DOCSLIB.ORG

Megaregion Freight Planning: a Synopsis August 2011; Revised March 2012 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Megaregion Freight Planning: a Synopsis August 2011; Revised March 2012 6 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-11/0-6627-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Megaregion Freight Planning: A Synopsis August 2011; Revised March 2012 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. CTR: Robert Harrison, Donovan Johnson, Lisa Loftus-Otway, 0-6627-1 Nathan Hutson, Dan Seedah, Ming Zhang TSU: Carol Lewis 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-6627 1616 Guadalupe Street, Suite 4.202 Austin, TX 78701 Texas Southern University Department of Transportation Studies TB 125, College of Science & Technology 3100 Cleburne Avenue Houston, Texas 77004-9986 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2010–August 2011 P.O. Box 5080 Austin, TX 78763-5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract Megaregion interest has grown strongly in the last decade and is now seen by a growing number of planners as offering effective contributions to problems such as modal congestion, development disparity, and air pollution that individual metropolitan areas or cities cannot resolve individually. Megaregion planning presents an alternative way of mitigating metropolitan problems of large-scale transportation systems, green infrastructure, and economic development and has attracted a number of transportation advocates since 2000. Central questions addressed in this report include how this approach might change freight planning in Texas, what benefits and costs are associated with its adoption, and what characteristics might be of specific interest to TxDOT. The work was structured to give the Department a comprehensive literature review, take directions of interest from the Project Monitoring Committee, undertake preliminary analysis, and present these to a workshop audience comprising TxDOT planners, Metropolitan Planning Organization staff, transportation providers, public transit agencies, and federal officials. A major recommendation is a program of future work that complements TxDOT freight planning, especially at the state transportation planning level. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Megaregions, Freight, State Planning, Modes No restrictions. This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161; www.ntis.gov. 19. Security Classif. (of report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 138 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized Megaregion Freight Planning: A Synopsis CTR Robert Harrison Donovan Johnson Lisa Loftus-Otway Nathan Hutson Dan Seedah Ming Zhang TSU Carol Lewis CTR Technical Report: 0-6627-1 Report Date: October 2011; Revised March 2012 Project: 0-6627 Project Title: Mega-Region Freight Issues in Texas: A Synopsis Sponsoring Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Performing Agency: Center for Transportation Research at The University of Texas at Austin Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin 1616 Guadalupe Street, Suite 4.202 Austin, TX 78701 www.utexas.edu/research/ctr Copyright (c) 2011 Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America iv Disclaimers Author's Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the Federal Highway Administration or the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Patent Disclaimer: There was no invention or discovery conceived or first actually reduced to practice in the course of or under this contract, including any art, method, process, machine manufacture, design or composition of matter, or any new useful improvement thereof, or any variety of plant, which is or may be patentable under the patent laws of the United States of America or any foreign country. Engineering Disclaimer NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING, OR PERMIT PURPOSES. Research Supervisor: Robert Harrison v Acknowledgments The CTR/TSU team wishes to acknowledge the assistance provided by a variety of individuals who spent time providing advice, information, and opinions on this topic. The Texas workshops played an important part in focusing on the key elements that might enable TxDOT to improve its statewide transportation planning. The study Project Director Jack Foster P.E (TPP) was central to maintaining that TxDOT planning focus while Dr. Duncan Stewart (RTI) actively participated in workshops and kept the team running of schedule. The TxDOT PMC members are commended for both participating in project meetings and attending the key Houston workshop when findings were presented and recommendations framed. The PMC members were John Sabala, ADM; Joseph Carrizales, AUS; and Orlando Jamandre, RRD. We would also like to acknowledge the assistance provided by individuals working in or impacted by megaregion issues as researchers, planners, or transportation specialists at MPO, state and federal levels. These include Chandra Bondzie, Lead Planner Freight, Houston Galveston Area Council; Greg Brubeck, Director of Engineering Services, Port of Corpus Christi Authority; Maureen Crocker, Executive Director, Gulf Coast Rail District; Charlie