All KJYL Procedures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

All KJYL Procedures SYLVANIA, GEORGIA AL-6842 (FAA) 20254 NDB JYL APP CRS Rwy Idg 5501 TDZE 190 NDB RWY 23 245 248° Apt Elev 190 PLANTATION AIRPARK (JYL) T MISSED APPROACH: Climb to 1500 then climbing left turn 3 Rwy 23 helicopter visibility reduction below 4 SM NA. to 2000 direct JYL NDB and hold, continue climb-in-hold to A 2000. AWOS-3 JACKSONVILLE CENTER UNICOM 118.875 132.925 363.2 122.8(CTAF)L MILEN JYL 25 N SA M M ( 2 1900 15 184 823 500 . 1 ° ) ° 068 688 293 ° 485 ° 113 ° ° 248 ° 063 243 248 SE-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV IAF SYLVANIA 245 JYLLYJ ° ) Procedure NA for arrivals at 9 2500 . 036 LOTTS on V157 southbound. 22 ( LOTTS SE-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV ELEV 190 TDZE 190 2000 332 ( 36 . ° 2 ) 248° to 15 JYL NDB SAVANNAH 3 x 2 115.95 SAVAS x V 3787 Chan 106 (Y) P X 100 1500 2000 JYL 75 JYL NDB Remain X within 10 NM 5501 P 0 U 6 % 8° .4 0 33 P 2000 5 ° 248 CATEGORY A B C D S-23 900-1 710 (800-1) 900-2 710 (800-2) 3 900-2 1040-2 4 C CIRCLING 900-1 710 (800-1) MIRL Rwy 5-23 L 3 710 (800-2) 850 (900-2 4 ) SYLVANIA, GEORGIA PLANTATION AIRPARK (JYL) Amdt 3 30JAN20 32°39'N - 81°36'W NDB RWY 23 SYLVANIA, GEORGIA AL-6842 (FAA) 20030 WAAS Rwy Idg APP CRS 5501 CH93799 TDZE 190 RNAV (GPS) RWY 23 235° W23A Apt Elev 190 PLANTATION AIRPARK (JYL) RNP APCH. T 3 MISSED APPROACH: Climb to Rwy 23 helicopter visibility reduction below 4 SM NA. For uncompensated 2500 direct TIKIE and hold. A Baro-VNAV systems, LNAV/VNAV NA below -15°C or above 54°C. AWOS-3 JACKSONVILLE CENTER UNICOM 118.875 132.925 363.2 122.8(CTAF)L 4 NM 6000 HOLD 2000 ° ° 235 055 (IF/IAF) 823 HOBOB ° 1900 ) 30 N (FAF) 2357 M ( t o BUYDA 2100 H O 145 B 15 NM O 688 ° to B 2000 H ( N SE-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV O 145 o 485 HOBOB B P T THOLN ° O ) 2.4 NM to B 248 RW23 RW23 HOBOB 325 3 0 ° N 325 M 2000 ° to H O B OB TIKIE SE-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV ° ° ELEV 190 TDZE 190 054 234 4 NM 2500 TIKIE VGSI and RNAV glidepath not coincident 4 NM 235° to (VGSI Angle 3.00/TCH 31). Holding Pattern RW23 HOBOB 15 LNAV only. BUYDA * THOLN x 23 2.4 NM to x RW23 055° 6000 37 1900 8 P 7 1.1 NM * ° 2000 X 235° 100 to RW23 235 75 X RW23 5501 GP 3.00° P 800* U 1900 TCH 40 % .4 0 1.1 NM 1.3 2.8 NM 7 NM P 33 CATEGORY A B C D 5 7 7 LPV DA 494- 8 304 (400- 8 ) LNAV/ 1 1 DA 623-1 433 (500-1 4 ) VNAV 4 3 3 LNAV MDA 700-1 510 (600-1) 700-1 8 510 (600-1 8 ) 1 3 840-1 2 1040-2 4 C CIRCLING 700-1 510 (600-1) 1 3 L 650 (700-1 2 ) 850 (900-2 4 ) MIRL Rwy 5-23 SYLVANIA, GEORGIA PLANTATION AIRPARK (JYL) Amdt 1 30JAN20 32°39'N - 81°36'W RNAV (GPS) RWY 23 SYLVANIA, GEORGIA AL-6842 (FAA) 20030 Rwy Idg WAAS APP CRS 5501 TDZE 178 RNAV (GPS) RWY 5 CH93605 054° W05A Apt Elev 190 PLANTATION