropriate, into a draft of the full Growth Manage- dent of Rettew Associates. ment Update. Drafts of the full Growth Management and Housing Updates will be released for public review in The three-part series took late summer/early fall. place in January, March and April at locations *To view the Summary, please visit the LCPC website at throughout the County www.co.lancaster.pa.us/planning/growthmanagement or to reach the most resi- contact Mary Frey, Principal Planner at [email protected] dents. At Parts I and II, er.pa.us or 717.299.8333. the Task Force heard Examples of tools by category of assistance in the that it is very important draft Smart Growth Toolbox: to residents to balance growth and preservation Smart Growth Tool Box in Lancaster County. Reinvestment Areas Incentive Zoning In Part III, the public shared its viewpoints on Infill Development Standards implementing a Smart Land Recycling Growth Plan for Future Buildable Lands / Mixed-Use Centers Land Use. The emerging Mixed-Use Zoning Designated Rural Areas Traditional Neighborhood Development Strategy and Growth Ar- eas Strategy were present- Transfer of Development Rights ed along with a Preferred Agricultural Resource Areas Based upon public input, the map provides a blueprint for balancing Growth Management Exclusive Agricultural Zoning growth with the preservation of farmland and open space. (see website*) Framework Map, which Farm Support / Home Occupation Provisions The Lancaster County Planning Commission’s Growth merged the two stratigies. The public was asked to com- Tax Policy Management Update Task Force (GMUTF) and its ment on the stratigies and the resulting preferred Growth consultant team, led by Wallace, Roberts, and Todd of Management Framework Map. This input is being evalu- Agricultural and Natural Resource Areas Philadelphia, are in the midst of drafting the Growth ated and will be used to further define these stratigies. Natural Resource Protection Ordinance Management Element Update for the Lancaster County Open Space Land Acquisition Comprehensive Plan. The implementation component of the Growth Manage- Rural Development Standards ment Update is the Smart Growth Tool Box. The Tool- Rural Centers This Update is based upon extensive public input that the box offers a variety of planning, policy, regulatory, and Task Force has garnered over the last six months, espe- investment strategies that can be used by the County and Village / Hamlet Zoning Standards cially through its three-part public meeting series, “This municipalities to achieve the goals and objectives of the Alternative Wastewater Systems Land Is Your Land.” The goal is to develop a document Growth Management Element. Transfer of Development Rights that will guide growth in Lancaster County through the 75 Years of Regional Planning In Lancaster County In the bustle of local planning programs underway last Lancaster’s City Planning Com- year, the 75th anniversary of a major regional planning mission that year. milestone for Lancaster County passed without recogni- tion. Pioneer city planner John Nolen submitted his plan The City Planning Commission for Lancaster City and its environs to Lancaster’s City stated in the preface to the No- Planning Commission in 1929. The plan was the first len Plan that “there has been no substantial effort at regional planning in the area and has attempt to standardize the city. served, since then, as the reference point for all compre- Lancaster is unique . the plan hensive planning in the Lancaster metropolitan region.
Recommended publications
  • For Lease 717.293.4477

    For Lease 717.293.4477

    For Lease 717.293.4477 Industrial/Commercial Realtors 910 SOUTH DUKE STREET LANCASTER, PA 17602 1853 William Penn Way Lancaster, PA 17601 717.293.4477 www.highassociates.com For Lease 717.293.4477 Industrial/Commercial Realtors Retail Opportunities Conestoga River Plaza 910 South Duke Street Lancaster, PA 17602 Square Footage Available: 1,088 square feet 1,122 square feet 2,233 square feet Lease Rate: $14.00/SF for vanilla box delivery Description: Be the next in a new retail strip in Southern Lancaster City. Looking to deliver a turnkey sit down restaurant that would compliment the other retailers and the neighborhood. Great opportunity for a startup or other professional service type user. Join Family Dollar, Brothers Grocery, among others already signed up. Available Square Feet: 1,088, 1,122 & 2,233 square feet Zoning: Mixed Use Water & Sewer: Public – City of Lancaster Municipality: City of Lancaster County: Lancaster County Tax Map Account #: 337-01486-0-0000 Deed Reference: 05716647 Information furnished regarding property for sale or rent is from sources deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed. No warranty or representation is made as to accuracy thereof and is submitted subject to errors, omissions, change of price, or other conditions, prior sale or lease or withdrawal without notice. No liability of any kind is to be imposed on the broker herein. 1853 William Penn Way Lancaster, PA 17601 717.293.4477 www.highassociates.com AERIAL PHOTO CONESTOGA RIVER PLAZA 902 SOUTH DUKE STREET LANCASTER, PA AERIAL PHOTO LOCATION MAP 902 South
  • Book Review: Field Notes Spring 2016 Issue John Nolen, Landscape

