Asset Management Plan 2021-2031

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Asset Management Plan 2021-2031 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2021‐2031 Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 5 1.1 OVERVIEW AND PLAN PURPOSE ...................................................................................................... 5 1.2 CORPORATE OBJECTIVES AND ASSET MANAGEMENT DRIVERS ...................................................... 5 1.3 STATUS OF PROGRAMMES AND PROJECTS ...................................................................................... 6 1.4 ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND INFORMATION ..................................................................... 6 1.5 NETWORK CONFIGURATION AND ASSET DESCRIPTION ................................................................... 7 1.6 SERVICE LEVEL OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................. 7 1.7 ASSET MAINTENANCE AND RENEWALS PLAN ................................................................................ 10 1.8 NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PLANS .................................................................................................. 12 1.9 RISK MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................................................... 14 1.10 PERFORMANCE GAP ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT PLANS ......................................................... 14 1.11 DEPLOYMENT OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES ......................................................................................... 15 2 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................... 17 2.1 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN PURPOSE ........................................................................................... 17 2.2 CORPORATE OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................ 17 2.3 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANNING DRIVERS ................................................................................... 18 2.4 PLANNING PERIOD AND REVIEW PERIODS ..................................................................................... 19 2.5 STAKEHOLDERS ............................................................................................................................... 19 2.6 ACCOUNTABILITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................... 21 2.7 AMP INTERACTION WITH CORPORATE GOALS AND BUSINESS PLANNING ................................... 23 2.8 ASSET MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS ............................................................................ 24 2.9 INFORMATION SYSTEMS GAP ANALYSIS: ....................................................................................... 26 2.10 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN FORMULATION AND STRATEGIC REVIEW PROCESS ......................... 26 3 NETWORK CONFIGURATION AND ASSET DESCRIPTION .................................................. 29 3.1 NETWORK CONFIGURATION .......................................................................................................... 29 3.2 ASSET JUSTIFICATION AND NETWORK OPTIMISATION .................................................................. 31 3.3 ASSET DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 31 3.4 NETWORK VALUATION ................................................................................................................... 41 4 NETWORK PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................... 42 4.1 ASSET PERFORMANCE .................................................................................................................... 42 4.2 ASSET EFFECTIVENESS .................................................................................................................... 43 4.3 ASSET EFFICIENCY ........................................................................................................................... 45 4.4 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................... 45 4.5 JUSTIFICATION FOR SERVICE LEVEL TARGETS ................................................................................ 48 Network Tasman Asset Management Plan 2021‐2031 Page 2 5 NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PLAN ..................................................................................... 51 5.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 51 5.2 NETWORK DEVELOPMENT POLICIES .............................................................................................. 51 5.3 NON ASSET SOLUTION POLICY ....................................................................................................... 52 5.4 DISTRIBUTED GENERATION POLICY ................................................................................................ 53 5.5 PLANNING CRITERIA ....................................................................................................................... 53 5.6 NETWORK SECURITY POLICY .......................................................................................................... 54 5.7 SECURITY DESIGN STANDARD ........................................................................................................ 55 5.8 DEMAND FORECAST ....................................................................................................................... 55 5.9 DEVELOPMENT PLAN ‐ DETAIL ....................................................................................................... 