DOCSLIB.ORG

Surface Water Supply of the United States 1925 Part Ix, Colobado Eivee Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Surface Water Supply of the United States 1925 Part Ix, Colobado Eivee Basin DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Ray Lyman Wilbur, Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otis Smith, Director Water-Supply Paper 609 SURFACE WATER SUPPLY OF THE UNITED STATES 1925 PART IX, COLOBADO EIVEE BASIN NATHAN C. GROVER, Chief Hydraulic Engineer ROBERT POLLANSBEE, A. B. PURTON and W. E, DICKINSON District Engineers Prepared in cooperation with THE STATES OP COLORADO, WYOMING UTAH, CALIFORNIA, and ARIZONA UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1929 For saJ<? by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. ----- Price 13 cents CONTENTS Page Authorization and scope of work___________________________________ 1 Definitional terms ______________________________._ 2, Explanation of data_______________________________ 2 Accuracy of field data and computed results_________________________ 4 Publications_____________________________________ 5 Cooperation______________________________________________________ 9 Division of work________________________________________ 9 Gaging-station records..____________________________ 10 Colorado River Basin________________________________ 10 Colorado River and tributaries above Green River___________ 10 Colorado River at Glenwood Springs, Colo_____________ 10 Colorado River near Palisade, Colo________________ 12 Colorado River near Cisco, Utah_______________________ 13 Colorado River at Lees Ferry, Ariz_________________ 15 Colorado River at Bright Angel Creek, near Grand Canyon, Ariz________________________________________ 17 Colorado River near Topock, Ariz__________________ 18 Colorado River at Yuma, Ariz________________________ 20 Fraser River near West Portal, Colo_____________ 22 Blue River at Dillon, Colo____________________ 23 Eagle River at Redcliffj Colo__________________ 25 Roaring Fork at Glenwood Springs, Colo_ __ __ ________ 27 Parachute Creek at Grand Valley, Colo__________________ 28 Roan Creek near De Beque, Colo___________________-_ 30 Taylor River at Almont, Colo_____________________ 31 Gunnison River near Gunnison, Colo__________________ 32 Gunnison River near Grand Junction, Colo_______________ 34 Leroux Creek near Lazear, Colo________________________ 36 Surface Creek at Cedaredge, Colo___-____-___--------_ 38 Uncompahgre River beltfw^ Ouray, Colo________________ 39 Uncompahgre River near Colona, Colo__________________ 41 Uncompahgre River at Delta, Colo_______ ___________ 42 San Miguel River at Naturita, Colo_____________________ 43 Green River Basin______________________________________ 45 Green River near Daniel, Wyo___________________ .__ 45 Green River at Green River, Wyo_______________________ 46 Green River at Green River, Utah____________________ 48 New Fork near Boulder, Wyo__________________ _ 50 Pine Creek at Pinedale, Wyo_ ____ ________ 51 Hams Fork at Diamondville, Wyo_______________ ,__ 52 Little Snake River near Lily, Colo_ ______.__-_--___- _ 53 Ashley Creek near Vernal, Utah___ __________ 55 Vernal Milling & Light Co.'s tailrace near Vernal, Utah___ 56 Duchesne River near Tabiona, Utah_____ _____ __, 58 Duchesne River at Duchesne, Utah____ _______________ 60 Duchesne River at Myton, Utah ________ ____________ 62 in IV CONTENTS Gaging-station records Continued. Colorado River Basin Continued. Green River Basin Continued. Page Strawberry River at Duchesne, Utah______________ 64 West Fork of Lake Fork near Mountain Home, Utah____ 66 Lake Fork near Myton, Utah__________________________ 67 Uinta River near Neola, Utah.._______________ 68 Whiterocks Creek near Whiterocks, Utah________,.____ 70 Fish Creek near Scofield, Utah __________________ 71 Price River near Helper, Utah________ *______________ 73 Huntington Creek near Huntington, Utah_______________ 75 Cotton wood Creek near Orangeville, Utah ________ __ __. 