DOCSLIB.ORG

Survey of Selected Fluorinated Green- House Gases

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Survey of Selected Fluorinated Green- House Gases Survey of selected fluorinated green- house gases Part of the LOUS-review Environmental project No. 1619, 2014 Title: Authors & contributors: Survey of selected fluorinated greenhouse gases Erik Hansen 1, Per Henrik Pedersen2, Frans Møller Christensen 1, Karen Louise Feilberg 1, Marlies Warming1 1 COWI A/S, Denmark 2Danish Technological Institute Published by: The Danish Environmental Protection Agency Strandgade 29 1401 Copenhagen K Denmark www.mst.dk/english Year: ISBN no. 2014 978-87-93283-24-4 Disclaimer: When the occasion arises, the Danish Environmental Protection Agency will publish reports and papers concerning re- search and development projects within the environmental sector, financed by study grants provided by the Danish Envi- ronmental Protection Agency. It should be noted that such publications do not necessarily reflect the position or opinion of the Danish Environmental Protection Agency. However, publication does indicate that, in the opinion of the Danish Environmental Protection Agency, the content represents an important contribution to the debate surrounding Danish environmental policy. While the information provided in this report is believed to be accurate, the Danish Environmental Protection Agency disclaims any responsibility for possible inaccuracies or omissions and consequences that may flow from them. Neither the Danish Environmental Protection Agency nor COWI or any individual involved in the preparation of this publication shall be liable for any injury, loss, damage or prejudice of any kind that may be caused by persons who have acted based on their understanding of the information contained in this publication. Sources must be acknowledged. 2 Survey of selected fluorinated greenhouse gases Contents Preface ........................................................................................................................... 5 Summary and conclusions ............................................................................................ 7 Sammenfatning og konklusion .....................................................................................12 1. Introduction to the substances ............................................................................ 18 1.1 Definition of the substance group ........................................................................................ 18 1.2 Physical and chemical properties ......................................................................................... 21 1.3 Function of the substances for main application areas ...................................................... 29 2. Regulatory framework ......................................................................................... 32 2.1 Legislation ............................................................................................................................ 32 2.1.1 Existing legislation ................................................................................................ 32 2.1.2 Proposed new regulation ...................................................................................... 32 2.2 Classification and labelling .................................................................................................. 40 2.2.1 Harmonised classification in the EU .................................................................... 40 2.2.2 Self-classification in the EU .................................................................................. 40 2.3 REACH .................................................................................................................................. 41 2.3.1 Authorisation List / REACH Annex XIV ............................................................... 41 2.3.2 Ongoing activities - pipeline .................................................................................. 41 2.4 Other legislation/initiatives ................................................................................................. 41 2.5 International agreements .................................................................................................... 43 2.6 Other relevant national regulation ...................................................................................... 44 2.7 Eco-labels ............................................................................................................................. 46 2.8 Summary and conclusions ....................................................................................................47 3. Manufacture and uses .......................................................................................... 50 3.1 Manufacturing ..................................................................................................................... 50 3.1.1 Manufacturing processes ...................................................................................... 50 3.1.2 Manufacturing sites ............................................................................................... 