    Book Review: Field Notes Spring 2016 Issue John Nolen, Landscape

    Book Review: Field Notes Spring 2016 Issue John Nolen, Landscape Architect and City Planner by R. Bruce Stephenson. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, in association with the Library of American Landscape History (LALH), 2015, 312 pages. Among enthusiasts of landscape and urban design, John Nolan (1869-1937) is a respected figure, but he has never become a household name, except perhaps in those households located in communities that he designed or improved. Madison, Wisconsin, for instance, named a boulevard for him. Kingsport, TN, Venice, FL, the Myers Park neighborhood of Charlotte, NC, and the Country Club Plaza in Kansas City, MO are other communities whose reputations derive from the quality of his planning. Mariemont, near Cincinnati, OH has been designated a National Historic Landmark. The American Society of Landscape Architects and the Library of American Landscape History teamed up in 2005 to reprint Nolan’s book, New Towns for Old: Achievements in Civic Improvement in Some American Small Towns and Neighborhoods, originally published in 1927. This includes a list of his firm’s more than 450 completed projects, among which are plans for 29 cities and 27 new towns. Now the LALH has followed up with a full-scale biography. Its author, R. Bruce Stephenson, director of the Department of Environmental Studies and Sustainable Urbanism at Rollins College, deftly weaves Nolan’s career and personal life together with the rise of the professions of landscape architecture and urban planning. Nolan was born in Philadelphia and qualified for admission to Girard College, a distinguished school for orphan boys there, because his father had been shot during an election dispute little more than a year after his birth.
  • Written Historical and Descriptive Data Hals Ca-131

    Written Historical and Descriptive Data Hals Ca-131

    THE GEORGE WHITE AND ANNA GUNN MARSTON HOUSE, HALS CA-131 GARDENS HALS CA-131 3525 Seventh Avenue San Diego San Diego County California WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY THE GEORGE WHITE AND ANNA GUNN MARSTON HOUSE, GARDENS (The Marston Garden) HALS NO. CA-131 Location: 3525 Seventh Avenue, San Diego, San Diego County, California Bounded by Seventh Avenue and Upas Street, adjoining the northwest boundary of Balboa Park in the City of San Diego, California 32.741689, -117.157756 (Center of main house, Google Earth, WGS84) Significance: The George Marston Gardens represent the lasting legacy of one of San Diego’s most important civic patrons, George Marston. The intact home and grounds reflect the genteel taste of the Marston Family as a whole who in the early 20th century elevated landscape settings, by example, toward city beautification in the dusty, semi-arid, coastal desert of San Diego. The Period of Significance encompasses the full occupancy of the Marston Family from 1905-1987, which reflects the completion of the house construction in 1905 to the death of daughter Mary Marston in 1987. George White Marston (1850-1946) and daughter Mary Marston (1879-1987) are the two notable family members most associated with the design and implementation of the Marston House Gardens, et al. The George W. Marston House (George White and Anna Gunn Marston House) was historically designated by the City of San Diego on 4 December 1970, Historic Site #40.
  • Still on the Road Venue Index 1956 – 2016

    Still on the Road Venue Index 1956 – 2016

    STILL ON THE ROAD VENUE INDEX 1956 – 2016 STILL ON THE ROAD VENUE INDEX 1956-2016 2 Top Ten Concert Venues 1. Fox Warfield Theatre, San Francisco, California 28 2. The Beacon Theatre, New York City, New York 24 3. Madison Square Garden, New York City, New York 20 4. Nippon Budokan Hall, Tokyo, Japan 15 5. Hammersmith Odeon, London, England 14 Royal Albert Hall, London, England 14 Vorst Nationaal, Brussels, Belgium 14 6. Earls Court, London, England 12 Jones Beach Theater, Jones Beach State Park, Wantagh, New York 12 The Pantages Theater, Hollywood, Los Angeles, California 12 Wembley Arena, London, England 12 Top Ten Studios 1. Studio A, Columbia Recording Studios, New York City, New York 27 2. Studio A, Power Station, New York City, New York 26 3. Rundown Studios, Santa Monica, California 25 4. Columbia Music Row Studios, Nashville, Tennessee 16 5. Studio E, Columbia Recording Studios, New York City, New York 14 6. Cherokee Studio, Hollywood, Los Angeles, California 13 Columbia Studio A, Nashville, Tennessee 13 7. Witmark Studio, New York City, New York 12 8. Muscle Shoals Sound Studio, Sheffield, Alabama 11 Skyline Recording Studios, Topanga Park, California 11 The Studio, New Orleans, Louisiana 11 Number of different names in this index: 2222 10 February 2017 STILL ON THE ROAD VENUE INDEX 1956-2016 3 1st Bank Center, Broomfield, Colorado 2012 (2) 34490 34500 30th Street Studio, Columbia Recording Studios, New York City, New York 1964 (1) 00775 40-acre North Forty Field, Fort Worth Stockyards, Fort Worth, Texas 2005 (1) 27470 75th Street,
  • Prologue to Urban Renewal: the Problem of Downtown Lancaster, 1945-1960