61 5.11 MAJOR NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 2020/21 ................................................................. 72 5.12 MAJOR NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 2021/22‐2024/25 ................................................. 73 6 ASSET RENEWAL AND MAINTENANCE PLAN ................................................................... 76 6.1 PLANNING CRITERIA AND ASSUMPTIONS ...................................................................................... 76 6.2 ASSET RENEWAL AND REFURBISHMENT POLICY ............................................................................ 77 6.3 ASSET CLASSES ................................................................................................................................ 77 6.4 ASSET MAINTENANCE AND RENEWAL CATEGORIES ...................................................................... 78 6.5 ASSET INSPECTION AND CONDITION MONITORING ...................................................................... 78 6.6 LIFECYCLE ASSET MAINTENANCE AND RENEWAL POLICIES BY ASSET CLASS ................................ 79 6.7 VEGETATION ................................................................................................................................... 91 7 NON NETWORK ASSETS ................................................................................................... 94 7.1 NON NETWORK ASSET DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 94 7.2 NON NETWORK ASSET DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE AND RENEWAL POLICIES ....................... 94 7.3 NON NETWORK ASSET CAPITAL, MAINTENANCE AND RENEWAL PROJECTS 2020‐2025 .............. 94 8 RISK MANAGEMENT AND NETWORK RESILIENCE ........................................................... 95 8.1 RISK MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW .................................................................................................... 95 8.2 NETWORK RESILIENCE STRATEGY................................................................................................... 95 9 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT, EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT ............................ 97 9.1 FINANCIAL AND PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE .................................................................................... 97 9.2 SERVICE LEVEL AND ASSET PERFORMANCE ................................................................................... 99 9.3 GAP ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT PLANS ................................................................................. 101 10 PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................................. 103 10.1 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS ....................................................................................................... 103 10.2 FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT AMP OUTCOMES ........................................................................... 106 Network Tasman Asset Management Plan 2021‐2031 Page 3 LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................... 108 A. NETWORK LAYOUT ....................................................................................................................... 109 B. GROWTH PROJECTION ................................................................................................................. 117 C. NETWORK PERFORMANCE STATISTICS ........................................................................................ 119 D. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE PROJECTION NETWORK DEVELOPMENT & ASSET RENEWAL ................. 120 E. SPECIFIC NETWORK DEVELOPMENT & ASSET RENEWAL PROJECTS ............................................ 121 F. NETWORK MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS EXPENDITURE PROJECTION ................................ 123 G. TYPICAL ASSET
Recommended publications
  • Full Article
    Southern Bird No. 47 September 2011 • ISSN 1175-1916 The Magazine of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand NEW ZEALANd’s LARGEST RECORDED SEABIRD WRECK CELEBRITY PENGUIN THE MISSING RARITIES Southern Bird No. 47 June 2011 • ISSN 1175-1916 QUOTATION RARE AUSTRALIAN VISITOR Why do you sit, so dreamily, dreamily, TO Kingfisher over the stream STEWART ISLAND'S Silent your beak, and silent the water. What is your dream?.. HORSESHOE BAY The Kingfisher by Eileen Duggan 1894-1972 The power lines of Sydney and Perth are quite a contrast to the windswept, rain lashed climate of Stewart Island for the Black- Faced Cuckoo Shrike, so spotting one on the island recently was a surprise for Brent Beaven, the Department of Conservation's CONTENTS Biodiversity Manager on Stewart Island/Rakiura. Brent spotted the rare Australian vagrant on 26th May 2011 at the Dancing President's Report 3 Star Foundation's Ecological Preserve at Horseshoe Bay. Writer and photographer, Fraser Crichton, who was working as a Treasurer's Report 5 conservation volunteer with the Foundation at the time, captured New Zealand's Largest Recorded Seabird Wreck 10 this image of the bird on a power line just outside the predator proof fence of the preserve. Bird News 13 Philip Rhodes Southland's Regional Recorder said, "Yes quite a The Missing Rarities 15 rare bird to see, and yes definitely a juvenile Black-faced Cuckoo shrike. There was another of these spotted on Stewart Island in Regional Roundup 16 about 2001." The immature Black-Faced Cuckoo Shrike (Coracina novaehollandiae) has an eye stripe rather than the full black mask of the mature bird.