DeWeese, The Hon. Ed Emmett, Harris County Judge; Kevin Feldt, Program Manager, North Central Texas Council of Governments; Les Findeisen, Director Government Affairs, Texas Motor Transportation Association; Dr. Jonathan Gifford, Dean of Research, George Mason School of Public Policy; Rebekah Karasko, Transportation Planner North Central Texas Council of Governments; Michael Kramer, Assistant Director, Planning and Development, City of Houston; Howard Lazarus, Director of Public Works City of Austin, Neil Maxfield, Managing Director Asset Development Denver International Airport; Saud Memon, ARUP; Regina Minish, Marketing Director BNSF Railroad; Margaret Shaw, Economic Development Officer City of Austin; Clint Schelbitzi, Director of Public Affairs UP Railroad; Rob Spillar, Director Transportation Planning, City of Austin; Charles “Muggs” Stoll, Transportation Director San Diego Association of Governments, Petra Todorovich, Director America 2050, and Lily Wells, Port of Houston Authority. Finally, we wish to acknowledge the assistance of Sarah Lind Janak (CTR) who provided substantial help in administering the project and workshops, together with Maureen Kelly (CTR), who edited the final document. vi Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Introduction and Background .................................................................................. 3 1.1 Current Delineations of Megaregions ....................................................................................4 1.1.1 America 2050 ................................................................................................................. 4 1.1.2 Lang and Dhavale .......................................................................................................... 5 1.1.3 Florida ............................................................................................................................ 6 Chapter 2. Domestic and International Scan ............................................................................. 9 2.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................9 2.2 North American Megaregions Scan .....................................................................................10 2.2.1 California—Northern and Southern Megaregions ....................................................... 10 2.2.2 Front Range .................................................................................................................. 12 2.2.3 Cascadia ....................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.4 Midwest (Great Lakes) ................................................................................................ 15 2.2.5 Piedmont Atlantic ........................................................................................................ 15 2.2.6 Northeast ...................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.7 Arizona Sun Corridor ................................................................................................... 17 2.2.8 Florida .......................................................................................................................... 18 2.2.9 Texas Triangle and Gulf Coast .................................................................................... 18 2.2.10 The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jean Gottmann's Atlantic “Transhumance” and The
    Finisterra, XXXIII, 65, 1998, pp. 159-172 JEAN GOTTMANN’S ATLANTIC “TRANSHUMANCE” AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIS SPATIAL THEORY LUCA MUSCARÀ 1 “ ...territory, although a very substantial, material, measurable and concrete entity, is the product and indeed the expression of the psychological features of human groups. It is indeed a psychosomatic phenomenon of the community, and as such is replete with inner conflicts and apparent contradictions. ” (GOTTMANN, 1973: 15) Abstract: This paper analyses Gottmann’s spatial model in relation to his complex biography which took place during some of the great historical changes of the 20 th century. In particular, it relates the concept of Megalopolis to his theoretical writings in political geography. The development of the latter ones could not be fully understood without reference to his “transhumance” between the two sides of the Atlantic from 1941 to 1961. Key-words: Gottmann, atlantic transhumance, spatial theory, Megalopolis, political geography. Résumé: LA “T RANSHUMANCE ” A TLANTIQUE DE JEAN GOTTMANN ET LE DEVELOPPEMENT DE SA THEORIE SPATIALE – Cet article analyse le modèle spatial de Jean Gottmann en relation avec sa complexe biographie, tout au long de certains des grands changements du XX e siècle. Nous développons, en particulier, la relation entre le concept de Mégalopolis et ses écrits théoriques en géographie politique. Le développement de la pensée de Gottmann doit prendre en compte, pour être compris, sa “transhumance” entre les deux côtés de l’Atlantique qui a eu lieu de 1941 à 1961. Mots-clés: Gottmann, transhumance atlantique, théorie spatiale, Megalopolis, géographie politique. Resumo: A “ TRANSUMÂNCIA ” ATLÂNTICA DE JEAN GOTTMAN E O DESENVOLVIMENTO DA SUA TEORIA ESPACIAL – Este artigo analisa o modelo espacial de Jean Gottman, relacionando-o com a 1 University of Trieste.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Megaregions Reconsidered: Urban Futures and the Future of the Urban