77 Paria River Basin____________________________________ 79 Paria River at Lees Ferry, Ariz____________________ 79 Little Colorado River Basin_______________________ _-- 80 Zuni River at Blackrock, N. Mex_______________ ,_ 80 Bright Angel Creek Basin_____________________________ 81 Bright Angel Creek near Grand Canyon, Ariz_ ___________ 81 Virgin River Basin._______._________________ 83 Virgin River at Virgin, Utah___________________ 83 Mukuntuweap River near Springdale, Utah____________ 84 Santa Clara Creek near Central, Utah_____ ___ ___ 85 Gila River Basin___,_________________________ 87 Gila River near Duncan, Ariz_______ ______________ _ 87 Gila River at York, Ariz______________ ___ 87 Gila River near Solomonville, Ariz______________________ 88 Gila River near Ashurst, Ariz_______ _______________ 90 Gila River near San Carlos, Ariz_____________-.___- ___ 90 Gila River at Kelvin, Ariz______________________ 92 Gila River at Ashurst-Hayden Dam, near Florence, Ariz___ 94 Gila River at Gillespie Dam, Ariz____________ _____ 95 Sunset Canal near Duncan, Ariz___ 97 Cosper-Windham Canal near Duncan, Ariz _______ _ 98 Moddle Canal near Duncan, Ariz__ ____ _______ 100 Valley Canal near Duncan, Ariz______ _________ __ 102 Duncan Canal near Duncan, Ariz__ ______ 103 Black-McClesky Canal at Duncan, Ariz ______ __ 105 Colmqnero Canal near Duncan, Ariz _____________ __ _ 106 York Canal at York, Ariz________ 107 Brown Canal near Solomonville, Ariz_______ ___________ 108 Brown Canal wasteway near Solomonville, Ariz._________ 109 Michelana Canal near Solomonville, Ariz ________ _ 110 Fourness Canal near Solomonville, Ariz _ 112 San Jose Canal near Solomonville, Ariz_____ _ 113 Montezuma Canal near Solomonville, Ariz _ 115 Union Canal near Solomonville, Ariz______ __ 116 San Simon Creek near Rodeo, N. Mex________ 118 San Simon Creek near San Simon, Ariz_ 119 Cave Creek near Paradise, Ariz__ 119 Cave Creek Canal near Paradise, Ariz_ 120 East Turkey Creek at Paradise, Ariz_ 121 Graham Canal near Safford, Ariz______ 122 Smithville Canal near Thatcher, Ariz 124 Dodge-Nevada Canal near Pima, Ariz _ 125 CONTENTS V Gaging-station records Continued. Colorado River Basin Continued. Gila River Basin Continued. Page Curtis-Kempton Canal near Eden, Ariz___________ 126 Fort Thomas Consolidated Canal at Ashurst, Ariz____ _ 128 San Pedro River near Fairbank, Ariz____t_____________ 129 Santa Cruz River at Tucson, Ariz__ ___________________ 131 Rfllito Creek near Tucson, Ariz_________________ 132 Salt River near Chrysotile, Ariz____________________ 133 Salt River near Roosevelt, Ariz____________________ 135 Tonto Creek near Roosevelt, Ariz________________> _ 136 Verde River near McDowell, Ariz_________________ _ 138 Barren Flat Basin____.__.________________________ 139 West Turkey Creek near Light, Ariz_________________ 139 Whitewater Draw Basin______________________________________ 140 Whitewater Draw near Rucker, Ariz______________________ 140 Miscellaneous discharge measurements_____________________________ 142 Index. ________________________________________________ 143 ILLUSTRATION FIGUBB 1. Typical gaging station.,...________._________-__ 3 SURFACE WATEE SUPPLY OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN, 192ft AUTHORIZATION AND SCOPE OF WORK This volume is one of a series of 14 reports presenting records of measurements of flow made on streams in the United States during the year ending September 30, 1925. The data presented in these reports were collected by the United States Geological Survey under the following authority contained in the organic law (20 Stat. L.,.p. 394): Provided, That this officer [the Director] shall have the direction of the Geologi­ cal Survey and the classification of public lands and examination of the geo­ logical structure, mineral resources, and products of the national domain. The work was begun in 1888 in connection with special studies relating to irrigation. Since the fiscal year ending June 30, 1895, successive appropriation bills passed by Congress have carried the following items: For gaging the streams and determining the water supply of the United States and for the investigation of underground currents and artesian wells, and for the preparation of reports upon the best methods of utilizing the water resources. Annual appropriations for the fiscal years ending June 30, 1895-1926 1895._--_--_--__-_-_-__ $12, 500. 