    Prologue to Urban Renewal: the Problem of Downtown Lancaster, 1945-1960

    - - 75 Prologue to Urban Renewal: The Problem of Downtown Lancaster, 1945-1960 David Schuyler Franklin &Marshall College Nostalgiafor the picturesque characterof Lancasterdoes not retain the tax-payingpopula- tion nor increase the taxable values of the city. Michael Baker, Jr., 1945 In the aftermath of World War II, Lancaster, Pennsylvania faced a series of problems ranging from an aging building stock, traffic congestion, and inadequate parking to sig- nificant population loss and the flight of effective buying income to adjacent suburbs. The impact of the automobile on urban areas large and small was dramatic, but in an older city such as Lancaster the density of building and narrow streets made efforts to accommodate large number of cars especially difficult. As traffic worsened and the shortage of parking spaces discouraged shoppers from driving downtown, the compact retail district, which extended two or three blocks outward from a central square, began to experience increas- ing competition from suburban strip malls. Confronted with a declining economy and signs of imminent commercial blight, elected officials worked with businessmen in a con- certed effort to solidify the retail underpinnings of what traditionally had been the desti- nation of choice for shoppers. How they defined the problem of downtown, what strate- gies they considered in their efforts to reinvigorate the central business district, would shape the city's approach to urban renewal in the 1960s. Although the problems the city confronted were similar to those experienced in urban areas across the nation, Lancaster's response differed from that of other cities because the debate over the future of downtown in the 1950s did not produce a pro-growth coalition which championed revitalization through clearance and new construction.' As a whole, owners of downtown stores were unprepared for the new competition from suburban retailers.
  • TCPA Newsletter 2021 JUL-AUG.Pub

    TCPA Newsletter 2021 JUL-AUG.Pub

    July-August 2021 Volume 32 Issue 4 www.TransCentralPA.org [email protected] c/o MCC of the Spirit 2973 Jefferson Street Serving the Transgender Community of Central Pennsylvania since 1989 Harrisburg, PA 17110 July-August Announcements The Harrisburg Meeting Our in-person meeting will be on July10th and August 14th at 8:00 pm at MCC of the Spirit, our normal meeting location. Please email us with questions at [email protected]. No signup required. July Dinner will be at the Macaroni Grill. Join us for a pre-meeting dinner. We meet at 5 pm and seat promptly at 5:30 pm. RSVPing is required, we must give the restaurant an accurate headcount. Please RSVP at [email protected]. August Dinner will be at Rubicon. Join us for a pre-meeting dinner. We meet at 5 pm and seat promptly at 5:30 pm. RSVPing is required, we Supreme court upholds Gavin Grimm's choice of bathroom facilities. must give the restaurant an accurate headcount. Please RSVP at See story on page 4 [email protected]. day, July 24th and June 28th on and support of community groups and Family Virtual Support Group Zoom! Zoom is a free, online video activities such as Common Roads, Meeting on Monday, July 19th and conferencing program that is easy to the Community Center, Central Penn- Aug. 16th use. If you would like to take part in sylvania Pride, etc. Please continue to The virtual meeting starts at 7:00 pm. this virtual meeting, please send us support our organization and efforts This group brings together parents an email and we can provide addi- by joining or renewing your member- and other adult family members seek- tional information on how to join the ship—we are making a difference! ing to better understand and support meeting.
  • Still on the Road Venue Index 1956 – 2020