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Loughborough University Institutional Repository 1 10 Megaregions reconsidered: urban futures and the future of the urban John Harrison and Michael Hoyler 10.1 An introduction to (more than just) a debate on megaregions We live in a world of competing urban, regional and other spatial imaginaries. This book’s chief concern has been with one such spatial imaginary – the megaregion. More particularly, its theme has been the assertion that the megaregion constitutes globalization’s new urban form. Yet, what is clear is that the intellectual and practical literatures underpinning the megaregion thesis are not internally coherent and this is the cause of considerable confusion over the precise role of megaregions in globalization. This book has offered one solution through its focus on the who, how and why of megaregions much more than the what and where of megaregions. In short, moving the debate forward from questions of definition, identification and delimitation to questions of agency (who or what is constructing megaregions), process (how are megaregions being constructed), and specific interests (why are megaregions being constructed) is the contribution of this book. The individual chapters have interrogated many of the claims and counter-claims made about megaregions through examples as diverse as California, the US Great Lakes, Texas and the Gulf Coast, Greater Paris, Northern England, Northern Europe, and China’s Pearl River Delta. But, as with any such volume, our approach has offered up as many new questions as it has provided answers.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TEXAS TRIANGLE OFFICE MARKETS 60 Degrees of Separation
    CBRE RESEARCH THE TEXAS TRIANGLE OFFICE MARKETS 60 Degrees of Separation SEPTEMBER 2016 CBRE RESEARCH THE TEXAS TRIANGLE OFFICE MARKETS 60 Degrees of Separation In Texas, six degrees of separation is really 60 -- not just because everything is bigger here, but because the physical locations of Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston and Austin form a triangle. Despite their geographic proximity, though, their office markets couldn’t be more different. CBRE RESEARCH | 2016 The Texas Triangle Office Market © 2016 CBRE, Inc. DALLAS TAKES OFF Dallas/Fort Worth is the largest office market in the state and the most diverse. Ranked first in the country for job growth over the past year, Dallas had record-smashing absorption in 2015 totaling 5.2 million sq. ft. That’s the equivalent of filling the Empire State Building nearly twice over. AUSTIN GETS TECHNICAL Austin is a major player in the tech world. Last year alone, 80% of the 119 relocations to or expansions in Austin came from the tech industry, driving explosive growth in the co-working sector. Companies are attracted to Austin’s young, socially-centric and tech-savvy demographic that has ignited an office building boom and transformed the Texas capital into an 18-hour city. SPACE CITY Houston’s nickname has taken on new meaning. Its 210 million-sq.- ft. office market is largely supported by energy-related tenants and is vulnerable to changes in commodity prices. Following the crude oil price downturn, sublease offerings have soared, thrusting office space availability up to 19.8%—a level not seen since the mid- 1990s—and stopping in its tracks a five-year consecutive streak of ferocious demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperloop Texas: Proposal to Hyperloop One Global Challenge SWTA 2017 History of Hyperloop
    Hyperloop Texas: Proposal to Hyperloop One Global Challenge SWTA 2017 History of Hyperloop Hyperloop Texas What is Hyperloop • New mode of transportation consisting of moving passenger or cargo vehicles through a near-vacuum tube using electric propulsion • Autonomous pod levitates above the track and glides at 700 mph+ over long distances Passenger pod Cargo pod Hyperloop Texas History of Hyperloop Hyperloop Texas How does it work? Hyperloop Texas How does it work? Hyperloop Texas History of Hyperloop Hamad Port Doha, Qatar Hyperloop Texas Hyperloop One Global Challenge • Contest to identify and select • 2,600+ registrants from more • Hyperloop TX proposal is a locations around the world with than 100 countries semi-finalist in the Global the potential to develop and • AECOM is a partner with Challenge, one of 35 selected construct the world’s first Hyperloop One, building test from 2,600 around the world Hyperloop networks track in Las Vegas and studying connection to Port of LA Hyperloop Texas Hyperloop SpaceX Pod Competition Hyperloop Texas QUESTION: What happens when a megaregion with five of the eight fastest growing cities in the US operates as ONE? WHAT IS THE TEXAS TRIANGLE? THE TEXAS TRIANGLE MEGAREGION. DALLAS Texas Triangle DALLAS comparable FORT FORT WORTH to Georgia in area WORTH AUSTIN SAN ANTONIO HOUSTON LAREDO AUSTIN SAN ANTONIO HOUSTON LAREDO TRIANGLE HYPERLOOP The Texas Triangle HYPERLOOP FREIGHT Hyperloop Corridor The proposed 640-mile route connects the cities of Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, and Houston with Laredo