AIRPARK (JYL) RNP APCH. MISSED APPROACH: Climb to 3 T Rwy 5 helicopter visibility reduction below 4 SM NA. For uncompensated 2000 direct HOBOB and hold. A Baro-VNAV systems, LNAV/VNAV NA below -15°C or above 54°C. AWOS-3 JACKSONVILLE CENTER UNICOM 118.875 132.925 363.2 122.8(CTAF)L 4 NM ° 055 ° 235 30 N M HOBOB 823 to 144 T I K ° I 2500 E 144 ° TIKIE 1 5 3 688 0 N TIKIE 324 M N ° M t o 2500 324 248 t SE-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV o T ° IK RW05 T IE IK 2600 CESOR IE 3.1 NM to ( No 309 PT) RW05 (FAF) LIPSE ° 1900 ) 054(7 (IF/IAF) TIKIE ° ° 054 234 SE-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV 6000 HOLD 2500 ELEV 190 TDZE 178 4 NM VGSI and RNAV glidepath not coincident 2000 HOBOB (VGSI Angle 3.00/TCH 33). 4 NM TIKIE 15 Holding Pattern LIPSE 3 *LNAV Only x 2 CESOR x 6000 234° 3.1 NM to 3787 RW05 P 2500 054° 1.1 NM to X 054 * 100 75 ° X RW05 RW05 5501 1900 P U GP 3.00° % .4 *1200 0 TCH 40 P 33 7 NM 2.2 NM 2 NM 1.1 5 CATEGORY A B C D 3 3 LPV DA 428- 4 250 (300- 4 ) LNAV/ 1 1 DA 591-1 413 (500-1 8 ) VNAV 8 054° to RW05 1 1 LNAV MDA 560-1 382 (400-1) 560-1 8 382 (400-1 8 ) 3 3 640-1 660-1 840-1 4 1040-2 4 C CIRCLING 3 3 MIRL Rwy 5-23 L 450 (500-1) 470 (500-1) 650 (700-1 4 ) 850 (900-2 4 ) SYLVANIA, GEORGIA PLANTATION AIRPARK (JYL) Amdt 1 30JAN20 32°39'N - 81°36'W RNAV (GPS) RWY 5 M1 A ALTERNATE MINS A 21280 INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE CHARTS A IFR ALTERNATE AIRPORT MINIMUMS Standard alternate minimums for non-precision approaches and approaches with vertical guidance [NDB, VOR, LOC, TACAN, LDA, SDF, VOR/DME, ASR, RNAV (GPS) or RNAV (RNP)] are 800-2. Standard alternate minimums for precision approaches (ILS, PAR, or GLS) are 600-2. Airports within this geographical area that require alternate minimums other than standard or alternate minimums with restrictions are listed below. NA - means alternate minimums are not authorized due to unmonitored facility, absence of weather reporting service, or lack of adequate navigation coverage. Civil pilots see FAR 91. IFR Alternate Minimums: Ceiling and Visibility Minimums not applicable to USA/USN/USAF. Pilots must review the IFR Alternate Minimums Notes for alternate airfield suitability. NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ALABASTER, AL ANNISTON, AL SHELBY COUNTY (EET)……RNAV (GPS) Rwy 16 ANNISTON RNAV (GPS) Rwy 34 RGNL (ANB)..………………ILS Y or LOC Y Rwy 51 NA when local weather not available. ILS Z or LOC Z Rwy 52 Category C, 800-2¼; Category D, 1000-3. RNAV (GPS) Rwy 53 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 234 ALBANY, GA NA when local weather not available. SOUTHWEST GEORGIA 1ILS, LOC, Categories A, B, 900-2; Category C, RGNL (ABY).…………………ILS or LOC Rwy 512 900-2¼; Category D, 1300-3. 