The Health of Freshwater Fish Communities in Tasman District

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Health of Freshwater Fish Communities in Tasman District State of the Environment Report The Health of Freshwater Fish Communities in Tasman District 2011 State of the Environment Report The Health of Freshwater Fish Communities in Tasman District September 2011 This report presents results of an investigation of the abundance and diversity into freshwater fish and large invertebrates in Tasman District conducted from October 2006-March 2010. Streams sampled were from Golden Bay to Tasman Bay, mostly within 20km of the coast, generally small (1st-3rd order), with varying types and degrees of habitat modification. The upper Buller catchment waterways were investigated in the summer 2010. Comparison of diversity and abundance of fish with respect to control-impact pairs of sites on some of the same water bodies is provided. Prepared by: Trevor James Tasman District Council Tom Kroos Fish and Wildlife Services Report reviewed by Kati Doehring and Roger Young, Cawthron Institute, and Rhys Barrier, Fish and Game Maps provided by Kati Doehring Report approved for release by: Rob Smith, Tasman District Council Survey design comment, fieldwork assistance and equipment provided by: Trevor James, Tasman District Council; Tom Kroos, Fish and Wildlife Services; Martin Rutledge, Department of Conservation; Lawson Davey, Rhys Barrier, and Neil Deans: Fish and Game New Zealand Fieldwork assistance provided by: Staff Tasman District Council, Staff of Department of Conservation (Motueka and Golden Bay Area Offices), interested landowners and others. Cover Photo: Angus MacIntosch, University of Canterbury ISBN 978-1-877445-11-8 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-877445-12-5 (web) Tasman District Council Report #: 11001 File ref: G:\Environmental\Trevor James\Fish, Stream Habitat & Fish Passage\ FishSurveys\ Reports\ FreshwaterFishTasmanDraft2011. Doc Trevor James Tom Kroos Resource Scientist Managing Director Tasman District Council Fish & Wildlife Services 189 Queen St PO Box 3207 Private Bag 4 Richmond RICHMOND Nelson 7050 [email protected] [email protected] Executive Summary Tasman District Council (TDC) has functions under the Resource Management Act to monitor and manage the life-supporting capacity and natural character of wetlands, lakes and rivers and their margins, as well as significant habitats for indigenous fauna and introduced sports fish such as trout and salmon. The overall aim of Council’s Freshwater Fish monitoring programme is to compare the diversity and abundance of freshwater fish in streams of varying habitat condition caused by certain land use and stream disturbance activities. This information can also be used to identify streams of particularly high value that require greater protection with respect to certain habitat disturbances which is used in drafting the Tasman Resource Management Plan Part IV and with the processing of specific resource consent applications. More specific objectives include: • compare the diversity and abundance of freshwater fish in streams of varying habitat condition caused by various resource use activities, particularly works in the beds and banks of streams. • assess the efficacy of stream rehabilitation projects, such as riparian plantings, and restoration at structures that present a barrier to fish migration • provide baseline data from which to build a more complete picture of fish distribution and abundance patterns in the region. This information can also be used to identify streams of particularly high value that require greater protection with respect to certain habitat disturbances which will then be used in the Tasman Resource Management Plan Part IV and with the processing of specific resource consent applications. This project involved cooperation between TDC, Department of Conservation (DoC), and Fish and Game New Zealand Nelson Marlborough Region (F&G) for survey design and implementing fieldwork. All three organisations have responsibility for monitoring fish populations under a range of legislation and have over-lapping objectives in this programme. Contract assistance was provided by Fish & Wildlife Services. The streams sampled were generally small (1st-3rd order) with varying types and degrees of habitat modification. From 2006-2010 a total of 247 sites were assessed on 89 individual streams, with a focus on coastal streams in Golden and Tasman Bays as well as some streams in the upper Buller and Motueka catchments. Streams selected were primarily sampled by backpack electric fishing or spotlighting but, in some circumstances, gee minnow traps and/or fyke nets were employed. In Tasman there are 20 species of indigenous freshwater fish, fifteen of which are diadromous (migrate to and from the sea to complete their life cycle). In addition there are three sport-fish, the most abundant of which is brown