00 1911-1917.__,-_--__--$150, 000. 00 1896.___.________ 24,500.00 1918-__-_-_-_---------- 175, 000. 00 1897-1899--.--_--- . 50, 000. 00 1919_________________ 148, 244 10 1900-- ---------__._ 70, 000. 00 1920.______-_.__- 175,000.00 1901-1902. _________ 100, 000. 00 1921-1923- _________ 180, 000. 00 1903-1906------------- 200,000.00 1924-1926-_---__-.._-_ 170,000.00 1907_ ____________ 150, 000. 00 1926--_-___-____.__ 165, 000. 00 1908-1910. _________ 100, 000. 00 In the execution of the work many private and State organizations have cooperated, either by furnishing data or by assisting in collect­ ing data. Acknowledgments for cooperation of the first kind are made in connection with the description of each station affected; cooperation of the second kind is acknowledged on page 9. Measurements of stream flow have been made at about 5,120 points in the United States and also at many points in Alaska and the Hawaiian Islands. In July, 1925, 1,710 gaging stations were being maintained by the Geological Survey and the cooperating organiza­ tions. Many miscellaneous discharge measurements were made at other points.. In connection with<,thi§ work, data, were also collected in regard to precipitation, evaporation, storage reservoirs, river pro­ files, and water power in many sections of the country and will be made available in water-supply papers from time to time. 2 SURFACE WATER SUPPLY, 1925, PART IX DEFINITION OF TERMS The volume
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zuni Bluehead Sucker BISON No.: 010496
    Scientific Name: Catostomus discobolus yarrowi Common Name: Zuni bluehead sucker BISON No.: 010496 Legal Status: ¾ Arizona, Species of ¾ ESA, Proposed ¾ New Mexico-WCA, Special Concern Threatened Threatened ¾ ESA, Endangered ¾ ESA, Threatened ¾ USFS-Region 3, ¾ ESA, Proposed ¾ New Mexico-WCA, Sensitive Endangered Endangered ¾ None Distribution: ¾ Endemic to Arizona ¾ Southern Limit of Range ¾ Endemic to Arizona and ¾ Western Limit of Range New Mexico ¾ Eastern Limit of Range ¾ Endemic to New Mexico ¾ Very Local ¾ Not Restricted to Arizona or New Mexico ¾ Northern Limit of Range Major River Drainages: ¾ Dry Cimmaron River ¾ Rio Yaqui Basin ¾ Canadian River ¾ Wilcox Playa ¾ Southern High Plains ¾ Rio Magdalena Basin ¾ Pecos River ¾ Rio Sonoita Basin ¾ Estancia Basin ¾ Little Colorado River ¾ Tularosa Basin ¾ Mainstream Colorado River ¾ Salt Basin ¾ Virgin River Basin ¾ Rio Grande ¾ Hualapai Lake ¾ Rio Mimbres ¾ Bill Williams Basin ¾ Zuni River ¾ Gila River Status/Trends/Threats (narrative): Federal: FWS Species of concern, USFS Sensitive: Region 3, State AZ: Species of concern, State NM: Endangered. Status The Zuni bluehead sucker was once common in the Little Colorado River and Zuni River drainages, but its historic range has been reduced by approximately 50% (Propst and Hobbs 1996) and its numbers by about 90% in the last 25 years (NMDGF 2000). The Zuni bluehead sucker currently inhabits less then 10% of its probable historic range, and within its current range, its distribution is fragmented, and its status in Arizona is uncertain (Propst 1999). Merkel (1979) reported that on July 21 1971, a sizable population of Zuni Mountain suckers was discovered deep in the Nutria Box where water was flowing. Biologist had assumed that the suckers had been extirpated as a result of fish eradication efforts in the 1960's.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recovery Plan Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax Traillii Extimus)