2 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV RNAV (GPS) Rwy 5³ ILS, Categories A, B, 900-2; Category C, 900-2¼; RNAV (GPS) Rwy 17³ Category D, 1300-3; LOC, Categories A, B, RNAV (GPS) Rwy 23³ 900-2; Category C, 900-2¼. RNAV (GPS) Rwy 35³ 3Categories A, B, 900-2; Category C, 900-2¼; VOR Rwy 17³ Category D, 1300-3. 1NA when control tower closed. 4Categories A, B, 900-2; Category C, 900-2½; 2LOC, Category C, 800-2¼; Category D, 800-2½. Category D, 1300-3. 3Category C, 800-2¼; Category D, 800-2½. ATHENS, GA ALBERTVILLE, AL ATHENS/BEN ALBERTVILLE RGNL-THOMAS J EPPS (AHN)..……………ILS or LOC/DME Rwy 271 BRUMLIK FLD (8A0).………….RNAV (GPS) Rwy 5 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 2 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 23 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 20 NA when local weather not available. RNAV (GPS) Rwy 27 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV VOR Rwy 2 ALEXANDER CITY, AL VOR Rwy 27 THOMAS C RUSSELL NA when local weather not available. FLD (ALX).………………...….RNAV (GPS) Rwy 18 1Category D, 700-2. RNAV (GPS) Rwy 36 Category C, 900-2½; Category D, 900-2¾. ATLANTA, GA ATLANTA RGNL FALCON ALMA, GA FLD (FFC).……………......….ILS or LOC Rwy 3112 BACON RNAV (GPS) Rwy 133 COUNTY (AMG)………...……RNAV (GPS) Rwy 16 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 313 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 34 1NA when local weather not available. NA when local weather not available. 2ILS, LOC, Category D, 800-2¼. Category C, 800-2¼; Category D, 800-2½. 3Category D, 800-2¼. ANDALUSIA-OPP, AL ATLANTA SOUTH ALABAMA RGNL AT BILL BENTON SPEEDWAY (HMP).….……….RNAV (GPS) Rwy 6 FLD (79J)…………...………COPTER NDB Rwy 29 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 24 NDB-A NA when local weather not available. RNAV (GPS) RWY 11 Category C, 900-2½; Category D, 900-2¾. RNAV (GPS) RWY 29 NA when local weather not available. A ALTERNATE MINS SE-4 A 21280 M1 M2 A ALTERNATE MINS A 21280 NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ATLANTA, GA (CON’T) AUBURN, AL COBB COUNTY INTL-MCCOLLUM AUBURN UNIVERSITY FLD (RYY).………………..….ILS or LOC Rwy 2712 RGNL (AUO).…………………ILS or LOC Rwy 3612 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 93 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 113 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 273 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 183 NA when local weather not available. RNAV (GPS) Rwy 293 1NA when control tower closed. RNAV (GPS) Rwy 363 2ILS, Categories A, B, C, 800-2; Category D, VOR-A3 1200-3; LOC, Category D, 1200-3. 1NA when local weather not available. 3Category D, 1200-3. 2LOC, Category D, 800-2¼. 3 Category D, 800-2¼. COVINGTON MUNI (CVC).……………………………NDB Rwy 28 AUGUSTA, GA RNAV (GPS) Rwy 10 AUGUSTA RGNL AT BUSH RNAV (GPS) Rwy 28 FLD (AGS)………….…....…...ILS or LOC Rwy 1712 NA when local weather not available.