trout. Freshwater fish were recorded in all but three sites with an average number of 3.0 fish species/site and a maximum of 8 fish species/site. When combining spring and summer surveys, longfin eels/tuna were observed most frequently (74.5% of sites), followed by adult inanga (46%) and shortfin eel/tuna (45%). Longfin eel, a species recognized as ‘in decline’ nationally, is the most widespread of any freshwater fish species in the district. The relatively high abundance of eels and inanga was a feature of the stream habitats targeted. Inanga migrating into freshwater during spring investigations (n=87) were abundant (>20 individuals/site) in 28% of all sites sampled. Inanga, common bully and shortfin eel have a tolerance to poor water quality and degraded habitat, particularly smaller farmland streams with silt-laden beds, moderate sediment load, intermediate in- stream cattle disturbance and streamside corridors dominated by pasture grasses. However, even these less habitat-sensitive fish have been found in much fewer numbers in streams or drainage ditches that are dug out regularly and, for inanga and common bully, streams with excessive aquatic plant growth over the last few decades. Banded kokopu, koaro, shortjaw kokopu, giant kokopu, torrentfish, bluegill bully and redfin bully have been found to be more sensitive to disturbance and they are absent or rare in sites where streamside vegetation has been removed, channels straightened or where there are high loads of fine sediment input by, for example, machinery or larger farm animals. Habitat-sensitive native fish species were observed in 21% of the sites surveyed. Giant kokopu, for example, are very rare in the region (only 44 records at 42 sites since 1990; NZFFDB) due to their preference for deeper, slow-flowing streams associated with lowland wetlands which are now also very rare within the region. This relationship between quality and quantity of habitat and the health of fish communities is similar to that found elsewhere in New Zealand. Brown trout, followed by eels, are the most significant freshwater fishery in the region. In the Motueka River, one of New Zealand’s best trout fisheries, numbers have rebounded since the mid 1990’s but fluctuate from year to year depending on flooding, food supplies and water temperatures. Based on distribution patterns and abundance of native fish compared to trout, it would appear that trout and eels dominate larger waterways (over approximately 3 cumecs) and native fish appear to dominate smaller waterways that discharge directly to the coast. In fact there are no trout or very few in many of these streams so native fish will not be affected by trout predation. Trend analyses for freshwater fish populations over time is not possible due to inadequate data available, pointing out the importance of future data collection. A search of the NIWA Freshwater Fish Database provided 59 historical records that can be compared to sites sampled in this monitoring programme. Caution should be considered when comparing historical records to 2006-2010 results as survey methods and seasons sampled may be dissimilar. Access to suitable habitat and spawning grounds for migratory fish is largely prevented due to migration barriers such as undercut culverts, weirs, dams, and tidal flap gates. Water takes are also known to dry up a significant area of streams in summer. Several survey results demonstrated the success of fish passage restoration projects such as that on Tui Stream (Wainui Bay), Reservoir Creek (Richmond) and Maisey Creek (Waimea estuary). The general absence of habitat-sensitive native species from modified streams provide justification for implementing measures that better manage habitats of native fish from activities such as drain clearance, stream straightening, cattle trampling, fine sediment discharges, riparian vegetation removal and other land uses impacting the beds and riparian zones of small order streams in the Tasman District. Avoiding, mitigating or remediating adverse effects on small lowland or spring-fed streams located within 10-15km of the coast are particularly important as these streams have both, the highest fish species abundance and diversity and the most vulnerable fish species. Acknowledgements Tasman District Council would like to thank all the people who have assisted in this monitoring programme. In particular we would like to thank landowners who provide access to monitoring sites and NIWA for data from the New Zealand Freshwater Fish Database (NZFFD). Thanks also to Cawthron Institute and Landcare Research which assisted with field investigations in the Motueka River Catchment under the Integrated Catchment Management (ICM) project in 2006. Thanks to Network Tasman and their support for fisheries
Recommended publications
  • Abel Tasman.Indd