    Final Recovery Plan Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) August 2002 Prepared By Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Recovery Team Technical Subgroup For Region 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 Approved: Date: Disclaimer Recovery Plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved Recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Some of the techniques outlined for recovery efforts in this plan are completely new regarding this subspecies. Therefore, the cost and time estimates are approximations. Citations This document should be cited as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Recovery Plan. Albuquerque, New Mexico. i-ix + 210 pp., Appendices A-O Additional copies may be purchased from: Fish and Wildlife Service Reference Service 5430 Governor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301/492-6403 or 1-800-582-3421 i This Recovery Plan was prepared by the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Recovery Team, Technical Subgroup: Deborah M.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for the Designation of Critical Habitat for the Zuni Bluehead Sucker
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE DESIGNATION OF CRITICAL HABITAT FOR THE ZUNI BLUEHEAD SUCKER Prepared by Harris Environmental group, Inc. For the Department of Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S Fish and Wildlife Service CONTACT: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service DATE: March 2015 October 22, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Figures............................................................................................................................................ iv Tables……………………………………………………………………………………………..iv Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ v CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION ........................................................... 8 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 8 Purpose and need for the action .................................................................................................. 8 Proposed action ........................................................................................................................... 9 Background ................................................................................................................................. 9 Critical habitat ............................................................................................................................. 9 Provisions of the ESA ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtail Chub (Gila Robusta) Status Survey of the Lower Colorado River Basin
    ROUNDTAIL CHUB (GILA ROBUSTA) STATUS SURVEY OF THE LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN Jeremy B. Voeltz, Wildlife Technician Nongame Branch, Wildlife Management Division Final Report to The Central Arizona Project Native Fish Conservation and Nonnative Aquatic Species Management and Control Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Field Office Phoenix, Arizona and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Phoenix Area Office Phoenix, Arizona Technical Report 186 Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program Program Manager: Terry B. Johnson Arizona Game and Fish Department 2221 West Greenway Road Phoenix, Arizona 85023-4399 January 2002 CIVIL RIGHTS AND DIVERSITY COMPLIANCE The Arizona Game and Fish Commission receives federal financial assistance in Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration. Under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information please write to: Arizona Game and Fish Department Office of the Deputy Director, DOHQ 2221 West Greenway Road Phoenix, Arizona 85023-4399 and The Office for Diversity and Civil Rights U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4040 North Fairfax Drive, Room 300 Arlington, Virginia 22203 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT COMPLIANCE The Arizona Game and Fish Department complies with all provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Cultural Resource Monitoring of Prepared and Submitted by Zuni