    [Show full text]
  • View Booklet As
    The story of the Friends of Nelson Haven The story of the Friends of Nelson Haven & Tasman Bay by Michael North Friends of Nelson Haven and Tasman Bay First published 2007 by Friends of Nelson Haven & Tasman Bay, Inc. PO Box 365, Nelson 7040, New Zealand [email protected] • www.nelsonhaven.org.nz © Friends of Nelson Haven & Tasman Bay, Inc. All rights reserved. With the exception of fair dealing for purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing from the copyright holders. Copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works or for resale, is prohibited. Special requests should be addressed to the copyright holders. ISBN 978-0-473-12216-4 Acknowledgements The idea of having this brief history written was conceived by Gwen Struik and made possible by writing and publishing grants to Friends from the Lottery Grants Board, Environment and Heritage committee. Interviews were held with Gwen, and with former and current committee members Patrick McGrath, Noel Matheson and Steffan Browning. Initial research by Simon Horrocks, including interview notes, proved very useful in piecing together the formative times of Friends. Comments on the initial and final drafts were canvassed from former and current committee members Frank Boyce, Roger Bray, Duncan & Jane Harris, Henk Heinekamp, Pam Lambert, Doris Reynolds, Margot & Peter Syms and A.E. (Tony) West. The sections on sewage and aquaculture were reworked to include more detail by Gwen and Steffan.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Studies of Historical Earthquake-Induced Landsliding, Ground Damage, and Mm Intensity
    59 RECENT STUDIES OF HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED LANDSLIDING, GROUND DAMAGE, AND MM INTENSITY IN NEW ZEALAND G. T. Hancox 1, N. D. Perrin 1 and G.D. Dellow 1 ABSTRACT A study of landsliding caused by 22 historical earthquakes in New Zealand was completed at the end of 1997. The main aims of that study were to: (a) study the nature and extent of landsliding and other ground damage (sand boils, subsidence and lateral spreading due to soil liquefaction) caused by historical earthquakes; (b) determine relationships between landslide distribution and earthquake magnitude, epicentre, isoseismals, faulting, geology and topography; and (c) establish improved environmental response criteria and ground classes for assigning MM intensities and seismic hazard assessments in New Zealand. Relationships developed from the study indicate that the minimum magnitude for earthquake-induced landsliding (EIL) in N.Z. is about M 5, with significant landsliding occurring at M 6 or greater. The minimum MM intensity for landsliding is MM6, while the most common intensities for significant landsliding are MM7-8. The intensity threshold for soil liquefaction in New Zealand was found to be MM7 for sand boils, and MMS for lateral spreading, although such effects may also occur at one intensity level lower in highly susceptible materials. The minimum magnitude for liquefaction phenomena in N.Z. is about M 6, compared to M 5 overseas where highly susceptible soils are probably more widespread. Revised environmental response criteria (landsliding, subsidence, liquefaction-induced sand boils and lateral spreading) have also been established for the New Zealand MM Intensity Scale, and provisional landslide susceptibility Ground Classes developed for assigning MM intensities in areas where there are few buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Gazette
    No. 60 1759 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE Published by Authority WELLINGTON: THURSDAY, I OCTOBER 1970 Amending Declaration of Land in the Nelson Acclimatisation parallel to and 2 chains di~tant from the shore of Lake Matiri District to be a Wildlife Refuge (Lake Matin] ! to its intersection with the eastern side of the formed track along the western side of Lake Matiri; thence generally ARTHUR PORRITT, Governor-General northerly along the eastern side of ithat track to the point of A PROCLAMATION commencement. As the same is shown on plan numbered S.O. 10946 and PURSUANT to section 14 of the Wildlife Act 1953, I, Sir Arthur marked I.A. Wil. 34 / 10 / 3 deposited in the Head Office, Espie Porritt, Baronet, the Governor-General of New Zealand, Department of Internal Affairs, Wellington, and thereon edged acting on the joint recommendation of the Minister of Internal red. Affairs, and the Minister of Forests and the Minister of Lands (being the Ministers charged with the administration of the Given under the hand of His Excellency the Governor­ departments of State having the control of the land of the General, and issued under the Seal of New Zealand, this Crown affected by this Proclamation), hereby proclaim as 26th day of September 1970. follows: [L.s.] DAYID C. SEATH, Minister of Initernal Affairs. 1. (i) This Proclamation may be cited as the Lake Matiri Goo SAVE nm QUEEN! Wildlife Refuge Declaration; *Gazette, No. 66, 12 September 1957, p. 1639 (ii) This Proclamation shall come into force on the day after the date of its notification in the Gazette.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Threatened Fauna in Nelson Lakes Area