51 3.1.3 Manufacturing volumes ........................................................................................ 52 3.2 Import, export and sale ........................................................................................................53 3.2.1 Import and export of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 in Denmark.......................................53 3.2.2 Sales of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 in EU ...................................................................... 56 3.3 Use ........................................................................................................................................ 60 3.3.1 Registrations by the Danish Product Register ..................................................... 60 3.3.2 Use of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 in EU ........................................................................ 60 3.3.3 Danish investigations ............................................................................................ 62 3.4 Historical trends in use ........................................................................................................ 64 3.5 Summary and conclusions ................................................................................................... 66 4. Waste management .............................................................................................. 68 4.1 Waste from manufacture and use of HFCs, PFCs and SF6................................................. 68 4.2 Waste products from the use of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 in mixtures and articles ................ 68 4.3 Release of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 from waste disposal ......................................................... 69 4.4 Summary and conclusions ................................................................................................... 70 5. Environmental hazards and exposure ................................................................. 72 Survey of selected fluorinated greenhouse gases 3 5.1 Environmental Hazards........................................................................................................72 5.1.1 Classification ..........................................................................................................72 5.1.2 Global warming potentials.....................................................................................72 5.1.3 Other environmental hazards ................................................................................74 5.2 Environmental Exposure ......................................................................................................74 5.2.1 Sources of release ...................................................................................................74 5.2.2 Monitoring data ..................................................................................................... 77 5.3 Environmental impact .......................................................................................................... 77 5.3.1 Global Warming ..................................................................................................... 77 5.3.2 Degradation Products ........................................................................................... 78 5.4 Summary and conclusions ................................................................................................... 80 6. Human health effects and exposure..................................................................... 82 6.1 Human health hazard .......................................................................................................... 82 6.1.1 Classification ......................................................................................................... 82 6.1.2 Hazard assessment................................................................................................ 83 6.2 Human exposure .................................................................................................................. 87 6.2.1 Direct exposure ..................................................................................................... 87 6.2.2 Indirect exposure .................................................................................................. 87 6.3 Bio-monitoring data ............................................................................................................ 88 6.4 Human health impact .......................................................................................................... 88 6.5 Summary and conclusions ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/0083979 A1 Costello Et Al