    Pueblo of Zuni 2011 Cultural Resource Monitoring of The Colorado River Ecosystem Through Grand Canyon Prepared and Submitted by Kurt E. Dongoske, RPA Director/Princi pal lnvestigator Zuni Heritage and Historic Preservation Office And Octavius Seowtewa Co-Principal lnvestigator Zuni Cultural Resource Advisory Team Prepared in Association with the Zuní Cultural Resource Advisory Team Prepared for and Submitted to Marianne Crawford, Contracting Officer for Technical Review Upper Colorado Regional Office Bureau of Reclamation 125 South State Street salt Lake city, utah 84r38-Lt47 Submitted in partial fulfillment of Contract R10PC40022 Work performed under NPS Permit Number: GRCA-2011-SCl-0036 August 2013 Executive Summary Between 13 and 22 August 2011, the Zuni Heritage and Historic Preseruation Office, on behalf of the Pueblo of Zuni, conducted a monitoring river trip on the Colorado River through Grand Canyon from Lees Ferry to Diamond Creek. The purpose of this river trip was to provide the Zuni religious leaders and cultural advisors an opportunity to inspect the health of the Colorado River ecosystem through Grand Canyon as part of the long-term monitoring program that is associated with the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP). Ten (10) Zuni representatives participated in the 2011 Zun¡ monitoring river trip representing 7 medicine societies, 4 kiva groups, and the Bow priesthood. During the 2011 Colorado River monitoring trip, Zuni cultural advisors monitored 28 places of traditional cultural importance. Of these 28
    [Show full text]
  • Gila Robusta Common Name: Roundtail Chub BISON No.: 010145
    Scientific Name: Gila robusta Common Name: Roundtail chub BISON No.: 010145 Legal Status: ¾ Arizona, Species of ¾ ESA, Proposed ¾ New Mexico-WCA, Special Concern Threatened Threatened ¾ ESA, Endangered ¾ ESA, Threatened ¾ USFS-Region 3, ¾ ESA, Proposed ¾ New Mexico-WCA, Sensitive Endangered Endangered ¾ None Distribution: ¾ Endemic to Arizona ¾ Southern Limit of Range ¾ Endemic to Arizona and ¾ Western Limit of Range New Mexico ¾ Eastern Limit of Range ¾ Endemic to New Mexico ¾ Very Local ¾ Not Restricted to Arizona or New Mexico ¾ Northern Limit of Range Major River Drainages: ¾ Dry Cimmaron River ¾ Rio Yaqui Basin ¾ Canadian River ¾ Wilcox Playa ¾ Southern High Plains ¾ Rio Magdalena Basin ¾ Pecos River ¾ Rio Sonoita Basin ¾ Estancia Basin ¾ Little Colorado River ¾ Tularosa Basin ¾ Mainstream Colorado River ¾ Salt Basin ¾ Virgin River Basin ¾ Rio Grande ¾ Hualapai Lake ¾ Rio Mimbres ¾ Bill Williams Basin ¾ Zuni River ¾ Gila River Status/Trends/Threats (narrative): Federal: (FWS) Species of concern, (USFS) Region 3 Sensitive, State AZ: Species of special concern, State NM: Endangered. The first examples of the roundtail chub were caught and described as new in the Zuni River, New Mexico, by Dr. S. W. Woodhouse, while attached as Surgeon and Naturalist to the expedition of Capt. Sitgreaves, for the exploration of Zuni and its tributaries (Baird and Girard 1853). Roundtail chub, although reduced in range and abundance, remain comparatively widespread and common in much of the upper Colorado River basin, (Kaeding et al. 1990). In New Mexico, the roundtail chub has been extirpated from the Zuni River drainage (Propst and Hobbes 1996). The physical and biological characteristics of the entire Colorado River system, have been altered by the operation of water development projects upstream, by the introduction of nonnative fishes and by other human activities (Minckley 1973).