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of Territory
    Interfaces – Thinkers’ Corner Geogr. Helv., 68, 65–68, 2013 www.geogr-helv.net/68/65/2013/ doi:10.5194/gh-68-65-2013 © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The Significance of Territory S. Elden Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK Correspondence to: S. Elden ([email protected]) Gottmann, J.: The Significance of Territory, Charlottesville, he called the “transactional city” (1983) or, in an edited text, VA, University of Virginia Press, 169 pp., ISBN: 0-8139- the relation between centre and periphery (1980), though he 0413-7, 1973. was also known for A Geography of Europe (1969b; origi- nally 1950, with multiple editions) and his French textbook Jean Gottmann (1915–1994) was a French geographer, al- Le politique des Etats´ et leur g´eographie (1952; re-edition though he was born in the Ukraine. He was from a Jewish 2007). family, his parents were killed in the 1917 revolution, and The last of these books showcases a perhaps under- he was taken to Paris by his uncle. It was there he earned appreciated side of Gottmann, as a political geographer a doctorate in geography, working with Albert Demangeon (though see Agnew and Muscara,` 2012). The book covers at the Sorbonne. He fled Paris shortly before the Nazi occu- a range of topics that are crucial to that sub-discipline today, pation, living in the south until 1941, and at the end of the including borders and frontiers, natural resources, the rela- war returned to Paris to work with Pierre Mendes-France` in tion between international relations and geography and the the French government, before being sent back to New York role of international organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Bryan Budget Proposal
    CITY OF BRYAN FY PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET 2020 CITY OF BRYAN, TEXAS ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 This budget will raise more revenue from property taxes than last year’s budget by an amount of $2,343,717 which is a 6.6% increase from last year’s budget. The property tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this year is $903,943. This page left blank intentionally. City of Bryan, Texas Fiscal Year 2020 Adopted Annual Budget Table of Contents Transmittal Letter City Manager’s Transmittal Letter ........................................................................................................................ i Introduction Principal City Officials ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Budget Calendar .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Organizational Chart ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Single Member (City Council) District Map .......................................................................................................... 7 Strategic Plan ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Strategic Areas of Emphasis by Department ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE TEXAS WAY of URBANISM the Texas Way of Urbanism
    THE TEXAS WAY OF URBANISM the texas way of urbanism center for opportunity urbanism 1 the texas way of urbanism The Center for Opportunity Urbanism (COU) is a 501(c)(3) national think tank. COU focuses on the study of cities as generators of upward mobility. COU’s mission is to change the urban policy discussion, both locally and globally. We are seeking to give voice to a ‘people oriented’ urbanism that focuses on economic opportunity, upward mobility, local governance and broad based growth that reduces poverty and enhances quality of life for all. For a comprehensive collection of COU publications and commentary, go to www.opportunityurbanism.org. 2 the texas way of urbanism CONTENTS Texas Urbanism Bios ........................................................................3 The Emergence of Texas Urbanism; The Triangle Takes Off .....................................5 The Texas Urban Model .....................................................................7 The Dallas Way Of Urban Growth........................................................... 12 Houston, City of Opportunity Center for Opportunity Urbanism .............................. 19 Opportunity Urbanism: The Tech Edition ................................................... 28 San Antonio: Growth And Success In The Mexican-American Capital ......................... 37 Military Employment and the Upward Mobility of Latinos in San Antonio ..................... 47 A summary of the analysis and motivators of growth in the Austin - San Antonio corridor. ...... 49 Endnotes ................................................................................. 57 3 texas urbanism bios TEXAS URBANISM BIOS John C. Beddow, Author – served as publisher of the Klaus Desmet, Author – is the Altshuler Centennial Houston Business Journal from 1998 to last year. He suc- Interdisciplinary Professor of Cities, Regions and Global- cessful turned the HBJ fromjust a weekly print product to ization at Southern Methodist University and a Research a 24/7 digital first multi-platform business news channel.