Recommended publications
  • CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS to AIRPORTS (Pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing by State, City and Airport
    CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS TO AIRPORTS (pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing By State, City And Airport State City Airport Name LOC_ID Grand Totals AK Alaskan Consolidated Airports Multiple [individual airports listed separately] AKAP $16,855,355 AK Adak (Naval) Station/Mitchell Field Adak ADK $30,000 AK Akhiok Akhiok AKK $20,000 AK Akiachak Akiachak Z13 $30,000 AK Akiak Akiak AKI $30,000 AK Akutan Akutan 7AK $20,000 AK Akutan Akutan KQA $20,000 AK Alakanuk Alakanuk AUK $30,000 AK Allakaket Allakaket 6A8 $20,000 AK Ambler Ambler AFM $30,000 AK Anaktuvuk Pass Anaktuvuk Pass AKP $30,000 AK Anchorage Lake Hood LHD $1,053,070 AK Anchorage Merrill Field MRI $17,898,468 AK Anchorage Ted Stevens Anchorage International ANC $26,376,060 AK Anchorage (Borough) Goose Bay Z40 $1,000 AK Angoon Angoon AGN $20,000 AK Aniak Aniak ANI $1,052,884 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Togiak TOG $20,000 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Twin Hills A63 $20,000 AK Anvik Anvik ANV $20,000 AK Arctic Village Arctic Village ARC $20,000 AK Atka Atka AKA $20,000 AK Atmautluak Atmautluak 4A2 $30,000 AK Atqasuk Atqasuk Edward Burnell Sr Memorial ATK $20,000 AK Barrow Wiley Post-Will Rogers Memorial BRW $1,191,121 AK Barrow (County) Wainwright AWI $30,000 AK Beaver Beaver WBQ $20,000 AK Bethel Bethel BET $2,271,355 AK Bettles Bettles BTT $20,000 AK Big Lake Big Lake BGQ $30,000 AK Birch Creek Birch Creek Z91 $20,000 AK Birchwood Birchwood BCV $30,000 AK Boundary Boundary BYA $20,000 AK Brevig Mission Brevig Mission KTS $30,000 AK Bristol Bay (Borough) Aleknagik /New 5A8 $20,000 AK
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Listings of General Aviation Airports
    Appendix B-1: Summary by State Public New ASSET Square Public NPIAS Airports Not State Population in Categories Miles Use Classified SASP Total Primary Nonprimary National Regional Local Basic Alabama 52,419 4,779,736 98 80 75 5 70 18 25 13 14 Alaska 663,267 710,231 408 287 257 29 228 3 68 126 31 Arizona 113,998 6,392,017 79 78 58 9 49 2 10 18 14 5 Arkansas 53,179 2,915,918 99 90 77 4 73 1 11 28 12 21 California 163,696 37,253,956 255 247 191 27 164 9 47 69 19 20 Colorado 104,094 5,029,196 76 65 49 11 38 2 2 27 7 Connecticut 5,543 3,574,097 23 19 13 2 11 2 3 4 2 Delaware 2,489 897,934 11 10 4 4 1 1 1 1 Florida 65,755 18,801,310 129 125 100 19 81 9 32 28 9 3 Georgia 59,425 9,687,653 109 99 98 7 91 4 18 38 14 17 Hawaii 10,931 1,360,301 15 15 7 8 2 6 Idaho 83,570 1,567,582 119 73 37 6 31 1 16 8 6 Illinois 57,914 12,830,632 113 86 8 78 5 9 35 9 20 Indiana 36,418 6,483,802 107 68 65 4 61 1 16 32 11 1 Iowa 56,272 3,046,355 117 109 78 6 72 7 41 16 8 Kansas 82,277 2,853,118 141 134 79 4 75 10 34 18 13 Kentucky 40,409 4,339,367 60 59 55 5 50 7 21 11 11 Louisiana 51,840 4,533,372 75 67 56 7 49 9 19 7 14 Maine 35,385 1,328,361 68 36 35 5 30 2 13 7 8 Maryland 12,407 5,773,552 37 34 18 3 15 2 5 6 2 Massachusetts 10,555 6,547,629 40 38 22 22 4 5 10 3 Michigan 96,716 9,883,640 229 105 95 13 82 2 12 49 14 5 Minnesota 86,939 5,303,925 154 126 97 7 90 3 7 49 22 9 Mississippi 48,430 2,967,297 80 74 73 7 66 10 15 16 25 Missouri 69,704 5,988,927 132 111 76 4 72 2 8 33 16 13 Montana 147,042 989,415 120 114 70 7 63 1 25 33 4 Nebraska 77,354 1,826,341 85 83
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson Airports District Office Staff Assignments
    FAA Southern Region Jackson Airports District Office Staff Assignments Serving Alabama and Mississippi Address: Jackson Airports District Office 100 West Cross St., Suite B Jackson, MS 39208-2307 Office Phone: 601-664-9900 FAX: 601-664-9901 Conference room: 601-664-9845 ADO Manager Rans Black Email: [email protected] Assistant ADO Manager William Schuller Email: [email protected] Alabama Airports and FAA Program Managers FAA Program Phone number, City Airport name LOCID Manager Email address 601-664-9898 Abbeville Abbeville Municipal 0J0 Luke Flowers [email protected] 601-664-9885 Alabaster Shelby County EET Jeff Orr [email protected] Albertville Regional – 601-664-9885 Albertville 8A0 Jeff Orr Thomas J. Brumlik Field [email protected] 601-664-9885 Alex City Thomas C. Russell Field ALX Jeff Orr [email