    DAYOUT. IN TASMAN BAY WALKS The relaxed lifestyle, excellent climate, beautiful beaches, picnic Walks in the Motueka - Kaiteriteri - Abel Tasman spots and very popular walks have always attracted New Zealand National Park area: holidaymakers to this area, especially at the end of December and throughout January when the population soars. 1 The Motueka Walkway - 2.5 hours If you want to be sure of your trip, you’ll need to book Pick up a free map at the Motueka Information Centre (well accommodation in advance. Outside those months, there are signposted, just off the High Street). more vacancies There are motels, campsites, backpackers lodges On this track you’ll see some splendid views of Tasman Bay and bed ‘n breakfasts to cater for all budgets in the towns and with glimpses of small-town New Zealand without the tourist surrounding areas. trappings. Interesting features include: Abel Tasman National Park • The Port - the centre of one of Motueka’s main industries If you want to walk the Abel Tasman Track, you’ll need to reserve - fishing. Evidence lies in the rusting hulk of the Janie Seddon, a in advance with the Department of Conservation, as numbers large vessel that lies in the estuary sand near the walkway. of walkers have had to be limited. But using water taxis, it’s • The track leads you beside a tidal estuary that changes possible to do sections of the track on a dayout without worrying from mud flats with wading birds to a beautiful seascape at full about bookings. tide. MOTUEKA • A wide variety of NZ houses from small, older baches Motueka is a small town at the mouth of the Motueka River, (holiday houses) to large, modern homes owned by Motueka’s which flows into Tasman Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • September-2016.Pdf
    ADVERTISING AND PRODUCTION PLACING AN ADVERTISEMENT Thank you for advertising in the Grapevine—you help us cover the cost of producing and delivering this free commu- nity newsletter each month. The deadline for each issue is the 15th of the month. Please email your print - ready ad to — [email protected] or provide paper based, print- ready copy to the Upper Moutere Store. The following prices apply for advertising: ∞ Births, marriages, deaths and giveaway notices: free ∞ Business card size advertisement: $12 ∞ 1/4 page advertisement: $25 ∞ 1/2 page advertisement: $50 ∞ Full page advertisement: $95 (if space available). Please deposit payment (and identify it with your name) to our account: NBS 03 1354 0229034 16. Sending us editorial items We warmly welcome editorial contributions to the Grapevine from all residents in the Moutere and Tasman regions. You make the newsletter an interesting read! There is no cost to having your articles published but if you are telling the community about a commercial or fundraising venture, we do appreciate a small donation to help us cover our costs—see above for bank details. Archived coloured copies of the Grapevine are available at www.mouterehills.org.nz\community\the-grapevine courtesy of the Moutere Hills Community Centre Staff. Grapevine circulation is 1300 copies. This issue has been constructed by volunteers: Miriam Lynch, Tanya Doty, Bever- ley Sellers, Sharon Beuke, Avril Stephens and Heather Egg- ers. Views expressed are not necessarily those of the volun- tary editors and no responsibility is taken! RECREATION RECREATION The Social Group Meets at the Sunday School Hall (Upper Moutere Lutheran Church) on Thursday afternoons at 1.30pm each fortnight.
    [Show full text]
  • Moutere Gravels
    LAND USE ON THE MOUTERE GRAVELS, I\TELSON, AND THE DilPORTANOE OF PHYSIC.AL AND EOONMIC FACTORS IN DEVJt~LOPHTG THE F'T:?ESE:NT PATTERN. THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS ( Honours ) GEOGRAPHY UNIVERSITY OF NEW ZEALAND 1953 H. B. BOURNE-WEBB.- - TABLE OF CONTENTS. CRAFTER 1. INTRODUCTION. Page i. Terminology. Location. Maps. General Description. CH.AFTER 11. HISTORY OF LAND USE. Page 1. Natural Vegetation 1840. Land use in 1860. Land use in 1905. Land use in 1915. Land use in 1930. CHA.PrER 111. PRESENT DAY LAND USE. Page 17. Intensively farmed areas. Forestry in the region. Reversion in the region. CHA.PrER l V. A NOTE ON TEE GEOLOGY OF THE REGION Page 48. Geological History. Composition of the gravels. Structure and surface forms. Slope. Effect on land use. CHA.mm v. CLIMATE OF THE REGION. Page 55. Effect on land use. CRAFTER Vl. SOILS ON Tlffi: MGm'ERE GRAVELS. Page 59. Soil.tYJDes. Effect on land use. CHAPrER Vll. ECONOMIC FACTORS WrIICH HAVE INFLUENCED TEE LAND USE PATTERN. Page 66. ILLUSTRATIONS AND MAPS. ~- After page. l. Location. ii. 2. Natu.ral Vegetation. i2. 3. Land use in 1905. 6. Land use regions and generalized land use. 5. Terraces and sub-regions at Motupiko. 27a. 6. Slope Map. Folder at back. 7. Rainfall Distribution. 55. 8. Soils. 59. PLATES. Page. 1. Lower Moutere 20. 2. Tapawera. 29. 3. View of Orcharding Arf;;a. 34a. 4. Contoured Orchard. 37. 5. Reversion and Orchards. 38a. 6. Golden Downs State Forest. 39a. 7. Japanese Larch. 40a. B.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Article