    A history of threatened fauna in Nelson Lakes area SEPTEMBER 2009 A history of threatened fauna in Nelson Lakes area Kate Steffens and Paul Gasson 2009 Published by Department of Conservation Private Bag 5 Nelson, New Zealand Publ.info. © Copyright, New Zealand Department of Conservation Occasional Publication No. 81 ISSN 0113-3853 (print), 1178-4113 (online) ISBN 978-0-478-14678-3 (print), 978-0-478-14679-0 (online) Photo: Black-billed gulls nesting on the upper Wairau riverbed. Photo: Kate Steffens CONTENTS 1. Introduction 7 2. Great spotted kiwi (Apteryx haastii) 10 2.1 Status 10 2.2 Review of knowledge 10 2.2.1 North-eastern zone 10 2.2.2 Murchison zone 11 2.2.3 Southern Mountains zone 12 2.3 Trends in abundance and distribution 13 2.4 Threats 13 2.5 Information needs 13 2.6 Recommended management 14 3. Blue duck (Hymenolaimus malachorhynchos) 15 3.1 Status 15 3.2 Review of knowledge 15 3.2.1 North-eastern zone 15 3.2.2 Murchison zone 16 3.2.3 Southern Mountains zone 17 3.3 Trends in abundance and distribution 19 3.4 Threats 20 3.5 Information needs 20 3.6 Recommended management 20 4. New Zealand falcon (Falco novaeseelandiae) 21 4.1 Status 21 4.2 Review of knowledge 21 4.2.1 North-eastern zone 21 4.2.2 Murchison zone 22 4.2.3 Southern Mountains zone 22 4.3 Trends in abundance and distribution 22 4.4 Threats 23 4.5 Information needs 23 4.6 Recommended management 23 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Atawhai-Central Stoke-Tahuna Two Ward Option – Potential Boundaries
    Atawhai-Central Stoke-Tahuna Two Ward Option – Potential Boundaries Atawhai Central Ward Generally - comprises the northern, central and eastern parts of the region (and adjacent inlets as well as Waimeas Inlet south of Nelson Airport) encompassing the northern Port Hills, Haulashore Island, Port Nelson, Washington Valley, Victory, Toi Toi, Bishopdale, The Brook, East Nelson, Maitai Valley, the Nelson city centre, The Wood, Brooklands, Atawhai, Dodson Valley, Marybank, Todds Valley, Wakapuaka, Glenduan, Hira, Cable Bay, Lud Valley, Teal Valley, Kokorua and the hills of the Bryant Range bounded by the council boundary. Specifically – follow the coast from the northwest corner of 30 The Cliffs to and along the seaward side of Rocks Road, to and along Tahunanui Beach to the western end, northeast across the water to the west coast of the Boulder Bank, follows the coast north to Pepin Island, across the entrance to the Delaware Bay Estuary, continuing north along the coast, across the entrance to the Whangamoa River Estuary, to the northern council boundary at Cape Soucis (Raetihi), south and then southwest along the eastern council boundary and west along the southern council boundary. At the southern edge of 227 Champion Road, the boundary follows the eastern edge of this property and continues across the foothills in a north east direction, towards and along the northwest edge of Marsden Valley Reserve, then southeast to the Barnicoat Walkway, where it turns northeast to the east edge of Marsden Valley Reserve, which it follows south then
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Support Nelson
    Neighbourhood Support Nelson Safe and friendly neighbourhoods February 2015 Co-ordinator Karen Clark Ph: 546-4902 Email: [email protected] Office located at: Stoke police station, 3 Bail St, Stoke Hours: Monday – Thursday Get ready to celebrate Neighbours Day! Plans for neighbourhood BBQs, picnics and other gatherings are under way to celebrate We are now on Facebook — Neighbours Day Aoteroa on the weekend of March 28-29. at www.facebook.com/ neighbourhoodsupportnelson A number of Neighbourhood Support groups are getting together for the annual event — so check us out, `like’ our and Neighbourhood Support Nelson is encouraging other groups to do the same. It’s an page and share the page with ideal opportunity to get to know your neighbours and celebrate your neighbourhood . others! Gatherings don’t need to be big or elaborate – even if you just invite your neighbours over for a cuppa, that’s joining in the spirit of things. In previous years gatherings have included morning teas, potluck dinners, street