protected] 601-664-9895 Aliceville George Downer AIV Ryan Constans [email protected] South Alabama Regional at Bill 601-664-9898 Andalusia/Opp 79J Luke Flowers Benton Field [email protected] 601-664-9885 Anniston Anniston Regional ANB Jeff Orr [email protected] 601-664-9885 Ashland/Lineville Ashland/Lineville 26A Jeff Orr [email protected] 601-664-9886 Atmore Atmore Municipal 0R1 Graham Coffelt [email protected] 601-664-9898 Auburn Auburn University Regional AUO Luke Flowers [email protected] 601-664-9886 Bay Minette Bay Minette Municipal 1R8 Graham Coffelt [email protected] Staff Assignments Updated 9/21/2021 Page 2 of 15 Serving Alabama & Mississippi Jackson Airports District Office FAA Program Phone number, City
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2016 AIP Grants Awarded in FY 2016 by State
    FAA Airports AIP Grants Awarded by State: FY 2016 AIP Grants Awarded in FY 2016 by State Service Grant Federal City Airport/Project Location Description of Project Level No. Funds Alabama General Alabaster Shelby County 19 147,152 Construct Building Aviation Albertville Regional-Thomas General Albertville 26 139,752 Rehabilitate Runway, Rehabilitate Taxiway J Brumlik Field Aviation General Aliceville George Downer 14 77,363 Rehabilitate Apron Aviation South Alabama Regional at General Andalusia 21 139,948 Install Perimeter Fencing Bill Benton Field Aviation General Anniston Anniston Regional 32 49,500 Conduct Miscellaneous Study Aviation General Ashland Ashland/Lineville 10 85,500 Construct Apron, Construct Taxiway Aviation General Atmore Atmore Municipal 13 31,757 Construct Fuel Farm Aviation Install Airfield Guidance Signs, Install Airport Auburn University General Auburn 29 1,089,900 Beacons, Install Miscellaneous NAVAIDS, Regional Aviation Rehabilitate Runway Lighting General Bay Minette Bay Minette Municipal 12 260,346 Improve Airport Drainage Aviation Bessemer Bessemer Reliever 15 121,298 Rehabilitate Runway, Rehabilitate Taxiway Total AIP Grant Funds Awarded 11/13/2017 Page 1 of 126 FY 2016 APP-500 Service Grant Federal City Airport/Project Location Description of Project Level No. Funds Birmingham-Shuttlesworth Birmingham Primary 99 4,050,000 Expand Terminal Building International General Brewton Brewton Municipal 14 715,598 Construct Taxiway Aviation General Camden Camden Municipal 11 464,451 Improve Airport Drainage, Remove
    [Show full text]
  • February 1, 2018 Notices to Airmen
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICES TO AIRMEN Domestic/International February 1, 2018 Next Issue March 1, 2018 Notices to Airmen included in this publication are NOT given during pilot briefings unless specifically requested by the pilot. An electronic version of this publication is on the internet at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/notices Air Traffic Products and Publications Team JANUARY − 2018 FEBRUARY − 2018 MARCH − 2018 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT ËË ËËË 1 2 3ËËË4 5 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 ËËË ËË ËËË 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ËËË ËËË APRIL − 2018 MAY − 2018 JUNE − 2018 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 ÊÊÊÊÊ ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12ÊÊÊ3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ÊÊÊÊÊ ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19ÊÊÊ10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ËË ËËË 22 23 24 25ËËË26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ËËË ËË ËËË 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ËËË JULY − 2018 AUGUST − 2018 SEPTEMBER − 2018 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ËËË ËË ËËË ËËË ËË ËËË 22 23 24 25ËËË26 27
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Airport Licensing: a Summary Report for The