    US 2015 0083979A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/0083979 A1 Costello et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 26, 2015 (54) FLUORINATED NITRILES AS DELECTRIC Related U.S. Application Data GASES (60) Provisional application No. 61/620,192, filed on Apr. 4, 2012. (71) Applicant: 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY, ST. Paul, MN (US) Publication Classification (72) Inventors: Michael G. Costello, Afton, MN (US); (51) Int. C. Richard M. Flynn, Mahtomedi, MN HOIB 3/56 (2006.01) (US); Michael J. Bulinski, Woodbury, HOIB 3/16 (2006.01) MN (US) HOIB 3/24 (2006.01) (52) U.S. C. (21) Appl. No.: 14/388,301 CPC. H01B3/56 (2013.01); H01B3/24 (2013.01); H0IB 3/16 (2013.01) (22) PCT Fled: Mar. 15, 2013 USPC ........................................... 252/571; 558/461 (57) ABSTRACT (86) PCT NO.: PCT/US2O13/031854 An electrical device containing a dielectric fluid, the dielec S371 (c)(1), tric fluid comprising heptafluoroisobutyronitrile or 2,3,3,3- (2) Date: Sep. 26, 2014 tetrafluoro-2-(trifluoromethoxy) propanenitrile. 3 Patent Application Publication Mar. 26, 2015 US 2015/0083979 A1 FIG. I US 2015/008.3979 A1 Mar. 26, 2015 FLUORINATED NITRILES AS DELECTRIC or high-pressure nitrogen. Some other replacement mixtures GASES Suffer from release of free carbon during arcing, increased toxicity during or after arcing, and increased difficulty in gas CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED handling during storage, recovery and recycling. Also iden APPLICATIONS tified are perfluorocarbon (PFC) gases that might also be 0001. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provi mixed with nitrogen or helium, like SF.
    [Show full text]
  • Ute Tates Att 1191 Mi... % 35:5
    Ute tates att 1191 [11] . 4,204,084 Mastroia et a1. [451 May 20,1980 [54] APPARATUS WITH DIELECI‘RIC GAS 4,110,580 8/1978 Farish ............................ .. 100/148 G MIXTURES IN SUBSTAN'I'IALLY UNIFORM FIELD OTHER PUBLICATIONS Mulcachy, M. J., et al., A Review of Insulation Break [75] Inventors: Martin J. Mastroianni, East Aurora; Sabatino R. Orfeo, Orchard Park, down and Switching in Gas Insulation, INSULA both of N.Y. TION/CIRCUITS, Aug. 1970, pp. 55 to 61. Bates, R. D., J of Chem. Physics, V. 57, #10, pp. [73] Assignee: Allied Chemical (Desperation, 4174-4190. Morristown, NJ. Khodeeva, S. M., Russian J of Physical Chem, vol. 40, [21] Appl. No.: 919,338 #8, pp. 1061-1063 (Aug. 1966). [22] Filed; Jun, 26, 1978 Primary Examiner-Richard R. Kucia [51] Int. Cl.2 ............................................. .. H01B 3/16 AttFriggger'fsongen .A t, or F‘"m —-A1 an M . Doem b erg ;J ay P. [52] us. (:1. .......................... .. 174/25 G; 174/17 GP; 174/26 G; 200/ 148 G; 252/635; 252/66 [57] ABSTRACT [58] Flew of g‘lgsgfégss Dielectric gas mixtures are described with improved ’ ’ ’ . ' ’ dielectric strength in uniform ?elds compared to pure [56] References Cited sulfur hexa?uoride. Sulfur hexa?uoride is mixed with Us PATENT DOCUMENTS about 1 to about 10 mole % of a noble gas such as he _I z’ _ iium, argon, krypton or neon and used in a device 2,75 7,261 7/3940 Lmgal ........................... .. 252/635 X wherein the dielectric gas is Subjected to a substantially 2,867,679 1/1959 Cobme ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared by 3M
    DRAFT ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL FATE TESTING OF SHORT CHAIN PERFLUOROALKYL COMPOUNDS RELATED TO 3M CHEMISTRIES XXX XX, 2008 Prepared by 3M Page 1 CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED IN 3M MN01537089 HENNEPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, NO. 27-CV-10-28862 2231.0001 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction (describes propose, goals, document organization .... ) 3 1) Degradation modes 4-27 Basic degradation pathways, Conversion routes from polymer to monomer & degradants or residual intermediates to degradants) 2) Degradants & Intermediates - Phys. Chem properties and test data by section & chapter i) Fluorinated Sulfonic acids and derivatives a) PFBS (PBSK) 28-42 b) PFBSI 43-44 ii) Fluorinated Carboxylates a) TFA 46-55 b) PFPA 56-59 c) PFBA (APFB) 60-65 d) MeFBSAA (MeFBSE Acid, M370) 66-68 iii) Fluorinated Non-ionics a) MeFBSE 70-74 b) MeFBSA 75-80 c) FBSE 81-84 d) FBSA 85-88 e) HxFBSA 89-91 iv) Fluorinated Inerts & volatiles a) PBSF 94-97 b) NFB, C4 hydride, CF3CF2CF2CF2-H 98-99 3) Assessments X Glossary 100-102 References/Endnotes 105- Page 2 CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED IN 3M MN01537090 HENNEPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, NO. 27-CV-10-28862 2231.0002 DRAFT Introduction to Environmental White Papers on Perfluoroalkyl acids related to 3M chemistries Perfluorochemicals have been commonplace in chemical industry over 50 years but until recently there has been little information on environmental fate and effects avialble in open literature. The following chapters summarize the findings of"list specific C4 intermediates PFBS, PFBSI, PFBA, PFPA, MeFBSAA, TFA, MeFBSE, FBSA, HxFBSA, FBSE, PBSF, NFB " As background, 3M announced on May 16, 2000 the voluntary manufacturing phase out of perfluorooctanyl chemicals which included perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), and PFOS-related chemistries.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrical Device with a Divalent Sulfur Dielectric Gas and a Composition Comprising Divalent Sulfur