    [Show full text]
  • MEGAREGIONAL SYNERGY the Intersection of Teaching, Research, and Practice at the University of Texas
    MEGAREGIONAL SYNERGY The Intersection of Teaching, Research, and Practice at the University of Texas Forum Texas Chapter of the American Planning Association’s State Conference Presented by Dr. Talia McCray and Billy Fleming Fort Worth, TX 10.4.2012 MEGAREGIONAL SYNERGY Outline 1. Developing the Nation’s First Course on MegaRegions Dr. Talia McCray 2. New Planners and the MegaRegional Opportunity Billy Fleming DEVELOPING THE NATION’S FIRST COURSE ON MEGAREGIONS Mega-Regional Synergy at UT-Austin Dr. Talia McCray 10.4.2012 Origins of the term “Megaregion” • Jean Gottmann, 1964 – French geographer coined the phrase “Megalopolis” – Very Large City. First applied to the Northeast Corridor – Boston to DC. Region defined as “discrete and independent, uniquely tied to each other through the intermeshing of their suburban zones, acting in some ways as a unified super- city: a megalopolis” • Global City-region (Scott, 2001) – Term has been used by urbanists, economists, and urban planners since the 1950s to mean not just the administrative area of a recognizable city or conurbation but also its hinterland that is often far larger. Economic ties may include rural areas, suburbs, or county towns. What is a Megaregion? • Networks of metropolitan regions with shared – Economies – Infrastructure – Natural resource systems • Stretching over distances of roughly 300 miles - 600 miles in length Source: Hagler & Todorovich, 2009 Definitions of a Megaregion • A chain of roughly adjacent metropolitan areas • Composed of two or more cities • Clustered network of American cities whose population ranges are or are projected between 7 to 63 million by the year 2025 • A polycentric agglomeration of cites and their lower-density hinterlands Spatial Linkages • Economics: Interlocking economic systems • Environment: Shared natural resources and ecosystems • Infrastructure: Common transportation systems How many Megaregions are there? Between 10 and 11, depending on the criteria Regional Plan Association & America 2050 – 11 Megaregions The image cannot be displayed.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecast of the Texas Labor Market 2012-2015
    Growth Abounds A FORECAST OF THE TEXAS LABOR MARKET 2012-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward . 1 Setting the Stage: Changing Economies. 3 Major Texas Industries . 7 Texas Economists Predicting Job Growth . 15 Texas Regional Snapshots . .20 Statewide . .31 Epilogue. 36 The Labor Market & Career Information department of the Texas Workforce Commission publishes this report every other year. This year, this report covers four components: 1) Employment forecasts for Texas by the contracted economics firm of IHS Global Insights 2) Employment forecasts for specific industries by the IHS Global Insights economists 3) National and regional economic insights by Texas economists 4) Anticipated employment growth in specific industries highlighted by region FORWARD Total employment in Texas should rise by 2.1% in 2013 and another 2.3% growth in 2014 and then another 2.4% growth in 2015, according to economists from the highly respected IHS Global Insights, an economic forecasting firm. The economists at IHS Global Insights have pulled employment data for different industries and regions in Texas then applied their national and global economic modeling to the Texas employment data to forecast employment levels in different industries and regions of the Lone Star State. For additional context and insight, economists at Texas universities and the Federal Reserve Bank were also surveyed regarding their Texas employment forecasts. The results are contained in this report. Proving that economic forecasting is equal parts art and science, the economists at Texas universities and other institutions are forecasting a broad range of job growth in the Lone Star State. These Texas economists polled are forecasting total employment growth of 0.5% to 2.8% in 2013 followed by forecasts of employment growth of 0.5% to 3.1% in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and the Texas Metropolises