    Revised Airport Licensing A Summary Report for the Aeronautics Bureau of The Alabama Department of Transportation By Mr. Renju Abraham, Mr. Jonathan Williams and Dr. Charles D. Haynes Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, Alabama Prepare d by UTCA University Transportation Center for Alabama The University of Alabama, The University of Alabama in Birmingham, and The University of Alabama at Huntsville UTCA Report Number 02410 June 30, 2003 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2003 Revised Airport Licensing Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report No. Mr. Renju Abraham, Mr. Jonathan Williams and Dr. UTCA Report 02410 Charles D. Haynes, 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. University Transportation Center for Alabama P O Box 870205 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Alabama Alabama Department of Transportation Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0205 Research Project 930-518 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Alabama Department of Transportation Final Report: January 2002 – September 2003 1409 Coliseum Boulevard 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Montgomery, AL 36130 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract A series of three projects developed a new annual inspection system for the Aeronautics Bureau of the Alabama Department of Transportation, for use on Alabama’s general aviation (GA) airports. An inspection rating algorithm was developed, a web site was designed, and a new inspection database was created and hosted online. The airport inspector can report the inspection results and post them within a matter of hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Capacity and TSAM
    A Modeling Framework to Estimate Airport Runway Capacity in the National Airspace System Yueh-Ting Chen Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Civil and Environmental Engineering Committee Members: Dr. Antonio Trani Dr. Hojong Baik Dr. Hesham Rakha December 12, 2006 Blacksburg, VA Keywords: airport runway capacity, Airfield Capacity Model Copyright 2006, Yueh-Ting Chen A Modeling Framework to Estimate Airport Runway Capacity in the National Airspace System Yueh-Ting Chen Abstract The objective of this study is to estimate the airport capacity in the National Airspace System (NAS). Previous studies have focused on the airport capacity of large commercial airports. This research study estimates the runway capacity for more than two thousand airports in the NAS in order to understand future tradeoffs between air transportation demand and supply. The study presented in this report includes capacity estimates for general aviation and commercial airports. To estimate airport runway capacity, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airfield Capacity Model (ACM) is used to assess the capacity at all candidate airports in a target airport set. This set includes all airports with potential Very Light Jet (VLJ) operations. The result of the study provides a broad view about the airport capacity in the future air transportation system, and could help decision makers with a modeling framework to identify congestion patterns in the system. Moreover, airport capacity is an important limiting factor in the growth of air transportation demand. The main motivation in our analyis is to include airport capacity constraints in forecasts of air transportation demand.
    [Show full text]
  • (AIP) Supports Investment in Alabama Airports
    How the Federal Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Supports Investment in Alabama Airports • 69 airports in Alabama have identified $495.2 million in unfunded improvements needed over the next five years that would be eligible for AIP grants. • There are 2,650 aircraft based at these airports, with 2.3 million enplanements each year. • Over the last decade, Alabama airports have received 717 grants worth a total of $654.4 million through the AIP. • 63 percent of that funding—$413.9 million—has gone towards projects that included the construction, repair, upgrade or rehabilitation of airport runways, aprons or taxiways. AIP Grants for Alabama Airports, by FFY $90 $79.4 $80 $71.4 $67.3 $68.5 $70 $64.5 $3.5 $60 $55.9 $57.0 $53.3 $44.0 $29.6 $26.7 $19.0 $50 $14.3 $17.2 $45.5 $40.7 $40 in millions in $30.0 $9.9 $20.3 $65.0 $30 $45.4 $20 $40.5 $41.7 $41.6 $39.8 $35.4 $30.8 $25.2 $10 $23.3 $0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Projects that include runway, taxiway or apron repair/construction work Other projects Total AIP Grants by Type of Airport, AIP Construction-Related Grants by FFY 2007-2016 Type of Airport, FFY 2007-2016 Other, $3.5, Other, $3.1, Commercial Commercial 1% Reliever, 1% Service, Service, Reliever, $7.2, 2% $8.1, 1% $6.2, 2% $8.0, 1% General Aviation, Primary, General Primary, $247.4, 41% $187.6, 48% Aviation, $336.3, 56% $184.6, 47% © 2017 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA).