    Southern Bird No. 47 September 2011 • ISSN 1175-1916 The Magazine of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand NEW ZEALANd’s LARGEST RECORDED SEABIRD WRECK CELEBRITY PENGUIN THE MISSING RARITIES Southern Bird No. 47 June 2011 • ISSN 1175-1916 QUOTATION RARE AUSTRALIAN VISITOR Why do you sit, so dreamily, dreamily, TO Kingfisher over the stream STEWART ISLAND'S Silent your beak, and silent the water. What is your dream?.. HORSESHOE BAY The Kingfisher by Eileen Duggan 1894-1972 The power lines of Sydney and Perth are quite a contrast to the windswept, rain lashed climate of Stewart Island for the Black- Faced Cuckoo Shrike, so spotting one on the island recently was a surprise for Brent Beaven, the Department of Conservation's CONTENTS Biodiversity Manager on Stewart Island/Rakiura. Brent spotted the rare Australian vagrant on 26th May 2011 at the Dancing President's Report 3 Star Foundation's Ecological Preserve at Horseshoe Bay. Writer and photographer, Fraser Crichton, who was working as a Treasurer's Report 5 conservation volunteer with the Foundation at the time, captured New Zealand's Largest Recorded Seabird Wreck 10 this image of the bird on a power line just outside the predator proof fence of the preserve. Bird News 13 Philip Rhodes Southland's Regional Recorder said, "Yes quite a The Missing Rarities 15 rare bird to see, and yes definitely a juvenile Black-faced Cuckoo shrike. There was another of these spotted on Stewart Island in Regional Roundup 16 about 2001." The immature Black-Faced Cuckoo Shrike (Coracina novaehollandiae) has an eye stripe rather than the full black mask of the mature bird.
    [Show full text]
  • Apoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Fauna of New Zealand 57, 295 Pp. Donovan, B. J. 2007
    Donovan, B. J. 2007: Apoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Fauna of New Zealand 57, 295 pp. EDITORIAL BOARD REPRESENTATIVES OF L ANDCARE R ESEARCH Dr D. Choquenot Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Dr R. J. B. Hoare Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF UNIVERSITIES Dr R.M. Emberson c/- Bio-Protection and Ecology Division P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF M USEUMS Mr R.L. Palma Natural Environment Department Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF OVERSEAS I NSTITUTIONS Dr M. J. Fletcher Director of the Collections NSW Agricultural Scientific Collections Unit Forest Road, Orange NSW 2800, Australia * * * SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 57 Apoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) B. J. Donovan Donovan Scientific Insect Research, Canterbury Agriculture and Science Centre, Lincoln, New Zealand [email protected] Manaaki W h e n u a P R E S S Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2007 4 Donovan (2007): Apoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2007 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication Donovan, B. J. (Barry James), 1941– Apoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) / B. J. Donovan – Lincoln, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, 2007. (Fauna of New Zealand, ISSN 0111–5383 ; no.
    [Show full text]
  • Ïg8g - 1Gg0 ISSN 0113-2S04
    MAF $outtr lsland *nanga spawning sur\feys, ïg8g - 1gg0 ISSN 0113-2s04 New Zealand tr'reshwater Fisheries Report No. 133 South Island inanga spawning surv€ys, 1988 - 1990 by M.J. Taylor A.R. Buckland* G.R. Kelly * Department of Conservation hivate Bag Hokitika Report to: Department of Conservation Freshwater Fisheries Centre MAF Fisheries Christchurch Servicing freshwater fisheries and aquaculture March L992 NEW ZEALAND F'RESTTWATER F'ISHERIES RBPORTS This report is one of a series issued by the Freshwater Fisheries Centre, MAF Fisheries. The series is issued under the following criteria: (1) Copies are issued free only to organisations which have commissioned the investigation reported on. They will be issued to other organisations on request. A schedule of reports and their costs is available from the librarian. (2) Organisations may apply to the librarian to be put on the mailing list to receive all reports as they are published. An invoice will be sent for each new publication. ., rsBN o-417-O8ffi4-7 Edited by: S.F. Davis The studies documented in this report have been funded by the Department of Conservation. MINISTBY OF AGRICULTUBE AND FISHERIES TE MANAlU AHUWHENUA AHUMOANA MAF Fisheries is the fisheries business group of the New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. The name MAF Fisheries was formalised on I November 1989 and replaces MAFFish, which was established on 1 April 1987. It combines the functions of the t-ormer Fisheries Research and Fisheries Management Divisions, and the fisheries functions of the former Economics Division. T\e New Zealand Freshwater Fisheries Report series continues the New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Fisheries Environmental Report series.