    Patentamt 3JEuropaisches European Patent Office © Publication number: 0 008 862 Office europeen des brevets A1 © EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (21) Application number: 79301456.4 (51) Int. CI.3: H 01 B 3/56 H 01 B 3/16 (22) Date of filing: 23.07.79 (So) Priority: 21.08.78 US 934758 (73) Applicant: ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION Law Department P.O. Box 1057R Morristown, New Jersey 07960(US) 43) Date of publication of application: 19.03.80 Bulletin 80/6 (72) Inventor: Mastroianni, Martin John 411 North Street S) Designated Contracting States: East Aurora, New York 14052(US) DE FR GB IT (72) Inventor: Orfeo, Sabatino Robert 9 Timberlake Drive Orchard Park, New York 14127(US) (72) Inventor: Sukornick, Bernard 53 Eastwick Drive Williamsville, New York 14127IUS) (74) Representative: Baillie, lain Cameron et al, c/o Ladas, Parry, von Gehr. Goldsmith & Deschamps Blumenstrasse 48 D-8000 Munchen 2(DE) © Electrical device with a divalent sulfur dielectric gas and a composition comprising divalent sulfur. Electrical device with a dielectric gas containing elec- tronegative, normally gaseous, fluorinated compounds with sulfur at valence state (2) alone or in combination with sulfur hexafluoride. Compositions of sulfur hexafluoride and such divalent sulfur compounds are also disclosed. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Dielectric gases have found increasing use in high voltage systems, especially over about 100 kilovolcs, with the most widely used material being sulfur hexafluor- ide. Sulfur hexafluoride has been used in both devices with uniform fields, such as compressed gas insulative devices, and in devices with non-uniform fields, such as circuit breakers and transformers. The rating of a particular device depends upon its configuration, the gas pressure, the dielectric gas used, the degree of freedom of the gas from moisture and other contamination, and other conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Halocarbons: Ozone Depletion and Global Warming Overview
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Principal Center for Clean Air Act Regulations Halocarbons: Ozone Depletion and Global Warming Overview Halocarbons are chemical compounds containing carbon, one or more halogens, and sometimes hydrogen. Some halocarbons (“ozone depleting substances,” or ODSs) deplete the ozone layer, while others (“greenhouse gases,” or GHGs) are thought to contribute to global warming. Many halocarbons are considered to belong to both categories. Ozone Depleting Substances Stratospheric ozone is constantly being created and destroyed through natural cycles. Various ODSs, however, accelerate the destruction processes, resulting in lower-than-normal ozone levels. The ozone depletion potential (ODP) is the ratio of the impact on ozone of a chemical compared to the impact of a similar mass of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) 11. Class I ODSs typically have an ODP of greater than 0.1 and include CFCs, halons, carbon tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, methyl bromide, hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs), and chlorobromomethane. Class II ODSs are hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs). They deplete stratospheric ozone, but to a lesser extent than most Class I ODSs. HCFCs generally have ODPs of 0.1 or less. Selected timeline elements for ODS phase-out are shown in Exhibit 1. EXHIBIT 1 ODS Phase-out Timeline United States Montreal Protocol ODS US HCFC Consumption Allowed Date No Production or Importation of: Date Class ODP-weighted Metric Tons (OMT) 1/1/1994 Halons I CFCs, carbon tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, HBFCs (some 1/1/1996
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Level Sensor AKS 4100/4100U
    MAKING MODERN LIVING POSSIBLE Technical brochure Liquid Level Sensor AKS 4100/4100U The AKS 4100/4100U liquid level sensor is designed AKS 4100/4100U - Cable Version AKS 4100/4100U - Coaxial Version specifically to measure liquid levels in a wide range of refrigeration applications. The AKS 4100/4100U liquid level sensor is based on a proven techhology called Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) or Guided Micro Wave. AKS 4100/4100U liquid level sensor can be used to measure the liquid level of many different refrigerants in vessels, accumulators, receivers, standpipes, etc. The electrical output is a 2-wired, loop powered 4-20 mA output signal, which is proportional to the refrigerant liquid level. AKS 4100/4100U in a cable version is suitable for most commonly used refrigerants, including R717(ammonia), HCFC, HFC and non corrosive gases/ liquids except CO2, and differing lengths from 800 mm(31.5 in.) and up to 5000 mm (197 in.). The coaxial version of AKS 4100/4100U is designed for use with CO2. It can also be used for all other appoved commonly used refrigerants. The AKS 4100/4100U coaxial version should always be used for marine applications for all refrigerant types. The AKS 4100/4100U cable version should NOT be used for CO2 or marine applications. Dust, foam, vapour, agitated surfaces, boiling surfaces, changes in density or in the dielectric constant , εr, for the liquid have no influence on the AKS 4100/4100U performance. Oil accumulated in the bottom of a standpipe will not disturb the liquid level signal and it is not necessary to remove AKS 4100/4100U for cleaning after oil has been drained out of the standpipe.