clean-ups and garage sales. New groups launched To help neighbourhoods mark the occasion we’re offering meat pack vouchers from Welcome to these new Pestell’s butchery and bakery vouchers from Stoke Bakery and Kitchen. Groups can enter Neighbourhood Support groups the voucher draw by filling out the application form with this newsletter, or via our which have recently been Facebook page or www.itson.co.nz (search Neighbours Day Aotearoa). The vouchers are launched: being funded by grants from the Nelson City Council and Network Tasman Trust. Tasman Street Ideas , tips and resources for Neighbours Day events can be downloaded from Golf Road (revived group) www.neighboursday.org.nz Even if you don’t take part in an event you can make an effort to be neighbourly with a smile or hello or taking the time to chat with neighbours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Health of Freshwater Fish Communities in Tasman District
    State of the Environment Report The Health of Freshwater Fish Communities in Tasman District 2011 State of the Environment Report The Health of Freshwater Fish Communities in Tasman District September 2011 This report presents results of an investigation of the abundance and diversity into freshwater fish and large invertebrates in Tasman District conducted from October 2006-March 2010. Streams sampled were from Golden Bay to Tasman Bay, mostly within 20km of the coast, generally small (1st-3rd order), with varying types and degrees of habitat modification. The upper Buller catchment waterways were investigated in the summer 2010. Comparison of diversity and abundance of fish with respect to control-impact pairs of sites on some of the same water bodies is provided. Prepared by: Trevor James Tasman District Council Tom Kroos Fish and Wildlife Services Report reviewed by Kati Doehring and Roger Young, Cawthron Institute, and Rhys Barrier, Fish and Game Maps provided by Kati Doehring Report approved for release by: Rob Smith, Tasman District Council Survey design comment, fieldwork assistance and equipment provided by: Trevor James, Tasman District Council; Tom Kroos, Fish and Wildlife Services; Martin Rutledge, Department of Conservation; Lawson Davey, Rhys Barrier, and Neil Deans: Fish and Game New Zealand Fieldwork assistance provided by: Staff Tasman District Council, Staff of Department of Conservation (Motueka and Golden Bay Area Offices), interested landowners and others. Cover Photo: Angus MacIntosch, University of Canterbury ISBN 978-1-877445-11-8 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-877445-12-5 (web) Tasman District Council Report #: 11001 File ref: G:\Environmental\Trevor James\Fish, Stream Habitat & Fish Passage\ FishSurveys\ Reports\ FreshwaterFishTasmanDraft2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembrance Trail
    Remembrance Trail Anzac Park 1 is the main memorial for the city Nelson Boys College Scriptorium 9 has records and commemorating all wars. This memorial was part a roll of honour of all Old Boys who have died in all of a bridge crossing nearby Saltwater Creek and wars. Ring the college for opening hours for visitors. it moved to the present park site in March 1988. The Stoke Memorial gates 10 record and honour the Wander around the park to discover various garden brave from Stoke who died in World War I. East of plaques commemorating specific sectors of the Stoke is Marsden Valley Road where the Marsden armed forces such as the 23rd Battalion under an olive Cemetery 11 can be found. It has a large RSA section tree. which features a memorial rose walk. In 1961 a The Returned Services Association (RSA) section Lone Pine seedling was planted here by veterans in within the Wakapuaka Cemetery 2 is shown on the memory of Gallipoli 1915. Lists of burial plots can be information board at the cemetery gates on Atawhai found at the cemetery entrance or online. Further Drive. A beautiful view over the harbour is found in up Marsden Valley Road near the entry to a scenic this tranquil setting. walkway is the Marsden Memorial cairn 12 dedicated The names of those who died in the world wars from to “the boys of Stoke who gave their lives 1939- Wakapuaka and the Whangamoa area are on the 1945”. plinth beside the Wakapuaka Hall 3 about 20km On Trent Drive leading to Nelson’s airport a North of Nelson on State Highway 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Top of the South Scorecards Freshwater & Terrestrial Ecosystems