    GLOBALIZATION AND THE TEXAS METROPOLISES: COMPETITION AND COMPLEMENTARITY IN THE TEXAS URBAN TRIANGLE A Dissertation by JOSÉ ANTÓNIO DOS REIS GAVINHA Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2007 Major Subject: Geography GLOBALIZATION AND THE TEXAS METROPOLISES: COMPETITION AND COMPLEMENTARITY IN THE TEXAS URBAN TRIANGLE A Dissertation by JOSÉ ANTÓNIO DOS REIS GAVINHA Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Daniel Z. Sui Committee Members, Robert S. Bednarz Hongxing Liu Michael Neuman Head of Department, Douglas J. Sherman December 2007 Major Subject: Geography iii ABSTRACT Globalization and the Texas Metropolises: Competition and Complementarity in the Texas Urban Triangle. (December 2007) José António dos Reis Gavinha, B.A., Universidade do Porto; M.Sc., University of Toronto Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Daniel Z. Sui This dissertation examines relationships between cities, and more specifically the largest Texas cities, and the global economy. Data on headquarters location and corporation sales over a 20-year period (1984-2004) supported the hypothesis that globalization is not homogeneous, regular or unidirectional, but actually showed contrasted phases. Texas cities have been raising in global rankings, due to corporate relocations and, to lesser extent, the growth of local activities. By year 2004, Dallas and Houston ranked among the top-20 headquarters cities measured by corporation sales The Texas Urban Triangle had one of the major global concentrations of oil- and computer-related corporation headquarters; conversely, key sectors like banking, insurance and automotive were not significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for U.S
    Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Transportation Planning For U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Dr. Catherine L. Ross, Principal Investigator CENTER FOR QUALITY GROWTH AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT at the GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2008 Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for Infrastructure Investment and Transportation Planning Project Title: Megaregions and Transportation Planning (FHWA-BAA-HEPP-02-2007) Deliverable 1b: a report comprised of case studies that summarize the application of large-scale regionalism in the U.S. and abroad and the existing literature on megaregions Submitted to: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Planning, HEPP-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Point of Contact: Supin Yoder Submitted by: Georgia Tech Research Corporation (A Non-profit, State Controlled Institution of Higher Education) Principal Investigator: Dr. Catherine L. Ross ([email protected]) Co-PIs: Jason Barringer, Jiawen Yang Researchers: Myungje Woo, Jessica Doyle, Harry West, with Adjo Amekudzi and Michael Meyer Georgia Institute of Technology College of Architecture Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development (CQGRD) 760 Spring Street, Suite 213 Atlanta, GA 30332-0790 Phone: (404) 385-5133, FAX: (404) 385-5127 ii Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Transportation Planning Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 SECTION I. OVERVIEW 9 A. Research Background 9 B. Report Organization 10 SECTION II. FOUNDATIONS AND DELINEATION APPROACHES 11 A. Examining the Literature 11 1. Regionalism 11 2. Globalization 12 3. Global Climate Change 13 4. Economic Geography 17 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enduring Importance of National Capital Cities in the Global Era
    URBAN AND REGIONAL University of RESEARCH Michigan COLLABORATIVE Working Paper www.caup.umich.edu/workingpapers Series URRC 03-08 The Enduring Importance of National Capital Cities in the Global Era 2003 Scott Campbell Urban and Regional Planning Program College of Architecture and Urban Planning University of Michigan 2000 Bonisteel Blvd. Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2069 [email protected] Abstract: This paper reports on the early results of a longer comparative project on capital cities. Specifically, it examines the changing role of national capital cities in this apparent global era. Globalization theory suggests that threats to the monopoly power of nation-states and the rise of a transnational network of global economic cities are challenging the traditional centrality of national capital cities. Indeed, both the changing status of nation-states and the restructuring world economy will reshuffle the current hierarchy of world cities, shift the balance of public and private power in capitals, and alter the current dominance of capitals as the commercial and governmental gateway between domestic and international spheres. However, claims in globalization theory that a new transnational system of global cities will make national boundaries, national governments and national capitals superfluous, albeit theoretically provocative, are arguably both ahistorical and improvident. Though one does see the spatial division of political and economic labor in some modern countries, especially in federations (e.g., Washington-New York; Ottawa-Toronto; Canberra-Sydney; Brasilia-Sao Paolo), the more common pattern is still the co- location of government and commerce (e.g., London, Paris, Tokyo, Seoul, Cairo). The emergence of global cities is intricately tied to the rise of nation-states -- and thus to the capital cities that govern them.
    [Show full text]