    [Show full text]
  • Walks in the Westport Area, West Coast
    WEST COAST Look after yourself Your safety is your responsibility Walks in the Choose a walk that matches the weather and your own • Plan your trip experience, and interests you. Know what the weather • Tell someone your plans is doing – it can change dramatically in a short time. • Be aware of the weather Westport area Call at Department of Conservation (DOC) offices or Visitor Centres to check current weather and • Know your limits track conditions. • Take sufficient supplies Times given are a guide only, and will vary depending on Visit www.mountainsafety.org.nz to learn more. fitness, weather and track conditions. For walks longer than an hour, pack a small first aid kit and take extra food and drink. Insect repellent is recommended to ward off sandflies and mosquitoes. Cape Foulwind Walkway Photo: Miles Holden The combined output of coal mines and sawmills helped create a remarkable railway up the sheer-sided Ngakawau Gorge to Charming Creek. It is now used by thousands of walkers who rate it one of the best walkways around. Westport had the West Coast’s earliest gold diggings The Westport area extends from and has some of the best-preserved reminders of this the Mokihinui River in the north vibrant period. Your historical wanderings can range from the haunting hillside site of Lyell, which many to Tauranga Bay in the south, and motorists pass unaware of, to the lonely Britannia inland to the Buller Gorge, including battery, reached by determined trampers via a several mountain ranges. It is valley track. wonderfully diverse. Even the highways have historic features, including Hawks Crag, a low-roofed ledge blasted out of solid There is a great range of walking rock in the lower Buller Gorge, and the stone-piered Iron Bridge in the upper gorge.
    [Show full text]
  • Apteryx Haastii)
    Genetic variability, distribution and abundance of great spotted kiwi (Apteryx haastii) John McLennan and Tony McCann ABSTRACT Recent information on the genetic composition, morphological features, distri- bution and abundance of great spotted kiwi is collated, analysed and used to evaluate the species’ conservation status. The species exhibits high levels of genetic variability but with no consistent geographical patterns. Some morphological variability is present along latitudinal and altitudinal gradients. Further study is warranted to determine if genetically and/ or morphologically distinct populations are present. There are currently about 22 000 great spotted kiwi spread over 6000 km2 in the northwest of the South Island. Most great spotted kiwi now live in high rainfall mountainous regions. There are three principal populations: in Northwest Nelson, the Paparoa Range, and the Arthur’s Pass–Hurunui district. Since European settlement, the species has become extirpated in eastern Nelson, part of North Westland, and the central Westland mountain valleys. Overall, the species’ range has contracted by at least 30%. The principal cause of decline is probably predation by stoats (Mustela erminea). Conservation of the intra-specific genetic and morphological diversity of great spotted kiwi is best achieved by protecting the range of extant populations, although this may be logistically difficult. The focus will probably settle on the three main population groups. We expect further declines to take place, particularly in southern Northwest Nelson and in Arthur’s Pass–Hurunui. The large populations in upland areas of Northwest Nelson and the Paparoa Range are probably stable but this needs to be monitored. The species should be classified as ‘vulnerable’ according to IUCN threat definitions.