    [Show full text]
  • ZUNI BLUEHEAD SUCKER (Catostomus Discobolus Yarrowi)
    ZUNI BLUEHEAD SUCKER (Catostomus discobolus yarrowi) STATUS: Endangered (79 FR 43132) July 24, 2014, with Proposed critical habitat (78 FR 5369), January 25, 2013. SPECIES DESCRIPTION: Coloration varies with habitat conditions, silvery tan to dark green above, silvery to yellowish or dirty-white below. Head often with a bluish cast, especially in large adults. The population of the Little Colorado River is markedly different than those in the Zuni River, with thickened body shapes, short fins, and generally smaller size. Sexually mature bluehead suckers usually attain standard lengths of 90 to 200 mm (3.5 to 8 inches). HABITAT: While this species occupies a variety of habitats from headwater streams to large rivers, it is almost always found in moderate to fast flowing water above a rubble-rock substrate. Young fish prefer quiet, shallow areas near shoreline. Spawning occurs in spring and summer when water temperatures are above 16°C. As with certain other suckers (e.g., the Sonora sucker, C. insignis), gravid females are probably attended by more than one male, and deposit their eggs in coarse gravel. The fry occupy backwater areas until they are able to swim strongly enough to remain in place in stronger currents. The Zuni bluehead sucker feeds upon algae and other small organisms which are found on the bottom substrate. RANGE: Historical: The Little Colorado River and tributaries, particularly the Zuni River system, in east-central Arizona and west-central New Mexico. Current: Zuni bluehead suckers are limited to headwaters of the Zuni drainage in New Mexico and Kinlichee Creek and its tributaries in Apache County, Arizona and Cibola, McKinley, and San Juan counties, New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Re£Ources of the Zuni Tribal Lands, Counties, New Mexico
    Water Re£ources of the Zuni Tribal Lands, Mc!~ ~.1ley and Cibola Counties, New Mexico United States Geological Survey · Water-Supply Paper 2227 Prepared in cooperation with the Pueblo of Zuni COVER: The symbolic figure of the Zuni "Rainbow Man" is shown over Dowa Yallane Mesa, a prominent topographic feature near the Pueblo of Zuni. Water Resources of the Zuni Tribal Lands, McKinley and Cibola Counties, New Mexico By BRENNON R. ORR Prepared m cooperation w1th the Pueblo of Zu m U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2227 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1987 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Sect1on, U S Geolog1cal Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 L1brary of Congress Catalogmg in Publication Data Orr, Brennon R Water resources of the Zum tnbal lands, McKmley and C.bola Count1es, New Mex1co (Water supply of lnd1an reservations) (Geolog1cal survey water-supply paper, 2227) "Prepared m cooperation w1th the Pueblo of Zum " B1bhography p 45 Supt of Docs no I 19 13 2227 1 Water resources development-New Mex1co-McKmley County 2 Water resources development-New Mex1- co-C1bola County 3 Water, Underground-New Mex1co-McKmley County 4 Water, Under­ ground-New Mex1co-C.bola County I Zum, (N M) II T1tle Ill Senes IV. Senes. U.S Geolog1cal Survey water-supply paper , 2227 TC424 N6077 1985 553 7'9'0978983 84-600264 Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Purpose 1 Location and geography 1 System for numbenng wells
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Studies of the Genus Gila (Cyprinidae) of the Colorado River Basin
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1968 Systemic Studies of the Genus Gila (Cyprinidae) of the Colorado River Basin Paul Bernard Holden Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Holden, Paul Bernard, "Systemic Studies of the Genus Gila (Cyprinidae) of the Colorado River Basin" (1968). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 2890. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2890 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SYSTEHATI C STUDIES OF THE GENUS GILA (CYPRINIDAE) OF THE COLORAD O RIVER BASIN by Paul Bernard Holden A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of HASTER OF SCIENCE in Fishery Biology UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Log an, Utah 1968 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is indebted to the late Dr. Donald R. Franklin whose efforts formed the groundwork for this study. Gratitude is expressed to Dr. Clair Stalnaker and Dr. Robert Behnke who guided the research and preparation of this manuscript. Thanks goes to several individuals who provided fish specimens; Rod Stone and John Livesay of the Utah State De partment of Fish and Game, Dr. W. Minckley of Arizona State University and Ernest Lachner of the U. S. National Museum. This project was financially supported by an NDEA Fellowship and the Utah Cooperative Fishery Unit .