    Still on the Road Venue Index 1956 – 2020

    STILL ON THE ROAD VENUE INDEX 1956 – 2020 STILL ON THE ROAD VENUE INDEX 1956-2020 2 Top Concert Venues Venue # 1. The Beacon Theatre, New York City, New York 46 2. Fox Warfield Theatre, San Francisco, California 28 3. Madison Square Garden, New York City, New York 20 4. Nippon Budokan Hall, Tokyo, Japan 15 5. Hammersmith Odeon, London, England 14 Royal Albert Hall, London, England 14 Vorst Nationaal, Brussels, Belgium 14 6. Earls Court, London, England 12 Heineken Music Hall, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 12 Jones Beach Theater, Jones Beach State Park, Wantagh, New York 12 Spektrum, Oslo, Norway 12 The Pantages Theater, Hollywood, Los Angeles, California 12 Wembley Arena, London, England 12 7. Entertainment Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 11 Greek Theatre, University Of California, Berkeley, California 11 Pine Knob Music Theatre, Clarkston, Michigan 11 The Tower Theater, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania 11 8. Globe Arena, Stockholm, Sweden 10 Hammersmith Apollo, London, England 10 Le Grand Rex, Paris, France 10 Palais Theatre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 10 Pavillon de Paris, Paris, France 10 Scandinavium, Gothenburg, Sweden 10 State Theatre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 10 The Forum, Inglewood, Los Angeles, California 10 The Orpheum Theatre, Boston, Massachusetts 10 Top Ten Studios rank Studio # 1. Studio B, The Abernathy Building, Washington, District Of Columbia 85 2. Rundown Studios, Santa Monica, California 63 3. Studio A, Columbia Recording Studios, New York City, New York 27 4. Studio A, Power Station, New York City, New York 26 5. Columbia Music Row Studios, Nashville, Tennessee 16 6. Studio E, Columbia Recording Studios, New York City, New York 14 7.
  • Two Views of John Nolen Reprints and Permission: Sagepub.Com/Journalspermissions.Nav Journals.Sagepub.Com/Home/Jph

    Two Views of John Nolen Reprints and Permission: Sagepub.Com/Journalspermissions.Nav Journals.Sagepub.Com/Home/Jph

    Book Review Journal of Planning History 2017, Vol. 16(1) 80-84 ª 2016 The Author(s) Two Views of John Nolen Reprints and permission: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav journals.sagepub.com/home/jph Jody Beck. 2013. John Nolen and the Metropolitan Landscape. New York, NY: Routledge. 169 pp. $53.95, ISBN 978-0-415-66485-1. R. Bruce Stephenson. 2015. John Nolen, Landscape Architect and City Planner. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press. 294 pp. $39.95, ISBN 978-1-62534-079-5. Reviewed by: Frederick E. Lutt, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA DOI: 10.1177/1538513216680462 John Nolen (1869–1937) is the quintessential American pioneer planner. From his humble begin- nings in Philadelphia, he became an internationally renowned city planner by 1920. His climb to the top of the newly created field of city planning reads like a Horatio Alger story. Both books are well written and backed by much scholarly research. Beck and Stephenson have both combed Nolen’s numerous writings to create compelling narratives. The two books under review here look at Nolen’s life and work from two very different perspectives. Stephenson offers a richly developed biographical portrait of Nolen interwoven with a detailed discussion of his numerous planning projects. In contrast, Beck offers less of a bio- graphical portrait of Nolen, focuses on fewer of his planning projects, and emphasizes the political and social aspects of his work. Beck concludes that Nolen was ineffective in many instances because he treated planning problems as technical issues and did not directly address the inher- ently political nature of all planning problems.
  • Prepared for Opportunity

    Prepared for Opportunity

    PREPARED FOR OPPORTUNITY: THE CRITICAL ELEMENT OF DELIBERATE REGIONAL PLANNING AND COORDINATION TOWARD INCREASING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS, EXECUTION AND EFFECTIVENESS. PATRICIA C. OLDHAM, M.S.P., A.I.C.P. SUBMITTED TOWARD THE SATISFACTION OF THE CAPSTONE REQUIREMENT FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE, TENNESSEE CERTIFIED ECONOMIC DEVELOPER PROGRAM AUGUST 20, 2017 Page Intentionally Blank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to the following individuals for their commitment and generous time spent providing support for these efforts toward the University of Tennessee Certified Economic Developer capstone report process: Gary Farlow, President and CEO, Cleveland/Bradley County Chamber of Commerce Martha L. Kelley, University of Tennessee Center for Industrial Services, Capstone Coordinator Dr. Dave Kolzow, President, Team Kolzow, Inc. One of the greatest satisfactions in doing any sound work for an institution, a town, or a city, or for the nation is that good work done for the public lasts, endures through the generations, at the little bit of work that any individual of the passing generation is enabled to do gains through association with such collective activities an immortality of its own. Charles W. Eliot Source: Sieur de Monts (Acadia National Park) National Monument: Address Upon Its Opening, August 22, 1916, quoted in The Asheville City Plan, (1925) John Nolen, Ph.B, Sc.D. A Valley and Its People: a look back to look forward The State of Tennessee, historically, has been at the national forefront of planning and regional economic development from engaging the nationally respected attorney Alfred Bettman, who developed the state’s enabling legislation, to the creation of a regional economic development and planning model that became a global model for river valley development.
  • The Roots of the New Urbanism: John Nolen's Garden City Ethic