    [Show full text]
  • Impulsive Breakdown Characteristics of Solid-Gas Interfaces
    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 365-377, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TPS.2020.3039722 1 Impulsive Breakdown Characteristics of Solid-Gas Interfaces Z. Wang, Graduate Student Member, IEEE, I. Timoshkin, Senior Member, IEEE, M. P. Wilson, Member, IEEE, M. J. Given, Senior Member, IEEE, T. Wang, S. J. MacGregor, Senior Member, IEEE environmentally friendly gases. The employment of such gases Abstract—Comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the in GIS and other gas-insulated HV components and systems is breakdown behavior of solid-gas interfaces is important for the aimed at potential replacement of SF6 - an insulating gas with development, optimisation and coordination of insulation in excellent dielectric and switching characteristics, but with a practical high voltage gas-insulated systems (GIS), which are widely used in the power and pulsed power industries. However, significant global warming potential (GWP), ⁓23,900 times that despite significant research efforts focused on characterisation of of CO2. A systematic and comprehensive investigation of the the breakdown parameters and properties of complex gas-filled characteristics and parameters of the flashover events across HV systems, the basic mechanisms which underpin the solid-gas interfaces in environmentally friendly gases, and in development of discharges in such solid-gas topologies are not fully gases with low (as compared with SF6) GWP values, is required understood. This lack of knowledge is particularly noticeable in for further understanding, optimisation and coordination of the case of solid-gas interfaces stressed with high voltage impulses. The present study is aimed at the experimental investigation of the dielectric insulation in different practical, gas-filled, HV power breakdown behavior of solid-gas interfaces, formed between solid and pulsed power systems and their elements, [1], [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Physiochemical Properties of Gaseous Dielectrics Alternatives to SF6
    www.dergipark.gov.tr ISSN:2148-3736 El-Cezerî Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi Cilt: 7, No: 3, 2020 (1460-1470x) El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering ECJSE Vol: 7, No: 3, 2020 (1460-1470) DOI :10.31202/ecjse.742492 Review Paper / Derleme Makale Environmental and Physiochemical Properties of Gaseous Dielectrics Alternatives to SF6 Hıdır DUZKAYA1,2a*, Süleyman Sungur TEZCAN1b, Alper ACARTÜRK3c, Mehmet YILMAZ3d 1Department of Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey, 2Ampère Laboratory, École Centrale de Lyon, Ecully, France 3R&D Center, Dicle Electricity Distribution Company, Istanbul, Turkey [email protected] Received/Geliş: 25.05.2020 Accepted/Kabul: 07.07.2020 Abstract: Research on alternative dielectric gases to eliminate the disadvantages of SF6, which is widely used in GIS and switching systems in the power system engineering, has been an important study topic in the literature for nearly 40 years. Because of environmental priorities defined by international agreements such as the Kyoto Protocol and Doha Amendment, the restrictions on the use of SF6 make these studies an obligation. Although the number of alternative dielectric gases studied for this purpose is quite high, these gases can be classified under the titles of non-synthetics, hydrocarbons (HCs), fluorocarbons (FCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), fluoronitriles (FNs), fluoroketones (FKs) and other synthetic gases. In this study, the gases classified under these titles are compared using the dielectric constant relative to SF6, Global Warming Potential (GWP), atmospheric lifetime, boiling point and toxicity parameters used in the comparison of dielectric gases. When compared with these parameters, non-synthetic air, CO2, and N2, C3F7CN from FNs, and C5F10O and C6F12O from FKs stand out among alternative gases to SF6.
    [Show full text]
  • CIRED 2019 1/5 25Th International Conference on Electricity Distribution Madrid, 3-6 June 2019
    25th International Conference on Electricity Distribution Madrid, 3-6 June 2019 Paper n° 1346 EMISSION REDUCTIONS THROUGH USE OF SUSTAINABLE SF6 ALTERNATIVES Ang XIAO Jason BONK John OWENS 3M Company – USA 3M Company – USA 3M Company – USA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] reduction in the GWP of at most 4% since the GWP is ABSTRACT calculated over a 100-year time horizon. Therefore, SF6 remains the highest GWP compound identified to date. For decades, SF6 has been a preferred dielectric gas used in many electrical power applications, including medium Research on insulating gases had continued even after the voltage gas-insulated equipment. However, SF6 has an introduction of SF6. This effort took on greater urgency extremely long atmospheric lifetime and has been after governments in various regions began to establish policies to limit SF emissions beginning in the late 1990s recognized as a potent greenhouse gas. As a result, 6 with its inclusion in the Kyoto Protocol. Identification of a governments have sought to reduce emissions