Crowdsourcing As a Model for Problem Solving
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CROWDSOURCING AS A MODEL FOR PROBLEM SOLVING: LEVERAGING THE COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE OF ONLINE COMMUNITIES FOR PUBLIC GOOD by Daren Carroll Brabham A dissertation submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Communication The University of Utah December 2010 Copyright © Daren Carroll Brabham 2010 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF DISSERTATION APPROVAL The dissertation of Daren Carroll Brabham has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Joy Pierce , Chair May 6, 2010 bate Approved Karim R. Lakhani , Member May 6, 2010 Date Approved Timothy Larson , Member May 6, 2010 Date Approved Thomas W. Sanchez , Member May 6, 2010 bate Approved Cassandra Van Buren , Member May 6, 2010 Date Approved and by Ann L Dar lin _ ' Chair of _________....:.; :.::.::...=o... .= "' :.: .=:.::"'g '--________ the Department of Communication and by Charles A. Wight, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT As an application of deliberative democratic theory in practice, traditional public participation programs in urban planning seek to cultivate citizen input and produce public decisions agreeable to all stakeholders. However, the deliberative democratic ideals of these traditional public participation programs, consisting of town hall meetings, hearings, workshops, and design charrettes, are often stymied by interpersonal dynamics, special interest groups, and an absence of key stakeholder demographics due to logistical issues of meetings or lack of interest and awareness. This dissertation project proposes crowdsourcing as an online public participation alternative that may ameliorate some of the hindrances of traditional public participation methods. Crowdsourcing is an online, distributed problem solving and production model largely in use for business. It leverages the collective intelligence of online communities by soliciting ideas and solutions for an organization from these communities through the form of an open call. The mechanism of one type of crowdsourcing, the peer-vetted creative production approach, aligns with the goals of public participation programs. In light of this, Next Stop Design was launched in 2009 in an attempt to test crowdsourcing in a public participation context for transit planning. Next Stop Design was an online competition where users submitted bus stop shelter designs and voted on the designs of peers to determine a best design. This study examines the effectiveness of the Next Stop Design project as an online deliberative democratic process, as perceived by Next Stop Design participants, and also examines the motivations of participants on the site. Interviews via instant messenger were conducted with 23 participants focusing on their perceptions of the Next Stop Design project according to a list of ideal features for online deliberative democratic process and a list of motivations for participation. Data suggest that Next Stop Design was perceived to be a generally effective online deliberative democratic process, with perceived weaknesses concerning the facilitation of the project through public voting and the equality of participants on the site in light of apparent voting fraud in the competition. Findings also suggest that participants were motivated to participate in the project because they saw an opportunity to advance their careers, they had fun, they learned new skills and knowledge, and they saw the project as an opportunity for creative self-expression. Participants were also motivated to participate because the Web site was appealing, usable, and had a low barrier to entry, and participants offered constructive feedback to improve the process as a whole. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ vii Chapters 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 PEN: A Vignette for Online Public Participation ....................................................2 Crowdsourcing as an Online Public Participation Tool ...........................................4 Overview of the Dissertation ...................................................................................5 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................................................10 Deliberative Democracy ........................................................................................11 Public Participation in Urban Planning..................................................................15 The Medium of the Internet ...................................................................................21 Collective Intelligence, Wise Crowds, and Problem Solving ................................24 Online Deliberation ................................................................................................27 Democratic Process in Organized Networks .........................................................33 Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving ...................................................35 The Knowledge Discovery and Management Approach ...........................37 The Broadcast Search Approach ................................................................38 The Peer-Vetted Creative Production Approach .......................................40 Distributed Human Intelligence Tasking ...................................................41 Moving the Crowd .................................................................................................43 3. METHOD ..............................................................................................................55 Applied Communication Research and Critical Media Design .............................56 Next Stop Design as Research Site ........................................................................59 Basic Findings from Next Stop Design .....................................................63 The Design of this Study........................................................................................67 4. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION..........................................................................77 Summary of Interview Data Collected ..................................................................78 Themes Relating to Ideal Features of Online Deliberative Democratic Process ...................................................................................................................82 Accessible and Informed............................................................................83 Autonomous, Free of Censorship, and Transparent...................................86 Pluralistic and Inclusive .............................................................................89 Accountable and Relevant and Public .......................................................92 Facilitated and Equal and Responsive .......................................................96 Themes Relating to Motivations ..........................................................................101 To Advance One’s Career and To be Recognized by Peers ....................102 To Contribute to a Collaborative Effort and To Express Oneself ...........105 To Have Fun and To Learn New Skills and Knowledge .........................106 Low Barriers to Entry, Ease of Use, and Perceptions of an Appealing, Usable Web Site ....................................................................108 General Impressions and Crowdsourcing for Future Government Projects ........110 5. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................116 Summary of Findings from this Study .................................................................117 Findings Related to the Ideal Features of Online Deliberative Democracy ...............................................................................................118 Findings Related to Motivations ..............................................................120 Limitations and Future Needed Research ............................................................121 Guiding Principles for Practitioners Interested in Crowdsourcing for Public Participation ..............................................................................................127 APPENDIX: INTERVIEW GUIDE ................................................................................132 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................135 vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The crowd that had a hand in this dissertation and in my decade of higher education deserves a lot of praise. I am thankful for my advisor, Joy Pierce, both for dealing with my procrastination and stubbornness and for providing wonderful scholarly guidance and friendly encouragement along the way. Thanks also to my supervisory committee: Cassandra Van Buren, for cultivating my creativity and inspiring me to push boundaries; Tom Sanchez, for supporting my interdisciplinary explorations into urban planning and helping get Next Stop Design off the ground; Tim Larson, for years of encouragement and confidence in both my teaching and research abilities; and Karim Lakhani, for going out on a limb to take me on as an advisee