    Ecosystem Health Top of the South Scorecards Freshwater & Terrestrial Ecosystems October 2020 Contents Ecosystem Health Scorecard: Top of the South………………………………………………… 1 Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Ecosystem Health: Scorecards, Descriptions, Maps, Findings, Strategies…...…… 7 o Rivers and Streams…………………………………………………………………………………. 7 o Forests……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 o Other Terrestrial Ecosystems………………………………………………………………….. 28 o Lakes and Wetlands………………………………………………………………………………… 39 Cultural, Social and Economic Wellbeing…………………………………………………………. 50 Conclusion & Next Steps….………………………………………………………………………………. 53 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 54 A. Measures Participants…………………………………………………………………………… 54 B. Methodology ………………..……………………………………………………………………... 56 C. Kotahitanga mō te Taiao Membership………………………………………………….. 60 D. Alliance Vision, Mission, Values………………………………………………………….…. 61 E. Top of the South Places Map………………………………………………………………... 62 F. Ecosystem Descriptions, Key Attributes, Ranking Standards..……………….. 63 . Rivers and Streams………………………………………………………………….. 63 . Forests…………………………………………………………………………………….. 69 . Other Terrestrial Ecosystems…………………………………………………… 78 . Lakes and Wetlands………………………………………………………………… 87 Ecosystem Health Scorecard Rivers & Streams Upland Rivers & Steep Lowland Valley Floor Lowland Streams Rivers & Streams Rivers Streams Forests Upland Steep Lowland Valley Floor Forests Forests Forests Other Terrestrial Ecosystems
    [Show full text]
  • Kahurangi National Park Visitor Information
    Kahurangi National Park visitor information Introduction Wilderness, diversity and sanctuary—these are the Kahurangi is New Zealand’s thirteenth national images that best describe Kahurangi National Park. park. Its formation came after years of lobbying by Formed in 1996, it protects much of the north-western conservation groups, seeking an internationally corner of the South Island. Weaving through the recognised status for the area which would better park, is a network of tracks from the easy to the very protect its natural values. For 30 years, most of its challenging. The oldest and the most famous is the 452,002 hectares were part of a forest park, for a long Heaphy Track. A number of interesting short walks time administered by the New Zealand Forest Service. cater for the day-tripper. But with the (1987) formation of the Department of Conservation came the opportunity to reassess the area’s values. If any part of New Zealand ever perfectly History met the criteria for national park status, Kahurangi is it. The natural diversity of Kahurangi and its importance as a wilderness area are a result of its size and its diverse and ancient geology. Kahurangi is How to get there New Zealand’s second largest natural protected area; it Motueka, Murchison, Karamea has some of the country’s oldest rocks and landforms, and Takaka are the gateways to Nelson and spectacular areas of limestone and marble Kahurangi. Roads extend from sculptured into caves, arches and stunning outcrops by these towns to the park; some water. require a little care and may be Christchurch The variety of rock types, coupled with the range closed after snow or heavy rain.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasman District LANDSCAPE STUDY 2021
    Tasman District LANDSCAPE STUDY 2021 OUTSTANDING NATURAL FEATURES AND LANDSCAPES DRAFT for Landowner Consultation Prepared for: Tasman District Council bridgetgilbert March 2021 | Status: DRAFT landscapearchitecture [INSERT PROJECT TEAM LOGOS HERE] 2 3 Y Y D D U U ST ST E E E CAP CAP S S D D N N A A L Contents L CT CT I I TR Front material to be inserted TR Section A: Executive Summary ���������������������������������������������������������5 N DIS N Copyright information DIS N A Acknowledgements A SM SM A Short description of document for referencing purposes Section B: Introduction to the Tasman District Landscape Study �������9 A T T Background 10 Project Team: Tasman District Council Landscape Assessment ‘Principles’ 13 Bridget Gilbert Landscape Characterisation 14 Dr Bruce Hayward Landscape Evaluation 17 Davidson Environmental Limited Mike Harding Is it a ‘Landscape’ or ‘Feature’? 18 Boffa Miskell Limited Threshold For ‘Natural’ 20 Threshold For ‘Outstanding’ 21 Expert Geoscience Input 22 Expert Ecology Input 23 Cultural Values and Iwi Consultation 23 Shared and Recognised Values 24 GIS Data Sources and Mapping 26 ONFs 26 ONL and ONF Mapping 28 DRAFT FOR LANDOWNER CONSULTATION LANDOWNER FOR DRAFT CONSULTATION LANDOWNER FOR DRAFT ONL and ONF Schedules 30 Section C: Tasman District Landscape Study Methodology �������������33 Assumptions 36 Section D: Outstanding Natural Landscapes ����������������������������������39 Contents: Outstanding Natural Landscapes 40 Section E: Outstanding Natural Features ����������������������������������������89
    [Show full text]