from gas- viable alternative to SF6 is complicated by the unique filled equipment. The electrical power industry has combination of properties required in electric power demonstrated a willingness to respond to this applications. The material needs to be nonflammable and environmental issue. Emission rates from gas-filled low enough in toxicity to allow for handling using equipment have been reduced. Progress has been made practices similar to those currently used within the but complete elimination of emissions will not occur until industry. An alternative compound needs to have very high alternative technologies are implemented for SF6 in dielectric strength, as close to the performance of SF6 as electrical power applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Management of Firefighting Foam Policy Explanatory Notes Revision 2
    Environmental Management of Firefighting Foam Policy Explanatory Notes Revision 2 Prepared by: Incident Response Unit, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection © State of Queensland, 2014-16. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. Information contained in this document is from a number of sources and, as such, does not necessarily represent government or departmental policy. Revision 2.2 – July 2016 www.EHP.qld.gov.au ABN 46 640 294 485 Firefighting Foam Management Policy – Explanatory Notes (Revision 2) Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background
    [Show full text]
  • Emissions of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances
    Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories EMISSIONS OF SUBSTITUTES FOR OZONE-DEPLETING SUBSTANCES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This paper was written by Reynaldo Forte, Jr. (USEPA), Archie McCulloch (ICI Chemicals & Polymers, Ltd.), and Pauline Midgley (M&D Consulting). Several reviewers made valuable comments on draft versions of this paper, including Stephen Seidel (USEPA), Thomas Martinsen (IPCC/OECD/IEA Inventories Programme) and Dina Kruger (USEPA). ABSTRACT Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) are emitted from a number of end use sectors in which they substitute for ozone-depleting substances. These include refrigeration, air conditioning, aerosol applications, fire suppression, foam blowing, sterilants, and solvents. Emissions of these gases may occur within a year of sale or gradually over several years depending on the application. Aerosols, open-cell foam blowing, and solvents are typical sectors where the chemical is rapidly emitted, while these emissions may be delayed for decades in refrigeration, fire suppression and closed-cell foam blowing. Recovery, recycling and destruction can further delay or eliminate the release of these gases into the atmosphere. The Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC Guidelines) include two methods: • The Tier 1 or “potential” method estimates emissions as being equal to current chemical consumption, where consumption is defined as chemical production plus imports minus exports and destruction. This method of calculating national emissions is simple to perform and recognises that all material consumed has the potential of being emitted eventually, but it seriously distorts the timing of emission by assuming that it occurs when the chemical is first consumed.
    [Show full text]
  • C1-C4 Halogenated HC Info 16FEB2018.Xlsx
    C1-C4 Halogenated Hydrocarbons/Halocarbons Not Otherwise Listed (C1-C4 NOL) Feb 28, 2018 Administrative Council Mtg - Printed 2/16/20184:11 PM Reported Uses (SOURCES:HAZMAP, NJDHSS, Wikipedia, TSCA CDR, mfr literature) TURA TSCA CDR Chemical CAS/Chemica chemical name chemical fire 2015 Chemical Name Pesti- blowing feedstock / supressant / propell- Inventory? TRI? List l Number (synonyms) formula Solvent refriger-ant etchant Other Tier II cide agent intermed-iate flame ant status* retardant insulation for refrigerators, freezers, commercial refrigeration equipment, refrigerated containers and LNG ships; spray foam insulation; insulated metal panels; slabstock and molded flexible foam; refrigerant for chillers; and solvents for metal cleaning and electronics, and circuit flush. https://www.honeywell-blowingagents.com/?document=solstice-lba-technical- HFO-1233zd (E) brochure&download=1 Hydro-fluoro-olefin C H ClF YYY yhttps://www.honeywell-refrigerants.com/americas/product/solstice-zd/ (HFO) 3 2 3 CDR 2016 Honeywell: 100% as propellants and blowing agents for plastics product mfg; R-1233zd CDR Honeywell Solstice® ZD refrigerant, Solstice® 1233zdE, Solstice Blowing Agent; Arkema (current Forane® 1233zd blowing agent for spray PU foam, appliance insulation, etc. and solvent (may Honeywell not be available in US) product) C1-C4 Cat 102687-65-0 1-Chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene Y 106‐95‐6 Allyl bromide 2-Propenyl bromide C3H5Br Y y Manufacture of synthetic perfumes, other allyl compounds; Insecticidal fumigant; 1-Propene, 3-bromo- Chemical intermediate in organic synthesis, for resins (copolymer with sulfur dioxide) and fragrances; As a fumigant (if quite volatile) or as a contact poison; C1-C4 Cat Used in the manufacture of plastics and dyestuff.
    [Show full text]