    [Show full text]
  • Enplanements at All Airports
    Source: ACAIS Calendar Year 2019 9/25/2020 FAA Airports Final Revenue Enplanements at All Airports CY 19 CY 18 Rank RO ST Locid City Airport Name S/L Hub Enplanements Enplanements % Change 58 AL AK ANC Anchorage Ted Stevens Anchorage P M 2,713,843 2,642,607 2.70% International 125 AL AK FAI Fairbanks Fairbanks International P S 562,420 549,289 2.39% 138 AL AK JNU Juneau Juneau International P N 459,191 440,277 4.30% 204 AL AK BET Bethel Bethel P N 160,874 160,110 0.48% 215 AL AK KTN Ketchikan Ketchikan International P N 137,090 135,389 1.26% 247 AL AK ENA Kenai Kenai Municipal P N 95,239 93,889 1.44% 251 AL AK SIT Sitka Sitka Rocky Gutierrez P N 90,839 87,119 4.27% 255 AL AK ADQ Kodiak Kodiak P N 85,655 81,562 5.02% 260 AL AK SCC Deadhorse Deadhorse P N 71,822 43,655 64.52% 265 AL AK OTZ Kotzebue Ralph Wien Memorial P N 67,876 69,070 -1.73% 267 AL AK OME Nome Nome P N 65,087 64,122 1.50% 290 AL AK HOM Homer Homer P N 46,367 46,867 -1.07% 291 AL AK BRW Barrow Wiley Post-Will Rogers Memorial P N 46,289 46,450 -0.35% 292 AL AK AKN King Salmon King Salmon P N 44,244 44,131 0.26% 311 AL AK DLG Dillingham Dillingham P N 35,486 34,496 2.87% 327 AL AK DUT Unalaska Unalaska P N 27,232 29,229 -6.83% 331 AL AK MRI Anchorage Merrill Field P N 26,505 10,478 152.96% 345 AL AK PSG Petersburg Petersburg James A Johnson P N 23,479 24,520 -4.25% 360 AL AK CDV Cordova Merle K (Mudhole) Smith P N 19,388 17,654 9.82% 366 AL AK LHD Anchorage Lake Hood P N 18,159 12,898 40.79% 382 AL AK UNK Unalakleet Unalakleet P N 15,911 16,208 -1.83% 385 AL AK WRG Wrangell Wrangell P N 14,776 14,033 5.29% 389 AL AK ANI Aniak Aniak P N 13,854 12,853 7.79% 394 AL AK AKW Klawock Klawock P N 12,980 13,503 -3.87% 397 AL AK YAK Yakutat Yakutat P N 12,808 11,800 8.54% 404 AL AK GAL Galena Edward G Pitka Sr P N 11,870 9,440 25.74% 410 AL AK KSM St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Method for Identifying General Aviation Airports That Are Candidates for Runway Extensions: a Planning Model for State Aviation Systems
    Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research Volume 2 Number 2 JAAER Winter 1992 Article 6 Winter 1992 A Method for Identifying General Aviation Airports that are Candidates for Runway Extensions: A Planning Model for State Aviation Systems Randall G. Holcombe Henry B. Burdg Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/jaaer Scholarly Commons Citation Holcombe, R. G., & Burdg, H. B. (1992). A Method for Identifying General Aviation Airports that are Candidates for Runway Extensions: A Planning Model for State Aviation Systems. Journal of Aviation/ Aerospace Education & Research, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.15394/jaaer.1992.1068 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Holcombe and Burdg: A Method for Identifying General Aviation Airports that are Candi A METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING GENERAL AVIATION AIRPORTS THAT ARE CANDIDATES FOR RUNWAY EXTENSIONS: A PLANNING MODEL FOR STATE AVIATION SYSTEMS Randall G. Holcombe and Henry B. Burdg ABSTRACT One of the most important characteristics of an airport is the length of its longest runway: that length determines the types ofaircraft that can use the airport andprovides a margin ofsafety for users. Arunway extension, therefore, would enhance the utility ofmany airports. But resources are scarce, and iffunds are to be allocated at the state level, state officials need a method for determining which airports could best use a longer runway. Consideration of demographic factors enhances the traditional engineering analysis approach to runway evaluation.
    [Show full text]