    The Roots of the New Urbanism: John Nolen's Garden City Ethic

    JOURNAL OF PLANNING HISTORY / May 2002 Stephenson / THE ROOTS OF THE NEW URBANISM The Roots of the New Urbanism: John Nolen’s Garden City Ethic Bruce Stephenson Rollins College The New Urbanism has invigorated city planning history by invoking the tradition of Americancivic designto solve the conundrumof suburbansprawl. Studies have docu - mented the similarities between the works of pioneer planner John Nolen and Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, but the ethic connecting past and present remains vague. This research presents the origins of the garden city ethic John Nolen introduced to the United States and its potential to foster a sustainable planning sys- tem capable of enlivening American civic culture. Keywords: Garden city, Florida city planning, John Nolen, New Urbanism, suburbansprawl. he New Urbanism has invigorated city planning history with rele- vance by invoking the tradition of American civic design to solve the Tconundrum of contemporary suburban sprawl.1 Eventhose most critical of the New Urbanism cannot deny the saliency of their agenda given the problems they seek to address: “disinvestments in central cities, the spread of placeless sprawl, increasing separation by race and income, envi- ronmental deterioration, loss of agricultural lands and wilderness, and the erosion of society’s built heritage as one interrelated community-building challenge.”2 As suburban growth has increasingly “become a pejorative”3 in state and local elections, the New Urbanism has moved from novelty to pol- icy. The challenge city planning historians face is not only to place the New Urbanism in context but, as Lewis Mumford wrote, “to bring to the fore- ground those things that have been left out of the current scheme of life and thought.”4 The plan by architects Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk (DPZ) for Seaside, Florida, revived the art of traditional town planning.
  • Tourism in Lancaster County

    Tourism in Lancaster County

    1 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .....................................................5 STRATEGIC VISION..................................................33 Vision ......................................................................35 INTRODUCTION ........................................................9 Overall Objective......................................................35 Background ............................................................11 History of Tourism in Lancaster County....................11 STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................37 Economic Impacts of Tourism Product Development Strategy.................................39 in Lancaster County.................................................13 Infrastructure/Mobility Strategy ................................50 Tourism Cluster ................................................13 Marketing Strategy...................................................56 Economic Impacts............................................15 Outreach/Public Involvement Strategy......................62 Recent Performance of Tourism Cluster............17 Organizational/Collaborative Strategy........................65 Economic Analysis Summary ............................18 CATALYTIC RECOMMENDATIONS ................................73 Travel Trends and Lancaster County ........................19 FUNDING THE PLAN’S RECOMMENDATIONS .................77 GUIDING PRINCIPLES ..............................................23 Stakeholder Involvement..........................................25

  • Introduction to New Towns For

    JOHN NOLEN AND THE NEW SYNTHESIS IN AMERICAN CITY PLANNING Charles D. Warren As the nineteenth century turned to the twentieth, civic leaders, businessmen, and intellectuals joined together in a complex effort to improve urban life in the United States. The Boston journalist Sylvester Baxter, writing in the Cen- tury magazine, called it the “Great Civic Awakening,” and he enumerated the major participants in the movement he described. These included village beautifiers, housing reformers, and park advocates aiming to ameliorate the de- grading effects of rapid growth and rampant industrializa- tion in American towns and cities. They came together in local and mostly voluntary organizations to improve and beautify the physical environment, but many also worked to address the underlying social, economic, and political causes of the chaos and misery of impoverished neighbor- hoods and congested streets. These reformers relied on the work of journalists, experts, and emerging professionals to inspire and abet their efforts to cleanse and revive the American city. Baxter’s title alludes to the hope for enlight- enment and communal redemption that had characterized earlier American awakenings and captures the evangelical fervor of the movement. The new century’s reformers were motivated by an urban darkness filled with nightmares of poverty, disease, and disorder, and they envisioned a new morning lighted with promise, energy, and more than a few dreams.1 xii INTRODUCTION In his first book, Replanning Small Cities (1912), John Nolen wrote: The form of this civic awakening that is most signif- icant and promising is the recognition of the need of comprehensive planning and replanning, especially of the smaller cities, where so much is practicable.