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of November 1965 to January 1966 in the Gila River Basin, Arizona and New Mexico, and Adjacent Basins in Arizona
    Floods of November 1965 to January 1966 in the Gila River Basin, Arizona and New Mexico, and Adjacent Basins in Arizona GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1850-C Floods of November 1965 tc January 1966 in the Gila River Basin, Arizona and New Merico, and Adjacent Basins in Arizona By B. N. ALDRIDGE FLOODS OF 1965 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1850-C UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HIGKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing O<"ice Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $2.50 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract._-_______--_______-____-_-_-__----__--___--_-_----___-_ Cl Introduction. __-__________________-___-_--------_---_-_-_--_--____ 2 Acknowledgments. ____________________________________________ 2 Geographic setting.___________________-_--__-_-___---_--_---____-__ 3 Storms and weather conditions.___________-_---_______-_-_____--____ 3 Storms of November 22-25, 1965________._..___.-___---_-______ 6 Storms of December 9-11 and December 14-15, 1965.______ _______ 7 Storm of December 22-23, 1965_____.______-__-_-______-_.____ 10 Storm of December 29-30, 1965.______._.______________ 10 Floods and runoff_---_____-___-_-_-_----_----_-_---__-------_-_--__ 11 Gila River basin above Coolidge Dam______----____-_-----_---_- 12 Gila River basin between Coolidge Dam and Salt River_____ ________ 14 Salt River basin and Gila River below Salt River.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions Final Listing for the Zuni Bluehead
    Frequently Asked Questions Final Listing for the Zuni Bluehead Sucker as an Endangered Species Q What action is the Service taking? A The Service announced the final listing rule for the Zuni bluehead sucker (Catostomus discobolus yarrowi) as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), throughout its range in New Mexico and Arizona. This rule becomes effective August 25, 2014. Q Why is the Service taking this action? A The Service’s determination that the Zuni bluehead sucker warrants listing as an endangered species is based on the combined effects of the following factors: habitat destruction, modification, and degradation resulting from water withdrawal (stream drying); sedimentation; impoundments; livestock grazing; the spread of non-native species; and predation by non-native species such as the green sunfish, northern crayfish, and red swamp crayfish, which limit recruitment and reduce population size. In addition, small population size and restricted ranges of the species make the Zuni bluehead sucker population vulnerable to stochastic events, such as wildfire and drought. Q Why is the Service making this determination now? A To meet our statutory deadlines outlined in the ESA and to comply with the provisions of the multi-district litigation (MDL) agreement and the Act, the Service must publish in the Federal Register a final listing determination for the Zuni bluehead sucker (Catostomus discobolus yarrowi) by July 25, 2014. We proposed critical habitat on January 25, 2013; the final critical habitat rule for this species will be published at a later date. Q Has this final rule been delayed, and if so why? A On January 25, 2013, the Service published a proposed rule in the Federal Register to list the Zuni bluehead sucker as an endangered species under the ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • Age Constraint for the Moreno Hill Formation (Zuni Basin) by CA-TIMS and LA-ICP-MS Detrital Zircon Geochronology
    Age constraint for the Moreno Hill Formation (Zuni Basin) by CA-TIMS and LA-ICP-MS detrital zircon geochronology Charl D. Cilliers1, Ryan T. Tucker1, James L. Crowley2 and Lindsay E. Zanno3,4 1 Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa 2 Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA 3 Paleontology, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC, USA 4 Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA ABSTRACT The “mid-Cretaceous” (~125–80 Ma) was punctuated by major plate-tectonic upheavals resulting in widespread volcanism, mountain-building, eustatic sea-level changes, and climatic shifts that together had a profound impact on terrestrial biotic assemblages. Paleontological evidence suggests terrestrial ecosystems underwent a major restructuring during this interval, yet the pace and pattern are poorly constrained. Current impediments to piecing together the geologic and biological history of the “mid-Cretaceous” include a relative paucity of terrestrial outcrop stemming from this time interval, coupled with a historical understudy of fragmentary strata. In the Western Interior of North America, sedimentary strata of the Turonian–Santonian stages are emerging as key sources of data for refining the timing of ecosystem transformation during the transition from the late-Early to early-Late Cretaceous. In particular, the Moreno Hill Formation (Zuni Basin, New Mexico) is especially important for detailing
    [Show full text]