    [Show full text]
  • For More Information on the Abel Tasman National Park Please Visit: Wild About New Zealand Travel Information Web Site
    WILD ABOUT NEW ZEALAND - ABEL TASMAN & NELSON LAKES NATIONAL PARK EPISODE GUIDE TO 10/9/13 Episode Two: Abel Tasman – Nelson Lakes National Park, Wild About New Zealand Series. Aired: Tuesday, September 10th, 8.30 on TV ONE By Gus Roxburgh The Wild About New Zealand Episode guides provide a simple overview for viewers on planning a trip to the National Park featured in the TV series. What can you visit? What is easily accessible? What needs more planning and preparation? Plus top tips on things to do in and around the National Parks. The guides are written by series presenter, Gus Roxburgh who spent 18 months on adventures – both big and small, in all our National Parks featured in the series. The information is designed to get New Zealanders to move from the inspiration of the TV series to action - and head out to explore our world renowned National Parks. Gus is presenter of the TV series, Wild About New Zealand, and principal author of the book of the series being published by Random House in October 2013 Content developed with Nelson and Tasman Regional Tourism Office, Department of Conservation and Jasons Travel Media. For more information on the Abel Tasman National Park please visit: Wild About New Zealand Travel Information Web Site: www.wildaboutnewzealand.co.nz 1 | P a g e Wild About New Zealand Episode Guide WILD ABOUT NEW ZEALAND - ABEL TASMAN & NELSON LAKES NATIONAL PARK EPISODE GUIDE TO 10/9/13 Episode Guide Sections : i. Essential Travel Information incl. Why You Should Visit, What is So Special, Getting There & 5 Top Things to Do ii.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Tasman Rotoiti Nelson Lakes Report(PDF, 203
    EPA Report: Verified Source: Pestlink Operational Report for Possum, Ship rat Control in the Rotoiti/Nelson Lakes BfoB 08 Nov 2014 - 08 Dec 2014 8/05/2015 Department of Conservation Nelson Lakes Contents 1. Operation Summary ............................................................................................................. 2 2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 TREATMENT AREA ....................................................................................................... 4 2.2 MANAGEMENT HISTORY ........................................................................................... 8 3 Outcomes and Targets ......................................................................................................... 8 3.1 CONSERVATION OUTCOMES ................................................................................... 8 3.2 TARGETS ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.2.1 Result Targets .......................................................................................................... 8 3.2.2 Outcome Targets ..................................................................................................... 9 4 Consultation, Consents & Notifications ............................................................................. 9 4.1 CONSULTATION .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Janszoon Toolbox
    Problem weeds in the Abel Tasman While 113 different weed species have been found in the Abel Tasman, Project Janszoon, DOC and the Abel Tasman Birdsong Trust are particularly interested in what we call the “filthy fourteen”. Each of these plants poses a different threat to the Park. If you see or suspect any of these species in or around the Park, please let us know. You can report sightings on [email protected] or through the “Have You Seen This” section of the Abel Tasman smartphone app. If you wish to control any of these plants yourself, please ask us or DOC for advice on the best means of control. For more information about these weeds you can also go to www.weedbusters.org.nz Grevillea (Grevillea rosmarinifolia) is a classic example Grevillea of the right plant in the wrong place. Originally from Australia, it is commonly found in gardens in Marahau, Nelson and Kaiteriteri, where it is prized for its pink flowers and long flowering period. It is likely to have been brought into Torrent Bay village as a garden plant, but instead found the Park’s dry ridges more to its liking. The seeds are dispersed by wind and at Torrent Bay it has spread up to 2 km back into the bush, colonising bare ridges in particular. The Birdsong Trust has spent $40,000 controlling it in this area, with years of work still to do to bring this Aussie invader under control. Please don’t select any Grevillea species to plant at your bach or near the Park’s boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Tau Ihu Claims Settlement Bill
    Te Tau Ihu Claims Settlement Bill Government Bill Explanatory note General policy statement This Bill gives effect to the deeds of settlement in which the Crown and Ngāti Apa ki te Rā Tō, Ngāti Kuia, Rangitāne o Wairau, Ngāti Kōata, Ngāti Rārua, Ngāti Tama ki Te Tau Ihu, Te Ātiawa o Te Waka- a-Māui, and Ngati Toa Rangatira agree to the final settlement of the historical claims of those iwi. It is intended to divide the Bill at the committee of the whole House stage so that— • Parts 1 to 3 become the Ngāti Apa ki te Rā Tō, Ngāti Kuia, and Rangitāne o Wairau Claims Settlement Bill: • Parts 4 to 7 become the Ngāti Kōata, Ngāti Rārua, Ngāti Tama ki Te Tau Ihu, and Te Ātiawa o Te Waka-a-Māui Claims Settle- ment Bill: • Parts 8 to 10 become the Ngati Toa Rangatira Claims Settle- ment Bill: • Part 11 becomes the Haka Ka Mate Attribution Bill. Parts 1 to 3—Ngāti Apa ki te Rā Tō, Ngāti Kuia, and Rangitāne o Wairau Claims Settlement Bill Parts 1 to 3 give effect to the deeds of settlement of Ngāti Apa ki te Rā Tō, Ngāti Kuia, and Rangitāne o Wairau. 123—1 2 Te Tau Ihu Claims Settlement Bill Explanatory note Parts 4 to 7—Ngāti Kōata, Ngāti Rārua, Ngāti Tama ki Te Tau Ihu, and Te Ātiawa o Te Waka-a-Māui Claims Settlement Bill Parts 4 to 7 give effect to the deeds of settlement of Ngāti Kōata, Ngāti Rārua, Ngāti Tama ki Te Tau Ihu, and Te Ātiawa o Te Waka- a-Māui.
    [Show full text]